ASPECTS OF CONTRACTS AND

NEGLIGENCE FOR BUSINESS

1 | Page

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3
1.1 The Requirements for the formation of a Valid Contract.......................................................3
1.2 Type of Contract.....................................................................................................................3
2.1 Possible Claim of Eddie and Frank against Doris..................................................................4
1.3 & 2.3 Terms in Contract.........................................................................................................4
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................6
2.2 Exclusion Clause and its Legal Treatment.............................................................................6
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................7
3.1 General Tortious Liability and Contractual Liability.............................................................7
3.3 Employers Liability, Vicarious Liability and Health & Safety Implications........................7
TASK 4............................................................................................................................................8
3.2 Components for a Successful Claim for Negligence.............................................................8
4.1 & 4.2 Application of rules of Negligence and Vicarious Liability for a Successful Claim of
compensation...............................................................................................................................8
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................8
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................9

2 | Page

INTRODUCTION
Contracts are a form of promise or consideration which is bounded legally to perform or not to
perform a particular thing (Brain, 2006). In the world of business, contracts are means of
understanding future obligations between two or more business entities (Sant, 2004). The present
report is an analysis on the concept of contracts and negligence in the business taking three
distinct scenarios. The report also gives various terms associated with contracts and their
practical application within the context of law.

TASK 1
1.1 The Requirements for the formation of a Valid Contract
A contract to be valid in the context of business transaction must be based upon certain factors
which prove its formation.
Agreement Agreement between two or more parties is the sole base of a contract. In every
contract, there must be agreement among the parties to go ahead with the contract where one
party makes a valid offer and the other party gives legal acceptance to the offer (Morgan, 2012).
Consideration Consideration in a contract relates to the exchange of things among the parties
upon which the contract is based (Chadman, 2009).
Intention For a contract to be valid it must be based upon valid intentions of the parties, which
is to say there is an intention to create a legally bounded relationship. The intention must have
legal and rational factors and not illegal which would void the contract (Morgan, 2012)
(Chadman, 2009).
Capacity For parties to enter into contract, they must be capable to enter into such parties.
Capacity also relates to age and mental condition of parties because according to laws of states
minors and mentally disabled persons cannot be considered as legally capable for a contract.
1.2 Type of Contract
The current case scenario of Doris, Eddie and Frank where one party offers to a business
proposal but there is no formal legal acceptance to the offer can be termed as a unilateral
3 | Page

contract. The case scenario can be termed as a unilateral contract because only party offers to a
business transaction and promises to accept considerations on behalf (Singh, 2010). This is
unlike a bilateral contract where both parties agree to fulfil the terms of the contract (Calamari
and Perillo, 2004). The present scenario is also different from an express contract where all
parties express all the related terms and conditions of the contract (Calamari and Perillo, 2004).
But the current scenario is similar to an implied contract because both Eddie and Frank agree to
accept the offer of Doris even in the absence of all relevant terms and conditions expressed
correctly (Smitley, 2011). Another aspect related to the case is that there is no formal acceptance
to the offer because Eddie posted the letter at 11.30 am and Frank posted the letter of acceptance
of Doris offer at 12.30 pm, and neither of the letters has reached Doris. In light of this, Doris is
not aware of the acceptance by Eddie and Frank, and this somewhat makes the offer invalid, thus
making it a void contract. From all the above facts, it is definite the present case is a unilateral
contract.
2.1 Possible Claim of Eddie and Frank against Doris
As already proven that the case belongs to unilateral contract and the offer of the vase has not
been legally accepted by both Eddie and Frank, thus there is no application of the rules of offer
(Andrews, 2011). Coming to the rules of acceptance, there is no instance in the case indicating
that Doris is aware of either of Eddies and Franks acceptance against her offer, this means that
there is no legal contract among them (Andrews, 2011). In the absence of any legal contract, the
rules of consideration too do not apply to the given case. Looking at the case, it is evident that all
the rules of a valid contract have not been met and Doris in no way responsible in any way to
both Eddie and Frank. Therefore, Eddie and Frank have no right to any kind of claim against
Doris.
1.3 & 2.3 Terms in Contract
Type of term

How does it come to be part of the Contract?

