Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MAGISTRATE(NORTHWEST)ROHINI
DELHI
C.C NO........../2015
PS:Adarsh Nagar
IN THE MATTER OF :
RAVI BHATEJA
APPLICANT
VERSUS
VISHNU KUMAR BHARTIYA
VINITA BHARTIYA
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 3
INDEX OF PAPERS
................................................
SNo.
PARTICULARS
C.F
PAGE No.
...............................................
1.
MEMO OF PARTIES
2.
3.
List of documents.
...............................................
APPLICANT
RAVI BHATEJA
28/45 PUNJABI BAGH
NEW DELHI-110026.
Delhi.
Dated:
THE
MATTER
OF
RAVI BHATEJA
APPLICANT
V/S
VISHNU KUMAR BHARTYA
VINITA BHARTYA
MEMO OF PARTIES
RAVI
BHATEJA
APPLICANT
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 1
2.VINITA BHARTIYA
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 2
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 3
APPLICANT
DATED:
RAVI BHATEJA
DELHI:
IN THE MATTER OF :
RAVI BHATEJA
APPLICANT
VERSUS
1.VISHNU KUMAR BHARTIYA
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 1
2.VINITA BHARTIYA
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 2
PROPOSED ACCUSED NO 3
PS:ADARSH NAGAR
---------------------------------------------APPLICATION
directions
U/S
to
against the
156(3)
the
CrPc.
police
to
respondents and
for
issuing
register
commit them
FIR
to
That
the
complainant
is
resident
of
2.
his
family .
The
complainants
father
and
mother
high
esteem
and
respect
in
the
society.
3.
house
at
24,
Vidalaya
Road,Kewal
Park,
a gang
eye.
Their
matrimonial
relationship
is
accused
varnueable
no
people
and
and
identify
accused
no
some
takes
and
by
shy
and
threats
that
and
who
can
acts
be
of
present
address
of
accused
no
is
had
cheated
taking
his
house
complainants
on
rent
father
through
by
forged
of
among
their
common
themselves
intentions
,leveled
and
fabricating
obscene
communication
which
shop
more
often
and
she
used
her
One
father
day
were
when
at
the
complainant
shop,the
and
accused
his
no.1
house .He
produced several
identity
couple
family
.He
also
told
the
IN-
DL04422730180392J
the
dated
4/01/2011
in
period
of
11
months
and
24
months
are
annexed
herewith
as
PW
Ex.
his election
6
convincing
landlord
.After
that
the
photocopy of
police
verification
form
which
the
form
bearing
the
seal
complainant
aforesaid
has
voter
come
id
is
forged/false/fabricated
to
of
.Later
know
actually
document
PS
which
that
a
was
forged mischievously.
9.
the
accused
no
and
joined
the
Near the
expiry
of duration of lease
no.1
approached
the
as as the
complainants
started
tenancy
occurring
period
as
soon
approached
as
the
expiry
and
by the
two
other
resident
tenant
families
by
families
stopped
paying
and
water)and
bills(electricity
quarreling
with
proceedings
had
complainant's
him
to
father
rent
started
therefore
be
initiated
against
and
legal
by
them
the
thereby
complainant and
his family
was
no
also
worked
in
tend-um
with
and
misrepresented
and
facts
an
officer
and
of
promoted
court
falsehood
society resides
unbecoming
of
his
whose conduct
profession.
In-spite
is
of
accused
made
the
statements
both
in
8
in-spite
of
knowing
that
they
are
Also
mentioned
is
in
the
would be if
complaint
the
which is
date
two months
plan
was
.So a well
executed
by
accused
persons.
11.
It
is
submitted
that
threatened
complainant
to
false and
frivolous criminal
accused
implicate
no
him
cases if
2
in
they
and
insulting
.The prominent
persistent
accused
no.1
psychological
harassment
&
trauma
and
threats
2,complainant
and
he
had
Due
by
suffered
to
be
applicant
was forced to
was
further
his
prevented
from
attending
to
After filing
fear
of
being
dispossessed
from
the
property/third party .
12.
allegation
the
gang
of
accused
bringing
reality
intention
was
plaintiff(only
their
dishonest
.The
underlying
just
only
child)so
to
as
intentions
motive
and
implicate
the
to
make
him
property
extort money
of
complainant
or any
father
valuable favor
grab
or
to
thereby
is
dated
relevant
form)
documents(police
submitted
by
the
accused
verification
no
shows
10
misconceived
and
misappropriated
to
lawful
authorities
.In
complaint
the
accused
states
he
that
the
is
the
past
10
years
but
in
police
landlord
hilarious
in
that
continue living
they
can
take
his
house
couple
with
some
wants
.Its
to
stick
an adversary
other
quiet
premises
to
whereas
on
rent
money
to
continue
to
stick
with
of
deliberate
misrepresentation
of
,intimidation
Complainant's
father
&
restraining
(landlord)
and
the
also
11
father
who
started
first
The
conduct
of
the
accused
persons
by
the
fabrication
identity documents
and
of
forged
govt
, conduct of harassment
intimidation
conduct
of
disrespect
judiciary
.It
is
also
very
humbly
litigation
which
was
filed
during
by
the
all false
appearance
upon
the
lordship
on
made
submission
premises
date
insistence
23/05/2014
to
vacate
of
his
the
accused
the
demised
submission is PEx no
15.
