Você está na página 1de 7

Materials Focus

Vol. 3, pp. 385391, 2014


(www.aspbs.com/mat)

Copyright 2014 by American Scientific Publishers


All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for


Photocatalytic Applications
Vidur Raj, Pranauv Balaji, Monika Joshi , and Manish Kumar
Amity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh,
Sector125 Express Highway, Noida 201303, U.P., India

ABSTRACT

Delivered by Publishing Technology to: The Australian National University


IP: 150.203.181.138 On: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:21:13
includingPublishers
(i) functionalization of ZnO with photosensi1. INTRODUCTION
Copyright: American Scientific
tizes
that
absorbs
UV light, (ii) doping with metals and
Photocatalysis using nanoparticles have potential applica(iii)
doping
with
non
metals have been applied to enhance
tions in optical devices like Organic LEDs, Solar energy
the
photocatalytic
activity
of semiconductors like ZnO.14
conservation (Solar cells), Water treatment using UV rays
Doping and making composite with metals are widely
and environmental pollution treatment etc.1 Compared
studied
ways of enhancing the photocatalytic activity of
with other semiconductor nanostructures, ZnO have been
metal
oxide
semiconductor. The interaction of metal with
studied extensively over the last decades due to their
semiconductor
improves the electrical and optical properunique physical and chemical properties. ZnO is one of the
ties
due
to
the
shifting of the Fermi level and the formost widely used photocatalytic metal-oxide nanostrucmation
of
a
Schottky
barrier for trapped electrons has
tured semiconductors with a wide band gap of 3.2 eV and
15
2
These trapped electrons are transearlier
been
reported.
a large exciton binding energy of 60 meV. It is an intrinsiferred
to
the
dye,
which
are further degraded through
cally n-type semiconductor of wurtzite structure and has a
the
hydroxyl
and
super
hydroxyl
radicals generated by
good chemical, thermal and catalytic stability at room tem16
Therefore,
the
photocatalytic
activity of
UV
illuminator.
perature. Due to these properties, ZnO is widely applied in
3
4
metal-semiconductor
shows
significant
enhancement
comvarious applications in optical devices, transistors, piezo5 6
7 8
9
pare
to
pure
ZnO.
electric devices, gas sensor, mechanical devices, UV
Noble metal such as (Ag and Au) shows unique electron
detectors10 11 and photoluminescence devices.12
storage
and light absorption properties.17 Compared with
However, photocatalytic efficiency of pure semiconductall other metal-semiconductor nanostructures, Ag/ZnO
ing nanomaterial is very low due to the fast recombination
nanocomposites have drawn particular attention, not only
of photo-generated electron hole pair and the inability to
because ZnO nanostructures can be easily prepared by
utilize visible light due to the large wide band gap. Therea series of simple methods,1821 but also that silver disfore, considerable efforts have been made for the developplays the most efficient plasmon resonance in the visible
ment of a photocatalytic system that can be more active
region among all metals by virtue of its favorable fre13
in visible light (>400 nm). To date, many approaches
quency dependence of the real and imaginary parts of
the dielectric function.22 ZnO nanorods with noble metals

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


shows
improved electrical, optical, magnetic and chemiEmail: mjoshi@amity.edu
23
Ag nanoparticles have lots of peculiar and
cal
properties.
Received: 29 May 2014
exciting physical chemical and catalytic properties that are
Accepted: 21 August 2014
Mater. Focus 2014, Vol. 3, No. 5

2169-429X/2014/3/385/007

doi:10.1166/mat.2014.1192

385

ARTICLE

Herein, ZnO nanoplates were synthesized by chemical method and Ag nanoparticles were grafted on ZnO
nanoplates surface by sonochemical method. The formation of the nanocomposites was investigated using
X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM). Optical properties of
the nanocomposite were investigated using Photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL) and UV-Visible spectroscopy
(UV-Vis). FESEM investigation confirms that the nanoplates were uniformly distributed and Ag nanoparticles
were grafted on the surface on ZnO nanoplates. The photocatalytic activity of Ag/ZnO nanocomposites was
evaluated in terms of their efficiency of the photo excitation of methyl orange dye (MeO) under UV illuminator.
A photo excitation of Ag/ZnO showed enhanced photocatalytic activity compared to pure ZnO Nanoplates. This
enhanced UV activity of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite makes it a potential candidate for optoelectronic devices for
Solar Energy conservation, water splitting and Light Emitting devices etc.
KEYWORDS: Optical Material, Chemical Synthesis, X-Ray Diffraction, Photocatalysis.