Express Term

Express terms are the most important aspects of any contract as it

gives a detailed list of all the terms, conditions and warranties of a
contract. These terms define the nature of the contract and also the

Implied Term

considerations of the parties concerned (Morgan, 2012).

As the name implies, these terms are not clearly mentioned in a
4 | Page

contract but are essential to its formation. These are terms of common
understanding between the parties and can be made applicable to
contract by statutes or courts (Austen-Baker, 2011).
Table 1: Significance of Express and Implied Terms in a Contract
Type of term

Actions available in case of

Relevant Case

Condition

Breach
In case of breach of condition

Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1

in a contract by one party, the

QBD 410

other party can legally

terminate the contract and can
also claim for damages against
the breach (Elawresources.co.uk, 2015).
Warranty

In case of breach of warranties

Bettini v Gye 1876 QBD 183

in a contract by one party, the

other party can claim for
compensation but has no legal
right to end the contract (Elawresources.co.uk, 2015).
Innominate term

In case of breach of the

Hong Kong Fir Shipping v

innominate term in a contract

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha

by one party, the other party

[1962] 2 QB 26

can terminate the contract

only if the breach has caused
the loss of all the benefits
from the contract. In cases
where the loss is minor, only
damages can be claimed (Elawresources.co.uk, 2015).

5 | Page

Table 2: Type of terms in Contract and there Breach

6 | Page

TASK 2
2.2 Exclusion Clause and its Legal Treatment
Exclusion clauses in a contract are a form of measures taken by parties to a contract whereby one
party seeks to limit or totally exclude its liability for any damage that may be caused to the other
party (Bunni, 2005). Problem associated with exclusion clause is that the party liable for damage
may use its incorporation in the contract for getting let-off from any responsibility of the
damage.
Exclusion clauses are termed as unfair terms in a contract by the Unfair Contract Terms Act
(UCTA) 1977 and Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations Act 1999. Lawful remedy to
exclusion clause is based on its incorporation and the loss covered (Posner, 2004). Incorporation
implies that the parties to the contract must be aware about the clause at the start of the contract.
Absence of knowledge about the clause will make it void in the eyes of the law. Considering the
cover of loss by the clause, the court applies the rule of contra proferentum rule (Posner, 2004).
The rule implies that if there is any ambiguity in the clause then the court will take upon the
wordings of the clause against the damaging party. According to UCTA, an exclusion clause will
cease to exist if there is:

death or personal injury

breach of standard implied terms of the contract (Legislation.gov.uk, 2015)

In the case of Mix-O-Crate, a contract is signed between the company and Bob and it looks like
Bob has full trust on the company. In the presence of exclusion clause, if the concrete mixer does
not work well but do no cause harm or personal injury, then Mix-O-Crate will be able to rely on
the clause. But if the mixer fails to work and causes death or personal injury then as per
definition by UCTA, Mix-O-Crate will be held liable for it.

7 | Page

TASK 3
3.1 General Tortious Liability and Contractual Liability
General Tortious liability is a general aspect within the purview of contract which relies on the
performance of ones duty of care. Tortious liability or tort law is a form of condition which
explains the degree of harm cause to a person whereas a contractual liability is an agreement
between persons and corporations (Legislation.gov.uk, 2015). The liability factor in tort law is
basically fixed by the court whereas in contracts it is more consent based between the parties
involved. Tortious liability is a form of negligence and in contrast contractual liability is mostly
intentional. The form of treatment related to claim of damages by court also explains their
difference in the real world (Legislation.gov.uk, 2015).
3.3 Employers Liability, Vicarious Liability and Health & Safety Implications
According to Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969, employers liability refers
to an employers understanding of the work environment within the organisation
(Legislation.gov.uk, 2015). Employers liability relates to the safety and security of its
employees within the organisation even when the employees owe a sense of duty of care
(Legislation.gov.uk, 2015). Vicarious liability comes into play when for the act of the employee
the employer too will be held responsible. Employee owe duty of care for the safety for
themselves and others, and any negligence causing harm to other will also vicariously liable the
employee along with the employee (Giliker, 2010). In light of both employers liability and
vicarious liability, the Health and Safety as Work Act 1974 was enacted which provided duty of
care to both the employee and employer with legal actions against any breach
(Legislation.gov.uk, 2015).

