Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SELECTIVITY
Science 1983, 219, 245
Chemoselectivity
preferential reactivity of one functional group (FG) over another
O OH
NaBH4, CeCl3
only
- Epoxidation:
MCPBA
+
OH OH OH
O O
(2 : 1)
VO(acac)2,
tBuOOH
exclusively
OH OH
O
Regioselectivity
- Hydration of C=C:
1) B2H6
2) H2O2, NaOH OH
R
R OH
R
1) Hg(OAc)2, H2O
2) NaBH4
- Friedel-Crafts Reaction:
O
RCOCl,
AlCl3 R
+ R
O
O
RCOCl,
SiMe3 AlCl3 R
SELECTIVITY 2
- Diels-Alder Reaction:
R O R O R
+ +
O
major minor
O R O
R R
+ +
O
major minor
O O
O O OAc O O OAc
H H
O O SPh O O SPh O O
H H H
Change in mechanism:
SPh
PhSH, H+
R
SPh
R
PhSH, (PhCO2)2
Stereochemistry:
Relative stereochemistry: Stereochemical relationship between two or more stereogenic centers
within a molecule
H H H H
HO OH
enantiomers
cholesterol same relative stereochemistry
- differences in absolute stereochemistry (of all stereocenters within the molecule) leads to
enantiomers.
Ph H Ph H
MeMgBr
H 3C OH
Ph H
O enantiomers
Ph (racemic product)
H
HO CH3
Ph H
MeMgBr
HO CH3 HO CH3
Ph H H Ph
Diastereoselectivity
CH3MgBr
CH3 + CH3
Ph Ph
Ph CHO
HO H H OH
syn anti
Diastereomers
L Nu L
Nu
S M R
R
favored disfavored
OBn OBn
Stereospecific
Stereochemictry of the product is related to the reactant in a mechanistically defined manner; no
other stereochemical outcome is mechanistically possible.
i.e.; SN2 reaction- inversion of configuration is required
Br2 H Br
H 3C
meso
H
Br CH3
enantiomers (racemic)
Stereoselective
When more than one stereochemical outcome is possible, but one is formed in excess (even if that
excess is 100:0).
CH3 H
H2, Pd/C H H
H + CH3
H H
O O O O O O
LDA, CH3I
N O N O + N O Diastereoselective
Enantiospecific
S S S
(96 : 4)
Diasteromers
OXIDATIONS 5
Oxidations
Carey & Sundberg: Chapter 12 problems: 1a,c,e,g,n,o,q; 2a,b,c,f,g,j,k; 5; 9 a,c,d,e,f,l,m,n; 13
Smith: Chapter 3 March: Chapter 19
Chromium Reagents
- Cr(VI) based
- exact stucture depends on solvent and pH
- Mechanism: formation of chromate ester intermediate
Westheimer et al. Chem Rev. 1949, 45, 419 JACS 1951, 73, 65.
HO
HCrO4 - O- R
R Cr
R2CH-OH C O O-
O + HCrO3- + H+
H+ R R
H
+ H2O
- Acidic media!! Not a good method for H+ sensitive groups and compounds
OXIDATIONS 6
1) Jones, SePh
SePh acetone
CO 2CH 3
OH 2) CH2N2
Me 3Si Me 3Si
JACS 1982, 104, 5558
H17C 8 H17C 8
O O
OH O
Jones
O acetone O
JACS 1975, 97, 2870
O O
CrO3•(C 5H5N)2 H
OH CH 2Cl 2 JACS 1969, 91, 44318.
O
ArO O
ArO O
O
O
CrO3 catalyzed (1-2 mol % oxidation with NaIO6 (2.5 equiv) as the reozidant in wet aceteonitrile.
oxidized primary alcohols to carboxylic acids.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5323.
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
OHC
HO JACS 1977, 99, 3864.
O
O
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
CHO
O
O OH TL, 1975, 2647
OXIDATIONS 7
- Oxidative Rearrangements
Me OH
Me
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
JOC 1977, 42, 682
O
Me
Me
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
JOC 1976, 41, 380
OH O
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
O O O
JOC 1984, 49, 1647
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
O O
NH NH
N N
OH
OH
PCC, CH 2Cl 2
H H 3,5-dimethyl
pyrazole H H
HO
O
(87%)
PDC PDC
CHO CH 2Cl 2 DMF CO 2H
OH
1° alcohol
to remove Cr(III)
1) HCl wash
2) KOH wash
3) H2O wash
CrO3/Et2O/CH2Cl2/Celite
Synthesis 1979, 815.
- CrO3 in non-aqueous media does not oxidized alcohols
- CrO3 in 1:3 Et2O/CH2Cl2/celite will oxidized alcohols to ketone and aldehydes
C 8H17 C 8H17
CrO3
Et2O/CH 2Cl 2/celite
(69%)
H2CrO7 on Silica
- 10% CrO3 to SiO2
- 2-3g H2CrO3/SiO2 to mole of R-OH
- ether is the solvent of choice
Manganese Reagents
Potassium Permanganate KMnO4/18-Crown-6 (purple benzene)
JACS 1972 94, 4024.
O
O O
K+ MnO 4-
O O
O
CHO
Synthesis 1984, 43
CL 1979, 443
CHO
OXIDATIONS 9
Sodium Permanganate
TL 1981, 1655
- heterogeneous reaction in benzene
- 1° alcohols are oxidized to acids
- 2° alcohols are oxidized to ketones
- multiple bonds are not oxidized
Barium Permanganate (BaMnO4)
TL 1978, 839.
- Oxidation if 1° and 2° alcohols to aldehydes and ketones- No over oxidation
- Multiple bonds are not oxidized
- similar in reactivity to MnO2
Barium Manganate
BCSJ 1983, 56, 914
Manganese Dioxide
Review: Synthesis 1976, 65, 133
- Selective oxidation of α,β-unsatutrated (allylic, benzylic, acetylenic) alcohols.
- Activity of MnO2 depends on method of preparation and choice of solvent
- cis & trans allylic alcohols are oxidized at the same rate without isomerization of the double
bond.
OH OH
HO HO
MnO 2, CHCl3
OH CO 2Me
MnO 2, Hexanes JACS1968, 90, 5616. 5618
MeOH, NaCN
Ruthenium Reagents
Ruthenium Tetroxide
- effective for the conversion of 1° alcohols to RCO2H and 2° alcohols to ketones
- oxidizes multiple bonds and 1,2-diols.
OXIDATIONS 10
RuO4, NaIO4 CO 2H
Ph OH Ph
O CCl 4, H2O, CH3CN O
JOC 1981, 46, 3936
OH
RuO4, NaIO4
Ph OH Ph CO 2H
CCl 4, H2O, CH3CN
H CH 3 H CH 3 94%ee
96% ee
HO
RuO2, NaIO4 O
TL 1970, 4003
CCl 4, H2O
O O
O O
OH O
TPAP
MeO 2C MeO 2C
OSiMe 2tBu O OSiMe 2tBu
(Ph3P)4RuO2Cl3 RuO2(bipy)Cl2
- oxidizes a wide range of 1°- and 2°-alcohols to aldehydes and ketones without oxidation of
multiple bonds.
OH
CHO
CHO
OH JCS P1 1984, 681.
H H
Ba[Ru(OH)2O3]
-oxidizes only the most reactive alcohols (benzylic and allylic)
(Ph3P)3RuCl2 + Me3SiO-OSiMe3
- oxidation of benzylic and allylic alcohols TL 1983, 24, 2185.
Silver Reagents
Ag2CO3 ( Fetizon Oxidation) also Ag2CO3/celite Synthesis 1979, 401
- oxidation of only the most reactive hydroxyl
O O
OH Ag 2CO 3 O
CO 2H
CHO AgO 2
Ph
Ph
AcOH
AcOH, H 2O
OsO 4, NMO O O OH
Os
O O OH
osmate ester
intermediate cis stereochemistry
OsO 4, NMO O OH
O
O OH
O OH
OH
TL 1983, 24, 2943, 3947
Stereoselectivity: OsO 4
R2 R3 HO H
OsO 4, NMO R2 HO
R4 R3
RO H RO H R4
OXIDATIONS 12
- new mechanism: reaction is accelerated in the presences of an 3° amine
R1 R1
O
O O R1 R3N R2
R2 O
Os R2 O
O Os Os O
O O [2+2] O
O O NR3
[O]
[3+2] R1 OsO2
[O]
R2
O hydrolysis R1 R2
O
Os O
O + OsO4
O HO OH
- Oxidative cleavage of olefins to carboxylic acids.
JOC 1956, 21, 478.
- Oxidative cleavage of olefins to ketones & aldehydes.
OH
CHO
OH O
OsO 4, NMO NaIO4 CHO H2O
O OH O O
O O
O O
O O
OAc OAc
OAc
JACS 1984, 105, 6755.
HO
OsO4, HO
O pyridine O
TMSO
TMSO
- by amides
AcO AcO
OH
MeS MeS
OsO4
OH
HN HN
O O
OAc OAc
OXIDATIONS 13
- by sulfoxides
•• O OMe •• O OMe OH
S OsO4 S
OH
(2 : 1)
••
O OAc
••
1) OsO4 O
S 2) Ac2O S
HN O AcO HN O
(20 : 1)
- by sulfoximines
O O
Ph S Ph S O
OH OH
MeN OsO4, R3NO MeN ∆ OH
OH
OH OH
CH3
Raney nickel
H 3C OH
OH
OH
CH3
- By nitro groups
PhO2S N
PhO2S N 1) OsO4 NHR
+ N
N NHR 2) acetone, H O2N
O2N N N
N N O O
N
N HO N NHR
HO N NHR
N N
N N O O
X= OH 80 : 20 (directing effect ?)
= OMe 98 : 2
= OAc 99 : 1
= NHSO2R 60 : 40 (directing effect ?)
- Ligand effect:
OsO4
X + OH
OH K3Fe(CN)6, K2CO3 OH OH
MeSO2NH2, tBuOH/H2O OH OH
N
"HO OH" Ar
H
H OR'
R3 R3 OH
R2 0.2-0.4% OsO4
R2 80-95 % yield
R1 20-80 % ee
acetone, H 2O, MNO
R1 OH
H OR'
"HO OH" Ar
MeO
N Ar =
dihydroquinine ester
N
R'= p-chlorobenzoyl
Mechanism of AD:
L
HO OH
O
O O
H 2O Os
O O
O
O O
Os
O O
First Cycle Second Cycle
(high enantioselectivity) [O] (low enantioselectivity) [O]
O
O
O Os
O O
O
L Os
O O
L
O
O O
Os
O O
O
R 3N HO OH
H 2O, L
- K3Fe(CN)6 as a reoxidant gives higher ee's- eliminates second cycle
TL 1990, 31, 2999.
- Sulfonamide effect: addition of MeSO2NH2 enhances hydrolysis of Os(VI) glycolate
(accelerates reaction)
- New phthalazine (PHAL) ligand's give higher ee's
N Et
Et N
Et N Et
N N
N N N
O O
H H O O
OMe H H
MeO
MeO OMe
N N
N N
(DHQD)2-PHAL (DHQ)2-PHAL
JOC 1992, 57, 2768.
OXIDATIONS 15
- Other second generation ligands
N Et Et
Et Ph N N
O O N O
H H H
MeO N N OMe O OMe
Ph
N N N
PYR IND
Phthalazine
OMe Floor
N
OMe
OMe
DHQL
DHQ
OXIDATIONS 16
Olefin Preferred Ligand ee's
R1 PYR, PHAL 30 - 97 %
R2
R1 PHAL 70 - 97 %
R1
IND 20 - 80 %
R2
R2
R1 PHAL 90 - 99.8 %
R2
R3
R1 PHAL 90 - 99 %
H
R2
R3 PHAL, PYR 20 - 97 %
R1
+ MeSO2NH2
R4
O
HO
O
Campthothecin
N
N
O
94 % ee OH O
OH OH
H H
Ph Ph
AD mix α Ph OH
OH
30% conversion
OH H
+ +
Ph OH
tBu H tBu
tBu (4 : 1) tBu
enriched
OXIDATIONS 17
Asymmetric Aminohydroxylation TL 1998, 39, 2507; ACIEE 1996, 25, 2818, 2813,
preparation of α-aminoalcohols from olefin. Syn addition as with the dihydroxylation
regiochemistry can be a problem
O O
Cl OH
Ph O N CO2Me
Na Ph O NH Ph
CO2Me +
Ph CO2Me N O Ph
K2OsO6H4 (cat) Ph
Ligand OH O
Ligand= PHAL 4:1
AQN 1:4
Molybdenum Reagents
MoOPH [MoO5•pyridine (HMPA)]
JOC 1978, 43, 188.
- α-hydroxylation of ketone, ester and lactone enolates.
O O
O- O O THF, -78°C
+ Mo R'
R' O R
R O
L L OH
Palladium Reagents
Pd(0) catalyzed Dehydrogenation (oxidation) of Allyl Carbonates (Tsuji Oxidation)
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 4361
O
R O 2 CO R R R
OH Pd(0)
H O O O Pd O
H - CO 2 H
R Pd(OAc) 2, R - R
R
CH 3CN, 80° C TL 1984, 25, 2791
Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 3903
HO
H HO
OH O CO H
2 OH
O O Pd(OAc) 2, O
CH 3CN
OTIPS O
(NH 4)2Ce(NO 3)6
DMF, 0°C
Ph Ph TL 1995, 36, 3985
OXIDATIONS 18
Oppenauer Oxidation Synthesis 1994, 1007 Organic reactions 1951, 6, 207
OiPr R1R2CHOH OiPr O
+O Al H +O Al + Al(OiPr)3
OiPr (CH3)2C=O R1 R2
R1 O OiPr
R2
Nickel Peroxide
Chem Rev. 1975, 75, 491
Thallium Nitrate (TNN, Tl(NO 3)3•3H2O
Pure Appl. Chem. 1875, 43, 463.
Lead Tetraacetrate Pb(OAc)4 Oxidations in Organic Chemistry (D), 1982, pp 1-145.
R Me
R2CH-OH Me R Et3N: R
S+ O O + S
Me R Me
H
B:
O O
Cl
DMSO, (COCl) 2
TL 1988, 29, 49.
CH 2Cl 2, Et3N
OH O
Moffatt Oxidation (DMSO/DCC) JACS 1965, 87, 5661, 5670.
Me C 6H11 Me R
S + O- CF 3CO 2H, R R
Me NH S+ O
Pyridine R2CH-OH O
Me S +
O C Me
H
+ N R
Me
C 6H11 N C N C 6H11 C 6H11 B:
CHO
OH DCC/ DMSO
JACS 1978, 100, 5565
CO 2Me CO 2Me
CF 3CO 2H,
O Pyridine O
S S
••
••
•O O • O O
•• ••
••
••
triplet singlet
H
Jones OH
RCOOH
Other Oxidations
Mukaiyama Oxidation BCSJ 1977, 50, 2773
O
N N
N N
R PrMgBr R R
O
CH OH CH O MgBr O
R THF R
R
OH
OHC
Cl CH 3 O Cl CH 3 O
O O
MeO NH MeO NH
O N N N N O
OEt OEt
O O
tBuMgBr, THF
SEt (70%) SEt
SEt SEt
MeO MeO
O
N N
N N
O O O
Dess-Martin Periodinane JOC 1983, 48, 4155. JACS 1992, 113, 7277.
- oxidation conducted in CHCl3, CH3CN or CH2Cl2
- excellent reagent for hindered alcohols
- very mild
AcO OAc OAc
I R I
••
R2CH-OH
OAc O + O + 2 AcOH
O
R
O O
Dess-Martin O
HO JOC 1991, 56, 6264
(99%)
RO
RO
Chlorite Ion
-oxidation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes to α,β−unsaturated acids.
Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 2091
NaClO 2, - HClO2
NaH2PO 4
tBuOH, H 2O OBn OBn
OBn
OH
CHO H CO 2H
-O-Cl-O
Selenium Dioxide
- Similar to singlet oxygen (allylic oxidation)
1) SeO2
2) NaBH 4
OAc
OAc
OH
Phenyl Selenium Chloride
O O Ph O
OLi
SePh Se
PhSeCl H2O 2 - PhSeOH
O-
THF
H
- PhS-SPh will do similar chemistry however a sulfoxide elimination is less facile than a
selenoxide elinimation.
