Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
HIV/AIDS
of Health Physical Education and Recreation and 2School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, 3Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis;
(US Agency for International DevelopmentAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare) Partnership, 5Moi University School of
Medicine, 6Moi University School of Public Health, Eldoret, Kenya; and 7Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada
4USAID-AMPATH
Background. This article describes the effect point of entry into the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care
program had on the clinical status of adults presenting for the first time to USAID-AMPATH (US Agency for
International DevelopmentAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare) Partnership clinics for HIV care.
Methods. All patients aged $14 years enrolled between August 2008 and April 2010 were included. Points of
entry to USAID-AMPATH clinics were home-based counseling and testing (HBCT), provider-initiated testing and
counseling (PITC), HIV testing in the tuberculosis clinic, and voluntary counseling and testing (VCT). Tests for
trend were calculated, and multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the effect of HBCT versus other
points of entry on primary outcomes controlling for age and sex.
Results. There were 19 552 eligible individuals. Of these, 946 tested in HBCT, 10 261 in VCT, 8073 in PITC,
and 272 in the tuberculosis clinic. The median (interquartile range) enrollment CD4 cell counts among those who
tested HIV positive was 323 (194491), 217 (87404), 190 (70371), and 136 cells/mm3 (59266) for HBCT, VCT,
PITC, and the tuberculosis clinic, respectively (P , .001). Compared with those patients whose HIV infection was
diagnosed in the tuberculosis clinic, those who tested positive in HBCT were, controlling for age and sex, less likely
to have to have World Health Organization stage III or IV HIV infection at enrollment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR],
0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], .03.06), less likely to enroll with a CD4 cell count of ,200 cells/mm3 (AOR,
0.20; 95% CI, .14.28), and less likely to enroll into care with a chief complaint (AOR, 0.08; 95% CI, .05.12).
Conclusions. HBCT is effective at getting HIV-infected persons enrolled in HIV care before they become ill.
275
METHODS
Study Area
HIV/AIDS
Eligible for inclusion in the analysis were adults aged $14 years
who enrolled in HIV care in any of the AMPATH clinics from
August 2008 to April 2010 and who had their point of entry
documented on their initial clinical encounter form.
Data Collection
Table 1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Patients Aged 14 Years Enrolling in US Agency for International Development Academic
Model Providing Access to Healthcare Clinics, Stratified by Point of Entry (N 5 19 552)
Variable
HBCT (n 5 946)
37 (3046)
VCT (n 5 10 261)
36 (2944)
PITC (n 5 8073)
P Value
36 (3044)
,.022
36 (2944)
,.001
Male
268 (28)
3537 (35)
3050 (38)
136 (50)
Female
678 (72)
6724 (66)
5023 (62)
136 (50)
75 (11)
360 (5)
321 (6)
7 (5)
,.001b
214 (24)
649 (7)
466 (6)
13 (5)
.045b
63 (7)
619 (6)
659 (8)
17 (6)
Restricted to women.
Data Analysis
RESULTS
The primary dependent variable was the patients CD4 cell count
and WHO clinical stage at enrollment, and the secondary dependent variables were having been hospitalized in the past year,
having a chief complaint (a symptom the patient self-reports at
the clinical encounter as being the main reason for coming to the
clinic) at enrollment, being in a discordant relationship, and
being pregnant (for women only). Other variables considered for
their potential explanatory or confounding relationship to the
primary dependent variable included age and sex. We identified
the point of entry to USAID-AMPATH clinics and compared age,
sex, pregnancy in women, discordant couples, the WHO clinical
stage at enrollment, CD4 cell count at enrollment, hospitalization
in the past year, and having a chief complaint at enrollment
between these points of entries and testing points. Patients whose
point of entry was documented as other were excluded from
the analysis. Proportions of missing data were calculated for each
variable and compared for different points of entry.
The data were analyzed using Stata/SE software (version 10).
