Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Untitled
Research on Gumnami Baba reveals that some times in 1963 he shifted to Darshan
Nagar area of Faizabad. Thereafter until his death in 1985 he resided at
different places in vicinity of Faizabad and Ayodhya (1965 to
66-Lalkothi,Ayodhya; 1966 to 73 -Shrista,Purani Basti; 1973 to 75-Lucknow Hatta
at Ayodhya; 1975 to 1976-Brahma Kund Ayodhya; 1976 to 78 Lucknow Hatta at
Ayodhya; 1978-73 Chhoti Deokali Ayodhya; 1983-85 Ram Bhawan,Faizabad.
Following are the reasons for some persons claiming that Gumnami Baba was
NetajiI)
Before one Santosh Bhattacharya who was an emissary of
Lila Roy and had seen Netaji from close quarters at Manikganj in 1940 ( Now in
Bangladesh), Gumnami Baba commented in 1963 that he was the man who had
tirelessly spent two days to spread the news that that Netaji was coming to
address a meeting at Manikganj.
II)
Lila Roy sent one Anil Das, another emissary alongwith a
note that he had met Netaji in Japan. After reading the note, Gumnami Baba
commented to Anil Das He had met Netaji not only at that time. He met him at
Singapore as well.Anil Das was stunned as it was true.
III)
Lila Roy had mentioned in a note to an emissary Apurba Ghosh
that he was a member of reception Committee at Manikganj. Gumnami Baba asked
Apurba Ghosh if he was the man who presented Netaji with a comb when he came out
of the bathroom at Kutcharibari. When Apurba Ghosh replied in affirmative,Gumnami
Baba asked him if he had seen Netaji smiling. Again after Apurba Ghosh confirmed
the fact, Gumnami Baba told that he was smiling because instead of offering it on
a plate or dish ,he had offered it with bare hands.He enquired from him about
Bahadur,a durwan at Netajis Elgin Road Residence and a portrait of Goddess Kali
in Netajis living room.
IV)
Prof.V.N. Arora who is among the first of researchers
regarding Gumnami Baba tells an incident. One
Ram Kishore Panda used to take
care of Gumnami Baba during his stay at a place in Ayodhya.The house had no
electricity. It was winter and Gumnami Baba was sleeping inside a room, while Ram
Kishore Panda was outside with an earthen firepot for warming himself .
Sometimes in the night when Ram Kishore awoke, it occurred to him that Baba may
be feeling cold. He asked Baba if he needed the firepot for warming purposes.
Baba replied his body had resided in Siberia so it did not need warmth.
V)
One Durga Prasad Pandey had seen Netaji in Lucknow during his
student days at Lucknow in 1940-41. He served Gumnami Baba for 9 years. He
deposed before the Mukherjee Commission that both were the same person.
VI)
Like Durga Prasad Pandey ,Shrikant Sharma Kanha ,witness no. 40
before the Mukherjee Commisssion insisted that he had seen Netaji in 1939-40 and
Bhagawanji in Neemsar and he firmly believed that Bhagawanji ( Gumnami Baba) was
Netaji himself.
Among the articles that have been found at Ram Bhawan in the room where Gumnami
Baba resided in his last days there are letters of former U P Chief Minister Late
Sampoornanand,another former Chief Minister of U P Banarasi Das Gupta, former
Railway Minister Abdul Ghani Khan Chowdhuri ,telegrams to P.M.Roy,and some
letters of other political personalities.There is one map page showing route to
India from Russia via China with all geographical coordinates-latitudes and
longitudes. There are family photographs of Netaji,photos of Goddess Kali,Swami
Ram Krishna Paramhans, Swami Vivekananda, round framed spectacle, pens, smoking
pipes and cigarettes. Postage stamps marking 25th anniversary of I N A. The
articles which were sent to him at Neemsar by Lila Roy have been found at Ram
Bhawan also.There are books like Himalayan Blunder and between the
lines.There are cuttings of a bengali daily related to an article
namelyTaihoku Plane disaster,a concocted story.There has been found photograph
of a youngman. Netajis niece Lalita Bose identified the photograph as that of
her uncle Subhash. Lalita Bose visited Ram Bhawan in in February 1986 and started
weeping looking on the articles of Gumnami Baba telling that they belonged to
her uncle Subhash. Later on the suggestion of the then chief minister of U.P.
Vir Bahadur Singh, she moved to court to get the items preserved.
It should now be clear why Justice Mukerjee told in an off-record talk to a
journalist that he was almost sure that Gumnami Baba was Netaji. Yet it is a
mystery why he did not carry forward his belief in the Commissions report and
described posting of his off-record talk on the u-tube as a breach of faith. Yet
Justice Mukherjee hinted towards this fact in his report- Apparantly there is no
reason for not acting or relying upon the evidence of witnesses, particularly
Page 2
Untitled
those who had seen Netaji before 1945 and also met Bhagawanji or Gumnami Baba
face to face on a number of occasions, more so when their evidence regarding the
frequent visits of some freedom fighters and some politicians and former members
of I N A on January 23 and Durga Puja festival is supported by the fact that
letters written by them including Professor Samar Guha, Pabitra Mohan Roy,and
Lila Roy were found in Ram bhawan, Faizabad. Mukherjee Commission Report also
criticized Government of India for not cooperating with it.
It is a mater of some satisfaction for Netaji researchers that on the orders of
Allahabad High Court regarding a case filed by Netajis niece Lalita Bose a
museum is finally being set up at Ayodhya to preserve the items found at Gumnami
Baba residence. The U.P. Government has sanctioned an amount of Rs. 11.5 crore
for a museum-cum memorial.The court has also ordered the U. P. Govt. to form a
committee of experts under a retired high court judge to hold an enquiry
regarding identity of Late Gumnami Baba.
Now like the earstwhile Congress Govt., even the B J P Govt. is declining to
disclose contents of files on Netaji, citing the reason that relations with some
foreign countries would be affected. The question arises which are these
countries. Let us go through possibilities : 1. Japan( It was Japan which
confirmed the Taihoku plane crash which never took place as per Mukherjee
Commission) or, 2.Russia ( If Russia sent Subhash first to Gulag and later
released him under a tacit understanding without bringing it to knowledge of
allied powers and now,if facts are disclosed by the Government of India ,Russia
may think a promise of keeping Subhash story under wraps has been broken) or,3.
UK ( as per several reports British knew that Subhash was in Russia and they
conspired to mislead Stalin so that he was sent to Gulag. If Subhash was released
without their knowledge , they are bound to feel offended ) or,4. U S A (which
has been chasing all the NAZI allies after World War II, to bring them to allied
justice and same may be the U S As case for Subhash also). Of the above, the
reasons given under no.3 and no. 4 look more plausible to me. Japan role is
limited to World War II while earstwhile U S S R is now disintegrated and present
Russian Govt. has got nothing to do with what was done by the previous regimes.
Posted by Sanjay Tripathi at 10:31
Source:
http://sanjayitx.blogspot.in/2015/09/netaji-and-gumnami-baba-two-facets-of.html
Page 3