Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Institute of Construction and Architecture, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dbravsk cesta, 9845 03 Bratislava 45, Slovak Republic
Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyova 464/118, Brno 612 00, Czech Republic
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 December 2013
Accepted 28 February 2014
Available online 6 April 2014
Keywords:
Reaction (A)
Microstructure (B)
Ca2SiO4 (D)
Ca3SiO5 (D)
Waste management (E)
a b s t r a c t
The formation of Portland clinker phases has taken place in thermodynamically non-equilibrium state between
macro-oxides CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and MgO from raw meal and P2O5 from bone meal. The paper deals with the
study of clinker minerals as solid solutions with P2O5 during the clinkerization of raw mixture containing bone
meal (BM). The ash of BM has contributed as a raw material to the formation of different clinker phases. Electron
probe microanalysis (EPMA) method was used to determine the preferential distribution of P2O5 inside calcium
silicate phases and its inuence upon C2S/C3S ratio. Basing on these results, composition of solid solution of C2S
and C3S was established.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The use of waste products as partial replacement of fossil fuels in cement manufacturing is well known. These alternative fuels are used
mainly for their caloric values and also because of the similarity between chemical composition of their ashes and raw materials or clinkers. Some alternative fuels can also be considered as alternative raw
materials. The ash as remained inorganic part of wastes after burning
process is incorporated into clinker or reacts with raw material to
form clinker minerals or their solid solutions. One of the alternative
fuels that could be considered as an alternative raw material is the
meat bone meal (MBM).
The ash of the MBM is composed mainly of P2O5 and CaO. P2O5 enters
the clinker minerals forming solid solutions. In solid solutions, the chemical composition varies while the crystal structure remains the same. Solid
solution is formed by the substitution of ions in crystal lattice by other
ions with similar ionic radius. During ionic substitution, the vacancies
can form in normally unoccupied sites. The composition of solid solutions
can be expressed by oxide or elemental analysis. According to [1], the
typical composition of alite (C3S solid solution) with a wide variety of
foreign atoms in its structure can be expressed as follows:
Na0:01 Ca2:90 Mg0:06 Fe0:03 Al0:04 Si0:95 P0:01 O5:00 :
Again, the amount of each foreign ion depends upon the amount of
the element in question in the bulk composition, but silicon and iron are
always present.
Of all phases, tetracalcium aluminoferrite has the most variable composition. In addition to its variable aluminium/iron ratio, it can take up
large amounts of foreign elements. Taylor quotes a typical composition for ferrite [1] in clinkers with higher alumina contents:
K0:01 Na0:01 Ca1:98 Mg0:17 Ti0:05 Mn0:02 Fe0:62 Al1:00 Si0:14 O5:00
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.02.010
0008-8846/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
148
Table 1
Chemical composition of used raw materials.
Composition
(wt.%)
Marl
Limestone
CaO
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
P2O5
18.88
41.80
11.90
3.82
53.67
3.65
8.84
3.20
0.69
80.91
0.20
54.14
0.82
0.01
38.03
Table 2
Adjusted basic chemical parameters.
Raw materials
Raw material
composition
(wt.%)
Characteristics
of cement
raw meal
Mineralogical
composition
(wt.%)
Marl
Limestone
BFS
Ash of BM
28.50
70.25
1.25
LSF
SM
AM
HM
C3S
C2S
C3A
C4AF
93.84
2.64
1.62
2.16
62.69
18.58
8.63
10.11
IV
Ca 2 Si NV0 2 P
The substitution of two PV atoms for two SiIV atoms causes the CaII
atom to leave its position and so the vacancy is created.
General formula of C2S solid solutions with stabilizing P2O5 follows
[12]:
Ca2x=2 V0x=2 Si1x Px O4 ; where 0:02 x0:10:
Fig. 1. Microstructure of the sample with 1.81 wt.%. P2O5 (1st series).
It follows that during the synthesis of stabilized C2S from pure C2S
and P2O5, certain amount of CaO must be released.
Stank and Sulovsk [13] found out that P enters the structure of
both calcium silicates at least partially through the so called berlinite
substitution: AlIII + PV = N 2 SiIV, where AlPO4 (the berlinite component), isostructural with quartz, substitutes SiO4 tetrahedrons.
