CONTENTS

Preface............................................................................................ iii

Chapter One A Lesson in Evil ......................................... 1

Chapter Two Rabin Won’t Go Away..................... 15

Chapter Three Internal Crimes........................................ 77

Chapter Four Foreign Atrocities ................................ 117

Chapter Five A Monster Loose in Israel ......... 161

Chapter Trips Before and After

Six
September 11 ...................................................................... 185

Chapter Seven The War Is On....................................... 203

Chapter 8 How Bad Are the Peacemakers? 291

Appendix Book Reviews .................................................. 299

i
 PREFACE
The year 2001 saw a turnaround. Israel took Barry Chamish’s
radical political writings seriously. Very seriously indeed. The
turning point came on October 29 at the Windmill Hotel in
Jerusalem. There, 200 people gathered for the second conference
on the Truth Behind the Rabin Assassination. Six years before,
when I insisted Yigal Amir could not have murdered Yitzhak
Rabin, I had zero support in the country. But that night I wasn't the
only one speaking. There was the former chairman of the Israeli
Chartered Accountants Association, Yaacov Verker. He was
followed by the Head of Vascular Surgery at Kaplan Hospital, Dr.
David Khen. Then came the distinguished Bar Ilan University
professor, Dr. Hillel Weiss. The equally distinguished professor of
genetics from Ben Gurion University, Dr. Arieh Zaritsky, chaired
the conference. No, I wasn’t alone anymore.
A few months later, the nation's largest circulation newspaper
Yediot Ahronot published a six page cover story in its weekend
magazine about the phenomenon of highly respected doctors and
professors researching the Rabin murder and supporting my once
derided conclusions.
My book Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin? has sold over 30,000
copies in five languages in Israel. It is one of the leading sellers of
the past decade. When once only the religious Right invited me to
speak, now the entire political spectrum, including kibbutzim and
the far left media, book me for lectures. And the disturbances of
the past are a fading memory; all audiences are polite and
respectful.
I speak primarily about the Rabin assassination because Rabin
himself still awaits justice; as does half the country which was
falsely implicated in his death. But to me Rabin is really just the key
to opening the whole box of horrors that has been inflicted on
Israel. I’m now speaking of the cabal of hidden American and
European rulers out to get Israel, and corrupting our leaders to get
their way. Such talk was unacceptable even two years ago, but now
Israelis are willing to try and understand that what is happening to
their country is the result of a deep, international conspiracy of evil.
iii
 In May 2001, my previous book, The Last Days of Israel, was
published in Hebrew. For the first time, I not only named Rabin's
murderers, but spelled out the plan for global domination called the
New World Order. Already in its second printing and heading for
lots more, the most common reaction among its Israeli readers is,
“I knew it”. Israelis know the truth when it is presented to them,
but the mainstream media is utterly controlled by the ruling
establishment, and any truth that would threaten our corrupted
leaders is censored out.
So I created my own media utilizing a combination of the
Internet, my books and lectures and the sale of those books at
rallies and fairs throughout the country. And the strategy is having a
profound effect. Look at the proof:
Last November, on the anniversary of Yitzhak Rabin’s murder, all
three of Israel’s big newspapers, as well as TV news, ignored the fact
that much of the country no longer believes the government’s version
of the murder. But literally every major religious and conservative
newspaper devoted huge articles on the unanswered questions and
likely truth of the assassination. These outlets included Makor Rishon,
Hatsofe, Yated Neeman, Hamodia, and Hashavuah.
Then the bombshell of October 26: The Voice of Israel
conducted a survey, the results of which were broadcast on the
popular Dahlia Yairi radio show. 29% of Israelis believe Rabin was
murdered in a conspiracy, with an equal number unsure. Half of
Israel believe or suspect Rabin was murdered in a political
conspiracy. It took six years, but my work had swayed the nation.
It will take just as long, if not much longer, to persuade my
people of the wider plot against us all. The Last Days of Israel was the
first volley in the battle for a truth that appears too fantastic to be
possible. This new book spells out in far greater detail the
manipulations and machinations of those who hate Israel and seek
our demise. When reading it, every now and then remember that
my previous works have all been proven uncannily correct.
The information within is the result of brave people supplying
me with evidence. Not surprisingly, few wish to be identified. So
let’s anonymously thank the man who gave me the 2000 pages of
sensitive Rabin murder documentation in October 2001, as well as
the lady from Toronto following the covert diplomacy of Europe,
iv
and especially the Vatican. The same heartfelt appreciation goes to
everyone who found the courage to get the facts into my hands.
All my readers inspire me, none more so than Martha Stephens,
who has made this work a reality. David Perkins had the ideas and
wherewithal to make my books actual products. The Last Days of
Israel would not have been published without the editing talents of
Menachem Bloch and the publishing skills of Israel Cohen. The
Greenfield family broke open the gates of truth with their Hebrew
and Russian publications of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin?. Elazar
Brandt edits brilliantly and makes sense of my musings. Joel
Bainerman is my invaluable number one asset. Meir Meshulum is
spreading my proofs on the Hebrew internet. Yaacov Verker and
Arye Gallin have done more than any two people in their pursuit of
justice for Rabin and the Jewish people. Adir Zik was there from
the beginning. And Franco Levi is the one who woke up Italy.

Barry Chamish
Modiin, Israel

v
 CHAPTER ONE
A LESSON IN EVIL

EXPELLING THE SETTLERS

One of the secret clauses of Oslo, negotiated by the likes of Uri
Savir, Yossi Beilin and Shimon Peres, was a promise to the PLO to
hand over all of Judea, Samaria and Gaza to them. That meant
expelling the Jewish residents, the so-called settlers, from their
homes. The means agreed to was to spread total demoralization by
murdering the political and spiritual leaders of the Jewish
community there. This required cooperation between the PLO and
a select group of Shabak officers. This cooperation has not ended.
The demoralization by murder of admired leaders such as
Binyamin Kahane has not had the desired effect, and may even
have strengthened the resolve of many in the settler community. So
a far more insidious campaign was initiated, and it involves
murdering members of families who had recently suffered tragic
losses.
The murder of Assaf Herskovitz, in the exact ambush spot
where Binyamin Kahane’s vehicle was riddled with 62 bullets last
October, is a case in point. Assaf’s father was shot dead barely two
months earlier while driving his car near Efrat. His son died the
same way. One brother remained to say Kaddish over his father and
sibling. The enormous disaster that befell the Herskovitz family has
been a huge blow to the morale of their community, Ofra... as it
was planned to be.
It is no different than the heartbreaking case of the 14 year old
son of Sheri Mandel, an American immigrant living in Tekoa. He
took a short hike from his home with a friend, they were set upon
by Arabs who tied them up and bludgeoned them to death,
cracking open their skulls with rocks. After delighting in the
screams of the boys as each rock opened more of their brains, the
murderers took further pleasure in the sadistic coup de grace of
ripping the bodies apart with knives.

1
 Later that same night, I received news not yet reported in the
Israeli media. Sheri Mandel’s home was sniped at, with a bullet
entering the bedroom of her nine year old daughter. Had she been
in the room, she would have joined the list of double murders.
Sheri took the hint and briefly abandoned her home in Tekoa. She
will likely not be the last. Her family was targeted for demoralizing
tragedy and others will follow.
The Mizrahi family is another example. Idit, aged 21, was shot
dead while driving past the settlement of Michmash. Her brother
died in combat previously. Only one son survives. At Idit’s funeral
an unexpected eulogist offered to make peace with Arafat on his
terms. The demoralization continues. The methods are heartless
and ghastly. Those behind them will stop at no atrocity in their war
against a Jewish presence in the land of their forefathers.
Take the example of 14 year old Amihai Yifrah. He and three
buddies were playing in the youth recreation center of Netzer
Hazani in the Gaza Strip, when a PLO mortar shell fell on them.
Three weeks later Amihai was released from hospital and returned
home. A mortar shell landed on that home the next day.
This was no accident. Call an actuarial statistician and ask him to
calculate the likelihood that these dual tragedies are random flukes.
Then reach a horrible realization that the Arab killers had to have
had exact intelligence about the locations of their victims and they
were in no position to gather it. Only Israeli intelligence fed to
them could have assured the desired, bloody effect.
We are observing raw evil in Judea and Samaria, so raw that
even sniping a 10 month old Hebron baby in her mother’s arms is
considered a legitimate operation. This highly trained murderer was
likely a graduate of CIA sniper training received in Virginia based
on the recommendations of the CIA’s then-Middle East go-
between, George Tenet.
This team of snipers has been coordinating its activities with
their counterparts in the Israeli General Services (Shin Bet or
Shabak). They have been under order from Shimon Peres since the
summer of 1993. Their existence was a concept conceived by Peres’
deputy, Yossi Beilin.
And Arafat is playing his role despite the deliberate media leaks
that he has lost control of his forces and senses. He has survived all
2
these years by obeying. He was ordered to start the next Middle
East War by his foreign handlers, and he is doing their dirty work
to their satisfaction. Those who insist on knowing who the masters
are might read my books; Traitors and Carpetbaggers in the Promised
Land, Israel Betrayed or The Last Days of Israel. Within I name the
foreigners who foisted a phony peace process on Israel that they
knew would lead to war by the true millennium. And I include
plenty of space on how the international media would be recruited
to spread the big lies against Israel once the conflagration began.
Readers will find that very few of my previous predictions have
proved wrong.
Now the conflagration is on and the media has lost all shame in
its lying reportage from Israel. Arafat is backing Israel into a corner
where it must go to war against him to survive. The world is now
primed to accept PLO land claims as legitimate. A totally
demoralized and satanized Jewish community in Judea, Samaria and
Gaza will put up little resistance to the complete dissolution of their
homes and their lives. And they still refuse to understand what is
being done to them.
I prefer to space out my reports, but I have been bombarded
with requests to verify my report of a CIA-PLO-Israeli hit squad
charged with eliminating Jewish leaders of Judea, Samaria and Gaza
and spreading mass demoralization as a prelude to removing the
“settlers” from their homes.
Let us begin with George Tenet, appointed during Peres’ reign
by CIA head John Deutsch to be his liaison between Israel and the
PLO. Now check out this ridiculously underlooked item that
appeared throughout the Israeli media. Then Prime Minister
Shimon Peres and the CIA’s resident spy, George Tenet, had come
to a little agreement: Peres assented to the PLO sending 40
“policemen” for an advanced CIA marksmanship course in
Virginia.
Once in old Virginee, the best snipers, especially those with the
loosest attitude towards murder, became a handpicked hit squad.
Their assignments would be chosen by the CIA and a tiny, nearly
independent cell of the Israeli General Security Services or Shabak.
The cell would be limited to a handful of officers loyal to the very
far left of the Israeli political spectrum. These officers had spent
3
most of the decade organizing often deadly sting operations against
the religious Right, and were responsible for setting up Yigal Amir
for the murder of Yitzhak Rabin, Dr. Baruch Goldstein for a
massacre in Hebron, the Kahalani brothers Eitan and Yehodidya
for a planned massacre they knew nothing about, and much more.
These officers preferred to let PLO Security Chief Jibril
Rajoub’s murderers carry out most of the killing. All they had to do
was supply the locations of the victims to the Arabs and they would
take care of the dirty business. One indication of the ties between
the two secret services was leaked to a religious newspaper Kol
Hashavuah by a “high-ranking government official.” He claimed that
after Rabin’s bodyguard Yoav Kuriel threatened to tell the truth of
Rabin’s assassination, Shabak chief Carmi Gillon ordered him
permanently hushed up. He could not find an assassin under his
command willing to murder a friend, so he had Rajoub’s men
pump seven bullets into his chest. All he did was supply the
location.
Let’s take a moment’s breather. So far, published material has
been the primary source of data. That Peres would be treacherous
enough to send PLO thugs to the US for CIA advanced sniper
training was confirmed many times over by the Israeli media. Of
course, they believed these snipers, and their brand new up to the
minute, state-of-the-art CIA equipment, would be used to further
peace because they believed Peres when he explained that the
snipers would be aiming only at Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists.
As for the Kuriel report in Kol Hashavuah, I have met the
newspaper publisher Asher Zuckerman on several occasions and
found him to be most responsible. Further, his reports (largely
from Haredi civil servants working within the system at day jobs)
have been reliable. One example stands out—the twice published
claims that Rabin’s surgeons were suffering from unexplained
debilitating diseases. Both stories were later confirmed to me at
lectures by colleagues of the doctors.
I will accept Zuckerman’s professionalism as verification of the
story and now do the same with another journalist, Steve Rodan. In
1994, he was the security affairs reporter for the Jerusalem Post.
Today, he writes for a variety of military and intelligence journals,
including Jane’s.
4
 At the time, I was co-editor of an intelligence newsletter, Inside
Israel. I received a call from a source who said he possessed
intercepted transmissions from the Oslo “peace” negotiations and
they were both genuine and terrifying. I told my partner about the
call and we met the caller in the lobby of the Jerusalem Hilton.
The caller was representing “an employee of a government
ministry”. This turned out to be the truth. I met the “employee” at
his office and later saw his picture in the papers on occasion.
The caller handed me reams of paper, which I read, and
concluded that I didn’t believe it, at least not the part about
murdering settler leaders to rid the territories of unwanted Jews.
The caller answered, “We gave these documents to Steve Rodan.
The Post has been checking the story out for three months. I want
you to publish the stuff the Post won’t touch.” I replied that I’d
have to do my own checking.
I called Rodan and he confirmed the veracity of the story. The
Post HAD been checking for three months. The leak was who he
said he was and his facts were accurate. A few days later Rodan’s
story appeared on the front page of the Post. It maintained that the
secret clauses of the Oslo Accord, negotiated by Yossi Beilin, call
for Israel returning to its pre-’67 lines. The settlers would have to
go.
The government Foreign Ministry lost its composure and
cancelled all its subscriptions worldwide to the Post. This cost the
paper $50,000 but they did not recant the story and no one sued
them. My informant had passed enough tests for us, and we
decided to run as our lead story in the next issue of Inside Israel,
“The Secret Clauses of Oslo.” It has since been reprinted in full in
my book Traitors and Carpetbaggers in the Promised Land.
The documents the Post chickened out of publishing accuse
Yossi Beilin, who at the time was Shimon Peres’ parliamentary
deputy, of approving the following plan with the PLO’s Abu
Mazen:
“The Foreign Ministry program for Israel’s future is outlined in a
document authored by Beilin himself called, ‘The Palestine Interim Self-
Government Agreement (PISGA). The PISGA’s main points are that the
ultimate aims of the peace process are to roll back Israel’s territory to the
1949 borders; to create a Palestinian ‘entity’ which, after an interim

5
 period, will be granted statehood; and to permit the right of return for any
Palestinian to the new nation...
“The Beilin plan calls for the removal of all Jews from beyond the Green
Line. Before such a change can be implemented, opposition from the
settlers of the Administered Territories is to be eliminated. Beilin is well
aware that tens of thousands of territorial Jews will fight his program; and
they will have broad support throughout the country. Thus, if they are to
be removed, he decided it would have to be in stages.
“Stage one calls for the disarming of the settlers...Once they become less
able to defend themselves, army presence on the roads leading to their
homes will be greatly diminished, leading to heavy terrorist casualties
along with feelings of fear and helplessness. This will cause the more
passive residents to panic, sell their homes and flee. With the resulting
crash in housing prices, the government will offer to buy up homes at
current market price...
“To facilitate this need, Beilin requested and received a significant
expansion of army intelligence (Aman), in order to supply the Shabak
with information required for total suppression of opposition voices...”
And onward this sick program continues through a media
campaign aimed at turning the settlers into monsters, and the
shutting down of voices of opposition. The plan was unleashed in
February of 1994, when three political figures were attacked:
Miriam Lapid, number four of the Moledet list lost her husband
and son to snipers. She has since moved back to pre-67 Israel.
Kahane Chai spokesman David Axelrod survived a knife attack.
And NRP head Chaim Druckman survived a sniper ambush but his
driver was killed. Shortly after, Dr. Baruch Goldstein was lured into
the Cave of the Patriarchs as the fall guy for a massacre of over fifty
Arabs.
This is not hip-shooting on my part. I read the eye-witness
testimonies of the massacre and no one, Jew or Arab, saw a lone
shooter. And that’s just for starts. Further details are in my book
Israel Betrayed.
And yet with all the carnage, the program devised by the long-
blackmailed homosexual Yossi Beilin hasn’t worked. So recently,
another stage has been added, increasing the demoralizing effect of
each hit via the murder of settlers who had recently suffered a
similar murder, horrid torture of victims, total heartlessness, going
as far as shooting a baby from her mother’s arms.
With the hope of stanching the agony, I will identify members
of the hit squad, right to the top, and that is where I will lose most
6
of the victims of this bloodletting because it will appear TOO
conspiratorial.

THE YESHA HIT SQUAD

The current hit squad is a continuation in policy of the previous
one, the one Shabak Chief Carmi Gillon ran, with Avishai Raviv the
big-time agent provocateur who got caught. It is fear of exposing
the previous hit squad that is the primary force behind the endless
delays of Raviv’s trial. Since Gillon ran the first manifestation of the
squad, could he still be directing operations? After all, he was fired
from the Shabak. I am reliably told that if this were the case, then
the squad would be run out of the Peres Center for Peace. That, I
am informed, is far from impossible.
Eli Barak, who operated the dirty tricks squad, which employed
the likes of Raviv, is still in the Shabak and as violent and loony as
ever. In short, he’s still on the squad.
And it’s been suggested to me that another Shabak agent, G.
Ben Ami is privy to the secrets of the Gillon squad, strong evidence
of an inside role. (See “Gagging on the Protocols” from The Last
Days of Israel.
The Beilin plan calls for cooperation with military intelligence
(Aman). Three such squad men are, most likely:
• Brigadier General (Ret.) Yisrael Blumenthal. He
commanded numerous sting operations on behalf of
the first squad, including the framing of 17 members of
an underground that didn’t exist and the similar
framing of the Kahalani brothers for a massacre they
had no intention of committing.
• Col. Shlomo Mofaz. Brother of the IDF’s current
Chief-of-Staff. An intelligence officer definitely seen
meeting Baruch Goldstein in Hebron the day before
the massacre. Was recently discovered on a PLO hit
squad target list.
• Shlomo Edelstein. A communications officer, who
coordinated the Hebron massacre operation at the
most, or, at the least lied non-stop to the government
commission of inquiry into the massacre. It is
7
 indisputable that, against regulations, he had his IDF
Jeep pick up Goldstein and take him to “pray” at the
Cave of the Patriarchs. Again, that’s just starters.
These are the highest ranking officers of the squad, but they let
others do the killing and their identities are the most protected. The
head of the PLO snipers can only be Jibril Rajoub chief of PLO
security and police. No one else would be entrusted with such a
squad. And his liaison to the Israelis is former Shabak deputy chief,
Yossi Ginosar. Ginosar is Rajoub’s personal messenger to Peres,
and shares with Jibril numerous business interests, including
undeclared shares of the once profitable Jericho casino.
Of members of the squad who actually pull the trigger, we know
of one for certain. He is Yoram Rubin. Three days before Rabin’s
last night alive, his regular bodyguard, Tzahi, was sent abroad on a
superfluous assignment. He was replaced by Rubin, who shot
Rabin three times and this is beyond a shadow of a doubt. All the
proof necessary is found my book Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin?
Within that book is ample evidence that Shimon Peres organized
the Rabin murder. Those who have been following my work will
not want me to recite the proofs again, and few doubt them by now
anyway.
But now here comes the part these people have the most trouble
with. For years I’ve been rationally explaining that a 3800 member
think tank in Manhattan called the Council on Foreign Relations is
out to get Israel. I sent their 1997 Middle East Task Force Report far
and wide and still the victims of the hit squads just don’t get it. The
CFR is powerful; no Secretary-of-State in memory has not been a
member and no president is unallied to them. And we know by this
report that they want the settlers gone from their homes and Israel
returned to its 1948 borders.
I have before me this year’s CFR members list. Recall that CIA
chief John Deutsch appointed George Tenet to be his personal
Israel/PA liaison. We look at the list and between I.M. Destler and
Phillip J. Deutch, we find John Deutsch. And who follows Dina
Simone Temple-Raston but George J. Tenet, the one and only
agent who put together the PLO’s hit squad with Shimon Peres’
approval.

8
 Yes, the CIA does the CFR’s bidding and in Israel’s case
through their loyal members John Deutsch and George J. Tenet.
And they are doing in Judea, Samaria and Gaza what they do
everywhere. Here’s a hint from the President’s Intelligence
Oversight Board (1996), investigating CIA operations in
Guatemala:
“In the course of our review, we found that several CIA assets were
credibly alleged to have ordered, planned, or participated in serious
human rights violations such as assassination, extra-judicial execution,
torture or kidnapping while they were assets—and that the CIA’s
Directorate of Operations headquarters was aware at the time of the
allegations.
“...a number of the station’s liaison contacts—Guatemalan officials with
whom the station worked in an official capacity—were also alleged to
have been involved in human rights abuses or in covering them up.”
Now we have the CIA’s assets and liaisons, the PLO,
assassinating, executing, kidnapping and torturing just like in
Central America. And with the approval of a few Jews in power,
utterly devoid of morality.
Nothing could be clearer. The campaign of violence aimed at
removing the settlers is deliberate. CIA-trained hit squads are
roaming the land. The goals of the Oslo peacemakers will not be
thwarted no matter how many settlers are in the way.

MAYBE IT’S TIME TO LISTEN

From Arutz Sheva News:
1. AT LEAST TWO DEAD IN ESCALATED WAVE OF PA
ATTACKS TODAY
“Blood mixes with blood” [Hosea 4,2]. Residents of the Gush Etzion city
of Efrat, south of Jerusalem, set off this afternoon for the funeral of this
morning’s terror victim—and themselves fell victims to murderous
terrorist fire. The security officer of the Shomron Regional Council, Gilad
Zar, was murdered this morning by Arafat’s Fatah agents. Zar was
pronounced dead on the scene after Arabs shot two rounds of fire at his
car on the southern Shechem bypass road, between Kedumim and
Yitzhar. Some forty bullet casings were found near the car. The attack
occurred near the Arab village of Kafr Jit, and the killers apparently
escaped into Shechem. Although Zar traveled in a clearly recognizable
security vehicle, Brig.-Gen. Benny Ganz, Commander of IDF forces in
Judea and Samaria, says there is no sign that the terrorists had specifically
targeted him.

9
 The victim, Gilad Zar, had been seriously wounded in a similar attack just
over two months ago. A resident of Itamar, he leaves behind eight
children. His father, Moshe Zar, is one of the pioneer settlers of the
Shomron.
I will not detail my previous two posts “Expelling the Settlers”,
and “The Yesha Hit Squad”. Those who read them know I
reported the existence of a CIA-trained hit squad run by PLO
police chief Jibril Rajoub in coordination with the Israeli “peace”
team formed by Yossi Beilin and Shimon Peres. You are aware of
the charge that this death squad was initially created to assassinate
Yesha leaders, and is now compounding the pain by murdering
people who had suffered recent attacks against them or their
families. The goal is the total demoralization of the settler
movement, to be followed by the complete dismantling of Jewish
homes in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. The IDF is reducing its
presence along the roads of Yesha to facilitate the hits, and the
murderers of the squad will never be caught in the act or after. The
atrocities will be covered up by the local and international media,
ultimately coordinated by the Manhattan think tank, the Council on
Foreign Relations.
That’s a summary of the claims. What does it take to wake the
victims up to the fact that this is the reality of their situation?
Gilad Zar was shot two months ago and finished off by the hit
squad today. The target was chosen for ultimate demoralization; if
the Shomron District security chief could be attacked twice with
impunity, then nobody is safe. One more Yesha leader bit the dust,
and the army commander of Judea and Samaria denies he was
chosen for assassination.
Well he was! The professionally trained hit team pumped over
40 bullets into his car and then approached the vehicle and made
sure their quarry was dead by blasting away his head. That is not
random terrorism; this is cold-blooded murder. And without
accurate intelligence about Zar’s movements from the Israeli side
of the death squad, it could not have happened!
Now ponder those facts before absorbing the whole picture.
Take your time. Now hopefully, you’re ready for the rest of the
facts.

10
 Just a few days ago, the weekly newspaper Makor Rishon ran an
article about the tank shelling of Jibril Rajoub’s house. The report
insisted that the shelling was a deliberate exercise aimed at restoring
Rajoub’s reputation among the Palestinian people starting to resent
his close ties to the Israeli intelligence agencies, specifically the Shin
Bet and Aman, the country’s internal and military intelligence
forces. Note that after today’s attacks, a leaflet distributed by the
“independent” militias, the Tanzim, announced that they were
taking the law out of Rajoub’s hands. This is another deception.
The CIA-trained snipers of the Tanzim are working hand in hand
with Rajoub, who is working hand in hand with the Israeli
intelligence officers plotting the final demise of the Jewish
population of Yesha.
The same issue of Makor Rishon had within, another exposé, this
time by Amnon Lord. He detailed how the international media
were being intimidated by their own to misreport the PLO’s
atrocities, both against Jews and their own people. He cited the case
of a USA Today reporter, Matthew Kalman, who exposed the
PLO’s deliberate policy of having children killed in clashes in all its
gory glory. He was fingered to the PLO by the ABC News bureau
chief, thus forcing him to move elsewhere or suffer the
consequences. Another bureau named by Lord is Reuters, run in
Gaza by two PLO-paid hacks.
Amidst the carnage, a story was lost. Three journalists,
American, British and Arab were kidnapped in the Gaza Strip and
released three hours later after reaching an accommodation with
their kidnappers. I now open my latest Council on Foreign Relations
Annual Report and turn to page 92. The first name on the list of
Corporate Members is ABC, Inc.
That’s a little taste of how the foreign media is kept in line. Now
here’s a taste of the Israeli media participation in the destruction of
Yesha. At 7:30 PM, the government-owned Channel One television
station had a discussion group analyzing the day’s events. And who
was the dominant speaker but Moti Kirschenbaum, former head of
the very same station? He insisted that the Yesha communities
could not be protected and in a matter of months, they would be all
but emptied.

11
 Shall we recall what Moti Kirschenbaum was up to from 1993
until the Rabin murder? He was approving phony news reports of
the activities of a Shabak front group called Eyal, the same
organization that the Rabin murder patsy Yigal Amir hung out
with. And he was busy turning the Shabak provocateur Avishai
Raviv into a typical Yesha extremist settler leader with his staged
reports on deadly training camps and initiation ceremonies.
And instead of standing trial for incredible abuse of his position,
he is on TV tonight scaring the settlers from their homes. And
what are the victims of Kirschenbaum and the Peres-Beilin peace
team doing about it? Why they’re blaming the IDF for their laxness
and Sharon for his cease-fire. Unbelievably, they still believe that
CFR-corrupted Sharon and the army are interested in protecting
them!
Well, they had better get that notion out of their heads and start
protecting themselves. They can start by properly patrolling their
own roads because no one else is going to.
And the blindness travels far. The pro-settler newspaper, the
Jewish Voice and Opinion of New Jersey ran a long article declaring
that, at last with Bush, they have a friend in the White House. The
editor has been long informed of the anti-Israel plot of the CFR.
She has been told that the Bush family is a founder of the CFR,
that Powell, Cheney, and literally everyone else close to Bush is a
member of the CFR. And that Bush’s closest Middle East advisors
are two Jewish CFR members who totally side with the Arabs on all
issues, Richard Haass and Daniel Kurtzer. All the editor had to do
was look at the yearbook. Kurtzer’s name is found on page 150,
following James R. Kurth and Haass, is on page 148 preceding
Inmaculada Habsburg, of European royalty.
We now know the CFR’s stated policy is Israel’s return to 1948
borders with a divided Jerusalem as its half-capital. So why isn’t this
editor protesting the dual allegiance of Israel’s new American
ambassador to Tel Aviv, Kurtzer? Could it be because ALL heads
of the big American Jewish organizations, be they Bronfman,
Lauder, Seigman are loyal CFR members? This week Morton
Zuckerman was appointed King of the American Jews by a council
of 50 kingmakers. We turn to page 159 of the CFR Annual Report.

12
Preceding Charles J. Zwick is none other than Mortimor B.
Zuckerman.
So let’s do some figuring out. The new American Ambassador
to Israel is CFR. The President’s closest Middle East advisor, Haass
is CFR. His Secretary of State Powell is CFR. Lest there be any
complaints, the president of the leading American Jewish
organization, the umbrella group covering all other major
organizations, is Zuckerman, CFR.
There are 3800 members of the CFR. The CFR’s written and
stated policy calls for the annihilation of Yesha. The head of the
CIA, and its Israeli/PA spy George Tenet, belong to the CFR. In
1996, Tenet and Shimon Peres approved the sending of 40 PLO
“policemen” for advanced CIA sniper training in Virginia. These
“cops” were trained in the arts of marksmanship, drive-by
shootings, urban warfare; the whole CIA course in the destruction
of nations from within. They are making their instructors back in
old Virginee very proud today.
Of course, they would be nothing without those officers, PLO
and Israeli, supplying them with precise intelligence about the
victim’s location and movements, unimpeachable escape routes and
the knowledge that they will never face justice for their bloodshed.
The families and neighbors of the fallen, I fear, will react by
organizing still another mass demonstration demanding that the
army and government protect them. They will beg the IDF to
attack the PLO in strength and put an end to the bloodletting. And,
of course, they will be wasting their time in this futile belief that
their country is a democracy.
There is one chance and one chance only, to save Yesha—get
the whole “peace” team removed from office and society by
exposing their ivolvment in the Rabin murder. They bungled the
assassination, left way too much indisputable evidence behind, and
are finished if justice is pursued. That upcoming wasted
demonstration demanding protection would be a great deal more
effective if it was turned into a mass rally outside the Attorney
General’s office demanding a reinvestigation of the Rabin
assassination.

13
 CHAPTER TWO
RABIN WON’T GO AWAY

THEY’RE TALKING
I ask my readers, in this case, not to inquire who my sources are.
I will be using deceptions to hide their identities.

The Evolution of Raviv

Source 1: We wish you had made it clearer that the Shabak is not a
monolith, it’s compartmentalized. You are taking down a lot of silent
heroes who don’t deserve to be associated with the dirty tricks
department. We wish you understood the kind of heroism taking place in
the service by young men whose committed duty is to prevent mass
murder in the country. They’re story should be told too. If the public
knew the filthy job they were doing and what daily dealings with vile
scum terrorists does to their permanent life’s perspective, the damage that
is about to be exposed publicly could be minimized.
You don’t know it but you’re on the edge of being proven right about
many of your claims. That’s going to happen with or without our help.
We’re just speeding up the process. We took the decision to talk to you
because things have gone too far. Even you don’t know how serious
matters really are.
We’ll tell you some things we know and they’ll know it had to come from
inside. We’ll stop short of naming certain names that could get you, or us,
killed.
Let’s start with Avishai Raviv. You didn’t get the whole story. You don’t
understand how things got out of hand. And you don’t know what he was
doing before there was an Oslo Accord. Start with 1992: His assignment
was to destroy the Tekhiya Party, the most committed Knesset
representative of the settlers. The plan worked like this. He had spent five
years infiltrating far right wing groups and now he was ordered to unite
them into one party which would draw away enough votes to annihilate
Tekhiya but not enough to actually sit in the Knesset.
He asked the Kach people to join his movement, but they turned him
down flat. However Gershon Salomon’s Temple Mount Faithful initially
accepted his proposal. Salomon was going to head the list and Raviv
began politicking for him. But Salomon soon suspected Raviv’s motive
and backed out. Raviv was furious and asked his followers, who later
would form the core of Eyal, to wreck Salomon’s car and property. They

15
balked at the idea, and Raviv went looking for another party to siphon off
Tekhiya’s supporters.
In the end, he got desperate and backed a party run by a disgruntled meat
company owner, whose plank was to eliminate the income tax authority.
Raviv campaigned hard to have the hard-line vote support what was
known as the Picanti Party, and drew off just enough Tekhiya support to
eliminate the party from the Knesset. He did so well, we’re told, he even
cost the National Religious Party a seat.
You never understood where Raviv came from. He wasn’t merely a
Shabak information gatherer, he was a pretend right winger planted by
the Labor Party to neutralize the political unity of the Right. That’s what
the leaders of the Shabak were doing with our service even before Oslo.
This was a huge breach of the Shabak’s mandate, which is to guard
internal security from violence and nationalistic crime.
Raviv was a political tool illegally run by our chief commander Yaacov
Perry. But it was Carmi Gillon’s Jewish Department, as you rightly
reported, which Raviv worked for. After the Hebron massacre Perry was
made CEO of the country’s biggest cell phone operator, and that was no
coincidence. He turned it into a surveillance tool of the highest order.
Meanwhile, Gillon was made head of the service, and he expanded the
role of Raviv and others dramatically. From a political manipulator, Raviv
was ordered to become a criminal instigator.
You are right that the goal of the instigations was ultimately the forced
removal of the Jewish residents of the West Bank and Gaza. Raviv’s
assignment was to radicalize young people and inspire them to commit a
continuing chain of murderous outrages. This would eventually justify the
army coming in and removing these criminal residents from their homes.
But the settlers didn’t cooperate. Raviv’s superiors badly misunderstood
the settlers’ thinking. Maybe they were victims of their own prejudices,
but they weren’t prepared for how meek these people really are. Today,
when the atrocities against them are being turned on high, they still
remain almost totally timid. The planners didn’t get proper intelligence on
the effect of their rabbis either. Far from being firebrands, the rabbis were
preaching fatalism. While their best people were being murdered, the
rabbis taught that it was the victims’ time to die. And though the covert
actions carry on with increased sadism, the rabbis are holding courses in
etiquette and values. The plan to remove the settlers is way behind
schedule and Arafat is going crazy. He thinks he was taken for a ride. The
way we were told it happened was that after the Hebron massacre, Rabin
was supposed to have the army round up the Jews of Hebron and Kiryat
Arba and start the removal process. He refused and that was the moment
the plan to murder him was hatched. You didn’t get that either.
Source 2: Another aspect about Raviv that you didn’t report is how poor
his decision making was. This guy is not terribly clever, and we were
always having to silence people who caught on to what he was doing. You

16
 got the arrest of Shmuel Cytrin right. After he started spreading the word
that Raviv worked for us, he was arrested on no charge and kept at a safe
distance in prison.
But you didn’t find out about the trouble we had with Yehuda Miller, a
police officer living near Raviv in Maale Levona. Raviv decided that he
could hide his service ties by telling everyone that Miller was his police
commander. Miller found out about it and told Raviv to stop the lying.
But Raviv just turned up the heat. He even had his mail sent to Miller’s
address.
Miller, it turns out, was a first rate photographer, and he began capturing
Raviv in criminal action on film. He had enough to bury Raviv and all his
officers, right up to Gillon. In the end we got him kicked out of the
police and terrified to tell anyone what he knows. I use the word ‘we’ with
reservations. I had nothing to do with these operations and have learned
to hate the people who did. Not everyone, there were kids caught up in
their duty who had nothing to compare to, I almost feel sorry for them,
but their officers were engaged in serious irregularities, and they knew
better. As for the platoon that did the killing, I have not an ounce of
forgiveness towards them.

Rabin’s Dead Bodyguards

Source 2: We knew you would ask so we prepared partial answers. We
don’t know that much, but we know it’s worse than what you wrote.
Source 1: All we know about Yoav Kuriel was that he was in a Shabak
course and taken out. Almost always that means he went into the deep
underground on assignment. I never knew him, but I do know that after
he was buried, we had to talk to the people who buried him. I can’t
imagine that the commanders thought they could hand a body riddled
with bullets and missing internal organs to a legitimate burial society and
not expect the undertaking crew to talk about what they saw afterwards.
We made it clear to one of the crew living in Bnai Brak, his name was
Baruch, as I recall, that the loose talk would have to end then and there.
He has been most obedient since then. And we had to lean on this guy
Biton from Pardes Katz who was blabbing about what he saw.
Source 2: There were a couple of other of our people who were
eliminated; one was from Ashdod or Rishon, I think, another guy named
Tzvi, as I recall, was buried in Jerusalem the night of Rabin’s murder. A
minyan was gathered in a hurry to supervise the burial and, of course,
someone reported the incident, this time to a Haredi paper in Bnai Brak.
This paper was called Hashavuah and they were about to publish the
victim’s name. We just closed down the paper and confiscated the
damning issue. The paper was re-opened under another name right after.
Source 1: At the risk of repeating myself, my friend uses the word ‘we,’
when neither of us were involved in the operations. People in the service
talk to each other, we are human after all, and that’s where this
17
 information comes from. There are now enough of us who have had it
with the situation that we decided to fight back. I am sure that most of
our buddies agree with what we are doing. At first, no one believed your
conclusions about the Rabin murder. You were checked out, and it was
concluded, now don’t be insulted, that you were too weird to ever be
taken seriously.
Source 2: The service really underestimated you. They never dealt with a
personality like yours. The intelligence reports painted you as an oddball
who could be neutralized with ease through the media. No one
anticipated that you had these kinds of persuasive talents. We have guys
in the service who are convinced you either have hidden powers or are
working at a high-ranking mutineer’s behest. Either way, a lot of us have
reached the conclusion that it is inevitable the Rabin murder is going to
rock the service like never before. We want to make sure the damage
won’t be permanent. The only people who should be prosecuted are
those who killed Jews, and there aren’t many of them. We want them
purged from our ranks.

Uzi Meshulum
(A rabbi who exposed the kidnappings of thousands of, mostly,
Yemenite infants in the early days of the state).
Source 2: At the same time that the service was being exploited to smear
political opposition to the Oslo process, we were being used to snuff out
another political threat, Rabbi Uzi Meshulum. I bought the propaganda
that he was a dangerous cult leader threatening widespread violence in
our society. Most of us did at the time, so we cooperated in his silencing.
Now we know that his message was honest and that it threatened the very
basis of the Labor movement. If it was allowed out, Labor’s first heroes
were going to be pilloried, the political movement would have no moral
imperative to continue, and thus the Oslo process would die. We were
used again.
As far as the service was concerned, Meshulum’s fatal mistake was
naming his Shin Bet infiltrator, Ilan Raz. We do not appreciate having our
men exposed and their lives thereafter threatened. We planned to move in
on Meshulum big-time for that.
But Raz tried to warn Meshulum. He had actually come around to
admiring him, and that, by the way, is breaking regulation number one:
get close to your target but not too close. He told him to stop his
campaign immediately or we would come down on him very hard. He
even tried bribing him but Meshulum wouldn’t budge. We laid siege to
his compound with army and police snipers everywhere. They killed one
of Meshulum’s young supporters. Meshulum was put into prison and now
he seems to have forgotten everything to do with missing infants. And
the story gets worse. The Prison Services medical head, Yaacov
Ziegelboim was appalled by the medical treatment Meshulum was
18
 receiving, and was on the verge of reporting the facts to the proper
authorities. A bomb in his car put an end to that. Our public relations
people shifted the blame to Meshulum’s followers. They are like the
settlers; they talk big, they used to call protest rallies thinking they could
persuade the public to seek justice but they never took murderous
actions. Yet the propaganda was so effective that the public believed the
bombing was by an extremist Yemenite. I have no proof but I’m
convinced, and I’m not alone, that victims like the Amir and Kahalani
brothers were chosen because they were Yemenite. Part of the overall
operation was to convince the public that Yemenites were unstable and
their claims shouldn’t be taken seriously.