Cl NO 2
H
O O
O
R1 C R2
R1 R2 R2 + ArCO2H
O R1 O
O
O Ar
HO O Ar
O
- Concerted R-migration and O-O bond breaking. No loss of stereochemistry
- Migratory aptitude roughly follows the ability of the group to stabilize positive charge:
3° > 2° > benzyl = phenyl > 1° >> methyl
JACS 1971, 93, 1491
O O
HO
O
O mCPBA O CO2H
CHO
O O HO CO2H
O HO OH
PGE1
O
O
CH3 mCPBA O Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 2173
Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 1385
(80 %) CH3
CH3
CH3
Oxaziridines
reviews: Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 5703; Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 919
O
R3
N C
R R2
- hydroxylation of enolates
O
_
O O R O
Base R'
R R _ R + PhSO2N=CHPh
R' R' R'
O NSO2Ph
O Ph HO
Ph
N
PhSO2
O By-product
_ supresed by using
O R
R' bulkier oxaziradine
R + PhSO2N=CHPh such as camphor
R' oxaziradine
Ph NHSO2Ph
OXIDATIONS 22
Asymmetric hydroxylations
O
O
MeO 2C NaN(SiMe3)2, THF HO
OMe
OMe
N (67% ee)
Ar SO 2 O
MeO O MeO O O OH O
KN(SiMe3)2 OH
CO2Me CO2Me OH
OH
- hydroxylation of organometallics
R-Li or R-Mg → R-OH JACS 1979, 101, 1044
NOCl, CH2Cl2
pyridine hν
- NO
OH O • O
NO • OH
H •
OH OH
NO N N
HO perhydrohistricotoxin
ketone C5H11
oxidation state
Epoxidations
Peroxides & Peracids
- olefins → epoxides Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 2855
- α,β-unsaturated ketones, aldehydes and ester → α,β-epoxy- ketones, aldehydes and esters
(under basic conditions).
O O
tBuOOH
triton B, C6H6
O JACS 1958, 80, 3845
(CH 2)n (CH 2)n
OXIDATIONS 23
CO 2Me O CO 2Me
mCPBA, NaHPO3
TL 1988, 23, 2793
O O
H H
O O
mCPBA
O + O
10:1 diastereoselection
OAc OAc OH
mCPBA
O + O
1:4 diastereoselection
O O
Ph NH
Ph NH
mCPBA "highly selective"
O
Ar
O O
H proposed transition state:
O -OH directs the epoxidation
H
O
OH OH
O
(CH2)n (CH2)n
Acyclic Systems:
tBu
O R1
L M
L R3 Rt
1,3-interaction O
O
R3 Rc
Rt
R2 O
R1 Rc O
A1,2-strain
M
O
R2 L
A1,3-strain L
Major influences:
A1,2-Strain between Rg and R1 (Rg and R2)
A1,3 -strain between R2 and Rc (R1 and Rc)
1,3-interactions between L and R1 (L and R2)
VO(acac)2,
tBuOOH
O
+ O
OH OH OH
(4 : 1)
tBu
CH3 H L O
H M
H O O L O
M L O H
L H 3C
O H
tBu
H
OXIDATIONS 25
VO(acac)2,
tBuOOH
O
+ O
OH OH OH
(19 : 1)
tBu H
O H 3C H
L
M H
L O H 3C O O
H 3C O H M L
H H L
O
tBu
CH3
Homoallylic Systems
L
L
V OtBu
O O O
OH OH
O OR
OR
CO2R CO2R
OR O OR O
RO CO2R RO CO2R
Ti O O O
Ti Ti Ti O
CO2R
O O O O O CO2R
O O O
O O
tBu tBu
OR OR
Disfavored Favored
OXIDATIONS 26
Asymmetric Epoxidation
tBuOOH, Ti(OiPr), (+) or (-) Diethyl Tartrate, 3Å molecular sieves
Empirical Rule
R1
R2 (+)- DET epoxidation from the bottom
(-)- DET epoxidation from the top
R3 OH
Catalytic system: addition of molecular sieves to "soak" up any water with 3A sieves, 5-10 mol %
catalyst is used.
Preparation of Allylic Alcohols:
[(CH3)2CHCH2]2AlH Na (MeOCH2CH2O)2AlH2
CO2R'
R (DIBAL) R OH
(REDAL)
R CHO R C C CH2OH
R R
[(CH3)2CHCH2]2AlH
CO2R' H2, Lindlar's Catalyst
OH
(R)-glycidol
OH water soluble
O
OH
(+)-DIPT
(S)-glycidol
O
O O
O S NO2 organic soluble
OH
O
stoicheometric: 85% ee
catalytic (6-7 mol %) 47% yield >95% ee
in situ deriv. with PNB 78% yield 92 % ee >98 %ee after 1 recrystallization
(+)-DET
R Ti(OiPr)4 R
tBuOOH
O
OH OH
yields: 50 - 100 %
ee: > 95%
OXIDATIONS 27
Ring Opening of Epoxy-Alcohols
REDAL OH
R OH
O 1,3-Diol
AE
R OH R OH
R OH
DIBAL
OH
1,2-Diol
(+)-DIPT, Ti(OiPr)4,
tBuOOH, 3A sieves +
(90 % ee)
O O
OH OH
OH 95 : 5
major minor
95 : 5 95 : 5
OH OH
O O OH
O
O O
OH OH O
OH
90 % meso 0.25 %
(>99.5 % ee) 9.75%
CO2R
OR
O H
RO CO2R
Ti O
Ti O
O O O CO2R
O
O
tBu
OR
OXIDATIONS 28
R3 R4 kinetic resolution R3 R4 R3 R4
-20 °C, 0.5 - 6 days O
R2
OH
R2
OH + R2
OH
R1 R1 R1
40 - 50 % yield 40 - 50 % yield
> 99 % ee high ee
CHO NaH
OH
CO2Me
OR OR OR OR
HO-
OH OH acetone, H+ O mCPBA, Ac2O
O -
O
OH PhS
HO O Pummerer
SPh SPh
PhS-
CHO
OR OR OR
HO H
O O O
DIBAL HO H
OAc O HO H
O O CHO O
HO H
SPh O CHO CH2OH
L-glucose
H H H H
N N NaOCl N N
Mn Mn
O Cl O O O
O
(98% ee)
O
86% ee
Dioxiranes (Murray's Reagent) Reviews: Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1187; ACR 1989, 27, 205
Org. Syn. 1996, 74, 91
KHSO 5 O
O
"oxone" O
- epoxidation of olefins
OTBS O
OTBS
O
TBSO O TBSO O JOC 1990, 55, 2411
TBSO CH 2Cl 2, acetone TBSO
(100%) O
1) LDA
2) Cp 2TiCl2 OH
F3C O
Reductions
1. Hydrogenation
2. Boron Reagents
3. Aluminium Reagents
4. Tin Hydrides
5. Silanes
6. Dissolving Metal Reductions
Hydrogenations
Heterogeneous Catalytic Hydrogenation
Transition metals absorbed onto a solid support
metal: Pd, Pt, Ni, Rh
support: Carbon, alumina, silica
solvent: EtOH, EtOAc, Et2O, hexanes, etc.
R1 R1
R2 R2 R2 R2
- Catalyst can be "poisoned"
- Directed heterogeneous hydrogenation
O O
H
H2, Pd/C
O O
MeO OH MeO OH
O H2, Pd/C H O
O O
MeO CO2Me MeO CO2M2
(86 : 14)
Lindlar Catalyst ( Pd/ BaSO4/ quinoline)- partially poisoned to reduce activity; will only
reduce the most reactive functional groups.
O O
CO 2Me CO 2Me
JOC 1982, 47, 4254
REDUCTIONS 31
H2, Lindlar Catalyst
CH 2Cl 2: MeOH: Quinoline
HO OH
(90:9.5:0.5)
Ease of Reduction: (taken from H.O. House Modern Synthetic Reactions, 2nd edition)
R COCl R CHO
R NO 2 R NH 2
R R' R R'
R CHO R CH 2-OH
R CH CH R' R CH 2 CH 2 R'
O HO H
R R' R R'
R Ar CH 3 + HO R
Ar O
R C N R CH 2 NH 2
O
R CH 2-OH + HO R'
R OR'
O
CH 2 R'
R' R N
R N
R'
R'
requires high
temperature & pressure
R CO 2- Na+ no reaction
R R S Raney Nickel R H
O (CH 2)n
R R S R H
REDUCTIONS 32
O O O O O O
HO HO
Raney Nickel
JOC 1987, 52, 3346
EtOH
S H H
(74%)
OH (Ph3P)3RhCl, H2
OH
JOC 1992, 57, 2767
C 6H6
(92%)
Directed Hydrogenation
Review: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26 , 190
- Diasterocontrolled hydrogenation of allylic alcohols directed by the -OH group
- +
O K
O- K+
PPh3
(Ph3P)3RhCl, H2 O PPh3
Rh H
H
H
MeO
MeO
Ph Ph
P P(C 6H11)3
BF4- Ir +
Rh+ PF6 -
N
P
Ph Ph
Brown's Catalyst
(Crabtree's Ctalyst)
JACS 1983, 105 , 1072
Regioselective Hydrogenation- allylic and homoallylic alcohols are hydrogenated faster than
isolated double bonds
MeO2C
MeO2C
OH
OH
REDUCTIONS 33
mechanism:
OH +
L + H2 + L
M L S M
M
L L S L O
H
lose
reductive H2
elimination (oxidative
H addition)
H OH
migratory H +
HO
H insertion H
M M
L L S L L O
H
Diastereoselective Hydrogenation: since -OH directs the H2, there is a possibility for control of
stereochemistry
- sensitive to: H2 pressure
catalyst conc.
substrate conc.
solvent.
Regioselective Hydrogenation- allylic and homoallylic alcohols are hydrogenated faster than
isolated double bonds
HO HO
"Ir"
(20 mol %)
O O (24 : 1)
H
Brown's Catalyst
JACS 1984, 106, 3866
OH H2 (640 psi), CH2Cl 2 OH
H
50 : 1 150 : 1
OH OH
33 : 1 52 : 1
REDUCTIONS 34
Olefin Isomerization:
CH3
(3 : 1)
OH OH
olefin
isomerization
major
product
OH O
- Conducting the hydrogenation at high H 2 pressures supresses olefin isomerization and often
gives higher diastereoselectivity.
Other Lewis basic groups can direct the hydrogenation. (Ir seems to be superior to Rh for
these cases)
OMe CO2Me
OMe CO2Me
+
Ir
99 : 1 Ir+ > 99 : 1
Rh+ 32 : 1
O O
CO2H CO2H
> 99 : 1 Ir+ 7 : 1
Rh+ 1 : 1
O O
O N O N O
O
1:1 130 : 1
Acyclic Examples
Me
OH Rh+ (2 mol %)
CH 3
H2 (15 psi) JCSCC 1982, 348
Me OH
(97:3)
L
H
L M O
OH
H
Ph Ph
H anti
H 3C H
CH3 1,2-strain OH
H
H Ph syn
Ph
H
L M O
H
L
REDUCTIONS 35
L
H
L M O
OH
R3 favored
R2
H R3 R1 syn
R1 H
OH R2
R3 R1
R2
H R1 disfavored OH
R3 anti
R2 R3 R1
H 1,2-strain
R2
L M O
H
L
olefin
isomerization
OH L OH
H
L M O syn
R2 R1 R2 R1
H R2
CH2R2
H
R1 H
R1 R3
R2
relative
stereochemistry
is critical
A 1,3-strain
A
E L R3 L
O M E
L O M
R2 H 1,2-strain R2 L
H
R3
REDUCTIONS 36
OH Rh+ (20 mol %) OH
H2 (15 psi)
OBz OBz
TBSO TBSO 32 : 1
H
O PPh2 PPh2 PPh2
P PPh2
MeO OMe PPh2 PPh2
O PPh2 PPh2
P H
DIOP CHIRAPHOS R= -CH3 PROPHOS
= -Ph PHENPHOS DBPP
= -C6H11 CYCPHOS
DIPAMP
P PPh2
PPh2
PPh2
PPh2
P
CO 2H Rh (I) L*, H2 CO 2H
Ph Ph
HN Ph ACR 1983, 16, 106.
HN Ph
O (95% ee) O
CO 2Me CO 2H
NHAc NH 2
O HO
O OH
L-DOPA
DIOP 85% ee
DIPAMP 96% ee
PPPFA 93% ee
BINAP 100% ee
NORPHOS 95% ee
BPPM 91% ee
REDUCTIONS 37
General Mechanism: J. Halpern Science 1982, 217, 401 Asymmetric Synthesis 1985, vol 5, 41.
CO2Me Ph
Ph
P S NHAc P
Rh Rh CO2Me
NH
P S P
(fast equilibrium) O
CH3
rate H2
CO2Me limiting (slow)
Ph
NHAc
Ph Ph
H
H S P
P Rh CO2Me
Rh CO2Me H NH
(fast) P
P NH
O O
S
CH3
CH3
Detailed Mechanism:
P S CO2Me
Rh + Ph
*
P S NHAc
MeO2C NH HN CO2Me
P P
* Rh Ph Ph Rh *
P CH3 H 3C P
O O
major complex minor complex
H2 H2
(slow) (slow)
MeO2C CO2Me
NH NH
H H
H H
Rh Ph Ph Rh
P CH3 H 3C P
O O
* P P *
S S
CH3 CH3
O O
NH HN P
P S S
Rh Rh *
*
H H
CO2Me MeO2C
P P
Ph Ph
H
H MeO2C N CH3
H 3C N CO2Me
O
O Ph
Ph
(S)
(R)
Major product
Minor product
REDUCTIONS 38
+
MeO2C
H NH
H
Rh Ph
P CH3
O
* P
Free Energy
CO2Me +
NH
H
H
Ph Rh
HN CO2Me + H 3C
O
P
P *
P
Ph Rh *
H 3C P
O
minor complex
MeO2C NH +
P
* Rh Ph
P CH3
O
major complex
Reaction Coordinate
Ph Ph
O
P O
Ru
P O
O ACR 1990, 23, 345.
Ph Ph
BINAP
O O O O
(BINAP)RuAc2, (BINAP)RuAc2,
H2 (100 atm) R H2 (100 atm) R
O O O O
50 °C, CH2Cl 2 50 °C, CH2Cl 2
(94 % ee) (95 - 98 % ee)
Ru(AcO)2(BINAP),
CO 2H H2 (135 atm), MeOH CO 2H
OH OH
HO
Vitamin E
REDUCTIONS 39
Kinetic Resolution by Directed Hydrogenation
R= Et > 96 % ee
Ph 82 %
OMe 93 %
Hydrogenation of Carbonyls
1,3-diketones:
O O OH O O OH
R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2
Ru (II)
O O H2 (700 psi) OH OH OH OH
+
R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2
anti syn
R1= -CH3 R2= -CH3 anti : syn= 99 : 1
-CH3 -CH2CH3 16 : 1 (90 % ee)
-CH2CH3 -iPr 32 : 1
-CH2CH3 -CH2CH3 49 : 1
O O H2 O OH Directed OH OH
Reduction
R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2
H
M O
H R2
O R1 O R1
R2 H
M O
H
anti syn
Ru2Cl 4(BINAP) OH
O Et3N, H2 (100 atm)
MeO 2C JACS 1988, 110 , 6210
MeO 2C
(98% ee)
Decarbonylations
O (Ph3P)3RhCl O (Ph3P)3RhCl
R H R Cl
R H - CO R Cl - CO
REDUCTIONS 40
OHC
(Ph3P)3RhCl
Fe Fe Fe
PhCH 3, ∆ Fe JOC 1990, 55, 3688
Diimide HN=NH
Review: Organic Reactions 1991, 40J. Chem. Ed. 1965, 254
- Only reduces double bonds
- Syn addition of H 2
- will selectivley reduce the more strained double bond
- Unstable reagent which is generated in situ
K+O2C-N=N-CO2K+ + AcOH → H-N=N-H
H2N-NH2 + Cu2+ + H2O2 → H-N=N-H
HN=NH
ACIEE 1965, 271
(76%)
O O
+-
CO 2MeK O 2C N N CO 2- K+ CO 2Me
JACS 1986, 108 , 5908
AcOH, MeOH
NO 2 NO 2
(95%)
HN hν (254 nm) NH
S + COS + CO
HN NH
O
O S O
N N
H H TL 1993, 34, 4137
hν, 16 hr
(96%)
Metal Hydrides
Review on Metal Hydride Selectivity: Chem Soc Rev. 1976, 5 , 23
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis 1991, vol 8, 1.
Boron Hydrides Review: Chem. Rev. 1986, 86 , 763.
NaBH4 reduces ketones and aldehydes
LiBH4 reduces ketones, aldehydes, esters and epoxides. THF soluble
LiBH4/TMSCl stronger reducing agent. ACIEE 1989, 28, 218.
Zn(BH4)2 reduces ketones and aldehydes
R4N BH4 organic soluble (CH2Cl2) borohydrides. Synth Commun. 1990, 20, 907
LiEt3BH reduces ketones, aldehydes, esters, epoxides and R-X
Li s-Bu3BH reduces ketones, aldehydes, esters and epoxides (hindered borohydride)
Na(CN)NH3 reduces iminium ions, ketones and aldehydes
Na(AcO)3BH reduces ketones and aldehydes (less reactive)
NaBH2S3 reduces ketones and aldehydes
REDUCTIONS 41
Sodium Borohydride NaBH4
- reduces aldehydes and ketones to alcohols
- does not react with acids, esters, lactones, epoxides or nitriles.
