Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
-versus-
COMMENT/OBJECTIONS
PURPOSE
against him.
The Accused admits the existence of said
resolution by the Public Prosecutor The
Dormouse.
However, the Accused objects as to the
said document.
The Accused however objects to the
veracity and the truthfulness of the
averments of this Affidavit.
Furthermore, P01 Queen O. Hearts was
not presented during trial hence there is
a question as to the due execution of her
Exhibit M
MAD HATTER.
The Accused objects to the purpose for
which it is offered.
The photographs in the document were
not clear nor were they presented during
the trial.
There was no clear showing that an
inventory was conducted hence the
proof that the police officers followed the
standard operating procedure is
Exhibit N
wanting.
The Accused objects to the purpose for
which it is being offered and the seized
items subject of this document.
The Accused was never made to identify
the alleged seized items as contained in
the document hence there is an
irregularity with regard to the ownership
of these alleged seized items. There is no
clear showing that the items seized were
that of the Accused. In addition, these
Exhibit P
turnover of evidence.
The Accused objects to the purpose for
which this document is being offered.
In their Joint Affidavit of Attestation
(Exhibit D, D-1, D-2, D-2-a,
D-2-b, and D-3 for the
Prosecution) , the Police Officers
mentioned that the Urine Test was
conducted at the Ospital ng Makati.
However, the examination results was
issued by the Makati City Police Station
particularly by Forensic Chemist White
Rabbit when in open court, she has only
limited here participation in the case as
to the identification that indeed what is
Officials.
The Accused objects for the purpose for
which this document is being offered.
There is no clear showing that the
Accused consented to this examination
nor was this test conducted with the
Enforcement Agency.
The Accused objects to the purpose for
which this document is being offered
because of its inadmissibility.
The Accused was not assisted by his
counsel when such document was
executed. There is also no clear showing
that any information elicited by the
Police Officers from the Accused was
Exhibit V
Exhibit W
document.
The Accused admits and stipulates that
he is currently detained at the Makati
Exhibit X and Y
City Jail.
The Accused objects to the purpose and
the identity of the sachets.
There is no clear showing that these
sachets were truly seized from the
Accused. The Accused disputes the
veracity as to the origins of these
substances. The Accused was first
shown these substances only after he
Exhibit Z
RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Accused most respectfully prays to this Honorable Court that the
foregoing object and documentary exhibits mentioned above be denied admission for
the reasons above stated. The Accused further prays for such other relief as may be
just and equitable under the premises.
MAKATI CITY
August 7, 2015
Respectfully Submitted,
Counsel for the Accused JOHNNY DEPP y CHRISTOPHER
CHARLES LUDWIG DOGSON LAW
CEU BUILDING,
2nd Floor Left Wing, Room 259
Sen. Gil Puyat Avenue
Makati City