Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
COUNTY OF SURRY
DIVISION
WILLIAM NEIL SHELTON
SUPERIOR COURT
}
15 CVS ________________
PLAINTIFF,
vs
COMPLAINT
( Jury Trial Requested)
}
}
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
.com, Unique Auto Sales of Mount Airy, Mayberry Limousine Service, Mobys Coffee and Otis
Nightclub. The Plaintiff William Neil Shelton did hold business accounts for the said businesses
with the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton being on the signature card and allowed to write
checks on said accounts and was a signer of Surety Bond for Unique Auto Sales of Mount Airy
North Carolina.
In 2010 the plaintiff William Neil Shelton and the business Unique Auto Sales of Mount Airy
were the victims of embezzlement from a employee Jody Clayton Inman also of Surry County,
North Carolina.
The Plaintiff William Neil Shelton was the victim of several warrantless and illegal arrests due to
the unscrupulous ways the bank and Mount Airy Police Department and Surry County District
Attorneys office.
The Plaintiff William Neil Shelton doing business as Unique Auto Sales of Mount Airy North
Carolina entered into a Civil Lawsuit against Jody Clayton Inman; Surrey Bancorp; Surry Bank and
Trust and Edward C. Ashby all of Surry County, North Carolina.
The lawsuit was settled by the then defendants Surrey Bank and Trust and all parties included
which just the settlement amount of the said lawsuit being sealed.
The settlement money was awarded to the plaintiff William Neil Shelton but made payable to
the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton to handle all open accounts and balances in which she did
not do.
The plaintiff William Neil Shelton has over One Hundred Thousand Dollars in monetary
judgements against him while The defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton even though who is on the
surety bond for Unique Auto Sales of Mount Airy North Carolina has no monetary judgments
against her only because the plaintiff William Neil Shelton has never sent a copy of the said
surety bond to the companies with said monetary judgments placed against the plaintiff William
Neil Shelton.
The defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens, Zachery Smith Brintle at the request
of the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton put a protective order against the sealed bank
settlement without me being allowed due process and not having it heard in court.
Upon information and belief, the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton at the coaching of the
Defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and Zachery Smith Brintle had my sister
Joan Shelton Phillips a Licensed Family Nurse Practioner in the State of North Carolina
misrepresented my medical records saying that the plaintiff William Neil Shelton was bi-polar
refusing medications to attempt two unsuccessful Involuntary Commitment Warrants in the
same day to try and institutionalize the said plaintiff William Neil Shelton. Which upon review
the hospital realized that the plaintiff William Neil Shelton had never been seen, diagnosed or
treated for bi-polar disorder.
Upon information and belief, the defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens,
Zachery Smith Brintle and Kimberly Hiatt Shelton the same day with the help of the defendants
Kimberly Hiatt Sheltons sister in law Melissa Watts Hiatt who was at that time the director for
Surry S.C.A.N. { Stop Child Abuse Now} then issued warrants for the plaintiff the same day as the
two failed Involuntary Commitment attempts then had warrants issued and enforced for
Domestic Criminal Trespassing to get a Restraining Order placed upon the plaintiff William Neil
Shelton for the third arrest of the same day.
The plaintiff William Neil Shelton was found not guilty of Domestic Criminal Trespassing but yet
due to the weight that the defendant Sarah Stevens carries with the Court due to her roll as
State Representitive for the State of North Caroina the Restraining Order remained in place.
The defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens, Zachery Smith Brintle and Kimberly
Hiatt Shelton then used the as proven now to be bogus Restraining Order to get a Custody Ex
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Parte put in place by Judge William Flynn Southern whom Sarah Stevens was making financial
contributions to his campaign for The North Carolina Court of Appeals to get Emergency Custody
of the two minor children and the home as well as all assets.
Upon information and belief the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton at the coaching of Stevens
and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and Zarchery Smith Brintle had the plaintiff William Neil
Shelton arrested numerous times with false accusations of violating the said restraining oder.
Which resulted in numerous False Arrests and Emotional and Financial suffering of the plaintiff
William Neil Shelton. All false allegations were either Not Guilty or Dismissed.
Upon information proof and belief, with the help of the defendants Sarah Stevens and Kimberly
Hiatt Shelton the drafted a letter which has been proven Zachery Smith Brintle to be the Author
threatening court officials, lawyers, family members and others to have the plaintiff William Neil
Shelton arrested and held in custody to insure a complete win in the divorce case thus leaving
the plaintiff William Neil Shelton receiving nothing in the Divorce Resolution.
