Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ASSIGNMENT
2 | Page
3 | Page
Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd is a Malaysia-based investment holding company. The Companys
subsidiaries are engaged in the manufacture and sale of soft drinks, dairy products, glass
container, property development activities and the provision of management services. Its soft
drinks division offers carbonated soft drinks, isotonic, Asian drinks, teas, juices and energy
drinks. Its dairy products division offers F&N sweetened condensed milk; F&N evaporated milk;
Cap Junjung, Ideal, Tea Pot and Carnation brands of condensed and evaporated milk; Farmhouse
and Magnolia brands of pasteurized milk; Magnolia brand of sterilized and ultra-heat treatment
(UHT) milk; pasteurized juices under the brand names of Fruit Tree fresh and Sunkist brand;
Magnolia brand of ice cream; Bear Brand sterilized milk; Bear Brand and Milo UHT milk, and
Three-in-One coffee mix. The projects under the property division include Fraser Business Park
and HELP City Campus at Zon-E.
This report aims to evaluate the financial performance of Fraser and Neave Holdings for the past
3 years (2009-2011) and make relevant projections on the companys Income Statement, Balance
Sheet and Cash Flow Statement for the next 3 years. To analyze the companys liquidity,
profitability, activity/efficiency, debt/gearing/leverage and market/investment; financial ratio
method is calculated based on the ratios formulae.
Projections were made based on the past activities with consideration of the economical
instability. From the projections, it reflects the companys future position in the market which
acts as a basis for investor to determine their potential investment.
4 | Page
5 | Page
6 | Page
RATIO
1.current ratio
2009
LIQUIDITY
5.07
96 054 588
27 166 138
3.10
1.44
2.52
10.01
0.04
3.quick ratio
1.inventory turnover
ACTIVITY
5.26
2010
2011
2.11
4.08
15.63 days
29.15days
37.4 days
0.09
38.88
55.44
36.7%
18.5%
21.46
45.63
24.1%
22.7%
19.9%
22%
16.6%
15.2%
17%
11%
11%
1.debt ratio
2.time interest earned
LEVERAGE
55.4%
69.06
PROFITABILITY
(17.52)
0.126
0.085
5.0
5.09
5.09
7 | Page
8 | Page
DEBT
DEBT RATIO
In the year of 2009, the ratio is 55.4% but it decreased it ratio to 36.7% in 2010 and keep on
decreasing in 2011 which is 18.5%.
TIME INTEREST EARNED
The time interest earned ratio decreased in the year of 2009 to 2010 which is from 65.06 to 21.46
and in the year of 2011 it increase to 45.63.Overall, this indicates that the company would have
to utilize outside funds to finance its asset to control this liabilities.
PROFITABILITY
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
The gross profit margin has decrease for 3 years respectively, from 2009 to 2011.
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN
The operating profit margin has decrease for 3 years respectively, from 2009 to 2011.
NET PROFIT MARGIN
The net profit margin for the year 2009 is 17. For the year 2010 it decrease to 11 and remain the
same for the year 2011.
Overall, the profitability ratios must be higher so that the company gain more profit.
MARKET
PRICE EARNINGS RATIO
The price earnings ratio of the company from 2009 to 2011 has increase for 3 years respectively.
MARKET BOOK RATIO
The market book ratio of the company falls in the year of 2009 to 2010 which is from 5.66 to
4.81. But then increased in a number in 2011 which is 5.09.
9 | Page
1.Inventory turnover
2009
LIQUIDITY
1.5
2010
2011
2.1
1.78
465 958
1 052 841
556 298
0.98
1.73
1.34
(7.14)
8.62
ACTIVITY
5.45
60.76
53.0
50.17
99.01days
32.38days
96.7days
1.Debt ratio
LEVERAGE
0.49
0.39
0.37
54.29
35.70
32.5%
30.7%
9.6%
10.7%
10.4%
37.46%
10.77%
10.68%
17.78
PROFITABILITY
34%
0.01
0.00389105
0.01
10 | P a g e
11 | P a g e
DEBT
DEBT RATIO
In the year of 2009 to 2011, the debt ratio has decrease for 3 years respectively.
TIME INTEREST EARNED
The time interest earned ratio increase in the year of 2009 to 2010 which is from 17.78 to 54.26
and in the year of 2011 it decrease to 35.70. Overall, this indicates that the company would have
to utilize outside funds to finance its asset to control this liabilities.
PROFITABILITY
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
In the year 2009 to 2011, the gross profit margin has decrease for 3 years respectively
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN
The operating profit margin has increase from 2009 to 2010, and decrease for 2011.
NET PROFIT MARGIN
The net profit margin for the year 2009 is 37.46 for the year 2010 it decrease to 10.76 and 10.68
for the year 2011.
Overall, the profitability ratios must be higher so that the company gain more profit.
MARKET
PRICE EARNINGS RATIO
The price earnings ratio of the company from 2009 to 2011, has increase for 3 years respectively
MARKET BOOK RATIO
The market book ratio of the company remains the same from 2009 to 2011, with 0.01.
12 | P a g e
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, Ajinomoto (M) Berhad has appeared to be growing in the stock market in
2009 to 2010 but it has been not much decline in 2011. On the other hand, Fraser and Neave
Holdings Bhd had bad reputation by showing dropped sharply in the stock market.
Besides, Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd may be deal with some problems with accounts
receivable and it also appears to be slow in paying its bills. Same goes to Media Prima but it can
roll the capital within a short period of time rather than Ajinomoto (M) Berhad.
Even though Ajinomoto (M) Berhad is slow in paying its debt but they did
not have much debt to be paid compare to Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd which have more debt
to be paid.
However, better profit gain is showing by Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd. Ajinomoto
(M) Berhad has show better performance in 2009 but in 2010 it decline from 2009.
13 | P a g e
RECOMMENDATIONS
From an investors point of view, Ajinomoto (M) Berhad Company do deserve additional
working capital loan as their debt ratio is decreases year by year. This shows Fraser and Neave
Holdings Bhd is good health in term of long term solvency. In other words, the company will
able to pay the loans includes with the interest due. This is because the lower debt ratio, the less
total debt the business in comparison to its asset. On the other hand, Fraser and Neave Holdings
Bhd high total debt ratio in contrast. the company is in danger of becoming or going bankrupt if
no efficient action taken. Therefore, its harder to obtain loan from banks
Another point of view of investor in Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd is a good investment
because lower price of Earning per Share (EPS) than Ajinomoto company. It is attracting our
interest in investing in the company as it indicates company with potential for improvement in
industry. So we do not have to pay too much to get that worth earnings per share. It shows that
company is very efficient in generating earnings using shareholders common equity.
14 | P a g e
APPENDICES
15 | P a g e