We Mean It
Source 1: We worked out a strategy that we can live with. We are going to
allow you to report a highly sensitive piece of information. It should show
the dirty tricks people that we aren’t kidding. Their operations have to
stop and now. This will be the last information you get from us. Next
time we’ll find a more conventional media outlet. That is a promise. You
will not be contacted again.
Source 2: I suggest you take a trip to HaChoresh Street in Ramot and
look at villas around the number 100 block. You’ll see one with a special
garage door. Suspects from the Ramallah area are taken there for
interrogation.
Let them find a new villa. If we don’t see a change of policy, the next
reporter we talk to will get more, much more information. We are looking
for an internal order that lets us know that the Shabak will have only one
function from now on, to protect Israelis from their real enemies.
Source 1: And like I said before, you must report that the Shabak is where
our country’s finest men serve. Most of us have no role in any of this
subterfuge. We are confident that we will be forgiven by the public when
the full story comes out. And it will.

AMIR INTERROGATION TAPE UNCOVERED

One evening last year, I gave a lecture on the Rabin
assassination in Netanya. Once the presentation was completed, a
handsome woman named Rachel Friedman approached me.
“My sister, brother-in-law and their three children were murdered in the
pizzeria explosion in Jerusalem,” she said. “The very last thing I said to
my brother-in-law was that I’m coming tonight to hear you. And the last
thing he told me was, ‘The violence against us is being run by the same
people who started the Holocaust. Maybe Rabin’s murder will lead us to
them.’ He was from Holland and knew things Israelis don’t. He was
blown up a few moments later.

19
 “I told Israeli TV news what he said and it was censored. The big story
the next day was about an Arab killed in a retaliatory action. My family
was almost wiped out and Sharon knocked down a few buildings in their
memory. And the media thought an Arab killed in one of the buildings
was more important than my brother-in-law’s last thoughts.”
Two days later, five more Israelis were murdered. A husband
and wife were slain before their infant children on the Modiin-
Jerusalem road, a mile from my home. And Sharon knocked down
some buildings to commemorate the slayings. Meanwhile, he is
sending Peres to Germany to arrange the continuation of the
slaughter until the NATO troops take over the region.
If you want to know what Israel is in for, look at Macedonia. It’s
the same plan. The New World Order leaders arm a gang of
Moslem dissidents and they murder and maim and massacre until
the world army comes in to douse the flames its commanders lit in
the first place. Arafat is just doing what he’s told, like any good
dissident Moslem leader.
I told Rachel that her brother-in-law’s last words were pure truth
from G-d’s heart to his mouth. I added that for years I’ve been
saying the only way to save our people is by exposing the Rabin
assassination. The truth will lead from Gillon to Peres to those
Europeans enflaming our region. Of all the innumerable crimes
against the Jews since the Oslo Accord, the only one Israelis will
never forget is Rabin’s murder. It is the key to our salvation.
Two days later I received the most dramatic piece of evidence
seen in years. A dogged writer, well known and oft-seen on Israeli
television, phoned me and insisted we meet. He drove to my home
with his wife. He brought 3 tapes with him as well as vital
information we had both been seeking for years.
Then he offered to show me three films he had acquired. They
were the police interrogations of Amir.
“And not the phony-baloney staged interrogation they showed
on Channel Two last year; the real ones.”
I will transcribe all three interrogations in time, but let us begin
with the interrogation of Yigal Amir on December 3, 1995. Earlier
that day Amir had a hearing, covered by the media. He entered the
courtroom and yelled to the cameras and over a million people
watching,

20
 “Why aren’t you investigating Rabin’s murdered bodyguard? The people
will forgive me when they know the background. After you understand
why, you’ll see the whole system is rotten. Everything you see is
fabricated. I didn’t think they’d start killing people.”
Then at his hearing, he told Judge Dan Arbel, “They’re killing
people, it’s all a lie?”
“What’s a lie?” asked Arbel.
“That I killed Rabin,” answered Amir. “I didn’t even try to kill him. What
you’ve seen up til now has been a facade. I request to be allowed to
explain the background to my actions. They’re killing people. If you listen
to the truth, the whole country will be up in arms.”
Needless to say, Judge Arbel did not give Amir a chance to
explain himself and he was taken back to his lockup. The following
interrogation took place later that nearly fateful day when Amir was
about to tell the court the truth. The interrogators are two nervous,
almost desperate policemen Yoav Gazit and Ofir Gamliel.
While reading the transcript, never forget that the Israeli media
has spread a lie that Amir confessed to the murder to the police
and that’s all. This transcript proves that was not the case. Amir still
wants to tell the truth but, clearly, he doesn’t trust the intentions of
the interrogators.
A decision was made to present the whole interrogation
transcript. While that will slow and greatly lengthen the reading and
often confuse the reader, the main consideration is authenticity,
both of the atmosphere of the interrogation and the fact that I have
acquired such damning evidence.
To reduce confusion, I will add commentary beginning and
ending with three stars (***).
447/95 Serious Crimes Division, Israel Police; Transcript of conversation
of 3/12/95 between the murder suspect of Prime Minister Rabin, Yigal
Amir, and two investigators, Sergeant Ofir Gamliel and Inspector Yoav
Gazit.
Gazit: Let’s finish the investigation. Let’s clean up the whole story.
Amir: I gave you the phone so give it back.
Gazit: Here it is. This is the starting point. As soon as things are cleared
up you can meet your parents. I want to start with a point you made and,
look, I’m not writing anything down. You can talk freely. I want to nail
down an issue you stated in Yoni’s report...
***Officer Yoni Hirshorn was Amir’s first interrogator.***

21
 Gazit: Everyone heard what you said in the courtroom today. I want to
know what you meant by it. I’m hearing bits and pieces in the media but
don’t have the true picture. I asked Yoni to write a summary of your
claims. Tell me what you meant by them. Were they real or not?
Amir: Now I’ll talk.
Gazit: You said that what we’ve seen so far has been a facade and you
asked the court to let you explain the background to your actions.
‘They’re killing people, if you listen to the truth there will be a revolution
in the country,’ you said. Wasn’t that a bit bombastic?
Amir: They didn’t let me tell what I could have.
Gazit: So tell me, I won’t write anything down, what did you mean? Is it a
theory or not? I don’t know.
Amir: They’re killing people. I heard about the dead bodyguard from my
lawyer and from my interrogators.
***The Shabak agent, Yoav Kuriel was buried two weeks before
and there were publicized suspicions of foul play. In the end, the
police and media insisted that he committed suicide because he was
depressed about the Rabin murder. Within a year, I spoke with one
of Kuriel’s burial team. He informed me that Kuriel had seven
bullets in his chest. A persistent suicide it was. When Amir shouted
to the cameras that the media was covering up the murder of a
bodyguard, he reopened the wound and the police wanted to
determine what he knows. Amir answers that his lawyer and other
policemen told him about Kuriel. Gazit sees this line is going
nowhere so far and switches topics.***
Gazit: Tell me briefly what you know about Itamar Ben Gvir.
Amir: That’s what I heard in the bus, that he was going to murder the
prime minister.
Gazit: Did you meet him personally?
Amir: No.
Gazit: Itamar was the one who put the sticker on the prime minister’s car.
He’s an extremist. Did you ever meet him?
Amir: No, I just saw him.
***Itamar Ben Gvir is a highly publicized member of Kach.
There are widespread suspicions that he is a Shabak agent. What
fueled said suspicions amongst many people was an incident a few
years back when he threatened to murder Sinead O’Connor and her
band if they showed up for their scheduled Jerusalem performance.
The show was cancelled, leading to great resentment among the
country’s Left and youth towards right wing settlers like Ben Gvir.
22
And what was Ben Gvir’s punishment for his death threats?
Nothing. He wasn’t even questioned by the police. A month before
Rabin’s murder, Ben Gvir put a sticker on his car reading, ‘We got
to Rabin’s car, next we’ll get to him.” Amir is claiming he heard a
rumor on a bus that Ben Gvir was planning to murder Rabin that
night. The plot thickens.***
Gazit: Ben Gvir is in Kach. And the one who told you about him was a
Likud Youth member from Raanana.
Amir: I don’t want to say.
Gazit: You already said it. What you mean is you don’t want to say who
he was. You gave him a first name and I don’t even remember it. Fine,
you heard a theory and your lawyer told you a bodyguard was dead too.
So what’s your take on all this? Briefly, what do you make of it all? If you
don’t feel like answering, that’s fine with me too.
Amir: Do you swear?
Gazit: Enough already.
Amir: Alright.
Gazit: I just want to clear up what you said, what is true and what isn’t.
Amir: Aaah.
Gazit: Nu, tell me already, briefly.
Amir: I’ll tell.
Gazit: What did you mean when you were so bombastic in court.
Amir: I had to be. They wouldn’t let me talk.
Gazit: Who knows what they thought.
Amir: I don’t care.
Gazit: I am speaking as your investigator and I don’t understand my case.
I have to follow up on things said in the media and the courtroom and I
don’t get it.
Amir: You’re my investigator, not my father.
Gazit: That depends. I never said I was your father and you don’t have to
confide in me. I never asked for names of people.
Amir: You’ll hear me in court.
Gazit: I’ll tell you, from what you said in court this morning I can surmise
that you think one of the bodyguards died, true?
Amir: Yes.
Gazit: You said an attorney told you? Who is he? What’s his name?
Amir: The one who came to me.
Gazit: That’s not enough and you know it. We’re not children here. I
want to know where you heard this theory. See, I’m not writing down a
word.
23
 Amir: It was nothing. I just threw out some theories.
Gazit: That’s not what you said before.
Amir: Okay.
Gazit: I spoke with your brother before you as you saw. I asked what you
meant in court today.
Amir: You’ll both know later in court.
Gazit: You said you were on a bus to the rally, right. There was a guy...
Amir: I won’t give his name. He told me that Itamar Ben Gvir was going
to murder Rabin.
Gazit. You said you were told Ben Gvir intended to murder Rabin?
Amir: Yes.
Gazit: And you said you heard from people that Avishai Raviv was a
Shabak agent. And that Avishai is friends with Itamar Ben Gvir, true?
That’s what you said and now you’re being wishy-washy. Are you finished
with your words?
Amir: Yes.
***Amir connects Avishai Raviv to the Rabin murder. He,
correctly identifies him as a Shabak agent. He connects Ben Gvir to
Raviv and implies that he was a Shabak agent as well. And he insists
that word was out that Ben Gvir was out to murder Rabin that
night. Far from confessing to Rabin’s murder, Amir is trying to
make sense of it. He has obviously drawn some strong conclusions
from the knowledge he possesses. Now look at the implications of
Amir’s conclusions.***
Gazit: I can see you’re tired. Stretch out while I carry on. Now tell me,
true or not, is this what you believe? The top ranks of government,
specifically Rabin and Peres, planned a fake assassination by a right
winger after the rally and that Ben Gvir was supposed to be the shooter?
Yes or no?
Amir: Yes, yes.
***How do like them apples? Amir sorted out the plot, at least
the fake assassination part and the blame shifted to a right wing
religious shooter. Note that he includes Peres in the plan, a fact that
also has turned out to be proven. No, Amir is not confessing to
murder, he’s caught on to what happened. Still, it must be noted,
there has been no subsequent proof of his charges against Ben
Gvir.***
Gazit: I need us to clear all this up. Other than that, I don’t need
anything.
Amir: Then I didn’t mean it.
24
 Gazit: Then what did you mean?
Amir: I said this, I said that, I wasn’t thinking straight.
Gazit: You said that Itamar Ben Gvir was supposed to arrive, um, with a
gun full of blank bullets that Avishai Raviv gave him. True? That’s what
you said.
***Amir told Hirshorn, his previous interrogator that Avishai
Raviv supplied Ben Gvir with a gun loaded with blanks. But, the
truth is that Raviv must have handed Amir that gun. We know this
because we have a picture of Raviv holding a Beretta. The serial
number, blown up, was the same as that of the gun Amir allegedly
used to shoot Rabin dead. We know it because, a minute after
Rabin’s shooting, forty minutes before anyone ever heard of Amir,
Raviv told reporter Amir Gilat and numerous members of his
phony radical group Eyal, that Amir did the shooting. He knew
before anyone else because he supplied the gun to him. So why is
Amir claiming Raviv also supplied a gun with blanks to Ben Gvir.
Was he also set up to be a patsy, or a backup to Amir? Or perhaps
Amir is making the story up to get the police to look into Raviv.
Whatever his motive, Amir has realized that he shot blanks at
Rabin.***
Amir: It was just a story. I threw it out as a possibility. Maybe Avishai
isn’t what I thought in the courtroom.
Gazit: No. You said what you said, also about the Kahalani brothers, that
they switched bullets or rigged their weapons. Where did you get that
idea?
***Amir is right again. Two months before Rabin’s murder,
Two brothers Eitan and Yehodidya Kahalani were arrested by the
Shabak and charged with planning to massacre Arabs. The Shabak
claimed they had tampered with the two M-16s, making them
inoperable. In October 1999, I addressed 400 political bigwigs
including four Knesset members at a forum in a Herzlia hotel. I
told the gathered that I had the reports from the police ballistics
lab. The two M-16s were in the lab the night before they were
planted, not in the Kahalanis’ car but in a car borrowed from a
Shabak snitch named Yves Tibi. Two months later, the Kahalani
brothers were quietly released from prison. And no one thanked
me. Amir is absolutely right about the frame-up of the Kahalanis.
How did he know? No one suspected the Shabak of such a thing
until the tactics of the Rabin assassination and Raviv were exposed

25
much later. Amir has more than a gut feeling about how he was set
up. Now look at him describe the plot perfectly.***
Gazit: No! You said it. You said they rigged their rifles.
Amir: I tell the police one thing because they lead me in certain directions
and it’s not what I intend to tell the court.
Gazit: I’m asking if your version is just a theory. Your claim is that the
top echelons of government staged a fake assassination to strengthen
their hold on government by blaming a right wing shooter who really shot
blank bullets. In the end, the intended shooter didn’t shoot, but you did.
Amir: True.
Gazit: And to further the plot, Rabin’s bodyguards cleared a path for the
shooter to Rabin?
Amir: That’s why the bodyguards shouted that the bullets were blanks.
***Bingo. Amir’s got it. He worked out the plan and it seems
that Gazit suspects he may be right. The problem is the addition of
Ben Gvir. Why add him? Why doesn’t Amir just say that Raviv
gave him the gun with the blanks, since that is most probably the
truth?***
Gazit: So it was supposed to be Ben Gvir. No, let’s not mention names.
Wait, Ofir (Gamliel) is coming. (A second policeman enters the room).
Ofir, he thinks I don’t understand him, what he’s getting to.
Amir: That’s it.
Gamliel: Listen.
Gazit: Talk to Ofir.
Gamliel: You spoke about a facade.
Gazit: Ofir wants to hear. That’s why I brought him.
***Like he wasn’t watching the whole thing through a two way
mirror.***
Gamliel: You brought up other people.
Amir: I’ve said nothing. They didn’t let me talk to the court or the
reporters.
Gamliel: No, I meant here.
Amir: I asked you to let me talk.
Gamliel: Nu, talk!
Amir: You’re not letting me.
Gamliel: Talk, let’s hear.
Amir: It’s too late.
Gazit: What’s the story?
Amir: Wait until my trial.
26
 Gamliel: The court will ask that the police testify to what you told us. You
can’t say we’re not giving you every opportunity to explain yourself.
Amir: I don’t want to say.
Gamliel: You don’t want to say but we know what you want to say. We
know your story.
Amir: It’s not a story.
***Gamliel is finally turning into the bad cop but the strategy
fails. Amir will lose whatever slight trust he had established with
Gazit as soon as Gamliel turns up the heat and the lies.***
Gamliel: You said there was a Shabak conspiracy and you accidentally
walked into the middle of it. You said the bodyguards shouted, ‘ They’re
blanks.’ Do you know which ones?
Amir: I told you why they shouted, ‘Blanks.’
Gamliel: And what do you base this theory on?
Amir: Nothing. It was just a theory. Take it or leave it.
Gamliel: So what’s the theory. I don’t understand it.
Amir: One of the bodyguards is dead.
Gazit: No.
Gamliel: Who told you such a thing?
Amir: Just people.
Gamliel: No one is dead. Now let’s listen to your theory.
Gazit: Your theory is based on a dead bodyguard, murdered to keep
silent.
Amir: He asked what I thought.
Gamliel: If I tell you there is no dead bodyguard, then your whole theory
collapses.
Amir: Yes.
Gamliel: That’s what I’m telling you.
***And is Gamliel ever wrong. Yoav Kuriel was buried on the
15th of November in HaYarkon Cemetery: His plot can be visited
at bloc 13, region 5, row 57, number 20. Amir is right, but
underestimated the situation. Another bodyguard was murdered
and buried ten days before Kuriel. Gamliel’s game is to lie to Amir
and force him to abandon his line of defense.***
Amir: Really?
Gamliel: Your line is that the Shabak murdered him to shut him up.
That’s what you meant to say.
Amir: Maybe.
Gamliel: Did you say that here?
27
 Amir: That’s what I said.
Gamliel: Who is Benny Birtz?
Amir: Just someone.
Gazit: He told me the one who stuck the sticker on Rabin’s car was there.
He saw him on television.
Gamliel: Wait a second, you told me it’s all connected and the shouts of,
‘Blanks,’ connects everything together.
Gazit: Suddenly he’s very mysterious.
Gamliel: You don’t want to talk to us.
Amir: Okay, I’ll talk.
Gamliel: Then talk already.
(Amir’s response missing from film).
Gazit: So nothing is true. It’s all based on a story someone told you about
a dead bodyguard.
Amir: As well.
Gazit: And you mixed the Kahalani story into your salad so everything
would fit together. So, say something.
Amir: There’s no need. This isn’t a detective novel.
Gamliel: If the bodyguards were involved, tell me how and I’ll investigate.
Amir: Does it seem right to you that...
Gamliel: So you’re not so sure what’s right, are you?
Amir: You said you’d investigate. If you’re so sure then you won’t, will
you?
Gamliel: There’s nothing to investigate. No one is dead. Everyone is alive.
Amir: Fine, if everyone’s alive...And your story is truthful.
Gamliel: Now listen. You’ve just been guessing all along, haven’t you? If
not, tell us something you know for sure. Up til now you’ve been very
frank with us. There’s no reason to hide anything more.
Gazit: I don’t understand your problem. We’ll investigate whatever needs
to be investigated. You explain yourself well. Say what it is you want to
say.
***Amir received information about Kuriel’s murder from a
trusted source, one of his lawyers. His attorneys were in a position
to know and, from first hand experience I know, they were privy to
profoundly disturbing information. Amir will not name which
lawyer (at the time he had two lawyers and their partners working
on his defense) and the two interrogators are becoming increasingly
frustrated. They want to know who knows about Kuriel and Amir
isn’t budging. Their tactic is to investigate nothing for him until he

28
spills the beans on his informants. In time, they will try to track
down the Likud youth who informed him about Ben Gvir. But
Amir will prove to be as suspicious of their true motives and as
stubborn not to turn into a stool-pigeon.***
Gamliel: It is the truth.
Gazit: I’m telling you, no one was killed.
Amir: So what, we’ll see.
Gazit: So where did you get the story from? From who exactly? You can’t
really say you’re basing your suspicions on hard facts.
Amir: Not this question.
Gamliel: So why is it one day you say at full volume that you did it, that
you were alone and now you’re inventing a conspiracy?
Amir: That’s the situation. It’s all been a facade.
Gazit: A facade by whom? Who wore the mask?
Amir: I can’t say anything.
Gamliel: You can’t or won’t say? Because you weave conspiracies.
Amir: Okay.
Gamliel: Not okay. I want to hear your theories.
Amir: I won’t give you what you’re after. You don’t care.
Gamliel: We care. Our problem is most of what you’ve said until now
checked out. We’ve been very impressed with your honesty. You’re not a
simpleton and what you’ve said so far, you believed. Now we want to
check out your new points.
Amir: I just can’t.
Gamliel: You mean you don’t want to because you don’t know anything.
Why can’t you tell? Is it because you know things that can’t be revealed or
you’re guessing based on logic, like the bodyguards shouting, ‘They’re
blanks.’ You think that doesn’t bother us, too? It does, no doubt about it.
I can imagine how much it disturbs you. The question is if there is
something behind it. So far, you’ve been very open with us, now we need
hard facts from you.
Amir: I can’t relate to that.
Gamliel: How...
Amir: I can’t relate to it.
Gamliel: You can’t relate?
Amir: Can’t relate.
Gamliel: Because you’re just theorizing.
Amir: Enough, enough.
Gamliel (laughing): No, it’s not enough.
Gazit: You really do want to relate your theory to us.
29
 Gamliel: It would be interesting to hear what you think.
Gazit: Suddenly, he’s so mysterious.
***The cops are running out of rehearsed script and are
repeating themselves. Amir has so far correctly told about the dead
bodyguard, the frame-up of the Kahalani brothers, the reason the
bodyguards shouted, ‘Blanks,’ the fact that Raviv supplied the gun
with the blanks, that the bodyguards cleared a path for the fake
killer and that the orders came from Peres. That is an awful lot to
know a month after the murder when it took the rest of us a good
year or two or more before all of Amir’s claims were proven true. If
nothing else, we must ask how Amir knew so much, so soon.***
Amir: All I can tell you is I don’t say things for nothing. Don’t worry
about that.
Gamliel: You’re trying to get other people involved. Until now this wasn’t
your line. So what changed your mind? What else is behind this
conspiracy of bodyguards and whoever else was in it? We’ll all leave here
with a cleaner conscience if you can prove a conspiracy, or you think
there was one because of this or that. Can you with a clean conscience
attest to a conspiracy? Don’t hesitate if you can give me evidence I don’t
have. Today they shut you up in court but you’ll be home free at your trial
to say what you want. Now what do you want to say?
Amir: I can’t say.
Gazit: What do you mean you can’t say?
Amir: I can’t tell you.
Gamliel: You’re just using logic, like in the Kahalani brothers story. What
you say makes some sense but they’re a different case. We’re not going to
investigate it for you. If you have evidence related to your case, we will.
So talk already.
Amir: Everything that you wrote down about Itamar Ben Gvir is
nonsense.
Gamliel: That was your theory.
Amir: It was nonsense.
***Out of the blue, Amir retracts his story about Ben Gvir. The
retraction is too sudden for the interrogators not to suspect the
motive of this change of heart and they pursue it. In a flash, Amir
has decided that he has said too much already for his own good.***
Gamliel: You just don’t understand the legal process. If you make a
statement to the police and retract it, the court won’t take you at your
word. You have to be consistent. It’s for your own good.
Amir: I didn’t say it for my own good.

30
 Gamliel: You’re hurting your own cause.
Amir: I never said anything, nothing. Are you telling me that no
bodyguard is dead?
Gamliel: No.
Amir: Fine.
Gamliel: So go on as if there was no dead bodyguard.
Gazit: One of your investigators told you that?
Gamliel: Ask your lawyer. He’s objective. If he tells me a bodyguard is
dead, I’ll investigate.
Amir: So why are they saying so?
Gamliel: We just told you, there is definitely no dead bodyguard. Does it
matter to you that much?
Amir: What?
Gazit: That you’re told there’s no dead bodyguard.
*** But there was a dead Shabak agent, Yoav Kuriel, and
Gamliel and Gazit, as investigators responsible for the most
important crime in Israel’s history, must have known it. Are they
splitting hairs? Kuriel wasn’t a Shabak bodyguard but a Shabak
agent. Or are they just lying to Amir? They may have suspected that
Kuriel’s death was unrelated to Rabin’s murder, but it is not their
right to inform Amir that there was no dead bodyguard when they
knew there was. The motives of Gazit and Gamliel must be
considered suspect or why are they using unscrupulous strategy to
get Amir to name the sources of his information?***
Gamliel: Yigal, it’s your right to think but there’s no motive for your
thoughts.
Amir: I never said anything, not a thing.
Gamliel: Then I can construe that your thinking is based on theory not
facts.
Amir: What was said here, wasn’t.
Gazit: Itamar, the bodyguards, the high-level plot, nothing?
Amir: I explained there, oh, alright.
Gazit: Have we stopped then?
Amir: He asked what could have been and I answered.
Gazit: So you meant none of it. They were just crumbs of ideas.
Amir: Yes
Gazit: This is hard to say, but we are at your service.
Amir: Yes.

31
 Gazit: What you said in the courtroom is unconnected to what you said
here?
Amir: I can say more here.
***Earlier in the day Amir told the judge and reporters that he
never intended to kill Rabin. He is not prepared to tell Gazit or
Gamliel anything nearly as important and they are beginning to see
that their cause was hopeless. With them, Amir never retracts his
claim that he didn’t even try to kill Rabin. This obstacle was
overcome when Amir was later instructed to explain he never
intended to kill Rabin, just cripple him. Meanwhile, whatever Amir
was prepared to tell Judge Arbel, he is not going to tell the
police.***
Gazit: Look how mysterious he’s become so suddenly. I don’t even know
you anymore. This morning I spoke with Ofri. He said he was
representing you. Do you even know who is your lawyer, the one who
changed your whole perspective? There’s no connection between these
things at all.
Amir: Now I know what the connection is.
Gazit: I’ve sat with you before several times. You weren’t like this. I want
to know why you’re so different now. Why you’ve suddenly become so
mysterious. Is it just something that came over you?
Amir: No?
Gazit: I’m not asking these questions for nothing. I consider you reliable,
now I can’t understand you. I had no problem with your story as long as
you said you did it.
Amir: Yes.
Gazit: Now you’re throwing out new things and we’re obliged to follow
them up.
Amir: Even without me you should be doing it.
Gazit: What?
Amir: Your conclusions are unconnected to it all.
Gazit. No. You’re saying these things in court and we have to find out
why. You throw out these things in court and I have to find out from the
media what you’re claiming. You tell me that one day you’ll tell
everything. I have to find out what you mean by that. I don’t even know
what you mean by a facade. Tell me simply.
Amir: (yawns)
Gazit: Are you tired?
Amir: (yawns)
Gazit: We can talk to you tomorrow if you want, but it would be better to
do some explaining now. You think you’re the only one without
32
 explanations? We can find explanations for everything you think. If
you’ve been just saying these things for nothing, then tell us.
Gamliel: I have one question.
Amir: What time is it now?
Gamliel: Five thirty. When you want to eat, join us. Now you told a story
about a bus ride from your house to the rally on the night of the murder
where you met an acquaintance who told you about Ben Gvir.
Amir: Truth and nothing but the truth.
Gamliel: Truth and nothing but the truth. That means you confirm the
story on the bus.
Amir: Yes.
Gamliel: Did you see him accidentally or do you always travel together?
That would mean he lives in Herzlia.
Amir: Raanana.
Gamliel: Raanana.
Amir: I didn’t say anything.
Gazit: He already told me.
Gamliel: What did he say?
Gazit: It was a guy from Likud Youth In Raanana. He gave me his name.
What was it?
Amir: I don’t want to give the name.
Gazit: You already told me.
Amir: Only the first name. I think it was Gilad, I’m not sure.
Gamliel: He must have known you or he wouldn’t have brought up the
subject.
Gazit: He was a young boy.
Gamliel: Someone who knew you.
Gazit: You said Margalit knew him as well.
***Amir has already incriminated Margalit Har Shefi, as we shall
soon see. The police are building their own right wing conspiracy
and want as many people within it as possible. If this Likud youth
didn’t report Ben Gvir’s intentions to the police, then he was as
guilty as Har Shefi was of not preventing the murder of Rabin. But
unlike Har Shefi, Amir told Officer Hirshorn that the youth did
report Ben Gvir’s plans to the police. The policemen are most likely
not trying to help Amir’s case but the government’s for a right
wing, religious conspiracy. And Amir has caught on.***
Amir: Maybe I did. Listen, I don’t want...
Gamliel: What don’t you want?

33
 Amir: that...
Gamliel: But you’re saying this is the truth. This is what happened on the
bus.
Gazit: That means you happened to meet him and he just happened to
tell you this story.
Gamliel: If you won’t give his name, at least tell exactly what he said.
Amir: He heard that Itamar Ben Gvir wanted to kill Rabin at the rally.
Gamliel: So what did you tell him?
Amir: Can’t you find the bus driver who might have seen us together?
Gamliel: Who was this youth?
Amir: (groans)
Gazit: Don’t play games. We’re trying to find people and you’re groaning.
Gamliel: Were you known to anyone else on the bus?
Gazit: I understood from you that you didn’t see him again, that you
avoided him.
Amir: Yes.
Gamliel: Now explain logically why he told you the story and no one else
we can find.
Amir: I’m not saying anything to incriminate someone else.
Gamliel: What could you incriminate him on?
Amir: It doesn’t matter.
Gamliel: Not true.
Amir: I’ve already turned the state upside down.
Gamliel: Not true. You haven’t turned anything upside down.
***Amir uses the word hafakhti and I translated it turned upside
down. It also means to cause a revolution. Now does Amir mean
he turned the state upside down because he murdered Rabin, or
because he was blamed for the murder? Look at his next line of
thinking.***
Amir: They’ve investigated every rabbi in the country.
Gamliel: Don’t exaggerate.
Amir: No exaggeration.
Gamliel: All in all we spoke to a very few rabbis, not what you think.
Amir: The reign of terror against them has started. (Amir used Arabic
word alayhom to describe terror).
Gamliel - Alayhom?
Amir: Yes.

34
 ***Amir has caught on to the whole plan; set up a religious
patsy for Rabin’s murder and start a reign of repression against the
religious community and their rabbis. He knows that is what the
policemen are aiming for and he’s testing them. They do not fail
him.***
Gazit: Hagai told me specifically that you went to a certain rabbi to get his
blessings.
Amir: Not true.
Gazit: Ask Hagai if he said it.
Amir: What does Hagai know about this?
Gazit: You tell me.
Amir: No, I know the rabbis permitted it. I hear it on the radio, read it in
the papers. But I never went to a rabbi to ask.
Gamliel: They said in their classes?
Amir: No. There was no need. The persecutor judgment was known.
Gamliel: You wanted verification.
Amir: Didn’t need it. Rabin fell in the category.
Gamliel: And I understand you checked that out first.
Amir: Me?
Gamliel: Yes, you.
Amir: And that’s how I arrived at my conclusion...
Gamliel: You arrived at your own conclusion. The question is if you had
help.
***Amir riled Gamliel and got his answer. He is out to prove
that the religious community and their rabbis murdered Rabin. His
only purpose in interrogating Amir was to get him to change his
testimony about a government conspiracy or to disprove it. Amir
was right from the beginning: all the interrogators were interested
in was wrapping up the government’s version of events. Amir plays
along with his inquisitors as he was always supposed to. He reverts
to form and victimizes Har Shefi. It isn’t easy to understand Amir’s
sudden reversal of form, but all talk of a government/Shabak
conspiracy disappears and the rabbis are now to blame. This is what
he was supposed to say all along and we can surmise that he knew
these cops weren’t there to help him. He gave up telling the
truth.***
Amir: No help but I was influenced.

35
 Gazit: Not enough, be more specific. We understand from Hagai that you
went to a rabbi and you yourself said that Margalit went to her rabbi in
Bet El.
Amir: She wanted to. She didn’t trust my judgment and said she’d see her
rabbi. I told her to ask him.
Gamliel: Did she get an answer?
Amir: She told me no.
Gamliel: What, no?
Amir: He put her off, didn’t give a straight answer.
Gamliel: So you felt vindicated.
Amir: I told her to ask and she’d find out it wasn’t forbidden. She wanted
to prove the opposite and I told her that he’d say it was allowed.
Gamliel: But you got a less certain answer in the end.
Amir: Another rabbi would have said it’s a blessing. I didn’t need to find
one to know it.
And now the Shabak agent Amir returns to form. That Amir
was, at least, a Shabak asset, has been testified to by thousands of
people who saw him at work with Avishai Raviv from the autumn
of 1992 on. Their job was to criminalize the religious community
and the Jews of Judea, Samaria and Gaza. The government had
promised the PLO their homes and in order to assure that there
would be no sympathy for their forced removal from them, the
Shabak’s Jewish Department, initially headed by Carmi Gillon,
organized a campaign of sting operations against them, culminating
in the Rabin assassination. Amir’s duty was to smear the rabbis.
Checking the timing carefully, not one rabbi ever brought up the
concepts of persecutor, or a death judgment for tyrants until Amir
arrived at their yeshivas and raised the issues. Amir knows precisely
what the plan is and is now feeding the cops what they want to
hear. They think they’ve finally broken him.
For the final five minutes of the interrogation, the interrogators
once again try to get Amir to name names: which rabbi blessed his
actions? who was the Likud youth on the bus? who told him about
the dead bodyguard? until Amir shouts, “Stop harassing me. This is
like a Shabak interrogation.”
Now how would he know that? Amir’s crime was a police
matter, and though the Shabak oversaw the interrogations,
supposedly he was not questioned by the Shabak. Apparently he
was.
36
 That morning, Amir made a break for freedom. He told the
media and the judge at his hearing that he didn’t kill Rabin, in fact
he never even tried to. When the judge refused to hear him out, his
fate was sealed. He tried to tell the truth to the police and realized
they had closed the book on him. His best hope lay in cooperating
with the Shabak.
This taped interrogation proves that Amir, up until December 3,
1995, did not confess to murdering Rabin and did try to expose the
conspiracy. It is a very different tape than the ones shown Israeli
television of Amir confessing and showing no regret.
So it has been hidden from the public. But I’ll show it and two
other tapes of Amir’s police interrogations to any group that invites
me. The issue isn’t justice for Rabin; it’s saving our nation from
those still in power who murdered him. They are murdering all of
us now and must be stopped. The only way to do so is through
Rabin.

NO SYMPATHY FOR HAR SHEFI

The Israeli Supreme Court turned down Margalit Har Shefi’s
petition to appeal her indictment for failure to prevent the murder
of Yitzhak Rabin. So she’s off to the slammer for nine months, and
I feel no sympathy for her whatsoever. Here’s why.
Shortly after Yitzhak Rabin’s murder, Margalit Har Shefi was
arrested as a suspect in a wider conspiracy than just Yigal Amir.
Not long after her incarceration, the Shabak (General Security
Services) provocateur Avishai Raviv was placed inside her cell.
Since mixing the sexes in Israeli jails is forbidden, we can be pretty
sure that Har Shefi had some Shabak ties of her own.
But so did her uncle, Rabbi Benny Elon, who now sits in the
Sharon government. A few days after, Elon broke the news that
Yigal Amir’s good buddy in the Eyal movement, Avishai Raviv was
a Shabak agent, and Eyal was a Shabak creation. How did Elon
know before anyone else?
He knew because HE worked with Raviv, and I have solid
witnesses to back me up. Elon hung around young people at anti-
Oslo rallies and directed them into the arms of Avishai Raviv. As
one Eyal teenager told me:

37
 “I was at a protest rally outside Orient House and Benny Elon told me,
‘You have to meet this guy.’ Then he introduced me to Avishai. He was
the matchmaker between me and Raviv and because of him, I could have
been Yigal Amir.”
Early in my research I worked with two filmmakers, Merav
Ktorza and Alon Eilat, who turned out to be inappropriate to the
task. But they did score a few coups and one occurred in a meeting
with Elon. He told them that a couple of months before the
assassination, Yitzhak Shamir called him into his office and told
him:
‘They’re going to kill Rabin and blame the Right. They’re planning
another Arlozoroff and this time we won’t get back in power for another
fifty years. I want you to identify potential assassins in your community to
prevent the murder.”
Elon refused to repeat the statement on camera but there are
two strong witnesses who said he made it.
Margalit Har Shefi, a political organizer at Bar Ilan University
started palling around with two Shabak assets, Avishai Raviv and
Yigal Amir. Amir was the chief social director and public speaker of
Eyal. His task was to attract idealistic young people opposed to the
Oslo Accords and turn them into hyper-extremist criminals. The
youths he attracted at his Shabbat seminars and his yeshiva
speaking engagements were then directed into the clutches of Raviv
and Eyal.
Amir and Benny Elon were doing the same thing for the
Shabak. And I strongly suspected so was Har Shefi, and said so
publicly at the Rabin Assassination Conference in Jerusalem.
Listening to me in the audience was Har Shefi’s grandmother Pnina
Peli.
She approached me after my speech, introduced herself and
said, “You’re right about Margalit and Benny but you’ve got the
motive all wrong.” I quickly directed her to a semi-quiet nook in
the auditorium and asked her what she meant. “They were
supposed to do a good thing, stop a political assassination. They
didn’t know the Shabak was using them.”
Too many people were approaching me with questions and I
asked Mrs. Peli to meet me at the end of the conference. However,
the event went on too long and I had to suffice myself with our

38
two minutes of conversation. But I think what she said was wise
and right.
Benny Elon was an early activist for truth about the Rabin
assassination. He testified at the Shamgar Commission about
Raviv’s activities and then, as far as I know, never made a public
accusation again. That task was left to his wife Emunah who
collected all the newspaper clippings about Raviv in one damning
volume called The Raviv File. And then she stopped her activities.
The Benny Elon family know all about Raviv and the more lurid
background of the Rabin murder, but they have not helped
Margalit Har Shefi in any way. The opposite. Benny Elon’s left
wing brother was hired as Har Shefi’s lawyer and he simply did not
defend her. Worse, he incriminated her even more deeply.
His chosen defense was that Har Shefi didn’t take Amir’s threats
against Rabin seriously, and to prove it he coached Har Shefi to
stress the fact that she asked her rabbi if Amir’s biblical
justifications for Rabin’s murder were legitimate. What a trap he
laid for Har Shefi! Obviously if she went to her rabbi, she did take
Amir seriously and thus should have informed the police about
him. That’s the way the judges saw it, and from then on Har Shefi’s
chances for acquittal were over.
Margalit Har Shefi had the best defense of all. She was innocent
of the charge of not preventing Yigal Amir from murdering
Yitzhak Rabin because he didn’t do it. She and her family have
been contacted by numerous friends and given the documentation.
There is not an honest court on earth that would convict Amir
because there is no evidence against him. But there is a whole pile
of solid evidence against Rabin’s bodyguard, Yoram Rubin, who
did shoot him and almost as much against Shimon Peres, who
indirectly ordered him to.
And if Har Shefi and her family were really interested in saving
her from prison, they would have used it. And if Benny Elon really
cared about his niece, he would have testified to what he knew
about Raviv and the murder. And if Margalit Har Shefi wanted to
be free, she would have told the truth about Eyal.
Now, I know they were warned not to. And we can be sure the
warnings were terrible and terrifying. However, there are other
people trying to get to the bottom of the Rabin assassination who
39
have suffered in similar ways and I’m one of them. I’m taking
ridiculous risks, so how can I be sympathetic to Har Shefi when she
won’t tell the truth to save her life?
I can only suggest a strong action which could redeem her.
Avishai Raviv is also charged with failure to prevent Rabin’s
murder and his role is a great deal deeper than Har Shefi’s. When
his trial begins again in Jerusalem District Court, it would be a very
good idea for her and her advocates to sit in his trial if the sessions
are open. Raviv’s trial must be scrutinized without letup, not just
for her sake, but for Rabin’s and that of the Jewish nation.
Meanwhile, Rabin’s real murderer Shimon Peres is in the Sharon
cabinet, while Margalit Har Shefi is in prison. Such is the upside
down moral reality of Israel.

