Você está na página 1de 3

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

30 / Tuesday, February 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules 7687

within 24 months after the effective date of SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a Washington 98055–4056; telephone
this AD, replace both upper and lower attach new airworthiness directive (AD) for (425) 917–6483; fax (425) 917–6590.
bolt assemblies with bolts and nuts made certain Boeing Model 737–300, –400, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
from Inconel; in accordance with the service
bulletin.
–500, –600, –700, –700C, –800 and –900
series airplanes. This proposed AD Comments Invited
(ii) If any cracking is detected, do the
actions specified in either paragraph would require installing an updated We invite you to submit any relevant
(l)(2)(ii)(A) or (l)(2)(ii)(B) of this AD, at the version of the operational program written data, views, or arguments
times specified, in accordance with the software (OPS) in the flight management regarding this proposed AD. Send your
service bulletin. computers (FMCs), and doing other comments to an address listed under
(A) Prior to further flight, replace both specified actions. This proposed AD ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
upper and lower attach bolt assemblies with 2005–20347; Directorate Identifier
would also require reinstalling software,
bolts and nuts made from Inconel and new 2004–NM–226–AD’’ in the subject line
washers; if necessary. This proposed AD is
(B) Prior to further flight, replace both prompted by one operator reporting of your comments. We specifically
lower attach bolt assemblies with bolts and FMC map shifts on several Model 737– invite comments on the overall
nuts made from Inconel and new washers, 400 series airplanes with dual FMCs, regulatory, economic, environmental,
and within 24 months after the effective date using OPS version U10.4A. We are and energy aspects of the proposed AD.
of this AD, replace both upper attach bolt proposing this AD to prevent the FMC We will consider all comments
assemblies with bolts and nuts made from from displaying the incorrect actual submitted by the closing date and may
Inconel and new washers. amend the proposed AD in light of those
navigation performance value to the
No Reporting Requirement flightcrew, which could prevent comments.
(m) Although certain service information adequate alerting of a potential We will post all comments we
referenced in this AD specifies to submit a navigation error. This condition could receive, without change, to http://
report and discrepant parts to the result in a near miss with other dms.dot.gov, including any personal
manufacturer, this AD does not include those airplanes or terrain, or collision if other information you provide. We will also
requirements.
warning systems also fail. post a report summarizing each
Alternative Methods of Compliance substantive verbal contact with FAA
DATES: We must receive comments on
(AMOCs) personnel concerning this proposed AD.
this proposed AD by April 1, 2005.
(n)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Using the search function of that
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following website, anyone can find and read the
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the addresses to submit comments on this
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if comments in any of our dockets,
requested in accordance with the procedures proposed AD. including the name of the individual
found in 14 CFR 39.19. • DOT Docket Web site: Go to who sent the comment (or signed the
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable http://dms.dot.gov and follow the comment on behalf of an association,
level of safety may be used for any repair instructions for sending your comments business, labor union, etc.). You can
required by this AD, if it is approved by an electronically. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Authorized Representative for the Boeing • Government-wide rulemaking Web Statement in the Federal Register
Delegation Option Authorization site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
Organization who has been authorized by the published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
and follow the instructions for sending 19477–78), or you can visit http://
Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved,
your comments electronically. dms.dot.gov.
the approval must specifically refer to this • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
AD. U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Examining the Docket
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, You can examine the AD docket on
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
3, 2005.
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
• By fax: (202) 493–2251. person at the Docket Management
Ali Bahrami,
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
Aircraft Certification Service. p.m., Monday through Friday, except
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, Federal holidays. The Docket
[FR Doc. 05–2837 Filed 2–14–05; 8:45 am] DC, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Management Facility office (telephone
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Monday through Friday, except Federal (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
holidays. level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
For service information identified in street address stated in the ADDRESSES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION this proposed AD, contact Boeing section. Comments will be available in
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Airplanes, PO Box 3707, the AD docket shortly after the DMS
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. receives them.
14 CFR Part 39 You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at http:// Discussion
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20347; Directorate dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket We have received from one operator
Identifier 2004–NM–226–AD] Management Facility, U.S. Department a report of flight management computer
RIN 2120–AA64 of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street (FMC) map shifts on several Boeing
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of Model 737–400 series airplanes with
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. dual FMCs, using operational program
Model 737–300, –400, –500, –600, –700, This docket number is FAA–2005– software (OPS) version U10.4A. In one
–700C, –800 and –900 Series Airplanes 20347; the directorate identifier for this of these incidents, the flightcrew did not
docket is 2004–NM–226–AD. know they were 5 miles off-course until
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam the air traffic controller contacted them.
Transportation (DOT). Slentz, Aerospace Engineer, Systems During all incidents, the VERIFY
and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, POSITION message was correctly shown
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification on the control display unit (CDU), but
(NPRM).
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, the actual navigation performance

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:39 Feb 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
7688 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules

(ANP) value did not agree with the • For Model 737–600, –700, –700C, condition that is likely to exist or
observed FMC position error. Also, the –800, and –900 series airplanes: develop on other airplanes of this same
required navigation performance (RNP) Installing the compatible, model/engine type design. Therefore, we are
message, UNABLE REQD NAV PERF, database (MEDB) software, P/N BCG– proposing this AD, which would require
was not displayed since the ANP value 00N–H6, in the left and right FMCs; accomplishing the actions specified in
was less than the RNP value. Although • For all airplanes: Installing the the service information described
the flightcrew is alerted to the position current version of the navigational previously.’’
differences, they do not know that the database (NDB) software in the left and
right FMCs; Difference Between the Proposed AD
ANP value is incorrect. Testing
• For all airplanes: Installing the and the Service Information
conducted by the airplane manufacturer
has shown that under some conditions, software options database (OPC) in the The service information does not
the FMC OPS, version U10.5, does not left and right FMCs, using the OPC specify what action to take if the
give reliable ANP data. An incorrect software that was originally installed incorrect software version (of the OPS,
ANP value displayed on the CDU of the before installation of the updated model/engine database if applicable, or
FMC to the flightcrew, if not corrected, version of the OPS; software options database) is found
could prevent adequate alerting of a • For Model 737–600, –700, –700C, installed on any FMC during any
potential navigation error that could –800, and –900 series airplanes: Doing configuration check. However, this
result in a near miss with other configuration checks of the left and right proposed AD would require
airplanes or terrain or collision if other FMCs to ensure that the following
reinstallation of the applicable software,
warning systems also fail. software is correctly installed: The
if necessary.
updated version of the OPS, compatible
The FMC OPS, with versions U10.3, version of the MEDB software, and OPC Clarification of Proposed Requirements
U10.4, U10.4A, and U10.5, on certain software;
Model 737–300, –500, –600, –700, • For Model 737–300, –400, and –500 The service bulletins provide
–700C, –800 and –900 series airplanes series airplanes: Doing a configuration procedures for doing configuration
are identical to those on the affected check of the left and right FMCs to checks of the left and right FMCs to
Model 737–400 series airplanes. ensure that the updated version of the ensure that the updated version of the
Therefore, all of these models may be OPS and OPC software is correctly OPS, the compatible version of the
subject to the same unsafe condition. installed; and MEDB software, and the OPC software
• For all airplanes: Replacing the are installed. We have determined that
Relevant Service Information
existing OPS disk set in the airplane’s certificated maintenance personnel
We have reviewed Boeing Alert software media binder with new OPS must perform these configuration
Service Bulletin 737–34A1801, dated disk set, P/N 10–62225–1013. checks.
July 15, 2004; and Boeing Alert Service Accomplishing the actions specified in Costs of Compliance
Bulletin 737–34A1821, dated July 15, the service information is intended to
2004. The service bulletins describe adequately address the unsafe There are about 3,482 airplanes of the
procedures for installing updated condition. affected design in the worldwide fleet.
version U10.5A of the OPS, part number This proposed AD would affect about
(P/N) 549849–014, in the left and right FAA’s Determination and Requirements 1,312 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
FMCs, and doing other specified of the Proposed AD following table provides the estimated
actions. The other specified actions We have evaluated all pertinent costs for U.S. operators to comply with
include the following: information and identified an unsafe this proposed AD.

ESTIMATED COSTS
Average labor Cost per
Boeing model Work hours rate per hour Parts airplane

737–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes ..................................................... 1 $65 $15 $80
737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes .............................. 2 65 15 145

