Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2Center of Physical Education,
Physiotherapy, and Sports, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil; 3Department of Physiology and
Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; and 4Department of Human
Physiology, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
2538
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
METHODS
Experimental Approach to the Problem
| www.nsca.com
2539
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2540
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
TABLE 2. Physiological and biochemical responses of Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes during a simulated competition (n = 10).*
Match 1
Pre
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
13
20
0.5
61
23
9
17
0.9
0.8
8
0.9
0.8
169
135
9.3
118
130
42
63
4.8
7.9
33
5.4
5.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
40
2.5
57
23
8
21
0.6
1.0
6
0.9
0.7
Pre
100
128
4.9
101
125
38
65
4.8
6.7
33
5.0
6.2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12z
28
1.4z
49
38
6
37
0.8
0.6z
6
0.9
1.1
Post
172
139
9.9
115
135
44
67
4.6
8.0
35
5.2
5.8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
10z
36
2.1z
51
35
10
34
0.7
1.0
6
0.9
1.2
Pre
100
135
5.2
108
118
38
57
4.4
6.9
36
4.7
6.8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
10z
45
1.5z
45
27
7
24
0.5
1.5
7
0.5
1.4zk
Match 4
Post
162
118
7.3
120
139
43
72
4.6
7.9
35
5.1
6.6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
16z
28
2.2zk
51
36
9
35
0.8
0.9#
7
0.4
1.4z
Pre
100
116
3.8
93
124
41
64
4.6
7.1
32
4.8
7.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
16z
34
1.0z
35
31
10
29
0.5
1.0
7
0.6
1.4z
Post
164
122
7.6
107
138
43
68
4.4
8.0
35
4.9
7.2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
14z
36
1.9z
53
25
8
18
0.7
0.8
5
0.6
1.4z
TM
2541
| www.nsca.com
*Data are presented as mean 6 SD. HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein.
Difference between pre- and post-match (p # 0.05).
zDifferent from the pre-match 1 (p # 0.05).
Different from the post-match 1 (p # 0.05).
kDifferent from the post-match 2 (p # 0.05).
n = 8.
#Different from the pre-match 2 (p # 0.05).
the
73
111
1.7
109
125
39
63
4.8
7.5
33
4.8
5.0
Post
Match 3
Match 2
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Statistical Analyses
RESULTS
Table 1 presents the food intake of Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes
who performed in the simulated competition.
Table 2 illustrates the physiological and biochemical responses of Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes during a simulated
competition.
Heart rate differed significantly between time points (F7,63
= 208.3, p , 0.001, h2 = 0.96, large), with pre-match values
lower than the post-match values (p , 0.001 for all comparisons). Moreover, lower values were seen before the first
match compared with all other time points (p , 0.001 for
all comparisons). For blood lactate, we observed differences
between time points (F3,0; 26,8 = 43.6, p , 0.001, h2 = 0.83,
large): [La] increased between pre- and post-matches 1, 2,
and 4 (p , 0.001 for all comparisons); values after the third
match were lower than those measured after the first (p =
0.001) and second (p = 0.045) matches; values before the
first match were lower compared with all other time points
(pre-match 2, p , 0.001; post-match 2, p = 0.001; pre-match
TABLE 3. Variation (D) of the physiological and biochemical responses in the athletes during the simulated
competition (n = 10).*
Match 1
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
96
24
7.6
9
6
3
0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
13
35
2.4
10
11
5
11
0.7
1.2
3.7
0.5
0.5
Match 2
71
11
5.0
13
10
6
2
20.2
1.3
2.0
0.2
20.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
10
21
2.0
21
8
6
12
0.8
0.7
4.0
0.7
1.2
Match 3
62
217
2.2
12
21
4
15
0.1
1.0
21.5
0.4
20.2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
15
23
2.0z
11
17
6
16
0.5
0.7
5.0
0.4
0.6
Match 4
63
6
3.8
14
14
2
3
20.2
0.9
2.6
0.1
20.2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
13
27
1.7
34
16
5
23
0.5
1.1
6.0
0.2
0.8
*Data are presented as mean 6 SD. HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein.
Different from the match 1 (p # 0.05).
zDifferent from the match 2 (p # 0.05).
n = 8.