Benarchid et al. [14] studied the inuence of chromium and phosphorus additions on the thermal decomposition of CaCO3 and the formation of the tricalcium aluminate. They showed that simultaneous
additions of chromium and phosphorus oxides up to 1.41 and
1.31 wt.%, respectively, lower the temperature decomposition of
CaCO3 and improve the burnability of the synthesized doped tricalcium
aluminate. The corresponding reduction of temperature decarbonation
was about 34 C. The same collective of authors [15] also examined the simultaneous inuence of iron and phosphorus inclusions on the CaCO3 decarbonation and the C2S formation in CaCO3SiO2 mixtures around the
molar ratio CaCO3/SiO2 = 2. In these reacting mixtures, the onset temperature of decarbonation decreased with Fe2O3 and P2O5 additions of,
respectively, less than 9.50 wt.% and 8.45 wt.%. The mineralogical
analysis of the synthesized solid solutions (Ca2 2xFexV0x)(Si1 xPx)O4
(V0: cationic vacancy of Ca2+) with 0 x 0.20 showed that at room
temperature the iron and phosphorus doped C2S is stabilized in the
, and forms for additions less than 9.50 wt.% Fe 2 O3 and
8.45 wt.% P2O5.
Another authors [16] studied the effect of combination of manganese and phosphorus elements on the formation of solid solutions, by
heterovalent substitution of corresponding ions (5/2 CaII + SiIV = N2
MnII + PV + 1/2 V0) in C3S lattice, at air atmosphere. These solid solutions were described by the following cationic vacancy formula
Table 3
The free lime content in the clinker.
Calcining temperature:
1450 C
1st series
Calcining temperature:
1450 C
2nd series
Ash of BM
(wt.%)
P2O5
(wt.%)
f-CaO
(wt.%)
Ash of BM
(wt.%)
P2O5
(wt.%)
f-CaO
(wt.%)
0
0.99
1.96
2.91
3.85
4.76
0
0.38
0.75
1.11
1.46
1.81
0.05
0.22
0.97
2.1
3.03
4.08
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
0.38
0.76
1.14
1.52
1.9
0.05
0.05
0.68
1.5
2.17
3.08
149
Table 4
EPMA line analysis of sample shown in Fig. 1.
Point
MgO
(wt.%)
Al2O3
(wt.%)
SiO2
(wt.%)
P2O5
(wt.%)
CaO
(wt.%)
Fe2O3
(wt.%)
CaO/SiO2
Solid solution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1.01
1.94
0.803
0.781
1.14
3.00
2.98
2.97
0.596
0.00274
0.00269
2.58
0.772
1.40
0.00277
1.12
0.00258
0.00218
0.502
2.02
1.04
0.749
1.00
1.02
0.00218
1.26
6.35
1.10
1.46
2.12
6.12
16.8
19.8
1.29
1.60
1.85
14.0
2.32
6.23
1.96
3.57
2.05
1.63
1.93
9.04
4.52
1.63
1.58
4.68
2.15
24.8
18.3
23.8
23.9
23.8
16.7
4.29
7.09
26.8
29.1
27.5
13.1
28.0
20.0
28.0
26.6
28.0
25.3
27.4
19.2
18.8
28.5
28.4
21.9
15.4
2.01
1.95
2.06
1.81
1.87
1.78
0.612
0.922
3.30
3.30
4.38
0.781
3.88
2.62
3.76
4.42
4.00
3.04
4.46
2.25
2.61
3.76
3.69
2.86
1.09
70.9
66.4
72.2
70.7
71.1
68.7
60.9
57.7
68.0
64.1
66.3
55.4
63.3
62.5
66.3
61.6
65.9
68.7
64.7
58.9
68.1
65.3
63.8
65.7
81.4
0.00911
5.06
0.00933
1.37
0.00911
3.78
14.4
11.5
0.0105
1.89
0.00986
14.2
1.72
7.27
0.0102
2.72
0.0106
1.35
1.02
8.52
4.98
0.0108
1.55
3.87
0.0113
2.85
3.63
3.03
2.96
2.99
4.12
14.2
8.14
2.54
2.21
2.41
4.24
2.27
3.13
2.36
2.31
2.35
2.72
2.36
3.06
3.62
2.29
2.25
3.00
5.30
C3S
C3S + C6AxFy
C3S
C3S
C3S
Grain boundary
C6AxFy
C6AxFy
C2S
C2S
C2S
Grain boundary
C2S
Grain boundary
C2S
Grain boundary
C2S
C2S + C
C2S
Grain boundary
Grain boundary
C2S
C2S
Grain boundary
Grain boundary
2. Experimental
2.1. The preparation of clinker samples
The ashes of BM, lime, marl and blast furnace slag with determined
chemical composition were used for preparation of the raw mixtures
(Table 1). Chemical analysis of starting raw materials was realized by
Table 5
EPMA line analysis of sample shown in Fig. 2.
