Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Team Members
Supervisors
Edward Romilly
Matthew John Wood
Koki Matsuoka
Hassan Mufti Mirza
Thomas Huxter-Freer
Hugo Currell
Mahdi Abdi
strategy. These concepts are rubble disposal, transport infrastructure, disaster-proof buildings,
tsunami mitigation, power, communications, and water infrastructure. Each of these topics is explored
in terms of its options and potential to help produce an effective reconstruction strategy, to gain a
more detailed understanding of what the final report will focus on.
2
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Table of Contents
1.
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................5
2.
3.
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.........................................................................................6
4.
5.
3.1
Road Network........................................................................................................................6
3.2
Rail Network..........................................................................................................................7
3.3
3.4
Reconstruction.......................................................................................................................7
Introduction...........................................................................................................................9
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
Steel.............................................................................................................................11
4.3
Flooding...............................................................................................................................11
4.4
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................12
RUBBLE DISPOSAL................................................................................................................12
5.1
Introduction.........................................................................................................................12
5.2
Waste Benchmarking...........................................................................................................13
5.3
Recycling.............................................................................................................................13
5.3.1
Separation Techniques.................................................................................................13
5.3.2
5.4
6.
7.
Recycling Plant....................................................................................................................14
5.4.1
5.4.2
TSUNAMI MITIGATION........................................................................................................16
6.1
Introduction.........................................................................................................................16
6.2
6.3
Natural Barriers...................................................................................................................17
6.4
Man-Made Barriers..............................................................................................................17
6.5
Drainage..............................................................................................................................18
6.6
Erosion Protection................................................................................................................18
6.7
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE.................................................................................................19
3
8.
7.1
Pre-existing infrastructure....................................................................................................19
7.2
7.3
Immediate response.............................................................................................................20
7.4
7.5
Focus...................................................................................................................................21
COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE.........................................................................22
8.1
8.2
8.3
Subscribers...........................................................................................................................23
8.4
Exchanges............................................................................................................................24
8.4.1
Local Exchanges..........................................................................................................24
8.4.2
Toll Exchanges.............................................................................................................24
8.5
9.
Links....................................................................................................................................25
POWER INFRASTRUCTURE................................................................................................26
9.1
Introduction.........................................................................................................................26
9.2
9.3
10. CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................29
11. REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................30
4
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
1. INTRODUCTION
The 2004 Boxing Day Indian Ocean earthquake reached a magnitude of 9.0 on the Richter scale and
was one of the most devastating natural disasters in recorded history. It resulted in over 250,000
casualties and left more than 1.7 million homeless in multiple countries (Tsunami2004, 2015). The
selected country for which this report will focus is Sri Lanka; it was the second most affected country
with over 35,000 deaths and approximately two thirds of its coast line inundated.
By creating a reconstruction strategy for the affected communities, future damage and loss of human
life caused by earthquakes and tsunamis can be minimised. Constructing earthquake and tsunami
resistant buildings is the most direct method of reducing the effects of the disaster. Furthermore, an
efficient rubble disposal scheme and tsunami mitigation measures will be crucial for the recovery
process. Therefore, it is the aim of this report to provide a feasible approach to reconstruction and
future damage mitigation following a similar disaster in the future.
An efficient method for clearing and disposing of rubble to facilitate the rebuilding phase.
As the reconstruction will be financed through aid funds, the proposed solution will seek to identify
the most efficient use of aid funds which provides improved infrastructure for the region that fits with
the local population requirements.
5
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
3. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
Disruption in the transport sector generally impacts the economic and social infrastructure of a region
within a nation; therefore this sector is considered a crucial one. Transport systems are typically
designed to work under average conditions henceforth a provision for disruptions caused by a natural
or man-made disaster is usually not accounted for.
The tsunami that struck two thirds of the coast of Sri Lanka in December 2004 severely disrupted the
transport infrastructure. Roughly 800 km of national roads, 1500 km of provincial and local roads,
and a 160 km stretch of railway infrastructure in the south were damaged as a result (Weerakoon,
Jayasuriya, Arunatilake and Steele, 2007).
local
roads
were
damaged
(Ratnasooriya,
3.4 Reconstruction
In the event of a natural disaster road infrastructure plays an important role in the fast recovery
process of a country. Majority of the roads affected by the tsunami were inaccessible during the
immediate aftermath. It is evident that previous design approaches and construction standards used in
Sri Lanka were not sufficient enough to withstand the impact.
