Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Research
question/goal
and objectives
Identifies very
essential research
question or goal
and logically breaks
it down, into
specific,
measurable and
realistic objectives
that are very
suggestive of
Identifies clear
essential research
question or goal
and logically breaks
it down into
specific,
measurable
objectives.
Identifies vague
essential research
question or goal
thereby resulting to
logically misaligned
objectives, or
objectives can still
be made more
specific and
measurable.
GRADES
Does Not Meet
Expectations
4.0
- The title is
irrelevant and fails
to inhibit the
SMART (Specific,
Measurable,
Attainable, Realistic
and Timely)
characteristics of a
study.
- The material fails
to provide
necessary
background
relevant for the
study.
- References are
inappropriately and
inaccurately cited.
There is no
essential research
question or goal
identified.
GRADE
Research and or
Design
Methodology
possible research
design.
-Provides a
comprehensively
detailed
explanation of the
scientific
strategy/design to
achieve the
research objectives.
-Proposes methods
that have been
shown in scientific
literature to be
appropriate and
which the
proponents
creatively innovate
in consideration of
time and facility
constraints.
- Describes the
methods in such
comprehensive
detail as if
indicating that the
proponents have
actual working
experience of
implementing the
associated
procedures.
-Provides a
sufficiently detailed
explanation of the
scientific
strategy/design to
achieve the
research objectives.
-Proposes methods
that have been
shown in scientific
literature to be
appropriate and
which can be done
using available
facilities.
- Describes the
methods in such
level of detail that
the proponents
know how to
implement the
associated
procedures.
-Provides
insufficiently
detailed
explanation of the
scientific
strategy/design to
achieve the
research objectives.
-Proposes methods
that have been
shown in scientific
literature to be
appropriate but
cannot be done
using available
facilities.
- Describes the
methods with
several details
missing as if
indicating that the
proponents are not
sure how to
implement the
associated
procedures.
ASPECT 1 AVERAGE
There is no
evidence of
structuring the
tasks and no
breakdown of tasks
into weekly
activities and
specific
deliverables, and
no specified
assignment of tasks
among team
members.
Provides estimates
of the cost but the
estimates are only
partially supported
by clear details of
cost breakdown or
some costs do not
have common
connection to the
planned research
activities.
Provides estimates
of the project cost
but estimates are
not supported by
clear details of cost
breakdown.
reflects creative
budgeting to
minimize the costs.
activities.
ASPECT 2 AVERAGE
Uses effective
formatting and
graphics (e.g.,
figures and tables)
that enhance
Uses formatting
and graphics (e.g.,
figures and tales)
when useful to aid
comprehension.
-Illustrates a limited
awareness of
formal tone;
attempts to use
language,
vocabulary and
techniques but not
successful in
making complex
concepts an ideas
easily
understandable.
-Uses limited
words, phrases and
clauses to link the
major sections of
the text.
Uses some
formatting and
graphics (e.g.,
figures and tables)
that may be
-Illustrates a limited
or inconsistent
tone; uses
imprecise
language,
vocabulary and
limited techniques
to make complex
concepts and ideas
easily
understandable.
-Uses very few, if
any, words,
phrases, and
clauses to link the
major sections of
the text.
Uses limited or
inaccurate
formatting and
graphics (e.g.,
figures and tables)
comprehension.
distracting or
irrelevant.
that impede
comprehension.
ASPECT 3 AVERAGE
(Student 1)
(Student 2)
(Student 3)
The proponents do
not always respond
to the questions
and answers them
with uncertainties.
The proponents
give answers no
longer relevant to
the questions or are
not able to respond
(Student 1)
(Student 2)
(Student 3)
Performance
established laws,
principles and
findings.
The proponents
demonstrate full
confidence and the
speaking style is
especially
appropriate, clear,
audible and well
paced.
to the questions at
all.
The proponents
demonstrate full
confidence and
speaking style is
appropriate. The
voice is audible
enough and the
pace is not good.
The proponents
need improvement
and speaking style
is mediocre. Voice
is not audible and
the pacing is very
poor.
The proponent is
not able to deliver
well.
(Student 1)
(Student 2)
(Student 3)
ASPECT 4 AVERAGE
OVERALL GRADE
Assessed by:
(Signature over Printed Name)
Date: