14444 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–851]
Certain Preserved Mushrooms from
the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of the Eighth Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 22, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Winkates at (202) 482–1904, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
At the request of Blue Field (Sichuan)
Food Industrial Co., Ltd., the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated a new shipper
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain preserved mushrooms from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
for the period February 1, 2004, through
July 31, 2004. See Certain Preserved
Mushrooms from the PRC: Initiation of
Eighth New Shipper Antidumping Duty
Review, 69 FR 57264 (September 24,
2004). The preliminary results of this
review are currently due no later than
March 16, 2005.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Review
Pursuant to 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), the
Department will issue the preliminary
results of a new shipper review within
180 days after the date on which the
new shipper review was initiated, and
issue the final results within 90 days
after the date on which the preliminary
results were issued. The Department
may, however, extend the deadline for
completion of the preliminary results of
a new shipper review to 300 days if it
determines that the case is
extraordinarily complicated (19 CFR
351.214(I)(2)).
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this new shipper review
within the statutory time limit of 180
days. Specifically, we find that
additional time is needed to conduct
our bona fide sales analysis based on
our findings at verification. Given that
additional time is needed to conduct
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 21, 2005 Jkt 205001
our bona fide sales analysis, we find
that this case is extraordinarily
complicated.
Accordingly, the Department is
extending the time limit for the
completion of the preliminary results of
this new shipper review until July 14,
2005, which is 300 days after the date
on which the new shipper review was
initiated. The final results will, in turn,
be due 90 days after the date of issuance
of the preliminary results, unless
extended.
This notice is in accordance with
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.214(i)(2).
Dated: March 15, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–1251 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–868
Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Partial Rescission of Second
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 22, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amber Musser or Brian C. Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1777 or (202) 482–
1766, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2004, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register (69
FR 30873) a notice of ‘‘Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review’’ of
the antidumping duty order on folding
metal tables and chairs from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for
the period June 1, 2003, through May
31, 2004.
On June 25, 2004, Wok and Pan
Industry, Inc. (‘‘Wok & Pan’’) requested
an administrative review of its sales. On
June 28, 2004, Cosco Home and Office
Products (an importer of the
PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
merchandise subject to this
antidumping duty order) requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order for the
following companies: Feili Furniture
Development Limited Quanzhou City,
Feili Furniture Development Co., Ltd.,
Feili Group (Fujian) Co., Ltd., and Feili
(Fujian) Co., Ltd (collectively ‘‘Feili’’)
and New–Tec Integration Co., Ltd.
(‘‘New–Tec’’). On June 29, 2004, Feili
requested an administrative review of
its sales. On June 30, 2004, Dongguan
Shichang Metals Factory Co., Ltd.,
Dongguan Shichang Metals Factory Ltd.,
and Maxchief Investments Limited
(collectively ‘‘Shichang’’), and Lifetime
Hong Kong Ltd. and Lifetime (Xiamen)
Plastic Products Ltd. (collectively
‘‘Lifetime’’) requested an administrative
review of their sales. Also on June 30,
2004, the Meco Corporation (‘‘the
petitioner’’) requested an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
for the following companies: Feili,
New–Tec, and Shichang.
On July 28, 2004, the Department
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on folding
metal tables and chairs from the PRC
with respect to these companies. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 69 FR 45010, 45011 (July 28, 2004)
(‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
On September 2, 2004, Lifetime
withdrew its request for an
administrative review. On September 7,
2004, the petitioner withdrew its
request for an administrative review of
Shichang. On September 8, 2004,
Shichang withdrew its request for an
administrative review.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review in whole or in part if a party that
requested the review withdraws its
request within ninety days of
publication of the Federal Register
notice that initiated the review.
Therefore, as the petitioner, Lifetime,
and Shichang were the only parties that
made requests for review on behalf of
Lifetime and Shichang, and because the
petitioner, Lifetime, and Shichang have
all withdrawn their requests for review
in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Department is
rescinding in part this review of the
antidumping duty order on folding
metal tables and chairs from the PRC
with respect to Lifetime and Shichang.
