Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
4477
Phone: 281.880.6525
www.hrp.net
www.hrp.net
The fact is, nearly half of complaints taken to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) involve a claim of retaliation. And in recent
years the plaintiffs have prevailed in about half of those instances.
Not only that, but in most of those cases where the EEOC agreed with the
plaintiffs that illegal retaliation had occurred, the EEOC had previously
rejected the same employee's claim of discrimination.
In other words, an employee may have a greater chance of success when filing
a claim of retaliation than a claim of discrimination. That's why it's imperative
that your supervisors understand how important it is to avoid any action that
might be interpreted as retaliation for a discrimination claim, actions such as a
reassignment to unpleasant duties, an undesirable work shift, or a demotion.
www.hrp.net
Protected Activity
The EEOC defines protected activity as the actions employees can take without
suffering adverse employment consequences.
www.hrp.net
www.hrp.net
However, actions by employees that are unlawful or that interfere with job
performance "such as acts or threats of violence" are not protected activity.
Two other categories of protected activity are:
Retaliation or adverse actions range from the obvious to the more subtle.
Firing, refusing to promote or hiring someone because he or she engaged in
protected activity conducted at a previous workplace both fall under the
"obvious" heading.
www.hrp.net
Murky Waters
Things can get a little murkier, says the EEOC on its website: "Other actions
affecting employment such as threats, unjustified negative evaluations,
unjustified negative references, increased surveillance, and any other action
such as an assault or unfounded civil or criminal charges that are likely to
deter reasonable people from pursuing their rights.
www.hrp.net
The EEOC offers some examples of retaliation claims that were successful, in
its article entitled, "Retaliation Making it Personal:"
1. An employee sought a promotion following several unsuccessful EEO
complaints. The employee's supervisor had inserted reports about those
complaints into the employee's personnel file. When the person who was
responsible for determining the employee's suitability for promotion
asked for references from her current supervisor, that supervisor told him
about the EEO complaints and furnished copies of the reports.
Presumably the employee didn't get the promotion, because the EEOC
was asked to rule on whether the handing over of those files constituted
illegal retaliation. It did because, among other reasons, "the EEO
information placed in the employee's personnel file was unnecessary and
hindered her promotion opportunities."
www.hrp.net
2. An employee who had filed a complaint with the EEOC subsequently was
denied the opportunity to use a company car. Although the supervisor had
discretionary authority to grant that privilege, the EEOC concluded the
denial was at least in part retaliatory in nature. The fact that the denial
came right on the heels of the EEO complaint apparently strengthened the
employee's case. However, the EEOC noted that "there have been cases in
which years have passed and other evidence established that the
employee's earlier EEO activities motivated the manager's action."
Evidence in such cases can include "verbal or written statements,
comparative evidence that a similarly situated employee was treated
differently, falsity of the employer's proffered reason for the adverse
action, or any other evidence from which an inference of retaliatory intent
might be drawn."
www.hrp.net
www.hrp.net
Ignorance is Bliss?
If an employee files an EEO complaint against one of your managers, you
might consider not even informing that manager until it becomes apparent
whether the complaint has merit or not. That way, the manager won't face
any temptation to retaliate. On the other hand, if there is a reasonable chance
that the employee has a case, by not bringing the manager into the picture,
you're running the risk that more truly discriminatory actions could be made
by the supervisor, and everyone is worse off.
www.hrp.net
The safest route is to be sure that supervisors are well trained to know what
kind of behavior can give rise to an EEO complaint. Also, have a system in
place for employees who feel their EEO rights may have been violated to bring
them to your attention before matters spiral out of control.
And also be sure supervisors realize that even if an employee's claim of
discrimination fails, he or she may still prevail if charges of retaliation are
brought.
Employee complaints about discrimination and retaliation have to be treated
with kid gloves. If you're in doubt about how to handle a complaint, consult
your employment adviser to go over the specifics of the case.
www.hrp.net
E-mail : info@hrp.net
www.hrp.net