Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
OF MODERN EUROPE
Marvin Perry
Baruch College, City University of New York
Palo Alto
BOSTON
TORONTO
9
Modern Consciousness: New Views of
Nature, Human Nature, and the Arts
The modern mentality may be said to have passed through two broad
phasesan early modernity and a late modernity. Formulated during
the era of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, the outlook of early modernity stressed confidence in reason, science, human
goodness, and humanity's capacity to improve society. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries a new outlook took shape.
Late modern thinkers and scientists achieved revolutionary insights
into human nature, the social world, and the physical universe; and
writers and artists opened up hitherto unimagined possibilities for artistic expression. These developments produced a shift in European
consciousness. The mechanical model of the universe that had dominated the Western outlook since Newton was altered; the Enlightenment view of human rationality and goodness was questioned; the
belief in natural rights and objective standards governing morality
was attacked; rules of esthetics that had governed the arts since
the Renaissance were discarded. Shattering old beliefs, late modernity
left Europeans without landmarkswithout generally accepted cultural standards or agreed upon conceptions of human nature and life's
meaning.
The end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries
were marked by extraordinary creativity in thought and the arts. However imaginative and fruitful these changes were for Western intellectual and cultural life, they also helped to create the disoriented, fragmented, and troubled era that is the twentieth century.
293
MUUtKN LUNSLIUUSNtSS
Irrationalism
IRRATIONALISM
MUUtKN LUNSUOUSNESS
Irrational^
But, adds Nietzsche, these virtues of love, compassion, and pity are
really only a facade; they hide the Christians' true feelings of envy,
resentment, hatred, and revenge against their superiors, betters, and
tormentors. One reason why the lowly aspire to heaven is that there
they will take their revenge; they will be able to peer into hell, as Aquinas noted, and take pleasure in the torments of the damned, including
their old enemies.
Although the philosophes had rejected Christian doctrines, they had
largely retained Christian ethics. Nietzsche, however, did not attack
Christianity because it was contrary to reason, as the philosophes had,
but because it was a "declaration of hostility towards life, nature, the
will to life."3 By blocking the free and spontaneous exercise of human
chological past, he proudly affirms his own being; dispensing with the
Christian "thou shalt not," he instinctively says, "I will." He dares to
be himself. Because he is not like other people, traditional definitions
of good and evil have no meaning for him. He does not allow his individuality to be stifled, but makes his own values, those that flow
from his very being and enhance his life. He relishes and exudes power.
He knows that life is purposeless but lives it laughingly, instinctively,
adventurously, fully. The superman represents the highest form of life.
The superman exemplifies the ultimate fact of life, that "the most
fearful and fundamental desire in man [is] his drive for power,"6 that
human beings crave and strive for power ceaselessly and uncompromisingly. It is perfectly natural for human beings to want to dominate
nature and other human beings, even to inflict pain on them. This will
to power is not a product of rational reflection but flows from the very
essence of human existence. As the motivating force in human behavior, it governs everyday life and is the determining factor in political
life. The enhancement of power brings supreme enjoyment: "the love
of power is the demon of men. Let them have everythinghealth, food,
a place to live, entertainmentthey are and remain unhappy and lowspirited; for the demon waits and waits and will be satisfied. Take
everything from them and satisfy this and they are alrriost happyas
happy as men and demons can be."7 The masses, cowardly and envious,
will condemn the superman as evil; this has always been their way.
Thus, Nietzsche castigates democracy, because it "represents the
disbelief in great human beings and an elite society/'8 and Christianity,
for imposing an unnatural morality, one that affirms meekness, humility, and compassion.
The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) had declared that beneath the conscious intellect is the will, a striving, demanding, and imperious force that is the real determinant of human
behavior. In contrast to Hegel, who identified ultimate reality with
reason, Schopenhauer viewed will, an all-encompassing force that pervades even plants and animals, as the the essence of reality: "the will
is the thing-in-itself, the inner content, the essence of the world. . ..
every man is what he is through his w i l l . . . for willing is the basis of
his inner being."9 In contrast to the philosophes, who saw human
beings as fundamentally rational, Schopenhauer held that the intellect
is merely a tool of an alogical and irrational will: "The intellect . . . .
is unable to determine the will itself, for the will is wholly inaccessible
to it, and, as we have seen, is for it inscrutable and, impenetrable."10
Life is an endless striving to fulfill ceaseless desires. Schopenhauer anticipated Freud when he declared that dark and blind animal impulses,
not reason, are a human being's true essence. Schopenhauer sought to
I [rationalism
repress the will, which he considered to be the source of human unhappiness. He urged stifling this striving, aimless life-urge that keeps
us in the throes of desire like an unquenchable thirst.
