Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Journal of Proteomics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jprot
Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Moshan 430074, China
Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, Vienna 1090, Austria
College of Life science and technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 June 2015
Received in revised form 29 September 2015
Accepted 8 October 2015
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Lotus
Cotyledons
Callus induction
Quantitative proteomics
a b s t r a c t
Lotus is an aquatic plant with high nutritional, ornamental and medical values. Its callus formation is crucial for
germplasm innovation by genetic transformation. In this study, embryogenic callus was successfully induced on
appropriate medium using cotyledons at 12 days after pollination as explants. To dissect cellular dedifferentiation
and callus formation processes at the proteome level, cotyledons before and tissues from 10 to 20 days after induction were sampled for shotgun proteomic analysis. By applying multivariate statistics 91 proteins were detected as differentially regulated, and sorted into 6 functional groups according to MapMan ontology analysis.
Most of these proteins were implicated in various metabolisms, demonstrating that plant cells underwent metabolism reprogramming during callus induction. 14.3% proteins were associated with stress and redox, indicating that the detached explants were subjected to a variety of stresses; 13.2% were cell and cell wall-related
proteins, suggesting that these proteins played important roles in rapid cell division and proliferation. Some proteins were further evaluated at the mRNA levels by quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis. In conclusion,
the results contributed to further deciphering of molecular processes of cellular dedifferentiation and callus formation, and provided a reference data set for the establishment of transgenic transformation in lotus.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) is a perennial aquatic plant of economic, ecological, cultural and religious importance with a wide distribution in East Asia. In addition to its high ornamental value, it is also
widespread cultivated as a food crop for its seeds and rhizomes, and
as a traditional herbal medicine for its seeds, fruit and leaves [13].
According to its agricultural purpose and morphological difference,
N. nucifera has been divided into three types corresponding with three
important organs, separately named as ower lotus, seed lotus and rhizome lotus, which has also been conrmed by random amplication
polymorphic DNA analysis [1,4]. These species can be propagated by
both sexual (seeds) and asexual (rhizomes) methods. Among them, rhizomes reproduction is the predominant reproduction mode used in
horticultural applications. However, it is mother rhizome-consuming,
low reproduction coefcient, difcult storage and transportation, and
can cause the degeneration of good species. In vivo tissue culture acting
as a good alternative method may overcome these obstacles to some degree. Although a remarkable success in lotus regeneration by de novo
Corresponding author at: Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and
Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Wuhan, China.
E-mail address: yangpf@wbgcas.cn (P. Yang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
1874-3919/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
centrifugation at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4 C. Supernatants were collected, an equal volume of Trisphenol (pH N 8.0) was then added, vortexed
and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4 C. The top phenol phase
was carefully transferred to a new tube. Subsequently, homogenization
buffer was added again, thoroughly mixed and centrifuged at 12,000 g
for 20 min at 4 C. The phenol phase was transferred to another new
tube followed by addition 5 volumes of 0.1 M methanolic ammonium
acetate in 100% methanol and incubation overnight at 20 C. The precipitated proteins were washed one time with 0.1 M methanolic ammonium acetate and two times with acetone. The protein pellets were
vacuum-dried and then stored at 80 C for further use.
