Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 May 2008
Received in revised form 23 November 2008
Available online 14 January 2009
Keywords:
Three-dimensional
Rigid inclusion
Thermal stress
Potential theory method
Stress singularity
a b s t r a c t
This paper examines the three-dimensional problem of nding thermal stresses due to an insulated rigid
sheet-like inclusion (anticrack) in an elastic space under a uniform perpendicular heat ow. By using
appropriate harmonic potentials, a general method of solving this problem is presented. The resulting
boundary-value problems are reduced to classical mixed problems of potential theory. For the purpose
of illustration, a complete solution in terms of elementary functions for a rigid circularly shaped inclusion
is given and discussed from the point of view of material failure.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Most advanced engineering structures contain some inhomogeneities. Cracks and rigid inclusions (sometimes called anticracks)
are the two most dangerous extremes that affect the behavior of
materials. It has been recognized that these defects obstructing
the heat ow produce thermal local disturbances. Therefore, the
knowledge of induced thermal stresses from the heat environment
is essential for the study of material failure.
The results of basic research on the three-dimensional thermoelastic crack problems are included in monographs by Kassir and
Sih (1975) and Kit and Khay (1989). Employing the potential theory method, effective and important results in this area have been
obtained by Kaczynski (1994), Kaczynski and Matysiak (2003), and
Chen et al. (2004). In comparison with spatial crack problems, the
rigid sheet-like inclusions have been studied to a much lesser extent and most investigations are mainly focused on 3D isothermal
problem in a homogeneous elastic material (see e.g. Kassir and Sih,
1968; Selvadurai, 1982, 2000a; Silovanyuk, 1984; Huang and Liu,
1988; Rahman, 1999, 2002; Kachanov et al., 2002; Chaudhuri,
2003 and the basic monographs by Mura, 1982; Panasyuk et al.,
1986; Alexandrov et al., 1993). As far as interface rigid inclusions
are concerned, we mention the contributions done by Gladwell
(1999), Selvadurai (2000b), Kaczynski (1999), Li and Fan (2001)
and Chaudhuri (2006). Although signicant progress has been
made in solving some plane thermoelastic inclusions problems
(see, among others, Sekine, 1987 and Chao and Shen, 1998, and
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +48 22 6219312; fax: +48 22 6257460.
E-mail address: akacz@mini.pw.edu.pl (A. Kaczynski).
0020-7683/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.002
T ;ii 0
rij;j 0
where a comma followed by the index i denotes partial differentiation with respect to xi.
For the constitutive equations we take the Fourier law of heat
conduction and the Duhamel-Neumann stress-displacement relations, given respectively by
qi kT ;i
q3 kT ;3 0 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 2 S
q
q3 kT ;3 ! q0 as x21 x22 x23 ! 1
where k and l are the Lam constants, b = a (3k + 2l) with a as the
linear coefcient of thermal expansion, k is the thermal conductivity and dij is Kroneckers delta.
Upon substitution of Eq. (4) into (2) the equilibrium equations
in terms of displacements (generalized Lam equations) are shown
to be
lui;jj k luj;ji bT ;i 0
For problems involving the plane of discontinuity at x3 = 0 , a suitable general solution to Eqs. (1) and (5) can be obtained by introducing a temperature harmonic function (potential) x such that
u1 u2 0; u3 e x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 2 S
Z Z
r33 x1 ; x2 ; 0 r33 x1 ; x2 ; 0 dx1 dx2 0
S
q
rij ! 0 as x21 x22 x23 ! 1
u1 u1 c
u2 u1 c
xdx3 x3 F
x3
1
xdx3 x3 F
x3
u3;2
u3;1
k 3l
u3 u1;3
u x3 F ;3
kl 2
where
F u 2 c x; c
b
2k 2l
r31 2l u1;3
r32 2l u1;3
r33
r11
r22
r12
l
kl
l
kl
u2 x3 F ;3
u2 x3 F ;3
~ i ; rij rij r
~ ij
T T Te ; ui ui u
20
21
22
The rst 0-solution to the basic Eqs. (1)(5) with conditions (18)
and (21) is readily obtained as
0
lu3;23
11
lu3;13
T x1 ; x2 ; x3
0
0
q0
x3 ; q1 x1 ; x2 ; x3 q2 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0
k
0
;1
12
;2
k 2l
2l u1;33
u2;3 cT x3 F ;33
kl
"
Z 1
k
2l u1 c
xdx3 x3 F
u
k
l 2;3
x3
;11
u3;12 2cT
"
Z 1
k
2l u1 c
xdx3 x3 F
u
k
l 2;3
x3
;22
u3;12 2cT
Z 1
2l u 1 c
xdx3 x3 F
x3
19
10
With the aid of the constitutive relations (4) the stresses corresponding to the displacements (7)(9) are found to be
18
;1
;2
17
T x;3
1773
13
q3 x1 ; x2 ; x3 q0
0
0
q a
q a
u1 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 x1 x3 u2 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 x2 x3
k
k
0
q0 a 2
2
2
x x1 x2
u3 x1 ; x2 ; x3
2k 3
0
rij 0
23
24
25
14
15
16
;12
1774
q
Te ;3 0 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 2 S
k
Te 0 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 2 R2 n S
26
27
~ ;3 ; x
~ x1 ; x2 ; x3
Te x
Z Z
1
cn1 ; n2 dn1 dn2
q
2p
S
x1 n1 2 x2 n2 2 x23
28
1
D
2p
Z Z
29
2
2
in which D @ 2 @ 2 stands for the planar Laplacian. Note that
@x1 @x2
due to the property of the normal derivative of the simple-layer po~ we have
tential x
Te x1 ; x2 ; 0 Te x1 ; x2 ; 0 2cx1 ; x2 x1 ; x2 2 S
30
cx1 ; x2 Te x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 x1 ; x2 2 S
u1 c
x3
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
f x1 ; x2 ; x3 0
kl
f0 x1 ; x2 x1 ; x2 2 S
k 3l
f;3 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 0 x1 ; x2 2 R2 n S
45
46
f0 x1 ; x2
q0 a 2
q a
~ x1 ; x2 ; 0 0 x21 x22
x x22 e cx
2k 1
2k
Z Z
b
qn1 ; n2 dn1 dn2
q
e
4pk 2l
S
x1 n1 2 x2 n2 2
47
34
35
f x1 ; x2 ; x3
32
33
~ dx3 u2 f u3 0
x
37
~ ;1 u
~ ;2
~ 2 x3 f;2 cx
~ 1 x3 f;1 cx
u
k 3l
~ x3 f;3 Te
~3
f cx
u
kl
l
~ ;1 x3 f;31 Te ;1
r~ 31 2l
f;1 cx
kl
l
~ ;2 x3 f;32 Te ;2
r~ 32 2l
f;2 cx
kl
k 2l
r~ 33 2l
f;3 x3 f;33 Te ;3
kl
k
~ ;11
r~ 11 2l
f;3 2c Te x3 f;11 cx
kl
k
~ ;22
r~ 22 2l
f;3 2c Te x3 f;22 cx
kl
~ ;12
r~ 12 2lx3 f;12 cx
31
~2 x1 ; x2 ; 0 0 x1 ; x2 2 R2 ;
~ 1 x1 ; x2 ; 0 u
u
q a
~ 3 x1 ; x2 ; 0 0 x21 x22 e x1 ; x2 2 S
u
2k
r~ 33 x1 ; x2 ; 0 0 x1 ; x2 2 R2 n S
0
1
q
1
C
~ i OB
u
@qA as x21 x22 x23 ! 1
x21 x22 x23
36
1
4p
kl
lk 2l
Z Z
S
x1 n1 2 x2 n2 2 x23
48
~ 33
where the unknown layer density q stands for the normal stress r
on the upper side of the inclusion, i.e.
