ISSUE: Has the High Court of Australia blood on its hands?

& the constitution

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I am obviously aware of and considering the legal principles
embedded in the constitution. On 22 July 2002 I wrote to the then General Peter Cosgrove that for any
invasion he would need a DECLARATION OF WAR naming the country concerned from the
Governor-General published in the Gazette. I on 18 February 2003 sought to file an s75 application to
prevent the Australian armed forces invading Iraq without a DECLARATION OF WAR, which was
refused by the Deputy Registrar and the High Court of Australia on appeal refused to accept it for filing.
The Registrar then to alter the make-up, and made notes how to do so. I on 18 March 2003 sought to refile
it as per directions of the Deputy Registrar but it was refused to be accepted for filing. On Appeal the
High Court of Australia citing the 18 February 2003 application, and not the 18 March 2003 application
(Still outstanding), (again) refused to accept it for filing. That day the armed murderous invasion
commenced to bomb Iraq back into the Stone Age. HANSARD 10-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
(Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention) Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).- QUOTE
Then, again, there is the prerogative right to declare war and peace, an adjunct of which it is that the Queen herself, or
her representative, where Her Majesty is not present, holds that prerogative. No one would ever dream of saying that the
Queen would declare war or peace without the advice of a responsible Minister. END QUOTE HANSARD 6-3-1891
Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN: We can make an exception in favour of imperial interests. We have
no desire to interfere with the imperial prerogative in matters of war and peace! END QUOTE

While we have Royal Commissions about unions, and bush fires, we had no Royal Commission about the
murderous unconstitutional invasion into Iraq. We were told that the world would be a safer place
without President Saddam Hussein. Well we had yet another murderous attack in Paris, with many
deaths, and one has to ask is the world really a safer place? Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott
refused my request for a Royal Commission and yet we need it to establish if the armed murderous
invasion was constitutionally permissible and the High Court of Australia unconstitutionally denied my
s75 of the constitution application to be accepted for filing. Combined with the aluminium tubes and other
false/fabricated issues I view John Howard had a case to answer but I view the High Court of Australia
bowed to its political master and so to say sold us, We, the People out! In my view had John Howard not
been able to join the USA regime change for oil, etc, then the USA may not have gone ahead with the
invasion. The vacuum left by the removal of President Saddam Hussein has since been filled by ISIS/ISIL
and we all suffer the consequences of The world being a safer place that we are subjected as innocent
citizens to a range of so called draconic anti-terrorism legislation which in real terms is only to curtain
the rights and freedoms of innocent Australians. In my view the terrorist are those in the government and
aided and abetted by the courts. As I proved on 19 July 2006 in the Country Court of Victoria no valid
federal election was held in 2001, and as such we had no valid Federal Government. And, for the record
the Commonwealth didnt challenge my evidence filed in court! They had the opportunity but as
weasels/gutless wonders left without challenging me! As such, it conceded my evidence was beyond
reproach. Why then are we not holding John Howard and his co-conspirators legally accountable for
treason, mass-murder, crimes against humanity, etc? Lets be clear about it I filed my evidence in court
(Including that which I obtained under FOI!), and as such not merely made claims, and it was open to all
Attorney-Generals to challenge within s78B NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS what I had
filed. They didnt but conceded! Too many people died directly or indirectly because of the Iraq invasion!
We must have a Royal Commission and without further delay! Are we waiting for a Paris
massacrer to occur in Australia before we finally will have matters investigated? Just then too late for
Australian victims! In my view the HCA has blood on its hands, and a case to answer!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all relevant issues/details.

Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)

p1
16-11-2015
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati