Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1. Introduction
River confluences are an integral and ubiquitous feature
linking together the individual tributaries within river
networks. As the flows from two tributaries merge and
adjust to the confluences planform geometry substantial
changes to the flow hydrodynamics and bed morphology
that occur within and immediately downstream of the
confluence (Mosley, 1976). This region where the local
hydrodynamics are influenced by the convergence and
realignment of the combining flows at the confluence is
known as the Confluence Hydrodynamic Zone
(Kentworthy and Rhoads, 1995).
It is generally acknowledged that the hydrodynamics
and morphodynamics (i.e. patterns of erosion and
deposition) within the confluence hydrodynamic zone
(CHZ) are influenced by (1) the planform geometry of
the confluence and upstream/downstream channels,
including the junction angle of confluence; (2) discharge
(QR) and momentum flux (MR) ratios of merging
streams; (3) the level of concordance between channel
beds at the confluence entrance; and (4) water density
differences caused by differences in tributary water
chemistry (e.g. Mosley, 1976; Best, 1987; Best and
Rhoads, 2008). The fluid dynamics about confluences
have a highly complex three-dimensional flow structure
with several common types of flow features observed
(e.g. Best, 1987). Further, the bed morphology within
the confluence hydrodynamic zone can generally be
related to these flow features (e.g. Best, 1988; Szupiany
et al., 2009).
More generally, the patterns of erosion and deposition
within the CHZ reflect the spatial variations in bed shear
stress (e.g. Best and Rhoads, 2008). Ultimately, the bed
shear stress and sediment transport can be related to the
localised fluctuations in flow velocity (e.g. turbulence)
generated through the interaction of the flow with both
vertical and horizontal variations in channel bathymetry
causing the flow accelerate or decelerate.
Despite recent advances in the understanding about
confluences, to date most studies have focused on
laboratory or small natural confluences, with only a
limited number of studies conducted about large river
confluences (i.e. channel width > 100 m).
One
important but poorly understood aspect of confluence
dynamics is how scale related changes in confluence
geometry will effect the flow structure through the
confluence with these confluence scaling relations
conceivably being non-linear and therefore complex
(e.g. Rhoads, 2006). The few available field studies in
large river confluences have highlighted some
significant differences between the dynamics of large
and small confluences that require further investigation.
3. Key Observations
Trevethan et al. (2015) presented an initial analysis of
the hydrodynamic, sediment transport and mixing
processes about the confluence of the Negro and
Solimes Rivers during the Field Study CNS1. The
tributary inflows entering the confluence were
approximately 25,000 and 65,000 m3/s for the Negro
and Solimes Rivers respectively, with the discharge
and momentum flux ratios being approximately
QR=0.379 and MR=0.112. As part of this analysis the
location and dimensions of key hydrodynamic and
morphodynamic features were approximated.
Figure 2 shows the location of key hydrodynamic and
morphodynamic features about the confluence of the
Negro and Solimes Rivers observed during the Field
Study CNS1. In Figure 2, the key hydrodynamic
features are: (1) stagnation zone; (2) region of
deflection; (3) downstream separation zone; (4) region
of maximum velocity; (5) region of flow recovery; (6)
mixing interface/shear layer; and (7) end of the
confluence hydrodynamic zone. While the key
morphodynamic features are: (8) scour hole; (9)
deposition about stagnation zone; (10) deposition about
downstream separation zone; and (11) deposition bars
about centre of channel; as well as (12) large bed-forms
on Solimes side of Amazon channel. It is worth noting
that no avalanche faces where easily discernable at
either tributary mouth during this field study. Further
throughout the study region the level and type of local
bed concordance (HN > HS; HN = HS; HN < HS) varied
significantly from site to site.
VN
VZ
2
1.5
4. Discussion
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
-0.5
Transect Length (m)
3
30.6
30.4
Mixing Interface
30.2
1
30
29.8
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
2800
3200
3600
4000
4400
0
4800
31
30.8
QN/QS
QN (Tatu Paricatuba)
QS (Manacapuru)
CNS1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Jan-08
May-09
Sep-10
Feb-12
Jun-13
160000
140000
120000
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
Discharge (m /s)
1
0.5
QN/QS
2.5
0
Nov-14
Date
5. Conclusions
About the very large confluence of Negro and Solimes
Rivers all key flow features and the majority of key bed
features noted in previous studies about smaller
confluences were observed. Some typical confluence
bed features and composition were presented from
seismic profiles collected about the confluence. Finally
some flow-bed interactions were briefly noted herein
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge this research was carried out
within the CLIM-AMAZON European Laboratory in
Brazil funded by grant agreement FP7 INCO-LAB n
295091 from European Commission; the CPRM
(Geological Survey of Brazil) for supplying research
vessel, instrumentation and technical assistance as well
as ADCP transects collected between 2008-2014; and
assistance of Joao Andrade with seismic data collection.
References
Best, J. (1987). Flow dynamics at river channel
confluences: implications for sediment transport and
bed morphology. Recent Developments in Fluvial
Sedimentology, (Eds. Ethridge, et al.), Spec. Publ. 39,
Soc. Econ. Paleontol. and Mineral.
Best, J. (1988). Sediment transport and bed morphology
at river channel confluences. Sedimentology, 35
Best, J., and Rhoads, B. (2008). Sediment transport, bed
morphology and the sedimentology of river channel
confluences. River confluences, tributaries and the
fluvial network, (Eds: Rice et al.), J.Wiley & Sons
Franzinelli, E. (2011). Caracteristcas morfologicas da
confluencia dos rios Negro e Solimes (Amazonas,
Brasil). Revista Brasileira de geocincias, 41
Ianniruberto, M., Campos, J. and Arajo, V. (2012).
Application of shallow seismic profiling to study
riverbed architectural facies: A case study of the
Tocantins river (Par-Brazil). Anais da Academia
Brasileira de Cincias, 84
Laraque, A., Guyot, J., and Filizola, N. (2009). Mixing
processes in the Amazon River at the confluences of
the Negro and Solimes Rivers, Encontro das Aguas,
Brazil. Hydrological Processes, 23
Meade, R., Rayol, J., Da Conceicao, S. and Natividade,
J. (1991). Backwater effects in the Amazon River
basin of Brazil. Environ. Geol. Water Sci., 18
Mosley, P. (1976). An Experimental study of channel
confluences. Journal of Geology, 84
Rhoads, B. (2006). Scaling of confluence dynamics in
river systems: some general considerations. In River
Flow 2006, September 6-8, 2006, Lisbon, Portugal
Sime, L., Ferguson, R. and Church, M. (2007).
Estimating shear stress from moving boat acoustic
Doppler measurements in a large gravel bed river.
Water Resources Research, 43
Szupiany, R., Amsler, M., Parsons, D. & Best, J. (2009).
Morphology, flow structure and suspended bed
sediment transport at large braid-bar confluences.
Water Resources Research, 45
Trevethan, M. and Aoki, S. (2009). Initial observations
on relationships between turbulence and suspended
sediment properties in Hamana Lake, Japan. Journal
of Coastal Research, SI-56
Trevethan, M., Martinelli, A., Oliveria, M. Ianniruberto,
M. and Gualtieri, C. (2015). Fluid dynamics, sediment
transport and mixing about the confluence of Negro
and Solimes rivers, Manaus, Brazil. In 36th IAHR
World Congress, June 28-July 3, 2015, The Hague, the
Netherlands