Raj et al.

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for Photocatalytic Applications

ARTICLE

different from massive silver. Therefore, incorporation of


silver (Ag) can enhance the photocatalytic efficiency of
semiconducting nanoparticle (ZnO) by acting as an electron sink for the exited electrons and thus increases the
generation of electron hole pairs in ZnO. Moreover, the
enhancement was not due to the electrons generated by
visible light excitation of surface plasmon resonance but
due to the plasmon resonance enhanced local electric field
of the incident light.24 These enhanced properties have
been utilized in photovoltaic cells, photo-catalysts, solar
cells and optoelectronic devices.
In the present article, Ag/ZnO nanocomposites have
been synthesized by varying the concentration of Ag. The
photocatalytic activity of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite under
UV-Visible irradiation was studied by photo degradation of organic dye (MeO). The nanocomposite shows
enhanced photocatalytic activity compared to the pure
ZnO. The results indicated that optical absorption of
Ag/ZnO nanocomposite showed enhanced photocatalytic
activity at 10 mM concentration of silver.

Fig. 1. XRD image of ZnO Nanoplates and Ag/ZnO nanocomposite.

obtained two prominent additional peaks at 2 = 3838


and 44.25 corresponds to (111) and (200) planes of
Ag nanoparticles with face centered cubic structure (fcc)
respectively. It is indicated that the crystallization of ZnO
Nanoplates is not affected by grafting of Ag nanoparticles, indicating a good crystalline property of the Ag/ZnO
nanocomposites.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The synthesized material was investigated by FESEM
2.1. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoplates
(Zeiss Ultra Plus-40-98) at room temperature for its
50 ml of 1 M NaOH was prepared and 1 g of poly ethymorphology and composition. Figures 2(A)(D) shows
lene glycol (PEG) was added and stirred for 1 hr. 0.5 M
micrograph
of theUniversity
synthesized ZnO nanoplates.
Delivered by Publishing Technology to: FESEM
The Australian
National
was added drop-wise
in Mon,The
Zn(COOCH3 2 (H2 O)2 (MERCK)
IP: 150.203.181.138
On:
21 Nanoplates
Sep 2015 04:21:13
formed were evenly distributed through
above solution. The mixture was thenCopyright:
stirred at 60
C for Scientific
American
Publishers
out the sample.
The nanoplates are arranged in the form
2 hr. A white precipitate was collected and washed several
of beautiful uniform flowers with bush like structure. The
times with D.W. and Ethanol (C2 H5 OH).
petals of nanoflowers are pyramidal in shape with a diameter of 30 nm70 nm and a length of few micrometers.
2.2. Grafting of Ag Nanoparticles on ZnO Nanoplates
The images reveal that Ag nanoparticles are sparsely dis0.2 g of synthesized ZnO Nanoplates were dissolved in
tributed on the ZnO Nanoplates. Figure 2(E) shows the
50 ml of D.W. and ultrasonicated for 2 hr. 10 mM
EDX mapping of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite. The EDX mapof Ag(NO3  (AR Grade) and 1 mM Tri sodium citrate
ping shows the presence of materials like Zn, O, Ag and
(Na3 C6 H5 O7  (MERCK) was added to the above solution.
some of the other stray molecules like C etc. confirming
The solution was stirred for 2 hr at room temperature. The
the presence of Ag grafted ZnO. The FESEM micrograph
resultant solution was centrifuged and obtained a blackish
and EDX mapping measurement reveals the presence of
brown colored powder. The same experiment was repeated
Ag nanoparticles grafted on to the surface of the ZnO
by varying the concentration of Ag (NO3  to 5 mM and
Nanoplates.
2.5 mM concentrations.

