Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD), Gadong BE 1410, Brunei Darussalam
Faculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD), Gadong BE 1410, Brunei Darussalam
Sports Medicine & Research Center, Hassanal Bolkiah National Stadium, Berakas, Brunei Darussalam
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 16 March 2013
Received in revised form 21 October 2013
Accepted 15 November 2013
Available online 26 November 2013
Keywords:
Case based reasoning (CBR)
Fuzzy systems
Support vector machine
Hybrid intelligent system
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
Rehabilitation monitoring
a b s t r a c t
This study presents an integration of knowledge-based system and intelligent methods to develop a
recovery monitoring framework for post anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured/reconstructed subjects. The case based reasoning methodology has been combined with fuzzy clustering and intelligent
classication techniques in order to develop a knowledge base and a learning model for identifying
the recovery stage of ACL-reconstructed subjects and objectively monitoring the progress during the
convalescence regimen. The system records kinematics and neuromuscular signals from lower limbs of
healthy and ACL-reconstructed subjects using self adjusted non-invasive body-mounted wireless sensors. These bio-signals are synchronized and integrated, and a combined feature set is generated by
performing data transformation using wavelet decomposition and feature reduction techniques. The
knowledge base stores the subjects proles, their recovery sessions data and problem/solution pairs for
different activities monitored during the course of rehabilitation. Fuzzy clustering technique has been
employed to form the initial groups of subjects at similar stage of recovery. In order to classify the recovery stage of subjects (i.e. retrieval of similar cases), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), fuzzy
unordered rule induction algorithm (FURIA) and support vector machine (SVM) have been applied and
compared. The system has been successfully tested on a group of healthy and post-operated athletes for
analyzing their performance in two activities (ambulation at various speeds and one leg balance testing)
selected from the rehabilitation protocol. The case adaptation and retention is a semi-automatic process
requiring input from the physiotherapists and physiatrists. This intelligent framework can be utilized by
physiatrists, physiotherapists, sports trainers and clinicians for multiple purposes including maintaining
athletes prole, monitoring progress of recovery, classifying recovery status, adapting recovery protocols and predicting/comparing athletes sports performance. Further, the knowledge base can easily be
extended and enhanced for monitoring different types of sports activities.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The monitoring of recovery progress after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury/reconstruction is crucial for athletes for not only
restoring their knee joint stability for dynamic activities and successful returning to sports but also minimizing the risks of re-injury,
cartilage degeneration and early onset of osteoarthritis [16]. ACL
injury causes deterioration in the sports performance or premature
end to the career for athletes as ACL is one of the critical ligament for
control and to enable the athletes to return to pre-injury activity level. The goal based criteria (e.g. muscle strength, functional
and static knee stability, range of motion) are suggested to safe
return to sports rather than relying on some specic time period for
rehabilitation [79]. The conventional methods for post-ACL reconstruction recovery assessment test the static and dynamic knee
stability of subjects. However, the dynamic knee stability analysis
usually lacks quantiable constructs, and some subjective or partially objective evaluations and knee rating scores are performed in
order to evaluate the recovery progress of ACL reconstructed (ACLR) subjects [1015]. Moreover, physiological variations in subjects
and coopers/non-coopers phenomenon indicate that the rehabilitation process may differ for an individual or a group of subjects
[16]. Thus, in order to provide an effective cure and timely intervention during recovery process, a comprehensive rehabilitation
monitoring system is essential for ACL reconstructed (ACL-R) subjects.
Intelligent techniques have been found effective for different medical applications including medical diagnosis, pathology
classication, rehabilitation of lower limb movements after neurological disorders and implantation of articial limbs [1722].