7
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
The process of reconstruction is an opportunity to relocate communities from hazard prone areas.
Moreover it helps in reducing previous inequities and rectifies poorly designed infrastructure.
Reconstruction will ensure the implications of reducing disaster vulnerability in the long term. In
order to do so DRR strategies (disaster risk reduction) shall be introduced to improve the
reconstruction process. Arterial roads, railway tracks, and other similar transport infrastructure are to
be redesigned well inside the setback line. Provision of access ways perpendicular to the coast going
inland is also beneficial.
Hard engineering measures such as the physical and technical measures for road reconstruction are:
While redesigning bridges, few considerations need to be taken into account. Bridges that may be
subjected to tsunamis are to be designed for earthquake motion and tsunamis, so that both the
superstructure and substructure can be used in case of emergency. Moreover it is to be designed so
that the tsunami does not result in the overturning, tilting or washing out of the structure. For bridges
that are further inland (earthquake motion only), the design approach is to ensure that the substructure
stays in a useable condition for emergency situations. Lastly a unique bridge shape can be designed to
smooth the tsunami flow around the structure and minimize the impact of the water.
More importantly the provision of coastal vegetation belts benefit both environmentally and
economically. Plantation of trees, especially the ones with deep roots, along the coast can prove
beneficial against tsunamis. In tsunami mitigation the role of coastal vegetation belts are:
Several other coastal structures can be constructed along the coast that helps in preventing these
natural disasters. Sea dikes are normally constructed on shore. Their purpose is to keep floods out of
low-lying areas. Similarly, sea walls are also onshore structures that help in preventing flooding and
keep the structures behind the wall safe. In densely populated areas and ports, sea walls provide the
best defence against tsunamis. Breakwaters are constructed to reduce the impact of waves. They calm
the waves and hence are used in construction of harbour to allow smooth manoeuvre of boats.
8
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
9
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Lanka is mud
very light weight solution so it is less catastrophic when the building collapses and less damage is
caused. However, timber is prone to rotting and without the correct maintenance it can come under
attack from fungal growth. Also with this method of construction, joints and material reliability can be
sub-standard and so provide a potentially weak structure. (Schilderman, 1990) It is also very
vulnerable during flooding as the walls leak water into the home and homes can fill with water. It may
therefore be beneficial to consider a more reliable building material.
4.2.2 Concrete frame with masonry walls
Another approach would be to use concrete
framed buildings with masonry walls. Masonry
walls within a concrete frame are not connected
to their surrounding concrete so when columns
are put under significant horizontal force the
masonry walls tend to resist the movement of
the column. Since masonry is a brittle
building material, these forces can frame under earthquake conditions. (Theconstructor) cause
cracks to develop as shown in Figure 4.2. They therefore act as a sacrificial fuse for the structure and
fail whilst maintaining the structural integrity of the concrete frame. (The Constructor, 2012)
10
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
times,
meaning
are
it
all over the world and is currently being used to construct buildings
in earthquake
zones. (Gibson,
(Klemenc,
n.d.)
2011)
4.2.4 Steel
Steel is a construction material that is arguably more appropriate in earthquake zones than concrete.
When the building is single story then a steel frame can easily be designed to withstand earthquake
11
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
loading. However, steel members on a large scale are difficult to transport and place on site so large
cranes and trucks would be necessary to move and place steel beams and columns. This means that it
is likely to only be a solution for larger public buildings such as hospitals and schools.
4.3 Flooding
The new buildings in Sri Lanka will also have to be designed to withstand flooding. In the 2014-2015
floods 39 people were killed and 1,000,000 people lost their homes. (Global Disaster Alert and
Coordination System, 2015) This could have been avoided if all homes were designed to be a safe
place during flooding. The easiest way to ensure that no water can get into the houses in the event of a
flood is to raise the floor level of the house above the maximum flooding level. A house safe from
flooding can save lives and prevent the need to rebuild homes. Therefore if the original investment
that goes into building homes is more, then not as many homes will have to be rebuilt in the long
term, causing an overall saving of both money and lives. A solution to this problem could include a
raised concrete floor resting on top of concrete columns, this would be an easily buildable solution
and very effective in avoiding damage to the building during flooding.