3. CHARACTERIZATION TECHNIQUES
The changes of crystalline phase structure of Ag/ZnO
nanocomposite were investigated using X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, D-2 Phaser) at room temperature. Figure 1
shows the comparative XRD image of uncoated ZnO
Nanoplates and ZnO Nanoplates coated with Ag nanoparticles. Three prominent peaks at 2 = 3162, 34.44 and
36.10 corresponds to the diffraction of the (100), (002)
and (101) planes of ZnO respectively. All diffraction peaks
can be indexed as wurtzite structure ZnO. The intensity
of (101) plane is higher than other two planes suggesting
that most of the ZnO Nanoplates are with (101) planes.
XRD image of ZnO decorated with Ag nanoparticles are
386

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


The photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes or toxic
pollutant is a commonly used approach to characterize
the efficiency of the photo catalyst. The photo-catalytic
activity of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite was evaluated by the
photo-degradation of methyl orange (MeO) placed under
UV illuminator for a fixed interval of time. Figure 3
shows a series of UV-Vis absorption spectra of (3A) ZnO
Nanoplates (3B) Ag/ZnO nanocomposite obtained from
the suspension of 10 M solution of organic dye (Methyl
Orange (C14 H14 N3 NaO3 S)MeO) with 1 mg of each of
the nanomaterials. On increasing the exposure time of UV
irradiation the absorption peak intensity decreases indicating the photo-decomposition of the organic dye (MeO)
Mater. Focus, 3, 385391, 2014

Raj et al.

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for Photocatalytic Applications

Fig. 2. FESEM micrograph (A)(D) ZnO Nanoplates with sparsely grafted Ag nanoparticle. (E) EDX mapping evaluation of the synthesized nanoparticle with presence Zn, O, Ag.

used. The two plots clearly indicate that after an exposure


for 12 hr with a time interval of 3 hr the photo-catalytic
activity of pure ZnO Nanoplates has been enhanced by
grafting of Ag on the Nanoplates.
The semiconducting metal oxides like ZnO on exposure to UV irradiation excite the material resulting in the
formation of electron hole pairs in the system. These electron hole pairs generated will interact with the molecules
attached on their surface forming reactive radicals such as

etc. from the oxygen in the metal oxide netO


2 , OH
work and hydroxyl groups on their surface respectively.25
These radicals are responsible for the catalysis of the reaction for decomposing the organic pollutant materials. The
main limiting factor in this reaction is the electron hole
pair recombination in the system. This problem is overcome when grafted or composited with noble metals (Ag,
Au) on semiconductor metal oxide materials. The noble
metal (Ag, Au) in the system acts as an electron sinks
which capture the electron from the generated electron
hole pair in semiconductor and prohibits the recombination of them. Thus, enhancing the photo-catalytic activity
Mater. Focus, 3, 385391, 2014

of the synthesized nanocomposite compared to the pure


ZnO nanomaterials.
To study the photodegradation behaviour of Ag/ZnO
nanocomosite, an aqueeous solution of MeO was irradiated in the presence and abscence of nanocomposite.
Figure 4(a) shows the degradation of MeO (in terms of
the UV-visible absorption intensity) as a function of time
for bare ZnO nanorods and Ag/ZnO nanocomosite. The
Blue plot indicates no change in the absorption intensity under dark conditions. The Ag/ZnO nanocomposite
shows higher photocatalytic activity compared to bare ZnO
nanorods. The rate of decolarization of MeO as a function
of absorption intensity can be calculated using the following equation:
% = C0 Ct /C0 100
Where, C0 and C are the initial and reaction concentration
of MeO after a time t, respectively.
Figure 4(b) shows a plot of C/C0 curve as a function of
time of MeO degradation in the presence and abscene of
catalyst. The photodegradation of the dye does not occur
387

ARTICLE

Delivered by Publishing Technology to: The Australian National University


IP: 150.203.181.138 On: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:21:13
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers

Raj et al.

ARTICLE

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for Photocatalytic Applications

Fig. 3. UV-Vis spectra Delivered


of photodegraded
MeO by photocatalyst
for (a) to: The Australian National University
by Publishing
Technology
bare ZnO and (b) Ag/ZnO nanocomposite,
as
a
function
of
UV
illumi(a) 2015
Shows 04:21:13
the UV absorbance versus UV illumination time.
IP: 150.203.181.138 On: Mon,Fig.
214.Sep
nation time.
(b) ShowsPublishers
the photocatalytic degradation of MeO versus time. Inset
Copyright: American Scientific
shows C/C0 versus time at 10 mM of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite, bare ZnO.

in the abscence of catalyst. The degradation curve of MeO


by ZnO and Ag/ZnO shows similar profile, suggesting a
similar way of degradation by both the catalyst. However,
the degradation rate of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite is higher
then bare ZnO nanorods. The kinetics of the photocatalytic efficency of the nanocomposite were evaluated by
calculating k using the first order kinetic model derived
from the Langmuir-Hinshelwood Kinetic equation. In this
model,the the first order rate constant (k) can be calculated
using the following equation:
lnC/C0  = kt
The first order rate constant (k) for zinc oxide and zinc
oxide grafted with silver were calculated from the slope
of the graphs to be 0.03814 hr1 and 0.16299 hr1
respectively. The results indicated that Ag/ZnO nanocomposite shows higher degradation rate compare to bare
ZnO nanoplates. Thus, the photocatalytic activity of ZnO
nanoplates enhances after the grafting pf Ag nanoparticles.