2.5. One-dimensional gel electrophoresis (1-DE)
Prior to 1-DE, protein samples were redissolved in lysis buffer (7 M
urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% w/v CHAPS, and 65 mM DTT) and quantied
using the Bradford method [22]. 25 g of total proteins was loaded
onto 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE)
and run at 50 V for 30 min and 150 V for 1 h. After running, the gels
were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB R-250) solution for
4 h, and then destained until protein bands were clear, scanned with
the scanner (EPSON PERFECTION V700) (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Each lane of the gels was divided into four fractions using the sterile
scalpel. Gel pieces were destained, equilibrated, digested with trypsin,
sequentially as described by Valledor and Weckwerth [23]. Afterwards,
tryptic peptides from a lane were dissolved in 4% acetonitrile and 0.1%
formic acid, thoroughly mixed, desalted and then subjected to analysis
using nanoHPLC coupled to LTQ-Orbitrap-MS according to previously
published report [24]. In brief, 10 g of digested peptides was injected
into nano-ow LCMS/MS system equipped with a pre-column
(Eksigent, Germany) following by peptides elution using a Ascentis
Express ES-C18 HPLC column (SUPELCO Analytical, USA) during a
80 min gradient from 5% to 50% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. MS
analysis was performed on an Orbitrap LTQ XL mass spectrometer
(Thermo, Germany) with a controlled ow rate of 500 nL/min. Specic
tune was set to 1.8 kV for spray voltage and 180 C for temperature of
the heated transfer capillary.
MS raw data were searched by SEQUEST algorithm of Proteome
Discoverer version 1.3 (Thermo, Germany) according to previous report
[15]. Briey, the following lter criteria were set: (i) 1% false discovery
rate (FDR); (ii) a variable modication of acetylation of N-terminus
and oxidation of methionine; and (iii) mass tolerance of 10 ppm for parent ion and 0.8 Da for fragment ion.
The newly annotated genome database of lotus (http://lotus-db.
wbgcas.cn) was employed to identify proteins. The assembled genome
of lotus was 804 Mb, which represented 86.5% of the estimated
929 Mb lotus genome. Following repeat-masking and annotation,
26,685 unigenes were inferred, 82% of them have similarity to proteins
in SwissProt [11]. Peptides were matched against lotus database plus
decoys with user-dened searching parameters as follows: (i) medium
or high peptide condence; (ii) minimum Xcorr of 1 for +1, 2 for +2
and 3 for +3 charged peptides, etc. Subsequently, a label-free approach
based on spectral counts (SpCs) was used to quantify the identied proteins followed by a normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) normalization strategy [25]. The NSAF was calculated as follows
N
X
SpC=Li :
i 1
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
Fig. 1. Morphology of lotus seeds and callus. Embryo (A), cotyledon (B), unshelled seed (C) and developmental seed (D) of 12 DAP. Cotyledon before callus-induction (E). Tissue from
10 days after callus-induction (F). Tissue from 20 days after callus-induction (G). Histological observation of cotyledons before callus-induction (H), tissue from 10 days after callus-induction (I) and tissue from 20 days after callus-induction (J), respectively. Bars = 0.5 cm in AG and 100 m in HJ. Rectangles indicate the samples for histological observation.
one exhibited a reverse tendency (Fig. 3A), revealing that the synthesis
of new proteins may occur in callus. Moreover, two proteins related
to N-metabolism including glutamate dehydrogenase 1 and branchedchain-amino-acid aminotransferase-like protein 3 also showed a continuous increase at CS1 and CS2 (Fig. 3G). The former catalyzes the
transformation of ammonia and -ketoglutaric acid into glutamate [31],
whereas the latter is responsible for the biosynthesis of branchedchain-amino-acid. This indicated that up-regulation of the proteins
would contribute to more substrates for protein biosynthesis. In summary, it is probable that pre-accumulated proteins in developmental
cotyledons concealed the synthesis of new proteins. However, the synthesis of new proteins was required for callus formation [19,32,33].