4.4 Conclusion
Designing buildings to be located on the Sri Lankan coast line brings many challenges. The buildings
must be designed to withstand earthquakes, flooding and tsunami despite being located on a poor
island country with hundreds of thousands of homes to be rebuilt as well as major community
buildings. Possible building materials include steel bar reinforced concrete, fibre reinforced concrete,
timber and mud or steel. In an attempt to avoid damage during flooding, the floor level can be raised
off the ground above the predicted height of flooding.
5. RUBBLE DISPOSAL
5.1 Introduction
Disasters, both natural and man-made, can generate vast quantities of waste that threaten public
health, hinder reconstruction and impact the environment. During recent years, the delays in response
and significant environmental impacts caused by disasters have raised many questions due to the
debris generated. The environmental and financial costs of debris management have been devastating
(Solis, Hightower, Sussex, & Kawaguchi, 1995). One of the major challenges in responding to almost
12
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
all disasters is the large amount of rubble created and the obstacles the rubble cause to relief and
reconstruction efforts. In the case of Sri Lanka, the tsunami of 2004 destroyed almost 100,000 houses,
generating about 450,000 tonnes of debris (Karunasena, Amaratunga, & Haigh, 2010). According to
United Nations Environment Protection (UNEP), the debris resulting from the tsunami of 2004 was
not properly disposed, reused or managed in Sri Lanka (UNEP, 2005). There are three types of debris
associated with a disaster (Solis, Hightower, Sussex, & Kawaguchi, 1995):
Debris generated indirectly by the disaster, e.g., spoiled food due to power failure or
excessive donations.
This section seeks to identify efficient methods for the clearing and disposing of debris generated
directly by the disaster to facilitate the rebuilding phase.
5.3 Recycling
Recycling is the collection and separation of materials from waste and subsequent processing to
produce marketable products (Tam & Tam, 2006). Giving focus to re-use and recycling efforts could
decrease the overall cost of reconstruction. They can reduce adverse impacts by diverting large
quantities of rubble away from more costly disposal options (Solis, Hightower, Sussex, & Kawaguchi,
1995). Increasing recycling efforts would also reduce the burden on local landfills.
13
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Materials which cant be recycled can be identified early to avoid double handing of
materials.
recycled aggregates, implications on their applications and benefits which may be gained from presoaking or coating.
(Trauma
and
Global
Health
Program)
effective solution. Further work will look into two possible solutions:
rebuilding.
Figure 5.6 Areas Affected Regionally (Indian Ocean Earthquake Triggers Deadly Tsunami, 2005)
6. TSUNAMI MITIGATION
6.1 Introduction
This section aims to cover and focus on possible concepts that reduce the damaging effects of the flow
and impact of a tsunami on coastal areas. These include options such as the implementation of
physical barriers, conservation of existing features, and land use management. The aim of this
section within the final report is for some of these options to be implemented alongside the other areas
of focus within to provide a feasible approach to reconstruction and future damage mitigation
following a tsunami.
To arrive at feasible outcomes from the following concepts, all of them must be explored with
several underlying points in mind. The relative financial cost must be considered for each option in
terms of its effectiveness at reducing damage and loss of human life. Every options efficacy must be
examined in different coastal situations and topographies, as something that may prove effective in
one location could have little or no effect in another. Furthermore, that the community and
environmental impacts sought after for each concept must be as little as possible; as it is important to
find a method of mitigation that does not require the sacrifice of permanent land use.
16
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
slowing and dissipating water energy. Therefore, the continued mining of coral reef in the surrounding
waters for aggregate further outlines the need for preservation of natural barriers. Furthermore, due to
their efficiency in mitigating the effects of a tsunami along with general flooding, it is important to
consider replanting areas of mangrove and increasing the size of existing forests.
