Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
*********************************************************
This section of the Journal offers readers an opportunity to exchange interesting mathematical
problems and solutions. Please send them to Ted Eisenberg, Department of Mathematics,
Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel or fax to: 972-86-477-648. Questions concerning
proposals and/or solutions can be sent e-mail to <eisenbt@013.net>. Solutions to previously
stated problems can be seen at <http://www.ssma.org/publications>.
In =
0
arctan x
dx.
(1 + x2 )n
Prove that
X
In
(a)
= (2);
n
n=1
Z
1
arctan x ln 1 + 2 dx = (2).
(b)
x
0
Solutions
AB = 1 + 32
BC = 6 + 4 2 and
CD = 14 + 12 2.
Find side AD so that the area of the quadrilateral is maximum.
Solution 1 by Bruno Salgueiro Fanego, Viveiro, Spain
In the published solution to part (b) of problem 787 Journal Crux Mathematicorum,
1984, 10(2), 56 58, it is proved that given three sides AB, BC, and CD, the area of the
quadrilateral ABCD is maximum if, and only if, the length of the fourth side, AD is the
diameter of the circle passing through B and C, and a root of the polynomial
2
2
2
x3 AB + BC + CD 2AB BC CD = 0. That is
p
(s a)(s b)(s c)(s d) where s = (a + b + c + d )/2.
2
So if a = 1 + 3 2, b = 6 + 4 2, and c = 14 + 12 2 then
16A2 = d 9 + 13 2 d 19 + 11 2 d + 21 5 2 d 7 + 19 2 .
This is a polynomial of degree four whose extremal points are located at the zeros of its
derivative. Brute force shows that the extremal points are
d1 = 7 + 5 2 > 0,
p
7 5 2 + 1987 1338 2
d2 =
< 0,
2
p
7 5 2 1987 1338 2
< 0.
d3 =
2
So AD = d1 = 7 + 5 2
References: (1) Thomas, Peter, Maximizing the Area of a Quadrilateral, The College
Mathematics Journal, Vol 34. No 4 (September 2003), pp. 315-316.
Solution 3 by Kee-Wai Lau, Hong Kong, China
s AB s BC s AB s AD ,
so that 162 f (x), where
f (7 + 5 2)
= 14 137 + 106 2.
4
It can also be
checked readily
that the area of thequadrilateral with
sides
AB = 1 + 3 2, BC = 6 + 4 2, CD = 14 + 12 2, AD = 7 + 5 2,
r
q
|y z| |z x| |x y|
,
,
|x|
|y|
|z|
,
(1)
|y z| |z x| |x y|
,
,
is less than equal to
|x|
|y|
|z|
1.
Suppose, on the contrary, that all of them are greater than 1. From
|y z|
> 1, we
|x|
obtain
y z)2 > x2 , or (x + y z )(x y + z ) < 0.
Similarly from
(2)
|z x|
|x y|
> 1, and
> 1, we obtain respectively
|y|
|x|
(x y z)(x + y z) > 0,
(3)
(x y z)(x y + z) > 0.
(4)
and
Multiplying (2), (3) and (4) together. we obtain
(x + y z)2 (x y + z)2 (x y z)2 < 0,
which is false. Thus (1) holds. Since F (2, 1, 1) = 1, we see that the maximum value of
F (x, y, z) is 1 indeed.
Solution 2 by Albert Stadler, Herrliberg, Switzerland
We claim that the maximum value equals 1.
x+2 x+1 1
Let x > 0. Then F (x, x + 1, 1) = min
,
,
= 1.
x
x+1 1
So the maximum value is 1.
Suppose the maximum value is > 1. Then there is a triple (x, y, z) with
|y z| > |x|, |z x| > |y|, |x y| > |z|.
(1)
which is a contradiction.
Assume next that x z y. Then (1) reads as
y z > |x|, z x > |y|, y x > |z|. So y x = (y z) + (z x) > |x| + |y| y x,
which is a contradiction.
This concludes the proof.
Solution 3 by Paolo Perfetti, Department of Mathematics, Tor Vergata
Unversity, Rome Italy
Answer: 1
The symmetry of F (x, y, z) allows us to set z y x. We have two cases:
1) 0 < z y x and
2) z < 0, 0 < y x.
Moreover, by observing that F (x, y, z) = F (x, y, z), the case z y < 0, x > 0
is recovered by the case 2) simply changing sign to all the signs and the same happens
if z y x < 0.
Now we study the case 1)
|y z|
|x z|
yz
xz
|x|
|y|
x
y
z x + y
|x|
|z|
x
z
yx + yz x2 + z 2
= 1 < 1.
x
y
y
The value 1 is not attained because z 6= 0.
