Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CADD environments often involve more than just shapes. As in the manual
drafting of technical and engineering drawings, the output of CAD must convey
Information, such as materials, processes, dimensions, and tolerances, according
to application-specific conventions.
Higher Productivity
Reduced Design Time
More Accurate Designs
Less Time Required for Modifications
Repeatability
Precise
3D detailed drawing
Computerized model to scale
Test without having to produce it
Drawings are device independent
You can resize easily by using calculation
More economical and efficient
Smaller files than bitmapped images
Easier to see the characteristics
You can see the image in animation so you can get the feeling
of it without having to build it the advantages are that fast
smooth quick works fine.
Optical
Cad/cam
Cad laser cutting
CAD
fabric
machine
cutter
One of the system's important strengths is its ease of use. You will
appreciate the professional, familiar tools the software provides.
Functions, data, and process-enabled steps are easily identifiable
through the friendly and intuitive interface. "Smart" information about
the piece and its relationship to other pieces, styles and markers is
readily available through powerful underlying data-storage
capabilities. cad.assyst detects user errors early, preventing loss of
time and profit.
With the cad.assyst quality control features, you can use any
measurement function while using other modification functions to
calculate measurements easily and quickly. Powerful features like
pattern mirroring streamline the development process.
10
11
intension is
problems
Production section of the
12
To reduce workers
13
Figure
Universal Drafting Machine
14
Figure
Creating an Aircraft Master Layout
by
Americans were first who begging automate processes in light industry. They
create automate cutting device (ACD) for cutting material flooring by special
knife over the ordered program without previous marking. The path to wide
15
spread using was not very easy. The developers over 5 years persuade
entertainments of light industry in effectiveness of their method. Once they
persuaded automobile entertainment to try cutting device to cut material for
car seat covers. Results surpassed all expectations. After this case some
entertainments in garment industry start to use cutting device. Very important
that many present-day CAD Systems very similar to American system Gerber.
In USSR the first CAD System for light industry was jointly developed by
specialist of Department mathematical and optimal projecting of Institute
machine-building problem in Ukraine Academy of Science and Research and
developing bureau of automated control systems for textile and light industry
in Moscow. The system was developed on the base of ARM SM-4.
Specialist of Institute machine-building problem developed software for
projecting markers.
Specialists of Research and developing bureau developed Automate Cutting
Device (ACD) for cutting by laser beam.
In 1988 year software was demonstrated at Federal Exhibition Center in
Moscow. CAD System was regarded by Gold medal because of realized
program of automatically projecting marker surpass all well-known CAD
System in the world.
This software serves the necessary need but didnt become wide spread
because of using ARM SM-4 which were only 2 units in USSR for light industry.
A wide developing of CAD Systems starts in 1990 years with spreading of IMB
PC computers.
16
was promptly taken back into the developing stage.[citation needed] CAM
software would output code for the least capable machine, as each machine
tool control added on to the standard G-code set for increased flexibility. In
some cases, such as improperly set up CAM software or specific tools, the CNC
machine required manual editing before the program will run properly. None
of these issues were so insurmountable that a thoughtful engineer or skilled
machine operator could not overcome for prototyping or small production
runs; G-Code is a simple language. In high production or high precision shops, a
different set of problems were encountered where an experienced CNC
machinist must both hand-code programs and run CAM software.
CAD had its origins in three separate sources, which also serve to highlight the
basic operations that CAD systems provide. The first source of CAD resulted
from attempts to automate the drafting process. These developments were
pioneered by the General Motors Research Laboratories in the early
s.
between CAD and CAM. One of the most important trends in CAD/CAM
technologies is the ever-tighter integration between the design and
manufacturing stages of CAD/CAM-based production processes.
The development of CAD and CAM and particularly the linkage between the
two overcame traditional NC shortcomings in expense, ease of use, and speed
by enabling the design and manufacture of a part to be undertaken using the
same system of encoding geometrical data. This innovation greatly shortened
17
the period between design and manufacture and greatly expanded the scope
of production processes for which automated machinery could be
economically used. Just as important, CAD/CAM gave the designer much more
direct control over the production process, creating the possibility of
completely integrated design and manufacturing processes.
The rapid growth in the use of CAD/CAM technologies after the early
was made possible by the development of mass-produced silicon chips and the
microprocessor, resulting in more readily affordable computers. As the price of
computers continued to decline and their processing power improved, the use
of CAD/CAM broadened from large firms using large-scale mass production
techniques to firms of all sizes. The scope of operations to which CAD/CAM
was applied broadened as well. In addition to parts-shaping by traditional
machine tool processes such as stamping, drilling, milling, and grinding,
CAD/CAM has come to be used by firms involved in producing consumer
electronics, electronic components, molded plastics, and a host of other
products. Computers are also used to control a number of manufacturing
processes (such as chemical processing) that are not strictly defined as CAM
because the control data are not based on geometrical parameters.