- Additives can increase reactivity.
R"-2NH, MeOH,
R R R' R H
AcO - NH4+ , pH~ 8 Na(CN)BH3
O N+ R'
R R R' R N
R'
O
R"-2NH, MeOH, JACS 1971, 93 , 2897
CHO AcO- NH4+
N
H
N Na(CN)BH3
N
HO HO
1) TsNHNH 2, H+
O 2) Na(CN)BH3
- Epoxide opening
O
NaBH3CN,
OH BF3•OEt2, THF OH
JOC 1994, 59, 4004
HO
REDUCTIONS 42
NaBH2S3 Lalancette Reduction Synthesis 1972, 526 Can. J. Chem. 1970, 48 , 735.
NaBH4/ NiCl 2 Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981, 29 , 1159; Chem. Ber. 1984, 117 , 856.
Ar-NO2 → Ar-NH2
Ar-NO → Ar- NH2
R2C=N-OH → R2CH-NH2
NaBH4 / TiCl 4
Synthesis 1980, 695.
R-COOH → R-CH2-OH
R-COOR' → R-CH2-OH
R-CN → R-CH2-NH2
R-CONH2 → R-CH2-NH2
R2C=N-OH → R2CH-NH2
R-SO2-R' → R-S-R'
R R R R R R
R R H
JCSCC 1978, 601
JACS 1978, 100 , 2226
O OH
OH OH
EtOH, H2O
CHO CHO
O
CeCl 3 1) NaBH 4, CeCl3
H2O R 2) work-up
OH
O CHO OH CHO
NaBH 4/ CeCl3
EtOH, H2O
(78%)
REDUCTIONS 43
Zinc Borohydride Zn(BH4)2 Synlett 1993, 885.
ZnCl2 (ether) + NaBH 4 → Zn(BH4)2
- Ether solution of Zn(BH4)2 is neutral- good for base sensitive compounds
- Chelation contol model
Zn
RO
O H
O OH
OR H B
R1 OR
H H R1
R2
R1 H R2
R2
Zn(BH4)2,
Et2O, 0°C OH
OH
O OH
H-
H TL 1983, 24 , 2653, 2657, 2661
Me O
O
R Zn
TL 1983, 24 , 4287
AcO OAc
O Bu4N (AcO) 3BH B
H
CHO C 6H6, ↑↓ O O
OH
Ph
Ph OH
Ph
H OAc H OAc
O B R B
R O OAc R O OAc
H H
R O
major minor
OH O
OH OH
Na+ BH(OAc)3
50 : 1
REDUCTIONS 44
OH O O OH OH O OH OH OH
Na+ BH(OAc)3 Na+ BH(OAc)3
CO2R CO2R CO2R
HO
OBn OBn
BnO BnO Me
MeO
OBn OBn O
Me Me
O
MeO O MeO O N O
OH Me
O
O
Me Me O OH
OH OH HO
Me OH
FK-506
TL 1989, 30 , 1037
(Ph3P)2Cu BH4
reduction of acid chlorides to aldehydes JOC 1989, 45, 3449
reduction of alkyl and aryl azides to amines J. Chem. Res. (S) 1981, 17
Alkyl Borohydrides
Selectrides
M + HB M + = Li (L-selectride)
LS-selectride
K (K-selectride) Li + HB
3 3
(99%)
b) Br
K+ HBPh3
Syn. Comm. 1988, 18 , 89.
- even greater 1,4-selectivity
Li + HBEt3 (Super Hydride)
- very reactive hydride source
- reduces ketones, aldehydes, esters, epoxides and C-X (alkyl halides and sulfonates)
O HO
Li Et3BH, THF
HCA 1983, 66 , 760
HO H HO H
HO
HO
CH 3
OH 1) TsCl, pyridine
2) Li Et3BH, THF HCA 1988, 71 , 872
HO
HO H
H
Boranes
Hydroboration
B 2H6 H2O 2, NaOH
B H HO H
Thexyl Borane B
H
H
B
9-BNN =
B
H B
H
O
Catecholborane BH
O
BH BH
Pinylborane
2 2
B B
Alpine Borane H
BCl BCl
IPC 2BCl (DIP-Cl)
2
2
B
Borolane H
Ph Ph
Oxazaborolidine O
N B
H
O alpine-borane OH
THF, 0°C Tetrahedron 1984, 40 , 1371
(94% ee)
REDUCTIONS 47
B B
H
9-BBN = B
B
α-pinene 9-BBN
B OH
Mechanism: H O
RL Rs RL
Rs
BCl
2
- Cl increases the Lewis acidity of boron making it a more reactive reagent
- saturated ketones are reduced to chiral alcohols with varying degrees of ee.
O OH
I Ipc2B-Cl, I
CO2tBu CO2tBu
THF
JOC 1992, 57, 7044
PrO PrO
OMe OMe (90 % ee)
B
H
B
O H OH
a) B
H
b) H2O 2, NaOH (99.5% ee)
OH
(99.5% ee)
REDUCTIONS 48
Oxazaborolidine (Corey)
JACS 1987, 109 , 7925; TL 1990, 31, 611l ; TL 1992, 33 , 4141
Ph Ph Ph Ph
O O + BH3
N B N B
H CH 3
Catalytic
O OH
R R
> 90 % ee
O OH
92 % ee
O OH
86 % ee
I I
O OH
93 % ee
Ph Ph
O O OH
N B
Me
(90% ee)
CF 3
O OH
O
• HCl
Cl Cl CH 3
N
H
94 % ee
Fluoxetine (Prozac)
O O
O O
90 : 10
BzO BzO
O OH
Aluminium Hydrides
1. LiAlH 4
2. AlH3
3. Li (tBuO)3AlH
4. (iBu)2AlH DIBAL-H
5. Na (MeOCH2CH2O)2AlH2 REDAL
REDUCTIONS 49
Lithium Aluminium Hydride LiAlH4 (LAH) Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 763 Org. Rxn. 1951, 6, 469.
- very powerful reducing agent
- used as a suspension in ether or THF
- Reduces carbonyl, carboxylic acids and esters to alcohols
- Reduces nitrile, amides and aryl nitro groups to amines
- opens epoxides
- reduces C-X bonds to C-H
- reduces acetylenic alcohols trans-allylic alcohols
LAH
OH
R OH
R
LAH, THF NH 2
H2N N H2N N
H NH 2 H
(62%)
NH 2
Lindlar/ H2
H2N N
H
O HO
CO 2Me
OH
LAH, THF, ↑↓
TL 1988, 29 , 2793.
(100%)
O H O H
O O
BINAL-H (Noyori)
- Chiral aluminium hydride for the asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones
1) LiAlH4
OH 2) ROH O H
Al Li +
OH O OR
R= Me, Et, CF 3CH 2-
BINOL BINAL-H
O
O O BINAL-H,THF
Tetrahedron 1990, 46 , 4809
-100 to -78°C
HO (94% ee)
Intermediate for 3-Component Coupling Strategy to Prostaglandins
I
O
Li+ O -
CO 2Me
RO Li+ RCu
RO OTBS
OTBS
O
O CO 2Me CO 2H
HO OH
RO OTBS PGE 2
REDUCTIONS 50
Alane AlH3
LiAlH 4 + AlCl3 → AlH3
- superior to LAH for the 1,2-reduction of α,β-unsaturated carbonyls to allylic alcohols
OMe
O 1) AlH3, ether, 0°C HO
O 2) H3O + O
Ph Me JACS 1989, 111 , 6649
O
O Me OH
O
Al if complex
O
DIBAL is unstable fast
R CO 2Me R C OMe R CHO R CH 2 OH
H
if complex
is stable
R CHO
O OBn
O OBn O O H
DIBAL, CH 2Cl 2 HO O
O
HO OBn
OH OBn O HO OH
HO
OH
JACS 1990, 112 , 9648
OBn OBn
CO 2iPr DIBAL, CH 2Cl 2 CHO
iPrO2C OHC
OBn OBn
O O
TMS-Cl, Et3N DiBAl-H O
TL 1998, 39, 909
R OH CH2Cl2 R OSiMe3 CH2Cl2, -78°C
R H
O R'-M O O
OMe DIBAL or LAH TL 1981, 22 , 3815
R R' R N R H
Me
REDUCTIONS 51
Sodium Bis(2-Methoxyethoxy)Aluminium Hydride REDAL
Organic Reactions 1988, 36, 249 Organic Reactions 1985, 36, 1.
MeO O H
Na+ Al
MeO O
H
- "Chelation" directed opening fo allylic epoxides
OH
REDAL O DIBAL-H R OH TL 1982, 23 , 2719
R OH R OH
OH
1,3-diol 1,2-diol
Sharpless OH
epoxidation O REDAL JOC 1988, 53 , 4081
Ph OH Ph OH
DME Ph OH
OH
OH +
O
LiAlH4 2 : 98
AlH3 95 : 5
OH
O
OH OH + OH
BnO BnO BnO
OH
REDAL 150 : 1
DIBAL 1 : 13
O
OH
OH Me
Me O OH
HO OH
HO O OH OH OH OH O OH
Me Me Me
Me
O O sugar
Me
O O Me O O sugar
OH
Amphotericin B NH 2 Me
HO
Erythromycin A
Lithium Tri(t-Butoxy)aluminium Hydride Li+ (tBuO)3AlH
- hindered aluminium hydride, will only react with the most reactive FG's
O Li(tBuO)3AlH O
R Cl R H
Cl Me
O
N+
Me Li(tBuO)3AlH O
H Me TL 1983, 24 , 1543
R-CO 2H R O
pyridine, -30°C N+ CuI (cat), -78°C R H
H Me
iPrOH, THF
X= H, Cl, OMe
yield: 83-100 %
96% ee
M, NH3 _•
•
R R R R
H H H
- position of the double bond in the final product is dependent of the nature of the substituent
R R R
R= ERG R= EWG
- ketones and nitro groups are also reduced but esters and nitrile are not.
- α,β-unsaturated carbonyl cmpds are reduced in a 1,4-fashion to give an enolate which can be
subsequently used to trap electrophiles
Me Me
Me K, NH3, Me Me
Me MeOH, -78°C O
O HO JOC 1991, 56 , 6255
HO
O O (92%) O OH
Me Me
O O O O
a) Li, NH3, tBuOH
b) CH 2O JOC 1984, 59 , 3685
O O
HO
Other Metals
- Mg
Mg, MeOH X- CN, CO2R, CONR'2
X X
H
H
Mg, MeOH
TL 1987, 28 , 5287
EtO2C (98%)
EtO2C
- Zn reduction of α-halocarbonyls
O O
Zn, PhH, Me
Br DMSO, MeI JACS 1967, 89, 5727
REDUCTIONS 53
Cl X Y Zn, AcOH
Zn
O R-OH R CH CH R'
R X= Cl, Br, I
R R' Y= X, OH
O
"Copper Hydrides"
LAH or DIBAL-H + MeCu → "CuH"
- selective 1,4-reduction of α,β-unsaturated ketones (even hindered enones)
O O
1) MeCu, DIBAL,
HMPA, THF, -50°C JOC 1987,52 , 439
2) MeLi
3) Br
O O
Silyl Hydrides
- Hydrosilylation
Et3SiH + (Ph3P)3RhCl (cat)
- selective 1,4-reduction of enones, 1,2-reduction of saturated ketones to alchohols.
Et3SiH,
O (Ph3P)3RhCl (cat) O SiEt3 H3O + O
TL 1972, 5085
J. Organomet. Chem. 1975, 94 , 449
O OSi(iPr)3
iPr3SiH, Et2O
O O
JOC 1994, 59, 2287
Si O Pt
O O
2 2 (87%)
- Buchwald Reduction
JACS 1991, 113 , 5093
- catalytic reagent prepared from Cp2TiCl2 + nBuLi and stoichometric (Et)3SiH in THF will
reduce ester, ketones and aldehydes to alcohols under very mild conditions.
- α,b− unsaturated esters are reduced to allylic alcohols
- free hydroxyl groups, aliphatic halides and epoxides are not reduced
REDUCTIONS 54
Clemmensen Reduction Organic Reactions 1975, 22, 401
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis 1991, vol 8, 307.
- reduction of ketones to saturated hydrocarbons
Zn(Hg), HCl H
O
H
- free radical reduction of halide, thio ethers, xanthates, thionocarbanates by a radical chain
mechanism.
nBu3Sn-H, AIBN
Ph-CH3 ↑↓
R3C-X R3C-H N N
S CN CN
S S
AIBN
X= -Cl, -Br, -I, -SPh, O Ph , O SMe , O N N
Barton-McCombie Reduction
JCS P1 1975, 1574
R3C-X → R3C-H X= -OC(=S)-SMe, -OC(=S)-Im, -OC(=S)Ph
O
O
O O
O NaH, imidazole, O O nBu3SnH, AIBN
O O PhCH3, reflux O
THF, CS2, MeI O O
O O
O (85%)
HO O
SMe
S
Xanthate
R R R
Cl
nBu3SnH, AIBN
a) Ph NMe2 , THF
+ PhCH3, reflux
S
b) H2S, pyridine (73%)
HO (90%) Ph O
Thionobenzoates
S
N N Ph O nBu3SnH, AIBN Ph O
Ph O O O O O
O O N N O PhCH3, reflux
HO N N AcHN (57%) AcHN
AcHN (CH2Cl)2 OBn OBn
OBn 59% S
Thiocarbonyl Imidazolides
REDUCTIONS 55
- Cyclic Thionocarbonates: deoxygenation of 1,2- and 1,3-diols to alcohols
S
OH S
N N nBu3SnH, AIBN
O HO
HO O N N O PhCH3, reflux O
O JCS P1 1977, 1718
MeO MeO MeO
MeO MeO (61%) MeO
OMe OMe OMe
- Methyl oxylates
O OAc
O OAc O OAc
MeO2CCOCl nBu3SnH, AIBN
THF OC PhCH3, reflux
OC OC
O
HO CO2Me
CO2Me MeO2C O CO2Me
O O O
O H O H O H
Radical Deamination
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis 1991, vol. 8, 811
NO2
O Bu3SnH, PhSiH3 O
initiator, PhCH3 (reflux)
O O
(75%)
PROTECTING GROUPS 57
Carey & Sundberg Chapter 13.1 problems # 1; 2; 3a, b, c ;
Smith: Chapter 7
Protecting Groups
T.W. Greene & P.G.M. Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis (2nd edition) J.
Wiley & Sons, 1991.
P. J. Kocienski, Protecting Groups, Georg Thieme Verlag, 1994
1. Hydroxyl groups
2 Ketones and aldehydes
3. Amines
4. Carboxylic Acids
Ethers
Methyl ethers
R-OH → R-OMe difficult to remove except for on phenols
O O
OBz OBz
O
R-OH +
H , PhH R O O Stable to base, acid labile
BnO BnO
(86%)
Cleavage: - H2 / PtO2
- Li / NH3
- DDQ
- Ce(NH4)2(NO3)6 (CAN)
- e-
o-Nitrobenzyl ethers
Review: Synthesis 1980, 1; Organic Photochemistry, 1987, 9 , 225
NaH, THF O 2N
R-OH
Cl O
R
NO 2
hν (300 nm)
ROH +
O CH3CN,H 2O O
(p-Methoxyphenyl)diphenylmethyl ether
4'-methoxytrityl MMTr-OR
Di-(p-methoxyphenyl)phenylmethyl ether
R2 C O R 4',4'-dimethoxytrityl DMTr-OR
Tri-(p-methoxyphenyl)methyl ether
4',4',4'-trimethoxytrityl TMTr-OR
R3
HN HN
HO OH HO OH
R = Tr 48 hr.
R= MMTr 2 hr.
R= DMTr 15 min.
R= TMTr 1 min. (too labile to be useful)
DMTrO B
O HO B
S O O
I O
Cl 3CCOOH
L O Si (CH 2)3 N C (CH 2)2 C O
I H
O
C O S O
A
O N (iPr)2 O O -
P Base O O
P CN P
O O
CN B O B
O O
coupling
S O S O
DMTrO B' HO B'
O O
Repeat Cycle
I2, H2O O O- Cl 3CCOOH O O-
P P -
O- O
O B O B
O O
S O S O
PROTECTING GROUPS 61
Silyl Ethers Synthesis 1985, 817 Synthesis 1993, 11 Synthesis 1996, 1031
R-OH → R-O-SiR3
formation: - R3Si-Cl, pyridine, DMAP
- R3Si-Cl, CH2Cl2 (DMF, CH3CN), imidazole, DMAP
- R3Si-OTf, iPr2EtN, CH2Cl2
TESO H2O/ACOH/THF OH
(3:5:11), 15 hr O Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1986, 1281
OTBS (97%)
OTBS
Phenyldimethylsilyl ethers
J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52 , 165
Esters
R-OH → R-O2CR'
Activated Acids Chem. Soc. Rev. 1983, 12, 129 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 569.