1.2) 0 < z y x and yx + yz > x2 + z 2 . In this case we must find the maximum of the
xy
function
. We have
z
xy
yz
yz
z
<
= 1 < 1.
z
x
y
y
Now we study case 2)
F (x, y, z) = min
and
yz xz xy
,
,
x
y
z
yz
xz
x
y
z x + y
x
z
This generates two subcases.
y x + z.
2.1) z < 0, 0 < y < x, y x + z. In this case we must find the maximum of
yz
x
= 1.
x
x
The maximum achieved.
2.2) z < 0, 0 < y < x, y > x + z. In this case we must find the maximum of
xy
xy
= 1.
z
xy
The maximum achieved.
Also solved by Jerry Chu, (student at Saint Georges School), Spokane, WA;
Ethan Gegner, (student, Taylor University), Upland, IN, and the proposer.
5339: Proposed by D.M. B
atinetu-Giurgiu, Matei Basarab National College,
Bucharest, Romania and Neculai Stanciu George Emil Palade School, Buz
au,
Romania
Z /2
3 sin x + 4 cos x
Calculate:
dx.
3 cos x + 4 sin x
0
Solution 1 by Haroun Meghaichi (student, University of Science and
Technology Houari Boumediene), Algeria
Consider the general case for a, b > 0 :
Z /2
a sin x + b cos x
I(a, b) =
dx,
b sin x + a cos x
0
Note that the derivative of the denominator (with respect to x) is b cos x a sin x, and
{b sin x + a cos x, b cos x a sin x} form a base on R[cos x, sin x], then there are , R
such that
a sin x + b cos x
xR
b a b = a b + a = 0.
We can easily solve the system to get (, ) =
I(a, b) =
1
2
a + b2
2ab b2 a2
,
, then
a2 + b2 a2 + b2
/2
2ab + (b2 a2 )
b cos x a sin x
dx
b sin x + a cos x
/2
1
2
2
2abx + (b a ) ln |a cos x + b sin x|
a2 + b2
0
1
2
a + b2
b
2
2
ab + (b a ) ln
.
a
1
The proposed integral equals I(4, 3) = I(3, 4) =
25
4
12 + 7 ln
.
3
sin2
u =
cos2
1 cos x
1 + cos x
and hence,
cos x =
1 u2
.
1 + u2
(1)
x
2
sin x
,
1 + cos x
we get
sin x =
2u
.
1 + u2
(2)
Finally,
du = sec2
x 1
x i
1h
1 + u2
dx =
1 + tan2
dx =
dx,
2
2
2
2
2
i. e.,
2
du.
1 + u2
Since u = 0 when x = 0 and u = 1 when x = , (1), (2), and (3) yield (upon
2
simplification)
dx =
Z
0
3 sin x + 4 cos x
dx = 4
3 cos x + 4 sin x
=4
0
2u2 3u 2
du
8u 3) (1 + u2 )
2u2 3u 2
du.
(3u + 1) (u 3) (1 + u2 )
(3u2
(3)
(4)
2
2
2
(3u + 1) (u 3) (1 + u )
25 1 + u
50 1 + u
100 3u + 1
7
1
+
100 u 3
imply that
Z
2
3 sin x + 4 cos x
dx = 4
3 cos x + 4 sin x
2u2 3u 2
du
(3u + 1) (u 3) (1 + u2 )
1
1
1
48
7
7
1
2
=
tan u
ln 1 + u
+
ln |3u + 1|
25
25
25
0
0
0
1
7
ln |u 3|
+
25
0
=
12
7
7
7
7
ln 2 +
ln 4 +
ln 2
ln 3
25
25
25
25
25
12
7
=
+
ln
25
25
4
3
1
(12 + 7 log(4/3)).
25
Define
Z
/2
3 sin x + 4 cos x
dx
3 cos x + 4 sin x
/2
sin x
dx
3 cos x + 4 sin x
/2
cos x
dx.
3 cos x + 4 sin x
I =
0
Z
A =
0
Z
B =
0
Then
I = 3A + 4B
/2
3 cos x + 4 sin x
dx =
3 cos x + 4 sin x
2
/2
3 sin x + 4 cos x
dx =
3 cos x + 4 sin x
I +AB =
0
Z
I 6A =
0
Z
3
1
du = log(4/3)
u
1
(12 + 7 log(4/3)) .