Point
MgO
(wt.%)
Al2O3
(wt.%)
SiO2
(wt.%)
P2O5
(wt.%)
CaO
(wt.%)
Fe2O3
(wt.%)
CaO/SiO2
Solid solution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
0.562
1.42
1.39
0.878
1.32
1.38
0.755
0.735
0.610
0.912
3.17
4.02
0.00129
0.00205
0.00164
0.00241
0.00260
0.00285
0.00293
0.927
0.00250
0.00246
0.356
0.00277
1.76
4.49
5.41
1.25
0.922
1.92
1.34
1.56
1.23
1.12
12.8
19.1
0.750
1.87
0.680
1.90
1.60
2.20
2.21
2.13
2.09
1.67
1.06
1.76
24.1
20.2
20.8
22.2
24.3
20.5
21.4
23.1
23.5
21.6
14.2
4.57
0.978
4.07
8.23
25.6
27.0
29.9
28.3
29.6
25.8
26.5
22.9
27.0
1.81
1.20
1.21
2.00
2.20
1.49
2.26
1.38
1.04
1.20
1.41
0.00302
0.00193
0.00287
1.26
4.51
4.22
2.88
3.94
3.43
4.33
3.89
3.44
4.50
71.7
67.7
68.3
73.7
71.3
74.7
74.3
73.2
73.6
74.0
58.6
55.7
69.2
90.9
87.9
68.0
65.0
63.8
65.6
63.9
65.3
66.8
72.2
65.3
0.00822
4.93
2.90
0.00867
0.00976
0.0101
0.00888
0.00927
0.00899
1.18
9.80
16.5
29.1
3.16
1.91
0.0112
2.10
1.19
0.0104
0.0111
2.49
1.20
0.0116
1.52
2.97
3.35
3.29
3.32
2.94
3.64
3.47
3.17
3.13
3.43
4.12
12.2
70.8
22.3
10.7
2.65
2.41
2.14
2.32
2.16
2.53
2.52
3.15
2.42
C3S
C3S + C6AxFy
C3S + C6AxFy
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
Grain boundary
C6AxFy
C2F + C
C
C
C2S + C
C2S
C2S
C2S
C2S
C2S
C2S
C2S + C
C2S
150
Fig. 2. Microstructure of the sample with 1.81 wt.%. P2O5 (1st series).
Fig. 3. Microstructure of the sample with 1.81 wt.%. P2O5 (1st series).
151
Table 6
EPMA line analysis of sample shown in Fig. 3.