RCO2H → "activated acid" → carboxylic acid derivative (ester, amide, etc.)
Acid Chlorides
O O
O O N N +
R N R N
R OH R Cl +
N N
Anhydrides
O O O
2 P2O 5
R OH R O R
Activating Agents:
Carbonyl Diimidazole
O
O
O NH
R N
+ N N + CO + N
R OH N N N
Acyl Imidazole
PROTECTING GROUPS 63
Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
C 6H11
O
O NH O O
R O C Nu: +C 6H11 C 6H11
+ N C N N N
R OH N R Nu H H
C 6H11
N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)
O
C 6H11
O O O
NH HO N
R O C +
R O N
N O
C 6H11 O
O Ph3P: O
+ + + Ph3P=O
R OH N S S N R S N N SH
O O
TsO - I-
+ + +
R OH F N R O N
Me Me
Acetates
R-OH → R-O2CCH3
- stable to acid and mild base
- not compatable with strong base or strong nucleophiles such as organometallic
reagents
Formation: - acetic anhydride, pyridine
- acetyl chloride, pyridine
PROTECTING GROUPS 64
Cleavage: - K2CO3, MeOH, reflux
- KCN, EtOH, reflux
- NH3, MeOH
- LiOH, THF, H2O
- enzymatic hydrolysis (Lipase) Org. Rxns. 1989, 37, 1.
OAc OAc
Porcine Pancreatic
Lipase
TL 1988, 30 , 6189
Chloroacetates
- can be selectively cleaved with Zn dust or thiourea.
O Me
Me
Cl O OR
O O OR
HO
AcO H2NNHCOSH AcO JCS CC 1987, 1026
Me O
Me O
O
OAc O
OAc
O
Cl O HO
Cl OH
O
O
Trifluoroacetates
Formation: - with trifluoroacetic anhydride or trifluoroacetyl chloride
Cleavage: - K2CO3, MeOH
Benzoate (Bz)
- more stable to hydrolysis than acetates.
Formation: - benzoyl chloride, benzoic anhydride, benzoyl cyanide (TL 1971, 185) ,
benzoyl tetrazole (TL 1997, 38, 8811)
Cleavage: - mild base
- KCN, MeOH, reflux
1,2 and 1,3- Diols Synthesis 1981, 501 Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 581
R2
O R2 R3
OH
R3
R1 O O
R
H+ , -H2O
OH R R1
Isopropylidenes (acetonides)
H+ Me Me
OH
R1 O O
R acetone or
OH MeO OMe OMe R
or R1
Cycloalkylidene Ketals
- Cyclopentylidene are slightly easier to cleave than acetonides
- Cyclohexylidenes are slightly harder to cleave than acetonides
O
MeO OMe
Benzylidene Acetals
PhCHO Ph
OH -or-
R1 PhCH(OMe)2 O O
R
+
OH H , -H2O
R R1
p-Methoxybenzylidenes
- hydrolyzed about 10X faster than regular benzylidenes
- Can be oxidatively removed with Ce(NH 4)2(NO3)6 (CAN)
OMe
OBn Ce(NH 4)2(NO3)6 OBn
BnO O CH 3CN, H2O BnO OH
O (95%) OH
MeO O MeO O
- Reductive Cleavage
Ph
Na(CN)BH3,
TiCl4,CH 3CN OH
O O
CO 2Me
MeO 2C Synthesis 1988, 373.
MeO 2C CO 2Me OBn
O TMS-CN O
O Ph OH
BF3•OEt2 Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3867
O O Ph
MeO O MeO O
H CN
PROTECTING GROUPS 66
Ph
O O BnO OH
DIBAL-H
TL 1988, 29 , 4085
O O
OMe OMe
Carbonates
O
OH
R1 (Im)2CO O O
R
OH R R1
HN HN
iPr2Si(Cl)-O-Si(Cl)iPr2 O O N
HO O N pyridine Si
O O
O
HO OH Si O OH
(CH 2OH)2, H+
R O
PhH, -H2O
TL 1980, 21 , 1357
-or- R1 O
(CH2OSiMe 3)2,
TMS-OTf, CH2Cl 2 1,3-dioxolanes
CH 2(CH 2OH)2, R O
H+ , PhH, -H2O
R1 O
1,3-dioxanes
PROTECTING GROUPS 67
Cleavage rate of substituted 1,3-dioxanes:
Chem. Rev. 1967, 67 , 427.
R O R O R O
> >>
R1 O R1 O R1 O
- Ketal formation of α,β-unsaturated carbonyls are usually slower than for the
saturated case.
O O O
CH 2(CH 2OH)2,
H+ , PhH, -H2O
O O
Fluoride cleavable ketal:
O
O
LiBF4
O O
O TL 1997, 38, 1873
(88%)
O O
Me3Si
Carboxylic Acids Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 2409. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 3691
Nucelophilic Ester Cleavage: Organic Reactions 1976, 24, 187.
Esters
Alkyl Esters
formation: - Fisher esterification (RCOOH +R'OH + H+)
- Acid Chloride + R-OH, pyridine
- t-butyl esters: isobutylene and acid
- methyl esters: diazomethane
Cleavage: - LiOH, THF, H2O
- enzymatic hydrolysis Org. Rxns. 1989, 37, 1.
- t-butyl esters are cleaved with aqueous acid
- Bu 2SnO, PhH, reflux (TL 1991, 32, 4239)
OH Pig Liver Esterase OH
pH 6.8 buffer
MeO 2C CO 2Me MeO 2C CO 2H
O
Bu2SnO, PhH, ↑↓ O
DCC
RCO 2H +
O
OH
R O
PROTECTING GROUPS 68
2-Trimethylsilyl)ethoxymethyl Ester (SEM)
HCA 1977, 60 , 2711.
- Cleaved with Bu 4NF in DMF
DCC R O O
RCO 2H + HO O SiMe 3
SiMe 3
O
2-(Trimethylsilyl)ethyl Esters
JACS 1984, 106 , 3030
- cleaved with Fluoride ion
DCC
RCO 2H + HO R O
SiMe 3 SiMe 3
O
Haloesters
- cleaved with Zn(0) dust or electrochemically
DCC
RCO 2H + HO CCl 3 R O CCl 3
Benzyl Esters
RCO2H + PhCH2OH → RCO2Bn
Formation: - DCC
- Acid chloride and benzyl alcohol
Cleavage: - Hydrogenolysis
- Na, NH3
Diphenylmethyl Esters
DCC
RCO 2H + HO R O
CHPh 2 CHPh 2
O
o-Nitrobenzyl Esters
- selective removed by photolysis
Orthoesters Synthesis 1974, 153 Chem. Soc. Rev. 1987, 75
TL 1983, 24 , 5571
O O
BF 3•OEt2 O
RCOCl +
R O R
O
OH O O
O O
Cl O R2N O
2,2,2-Trichloroethyl Carbamate
O O
R2NH, pyridine
R
Cl 3C O Cl Cl 3C O N
R
- Cleaved with zinc dust or electrochemically.
O
S Te Te S
N O CCl 3 NH
TL 1986, 27 , 4687
EtO2C NaBH 4 EtO2C
S S
2-Trimethylsilylethyl Carbamate (Teoc)
- cleaved with fluoride ion.
O O
O
Me 3Si Me 3Si R
O O N + R2NH O N
R
O
SiMe 3
OH
OTBS Cl
O O H O
Cl MeO N
O Bu4NF, THF CH 3
MeO N H
CH 3 (100%) OEt
H O
OEt SEt
O
SEt SEt
SEt
JACS 1979, 101 7104
Cleavage: - Hydrogenolysis
- PdCl 2, Et3SiH
- TMS-I
- BBr3
- hν (254 nm)
- Na/ NH3
m-Nitrophenyl Carbamate
JOC 1974, 39 , 192
O NO 2
R2N O
- removed by photolysis
Amides
Formamides
- removed with strong acid
HCO 2Et O
R2NH +
R2N H
Acetamides
- removed with strong acid
Ac2O O
R2NH +
R2N CH 3
Trifluoroacetamides
Cleavage: - base (K2CO3, MeOH, reflux)
- NH3, MeOH
O
(CF3CO) 2O
R2NH +
R2N CF 3
Sulfonamides
p-Toluenesulfonyl (Ts)
pTsCl, pyridine
R2NH R2N SO 2
PROTECTING GROUPS 71
Cleavage: - Strong acid
- sodium Naphthalide
- Na(Hg)
Ts Ts Na(Hg), MeOH
Na2HPO 4 H H
N N N N
JOC 1989, 54 , 2992
(65%)
N N
Ts H
Trifluoromethanesulfonyl
Tf Tf
N N NH HN
Na, NH3
JOC 1992, 33, 5505
N N NH HN
Tf Tf
Trimethylsilylethanesulfonamide (SES)
TL 1986, 54 , 2990; JOC 1988, 53, 4143
- removed with CsF, DMF, 95°C
SO 2Cl
Me 3Si R2N SiMe 3
R2NH S
Et3N, DMF O O
O O O-
B:
H H - H
R R R
H
H H H
- Base is chosen so as to favor enolate formation. Acidity of C-H bond must be greater
(lower pKa value) than that of the conjugate acid of the base (C&S table 1.1, pg 3)
O
MeO- pKa = 15 unfavorable enolate
pKa = 20 concentration
H 3C CH3 tBuO- pKa = 19
O O more favorable
H 3C CH2 OEt
pKa = 10 enolate concentration
Enolate Formation:
- H+ Catalyzed (thermodynamic)
O
OH
H+
O O - Li+
LDA, THF, -78°C
C-C BOND FORMATION 73
typical conditions: strong hindered (non-nucleophilic) base such as LDA
R2NH pKa= ~30
Li
N
Ester Enolates- Esters are susceptible to substitution by the base, even LDA can be
problematic. Use very hindered non-nucleophillic base (Li isopropylcyclohexyl amide)
O O
O O- Li+
N
OR' Li R
OR'
R THF, -78°C
kinetic thermodynamic
- note: the kinetic and thermodynamic enolate in some cases may be the same
- for α,β-unsaturated ketones
O
thermodynamic kinetic
site site
Regiochemically
Ph Ph
pure enolates
O- Li+ O- Li+
C-C BOND FORMATION 74
- silyl enolethers Synthesis 1977, 91. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 181.
1) LDA
2) Me3SiCl Ph
Ph Ph + OTMS
O kinetic OTMS
isolatable
separate & purify
Geometrically Ph Ph
pure enolates O- M+ O- M+
- From Enones
1) MeLi
1) Li, NH3
2) TMS-Cl 2) E+
O TMSO O
H H
E
OSiMe3 O OSiMe3
O OSiMe3
TMS-Cl
M+ -O
Alkylation of 4-t-butylcyclohexanone:
O O
E
R
R
equitorial anchor
E H
A E
H tBu
A favored Chair
tBu R
O
R
B O- M+
H
E O
tBu Twist Boat
B R
E
on cyclohexanone enolates, the electrophile approaches from an "axial" trajectory. This
approach leads directly into a chair-like product. "Equitorial apprach leads to a higher
energy twist-boat conformation.
O Kinetic H E H
R1 R2
H H O- M+ O
E
R1 R2 R1 R2
H H E
Thermodynamic
C-C BOND FORMATION 76
Stork-Danheiser Enone Transposition:
- overall γ-alkylation of an α,β-unsaturated ketone
O O
LDA HO CH3 CH3
+
PhCH2OCH2Cl CH3Li H3O
PhO PhO PhO
OMe OMe OMe O
J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7837.
valinol
O O O O
O
R LDA, THF R LiOH, H2O, THF R
N O N O
OH
Et-I
Me Ph Me Ph Complimentary Methods
major product for enantiospecific alkylations
(96:4)
O O O
O O Diastereoselectivity: 92 - 98 %
R LDA, THF
N O R
N O
LiOH, H2O, THF R for most alkyl halides
OH
Et-I
major product
(96:4)
1) HO-
O O
2) CH2N2 O
LDA, THF R
N O 3) TFA
R
O Boc N 4) Raney Ni OMe
N OtBu NH2
tBuO N HN (94 - 98 % de)
O Boc
C-C BOND FORMATION 77
Bu Bu
O O B O O
R Bu2BOTf, Et3N O O NBS N3-
N O R
R N O
N O
Br
Ph
Ph
Ph
O O
1) LiOH O
R 2) H2, Pd/C
N O R
OH
N3
NH2
Ph D- amino acids
O O O O
R KN(SiMe3)2, THF R
N O N O
N3
SO2N3
Ph Ph
SO2Ph
R
N Ar
Ar N O R
O SO2Ph
R O O N
O
O SO2N(C6H11)2 S O
O2
R
H
LDA, NBS H
Et2Cu•BF3 H
O O
O
Br HO
O O NH2
SO2N(C6H11)2 SO2N(C6H11)2 O
SO2N(C6H11)2 O
H
N Ph OTMS
O But H N Ph
N
N O Li
Li N
THF, HMPA (97 % ee)
TMSCl N tBu
tBu Me
"Kinetic" "Thermodynamic"
O O
O
O +
••
N N N O
H R-I H2O
R E
H+, (-H2O)
enamine
-Chiral enamines
O
N
E
N N
O N N
N
-N
Me2N-NH2 LDA, THF
-
+
H , (-H2O)
N
N O
E+ hydrolysis
E E
- Hydrazone anions are more reactive than the corresponding ketone or aldehyde
enolate.
- Drawback: can be difficult to hydrolyze.
- Chiral hydrazones for asymmetric alkylations (RAMP/SAMP hydrazones- D. Enders
"Asymmetric Synthesis" vol 3, chapt 4, Academic Press; 1983)
OMe MeO
N N
NH2 H 2N
SAMP RAMP
N N
LDA O3 O
N OMe N OMe
H
I OTBS
(100 % ee)
Me
O
Li •• MeO
R1 N N R1 N N
E (C,C) R2 R2 H
H Z (C,N)
E
- The effects of the counterion on the reactivity of the enolates can be important
Reactivity Li+ < Na+ < K+ < R4N+ addition of crown ethers
C-C BOND FORMATION 80
- The aldol reaction is an equilibrium which can be "driven" to completion.
M
O- M+ O O O OH
work-up
R + RCHO H H R'
R'
R' R
R
In the case of hindered enolates, the equillibrium favors reactants. Mg2+ and Zn2+
counterions will stabilize the intermediate β-alkoxycarbonyl and push the equillibrium
towards products. (JACS 1973, 95, 3310)
O- M+ O OH
- Dehydration of the intermediate β-alkoxy- or β-hydroxy ketone can also serve to drive
the reaction to the right.
O O
O
tBuO- Na +, tBuOH
JACS 1979, 101 , 1330
O O
H H
O O
Enolate Geometry
- two possible enolate geometries
O O - Li+ O - Li+
LDA, THF, -78°C H
+
H
E - enolate Z - enolate
E -enolate OM O OH
R3CHO threo
H
R
1
R 1
R 3 (anti)
R2 R
2
Ph OMgBr
H
"pericyclic" T.S.
C-C BOND FORMATION 81
Analysis of Z-enolate stereoselectivity
R2 R2
R3 R2 O M O O
O O R3 O OH
R3 M M
O R1 R3
H H
H H R1
H R1 H R2
R1
erythro (syn)
favored
R2 H R2 O M R2
O O O O O OH
H M H M
O
H R1 R3
H H R3
R3 R1 R3 R1 R2
R1
threo (anti)
disfavored
H H
O O H H O M O O
H M H M
O OH
2 O R2
R R1 R3
R1 R2 R3 R3 R1
R3
R1 erthro (syn) R2
disfavored
O- M+ O HO
H
R1 R1 R3
Path A
R2 R2
When R1 is the dominent steric influence, then path A proceeds. If R2 is the dominent
steric influence then path B proceeds.
4. The Zimmerman-Traxler like transition state model can involve either a chair or boat
geometry.
60 ° 60 °
HA HA HA
O HB HB R3 R3 OH
H
O R1 O
R2 R2 R2
R1 R3 O O R1 HB
H
non H-bonded
H
O OH
B Anti Aldol
R1 R3 JAB = 1 - 10 Hz
R2 HA
60 ° 60 °
HA HA HA
O R3 R3 HB HB OH
H
O R1 O
R2 R2 R2
R1 HB O O R1 R3
H
non H-bonded
Boron Enolates: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis 1991, 2, 239. Organic Reactions 1995, 46, 1;
Organic Reactions 1997, 51, 1. OPPI 1994, 26, 3.
- Alkali & alkaline earth metal enolates tend to be aggregates- complicates
stereoselection models.
- Boron enolates are monomeric and homogeneous
- B-O and B-C bonds are shorter and stronger than the corresponding Li-O abd Li-C
bonds (more covalent character)- therefore tighter more organized transition state.