The beneficial aspect of using natural barriers is that they come at a relatively small financial cost to
the country or local people, making them a very favourable option given their effectiveness.
however,
serving as
6.5 Drainage
Due to slow ground water seepage and areas of low level, once a tsunami surge has hit land it can take
a while before all areas are free of standing water. This is first and foremost an issue when trying to
provide immediate aid and rescue to the areas affected. It is then an issue in the long term for the
salinity of the soil as well as having the potential to saturate soil to the extent of causing damage to
building foundations. Therefore, the report will look at the feasibility of providing a network of
underground or covered storm drains that allow water a faster route to drain back to the sea from
inundated areas.
18
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
failure
when surges of water saturate the toe of the slope. This may then destabilise the slope causing a slip.
The number of settlements located in such areas, how high the risk levels are and the feasibility of
stabilising these slopes is therefore of interest in the report.
7. WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
7.1 Pre-existing infrastructure
Water supply at the coastal regions of Sri Lanka comprised of pipe-borne water to the cities from
reservoirs, deep groundwater wells, and private shallow wells. The most common source of water in
the areas affected by the tsunami came from shallow wells less than 10m in depth. (UNEP, 2006)
Many of these open wells had high levels of salinity even before the tsunami hit due to their proximity
to the ocean and shallow depth. Some of these wells produced no water at all during the dry season
between monsoons. As a result, many people bought and stored potable water in the home. (Clasen
T., 2005)
of seawater contaminates wells and increases the salinity of soil as saltwater leaches through the
ground. Just a 5% mix of seawater with freshwater can render it unsuitable for drinking (Violette,
2009). It can take years for rainwater to naturally flush out or dilute the system to a safe level. This
has a major impact on crop harvesting along with clean water supply in the area.
The damage caused by the 2004 earthquake and following tsunami on Sri Lankas coastal water
network was comprehensive.
service mainly due to blockages and overloading in the system. An estimated 62,000 shallow coastal
wells were contaminated by sea water along with debris and sewage stirred up by the tsunami
(Villholth K.G., 2011). Many aquifers also became contaminated as seawater gained direct entry into
the water table through open wells. Around 9000 acres of paddy fields and 1467 acres of vegetable
and fruit crops were destroyed affecting 7,500 farmers (Imbulana K., 2006). Major paddy fields in
Trincomalee and Batticoloa which produce about one third of the countrys total rice harvest were
heavily afflicted. The impact of the tsunami on rice crop is a major concern as close to 90% of
irrigated land in Sri Lanka is cultivated with paddy. (Imbulana K., 2006) According to a study it took
roughly 5 years for ground water in the affected area to completely recover back to purity. (Villholth
K.G., 2011)
rinse the well of seawater however this procedure was largely ineffective and often exacerbated the
problem due to seawater intrusion from below. (Clasen T., 2005)
20
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Figure 7.1.
Mobile
water purification machine in Kalmunai Sri Lanka Source: (UNEP, 2006)
Perhaps the most commonly used today is reverse osmosis due to its low energy
consumption.
However the biggest problem for desalination is its cost compared to conventional
water collection. Energy is needed to separate the salt from the water therefore the cost of the water
21
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
produced from the plant is higher compared to treated freshwater from a reservoir for example. As Sri
Lanka is still a developing country it may not be feasible to develop an expensive desalination plant
unless an innovative solution is presented. One of these solutions could be using a renewable energy
source such as tidal energy or solar energy to provide the power needed. (Friszmann, 2009) There is
already a project underway in Australia which will utilise tidal energy to power a desalination plant.
(Hanafi, 2013)Another option would be cogeneration in which a desalination facility could be
coupled to a power plant so that excess or waste heat can be used efficiently.
Rainwater harvesting
Rainwater harvesting is a very simple technique that can be used to provide freshwater. Rainwater is
simply channelled from roofs into tanks. (Han, 2009) This provides a very cheap source of water
however there can be issues in the reliability of the supply especially during the dry season.
7.5 Focus
The main focus will be on the long term solutions available which will be researched in greater detail.
A feasibility study will be conducted comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each option.
The sustainability needs to be investigated to ensure a good solution is presented that is right for the
local population. It would be unreasonable to suggest the construction of an expensive desalination
plant only for the local population to be priced out by the cost of the water. Therefore, a cost analysis
will also be conducted taking into account the aid funds available post tsunami. The overall solution
may include a combination of the options described above.
8. COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE
The purpose of this section is to investigate options for constructing a disaster-resilient
telecommunications network. This is done by developing an understanding of the top-level structure
of a typical telecoms network and identifying the types of components that could be at risk for a
cataclysmic failure during an environmental disaster stemming from, but not limited to earthquakes.
Once these risks have been identified, investigation into disaster-recovery solutions will be carried
out.
For the purposes of this investigation cataclysmic failure should be defined as the following:
A failure of the network such that vital communications in the hours or days after the disaster are
limited in such a way as to cause further loss of many human lives that could have otherwise been
prevented.
22
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Due to the lack of information available on the state of Sri Lankas communications network and the
system already in place, this section focuses mainly on identifying areas of concern that can be further
improved upon in a typical telecom network to make it more disaster-resilient.
8.3 Subscribers
Subscribers to the telephone service may be associated to individuals or companies. Individual
subscribers that are at risk during a disaster will belong to individuals that may require emergency
assistance from the ambulance or fire service. Individual subscribers are the most time-dependant as
loss of life may be imminent in many scenarios. The only way for a typical individual subscriber to
help make sure they can use telecoms in a disaster is to ensure their device (mobile, landline, etc.) has
a power supply and is connected to a local exchange link (plugged into phone network, antenna is
attached, etc.). The subscriber will always be dependent on access to a functioning local link. In
addition to this it should be noted that one individual is usually only associated with one subscriber.
Because failure of a single subscriber does not usually result in the fatalities of many persons, it
should be disregarded as a candidate for this project despite the fact that the requirement for aid may
be imminent.
Companies may require a functioning communication network for business to continue as usual. This
is less time-critical as the business can pick up again in the weeks following the disaster. Its also
possible that companies may be able to fund disaster-recovery solutions not only to prevent loss of
data and services they may provide, but also to temporarily restore communications for their
premises. These kinds of scenarios may involve the use of entirely independent networks.
8.4 Exchanges
As described earlier in Error: Reference source not found there are at least two categories of
exchanges, these being toll exchanges and local exchanges. Firstly local exchanges are covered,
followed by toll exchanges.
8.4.1 Local Exchanges
Local exchanges allow for a local region to be connected to each other for telecoms. For a single
region to be able to manage its own emergencies, its important that the entire emergency
infrastructure is connected within a local region. Because of this the emergency services should be
prioritised for a local exchange connection, particularly the hospitals. For this reason a case could be
made to block non-emergency service connections in the event of a serious disaster such as an
24
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
earthquake-tsunami. Doing so would free up more bandwidth for emergency services calls. Especially
considering the higher than usual telecom traffic generated from personal calls that is likely to be
present after an earthquake.
For the purpose of example it is simpler to see how exchanges and hospitals relate in a familiar area,
than investigate the situation in Sri Lanka. Guildfords local telephone exchange serves more than
30,000 people (SamKnows.com, 2015). Royal Surrey County Hospital, located in Guildford serves a
total of 320,000 people (Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust, 2015). While there are other
hospitals in Surrey, the important thing to note is that the coverage (in terms of population) of a single
local telephone exchange could be an entire order of magnitude different to the coverage of hospitals.
Its clear from this that a large hospital like Royal Surrey County could be taking calls that have
arrived through a number of different exchanges. If one of these exchanges were to fail, it could lead
to a large loss of life as the distance may be too great to another suitable hospital for badly-injured
patients to survive the journey. This is escalated when it is considered that they may be unable to call
an ambulance for this trip. For this reason there should be redundancy in local exchanges, so that if
one fails the same people are covered by another. This could be done by using overlapping local
exchanges so that traffic can be split from a failed exchange to multiple other nearby exchanges. Its
better to overlap than to simply duplicate the number of exchanges as it would require fewer
exchanges to be built.
8.4.2 Toll Exchanges
The importance of the toll exchange is to link local exchanges together. Having a connection between
local exchanges and the toll exchange after an earthquake will allow for overfull hospitals to spread
the load to neighbouring less-busy hospitals.
Its likely that the army will be called into to aid in the recovery effort following an earthquake. While
most typical emergency services will have outposts all across the country, its important to note that
the army may not.
