Você está na página 1de 2

8751

Proposed Rules Federal Register


Vol. 70, No. 35

Wednesday, February 23, 2005

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Chatham Harbormaster at the Chatham
contains notices to the public of the proposed McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast Harbormasters Department.
issuance of rules and regulations. The Guard District, (617) 223–8364.
purpose of these notices is to give interested Discussion of Proposal
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
persons an opportunity to participate in the This proposed change would revise
rule making prior to the adoption of the final Request for Comments 33 CFR 117.607, which lists the
rules.
We encourage you to participate in operating regulations for the Chatham
this rulemaking by submitting Highway Bridge. This proposed change
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND comments or related material. If you do would require the bridge to open on
SECURITY so, please include your name and signal after a one-hour advance notice is
address, identify the docket number for given, May 1 through October 31,
Coast Guard this rulemaking (CGD01–05–006), between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., by calling
indicate the specific section of this the Chatham Harbormasters
33 CFR Part 117 document to which each comment Department.
applies, and give the reason for each The draw would continue to open
[CGD01–05–006] comment. Please submit all comments from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m., May 1 through
RIN 1625–AA09 and related material in an unbound October 31, after a 12-hour advance
format, no larger than 8 1⁄2 by 11 inches, notice is given and all day from
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; suitable for copying. If you would like November 1 through April 30, after a 24-
Mitchell River, MA to know if they reached us, please hour advance notice is given.
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. postcard or envelope. We will consider Regulatory Evaluation
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. all comments and material received This proposed rule is not a
during the comment period. We may ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change this proposed rule in view of section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
change the drawbridge operating them. Regulatory Planning and Review, and
regulations governing the operation of
Public Meeting does not require an assessment of
the Chatham Highway Bridge, mile 0.2,
potential costs and benefits under
across the Mitchell River at Chatham, We do not now plan to hold a public 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of
Massachusetts. This proposed change to meeting. But you may submit a request Management and Budget has not
the drawbridge operation regulations for a meeting by writing to the First reviewed it under that Order. It is not
would require from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. that Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch, at
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
only one hour notice be given for a the address under ADDRESSES explaining
policies and procedures of the
bridge opening instead of the currently why one would be beneficial. If we
Department of Homeland Security
required 12 hours notice from May 1 determine that one would aid this
(DHS).
through October 31. This rulemaking rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
would also change the on-call contact We expect the economic impact of
and place announced by a later notice
information. This action is expected to in the Federal Register. this proposed rule to be so minimal that
better meet the reasonable needs of a full Regulatory Evaluation, under
Background paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies
navigation.
The Chatham Highway Bridge has a and procedures of DHS, is unnecessary.
DATES: Comments must reach the Coast vertical clearance in the closed position This conclusion is based on the fact
Guard on or before April 25, 2005. of 8 feet at mean high water and 12 feet that the bridge will open after a one-
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments to at mean low water. The existing hour advance notice from 8 a.m. to 5
Commander (obr), First Coast Guard drawbridge operation regulations are p.m. for vessel traffic from May 1
District Bridge Branch, 408 Atlantic listed at 33 CFR 117.607. through October 31.
Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, The Town of Chatham, the owner of Small Entities
or deliver them to the same address the bridge, asked the Coast Guard to
between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday change the drawbridge operation Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
through Friday, except Federal holidays. regulations for the Chatham Highway (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
The telephone number is (617) 223– Bridge to extend the one-hour advance whether this proposed rule would have
8364. The First Coast Guard District, notice requirement to include the 4 p.m. a significant economic impact on a
Bridge Branch, maintains the public to 5 p.m. hour, May 1 through October substantial number of small entities.
docket for this rulemaking. Comments 31. The existing regulations require the The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
and material received from the public, bridge to open on signal after a one-hour small businesses, not-for-profit
as well as documents indicated in this advance notice is given between 8 a.m. organizations that are independently
preamble as being available in the and 4 p.m. This proposed rule would owned and operated and are not
docket, will become part of this docket extend that one-hour advance notice dominant in their fields, and
and will be available for inspection or requirement to include the 4 p.m. to 5 governmental jurisdictions with
copying at the First Coast Guard p.m. time during May through October. populations of less than 50,000.
District, Bridge Branch, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Also, the on-call contact person The Coast Guard certifies under
Monday through Friday, except Federal would be changed from the duty officer section 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this
holidays. at the Chatham Police Department to the proposed rule would not have a

