Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
If you wish to send any of your colleagues for this class, there are still places vacant. Course details are
attached.
Regards,
Prof. Sam.
Prof. Indrawansa Samaratunga PhD, DSc
FRICS, FAIQS, FIQSSL, FCIArb, FCIOB, FCMI, FASI, FBEng
Chartered Quantity Surveyor and Registered Arbitrator / Expert
Australian Inst.of Qty.Surveyors-Middle East Representative
PO Box 23461, Dubai, UAE. T +971504588949 F +97143378668
Employer did not desire to revise his original awarded letter, Contract sum given
in as 9m. Then eventually Employer would have to pay the Contractor his underrecoveries pursuant to Sub-Clause 52.3 as the Effective Final Account would be
less than Effective Contract Price by over 15%.
As a Consultant, how we can administrate this situation. Please clarify! Advice the
Employer on the above two comments.
Regard
Ranjan
----- Original Message ----From: Hasaranga Fonseka
To: sam99 <sam99@emirates.net.ae>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:40:15 -0800 (PST)
Subject: pls clarify
Dear Dr Sam,
Our original project duration was 150 days & the contract sum was 133 milion &
excavation volume was 15 million m3, as a variation to the project there was an additionl
excavation of 27 million m3 & a 471 days of additional time was given for the project.
but as the contractor we were agreed to do the additional work for the same excavation
rate. For the time extention we claimd time related priliminaries & Headoffice
overheads . is this correct.? Correct. can we claim head office overheads again.(because
in the rate of excavation ,profits & head office overheads are already included)
pls clarify Pursuant to Sub-Clause 52.3 there would be an adjustment to deduct the Head
Office Overhead over-recovery which is beyond 15%.
Hasaranga Fonseka