Comparisons were done using Pearsons v2 test for categorical
277
Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of Patients Aged 14 Years Enrolling in US Agency for International Development Academic Model
Providing Access to Healthcare Clinics Stratified by Point of Entry (N 5 19 552)
HBCT
(n 5 946)
Variable
VCT
(n 5 10 261)
PITC
(n 5 8073)
Tuberculosis Clinic
(n 5 272)
P Value
136 (59266)
,.001
323 (194491)
221 (23)
4697 (45)
4209 (52)
103 (38)
Stage I/II
612 (86)
5271 (62)
3357 (54)
47 (21)
.002a
Stage III/IV
Missing data
97 (14)
237 (25)
3165 (38)
1825 (18)
2843 (46)
1873 (23)
172 (79)
53 (19)
.002a
Yes
18 (2)
843 (8)
1076 (14)
33 (13)
,.001a
Missing data
16 (2)
208 (2)
241 (3)
8 (3)
Yes
264 (35)
6008 (67)
5044 (72)
205 (87)
Missing data
196 (21)
1324 (13)
1051 (13)
36 (13)
217 (87404)
190 (70371)
HIV/AIDS
Abbreviations: HBCT, home-based counseling and testing; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; PITC, provider-initiated testing and
counseling; VCT, voluntary counseling and testing; WHO, World Health Organization.
AOR
95% CI
P Value
Reference
PITC
0.24
.17.33
,.001
VCT
0.17
.12.23
,.001
0.04
.03.06
,.001
Reference
PITC
0.62
.45.86
.004
VCT
0.52
.38.72
,.001
HBCT
0.20
.14.28
,.001
HBCT
Table 4. Logistic Regression Subanalysis of Impact of HomeBased Counseling and Testing Versus Voluntary Counseling and
Testing on Key Markers of Clinical Status at Enrollment, Adjusted
for Age and Sex
Marker at
Enrollment and
Point of Entry Into HIV Care
WHO III/IV clinical stage disease
VCT
HBCT
VCT
0.39
.27.57
,.001
VCT
HBCT
0.31
0.08
.21.46
.05.12
,.001
,.001
Reference
PITC
1.11
.771.61
.567
VCT
0.64
.44.93
.018
HBCT
0.14
.07.25
,.001
P Value
Reference
0.26
.21.32
,.001
HBCT
Reference
0.38
.32.45
,.001
Reference
0.25
.21.29
,.001
Reference
0.21
.13.34
,.001
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HBCT, homebased counseling and testing; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PITC,
provider-initiated testing and counseling; VCT, voluntary counseling and
testing; WHO, World Health Organization.
a
men are proportionately less well represented. Much more attention needs to be focused on helping HIV-infected men access
care in a timely manner, and more research is needed to understand the issues facing HIV-infected men in sub-Saharan
Africa that prevent them from accessing care.
With improved access to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan
Africa [3, 25], rates of mother-to-child transmission of HIV have
been greatly reduced [3]. Even so, the coverage of PMTCT services
is not optimal, with most countries having not yet reached all
pregnant women with these services [3, 25]. Our findings revealed
that HBCT was able to enroll twice the proportion of HIV-infected
pregnant women compared with VCT, PITC or tuberculosis entry
points. The implication is that HBCT could complement PMTCT
by identifying and referring pregnant women who are not otherwise accessing antenatal or PMTCT services.
Differences in clinical status among persons who tested positive in PITC versus in VCT were rather attenuated, even compared with the differences between VCT and HBCT. This suggests
that persons who test positive in VCT are more likely to come for
care only once their health begins to deteriorate, reducing the
279
Reference
PITC
95% CI
AOR
Notes
Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank all the clinicians
in all the AMPATH clinics, especially the clinical officers, medical officers,
pediatricians, nutritionists, outreach workers, and social workers, for their
dedication in caring for patients and their attentiveness in accurately recording their patients data. We would also like to thank all the data entry
technicians, data managers, and administrative and clerical staff for enabling the collection, management, interpretation, and publication of these
data. We appreciate Dr Jane Carter and Dr Harsha Triamurthy, who both
made important contributions to earlier versions of the manuscript.
280
HIV/AIDS
J. W. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and was primarily responsible for incorporating authors comments into subsequent drafts.
S. K., S. N., and J. M. are the principal investigators of the AMPATH HBCT
Program and contributed to the manuscript by revising drafts and assisting
in the interpretation of the findings. P. B. conceived the idea for the
analysis, conducted all statistical analysis, and took primary responsibility
for supervising and mentoring J. W. in developing the paper and making
the final decision about its submission.
Both the Indiana University Institutional Review Board and the Moi
University Institutional Research Ethics Committee provided approval for
retrospective analysis of routinely collected clinical data in AMPATH.
