Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
... Petitioners
V/s
Mr. Ravi Sawant & Ors.
Respondents
47.
48.
Control Team composed of the Fire Brigade and the Police. All the
Respondents are aware of and have full knowledge of the collapse.
49.
50.
51.
52.
his flat without carrying out repairs or reinforcing the collapsed parts
of the building as directed by the several MCGM notices. MCGM
issued stop work notice dated 4.4.2014 to Respondent No. 4 (Exhibit
O, page 97) .
53.
55.
The worst and curious fact being that the stop work
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
).
East side terrace and the beams and the columns which form
the common areas. Whatever is wrong is in the flat of the
Respondent no. 4 to whom notice under section 353(B) has not
been issued by MCGM even though stop work notice was
issued on 4.04.2014 and the Respondent No. 4 was
specifically directed not to carry out any work till the structural
audit of the building is received in MCGM office and status of
the structure is ascertained by the concerned licensed
Structural Engineer (Exhibit O, page 97).
61.
other flat owners, other than the Petitioners flats were ever
asked to carry out the structural audit reports. In his Affidavit,
the Respondent No. 1 has no compunction in advocating that
Respondent No. 4 cannot conduct the structural audit of the
entire building and bear the whole expenses, but he has no
scruples in asking the Petitioners to carry out structural audit
and repairs and bear the whole expenses. This shows the
collusion of Respondent No.1 and Respondent No. 4.
62.
63.
actual work being carried out and are aware that the additions
and alterations exceed the purview of section 342, hence
neither of them have annexed any photograph as Exhibits. I
say that photographs taken by the Petitioners on directions of
the Honble Court dated 30th April 2014 are part of the
Petition and they expose the falsehood of the Respondents in
jeopardising the safety of the building.
(c-ii)