Você está na página 1de 2

6636 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Notices

Annual Responses: 3,152. Type of Request: Extension. Dated: January 31, 2005.
Average Burden Per Response: 101 Number of Respondents: 11,700. Patricia L. Toppings,
hours. Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Annual Burden Hours: 318,295. Responses Per Respondent: 1. Officer, Department of Defense.
Needs and Uses: DoD contracting Annual Responses: 11,700. [FR Doc. 05–2385 Filed 2–7–05; 8:45 am]
officers need this information to
evaluate contractor proposals for Average Burden Per Response: 0.6 BILLING CODE 5001–06–M

contract modifications; to determine hours.


that a contractor has removed Annual Burden Hours: 7,020.
obstructions to navigation; to review DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Needs and Uses: The specific
contractor requests for payment for objective of a personnel security Notice of Proposed Information
mobilization and preparatory work; to investigation is to elicit information Collection Requests
determine reasonableness of costs concerning the loyalty, character, and
allocated to mobilization and reliability of the individual being AGENCY: Department of Education.
demobilization; and to determine investigated so that the DoD adjudicator SUMMARY: The Leader, Information
eligibility for the 20 percent evaluation may determine if it is clearly consistent Management Case Services Team,
preference for United States firms in the with the interests of national security to Regulatory Information Management
award of some overseas construction grant the individual access to classified Services, Office of the Chief Information
contracts. information (or to continue such Officer, invites comments on the
Affected Public: Business or other for- access), or to place the individual (or proposed information collection
profit and not-for-profit institutions. retain them) in a sensitive national requests as required by the Paperwork
Frequency: On occasion. Reduction Act of 1995.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to security position. Adjudicative
obtain or retain benefits. determinations are made in accordance DATES: Interested persons are invited to
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis with DoD 5200.2–R, ‘‘DoD Personnel submit comments on or before April 11,
Oleinick. Security Program,’’ which requires the 2005.
Written comments and DoD adjudicator to consider both SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
recommendations on the proposed potentially disqualifying information 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
information collection should be sent to and mitigating information when there 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
Mr. Oleinick at the Office of is an indication that the individual has that the Office of Management and
Management and Budget, Desk Officer a history of mental or nervous disorder; Budget (OMB) provide interested
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive use or abuse of prescribed or illegal Federal agencies and the public an early
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. drugs, such as marijuana, narcotics or opportunity to comment on information
DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia barbiturates; or abuse or excessive use of collection requests. OMB may amend or
Toppings. alcohol. Much of the appropriate waive the requirement for public
Written requests for copies of the information which the adjudicator must consultation to the extent that public
information collection proposal should consider can only be obtained from participation in the approval process
be sent to Ms. Toppings, WHS/ESCD/ physicians who have treated the would defeat the purpose of the
Information Management Division, 1225 individual. Obtaining such information information collection, violate State or
South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, provides the adjudicator with a complex Federal law, or substantially interfere
VA 22202–4326. picture of the individual. Without it, the with any agency’s ability to perform its
Dated: January 31, 2005. adjudicator may not be able to make a statutory obligations. The Leader,
Patricia L. Toppings, determination as to whether or not the Information Management Case Services
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
individual should be granted access to Team, Regulatory Information
Officer, Department of Defense. classified information. Management Services, Office of the
[FR Doc. 05–2384 Filed 2–7–05; 8:45 am] Affected Public: Individual or Chief Information Officer, publishes that
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M households and business or other for- notice containing proposed information
profit. collection requests prior to submission
Frequency: On occasion. of these requests to OMB. Each
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE proposed information collection,
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. grouped by office, contains the
Office of the Secretary OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis following: (1) Type of review requested,
Oleinick. e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
Submission for OMB Review; reinstatement; (2) title; (3) summary of
Comment Request Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed the collection; (4) description of the
ACTION: Notice. information collection should be sent to need for, and proposed use of, the
Mr. Oleinick at the Office of information; (5) respondents and
The Department of Defense has Management and Budget, Desk Officer frequency of collection; and (6)
submitted to OMB for clearance, the for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive reporting and/or recordkeeping burden.
following proposal for collection of Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. OMB invites public comment.
information under the provisions of the The Department of Education is
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia especially interested in public comment
chapter 35). Toppings. addressing the following issues: (1) Is
DATES: Consideration will be given to all Written requests for copies of the this collection necessary to the proper
comments received March 10, 2005. information collection proposal should functions of the Department; (2) will
Title, Form, and OMB Number: be sent to Ms. Toppings, WHS/ESCD/ this information be processed and used
Medical Information Questionnaire; Information Management Division, 1225 in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
DSS Form FL 14a; OMB Control South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Number 0704–0206. VA 22202–4326. Department enhance the quality, utility,