2542
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
TABLE 4. Hormonal responses and the cell damage markers of Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes during a simulated competition (n = 10).*
Match 1
Pre
128
419
30
242
0.15
12.6
291
42
47
429
1.2
58
24
11
97
0.08
9.7
178
16
8
115
0.1
405
492
35
324
0.12
10.9
362
70
59
443
1.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
186
5
13
78
0.06
5.3
246
28
18
81
0.2
Pre
168
461
33
322
0.15
12.2
313
53
49
372
1.3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
81
12kz
12
138
0.13
7.7
222
22
11
69
0.2k
Post
340
496
37
357
0.11
7.7
403
71
56
493
1.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
99
4k
8
98
0.05
5.5#
230
23k
12
132
0.2k
Pre
120
452
35
305
0.15
9.8
404
63
53
447
1.3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
53z
16z
9
137
0.09
6.8
273
24
13
82
0.1
Match 4
Post
244
478
32
377
0.09
5.9
480
75
56
479
1.5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
94z
11k
8
68
0.03
5.4z#
298
28k
11k
74
0.2
Pre
118
421
29
345
0.09
8.3
437
52
48
451
1.3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
47z
18z#**
13
95
0.05
7.2
241
21
12
81
0.2
Post
242
468
36
322
0.12
4.5
609
75
58
487
1.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
105
13kz
4
76
0.03
3.1z#
364zk#
27k
18
112
0.2k
TM
2543
| www.nsca.com
*Data are presented as mean 6 SD. T/C = testosterone/cortisol ratio; CK = creatine kinase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; LDH = lactate
dehydrogenase.
Difference between pre- and post-match (p # 0.05).
zDifferent from the post-match 1 (p # 0.05).
Different from the post-match 3 (p # 0.05).
kDifferent from the pre-match 1 (p # 0.05).
Different from the post-match 2 (p # 0.05).
#Different from the pre-match 2 (p # 0.05).
**Different from the pre-match 3 (p # 0.05).
n = 8.
the
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Post
Match 3
Epinephrine (pg$ml21)
Norepinephrine (pg$ml21)
Testosterone (ng$ml21)
Cortisol (ng$ml21)
T/C
Insulin (ng$ml21)
CK (U$L21)
AST (U$L21)
ALT (U$L21)
LDH (U$L21)
Creatinine (mg$dl21)
Match 2
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
TABLE 5. Variation (D) of the hormonal responses and the cell damage markers of Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes during
a simulated competition (n = 10).*
Match 1
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Epinephrine (pg$ml21)
Norepinephrine (pg$ml21)
Testosterone (ng$ml21)
Cortisol (ng$ml21)
T/C
Insulin (ng$ml21)
CK (U$L21)
AST (U$L21)
ALT (U$L21)
LDH (U$L21)
Creatinine (mg$dl21)
277
73
5
82
20.03
21.7
71
27
11
14
0.2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Match 2
144
25
8
141
0.10
7.4
85
16
12
135
0.1
171
35
3
36
20.03
24.5
90
18
7
121
0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
65
11
12
173
0.14
3.2
77
14
10
94
0.0
Match 3
124
26
24
71
20.06
23.9
77
11
3
32
0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
62
18
10
137
0.09
4.3
87
18
6
82
0.1
Match 4
124
47
7
223
0.03
23.8
172
23
9
37
0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
62
17z
11
101
0.04
5.4
196
17
12
103
0.1
*Data are presented as mean 6 SD. T/C = testosterone/cortisol ratio; CK = creatine kinase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase;
ALT = alanine aminotransferase; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase.
Different from the match 1 (p # 0.05).
zDifferent from the match 3 (p # 0.05).
n = 8.
2544
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
| www.nsca.com
TABLE 6. Heart rate variability before the matches of a Brazilian jiu-jitsu simulated competition (n = 7).*
Pre-match 1
RR medium (ms)
RMSSD (ms)
SDNN (ms)
LF (ms2)
HF (ms2)
LF (n.u.)
HF (n.u.)
LF/HF (a.u.)
874
70
69
1,908
1,665
63
37
3.8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
149
39
28
1,426
1,730
17
17
6.2
Pre-match 2
575
48
41
902
1,482
70
30
4.7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
48
55
40
1,975
3,174
26
26
4.1
Pre-match 3
562
42
32
120
35
77
23
4.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
48
32
20
112
42
12
12
2.4
Pre-match 4
605
66
58
630
364
68
32
3.9
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
57z
78
59
1,176
725
19
19
4.8
*Data are presented as mean 6 SD. RR medium = average of the normal R-R intervals; RMSSD = square root of the mean squared
successive difference between adjacent RR intervals; SDNN = SD of normal R-R intervals; LF = low-frequency components; HF =
high frequency; n.u. = normalized units; LF/HF = ratio between LF and HF; a.u. = arbitrary units.
Different from the pre-match 1 (p # 0.05).
zDifferent from the pre-match 2 (p # 0.05).
in pre-match 2 (p = 0.005), pre-match 3 (p = 0.006), prematch 4 (p , 0.001), and post-match 4 time points (p =
0.037). The post-match 2 values were higher than the prematch (p = 0.002) and post-match 3 (p = 0.016) and prematch (p , 0.001) and post-match 4 values (p = 0.018).
Moreover, the pre-match 4 values were lower than the
pre-match 2 (p = 0.002) and pre-match 3 values (p = 0.002).
The testosterone and cortisol concentrations and the
testosterone/cortisol did not change significantly (p .