This review will continue with respect
to Feili, New–Tec, and Wok & Pan.
22MRN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 16, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–1250 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–867]
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Automotive Replacement
Glass Windshields from the People’s
Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 22, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Freed or Will Dickerson, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3818, or 482–1778,
respectively.
Background
On May 27, 2004, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of the initiation of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of automotive replacement glass
windshields from the People’s Republic
of China for the period April 1, 2003,
through March 31, 2004. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 69 FR
30282 (May 27, 2004). On October 12,
2004, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notice rescinding the
administrative review of two companies
which had withdrawn their requests for
reviews. See Notice of Partial Rescission
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Certain Automotive
Replacement Glass Windshields from
the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR
60612 (October 12, 2004). On December
3, 2004, the Department published in
the Federal Register a notice extending
the time limit for the preliminary results
of the administrative review from
December 31, 2004, to March 31, 2005.
See Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review:
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 21, 2005 Jkt 205001
Automotive Replacement Glass
Windshields from the People’s Republic
of China, 69 FR 70224 (December 3,
2004). The preliminary results of review
are currently due no later than March
31, 2005.
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), states
that, if it is not practicable to complete
the review within the time specified, the
administering authority may extend the
245-day period to issue its preliminary
results by up to 120 days. Completion
of the preliminary results of this review
within the 245-day period is not
practicable because the Department
needs additional time to analyze a
significant amount of information
pertaining to verification of one
company’s questionnaire responses and
to review supplemental questionnaire
responses of a second company.
Because it is not practicable to
complete this review within the time
specified under the Act, we are
extending the time limit for issuing the
preliminary results of review by an
additional 30 days, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Therefore, as 30 days from March 31,
2005, falls on a Saturday, the
preliminary results are now due on May
2, 2005, the next business day. The final
results of review continue to be due 120
days after the date of publication of the
preliminary results.
Dated: March 15, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–1249 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
U.S. Healthcare Technologies Trade
Mission
AGENCY: International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice to U.S. Healthcare
Technologies Trade Mission to Australia
and New Zealand, September 12–16,
2005.
SUMMARY: The United States Department
of Commerce, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Commercial
Service, Office of Global Trade
Programs, is organizing a Healthcare
Technologies Trade Mission to Sydney
and Melbourne, Australia and to
PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
14445
Auckland, New Zealand, September 12–
16, 2005.
The trade mission will target the IT-
healthcare sub-sector, e.g., electronic
patient records, automated patient
scheduling, telemedicine, but will also
include other sectors within the
healthcare industry.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Global Trade Programs; Room
2012; Department of Commerce;
Washington, DC 20230; Tel: (202) 482–
4457; Fax: (202) 482–0178.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES
TRADE MISSION
Australia and New Zealand
September 12–16, 2005
Mission Statement
I. Description of the Mission
The United States Department of
Commerce, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Commercial
Service, Office of Global Trade
Programs, is organizing a Healthcare
Technologies Trade Mission to Sydney
and Melbourne, Australia and to
Auckland, New Zealand, September 12–
16, 2005.
The trade mission will target the IT-
healthcare sub-sector, e.g., electronic
patient records, automated patient
scheduling, telemedicine, but will also
include other sectors within the
healthcare industry.
The focus of the mission will be to
match participating U.S. companies
with qualified agents, distributors,
representatives, licensees, and joint
venture partners, and where
appropriate, arrange for appointments
with government officials, in these
markets. Consumers in Australia and
New Zealand have a strong affinity for
U.S. products.
II. Commercial Setting for the Mission
Over 85 percent of medical devices
and diagnostics used in Australia are
imported, with approximately 60
percent of these products coming from
the U.S. Other major market suppliers
are the E.U. and Japan. The Australian
medical equipment market is valued at
approximately US$2 billion,
representing about one percent of the
global medical market.
Australia is a mature market for
medical equipment, and its high per
capita income and sophisticated health
system translate into demand for a
broad range of cutting-edge medical
equipment. As in the United States,
Australians are educated consumers,
and expect state-of-the-art medical
treatment, which ensures continuous
22MRN1