Using CAD, it is possible to simulate in three dimensions the movement of a
part through a production process. This process can simulate feed rates, angles
and speeds of machine tools, the position of part-holding clamps, as well as
range and other constraints limiting the operations of a machine. The
continuing development of the simulation of various manufacturing processes
is one of the key means by which CAD and CAM systems are becoming
increasingly integrated. CAD/CAM systems also facilitate communication
among those involved in design, manufacturing, and other processes. This is of
18
19
Numbe
r
Stages
Procedures
of stage
1.
A. Measurement check
B. Checking of face to face sewing
places
correction
C. Main size pattern correction
A. Production gathering allowances
Putting necessary
allowances on
3.
B. Shrinkage allowances
patterns
C. Seam allowances
4.
20
A. Measurement check
5.
6.
Arrangements prior to
marker making
E. Transferring patterns on
transparent papers to
cardboard
F. Checking the patterns on
cardboard
G. Correcting the patterns on
cardboard
H. Cutting the patterns on
cardboard
7.
21
Marker plotting
B. Rib marker plotting
Table 2. Stages and procedures for the CAD system working method.
Numbe
r
Stages
Procedures
of stage
1.
2.
A. Measurement check
B. Checking of face to face sewing
places
correction
C. Main size pattern correction
A. Production gathering allowances
Putting necessary
allowances on
3.
patterns
B. Shrinkage allowances
22
C. Seam allowances
4.
A. Measurement check
5.
6.
Arrangements prior to
marker making
7.
8.
Marker plotting
The research was carried out in two directions: In the first direction,
the manual method was compared with the CAD method to
investigate the effects of model complexity. The course steps and
procedures for the model chosen were applied both manually and by
the CAD method. The course steps and procedures for the manual
23
method were realized by the author. Those for the CAD method
were realized by an expert CAD system operator.
During the studies carried out in the second direction, the aim was to
com-pare the manual method with the CAD method separately for
each stage value and the total values. At this point only the Model was handled and related stages and procedures were conducted
times by
technicians, and
times by
24
Stages and procedures for the CAD working method are shown in
Table
Similar losses are also observed in the apparel sector. The share of
raw materials and accessories, which are the main items of the
apparel industry, reaches
25
suffered in the apparel industry are pieces called waste and surplus
fabric, and they often do not have any definite commercial value
Therefore, the effects of the CAD system on the cost of fabric, which
has the greatest share within the total product cost, were also
included into the scope of the research.
For this reason, after the completion of all kinds of work related to
patterns, markers were prepared both manually
Figure
Figure
26
The material for this study consists of garment models, patterns, transparent
pattern papers, cardboards, CAD systems, a chronometer and fabrics.
Sr.#
Nomenclature of Equipment/Tools
Quantity
25
Plotters
01
Digitizers
02
Scales
25
Inches tapes
25
scissors
12
Cutting tables
06
Set squares
12
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Manual
and
37
38
geometric shapes such as boxes and cones) and combine those using
Boolean operations. In 1982, Autodesk made CAD/CAM history
when it released the first version of AutoCAD, which soon became
the premiere software platform for automobile design.
At times, the history of CAD/CAM seems like the plot of a spy novel.
In 1984, a Hungarian scientist named Gabor Bajor, succeeded in
smuggling two Macintosh computers into his Communist-controlled
homeland. With the intent of writing a 3D CAD program, Bajor and
his teenage assistant used the illegal computers to create just that
program, and started the Graphsoft Company. In 1985, Diehl
Graphsoft introduced MiniCAD to the market, which would be
considered the industry standard for CAD on the Mac. The same year
Autodesk unveiled AutoCAD 2.1. Complete with 3D capabilities,
AutoCAD 2.1 was another breakthrough that transformed design in
the auto industry. In the late 80's and early 90's, CAD/CAM giant
Unigraphics took its place as a major industry player by partnering
with industry powerhouses such as General Motors, UNIX, GE and
Boeing.
During the early 1990s, Unigraphics introduced hybrid modeling,
which featured both traditional modeling and advanced parametric
techniques. By the end of 1994, over one million units of AutoCAD
had been sold, and by the end of 1995, there were about 350,000 users
of generic CAD/CAM reported worldwide.
In 1996, General Motors signed the largest contract in CAD/CAM's
history by selecting Unigraphics as its sole vendor for vehicle
development software. Soon afterwards, Unigraphics would once
again transform the medium by releasing CAD/CAM software that
allowed for the definition, control and evaluation of product
templates.