Generation of Boron Enolates:
O R2B-X OBR2
X= OTf, I
R= Bu, 9-BBN
iPrEtN
C-C BOND FORMATION 84
R3N: H _ OBL2
+ BL2OTf R2
R1 O R1
H R2
Z-enolate
R3N: H _ OBEt2
+ BL2OTf
R1 O R1
R2 H R2
E-enolate
O
R 3B OBR2
OSiMe3 OBR2
R2B-X
+ Me3 Si-X
O R' 3B OBR'2
N2 R' Hooz Reaction
R R
OBEt2 O OH
R3CHO generally
R1 R3 ~ 75 : 25
R1 anti : syn
R2 R2
E-enolate
O O B OH O O
Bu2BOTf, O - O +
Me EtNiPr2 , -78° RCHO
N O R N O
N O
Me
L L H L L L L
B
_ + B
_ B +
O O R O O O _ O
+ O O
N O N O R N O
RCHO
H L L L L
B B +
R O _ O O _ O
+
N R N
O O
O O
preferred conformation
R2 R2
R3
O O
H H
L O R3 L O R3
B B
N N
H
L O L
O
O O
Favored Disfavored
O O OH O O OH
O N R3 O N R3
R2 R2
Oppolzer Sultam
L 2B OH
O O O
R2 R2 R3CHO
N N N R3
S S S R2
O2 O2 O2
1) LDA
2) Bu3SnCl
R3
Sn OH
O R3CHO O
R2
O N R3
N
S R2
S
O2
O
C-C BOND FORMATION 86
Chiral Boron
O BOTf OH O OH O
StBu Ph StBu + Ph StBu
iPrEt2N,
PhCHO,-78°C
when large, 1 : 33
higher E-enolate (> 99 % ee)
selectivity
Ph Ph
O ArO2SN NSO2Ar OH O
B OH O
R Br
SPh Ph SPh + Ph SPh
iPrEt2N, R R
PhCHO,-78°C > 95 : 5
(> 95 % ee)
• In general, syn aldol products are achievable with high selectivity, anti aldols are
more difficult
RCHO, TiCl4, OH OH
OSiMe3 CH2Cl2, -78°C
CO2Et + CO2Et
R R
OEt CH3 CH3
RCHO, TiCl4, OH
OSiMe3 OH
CH2Cl2, -78°C
CO2Et + CO2Et
R R
OEt CH3 CH3
syn : anti = 85 : 15
selectivity insenstivie to enolate geometry
C-C BOND FORMATION 87
Ph iPrCHO, TiCl4, O HO
N SO Ph CH2Cl2, -78°C 96 % de
2 Rc anti : syn = 93 : 7
O OSitBuMe2 CH3
RCHO, TiCl4, O HO
CH2Cl2, -78°C + Syn product
O Rc
CH3
OSitBuMe2
SO2N(C6H11)2
E-Enolate
R= Ph % de= 90 anti : syn = 91 : 19
nPr 85 94 : 6
iPr 85 98 : 2
Z-Enolate
R= iPr % de= 87 anti : syn = 97 : 7
Mukaiyama-Johnson Aldol- Lewis acid promoted condensation of silyl enol ethers with acetals:
OSiMe3 O OH
TiCl4 or SnCl4 Mukaiyama-Johnson Aldol
R
RCHO or RCH(OR')2
via Ti or Sn enolate
CH2Cl2, -78°C
O O
O HO
O O
O
OTMS
+
O
O Cl4Ti O
Cl4Ti O+ OSiMe3
OTMS TiCl4,
(CH3)2C(OEt)2 O OEt
Ph (78 %) Ph
Fluoride promoted alkylation of silyl enol ethers Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 181
OSiMe3 O
CO2Me O OH
1) LDA, THF, 1) HIO6
-78 °C O 2) CH2N2 MeO2C
N R
2) RCHO CH3
N R
CH3 Anti Aldol
MOMO O HO
2) RCOCl CH3
O
OMOM MOMO O HO
MeO
Zn(BH4)2 N CH3 syn : anti
97 : 3
CH3
OMOM
O O
1) LDA, THF, O O O O O OH
-78 °C Zn(BH4)2
O N
O N R O N R
2) RCOCl syn : anti = 100 : 1
CH3 CH3
C-C BOND FORMATION 89
Aldol Strategy to Erythromycin:
O
9
10
8 4 3 2 1
11 7
12
OH 6
CO2H Erythromycin
15 5
seco acid
13 O 4
OH OH OH O OH OH
14 1 3
O 2
OH
[O] [O]
syn
Erythromycin aldol 3
aglycone
CHO CO2H
OH O OH OH
syn syn
aldol 4 aldol 1
CHO + CHO +
CHO CO2H
O OH
syn
aldol 2
CHO +
CHO
O
OH OH O OH OH
1
HO2C
3 5 9 11 13
1) Zn(BH3)2
O O LDA, O O O TiCl4, iPr 2EtN, O O O OH 2) (H3C)2C(OMe)2
CH3CH 2COCl CH2Cl2 CSA
O N O N 1 O N 5
83%, (96:4) (100%)
Ph CHO
Ph 90% (> 99:1) Ph
O 1) 9-BBN, THF O O O O
O O O
2) Swern oxid.
CHO
O N O N
3 5 73% (85:15)
Ph Ph
1) Na BH(OAc)3
O OH OTBS
O O O O OH 2) TBS-OTf, 2,6-lutidine
O O Sn(OTf)2, 3) AlMe3, (MeO)MeNH•HCl MeO
Et3N, CH2Cl2 N
O N O N 9 11 13
CH3CH 2CHO 72% (>99:1) CH3
PMBO PMBO
O O O O BF3•OEt2, O O O O OH O OTBS
TMSO OTBS
CH 2Cl2, -78 °C
CHO
O N 3 5 7 + 11 13 83% (95:5)
O N
3 5 7 9 11 13
8
p-MeOC 6H4
Ph Ph
O O O O OH O O OTBS
1) Zn(BH3)2 1) NaH, CS2, MeI
2) DDQ 2) nBu3SnH, AIBN
O N
95% 70%
Ph
p-MeOC 6H4 p-MeOC 6H4
Cl3C6H2COCl
O O O O O O OTBS 1) LiOOH O O O O O OH
2) TBAF
iPr2EtN, DMAP
O N HO
63% 13 (86%
Ph p-MeOC 6H4 O
O 9
10 9 1) Pd(OH)2, iPrOH
11
8 2) PCC
11 7 3) 1M HCl, THF OH
O 5
12 6
5 58 % 13 O OH
13 O O 1 3
4
1 3 O OH
O 2 O
Michael Addition
- 1,4-addition of an enolate to an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl to give 1,5-dicarbonyl
compounds
O O O
- +
O M
R Ph
Ph
R
Organometallic Reagents
Grignard reagents:
O
Mg(0) OH
R-Br R-MgBr
THF R
O
O
OH
often a mixture of
+
R-MgBr R 1,2- and 1,4-addition
THF
R
C-C BOND FORMATION 91
O
OH
R-MgBr R 1,2-addition
THF, CeCl3
O O
R-MgBr 1,4-addition
CuI,THF, -78C
R
Organolithium reagents
- usually gives 1,2-addition products
- alkyllithium are prepared from lithium metal and the corresponding alkyl halide
- vinyl or aryl- lithium are prepared by metal-halogen exchange from the
corresponding vinyl or aryl- haidide or trialkyl tin with n-butyl, sec-butyl or t-
butyllithium.
Li(0)
R-Br R-Li
Et2 O
X Li
nBu-Li
X= Br, I, Bu3Sn
Et2 O
Organocuprates
Reviews: Synthesis 1972, 63; Tetrahedron 1984, 40 , 641; Organic Reactions 1972, 19 , 1.
- selective 1,4-addition to α,β-unsaturated carbonyls
CuI, THF
2 R-Li R2CuLi
O O
R2CuLi
non-transferable
ligand
Other non transferable ligands
_ _ _ _
+ +
Bu3P Cu R Li Me2S Cu R Li+ NC Cu R Li F3B Cu R Li+
2-
L L
O OH
M S M S
L R1 R2 -
R
1
R
2
L
1
S M 1
R R
better worse
- Chelation Control Model- "Anti-Cram" selectivity
- When L is a group capable
+
of chelating a counterion such as alkoxide groups
M OH
O S
2 M
OR' R
1
R1 R
*
M OR' "Anti-Cram" Selectivity
S
M+
OR'
O OR' HO R2
R2 -
M S
M S R1
1
R
Umpolung - reversal of polarity Aldrichimica Acta 1981, 14, 73; ACIIE 1979, 18, 239.
i.e: acyl anion equivalents are carbonyl nucleophiles (carbonyls are usually electophillic)
O O
usually
- +
R R
KCN O- OH HO O- -O OH O OH
PhCHO
PhCHO
H
Ph CN Ph - CN Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph
CN CN
Cyanohydrin anion Benzoin
C-C BOND FORMATION 93
Thiamin pyrophosphate- natures acyl anion equivalent for trans ketolization reactions
NH2 H
NH2 _
+ +
N N S
N N S
H 3C N OPO3PO3
H 3C H 3C N OPO3PO3
H 3C
Thiamin pyrophosphate
H 2C OH
CHO H 2C OH
O
H OH O CHO
thiamin-PP HO H
H OH + H OH H OH
+
H OH
H OH H OH H 2C OPO3
H OH
H 2C OPO3 H 2C OPO3
H OH
glyceraldehyde-3-P
D-ribose-5-P D-ribulose-5-P (C3 aldose) H 2C OPO3
(C5 aldose) (C5 ketose)
sedohepulose-7-P
(C7 ketose)
Trimethylsilycyanohydrins
O TMS-CN TMSO CN TMSO CN acyl anion
LDA, THF
R H R
_ equivalent
R H
NC O
OMs
NaHMDS, OEE
THF, -60°C CSA, tBuOH
CN Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7471
(72%)
OEE O
O O O
O O
Dithianes
Sulfoxides
O R'
_ OH
R' OH
Ph Ph R' R' R' Raney Ni
LDA, THF R S R'
R S Ph
O R S
O
R
O
C-C BOND FORMATION 94
Epoxide Opening Asymmetric Synthesis 1984, 5, 216.
Basic (SN2) Condition
Nu:
R R Nu
Steric Approach Control
O HO
Acid (SN1-like) Condition
R Nu: attachs site that best
R OH
O+ stabilizes a carbocation
Nu Nu
H
OH
O
OH OH + OH
BnO BnO BnO TL 1983, 24, 1377
OH
Me2CuLi 6:1
AlMe3 1:5
OH
Me3Al
O JACS 1981, 103, 7520
S S
_ OH S JOC 1974, 3645
O
S
O
OH
S S + S S
_ Ph
Ph (69 %)
1) TBS-Cl O OH
2) MeI, CaCO 3, H+
Ph Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 931
S S
H2O HO H
O O Nu: O H
R2 R2
R1 R2 R1 Nu R1 Nu
H2O
O O O
O-
S O S
O O Nu: Nu: H H
O H
Nu2 R
R1 R2 R1
R2 R1 Nu1 2
Nu
C-C BOND FORMATION 95
CO2Me
MeO2C CO2Me
O SO2
CO2Me
R2
R1 R1 R2
O NaH
O
O SO2 OTBS
1) H2, Rh
1) (CH3)2CuLi 2) HF
CO2Me O carpenter Bee
CO2Me
pheromone
O 2) TBS-Cl
CH3
∆
O
MeO OH
MeO
OBn
meso OBn
HO OBn OBn
MeO OMe MeO OMe
NCH3 NCH3
BnO BnO
OAc
3 3
2 4 2 4
∆
1 1 5 [1,5]-Hydogen migration
R H 5 R H
1 1
σ bond σ bond
that breaks that forms
3,3-sigmatropic Rearrangements
Cope Rearrangemets- requires high temperatures Organic Reaction 1975, 22, 1
∆
R R
C-C BOND FORMATION 96
Chair transition state:
CH3 CH3 Z
220 °C
H 3C H H 3C
H E
CH3
H
H 3C HH
H 3C
CH3
H
CH3 Z
E
H 3C
H 3C
E Z
H 3C
"Chirality Transfer"
H
Ph R E S
Ph CH3
CH3
CH3 (87 %)
Diastereomers
Ph
Ph Z
H 3C
H 3C CH3
R R
E H (13 %)
CH3
R R
Ph E
Z Ph H
CH3
CH3
Diastereomers
Ph
Ph Z
H 3C
H
H 3C R
S
Z CH3
- anion accelerated (oxy-) Cope- proceeds under much milder conditions (lower
temperature) JACS 1980, 102 , 774; Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1877; Organic Reactions 1993, 43,
93; Comprehensive Organic Synthesis 1991, 5, 795. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13971.
C-C BOND FORMATION 97
OMe O
OH
KH, DME, 110°C
OMe
KH
OH
O- O
OH O
KH, ∆
9-membered
ring
O
OH CHO
O
220 °C
X=H E/Z = 90 : 10
X= OEt, NMe2, etc E/Z = > 99 : 1
R O X 1,3-diaxial
interaction Z-olefin
R X R
X
H
O
O
new stereogenic
centers
R O
old stereogenic O
center H X R
X
C-C BOND FORMATION 98
- Chorismate Mutase catalyzed Claisen Rearrangement- 105 rate enhancement over
non-enzymatic reaction
CO2H HO2C CO2H
Chorismate
mutase O J. Knowles
JACS 1987, 109, 5008, 5013
O CO2H
OH OH
Chorismate Prephenate
HO2C H O H
O Chair
CO2H
T.S
OH OH
Opposite
H stereochemistry
H H CO2H
CO2H Boat
O H
CO2H T.S O
CO2H
OH OH
OH OH OH
+
O O
J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3497, 3512 +
J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3435
O
R R
O
H H
O
s CH3 R H
O
R s
H CH3
CH3 O
CH3 OH CH3 OH
OH O ∆ O [3.3]
H3C-C(OEt)3 O
H+ - EtOH
O
OBn LDA, THF Me
O TMS-Cl
CO2H JOC 1983, 48, 5221
Me
Me Me
OBn
Eschenmoser
NMe2
R
EtO OEt O ∆ O
OH
BF3 NMe2 NMe2
R R
"Chirality Transfer"
R R
R aldehyde
O N
N N O oxidation state
Ph O
Ph Ph
R= Et, Bn, iPr, tBu (86 - 96 % de)
H Y
:X
-Wittig Rearrangement Organic Reactions 1995, 46, 105 Synthesis 1991, 594.
_
O base
HO
BuLi _
O SnR3 O
C-C BOND FORMATION 100
TBDPSO KH, 18-C-6, TBDPSO TBDPSO
Me3SnCH2I nBuLi
H H H
MeO O MeO O MeO O
OH O O
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
SnMe3 Li 1997, 119, 10935
TBDPSO
TBDPSO
H +
H
MeO O
MeO O
OH
(58%) (42%)
CH3 CH3
CH3 (13 %)
H _ H3C
O Ph Ph OH
Sulfoxide Rearrangement
R R
S S (MeO) 3P
O
-
O HO
O O
CO2Et CO2Et
(MeO) 3P
S
Ph HO
O-
Ene Reaction Comprehensive Organic Synthesis 1991, 5, 1; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23,
876; ; Chem. Rev. 1992, 28, 1021.
H H
OH
CHO
Et2AlCl JOC 1992, 57, 2766
CH2Cl2 -78°C
O O
Ph Ph
O OH
O O 99.8 % de
H SnCl4
O
Ph
OH
O
SnCl4 + syn isomer
H3C
(94 : 6)
C-C BOND FORMATION 101
O
TiCl2
O
O OH Tetrahedron Lett.
(97% ee)
+ 1997, 38, 6513
H CO2Me CO2Me
OH
O OH
+ +
PhS PhS CO2Me
R H CO2Me CO2Me
PhS R
R
(9 : 1)
anti (99 % ee) syn (90 % ee)
C6H13 C6H13
Cl MgCl H2O
H 3C
H 3C H 3C
ClMg (> 1%)
intramolecular
BrMg
+ (11 : 1)
+
MgBr
BrMg
CH3
1) Mg(0), Et2 )
1) Li 2) 60 °C MgCl
CH3 CH3
O Cl 1) Mg(0), Et2 )
SOCl2 2) 60 °C
OH
CH3 CH3
MgCl O2
H H
MgCl OH
Synthesis of Phyllanthocin A. B. Smith et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1269.
