Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ABSTRACT
In digital signal processing (DSP), image processing and
performing arithmetic operations in microprocessors
substractor plays an important role. In this paper, a 2-bit
half subtractor circuit has been designed and analyzed. A
comparative study has been done in account of the
silicon area and the power consumption in the designed
circuit using different channel lengths such as 65nm,
45nm and 32nm. The designed circuit has shown a
remarkable reduction in the consumed power of 84.64%
and a reduction of 67.08% in consumed area in 32nm
foundry as compared to 65nm CMOS foundry. The
design and simulation are performed of 2-bit half
subtractor using DSCH and MICROWIND tools.
KEYWORDS:
CMOS, VLSI, Subtractor, Power
consumption, CMOS technology.
I.
INTRODUCTION
www.ijsret.org
274
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 4, Issue 3, March 2015
B
0
1
0
1
BOut
0
1
1
0
DIFFERENCE
1
1
0
0
www.ijsret.org
275
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 4, Issue 3, March 2015
IV. RESULT
A binary Half-Subtractor subtracts two input bits and
gives two output bits with one of them determining the
difference (D) of the two input bits while the other
giving the borrow bit (Bout). The proposed 2-bit Half
Subtractor are compared based on the performance
parameters like surface area and power dissipation. To
achieve better performance, the circuits are designed
using CMOS process by Microwind 3.1 in 65nm ,45nm
and 32nm technology. The timing diagram results of
proposed 1bit half subtractor using 65nm ,45nm and
32nm CMOS fabrication technology shown in Figure 57.
Parameters
Power
(in W)
Surface Area
(in m2)
.
Fig5: Output of half subtractor using 32 nm CMOS
Technology
www.ijsret.org
32 nm
45 nm
65 nm
0.276
0.377
1.797
5.3
8.2
16.1
276
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 4, Issue 3, March 2015
[5]
A. Anand Kumar, Fundamentals of Digital
Circuits Second Edition, Prentice Hall of India, pp.
234-261, 2006.
[6]
D.Sivaranjani, J.Ajayan, S.Sivasankari, High
Performance Low Leakage Power Full Subtractor
Circuit Design Using Rate Sensing Keeper,
International Journal of Research in Engineering and
Technology (IJRET), eISSN: 2319-1163, pISSN: 23217308, Volume: 03 Special Issue: 07, pp. 648-654, May2014.
AUTHORS
Fig.8 Graphical Comparison of Power and Area
V. CONCLUSION
The performance of the half subtractor was Assessed in
terms of area and power consumption also quality of the
output signals [3]. The proposed 2-bit Half Subtractor
is simulated with 32 nm, 45nmAnd 65nm CMOS
technologies. The performance parameters power and
surface area are compared. The proposed 2-bit Half
Subtractor using the proposed logic in results reduction
in the power and surface area. The power required for
the half subtractor circuit in 32nm, 45nm and 65nm
CMOS technologies are 0.276 W, 0.377 W and 1.797
W respectively. The surface area consumed by the
circuit in 32nm, 45nm and 65nm CMOS technologies
are 5.3 m2, 8.2 m2, and 16.1 m2 respectively.
REFERENCES
[1]
Ruchika Sharma, Rajesh Mehra, Design And
Performance Analysis of CMOS Full Adder With 14
Transistor, International Journal of Computer
Technology and Applications (IJCTA), ISSN:22296093, Volume 5, pp. 1461-1465, July-August 2014.
[2]
Etienne Sicard, Sonia Delmas Benddhia,
Advanced CMOS Cell Design, Tata McGraw-Hill,
Second Edition, pp. 1-5, 2007.
[3]
Monikashree T.S, Usharani .S, Dr.J.S.Baligar,
Design and Implementation of Full Subtractor using
CMOS 180nm Technology, International Journal of
Science, Engineering and Technology Research
(IJSETR), ISSN: 2278 7798, Volume 3, Issue 5,pp.
1421-1426, May 2014.
[4]
Devendra Kumar Gautam, Dr. S R P Sinha, Er.
Yogesh Kumar Verma, Design a Low Power HalfSubtractor Using AVL Technique Based on 65nm
CMOS Technology, International Journal of Advanced
Research in Computer Engineering & Technology
(IJARCET), ISSN: 2278 1323 Volume 2, Issue 11, pp.
2891-2897,November 2013.
www.ijsret.org
277