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:12 Feb 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Notices 6637

and clarity of the information to be DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 75.105(c)(3) we consider only


collected; and (5) how might the applications that meet either of the
Department minimize the burden of this Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; absolute priorities.
collection on the respondents, including Overview Information Grant These priorities are:
through the use of information Competition To Prevent High-Risk
Drinking or Violent Behavior Among Absolute Priority One—Develop or
technology. Enhance, Implement, and Evaluate
College Students; Notice Inviting
Dated: February 2, 2005. Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Campus- and/or Community-Based
Angela C. Arrington, Year (FY) 2005 Strategies To Prevent High-Risk
Drinking Among College Students
Leader, Information Management Case
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Under this priority, applicants are
Services Team, Regulatory Information
(CFDA) Number: 84.184H.
Management Services, Office of the Chief required to:
Information Officer. Dates: Applications Available: (1) Identify a specific student
February 8, 2005. Deadline for population to be served by the grant and
Office of the Chief Financial Officer Transmittal of Applications: March 25, provide a justification for its selection;
Type of Review: Extension. 2005. Deadline for Intergovernmental (2) Provide evidence that a needs
Review: May 24, 2005. assessment has been conducted on
Title: Generic Application Package for Eligible Applicants: Institutions of campus to document prevalence rates
Discretionary Grant Programs. higher education (IHEs), consortia related to high-risk drinking by the
Frequency: Annually. thereof, public and private nonprofit population selected;
organizations, including faith-based (3) Set measurable goals and
Affected Public: Individuals or
organizations, and individuals. objectives for the proposed project and
household; businesses or other for- Estimated Available Funds: provide a description of how progress
profit; not-for-profit institutions; State, $2,500,000. Contingent upon the toward achieving goals will be
local, or tribal gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. availability of funds, we may make measured annually;
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour additional awards in FY 2006 and (4) Design and implement prevention
Burden: subsequent years from the list of strategies, using student input and
Responses: 12,464. nonfunded applications from this participation, that research has shown
competition. to be effective in preventing high-risk
Burden Hours: 304,806. Estimated Number of Awards: 20. drinking by the target population;
Abstract: This is a generic application Estimated Range of Awards: (5) Use a qualified evaluator to design
package using ED standard forms and $100,000—$150,000. and implement an evaluation of the
instructions, OMB Standard forms and Estimated Average Size of Awards: project using outcomes-based
Instructions and EDGAR and statutory $125,000. (summative) performance indicators
criteria. The purpose is to provide a Note: The Department is not bound by any related to behavioral change and process
common and easily recognizable format estimates in this notice. (formative) measures that assess and
for applicants when applying under document the strategies used; and
Project Period: Up to 24 months. (6) Demonstrate the ability to start the
discretionary grant programs. Projects will be funded for one year project within 60 days after receiving
Requests for copies of the proposed with an option for an additional year, federal funding in order to maximize the
information collection request may be contingent upon substantial progress by time available to show impact within
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, the grantee and the availability of funds. the grant period.
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending Full Text of Announcement
Collections’’ link and by clicking on Absolute Priority Two—Develop or
link number 2665. When you access the I. Funding Opportunity Description Enhance, Implement, and Evaluate
information collection, click on Purpose of Program: The Grant Campus- and/or Community-Based
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view. Competition to Prevent High-Risk Strategies To Prevent Violent Behavior
Written requests for information should Drinking or Violent Behavior Among Among College Students
be addressed to U.S. Department of College Students provides awards to Under this priority, applicants are
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., develop or enhance, implement, and required to:
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington, evaluate campus- and/or community- (1) Identify a specific student
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be based strategies to prevent high-risk population to be served by the grant and
electronically mailed to the Internet drinking or violent behavior among provide a justification for its selection;
address OCIO_RIMG@ed.gov or faxed to college students. (2) Provide evidence that a needs
202–245–6621. Please specify the Priorities: These priorities are from assessment has been conducted on
the notice of final priorities and campus to document prevalence rates
complete title of the information
selection criteria for this program, related to violent behavior;
collection when making your request.
published in the Federal Register on (3) Set measurable goals and
Comments regarding burden and/or December 27, 2000 (65 FR 82224– objectives for the proposed project and
the collection activity requirements 82226), and a correction notice provide a description of how progress
should be directed to Sheila Carey at published in the Federal Register on toward achieving goals will be
Sheila.Carey@ed.gov. Individuals who January 10, 2001 (66 FR 1963) measured annually;
use a telecommunications device for the (collectively, the Notice of Final (4) Design and implement prevention
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Priorities and Selection Criteria). strategies, using student input and
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– Absolute Priorities: For FY 2005 and participation, that research has shown
800–877–8339. any subsequent year in which we make to be effective in preventing violent
awards on the basis of the funding slate behavior among college students;
[FR Doc. E5–497 Filed 2–7–05; 8:45 am]
from this competition, these priorities (5) Use a qualified evaluator to design
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR and implement an evaluation of the

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:12 Feb 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1

Você também pode gostar