~ 33 x1 ; x2 ; x3 0 x1 ; x2 2 S
qx1 ; x2 r
49
Z Z
S
50
Z Z
k 3l
H
4plk 2l
51
After q is known from the solution of governing Eq. (50), the potential f can be determined from Eq. (48) and then the whole perturbed
eld is obtained from Eqs. (37)(44). Finally, the unknown settlement e is calculated from Eq. (20) which can be equivalently rewritten as
Z Z
52
It turns out that for an arbitrary shaped anticrack S the derived integral Eqs. (50) and (29) generally may be solved by numerical techniques (see, for instance, Kit and Khay, 1989; Fabrikant, 1991;
Aliabadi and Rooke, 1992). Analytical solutions are available, when
the rigid inclusion is circular or elliptical and f0 is a polynomial
(Rahman, 2002). As an illustration, a complete solution in elementary functions will be presented for the circularly shaped (pennyshaped) rigid inclusion in the next section.
f0 r
53
Then by using the results of Fabrikant (1989), the exact elementary
solution of Eq. (29) and the expression for the thermal potential in
Eq. (28), independent of the angular coordinate h, are
p
0
2
2
cr 2q
pk a r
q
2
2
~ x1 ;x2 ;x3 q0 2a2 2x23 r 2 sin1 la 2a a3l1 l22 a2
x
2
2pk
54
qr
55
q
2
a
x3 P 0
a 2 l1
l2
q
2
a
x3 < 0
a 2 l1
l2
56
06r<a
60
RR
RR
1 dn2
p2
qqdn
a2 n21 n22 x1 n1 2 x2 n2 2
61
c 2 a2
bq0 a2
e
2
4kk 2l
q 2a c q0 ak 6l
c2 0
k
2kk 2l
c0
62
63
2 2
a c2
3
64
1
6
bq0 a2
q aa2 5k 6l
0
6kk 2l
4kk 2l
65
Thus, bearing in mind Eqs. (64) and (60), the main function of the
thermoelastic perturbed problem (the solution to Eq. (50)) has a
simple form
~ 33 r; 0
qr r
c2
3p
2H
2a2 3r2
p
a2 r 2
06r<a
66
The subsequent substitution of Eqs. (66) in (48) gives, due to the results of Fabrikant (1989, 1991), the explicit expression for the governing harmonic potential f for x3 P 0:
"
#
2 q
c2 k l
3
32a2 3l1 2
1 a
l2 a2
a2 3x23 r 2 sin
f x1 ;x2 ;x3
3pk3l
2
l2
2a
67
8
q
2
>
2 xi
>
a2 l1
>
2q
a
> 0
<
i 1; 2
p l2 l2 l2
2 2
1
p
>
> 2q
>
a l2 a2
1
>
: p0 sin la2 2 2 2
i3
l l
2
c0 c2 r2
p
Hp2 a2 r 2
e a2 c2
e can be obtained
As shown in Eq. (28), the perturbed temperature T
~ with respect to x3. From Fabrikant
simply by differentiating x
(1989) (see Appendix A4.1), we get the exact result with elementary
functions as follows:
~i x1 ; x2 ; x3 k Te ;i kx
~ ;3i
q
59
q q
l1 l1 a; r; x3 12
r a2 x23 r a2 x23
q q
r a2 x23 r a2 x23
l2 l2 a; r; x3 12
8
>
2q0
1
>
>
< pk x3 sin
e
T x1 ; x2 ; x3
>
> 2q0 x sin1
>
: pk
3
q0 a 2
q0 b
r e
2a2 r2
8kk 2l
2k
c0
58
In this case it is known (see Rahman, 2002 for a full account) that there
exists an unique admissible solution to Eq. (50), unbounded in the
vicinity of the circumference of the rigid disc-inclusion, given as
so the right side of the governing Eq. (50) is a second order polynomial of one variable r, taking the following form:
1775
57
Turning now to the solution to Eq. (50), we observe that only the
~ x1 ; x1 ; 0 are required from the thermal pervalues of potential x
turbed problem. Hence in view of Eqs. (54) and (47), it is found that
for (x1,x2) 2 S
All the derivatives of this potential that enter formulas for the thermal-elastic eld quantities in Eqs. (37)(44) are derived by using
Fabrikants results. They are given in Appendix A.