A profound pessimism underlay Schopenhauer's philosophy. If the
will is not gratified, we suffer pain; if is is too easily satisfied, we experience terrible boredom. And fear of death gnaws us.
Man, as the most complete obj edification of that will, is ... also the
most necessitous of all beings: he is through and through concrete willing and needing; he is a concretion of a thousand [needs and wants). With
these he stands upon the earth, left to himself, uncertain about everything except his own need and misery. . . . With cautious steps and casting anxious glances round him he pursues his path, for a thousand accidents and a thousand enemies lie in wait for him. Thus he went while
yet a savage, thus he goes in civilised life; there is no security for him.
The life of the great majority is only a constant struggle for this existence
itself, with the certainty of losing it at last. But what enables them to
endure this wearisome battle is not so much the love of life as the fear
of death, which yet stands in the background as inevitable, and may
come upon them at any moment.11
iUI
(.uu/Jiei
IVIUUCKIM LUINJUUUMNbiS
these words offer no constructive guidelines for dealing with the problems of modern industrial civilization. Nor can we find anything helpful in Nietzsche's condemnation of equality. In Thus Spake Zarathustra (1883-85), the prophet declares: "With these preachers of equality
will I not be mixed up and confounded. For thus speaketh justice unto
me: 'Men are not equal.' And neither shall they become so! What
would be my love to the Superman if I spoke otherwise."17 Nietzsche's
view that society is merely "a foundation and scaffolding by means of
which a select class of beings may be able to elevate themselves to ...
a higher existence"1* is a warrant for ruthless domination and exploitation.
Nietzsche had no constructive proposals for dealing with the disintegration of rational and Christian certainties. Instead, his vitriolic attack on European institutions and values, immensely appealing to central European intellectuals, who saw his philosophy as liberating an
inner energy, helped erode the rational foundations of Western civilization. Thus, many young people, attracted to Nietzsche, welcomed
World War I; they viewed it as an esthetic experience and thought that
it would clear a path to a new heroic age. They took literally
Nietzsche's words: "A society that definitely and instinctively gives
up war and conquest is in decline"19 and "Ye shall love peace as a
means to new warsand the short peace more than the long.... Ye
say that it is the good cause which halloweth even war? I say unto you:
it is the good war which halloweth every cause."20
Nazi theorists tried to make Nietzsche a forerunner of their movement. They sought from Nietzsche a philosophical sanction for their
own will to power, contempt for the weak, ruthlessness, and glorification of action, as well as for their cult of the heroic and their Social
Darwinist revulsion for human equality and endorsement of cruelty.
Recasting Nietzsche in their own image, the Nazis viewed themselves
as Nietzsche's supermen: the new aristocracy, members of a master
race who, by force of will, would conquer all obstacles and reshape the
world according to their self-created values. Were they not engaged in
the liberation of the instincts and the "transvaluation of all values"
that Nietzsche had urged, in which nothing is true and everything is
permitted? Some German intellectuals were drawn to Nazism because
it seemed a healthy affirmation of life, the life with a new purpose for
which Nietzsche had called. Thus, Alfred Baeumler, a German academic and fervent National Socialist, lauded Nietzsche as the philosopher of heroic youth:
The foundations of Christian moralityreligious individualism, a
guilty conscience, meekness, concern for the eternal salvation of the
soulall are absolutely foreign to Nietzsche. . . . The Mediterranean religion of salvation is alien to and far removed from his Nordic attitude.
iiiniiuiiuiiiiii
Fyodor Dostoevski
Like Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoevski (1821-1881), Russian novelist and
essayist, attacked the fundamental outlook of liberals and socialists.
In contrast to their view that human beings are innately good, responsive to reason's promptings, and capable of constructing the good society through reason, Dostoevski saw human beings as inherently depraved, irrational, and rebellious.
Notes from Underground In Notes from Underground (1864), the
narrator, the Underground Man, rebels against the efforts of rationalists, humanists, positivists, liberals, utilitarians, and socialists to define human nature as essentially rational and good and to reform society so as to promote greater happiness. He rebels against science and
reason, against the entire liberal and socialist vision, and he does so
in the name of human subjectivitythe uncontainable, irrepressible, whimsical, and foolish human will. Human nature, says the