Point
MgO
(wt.%)
Al2O3
(wt.%)
SiO2
(wt.%)
P2O5
(wt.%)
CaO
(wt.%)
Fe2O3
(wt.%)
CaO/SiO2
Solid solution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
0.465
0.406
2.45
1.08
0.711
0.00159
0.00260
0.00275
0.537
0.542
0.449
0.350
0.782
0.748
1.22
1.23
0.00229
2.24
0.706
0.750
1.12
1.36
0.538
0.00251
1.90
1.91
12.8
4.23
1.71
1.59
2.05
2.50
3.73
2.29
2.19
1.98
2.40
5.45
0.00200
0.00251
1.34
9.47
6.37
0.00203
0.00187
0.695
3.25
2.16
26.9
26.8
4.98
18.3
26.7
15.5
28.0
29.2
26.6
27.8
26.2
14.8
20.6
15.7
0.00233
0.959
25.2
10.7
11.9
0.00256
0.00219
2.50
21.6
25.0
3.62
3.90
0.00249
2.03
4.42
1.28
4.71
4.56
3.92
3.55
3.23
1.54
2.41
2.26
0.00247
0.00288
3.47
0.643
1.21
0.00264
0.00223
0.00275
2.19
3.51
64.8
65.2
64.9
70.8
66.5
79.8
65.3
62.6
62.6
64.0
65.7
77.8
72.1
68.4
98.8
97.8
70.0
67.0
70.5
99.2
98.9
95.4
69.4
69.3
2.38
1.80
15.0
3.55
0.00996
1.86
0.00931
1.17
2.57
1.84
2.16
3.55
1.64
7.37
0.00757
0.00953
0.0108
9.88
9.26
0.00809
0.00754
0.00835
2.98
0.0104
2.41
2.43
13.0
3.88
2.49
5.15
2.33
2.14
2.35
2.30
2.51
5.27
3.50
4.35
42389.7
102.0
2.78
6.23
5.93
38799.3
45119.0
38.2
3.22
2.78
C2S
C2S
C6AxFy
C2S + C6AxFy
C2S
C2S + C
C2S
C2S
C2S
C2S
C2S
Grain boundary
C3S
Grain boundary
C
C
C2S + C
CxS + C6AxFy
CxS + C6AxFy
C
C
C
C3S
C2S + C
these oxides, the formulas of C2S and C3S solid solutions were calculated. For example, C3S solid solution (bolded in Table 7) formula from
line analysis shown in Fig. 6 is:
8
C2S
C3S
0
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
C2S
C3S
0
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
152
Table 7
EPMA line analysis of sample shown in Fig. 6. The values bolded were used to calculate the formula of C3S solid solutions.
Point
MgO
(wt.%)
Al2O3
(wt.%)
SiO2
(wt.%)
P2O5
(wt.%)
CaO
(wt.%)
Fe2O3
(wt.%)
CaO/SiO2
Solid solution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
0.000569
0.000861
0.982
0.613
0.00199
0.886
0.745
4.27
0.00130
0.00214
1.09
0.801
1.07
0.965
1.00
0.793
4.07
0.655
1.63
0.648
1.73
1.91
0.924
0.643
0.502
2.01
0.501
0.000794
0.404
1.07
0.881
0.721
0.995
1.40
17.7
3.69
0.00258
0.00288
1.16
1.20
0.803
0.919
2.00
14.8
3.06
8.76
1.56
6.01
8.83
1.08
1.28
0.630
3.45
4.78
0.00176
1.18
22.2
18.4
14.6
20.9
22.8
3.91
1.90
19.7
21.9
21.5
22.3
22.6
23.7
24.1
10.6
25.5
8.69
22.4
1.19
14.3
22.5
22.6
18.8
17.0
3.10
0.00186
0.00217
1.61
0.00314
0.561
1.06
0.902
0.00322
0.00263
0.862
1.59
1.93
1.50
1.84
2.36
1.87
0.824
3.21
0.00307
2.08
0.639
0.00323
1.91
1.12
1.67
1.27
0.00268
81.4
88.8
74.2
80.1
84.1
76.1
73.2
56.3
74.1
79.5
75.4
74.6
72.5
72.8
70.2
71.3
58.2
65.5
67.2
73.3
86.5
70.3
73.6
74.4
78.4
74.2
77.5
18.6
9.67
0.00936
0.0101
0.00961
0.00949
1.01
17.9
20.3
0.0101
0.00934
0.00861
1.46
1.03
1.82
0.00902
11.5
2.06
13.7
0.00818
3.92
4.59
0.00881
0.00858
0.00943
2.07
14.1
46256.0
75.5
3.34
4.36
5.75
3.64
3.21
14.4
39.0
4.05
3.44
3.47
3.26
3.22
2.96
2.96
5.49
2.57
7.73
3.27
72.8
4.90
3.28
3.29
4.16
4.35
25.0
C2F + C
C2F + C
C3S
C3S + C
C3S + C
C3S
C3S
C6AxFy
C2F + C
C3S + C
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
C3S
Grain boundary
C2S
C6AxFy
C3S
C6AxFy
Grain boundary
C3S
C3S
C3S + C
Grain boundary
C6AxFy
values of P2O5 stoichiometric coefcients in belite and alite in both series of samples shows that more PV is incorporated in the structure of
calcium silicates in the 2nd series.
4. Conclusions
Fig. 6. Microstructure of the sample with 1.81 wt.%. P2O5 (1st series).