This, in fact, completes the solution to the problem under consideration, since without any difculties the full-eld temperature,
uxes, displacements and thermal stresses can be obtained from
the sum of (23)(25) and Eqs. (37)(44), together with Eqs. (56)
and (57). It is noteworthy that the problem has been solved in elementary functions. As might be expected, it is axially symmetric.
The complex general results simplify signicantly for x3 = 0,
namely,
1776
(
Tr;0
p
0
2
2
2q
pk a r
06r6a
r>a
(
2q0
p
@Tr;0
@r
0
qr r;0 k
68
r
p
a2 r2
06r6a
r>a
r!a
SI lim
06r<a
69
r>a
e
2
p e
06r<a
1
0a 2
q2k
r sin ar qp0 aka
r33 r;0
p q a
0
r 2 a2 2k
r2
3r
p
b3pq0 2a
a2 r2
06r<a
r >a
70
r>a
71
r>a
8
p
1
< 2q0 kb a2 p
al5k6l a2 r 2
06r<a
r>a
a2 r2
kk3l
77
These parameters describing the strength of the thermal stress singularities may be used directly or indirectly in conjunction with a
suitable failure criterion to analyze the mechanics of fracture initiation near the edge of the rigid inclusion (see e.g. Rahman, 2002).
Finally, it is worth noting to compare the stress singularities of
an anticrack and a crack in the study of the considered heat ow.
For the corresponding penny-shaped crack problem, the mode II
thermal stress intensity factor only exists and is given by (Florence
and Goodier, 1963)
p
p crack
2bcrack q0 a a
p
2pr ar3r r; 0
78
bcrack
al1 m
3k1 m
79
Now returning to Eq. (76), it is seen that the ratio of stress intensity
factors for the two problems is
73
jK II j
K crack
II
74
2alk 6l 4al3 5m
3kk 3l
3k3 4m
3alk 2l 3al1 m
~
b
2kk 3l
k3 4m
2
a
l
k
6
l
al1 2m3 5m
b
3kk 3lk 2l
3k3 4m1 m
76
where
72
p
p
b q a a
2pa rr33 r; 0 3 p0
r!a
06r<a
p
2
2
~
1 a
: 2q0 brsin
~
rp
ba rr a
r
p
r2 a2
b a3
r!a
K crack
lim
II
p
p
2b q0 a a
p
2pr ar3r r; 0
K II lim
2q 1 a
a
: 0 sin
p
q0
r
p
r2 a2
b
b
crack
1 2m3 5m
3 4m1 m
80
It is easy to prove that for 0 < m < 12 this ratio decreases from 1 to 0,
from which we conclude that K IIcrack > jK II j. It means that on the
viewpoint of fracture the crack is more dangerous than the rigid
inclusion in the problem under study.
b3
5. Conclusions
75
k
with m 2k
l being Poissons ratio. We can observe the following
features of the exact solution given here:
(1) The rigid insulated inclusion obstructs the given perpendicular heat ow in such a manner that produces the jump of the
temperature across the inclusion plane and the innite increase
of heat uxes in the vicinity of its edge. The identical behavior is
observed for this ow disturbed by an insulated crack (Florence
and Goodier, 1963).
(2) The thermal normal stresses have jump discontinuities on
the inclusion plane and are unbounded as r ? a.
(3) The sign q
of normal stress r33 changes from positive to negative at r 23 a.
(4) All components qi of the heat ux and rij of the stress tensor
(excluding r12) are singular at r = a (strictly, qr and r33,r11,r22
at the points on the edge of the disc, r = a, q3 and r3r at the
points exterior to the disc, r = a+) with the familiar square root
singularity in linear fracture mechanics.
