4092 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
Product/NSN: Tape, Electronic Data
Processing, 7045–00–377–9235.
NPA: North Central Sight Services, Inc.,
Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Contracting Activity: Defense Supply Center
Columbus, Columbus, Ohio.
Sheryl D. Kennerly,
Director, Information Management.
[FR Doc. 05–1646 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews; Correction
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
In accordance with section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) published its notice
of five-year (‘‘sunset’’) reviews of certain
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on January 3, 2005. See Initiation
of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR
75 (January 3, 2005). In that notice, the
published case number of the
antidumping duty order on certain
carbon cut-to-length quality steel plate
from Japan was incorrect. The correct
case number is A–588–847.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martha Douthit, Office of Policy, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce at (202) 482–5050.
Dated: January 24, 2005.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–338 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–801]
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding its
administrative review of four companies
under the antidumping duty order on
certain frozen fish fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam for the
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:43 Jan 27, 2005 Jkt 205001
period January 1, 2003, through July 31,
2004. This rescission, in part, is based
on the timely withdrawal of the request
for review by the respective interested
party that requested a review. A
complete list of the companies for
which the administrative review is
being rescinded is provided in the
Rescission, in Part, of Administrative
Review section below. The Department
is not rescinding its review of Can Tho
Agricultural and Animal Products
Import-Export Company (CATACO);
Phan Quan Company, Ltd.; Phu Thanh
Company, Co.; or Vinh Hoan Company,
Ltd.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Javier Barrientos or Alex Villanueva at
(202) 482–2243 and (202) 482–3208,
respectively, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published in the
Federal Register an antidumping duty
order on certain frozen fish fillets from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on
August 12, 2003 (68 FR 47909).
Pursuant to its Notice of Opportunity to
Request an Administrative Review, 69
FR 46496 (August 3, 2004), and in
accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
section 351.213(b) of the Department’s
regulations, the Department received
timely requests for review from eight
exporters: An Giang Fisheries Import
and Export Joint Stock Company; An
Giang Agriculture and Foods Import-
Export Company (AFIEX); Can Tho
Agricultural and Animal Products
Import-Export Company (CATACO);
Mekong Fisheries Joint Stock Company
(MEKONIMEX); Phan Quan Company,
Ltd.; Phu Thanh Company, Co.; QVD
Food Co., Ltd.; and Vinh Hoan
Company, Ltd. No other interested party
requested a review.
On September 22, 2004, the
Department published its Notice of
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, Requests for Revocation in Part
and Deferral of Administrative Review,
69 FR 56745 (September 22, 2004),
initiating on all eight companies for
which an administrative review was
requested. The Department
subsequently received timely
withdrawal requests from four of the
eight exporters that requested a review:
An Giang Fisheries Import and Export
PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
Joint Stock Company (October 26, 2004);
AFIEX (October 19, 2004);
MEKONIMEX (November 5, 2004); and
QVD Food Co., Ltd. (September 29,
2004).
Rescission, in Part, of Administrative
Review
Pursuant to section 351.213(d)(1) of
the Department’s regulations, the
Department may rescind an
administrative review, ‘‘if a party that
requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review.’’ Because four
exporters have timely withdrawn their
requests for an administrative review
within the ninety-day period, and no
other party requested a review of these
companies, we are rescinding this
administrative review, in part, for the
period January 1, 2003, through July 31,
2004, for the following companies: An
Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint
Stock Company; AFIEX; MEKONIMEX;
and QVD Food Co., Ltd. However, we
will continue the administrative review
with respect to: CATACO; Phan Quan
Company, Ltd.; Phu Thanh Company,
Co.; and Vinh Hoan Company, Ltd., as
these exporters individually submitted a
request for review.
The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) within 15 days of
the publication of this notice. The
Department will direct CBP to assess
antidumping duties for these companies
at the cash deposit rate in effect on the
date of entry for entries during the
period January 1, 2003, through July 31,
2004.
Notification to Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
section 351.402(f) of the Department’s
regulations to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this period of
time. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
28JAN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 351.213(d)(4) of
the Department’s regulations and
sections 751(a)(2)(C) and 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: January 18, 2005.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–339 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of first request for panel
review.