25
Since
Z
0
/2
3 sin x + 4 cos x
dx =
3 cos x + 4 sin x
/2
1
(24x + 7 ln(3 + 4())
25
0
1
1
(12x + 7 ln(3 0 + 4 1))
(24 0 + 7 ln(31 + 4 0)
25
25
12
7
+
ln
25
25
4
.
3
/2
f (x)
dx =
g(x)
/2
A
g 0 (x)
g(x)
+ B dx
/2
A ln(g(x)) + Bx]0
4
= A ln
+B
3
2
4
7
12
ln
.
=
+
25
3
25
9
Solution 1 by Angel
Plaza, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Changing variables by letting s a = x, s b = y and s c = z the proposed inequality
is equivalent to the following one, for x, y and z positive real numbers:
X
y 2
x 2
+ 1+
24.
1+
z
z
cyclic
X
1+
cyclic
= 1+
x
y
+ 1+
z
z
6
X y x
+
z
z
cyclic
s Y6
y x
1+ 6
z z
cyclic
= 2
10
from where the result follows, with equality if and only if x = y = z, that is if a = b = c.
Solution 2 by Nikos Kalapodis, Patras, Greece
a + b + c = 2s = a2 = (s b + s c)2 .
Using the well-known inequality (x + u)2 4xy for x = s b and y = s c we have
(s b + s c)2 4(s b)(s c), i.e.,
a2 4(s b)(s c)
(1)
Similarly we obtain,
b2 4(s c)(s a)
(2)
(3)
Applying the well known inequality x2 + y 2 2xy, to (1), (2), and (3) we have
a2 + b2
b2 + c2
c2 + a2
+
+
=
(s c)2 (s a)2 (s b)2
"
a
sb
2
+
a
sc
2 #
"
+
b
sc
2
+
b
sa
2 #
+
c 2
+
(s a)
2a2
2b2
2c2
+
+
2(4 + 4 + 4) = 24.
(s b)(s c) (s c)(s a) (s a)(s b)
X a2 + b2
P a2 + b2
24
2
2 6.
cyc (s c)
cyc (a + b c)
Since a2 a2 (b c)2
a2
c+ab
a+bc
and
b2
b+ca
a+bc
then by AM-GM Inequality we have
r
Xc+ab
P
a2
c+ab a+bc b+ca
33
=3
2
a+bc
a+bc b+ca c+ab
cyc (a + b c)
cyc
b2 b2 (c a)2
and
P
r
Xb+ca
b2
b+ca c+ab a+bc
33
= 3.
2
a+bc
a+bc b+ca c+ab
cyc (a + b c)
cyc
Thus,
a2 + b2
2 6.
cyc (a + b c)
P
11
c
(s b)2
Solution 4 by D.M. B
atinetu-Giurgiu, Bucharest, Romania
We shall prove that
xam + ybm xbm + ycm xcm + yam
+
+
3 xy 2m+1 , where m, x , y > 0.
(s c)m
(s a)m
(s b)m
Proof: We denote the area of the triangle by F , its circumradius by R and its inradius
by r.
By the AM-GM
inequality and taking into account that
p
F = sr = s(s a)(s b)(s c) we have that
X xam + ybm
2 xy
m
(s c)
cyclic
m
ab
X
cyclic
(s c)m
v
m
u
uY
ab
u
3
2 xy 3 t
(s c)m
cyclic
s
= 6 xy
= 6 xy
= 6 xy
= 6 xy
= 6 xy
= 6 xy
abc
(s a)(s b)(s c)
m
(4RF )m sm
(s(s a)(s b)(s c))m
4m Rm F m sm
F 2m
4m Rm sm
Fm
4m Rm sm
sm rm
4m
Euler(R2r)
m
R
r
3
6 xy 4m 2m
3
3
= 6 xy 23m = 6 xy 23m = 3 xy2m+1
If we take m = 2 we obtain a solution to problem 5340.
Solution 5 by Paul M. Harms, North Newton, KS
12
If x > 0, then using calculus we can show that the minimum value of both expressions
x + 1
x
1
x2 +
x2
is 2 and occurs at x = 1. I will use several substitutions to get the left side of the
problem inequality into a form easier to use.
c
First let t > 0 and r > 0 such that a = rc and b = tc. Then s = (r + t + 1) and the left
2
side of the problem inequality is
r2 + t2
t2 + 1
r2 + 1
+
+
.
t+r1 2
tr+1 2
rt+1 2
2
2
2
2H = r + t 1,
Now let 2L = t r + 1
2K = r t + 1.
r = H + K
Then t = H + L
L=1K
K
H
+
H
K
+2
L
H
+
H
L
+2
H
K
2
+
K
H
2 !
