Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1 23
1 23
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Received: 16 January 2013 / Accepted: 30 April 2013 / Published online: 24 May 2013
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Introduction
Increasing demand for clean water coupled with a shortage of clean water sources has led to water access
becoming an issue worldwide. Treating rural and/or municipal wastewater for reuse in agricultural and industrial
activities could constitute a water resource sizeable
enough to offset this shortage as well as meet the demand for fresh, clean water (Chong et al. 2010).
However, in order to be rendered safe to use, this wastewater needs to be cleaned of hazardous materials, particularly heavy metals.
Heavy metals prove to be phytotoxic at higher concentrations (Tan et al. 2000; Chen and Wong 2006;
Llamas et al. 2008). Phytotoxicity results in chlorosis,
weak plant growth, yield depression, and disorders of
plant metabolism (Sasmaz and Sasmaz 2009). The intentional and incidental disposal of sewage sludge, industrial effluents, etc. into rivers and, consequently, onto
agricultural lands results in the accumulation of heavy
metals in the soils, leading to contamination of the food
chain (Kawatra and Bakhetia 2008).
The presently used techniques for the removal of
heavy metals from contaminated waters include reverse
osmosis, electrodialysis, ultrafiltration, ion exchange,
chemical precipitation, phytoremediation, etc. However,
all these methods have disadvantages such as high reagent and energy requirements or generation of toxic
sludge or other waste products that require careful disposal (Ahalya et al. 2003). Given the increasing need
for water and the severe limitations of treatment current
techniques, considerable attention has been focused in
recent years upon the field of phytoremediation for the
removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous effluents
(Alluri et al. 2007; Christian et al. 2012).
The role of aquatic plants in phytoremediation technology is well established (Dushenkov et al. 1995; Rai
et al. 1995; Schneider and Rubio 1999). The potential
8221
100
10
80
%T
9 8
60
7
6
40
3
5
20
2
500
1000
1500
Wavenumber
2000
(cm
2500
-1
3000
Methodology
Synthesis and spectroscopic analysis of polymethyl
methacrylate polymer
About 100 ml of methyl methacrylate monomer, Puriss
(Fluka), was degassed by nitrogen in a screw-capped jar.
A trace of benzoyl peroxide was then added as initiator. The
jar was sealed then degassed by argon and kept undisturbed
for 48 h at 55 C in an oven. The temperature was raised
gradually to 90 C for 5 h in order to remove any remaining
traces of unreacted initiator. Before taking the samples out
of the oven, we slowly decreased the temperature to 25 C
over a period of 24 h. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum of PMMA was recorded in the
solid phase using Bruker IFS 66V FTIR spectrometer in the
region 4,000400 cm1.
Water hyacinth roots polymer thin film preparation
E. crassipes plants were collected from Nile River in Giza,
Egypt. The plants were washed with deionized water before
being left to air dry. The dried roots were subsequently
crushed in a laboratory blender to obtain a fine powder (Al
Rmalli et al. 2005). A proportional weight (0, 0.02, 0.04,
0.06, 0.08, and 0.1 g) of water hyacinth roots powder was
suspended in 10 ml of the synthesized polymer. The mixture
was uniformly distributed in a Pyrex glass Petri dish
(100 mm in diameter) and left to dry for 24 h at room
temperature.
Assignment
2,955, ms
2
3
4
1,733, vs
1,442, ms
1,376, w
CH asymmetrical
stretching in CH2
C=O stretching
CH3 deformation
CH2 deformation
5
6
7
8
9
10
1,165, s
1,065, m
984, w
923, w
830, w
758, w
CO stretching
CH3 twisting
CC stretching
CH3 rocking
CH2 rocking
C=O out of plane bending
and plasma emission collection system; and (c) the system for
spectral analysis (echelle spectrometer (PI-Echelle, Princeton
Instruments, USA)). Light from the plasma was collected by a
1-m-long wide band fused-silica optical fiber, connected at its
other side to an echelle spectrometer. The spectral analysis
system consisted of an echelle spectrometer with a gate-intensified charge-coupled device (Princeton Instruments) attached
to it. The gate width and delay time had been chosen after
performing an optimization procedure for maximizing the
spectral line intensity. The choice of gate width and delay time
for the spectroscopic data acquisition was made by Princeton
Instruments WinSpec software. Data of results were represented using Microcal Origin 8 scientific charting.