To fund many aspects of the recovery, aid will be required from outside the country, this is up to the
government to distribute, and as such parliament will need to communicate with smaller regions of
the country. While a lack of these extra aid factors may not be as time-critical as a phone connection
to a local hospital, theres still quite a large amount of possible loss of life from losing the toll
exchange. Along with the local exchanges, redundancy should also be built into the toll exchange.
More than one toll exchange in a separate location should prevent any single disaster from cutting off
all local exchanges from each other.
8.5 Links
25
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
The final area of the telecoms network to consider is the links. One important thing to note about the
telephone network is that it operates on a hierarchy as opposed to a web. However it should be
possible to create dormant lines between subscribers and a local exchange other than their own. The
lines could then be activated by a switch between exchanges in the event of a local exchange failure.
While redundancy is one way of recovering from failure, another way is to construct the lines in more
resilient ways. One possible way is to put telephone lines underground instead of on masts. Elevated
lines are likely to be snapped by debris carried in by the wave of a tsunami. However this would only
affect the first few kilometres in from the coast. Past this the lines should be safe.
While all coastal links are likely to be equally vulnerable points, loss of some links will cause more
problems than others. Loss of a link between a local exchange and the toll exchange will isolate that
region from international aid. While the link between a subscriber and the local exchange will
probably only isolate an individual from the emergency services. Priority should be given to the links
between local and toll exchanges.
26
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
9. POWER INFRASTRUCTURE
9.1 Introduction
According to the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2014), the generation of electricity in Sri Lanka is
dominated by Thermal Heat Power and Hydro-electric Power, along with a type of renewable energy,
i.e. wind power, solar power, etc., that accounts for a few percent of the total energy generation.
Therefore, designing some resilient power plants and transmission network in this country can ensure
consistent power supply when earthquakes, tsunamis and other disasters occur; especially for the
critical infrastructure such as hospitals, water supply, and shelters etc. that are located or used to
supply the coastal area because of the high population density. However, no matter how resistant the
structure is, there are always opportunities for the occurrence of an unpredictable natural disaster, so it
will be vital to prioritise the restoration of power supply and backup power for critical infrastructure.
fabric
filters.
However,
from
the
accessed if the transport network is destroyed. As a result, multiple emergency backup power
approaches should be applied for the critical infrastructure.
27
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
28
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
electricity supply immediately after different disasters. The most direct way to keep power generating
is the protection of power plants and substations.
Water-proof power plants
Figure 9.2. Transmission Network
When earthquakes or tsunamis occur, flooding will usually occur subsequently. The power generator
would easily be damaged by water if there is no suitable protection from the outside. Hence designing
the structure with impermeable materials can prevent water from getting in and as a result avoids the
potential submergence of the electrical systems and devices, for example, the step-up transformer and
electrical generator in a coal thermal power station. Concrete with lower water/cement ratio should be
chosen due to its low permeability to prevent and minimise the water from reaching the steel elements
and reinforcements, which may lead to durability and other structural issues. In addition to that, an
embedded membrane to its outer surface will be able to overcome this problem and maintain the
robustness of the structure. Another method to avoid water from getting into the power station district
is to build a tsunami (wave) barrier. It works by building a high wall that surrounds the power station
and consequently stops the water from entering.
Earthquake Resistant Power station
To achieve a power station that is resistant to different disasters is the primary aim to ensure steady
power supply for the residents, businesses and most importantly for the critical infrastructures. By
using the application of earthquake resistant building design, seismic isolation systems should be
included which is basically reducing the earthquake energy that affects the structure by extending the
structural period rather than increasing the resistance capacity according to Torunbalci (2004).
Undoubtedly, seismic isolation systems are some expensive technology, however, safety is always the
most important consideration, and so human life must be prioritized. Moreover, the hydro power
plants must be constructed to sustain seismic loads, so that the water from the dam or reservoir will
not cause serious flooding.
Robust Power Distribution System
As mentioned above, as the population in Sri Lanka is focused along the coastal areas, ensuring the
resiliency of the power distribution system, including transmission lines. Substation, transformers,
etc., can supply the country with electricity immediately after the earthquake or other disasters, which
could allow prompt rescue and assistance for reconstruction work of devastated buildings. Due to the
differences in structural characteristics of a power station and a transmission tower, instead of
applying seismic isolation systems, making sure the seismic resistance capability of the distribution
system would be more suitable. Babu and Selvam (2012) recommend that there should be
consideration of seismic loads when designing distribution systems and transmission line towers,
29
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
hence ensuring these kinds of structures are capable of withstanding critical loadings without any
deformations and structural failures.