These techniques assist clinicians in decision making process about
subjects health condition. Although, there has been number of
studies using intelligent mechanisms for assessment and classication of gait patterns for subjects having lower limb impairments
due to stroke or cerebral palsy but few efforts have been made for
gait and recovery analysis after ACL injury/reconstruction. Mostly
the assessment of injured/reconstructed subjects is still based on
the comparison of mean and peak values or some other statistics of kinematics, kinetics and neuromuscular parameters with
controlled subjects [6,2327]. Moreover, in most of the previous
studies individual parameters are observed and few efforts have
been made for developing an intelligent assistive tool for monitoring recovery of athletes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
injury and reconstruction [28,29]. In order to differentiate between
ACL intact (ACL-I) and ACL decient/injured, an intelligent classication system has been developed using adaptive neuro-fuzzy
inference (ANFIS) system based on arthrometric data [30]. This
system recognizes the normal and ACL injured subjects with high
values of sensitivity and specicity but it does not consider the
knee dynamics changes in ACL-R subjects. A classication model
to test the gait normality of ACL-R subjects has been proposed
in [28] based on principal component analysis and regression
modeling techniques. This system used 3-D rotational kinematics
and the classication results indicated the presence of abnormal
gait patterns in frontal and transversal planes for ACL-R subjects
still 1 year after surgery with an accuracy of 93.75%. Recently,
an intelligent recovery classication model has been presented
for ACL-R subjects to monitor their rehabilitation progress during different ambulation and balance testing activities [19]. This
system integrates the kinematics and neuromuscular signals and
the accuracy of the classication results is approximately 95% for
different activities monitored. Although these studies used computational intelligent techniques for differentiating the normal and
impaired human motion but post-surgical monitoring and prognosis of rehabilitation and sports performance of ACL-R subjects
are fairly complex processes because of the involvement of multiple varying factors for each subject. The restoration of normal
gait patterns does not ensure the complete recovery and return
to high level sporting activities. In addition, keeping a record of
pre- and post-surgery treatments and their effectiveness, adjustments in individuals rehabilitation protocol and all the different
experiences during convalescence is a complicated phenomenon
for physiatrists and physiotherapists. These experiences can be
used to learn and adapt the rehabilitation procedure for ACL-R
subjects having similar parameters or patterns. In order to build
129
Fig. 1. A knowledge-based intelligent framework for monitoring recovery progress and sports performance of subjects after ACL reconstruction.
behind the desired level of recuperation. Additionally, the feedback/solution from the previous cases will assist them to take the
required therapy/training measures or accelerating their ongoing
activity level.
2. A knowledge-based intelligent framework for ACL
recovery monitoring
The knowledge-based intelligent framework for monitoring
rehabilitation progress and sports performance of ACL-R subjects is
shown in Fig. 1. The components and sequential operations of the
system are elaborated in the following sections.
Velcro straps to note the knee joint movements. For recording the
EMG signals, foam snap electrodes were placed on four different
knee extensor and exor muscles including vastus medialis (VM),
vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF) on
both legs of the subjects during ambulation activities. For balance
testing activity, EMG data were also collected from gastrocnemius
medialis (GM) muscle in addition to above four muscles. SENIAM
guidelines were followed to prepare the skin for better conductance
of signals and placing the electrodes on identied position on muscles [39]. The command module and the BioRadio were worn by the
subjects using a waste belt. These acquired kinematics and neuromuscular signals were the basis to derive raw pattern set for the
formation of knowledge base as described in Section 2.2.
(t) + (t+1)
2
t
(1)
(2)
60
40
20
0
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
Time (sec)
200
100
0
100
200
1
1.5
2.5
Time (sec)
400
200
0
200
1
1.5
2.5
3
Time (sec)
Fig. 2. (a) Knee exion/extension (degrees), (b) Angular rate for thigh (rad/s) (c) Angular rate for shank (rad/s) for multiple gait cycles of an ACL intact leg.
131
60
50
40
30 Load
Response
20
Pre Swing
Terminal Stance
Mid Stance
Terminal
Swing
Mid Swing
Initial Swing
10
0
10
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.1
Time (sec)
Fig. 3. Variations in knee exion/extension during different gait phases.
found to be slow to test each subset for the prediction error for the
large the feature number of features and were unable to re-assess
the features importance as once a feature was added to the subset
it could not be removed. In this study, one of the widely used feature reduction/projection technique namely principal component
analysis (PCA) was applied to determine the best combination of
the original features to form a new and smaller feature set. PCA has
been successfully used reduce the dimension of bio-signals data set
by removing the redundancy in the data and replacing the group
of variables with a single variable while still not rejecting some of
the features completely from the data set [47,48]. PCA transformed
the original feature set of kinematics and EMG parameters f F RN
into a new feature set of variables v V RM of reduced dimension
by minimizing the mean-square error (MSE) between the original
set F and projected set V [49]. For a given set of kinematics and
EMG input vectors, fi (i = 1, . . ., n), where each fi is of dimension N
(N = 861 for ambulation and 153 for balance testing activity), PCA
linearly transformed each vector fi into new vector vi by using (3).