8223
Time
Cd
0
60
120
180
240
Ni
0
60
120
180
240
SD
1
96
78
65
6
0
3.694203
17.2675
24.67766
27.68875
0
0.020149
0.01347
0.008823
0.008558
1
88
75
71
68
0
8.823997
16.58073
18.5753
20.49115
0
0.008961
0.006586
0.00623
0.006216
110
100
90
Control
0.02 g
0.04 g
0.06 g
0.08 g
1g
80
I/I0 %
70
60
50
40
30
20
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time (min.)
b
100
90
Control
0.02 g
0.04 g
0.06 g
0.08 g
1g
80
I/I0 %
Fig. 4 Percentage of
adsorption of a Cd at ex =
636.3 nm and b Ni at ex =
352.2 nm. I/I0 represents the
optical density at any time
divided by the optical density at
zero time
70
60
50
40
0
50
100
150
Time (min.)
200
250
a
500
Cd I
300
Cd I
Intensity (a.u)
400
200
100
257
258
259
260
261
262
wavelength (nm)
2000
1500
1000
Ni I
Ni I
Intensity (a.u)
500
0
342
344
346
348
350
352
354
wavelength (nm)
Table 3 Removal efficiency and rate of Ni and Cd (10 mg/L) measured by LIBS techniques after a time of 240 min
Cd
Ni
Water hyacinth
concentration (g)
Removal
efficiency (%)
100
Removal
rate
90
0
0.02
2
15
1.3910
1.04105
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
34
50
67
70
2
12.5
33.4
42
50
52
2.4105
3.5105
4.7105
4.9105
1.39106
8.7106
2.3105
2.9105
3.4105
3.6105
80
Control
Ni
Cd
70
I/I0
Heavy metal
60
50
40
30
20
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
8225
Conclusions
This study introduces an economic method for removing
heavy metal contaminants from water by hyacinth thin film.
Hyacinth shows high ability to remove Cd and Ni from
artificially contaminated water. LIBS technique was successfully used for detecting and identifying Cd and Ni.
The average removal efficiency for the plant species water
hyacinth was 70 %, for Cd, and 52 %, for Ni after 240 min.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by Cairo University,
National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences, Department of Laser
Application in Metrology, Photochemistry and Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt.
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Abida B (2009) Concurrent removal and accumulation of Fe2+, Cd2+
and Cu2+ from waste water using aquatic macrophytes. Der
Pharma Chemica 1(1):219224
Ahalya N, Ramachandra TV, Kanamadi RD (2003) Biosorption of
heavy metals. Res J Chem Environ 7:7178
Al Rmalli S, Harrington C, Ayub M, Haris P (2005) A biomaterial based
approach for arsenic removal from water. J Environ Monit 7:279282
Alluri HK, Ronda SR, Settalluri VS, Bondili JS, Suryanarayana V,
Venkateshwar P (2007) Biosorption: an ecofriendly alternative for
heavy metal removal. Afr J Biotechnol 6:29242931
Buasri A, Chaiyut N, Tapang K, Jaroensin S, Panphrom S (2012)
Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using water
hyacinth as a low cost biosorbent. Civil Environ Res 2(2):1725
Chen Q, Wong JWC (2006) Growth of Agropyron elongatum in a
simulated nickel contaminated soil with lime stabilization. Sci
Total Environ 366:448455
Chigbo FE, Smith RW, Shore FL (1982) Uptake of arsenic, cadmium,
lead and mercury from polluted waters by the water hyacinth
Eichhornia crassipes. Environ Pollut A 27(1):3136