5. PHOTO CATALYTIC MECHANISM


Figure 5(a) shows the schematic diagram of the mechanism of enhanced photocatalytic dye degradation of MeO
by Ag/ZnO nanocomposites and Figure 5(b) shows the
chemical structure of MeO. The transfer of electron in
388

metal and semiconductor takes place when they are in the


contact and the direction of the electron transfer depends
on the energy states and band structure of the metal and
the semiconductor. In case of Ag/ZnO nanocomosite the
Fermi level of ZnO lies lower than the Fermi level of Ag.
Therefore, the conduction band of the ZnO undergoes a
shift, and hence the interference of Ag is responsible for
band bending. The process of band bending in Ag/ZnO
nanocomposite forms the Schottky barrier for trapped electrons. These trapped electrons are transferred to MeO for
photo-degradation.
In case of ZnO nanoplates on UV illuminator, ZnO leads
to generate electron and hole pairs (Eq. (1)). The generated electrons can be trapped by electron acceptors to
produce superoxide radical ions ( O
2  (Eq. (2)) and the
holes can be trapped by the hydroxyl group to produce
super hydroxyl radicals ( OH ) (Eq. (3)).

ZnO + h
h+

+ ec

O2 + ec

O
2

(2)

h+

OH OH

h+

+ H2 O

OH + H

(1)

(3)
+

(4)

Further, methyl orange (MeO) on absorption of UV-light


goes to an excited state (MeO ), these excited state can
Mater. Focus, 3, 385391, 2014

Raj et al.

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for Photocatalytic Applications

Fig. 5. (a) Shows the mechanism of the photocatalysis. (b) Shows the
structure of methyl orange.

Mater. Focus, 3, 385391, 2014

389

ARTICLE

either donate or accept electron and generate radical cation


(MeO+ ) or radical anion(MeO).26
The photo generated hole hvb+ can also reacts with
water molecule in solution leads to generate superoxide
radical anion (Eq. (4)).
These super
hydroxyl radicals
and to: The Australian National University
Delivered
by Publishing
Technology
Fig. 6. (a) PL spectra of ZnO Nanoplates; (b) PL spectra of Ag/ZnO
IP: 150.203.181.138
On: Mon,
21 Sep 2015 04:21:13
holes are responsible for decomposition
of MeO and pronanocomposite.
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
duce colorless MeO.
In case of ZnO, most of the photo generated charges
can recombine, thus the photodecomposition efficiency of
nanocomposite decreases on increasing the percentage of
MeO decreases. On the other hand, in case of Ag/ZnO
Ag nanoparticles. This indicates that due to the surface
nanocomposites Ag acts as an electron acceptor causes a
plasmon resonance (SPR) affect of Ag the electron hole
fast removal of photo generated electron to the conduction
pair recombination decreases.32 At 10 mM concentration
band of ZnO and this process decreases the recombination
of Ag two sharp peaks at around 361 nm and 470 nm
rate of photo generated electronhole pair. Therefore, the
were observed. The change of the peaks towards right hand
photocatalytic activity of Ag/ZnO composite shows sigside (red shift) is due to change in interaction between
nificant enhancement over pure ZnO. In this process of
Ag and ZnO Nanoplates. The red shift suggested that Ag
photo-degradation a small quantity of Ag/ZnO nanocomnanoparticles are very small (few nm) in size and easily
posite can initiate the degradation, which can further use
incorporate on the ZnO surface. On modification of ZnO
using recycle process.
Nanoplates by Ag nanoparticles PL spectra in Figure 6(b)
The PL spectrum of uncoated ZnO Nanoplates is shown
shows decrement in the visible region peak whereas an
in Figure 6(a) which was investigated using Shimadzu RF
increment in the UV region peak. Also decreasing the
5301PC at room temperature. A sharp peak at 362 nm
concentration of Ag has decreased the intensity of visible
is observed that corresponds to radiative recombination,
region of PL spectra. At 25 mM conc. of Ag the visible
occurs due to the recombination between the electrons in
band due to structural defects almost diminished and only
the conduction band and the holes in the valence band.27
UV peak was obtained. The PL result also suggested that
This peak is also known as a UV range emission peak.28
at 10 mM concentration of Ag the nanocomposite have
only point defects, shows very good crystal quality, which
The two small peaks at 387 nm and 469 nm are also
observed that corresponds to UV range emission and blue
is a good agreement with XRD results.
The optical absorption spectra of pure ZnO nanoplates
range emission.29 30 The blue emission is considered to be
due to the deep level defect produced during the growth.
and AgZnO nanocomposites were shown in Figures 7(a)
and (b) respectively. Figure 7(a) shows the absorption
Oxygen vacancies and zinc interstitial related defects are
spectra of ZnO nanoplates. A broad peak at around 360 nm
considered as the most probable region for generation of
corresponds to the characteristic peak of ZnO Nanoplates.
blue emission.31 Figure 6(b) shows the PL spectra of the
The optical absorbance peak of noble metals, Ag or Au
Ag/ZnO nanocomposite. The UV emission band of the