EMG (mV)
vi = AT fi
(3)
Cov =
(4)
i=1
These new variables, called principal components, were the linear combination of original kinematics and EMG features, which
form an orthogonal basis for the space of data. The feature projection step can only be performed after collecting and extracting
features for multiple trials from a group of healthy and ACLR subjects so that PCs covers variations in kinematics and EMG
parameters. Hence, a nal pattern set was generated based on this
method which was used as the input to develop the knowledge
based system.
2.3. Fuzzy clustering
In order to make the case selection and retrieval process more
efcient and to avoid searching the whole case repository, the
knowledge base was designed using clustered based structure. The
0.5
0
0.5
0
0.5
1.5
Sampling Rate
1
cA1 0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0.05
0
7000
4
x 10
cD1
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0.2
1
cA2 0
1
2
1
cA3 0
1
0
2.5
1
0
2
0.05
cD2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0.2
0
3500
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0.5
cD3
0
0.5
500
1000
1500
500
1000
1500
Fig. 4. EMG signal for vastus lateralis of a healthy (ACL intact) subject walking at 5 km/h analyzed by DWT with Daubechies 05 mother wavelet at 3-levels of decomposition.
um
||vi cj ||2
ij
(5)
i=1 j=1
N
um v
i=1 ij i
cj =
N
uij =
C
(6)
um
i=1 ij
1
2/m1
(7)
K
Validity =
i=1
2
/KN
vV vci v ci
2
min(ci cj )
(8)
133
n
i li =
w
i=1
i=1
wi =
n
wi li
i=1
n
n
ij (xj )
wi
(9)
(10)
j=1
large search space. The forward pass (least square method) and
backward pass (gradient descent method) are used to optimize the
consequent and premise parameters, respectively. After determining the consequent parameters, the output of ANFIS is calculated
and the premise parameters are adjusted based on output error by
using the back-propagation algorithm [57].
2.5.2. Fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm (FURIA)
FURIA is a recent classication algorithm based on the RIPPER
algorithm with certain modications and extensions [58]. It learns
the fuzzy rules having soft boundaries as compared to conventional
strict rules and provides an unordered rule set using one vs. rest
strategy such that there is no default rule. A rule stretching mechanism is used in case when a new problem is not covered by any of
the existing rules. A fuzzy rule in FURIA is obtained through replacing the RIPPERs intervals with fuzzy intervals (IF ) of the form of
trapezoidal membership functions specied with four parameters
as follows:
IF =
1
bvc
va
ba a<v<b
(11)
dv
c<v<d
d
c
else
where b and c are the lower and upper bound of the core of the fuzzy
set, respectively, and a and d are the lower and upper bound of the
support, respectively. If a fuzzy selector (Ai IiF ) covers an instance
x = (x1 , . . ., xn ) to the degree IiF (xi ) then a fuzzy rule rF involving k
selectors (Ai IiF ), i = 1, . . ., k, covers x to the degree as follows:
n
r F (x) =
IiF (xi )
(12)
i=1..k
relevant training data DTi and DTi is partitioned into positive and
negative instances. For a new query instance x, the support of this
class is dened by
sj (x) =
(j)
(13)
r (j) .CF(ri )
i
i=1...k
(j)
(j)
CF(ri ) =
(2DT /DT ) +
(j)
T
xD
(j)
T
xD
r (j) (x)
r (j) (x)
(14)
(15)
(16)
135
cases are retrieved from the identied cluster by using case density
function given in (11) [60].
3.1. Subjects
Case Density(e, C) =
3. Experimental setup
e C{e}
SMee
|C| 1
(17)
The balance test was performed for both legs of the ACL reconstructed subjects. The data were collected for multiple trials (2 trials
for ambulation activity and 4 trials for balance testing activity) for
each activity in order to take care of the variations in kinematics and
EMG parameters, and generating a large pattern set for performing
fuzzy clustering and training the classiers.