bring
about
police
action
on
the
ka kya
hoga.Accused no
lawyer
and
criminal law
aware
of
new
amendment act
provisions
of
2014, wherein
oral
lady
testimony
certain
acts
opportunity
NIRBHAYA
of
.The
created
incident
complaining
exploitation
because
also
of
pin
of
of
the
unfortunate
points
on
to
day
13
it's
box
installed
premises Exbit no
within
the
gated
..........It is imperative
complainants
family
but/also
new
meters
this
he
informed
NDPL
property
and
made
circumstantial
injury
and
otherwise
loss
to
neither
the
landlord
interested
in
who
was
extending
as
he
submitted
to
the
court
and
what
that
they
are
and
clearly
admitting
to
being
perpetrator
to
thereafter
intending
to
implicate
father
&
later
on
tried
to
19.
It
is
also
submitted
that
the
him
criminal
complaint
case
no
is
their
lawyer
against
him
prosecuting
non
ravi
cognizable
(complainant
here)
offenses(compoundable
for
).Mo
any
injury
through
his
legal
powers
aided
by
the
environment
of
defraud
and
harass
the
authorities
and
16
complainant for
some unjust
gain. They
had
which
they intend
Through
being
their
continued
conduct
undermined the
till
they
value and
this
have
date.
seriously
importance of
not
whole.
Moreover
it
is
pertinent
to
bomb
blasts
and
terror
activities
has
02/03/2015,
the
accused
no
has
again
complainant
and
no
action
was
taken
against him .
22.
The
cause
of
action
also
arises
in
another
offending
and
incriminatory
which
his
parents
were
summoned
by
in
this
specific
communication
on
dated13/07/2014
restrained
then made
fostering
jealousy
towards
HC
him
are
themselves
writing
and
posting
are
in
provocation
one
way
through
or
the
anonymous
another
by
communication
haven't
causing
peaceful
given
hindrances
enjoyment
up
and
of
on
their
efforts
disturbances
the
property
of
in
the
by
the
property
accused
and
no
provoke
the
get
settled
and
his
elsewhere
wife
complainant
always
by
The
try
to
making
some
is totally
unbecoming of
his
humbly submitted
government
documents
having
security
real
else
on
situation
reel
and
is
portraying
that
is
something
unbecoming
the
Mo
perpetrated
rover
by
all
accused
these
no
offenses
and
were
at
the
deliberately
fabricated
and
tendered
to
it can
be easily
derived
family
in
shroud
under
which
offenses
against
state. It
posing themselves as a
society
is
accused
both
the
is submitted
just
only
persons
commit
citizens
&
that such
the
incidents
father
is
owing
this
property
photocopy
given
by
accused
father and
no
for
is
registration
forged/false
number
of
the
document
above
.The
mentioned
Navalgarh
no
and
Rajasthan
2
are
of
which
the
natives/aborigines.
of
accused
no
name/identity.
is
Ex.No.
also
in
.......
different
voter
list
Also
accused
signatures
of
no
managed
complainant
to
father
get
on
vineeta. Hence
deception played
on
multiple
identities
to
government
authorities
for
achieving
their
seasoned
criminals.
Even
the
that
terrorists
NIA
has
of terror
retort
to
acquire
enforcement
heinous
crimes
agencies
like
bomb
for
perpetrating
blasts
&
hawala
activities.
28.
toll
Mo
rover
it
is
also
21
and
moreover
prejudicial
not
such
just
individual(complainant)
but
acts
are
to
to
one
the
whole
society.
29.
Also
(Copy enclosed as
an
of
the
same
was
reply
......
to
initially
the
same
PEx.No.
satisfactory so
No reply
received
Which
on
date
was
non
sent on ..PEx.No.
Police.
other remedy
the
Therefore
but to seek
applicant
has
no
intervention of
22
PRAYER:
It
prayed
is,
that
therefore,
Honorable
most
court
respectfully
may
kindly
be
Applicant/complainant
Delhi:
Dated:
Ravi Bhateja
23
APPLICANT
V/S
1.VISHNU KUMAR BHARTYA
PROPOSED ACCUSED 1
2.VINITA BHARTYA
PROPOSED ACCUSED 2
PROPOSED ACCUSED 3
AFFIDAVIATE
1.I
Bagh
,New
Delhi-
the
above
and
matter
aware
of
the
facts
references
from
whatever
legal
24
4.That
have
application
and
read
the
the
same
accompanying
have
also
been
understood by me.
5.That
the
contents
of
accompanying
the
contents
of
accompanying
APPLICANT
RAVI BHATEJA
VERIFICATION :Verified
that
the
contents
of
and
nothing
material
has
been
concealed therefrom.
APPLICANT
Verified at Delhi
DELHI:
DATED:
RAVI BHATEJA
25
26