From the viewpoint of classical fracture mechanics, it is of
interest to investigate highly intensied thermal stresses in
the vicinity of the rigid inclusion edge resulting in fracture initiation under the environment of given heat ow. From Eqs.
(71)(74) it is seen that there are two mechanisms controlling
failure of the material surrounding the inclusion border: mode
2
3pk 3l
l2
l2
q3
2
2a2 l1 l2 a2
5 i 1;2
2
2
l2 rl2 l1
q
2c2 k l
2
1 a
f;3 x1 ;x2 ;x3
3 a2 l1
3x3 sin
3pk 3l
l2
q3
2
a2 a2 l1
2 2 5
l2 l1
A:1
A:2
2 q
2
2c2 k la2 43 a2 l1
xi
f;3i x1 ;x2 ;x3
2
2
3pk 3l
l2 l2 l1
q
3
2
2
2
a2 l1 3l2 l1 4a2
5 i 1;2
2
2
l2 l1 3
q
2
2
3a l2 a2
2c2 k l 4
1 a
f;33 x1 ;x2 ;x3
3 sin
2
2
3pk 3l
l2
l2 l1
3
A:3
a2 2a2 2x23 r2 l1 7
q
5
2 2
2
a2 l1 l2 l1 3
q
2
2
2
3a l2 l1
c2 k l 4
1 a
3sin
f;ii x1 ;x2 ;x3
2
3pk 3l
l2
l2
q
3
!
2
2
2
2l2
2a3 l2 a2 3l2 l1 6a2 r21
2ax2i
5
1 2 2 2
2 2
2
l2 l2 l1
l2 l2 l1
a2 x3
i 1 or 2
q
2
3a l2 a2
2c2 k la
x1 x2 4 4 2 2
3pk 3l
l2 l2 l1
3
4
2
2
2l
23l2 l1 6a2 r21
5
2 2
2 3
l2 l2 l1
q1
0
2
a l2 a2
q0 @
1 a
A i 1;2
~ ;i x1 ;x2 ;x3 xi sin
x
2
pk
l2
l2
q
2
!3
2
a l2 a2
2a2 x2i
q0 4
1 a
~
x;ii x1 ;x2 ;x3
1 2 2 2 5
sin
2
l2
pk
l2 l2 l1
l2
2
i 1 or 2
q
2
2q0 a x1 x2 l2 a2
A:4
A:5
A:6
A:7
A:8
~ ;12 x1 ; x2 ; x3
x
pk
l2 l2 l1
A:9
References
Alexandrov, V.M., Smetanin, B.I., Sobol, B.V., 1993. Thin Stress Concentrators in
Elastic Solids. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Aliabadi, M.H., Rooke, D.P., 1992. Numerical Fracture Mechanics. Computational
Mechanic Publications, Southampton.
Chao, C.K., Shen, M.H., 1998. Thermal stresses in a generally anisotropic body with
an elliptic inclusion subject to uniform heat ow. ASME Journal of Applied
Mechanics 65, 5158.
Chaudhuri, R.A., 2003. Three-dimensional asymptotic stress eld in the vicinity of the
circumference of a penny-shaped discontinuity. International Journal of Solids
and Structures 40 (13-14), 37873805. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00017-9.
Chaudhuri, R.A., 2006. Three-dimensional asymptotic stress eld in the vicinity of
the circumference of a bimaterial penny-shaped interfacial discontinuity.
International Journal of Fracture 141, 211225. doi:10.1007/s10704-0060076-5.
Chen, W.Q., Ding, H.J., Ling, D.S., 2004. Thermoelastic eld of transversely isotropic
elastic medium containing a penny-shaped crack: exact fundamental solution.
International Journal of Solids and Structures 41 (1), 6983. doi:10.1016/
j.ijsolstr.2003.08.020.
1777