APOLOGIZE FOR REPRESSION?

I received a letter from my friend Joel Bainerman today. He just
had a phone conversation with our mutual friend Gemma Blech, an
activist for Women in Green, who informed him that the Israeli
Right was angry at me for my stance on Margalit Har Shefi, who is
serving a nine month prison term for “not preventing the
assassination of Yitzhak Rabin.” He, better than anyone, should
know that I do not serve the Right, I serve the Truth.
You see, the Women in Green are campaigning to have her
released and they think I am opposing them. Nothing could be
further from the truth. I want to see her free, but I know unless she
and her family start telling what they know about the Shabak and its
provocateur Avishai Raviv, she will not be released no matter how
many pleas for mercy are sent the Israeli President. Look how well
that strategy worked with Jonathan Pollard. His people are also too
frightened or lazy to hire a professional and find out why he is
REALLY sitting in prison for life.
No, Pollard did not work alone. No middle level Navy
Intelligence employee could have possibly sifted through the
billions of files in the Navy Intelligence archives to fish out the data
that Israel needed. He had high-level guidance, and he is sitting
while someone else, someone high up, is being protected. And
those supposedly fighting for Pollard refuse to go looking. Pollard

40
will not be released out of pity; it’s war out there and his advocates
had better, finally, start looking for some ammunition.
No different with Har Shefi. Her uncle Benny Elon was the first
public figure to finger Raviv as a Shabak plant. He knew him, he
was apparently tricked into working with him, I have witnesses to
this fact, and he’s keeping his mouth shut while his niece wallows in
prison.
Am I supposed to admire that? Joel should know better.
Because you see, two days ago Joel and I took our kids on a
camping trip. When he got home, he found that his house had been
broken into and trashed. The only thing stolen was his computer.
He knows the robbery was an intelligence-gathering operation and
surmises it resulted from his having financed the Hebrew
translation of my book The Last Days of Israel.
Funny, we did a lot of talking about intelligence gathering
operations during the camping trip because of an incident that
happened to me the day we left.
Our upstairs neighbors suddenly abandoned their new home
and took a five month trip abroad. I was sitting on the patio with
my kids when we heard the blinds open above us. My son was
shocked, “No one’s supposed to be living there, so why did the
blinds open?” he asked.
I have two phone lines; one downstairs for the computer, two
upstairs for the home. The next day, one of the upstairs phones
stopped ringing, yet you could dial out. We called the phone
company, and an hour before I left for the camping excursion, a
technician came over to repair the problem. He discovered that the
upstairs phone now shared the line with the computer phone
downstairs.
He explained, “Phones don’t switch lines by themselves. The
only way that this could have happened is if someone tapped your
phones and mixed the lines up afterward. To do that, he’d have to
have a key to your building.”
Our efficient Shabak leaves its mark again.
If Margalit Har Shefi thinks she is the only victim of repression
in Israel, she’d better think again. The newspaper Makor Rishon this
week reported the police investigation of Tzahi Zweig, the brave
41
post-graduate archaeology student, who did far more to expose the
PLO’s illegal digging under the Temple Mount than our
government. He is now being investigated on trumped up charges
of stealing artifacts. Then there is the gutsy investigative journalist
Dell Griffin, arrested and handed deportation orders for reasons he
isn’t sure of yet. The guesses being sent to me range from his
advocacy of a less than popular theological position to his past
personal acquaintanceship with Avishai Raviv.
Zweig’s crime was exposing the PLO, Griffin’s is not
understood yet. However, what is indisputable is that he is a
reputable writer, a former reporter for the Jerusalem Post and he is
being deported from his home. But he is fighting back. He is
seeking out the facts. He is talking, writing, informing. So why isn’t
Margalit Har Shefi? Why is her only defense that she didn’t take
Yigal Amir seriously? The implication is that Amir was the
murderer, which he was not. Her stance is undermining all the years
of hard work of those, all right including me, who labored to
expose the truth. She is hurting me by her silence, she is
perpetuating the lie that the religious Right murdered Rabin, but
most of all, she is destroying her own life.
And I’m supposed to thank her for that? Talk, and I’ll support
her with all I have to give. Otherwise, don’t expect anything from
me with what I have to go through.
Fine, I’m not in prison... yet. The authorities won’t dare to hand
me a public forum by allowing me to defend myself in court. I
would like nothing better than to subpoena Rabin’s assassins to my
trial. But look what else is going on besides mere surveillance.
My family received a notice that we owed the income tax
authority $80,000. I was accused of not submitting my annual
income tax statement in 1998. I NEVER miss submitting it so I
contacted my accountant who admitted he forgot to submit it but
refused to repair the damage. So we hired another accountant to get
to the bottom of the matter. All he has to report is the first
accountant won’t answer his queries but I wasn’t billed by him for
my 1999 report either. Here comes another $80,000 bill.
So someone is trying to get me on trumped up tax charges and
now my family has a lien on the house and car. And if that doesn’t
work, a widespread disinformation campaign is being mounted
42
against me. This time the claim is I am publicly accusing everyone
in sight, people I have traded information with for years, of being
Shabak agents. The smearing is spreading and I’m expecting a huge
final smear to shut me up for good any day.
I’m no angel, I’ve never claimed to be a saint and whatever form
it may take, I’ve decided to just accept the consequences. I’m
frankly getting very discouraged with my fellow Israelis. I tell them
the truth and they are incapable of absorbing it.
Tomorrow Shimon Peres is in Washington. Makor Rishon
reported that he will be meeting with two of his biggest allies in the
Bush Administration: Dan Kurtzer and Richard Haass. Both are
high ranking members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Kurtzer, in fact, is the only orthodox Jew in the CFR, which means
his orthodoxy is a sham. Haass, who as I have previously reported,
is the most anti-Israel politico in the Republican Party, and this fact
came from a politician who knows, Jack Kemp. Other
correspondents sent me ample proof in the form of Haass’ own
writing which confirmed the fact.
That they are both influential members of the CFR is not a
coincidence. That Peres is meeting them is not a coincidence. That
Sharon is sending Peres is not a coincidence. That Sharon
appointed Peres Foreign Minister is not a coincidence. That Peres
organized the murder of Rabin was a fact known to Sharon when
he made his appointment. After presenting my proofs of Peres’
complicity to thousands of people, the Israeli Right knows my case
is solid.
But they can’t put things together to save their lives and their
nation. Israel has an enemy in the United States; it is called the
CFR. Peres will be meeting their stooges tomorrow in Washington.
They will be plotting Israel’s downfall. And as far as the Right is
concerned, the core of the Middle East bloodshed is Arabs hating
Jews. Well, that’s not what’s happening. The CFR exploits the
hatred that exists through the Israeli and Arab leaders it has
corrupted and that includes Netanyahu and Sharon.
And while my nation bleeds, the Right refuses to listen to who is
twisting the knife. And while the Rabin assassination has been
exposed and proven, their biggest issue is Margalit Har Shefi’s
release because she was a victim of injustice.
43
 Well get this, WE ARE ALL VICTIMS OF INJUSTICE. The
whole state of Israel is under diplomatic siege by murderers who
rule us, the EU and America. The only solution I can think of to
save our enterprise is to FINALLY expose the Rabin assassination
and watch where the pieces fall. By doing so we can preserve our
existence and as a bonus, free Margalit Har Shefi.
After expressing all this deep-seated frustration with the people
I care for most, why should I carry on?
It’s because of people like Miriam Samsonovich, a fine
journalist, who faxed me the following report from Yom Hashishi
(April 20, 2001):
Interpol Director Arrives to Investigate Rabin Murder
Israel police heads, and the commanders of Tel Aviv Police and Yarkon
District Police spent an hour and a half in Rabin square demonstrating
the Rabin assassination for the Director of Interpol. Also present was a
reporter from Hashavuah who was informed of the event.
The Interpol Director climbed up and down the steps where Rabin spent
his last few moments alive, while checking various angles and recording
them in his computer. He engaged in conversations with the police
representatives which appeared to end in heated disputes. Citizens passing
the site, were hurriedly directed elsewhere.
The Interpol Director flew to Israel for a few hours, specially to
investigate the Rabin murder. He was seen examining adjoining buildings.
Police spokesperson Shulamit Herzberg confirmed the visit to Hashavuah.
She added that it was an official visit but insisted it was unconnected to
new findings about the Rabin murder.
There you go. After over five years of presenting the evidence,
the head of Interpol, plainly against the wishes of Tel Aviv area
police commanders, came to investigate the Rabin assassination.
We don’t know who sent him or why. I’d like to believe it was a
leader of the Israeli Right. But I doubt it. They’re too busy trying to
arrange a pardon for the smallest cog in the murder.
And I hope they succeed. But the only way they will is to
become warriors for truth, the complete truth, the deep truth...
already.

HAR SHEFI AND OTHER STINKY DEALS

President Katzav has pardoned Margalit Har Shefi and is
receiving endless accolades from her supporters, praising him for
44
his wisdom and goodness. When will they learn that there is no
goodness left in Israeli politics, just stinky deals?
Katzav has never had an original thought in his life, nor has he
once acted upon his own initiative. Har Shefi’s pardon was part of a
program to make certain that the Shabak inciter Avishai Raviv
never has his day in court.
The first signs that such a plan exists were revealed two weeks
earlier when charges of incitement against three Eyal members were
dropped. They were accused of participating in a filmed initiation
ceremony, broadcast over the Israel Broadcasting Authority’s
Channel One television station. Of course, the inflammatory
ceremony was organized by Raviv himself and stage-directed by
Channel One’s Shabak director Eitan Oren. Now, thought the
authorities, we wouldn’t want those nasty facts emerging from a
trial, so let’s get rid of this problematic exercise in legal malpractice.
And since the charges were dropped against the Eyal boys, well,
we’ll just drop the same charge against Avishai Raviv.
That left just one charge against Raviv: failure to prevent the
assassination of the prime minister, why the very same crime Har
Shefi was convicted of. And if she gets a pardon, well so will Raviv,
even before his trial begins.
Now how do we know this was the deal? Because Katzav as
good as told us. He explained he reached his pardon decision after
consulting with Carmi Gillon and Edna Arbel. Now why, oh why,
would they want Margalit Har Shefi pardoned? Could it be because
Arbel, as state prosecutor, dropped numerous police complaints
against Raviv and prevented Eitan Oren from standing trial for
directing the infamous Eyal initiation ceremony? (For full details,
look at the chapter called “Gagging on the Protocols” from my
book The Last Days of Israel.) And could it be, because Gillon was
Raviv’s ultimate superior officer, and his role in the incitements
leading to and including the Rabin murder would inevitably be
exposed in a fair trial of Avishai Raviv? Could it also be because
Rabin’s real murderer, the Shabak bodyguard Yoram Rubin, has to
be protected at all costs.
Recall a similar episode. In 1974, a soldier, Rachel Heller, was
murdered by her boyfriend, a Shabak officer named Yoram
Bichovsky. To protect their man, the Shabak had State Attorney
45
General Meir Shamgar sent an innocent dupe, Amos Baranes, to
prison for life. As public awareness of the injustice spread, Supreme
Court Judge, Haim Cohen, begged Baranes, literally on his knees, to
accept a presidential pardon and be released.
Baranes refused because one can only be pardoned for a crime
actually committed. He would not go through life a convicted
criminal. He chose prison over letting the state get away with
murder. Margalit Har Shefi was just as innocent as Baranes and if
she had a fraction of his integrity she would have turned down
Katzav’s phony pardon.
But she didn’t, and watch the consequences. Raviv will be
pardoned as well, even before he steps into the courtroom.
****
But since stinky deals are a way of life in Israel, let’s take the
opportunity to look at a few more:

1. Covering Up the Enemy’s Crimes

The source of the ammonia poisoning in the Gush Dan water
supply has been solved. The water authority Mekorot found an
ammonia leak at a filtration station in Bet Netofa in the Jezreel
Valley.
A hydrology student wrote: “That means the ammonia-polluted
water flowed 80 kilometers undetected before entering the Gush
Dan network... like that could happen.”
A nature-loving shepherd was murdered by the PLO and our
government told us he was shot dead. Why didn’t they want the
public to know the truth, as explained by another writer:
“It was told to me this evening that the government version of the
murder of Yair Har Sinai being shot by automatic fire from a distance was
a fabrication. The fact as reported to me by an army officer is that he was
surprised and caught by a number of assailants and tortured before death.
His body was cut from the area of the navel up towards the throat, his
innards being removed as well as other mutilations. It was the opinion of
the officer that he suffered greatly before his unfortunate death which
was ended with a bullet in the head at close range.”

2. Trojan Horses
Palestinian leader Faysel Al-Husseini was murdered in Kuwait
by his own CIA-trained bodyguards. The motive reported by Arab
46
sources was a power struggle between him and PLO Security chief
Jibril Rajoub for the takeover of power when Arafat goes to the
great kasbah in Hell.
However, a much better motive has emerged. Husseini started
blabbing about the real purpose of the Oslo Accord: to plant a
totally corrupt Arafat within Israel’s gates, like a Trojan Horse, then
destroy the country in stages. To say the very least, this was a no-no
on several counts and the penalty had to be a quick murder.
Here is a sample of Husseini’s ego getting him killed:
On his way to Kuwait, where he later died of a heart attack,
PLO senior Faysal Al-Husseini gave what turned out to be his last
interview to the Egyptian (Nasserite) daily Al-Arabi.
“Had the U.S. and Israel not realized, before Oslo, that all that was left of
the Palestinian National movement and the Pan-Arab movement was a
wooden horse called Arafat or the PLO, they would never have opened
their fortified gates and let it inside their walls.”
“Despite the fact that we entered these walls in order to build, unlike the
Greeks who entered in order to destroy, I now tell you all, all those to
whom I spoke in a secret meeting during the days of Oslo: ‘Climb into
the horse and don’t question what type of material the horse is made of.
Climb into the horse, and we shall transform your climbing into that
horse into a beginning of a building era rather than an era of the end of
hope.’
“And indeed, there are those who climbed unto the horse and are [now]
inside [the PA territory] whether they supported the Oslo Accords or
not.”
The PLO are hardly the only Trojan Horse in Israel. Thanks,
initially to the Debka File (debka.com), the world learned that Saudi
Arabia is calling America’s shots in the Middle East. Subsequent
reports sent to this address insist that the Saudi Foreign Minister is
threatening the Bush family oil interests if Israel’s disintegration
isn’t speeded up.
The Trojan Horse planted in Israel by Bush is the new American
ambassador, Daniel Kurtzer. He is being painted by the media as an
orthodox Jew, with a son studying Torah in Mevasseret Zion, who,
of course, could mean no harm to his own people.
Well look who controls Daniel Kurtzer! Look at the company he
keeps! Why, it’s the notorious Henry Siegman, who was exposed by
Ma’ariv reporter Yoav Yitzhak for taking what amounts to a

47
$200,000 bribe from the EU to run a smear campaign against Israel.
And look where they like to meet; why at CFR headquarters:
(http://www.cfr.org/p/resource.cgi?meet!838)
Ad Hoc Meeting
December 18, 1997, New York, NY
“The State of U.S.-Egyptian Relations”
Speaker: Daniel Kurtzer, U.S. Department of State
Presider: Henry Siegman, Senior Fellow and Director, U.S./Middle East
Project, Ad hoc meetings on the Middle East
Other Meetings in this Series:
The Middle East Process After the Israeli Elections: An Egyptian
Perspective
Israel’s Elections and Middle East Peace
The State of the American-Israeli Alliance
Three Perspectives on Peace
After May 4: Palestinian Options and Strategies
The Middle East after Oslo
Current Developments in the Middle East
Orthodox Perspectives on the Peace Process
What Now? The Aftermath of Secretary Albright’s Visit to the Middle
East
The Middle East Peace Process at a Crossroads: A Palestinian View
Promoting the Middle East Peace Process
The Peace Process after Hebron: A Palestinian Perspective
Update on the Peace Process and U.S.-Egypt Relations
Israeli-Palestinian Relations
The Future of Jerusalem
An Israeli Perspective on Radical Islam and the Peace Process
Is the Peace Process in Crisis?
Perspectives on the Middle East Peace Process

3. The Media
And if you’re wondering why you’ve heard of none of these
stinky deals, maybe it’s because the mainstream media isn’t telling
you. Here’s a little example of why, sent by Toronto journalist
Marshall Shapiro:
“It has come to my attention that Ms. Wafa Amr, senior editor at CNN
and senior writer at Reuters, is an officer of the Palestinian Authority

48
 security forces. Wafa’s husband, the head of Arafat’s Voice of Palestine
PBC radio station, also plays an essential role in the security forces of the
Palestinian National Authority.”
For those who believe that President Katzav’s pardon of
Margalit Har Shefi was a unilateral act of decency that deserves
high praise, think again. It was just another stinky deal that the
Israeli public will soon pay for many times over.

AN EYE-WITNESS TO THE RABIN ASSASSINATION

I gave six lectures this week and reached about 1500 people.
That is why a tidal wave of new information was imparted to me.
The people who spoke with me noted the recent death of one of
Peres’ chauffeurs, who collapsed while playing backgammon with
friends. One more early death of someone who got too close to
Peres. A few noted that Yigal Amir’s judge, Edmund Levy was
appointed to the Supreme Court. Others observed that the
country’s dirty judge Meir Shamgar released his report on the
Kishon River navy cancer deaths and, as expected, not one officer
was held responsible for the agony.
And a few people donated inside information, such as:
“The funeral director who arranged the burial of Yoav Kuriel, the Shabak
officer murdered after Rabin’s assassination, was Israel Ehrlich. He lives
in Bnai Brak. He has been warned not to talk and has suffered very
serious harassment, especially at the hands of the income tax authority, as
a hint of what’s to come if he speaks. But when the day comes that the
murderers are prosecuted, you have the name of the person to subpoena
to testify as to what exactly happened to Kuriel.”
“I am related by marriage to a senior Shabak officer named Reuven Gilad.
I gave him your material and he studied it for hours. He told me, ‘This
demands a serious investigation. I didn’t know all this and that means,
neither did most of the Shabak. This isn’t how my unit operates. There
must be people breaking all the rules and they should be identified and
interrogated.’”
Now the most serious incident of all. Someone who was at
Ichilov Hospital when Rabin arrived had something to say.
Something extremely important. What I could verify, assures me
that I had a truthful conversation. Nonetheless, I will add some
commentary to put the dialog in context. Naturally, I will do what
is necessary to hide the witness’ identity.

49
 “To begin, there were people in Ichilov who saw what was going on that
night. One who I caught was a journalist who later became an advisor to a
well-known politician. He hid in a vent and I saw him but didn’t say
anything.
“Ten minutes before Rabin arrived, anyone in the ER was ordered
removed. I only saw Dr. Surkin and he objected rather violently to being
thrown out, protesting that anyone who tried it would have to kill him
first. However, he gave in and only went back after Rabin was put on the
table in there.
“He examined Rabin and while doing so, Shimon Peres, Yossi Sarid and
someone I didn’t recognize stood outside in the hall. Dr. Surkin emerged
and told Peres that Rabin was too ripped up to be saved. Peres broke out
in a huge grin and started joking with Sarid.”
After almost six years of research, I had never heard of Dr.
Surkin, nor did anyone place Sarid inside the hospital. So I did
some investigating. Dr. Surkin exists, lives in Raanana and is in
charge of Ichilov’s ER department today. The information does
check out.
“Then Prof. (Gabi) Barabash arrived with the journalist Eitan Haber.
They were both at the same party and drove to the hospital together.
Prof. Barabash went into the ER and examined Rabin. He came out a few
minutes later and told Peres that Rabin’s condition had improved.
“The grin on Peres’ face disappeared in an instant and he went crazy. He
picked up his cellular phone and barked orders into it. He started yelling
at people to do things. Rabin was moved to the operating theater and
Peres ordered Haber to go in there and collect anything that belonged to
Rabin.
“That’s all I saw. I was terrified I’d be noticed and I got out of there after
that.”
Eitan Haber testified to the Shamgar Commission that after
hearing of the shooting, he rushed to Ichilov, ran to the operating
theatre and collected Rabin’s possessions. For years I’ve asked how
Haber would have had the knowledge and authority to know where
the theater was and actually enter it. His arrival from a party
together with Barabash answers the questions perfectly.
I believe the previous eye-witness account is accurate.
And I don’t know what to do about it.
***
The release of the Amir interrogation tape led to consequences.
Most people were highly impressed by the discovery of Yigal Amir
telling the police about the Rabin murder plot. One person who
50
wasn’t was Natan Gefen, author of Fatal Sting, a very important
Rabin murder exposé.
I received the tape, with no conditions attached, from the
economic writer and commentator Yaacov Verker. He received the
tape from Natan Gefen, who received it from a former advisor to
the Israel Police Crime Lab, Nahum Shakhak.
A couple of years ago, Shakhak dropped into the Rabin research
community from parts unknown. He had an enormous stockpile of
important evidence in his apartment, including the final unreleased
Shamgar Commission report, which he would wave under our
noses and return it to a drawer “until the time was right to release
them.”
There are those convinced that Shakhak is an agent keeping tabs
on the Rabin “conspiracy” crowd. They, yes we, suspect he releases
decent evidence about once a year to cover his real duty of
spreading division in the small community and sabotaging real
progress, such as TV documentaries.
Maybe we’re wrong and he really is a former police adviser with
a bad personality. Either way, he got the tape first and passed it on
to Natan Gefen.
He was furious when he called. “I was negotiating the tape’s sale
and you could have wrecked everything.” Natan has a more
commercial view of Rabin evidence than I do.
“No one said not to release the transcript. The way I hear it, you’ve been
handing the tape out all over the place. Nurit Kadar of Channel Two got
a copy from someone.”
“That was then. Now I’m in negotiations and you’re in the way. I already
sold the tape to Fox News and I wanted to find a newspaper as well.”
“Fox bought the tape?”
“Yes. They’ll be broadcasting it on November 4th.”
Now that is news. This coming Rabin murder day, Fox TV will
expose a film proving his alleged murderer believed he was a sucker
in a conspiracy to knock off the prime minister. That should do the
trick, except, fifty to one, enough threatening phone calls will have
been made to Fox News to cancel their plans. But Gefen did make
his sale anyway, and has put another “Final Proof” on the market.
“I have the original police conclusions about the Rabin murder. They are
in three pages. On the first page the police conclude that Amir could not

51
 possibly have been the murderer. The police cleared him and I have the
proof. This should blow things open. And I have follow-up proof of
tampering. The next page’s conclusion is that Amir was likely guilty and
by the third revision, the police decide that he is the murderer. The whole
genesis of the cover-up is on these pages.”
Natan is putting these documents on the open market.
Next, he lit into me about a supposed mistake in the previous
article. I had written the name of the mysterious Rabin bodyguard
murdered the same night as the prime minister; Tzvi Forster. Natan
insisted, “Forster was the Shabak agent who murdered Rachel
Heller in ‘73.”
“I thought Yoram Bichovsky was the prime suspect.”
“He didn’t do it, Forster did and I don’t believe he was still in
the Shabak twenty two years later.”
So, I contacted Bichovsky’s lawyer, Chaim Misgav, who does
believe his client was innocent and asked him about Tzvi Forster.
He replied, “I don’t recall hearing his name in any of the
proceedings.”
From Natan, the tape led to a friend of a bodyguard who took
me aside at my newspaper kiosk.
“My friend was a Shabak bodyguard and I’ve got news for you. The
Shabak owns most of the gun shops in the country and they let their
agents run them. It’s good for money and keeping tabs on who has guns.
My friend shared responsibility for a shop near Tel Aviv and he was
called away on assignment to South Africa. There he was quickly gunned
down by a ‘robber’ outside his hotel. That’s how it was reported, anyway.
He never said so, never said not, but I think he was one of Rabin’s
guards. Now, Yoram Rubin (Rabin’s bodyguard and real murderer) was
given a gun shop in Netanya to operate with his brother. I heard he was
just given an assignment in Egypt. Take my word for it, this won’t be a
long assignment.”
The tape then went public. It seems that Kach had spread a
leaflet throughout Judea and Samaria accusing me of being a
Shabak agent because I was accusing “those who most care about
Israel” of being Shabak agents. The left wing weekend supplement
of Ha’aretz, Kol Ha’ir interviewed me about the leaflet. I explained
that Kach people were out in full force in the month before the
Rabin assassination. Avigdor Eskin performed his Pulsa Dinara,
death curse on Rabin, Itamar Ben Gvir put a death threat on
Rabin’s car, Avishai Raviv had infiltrated Kach, etc. Then I
52
mentioned the tape and Amir’s contention within that he had heard
that Avishai Raviv had given Itamar Ben Gvir a gun with blanks
and that he was going to shoot Rabin with it.
The tape made the news. The newspaper quoted me, “This
proves I’m not working for the far right like the media claimed, but
for the truth.” The approach was serious and a nice color photo
accompanied the article. The left is warming towards me somewhat.
I gave three lectures to left wing audiences recently. Even the
stalwart Kibbutz Yotvata near Eilat, flew me in for a speech.
The article led to responses. Natan Gefen commented about
Kach leader Noam Federman:
“He’s a real shmuck. He told me he opposes my work and is working to
give Amir the full credit he deserves. They want Amir to be the murderer
no matter what the evidence.”
And now from the left:
“Remember last month the Shabak found three bombs in Federman’s car.
We knew the story was fishy from the start but we assumed it was an
Avishai Raviv type operation to blame the settlers for some outrage. The
outrage came a couple of days later when three Arabs were killed in a
drive-by shooting and Raviv’s old organization took responsibility. Then
it turned out that the driver of the van was an intelligence officer not liked
by Arafat and blaming a straw Jewish group for his murder served a lot of
purposes.
“Now look what the effect was on Federman. By blaming the Shabak, he
planted the message that they are my enemy. Then his wife got a huge
story in Ma’ariv restating the Shabak planted the bombs angle. So now,
any suspicions of Federman’s ties to the Shabak are erased. But we know
that Kach was involved in the atmosphere creation before the Rabin
murder because of the Ben Eliezer incident.”
This week the Labor Party held a leadership vote. Two thugs,
Avraham Burg and Binyamin Ben Eliezer vied for the votes. Burg
is currently being investigated by the State Comptroller for
corruption while he was head of the Jewish Agency. He liked to
pilfer money and take his friends and family on little jaunts to
expensive hotels. Ben Eliezer had already been investigated as
Housing Minister for bribing Arab councils with ministry
allocations in return for voting Labor.
Burg was also leader of the EU and CIA-funded Peace Now
movement. He was apparently the winner of the contest, which
means that Labor will be no different than Meretz from now on.
53
Except Ben Eliezer discovered vote fraud. And as he digs deeper in
his own police investigation, here is what he will discover.
A couple of months back, Burg was in Washington meeting with
lots of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) bigwigs like Powell,
Rice and both Clintons. They liked him a whole lot and promised
to finance and arrange his ascension to the leadership of the Labor
Party. They used a trick described in detail by me and Joel
Bainerman in the March 14, 1994 edition of the National Review.
They got the PLO to decide the winner.
Only about a quarter of all Jewish voters bothered to cast ballots
and they overwhelmingly supported Ben Eliezer. But over 80% of
eligible Arabs voted and literally ALL chose Burg. Ben Eliezer
knows that after bribing so many Arab municipal leaders for so
long that this is impossible. But he’s wrong, as he shall soon
discover. When the PLO orders Israeli Arabs to vote for one
candidate, they obey. And that’s how Burg won, the same way
Rabin won in 1992. Now all Burg has to do is win a national
election and return his favors to the CFR and Arafat by dismantling
the state.
Next, I get a phone call from a neighbor of Burg’s. “The kippa
he’s wearing is phony,” he said. “Burg isn’t religious. He lives
across from me. The lights go on and off all Shabbat and more.”
Back to the reporter from the left.
“Remember before the murder, these Kach kids jumped on Ben Eliezer’s
car while he was in it, supposedly threatening his life. Ben Eliezer was in
on the setup. If he was threatened like that for real, his bodyguards would
have started shooting them off the roof and hood one by one. He was in
on the incitements, though nobody thinks he knew it would lead to
Rabin’s murder.”
I meet another left wing reporter, Greer Faye Cashman of the
Jerusalem Post. She is one of the most informed, astute reporters in
Israel and her paper isn’t giving her a chance to really strut her
stuff. Her first observation never occurred to me. It was about the
bloodied song sheet Rabin put in his side jacket pocket:
“How would the blood have gotten on the sheet unless it was put there?
Rabin’s jacket was open, if he was shot lying down like they said, the flap
of the jacket would have fallen away from his chest.”
Then she passed on a solution to one of the great mysteries of
today: Why is Rabin’s daughter Dahlia sitting in the same cabinet
54
with Peres and even hugging him publicly. A common answer is a
little conversation that went like this:
“Your mother went too far and I’m sorry she’s gone. Don’t let it happen
to your children. They don’t deserve to be that sick.”
Greer put an end to such thinking:
“The way I hear it is Dahlia Pelosoff wanted to be Deputy Security
Minister so she could have access to the files about her father’s murder.
But the Peres appointees are feeding her the wrong information. I hear
the Rabin children want the truth out and Yuval is coming back to Israel
soon to campaign for it.”
Greer’s information is confirmed by the Arutz Sheva Arab
Affairs reporter Yehoshua Meiri who tells me, “Yuval Rabin wants
it out and doesn’t care anymore who gets hurt.”
I cross the street and enter Gefen Books, publisher of the
Hebrew and Russian versions of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin? I am
meeting the wife and friend of Victor Mordechai, author of a
powerful book called Is Fanatic Islam a Global Threat?
I step outside to inhale some fresh nicotine when I see a
gentleman photographing us from a white Mitsubishi van across
the street. I bring everyone out to see, he spots us and takes off.
His license is 60 061 02. Can anyone hack into the Motor Vehicle
Office computers?
I take a trip to Efrat to show the Amir tape to a small group
who know the issues. It’s an advanced intelligence gathering.
Interesting information emerges, very interesting. It was an Efrat
researcher, David Bedein, who uncovered Yigal’s mother, Geula
Amir’s, own strange intelligence ties.
In 1974, Geula Amir led a letter writing campaign to release a
female Mossad spy held by Norway, after a bungled hit in the city
of Lillehammer.
“Why she was chosen for the job isn’t certain but she was the niece of
that crooked Histadrut head, Yisrael Kessar. The intelligence ties of the
Amir family are far deeper and go back a lot farther than anyone knows.”
The week is winding down. Sharon flies to Moscow. Now did
anyone report that King Juan Carlos was also in Moscow that day?
Well he was. Just read
(http://asia.dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/world/article.html?s=asia/h
eadlines/010905/world/afp/Solana_works_for_Arafat-Peres_summit __
Israel_beefs_up_security.html)
55
 Sharon is run by the top of the New World Order. The
Europeans are planning their next slaughter of the Jews and Sharon
is playing with their leader and not telling anyone about it. It’s what
happens when outsiders completely corrupt the political leadership
of the Jews. The Amir tape led to the deepest crevices barely
concealing the rot.
A story being told goes like this.
A Palestinian and settler are complaining about their governments.
“Arafat is a thief.” says the Palestinian, “All he does is rob us and get us
killed. When will we get an honest leader and put an end to the
suffering?”
The settler retorts, “And our government has lied to us all and sold out
our heritage to terrorists. When will the suffering end?”
“Well,” answers the Palestinian. “At least yours won’t last for long.

AMIR DID NOT MURDER RABIN

AND NOW IT’S A PROVEN FACT
Wasn’t Adir Zik wonderful in his cover story interview in Makor
Rishon? This leading journalist/broadcaster said his view of the
Rabin murder is exactly the same as mine. He also confirmed my
view that Baruch Goldstein was a patsy for a massacre others
committed. Lest anyone dare to doubt him, me or the truth
anymore, within this article are the conclusive proofs that Amir did
not shoot real bullets at Rabin. As I’ve been saying for six years
now, he shot blanks.
National Police Headquarters - Investigations Division
Department of Criminal Identification – Ramle, 13 November 1995
Subject: Murder of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin
Background: On 4/11/95, around 21:45, Prime Minister Rabin and one
of his bodyguards were shot while about to enter their vehicle at the end
of a rally in Kings of Israel Square. A suspected shooter, Yigal Amir, was
caught by police and transferred to the Yarkon Division police station.
The prime minister died of his wounds at Ichilov Hospital.

56
57
58
 Test Results: On 4/11/95 I was part of a video crew led by
Superintendent Shmuel Berger at a rally in the Kings of Israel Square. At
approximately 21:55 I was given a plastic bag with a pistol inside,
suspected of being used in a shooting, by Deputy Superintendent Moti
Naftali. The pistol was a model 84F Beretta, serial number D98231Y that
utilized short 9 mm bullets, which included a clip with an undetermined
number of bullets within.
On the street and sidewalk, three 380 WIN Auto cartridges were found.
At 22:15 approximately, I arrived at the office of the commander of the
Yarkon Division police station. The suspect Yigal Amir was present. I
took samples from his hands and hair.
I could find no significant results from the Feroprint examination that I
undertook of the suspect’s hands...
Detective Arieh Moshe 93614
Mobile Police Laboratory
A Feroprint examination will reveal the tiniest amount of metal
residues. Officer Moshe examined Amir’s hands a half hour after he
claimed the shooting took place and found none on Amir’s hands.
After consultations with a forensics expert, doctor and
policewoman, I can conclude that this result would be unlikely in
the extreme if Amir had shot real bullets. However, there are
possible explanations. So let us now look at a second report to get
the full story of the forensic tests on Amir’s hands.
Israel Police Headquarters/Investigations Division
Department. of Criminal Identification
Written by Nadav Levine - Trace Evidence
On 5/11/95 I received evidence for testing, including samples taken from
the murder suspect Yigal Amir, (identity number 027790088). Here are
the initial test results:
In the suspect’s hair sample, I found one particle that could be identified
as a gunshot residue. We are unaware of any similar compound not used
in the explosion of caps.
In the sample from the suspects hands, I found no particles which that
could be identified as gunshot residue.
Detective Nadav Levine
Trace Materials Laboratory

The Hebrew word for cap, as in cap gun, is pica, the world
chosen by Levine. But even if the one particle found in Amir’s hair
was from gunpowder and not a cap, the explanation is simple. A
59
policeman touched his own pistol, then Amir’s head and left a
particle in the hair.
But if Amir actually shot real bullets, there would have been
gunshot particles on his hands. AND THERE WERE NOT!
Neither gunpowder nor metal residues were found on Amir’s hands
in two separate tests, by two competent police technicians. THIS IS
AN IMPOSSIBILITY IF AMIR SHOT REAL BULLETS!
Blank bullets are noisemakers which do not have enough
explosive material to leave significant residues. Nor is the material
of the same power to expel a bullet from a cartridge. Think of a
little boy’s cap gun, or those party poppers that make noise when a
strip of paper is pulled. That is what Amir shot and that is why the
police technicians could not find gunpowder traces or metal
residues on his hands: because Amir shot blanks!
It’s over, people. The cover-up of Rabin’s murder is finished.
We have all the proof we need that Amir did not murder Rabin.
Send the attached documents to the world and force the Israeli
government to tell the truth.

HAPPY RABIN WEEK

Every Rabin week has its revelations but this year was the best,
thanks in part, to the little old evidence leaker. Four days into the
week, ending November 4, the popular radio announcer Dahlia
Yairi announced the results of a survey conducted for the Israel
Broadcasting Authority to determine how many Israelis believe in
the “conspiracy theory” of the Rabin assassination.
The last time this survey was undertaken, in 1999 by Ma’ariv and
Gallup, 18% of Israelis believed there was a high-level plot that
took Rabin’s life, while 13% answered that there might have been.
This year, the figure of those who accept the “conspiracy theory”
rose to 30%. A befuddled Yairi reportedly said, “That means two
million Israelis believe the Shabak was behind Rabin’s murder.”
Actually, even more, because the figure of those who suspect
such a thing wasn’t included. However, it’s a sure bet that half of all
Israelis now believe or suspect that Rabin was murdered in a way
much different than what their government is telling them.