Carbohydrate and energy metabolism-related proteins play important roles in maintaining carbon skeletons and supplying energy for key
metabolic processes. In this study, 4 glycolysis-related proteins including
pyruvate kinase, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, pyrophosphatefructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase subunit beta and NADPdependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were all upregulated at CS1 and presented at even higher levels at CS2 (Fig. 3B),
demonstrating that they play a crucial regulatory role in carbon ux
and energy supply during callus induction. Recently, several studies
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
Fig. 2. Multiple analysis of identied proteins. Principal components analysis (A) on all samples from three replicates at three stages based on the quantied proteins and their relative
abundance. Venn diagram analysis (B) of quantied proteins at three biological replicates in one stage at least, the numbers of proteins quantied at NC, CS1 and CS2 are shown in different
segments. Functional categorization of differentially changed proteins (C). Classication of proteins associated with various metabolism pathways (D), the different numbers show identied protein number. NC, before callus-induction; CS1, 10 days after callus-induction; CS2, 20 days after callus-induction.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
Fig. 3. Expression proles of proteins involved into different functional groups: NSAF scores averaged over three biological replicates.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
Fig. 4. Relative mRNA levels of several interested genes. The gene ID in the x-axis stands for differentially changed proteins that have been explained in Supplementary Table 1. The values
are means of three replicates SD. Statistically signicant differences among cotyledons before, tissues from 10 days and from 20 days after callus-induction are indicated with different
lowercase letters. NC, before callus-induction; CS1, 10 days after callus-induction; CS2, 20 days after callus-induction.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
4. Conclusion
Callus formation and differentiation are crucial for genetic transformation and molecular genetic studies in most plants. However,
the techniques were still undeveloped in lotus. In this study, embryogenic callus was successfully induced from developmental cotyledons. Afterwards, through a shotgun proteomic strategy quantitative
proteomic analysis of callus was performed to dissect the molecular
mechanisms underlying cellular dedifferentiation and callus formation. Totally, 91 proteins were quantied to be signicantly differential changed. Over half of these proteins were metabolism-related
proteins, demonstrating that plant cells underwent metabolism
reprogramming during callus formation. Most of the stress and redoxrelated proteins (14.3%) showed a continuously increased expression
at NC1 and NC2, indicating that the detached explants were subjected
to various kinds of stresses under in vitro culture condition and always
protected themselves from damage by the regulation of protein expression. Furthermore, 13.2% cell and cell wall-related proteins were
also quantied, which may be required for rapid cell division and
proliferation.
Based on our obtained proteomic results, the following model for
molecular mechanisms guiding metabolism progresses of cellular dedifferentiation and callus formation in lotus cotyledons was proposed
(Fig. 5). Based on the model, plant hormones such as auxin (6-BA)
and cytokinin (2, 4-D, IAA) and wounding, acting as inducers, induced
cell proliferation and callus formation in differentiated lotus cotyledons.
Briey, the inducers (stimulus) contributed to a wide range of metabolism reprogramming and imposed various stresses on the explants
following by energy consumption and ROS overproduction. As a result,
the explants activated defense systems to resist all kinds of attacks or
antioxidate systems to scavenge excess ROS, and accelerated carbohydrate and energy metabolism to supply energy and maintain carbon
skeletons. Simultaneously, the addition of exogenous phytohormone
triggered cell division followed by the changes of cell wall. Finally, the
explants generated a mass of irregular cells called callus.
Fig. 5. A work model for callus formation in lotus cotyledons. Numbers located in brace indicate the number of quantied differentially changed proteins in this study.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
Conict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conict of interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Ms. Lei Wang for her help in MS analysis.
This work was supported by The Knowledge Innovation Project (No.
Y455421Z02).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010.
References
[1] H.B. Guo, Cultivation of Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. nucifera) and its utilization in China, Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 56 (2009) 323330.
[2] M. Yang, Y. Han, R. Buren, R. Ming, L. Xu, Y. Han, Y. Liu, Genetic linkage maps for
Asian and American lotus constructed using novel SSR markers derived from the genome of sequenced cultivar, BMC Genomics 13 (2012) 653.
[3] L. Pan, Q. Xia, Z. Quan, H. Liu, W. Ke, Y. Ding, Development of novel ESTSSRs from
sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn) and their utilization for the genetic diversity
analysis of N. nucifera, J. Hered. 101 (2010) 7182.
[4] J. Wu, Y. Zheng, T. Chen, L. Qin, K. Rahman, W. Lin, Evaluation of the quality of lotus
seed of Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn from outer space mutation, Food Chem. 105 (2007)
540547.