8 | Page

TASK 4
3.2 Components for a Successful Claim for Negligence
In order to prove a successful claim for negligence, a claimant must be able to prove the
following components:
The claimant must first prove duty of care against the defendant in the negligence.
The claimant then must prove that there was certainly a breach of the said duty of care.
The claimant must next prove the causation damage, personal injury or financial loss,
caused by the breach of the duty of care by the defendant (Posner, 2004).
4.1 & 4.2 Application of rules of Negligence and Vicarious Liability for a Successful Claim
of compensation
After following the case scenario, one thing that is very definite is that it was the fault of both
Jerry and Asif for the severity of injury. Looking at the rules of negligence, it is clear that Jerry
was negligent in driving his company van to 50mph speed in a 30pmh zone and his negligence
caused the crash and subsequently injury to Asif. The rules of negligence also apply to Asif who
was not wearing his seat belt which increased the propensity of damage and this may cause
weakening of his case in the court (Andrews, 2011).
When looking at the rules of vicarious liability, Asif was injured for the fault of Jerry and it was
Jerrys negligence which caused the initial crash and this may prove beneficial in proving Asifs
case. Also, vicarious liability also implies to the employer of Jerry as for the negligence of
employee the employer too will be held liable (Giliker, 2010). Asif will be able to claim damages
from the employer as it was the company can which caused the accident. Therefore, Asif will be
able to gain certain claim for damages but will also be legally held for not wearing his seat-belt.

CONCLUSION
Looking at all the scenarios, the researcher from the report has been able to present a coherent
picture about the various terms associated with contracts. Claimant and defendant must be aware
of all the conditions, terms and warranties in a contract as also the exclusion clause. The report
also outlined the liability in relation of business and this shows the important clearly defined
9 | Page

contracts in a business, both between seller and consumer and also between employee and
employer.

10 | P a g e

REFERENCES
BOOKS
Andrews, N. (2011). Contract law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austen-Baker, R. (2011). Implied terms in English contract law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Brain, R. (2006). Contracts. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.
Bunni, N. (2005). The FIDIC forms of contract. Oxford: Blackwell.
Calamari, J. and Perillo, J. (2004). Contracts. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.
Chadman, C. (2009). Contracts and partnership. Getzville, N.Y.: Bridge Publishing Company
LLC.
Giliker, P. (2010). Vicarious liability in tort. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, J. (2012). Business law. Redding, CA: BVT Publishing.
Posner, R. (2004). The law and economics of contract interpretation. [Chicago, Illinois]: Law
School, University of Chicago.
Sant, T. (2004). Persuasive business proposals. New York: AMACOM.
Singh, A. (2010). Business and contract law. London: Thorogood.
Smitley, M. (2011). Implied contract. Sadler, Tex.: First Edition Design eBook Pub.
WEBSITES
E-lawresources.co.uk, (2015). Conditions, warranties and innominate terms. [online] Available
at: http://e-lawresources.co.uk/Conditions,-warranties-and-innominate-terms.php [Accessed
17 Nov. 2015].

11 | P a g e

Legislation.gov.uk, (2015). Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969. [online]

Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1969/57/contents [Accessed 17 Nov.
2015].
Legislation.gov.uk, (2015). Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. [online] Available at:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/37 [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].
Legislation.gov.uk, (2015). Occupiers Liability Act 1957. [online] Available at:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/5-6/31 [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].
Legislation.gov.uk, (2015). Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. [online] Available at:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/50 [Accessed 17 Nov. 2015].

12 | P a g e