60
 HALF OF ISRAEL! The truth is truly out. But it’s only being
released to that half of the country that cares. Look at this Rabin
week’s press coverage:
• Hatsofe—religious right wing—Eight pages in weekend
magazine. Extensive coverage of Amir’s trial defense
summation, which arrived precisely at the “conspiracy”
theory. Headline; “THERE ARE NO TRACES OF AMIR ON
THE GUN THAT KILLED RABIN.”
• Yated Ne’eman—religious, liberal—In a two page article,
which referred in large part to Hatsofe’s revelations, the
rather skittish Hebrew edition (compared to the
fearless English version), admitted that there is much
backing for the “conspiracy theory.” The author noted
that the mainstream Israeli papers, “Who know how to
attack like only the left wing does,” backed off their
incitements this year because word has reached them of
decisive evidence proving Amir did not murder Rabin.
• Hashavuah—haredi, right—The headline was AMIR
DIDN’T MURDER RABIN. The three page coverage
included an extensive interview with Dr. David Khen,
showing medically how Amir had no opportunity to
murder Rabin the way he died.
• Makor Rishon—secular, right—Two pages of new
evidence in the weekend magazine, with an impressive
article in the main section about Rabin’s song sheet.
On the night of the murder, it had a round black hole
in it that sure looked like a bullet hole. The newspaper
printed that photo beside a photo of the sheet as it
appears in the prime minister’s archive today. The hole
has disappeared.
Now compare:
• Ma’ariv—secular liberal—Eight paragraph article in
weekend paper reporting Hatsofe’s exposé of Avishai
Raviv’s police testimony. The more damaging report
on Amir’s trial defense is excluded.
• Yediot Ahronot—secular liberal—Nuttin’
• Ha’aretz—secular, extreme left—Nada.
61
 • Kol Ha’ir—secular, extreme left—Had a long article
about Rabin’s bodyguards who suffered mysterious
deaths. Mostly debunking junk BUT with a huge
revelation. A third young bodyguard died of an
unexpected heart attack a few days before he planned
to testify at one of Avishai Raviv’s trials.
And that’s it for the secular left. They’re covering up the truth.
Case closed and Period! But the desperation of the ruling tyrants is
shining through. Just look what’s going on: From Ha’aretz we
discover that Margalit Har Shefi’s letter to President Katzav which
led to her early release, was a forgery, and she could be shipped
back to prison. From Ma’ariv, we learn that the Rabin family want a
true hero to be prosecuted. They speak of Shlomi Halevy, the Bar
Ilan student and soldier in the Intelligence Brigade who, five
months before Rabin’s murder, reported to the police and Shabak
that Amir was threatening Rabin’s life. Why would the Rabin family
want him tried? Perhaps to get to the Shabak.
Because that’s what Dahlia Pelosoff Rabin told Ha’aretz. She
said she can’t wait for Raviv’s trial because she knows he is just the
tip of the iceberg. Well, now she’s going to have to wait six months
because the trial has been postponed again. That’s nine times now.
***
Now how do we really know there is a Rabin cover-up? Because
a highly significant convention took place on his Hebrew memorial
day, and other than in Arutz Sheva’s newsletter, no Hebrew media
covered it. The hit lecturer was Joel Skousen, editor of the World
Affairs Brief, who journeyed from Utah, in part, to attend the
convention. He explained New World Order philosophy and how
the hidden rulers can deliberately create radical regimes like the
Taliban or PLO, fund and arm them into power, only to have a
useful enemy to make war on down the line. It was nice to have
Israelis hear it from someone else.
This author has been writing steadily that Shimon Peres is a tool
of the European Illuminati, headed in part by King Juan Carlos of
Spain. Peres will meet Arafat in Spain shortly. Please, someone,
connect the dots already.
(http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/011031/2001103125.html)

62
 Mubarak on a Two-Day Visit to Spain
Egypt-Spain, Politics, 10/31/2001
Later the President will meet King Juan Carlos on a lunch banquet
attended by the delegation accompanying the President and Senior
Spanish officials.
Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher said that President Hosni Mubarak’s
coming visit to Spain acquires special importance at this stage.
Maher said that Mubarak will have talks with Spanish King Juan Carlos
and Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, and will address the forum on
means to expand cooperation between the European and Mediterranean
countries.
He told diplomatic editors on Tuesday that the talks would also deal with
relations between the two countries, international and regional issues,
developments in the Palestinian territories and means to bring the
Palestinians and Israelis together at the negotiations table.
The talks will further cover cooperation to achieve security and stability in
the Mediterranean basin and means to push forward development efforts
in North Africa and the Southern Mediterranean, added Maher.
Maher said that round-table talks would be attended by him together with
Palestinian Minister of local government Saeb Erekat and with the
possible participation of Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres
Ambassador of Egypt to Spain
Hussein Kamel Haridy said President Mubarak’s talks with King Juan
Carlos and Premier Aznar would focus on three key issues namely the
situation the Middle East, terrorism and the Spanish Presidency of
European Union.
And for those who don’t think Peres had a role in Rabin’s
murder, broadcaster Yehoshua Meiri has a scoop. It seems that a
really damaging tape recording is floating around. On the day
before the signing of the first Oslo agreement, two reporters,
Shimon Shiffer and Nahum Barnea were taping an interview with
Peres at his office. The interview was interrupted by a phone call
from a Peres Labor Party politico, Giora Einam. Peres had the
reporters to leave the room for the duration of the call. They did
but left their tape recorder on “accidentally” .
Rabin wanted to attend the signing ceremony and Peres didn’t
like the idea. “Something’s got to be done about that S.O.B.,” Peres
shouted. “We have to do something about him. The bastard’s been
haunting me for sixteen years and it has to stop.”

63
Rabin Day Addendum
November 4, 2001, the final day of Rabin week. In our previous
overview, we discovered that the entire Israeli religious and
conservative media reported extensively on the conspiracy that
ended with Rabin’s murder. We noted that one newspaper, Yated
Ne’eman, observed that this year the liberal/left media chose to
drastically tone down its coverage of Rabin week because they had
received conclusive proof that Yigal Amir did not murder Rabin in
the form of two police lab tests on his hands right after the
shooting, which proved negative for metal and gunpowder traces.
The gunpowder trace test was conducted by the head of the
Israel Police Trace Laboratory, Chief Inspector Nadav Levine. This
week, one of my faithful readers, who works in the medical field,
called Levine to verify his test results on Amir’s hands. Levine did
not deny that he conducted the tests, nor did he deny the results.
He simply said, “I did my job and now it’s in the hands of the
courts.” We can assume that he gave the same answer to those
journalists of the mainstream media who decided to keep Rabin
week coverage to a minimum.
On the weekend before the end of the obscene annual ritual, the
newspaper pattern stayed the same, but with one huge difference:
• Hamodia—religious, right—A superb three page précis
of the Amir/Raviv issues including fifty unanswered
questions about the Rabin assassination that put it all
together for the novices and former non-believers.
• Makor Rishon—secular, right—A two and a half page
summary of the main conspiracy theses. This author’s
section was riddled with errors. The article, though
extremely helpful to the cause of truth, claimed I have
been working with one of Amir’s lawyers from the
beginning, in order to publicize facts not suitable for
the courtroom. Simply, not true at all.
• Yerushalayim—secular, left—Nearly supercilious
coverage of the recent Root and Branch Rabin
Assassination Congress.
• Ma’ariv—secular, liberal—A tiny reference to the
“conspiracy” theory in one column. Nothing else.
64
 • Yediot Ahronot—secular, liberal—Nothing
• Ha’aretz—secular, extreme left—Nope
• Kol Ha’ir—secular, extreme left—One of the most
thorough and important exposés of this week or any
other.
Wait, what was that? An extreme left news magazine printing a
Rabin murder exposé? Could it be? It sure could and let’s take a
gander at this revelation.
The front page of the magazine: Pictures of Shlomi Halevy, Hezi
Kalo and Dahlia Pelosoff Rabin. The headline: “THEY’RE
AFRAID”.
The characters so far:
• Shlomi Halevy—He reported Amir’s threats on Rabin
to the police and Shabak in July 1995, five months
before the murder, making him one of the rare heroes
in the ugly tale of the assassination.
• Dahlia Pelosoff Rabin—In last week’s Ha’aretz, she was
quoted as watching the upcoming Avishai Raviv trial
with great interest, believing that this Shabak
provocateur was “just the tip of the iceberg.” As we
know, Raviv’s trial was delayed for the ninth time, this
time for six months. On the same day as her Raviv
quote, Ma’ariv reported that the Rabin family was
pressing for the prosecution of Shlomi Halevy.
• Khezi Kalo—Head of the Jewish Department of the
Shabak in the period leading up to and including the
Rabin murder. Thus, he was Avishai Raviv’s
commander.
We open the article. The headline reads: “THE SHABAK’S
TRICK”.
The new characters are:
• Yaniv Elrad—Kalo’s lawyer, previously Ehud Barak’s
strategic planning director.
• Khemi Sal—Head of the Political Affairs Department
of the National Kibbutz Movement and an executive

65
 member of Dor Shalom, the organization supposedly
charged with keeping Rabin’s ideals alive.
• Yossi Ginosar—Former Deputy Head of the Shabak.
Released from duty for perjury and abetting murders.
Took his ties to the PLO with him and became a
partner in their Jericho casino, or what’s left of it. The
mediator between PLO security chief, the well known
tyrant and murderer Jibril Rajoub and Shimon Peres,
Ehud Barak and their ilk.
The plot:
Kol Ha’ir reports:
“On the surface, the last person the Shabak would want to prosecute
would be Shlomi Halevy, one of the few sympathetic people involved in
the Rabin assassination.”
Yet, the report continues, the person behind the initiative is
none other than Khezi Kalo. The media reports that the Rabin
family were behind Halevy’s planned prosecution were lies.
Dahlia Pelosoff Rabin told the reporter (Anat Ben Moshe):
“Neither I nor my family led any initiative to prosecute Shlomi
Halevy. The media was wrong.”
So how did the Rabin family get the blame/credit/
responsibility? The plot unfolds:
Kalo is terrified about what could come out at the Raviv trial.
Raviv has let it be known that he will not allow himself to become
the scapegoat for all the incitements leading to the Rabin murder. If
Raviv turns his anger into truthful testimony, the whole Rabin fake
assassination plot could be revealed in court.
So far, the Shabak has managed to postpone Raviv’s trial nine
times, and the public is getting very sick of the manipulations. What
is needed for Kalo is a legal precedent that could be used to cut a
trial-ending deal. Raviv is charged with not preventing Rabin’s
murder because he withheld knowledge of Amir’s murderous
intentions and did not inform his superiors. Halevy also had
knowledge of Amir’s Shabak-directed threats but did inform the
police and Shabak, however, without naming Amir. He, instead,
described Amir, as a short Yemenite who belonged to a political
group at Bar Ilan University.

66
 Now the nutty conclusion. Because Halevy had foreknowledge
but didn’t name Amir, he should be charged with the same crime as
Raviv. But because he did inform the authorities, the court will
throw out the case against him. When it does, Raviv will have his
precedent to have his charges thrown out as well.
As one Shabak official summarized the plot:
“Kalo is terrified that he’ll have to testify at Raviv’s trial. He made a
strategic decision to go after Halevy to prevent that. Since Halevy is such
a minor character, there will be no pressure on the court to try him, like
there was for Margalit Har Shefi. The judges will refuse to proceed based
on lack of public interest and Kalo will have his precedent for canceling
Raviv’s trial.”
And now the plot deepens.
Kalo could not be seen as behind the initiative to prosecute
Halevy, so he set up a few walls between him and the facts. He
asked his attorney, Elrad, to find and convince a respected public
figure to submit the case against Halevy to the courts. Khemi Sal
was chosen, and he told Kol Ha’ir that he had no idea Kalo was
behind the trial petition. Deceit number one.
Deceit number two. To get the trial ball rolling, there is nothing
like Rabin family support. Because Kalo has no in with the Rabins,
he sent his pal Ginosar to Dahlia Pelosoff Rabin and included in
his conversation was a reference to the prosecution of Halevy. She
acknowledged the idea and that was leaked to Ma’ariv as Rabin
family support for a trial against Halevy.
Kalo’s plot illustrates just how desperate the Shabak is to put an
end to the Rabin murder affair. They are up to all kinds of tricks,
including planting lies everywhere. Local researchers have a
disrupter in their ranks and all kinds of increasingly desperate
disinformation is being placed on the internet by an address called
cyber samizdat. The deceit is being spread by a Haifa-based
professor, trained and groomed by the Federal Reserve, and
apparently sent to Israel to spread that kind of free-market
economic theory that allows American corporations to take over a
nation’s finances. He is being backed by a CIA/CFR father-son
team in America, also tied to academia.
Then there is the plot to re-imprison Margalit Har Shefi as
reported in Ha’aretz, based on an allegedly forged letter sent by her
to President Katzav, which led to her early release.
67
The List
Included in the massive pile of documents left to this writer a
couple of months ago is a list of nearly 400 unmarried, religious
women, their addresses and phone numbers, recovered from
Amir’s computer by the police. Journalist Adir Zik took special
interest in the list and found its significance. He believes the Shabak
supplied Amir with the list to find women to victimize, and in
Raviv’s case, to marry.
Reading the newly uncovered testimonies of Raviv, Amir and
Har Shefi leaves no doubt, that the latter was the second most
gullible woman found. The most gullible was the poor settler
woman who actually married Raviv.
Here are just a few of the ways Amir set up the foolish Har
Shefi to be a conspirator in his crimes.
• Amir asked Har Shefi to buy her some digital watches,
the kind that can be used to set off bombs. She
complied.
• Amir asked Har Shefi to recommend a chemist who
could teach him to make bombs. She directed him to
Dr. Bachrach of Bet El.
• Amir invited Har Shefi to join his underground. She
agreed if she wouldn’t have to do anything violent.
Time after time, Amir framed Har Shefi and this silly girl played
along without a second thought, if she was even capable of a first
thought at what she was getting into. And none of this setup was
ever mentioned at her trial. Clearly it was not in her or the Shabak’s
interest to bring up these embarrassing little facts. Nor did the
court pursue them because the judicial system is rotten. Let’s look
at a personal example.
I sued Knesset Member Ophir Pines for slander after he had my
book banned from the podium of the Knesset. I won the first
hearing when Judge Boaz Okun ruled that it was my right to sue a
Knesset member, despite parliamentary immunity from
prosecution.
And I was winning the second hearing until Attorney General
Elyakim Rubinstein sent his attorney to the courtroom with a brief
to show Judge Okun. A meeting was held behind closed doors and
68
the judge returned to close the trial. (A full account of the fiasco is
in the author’s book The Last Days of Israel).
Now what could Judge Okun have been offered to agree to such
a miscarriage of justice? A year and a half later, Judge Boaz Okun
was appointed to the Israeli Supreme Court.

THE SAD SAGA OF SARAH SHWARTZ

On the night of the Rabin assassination, the police raided
“assassin” Yigal Amir’s house and found no weapons. This could
not be permitted, so two days later the Shabak conducted their own
raid and found a veritable armory, they claimed belong to Yigal’s
brother Hagai. Now they could explain where Yigal got his gun and
ammo; from little brother’s stockpile.
The Hagai armory was photographed and released to the press.
Many noticed that among the stock there was an IDF issued M-16
and lots of IDF ammo. How, many asked, did Hagai acquire army
equipment?
The Shabak sprung into action and came up with a plan. They
looked in their registry of young men opposed to the peace process
and found Sergeant Arik Shwartz, who was in charge of an armory
in a small IDF base. He would be the source of Hagai’s army
weapons whether he was or not.
What caught the author’s eye was the sheer volume of
documents related to the framing of Sgt. Shwartz. While my co-
researchers saw little reason to pore over so many pages related to
such an obscure side issue, the author saw great drama emerging
from the Shabak’s Humor and Absurdity Branch. The following
tale comes right from the records of Israel Police.
The Shabak hand the police an order to raid Arik Shwartz’ home
based on their claim that he had stolen IDF weaponry, sold it to
Hagai Amir, and one of his bullets may even have murdered the
prime minister.
The police are dispatched to the home of Sgt. Arik Shwartz but
he’s not in, he’s at his base. But his 61 year old mother Sarah
Shwartz is in, opens the door and a squad of police barge into her
home. The commander barks at her, “Okay, where does he keep
his weapons?” Sarah replies, “Who keeps what?”
69
 “The weapons Arik stole from the army. Where are they?”
“Arik took his weapon back to the base.”
“No, the rest of them. The ones he gives out to his assassin
pals.”
“He’s never brought anything like that home. He’s a wonderful
boy.”
Sarah refuses to allow her house to be searched but her husband
Dr. Naftali Shwartz, yes the well-known dentist, acquiesces and the
police turn the house upside down. In the end they found one used
grenade pin and handle, a souvenir of army training.
Behind the scenes and unreported, the police must have
expressed their pique to the Shabak for sending them on a wild
goose chase. The men of the Shabak’s Humor and Absurdity
Division spring back into action. They return to the Shwartz home
in Ramat Gan and only Sarah is home this time. We don’t know
which threats were used on her but she did agree to go to the police
and admit that she gathered all of Arik’s weapons, put them in a
suitcase and threw it into the Mediterranean Sea. Here is her
testimony to the police.
“On the night of the Rabin assassination my son Arik called from his
base and said there could be trouble if I didn’t do him a little favor. He
asked me to pack all his weapons and get rid of them where no one
would find them. I found his weapons sitting in a carton and I packed
them into a suitcase. Then I took a bus to look for a good spot to dump
the suitcase. I got off near the Dolphinarium Disco and took a trail
behind it to the sea. I climbed onto a rock outcrop and threw the suitcase
into the sea. This I declare is the truth.”
The police were hardly convinced. They asked her what was in
the suitcase and she replied, “Rifles, bullets, grenades, that sort of
thing.”
To which the police insisted that suitcase would weight 75
kilograms. That they decided was too heavy for frail, 61 year old
Sarah to lift onto the bus, let alone throw far enough into the sea
that no one would detect its presence in the water. They sent her
home.
We do not know how the police chided the Shabak for again
wasting their time but the Humor and Absurdity Brigade were back
in action, once again visiting Sarah Shwartz. They ordered her to

70
find a co-conspirator, a strong young man who could have
conceivably thrown the suitcase in the sea. She phoned her
nephew, seventeen year old Moshe Khakham and asked him to do
her a teeny little favor. One can only imagine his enthusiastic
response, “Sure I’ll help you destroy vital evidence connected to the
biggest murder in the country’s history. I like the idea of spending
fifteen years in prison for you.”
Sarah and Moshe tramp down to the police station and once
again confess. Moshe gives the following testimony.
“On the night of the Rabin assassination, my aunt Sarah phoned me to
ask for a small favor. She asked if I wouldn’t mind picking up a suitcase
of hers and throwing it into the sea. I went to her place, rang the bell and
waited until she came down. She was walking the dog and carrying a
suitcase. She didn’t tell me what was in it. But she asked me to take a ride
in my car and throw it into the sea. I saw a trail behind the Dolphinarium
which led to a rock outcropping. I stood on it and threw the suitcase fifty
meters into the sea. This I declare this to be the truth.”
Here comes the drama. The police don’t believe that Sarah
carried the suitcase down to his car, but they especially didn’t
believe that Moshe could throw 75 kilos fifty meters.
Moshe explained, “It was stormy that night. I threw it only a few
meters then watched as the waves carried it fifty meters out.”
The police react, “Then the suitcase floated.”
“For a little while, just long enough for the waves to take it fifty
meters out.”
“And how long does a suitcase full of steel float?”
“Longer than you’d expect. Look, can I talk to my aunt?”
Sarah is brought into the room. She looks at Moshe and says,
“You told them, didn’t you?” He replies, “They made me.”
This show over, the police ask Sarah a simple question. How did
she know about the trail behind the Dolphinarium and the rock
outcropping if she wasn’t there? Now, I guess in hindsight she
would have preferred to say, “I asked Moshe where he threw it and
he drew a map for me,” but she was stunned by the question and
couldn’t answer it.
The police tell Sarah and Moshe to get lost and once again we
can only imagine what they told the Shabak. But nothing deters the
Humor and Absurdity Battalion. They visited Sarah Shwartz again
71
and the next day she was back at the police station. This time her
testimony was:
“After Moshe came back without he suitcase, I became curious where he
had thrown it. So I asked him to drive back with me to the exact spot. We
got out near the Dolphinarium, crossed a trail behind it and climbed onto
a rock out cropping. Then he pointed to the left and said, ‘I threw it over
there.’”
This Sarah declared to be the truth.
Now why was the author so entranced by the sad saga of Sarah
Shwartz. Because it showed just how panicky and irrational the
Shabak were in the days after the Rabin murder. The plan did not
go off as anticipated, and a brand new conspiracy had to be built
almost from scratch. If Yigal Amir had access to IDF ammo, which
they were now saying Hagai prepared for him to murder Rabin,
then a source for the ammo had to be found. They viewed it as
crucial to their cover-up. They started with Sgt. Arik Shwartz and
by George, he was going to be their culprit.
At this point in the drama, the tempo picks up. The police are
worn down and finally accept Sarah’s sworn testimony. At one in
the morning a team of police frogmen and their hi-tech night vision
equipment assemble on a beach opposite the Dolphinarium. It
turns out the water Moshe Khakham had tossed the suitcase into
was too shallow to swim in, so the frogmen first formed a line to
feel for the suitcase with their feet. Only after nearing the magic
fifty meter offshore line did any swimming underwater take place.
But alas, no suitcase was found.
However, since a compact suitcase weight at least 75 kilos could
not have drifted far or anywhere, the frogmen reassembled at 6:45
in the morning to finally track down the proof that Hagai Amir
supplied army issue ammo to his assassin brother Yigal from Arik
Shwartz’ considerable, stolen weapons cache.
But the suitcase just wasn’t there. This time the police were
hopping mad. At the next interrogation they invited Sgt. Arik
Shwartz to testify with his mother. Enjoy the next scene as
inscribed in the police records:
Arik Shwartz:: And then I asked my mother, if she wouldn’t mind, to
collect all my stolen weaponry and throw them in the sea where no one
would find them.
Sarah Shwartz: Enough lies!
72
 Arik Shwartz: Mom, no!
Sarah Shwartz: Maybe if we tell the truth, we can get Moshe out of jail.
It was all too much for Sarah, she cracked. She couldn’t go on.
The last straw for her was when they arrested and jailed her teenage
nephew on suspicion of destroying evidence vital to the
investigation of the murder of Yitzhak Rabin. Through
circumstances she could not possibly have understood, she
managed to get her nephew to face up to fifteen years in prison.
She couldn’t do the same thing to her son. Sarah had had enough
of the threats and lies and said so. Which is why the sad saga of
Sarah Shwartz was never mentioned in the Shamgar Commission
findings or the protocols of either Hagai or Yigal Amir’s trial. The
Shabak’s Humor and Absurdity Force didn’t foresee that sixty one
year old Sarah Shwartz would tell the truth at the end of the day.
And now for the punch line: Sgt. Arik Shwartz was charged and
indicted for stealing weapons from the IDF and selling them to
Hagai Amir. Why not, with such powerful evidence against him
gathered by the Keystone Shabak?

THREE MORE DEAD IN RABIN RAMPAGE

The latest Rabin hush-up murders were Dr. Dalia Eyal, her
husband Nimrod Eyal and son Assaf. Dalia Eyal had been
employed at Ichilov Hospital since the early 1980s. Currently, she
was director of a health fund located there but shift-worked in the
trauma department throughout her career at Ichilov. So far, she has
not been positively located in the trauma center on the night
Yitzhak Rabin died there, but let’s not rule out the possibility. What
is certain is that she knew the doctors and nurses who attended
Rabin and was privy to the truth.
Let us repeat the murder motive: Dr. Eyal undoubtedly knew
how Rabin was really murdered.
Who conducted the autopsy on the Eyal family? Dr. Death
himself, Yehuda Hiss, the head of the police pathological institute,
which was raided for hoarding the internal organs of 81 corpses
without informing the families of the dead. And as we all know, it
was Dr. Death Hiss who changed Rabin’s wounds in his infamous
pathologist’s report.

73
 Let us repeat the motive for the cover-up: Dr. Eyal knew Hiss
lied about Rabin’s real wounds.
Now let’s look at another really sloppy mass murder.

The Chronology of a Slaughter

Thursday night, January 10, 2002—Dalia and Nimrod Eyal die
embracing in their bed.
Friday morning—January 11—Assaf, 22, dies sitting upright in a
salon chair. According to the Jerusalem Post (15/1/2002):
“Police theorize that Assaf came home and found his family dead. Failing
to detect the presence of the odorless, colorless gas, he too, passed out
and died.”
Saturday, January 12—Yona Eliad, Nimrod’s brother-in-law,
discovers the bodies, along with the family cats, that were very
much alive. Police announce that it was an apparent family suicide.
Friends and relatives of the Eyals vigorously deny the possibility.
Sunday, Jan. 13—Police reinvestigate and come up with the
answer within a day. From the Jerusalem Post:
“They died as a result of inhaling carbon monoxide fumes leaked from
the water heater in their closed luxury apartment, after a bird’s nest
blocked the exhaust pipe.”
The Post reports that about 100 victims a winter, “are overcome
by gas from home heaters,” though only one hospital in the
country is equipped to revive carbon monoxide poisoning victims.
Now let’s start thinking clearly:
• The Bird’s Nest—Birds do not nest in Israel in January.
They do not put up a nest overnight anywhere in any
season. They do not put up a nest on a pipe venting
carbon monoxide. If they tried, they would not finish
the nest.
• The weather—It has been cold and rainy for most of
the winter. The water heater was not turned on for the
first time that night. If a summer nest had blocked the
exhaust vent, the Eyals would have discovered it or
suffocated by the cold November past.

74
 • The cats—The bodies were discovered 48 hours after
they had succumbed. The apartment was sealed. The
cats should have died as well by then.
• The son—Assaf comes home, discovers his dead
parents and instead of immediately calling an
ambulance, sits down on a comfy chair and dies.
• Ichilov Hospital—Every doctor and nurse who tended
Rabin on November 4, 1995 has received written and
verbal death threats. Two of the doctors, Kluger and
Gutman, suffered unexplainable and almost fatal
disorders. They learned to be silent afterward. Dr. Eyal,
it seems, had not properly learned the lesson.

The Ticking Bombs

Rabin’s murderers are utterly desperate. The public is becoming
more and more informed of their crime and the cover-up is quickly
and obviously breaking down. Things are getting out of hand for
them and they know there are at least four ticking bombs waiting to
explode. They are:
• Dr. Yehuda Hiss. Last week, his pathological institute
was raided and body parts, some over five years old,
were found, including those of four soldiers killed in
action. But Hiss was not arrested. He knows too much
about Rabin for that. But one soldier’s father, Dr.
Haim Buzaglo, is suing to have Hiss imprisoned and
the case is coming up soon. The public will not tolerate
the atrocities done to their brave soldiers and Dr.
Death will have to face the music. When he does,
watch him sing the song of Rabin.
• Judge Meir Shamgar. He is heading a commission of
inquiry into the cancers of navy frogmen who trained
in the carcinogenic Kishon River of Haifa. The press
has already leaked his findings that there is no
connection between the cancers and the river. Though
he may save the navy hundreds of millions of dollars in
compensation payments, the public will not buy into
this whitewash and will start recalling that he was the

75
 judge who similarly whitewashed the findings of
Rabin’s murder.
• Menachem Damti. Rabin’s driver on his final night
alive is going mad. That comes from a cousin, a friend
and a neighbor. He is undergoing a severe conscience
attack and is close to cracking.
• Avishai Raviv. Come April, Yigal Amir’s Shabak
handler is scheduled to go on trial, and a ninth
postponement is not going to go over well with the
public.
By murdering Dr. Dalia Eyal, one ticking bomb was neutralized
but there are many more. So, expect many more murders. The Eyal
family was poisoned, maybe with CO, maybe with another
asphyxiating substance. And it wasn’t a little birdie that did it.

76
 CHAPTER THREE
INTERNAL CRIMES

YOU HEARD IT FIRST

My sources tell me that high ranking IDF officers are seriously
considering the overthrow of Barak. The scenario described to me
is the following:
When the PLO first ordered its police and peasants to attack
IDF soldiers, Barak issued a command unheard of in any army:
soldiers were to wait until fired on to retaliate. Despite years of
politically obedient appointments, many in the IDF’s high
command were highly unhappy with Barak’s policy, believing it
would lead to Israeli casualties and a prolonging of the conflict.
These officers became increasingly frustrated when forbidden to
use force to save a soldier slowly bleeding to death at Joseph’s
Tomb and later when the shrine was abandoned. The refusal to
react to the kidnapping of three soldiers on the Lebanese border by
Hizbullah turned the frustration into anger. The turning point was
the sadistic lynching of two soldiers in Ramallah. The IDF high
command issued the following operational request to the Defense
Minister, Ehud Barak: In retaliation for attacks against IDF soldiers
by members of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Tanzim, or Fatah, the
Israeli Air Force would use 2000 pound bombs to turn their
headquarters and other facilities into rubble.
Second, the IDF had filmed Fatah policemen sniping at their
soldiers, and an Italian television crew had captured the murderers
of the lynched soldiers on film. The IDF had identified the
murderers and wanted them hunted down and killed immediately.
Barak turned the recommendation down and instead issued a
directive sending helicopters against insignificant targets only after
the PLO had been given ample warning to abandon them.
Certain officers now understood that Barak was under
international orders not to utilize the IDF to defend the nation or

77
avenge the murders of its citizens. The first grumblings of “coup”
were heard.
The final straw was Hizbullah’s kidnapping of Colonel
Tannenbaum. The officers knew that he was being tortured and
forced to reveal the names, addresses and all details of IDF staff,
strategy, equipment and facilities. They summoned Barak to mount
an operation inside Lebanon involving mass hostage taking to
secure the release of Tannenbaum but were again rebuffed by
Barak.
Not knowing which demoralizing IDF fiasco was next and
fearing that Israelis would take to the streets to secure the
protection their army was forbidden to provide, high level but still
informal discussions to plan a Barak overthrow gained momentum.

News from the Front No One Else is Reporting

A well known political activist has formulated a plan to
neutralize the blatant New World Order reporting of the mini-war
by the international media. According to the activist:
“The next time some CNN or BBC boob justifies the PLO’s savagery, we
will go to his home and pelt him with rocks when he tries to leave.
Unfortunately, our plan doesn’t call for the use of live fire to make the
scenario more realistic.”
The activist adds:
“I have a long-term plan to buy properties next door to their homes in
London or Stockholm and move Palestinian families in. We’ll be sure to
put lots of loose stones in their driveways. Then they’ll get a real taste of
how much fun it is to have them as neighbors.”

Overheard
A Palestinian mother telling her nine year old son, “Go play in
the war zone.”
***

MORE OF WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING US

The government-owned Israeli Television station, Channel One,
presented an amazing item on its news program New Evening. The
PLO had sent death threats to the two Italian television networks
that had filmed the Ramallah lynching of two IDF soldiers and
78
broadcast it. The threat was so real that the filmmaker apologized
to the PLO for doing his job and for doing so, had his press card
revoked by Israel’s Government Press Office.
What was behind the death threat? According to the report, the
filmmaker had captured Yasser Arafat standing in the Ramallah
Police Station overlooking the sadistic murders of the soldiers. It is
widely reported that the full film of the lynching has been
suppressed and the excuse given is that it is too grisly to watch.
That never stopped the Italian media before. Capturing Arafat on
camera personally directing a double murder would be a more
logical reason for the death threats and the censorship.

Blackmailing Barak
Ehud Barak IS being blackmailed by the U.S. over numerous
serious crimes surrounding his election campaign. This campaign
was organized by Clinton’s trickster James Carville, who thought of
numerous illegal scams to get Barak into power.
One involved breaking into the Labor Party headquarters in
Washington, not once, but twice, and implying that his political
opposition in Israel, the Likud Party, was responsible. Then there
was a massive campaign funding fraud, run by Barak’s brother-in-
law and a son of the late Israeli president Chaim Herzog.
Americans, mostly Jews, were snookered into giving huge
donations to charities supporting employment in impoverished
neighborhoods, promoting democracy education, building sports
facilities and the like. But the money went into Barak’s back pocket.
Israel’s State Comptroller discovered the crimes and
recommended that the police investigate. However, the American
authorities have stymied the cops by preventing the Israeli
investigators from pursuing their investigations in the US. If Barak
doesn’t play ball, Clinton and the CIA have promised that they will
open the door for Israel Police to investigate crimes that could land
him in prison for a decade or more.

Inciting to War
The Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria are being incited into
violence. The aim is to crush them and thus provide a pretext for
their removal from their homes. To further this aim, two rabbis
79
have been murdered, one while the IDF stood by refusing to stop
it, and two sacred sites, Joseph’s Tomb and the Jericho Synagogue
were torched. The leader of this incitement is, reportedly, Israeli
Justice Minister Yossi Beilin, who is pursuing a strategy he mapped
out when the original Oslo Accord was signed. The gentle people
of Judea and Samaria are just not violent enough to fall into the
trap, so the atrocities committed against them will continue until
they crack and start shooting.

PEACE OF THE MURDERERS

Shimon Peres met Yasser “Mad Dog” Arafat in Gaza and, lo
and behold, miracle of miracles, they agreed to make peace again.
At least, that’s how the world media is reporting the meeting. Now
here is what really happened.
The New World Order’s hardcore agents in the Israeli cabinet,
Peres and Yossi Beilin are threatening Prime Minister Barak and he
knows they mean business. He is terrified, not of them so much, as
of the foreign troublemakers they are representing. Barak was
placed in power by the Council on Foreign Relations and is owned
by the Anglo-Saxons. He has debts to repay and, for a couple of
more months anyway, he must obey Clinton. Come January, the
next CFR President and his CFR Secretary of State, will take over
where Clinton and Albright left off.
Peres, on the other hand, is beholden to the Europeans and they
want their piece of the peace. So, German Chancellor Shroeder
showed up in Gaza and ordered Arafat to meet with Peres. The
Peres meeting with Arafat was arranged by:
• Yossi Ginosar—Former Deputy Shabak (General
Security Services) chief, who became mired in scandal
in the 80s when he lied about the execution of two
PLO murderers in what is known as the Bus 300
Scandal, and later was forced to resign when it was
exposed that his perjured testimony sent an innocent
army officer to a long prison term. He and Arafat share
a major business interest, both skimming from the
profits of the Oasis Casino, near Jericho.

80
 • Carmi Gillon—While Shabak chief, he oversaw a long
string of deadly scam operations, including the Hebron
massacre of February 1994, and the Rabin
assassination, as part of a policy to promote peace by
isolating and demonizing those opposed to it. It was
his duty to remove the Jewish residents of Judea and
Samaria from their homes, in order to fulfill secret
promises to the PLO to acquire 100% of the territory
known to many as the West Bank.
Another of the promises Peres made, as fully documented in my
previous work, was to remove Israeli sovereignty over the Old City
and East Jerusalem. He made a vow to the Europeans that the UN
would take over security of Jerusalem, while the Vatican would
become guardians of the holy sites. Once Israeli hegemony passed
to the UN, it would grant the PLO the right to establish its capital
in the parts of the city it controlled. The current war is being fought
because neither the CFR, thus, nor Barak, want the Vatican deal to
go through, and Arafat feels cheated. Peres must live up to his
bargain for the fighting to stop. And Barak knows it. He also
knows Clinton’s gang is opposed to Peres’ handover of Jerusalem
to the Europeans.

NO REASON TO CELEBRATE SHARON’S VICTORY

My message, to those who respect it, is clear. The Israeli political
leadership has been corrupted from abroad, and no one running for
Prime Minister is exempt. And that includes Ariel Sharon above all.
I can understand the widespread celebration of his unprecedented
rout of Ehud Barak. Finally, those elements determined to drag
Israel into a suicidal pact with the PLO have been given a
resounding message that the people have had it with them. As a
temporary relief valve this election served a most therapeutic
function. Unfortunately too many people think Sharon’s victory
means the war has been won, and they are about to be very
disappointed because Sharon will betray them just as much as
Barak did. Only the style will change.
Here’s how we got the elections in the first place. Binyamin
Netanyahu was in the middle of a lucrative American speaking tour.
There, he met two members of the Council on Foreign Relations
81
(CFR), George Shultz and Henry Kissinger. In Netanyahu’s own
words, they told him the time was right to run for prime minister; a
very noble message except elections weren’t planned for another
two years.
Netanyahu then hopped on a plane to Israel, he claimed to
attend a Bat Mitzvah, had a few words with Barak and flew back to
America to continue his lectures. Two days later Barak, who
Kissinger and gang put in power beginning with a New York
meeting in May 1995, resigned and called for elections in which he
would remain a candidate.
Now why would he do such an insane thing unless told to? He
was losing badly in the polls and began the race in a hopeless
position. Then he continued with a campaign guaranteed to get him
trounced at the polls. The CFR determined that it was Sharon’s
turn to drag Israel into war. Barak had prepared the path and now
Sharon would lead the war. And the world and its Jews, getting
dumber by the day, believe that all these events will be explained by
random actions.
A few years back I received a phone call from New York from
Joel Bainerman, who was attending an Israeli economic conference
at the Sheraton Hotel in Manhattan. Excited, he said, “I was
walking through a hall and guess who I saw come out of a
conference room? Sharon and Kissinger.” Joel told the same story
to journalists covering the conference, and at the next morning’s
press conference, Sharon confirmed the meeting, adding that, “In
order to achieve peace, concessions will have to be made.” He was
asked if he meant territorial concessions and he refused to answer.
Kissinger’s talk had molded the man.
Meanwhile, I called Sharon’s spokesman Raanan Gissen and
asked him what was discussed at the meeting.
He replied, “They met to discuss overall Middle East security
issues.”
I asked why Sharon, the Infrastructure Minister should be
discussing security matters at a trade conference.
He answered, “You’re right, of course. They were discussing
economic matters.”