Table 8
The formula of C2S solid solution in the 1st series of samples.
Addition of P2O5
(wt.%)
0
0.38
0.75
1.11
1.46
1.81
C1.988 0.007 M0.012 0.007 S0.97518 0.00001 A0.019 0.001 F0.005 0.002P0.00005 0.00001
C1.988 0.002 M0.012 0.002 S0.957 0.004 A0.025 0.003 F0.009 0.004 P0.009 0.001
C1.987 0.007 M0.013 0.007 S0.940 0.007 A0.029 0.005 F0.009 0.004 P0.022 0.003
C1.987 0.005 M0.013 0.005 S0.924 0.004 A0.031 0.001 F0.011 0.002 P0.034 0.002
C1.987 0.002 M0.013 0.002 S0.909 0.004 A0.035 0.003 F0.011 0.003 P0.045 0.002
C1.987 0.006 M0.013 0.006 S0.897 0.005 A0.038 0.003 F0.012 0.003 P0.053 0.001
153
Table 9
The formula of C3S solid solution in the 1st series of samples.
Addition of P2O5
(wt.%)
0
0.38
0.75
1.11
1.46
1.81
C2.966 0.009 M0.034 0.009 S0.9922 0.0008 A0.0075 0.0008 F0.000170 0.000003 P0.0000595 0.0000009
C2.95 0.01 M0.05 0.01 S0.973 0.009 A0.016 0.002 F0.007 0.002 P0.0042 0.0001
C2.959 0.008 M0.041 0.008 S0.97 0.01 A0.0161 0.0005 F0.008 0.001 P0.011 0.004
C2.962 0.008 M0.038 0.008 S0.952 0.003 A0.022 0.004 F0.0081 0.0002 P0.018 0.003
C2.955 0.003 M0.045 0.003 S0.94 0.01 A0.027 0.001 F0.010 0.001 P0.0236 0.0032
C2.949 0.002 M0.051 0.002 S0.928 0.008 A0.031 0.003 F0.011 0.004 P0.030 0.001
Table 10
The formula of C2S solid solution in the 2nd series of samples.
Addition of P2O5
(wt.%)
0
0.38
0.76
1.14
1.52
1.9
C1.988 0.007 M0.012 0.007 S0.97518 0.00001 A0.019 0.001 F0.005 0.002 P0.00005 0.00001
C1.988 0.002 M0.011 0.002 S0.936 0.005 A0.025 0.003 F0.012 0.003 P0.027 0.005
C1.982 0.007 M0.018 0.007 S0.926 0.007 A0.033 0.005 F0.013 0.003 P0.029 0.001
C1.984 0.005 M0.016 0.005 S0.911 0.001 A0.033 0.001 F0.013 0.002 P0.043 0.002
C1.97 0.02 M0.03 0.02 S0.894 0.006 A0.036 0.003 F0.014 0.004 P0.057 0.008
C1.987 0.002 M0.013 0.002 S0.886 0.004 A0.038 0.002 F0.016 0.003 P0.060 0.003
Table 11
The formula of C3S solid solution in the 2nd series of samples.
Addition of P2O5
(wt.%)
0
0.38
0.76
1.14
1.52
1.9
C2.966 0.009 M0.034 0.009 S0.9922 0.0008 A0.0075 0.0008 F0.000170 0.000003 P0.0000595 0.0000009
C2.96 0.02 M0.04 0.02 S0.95 0.01 A0.022 0.003 F0.010 0.005 P0.015 0.006
C2.964 0.009 M0.036 0.009 S0.950 0.008 A0.023 0.004 F0.011 0.003 P0.016 0.004
C2.960 0.008 M0.030 0.008 S0.94 0.01 A0.025 0.003 F0.013 0.003 P0.026 0.009
C2.945 0.003 M0.055 0.003 S0.928 0.003 A0.031 0.002 F0.014 0.005 P0.028 0.004
C2.95 0.01 M0.05 0.01 S0.91 0.01 A0.033 0.007 F0.014 0.002 P0.040 0.007
Fig. 7. The dependence of SiO2 stoichiometric coefcient in the formula of belite and alite on the content of P2O5 added to the raw meal from ash of BM.
Fig. 8. The dependence of Al2O3 stoichiometric coefcient in the formula of belite and alite on the content of P2O5 added to the raw meal from ash of BM.