10. CONCLUSION
The 2004 tsunami was a devastating event that caused vast damage to every aspect of the Sri Lankan
Coast line. This report has looked at rebuilding measures that can be taken in the wake of this disaster
so that a similar event in the future would not have such a devastating effect.
Before any rebuilding efforts begin, the rubble from damaged buildings and infrastructure must be
cleared. It is a priority to ensure that this rubble is not just wasted but recycled and reused. For this to
happen there must be available recycling plants for the whole coast line so a portable recycling plant
would be very effective. When it comes to rebuilding the long term housing solutions, multiple
construction methods were discussed. The most likely option would be raised floor concrete frame
buildings. This would not be as cheap as typical mud and pole construction, but provides a more
effective solution against future disasters. The infrastructure of the coastline was severely damaged
and a complete redesign of the whole system is potentially a viable option with more appropriate road
materials and rail routes. Mitigation measures have also been proposed to reduce the damage inflicted
in the future. Such measures include preserving mangrove areas to act as a physical barrier to
tsunamis; improving town planning to channel and divert tsunamis and developing an improved
drainage system to remove flood water.
Flooding and earthquakes had a severe effect on services including water, gas, electricity and
communications. New systems have been discussed that can replace the damaged service routes and
provide a solution that is able to withstand similar events in the future.
30
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
11. REFERENCES
Basnayake, B., Chiemchaisri, C., & Mowjood, M. (2005). Solid wastes arise from the asian tsunami
disaster and their rehabilitation activities: case study of affected coastal belts in Sri Lanka and
Thailand. Italy: Environmental Sanitary Engineering Centre.
Friends of the Earth. (2009). Recycling collections - source separated or commingled?
Indian Ocean Earthquake Triggers Deadly Tsunami. (2005, January). Retrieved from USGS.
Karunasena, G., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2010). Waste Management Strategies during Post
Disaster Phase: A Case of Sri Lanka.
Reycling Concrete and Masonry. (1999). Skokie, Illinois, USA.
Schwein, D. E., Cavalline, T. L., & Weggel, D. C. (2013). Use of Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregate
and Recycled Brick Masonry Aggregate Concrete in Sustainable Construction. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Project Management.
Solis, G. Y., Hightower, H. C., Sussex, J., & Kawaguchi, J. (1995). Disaster Debris Management.
Tam, V., & Tam, C. (2006). Evaluation of existing waste recycling methods:A Hong Kong study.
Trauma and Global Health Program. (n.d.). Retrieved from McGill: https://www.mcgill.ca/traumaglobalhealth/countries/srilanka
UNEP. (2005). Sri Lanka post tsunami environmental assessment.
Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System. (2015). Retrieved October 21st, 2015, from
http://www.gdacs.org/report.aspx?eventtype=FL&eventid=4215
Klemenc, S. E. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19th, 2015, from
http://www.concretedecor.net/decorativeconcretearticles/vol-9-no-7-novemberdecember-2009/pvafibers/
Luthra, D. (2005). BBC News. Retrieved October 21st, 2015, from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4618683.stm
Rosenblueth, E., & Meli, R. (1986, May). The 1985 Earthquake: Causes and Effects in Mexico City.
8(5), 23-34. Retrieved October 20th, 2015
Schilderman, T. (1990). Earthquake Resistant Housing. Practical Action. Retrieved October 18th,
2015
The Constructor. (2012). Retrieved October 18th, 2015, from
http://theconstructor.org/earthquake/earthquakes-effects-reinforced-concrete-buildings/3790/
Esfandiar. (2009). Design of a Tsunami Barrier to The North of Pengang Island. Malaysia: Universiti
Teknologi Malaysia.
Kinver, M. (2015, May 12). Sri Lanka first nation to protect all mangrove forests. Retrieved October
23, 2015, from BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-32683798
31
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Clasen T., S. L., 2005. The Drinking Water Response to the Indian Ocean Tsunami , s.l.: World Health
Organization (WHO).
Friszmann, C., 2009. State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination, 1(216), pp. 1-76.
Hanafi, A., 2013. Desalination Using Tidal Energy, s.l.: DESWARE.
Han, M., 2009. Rainwater harvesting as a sustainable water supply option in Banda Aceh.
Desalination, 1(248), pp. 223-240.
Imbulana K., W. N. N. B., 2006. Sri Lanka National Water Develeopment Report, s.l.: UNESCO.
UNEP, 2006. After the tsunami: rapid environmental assessment - Sri Lanka, s.l.: UNEP.
Villholth K.G., N. B., 2011. Tsunamis as Long-Term Hazards to Coastal Groundwater Resources and
Associated Water Supplies. s.l.:INTECH.
Violette, S. G. B. &. S. G., 2009. Tsunami-induces groundwater salinization. Geoscience, Issue 341,
pp. 339-346.
Torunbalci, N. (2004) Seismic Isolation and Energy Dissipating Systems in Earthquake Resistant
Design [Online] 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Available from:
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_3273.pdf [Accessed: 21st October 2015]
Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2014) Economic and Social statistics of Sri Lanka.[Online]Available
from:http://www.cbsl.gov.lk/pics_n_docs/10_pub/_docs/statistics/other/econ_&_ss_2014_e.pdf
[Accessed: 20th October 2015]
Kowatech (2015) Other Cars. [Online] Available from: http://www.kowatech.co.jp/p_other.html
[Accessed: 22nd October 2015]
Shimizu, T. (2015) This Japanese Company Built A Disaster-Proof Factory. [Online] Available
from: http://www.gereports.com/post/113798852100/this-japanese-company-built-a-disaster-proof/
[Accessed: 20th October 2015]
Ratnasooriya, H. (2007) Post Tsunami Recovery Process in Sri Lanka. [Online] Available from:
http://jsnds.org/jnds/29_1_3.pdf [Accessed: 20th October 2015]
Babu, R. & Selvam, R. (2012) Earthquake Resistance Capability of Distribution Pole. [Online]
Available from: http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_5723.pdf [Accessed: 22nd
October 2015]
Tsunami2004 (2013) Tsunami 2004 Facts and Figures. [Online] Available from:
http://www.tsunami2004.net/tsunami-2004-facts/ [Accessed: 23rd October 2015]
Palliyaguru, R., Amaratunga, D. and Haigh, R. (2007). Effects of post disaster infrastructure
reconstruction on disaster management cycle and challenges confronted: The case of Indian Ocean
tsunami in Sri Lanka. [online] Academia.edu. Available at:
http://www.academia.edu/2670039/Effects_of_post_disaster_infrastructure_reconstruction_on_disaste
r_management_cycle_and_challenges_confronted_The_case_of_Indian_Ocean_tsunami_in_Sri_Lank
a [Accessed 22 Oct. 2015].
32
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2
Weerakoon, D., Jayasuriya, S., Arunatilake, N., and Steele, P. (2007). Economic Challenges of PostTsunami Reconstruction in Sri Lanka. [online] Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available
at: http://www.adbi.org/discussionpaper/2007/08/31/2354.sri.lanka.post.tsunami.reconstruction/
[Accessed 22 Oct. 2015].
Ratnasooriya, H., Samarawrickwama, S. and Imamura, F. (2007). Post Tsunami Recovery Process in
Sri Lanka. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 29(1), pp.21-28.
Huurdeman, A.A. 1997, "Chapter 1 Telecommunications" in Guide to Telecommunications Transmission
Systems Artech House, Inc., Norwood, MA, pp. 1-44.
SamKnows.com 2015, Unknown-last update, SamKnows - Broadband Availability - Guildford (THGI)
Exchange [Homepage of SamKnows.com], [Online].
Available: https://www.samknows.com/broadband/exchange/THGI[2015, 10/22].
Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust 2015, 08 September 2015-last update, Overview - Royal
Surrey County Hospital - NHS Choices [Homepage of NHS], [Online].
Available:http://www.nhs.uk/Services/hospitals/Overview/DefaultView.aspx?id=775 [2015, 22/10].
33
Earthquake Reconstruction: Group 2