Financial support. The HBCT program was supported by grants from
Abbott Laboratories, the Purpleville Foundation, and the Global Business
Coalition. The United States Agency for International Development as part
of the Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (USAID-PEPFAR)
supported care for those found to be HIV positive, and the Abbott Fund
provided test kits and logistical support. AMPATH and the authors are
particularly grateful to the Rockefeller Foundation for funding the development of the AMPATH Medical Records System, and the Kenyan
Division of Leprosy, TB and Lung Disease, formerly the Kenyan National
Leprosy and Tuberculosis Program, for its support.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential
Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the
content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
1. Kenya Ministry of Health. Kenya AIDS indicator survey 2007. Nairobi,
Kenya: Ministry of Health, 2009.
2. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). UNAIDS
report on the global AIDS epidemic 2010. Available at: http://www.
unaids.org/globalreport/global_report.htm. Accessed 22 August 2011.
3. WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF. Towards universal access: scaling up priority
HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector. 2009. Available at: http://
www.who.int/hiv/pub/tuapr_2009_en.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2011.
4. Badri M, Lawn SD, Wood R. Short-term risk of AIDS or death
in people infected with HIV-1 before antiretroviral therapy in South
Africa: a longitudinal study. Lancet 2006; 368:12549.
5. Sabin CA, Smith CJ, Gumley H, et al. Late presenters in the era of
highly active antiretroviral therapy: uptake of and responses to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2004; 18:214551.
6. Antinori A, Johnson M, Moreno S, et al. Introduction to late presentation for HIV treatment in Europe. Antivir Ther 2010; 15:12.
7. Kigozi IM, Dobkin LM, Martin JN, et al. Late-disease stage at presentation to an HIV clinic in the era of free antiretroviral therapy in
sub-Saharan Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 52:2809.
8. Braitstein P, Brinkhof MW, Dabis F, et al. Mortality of HIV-1infected
patients in the first year of antiretroviral therapy: a comparison between low-income and high-income countries. Lancet 2006; 367:
81724.
9. Wools-Kaloustian KD, Kimaiyo SD, Diero LD, et al. Viability and
effectiveness of large-scale HIV treatment initiatives in sub-Saharan
Africa: experience from western Kenya. AIDS 2006; 20:418.
10. Chesney MA, Smith AW. Critical delays in HIV testing and care: the
potential role of stigma. Am Behav Scientist 1999; 42:116274.
11. Samet JH, Freedberg KA, Stein MD, et al. Trillion virion delay: time
from testing positive for HIV to presentation for primary care. Arch
Intern Med 1998; 158:73440.
12. Marum E, Taegtmeyer M, Chebet K. Scale-up of voluntary HIV
counseling and testing in Kenya. JAMA 2006; 296:85962.
13. Chakaya JM, Mansoer JR, Scano F, et al. National scale-up of HIV
testing and provision of HIV care to tuberculosis patients in Kenya. Int
J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008; 12:4249.
14. Anand A, Shiraishi RW, Sheikh AA, et al. Site factors may be more
important than participant factors in explaining HIV test acceptance in
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
23. Plitt SS, Mihalicz D, Singh AE, Jayaraman G, Houston S, Lee BE. Time
to testing and accessing care among a population of newly diagnosed
patients with HIV with a high proportion of Canadian aboriginals,
19982003. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2009; 23:939.
24. Braitstein P, Boulle A, Low N, et al. Gender and the use of antiretroviral
treatment in resource-constrained settings: findings from a multicenter
collaboration. J Womens Health 2008; 17:4755.
25. John FN, Farquhar C, et al. Cost effectiveness of couple counselling
to enhance infant HIV-1 prevention. Int J STD AIDS 2008; 19:
4069.
26. Howard AA, El-Sadr WM. Integration of tuberculosis and HIV services
in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:23844.
27. Lingappa JR, Lambdin B, Bukusi EA, et al. Regional differences in
prevalence of HIV-1 discordance in Africa and enrollment of HIV-1
discordant couples into an HIV-1 prevention trial. PLoS One 2008;
3:e1411.
28. Kumar A, Waterman I, Kumari G, Carter A. Prevalence and correlates
of HIV serostatus disclosure: a prospective study among HIV-infected
postparturient women in Barbados. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2006;
20:72430.
29. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection
with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:493505.
30. Miller A, Rubin D. Motivations and methods for self-disclosure of HIV
seropositivity in Nairobi, Kenya. AIDS Behav 2007; 11:68797.
31. Sullivan KM. Male self-disclosure of HIV-positive serostatus to sex
partners: a review of the literature. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2005;
16:3347.
HIV/AIDS
281
22.