Authority for This Rulemaking procedures the Administrator finds responsibilities among the various
necessary for safety in air commerce. levels of government.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in This regulation is within the scope of For the reasons discussed above, I
Title 49 of the United States Code. that authority because it addresses an certify that the proposed regulation:
Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
authority of the FAA Administrator. develop on products identified in this action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, proposed AD. 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
describes in more detail the scope of the Regulatory Findings DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
agency’s authority. (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
This rulemaking is promulgated We have determined that this 3. Will not have a significant
under the authority described in proposed AD would not have federalism economic impact, positive or negative,
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section implications under Executive Order on a substantial number of small entities
44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under 13132. This proposed AD would not under the criteria of the Regulatory
that section, Congress charges the FAA have a substantial direct effect on the Flexibility Act.
with promoting safe flight of civil States, on the relationship between the We prepared a regulatory evaluation
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing national Government and the States, or of the estimated costs to comply with
regulations for practices, methods, and on the distribution of power and this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:39 Feb 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 15, 2005 / Proposed Rules 7689

section for a location to examine the PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Comments Due Date
regulatory evaluation. DIRECTIVES (a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this AD
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 1. The authority citation for part 39
action by April 1, 2005.
continues to read as follows:
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Affected ADs
safety, Safety. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
(b) None.
The Proposed Amendment § 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding Applicability
Accordingly, under the authority the following new airworthiness (c) This AD applies to the airplanes listed
delegated to me by the Administrator, directive (AD): in Table 1 of this AD, certificated in any
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2005–20347; category:
39 as follows: Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–226–AD.

TABLE 1.—APPLICABILITY
Boeing models As listed in

737–300, -400, and –500 series airplanes .............................................. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–34A1821, dated July 15, 2004.
737–600, –700, –700C, –800 and –900 series airplanes ........................ Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–34A1801, dated July 15, 2004.

Unsafe Condition accordance with the procedures found in 14 DATES: We must receive comments on
(d) This AD was prompted by one operator CFR 39.19. this proposed AD by March 17, 2005.
reporting flight management computer (FMC) Issued in Renton, Washington, on February ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
map shifts on several Model 737–400 series 2, 2005. addresses to submit comments on this
airplanes with dual FMCs, using operational Ali Bahrami,
program software (OPS) version U10.4A. We
proposed AD.
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, • DOT Docket Web site: Go to
are issuing this AD to prevent the FMC from
Aircraft Certification Service. http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
displaying the incorrect actual navigation
performance value to the flightcrew, which [FR Doc. 05–2827 Filed 2–14–05; 8:45 am] instructions for sending your comments
could prevent adequate alerting of a potential BILLING CODE 4910–13–P electronically.
navigation error. This condition could result • Government-wide rulemaking Web
in a near miss with other airplanes or terrain,
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
or collision if other warning systems also fail. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
and follow the instructions for sending
Compliance Federal Aviation Administration your comments electronically.
(e) You are responsible for having the • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
actions required by this AD performed within 14 CFR Part 39 U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
the compliance times specified, unless the Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
actions have already been done. [Docket No. FAA–2005–20345; Directorate room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
Install Updated Version of OPS Identifier 2004–NM–101–AD] • By fax: (202) 493–2251.
(f) Within 180 days after the effective date • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
of this AD, install the updated version of the RIN 2120–AA64 the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
OPS in the left and right FMCs; and, before 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
further flight, do all the other specified Airworthiness Directives; Dornier
Model 328–300 Series Airplanes DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
actions. Do the installation and other through Friday, except Federal holidays.
specified actions by accomplishing all of the
AGENCY: Federal Aviation For service information identified in
actions in the Accomplishment Instructions
of the applicable service bulletin, as listed in
Administration (FAA), Department of this proposed AD, contact AvCraft
Table 1 of this AD. Where the service bulletin Transportation (DOT). Aerospace GmbH, PO Box 1103, D–
specifies a configuration check, certificated ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 82230 Wessling, Germany.
maintenance personnel must perform the (NPRM). You can examine the contents of this
configuration check. AD docket on the Internet at http://
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Reinstall Software, If Necessary
new airworthiness directive (AD) for Management Facility, U.S. Department
(g) If the incorrect software version of the certain Dornier Model 328–300 series
OPS, model/engine database if applicable, or of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
airplanes. This proposed AD would SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
software options database is found installed
on any FMC during any configuration check
require installing a drain hole in the the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
required by paragraph (f) of this AD: Before lower skin of the left- and right-hand This docket number is FAA–2005–
further flight, reinstall the software, as elevator horns. This proposed AD is 20345; the directorate identifier for this
applicable. Do the reinstallation of any prompted by reports of water found in docket is 2004–NM–101–AD.
software in accordance with the the elevator assembly. We are proposing
Accomplishment Instructions of the this AD to prevent water or ice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
applicable service bulletin, as listed in Table accumulating in the elevator assembly, Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
1 of this AD. which could result in possible corrosion International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Alternative Methods of Compliance that reduces the structural integrity of Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
(AMOCs) the flight control surface, or in an Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
unbalanced flight control surface. These 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125;
(h) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to conditions could result in reduced fax (425) 227–1149.
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in controllability of the airplane. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:39 Feb 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1

Você também pode gostar