Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Decision-Making Toolbox
Prof. Ed Robinson
MGT 350
November 1, 2004
Decision-Making Toolbox 2
Decision-Making Toolbox
Abstract
smarter not harder – make the best use of your time and throw the garbage out! As a
software engineer, web developer, and database administrator, I apply what is called
GIGO to my code (and to data) – garbage in, garbage out. This concept helps me to
remember to avoid spaghetti code (inefficient and cumbersome code) by using methods
and behaviors that streamline processing making the program more efficient, reliable,
Productivity Plus. The impressive training materials provided by the company are
designed to help individuals and management teams focus on creating harmony and
balance in life consistent with personal values. It is believed that individuals equipped
with these life-management skills/tools are better able to cope with and to meet life
increase job satisfaction. It is a win-win solution for both participants and for their
organizations.
The techniques taught in the seminars and workshops emphasize the Pareto
Analysis which is the bases or foundation for Pareto Principle. Using the Pareto
Analysis, seminar / workshop participants identify and select areas of life to change
based upon their personal values. Identifying values and ranking them in order of
Decision-Making Toolbox 3
importance provides participants with a meaningful perspective of life and how their
actions and decisions can be used to create balance. Participants are taught to focus
on those actions and decisions that will reap greater benefits based upon values. The
goal of the seminars and workshops is to teach individuals to focus their attention on
This paper discusses techniques you can apply to your life not only to make a
decision, but also to decide when and if a decision actually needs to be made (no
decision is a decision). Readers will find these tools useful when seeking inner
harmony and balance in their life. It is believed that seeking this balance in life leads to
reduced stress levels and hence, a better, more rewarding, and quality life. By applying
and a mutuality of respect for diversity of viewpoints. These techniques are not for
everyone. If you are a person who does not need or require a balance in your life, or an
organization that does not encourage unity and teamwork, you can use this information
Simply, the Pareto Principle states that 20 percent of causes are responsible for
80 percent of the effect. In the business setting the principle is applied as follows: 20
percent of all the customers actually generate 80 percent of the sales OR that 80
percent of merchandise sold comes from 20 percent of your vendors, etc. The principle
helps you to identify the most important problem to solve by illustrating the severity of
economists and business pioneers recognized the principle at work in their own fields of
expertise referring to the phenomenon as the “vital few and trivial many”. Dr. Joseph
Juran later coined the phrase “Pareto Principle” which is how we refer to this experience
today.
In time management the principle is used to determine IF you should deal with an
issue or decision, delegate the decision or issue to someone else, or disregard the
issue because it is so trivial it doesn’t matter what the resolution is – it isn’t going to
affect your life or the life of others in any meaningful way. In other words, there is no
value in resolving it. One can logically deduct that time is most effectively spent when it
focuses on the few (20 percent) of that which creates the many (80 percent) of return.
For instance, in creating life’s balance, you spend 80 percent of your time and focus on
that 20 percent of the issues that creates an 80 percent return. In theory, 80 percent of
your time should be spent doing what is important: addressing the top 20 percent of the
for plotting a course of action to see a rapid return on an investment (resources of time
or money). It is important to use the principle wisely. “Helping the good become better
is a better use of your time than helping the great become terrific.” states F. John Reh.
In creating balance and harmony, first individuals (or organizations) identify their
core values (what is important to them). The values are rated in order of importance
(which values you would give up for the sake of another). After identifying and rating
values, list the changes you would like to make grouping related items and then classify
the changes based upon the values you have identified as important. You then focus
on changing those areas of most value to you (items listed in your most important core
value) and tackle the list in progressive order, most important to least. The applied
theory then states that as you change those items with the highest score, you reap the
greater rewards or benefits. The items with the least scores will probably never be
addressed because the solutions (burden) cost more or outweigh the benefits
(blessings).
2. Group options / solutions that are related to or resolve the same larger
problem(s)
Decision Trees form a “balanced picture” of risk and reward associated with a
course of action. The tool can help you chose options after investigating “likely”
outcomes. When used with Pareto Principle, the risks and rewards are evaluated at the
beginning of the process when you identify and list problems and solutions. Using the
Decision Tree at the beginning of and in unison with the Pareto Principle helps you
identify risks that you may not be willing to take (betrayal of values creating an
imbalance) OR the opposite, identify greater rewards and thus classify solutions more
circles that represent uncertainty. To use the Decision Tree, draw a small square on
the left side of a large piece of paper (I use legal size copy paper) to represent the
problem or decision that needs to be made. Represent solutions by drawing small lines
from the square to the right hand side of the paper writing the solution on the applicable
line. Leave plenty of room for expansion. At the end of the solution line, consider
possible results or outcomes and represent each with a circle (uncertainty) or square
(decision) writing out the factor above the respective figure illustrated. Leave complete
solutions blank. Follow the same process for all squares on the diagram: draw lines
Decision-Making Toolbox 7
representing options and include the proper notation on the lines. For circles on the
diagram: draw lines representing possible outcomes including notations. Continue this
process until you exhaust possible options or outcomes to the original decision.
Review your diagram by brainstorming each square and circle to give you the
most complete and accurate diagram of considerations. Evaluate each option based
upon its worth to you either monetarily or intrinsically (based upon values). Inquire as to
the cost (what you are willing to give up – not always money) as compared to the
benefits (what you will reap – not always money). Examples of intrinsic corporate
values may be that a decision may affect the 20 percent of the customer (or vendor,
investor, employee) base that generates 80 percent of the corporate return (profit or
good name). The cost may be a sacrifice in the confidence of the board of directors (or
investors) or undermine the interests of a loyal customer base. Sacrificing your good
name cannot be measured by dollars or by time. Be sure you know and consider the
percentage (totals must equal 100 percent for each circle (use historical data
when available)
3. Calculate: Working from right to left, complete the calculations by applying the
b. Place the calculated value of each node in a box above the node
Decision-Making Toolbox 8
4. Benefit: Note the cost of each option on the appropriate decision line (from
and subtract the cost of the outcome from the anticipated value. This figure
represents the estimated NET benefit and the value of the respective decision
node.
a. Sunk costs are not used in the Decision Tree analysis (amounts
already spent)
Conclusion
Common sense and critical thinking will always be the greatest asset available in
your “decision-making toolbox”. Different problems may require new tools and a fresh
environment that values and encourages the exploration of new and better ways to find
solutions. Experience helps estimate the probability of success, but don’t discount your
gut feelings because they cannot always be quantified in measurable results. Apply
these feelings weighted as you would any other probable outcome or option.
leading to a desirable corporate culture based upon respect and mutuality. Be sure
your weighted measures consider moral and ethical values as well as monetary
rewards.
Decision-Making Toolbox 9
References
Reh, F. John. Pareto’s Principle – The 80-20 Rule. Primedia Company. About, Inc.
http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/Pareto081202.htm
Manktelow, James (August 2003). Pareto Analysis – Selecting the Most Important
Changes to Make. Mind Tools Ltd of Signal House, Station Road, Burgess Hill,
West Sussex, RH15 8DY, United Kingdom. ©Mind Tools, 1995-2004. Retrieved
Manktelow, James (August 2003). Decision Tree Analysis – Choosing between Options
by Projecting Likely Outcomes. Mind Tools Ltd of Signal House, Station Road,
Burgess Hill, West Sussex, RH15 8DY, United Kingdom. ©Mind Tools, 1995-
http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_04.htm