Upon information and belief, The defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and
Zachery Smith Brintle then began bombarding the Court with Motions to Compell regarding to
answering questions in the Divorce case knowing that the plaintiff William Neil Shelton did not
posses them and had no access to the Interrogatory Questions from the Divorce Proceedings.
Upon information and belief, the defendants Sarah Stevens and Zachery Smith Brintle conspired
with the local District Attorneys office to hold the Defendant in Jail on the False Allegations for
the Threatening Letter that Zachery Smith Brintle wrote saying that the plaintiff Willaim Neil
Shelton wrote. To hold the Plaintiff William Neil Shelton illegally for eleven months in the Surry
County Jail in order to lose everything in the Divorce Proceedings.
Upon information and belief, The defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and
Zachery Smith Brintle made and published disparaging remarks about the plaintiff William Neil
Shelton with the intent to harm the plaintiffs reputation which were in fact harmful to the
plaintiff William Neil Sheltons businesses and reputation.
The defendants actions with the letter written by the defendant Zachery Smith Brintle of the
Lawfirm Stevens and Brintle who was conspiring with the defendants Sarah Stevens and
Kimberly Hiatt Shelton to manufacture evidence for the purpose of harming the plaintiff William
Neil Shelton.
The defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton took and converted to his own, to the exclusion of the
plaintiff William Neil Shelton, use monies and properties due to the plaintiff. The defendant
Kimberly Hiatt Shelton who was conspiring with the defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirms,
Sarah Stevens and Zachery Smith Brintle took and transferred to others all pre marital property
including motor vehicles, marital monies, business monies that were the sole or joint property
of the plaintiff.
The defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton while conspiring with the defendants Stevens and Brintle
Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and Zachery Smith Brintle took and converted to her own use, to the
exclusion of the plaintiff, various personal property, data and private information, including all
businesses and property of the plaintiff William Neil Shelton.
The defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton who was conspiring with the defendants Stevens and
Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and Zachery Smith Brintle instituted and prosecuted against the
plaintiff William Neil Shelton, wrongfully and maliciously, criminal charges including the ones
mentioned above but not limited to the six felonies from the letter written by Zachery Smith
Brintle, among other charges.
Upon information and belief, the defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens and
Zachery Smith Brintle conspired with the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton to institute and
prosecute wrongful and malicious criminal claims against the plaintiff William Neil Shelton.
35. Upon information and belief, the defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens,
Zachery Smith Brintle conspired with the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton toaid and abet
institute and prosecute wrongful and malicious criminal claims against the plaintiff William Neil
Shelton, resulting in damage to the plaintiffs reputation and incarceration.
36. Upon information and belief, the defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm, Sarah Stevens,
Zachery Smith Brintle conspired with the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton to obstruct justice
and prevent the plaintiff from obtaining necessary information to starve off and defend both
civil and criminal charges.
37. As a direct, proximate and consequential result of the defendants Stevens and Brintle Lawfirm,
Sarah Stevens, Zachery Smith Brintle and Kimberly Hiatt Shelton misconduct the plaintiff William
Neil Shelton has suffered substantial damages including but not limited to loss of personal and
marital property, loss of funds, lost profits, extensive expenses, loss of creditworthiness,
damage to reputation, the loss of his livelihood, physical pain and mental suffering and parental
alienation.
7. The defendant Kimberly Hiatt Sheltons willful, intentional and malicious conduct and her false
allegations, representations were designed to mislead the plaintiff William Neil Shelton and
others and did mislead the plaintiff William Neil Shelton and others resulting in substantial harm
and damage to the plaintiff as set forth herein.
8. The Plaintiff is entitled to have and recover of the defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton in excess of
$1,000,000.00 as a result of her actual and constructive Fraud.
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION Kimberly Hiatt Shelton)
9. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations set forth in the preceeding
paragraphs of this Complaint as is fully set forth herein.
10. The defendant Kimberly Hiatt Shelton made intentional, knowing, reckless and negligent
misrepresentations to the plaintiff William Neil Shelton, and to local law enforcement agencies,
family, and third parties regarding ownership of property, including but not limited to motor
vehicles, real property and criminal activities thus causing financial, emotional and mental
damages, false arrests and incarceration.
11. As a direct, proximate and consequential result of the defendants Kimberly Hiatt Sheltons
misrepresentations, the plaintiff William Neil Shelton lost property, incurred obligations, breach
of fiduciary responsibilities and paid money to lenders, third parties and others, wrongful
imprisonment, parental alienation and the plaintiff William Neil Shelton was damaged in an
amount in excess of $1,000,000.00.
______________________________________
William Neil Shelton
Pro-Se
OF COUNSEL
William Neil Shelton
1497 North Franklin Road
Mount Airy NC 27030