82
 I persisted, “Why was Sharon meeting Kissinger in the first
place?”
The reply was boggling. “Minister Sharon has met Mr. Kissinger
every time he has flown to America since the end of the Yom
Kippur War.”
This was way too much to digest so quickly. I blurted out,
“What do you know about Kissinger’s leadership in the Council on
Foreign Relations?”
Gissen paused and answered, “Mr. Sharon has left instructions
that this topic will only be discussed when he writes his diplomatic
memoirs.”
Ariel Sharon was born and raised on a radical-Left Mapai
moshav, Kfar Malal. In early 1973 he quit the IDF and formed a
political party, Shlomzion, whose followers were anticipated to be
from the Left. Sharon even invited the extremist Yossi Sarid to join
him in the party leadership. In October of the same year, war broke
out and Sharon emerged the national hero. Now his political career
would rise, and the CFR decided that he had to be on their side.
He met with Kissinger and his protégés in early 1974 and
received their power and blessings for a rise to the top, but with
conditions. The first was that he become a mole in the Israeli Right,
and that he destroy the Herut movement. He returned to Israel,
built up his party and proposed a united Right wing party to run in
the 1977 elections. He amalgamated the Liberal (Gahal) Party with
his own and Herut to create the Likud.
The election of the honorable and independent Likud leader
Menachem Begin sent the CFR into a tizzy, and Sharon was called
on to neutralize and ultimately remove him. Before that could be
done, Begin was outflanked by Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat and
with all the power of the CFR behind the Egyptian position, Begin
relented and withdrew from the entire Sinai Peninsula. The
withdrawal could only proceed because Sharon was leading it.
When one stubborn town, Yamit, refused to be obliterated, Sharon
sent in the bulldozers to do the job, one reason he is known as “the
bulldozer,” and a better reason to fear his real policy on uprooting
Jewish homes.
On June 6, 1982, my army unit entered the Lebanon War.
Following a trail of battles, we finally arrived at our position on
83
Jebel Barauch, high in the Chouf Mountains, 80 kilometers from
the safety of the Israeli border. We gathered around the TV set for
the evening news and we heard Defense Minister Sharon’s lie to
Begin that the troops would stop advancing once they had reached
the 40 kilometer line in Lebanon. We were stunned. The nation and
its Prime Minister were being given a totally false picture of the war
by Sharon. We all asked why and no answer was satisfactory.
A decade later Joel Bainerman and I spent an afternoon
interviewing Menachem’s son, Benny Begin. He was very coy with
the facts we sought but, nonetheless, provided vital testimony. His
father’s war had been fought mostly to reverse a deal reached by
Kissinger, Rabin and Syrian President Assad in 1975. Assad wanted
Israel off the Golan Heights, Rabin couldn’t deliver so Kissinger
came up with a neat idea. Syria wanted Lebanon just as much, so
let’s give her it. We’ll ignite a civil war and Israel will allow Syrian
troops in to bring peace.
Benny Begin recalled. “Rabin laughed when he told this story
and I said, ‘Why are you so happy, 300,000 people died in that
war?’ He smiled and answered. ‘Don’t worry, it was a good deal.’”
Menachem Begin’s goal was to reverse the Middle East of murder
organized by the CFR and Sharon’s task was to stop him.
Benny Begin stressed one point without adding the precise
details we sought; Sharon deliberately ousted his father from office.
We now recall the 1983 massacre at the Sabra and Shatilla
refugee camps. On a Friday morning, Sharon gave permission for
Phalangist forces to eliminate remaining PLO snipers in the camps.
The Phalangists had been victimized by savage PLO massacres and
Sharon must have known how they would react if given a free hand
to operate in the camps. Word of the massacre reached him by the
night but he did not order the Phalangists removed for two more
days. Sharon suffered a temporary career setback for his negligence,
but this was the beginning of the end of Menachem Begin.
Sharon has been a magnificent performer, building on his
deserved reputation as a daring commander, since 1974 he has been
the darling of the Right. And since his rise, the Right has been
slowly disintegrating. When Netanyahu was ordered by his CFR
masters to sign the upcoming Wye Agreement, which gave the
PLO more territory than Rabin or Peres ever handed over, both
84
they and he understood that a huge ploy was needed to prevent
massive protest against the outrage. So Netanyahu appointed
Sharon his Foreign Minister, and barely a week later, Sharon gave
his seal of approval to Wye. How could anyone protest when the
militant, darling of the Right authorized all its clauses?
Early on during the recent election campaign, numerous Israeli
journalists wrote that Shimon Peres and Sharon were plotting
against Barak. The goal this time, was to have Sharon’s buddy Peres
replace Barak as the Labor candidate.
However, Barak caught on and fought back with the strongest
weapon in his arsenal; Peres’ organization of the Rabin
assassination. The far left Meretz Party was about to back a motion
led by Yossi Sarid to make Peres their candidate for the elections.
Their central council was all ready to approve Peres when
according to Yediot Ahronot, “Barak sent a messenger to remind the
council members about Yitzhak Rabin.” Meretz then changed its
mind about Peres. The media speculated that Barak reminded the
Meretz members that Peres snitched on Rabin about an illegal bank
account in 1977 that drove him from office, or that Rabin called
Peres, “a relentless conniver,” as if those facts weren’t known and
that they could turn the party against Peres.
Despite the Meretz rejection, Peres called out all his forces,
especially in the media, to mount a campaign to replace Barak with
him. Then Barak appeared on a morning radio show on Reshet Bet
and said that if Peres didn’t stop his campaign, he was going to talk
to the Rabin family about the assassination. Peres’ campaign to
replace Barak came to a grinding halt.
Every available Saturday afternoon, for over twenty years,
Sharon and Peres meet at Peres’ home for what they call “social
visits.” At Peres’ 75th birthday party, Sharon was placed in the seat
of honor beside him. They are the closest of friends and their
“vicious” rivalry over the years has been brilliantly stage-managed.
Do not be surprised if the happy couple come out of the closet
and into the Knesset. If Sharon has his way, Peres will be his
Foreign Minister. Yes, he knows about Rabin, all the insiders do. So
Sharon will fight any legal action which could bring justice to the
memory of Rabin by trying his real murderers. He’ll protect his

85
buddy Shimon with all the considerable powers he has just
received.
And Israel will go to war under Sharon, not because of him—he
is just the right “hard-line, militant” pawn to justify bloody violence
against the Jewish nation—but because the real powers who rule
this planet have planned it that way all along.

JUST SAY NO TO UNITY GOVERNMENT

In the closing act of Barak’s Greek tragedy, he has warned the
PLO that if he shooting doesn’t stop within 48 hours, he will invite
the Likud and religious parties into his government. Why should
they humbly accept this offer? They and all Israelis would be far
better off if they stayed out. Barak’s gang got us into this mess and
they can get us out. After seven years of national demoralization,
there is no reason to believe a unity government will be any more
effective at saving the nation, and there is good reason to believe
Barak is trying to spread the blame as the situation deteriorates.
Before any opposition party throws in his lot with Barak’s cabal
of treacherous incompetents, the following conditions must be
agreed to.
1. Yossi Beilin, Ron Pundak and Yair Hirshfeld held illegal
meetings with the PLO beginning in November 1992, which
led to the Oslo Accord. At the time, the Knesset harshly
forbade such meetings, specifically outlawing them as
treasonous consorting with the enemy. Only an
unprecedented law, passed in November 1993, retroactively
legalizing the meetings, saved this trio from standing trial for
their crimes. This law must be rescinded and those
responsible for the Oslo Accord must stand trial for their
original crimes. Included also must be Uri Savir, Yoel Zinger
and Shimon Peres, who entered the negotiations from March
1993, when it was illegal to do so.
2. Actions taken to promote the “peace,” including the
provocations of Shabak agents such as Avishai Raviv, will be
investigated honestly. Falling into the same category, the
truth about the Rabin assassination and Hebron massacre will
be released to the public. All those who opposed Oslo and
fell victim to such connivances will be publicly exonerated.
86
 3. The Israeli public will receive a detailed explanation of the
secret clauses of the Oslo Accord and will be told the precise
demands of the foreign power brokers who manipulated us
into this disaster to fulfill their own agendas.
4. Barak will appear on television and rip the Oslo Accord into a
hundred pieces; after which, he will resign.
Short of his accepting these demands, there is nothing to be
gained by the political opposition throwing in their cards with
Barak. The Jewish people and its army will not be strengthened by a
broader government if Barak and the Oslo gang remain in power
after. We will fight our way out of this catastrophe despite our
leadership. But we must never join it... unless they promise to
cleanse the nation after the fires they lit are extinguished.

COUP AGAINST PERES PLANNED IN WASHINGTON

After Sharon’s election, leaders of the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) met with Labor MK Avraham Burg in Washington
to plan a political coup against Shimon Peres, the leader of the
Labor Party and its most powerful cabinet member. The CFR sent
CIA head George Tenet to Israel to threaten PM Sharon with
deadly consequences if he interferes with the plan to destroy the
settler movement by the end of the summer. Tenet was pleased by
the successes of the PLO murder squads he had trained in Virginia
but was most disturbed by reports of Shimon Peres’ mental
condition. He was informed that Peres was cracking under the
strain of fear that his organization of Yitzhak Rabin’s assassination
was being widely exposed. He was subject to irrational bursts of
anger and even his public statements were becoming increasingly
nutty. Before he even returned to Washington, Tenet
recommended Peres’ immediate removal.
Avraham Burg has been long groomed for power by the CFR.
His father, Yosef Burg, served longer than anyone in the Israeli
cabinet, beginning in Ben Gurion’s days, and trained his son well
where the real sources of political power lie. The CFR believe that
it can repeat the success they had in electing Ehud Barak with Burg.
They view him as a young, nominally religious candidate with
potentially wide appeal, who can take over where Barak left off
when Sharon is ousted from power. As a religious Jew, he would be
87
held blameless for the disintegration of Jewish villages in their
ancient homeland.
Burg had meetings with Colin Powell (CFR) and National
Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice (CFR) to outline the coup
plans. To overwhelm him with the seriousness of the plot,
additional meetings were arranged for Burg with Bill Clinton (CFR)
and Senator Hillary Clinton.
The top leadership of the CFR have concluded that Peres must
go, willingly or not, and well before his role in the Rabin murder
becomes a national scandal the likes of which Israel has not seen
before. It is essential that Burg be placed in power before that day
comes, and vast cash resources will be thrown at a Burg campaign
to, first, take over the leadership of Labor, and then the country.
The CFR realizes that time is running out on their obsessive
goal of ridding Judea, Samaria and Gaza of Jews. They are amazed
that these people have not caught on to who is behind the covert
war against them, and still believe their government and army has
an interest in protecting them. However, great pains are being taken
to keep the ignorance intact.
A delegation of American presidents of major Jewish
organizations is touring Israel, concurrent with the Burg talks. It is
led by one Mort Zuckerman, who is not only a CFR member but
was on the board of the notorious CFR Middle East Task Force
Report of July 1997, which demanded that Israel’s borders be
reduced to those of 1948, with half of Jerusalem handed over to the
PLO.
Zuckerman submitted a dissenting opinion of the report’s
conclusions, but one should not view that fact as anything more
than window dressing. He is as aware as anyone of the CFR/CIA’s
plot against the settlers and is in Israel maintaining control of any
objections to it raised by his delegation of American Jewish leaders.
Unless the settlers miraculously awaken from their delusions and
protect themselves bravely and intelligently, they have no more of a
chance to continue their lifestyle than the other victims of
CFR/NWO manipulations like the Afrikaaners, Rhodesians or
Serbs. Their ONE AND ONLY long-term chance is to exploit the
opportunities offered by those who are exposing the ghastly crimes
of their enemies within Israel.
88
 “THEY’RE TALKING” UPDATE
Those who read the claims of the Shabak informants in my
earlier posting, “They’re Talking”, will be pleased to learn that the
information is being confirmed.
Asher Zuckerman, publisher of Kol Hashavuah confirms that a
few weeks after the Rabin murder, he was about to publish a report
about the murder of two of Rabin’s bodyguards. His backer was
approached with a threat to his life and he shut down the
newspaper. Later it reopened with a new name. The informants
were exactly right.
Yehuda Miller of Maale Levana did photograph Avishai Raviv in
criminal action, and he was fired from Israel Police. The informants
were right, but forgot to add that as a sweetener for his silence, a
job as photographer for the weekly magazine Mishpakha was
arranged for him. He still holds the position.
A correspondent went to the 100 block of HaChoresh Blvd. in
Ramot and confirmed that a villa matching the description of the
Shabak interrogation and surveillance center the informants
reported does exist.
And because the information is proving accurate, suspicions
have been raised by the murder of a Military Intelligence/Shabak
colonel, Yehuda Edri, two days after the posting was released. For
one day, both Ha’aretz and Hatsofe published the truth of the
assassination, then they stopped. Edri met his Arab informer
outside Jerusalem and was shot by him. This should not have
happened. Edri was traveling with two bodyguards. Neither
searched the informer before he approached Edri. In fact, neither
left the car to take up protective positions. The bodyguards let Edri
get murdered. One bodyguard was shot by a bullet aimed at Edri,
while the assailant chose not to shoot a seemingly helpless
bodyguard seated in the backseat of the car. He shot and killed the
informer.
The informer’s employer wrote a personal piece published on
the front page of the Jerusalem Post. She described an Arab sick of
PLO corruption with no fight against the Israelis. She concluded
that he was not a murderer type and that his family must have been
threatened.

89
 Edri was a religious Jew living in the “settlement” of Maaleh
Adumim. He was assassinated under most suspicious
circumstances. We hope it was not because someone thought he
was one of the people who passed on the information in “They’re
Talking”.
He wasn’t, at least not directly.
The real informants have not contacted me again, as they
promised, so I searched my notes for quotes I chose not to include
the previous posting. I rejected most because the informants
admitted they were just rumors. One, however, should have been
included. I was told the Shabak took over Yigal Amir’s police
investigation right after the murder and staged the filmed
interrogation of Amir with his forced cooperation. This wasn’t
included because it was previously reported in Natan Gefen’s book
Fatal Sting and oft-repeated since. Still, this is confirmation.
Of the uncertain claims:
Source 1 - “While on the topic of the Kahalani brothers, you should
know they had a brother in the army who started mouthing off about
how the Shabak framed his brothers. He died of a ‘suicide,’ though no
one I know of in the service believes that’s what happened.”
Source 1 - “I’ve heard that a few agents are assigned to covering up forest
fires. When the PLO want concessions from the government, they burn
down Israeli forests. There is barely a tree left on the Tel Aviv/Jerusalem
highway and Rabin’s government hid the arson from the public. Now
they’re working on the Galilee, burning down those forests the same way.
To cover this up, we identified a ‘security risk,’ a visionary Gog and
Magog philosopher who wrote about his vision of Israel burning, and the
police used him as the fall guy for the fires.”
A certain claim from a different source:
A New York correspondent who I met at my NY lectures twice,
and who I trust, wrote recently that he had met Yigal Amir’s
mother Geula in New York. He asked her opinion about my book
and she was not delighted with it, believing that I had hurt her
chances to raise money among the religious Right for her son’s
defense by implying that he was a Shabak asset. She was asked why
her son doesn’t just tell the truth, and she admitted what we knew
all along; Amir has been told that if he so much as whispers
anything near the truth, his family will start dying one by one.

90
 An awful evil is being committed to Israel. The settlers are being
abandoned to their murderers by Ariel Sharon, who lives daily with
a foreign gun at his head. And Israelis, especially the Jewish
residents of Judea, Samaria and Gaza, can’t understand the obvious.
So they’ll keep dying until barely a sole is left in his home and then
they’ll express their indignation by voting for Burg in the next
elections.

DREADFUL CONFIRMATION
One by one, the information being sent out by this writer is
being validated. And it is now abundantly clear that the information
received from two renegade Shabak agents relayed worldwide in the
article called “They’re Talking” was mostly right on the money.
Let’s begin with the claim that the CIA, PLO and Shabak are
running death squads aimed at removing Jews from their homes in
Judea, Samaria and Gaza. Confirmation came from Defense
Minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer.
***
Rosh HaShanah War/News: DEFENSE MINISTER BEN-ELIEZER
ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE C.I.A TRAINED P.L.O. DEATH
SQUADS WITH ISRAELI APPROVAL
YERUSHALIYIM, D.C. (David’s Capital), Yom Rishon (Day One --
“Sunday”), 10 Tammuz, 5761 (Gregorian Date: July 1, 2001) (Hijri Date:
9 Rabi Thani, 1422), Root & Branch: Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin
Ben-Eliezer acknowledged today that the United States Central
Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) trained P.L.O. death squads in the United
States with the approval of the Barak Government and Mr. Shimon Peres,
currently Foreign Minister in the Sharon Government and formerly
Minister of Regional Cooperation in the Barak Government.
Defense Minister Ben-Eliezer made his remarks during a press
conference today at the Inbal Hotel (formerly the Laromme Hotel) in
Jerusalem, organized by the Foreign Press Association in Israel (F.P.A.).
Mr. Ben-Eliezer was responding to a question posed by F.P.A. member
Mr. Aryeh Gallin of the Root & Branch Information Services.
Mr. Ben-Eliezer did not deny that any of the alleged facts cited in
Mr. Gallin’s question were true.
Mr. Ben-Eliezer simply said that the then Israeli Government thought the
C.I.A. trained P.L.O. death squads would ‘behave themselves’.
GALLIN QUESTION (verbatim):

91
 “While Peres was prime minister, C.I.A. Chief John Deutsch appointed
George Tenet to serve as C.I.A. liaison between Israel and the P.L.O.
Shimon Peres agreed to Tenet’s request that the P.L.O. send 40
‘policemen’ for advanced C.I.A. sniper, marksmanship and advanced
weapons training in Virginia.
Mr. Defense Minister, are not those C.I.A. trained P.L.O. squads the very
ones today inflicting such terrible casualties on so-called Arab
collaborators, the IDF, and Jews in Gilo and especially in Judea, Samaria
and Gaza?
And, Mr. Defense Minister, why was the C.I.A. request to train these
P.L.O. squads routed through and approved by Mr. Shimon Peres?”
BEN-ELIEZER ANSWER (summary*):
“It’s an easy question. We thought that they would behave themselves.”
***
Then there was the suggestion that the Versailles Ballroom
collapse was sabotage. The government announced that it would
not investigate the disaster. The asinine compromise was a general
commission of inquiry to investigate local building practices. YES,
the government IS covering up Versailles.
Now speaking of Versailles, we hop over to the claim that
Shimon Peres was in France two weeks before the Rabin murder
promising the French the total capitulation of Israel to Europe in
return for approving the assassination of Rabin. Amnon Lord,
writing in Makor Rishon last week, reported that Peres gave a speech
at the Versailles Palace in Paris, to a gathering of Technion
professors and academics, about two weeks before the murder,
during which he shocked the assembled by not mentioning Israel
even once.
Finally, Peres is placed in France just when I said he was there
plotting Rabin’s death.
The recently reported CFR plan to promote Knesset speaker
Avraham Burg as the next Labor leader received a boost when the
party’s front runner, Shlomo Ben Ami, announced his decision to
drop out of the upcoming race, thus leaving the way clear for the
Burg takeover. To get a taste of what’s coming, a faithful Toronto
correspondent sent an article in which Burg insists that the Temple
Mount is located elsewhere, so there is no need to object to PLO
sovereignty over the present site.

92
 Another informant reminded me of a frightening fact that I
knew but had refused to report because it is just too conspiratorial.
Twenty minutes before the bridge collapsed at the previous
Maccabiah Games, causing dozens of casualties to the Australian
contingent, a Shabak Jeep drove over the same bridge, and a film of
the event was shown on Israel television news. I had long
considered the possibility that the bridge, like the Versailles
Ballroom, was collapsed as part of an overall demoralization plan,
in this case alienating Israel from the Diaspora, but desisted from
saying so lest it neutralize, by going too far, proven cases of
murderous intrigue.
There I said it, and frankly I don’t care about the consequences
because the New World Order plot against Israel is entering its
final phase. The Israeli people no longer feel they have an army nor
a government. They live day by day waiting for the next murder and
wondering if they will be a victim of the next massacre wherever it
takes place. And if they do die a grisly death, they know our
government will not avenge it, and the criminals of the
international media will justify it.
And a few people woke up when they saw former Serb leader
Milosevic extradited in shackles to Holland. They put the pieces
together, starting with the BBC’s Panorama program questioning
whether Ariel Sharon should be tried as a war criminal, and
continuing with his possible indictment in a Belgian court. It
became clear that Sharon is under threat that if he doesn’t
cooperate in the disintegration of Israel, the next Israeli cabinet will
be confronted with the nation’s quick destruction if he isn’t
manacled and shipped for trial to Europe. And now, after his
performance with Arafat at the gathering of the Socialist
International in Portugal, even Israel’s far left are questioning the
total lack of human morality within Shimon Peres and wondering if
he didn’t set Sharon up for this upcoming European humiliation.
Feeling there is nothing left to lose anymore, that Peres and the
Shabak must be stopped and now, allow me to present the most
devastating crime ever committed in Israel, Peres’ likely
participation and confirmation of still another Shabak murder.
The agents quoted in “They’re Talking” claimed the former
head of the Prison Services’ Medical Department, Yaacov
93
Ziegelboim, was murdered by the Shabak just before he was
planning to report the torture of Rabbi Uzi Meshulum. Today his
son Eddie Ziegelboim contacted me, and in a long conversation,
confirmed everything.
Paralleling the Shabak’s covert war against all opponents of the
Oslo Accord, was an equally vicious battle against Rabbi Uzi
Meshulum. In the early years of the state, at least 4500, mostly
Yemenite, infants were kidnapped from immigrant transit camps,
nurseries and hospitals. Two new Hebrew books have thoroughly
documented the fact that these kidnappings took place. It is
commonly believed that the infants were sold for adoption, but
Rabbi Meshulum, as I will shortly explain, reached a different
conclusion.
Rabbi Meshulum’s congregation lead the fight to have the
kidnappings exposed and the kidnappers tried. In the summer of
1994, his headquarters in Yehud was attacked by hundreds of army,
police and Shabak snipers. They sprayed Meshulum’s home with
dozen’s of bullets in an attempt to murder him and his family, but
in the end the sole victim was an eighteen year old congregant of
the rabbi.
Rabbi Meshulum was imprisoned and subjected to cruel medical
techniques aimed at destroying his will and his memory. He was
released from prison two years ago with almost a total memory
loss. Those who saw him at his son’s wedding last month were
shocked. He was in such pain he couldn’t even sit in his wheelchair.
He lay prone throughout the ceremony.
Not long after Rabin’s murder, the head physician of the prison
Medical Services, Yaacov Ziegelboium, was blown to bits in his car.
The police and media blamed Meshulum’s followers for the
murder, claiming they thought he was behind the rabbi’s atrocious
medical treatment. I was reliably informed the Shabak carried out
the hit... but who gave them the order?
Eddie Ziegelboim called me this morning.
EZ - I’m sorry I called so early but it’s urgent. It’s about the information
you published from the Shabak agents.
BC - What about it?
EZ - I’m Yaacov Ziegelboim’s son.
BC - Oh my. I hope you approve of what I did.
94
EZ - That’s why I’m calling. I know the Shabak murdered him and I want
justice done... My father was honest and he was stubborn. He came from
Russia thirty years ago and accomplished as much as any immigrant of the
time. It was he who had the most modern prison medical facility built. He
cared about his patients and had nothing to do with Rabbi Meshulum’s
treatment. In fact, he told me, he was the only person in the prison
services the rabbi would speak to.
BC - Did he tell you anything else?
EZ - Hardly anything but his personality was changing by the end of his
life. He was complaining about the dirty politics he had to confront and
asked why he was being dragged into it. Just before he died he bought a
book called Only the Paranoid Survive, which was out of character for him
and told his wife, my stepmother, that she may not see him again. He was
obviously frightened but it wasn’t like him to show it openly... He was
murdered two weeks before he was going to report Rabbi Meshulum’s
treatment to a government committee. He was preparing his presentation
the day his car was bombed. But there’s something else about the timing
you should know. The night before, there was the biggest protest rally
over the Yemenite children ever. The movement was gaining big ground.
By murdering my father and blaming it on Meshulum’s followers, the
Shabak killed two birds with one stone.
BC - And you’re positive Meshulum’s people couldn’t have done the
deed?
EZ - Do you know how professional this operation was? It wasn’t just
that the bomb was planted so no one saw it, the explosion occurred right
after he dropped his children off. It was radio activated and there were
spotters timing it. Not only that, the force of the explosion was perfectly
calibrated to blow him to death but no bystanders. Rabbi Meshulum’s
people were shlemiels, they could barely get the microphones set up at
rallies. They didn’t have the expertise to pull it off and supposedly a
hundred policemen were assigned to the case and they couldn’t find the
bomber. There should have been no problem finding him if he really was
one of the rabbi’s followers. I tried getting information from the
policemen. They were told to hush up everything and you could hear the
fear in their voices.
BC - Did your father keep a diary? Maybe his secretary has his notes?
EZ - My father kept a diary and it was confiscated. So was his computer.
The police to this day won’t return them. The secretary is too terrified to
talk. I tried to reason with her, however it didn’t help. But do you know
who did try to get to the truth, the Police Minister Avigdor Kahalani. He
told the media to quit blaming the Meshulum people. It was obvious they
didn’t have the means to organize the murder. And he was ruined after
that. He was accused of corruption and was only cleared of the phony
charges last month. Anyone who touches my father’s murder is in serious
trouble. No newspaper will investigate. Even the Russian papers I

95
 approached wouldn’t go near it. They all know it was a Shabak hit, just
like Rabin, and they won’t even lift a phone to get to the bottom of the
crime... just like Rabin.
BC - Why do you think Rabbi Meshulum was being maltreated in the first
place?
EZ - I remember what my father told me. He said, politics wasn’t
supposed to be part of my job. Rabbi Meshulum was threatening a
political figure powerful enough to have the army put him down and have
my father murdered.
I think I know who the figure is because Rabbi Meshulum told
me who he is. I was the last journalist to visit Rabbi Meshulum in
prison. After my early revelations about the Rabin murder made
national news, he asked his wife to contact me. She requested that I
meet him and I agreed. On a hot summer morning, I walked
through a maze of corridors in Sharon Prison and had a powerful
discussion with the rabbi. He was still strong then and had a vise-
like handshake. He turned his tape machine on high so no one
would record our conversation with ease and blasted Haredi music.
What he told me was utterly terrifying and I have refrained from
reporting the conversation in depth. However, a year later a
Jerusalem rabbi, David Savilia confirmed his most awful claims to
me. Nonetheless, even now, with my country being set up for ruin,
I will qualify the following charges: this is what he told me and I
can’t prove it and can’t stand by it. That said, our establishment
mentally and physically wrecked Rabbi Meshulum and there had to
be one heck of a good reason.
He got straight to the point and said he suspected his
movement’s spokesperson, one Ora Shifris, of being a Shabak plant
and asked me to take over from her. I agreed but she would have
nothing to do with the change and prevented it forcefully. He then
displayed a fine understanding of world politics and a universally
controlled media. He didn’t know it but he was describing the New
World Order.
I asked him the one question I had prepared: If you have the
information, why don’t you reunite all the children with their
biological parents already?
He pulled closer to me and whispered, “Because most of the
children aren’t alive. I’m waiting for their parents to die before I
release the truth.”
96
 I still don’t know why he chose me, but he saw something in me
and related the following ghastly history.
“Back in the late 40s, the Americans still didn’t understand the effects of
atomic radiation. They were conducting radiation experiments on
retarded children and mostly, black prisoners in the American South. But
the experiments were exposed and ended. The Americans needed guinea
pigs for their experiments and at the same time, Israel was determined to
build a nuclear reactor and ultimately bombs. The French knew how to
build a reactor but only the Americans had the secrets of bomb building.
We traded Yemenite babies to be experimental lab rats for those secrets.
“The man at the top of the nuclear program was Shimon Peres. He got
the French to put up the reactor at Dimona and he is my number one
culprit in the kidnappings. He is a monster and he’s after me. He’s after
all of us.”

GREAT MAIL, GREAT INTELLIGENCE

The timing of my intelligence information seems divinely
guided. Here’s an example. Years ago I wrote about Rabbi Marvin
Antelman’s idea of putting a bit of pork in the IDF’s bullets. He
explained that Moslems believe that if there is even the tiniest sign
of pig on a body, Allah would turn the soul away from paradise.
Rabbi Antelman explained that the fanatic Muslim’s courage comes
from the belief that dying in a holy cause is a direct route to
paradise where 3000 virgins await the martyr. Put a little pig in him
and he loses the grand prize for martyrdom and with it, his reason
for irrational courage.
After I sent out the idea, both Rabbi Antelman and I were
subjected to abuse, mostly for misperceived bigotry. One letter did
stand out, however. The correspondent wisely asked what happens
to the 3000 virgins after the martyr has his way with them. Since
they are no longer virgins and infinity is a long time, where’s the big
reward?
I had forgotten all about the concept until I was in Hawaii.
There, a special ops officer who fought against Iraq told me about a
little fracas he had with America’s Arab allies. He was cleaning rifles
recently packed in grease. Some Arab soldiers asked what he was
doing and he was irritated enough to tell them he was smearing the
rifles with lard to prevent the Iraqis from going to paradise.
He explained

97
 “If I had said I was unloading plutonium to nuke Baghdad there would
have been no reaction. If I told them it was gelled anthrax, they wouldn’t
have cared. But pork fat caused real anger and even more real fear. They
were terrified by this ‘secret’ weapon. If Israel wants to control Muslim
fanatics, a little pig’ll do ya.”
Then I returned home and one of the first letters I opened was
from a long-time correspondent who recalled my pig bullet article
of many years before. He included a news item that reported that a
group of Yesha residents had asked Likud MK and former Deputy
Chief of the Shabak, Gidon Ezra, to infuse IDF bullets with pork.
He refused, saying that was a former British tactic that Jews found
barbaric.
So pig bullets are not to be employed, though they should be.
But I did get an idea out of the letter; let’s show my wonderful
correspondents some of my other letters to give them an idea of
how I collect and verify intelligence. So here goes.
My last article asking if the British are behind Israel’s misery
included a claim that B’nai B’rith head Abe Foxman was faking
concern for Israel and allying himself with the forces weakening
and bleeding the country. The source added the claim that the B’nai
B’rith are an arm of freemasonry. This prompted a letter from a
genuine ex-American intelligence spook who I met personally a few
years ago. I add that detail to reinforce the strength of his claims:
***
You mentioned several times Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation
League. I know Abe very well. We both were at the Yeshiva of Flatbush,
between 1952/1957. Abie was then in Betar, from a firm Revisionist
family and himself a staunch Revisionist. It was to him that I owe my
association with Betar. He introduced me to Begin’s book The Revolt.
It seems that over the years, he sold his soul to Bnai Brith, an
organization founded by German Jews whose interest was that they
should be able to thrive in USA without problems. They were never pro-
Israel, and see themselves as Americans, who lukewarmly believe in some
of the tenets of the Jewish faith. They are not kosher nor are they treyf.
They certainly do not believe in Christianity, but mainly in the idol
Mamon.
You could print what I wrote. I stand behind every word.
***
Also included in my previous article was the evidence that Ben
Gurion’s buddy Chaim Arlozoroff was murdered by the Nazis in
98
1933 as a result of his affair with the Propaganda Minister Joseph
Goebbel’s wife Madje. A correspondent sent me this item
confirming her perverse attraction to and close ties with Jews, a fact
the Nazis would have murdered in order to hush up.
***
NAZI LEADER GOEBBELS’ JEWISH RELATIVE DIED IN CAMP
BERLIN (Reuters)—The wife of top Hitler aide Joseph Goebbels, one of
the most fanatical anti-Semites among the Nazi leadership, had a Jewish
stepfather who died in a concentration camp, a German television
channel said Wednesday.
The documentary series “Hitler’s Women’’ on the public channel ZDF
said Magda Goebbels’ stepfather, Richard Friedlaender, who her mother
divorced when she was young, died in a camp because he was Jewish and
could not get help from his powerful relatives.
“At one point my grandfather had the idea of speaking to his son-in-law
and went to the ministry,’’ Michael Tutsch, Friedlaender’s grandson, told
the program, referring to the Berlin Propaganda Ministry that Goebbels
headed.
“When he got to the office he must have been shocked to recognize his
father-in-law. He turned to his aide and said ‘ask what this Jew
Friedlaender wants here’,’’ he said. “He did this and thus the conversation
was finished for my grandfather.’’
Friedlaender was sent to do hard labor at the notorious Buchenwald
concentration camp near Weimar in 1938. He died there the following
year.
“One word from his daughter-in-law or her prominent husband could
have saved Friedlaender’s life,’’ the program concluded.
Although historians have long known Magda Goebbels’ mother, Auguste
Behrend, had married and divorced Friedlaender, who was working as a
waiter in a Berlin cafe when he was arrested, his eventual fate had not
previously been well known.
Magda and Joseph Goebbels killed their six children and then committed
suicide in Hitler’s bunker in the closing days of World War Two.
***
Exactly one month before the Rabin murder, a minyan gathered
outside Rabin’s home to recite a Medieval death curse, the Pulsa
Dinara. Leading the worshipers was one Avigdor Eskin. I had
written that the ceremony was part of the Shabak’s pre-
assassination incitement, ergo, Eskin was a Shabak agent. Later on
his participation in such outrages as throwing a pig’s head into a
mosque in Hebron, beating up a cab driver in front of the press
99
cameras while delivering a birthday cake to Yigal Amir at his prison,
and his frequent trips to Moscow led me to declare assuredly that
Eskin was a provocateur, not a right wing fanatic. What sewed up
the issue for me were his ties to the supposedly extremist group,
Kach. Over the years I have spoken to numerous Americans who
founded Kach in Israel and they all said the same thing: They left
the organization because it was totally infiltrated by Israeli secret
service men. There is barely an American left in Kach; what
remains is a tool of the Shabak, and Eskin was a leader of the tools.
He was sentenced to a prison term recently but that is just to
maintain his credibility, as the next correspondent proves:
***
Hello Barry,
There has been a recent important development in this. Avigdor Eskin
has been elected (in absentia) as a member of Political Council
(leadership) of “Eurasia” Movement based in Moscow, Russia. The
Eurasia socio-political movement is financed and structurally supported
by Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) and Russian Presidential
Administration. Although it is officially a “patriotic”, “neo-eurasian”,
“anti-American” organization, it serves the purpose of NWO and is paid
by its emissaries in Russia (basically, it is a pro-NWO party which hides
behind a pseudo-patriotic facade). The official organizer is talented
Russian geopolitician and political philosopher Alexander Dugin. It seems
they are trying to use Eskin and his cohorts to “smooth” the relations
between pro-Western Russian elite (Putin, etc.), criminal oligarchs
(Deripaska, Abramovich, Chubais, etc.) with Israeli business elite and
political circles. (It is known that Eskin has connections with Israeli lobby
in Washington, with Republican Senator Jesse Helms, and with head of
Committee on International Relations of Russian State Duma Dmitrii
Rogozin, and has been used to make contact between Russian and
American administrations.)
I have much more info on this, but I would be very interested in hearing
what you can say (research) on this angle from your vantage point.
***
Last November I gave a lecture in Kochav Yair, to a group of
mainly army officers, at the home of a prominent IDF colonel (his
brother was President Weizmann’s media advisor). At the end of
the lecture, a high ranking officer told me not to be so bleak about
the IDF, a rebellion was taking place at the top of the military
hierarchy that could even lead to a coup against Prime Minister
Barak.

100
 My source was an insider so I wrote an article about the
incipient IDF coup against Barak. MANY people wrote to say I
had gone too far and a coup could never happen in Israel. Isn’t it
nice to be proven reliable. A correspondent who apparently
remembered my claim sent me this item from UPI:
As United Press International recently reported exclusively, there was a
plot last November where senior Israeli military commanders by Lt. Gen
Shaul Mofas, Israel’s Army Chief of Staff, led a rebellious party of Israeli
generals, who wanted “harsher measures” taken against the Palestinian
insurgents, including assassinating president of the Palestine Authority,
Yasser Arafat, according to U.S. government officials.
But according to Pat Clawson, Middle East analyst at the Washington
Institute for Near East Policy, Barak met the proposal with the scathing
“contempt that it deserved.”
One U.S. congressional source described the blow out as “the most
severe crisis of civilian authority in the history of Israel.” This source
explained the conflict centered on “the extent of the government’s ability
to disregard the Israeli defense establishment and the estimates of
intelligence chiefs in the pursuit of policy.”
Well, what do you know? I was right. And this was no fluke.
The article that boosted my credibility a hundred times was called
“Sharon: No Reason To Celebrate”. Written the day of his electoral
victory, my thesis was that Sharon was controlled by the world
globalists and he would do their bidding. To prove it, I predicted
that he would name Rabin murderer and Oslo architect Shimon
Peres his Foreign Minister.
That very night, Sharon outlined his new government’s policy
and tacked to the end of his peace strategy was a promise that Israel
would adhere to “the global economy.” Readers immediately
spotted the addendum and concluded that he was sending a
message to his masters. A few weeks later Peres became FM and...
you know the rest. People asked why I was the only one to
correctly assess Sharon’s motives. Since then numerous people
have informed me that Sharon was just being smart because he
could blackmail Peres over the Rabin murder. Their proof is Peres’
recent about-faces on peace, settlements, terrorism and Arafat.
That reasoning does not appease me one bit. Sharon hired an arch-
criminal and that was unforgivable. But it was just part of the
pattern, as a Massachusetts college lecturer confirms in the
following article:

101
Sharon makes the case for Chamish, E. Narrett, 05-13-01, 20 Iyar
5761 Monday evening May 07, Pesach Sheni I was in Manhattan
discussing Israel on Cable TV. Later that night, I spoke with major
sponsors of Yeshiva Beit Orot and the restoration of Jerusalem’s Shimon
haTzaddik neighborhood. As we said goodnight and while I drove home
the next morning, in Israel, Kobi Mandel and Joseph Ishran of Tekoa
were being abducted, battered and stabbed to death by Arabs in the
Haritoun cave.
Six months ago, Barry Chamish warned that for two and a half decades,
Henry Kissinger had groomed Ariel Sharon to eventually play a role in
the dismemberment of Israel. Just as the Yom Kippur War ‘softened up’
Israel and Israelis, making them more pliable to State Department
pressures, so the Labor Party and media-managed savaging of Sharon
after the Maronites revenge at Sabra and Shatila in 1982 helped prepare
the General to make his separate peace with the globalists. Already
Sharon had bulldozed Yamit and spared Arafat in Beirut. Since then, the
golem has grown ever bigger and more deadly.
Eight years ago, Sharon told a woman in Efrat, newly-widowed by Arab
terrorists, that the security of the people of Gush Etzion requires
additional settlements. But none of significance has been created and the
toll of murdered Jews continues to mount. Dr. Shmuel Gittis, Asaf
Hershkowitz and now the two boys from Tekoa have paid the price for
politicians whose perks are bought by those committed to severing Israel
from its holiest places, if not destroying it altogether.
Reports from Wye Plantation in fall 1998 suggested that Sharon was the
weakest link at those talks. The one issue on which the General reportedly
was strong was freeing Jonathan Pollard. Now that he is Prime Minister,
he has abandoned the Israeli agent, recently ignoring a personal appeal
from his former comrade in arms Gen. (res.) Rehavam Ze’evi.
Another big shot whose organization Chamish often discusses is in the
news today. Edgar Bronfman, Chief of Seagrams, the World Jewish
Congress and main sponsor of “Peace Now” has underwritten an
‘advertisement’ in which several dozen Israelis declare their common
interest with the PLO (Ha’aretz & International Herald Tribune, May 11).
The “Peace Coalition,” including about twenty Labor and Meretz MKs,
demands “a freeze on all building in the settlements” in Judea and
Samaria. And it demands accepting the [former Senator George] Mitchell
Commission Report that studiously avoids blaming the PLO for terrorism
while recycling the canard that Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount was
partly responsible for the long planned Oslo War. The “Peace Coalition”
also insists that Israel support the Egyptian-Jordanian ‘peace initiative’
advancing the PLO position.
The signers of this agreement are practicing treason against the State,
consorting, meeting with and coordinating policy with enemies of Israel
who for months (indeed, for decades) have been involved in murdering
Jews and pursuing their goal of destroying Israel. In America, they would
102
be prosecuted under the Logan Act. Not surprisingly, the signers also
demand that “circles close to the government and settlers” cease
delineating them as the traitors they are.
Mr. Bronfman is an active member of the Council on Foreign Relations
whose anti-religious and anti-Israel plans for a global state Chamish often
has reviewed. His “Peace Now” is a major instrument for achieving this
end and thwarting 3500 years of Jewish faith, endurance and sacrifice. His
high-profile focus on European anti-Semitism in the past obscures his
unconcern with murderous Arab anti-Semitism today, and with the hatred
of Israel and Jews encoded in efforts by European Foreign Ministries to
ban the import of Israeli goods (especially from Yesha) and to legitimate
Arab attacks on “settlers.” (“Danish FM: EU must ban settlement
exports,” Ha’aretz, May 6).
In 1993, Ariel Sharon acknowledged that more settlements and settlers
would improve safety in Judah. “Only a continuous Jewish presence here
can guarantee normal Jewish life.” But now that he is a ‘statesman,’ his
mouth spouts “admiration” for the settlers while his hand slashes fiscal
appropriations to them by 60%. Thus Sharon follows State Department
policy that Jewish settlements in the Jewish heartland are “provocations
that harm chances for peace” (news services May 10, 2001). As numerous
writers out of the media mainstream have noted, for three decades the
State Department (and Presidential candidates, Democrat and
Republican) have been members of the CFR and more or less active
promoters of shrinking Israel back to its Auschwitz borders.
The day the boys were buried, I looked at photos of Tekoa on the web.
There it lay amid the Judean hills, its rings of homes interspersed with
trees. The larger it is and the more neighboring Jewish communities and
farms there are, the more Hashem will be exalted and obeyed and the
safer and prouder Israelis will be.
Sharon and his appointees have stated often that they want to greatly
increase immigration from North America. The family of Jacob Mandel
made aliyah from Maryland. Kobi was looking forward to teaching his
sabra friends to play baseball. Surely Mr. Sharon realizes that North
American Jews will not come to Israel in significant numbers if their
children cannot hike near their homes and if they cannot drive to and
from work or the store safely.
Nothing significant has been done to avenge the deaths of Kobi Mandel
and Joseph Ishran and to deter further such murders. The missile strikes
in Gaza, Jericho and Jenin demonstrated again that Israel can militarily
(and legally, see ‘Oslo II,’ Articles 1, 10 and 11, imra.org May 09, 2001)
obliterate the ‘Palestinians’ at any time. That it refuses to do so, as the
Arabs continue to make war on Israel and Jews suggests that powers in
the American State Department set Sharon’s policy.
This government is failing very badly and Netanyahu proved himself to
be even less reliable. The treachery of the Shas leadership in maintaining

103
 the ‘Barak’ Knesset proves more costly every day. Israel needs new
elections and an entirely new leadership to avenge the spilling of Jewish
blood and bring real peace closer by victory.
Let’s give the Prime Minister the benefit of the doubt. Sharon’s Pesach
Sheni is to expel Labor from his government, form a nationalist coalition
and seek victories to bequeath to its children. In the long term, only a
new generation will save Israel from the machinations of those now
afflicting it from without and crippling it from within.
Eugene Narrett is the author of Gathered against Jerusalem: Essays on a False
Peace (December 2000).
***
The last letter will be presented as received, with punctuation
errors intact just to get a feel for how invaluable information is
sometimes received.
God Bless you for your wonderful work.. I would like to tell you my own
personal experience with the masons and inner workings on high levels.
I spent 10 years in Air Force Security Service from 1954 to 1964. I was
trained as a Russian Linguist and Radio intercept communications analyst
of Soviet military radio transmissions. My training manuals had been
written by Germans. When I graduated I was told that if I was ever
captured and I had a mason’s ring I would be freed...and conversation left
hanging at that! but I filed it in back of my mind. I was privileged to have
worked on the U-2 program back in mid 50’s. first as intercept operator
in middle east monitoring soviet fighter reaction against U-2. later I had
part in Cuban Missile Crisis and watched the whole thing build up just the
way things are going now and we are fools here in America...that is why I
write to Bush because I hope he goes against what his father tells him
about Israel. If little Bush is a real Christian I hope he has courage to
stand up against Arafat by not inviting him to Washington.
As for the Council on foreign relations or Rockerfeller family.....in 1963 I
was accidently given an emergency top secret message intended for the
White House from Saigon saying we had killed their president and gave
all details..I was at our World hq. in San Antonio and responsible for any
“spot reports” of on going Soviet Bomber/Air defense activity in Europe.
The comm center thought it was for me...after an hour of re-reading it I
gave it to my civilian bosses who returned it to the Comm. Center to send
on to White house. A boss told me that when we wanted to stop or start
a war one did not call the white house or pentagon, but new york...He
would not tell me but only say that above a 36th floor in new yorks an
organization planned all events even up to 50 years in advance and they
determined who ruled where. I believe he was talking about Chase Bank
and David Rockerfeller.
I was later called in to some secret office and read the riot act that I
would have my clearance pulled immediatelly if i talked....Then kennedy
104
 got killed....i was told there was tons of oil off viet nam and that plus all
the other natural resources of the area was our goal. i was then told we
put in all the governments in mexico and central and south america... in
february of 1964 I got out because i had been threatened with loss of top
secret clearance and knew of coming viet nam conflict.
I think God let me stay in just 10 years and see only the tip of the iceberg
to prepare me for today to, if nothing else, humbly, in my own way alert
everyone i can to love and support israel.