+
L
H
2
+
H
L
H
K
2
H
1
+2 +1+ 2
K
K
2 !
+4+
1
1
2
Each of the brackets in the last expression has the form x +
or x + 2 so the
x
x
minimum value of each bracket is 2. Then the left side of the original problem inequality
1
1
is greater than or equal to 2(2) + 2(2) + 2 + 2 + 4 + 2 + 2 . If we can show that this
K
L
expression is greater than or equal 24, the original inequality is correct.
1
1
We must show that 2 + 2 is at least 8. Since K and L are positive numbers such
K
L
2
2
that L = 1 K, the derivative of the two terms is 3 3 (1). Letting the derivative
K
L
1
1
1
equal to zero, we obtain K = L = . The value of 8 is clearly a minimium for 2 + 2 .
2
K
L
Thus the problem inequality is correct.
Solution 6 by Henry Ricardo, New York Math Circle, NY
13
1
1
+ 2.
2
K
L
1/3
(2ab)(2bc)(2ac)
3
[(b + c a)(a + c b)(a + b c)]2 /64
1/3
8a2 b2 c2
3
= 24.
(abc)2 /64
1/3
Also solved by Dionne Bailey, Elsie Campbell, and Charles Diminnie, Angelo
State University, San Angelo, TX; D. M.Btinetu-Giurgiu, Bucharest,
Romania; Bruno Salgueiro Fanego, Viveiro, Spain; Ethan Gegner (student,
Taylor University), Upland, IN; Ed Gray, Highland Beach, FL; Nikos
Kalapodis (two additional solutions to #2 above), Patras, Greece; Kee-Wai
Lau, Hong Kong, China; Haroun Meghaichi (student, University of Science
and Technology Houari Boumediene), Algeria; Albert Stadler, Herrliberg,
Switzerland; Nicusor Zlota, Traian Vuia Technical College, Focsani,
Romania; Titu Zvonaru and Neculai Stanciu, Romania, and the proposer.
5341: Proposed by Jose Luis Daz-Barrero, Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain
Let z1 , z2 , , zn , and w1 , w2 , , wn be sequences of complex numbers. Prove that
!
n
n
n
X
X
3
3n2 + 6n + 1 X
Re
z k wk
|zk |2 +
|wk |2 .
(n + 1)(n + 2)
20
k=1
k=1
k=1
n
X
k=1
!
z k wk
n
n
X
X
z k wk
|zk | |wk |
k=1
k=1
n
(n + 1)(n + 2)w
X
6z
k
k
=
p
(n + 1)(n + 2)
6
k=1
2 p
2
n
X
(n
+
1)(n
+
2)w
1
6zk
k
p
+
(n + 1)(n + 2)
2
6
k=1
X
3
(n + 1)(n + 2) X
|zk |2 +
|wk |2 .
(n + 1)(n + 2)
12
14
k=1
k=1
Since
(n + 1)(n + 2)
3n2 + 6n + 1 (n 1)(4n + 7)
3n2 + 6n + 1
=
,
12
20
60
20
so the inequality of the problem holds.
Solution 2 by Ethan Gegner (student, Taylor University), Upland, IN
For n N , define
f (n) =
3
(n + 1)(n + 2)
3n2 + 6n + 1
20
and observe that f is an increasing function of n; thus, f (n) f (1) = 1/4 for all n N .
Applying AM-GM inequality and then Cauchys inequality, we obtain
v
! n
!2
u
n
n
n
u
X
X
X
3n2 + 6n + 1 X
3
2
2
2
t
|zk | +
|wk | 2 f (n)
|zk |
|wk |
(n + 1)(n + 2)
20
k=1
k=1
k=1
n
X
k=1
!1/2
n
X
|zk |
k=1
n
X
!1/2
2
|wk |
k=1
|zk | |wk |
k=1
Re
n
X
!
z k wk
k=1
k=1
k=1
X
3n2 + 6n + 1 X
3
|zx |2 +
|wx |2 2
(n + 1)(n + 2)
20
v
u n
n
X
X
3 3n2 + 6n + 1 u
2.
t
|z
|
|wr |2 .
x
20 n2 + 3n + 2
r=1
Moreover
15
k=1
k=1
r=1
Re
n
X
!
z k wk
k=1
n
n
X
X
z k wk
|zk wk | ,
k=1
k=1
k=1
k=1
X
3n2 + 6n + 1 X 2
3
(ak xk bk yk )
x2k + yk2 +
ak + b2k .