[5] S. Shou, L. Miao, W. Zai, X. Huang, D. Guo, Factors inuencing shoot multiplication of
lotus (Nelumbo nucifera), Biol. Plant. 52 (2008) 529532.
[6] S. Arunyanart, In vitro culture of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.), J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic.
Sci. 67 (1998) 257 (Suppl.).
[7] Z. He, S. Liu, A study on callus induction and regeneration of plantlet from embryo
culture of Lotus, Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 11 (1987) 278280.
[8] S. Arunyanart, M. Chaitrayagun, Induction of somatic embryogenesis in lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Geartn.), Sci. Hortic. 105 (2005) 411420.
[9] Y. Diao, J. Wu, L. Zhao, Z. Hu, Primary study on embryogenic callus induced from
shoot tips of Nelumbo nucifera, Hubei Agric. Sci. 50 (2011) 29912992.
[10] Y. Wang, G. Fan, Y. Liu, F. Sun, C. Shi, X. Liu, The sacred lotus genome provides insights into the evolution of owering plants, Plant J. 76 (2013) 557567.
[11] R. Ming, R. VanBuren, Y. Liu, M. Yang, Y. Han, L. Li, et al., Genome of the long-living
sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.), Genome Biol. 14 (2013) R41.
[12] M. Ikeuchi, K. Sugimoto, A. Iwase, Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression, Plant Cell 25 (2013) 31593173.
[13] F. Skoog, C.O. Miller, Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro, Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 11 (1957) 118130.
[14] M. Rieer, O. Novak, M. Strnad, T. Schmllinga, Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor mutants reveal functions in shoot growth, leaf senescence, seed size, germination,
root development, and cytokinin metabolism, Plant Cell 18 (2006) 4054.
[15] T.L. Palama, P. Menard, I. Fock, Y.H. Choi, E. Bourdon, J. Govinden-Soulange, et al.,
Shoot differentiation from protocorm callus cultures of Vanilla planifolia
(Orchidaceae): proteomic and metabolic responses at early stage, BMC Plant Biol.
10 (2010) 82.
[16] C. Chen, S. Fu, Y. Lee, C. Lin, W. Lin, H. Huang, Transcriptome analysis of age-related
gain of callus-forming capacity in Arabidopsis hypocotyls, Plant Cell Physiol. 53
(2012) 14571469.
[17] K. Xu, J. Liu, M. Fan, W. Xin, Y. Hu, C. Xu, A genome-wide transcriptome proling reveals the early molecular events during callus initiation in Arabidopsis multiple organs, Genomics 100 (2012) 116124.
[18] Z. Lai, Y. Lin, Analysis of the global transcriptome of longan (Dimocarpus longan
Lour.) embryogenic callus using Illumina paired-end sequencing, BMC Genomics
14 (2013) 561.
[19] B.C. Tan, C.F. Chin, S. Liddell, P. Alderson, Proteomic analysis of callus development
in Vanilla Planifolia Andrews, Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 31 (2013) 12201229.
[20] Y. Liu, M. Li, C. Han, F. Wu, B. Tu, P. Yang, Comparative proteomic analysis of rice
shoots exposed to high arsenate, J. Integr. Plant Biol. 55 (2013) 114.
[21] P. Yang, X. Li, X. Wang, H. Chen, F. Chen, S. Shen, Proteomic analysis of rice (Oryza
sativa) seeds during germination, Proteomics 7 (2007) 33583368.
[22] M.M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram
quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding, Anal. Biochem.
72 (1976) 248254.
[23] L. Valledor, W. Weckwerth, An improved detergent-compatible gel-fractionation
LC-LTQ-orbitrap workow for plant and microbial proteomics. Humana press:
Totowa, NJ. Plant proteomics, Method Mol. Biol. 1072 (2013).