LIES, LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES, LIES, LIES

The Tel Aviv region’s water supply is poisoned with ammonia.
At the height of the panic, the national water inspector tells
Channel Two evening news that he is not ruling out sabotage. An
hour later, a security guard working at the National Water Carrier’s
pumping station south of Lod is murdered and his weapon stolen.
The murder is not seen as worthy of note by the Israeli media. A
story is disseminated that agricultural runoff somehow entered a
small pipe whose one direction flow valve failed. And that
somehow tainted the water supply of two million people.

Lies, Lies and More Lies.

The families of the three soldiers kidnapped by Hizbullah are at
Ben Gurion Airport one night on the way to meet UN big chief
Kofi Annan. Coincidentally, so am I. I tell them, don’t believe a
word from Annan. On a 40 kilometer road, your sons were
kidnapped outside a UN outpost by terrorists wearing UN
uniforms and driving a UN vehicle. This was a UN operation,
probably coordinated with Syria. A few of the family members have
read Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin? and listen closely. They vow to
investigate further. In New York they tell the media the UN was
responsible for the kidnappings. This week a film emerges proving
it.
For the past 25 years, Shimon Peres has written and stated that
he had a personal talk with Yoni Netanyahu before he flew off to
lead the Entebbe rescue. At the anniversary celebration this week,
another officer says that Peres was lying. Peres admits he was
“mistaken” and never actually spoke to Yoni Netanyahu.
More bald-faced lies from Peres and the Israeli media drops the
issue like a hot falafel... Just like they never followed up on an
105
exposé by Hebron leader David Wilder published on the Arutz
Sheva website.
Please, listen to this carefully, because otherwise you will not believe what
you hear.
The date is Friday, July 14, 1995 several months before the assassination
of then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Rabin’s Foreign Minister was none
other than the present Foreign Minister, Shimon Peres.
I was in the middle of writing an article when I heard an interview on Kol
Yisrael radio with Rabbi Nahum Rabinovitch, from Ma’ale Adumim.
Rabbi Rabinovitch had spoken to a reporter who interviewed Peres a
short time before. The reporter asked Peres, “Aren’t your worried about
what will happen to the ‘settlers’ in Judea and Samaria after the army pulls
out?” Peres’ answer was, and I quote from that 1995 article “I have no
problem with what will happen in Yesha. We will withdraw the army and
then let’s see what happens. They (the Jews) will either run away
immediately, or the Arabs will massacre some, and then we’ll see what
happens.”
You are undoubtedly asking yourselves, “what did he say?”
So, I repeat, and again, please listen carefully. Shimon Peres: “I have no
problem with what will happen in Yesha. We will withdraw the army and
then let’s see what happens. They (the Jews) will either run away
immediately, or the Arabs will massacre some, and then we’ll see what
happens.”
That was Foreign minister Shimon Peres of 1995. This time,
Peres did not lie. That is an oddity as you’ll see if you visit
www.afsi.org/shimon.htm.
Nothing makes sense about the Dolphinarium explosion, which
killed 23 young revelers in a line outside a disco. Israel blamed
Hamas or Islamic Jihad for the bomb yet neither accepted
responsibility or had filmed the bomber before his mission, as is
always their modus operandi. Disinformation spreads throughout
Israel that the bomber was sent by Osama bin Laden. His original
target was the American Embassy but it was too heavily guarded.
So he set his sights on the disco instead.
Now why would the bomber want to explode his device outside
a completely deserted embassy on a Friday night? Why would he
choose an alternative target half a mile away, when the most
crowded cafes were a few steps away from the embassy? The
bomber is a Jordanian residing in Israel on a government visa. He
would have been under heavy Shabak surveillance. Now look at
this detail, not surprisingly, unreported in the Israeli media:
106
 From the Sunday Times of London:
DISCO BOMBER USED ISRAELI MOLE AS DRIVER
Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv
A PALESTINIAN with links to Israeli intelligence unwittingly acted as a
driver for the suicide bomber responsible for the devastating explosion
that killed 22 people outside a Tel Aviv discotheque, it was claimed last
week.
A senior Palestinian intelligence official told The Sunday Times that the
driver, Mahmoud Dahshat Rashid Al-Nadi, who made his living ferrying
Palestinians from the West Bank to Israel, was an informant for Israeli
police intelligence.
Al-Nadi, who is in his twenties, was arrested on June 2, the day after he
allegedly dropped off the bomber in front of the entrance of the
Dolphinarium disco on the city’s seafront.
Brigadier-General Tawfik Tirawi, the head of the Palestinian General
Intelligence in the West Bank, said Al-Nadi did not appear to have been
aware of his passenger’s deadly mission until it was too late.
Israeli authorities have not announced Al-Nadi’s arrest—apparently out
of embarrassment at the close links they enjoyed with a man who
allegedly facilitated the worst suicide bombing in five years.
Al-Nadi was believed still to be in custody last week, although it was not
clear if he had been charged.
“The man is under arrest,” said Brigadier-General Ron Kitri, the chief
Israeli army spokesman, “but he is not a Shin Bet [Israeli secret service]
agent.”
Tirawi claimed that Al-Nadi, who lives in the West Bank town of Qalqilia,
had been working with Israeli police intelligence since 1999, giving them
information about Palestinian activities in the area. In so doing, he said,
he was following the example of several other members of his family
suspected for decades of links with the Israeli security services.
In return, he had been given a special pass enabling him to travel back
and forth between the West Bank and Israel. He also possessed an Israeli
identity card.
***
So what has our government been telling us about the
Dolphinarium blast? Lies, nothing, lies, nothing and more lies.
Twenty family members of the victims of the Versailles
Wedding Hall collapse demonstrated. They want to know why the
government is refusing to investigate the disaster. They are getting
increasingly frustrated by the government’s policy of lies, nothing,
lies and nothing but lies.

107
 ***
For the past five years, various people have told me that Jewish
worshippers in the Cave of the Patriarchs heard Dr. Baruch
Goldstein banging on the door begging someone to open it. Either
because they couldn’t or wouldn’t, no one opened the door. Instead
they heard Goldstein’s screams as he was, we were told,
bludgeoned to death.
The government would not allow an autopsy to be performed
on Dr. Goldstein’s body, even when his wife requested it. This
week I found out why.
An informant gave me the phone number of Itzhak Dov Reinitz
of the Jerusalem burial society, which organized Dr. Goldstein’s
funeral. He added, he also knows about the Rabin bodyguard who
was buried on the night of the assassination.
Of the bodyguard, Reinitz told me,
“I have no personal information. I just know that on the day after the
assassination there was talk throughout the burial society of a bodyguard
buried the night before... But Goldstein was something I’ll never forget.
His body came in a bag in tiny pieces. He was decapitated, his limbs were
torn off, his body was butchered inside and out.”
I asked what is needed to decapitate a body. He replied that a
sharp heavy instrument like an ax or butcher’s knife was used. Now
what was an ax doing inside the mosque where worshippers must
pass through military inspectors and metal detectors?
The government’s Shamgar Commission of Inquiry into the
Hebron Massacre concluded that Goldstein was bludgeoned to
death by iron bars, strangely, handed out by someone who found
them in a storage closet. Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies and more Lies, Lies,
Lies. I spoke to the man who prepared what was left of Goldstein’s
body for burial. Dr. Goldstein was axed and butchered to death.
And the government must be lying because under honest
circumstances, axes and butcher knives would never have entered
the mosque.
Another informant, whose information has not been verified,
knows the true circumstances of the murder of Military
Intelligence/Shabak Colonel Yehuda Edri last month. She insists he
did not die on the spot as we were told, but perished in the hospital

108
a few days later. And apparently, the reports of his bodyguard being
severely wounded were highly exaggerated.
Since this is early information, I won’t vouch for it. However,
based on the previous verified facts, the official reports of Edri’s
death will turn out to be lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies and more lies,
then some added lies and lies. Because, while our besieged nation is
being set up for its fall by death squads, bombers, sabotage and
poison, our government has been forced to remain passive, cover
up the enemy’s crimes and lie to its people.
Watch Sharon lately. He can’t stop smiling while he lies.

PRACTICAL IDEAS
“Okay, I believe you but what can I do?”
“Even if you’re right, there’s nothing we can do to change
things.”
“Fine, you identified the problem, what’s the solution?”
Yes, there are ways. With lots of flair and imagination, we CAN
change things.
1. A Law To Revoke—In November 1993, the Rabin
government passed a law retroactively legalizing
meetings between Israelis and members of the PLO.
Until then, such meetings were illegal treason. The
law saved the likes of Shimon Peres, Yossi Beilin,
Ron Pundak, Yair Hirshfeld and Uri Savir from
prison for illegally meeting the PLO.

Let’s revoke it. From a jurisdictive point of view, we

have all the high cards. Numerous legalists have
explained that there is no precedent for a retroactive
law protecting criminals from high crime. One can no
more retroactively legalize treason than murder or rape.
Many, many people have tried to have the Oslo Accord
repealed because the PLO have broken its clauses
thousands of times. But getting rid of an internationally
sanctioned treaty is not simple. Rescinding the
retroactive meeting law is, legally speaking, a snap. It is
an unbelievably non-binding piece of legislation. A few
109
 good arguments to the Supreme Court could do the
trick.
And imagine the fine results after no one, not Sharon,
not Peres could meet any PLO leader until a new law
was passed. And we’ll fight that one as well. And best
of all, the Oslo criminals could finally be prosecuted.
So where are a gutsy attorney or two?
2. Get the CIA—Now that the Israeli Defense Minister
Binyamin Ben Eliezer has acknowledged that the CIA trained
the PLO death squads, with agreement from Shimon Peres;
and now that a wide range of “experts” have acknowledged
that the CIA trained numerous PLO “policemen” in the fine
arts of advanced snipery and sundry deadly operations, let’s
get the CIA and hard.
Who says the American taxpayer would have agreed to foot
the bill for the PLO’s training in sophisticated murder
techniques? Who says the CIA had any legal right to train
these squads, which have murdered over 100 Jews and
maimed five times that number, even with the permission of
Peres?
Investigate George Tenet’s direct role in the mass
murder of Israeli citizens. Prosecute him if he
overstepped ANY law.
And while you’re at it, you may as well expose the
further training of the PLO at Lackland Air Force Base
in Texas. My sources assure me, the “policemen” are
there right now taking courses in the slaughter of
innocents.
American lawyers, where are you?
3. No Place to Hide Anymore for Yoram Rubin—Yes, the State
Prosecutor found a trick to drop one of the two charges
against Avishai Raviv. Yes, the ploy is to delay his trial until
the statute of limitations for indictment on new charges
passes. So let’s open a new front. Rabin’s last bodyguard,
Yoram Rubin, testifying to the Shamgar Commission, lied
that Yigal Amir shot a bullet in his arm while he was
protecting the prime minister. We have his clinical report; he
got caught in his lie. Rubin testified at Amir’s trial that Rabin
110
 jumped head-first into his car. We have the “amateur”
murder film; he lied again. Rubin was the one who murdered
Rabin. But there’s no point going for the home run ball. Let’s
get him on deep perjury. It’s like shooting a fish in a barrel.
So far, Rubin has evaded scrutiny. He DID have a
most unlikely car accident two years ago that almost
killed him, but that’s internal Shabak diplomacy. Now
it’s time to have Rubin stand trial for perjury and let’s
see where it leads. I’ll provide all the official records
anyone could ever need to prove the charge.
He must be made to know, he will not escape his
crimes. Journalists, researchers, truth seekers, lawyers
and the interested public, here is how to reach him.
Yoram Rubin’s work number is 09 861-1122; fax: 862-
5831. His work address is the cellar of Herzl 53,
Netanya.
4. Gillon’s Huge Mistake—It took a lot of e-mailing, but it
worked. Carmi Gillon’s role in the Rabin murder made front
page headlines in Denmark’s largest circulation newspaper.
Simply, I exploited an opening. Gillon’s appointment as the
Israeli ambassador to Denmark is causing a huge ruckus in
that country. Now, of course, Danes will be Danes and the
issue is his rough treatment of Arabs while head of the
Shabak.
Now that the Danes are in the mist of Gillonmania,
let’s spread the word about who Gillon REALLY is.
Go to your favorite search engine and seek lists of
influential Danes in all fields; journalism, academia,
government, diplomacy, then copy and paste your
version, the real version, of who the Danes now have
as their Israeli ambassador. With enough letters floating
around the country, even the princes of modern
humanity in Denmark, will get the message. If the
Rabin truth can’t be exposed in Israel, well then, let’s
go through the back door of Denmark.
Here is what I sent out. Perhaps it will serve as a reminder for
your own messages to the Danish people.

111
 CARMI GILLON:
THE NEW ISRAELI AMBASSADOR TO DENMARK
The cover-up of the Rabin assassination reached new and even
uglier heights of deceit in yesterday’s (April 14) Israeli newspaper
media. Both Yediot Ahronot and Ha’aretz published long interviews
in their weekend magazines with former General Security Services
(Shabak) legal affairs director Shabtai Ziv. My, what a coincidence,
two papers, same obscure character. And just a few days before
Yediot Ahronot, as was emblazoned on its front page headline, would
publish two chapters of former Shabak chief Carmi Gillon’s new
book on the Rabin assassination in its Passover magazine.
You can just feel the terror in Shabak headquarters as the
fumbling high officers mapped out a full media blitz to quash the
widespread and accurate perception that Gillon was one of the
conspirators behind Rabin’s murder. In fact, Ziv admits that the
current Shabak chief Ami Ayalon did not try to prevent the trial of
Yigal Amir’s partner in provocation and crime Avishai Raviv,
because, “He was tired of hearing about the conspiracy theory.”
What is so useful in these media cover-ups, are the facts that
don’t get cleaned out of the final copy. Ziv told Ha’aretz, as he did
Yediot Ahronot that:
“I can state that all the activities of a judicial character in connection with
Raviv were done in consultation and full transparency vis-a-vis the state
attorney and her department. A number of discussions were held about
him in which we gave the Justice Ministry all the information we
possessed about offences he committed...”
This isn’t new, I made the same claims in my book Who Murdered
Yitzhak Rabin? But then, I wasn’t the head of the Shabak’s legal
affairs department. Ziv’s remarkable admission means former
Justice Minister David Libai and former State Attorney General
Dorit Beinish and her staff were apprised of Raviv’s crimes and
provocations and approved their continuation. This justifies
indictments against them all as active accessories in innumerable
crimes. Yet how does one issue indictments against the people who
issue indictments?
And Ziv, as was clearly requested by his authorities, went out of
his way to compliment Carmi Gillon: “He is a humane and
sympathetic gentleman,” he insisted.

112
 Well no, actually he’s a bit off here. Gillon is a brutish and cruel
gorilla. He is also an inveterate liar, which is why I am presenting a
truer picture of him than his own book will. Gillon will claim that
the Rabin assassination was a series of blunders and he felt so bad
about it, he offered to resign the next day. He will paint a picture of
a murderous anti-peace community that had to be infiltrated by the
likes of Raviv to protect Israel’s glorious democracy. He may even
claim, as he once did, that he never even met Avishai Raviv. So
before anyone has a chance to believe this liar, permit me to paint a
truer picture of the monster.

How He Became Shabak Chief

In 1990 Gillon wrote an MA thesis at Haifa University on the
dangers the Israeli Right present to the nation. More than a few
people have insisted the thesis was written for him, just as post
assassination newspaper analyses on peace clearly were. At the time,
he was head of the Shabak’s Jewish Department and he was
utilizing Avishai Raviv to infiltrate various borderline groups such
as Kach and the Temple Mount Faithful.
However, someone very powerful had bigger plans for him and
after the Hebron massacre of February 1994, Gillon became
Shabak chief. Of course, in a fair world that would have been
impossible since, as Jewish Department head, he had supposedly
failed miserably to prevent the massacre. In fact, he had succeeded
but this is not the place to explain how Dr. Baruch Goldstein was
set up to take the blame for bloodshed planned by others.
The one sticking point was Rabin, who opposed Gillon’s
appointment vehemently. So, Gillon had Avishai Raviv organize a
protest against his home in Mevasseret Tzion to place him in
contention and Rabin agreed to his appointment only if then-
Shabak head Yaacov Perry supervised his tenure, an unheard of
procedure. Rabin admitted that Gillon’s lack of experience dealing
with Arab terrorism made him unfit for the post, but he gave in
“because of cabinet pressure.” Which in the cabinet of the day,
meant that Shimon Peres supported Gillon. Recently Gillon was
the chairman of the Shimon Peres Institute for Peace. All in all,
while head of the Shabak, Gillon was a Peres plant.

113
 Now let us look at Gillon’s activities and his central role in the
Rabin murder according to Israeli experts. We begin with Adir Zik
writing in Hatsofe:
Carmi Gillon was the direct handler of Avishai Raviv for an extended
period. It was he who turned Raviv into the biggest provocateur in
Israel’s history...
Even while Gillon’s deputies directed Raviv, Gillon was in direct contact
with him. He ordered him to marry a Russian born settler as a cover for
his activities.
Gillon ordered Raviv to undertake a long series of violent crimes against
Jews and Arabs in Hebron, Jerusalem, and at Tel Aviv and Bar Ilan
Universities.
Gillon ordered Raviv to make violent attacks on Knesset Members Tamar
Guzonsky and Shulamit Aloni on behalf of the Shabak front organization,
Eyal.
Gillon’s hatred of the Right led him to utilize the services of a Shabak
plant in the Israel Broadcasting Authority named Eitan Oren, to film and
televise a series of phony reports whose goal was to humiliate the
residents of Judea and Samaria...
Gillon ordered Raviv to print a photomontage of Rabin in a Gestapo
uniform and display it a huge anti-government rally. Rabin called Gillon
to his office and demanded an explanation. Gillon told Rabin not to
worry, Raviv was under his authority.
Immediately after Rabin’s murder, Raviv told police investigators that he
had heard Amir threaten Rabin’s life four or five times. Raviv had to have
informed his superiors, including Gillon about Amir’s intentions and they
had to have deliberately ignored the warnings.
Amir shot blank bullets at Rabin and Gillon’s Shabak underling,
Rabin’s bodyguard Yoram Rubin, actually murdered Rabin.

Gillon’s Uncanny Predictions

On August 24, 1995, barely two months before Rabin’s murder,
Gillon told a group of journalists that Rabin’s life was in danger
from an assassin. He described this theoretical murderer: “He
doesn’t have to be a settler, he could be a dark-skinned Sephardic
student, studying at Bar Ilan University and living in Herzlia.”
What powers of precognition hath the prophet Gillon! Why Amir
also was a Sephardic Bar Ilan student who lived in Herzlia! Ophir
Shalakh of Ma’ariv was but one of many of the attending journalists
who noted, “The profile Carmi Gillon presented precisely
described Yigal Amir.”
114
 And who can forget Gillon’s classic reaction when informed of
the murder by phone while he was in Paris (Yediot Ahronot,
24/11/95): “It was a Jew.” However did he know?

What Was Gillon Doing in Paris on the Assassination Night?????

Gillon’s Shabak underlings were widely quoted claiming to have
queried Gillon why he was flying to Paris two days before the most
security-sensitive rally in the country’s history. He refused to
answer, but did order his deputies not to change even one detail of
his procedures for the rally.
In previous articles I have traced the tracks of the Rabin
assassination to Paris. The goal of the murder was to place the
French puppet Shimon Peres in power. And Gillon was there
pitching in. He was later rewarded for his connivance and silence,
when in 1999, Peres appointed Gillon, at a huge salary, to chair his
peace institute.

Trying The Wrong Man

Mati Golan wrote in Globes (11/12/97):
Carmi Gillon is opposing the indictment of Avishai Raviv because it
would reveal Shabak operating procedure. Perhaps he is right, Raviv
shouldn’t be on trial, his superiors should be.
However, the State Attorney General did finally indict Raviv on
two minor charges in 1999. When he announced the indictment, he
added a strange addendum: “We found no justification for indicting
his superior, Carmi Gillon.”
While the government protected Gillon, a good portion of the
Israeli people are convinced he was a leader in the plot to murder
Yitzhak Rabin.

115
 CHAPTER FOUR
FOREIGN ATROCITIES

THE VATICAN’S PLOT AGAINST ISRAEL

In March 1994, the newspaper Shishi revealed a most remarkable
secret of the Middle East “peace” process. A friend of Shimon
Peres, the French intellectual Marek Halter, claimed in an interview
that in May 1993, he delivered a letter from Peres to the pope.
Within, Peres promised to internationalize Jerusalem, granting the
UN political control of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Vatican
hegemony of the holy sites within. The UN would give the PLO a
capital within its new territory and East Jerusalem would become a
kind of free trade zone of world diplomacy.
Halter’s claim was backed by the Italian newspaper La Stampa,
which added that Arafat was apprised of the agreement and it was
included in the secret clauses of the Declaration of Principles signed in
Washington in September 1993.
In March 1995, the Israeli radio station Arutz Sheva was leaked a
cable from the Israeli Embassy in Rome to Peres’ Foreign Ministry
in Jerusalem confirming the handover of Jerusalem to the Vatican.
This cable was printed on the front page of the radical leftwing
Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz two days later. A scandal erupted and
numerous rabbis who had invited Peres for Passover services
cancelled their invitations in protest of his treachery. Peres reacted
by claiming that the cable was real, but that someone had whited
out the word, “not;” the cable really said that Israel would “not”
hand Jerusalem over to the holy pontiff.
Illustrating the sorry political state of Israel’s rabbis, they
accepted this cockamamie excuse and re-invited Peres to their
tables. However, in the widely distributed minutes of a meeting
with Clinton in 1997, Peres reiterated his diplomacy, ending with
the words, “as I had previously promised the Holy See.”
Peres’ partner in crime, and the real founder of the Oslo
Accord, Yossi Beilin, coordinated his PLO policy with the Vatican.
117
Check the timing. At the same moment that he was finagling an
accord with the PLO, he was negotiating an agreement for Vatican
recognition of Israel. His deal with the pope became another brief
scandal when politicians like Agudat Yisrael head Avraham Shapira
and Jerusalem Deputy Mayor Shmuel Meir were leaked hidden
details of Beilin’s accord which included, “the extra-territoriality of
holy sites in Jerusalem to be transferred to Vatican control.” Later,
Shapira was neutralized by having $250 million in debts accrued by
his crooked carpet factory forgiven, while Meir was permanently
hushed when his car was crushed by a UN truck driven by a PLO
driver. The driver, of course, was released forever after being
briefly questioned by Israel Police.
Now let us jump ahead to 1999. The Foreign Minister Shlomo
Ben Ami is shuttling between King Carlos of Spain and the
Vatican. That is where the action is for the Israeli government
today, and when things get serious, the focus shifts to Paris where
Chirac, Albright and Arafat await him.
There is no question whatsoever that the Vatican wants Israel
off the Temple Mount and that our leadership is accommodating
their desire. What I have not been able to pinpoint is why.
However, material sent to me appears to answer the question.
Allow me to preface a few comments before I carry on. The vast
majority of my ongoing readers are not really conspiratorial in their
outlook. What attracted them to my e-mail list and books is that I
solved the Rabin assassination to their satisfaction and that I am
offering more likely explanations for Israel’s suicide than they are
getting from the mainstream media. It took five years for me to
finally instill the fact that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
in New York is Israel’s number one enemy, and despite pouring on
the evidence time after time, there are still doubters who refuse to
believe that any organization can have that much power. Every
time I dig deep, I’m accused of going too far, even of fantasizing
imaginary foes.
So what am I going to do with the evidence sent to me accusing
the Society of Jesus, whose members are known as Jesuits, of being
the real power behind the CFR and of being Israel and Judaism’s
most vicious and successful enemy? My doubters are going to have

118
a field day with this revelation but I’m going ahead anyway. The
weight of the evidence is beyond merely compelling.
I had known for some time that a former Jesuit priest, Malachi
Martin had exposed his society’s treachery at great length.
Numerous correspondents insisted I could not understand Israel’s
dilemma without reading Martin’s revelations. Still, one voice
wasn’t enough for me to risk unnecessary mockery. However,
recently other voices have been added to Martin’s, and I’ve started
paying attention. A composer who I had greatly admired thirty
years ago, Tupper Saussy released a book called Rulers of Evil, which
expanded on the thesis of Jesuit control of the American political
system, and is receiving fine reviews. We have begun a
correspondence, and I will receive his book shortly.
In the meantime, I will expand on the book I have completed
reading. It is called Vatican Assassins and the author is Eric Jon Phelps.
One may read excerpts by visiting www.vaticanassassins.org. This was
no ordinary reading experience. The manuscript I received spiral
bound is 750 pages in length. The first 600 pages attempt, mostly
successfully, to prove that the Jesuits were formed in reaction to
the Protestant Reformation, and their goal is to return the planet to
the good old days when one pope held the monopoly on world
religion. Utilizing any evil means available, their plan is to eliminate
all the competition, be they Jews, Muslims or Christians who don’t
recognize the Vatican as their capital.
It is their war on the Jews which will most interest my readers
and from here on, we will concentrate on that one aspect of a most
complicated history.
I will start with the book’s claim that Jesuit control of Great
Britain was the real force behind Zionism and the re-establishment
of a Jewish homeland in Israel. I have no problem with this thesis
since the entire Middle East as it exists today, was created by the
British during and after the first World War. If the British created
Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria, one can be very
certain they created modern Israel as well.
The most disturbing charge is that, to populate the new Israel,
the Jesuits stirred up the pogroms and Holocaust of Europe to
drive Jews to their safe haven in the Middle East. On page 548 we
read:
119
 “Hitler, now in power, patterned his SS after the Jesuit Order. He used
Roman Catholic Bavarian Himmler with his Jesuit uncle to carry out the
plan. Hitler declares:
‘I have learnt most of all from the Jesuit Order. A good part of that
organization I have transported direct to my own party. I will tell you a
secret, I am founding an Order. In Himmler I see our Ignatius de Loyola.’
“Walter Shellenberg, Chief of the Nazi Sicherheitsdienst (SD) reveals:
‘The SS had been organized by Himmler according to the principles of
the Jesuit Order. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by
Ignatius de Loyola constituted a model which Hitler strove carefully to
copy.’
“Edmund Paris then asks this most penetrating question concerning
Hitler:
‘Was it not his uncle, the Jesuit father, who had been promoted to a high-
ranking officer of the SS? And was not the latter the very eye and arm of
Halke von Ledochowski, General of the Order? Who then was sending so
many million deportees to death? Was it Heinrich Himmler or his uncle,
the Jesuit canon?’”
The book details the betrayal of Israel’s leadership during the
Holocaust, recalling that Rudolph Kastner:
“then one of Israel’s most honored leaders, was a traitor who had
cooperated with the Nazi leaders of Germany including Adolph
Eichmann to deport Jews from Hungary.”
I don’t dispute this claim and anyone who does should read Ben
Hecht’s, Perfidy or The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black. It is the
conclusion drawn from this treason, on page 584, which is far more
troublesome:
“Ah, dear truth seeker, Zionist Israel is a creation of the Jesuit Order. Its
purpose is to secure Jerusalem for the Jesuits “infallible” Pope, that he
may receive worldwide worship from Solomon’s rebuilt Temple. If the
Masonic Zionists betrayed their own Jewish race into Pius XII’s
concentration camps overseen by the Jesuit Order, would they not betray
the nation of Israel by giving Jerusalem to the Pope in preparation for the
rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple?
“...Therefore we are living under the preeminence of a Gentile Jesuit
conspiracy. It employs notorious Masonic Jews and Gentiles as their
agents. This furthers the deception of an international Jewish conspiracy
oppressing the nations. Using this lie, the Jesuit General is creating global,
anti-Jewish fury again. This fury will culminate in the last mad attempt to
invade Israel and destroy the physical descendants of Jacob.”
And who is leading the invasion? We learn that Bill Clinton was
the student president of the Jesuit’s Georgetown University and,

120
for a time, expressed the desire of becoming a Jesuit priest. In those
days, Clinton was sent to England on a Rhodes scholarship, with all
that that implies, and at an anti-American demonstration met Jesuit
Friar Richard McSorely, who later headed Georgetown’s Center for
Peace Studies. On page 672, we get a haunting hint at Clinton’s
later role in Israel’s destruction, as well as those of Norway and
France:
“McSorley then went to France and Scandinavia to meet peace people.
Stepping off the train right behind him in Oslo, Norway was Bill
Clinton.”
And if a Clinton Democrat fails to ignite the flames that will
engulf Israel, the Jesuits “will use the Republican Party to bring a
Jesuit-controlled, Jew-hating fascist dictator to power, ‘For the
greater glory of the god who sits in St. Peter’s chair.’”
That’s Eric Jon Phelps explanation why Israel’s political leaders,
especially those of the Labor Party, are running between Chirac,
King Carlos and the Vatican to secure a “peace” treaty with the
PLO. I can only advise my readers not to dismiss the possibility
that he got it right.

RABIN’S LAST DOCTOR

AND THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
We now enter the realm of the truly bizarre as we look at the
doctor who last examined Yitzhak Rabin, the State Pathologist, Dr.
Yehuda Hiss. Israelis know too well that their government’s
coroner is corrupt. In September 1999, Judge Ruth Orr overturned
a conviction against a Jewish resident of Judea and Samaria for the
shooting murder of an Arab boy because she accused Dr. Hiss of
forging the forensic evidence against him. It was the second time in
a year that a murder conviction was overturned because Hiss had
falsified an autopsy for political purposes. He had earlier been
caught doctoring the facts to secure a wrongful rap against the
parents of a murdered child.
His biggest fabrication of all occurred after the country’s most
ghastly scandal was proven. In the first decade of Israel’s existence,
the Labor government kidnapped over 4500 babies, mostly of new
Yemenite immigrant parents, and sold them off for adoption and
medical experiments, mostly abroad. Through the efforts of
121
Yemenite groups fighting to expose this crime, three years ago one
mother, Margalit Omeisse was reunited with her daughter Celia
Levine, given up for adoption to a California couple almost half a
century before. Besides looking like twins, the Hebrew University
genetics laboratory proved they were mother and daughter by
DNA testing. Dr. Hiss retested the two for the government and lo
and behold, found that Hebrew University was wrong.
And that’s why his nickname in certain circles is Dr. Cover-up.
People started calling him that about a year after the Rabin
assassination. He conducted a partial autopsy of Rabin and
concluded he was shot twice in the back from medium range. In
1996, Rabin’s hospital records were uncovered, and over ten
doctors and nurses signed very different accounts of Rabin’s
demise. He was actually shot three times, twice from point blank
range and once frontally in the upper chest. On top of that, Rabin’s
spine was shattered and Hiss categorically reported that it wasn’t.
Because the patsy Yigal Amir never shot from point blank range or
from the front, and because the assassination film proved Rabin’s
spine could not have been broken since he kept right on walking
after the shot to his back, somebody must have asked Hiss to alter
the medical facts. So he did, and then the government’s
commission of inquiry into the murder adopted Hiss’s lies as the
official version of Rabin’s death.
So we knew that Hiss was corrupt and that he molded his
reports to fit government orders. What we didn’t know was that he
is also genuinely ghoulish. Avi and Nitzana (Darshan) Leitner are
Yigal Amir’s attorneys. They also represent another victim of
Dr. Hiss, the family of Alisdair Sinclair.
On April 14, 1998, 47 year old Alisdair Sinclair, was stopped by
customs officials at Ben Gurion Airport on his way out of the
country after a six day stay. They found 9000 Deutsche marks in a
false bottom of his handbag and he was arrested without charge.
The police thought the false bottom suggested something illegal
though hiding a large amount of money is a legitimate means of
thwarting theft.
At the airport police station, Sinclair was found strangling on his
shoelaces. He was rushed to hospital and pronounced dead. From
there his body was transferred to the Abu Kabir Institute for
122
Forensic Medicine, and straight into the paws of Dr. Yehuda Hiss,
who conducted an autopsy, which concluded that Sinclair had killed
himself.
After that, there was a problem with the body. Sinclair was
unmarried, his parents weren’t alive and he had been living a rather
rootless life in Amsterdam dealing in vintage guitars and strumming
them at local pubs. It took three days to track down his family in
Scotland and the police offered to bury him in Israel. The family
refused, and paid about $5000 to fly the corpse home.
On May 13, another autopsy was conducted, at the University of
Glasgow and guess what? The hyoid bone at the base of the tongue
was missing and so was the heart. Both were removed by Dr. Hiss.
But why? No problem guessing why the hyoid bone was gone. It
would reveal that Sinclair did not hang himself but was strangled by
other means.
But the heart? Avi Leitner can only say:
Our best guess is that Hiss is involved the black market trade in human
organs. We can’t prove that yet, but it seems the most likely motive for
removing a healthy heart.
Incredibly, a most unlikely source provides an even spookier
motive. But let’s get on with the story first.
The Sinclair family started investigating Alisdair’s recent life and
none of his friends thought him remotely suicidal. Nor did they
understand why he was arrested for carrying perfectly legal currency
in the first place. Israel police explained that they suspected he was
a drug dealer and under interrogation he admitted to have smuggled
in thousands of Ecstasy pills the week before, though he did not
know who bought them. Alisdair’s brother James, of Selkirk,
Scotland mocked the police version, noting accurately, that since he
wasn’t caught with drugs, he had no reason whatsoever to confess
to the supposed crime.
Enter the British government. Tel Aviv embassy official Suad
Andraus was furious, stating, “People don’t just die in lockup.” The
British authorities demand that Dr. Hiss explain what he did with
the heart and then return it immediately.
Hiss explained that as a drug smuggling suspect, the heart would
have shown “signs of long-term drug abuse.” Fine, so why didn’t
he return the heart with the rest of the body? According to Hiss:
123
“It’s true we didn’t inform the family in Scotland that the heart was
missing. Frankly, we didn’t want to upset them.”
How thoughtful, and returning the body without the heart
wasn’t in the least bit upsetting???? Hiss complied to the second
demand and turned over the heart to the Sinclair family, or at least
a heart. A not very convincing heart, at that. The Sinclair Family
demanded DNA proof that this was Alistair’s heart but Dr. Hiss
refused, citing the $6000 cost of the test. The Sinclairs found the
cost prohibitive as well but this time, the British authorities did not
press the issue or conduct their own tests.
A frustrated James Sinclair expressed his disgust with the
inconsistencies of his brother’s strange demise.
Alisdair never had a police record and it is unlikely that he would turn to
drug smuggling. And he repeats, “Why would he admit to anything if his
bloody suitcase was empty? My brother was an intelligent, well read man.
He wasn’t daft.”
The Israeli Police conducted DNA tests, and James, awaiting the
results, was clearly unaware that if Dr. Yehuda “Cover-up” Hiss has
his hands in the testing, the findings will be as honest as those of
the Rabin assassination.
And now a most unexpected motive for the whole affair. It was
published in the Jerusalem Report, a staid, establishment
newsmagazine which is used as a fount of disinformation on behalf
of the country’s Labor Party. This peculiar passage may be of
interest to those questioning Britain’s early and deep interest in
Zionism, their reverence for Chaim Weizmann, the Balfour
Declaration, the British-Israel Society, the Round Table policies of
Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner and the like.
According to Alisdair’s brother James, family lore has it that the Sinclairs
are descended from the crusading Knights Templars, who journeyed to
Jerusalem in the mid-1300s in search of holy artifacts from Herod’s
Temple to bring back to Scottish hero Robert Bruce. Alisdair himself,
says James, was particularly proud of his middle name, Roslyn, the name
of a chapel in Scotland whose floor plan is said to be based on Herod’s
Temple. James mentions these details in attempting to reconstruct his
brother’s motive for traveling to Israel.
How does this medieval history explain Alisdair Sinclair’s
missing heart? Researchers of the Templars present clues that may
explain Hiss’ ghoulish crime. Let us begin with a marvelous history
of the Knights Templar written by two Freemasons, Christopher
124
Knight and Robert Lomas, called The Second Messiah. Summarized is
their history of the organization:
The Templars were a poor chivalric order that disdained
materialism until their arrival in Jerusalem in the early twelfth
century on a papal crusade. Eleven knights dug under the ruins of
Solomon’s Temple for nine years and hit pay-dirt. Under the
Temple Mount the Templars discovered a network of tunnels
where the Jewish priests hid their treasures from the marauding
Romans in 70 AD. The knights not only uncovered some of the
gold and silver described in the Copper Scroll of the Dead Sea
Scrolls, but the records of the first Jerusalem church of Christianity.
This according to Knight and Lomas is precisely what they went
digging for.
The first Bishop of the Jerusalem Church was Jesus’ brother
James. He was aided by Jesus’ other siblings, five brothers and two
sisters. After the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and dispersed the
Jews, James and his family fled to France, a fact confirmed by the
best-selling book Holy Blood, Holy Grail. These descendants of the
holy Davidic line had the wherewithal to gain wealth throughout
Europe and buy vast properties. Over time they constituted a good
chunk of European royalty.
While professing whatever religion the state demanded, first
worshiping the pantheon of Roman gods and later papal
Christianity, they secretly practiced the Christianity of the early
Jerusalem church. These descendants of the priestly line, now called
themselves Rex Deus, and passed on their traditions throughout the
royal courts of Europe where they ruled. The original Celt church
was founded by the Rex Deus, and St. Patrick of Ireland was a Jew.
Other Rex Deus included the Habsburgs, the Stuarts of Scotland
and today’s King Juan Carlos of Spain, who includes among his
titles, Protector of the Holy Places of Jerusalem.
The Templars returned from their Crusade with vast wealth
uncovered under the Temple Mount and initiated a monumental
building program in Europe, which ultimately resulted in the
construction of over 250 castles and Gothic churches. They now
challenged the papacy for political control of Europe, yet the
usually jealous Vatican allowed their power to grow unabated.

