Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Tonights Agenda
October 14: Transportation and connections; parks and open space; and land use and density
B
C
A
Vision, Image and Character
Transportation and Connections
Parks and Open Space
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Breakout Groups
Public Facilities
Land Use and Density
Summary Comments
Summary of comments
from Oct. 14 meeting
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Rockville Pike as an
urban boulevard
10
11
Non-Residential
12
Executive Boulevard
Executive
Blvd
13
Main/Market Street
14
Towne Road
15
Chapman/Maple Avenue
16
Modeling Tool/Methods
Performance Measures
VISSIM (microsimulation)
CLV
HCM level of service
HCM v/c ratio
Person Throughout
CLV
HCM level of service
HCM v/c ratio
Connectivity Index
Person Throughput
17
Current conditions
Existing roadways
Transit and TDM
Staff Analysis Tools
TRAVEL/4 travel demand model
Cordon Line Analyses
Local Area Model (LAM)
Transportation Balance
Other
Zoning capacity/flexibility
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
18
19
20
Montgomery County
Washington Region
21
22
23
24
Highways
Transit
25
26
27
28
There are two tests for determining transportation adequacy: Local Area Transportation
Review (LATR) test and the policy area test called Transportation Policy Area Review (TPAR).
These tests are required by the 2012-2016 Subdivision Staging Policy.
29
2. Aspen Hill
3. Bethesda CBD*
4. Bethesda/Chevy Chase
5. Clarksburg
6. Cloverly
7. Damascus
8. Derwood
9. Fairland/White Oak
10. Friendship Heights
11. Gaithersburg City
12. Germantown East
13. Germantown Town Center
14. Germantown West
15.Glenmont*
16. Grosvenor*
17. Kensington/Wheaton
30
Modeling of Roadway
Improvements:
31
Randolph Rd
Rollins Ave
Rock Spring Dr
Rocking Horse
10 Minor Arterials
Montrose Pkwy
Grosvenor Ln
Marinelli Rd
Twinbrook Pkwy
Nicholson Ln
Rockledge Dr
Democracy Blvd
Chapman Ave
Adequacy Standard
Exexutive Blvd
Montrose Rd
E. Jefferson St
Tuckerman Ln
Nebel St
Parklawn Dr
Network
F12-2040
T12-2018-02
Guidance to
reviewers to help
better understand
these Charts
Revised 4-3-12
32
Critical Lane
Policy Area
Volume Congestion
Standard
HCM volume-tocapacity
equivalent
1550
North Bethesda
(White Flint 2)
0.97
1500
City of Rockville
0.94
1800
1.13
White Flint 1 *
Twinbrook *
Grosvenor*
Rockville Town Center*
33
34
35
Rock Spring
White Flint 2
36
Proposed Development
37
Next Meeting
38
39
40