Raj et al.

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for Photocatalytic Applications

ARTICLE

6. CONCLUSION
In summary, a simple method was developed to synthesize Ag/ZnO nanocomposite and their photocatalytic activities were evaluated by the degradation of Methyl Orange
(MeO) under UV light irradiation. The grafting of Ag
nanoparticles was found to be enhanced the photocatalytic
activity compared to bare ZnO Nanoplates. The enhanced
photocatalytic activity of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite is due
to the behavior of Ag nanoparticles as a sink for electrons from the electron hole pair generated by irradiation
in metal-oxide semiconductor material. The XRD results
reveals that the grafting of Ag nanoparticles does not affect
the crystalline of the ZnO Nanoplates but the morphology
of the nanocomposites varied with the increased amount
of Ag. Optical properties of Ag/ZnO nanocomposites were
improved compared to the pure ZnO Nanoplates. The
optical properties of Ag nanoparticles on ZnO surfaces
were investigated by varying the concentration of Ag. The
amount of Ag content was found to control the absorption
band due to the surface plasmon resonance effect. From
the Photo luminescence and absorption spectra it is concluded that at 10 mM concentration of Ag the composite
film shows best optical properties.

References and Notes

Delivered
Technology
Fig. 7. (a) Optical absorption
spectrabyofPublishing
ZnO Nanoplates;
(b) optical to: The Australian National University
S. Bhatkhande,
V. G. Pangarkar, and A. A. Beenackers, J. Chem.
IP: 150.203.181.138 On: Mon,1.21D.Sep
2015 04:21:13
absorption spectra of Ag/ZnO nanocomposite.
Technol.
Biotechnol. 77, 102 (2001).
Copyright: American Scientific
Publishers
2. C. Jagadish and S. J. Pearton, Zinc Oxide Bulk, Thin Films and
Nanostructures Processing, Properties and Application, Australian
is always sharp and intense compare to the nanocomposNational University, Elsevier, Australia (2006).
ite. For pure Ag the absorbance peak at 420 nm which
3. A. N. Shah, M. Baheer Ahamed, and E. Manikandan, J. Mat. Science
2157 (2013).
corresponds to the surface plasma resonance effect. The
4. P. C. Chang and J. G. Lu, IEEE T. Electron Dev. 55, 2977 (2008).
position and broadening of the peak depends on the size
5. R. S. Yang, Y. Qin, L. M. Dai, and Z. L. Wang, Nat. Nanotechnol.
of the metal and the semiconductor.
4, 34 (2009).
The aim of the grafting of Ag nanoparticles on ZnO
6. T. Shiosaki and Y. Kawabata, Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 10 (1974).
7. O. Lupan and G. C. Lee, Microelectron. Eng. 85, 2220 (2008).
nanoplates is to enhance the photocatalytic efficiency in
8. C. Y. Lu, S. P. Chang, S. J. Chang, T. J. Hsueh, C. L. Hsu, Y. Z.
the visible region. After the grafting of silver nanoparChiou, and I. C. Chen, IEEE Sens. J. 9 (2009).
ticles, new broad peaks at around 380 nm, 395 nm
9. T. H. Fang and S. H. Kang, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 405 (2010).
and 440 nm appears in all samples containing Ag with
10. J. Zhou, Y. D. Gu, Y. F. Hu, W. J. Mai, P. H. Yeh, G. Bao, A. K.
molar ratio of 2.5 mM, 5 mM and 10 mM respectively
Sood, D. L. Polla, and Z. L. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 191103
(2009).
(Fig. 7(b)), which corresponds to the surface plasmon res33
11.
C. Soci, A. Zhang, B. Xiang, S. A. Dayeh, D. P. R. Aplin,
onance of Ag nanoparticles. In comparison to the narJ. Park, X. Y. Bao, Y. H. Lo, and D. Wang, Nano Lett. 7, 1003
row absorption peak of pure ZnO Nanoplates, the observed
(2007).
broad bands are evidence of strong interactions between
12. X. Y. Ye, Y. M. Zhou, Y. Q. Sun, J. Chen, and Z. Q. Wang,
ZnO and silver nanoparticles. After the grafting of Ag
J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1159 (2009).
13. A. Primo, A. Corma, and H. Garcia, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
nanoparticles the peaks were shifted towards the visible
13, 886 (2011).
range compared to the pure ZnO nanoplates. These results
14. Y. Qu and X. Duan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 2568 (2013).
suggested that the grafting of silver nanoparticles helps to
15. M. H. Habibi and R. Sheibani, Journal of SolGel Sci. Technol.
reduce the band gap. The results indicated that for 10 mM
54, 195 (2010).
concentration of Ag a broad peak appears at 430 nm. The
16. K. Umar, M. M. Haque, M. Muneer, T. Harada, and M. Matsumura,
J. Alloy and Comp. 578, 431 (2013).
absorption at 430 nm originates with a good incorporation
17. M. K. Lee and H. F. Tu, J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, 758 (2008).
of small size Ag nanoparticles (few nm) in ZnO matrix.111
18. A. B. Moghaddam, T. Nazari, J. Badraghi, and M. Kazemzad, Film.
From the absorption curve it was concluded that at 10 mM
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 4, 247 (2009).
concentration surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is maxi19. P. K. Samanta, S. K. Patra, A. Ghosh, and P. Roy Chaudhuri, ISSN
09743081, 1 (2009).
mum, which is a good agreement with PL results.
390

Mater. Focus, 3, 385391, 2014

Raj et al.

Ag Grafted ZnO Nanoplates for Photocatalytic Applications

20. D. Geetha and T. Thilagavathi, Journal of Nanomaterials and


Biostructures 5, 297 (2010).
21. N. Van Quy, V. Minh, N. Van Luan, V. N. Hung, and N. Van
HieuSens, Actuators B: Chem. 153, 188 (2011).
22. H. Liang, W. Wang, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, H. Wei, and H. Xu. Pheres,
J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 7427 (2010).
23. C. Karunakaran, V. Rajeswari, and P. Gomathisankar, 13, 923
(2011).
24. X. Yin, W. Que, D. Fei, F. Shen, and Q. Guo, J. Alloys Compd.
524, 13 (2012).
25. Q. Lu, Z. Lu, and Y. Lu, Nano Lett. 13, 5698 (2013).
26. K. Umar, A. A. Dar, M. M. Haque, N. A. Mir, and M. Muneer,
Desalination and Water Treatment 46, 205 (2012).

27. A. Ghosh, N. G. Deshpande, and Y. G. Gudage, Journal of Alloys


Compound 469, 56 (2009).
28. G. J. Lee and Y. P. Lee, Journal of Korean Physics 57, 1624 (2010).
29. Q. Yang, K. Tang, J. Zuo, and Y. Qian, Appl. Phys. A 184751
(2004).
30. X. L. Wu, G. G. Siu, and C. L. Fu, Applied Physics Lett. 78, 2285
(2001).
31. W. Cheng, W. Ping, X. Zou, and T. Xiao, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 4311
(2008).
32. V. Subramanian, E. E. Wolf, and P. V. Kammat, Phys. Chem. B
107, 7479 (2003).
33. A. H. Shah, E. Manikandan, M. Basheer Ahmed, and V. Ganesan,
Shah, J. Nanomed. Nanotechol. 4, 3 (2013).

ARTICLE

Delivered by Publishing Technology to: The Australian National University


IP: 150.203.181.138 On: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:21:13
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers

Mater. Focus, 3, 385391, 2014

391

Você também pode gostar