O O O O
1) LAH
(Me3Si)2 NLi 2) BnBr
O N O N
Br
Ph CH3 Ph CH3
BnO
1) O3
2) H2, Lindlar's BnO MeAlCl
CHO
BnO 1) MEM-Cl
H 2) O3
BnO BnO
CH3
O H
OH CHO
OMEM
O O O
O
1) ZnCl2 O
1) BnO +
- O
2) H O
O BnO (CH3 )2S(O)CH 2-
2) H3O + O
MEMO O
3) Swern
O CH 1) DBU
O O 1) LDA, TMSCl O 3
2) H2, Pd/C
2) BnMe3 NF, MeI
O O
BnO BnO 3) RuO4
O O
O O
O
O CH3 O CH3
O Ph Phyllanthocin
O MeO2C O
HO2C
O
C=C BOND FORMATION 103
1. Aldol Condensation
2. Wittig Reaction (Smith, Ch. 8.8.A)
3. Peterson Olefination
4. Julia-Lythgoe Olefination
5. Carbonyl Coupling Reactions (McMurry Reaction) (Smith Ch. 13.7.F)
6. Tebbe Reagent
7. Shapiro and Related Reaction
8. β−Elimination and Dehydration
9. From Diols and Epoxides
10 From Acetylenes
11. From Other Alkenes-Transition Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling and Olefin
Metathesis
Aldol Condensation -Aldol condensation initially give β-hydroxy ketones which under
certain conditions readily eliminated to give α,β-unsaturated carbonyls.
OMe OMe
LDA, THF, -78°C
Tetrahedron
O O 1984, 40, 4741
O O
CHO
OMe OR O OMe OR O
-78C → RT
L-proline O
O
Weiland-Mischeler Ketone
(chiral starting material)
H2C=O, Me2NH•HCl
O
O
Me
H 2C N Cl-
+ Me
Mannich Reaction
C=C BOND FORMATION 104
betaine oxaphosphetane
- Olefin Geometry
O
L S
Z- olefin
Ph3P
L S
L S
E- Olefin
Ph3P
S L
- With "non-stabilized" ylides the Wittig Reaction gives predominantly Z-olefins.
Seebach et al JACS
-
O
O
O S L L S
S L S L
L S L S
PPh3 + PPh3
+ PPh3 +
O O PPh3
L S - Ph3P=O S S
Ph3P L S
L S L L
L S Z-olefins
H R
Ph R
Planar (trans)
Ph P H Trans oxaphosphetane
O (thermodynamically favored)
Ph
- CF3CH2O- groups make the betaine less stable, giving more Z-olefin.
O
Me3Si CHO (CF3CH2O)2P CO2Me Me3Si JACS 1988,
- + CO2Me 110, 2248
(Me3Si)2N K , THF,
18-C-6 Z:E = 25:1
MeO2C H
C=C BOND FORMATION 106
SO2Ph OH
PhO2S 1) MsCl, Et N OTBS
LDA, THF, -78°C OTBS 2) Na(Hg),3MeOH
mixture TL 1991,
CHO of olefins 32, 495
TBSO
R
R R
O
O O
H O
1) tBuLi, THF,
O O
HMPA, -78°C
O OBz 2) Na(Hg) NaHPO4
THF, MeOH, -40°C
OBz O O
+
OSitBuPh2 HO
OSitBuPh2 HO
HO
PhO2S
O
O
O
OH
OH
OH
Milbemycin α1
OR SmI2,
HMPA/THF O OTBDPS
OTBDPS Synlett 1994, 859
O
SO2Ph R= H, Ac O 75 % yield
O E:Z = 3 : 1
Ramberg-Backlund Rearrangement
Br
1) Na2S•Al2O3
OSiPh2tBu 2) mCPBA O OSiPh2tBu SOCl2
S
OSiPh2tBu O OSiPh2tBu
Br
Cl
O MeLi, THF O OR - SO2 OR
OR
S S
O OR O OR OR
thiiarane dioxide
JACS 1992, 114, 7360
O R1 R1 R1 R2 usually a mixture
"low-valent Ti" +
of E and Z olefins
R1 R2 R2 R2 R2 R1
CHO
CHO
OMe OMe
TiCl4, Zn,
pyridine Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7005
Shapiro and Related Reactions Organic Reactions 1990, 39, 1 : 1976, 23, 405
- Reaction of a tosylhydrazone with a strong base to give an olefin.
_
_
NNHTs N N N
N Ts _ E
Et Et Et - N2 Et
2 eq. nBuLi E+ Et
_
THF
Me Me Me Me Me
β- Eliminations
Anti Eliminations
- elimination of HX from vicinal saturated carbon centers to give a olefin,
usually base promoted.
- base promoted E2- type elimination proceeds through an anti-periplanar
transition state.
B:
H
R1 R2 R1 R2
R3 R4 R3 R4
N N N
N N
N
N
O OH BCSJ 1979, 52, 1705
R R' AlEt2 R JACS 1979, 101, 2738
- or - R'
"unactivated" TMS-OTf, DBU
Syn Elimination
- often an intramolecular process
H
R1 R2
R1 R2 O O
X X= Se S
R3 R4 Ph Ph
R3 R4
O O NMe2
1) Me2CuLi JACS 1977,
99 , 944
+ Tetrahedron
2) Me2N=CH2 1977, 35 , 613
CF3CO2-
C=C BOND FORMATION 109
SeCN
H 3C O H 3C PhSeO2H, H 3C O H 3C
O O
PhH, 60 °C JOC 1995, 60, 7224
H3CHN N N H3CHN N N JCS P1 1985, 1865
Ph (82%) Ph
O O
Dehydration of Alcohols
- alcohols can be dehydrated with protic acid to give olefins via an E 1
mechanism.
- other reactions dehydrate alcohols under milder conditions by first converting
them into a better leaving group, i.e. POCl3/ pyridine, P2O5
Martin sulfurane; Ph2S[OCPh(CF3)2]2 JACS, 1972, 94, 4997 dehydration
occurs under very mild, neutral conditions, usually gives the most stable olefin
OH
MSDA, CH2Cl2
JACS 1989,
BzO BzO 111 , 278
H H
Burgess Reagent (inner salt) JOC, 1973, 38, 26 occurs vis a syn elimination
_ +
MeO2CNSO2NEt3
MeO2C
_ + - N SO2
H R3
MeO2CNSO2NEt3 R1 R4
R4 H O
R1 PhH, reflux
R2 OH R1 R4 R2 R3
R2 R3
- vic-diols can be converted to olefins with K2WCl6 JCSCC 1972, 370; JACS
1972, 94, 6538
- This reaction worked best with more highly substituted diols and give
predominantly syn elimination.
- Low valent titanium; McMurry carbonyl coupling is believed to go through
the vic-diol. vic-diols are smoothly converted to the corresponding olefins under
these conditions. JOC 1976, 41 , 896
NCSe Se -
-
O NC-Se - O H R2
-
OR H NCOR H
R1 H 2 2
R1 H SeCN
H R2 H R1 H
R1
NCO H R2 H R2 R1 H
R1 H "retention"
R1 H Se -
Se of R groups
H R2
From Acetylenes
- Hydrogenation with Lindlar's catalyst gives cis-olefins
Co2(CO)8 H2, Rh
R R' R R'
R R'
Co2(CO)6
Bu3SnH
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2609
H SnBu3
R R'
OH OH
Cl Cl
Ti
+ JACS 1992
114 , 2276
up to 80% ee
R'
OH
OH
I2, CH2Cl2
CO2Me HO
CO2Me
C5H11 OH
C5H11 OH
OH JACS, 1984, 107, xxxx
R R
O O
O
(EtO)2PCl R2CuLi
O OP(OEt)2 R
tBu N tBu
C=C BOND FORMATION 112
O SnMe3
O
1)LDA, Tf2NPh
JOC 1986,
O 2) Pd(PPh3)4
O 51 , 3405
OH
OTBS Bu3Sn
I Bu Sn I
3 O OH
O O J. Am. Chem. Soc.
OH
1998, 120, 3935
HO
TBSO
HO Bu3Sn
TBSO I
(-)-Macrolactin A
BOMe
TESO 1) O3, Me 2S
TBSO OH 1) HF, MeCN
CHO 1) 2) allyl bromide, Zn 2) Me4NBH(OAc)3
2
(77%) OH b) I2 I OH
(83%
OH I
OPiv 1) Dess-Martin
Periodinane
OPiv 2) Ph3P+CH2I, I- OH
Bu3Sn NaHMDS
TBSO TBSO
3) DIBAL
PdCl2(MeCN)2 TBSO (50%) TBSO
I
TESO TESO TESO
Bu3SnCHBr2, CrCl2 CO2H
CHO SnBu3
(42%) PdCl2(MeCN)2
(65%) CO2H
Bu3SnH, AIBN TESO I
(38%) Bu3Sn
CO2H
C=C BOND FORMATION 113
TESO
OH
Ph3P, DEAD
Bu3Sn +
TESO
CO2H (50%)
TESO
TESO OH
Bu3Sn
I 1) Pd2(dba)3
O O iPr2NEt O O
2) TBAF
(35%) HO
TESO
HO
TESO (-)-Macrolactin A
AcO
Br OMe Br HO
Ni Ni OMe
1)
Br
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2 equiv), 65 °C 1998, 39, 2537, 2947,
N OAc
H N OH
2) LiAlH4 , Et2 O H
(72%)
(±)-Neocarazostatin B
Olefin Metathesis Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413, Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 25, 446.
olefin
metathesis R2
R1 + R2 R1
catalyst
catalyst
Ring-Opening Metathesis
(CH 2)n Polymerization (ROMP)
(CH 2)n
n
Metathesis Catalysts:
(C6H11)3P Ph (C6H11)3P
iPr iPr Cl Ph
Cl
H3C N Ru Ph Ru
F3C O Mo Cl Cl
F3C O Ph (C6H11)3P (C6H11)3P
F3C
F3C CH3
Mechanism:
R2
R1 + [M] R1 [M]
R1
[M] R2 [M]
R1 +
R2
C≡C BOND FORMATION 115
R1-X
O
OH
R _ R2 R3
R H R
R
M+ R2 3
Et2AlCl
OH
R
JACS 1990,
Cl Cl
iPr3Si SnBu3 112, 1607
(Ph3P)4Pd
iPr3Si SiiPr3
C≡C BOND FORMATION 116
OTBS
OTBS CO2Me
CO2Me Br C5H11
OTBS
OTBS OTBS
Pd(Ph3P)4, CuI
iPr2NH, PhH
OH
HO
CO2H
OH
Nicholas Reaction
- acetylenes as their Co2(CO)8 complex can stabilize an α-positive charge,
which can subsequently be trapped with nucleophiles.
OR4 (CO)6Co2 OR4 (CO)6Co2
Co2(CO)8 +
R1 R1 R1
R2 R2 R
R3 R3 R3 2
oxidative Nu
Nu: (CO)6Co2 Nu decomplexation
R1 R1
R2 R2
R3 R3
R R'
R'-X
P3P, CBr4 Br 2 eq. nBuLi ClCO2Et
R R _ Li+
RCHO R CO2Et
Br H2O
R H
C≡C BOND FORMATION 117
Br2C a) nBuLi,
OSitBuPh2 THF, -78°C MeO2C
OHC OSitBuPh2 CBr4, Ph3P OSitBuPh2
b) ClCO2Me
OSitBuPh2
OHC OSitBuPh2 OSitBuPh2
Br2C MeO2C
JACS 1992, 114 , 7360
O
Me3Si N2
_
THF, Synlett 1994, 107
-78°C → RT
X= Cl, Br, I, OTf, O3SR, OP(O)R2 Base= LDA; tBuOK; NaNH2, DBU
1) 370 °C
2) 12°K ACIEE 1988,27 , 398
O
- CO JACS 1991, 113 , 6943
R1
R2
FVP
R1 R2 +
(retro- D-A)
CL 1982, 1241
Eschenmoser Fragmentation
Ph
O N Ph R
N Base
R R -or- HCA 1972,
heat O 55 , 1276
O
R' R' R'
HN NH2
iPr iPr
O O
O tBuOOH,
triton B, C6H6
O iPr JOC 1992, 57, 7052
AcOH, CH2Cl2
Br Br R H
R' R' R'
1 sulfonates
2 halides
3 nitriles
4 azides
5 amines
6 esters and lactones
7 amides and lactams
Sulfonate Esters
- reaction of an alcohols (1° or 2°) with a sulfonyl chloride
R'SO2Cl O R'= CH3 mesylate
R OH R O S R'
O CF3 triflate
sulfonate ester
CH3 tosylate
Halides
- halides are good leaving groups with the order of reactivity in SN2 reactions
being I>Br>Cl. Halides are less reactive than sulfonate esters, however
elimination as a competing side reaction is also reduced.
- sulfonate esters can be converted to halides with the sodium halide in acetone
at reflux. Chlorides are also converted to either bromides or iodides in the same
fashion (Finkelstein Reaction).
O
X-
R O S R' R X X= Cl, Br, I
O
NaI, acetone
reflux
R Cl R I
- R-OH to R-Cl
- SOCl2
- Ph3P, CCl4
- Ph3P, Cl2
- Ph3P, Cl3CCOCCl3
FUNCTIONAL GROUP INTERCONVERSIONS 120
- R-OH to R-Br
- PBr3, pyridine
- Ph3P, CBr4
- Ph3P, Br2
- R-OH to R-I
- Ph3P, DEAD, MeI
Nitriles
- displacement of halides or sulfonates with cyanide anion
KCN, 18-C-6
R X DMSO
R C N
- dehydration of amides
O
R C N
R NH2
- POCl3, pyridine
- TsCl, pyridine
- P2O5
- SOCl2
- Dehydration of oximes
OH
H2NOH•HCl N
P2O5
R CHO R C N
R H
- Oxidation of hydrazones
O
O
N C Tetrahedron Lett.
NMe2 (97%) 1998, 39, 2009
N
Azides
- displacement of halides and sulfonates with azide anion
LDA, THF O
O NaN3 O
NBS
O O O
Br
SO2N(C6H11)2 SO2N(C6H11)2 SO2N(C6H11)2 N3
O O
TL 1986, 27, 831
O HO
NH2 NH2
SO2N(C6H11)2
- activation of the alcohol
+ + R N3 +
R OH +
N F N OR N O
Me Me Me
TsO -
+
EtO2C PPh3
Ph3P, NaN3
R OH + EtO2C N N CO2Et N N
_ CO2Et
DEAD
activated alcohol
+
R-OH R N3 +
R O PPh3 Ph3P=O
JOC 1993, 58, 5886
HO N3
O
(PhO)2P(O)-N3 P(OPh)2 SN2
O + -
DBU, PhCH3 + DBU-H + N3 (91 %) O
O
(99.6 % ee) Ar (97.5 % ee)
- Photolyzed to aldehydes
Amines
- Gabriel Synthesis
O O
R X H2NNH2
N - K+ N R R NH2
O O
- reduction of nitro groups
R NO2 R NH2
H2, Pd/C
Al(Hg), H2O
NaBH4
LiAlH 4
Zn, Sn or Fe and HCl
H2NNH2
sodium dithionite
FUNCTIONAL GROUP INTERCONVERSIONS 122
- reduction of nitriles
R C N R CH2 NH2
H2, PtO 2/C
B2H6
NaBH4
LiAlH 4
AlH3
Li, NH3
- reduction of azides
R N3 R NH2
H2, Pd/C
B2H6
NaBH4
LiAlH 4
Zn, HCl
(RO)3P
Ph3P
thiols
R R' R R'
H2, Pd/C
Raney nickel
NaBH4, TiCl4
LiAlH 4
Na(Hg), AcOH
- reduction of amides
O
R'
R' R N
R N
R'' R''
H2, Pd/C
B2H6
NaBH4, TiCl4
LiBH4
LiAlH 4
AlH3
- Curtius rearrangement
O O O
NaN3 •• ∆ ••
••
R Cl R N N N R N
••
••
+ - N2
nitrene
R N O H2O
R NH2
isocyanate
FUNCTIONAL GROUP INTERCONVERSIONS 123
- alkylation of sulfonamides
Tf Tf Tf
N HN K2CO3, DMF N N NH HN
Tf 110°C Na, NH3 TL 1992, 33 , 5505
Tf
N HN Br N N NH HN
Tf Br Tf Tf
cyclam
- transaminiation
O N Ph N Ph NH2
PhCH2NH2 Can. J. Chem.
tBuOK H3O +
H+ 1970, 48, 570
- Arndt-Eistert Reaction Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 15, 32.