125
Knight and Lomas insist this is because the Templars had a huge
advantage over Rome.
According to their version of events, the Knights uncovered the
original records of the Jerusalem Church, and they prove that Jesus
was a prophet but not a deity. His goal was to organize armed
resistance to the Roman tyrants and re-establish an independent
Jewish nation. Lest my Christian readers object, it is more than a
little consolation knowing that Knight and Lomas are proud
Freemasons and are promoting their own Masonic agenda. There is
no obligation to take them theologically at their word.
However, historically they are on solider ground because the rest
of their tale is mostly provable fact. In the fourteenth century, the
French king known as Philip the Fair coordinated a purge of the
Templars in conjunction with the Holy See. Their properties were
seized and their leader, in fact the last Templar leader, Jacques de
Molay was brutally tortured by crucifixion until he confessed to the
sins of his Order. He survived the first round of torture and a linen
cloth was placed over him to absorb his blood and keep him warm.
This cloth became known as the Shroud of Turin and the authors
arguments for this claim are superbly grounded in fact.
A group of Templars led by the St. Clair clan escaped the
French siege by ship and landed in Scotland, a safe port since it was
ruled by the Rex Deus member, Robert the Bruce. It must be noted
that at his death, Robert the Bruce’s heart was transported to
Jerusalem for burial. Two versions of what happened to it exist.
The first says the deliverers of the heart were captured in Spain, the
second insists they made it and the heart lays buried in Jerusalem to
this day.
An unpublished historian of the Templars, Daniel Leary notes:
The name Sinclair comes from the hermit St. Clare or St. Clere, who lived
near the town that is now called St. Clair sur l’Epte, northwest of Paris,
France. Sinclair’s ancestors took their surname from an abbey that was
named after the hermit, because that was the site where in the year 911
their ancestor Rollo the Viking, signed the treaty with King Louis the
Simple of France that created Rollo hereditary Duke of the new Duchy of
Normandy.
Rollo’s descendants included the nine St. Clare knights who accompanied
their cousin William the Conqueror (also a descendant of Rollo) to
England in 1066. They assisted his victory at the battle of Hastings, 14
October 1066. Many of them remained in England.
126
 The Sinclairs played a prominent role in the history of the British Isles
and were particularly important in Scotland. Through marriage, their
family became related to the Bruces and the Stewarts. One of them,
Henry St. Clair (1275-1336) both fought at Bannockburn and signed the
Declaration of Arbroath of 4 April 1320 from Scottish nobles to the pope
that declared Scottish independence.
According to Knight and Lomas, the French Templars brought
with them the damning scrolls from under the Jerusalem Temple
Mount and built a chapel in Rosslyn, near Edinburgh to house
them. The chapel, built by William Sinclair (1415-1482), which
exists today, was built according to the specifications of the
Herodian Temple and an exact duplicate of the Western Wall was
constructed alongside it. To hide their now-banned Templar roots,
the Knights formed a new organization, Freemasonry, whose rites
were precisely those set down in the scrolls recovered from beneath
Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.
Scottish rite Masonry spread throughout Europe, according to
Knight and Lomas, much to the chagrin of the Vatican. In their
version of events, in 1717, the pro-Catholic Hanoverian dynasty
took over the British crown and ordered vast changes in Masonic
rites. The 33 Scottish degrees were reduced to just four in the new
English rites, and all the secrets within the Jerusalem scrolls were
eliminated from lodge ceremonies.
However, other writers share a different version of events,
insisting the Templars and the Vatican remained partners
throughout their public trials. F. Tupper Saussy in his excellent
book Rulers of Evil writes:
On March 22, 1312, Clement V dissolved the Knights Templar with his
decree Vox clamantis. But the dissolution proved a mere formality to
further appease Philip (the Fair). More importantly, it permitted the
Templars, in other manifestations to continue enriching the papacy...A
subtle provision in Vox clamantis transferred most Templar estates to the
Knights of St. John of Jerusalem. In Germany and Austria, the Templars
became “Rosicrucians” and “Teutonic Knights.” Six centuries later, as the
“Teutonic Order,” the Knights would provide the nucleus of Adolph
Hitler’s political support in Munich and Vienna.
In his massive work Vatican Assassins, Eric Jon Phelps comes to
practically the same conclusion. In his version of events, the Jesuit
Order infiltrated Scottish Freemasonry in the sixteenth century and
since then, the Templars have been doing the work of the true ruler
of the Vatican, the Supreme General of the Jesuits who both Saussy
127
and Phelps call, the Black Pope. Daniel Leary concurs on the
Templar/Vatican alliance.
These 2nd sons of European gentry have had a long close relationship
with Rome and still act as the Vatican’s bankers and intelligence
operatives. Plus, they’re current membership includes a rogues gallery of
modern intrigue, not the least of which being the father of the US
president elect, former president George Bush Sr...
Now the PLO has plans of its own. By the summer of 2000,
they began digging under the Temple Mount in earnest. Originally
they claimed they were simply expanding a mosque under
Solomon’s Stables, beneath the Damascus Gate of Jerusalem’s
walled Old City. However, the huge mounds of earth and artifacts
from the Second Temple that were being dumped in nearby wadis
betrayed a much more extensive plan.
On January 26, 2001, the Israeli government’s television outlet,
Channel One, broadcast a video clip secretly filmed under the
Shrine of Omar, the 7th century Islamic building which may have
been deliberately constructed over the Holy of Holies, the most
sacred prayer room of the ancient Temple. The video revealed a
new and massive tunnel aimed directly at the most sacred core of
Solomon’s and later, Herod’s Temples.
The PLO are after not only the treasures buried beneath the
Temple to deplete their morally and financially bankrupt regime of
terror, but must be looking for more scrolls that can be used to
blackmail the Vatican and thus get their way in world diplomacy.
The Vatican is terrified that the Jews will uncover the truth
under the Temple, whatever it may be. It is essential for them that
Israel is removed from the Holy Mount. And they are not alone in
this desire. Now we come full circle to Alisdair Sinclair’s heart.
On January 4, 2001, Colin Grant published a full front page
exposé of the Hiss scandal in the Glasgow Sunday Post. He revealed
that the Knights Templar, as descendents the Davidic line, believe
they have a right to reclaim the Temple Mount as their rightful
heritage:
A spokesman for Militi Templi Scotia, the Scottish Knights Templar
admitted to the Sunday Post, “We are currently involved in an attempt to
remove control of the holy sites from the Israeli government. We believe
they should be administered by the United Nations and are working with
the UN and NATO to achieve that goal.”

128
 A secret Medieval battle over the Temple Mount is being
conducted in Israel today, and unless it can be stopped, this
skirmish has the potential of dragging the whole planet into war.

HOW THINGS REALLY WORK ... AGAIN

More on Spain and the Jesuits

For those who can’t accept that little old Spain is planning its
latest inquisition of Jews, recall that King Juan Carlos is long
abdicated and supposedly has no more than a figurehead political
role. If so, kindly explain the following facts:
I will add my explanations between three stars (***). Now let’s
see how things really work:
(http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=61706
&contrassID=1&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0)
Sharon: Israel ready for painful concessions for peace
Ariel Sharon (L) shakes hands with his Turkish counterpart Bulent Ecevit
in Ankara on Wednesday.
http://www.img.com.tr/article.asp?docid=824
April 30 /01 Prime Minister Ecevit visits Spain
The Spanish King Juan Carlos also received Ecevit, during his short visit,
in addition to his bilateral meeting with the Spanish Prime Minister.
Noting that they evaluated the bilateral relations with their political, social
and cultural dimensions during their contacts in Spain, Ecevit said that
they decided to activate the joint action plan signed earlier.
Ecevit said that they focused on various cooperation methods to benefit
from the investment opportunities in the two countries and to further
improve economic and commercial relations.
***Spain has, at the least, a mediating role in Israeli-Turkish
relations but a far greater one between Israel and her neighbors.
Recall that after the Persian Gulf War, the Bush/Baker team forced
Israel to make grand concessions at a conference held in Madrid.
Well, the “peacemakers” of Israel and the US are finagling to
arrange a repeat conference under Spanish auspices:***
(http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml;$sessionid$JXE
JEZQAAC3OJLAUAUCSGWVMCQCQMI5G?itemNo=63033&contra
ssID=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y)

129
 All roads not only lead to Rome but also to ......
the Beilin plan.
*** Now look what happened within just two days.***
Source: CNN Friday August 10, 2001
Statement by U.S. President George W. Bush: Bush condemns Jerusalem
suicide bombing
.....The United States remains committed to implementation in all its
elements of the Mitchell Committee Report, which provides a path to
return to peace negotiations based on United Nations Security Council
Resolutions 242, 338 and the Madrid Conference. To get to Mitchell the
parties need to resume effective security cooperation and work together
to stop terrorism and violence.
Source: Ha’aretz Sunday August 12, 2001
Peres gets green light to talk to PA;
Beilin plans ‘‘second Madrid conference’’ this October
Former justice minister Yossi Beilin, meanwhile, is embarking on a new
diplomatic initiative of his own—convening a “second Madrid
conference” this October, on the tenth anniversary of the 1991
conference that kicked off the peace process. Several European countries
have expressed enthusiastic support for the idea, as has UN Secretary-
General Kofi Annan and even some U.S. State Department officials.
Yesterday, Beilin went to Cairo to try to sell his plan to the Egyptians.
***Now look who immediately flies to Damascus after the
Syrian president exchanges a few words with King Juan Carlos.***
PLO secretary arrives in Damascus Sunday
Today’s Jerusalem Post article: Arafat invited to Damascus.
http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/010806/2001080616.ht
ml
Bashar al-Assad on Saturday received a message from the Spanish King
Juan Carlos.
http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/010806/2001080608.ht
ml
Mahmoud Abbas in Damascus
Syria-Palestine, Politics, 8/6/2001
The secretary of the PLO executive committee Mahmoud Abbas ( Abu
Mazin) arrived in Damascus on Sunday. In an arrival statement to the
press, Abu Mazin said that his visit to Damascus falls in the course of
consultation with the Syrian leadership on vision towards the future. He
added “ I will brief the Syrian leadership with the current developments in
the occupied Arab territories.”

130
 (http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/08/07/LatestNews/LatestNews.
32038.html)
09:35 Report: Assad invites Arafat to visit
Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat has been officially invited
to visit Syria, according to Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), Arafat’s
deputy, Israel Radio reports.
***So what are we told Juan Carlos said to Assad which sent the
PLO’s Nabil Shaat scurrying to Damascus? Then we ask, what did
Juan Carlos REALLY tell Assad?***
(http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/010806/2001080601.ht
ml)
A message to al-Assad from Spanish King
Syria-Spain, Politics, 8/6/2001
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Saturday received a message from the
Spanish King Juan Carlos. The message was delivered to the foreign
minister Farouk al-Shara during his meeting with the Spanish ambassador
in Damascus Javier Navoro. Talks, during the meeting, dealt with bilateral
relations between the two countries.
There is still room for optimism, Palestinian Planning and International
Cooperation Minister Nabil Shaath told Jerusalem Post Radio this
afternoon.
***Now, let us look at how Shaath coordinated his Spanish
orders with then Israeli Foreign Minister, and Juan Carlos’ spy in
the Knesset, Shlomo Ben Ami.***
http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2000/08/13/News/News.10828.html
Arafat fails to get backing to declare state
Meanwhile, Acting Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami, currently in Spain,
said that if Arafat does go ahead and declare his state on September 13 it
would likely cause “irreversible damage” to the peace process.
Ben-Ami’s comment came during a meeting with Spanish Foreign
Minister Josep Pique in Barcelona, on the second leg of a five-day journey
to Turkey, Spain, France, Italy, and the Vatican to counter Arafat’s
globetrotting efforts in search of international support.
Ben-Ami warned at a press conference yesterday that Israel might take its
own unilateral measures to counteract the declaration of a state by the
Palestinians.
“When someone breaks the rules of the game, it is possible that the other
part takes unilateral measures as well,” he said.
Ben-Ami asked Pique to use his influence in Spain and in the European
Union to get Arafat to display a more “pragmatic approach” on the
negotiations.

131
 “You should warn Arafat about losing an historic opportunity that may
not return,” he said.
Pique, who met earlier in the day with PA Planning Minister Nabil
Shaath, said he would work inside the European Union to ensure that it
coordinates its position on a Palestinian state with the US.
At a press conference in Madrid yesterday after meeting Javier Solana, the
European Union’s foreign policy chief, Ben-Ami, a former ambassador to
Spain, said he would like Spanish King Juan Carlos to play a mediating
role with Arab countries in peace talks focusing on the future of
Jerusalem.
“I have asked Pique to see if it is possible for King Juan Carlos to use his
good relationships with some Arab countries to make the parties move
closer about Jerusalem,” Ben-Ami said.
Ben-Ami said the two sides had an historic opportunity to reach peace,
but he played down the prospects for a new summit with the Palestinians.
He had raised the possibility in Barcelona of “a short, decisive” meeting
before September 13.
“Our peace strategy leads to the possibility that perhaps, some time in the
month of September, possibly at the end of the month, we will be ready
to go to a summit in which we would be able to make decisions and reach
the end of the conflict,” Ben-Ami said.
***If you think Juan Carlos is only interested in Israel and its
neighbors, look at how he spreads his talons throughout the Middle
East.***
June 29, 2001
King Juan Carlos receives Prince Salman at the outset of his official visit
to Spain.
The Spanish monarch: Saudi Arabia and Spain can play a role in
contributing to reaching a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the
region.
Emir of Riyadh region: the nature of our links is the product of the two
peoples’ moral and the cultural and historical heritage.
King Juan Carlos I of Spain announced that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
and Spain can play a growing role to contribute to reaching a just,
comprehensive and lasting peace for which all peoples in the region are
longing.
‘‘The intimate friendship which binds our two families is not but a true
picture that reflects the distinguished relations which binds our two
peoples and countries, and which draw its roots from history.’’
Prince Salman Ibn Abdul Aziz, Emir of Riyadh region, had arrived in
Madrid for several days official visit, and was received at the airport by
Crown Prince of Spain Don Felipe De Borbon, who is also the Prince of
Asturias, Fernando De Almansa, Chief of the Royal Palace, along with the
132
 Director of Foreign Policy at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the
military corps in Madrid.
In an address during a banquet, King Juan Carlos of Spain has affirmed
that the current visit of Prince Salman Ibn Abdul Aziz, Emir of Riyadh
region to Spain, will strengthen bilateral relations and enhance
cooperation in various fields between the two countries. King Juan Carlos
said ‘‘the visit of the Emir of Riyadh region to Spain, reflects the existing
strong ties between the two countries.’’
The King of Spain asked Prince Salman to convey his best wishes and
greetings to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Fahd Ibn
Abdul Aziz.
‘‘Spanish companies and investors are following up with great interest the
opportunities that are available in Saudi Arabia,’’ King Juan Carlos said.
With regard to the peace process in the Middle East region, King Juan
Carlos said that Spain is following with great care and interest the difficult
stage which the peace process is witnessing, but he added that it seems
there is a little hope following eight months of violence.
‘‘The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Spain can play a larger role in
contributing to reaching a just, comprehensive and lasting peace for
which all peoples in the region are longing,’’ King Juan Carlos said.
King Juan Carlos also said that after six months Spain will preside the EU
and there will be a lot of fields in which opportunities for enhancing and
intensifying cooperation and relations would be opened.
***And while the retired king makes his promises to Syria, the
PLO, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia to take care of Israel the way they’d
like to see it done, he pulls the blinders over the Jews.***
(http://www.ecjc.org/)
The Delegation to the King Juan Carlos
The King of Spain receives top representatives from the Second
Assembly of European Jewish Communities.
Another important issue for his Majesty is Israel’s situation, he hoped that
peace will soon reach that area.
All the attendants at the reception stated how interesting and important it
was for them that the King had received them and listened to their
message and concerns.
Both the King’s statements and the Cardinal’s words, were symbolic signs
of the desire to reconcile with the Jewish people and further that explain
the reasons ECJC decided to hold the second GA in Spain.
***And that is how things really work in the Middle East.***

133
 ARE THE BRITISH BEHIND ISRAEL’S MISERY?
I will cave in to many readers’ requests and review two studies
by writers I am instinctively uncomfortable with; one a Jew who
converted to Christianity, the other, a Jew who works on behalf of
an ideology promoting a German-run planet. The works I speak of
are The Executive Intelligence Review’s Special Report: Who Is Sparking a
Religious War in the Middle East—And How to Stop It, edited by Jeff
Steinberg; and Tim Cohen’s book The Anti-Christ and a Cup of Tea. I
suppose an analysis of both is mandatory since both cite me, in
Cohen’s case, effusively.
There is a great deal in common with both works since they
agree that Great Britain is behind the bloodshed in the Middle East,
using as its means, secret societies. This is not a new thesis; the
investigative journalist John Coleman has written that Britain stands
up there with Germany, Russia and Rome in the first line of
atrocities against Jews this century and that her current plan is “to
keep the nation of Israel apostate and under Masonic hegemony.”
While both works agree with the second half of the sentence,
Cohen despises the existence of an apostate Israel, while Steinberg
would like nothing better than to see Israel’s religiosity disappear.

The EIR Report

The Executive Intelligence Review is the magazine outlet of a quirky
political movement led by one Lyndon G. LaRouche, Jr. The one
theme of LaRouche’s philosophy appears that the evil British real
and secret empire, led by its royal family, must be destroyed to be
replaced by a cleaner German-led Europe. In pursuit of the goal,
the organization has, in the past, published worthy exposés of the
world drug trade, Henry Kissinger and the Bush family. However,
they are way out of their depth when tackling the Middle East.
Here is the EIR’s worldview in a nutshell: Israel was led by an
inspired Platonist, David Ben Gurion, whose dream was to build a
nation to uplift the Third World. His vision was opposed by a
“Fascist,” Zeev Jabotinsky and his Revisionist movement. He
melded his secular Fascism with the religious Fascism of the
cabbalist rabbi, Avraham Kook. Together they created a Jewish
Fascist (the EIR loves the word Fascist) philosophy, which in 1933

134
resulted in the murder of Ben Gurion’s altruistic friend Chaim
Arlozoroff.
Two generations later, Ben Gurion’s protégé Yitzhak Rabin
carried on his vision by signing a peace agreement with the PLO.
But those nasty scions of Jabotinsky/Kook extremism sent their
believer Dr. Baruch Goldstein to sabotage the peace with a
massacre in Hebron and then sent another follower Yigal Amir to
eliminate Rabin. Luckily, another advocate of Ben Gurion’s dream,
Shimon Peres took over his mantle and, despite Ariel Sharon’s
current Jabotinsky/Kook Fascist regime, is gathering all his powers
of goodness to save Israel from, yes, again, Fascism.
This, despite the somewhat mocking description, is an accurate
summary of the EIR’s view of modern Israeli history. So why don’t
we tear it apart point by point?
● Jabotinsky lived in pre-state Israel briefly in the 1920s before
being deported by the British, I repeat, the British, those wicked
imperialists who preferred that Ben Gurion lead the Jews. From
there Jabotinsky moved to Paris, became heavily involved in
Masonry (as exposed in an extensive Ha’aretz Magazine article
recently) and connived with the French over the future of the
Middle East.
In 1933, while Jabotinsky led a worldwide economic boycott of
Nazi Germany, Ben Gurion sent his buddy Arlozoroff to Germany
to broker a deal known as the “Transfer Agreement”. In return for
the Nazis expelling their Jews to Palestine, Ben Gurion and his
coterie agreed to use their assets to support the Nazi regime in the
face of the international boycott. To stanch the Revisionists
objection to this utterly immoral arrangement, Ben Gurion falsely
blamed them for Arlozoroff’s murder and had three Jabotinsky
followers arrested. They were released shortly after, but the damage
to Jabotinsky had been done. He and his followers were expelled
from the Zionist movement and Ben Gurion’s murderous transfer
agreement went through.
The most likely motive for Arlozoroff’s murder, also revealed
recently in a long Ha’aretz Magazine article, was his affair with Madja
Goering, Herman’s wife, while in Germany negotiating the transfer
agreement. This version of events is widely accepted in Germany

135
itself, thanks to a best-selling book there which concluded that the
Nazis knocked off Arlozoroff, not the Revisionists.
● Rabin, a puppet of the Anglo Saxon New World Order,
signed a “peace” treaty with the PLO, which he later regretted and
tried to renege on. That cost him his life. At this point, the EIR’s
shoddy research becomes more than a little irritating.
Unlike Steinberg, I actually collected the eyewitness testimonies
of the Hebron massacre. Not one witness, Jew or Arab, saw a lone
shooter inside the killing mosque. But a whole bunch, including
Arab religious and municipal leaders, saw two soldiers shoot
anyone who tried to escape the pandemonium inside the mosque,
from outside the exit door. Goldstein was a patsy for peace.
As was Yigal Amir. Again, unlike the superficial researchers of
the EIR, I took the trouble of actually gathering the police, court
and hospital records, as well as all the eye-witness testimonies I
could track down. While Amir never shot Rabin, three times, at
point-blank range or from the front, that is how Rabin died
according to the police laboratories and Rabin’s doctors. Amir shot
blanks at Rabin and his bodyguard Yoram Rubin did the killing.
And there are now five books out in Israel that accept and further
prove these facts.
And guess what? Three of the books, including my own, accuse,
with much backing evidence, Shimon Peres of being the
mastermind of the assassination.
So, all in all, the EIR got NOTHING right. So is there any
reason to take their view of current Israeli events seriously? My
feeling is, mostly no, but don’t dismiss EVERYTHING, as I’ll
illustrate shortly.
Here is their version of the situation.
“In December 1995, the ‘Jerusalem’ freemasonic lodge was established,
adjacent to the Temple Mount, in the Grotto of King Solomon, to work
for the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple. The lodge worked side by side
with the on-the-ground networks of Jewish and Christian fundamentalist
fanatics, to foment a bloody religious war over the control of the Temple
Mount. That such a lodge would be founded shortly after the Israel-
Palestine peace breakthroughs at Oslo—and just weeks after the
assassination of Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, an architect of that
peace—is surely no coincidence.

136
 “The Jerusalem Lodge was founded by Grand Master of Italian Regulat
Freemasonry, Giuliano di Bernardo, the right-hand man of Lord
Northampton on the Temple Mount project...
“Di Bernardo also let slip that Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith
director Abe Foxman is a collaborator in the Temple Mount project, Di
Bernardo revealed that, ‘While Foxman lacks intellectual capital, Lord
Northampton and he had met Foxman in Switzerland, just prior to the
launching of the Jerusalem Lodge, to discuss their project, and have met
with him on several other occasions. ‘There are strong relations between
B’nai B’rith and Freemasonry,’ Di Bernardo explained.
“The role of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge in the Temple Mount plot
significantly predates the launching of the Jerusalem Lodge. Dr. Asher
Kaufman, a corresponding member of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, did
some of the first post-war archaeological ‘studies’ of the Temple Mount,
laying the foundations for the upsurge of the Jewish fundamentalist
assaults on the site.”
And so on. In short, Prime Minister Sharon is a member of the
Quatuor Coronati Lodge and he is being used as an instrument to
set the Middle East aflame through assaults on the Temple Mount.
Others in the plot include architect Leen Ritmeyer who has
completed design studies of the Temple financed by Lord Jacob
Rothschild, Stanley Goldfoot, an aging member of the Jewish
underground of the 1940s, and a slew of Christian fundamentalist
leaders determined to ignite the Final Days, no matter how many
Jews die, including Dr. Lambert Dolphin, Chuck Missler and
J. Randall Price.
There you have it, the British plan for Israel as told by the EIR.
Of the accused, I have met only Stanley Goldfoot. He invited me to
his home to convince me to stop my political writing and turn to
satire instead; admittedly, a peculiar request. As for enflaming the
Middle East via the Temple Mount, a few weeks ago, an American
military officer told me a huge fear in his intelligence circles is that a
desperate and evil Yasser Arafat may be tempted to blow up the Al
Aksa mosque, blame it on Israel, and provoke the jihad he so dearly
desires for his cause.
Just because the EIR gets so much wrong, doesn’t mean a
perusal of their “research” is a complete waste of time. Buried
within mounds of unfounded speculation, specious connections
between people, and unjustified leaps of logic, are solid truths, even
if they weren’t meant to be interpreted as such.

137
 The EIR hates the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and
accuses them of being behind America’s murderous policies,
foreign and internal, but then, don’t we all. Yet in one instance,
Steinberg, incredibly chooses to utilize a CFR source to reinforce
his own case. The result is a small triumph for truth. Read on:
“In 1988, the scenario was already fully developed in the book Jewish
Fundamentalism in Israel: For the Land and the Lord, published for the New
York Council on Foreign Relations by Ian S. Lustick. He began his study
1n 1979-80, when he worked as a CFR Fellow at the State Department’s
Bureau of Intelligence and Research...Lustick’s CFR scenario outlines
how the plans of Jewish radical sects, such as Gush Emunim, to rebuild
Solomon’s Temple on Al Haram Al Sharif, could ignite nuclear World
War III. The following are excerpts from the book.
“‘Washington must seek ways to prevent the explosiveness that surrounds
Jewish fundamentalism from being unleashed...In Israel such a crisis
would almost certainly involve repeated demonstrations by hundreds of
thousands of Jews, violence against both Jews and Arabs, challenges to
the authority and legitimacy of the government...the creation of scores of
new illegal settlements, threats of civil war, a sudden influx of militantly
ultra-nationalistic Diaspora Jews, and, as suggested above, attempts at
spectacular actions such as the destruction of Muslim shrines in
Jerusalem.’”
Look what the EIR has provided us: proof that the CFR’s
machinations against the religious of Israel date to at least 1979.
How Washington and the CFR have sought to fight this war
against religion and the Right has been quite thoroughly
documented in the next work critiqued, Tim Cohen’s The Antichrist
and a Cup of Tea.
There is much about Cohen’s treatise that makes me feel ill at
ease. That he abandoned my perfectly good faith for another is
hardly a reason to celebrate, but his religious arrogance is more
than a little bothersome. As far as he is concerned, any belief that is
not his, and that includes rabbinic Judaism, is paganism.
That said, his viewpoint on Israel, like those of many prophetic
Christians, is often crystal clear. And like many prophetic
Christians, he shares an uncanny sense, that I wish my own rabbis
would develop, of who is really after the Jews and why. Unlike,
Steinberg, Cohen is not fooled by Ben Gurion’ s Platonism:
“Peres and Beilin appear to be working toward fulfillment of David Ben
Gurion’s twisted 1962 predictions that ‘countries will become united in a
world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All

138
 armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the
United Nations will build a shrine to the Prophets to serve the federated
union on all continents...”
Cohen calls Ben Gurion’s vision, certainly the ultimate goal of
the New World Order, “Plato’s pagan slave state.” And he notes
that Ben Gurion was a member of the Committee of 300. Relying
“The British monarchy heads the Committee of 300, and the Royal
heavily on John Coleman’s work, Cohen insists that:Institute of
International Affairs, both of which control the US and Israeli CFRs. In
other words, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles sit at the real top of
the entire Mideast peace process.”
In prophetic circles, there is a serious exercise taking place to
name the Antichrist. The leading candidates are King Juan Carlos
of Spain and Prince Charles of Wales. Cohen’s theory is that
Charles is the winner though I would favor Juan Carlos if asked.
And this is a perfect week for such advocacy. First Syrian President
Assad flew to Spain to meet Juan Carlos, then the pope lands in
Damascus. Syria is now the focus of big-time NWO attention and I
might suggest that it is being offered a kind of renewed Umayyid
empire, a united Middle East bloc, with one faith and currency,
whose capital will be Damascus. Of course, in time this bloc will
have to join the EU, NAFTA and other blocs to create a one world
government but that would be no problem for Assad provided he
received the expected promises that Israel will be eliminated before
then.
Still, Cohen devotes his study to proving that Charles and his
family are New Age spiritualists, drug dealers and murderers out to
destroy Christianity and Israel. It is all a strong indictment of
Charles, but it doesn’t add up to the Antichrist for me.
Yet along the way, Cohen provides vital information about Jews
working against Israel by aiding and abetting our enemies. He
exposes the finagling between Lord Victor Mishcon, Shimon Peres
and Yossi Beilin to force Israel’s retreat from its sovereign
territories. He reveals how Armand Hammer financed Charles’
personal NWO project, the United World Colleges. And look at
this surprising revelation found by one of Cohen’s many sources:
“An example of how Gentile and Jewish Satanists collaborate together
could be seen when Prince Philip of England’s representative Martin
Palmer and Edgar Bronfman’s aide, Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg jointly
announced their plans at the United Nations in 1989 for the Sacred
139
 Literature Trust, which is a major project to revive Mother Earth
worship.”
Cohen believes that Charles and the Vatican are conniving to
create, “more than just a return to the old European order, in
which the pope rules the spiritual realm and the emperor, the
secular.” If that is the plan, judging by this week’s events in Syria,
Cohen had better reconsider King Juan Carlos as the more qualified
AntiChrist candidate.
It’s clear that I am not an advocate of either work. Both have
agendas that I have nothing to do with. Nonetheless, by their
earnestness, both provide information essential to understanding
the deep and secret manipulations against Israel. Now to sort it all
out objectively.

THE GUILT-RIDDEN JEWS

OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat shared the podium at the
World Economic Conference in Davos, Switzerland. In attendance
was a Jewish journalist named Thomas Friedman. After Arafat
cursed Israel for half an hour, and Peres shook his hand after the
display of venomous hatred, Friedman was so shocked that he told
an Israeli economics journalist, Stephan Plosker that, “You have no
peace partner until Arafat leaves the scene.”
My, what a revelation from a New York Times Middle East
“expert” who has spent two decades eroding Israel’s position in the
US!
That day, a pure, true revelation appeared on an Israeli political
site www.debka.com. The writers there noted that it didn’t matter
what Arafat said or who witnessed it in the audience, the real
business took place behind the scenes “at the exclusive meetings of
the Bilderberg group.”
Subsequently, a few people sent me a TV listing from the US. It
seems that CFR member Daniel Pipes, the author of two books on
“conspiracy theories,” would be exposing, on a History Channel
program, the paranoia of those who believe organizations like...
“...the Skull and Bones Society, Council on Foreign Relations and
Bilderberg Group are up to plots against the people of the planet.”

140
 I have before me the latest membership list of the CFR; Pipes is
on it and so is Thomas Friedman. To remind those who don’t
remember, during the 1980s, the New York Times sent two
correspondents to Israel, David Shipler and Thomas Friedman.
Shipler came first and he was a far less talented writer than his
successor. However, he provided Friedman with most of his
contacts, many of whom were Israeli Uncle Toms like Rabbi David
Hartman, who liked the publicity and pandered to the reporters,
telling them what New York radical Liberals liked to hear.
Both Shipler and Friedman wrote books about their experiences
as NY Times correspondents in Israel. Neither book had anything to
do with the actual country of Israel, and Shipler’s long forgotten
volume was atrociously written. But both journalists were awarded
Pulitzer Prizes for creating an Israel that uniformly despised the
Likud leadership and longed for close personal relationships with
their Arab neighbors.
Friedman’s book From Beirut to Jerusalem was far more damaging
than Shipler’s because it was readable. Within, Friedman created
out of the Middle East, a little New York, filled with fine people, all
with impeccably good hearts. With a little understanding and lots of
Israeli concessions, Lebanon could become another Long Island
and Israel, the Borough of Queens. The damage came because
Friedman put all the onus on Israel to be more charitable, and was
completely blind to the medieval savagery of the people Israel is
stuck with as neighbors.
However, since the recent Davos meeting, Friedman is sorry he
wrote all that stuff. At least that’s what his fellow CFRer Daniel
Pipes writes in the Jerusalem Post.
But let us wait before analyzing this “masterful” apology. First,
let us look at the real world. By a coincidence, last night, I finished
reading a truly masterful work; Europe’s Full Circle—Corporate Elites
and the New Fascism by British economic writer Rodney Atkinson.
This is a sober exposé of the Bilderberg Group and its allies in the
Royal Institute for International Affairs in London and the Council
on Foreign Relations in New York. The author concludes that
these groups are dedicated to completing the economic plan of the
Nazis and their Vatican compatriots, and in Europe the means is
the Maastricht Treaty. Allow me to quote Atkinson:
141
 “The European Union is based precisely on the social and economic
structures of ‘The European Economic Community’ proposed by the
Hitler regime in 1941. The covert and undemocratic methods of forcing
European rule on Britain—through Treaty law, directives and regulations
which largely bypass parliament—had their equivalent in the emergency
laws by which Hitler governed Germany... The Treaty of Rome, which
brought the European Community into being, was nurtured at Bilderberg
meetings.”
Atkinson is kind enough to present a list of those who attended
the exclusive 1995 Bilderberg Conference on forced economic
globalization and guess who’s name appears alongside Henry
Kissinger and David Rockefeller? None other than NY Times
Foreign Affairs columnist, Thomas Friedman!
Now CFRer Daniel Pipes, decided to bail out his fellow CFR
member, who just happens to also be a Bilderberger, the
distinguished journalist Thomas Friedman. Now keeping in mind
that Pipes is a proud conspiracy debunker, how does he do it?
First he introduces his colleague, “Thomas Friedman may be the
journalist who has the most influence on the way the outside world
understands the Arab-Israel conflict.” Maybe true, but now we
learn how he views the issue; “His signature concept is applying a
globalization theory to the conflict.” Ooh, could he have picked
that up at his Bilderberg/CFR meetings by some chance???
“If Arabs and Israelis would concentrate on fulfilling the imperatives of
globalization, he argues, they would not only live better but also find
themselves too busy making money to hate each other.”
This was not just Friedman’s stupid idea but note, this is also
Peres’ New Middle East and isn’t it a cozy coincidence that both
Peres and Friedman were at Davos together this year?
It was this globalization concept of Peres and his partner in
crime Yossi Beilin, that led them to handing the PLO 40,000 rifles,
and thus turned both into accessories to mass murder. But Pipes
forgives Friedman his role in Israel’s bloodletting because, “Of late,
Friedman has woken up to Middle Eastern realities.” As if better
late than never works out fine this time around.
But that’s okay, too, because:
“To his credit, Friedman has candidly acknowledged his
mystification...Sadder but wiser, Thomas Friedman is learning a deeper
truth about the Middle East. This is one region where politics trumps
economics.”
142
 And so we end on an upbeat note. The world’s number one
propagandist against Israel is sorry. He was wrong all along. And
thanks to his Lodge buddy Pipes, we’re all going to thank him for
changing his mind. Even those Jews mourning their dead will be
grateful because Friedman has seen the light at last.
Back to Atkinson’s Bilderberg list. What struck me was the
paucity of Jewish Bilderberg members. The vast majority of
members are from Northern Europe. There are undoubtedly Jews
who have lost their moral compass and are plotting a world
government based on the Nazi model but Friedman’s about-face
leads to the conclusion that others were invited as dupes, to
promote an agenda they were too dim-witted to see through.