Table 1
Number of rules generated by ANFIS and FURIA classiers for different activities.
Activity\technique
ANFIS
FURIA
Walking at 4 km/h
Walking at 5 km/h
Walking at 6 km/h
Single leg balance test
8
5
7
15
4
5
3
3
may depend on individuals other physical parameters. After forming the clusters, the case generation step was performed by storing
problemsolution pairs, corresponding treatments given/followed
by the subjects and the recommendations from the physiatrists.
In order to build an efcient case retrieval model, three different classiers (ANFIS, FURIA and SVM) were trained and tested for
each activity based on the respective clustered data for healthy and
ACL-R subjects, and their performance measures were compared.
The classiers models for ANFIS and SVM were developed using
MATLAB 7.0 functions and Weka (3.7.9) was used for generating
classier models for FURIA. The cross validations of all models were
done by partitioning the data into two groups: training data (70%
of the total data) and test data (30% of the total data). The partitions for ANFIS and SVM classiers were made by using cvpartition
function from MATLAB which randomly partitions the observations
into a training set and a test set with stratication such that both
training and test sets contain approximately the same class proportions as in the clusters groups (original groups). For FURIA,
the partitioning task was implemented using Weka Experimenter
where the randomized data split option was used for training and
testing the model. The training/testing phase for all classiers was
repeated 100 times and the average values of different performance
measures were computed.
The ANFIS networks were trained for 1000 epochs and the step
size was set to an initial value of 0.01. The networks were generated using gens2 with gaussmf input membership functions. The
parameters for initial membership functions were tuned using the
training/testing of the networks and the examinations of nal (after
training) membership functions indicated that there were signicant differences in the parameters for these membership functions
for all activities. Fig. 10 shows the initial (before training) and nal
(after training) membership functions of two inputs (PCs) for walking at 5 km/h speed. Similar trends were found for other activities
also. Both ANFIS and FURIA based classiers generated the rules
after training phase and these rules (models) were saved for further validation and retrieval of cases for new problems. However,
it was found that the number of rules generated by FURIA based
classiers were, in general, much less than the rules generated by
ANFIS models for different activities which indicates the efcient
rule learning/pruning mechanism in FURIA. The number of rules
generated by ANFIS and FURIA models for four different activities
is shown in Table 1. Multi-class SVM models were also developed
for different activities using three different kernel functions namely
linear, quadratic and Radial Basis Function (RBF). The overall classication accuracies of all three types of models were more than 95%
but linear-SVM model was found more accurate in classifying the
health status of subjects as compared for quadratic- and RBF-based
SVM models (Fig. 11).
The experiments showed that only rst few PCs were enough
to achieve high classication accuracy for all three types of classiers. In general, it was found that rst 37 PCs produced that
maximum classication accuracy for all techniques for different
activities. Fig. 11 shows a comparison of overall classication accuracy of three models for different activities. ANFIS based classiers
performed better than other two models for two walking activities
(4 km/h and 5 km/h) but it poorly classied the data for balance testing activity. For walking at 6 km/h and balance testing activities,
137
50
Walking at 4 km/h
Walking at 5 km/h
Walking at 6 km/h
Single Leg Balance
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
Number of Principle Component
35
40
45
50
Fig. 6. Percentage of variance explained by rst 50 principal components for ambulation and balance testing activities.
Principal Component 3
30
20
10
10
20
20
10
0
10
20
Principal Component 2
30
40
50
60
20
10
20
10
40
30
50
60
Principal Component 1
FURIA and SVM classiers were found more effective and these
models were able to classify the data for these two activities
without any error (100% accuracy). The sensitivity, specicity and
F-measure computed for each classication model for three groups
(class 1 subjects after less than 6 months of surgery, class 2
subjects between 6 months and 1 year of surgery, class 3 healthy
subjects without ACL injury) are shown in Tables 24. The high
values of these performance measures indicate that all three types
of classiers are suitable for classifying the recovery state/health
condition of subjects after ACL reconstruction (Fig. 12).
The trained models and cases for each activity were stored and
the second data set (data from 5 new subjects with known classes)
Principal Component 3
15
10
10
25
20
15
10
5
0
Principal Component 2
5
10
15
50
40
30
20
10
Principal Component 1
Fig. 8. Clusters centers identied by FCM for walking at 5 km/h cluster 1 () cluster 2 (o) cluster 3 (+).
10
20
Principal Component 3
10
10
15
15
10
30
20
0
10
0
Principal Component 2
10
10
20
15
Principal Component 1
30
in2cluster1
in2cluster4 in2cluster2
in2cluster5 in2cluster3
Degree of membership
Degree of membership
Fig. 9. Clusters centers identied by FCM for walking at 6 km/h cluster 1 () cluster 2 (o) cluster 3 (+).
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
15
10
10
in3cluster1
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
15
10
in2cluster4in2cluster2
n2cluster5
i
in2cluster3
Degree of membership
Degree of membership
in2cluster1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
15
10
5
0
5
10
c) Input 1 After Training
15
20
in3cluster4
0.8
0
5
10
b) Input 2 Before Training
in3cluster2
in3cluster1
in3cluster2
15
in3cluster4
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
0
5
10
d) Input 2 After Training
15
Fig. 10. Membership functions for two inputs of the ANFIS network before and after training for walking activity (5 km/h).
was used for validation of the retrieval process and the framework. PCA coefcient matrices were applied on the given data,
and three classication models were used to identify the classes
and retrieve the cases from the case repository. The classication
performances of three models were compared (Fig. 13) and it was
Fig. 11. Overall classication accuracy using linear, quadratic and RBF kernel functions for SVM for different activities monitored during recovery analysis.
Activity
Class
Sensitivity (%)
Specicity (%)
F-measure (%)
Walking
4 km/h
1
2
3
99.66
98.98
100.00
99.37
99.75
100.00
99.54
99.19
100.00
Walking
5 km/h
1
2
3
99.54
95.99
100.00
97.31
99.62
100.00
98.85
97.42
100.00
Walking
6 km/h
1
2
3
99.32
100.00
100.00
100.00
99.70
99.90
99.65
99.64
99.88
Single leg
balance test
1
2
3
79.83
87.00
100.00
94.17
95.29
93.94
82.81
87.96
94.94
Class
Sensitivity (%)
Specicity (%)
F-measure (%)
Walking
4 km/h
1
2
3
96.50
94.10
98.60
97.80
98.50
100.00
96.50
91.40
99.30
Walking
5 km/h
1
2
3
98.50
96.60
100.00
97.80
98.80
100.00
98.50
96.60
100.00
Walking
6 km/h
1
2
3
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Single leg
balance test
1
2
3
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Table 4
SVM classication performance for all activities.
Activity
Class
Sensitivity (%)
Specicity (%)
F-measure (%)
Walking
4 km/h
1
2
3
98.22
100.00
100.00
100.00
98.91
100.00
99.08
99.51
100.00
Walking
5 km/h
1
2
3
89.79
100.00
100.00
100.00
93.09
100.00
94.44
97.69
100.00
Walking
6 km/h
1
2
3
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Single leg
balance test
1
2
3
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
139
Fig. 12. Overall classication accuracy using ANFIS, FURIA and SVM (linear) for
different activities monitored during recovery analysis.
Fig. 13. Overall classication accuracy for case retrieval using trained classiers
(ANFIS, FURIA and SVM) for new subjects to test the framework.
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
References
[1] G.A. Murrell, S. Maddali, L. Horovitz, S.P. Oakley, R.F. Warren, The effects of time
course after anterior cruciate ligament injury in correlation with meniscal and
cartilage loss, Am. J. Sports Med. 29 (2001) 914.
[2] B. Reider, M.A. Arcand, L.H. Diehl, K. Mroczek, A. Abulencia, C.C. Stroud, M. Palm,
J. Gilbertson, P. Staszak, Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction, Arthroscopy 19 (2003) 212.
[3] H.G. Potter, S.K. Jain, Y. Ma, B.R. Black, S. Fung, S. Lyman, Cartilage injury after
acute, isolated anterior cruciate ligament tear: immediate and longitudinal
effect with clinical/MRI follow-up, Am. J. Sports Med. 40 (2011) 276285.
[4] M. Hall, C.A. Stevermer, J.C. Gillette, Gait analysis post anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction: knee osteoarthritis perspective, Gait Posture 36 (2012) 5660.