154
Fig. 9. The dependence of Fe2O3 stoichiometric coefcient in the formula of belite and alite on the content of P2O5 added to the raw meal from ash of BM.
Fig. 10. The dependence of P2O5 stoichiometric coefcient in the formula of belite and alite on the content of P2O5 added to the raw meal from ash of BM.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by courtesy of the Slovak Grant Agency
(VEGA 1/0064/12) and by Project Centres for Materials Research at
FCH BUT, reg. no. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0012.
References
[1] H.F.W. Taylor, Cement Chemistry, 2nd ed. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, 1997.
[2] R.W. Nurse, The effect of phosphate on the constitution and hardening of Portland
cement, J. Appl. Chem. 2 (1952) 708716.
[3] B. Matkovich, J.F. Young, Dicalcium Silicates Doped with Phosphates, in: Finep (Ed.),
2, 8th ICCC, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1986, pp. 276281.
[4] W. Gutt, High temperature phase equilibria in the system 2CaOSiO23CaOP2O5
CaO, Nature 197 (1963) 142149.
[5] W. Gutt, Manufacture of Portland cement from phosphatic raw materials, 15th ICCC,
Tokyo, Japan, 1968. 93105.
[6] L. Halicz, Y. Nathan, L. Ben-Dor, The inuence of P2O5 on clinker reactions, Cem.
Concr. Res. 14 (1) (1984) 1118.
[7] S. Puntke, Auswirkungen des Phosphateintrages in Drehofenanlagen der
Zementindustrie auf Klinkermineralogie und Zementeigenschaften, Dissertation,
TU Clausthal, 2004.
[8] A. Diouri, A. Boukhari, J. Aride, F. Puertas, T. Vazquez, Formation d'hydroxyapatite
Ca5(PO4)3OH en milieu silicat, Mater. Constr. 45 (236) (1994) 513.
[9] A. Diouri, A. Boukhari, J. Aride, F. Puertas, T. Vazquez, Research of the lime rich
portions of the CaOSiO2P2O5 system, Mater. Constr. 45 (237) (1995) 313.
[10] A. Diouri, A. Boukhari, J. Aride, F. Puertas, T. Vazquez, Elaboration of aVL-C2S form of
belite in phosphatic clinker. Study of hydraulic activity, Mater. Constr. 48 (249)
(1998) 2332.
[11] H. Saalfeld, K.H. Klaska, The crystal structure of 6 Ca2SiO41 Ca3(PO4)2, Z. Kristallogr.
Cryst. Mater. 155 (12) (1981) 6573.
[12] K. Fukuda, H. Taguchi, T. Fukuda, Effect of substituent ions on martensitic transformation temperatures in dicalcium silicate solid solutions, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85 (7)
(2002) 18041806.
[13] T. Stank, P. Sulovsk, The inuence of phosphorous pentoxide on the phase composition and formation of Portland clinker, Mater. Charact. 60 (2009) 749755.
[14] My.Y. Benarchid, A. Diouri, A. Boukhari, J. Aride, R. Castanet, J. Rogez, Thermal study
of chromiumphosphorus-doped tricalcium aluminate, Cem. Concr. Res. 31 (2001)
449454.
[15] My.Y. Benarchid, A. Diouri, A. Boukhari, J. Aride, J. Rogez, R. Castanet, Elaboration and
thermal study of ironphosphorus-substituted dicalcium silicate phase, Cem. Concr.
Res. 34 (2004) 18731879.
[16] A. Diouri, A. Boukhari, J. Aride, F. Puertas, T. Vazquez, Stable Ca3SiO5 solid solution
containing manganese and phosphorus, Cem. Concr. Res. 27 (1997) 12031212.
[17] T. Ifka, M.T. Palou, Z. Bazelov, The inuence of CaO and P2O5 of bone ash upon the
reactivity and the burnability of cement raw mixtures, Ceram. Silik 56 (1) (2012)
7684.
[18] M.P. Javellana, I. Jawed, Extraction of free lime in portland cement and clinker by
ethylene glycol, Cem. Concr. Res. 12 (3) (1982) 399403.
[19] M. Zhao, Quantitative control of C2S crystal transformation, Appl. Mech. Mater.
121126 (2012) 311315