[24] P. Chaturvedi, T. Ischebeck, V. Egelhofer, I. Lichtscheidl, W. Weckwerth, Cell-specic
analysis of the tomato pollen proteome from pollen mother cell to mature pollen
provide evidence for developmental, J. Proteome Res. 12 (2013) 48924903.
[25] B. Zybailov, A.L. Mosley, M.E. Sardiu, M.K. Coleman, L. Florens, M.P. Washburn, Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, J. Proteome Res. 5 (2006) 23392347.
[26] J. Xu, C. Xue, D. Xue, J. Zhao, J. Gai, N. Guo, H. Xing, Overexpression of GmHsp90s, a
heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) gene family cloning from soybean, decrease damage
of abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana, PLoS One 8 (2013), e69810.
[27] X. Sun, W. Weckwerth, COVAIN: a toolbox for uni- and multivariate statistics, timeseries and correlation network analysis and inverse estimation of the differential
Jacobian from metabolomics covariance data, Metabolomics 8 (2012) 8193.
[28] A. Fehr, T.P. Pasternak, D. Dudits, Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state, Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 74 (2003) 201228.
[29] P. Zimmermann, M. Hirsch-Hoffmann, L. Hennig, W. Gruissem, GENEVESTIGATOR.
Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox, Plant Physiol. 136 (2004)
26212632.
[30] P. Tang, D. Sun, J. Zhao, X. Su, J., Light and electron microscopic observation on
the development pattern of cotyledons of Nelumbo nucifera, Acta Bot. Sin. 31
(1989) 750756.
[31] R. Melo-Oliveira, I.C. Oliveira, G.M. Coruzzi, Arabidopsis mutant analysis and gene
regulation dene a nonredundant role for glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93 (1996) 47184723.
[32] G. Shari, H. Ebrahimzadeh, B. Ghareyazie, J. Gharechahi, E. Vatankhah, Identication of differentially accumulated proteins associated with embryogenic and nonembryogenic calli in saffron (Crocus sativus L.), Proteome Sci. 10 (2012) 3.
[33] L. Sun, Y. Wu, H. Zou, S. Su, S. Li, X. Shan, J. Xi, Y. Yuan, Comparative proteomic
analysis of the H99 inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line in embryogenic and nonembryogenic callus during somatic embryogenesis, Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.
113 (2013) 103119.
[34] J.W. Zhang, H.Q. Ma, S. Chen, M. Ji, A. Perl, L. Kovacs, S.W. Chen, Stress response
proteins differential expression in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus of
Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignona proteomic approach, Plant Sci. 177
(2009) 103113.
[35] R.C. Silva, L.S.T. Carmo, Z.G. Luis, L.P. Silva, J.E. Scherwinski-Pereira, A. Mehta, Proteomic identication of differentially expressed proteins during the acquisition of
somatic embryogenesis in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.), J. Proteome 104
(2014) 112127.
[36] S. Correia, R. Vinhas, B. Manadas, A.S. Lourenco, P. Verssimo, J.M. Canhoto, Comparative proteomic analysis of auxin-induced embryogenic and nonembryogenic
tissue of the solanaceous tree Cyphomandra betacea (Tamarillo), J. Proteome Res.
11 (2012) 16661675.
[37] L. Yin, Y. Lan, L. Zhu, Analysis of the protein expression proling during rice callus
differentiation under different plant hormone conditions, Plant Mol. Biol. 68
(2008) 597617.
[38] L. Yin, Y. Tao, K. Zhao, J. Shao, X. Li, G. Liu, S. Liu, L. Zhu, Proteomic and transcriptomic
analysis of rice mature seed-derived callus differentiation, Proteomics 7 (2007)
755768.
[39] Z.Y. Pan, R. Guan, S.P. Zhu, X.X. Deng, Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis
in Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck), Plant Cell Rep. 28 (2009)
281289.
[40] S.H.E. Kaufmann, Heat shock protein and the immune response, Immunol. Today 11
(1990) 4.