O O O
CH2 N2 hν
N2 ••
R Cl Et2 O R ROH R CH
diazo ketone
Wolff R O
Rearrangement C O R'OH
R
H OR'
ketene
O TsN3, Et3N O
CO2Me N2
R R
R R R R
Pd(OAc)2
(5 mol %)
CO2H O JOC 1993, 58, 5298
DMSO, air O
(86%)
- Selenolactonization
PhSe
O PhSeCl, CH2Cl2 O H 2O 2 O
O JACS 1985,
O
107 , 1148
OH
O OH
O
O
PhCH2NH2 N Ph TL 1977, 4171
AlMe3 H
OTHP OTHP
3 Membered Rings
1. epoxides
a. peracids, hydroperoxides and dioxiranes
b. transition metal catalyzed epoxidations
c. halohydrins
d. Darzen's condensation
e. sulfur ylides
2. cyclopropanes
a. Simmons-Smith reactions
b. diazo compounds
c. sulfur ylides
d. S N2 displacements
3. aziridines
a. nitrenes
b. SN2 displacements
Epoxides
- peracid, hydroperoxide and dioxirane oxidation of alkenes
- from halohydrins
Br
NBS, H2O base
OH O
bromohydrin
- Darzen's Condensation
O O-
R
B: _ R R' O
R' CO2Et R CO2Et
BrCH2CO2Et BrCHCO2Et
R'
Br
O O
+ +
Me S + Ph S CH2- _ SPh2
Me2SCH2-
Me CH2- NMe2
Trost
Corey Johnson
sulfoximine
THREE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 126
O
O -
DMSO, NaH O SMe2 O
R R' R R' R R'
+ O
O _ SPh2 -
O SPh2 O BF3
R'
R R' R R' R R'
R
Cyclopropanes
- Simmons-Smith Reaction Org. Reactions 1973, 20, 1.
- sulfur ylides
O O
O
Me2S CH2- Tetrahedron
1987, 43 , 2609
O _
Ph S
Ph Ph Ph ACR 1973,
NMe2 Ph 6 , 341
O
O
THREE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 127
- diazo alkanes and diazo carbonyls Synthesis 1972, 351; 1985, 569
- cyclopropanation with diazoalkanes; olefin requires at least on electron
withdrawing group.
CO2Me N N CO2Me
CO2Me
MeO2C MeO2C JACS 1975,
CH2N2 MeO2C hν
97 , 6075
(MeO)2HC (MeO)2HC (MeO)2HC
O O
O Rh2(OAc)2 O
Ph O Ph O JACS 1993, 115, 9468
O O
Ph 91 % yield
N2 O O
Ph 89 % de
- SN2 Reactions
O DBU O
JACS 1978,
O O O O 99 , 1940
Br CO2Et CO2Et
CO2R Nu CO2R
ACR 1979,12 , 66
Nu: CO2R CO2R
THREE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 128
O O TL 1976, 3875
- hydrogenation
O
CO2Me CO2Me ArCO3H, CO2Me
CH2I2, Zn-Cu Na2HPO4
H H H
O
H2, PtO2, CO2Me
TL 1982, 23 , 1871
AcOH
- hydrolysis
OH OH OH
CH2I2, Zn-Cu +
H , MeOH JACS 1967
89 , 2507
OMe MeO O
Aziridines
Ts
R2 Cu(acac)2
N
J. Org. Chem. .1991, 56, 6744
R1 R3 PhN=ITs R2
R1 R3
FOUR-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 129
4 Membered Rings
Cyclobutanes
- [2+2] cycloadditions
- photochemical cycloadditions (2πs +2πs)
Acc. Chem. Res. 1968, 1, 50; Synthesis 1970, 287; Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 41;
Organic Photochemistry 1981, 5, 123; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 820;
Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 135; Organic Photochemistry 1989, 10, 1
Organic Reactions 1993, 44, 297
- for synthetic purposes, cyclic α,β-unsaturated carbonyl are the most
useful.
intersystem
crossing 3
E 1
E* E*
- symmetry requirements
*
hν
2πs + 2πs O O
~ 340 nm
HOMO
LUMO
- enones with olefins
O O O O O
CH2 hν JCSCC
+ + + 1966, 423
CH2
(90%) O
O O O
H
hν E.J. Corey
+ JACS 1963,
+
85 , 362
H
Caryophellene
Base
Hot Ground State?
O O O
H
hν H2C=CH2
isomerization
cis
2πs + 2πa ring-fusion
thermal cyclization H
O O
O H H
+ JACS 1984
106 , 4038
hν
H H
2:1
- DeMayo Reaction
CO2Me
O O H
O pTSA, MeOH
hν, pyrex O reflux JACS 1986,
O O 108 , 6425
O
H
O
R
O R hν O
R
O O
H MeO2C
O O 70-80 % de
favored O O
H H H H
O
O controls O O
hν H 3C
conformation O H 3C
O O O
O H H
H 3C CH3 CH3
O CH3
CH3 O
H H
controls disfavored
addition O TL 1993, 34, 1425
H 3C
O
H
H 3C
Norrish II
cleavage
•
HO OH OH
Yang
reaction •
+
FOUR-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 131
- Yang Reaction
MOMO MOMO
O
hν (254 nm) OH JACS 1987,
C6H6 109 , 3017
CH3 SEMO CH3
SEMO
LUMO
- ketenes
O
∆ H
O O
H
O
Et3N
Cl O
H
O
Zn
Cl O
Cl
O
hν R
N2 O
R H
LUMO
of ketene
2πa
py O
pz
HOMO
of olefin
2πs
FOUR-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 132
Cl O
O
O
Ph CH3 Cl
CCl3 Cl CH2N2 Cl
CH3
O CH3 Cl
O Zn-Cu, Et2O CH3
CH3 R*O Ar
Ph
JACS 1987,
109 , 4753
O H
H 3C 1) H 3C
N+ JACS 1982, 104, 2920
N+ H 3C
H 3C 2) H2O
H
OMe OMe
O O
NR2
R'
R'
- SN2 Reaction
O
O
KH, DMSO JACS 1980,
102 , 1404
OTs
CN CN
O _ JACS 1974, 96,
HO OH
OR OR 5268, 5272
Grandisol
R CO2Me R O
R CO2Me R OH
benzocyclobutane o-quinodimethane O
CpCo(CO)2 Me3Si
- sulfur ylides
+ O
O _ SPh2
O BF3
R R'
R'
R R' R
O O
hν (254 nm) R
R R'
R'
FOUR-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 134
O hν O
O TL 1975
Me2C CMe2 O 1001
O O
- SN2 reaction
OH NBS O
SiMe3 JCSCC 1979, 421
SiMe3
Br
OH
OTBS OH
OH
Br Br
CO2Me (MeO)3P, DEAD CO2Me JACS 1984,
O
HO C5H11 C5H11 107 , 6372
O O
OH OH
- sulfur ylides
O -
O
O O
H2C_ S Me NTs JACS 1979,
S 101 , 6135
NTs CH3
O
β-Lactones
O O- O O
R1 LDA, THF O JOC 1991,
R2 SPh R4 SPh
O 56 , 1176
R3 R1 R4
H R2 R1
R3 R4 R2 R3
OH DEAD, Ph3P
O R2CuLi CO2H
O O R JACS 1987,
BnO N CO2H BnO NH 109 , 4649
H BnO N O
H
O
O 1) MgBr2•OEt2 OBn
OBn O 2) KF, H2O, CH3CN O
O
+ TL 1995, 36, 4159
H
H SiMe3 96 % de
BALDWIN'S RULES FOR RING CLOSURE 135
Baldwin's Rules (Suggestions) for Ring Closure
JOC 1977, 42 , 3846
JCSCC 1976, 734, 736, 738
Nu: Nu L Nu :L
L
Nu
Nomenclature
1. indicate ring size being formed
3 membered ring = 3
4 membered ring = 4
etc.
X:
Z Z
Y Y
X: X:
Exo Endo
BALDWIN'S RULES FOR RING CLOSURE 136
4. Ring forming reaction is designated as Favored or Disfavored
disfavored does not imply the reaction can't or won't occur- it only means
the reaction is more difficult than favored reactions.
X: X: X: X:
Y Z X: Y Z Y Y Y
Z Z Z
3- 4- 5- 6- 7-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --Favored- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Z Z
Y
Y
X:
X:
5- 6-
- - - - -Disfavored- - - - -
X: X: X:
X: Y Z X: Y Z Y Y Y
Z Z Z
3- 4- 5- 6- 7-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --Favored- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Z Z
Z Z Y
X: Y Y X: Z
X: Y X:
X: Y
3- 4- 5- 6- 7-
- - - - - - - - - - - - -Disfavored- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Favored- - - - - -
BALDWIN'S RULES FOR RING CLOSURE 137
- 3-Exo-Dig and 4-Exo-Dig are disfavored; 5-Exo-Dig, 6-Exo-Dig, 7-Exo-Dig, etc.
are favored
X: X: X: Y X: X:
Y Y Y
Z Y
Z Z Z Z
3- 4- 5- 6- 7-
- - - - - -Disfavored- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Favored- - - - - - - - - - - -
Z Z
Y
Z Z Y X: Z
X: Y
Y X: Y
X: X:
3- 4- 5- 6- 7-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --Favored- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EXCEPTION:
There are many !!! (see March p 212-214)
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 138
5 Membered Rings
HO O
CO2H CO2H
HO OH HO OH
PGF2α PGE2
Me H Me
Me
Me
Me
Me Me
Me
Hirsutene Modhephane Isocumene
Br
O
O O
CO2Me
CO2Me
Br
CN CN OH
JACS 1974, 96 , 5268
O
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 139
O Cl
O JACS 1979,
101 , 5081
RO2C RO2C CO2R
CO2R Cl
O O
NaH, DMSO
JCSCC 1979, 817
TsO
O O
R
R
O
R'
R'
O O
CH3
CH3 TL 1982,
O 29, 2237
CH3
CH3
Br Br
O
NaOMe, MeOH
O JACS 1980,
102 , 4262
O CO2Me
CO2Me
O O
NaOH JOC 1983,
O O 48 , 1217
O
C5H11
THPO
OTHP C5H11
THPO
OTHP JOC 1981, 46 , 1954
O CO2H
base
C5H11
THPO
OTHP C5H11
HO
OH
O O
H O
H H
O O O
TMSO
Cl O O
Cl
Cl
CH3 CH2N2 Cl
O CH3 CH3
O CH3
•
TMM
CO2Me
MeO2C MeO2C CO2Me
H CH3
∆, MeCN • •
N •
-N2
N
• H
JACS 1981,
103 , 2744
O O
Me3Si OAc H
O O
TL 1986, 27 , 4137
Pd(0), 80°C
MeO2C CO2Me
- α,α'-dihaloketones
O
O OFeLn
Fe(CO)9 Ar ACR 1979, 12 , 61
+
Br Br Ar
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 142
- nitrones ACR 1979, 12 , 396; Organic Reactions, 1988, 36 , 1
O- O
+N R2 R1 N
R1
R2 R3
R3
Nitrone
JACS 1964,
O 86 , 3756
- O N
N
Me O OH
N Me2N
O MeNHOH, Me 1) MeI Me
2) H2, Pd/C JOC 1984,
EtONa 49 , 5021
H H H H H
MeO2C MeO2C Bn
NH Bn NH
N N
O- O JACS 1983,
S S 104 , 6460
C 4H 9
C 4H 9
- nitrile oxides
O O + O
-
N N O O OH
N H2
ArNCO JACS 1992,
104 , 4023
N (88%) O
N (88%)
OH O OH
OTHP O O
1) PPTS, EtOH, ↑↓
1) TBS-Cl, DMF, HF•pyridine,
2) (CH3 )2C(OMe)2 ,
imidazole CH3 CN, pyridine
OH PPTS Cassiol
2) nBuLi, THF
TL 1996, 37, 9292
3) Swern (73%)
Bu3Sn
O (48%)
TBSO O TBSO O OH
O HO
(80%)
O O OH
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 143
OTBS OTBS OTBS
LAH
TL 1993, 34, 3017
N + O N NH2
O _ OH
1 *
hν
hν * OAc
OAc
*
JACS 1982,
Me2CuLi O
O 104 , 5805
JCSCC, 1986 247
Me
1) FVP
* 2) H2, Pd/C
*
hν
isocume
+ +
*
Tetrahedron
1981,37 , 4445
*
hν * *
OMe
OMe
JACS 1981,
103 , 688
OMe
cedrane
* HO
AcO hν AcO * H+
H
TL 1982, 23 , 3983
TL 1983, 24 , 5325
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 144
Intramolecular Photochemical [2+2]
"Rule of Five"
O O
hν
O O
O O JOC 1975, 40 , 2702
JOC 1979, 44 , 1380
hν
O
O
Nazarov Cyclization review: Synthesis 1983, 429 Organic Reaction 1994, 45, 1
- cyclization of allyl vinyl or divinyl ketones
O O
H3PO4/HCO2H
O
O
H3PO4/HCO2H
- 1,4-hydroxy-acetylenes
- Silicon-Directed Nazarov
O O
Tetreahedron
FeCl3 1986, 42 , 2821
SiMe3
Me Me
Radical Cyclization
B. Giese Radicals in Organic Synthesis: Formation of Carbon-Carbon Bonds
(Pergamon Press; NY) 1986; Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1990, 127 , 675; Tetrahedron 1981, 37 ,
3073; Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 3541; Advances in Free Radical Chemistry 1990, 1, 121.
Organic Reactions 1996, 48, 301-856.
kinetically thermodynamically
favored favored
•
• 3-exo-trig
• + vs
100 : 0 4-endo-trig
• •
• 4-exo-trig
+
vs
100 : 0 5-endo-trig
•
•
• 5-exo-trig
+ vs
98:2 6-endo-trig
•
• •
+ 6-exo-trig
vs
85:15 7-endo-trig
•
• •
7-exo-trig
+ vs
8-endo-trig
100 : 0
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 146
• •
and
radicals open up fast and are not synthetically useful;
often used as probes for radical reaction
•
•
•
+
48:1
•
•
•
+
>200:1
•
•
•
+
2:3
•
•
•
+
< 1:100
2 Bu3SnH H
Br R R
•
+
R H R
65 : 35
prefered transition state
R
• R R R
Br H +
3
H 75 : 25
H
4
Br R +
•
R H
R 83 : 17 R
R
Bu3SnH R
Br • +
1 H
R 73 : 27 R
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 147
Br
nBuSnH, JACS 1983,
AIBN 105 , 3720
OH OH CN
CN
Bu3SnH,
AIBN JACS 1990,
112, 5601
CO2Me
Br CO2Me
Br OH
Si H Si
H2O2 H
O Bu3SnH O
OH
OTBS
PhSe
PhSeCl, CH2Cl2 O H2O2 O THPO CuSMe2 Li+
O O
Me
I • H
Bu3SnH, AIBN JACS 1985,
PhH, reflux 107 , 1148
H H
(±)-hirsutene
CH3MgBr, HO 1) I2 O
O O 2) DBU O
CuBr•SMe2 O
O O MgBr
CuBr•SMe2, THF
O 1) LAH
O 2) CH3SO2Cl CO2Me 1) CH3MgBr
HO
O 3) NaI (excess) Br
4) Li 2) Me3SiBr
5) CrO3, H2SO4, H2O
H H
Bu3SnH, AIBN •
PhH, reflux (±)-capnellene
Tetrahedron Lett.
1985, 41, 3943
H 3C H
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 148
O O Me O
nBuSnH, O
AIBN JACS 1986,
108, 1106
Me Me
Me
Br
OH
CHO H O JACS 1988,
O SmI2, THF 110 , 5064
O O
H
radical trapping
OEt
I
O OEt OEt
nBuSnH, O tBuNC O
AIBN JACS 1986,
108 , 6384
RO • CN
RO RO
C5H11
C5H11
RO HO
RO OH (+)-PGF2α
O
R R' R'' R R
R'' Organometallics
+
Co2(CO)6 1982, 1 , 1560
O O O O
FIVE-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 149
Cp2TiCl2, Ph
EtO2C CO2Et EtMgBr, CO CO2Et
O JOC 1992,
Ph 57 , 5803
CO2Et
Ring-Closing Metathesis Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413, Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 25, 446.
P(C6H11)3
Cl Ph
O OH O O Ru
O Bu2BOTf, Cl
CH2Cl 2, -78°C N O P(C6H11)3
N O
CHO (97%)
(82 %)
Ph Ph
OH O O
LiBH4, OH
THF, MeOH J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4192
N O
OH
(78%)
Ph
1. Diels-Alder Reaction
2. o-Quinodimethanes
3. Intramolecular ene reaction
4. Cation olefin cyclizations
5. Robinson annulation
Diels-Alder Reaction
ACIEE 1984, 23 , 876; ACIEE 1977, 16 , 10; Organic Reactions 1984, 32 , 1
W. Carruthers Cycloadditions Reactions in Organic Synthesis (Pergamon Press, Oxford) 1990
B B A B A
X Y X Y
A Y X
+ +
A Y X
X Y X Y
B B A B A
- Alder Endo Rule: In order to maximize secondary orbital interactions, the endo TS is
favored in the D-A rxn. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 2095
X Y B A
X Y X
B Y
A
Y
A
X
B B A
O
O exo O
minor
O O
H
H
O
H
endo H
O major
O O O O
O
Orientation Rules
X X X
Y Y
+ +
Y
major minor
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 151
X Y X X Y
+ +
Y
major minor
- when both the diene and dienophile are "unactivated" the D-A rxn is sluggish
- D-A rxns with electron rich dienes and electron defficient dienophiles work the best.