0.05) during the simulation of competition. The insulin concentrations changed during the time points (F3,4; 30,4 = 6.2,
p = 0.002, h2 = 0.41, moderate), with the peak in the initial
time point of the simulated competition; the post-match 1
values were higher than the post-match 3 (p = 0.033) and
post-match 4 values (p = 0.011), and the pre-match 2 values
were higher than the post-match 2 (p = 0.049), post-match 3
(p = 0.013), and post-match 4 values (p = 0.037).
For the cell damage markers, the CK concentration varied
significantly over time (F2,4; 22,0 = 10.3, p , 0.001, h2 = 0.53,
moderate), with post-match 4 values higher than those from
pre-match 1 (p = 0.039), post-match 1 (p = 0.037), and prematch 2 (p = 0.041). The AST concentration was significantly
altered by the matches (F4,0; 36,3 = 10.5, p , 0.001, h2 = 0.54,
moderate), with the pre-match 1 values lower than all postmatch values: post-match 1 (p = 0.014), post-match 2 (p =
0.001), post-match 3 (p = 0.003), and post-match 4 (p =
0.003). Additionally, the post-match 3 values were higher than
those values from pre-match 4 (p = 0.047). The ALT concentration differed between the time points (F2,9; 25,8 = 5.2, p =
0.007, h2 = 0.36, moderate), with the pre-match 1 values
lower than those from post-match 3 (p = 0.030). The LDH
did not change (p . 0.05) during the simulated competition.
For creatinine, differences were identified between the time
points (F2,5; 17,2 = 10.8, p , 0.001, h2 = 0.61, moderate):
the pre-match 1 was lower than the post-match 1 (p ,
0.001), pre-match 2 (p = 0.009), post-match 2 (p = 0.001),
DISCUSSION
The analysis of multiple Brazilian jiu-jitsu matches, simulating
a competition, resulted in a decrease of the delta lactate
accumulation during the sequence of matches (suggesting
a decrease in the glycolytic pathway activation during the
simulation of competition) and a decrease in delta of the
catecholamines and insulin plasma levels. Additionally, there
VOLUME 29 | NUMBER 9 | SEPTEMBER 2015 |
2545
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2546
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
| www.nsca.com
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
Based on the results obtained in this study, it is recommended that training loads should be imposed to simulate
VOLUME 29 | NUMBER 9 | SEPTEMBER 2015 |
2547
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
21. Jeukendrup, AE, Saris, WH, and Wagenmakers, AJ. Fat metabolism
during exercise: A review. Part I: Fatty acid mobilization and muscle
metabolism. Int J Sports Med 19: 231244, 1998.
22. Jeukendrup, AE, Saris, WH, and Wagenmakers, AJ. Fat metabolism
during exercise: A reviewpart II: Regulation of metabolism and the
effects of training. Int J Sports Med 19: 293302, 1998.
23. Katirji, B and Al-Jaberi, M. Creatine kinase Revisited. J Clin
Neuromuscul Dis 2: 158164, 2001.
24. Kraemer, WJ, Fry, AC, Rubin, MR, Triplett-Mcbride, T, Gordon, SE,
Perry, KL, Lynch, JM, Volek, JS, Meuffels, DE, Newton, RU, and
Fleck, SJ. Physiological and performance responses to tournament
wrestling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 13671378, 2001.
25. Lohman, TG, Roche, AF, and Martorell, R. Anthropometric
Standardization Reference Manual: Human Kinetics. Champaign, IL, 1988.
26. Martin, A. Recommended Dietary Intake for the French population.
Paris: National Center of Scientific Research. CNERMA Lavoisier,
2001.
27. Meckel, Y, Nemet, D, Bar-Sela, S, Radom-Aizik, S, Cooper, DM,
Sagiv, M, and Eliakim, A. Hormonal and inflammatory responses to
different types of sprint interval training. J Strength Cond Res 25:
21612169, 2011.
29. Nilsson, J, Csergo, S, Gullstrand, L, Tveit, P, and Refsnes, PE. Worktime profile, blood lactate concentration and rating of perceived
exertion in the 1998 Greco-Roman Wrestling World Championship.
J Sports Sci 20: 939945, 2002.
30. Pinho-Junior, EA, Brito, CJ, Santos, WOC, Valido, CN, Mendes, EL,
and Franchini, E. Influence of cryotherapy on muscle damage
markers in jiu-jitsu fighters after competition: A cross-over study.
Rev And Med Dep 7: 712, 2014.
9. Chen, JL, Yeh, DP, Lee, JP, Chen, CY, Huang, CY, Lee, SD,
Chen, CC, Kuo, TB, Kao, CL, and Kuo, CH. Parasympathetic
nervous activity mirrors recovery status in weightlifting
performance after training. J Strength Cond Res 25: 15461552,
2011.
2548
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
| www.nsca.com
2549
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.