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:25 Feb 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1
8752 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules

significant economic impact on a Protection of Children from adopted by voluntary consensus


substantial number of small entities. Environmental Health Risks and Safety standards bodies. This proposed rule
This conclusion is based on the fact Risks. This rule is not an economically does not use technical standards.
that the bridge will open an additional significant rule and would not create an Therefore, we did not consider the use
hour each day for vessel traffic from environmental risk to health or risk to of voluntary consensus standards.
May 1 through October 31. safety that may disproportionately affect
If you think that your business, children. Environment
organization, or governmental
Indian Tribal Governments We considered the environmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
This proposed rule does not have impact of this proposed rule and
and that this rule would have a
tribal implications under Executive concluded that, under figure 2–1,
significant economic impact on it,
Order 13175, Consultation and paragraph (32)(e), of Commandant
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it Coordination with Indian Tribal Instruction M16475.1d, this proposed
qualifies and how and to what degree Governments, because it would not have rule is categorically excluded from
this rule would economically affect it. a substantial direct effect on one or further environmental documentation
more Indian tribes, on the relationship because promulgation of drawbridge
Collection of Information between the Federal Government and regulations have been found not to have
This proposed rule would call for no Indian tribes, or on the distribution of a significant effect on the environment.
new collection of information under the power and responsibilities between the A written ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Federal Government and Indian tribes. Determination’’ is not required for this
U.S.C. 3501–3520). To help the Coast Guard establish rule.
regular and meaningful consultation
Federalism and collaboration with Indian and List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
A rule has implications for federalism Alaskan Native tribes, we published a Bridges.
under Executive Order 13132, notice in the Federal Register (66 FR
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 36361, July 11, 2001) requesting Regulations
effect on State or local governments and comments on how to best carry out the
would either preempt State law or Order. We invite your comments on For the reasons set out in the
impose a substantial direct cost of how this proposed rule might impact preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
compliance on them. We have analyzed tribal governments, even if that impact amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
this proposed rule under that Order and may not constitute a ‘‘tribal
implication’’ under the Order. PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
have determined that it does not have
OPERATION REGULATIONS
implications for federalism. Energy Effects
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act We have analyzed this proposed rule 1. The authority citation for part 117
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act under Executive Order 13211, Actions continues to read as follows:
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Concerning Regulations That Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Federal agencies to assess the effects of Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
their discretionary regulatory actions. In Distribution, or Use. We have CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
particular, the Act addresses actions determined that it is not a ‘‘significant under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
that may result in the expenditure by a energy action’’ under that order because Stat. 5039.
State, local, or tribal government, in the it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
aggregate, or by the private sector of under Executive Order 12866 and is not 2. Section 117.607 is revised to read
$100,000,000 or more in any one year. likely to have a significant adverse effect as follows:
Though this proposed rule would not on the supply, distribution, or use of
§ 117.607 Mitchell River.
result in such an expenditure, we do energy. It has not been designated by the
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere Administrator of the Office of The Chatham Highway Bridge, at mile
in this preamble. Information and Regulatory Affairs as a 0.2, at Chatham, Massachusetts, shall
significant energy action. Therefore, it operate as follows:
Taking of Private Property does not require a Statement of Energy (a) From May 1 through October 31,
This proposed rule would not effect a Effects under Executive Order 13211. the draw shall open on signal from 8
taking of private property or otherwise Technical Standards a.m. to 5 p.m., if at least one hour notice
have taking implications under is given and from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. the
Executive Order 12630, Governmental The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 draw shall open on signal if at least 12
Actions and Interference with hours notice is given by calling the
Constitutionally Protected Property U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their Chatham Harbormasters Department.
Rights.
regulatory activities unless the agency (b) From November 1 through April
Civil Justice Reform provides Congress, through the Office of 30, the draw shall open on signal if at
This proposed rule meets applicable Management and Budget, with an least a 24-hour advance notice is given
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of explanation of why using these by calling the Chatham Harbormasters
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice standards would be inconsistent with Department.
Reform, to minimize litigation, applicable law or otherwise impractical. Dated: February 2, 2005.
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications John L. Grenier,
burden.
of materials, performance, design, or Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Protection of Children operation; test methods; sampling Commander, First Coast Guard District.
We have analyzed this proposed rule procedures; and related management [FR Doc. 05–3413 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am]
under Executive Order 13045, systems practices) that are developed or BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:25 Feb 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1

Você também pode gostar