Some electron deficient dienophiles are quinones, maleic ahydride, nitroalkenes, α,β-
unsaturated ketones, esters and nitriles.
- D-A rxns with electron deficient dienes and electron rich dienophiles also work well.
These are refered to as reverse demand D-A rxns.
- D-A rxns are sensitive to steric effects of the dienephiles, particularly at the 1- and 2-
postions. Steric bulk at the 1-position may prevent approach of the dienophile while steric
bulk at the 2-position may prevent the diene from adopting the s-cis conformation.
- The D-A rxn is promoted by Lewis acids (TiCl4, BF3 AlCl3, AlEt2Cl, SnCl4,...)
- The D-A rxn is promoted by high pressure (1 kbar ~ 14200 psi) Synthesis 1985, 1.
O
OMe
OMe 5 Kbar Me
O JACS 1986,
+ 108 , 3040
Me
O
O
NHBOC NHBOC
NHBOC H H
20 kbars, 50°C Synthesis
+ H +
O O 1986, 928
Eu(fod)3
O
OMe OMe OMe
- The D-A rxn is usually insenstive to solvent effects, except for water. ACR 1991, 24 , 159
O
isooctane O
+
+ krel=1
O H
endo exo JACS 1980, 102 , 7816
4:1 TL 1983, 24 , 1901
TL 1984 , 25 , 1239
H2O 20 : 1
krel= 700
JACS 1972,
D D 94 , 1168
D D
k2 D D
+
D D
O O
H MeO2C CHO
PhH, reflux
O H MeO2C OAc
O CO2H
OMe
HO2C
MeO
N N Tetrahedron
H 1958, 2 , 1
H
MeO2C O2CAr
reserpine OMe
H H CH3 trans
CHO
H H
+ O
H
O CHO
NHCO2Bn trans BnO2CHN
BnO2CHN
NHCO2Bn
JACS 1978,
100 , 5179
N
H
pumiliotoxin C
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 153
MeO OMe
O
R
+ O
O R O
MeO2C MeO2C
CO2Me R O
MeO2C
PhS SPh
PhS
SPh
MeO OMe
O
O
JACS 1986,
O 108 , 5908
Compactin
OMe OMe
R R
R
ACR 1981,
+ 14 , 400
Me3SiO Me3Si-O O
Danishefsky's
Diene
OMe OH
O
CO2Me
MeO2C H
O
+ H
O
Me3SiO O
H O
Vernolepin
O
CO2Me HO TL 1987,
Me3SiO PhH, 5°C
28 , 813
+ HO
N N OH
Ts TsN H
CO2Me
Me Me
Me O Me O Me NHTs TL 1983,
S
+ S Me 24 , 987
NTs Me
Me NTs Me
Me
Me Me
S Tetrahedron,
S
S Ph 1983, 39 , 1487
Ph S Ph H
Ph
O
O 1) MgBr2
OMe 2) H3O+
H O JACS 1985,
+ 107 , 1256
Me3SiO OBn O
OBn
OMe
OMe O OMe
HF, Me JACS 1985,
Yb(fod)3 Me
Ar Pyridine O 107 , 6647
O
+ H
Ar
Ar O
Me Me3SiO
Me3SiO
Me Me
Me Me
O C3F7
M
O O
C3F7 O M
3
3
M(fod)3 M(hfc)3
- Heterodienes
H H
H O O O O O
O
+ ACIEE 1983,
+ 22 , 887
MeO2C MeO2C MeO2C
H endo: exo H
OAc AcO AcO
1:2
Me O OEt EtO O Me HO O Me
+ ACR 1986,
19 , 250
PhS OH
endo:exo SPh
OAc 10 : 1 OAc OH
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 155
OR'
O O OR' O OMe
O RO RO JACS 1987,
N O RO 109 , 285
N
+ N
O RO N RO NHAc
RO
OR CO2R' OR
OR' OR
∆ JOC 1985,
N 50 , 2719
N N
AcO O O
O
Fused bicyclc
Bridged Bicyclic
- Generally, for E-dienes, the fused product is observed unless the connecting chain is
very long. For Z-dienes, either the fused or bicyclic products are possible.
- IDA reactions to give fused 6•5 (hydroindene) and 6•6 (hydronaphthalene) ring
systems are usually favorable reactions.
R' R'
R R
n= 1 or 2
(CH2)n (CH2)n
- Intramolecular D-A rxns that give medium sized rings (7,8,9, 10) are much less
favorable.
- Intramolecular D-A rxn which form large rings are often favorable reactions with the
diene and olefin portions act as if they were seperate molecules
O
H
H O
H
O O O
+ JACS 1980,
H +
H H 102 , 1390
O O O
O O O O
O O O O
endo exo
6.2 : 6.8 : 1 (77% combined yield)
- Preference for endo or exo transition state depends on the substituition of the diene,
dieneophile and connecting chain.
- For intramolecular D-A rxns, geometric constraints can now reverse the normal
regiochemistry of the addition as compared to the intermolecular rxn.
+
CO2R' CO2R'
R R
CO2R'
CO2R'
- for intramolecular D-A reactions, we will use endo and exo to described the
disposition of the connecting chain
R R'
R' H
R
(CH2)n
R'
H
R (CH2)n
(CH2)n endo
R R'
R' H
R
(CH2)n
(CH2)n H
exo
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 157
- Lewis acids can greatly effect the endo/exo ratio of IDA reactions especially when the
olefin portion is E. The effects for Z-olefins is much more subtle
MeO2C
MeO2C MeO2C
H H
+
JACS 1982,
104 , 2269
H H
H H
- the effect of substituents on the connectinng chain can influence the stereochemical
course of the IDA reaction
HN
O
HN JOC 1981,
EtAlCl2 H 46 , 1509
MeO2C
O
rt
MeO2C
H
R
O R R R
O
H
H
O O
O O TL 1973,
150°C
4477
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 158
OTBS OTBS
H H
O
O
TiCl4, 0°C TL 1984,
+ 25 , 2191
O O
O R*
O
O (97:3)
O X ∆ = 4.5 %ee
CO2R* TiCl4= 78% ee
O
iBu2AlCl= 90% ee
O CO2R*
O
O O
O O
Ph
O Ph + + JOC 1989,
OR* Ph
54 , 2209
O Ph O OR*
18 : 82
w/ BF3•OEt2 92 : 8 d.e > 95%
O
O
Ar Et2AlCl
O + R* Chem Lett. 1989, 2149
O
CH2Cl2, -80°C
OTMS
O up to 70% d.e.
Ph Ph
H PhCHO O O
O OR* + OR* JACS 1986, 108, 7060
Eu(hfc)3
Me OTMS O Me O Me
8 : 92
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 159
CH3 O
O O
R* O
Ph SnCl4, -78C O N R*
O N + PhMgBr O N R* OH
H O N
S O S O S
O R R Ph
97% d.e. R R
O
Tetrahedron
O (iPrO)2TiCl2, 1987, 43 , 1969
H
H O CH2Cl2, 0°C
H CO2R*
O O
SO2
N X endo/exo= 86:4 TL 1989,
98% de 30 , 6963
EtAlCl2, -78°C
Oppolzer Auxillary
O
O O
O
Evan's auxillaries R N O
R N O
Me Ph
+
O O
CO2R*
Me2AlCl CO2R*
N O endo (major) endo
CO2R*
CO2R*+
exo exo
1 equiv Me2AlCl 2 equiv. Me2AlCl
endo/exo 20:1 60:1
endo A/ endoB 4:1 20:1
k(rel) 1 100
_
Me2AlCl2
_
Me2ClAl +
O O O + Al
O O O O Al
Me2AlCl Me2AlCl
N O N O O
N O N
H
O
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 160
O O O
OH JACS 1984, 106, 4261
R N O R*
JACS 1988, 110 , 1238
EtAlCl2, -100°C
Ph (R)-(+)-α-terpineol
O O O O
R* R*
O N H H
Me2AlCl
+
Ph Me TL 1984 , 25 , 4071
JACS 1988, 110 , 1238
H H
15 : 85
O O
O N
Me2AlCl 95 : 5
Ph
- Chiral Dienes
O
Ph
O
OMe CHO OHC OMe BF3•OEt2, -20°C 4:1
O BF3•OEt2, -78°C 94:6
Ph
O
π-stacking
MeO arrangement O
O OH Ph
OMe H O O OH
O O H
+ OMe
Ph O
O
O H
approach of O
dienophile only product
- Chiral Catalysts Chem. Rev. 1992, 92 , 1007; Synthesis 1991, 1; OPPI 1994, 26, 129-
158
OH
OtBu
Me Eu(hfc)3, -10°C O TL 1983,
+ PhCHO 24 , 3451
TMSO O Ph
Me Me
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 161
Ph Ph
Ph O OH
Me O OH
O O
Ph Ph CL 1986, 1967
+ O N
N O (iPrO)2TiCl2 O
O
O
Ph Ph O
Ph O OH O N
O O
Me O OH H
N O Ph Ph
O 70% yield
(iPrO)2TiCl2 95% ee
O O (30 mol % catalyst) O H
Ph
O O
OH
OH
JACS 1986,
+ 108 , 3510
Ph
OH O OAc BH3, -78°C OH O OAc (98%)
Ts
N
Et B
O N
Br CHO O H CHO JACS 1992,
+ 114 , 8290
-78°C Br
(> 99% ee)
H
N
O
O
Br CHO CHO H
+ N B Bu N
Ts
Br
CH2Cl2, -78 °C,
Br 16 hrs Br
Br (81%, 99% ee) O H
O
N B O
OC Ts
OH
O HO
approach of diene
CO2H
Br Gibberellic Acid
H
N
OTBS H 3C 1) NaBH4
O OTBS O
2) DDQ
CHO H O O JACS 1994, 116, 3611
-
3) F
+ N B H
Ts 4) HCl
R
benzocyclobutane o-quinodimethane
O O
OTMS
1) LiNH2, NH3, THF
MgBr Me3Si SiMe3
O O
O
170 °C
H
Me3Si Me3Si
Me3Si
H H H H
Me3Si Me3Si
Me3Si
Estrone
O
O
HN
HN JACS 1971,
155 °C
93 , 3836
H
Me Me
O O
N N
155 °C
ACIEE 1971, 11 , 1031
O O
Me Me
O O
N N
155 °C ACIEE 1971, 11 , 1031
N N
OMe OMe
Me Me
O
O N
N ACIEE 1971, 11 , 1031
180 °C
NH
N
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 163
R
R OH O
CO2Me
O
CO2Me
R O R
90% ee)
Polyene Cyclization
+ +
Terpene Biosynthesis
terpenes C 10 geraniol
sesquiterpenes C 15 farnesol
diterpenes C 20 geranylgeraniol
steroids C 30 squalene
OPP
isoprene unit
isopentyl-PP
OPP
OPP
OPP
O
HO2C
Camphor α-Cedrane Abietic Acid
Biosynthesis of camphor:
+
OPP O
+
Biosynthesis of cedrane:
OPP H
+
+
Me Me Me
Me Me
+ Me
R Me Me
R
H H
H H
OPP OPP
+ OPP
+ H
H
H H
+
H
+
H
H
H H H
H HO2C
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 165
-Steroid Biosynthesis:
H H+
squalene squalene H
epoxidase cyclase + H
squalene
H H
+O HO HO
H H
Protosterol
H squalene oxide
H
+
H
H H H
H
H H H
HO HO HO
H H
Lanosterol Cholesterol
- Polyene cyclization in synthesis ACR 1968, 1, 1; Bioorg. Chem. 1976, 5, 51; Asymmetric
Synthesis 1984, 3, 341-409; ACIEE 1976, 15, 9
SnCl4
CH3NO2, 0°C
H
E.E. van Tamelen
(8%)
JACS 1972, 94 , 8229
H
O HO
H δ- Amyrin
OH
CHO
SnCl4 JACS 1974,
PhH, rt H
96 , 3333
(38%)
MeO MeO
CO2Me CO2Me
1) Hg(O2CCF3)2 O
OPO(OEt)2 2) NaCl JACS 1980,
102 , 7612
ClHg
H
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 166
acid or base O
O
(thermodynamic
conditions)
-O O
-
O base
(kinetic conditions)
- stabilizing the resulting enolate of the Michael Addition product can shift the
equilibrium as in the case of the vinyl silane shown below
O
Me3Si Me3Si
- O
O -
O O
base
(kinetic conditions)
OR OR OR
a) MeLi
JACS 1974,
b) O O O 96 , 6181
O Me3SiO Me3Si
H H
O
O
c) MeONa O
mCPBA H+
+ -
O
O O
Me3Si Me3Si O
Me3Si
Aldol
JACS 1974,
O O O 96 , 3862
O
+ -
O O O O
O
O
6-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 167
base R'
- H2O
R
R O
Radical Cyclizations
Acyloin Reaction
Sigmatropic Rearrangements
7-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 168
7-Membered Rings
[4+2] cycloadditions
- [4+2] cycloadditions between dienes and allylcations leads to cycloheptadienes
review: ACIEE 1984, 23 , 1; ACIEE 1973, 12 , 819
+ + +
ZnCl2, -30°C
ACIEE 1982,
+
21, 442
+
H H
F3CCO2
SiMe3 SiMe3
O O
OTMS
+ JACS 1982,
104 , 1330
ZnCl2
Br
OMe O O
O O + O
O O O
+ O
O
O O O
Br Br Fe2(CO)9 Br Br Zn
O O O
Br Br
CO2Me
O N
MeO2C
Br Br 1) N JACS 1978, 100 , 1786
Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5879
Br Br Fe2(CO)9
2) Zn O
OMe O O
O O + O
O O O
+ O
O
O O
mCPBA JACS 1979, 101, 226
O
HO
O O
1) O 1) H2, Pd/C OH
Me Me O
2) CF3CO3H JACS 1972, 94, 3940
O JOC 1976, 41, 2075
Br Br Fe2(CO)9 O
O H H
O CO2H
O O Me Me Me
O 1) CF3CO3H
OH
2) LDA, MeI JCSCC 1985, 55
O
O OBn Me OBn OH OH OBn
O
O
+ + +
O OH
HO - O
∆ O Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 2387
+ O
JOC 1987, 52, 759
O O
7-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 170
O
MeO OMe
OMe
SnCl4 JACS 1977, 99, 8073
JACS 1979, 101, 6767
JACS 1981, 103, 2718
OMe
O O
HO HO
HO OH
Ingenol
150°C
(81%)
O O
•O nBu3SnH JACS 1987,109, 3493
CO2Me JACS 1987,109 , 6548
(CH2)n •
(CH2)n (CH2)n
CO2Me CO2Me
7-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 171
O O O
Bu3SnLi
CH3 •
BrCH2SePh SePh
SnBu3 SnBu3
Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 909
O Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 6795
•O
+ Bu3Sn•
SnBu3
Br Br Bu3SnH, AIBN,
+ C6H6, reflux JOC 1992, 57, 7163
O O
O
O O
O
O O
O
JACS 1988,
Ni(COD)2, Ph3P
H 110 , 5904
60°C H
O
Asteriscanolide
- McMurry Reaction
R R
CO2Et Ti (0)
O
O
7-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 172
CHO OHC
TiCl3, Zn-Cu
JACS 1986,
H H 108 , 3513
Aldol-like Condensations
O
TiCl4 O
O OH JCSCC 1983, 703
OTMS O
SiMe3 SiMe3
R Lewis Acid R
JACS 1986,
O 108 , 3516
(CH2)n O OMe (CH2)n O
n= 1,2
Me3Si Cl Cl
Me3Si Cl
SnCl4
OTs
O OTs O
tBuPh2SiO O
tBuPh2SiO JACS 1988,
OEt Laurenyne 110 , 2248
TiCl4
JOC 1988,
53 , 50
O SiMe3 O
Pinocol Rearrangement
O
Me3SiO SnCl4 Me3SiO
+ JACS 1989,
OMe 111 , 1514
OMe
OMe H
OMe
- also see Beckman and Schmidt rearrangements as a one atom ring expansion
for the conversion of cyclic ketones to lactams.
7-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 173
DeMayo Reaction
O
O O O
hν O O
+
OAc
AcO
O
O O
O
CO2Me
O O H
O pTSA, MeOH
hν, pyrex O reflux JACS 1986,
O O 108 , 6425
O
H
O
O
SMe TL 1991,
55°C
32 , 6969
O
O
O O
OH O
OCOCH2OH
Pleuromutilin
- Claisen Rearrangement
O
O
Tebbe
reagent O 185°C
O H TL 1990,
31 , 6799
7-MEMBERED RING FORMATION 174
MOMO MOMO
1) LDA, TBS-Cl
H 2) 110°C JOC 1988, 53 , 4141
O
H
O H CO2TBS