Another major advance in CAD/CAM occurred IN 1999 when
Think3, a "Johnny-come-lately" to the world of CAD/CAM,
introduced the first mechanical design software that could fully
combine the power of parametric solids, advanced surfacing,
wireframe and two-dimensional drafting on the desktop in one
environment. Subsequently, a plethora of software vendors has
39
One thing that can be said with a degree of certainty is that research
and development are currently ahead of user demand. When, and if,
the garden-variety CAD/CAM user decides that they need to expand
their range of capabilities, they will find a world of cutting-edge
CAD/CAM tools at their disposal.
41
MANUAL SYSTEM
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
NEW PATTERN
CREATION
GRADING
MARKER
PLANNING
SKETCH
PREPARATION
CAD SYSTEM
20
15
10
Series 1
5
0
NEW PATTERN
CREATION
GRADING
MARKER PLANNING
SKETCH
PREPARATION
42
Series 2
400
200
0
TOTAL LENGTH OF FABRIC IN METERS
NO Of SHIRT
Series 1
400
200
0
TOTAL LENGTH OF FABRICS IN
METERS
NO . OF SHIRTS
43
16400
16200
Column2
16000
Column3
Column4
15800
Column5
15600
Column6
Column7
15400
Column8
15200
15000
NO OF SHIRTS PER DAY
44
4300
4200
4100
Series 1
4000
Series 2
Series 3
3900
Series 4
Series 5
3800
Series 6
3700
Series 7
3600
3500
NO OF SHIRTS PER DAY
Markers
quantity per
day
per
day
per
day
per
day -->>
per month
45
per
day
per
day
per
day -->>
per month
omparing of
fabric
consumption:
marker
nested
manually
,
m
,
m
automatically ,
by IMM
m
Fabric
savings on
layer
,
m
Fabric
savings on
layers
,
m
, m
,
m
,
m
,
m
,
m
, m
,
m
, m
Comparing of
labor time:
marker
nested
manually
min.
h
min.
automatically
by IMM
min..
min
Time
savings
min.
min. ~
h
min.
min.
4 min.
40 min.
h=
~ days
14
min.
min.
h=
~ days
46
Money
savings
per each
month:
m*$
m+
h*$
h=
m*$
$
Marker Efficiency:
Calculation of marker efficiency is explained below with formula.
General formula using area,
47
m+
h*$
h=
48
Time savings
marker nested manually
Automatically by IMM
min.
min.
49
Time savings
50
To survive in the global market we have to keep in pace with the adventures of
modern generation which demands for Flexible, Dynamic &Versatile
techniques. CAD plays a vital role in textile designing as well as fabric
51
The increase in the number and the complexity of the models and the decrease
in production time have boosted demands for automatic grading of garment
patterns. Automatic preparation of garment pat-terns using body
measurements obtained from body scanning, and furnishing them with fabric
and production characteristics, will greatly contribute to the dynamic structure
of the apparel sector. Body scanning provides multi-dimensional data that has
the potential to provide new insights into sizing and grading systems. However,
for body scanning to support automated garment development, automatic
integration of measurement data into commercially available CAD/CAM
software must be achieved first.
52
Using the CAD system during marker making as efficiently as in other steps
naturally requires the determination of certain standards concerning marker
making. Moreover, improving automatic marker making programmes and
preparing markers using these programmes followed by necessary corrections
will make it possible for the CAD systems to be profitable during these steps as
well. Until this objective is realised, some solutions can be offered;
The technician who makes the marker plan and corrections must learn
the CAD system.
Marker makers who prepare the marker plan according to their previous
experience are urged to cooperate and work together with the CAD operator
in charge.
The root of the matter lies not only in the selection of the proper CAD system
according to the type of the firm and the product, but also in the training of
the operators to carry out their functions in the fastest and the most efficient
way, and to improve the work standards within the company. Unpredicted
problems or results encountered in this research could therefore be attributed
to lack of training.
53
The in-service training programmes of the CAD system companies often fall
short of being adequate, because the trainers are not knowledgeable enough
to provide training on pattern making and apparel production; the trainees do
not have the proper background; they are not technically equipped to function
efficiently within the CAD system. Consequently, they fail to reach expected
efficiency targets in using the CAD system. For a lasting solution to this
problem, it is recommended that the cooperation between the universities and
the industrial organizations be promoted in the short term. As a long-term
solution, however, it is essential that comprehensive and relevant training
programmes be developed, especially at the college level, and that the
technicians completing these programmes should be employed in the apparel
industry
54