[41] I. Chaves, C. Pinheiro, J.A.P. Paiva, S. Planchon, K. Sergeant, J. Renaut, J.A. Graa, G.
Costa, A.V. Coelho, R. CP, Proteomic evaluation of wound-healing processes in potato
(Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber tissue, Proteomics 9 (2009) 41544175.
[42] S.S. Gill, N. Tuteja, Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic
stress tolerance in crop plants, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48 (2010) 909930.
[43] Y. Zhang, L. Xu, X. Zhu, Y. Gong, F. Xiang, X. Sun, L. Liu, Proteomic analysis of heat
stress response in leaves of radish (Raphanus sativus L.), Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 31
(2013) 195203.
[44] D. He, C. Han, J. Yao, S. Shen, P. Yang, Constructing the metabolic and regulatory
pathways in germinating rice seeds through proteomic approach, Proteomics 11
(2011) 26932713.
[45] A. Moons, Regulatory and functional interactions of plant growth regulators and
plant glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), Vitam. Horm. 72 (2005) 155202.
[46] P. Holmes, R. Farquharson, P.J. Hall, B.G. Rolfe, Proteomic analysis of roots meristems
and the effects of acetohydroxyacid synthase-inhibiting herbicides in the root of
Medicago truncatula, J. Proteome Res. 5 (2006) 23092316.
[47] Y. Hu, F. Bao, J. Li, Promotive effect of brassinosteroids on cell division involves a
distinct CycD3-induction pathway in Arabidopsis, Plant J. 24 (2000) 693701.
[48] C. Bttcher, R.A. Keyzers, P.K. Boss, C. Davies, Sequestration of auxin by the indole-3acetic acid-amidosynthetase GH3-1 in grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) and the proposed role of auxin conjugation during ripening, J. Exp. Bot. 6 (2010) 111.
[49] F. Carland, S. Fujioka, T. Nelson, The sterol methyltransferases SMT1, SMT2, and
SMT3 inuence Arabidopsis development through nonbrassinosteroid products,
Plant Physiol. 153 (2010) 27412756.
[50] J.B. Pereira-Leal, M.C. Seabra, Evolution of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins, J. Mol. Biol. 313 (2001) 889901.
[51] H. Jin, Z. Hong, W. Su, J. Li, A plant-specic calreticulin is a key retention factor for a
defective brassinosteroid receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 1361213617.
[52] L.E.V. Del Bem, The evolutionary history of calreticulin and calnexin genes in green
plants, Genetica 139 (2011) 255259.
[53] J. Howard, A.A. Hyman, Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end,
Nature 422 (2003) 753758.
[54] S. Khurana, S.P. George, Regulation of cell structure and function by actin-binding
proteins: villins perspective, FEBS Lett. 582 (2008) 21282139.
[55] M. Marsoni, M. Bracale, L. Espen, B. Prinsi, A.S. Negri, C. Vannini, Proteomic analysis
of somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera, Plant Cell Rep. 27 (2008) 347356.
[56] K. Cao, R. Nakajima, H. Meyer, Y. Zheng, The AAA-ATPase Cdc48/p97 regulates spindle disassembly at the end of mitosis, Cell 115 (2003) 355367.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010
10
[57] S. Park, D.M. Rancour, S.Y. Bednarek, In planta analysis of the cell cycle-dependent
localization of AtCDC48A and its critical roles in cell division, expansion, and differentiation, Plant Physiol. 148 (2008) 246258.
[58] H.S. Feiler, T. Desprez, V. Santoni, J. Kronenberger, M. Caboche, J. Traas, The higher
plant Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a functional CDC48 homologue which is highly
expressed in dividing and expanding cells, EMBO J. 14 (1995) 56265637.
[59] P. Zimmermann, L. Hennig, W. Gruissem, Gene-expression analysis and network
discovery using genevestigator, Trends Plant Sci. 10 (2005) 407409.
Please cite this article as: Y. Liu, et al., Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus
(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.spp. baijianlian), J Prot (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.010