(n + 1)(n + 2)
20
3
3n2 + 6n + 1 2
x2k +
ak .
(n + 1)(n + 2)
20
Considering this as a quadratic inequality for the variable xk , we see that the
discriminant is negative.
3
3n2 + 6n + 1 2
4n2 + 3n + 7
2
2
= ak 4
ak = ak
< 0.
(n + 1)(n + 2)
20
5(n + 1)(n + 2)
Hence, the problem is solved.
Also solved by Bruno Salgueiro Fanego,Viveiro, Spain; Ed Gray, Highland
Beach, FL, and the proposer.
5342: Proposed by Ovidiu Furdui, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca,
Romania
Let a, b, c, > 0, be real numbers. Study the convergence of the integral
!
Z
b1/x + c1/x
1/x
I(a, b, c, ) =
a
dx.
2
1
The problem is about studying the conditions which the four parameters, a, b, c, and ,
should verify such that the improper integral would converge.
Solution 1 by Arkady Alt, San Jose, CA
16
bx + cx
= 0, so I(a, b, c, ) = 0 for
2
1
bx + cx
Case 2. Suppose isnt an integer. Then a
must be nonnegative for any x
2
b+c
and in particular, it must be positive for x = 1, that is a
.
2
(
2a = b + c
Since
a = b = c then, to avoid the trivial case 1, we will consider
b=c
a, b, c such that
(
2a = b + c
b+c
a>
or
2
b 6= c.
1
x
>
,
2
2
2
2
1
bx + cx
and we obtain a >
for any x > 1 and that the integral is defined.
2
1
x
1
pt 1
bx + cx
For any real p > 0 we have lim
= ln p. So, lim x a x
x
t0
t
2
!
=
1
1
1
1
ln b + ln c
a
lim x a x 1
lim x b x 1 + lim x c x 1 = ln a
= ln > 0,
x
x
2 x
2
bc
because a >
bc if b 6= c or if a >
b+c
.
2
!
1
1
bx + cx
a
2
a
Therefore, lim
= ln > 0, and by the Limit Comparison Test,
1
x
bc
x
1
I(a, b, c, ) converges iff converges; that is, I(a, b, c, ) converges if > 1 and diverges
x
if (0, 1].
!
1
1
1
bx + cx
Case 3. Let be a positive integer. Then the expression a x
is defined
2
for any positive a, b, c and since
!
1
1
1
bx + cx
a
lim a x
= ln > 0
x
2
bc
1
x
17
bc must
1
bx + cx
Then a x
=
2
(1)
2
1
1
b 2x c 2x
2
.
1
1
b 2x a 2x
then lim
1
b 2x
1
a 2x
=
1 b
ln > 0,
2 c
!2
1 b
ln
2 c
2
=
> 0, and by the Limit Comparison Test
1
x2
1
I(a, b, c, ) is convergent iff 2 convergent, that is I(a, b, c, ) convergent if
x
> 1/2 and divergent if (0, 1/2].
x
In summary,
If a = b = c then I(a, b, c, ) = 0 is convergent for any real ;
b+c
2a = b + c
then I(a, b, c, ) is convergent
or
If <+ /N and a >
b 6= c
2
for > 1 and divergent for (0, 1];
If <+ /N and a > bc then I(a, b, c, ) is convergent for > 1 and divergent for
(0, 1];
If N and a = bc then I(a, b, c, ) is convergent for > 1/2 and divergent for
(0, 1/2].
"
1/x
b1/x + c1/x
(
=
1+
ln a ln2 a ln3 a
+
+
+
x
2x2
6x3
1
ln b ln2 b ln3 b
ln c ln2 c ln3 c
4
1+
+
+
+1+
+
+
+ O(x )
2
x
2x2
6x3
x
2x2
6x3
2
ln2 a ln2 b
1
a
= ln +
x
2x
bc
A=
1
6
ln2 c
2
+ xA
x3
2x3
2x3
2
+ O(x4 )
= bc
4
4
4
Let > 1. Since for any x large enough it is
2
ln2 a ln2 b
a
ln
+
2x
bc
ln2 c
2
+ xA C
ln2 a ln2 b
a
1
+
ln
x
2x
bc
ln2 c
2
+ xA
dx converges.
bc.
b1/x + c1/x
a1/x
2
!
=
1 1
C1
2
2
(ln
b
ln
c)
+
x
A
2
2
x
4
x
whence convergence.
Let 0 < 1/2, and a = bc. To have convergence we need ln b = ln c that is b = c, but
this would yield a = b = c, a forbidden condition.
Also solved by the proposer.
19