SUMMARY: On January 18, 2005, the
Canadian Lumber Remanufacturer’s
Alliance (‘‘CLRA’’) and its individual
members filed a First Request for Panel
Review with the United States Section
of the NAFTA Secretariat pursuant to
Article 1904 of the North American Free
Trade Agreement. A second, third,
fourth and fifth Request for Panel
Review was filed on January 19, 2005 on
behalf of the Canfor Corporation and its
affiliates Lakeland Mills Ltd. and the
Pas Lumber Company Ltd. (collectively
‘‘Canfor’’); Terminal Forest Products
Ltd. (‘‘Terminal’’); and on behalf of the
Government of Canada, the
Governments of the Provinces of
Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba,
Ontario, and Saskatchewan, the
Gouvernement du Quebec, the
Governments of the Northwest
Territories and the Yukon Territory, the
British Columbia Lumber Trade Council
and its constituent associations (the
Coast Forest & Lumber Association and
the Council of Forest Industries), the
Ontario Forest Industries Association,
the Ontario Lumber Manufacturers
Association, Quebec Lumber
Manufacturers Association; Apex Forest
Products Inc., Aspen Planers Ltd.,
Buchanan Lumber Sales, Inc. and the
Buchanan affiliated mills, exporters and
importers (including Atikokan Forest
Products Ltd., Buchanan Forest
Products Ltd., Buchanan Northern
Hardwoods Inc., Dubreuil Forest
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:43 Jan 27, 2005 Jkt 205001
Products Limited, Great West Timber
Limited, Long Lake Forest Products Inc.,
McKenzie Forest Products Inc., Nakina
Forest Products Limited, Northern
Sawmills Inc., Northern Wood, and
Solid Wood Products Inc.), Devlin
Timber (1992) Ltd., Downie Timber
Ltd., Federated Co-operative Limited,
Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd., Haida Forest
Products Ltd., Kenora Forest Products
Ltd., Lecours Lumber Co. Limited,
Liskeard Lumber Limited, Manitou
Forest Products Ltd., Manning
Diversified Forest Products Ltd.,
Midway Lumber Mills Ltd., Mill &
Timber Products Ltd., Nickel Lake
Lumber, North Enderby Timber Ltd.,
Olav Haavaldsrud Timber Company
Limited, Pastway Planing Limited, R.
Fryer Forest Products Limited, Selkirk
Specialty Wood Ltd., Tembec Inc., Tyee
Timber Products Ltd., and West
Hastings Lumber Products (hereafter,
‘‘the Parties’’), respectively. Panel
review was requested of the final results
of countervailing duty administrative
review and rescission of certain
company-specific reviews made by the
United States Department of Commerce,
International Trade Administration,
respecting Certain Softwood Lumber
Products from Canada. This
determination was published in the
Federal Register, (69 FR 75917) on
December 20, 2004. The determination
was amended by Notice of Correction to
Final Results on December 27, 2004 , 69
Federal Register 77220. The NAFTA
Secretariat has assigned Case Number
USA–CDA–2005–1904–01 to this
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
4093
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was
filed with the United States Section of
the NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to
Article 1904 of the Agreement, on
January 18, 2005, requesting panel
review of the final determination
described above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 39 within 30
days after the filing of the first Request
for Panel Review (the deadline for filing
a Complaint is February 17, 2005);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or
interested person that does not file a
Complaint but that intends to appear in
support of any reviewable portion of the
final determination may participate in
the panel review by filing a Notice of
Appearance in accordance with Rule 40
within 45 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Notice of Appearance is
March 4, 2005); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including the jurisdiction of the
investigating authority, that are set out
in the Complaints filed in the panel
review and the procedural and
substantive defenses raised in the panel
review.
Dated: January 25, 2005.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 05–1617 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of first request for panel
review.
SUMMARY: On January 18, 2005, the
Ontario Forest Industries Association,
the Ontario Lumber Manufacturers
Association and Tembec, Inc. filed a
First Request for Panel Review with the
United States Section of the NAFTA
Secretariat pursuant to Article 1904 of
the North American Free Trade
Agreement. Panel review was requested
28JAN1