[5] A. Jin, J. Lynch, C. Scholes, Q. Li, M. Coolican, D. Parker, Osteoarthritis following
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 94-B (2012)
125.
[6] B. Gao, N.N. Zheng, Alterations in three-dimensional joint kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-decient and -reconstructed knees during walking, Clin.
Biomech. 25 (2010) 222229.
[7] G.D. Myer, M.V. Paterno, K.R. Ford, C.E. Quatman, T.E. Hewett, Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: criteria-based progression
through the return-to-sport phase, J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 36 (2006)
385402.
[8] G.S. Roi, D. Creta, G. Nanni, M. Marcacci, S. Zaffagnini, L. Snyder-Mackler, Return
to ofcial Italian rst division soccer games within 90 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report, J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 35
(2005) 2261, discussion 6166.
[9] D. Adams, D.S. Logerstedt, A. Hunter-Giordano, M.J. Axe, L. Snyder-Mackler,
Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterionbased rehabilitation progression, J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 42 (2012)
601614.
[10] T. Shaw, L.S. Chipchase, M.T. Williams, A users guide to outcome measurement
following ACL reconstruction, Phys. Ther. Sport 5 (2004) 5767.
[11] P.P. Gogia, J.H. Braatz, S.J. Rose, B.J. Norton, Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee, Phys. Ther. 67 (1987) 192195.
[12] P.J. Miller, Assessment of joint motion, in: J.M. Rothstein (Ed.), Measurement
in Physical Therapy, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1985, pp. 103136.
[13] I. Fiebert, J. Gresley, S. Hoffman, K. Kunkel, Comparative measurements of
anterior tibial translation using the kt-1000 knee arthrometer with the leg in
neutral, internal rotation, and external rotation, J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 19
(1994) 331334.
[14] W.P. Hanten, M.B. Pace, Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of the knee joint
using a knee ligament arthrometer, Phys. Ther. 67 (1987) 357359.
[15] C.L. Highgenboten, A. Jackson, N.B. Meske, Genucom, kt-1000, and stryker knee
laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice
comparison in asymptomatic subjects, Am. J. Sports Med. 17 (1989) 743746.
[16] S.L. Di Stasi, D. Logerstedt, E.S. Gardinier, L. Snyder-Mackler, Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and
those who fail, Am. J. Sports Med. 41 (2013) 13101318.
[17] Y. Geng, L. Zhang, D. Tang, X. Zhang, G. Li, Pattern recognition based forearm
motion classication for patients with chronic hemiparesis, in: Proceeding of
the 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine
and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013.
[18] H. Joutsijoki, K. Varpa, K. Iltanen, M. Juhola, Machine learning approach to an
otoneurological classication problem, in: Proceeding of the 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
(EMBC), 2013.
[19] S. Senanayake, O.A. Malik, M. Iskandar, D. Zaheer, 3-d kinematics and neuromuscular signals integration for post ACL reconstruction recovery assessment,
in: IEEE Proceedings of 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS,
Osaka, Japan, 2013, ISBN 978-1-4577-0216-7, pp. 72217225.
[20] M. Vallejo, C.V. Isaza, J.D. Lopez, Articial neural networks as an alternative to traditional fall detection methods, in: Proceeding of the 35th Annual
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
141
[54] S. Ray, R.H. Turi, Determination of number of clusters in k-means clustering and
application in color image segmentation, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Pattern Recognition and Digital Techniques,
1999.
[55] M. Khezri, M. Jahed, A neuro-fuzzy inference system for SEMG-based identication of hand motion commands, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58 (2011) 19521960.
[56] S. Kocer, Classication of EMG signals using neuro-fuzzy system and diagnosis
of neuromuscular diseases, J. Med. Syst. 34 (2010) 321329.
[57] J.-S.R. Jang, ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Trans.
Syst. Man Cybern. 23 (1993) 665685.
[58] J. Hhn, E. Hllermeier, Furia: an algorithm for unordered fuzzy rule induction
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 19, 2009, pp. 293319, LA English.
[59] J. Shawe-Taylor, N. Cristianini, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines
and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2000.
[60] S. Shiu, S. Pal, Foundations of Soft Case-based Reasoning (Wiley Series on Intelligent Systems), Wiley-Interscience, NY, 2004.