THE BEST LAID PLANS OF MICE

The EU’s political head, Javier Solana showed up in Israel on
July 24, and ran into the arms of Europe’s chief spy in the Israeli
cabinet, Shimon Peres. And, because Solana and Europe are so
dreadfully boring, hardly anyone paid attention to the evil
significance of the visit.
Luckily for us, an attorney, Constance E. Cumbey, is keeping
close watch on Solana. She writes:
I have kept the closest of tabs on Dr. Solana since he first came to my
attention -- November 22, 1995. I collected all I could find thereafter
about his earlier activities. I have saved all to disk. Perhaps the best way to
transmit might be by CD-ROM. I have prepared an informational video; I
am working on a book about him. Since I practice law on a full-time
basis, all is not easy. I did meet a Daniel Seaman, Director of the Foreign
Press Department, Government Press Office, Office of the Prime
Minister (then Barak) at a War Bonds for Israel dinner last fall. His
address is 37 Hillel Street, Jerusalem 94581; telephone 972-2-623-3389-90;
FAX 972-2-623-3388; Web Site www.gpo.gov.il. I did bend his ear at
some length that evening about Javier Solana. He knew about the EU and
damage coming from it, but was a little bit more clueless about Solana,
but said he wanted to learn much more. He offered to get me press
credentials if I wanted to come to Israel. I do believe he may have taken
to heart what I told him and he might be an excellent contact. I told him
he and the others in Israel would be very wise to learn as much about
Solana as they knew about Hitler. Solana, unfortunately, appears to be
tens of times shrewder and smarter than Mr. Hitler, and far more
disarming. If one looks carefully, however, the fangs are obviously
showing.

143
 Ms. Cumbey’s approach is to absorb what Solana is telling the
Arabs and what they are saying about him. She sent along some
examples. Permit me to add some comments:
Greater EU role in Middle East peace process demanded
The Emirates News Agency (WAM)
Posted Thursday May 24, 2001 - 10:12:26 AM EDT
Abu Dhabi—A UAE newspaper hoped today the European Union (EU)
would play greater role in mediation in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict,
saying that the partisan role of the US had harmed peace-making.
The “Gulf News” said in part : “The European Union (EU) is beginning
to take a high-profile interest in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It has
endorsed the Mitchell report and said it stands ready to assist the parties.
“The EU head of foreign policy Javier Solana was a member of the
Mitchell Commission which authored the report, and he has undertaken a
tour of the region and held meetings with officials from both sides. The
EU is one of the biggest aid donors of the Palestinians and has extensive
economic interests and ties in the region.”
***Now let’s get this straight. Solana was a member of the
Mitchell Commission, whose findings Israel alone adopted and
since then has suffered over 700 terror attacks. Yet Solana tells the
Arabs that the US role had harmed their peaceful interests. That
means that Mitchell, the US mediator, was harmful but not Solana,
who worked hand in hand with Mitchell to write his commission’s
report. Either Solana is a double-dealing, back-stabbing cretin or
he’s playing the role demanded of him, which is to make it appear
that the EU and US have not coordinated Middle East policy. We
can already conclude that if Mitchell demanded that Israel adopt a
one-way cease-fire which lets the PLO murder with impunity, so
did the EU.***
“Palestinians now want to see the EU play a greater role in mediation in
the conflict with Israel. This would be beneficial for everyone. The
overbearing and partisan role of the United States has done much to
exacerbate the situation. Palestinians cannot get a just deal because the
mediator is so clearly and avowedly biased.
“The EU has always propagated a balanced approach to the conflict and
insisted on the implementation of UN Resolution 242 and 338. It has also
called for a freeze in settlements.
“A more direct role would enable the EU to flex its political muscle and
grow out of the shadows of the US. It would instill greater balance in
diplomacy and perhaps provide the opening that everyone has been
searching for,” the paper said.

144
 ***And now we see how Solana has pulled the wool over the
Arabs’ eyes. He has convinced them that the EU’s policy towards
Israel is more unbiased than America’s, and that it would press
harder for Israel’s demise. By leaving this impression, Solana also
does some wool-pulling over Israeli eyes. Clearly, they must reason,
America is a much better friend of Israel than the EU... the same
America which prepared and endorsed the Mitchell Commission
report, of which, Solana was an active contributor. Now let’s have a
look what Solana told the Syrians:***
Al-Assad confers with Solana, Syrian patriarchs
Syria-European Union, Politics, 5/22/2001.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday in Damascus’s al-Shaab
palace received the European Union’s foreign policy and Security Council
chairman Javier Solana and members of the accompanying delegation.
The meeting was attended by the foreign minister Farouk al-Shara. Talks
dealt with the conditions in the occupied Arab territories and the
practices of genocide conducted by Israel against the Palestinians.
The president stressed the importance of the ME peace progress in terms
of maintaining clear-cut criteria according to provisions of the
International legitimacy resolutions and the Madrid’s terms of reference
with a view to achieving a just and comprehensive peace.
Al-Assad also noted the effective role of the EU has to play in the peace
process. An agreement was concluded on continuing contacts between
Syria and the EU. In a statement to SANA following his meeting with
President al-Assad, Solana described the talks as very positive and
constructive.
***Solana has just attended a meeting with the Syrian resident
and foreign minister and the topic is Israel’s ongoing genocide
against the Palestinians. Does he vigorously reply that the only
genocide being discussed in the region is the Arabs’ plans for
Israel? Does he condemn the PLO’s serial murder of innocents?
Nope, he views what was discussed as constructive.***
He said that his talks with President al-Assad covered the situation in the
region and relations between the EU and Syria.
He added: “I am very pleased and wish to go back to Damascus to
complete my talks.”
He continued: “‘We, in the European Union, are trying our best to stop
the cycle of violence and to create the conditions that allow the
resumption of constructive negotiations.” Solana, who is on a Middle
East tour of five countries and the Palestinian territories, added that he
had: “good and productive” talks with President al-Assad, which also

145
 covered negotiations on an association agreement between Syria and the
EU.
“I had a very good meeting with the President.. I think I have a very good
picture about the thinking of Syria about the situation in the region.”
***Look what Solana offered Syria; an associate membership in
the EU, with all the monetary benefits that go along with joining
the club. Now why would the EU welcome Syria as a junior
partner? For its future contributions to the well-being of the
European continent? To spread its fine human rights record to the
world? And why would Syria agree unless the EU and Solana made
some very concrete proposals concerning Israel? Now what could
they include?***
It was also on Monday, the president received at the Damascus al-Shaab
Palace Patriarch of Antioch and All the East for the Greek Orthodox,
Patriarch Zakka Iwaz I, the patriarch of Antioch and all the east for
Syrian Orthodox, Higher President of the Syriac Church in the World,
Patriarch Isador Bateikha, the deputy patriarch for the Greek Catholics.
The patriarchs expressed their “high appreciation for the President’s wise
leadership, his national attitudes and his efforts for activating Arab
solidarity in confrontation of the current challenges.
***Could it be Solana made a promise to get the Jews out of the
Old City of Jerusalem and Assad just couldn’t wait to tell the good
news to his Christian patriarchs?***
At this very moment, some 200 European troops from a
Ukrainian division, are learning the lay of the land in Jerusalem.
They have been spotted roaming the Old City by several of my
correspondents. Israel’s perfidious leader Sharon is supposedly
opposing the presence of EU troops while knowing they are
already wandering his land. He would prefer inviting a contingent
of CIA monitors, we are told, as if they won’t be coordinating their
murderous plots against Israel with the soldiers of the EU.
Last week, the settlers were set up but good. A former Kach
leader, Noam Federman, had three bombs planted in his car by
radical elements of the General Security Services (Shabak). A lie
was spread that he had planned to use them against Arabs. He
wisely blamed the Shabak for the setup, but that didn’t stop the
Shabak from continuing their plan. Next, three Arabs, including an
infant, were shot dead on a road near Hebron and the “Committee
for Road Safety” took responsibility. This same group was run by
the Shabak provocateur Avishai Raviv in the early 1990s, which the
146
Shabak obviously forgot when they tried blaming Kach for the
murders.
Everything is in place: the EU troops are coming, the CIA is on
the way in bigger and more deadly numbers to “stop the violence”
by removing the “violent” settlers from their homes, starting with
Hebron and ending, for a spell, in Jerusalem.
However, there is a fly in the ointment, a spanner in the works,
that could put an end to these best laid plans of mice, and that is
the Rabin murder. As a result of President Katzav’s early release of
Margalit Har Shefi, there has a been a spirited revival of Rabin truth
and demands for it. Here are two radio reports sent to me by
correspondents:
Yesterday, the Radio interviewed Yitzchak Rabin’s grandson regarding the
release of Margalit Har Shefi. The grandson revealed that Leah Rabin had
her doubts and questions about the assassination of Yitzchak but was
afraid to open Pandora’s box.
Today, 18.7.01, on the Jojo Aboutbul evening radio talk show, an Israeli
journalist from Bet El went live on the line to praise President Katzav for
pardoning Har Shefi. He went on to disclose that, according to a cabinet
protocol released shortly after the Rabin murder but immediately banned
from further publication, a very senior cabinet minister suggested during a
cabinet meeting that “we must stage a political assassination” in order to
further the Oslo process. The journalist said the cabinet meeting
protocols were available for a day or two, then strictly banned by
government and GSS decrees and failed to reach the mass media.
Nevertheless, he’s got a copy of it. He went on to say that the public did
not get a chance to demand a REAL investigation into the Rabin murder
and unfortunately the real murderer is still at large. At this point Juju
forcefully cut him off, in mid-broadcast.
Now, of course, we know that cabinet minister was Shimon
Peres, the same fellow who smilingly hugged Solana earlier today.
And if the Rabin assassination truth emerges, he will fall hard, as
will the coterie of “peacemakers” who have brought Israel to the
precipice of extinction.
And look who demanded that the truth come out! Recall July 24,
because on this day, after nearly six years of cowardly silence, the
Jerusalem Post finally displayed integrity. The concluding paragraphs
of its main editorial read:
The fact remains that the killing of Rabin continues to haunt Israeli
society, as the ruckus over the Har Shefi pardon made all too apparent.
There are still too many questions that remain open, such as the role of
147
 GSS agent-provocateur Avishai Raviv, for the wounds on the national
psyche to have healed properly and fully. Indeed, Raviv is suspected of far
more grievous crimes than Har Shefi, yet he still has not been brought to
trial.
The Raviv case could very well answer many of the lingering uncertainties
surrounding the assassination regarding who knew what and when they
knew it. If Israeli society is to truly succeed in uniting, it will have to come
to terms with the divisions engendered by that horrific act, and the only
way to do so is to start by removing whatever question marks still remain.
Let us hope that such clarity will be achieved promptly and unequivocally.
For the first time since the Rabin assassination, we all applaud
the Jerusalem Post... all except Solana, Peres, Gillon and company.

BEHIND THE AMERICAN CONDEMNATION

The viciousness of the American condemnation of Israel’s
killing of six Hamas leaders in Nablus has caught more than a few
people off guard. Delivered, as usual, by a sold out Jew figurehead
named Ari Fleischer, screeching like a wronged fish maiden, that “a
ceasefire is a ceasefire is a ceasefire,” the Bush administration
questioned Israel’s right to defend itself. Of course, the only
question the White House should have asked Israel is, “What took
you so long?”
Since the Israeli action was clearly a military triumph, why would
the Bush gang have been so quick on the trigger to shoot down the
first clear signal from the Sharon administration that it had had
enough with Hamas murders? Could it be that the hooligans at the
White House are not interested in Israel’s survival?
It is not every day that one receives a phone call and long fax
from a retired member of the American Joint Chiefs of Staff. This
week retired Col. A.B. Cuppett, a former member of the US Army
Joint Staff, recipient of the Secretary of Defense Civilian Service
Medal, Joint Meritorious Unit Award and the Bronze Star, did so
contact me and relayed information of such terrifying import, that
many of my readers will dismiss it out of psychological self-defense.
That would not be a wise idea. I quote from sections of the fax sent
to me.
Col. Cuppett relates that the American administration is fully
cognizant of the “1939 vs.1999 Third Reich similarities,” which are

148
being perpetrated against Israel by, “the United Nations and the
New World Order.” The plan includes:
...the necessary foreign troops/policemen to execute the planned
implementation of another 1939-45 holocaust. The same spirit which
annihilated six million-plus Jews sixty years ago is still extant, active and
poised in the United States today.
On June 28, 2001, Col. Cuppett was advised of:
...a serious report of plans to allow UN police units to patrol US
international airports in the event of an Arab-Israeli war in the Middle
East.
These troops will also be placed at nine European airports and
will be used to derail an Israeli “call-up of reservists for military
duty.” Further, the UN will prevent ships carrying reservists from
sailing for Israel.
The UN shall soon declare Zionism to be racism...affirm that settlements
are a crime against humanity and equate the Jewish people with the likes
of Hitler and Stalin...When the war breaks out, Moslems will riot in the
US, and Jews, trying to go to Israel, for any reason, including bringing
funds to aid the besieged state, will be arrested at the airports.
All the above information was relayed to me by a Field Grade
US military officer, a US Army LTC and a USAF Major.
If any reader doubts that a new Holocaust is being planned, take
a look at how Europe is being primed for the kind of anti-Semitism
not seen in six decades. In the eyes of the European media, Israel
can do nothing right and any act of self-defense is an act of
barbarism. Six decades ago, the savage peasants of Croatia,
Lithuania and Poland were the tools of the Nazi mass murder of
Jews. This time, the equally ignorant Arab masses are being roused
to take care of the sadism.
So who is behind the provocations against Israel? Once again,
look across the street from the Vatican at the headquarters of
Society of Jesus, better known as the Jesuits, for the answer. The
following reports were sent by a few correspondents, but especially
an insightful woman from Toronto who wants no recognition. Her
only reward is the safety of Israel.
She writes:
You may be interested to know that both George Tenet and George
Mitchell are Georgetown graduates!

149
 The two men most responsible for Israel’s murderous
predicament are both graduates of Washington’s Jesuit control
center at Georgetown University. But then, look who at who are
honorary graduates of the same campus, King Juan Carlos of Spain
and his Prince, Felipe.
(http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/1996/s960220a.htm)
In the opening paragraph of this address Javier Solana addresses the
students re: his country’s distinguished connection to Georgetown, stating
Prince Felipe graduated from Georgetown and King Juan Carlos received
an honorary doctorate from Georgetown as well.
And what ties Juan Carlos has to President Bush!
I couldn’t find the picture I originally came across of President
George Bush Sr. and King Juan Carlos on the palace steps
November 14, 2000. I however, found this short article from the
Washington Post which verifies the same.
I just found the timing of this particular meeting most
interesting, since it was only seven days following the American
elections and prior to George W. being finally announced president
after the ballot fiasco. Interesting also that he had Norman
Schwarzkopf with him. It was the timing which caught my
attention. I was wondering if perhaps this was a planning meeting
to bring to completion (re: NWO) under George W. which wasn’t
finished under his administration.
(http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14414-2000Nov13.html)
Never mind all those celebs who threatened to leave the United States if
George W. Bush were elected. Bush’s ex-president dad, George H.W.
Bush, has actually left. The elder Bush spent the weekend in Spain
hunting for red-leg partridge with King Juan Carlos, retired general
Norman Schwarzkopf and ex-Indiana University basketball coach Bobby
Knight, and plans to meet today with His Majesty and Spanish Prime
Minister Jose Maria Aznar.
“We’re not supposed to discuss that.”
Now look at this item from the Jerusalem Post, to get an
understanding of how the Italian Jesuit, Juan Carlos is running
Israel’s leadership on behalf of the Supreme Jesuit General, the
“Black Pope” of the Vatican.
Arafat Fails to Get Backing to Declare State
At a press conference in Madrid yesterday after meeting Javier Solana, the
European Union’s foreign policy chief, Ben-Ami, a former ambassador to
Spain, said he would like Spanish King Juan Carlos to play a mediating
150
 role with Arab countries in peace talks focusing on the future of
Jerusalem.
“I have asked Pique to see if it is possible for King Juan Carlos to use his
good relationships with some Arab countries to make the parties move
closer about Jerusalem,” Ben-Ami said.
Now let’s see how the Italian leadership is manipulating the
most powerful Arab leader to get those EU/NATO/UN troops
into Israel:
Egypt-Italy Talks on Peace Observers on Palestinian Areas
Egypt-Italy, Politics, 7/28/2001
Italy has started pan-European and International contracts in light of talks
between president Hosni Mubarak and Italian premier Silvio Berlusconi
to deploy international observers to the Palestinian territories.
In his talks with his Italian counter part Renato Rugioro, foreign minister
Ahmed Maher discussed the efforts to dispatch international observers to
the areas of clashes.
Ruggioro said Italy has wide experience in peace keeping and observer
operations as it participates in peace efforts in areas of clashes in the
world under UN or NATO banners.
Analysts say Mubarak-Berlusconi talks were significant with the new
Italian leadership.
Now guess who is currently meeting the pope to coordinate the
slaughter of Jews?
Palestinian Leader Arafat to Meet Pope
Palestinian President Yasser Arafat is set to visit Rome on Wednesday
and Thursday and will meet with Pope John Paul II.
The Palestinian leader is also expected to meet Italian President Carlo
Azeglio Ciampi, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and Foreign Minister
Renato Ruggiero to discuss the situation in the Middle East, sources in
Rome said.
President Arafat is currently visiting Morocco, Tunisia and other Arab
states to discuss support for international observers to help bolster a
now-broken ceasefire between Israeli and Palestinian forces.
President Arafat is due to arrive in the Italian capital on Wednesday
evening and will meet the Pope on Thursday morning.
Not that the plots against Israel aren’t inter-denominational. The
New World Order’s declared intention of forming a one-world
religion, with its capital sitting on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount,
insures inter-religious harmony, if you don’t happen to be a rabbi.

151
 Now how is it Arafat is going to Rome to meet the Pope just a
couple of days after meeting with the Archbishop of Canterbury
and the Cardinal of Ireland?
(http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/07/31/News/News.31549.htm)
Speaking at the press conference following meetings with both Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon and PA Chairman Yasser Arafat, Carey went out of
his way to praise both.
And what is the first object of these meetings?
(Fhttp://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/010727/2001072715.html)
EU report: the settlers are ready to evacuate the settlements
Israel-Palestine, Politics, 7/27/2001
A secret report by the European Union .............
And it is not only Israel’s government that is cooperating in the
plots against the Jewish State. Take a gander at Binyamin
Netanyahu’s secret meeting with Assad at the behest of the Spanish
prime minister.
Actualite Juive (Paris) 26th of July by Jean-Jacques Biton
Monaco—Benyamin Netanyahu met Syrian president Bashar al Assad at
the initiative of Spanish prime minister, Jose Maria Aznar, who organized
the meeting by phone. A private meeting between Netanyahu and Assad
took place at l’Hotel Hermitage on Sunday 27th of June.
Sources say the secret meeting concerned an Israeli withdrawal from the
Golan Heights.
My, my, my, aren’t the Spaniards planning another Inquisition,
and just like earlier this century, aren’t their Jesuit bosses using the
corrupted Jewish leadership to lead their people into annihilation?

SNOWBALL EFFECT, TIDAL WAVE

Our previous message included some terrifying information
imparted by a former member of the American Joint Chiefs of
Staff, Col. Al Cuppett. The following snowball effect led to a
personal visit by a former US Navy submarine sailor with even
more important information about, “a much higher ranking former
member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” Admiral William Owens.
Owens, a four star Admiral, high ranking member of the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a Rhodes scholar, was the
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the early 1990s. In

152
1990, he was a temporary Five Star Admiral while commanding the
Sixth Fleet during the Persian Gulf War.
“The last time I met him,” recalls the visitor, “I caught him on his cell
phone negotiating the sale of Motorola’s Irridium global satellite network
to the American government. He is now the CEO of Teledesek, a
corporation 25% owned by Saudi Arabia, which is building a worldwide
satellite-operated cellular network. He assured me that within five years,
every person on the planet will have access to the network. I expressed
deep misgivings about the likely misuse of this cellular monopoly but he
promised me, ‘It’ll be good for everyone. Even the poorest peasant will
be able to afford to join in. Calls to anywhere will cost about three
cents.’”
The discussion digressed to the current use of cell phones in
Israel to locate PLO terrorists and Jewish settlement leaders
targeted for assassination. Any hit squad can ambush its quarry to
within a few meters if he is carrying his mobile phone, and that has
led to a huge percentage of successful assassinations in the past
year. Even if the phone is off, a hidden passive power source can
send out location signals. The fact that Saudi Arabia is a one
quarter owner of Owens’ upcoming worldwide surveillance dream,
will become a nightmare for Israeli security.
“Bill Owens was the skipper of my submarine twenty years ago. All the
crew viewed him as a likeable, caring officer. He decided that he’d like to
recommend me for officer training and I agreed to take the course if it
was offered to me. Before he submitted his recommendation to
Washington, he invited me for a private discussion in his quarters.
“After a bit of small talk he asked me, ‘If the US turned on Israel like it
should, would you be prepared to launch a Subroc against Israel?’ A
Subroc is a nuclear tipped rocket. I told him that it would never happen.
He answered that it very well might happen. I replied that God wouldn’t
let it happen. That was the end of the conversation. He dismissed me and
I wasn’t recommended for officer training.
“But over time, we have kept in touch. He is not a man to tell me more
than what he thinks I ought to know. Still, he told me some things that
Israelis should understand already. The most bothersome concerned the
position of the Sixth Fleet during the Persian Gulf War. You would think
it would have been anchored off Saudi Arabia or steaming toward
Kuwait. It wasn’t. Admiral Owens never took his fleet out of the
Mediterranean. I asked him why and he answered that his ships were
protecting the region from enemy interdiction in the war. I asked which
enemy and he replied, ‘Libya, for instance.’”
Needless to say, the answer was unsatisfactory. Libya does not
and did not have the capability to tackle the allied forces patched
153
together by George Bush, Colin Powell and their NWO cronies.
Even if it could make trouble, the whole Sixth Fleet wasn’t needed
to prevent it. However, part of the fleet was anchored off Haifa, a
long way from Libya, and Iraq for that matter.
Israel was ordered not to react militarily to Iraqi Scud attacks.
The politician in charge of the operation was Defense Minister
Moshe Arens, a member of the CFR’s Middle East Advisory
Committee. Every effort was made to keep Israel a helpless sitting
duck, including rigging polls to show most Israelis were in favor of
restraint no matter how many missiles fell on them.
Arens played ball, the visitor concluded, not because he
betraying Israel but because Admiral Owens was sailing off his
coast and if Israel dared defend itself, he would have launched that
Subroc against the country. Haifa could have been flattened in a
matter of seconds if Arens or Prime Minister Shamir dared defy the
CFR’s Sixth Fleet Admiral, William A. Owens.
“The last time we met,” continued the visitor, “he almost revealed
something just as powerful. He told me, ‘If Rabin wasn’t murdered, we
might have had peace. He had a special relationship with President Assad
of Syria and he holds all the cards in the region. Rabin’s death put an end
to our best diplomatic shot.’
“I said to him, ‘You know the convicted assassin didn’t do it, and the ties
to the murder run through Peres and France?’ His answer was succinct; ‘I
saw the film: Rabin’s bodyguards pulled back.’”

REALITY CREATION FOR THE IGNORANT

On September 30, 2000, a twelve year old Gazan boy named
Muhammed ad-Dura was shot while huddled against a wall with his
father, trapped in a firefight between the PLO and the Israel
Defense Forces (IDF). The shooting was filmed by French TV and
the PLO exploited the incident to fuel a bloody terror war against
Israel, turning the boy into an international martyr through the
foreign media.
Numerous responsible Israelis such as Yaacov Verker and Yosef
Doriel approached this same media with conclusive evidence that
the IDF could not have shot the boy. The film proved that
Muhammed ad-Dura was shot from in front and above. The IDF
troops were behind him and at his side.

154
 That meant that the PLO, in an incredibly ugly act of cynicism,
shot the boy and milked him for all that he was worth. And maybe
even more: Yaacov Verker’s research led him to the conclusion that
ad-Dura survived the shooting.
For 18 months, the world media refused to accept that the PLO
shot the boy, to the point that when the IDF’s own investigative
team reached the same conclusion, it was subjected to derision.
Finally, one lone producer from German TV, Esther Shapira,
broadcast the filmed proof that the IDF were not in position to
have done the shooting.
It was a rare instance of media truth about Israel, and just watch
it get ignored everywhere. The innocent boy will continue to be a
victim of Israeli cruelty no matter what the truth because the major
world media are serving their political bosses’ agenda of destroying
Israel by pumping up the anti-Semitism, especially in Europe, to
pre-Holocaust levels. There is nothing accidental or random about
the twisted news angles from Israel and we’re going to prove it by
what the media is NOT reporting.
However, before we take a look at the international media, let’s
see how bad things are in Israel. Turn on your sets to Channel
One’s 7:30 news report and you get to see a map of Israel minus
Yesha. Yup, the good folks who run the government-owned
station, those selfsame visionaries who brought us the joys of the
Oslo peace, have removed those contentious territories from the
map, along with, presumably, the quarter million Israelis who live in
them.
Then, as one informant tells me, there is the issue of censorship
at the communal farmsteads. The Labor Party-affiliated publishing
house, Kibbutz Hameuhad published an edition of Joan Peters’
book From Time Immemorial. This is the book the PLO has had
banned wherever it had the persuasive power to do so, because it
proves that there is no ancient Palestinian people.
Peters confirms what every travel writer of the 19th century saw:
the Turkish province where Israel sits today, was nearly
depopulated, and in the few urban centers that existed, such as
Jerusalem, Tsfat and Tiberius, Jews were the majority. She backs
the travel writers with detailed censuses undertaken by the Turks
and British. Central to her thesis that the ancient Palestinian people
155
is a myth, is the huge jump in the population of the Arabs after the
British arrived. Arabs from as far away as Iraq were being
encouraged by the British to settle in the Palestinian colony they
had occupied. Most of today’s Palestinians have lived in the land
they claim as their own, for no more than eighty years.
At the same time as the British were luring distant Arabs to the
land, mostly by economic opportunities, they approved the
establishment of a Jewish state on the same land. Just as they had
done in Africa and on the Indian sub-continent, the British were
deliberately creating future chaos, all the better to control once
their forces had gone home.
My informant relates:
I wanted a copy of the Hebrew edition of Peters’ book and called every
bookstore in Tel Aviv. They were taken off the shelves. So I phoned the
publisher, Kibbutz Meuhad to order a copy. I was told not a copy of the
book was left in their inventory and they would never publish it again, no
matter how many people ordered it. I asked why and was told the book
harms the peace process.
Indeed it would, if the goal is to create a distorted reality of
events. But everyone is doing it. When a bomb killed 12 people in a
Jerusalem restaurant, the BBC chose to cover the atrocity with a
report on Israeli occupation in Gaza. Irrelevant coverage is just as
good as no coverage at all.
Still, no coverage is the prime means of distortion. Let’s have a
look at some of the stories that somehow, are deemed
unnewsworthy.

Who Needs Christians Anyway?

In 1992, 40,000 Christians lived in Bethlehem, and they had a
considerable presence in Jericho and Jerusalem. Today, they’re all
but gone, maybe 8,000 remain in Bethlehem and just hundreds in
Jericho. Some found refuge in supposedly Israeli-controlled
Jerusalem, but the long arm of the PLO is driving them out of
there almost as quickly. The Christians were terrorized, threatened,
molested, robbed, raped, beaten and murdered until they got the
hint that they were unwanted in PLO-land.
But why report this trivial story?

156
Business, We Don’t Need No Filthy Business!
In 1992, the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza had a thriving
commerce and as good a local economy as is found in the Middle
East. No more, because the PLO thugs, and those of the “radical
elements” strong-armed the proprietors out of business. If you own
a store or factory in PLO-land, you pay protection money or else!
With their businesses in tatters, and nothing left to lose, a
significant number of such proprietors have moved their families to
Israel, fearing what will become of them when the extortion capital
has run out.
But who cares about greedy capitalists anyway?

We’re Not Talking to That Troublemaker

A few weeks ago, a bomb went off next to a high school in the
Arab village of Sur Bahr, wounding 13 students. CNN was the first
to report that it was the work of “Jewish extremists,” and that’s the
line that was spread worldwide. But all that was needed was the
most cursory of background reporting to set the record straight.
You see, Sur Bahr is the only Arab village to have openly
declared that it doesn’t relish the idea of being taken over by the
PLO. Life is better without the PLO mucking things up. Needless
to say, the PLO felt hurt by the rejection and pumped two bullets
into the village mayor Zuhair Hamdam. The prime and only
suspect in the bombing was the PLO, not an imaginary group of
“Jewish extremists” who have not been heard from since.
However, reporting about an Arab village that thinks the PLO
isn’t keen, is bad for the peace business. It’s much prettier to spend
airtime on hopeless experiments in reconciliation between the
Jewish radical left and handpicked Arabs.

The Rabin Assassination

I can personally attest that there are lots of local and foreign
media in Israel who know Yigal Amir was the patsy in the Rabin
assassination. I know of one local social reporter who is convinced
Shimon Peres organized the murder, but gives him glowing press
for their common cause. Even the secretary of the Foreign Press
Association here has asked me to fax documentation and has told
me she suspected a conspiracy from the night of the murder.
157
 Here’s a typical incident. David Chater of Sky News interviewed
me at my home for two hours. He understood the evidence just
fine but when his report was aired, my portion had been edited out.
I asked why and was told the decision was made in London.
Instead of exploding the scandal, Chater ended up reporting that
unfounded rumors of foul play found advocates in Israel. Only
those condemning the “rumors” made it to the small screen.
I could name ten Israeli reporters who wrote fair articles about
my work, only not to see it appear in print or on film. I can name
one who told me he was warned that his career would be over if he
ever reported on the Rabin murder again.
You see, it’s much better for peace if Rabin was murdered by a
Jewish extremist and not by the peace-loving Foreign Minister.
Now that we’ve proven unethical, selective or downright
deceitful reporting, one must ask why do the reporters do it? An
anecdote: A number of years ago, the Cuban-born Jerusalem
bureau chief of the Miami Herald called me, saying he was looking
for an assistant. I went to his office and before even getting
acquainted, he asked me, “Who do you vote for?” I answered, “The
Likud.” He replied, “I’m sorry, I can’t use you.” Flabbergasted I
said, “Do you know it’s illegal to discriminate like that?” His cool
retort was, “Not here it’s not.”
Touche.
I’ve met enough of the “journalists” to generalize: they’re not
very bright and they were chosen for their assignments because of
their politics and lack of ethics. They are serving the hidden masters
of this planet, and I won’t pull out my Council on Foreign
Relations members list right now to prove it. But the chairmen of
NBC, CNN, The Washington Post, ABC, CBS, The New York Times,
Newsweek et al are all members of the CFR. And they are kind to
Israel compared to the creepy characters working for the
Bilderberg-controlled European media.
Now here’s how you aid and abet the mini-Holocaust taking
place in Israel today and prepare world opinion for more
extermination of Jews: you distort reality.

158
You’re Occupying Their Territory
Since 99% of “Palestinians” now share the subtle joy of being
ruled by their own, Israel can’t be accused of occupying the
Palestinian people. So the big, big justification for murdering
Israelis is that they’re occupying their territory.
Now who says it’s their territory? Barbara Walters for one. She
told a colleague of mine that it’s a given in the media that Yesha is
Palestinian land and there is no hope of ever reverting the concept.
Not as long as the truth isn’t being told. What truth is that? That
there never was a Palestinian state or people. That both are mid-
twentieth century inventions. That from 1948, 800,000 Jews were
expelled from Arab lands with all their assets confiscated and that
the 500,000 Arabs who left Israel at the same time could have been
compensated from the stolen Jewish assets. That Israel settled its
refugees and the Arabs left theirs in squalor. That the whole
conflict could have been settled back then with a, ‘you take in your
refugees, we’ll take in ours,’ deal.
Judea and Samaria not Jewish? Well then, the PLO had better
change the Hebrew names of their towns. Hebron in Hebrew
means Little Friend; Ramallah, Great Heights; Jericho; Moon
Town; Bethlehem, Bakery.
And why should the media mention that before being massacred
by the Arabs in the 1920s, a Jewish community had existed in
Hebron from King David’s time? Or that a string of Jewish villages
existed from Jerusalem to Hebron before they were razed by the
Arabs in 1948? Or that not one Arab village existed in the Jordan
Valley from Jericho to Bet Shean before the Israelis settled there
and made the land worthwhile enough for “Palestinians” to claim
today that somehow they have a right to it.
Then there is the fact that not only did the British settle Arabs
from throughout the Middle East in their Palestine, but after 1948,
Egypt shifted thousands of its people to the Gaza Strip to maintain
control. Gazans and West Bankers are not one happy family
because a good chunk of the Gazans are, in fact, Egyptian.
All those unpleasant historical facts, must never be hinted at;
after all, they could harm the war process.

159
There Is Cycle of Violence in the Middle East
Now here is what’s really going on. The PLO and associated
gangs take great pains to murder civilians, the younger the better.
The Israeli army takes great pains to kill those shooting at its
civilians. If Israel kills a non-combatant, it’s an accident. If the PLO
kills a soldier, odds are he’s out of uniform sipping coffee at a cafe,
or, an accident.
Now how come the great institution of the free press doesn’t
ask, what kind of a people sends its teenagers out to blow
themselves up? Because the answer is, a monstrous people. Back in
the 30s, many in the media reported on the achievements of Nazi
Germany in terms not unlike those used to describe the
“Palestinian” enterprise. When asked to cuddle monsters, they end
up fondling them for their masters.
And this kind of raw lying, hiding, twisting and distorting won’t
end because Saudi Arabia owns controlling shares of UPI and a
sizable piece of CNN. The Saudi leadership, long ago appointed by
British and American oil companies, walk hand in hand with their
buddies from the CFR and Royal Institute of International Affairs.
And why shouldn’t they? Without Israel as the whipping boy,
Arabs might begin to question their own repressive leaders, religion
and culture.
Which, of course, is the true road to peace. If the Arabs ever
wake up to how they’ve been impoverished in every way by the
outsiders who control their leaders, they might begin to see reality,
instead of the distorted picture shown in the media, which is
keeping them ignorant and turning them barbaric.
If the Arabs don’t snap out of it, then they should know: after
Israel, them.

160
 CHAPTER FIVE
A MONSTER LOOSE IN ISRAEL

A TALE OF TWO CENTERS:

The Criminal Mindset of Shimon Peres
versus The Truth Seeping Out of Rabin’s Edifice
Shimon Peres had a busy month. Not as Foreign Minister
especially, but as director of the Peres Center for Peace. You see,
there is no real justification for this center’s existence. Its stated
purpose is to promote business ties between Israelis and Arabs and
based on this worthy sounding goal, it has raised tens of millions of
dollars from private donors and the World Bank.
However, no such projects have been initiated by the center.
Instead it hosts bi-annual meetings of cooperative regional thugs to
talk about regional cooperation. The only project that got off the
ground was an unmitigated fiasco called the Peace Cup.
Here’s how it worked. Last summer, the center hosted a soccer
tournament held in Rome. Perennial Italian champs, Juventus
Rome and teams from Israel and its Arab neighbors were to play
each other for the Peace Trophy. Though Israel sent a team, Betar
Jerusalem, none of Israel’s Arab neighbors but Jordan consented to
participate.
So the three teams played three 30 minute games one night in
front of literally dozens of enthusiastic Italian fans in a stadium
holding 60,000. First Juventus beat Jordan 11-0 in half an hour,
then Betar proceeded to slaughter the Jordanians 7-0. Finally, to the
disgust of all 57 Italian fans, Betar beat Juventus 1-0 for the
championship.
The Jordanians, beaten 18-0 in an hour felt anything but
peaceful afterward. As far as they were concerned, they were lured
into a trap designed to illustrate the total impotence of Arab
sporting efforts. In fact, they better illustrated the total impotence
of the Peres Center for Peace. As usual, its vision of peace just
fueled more hate and hostility.
161
 In order for him to justify his center’s existence, it is incumbent
upon Peres to get a few more fiascos rolling, and that requires
finally, funding economic co-existence. So he has spent the past
month raising money for hi-tech ventures in the Arab sector of
Israel, ventures, of course, doomed to fail since there are, without
exaggeration, no original hi-tech projects in the entire Arab world.
Like his Peace Cup joke, Peres’ vision will result in an 18-0 loss
because it is the vision of a diseased mind. And the result will be
the same; more hatred and hostility.
Nonetheless, Peres used his pal Benny Gaon, head of Koor
Industries to raise $10 million for the doomed ventures, then took a
trip to America with another buddy, Rabbi Michael Melchior to
persuade American Jewish businessmen to throw their money away
on Peres Center hopeless projects in the Arab sector.
If they only knew the criminal mindset of Peres and his center,
these star struck Americans would have kept their wallets tightly in
their front pants pocket where they belong. Let’s look at just one
example of how the Peres Center thinks. And this time, for a
change, the convincing proof of Peres’ central role in the Rabin
assassination does not get even a passing mention. Instead, let us
look at the construction of the new Peres Center headquarters in
Yaffo.
A major donor, the Peres Center refuses to give out his identity,
agreed to build a sparkling new building to house the Peres dream,
designed by an Italian architect. Yaffo municipality head Israel
Peleg, a longtime Peres crony, invited him to build the facility in his
town and offered a selection of suitable sites. None was good
enough for Peres; he wanted a building in his name with a sea view.
So he chose a plot of land on the previous site of a hospital and
insisted it would be his.
Here’s where Peres’ criminal mindset comes into play. It was
illegal to build on the site, but that never stopped Peres before. Just
look who ran the Peres Center. The Chairman was Carmi Gillon,
head of the General Security Services (Shabak) at the time of the
Rabin murder and a proven conspirator in the assassination itself.
The Director is Uri Savir, a chief negotiator of the Oslo Accords,
whose deceit and lies to the Israeli public will someday lead to
criminal charges. And sitting on the board is former Chief Justice
162
Meir Shamgar, who headed the government commission of inquiry
that covered up the truth of the Rabin assassination. The rest of the
board includes a who’s who of local and international greed
mongers, who may be viewing the center’s money laundering
potential with unfettered lust.
The Tel Aviv City Hall had designated the Yaffo site as a public
park in its ordnance, Boardwalk Project 2236. The land was slated
to be a continuation of the Yaffo boardwalk with a sea view for all
residents to enjoy. Any construction which blocked the view was
forbidden. Not that this little roadblock stopped Peres. His
“experts” found another city ordnance which seemed to nullify the
first. Because the land previously housed a hospital, another public
building could legally replace it. That’s the law at Tel Aviv City Hall,
and somehow Peres persuaded Tel Aviv’s mayor and city council to
buy the argument and give him over an acre of invaluable seafront
property FOR FREE. Yes, you heard it right. Peres got the land for
49 years at 2% of the real estate value of a public building or 2% of
nothing.
Only the Peres Center for Peace is not a public institution. It is
entirely private. So how did Peres get around this nasty fact? Now
watch this to better understand the criminal mindset. Because the
Peres Center is a non-profit foundation, whose goal is to serve the
public, it is by definition a public institution.
The business newspaper Globes summed up the absurdity better
than I could. It wrote:
By that definition, every one of the thousands of foundations in Israel are
public institutions including the Foundation for Orchid Growers, the
Foundation for the Promotion of Racing Horses and the Foundation for
the Expansion of Chocolate Drinks. They are all now eligible for the
breaks that come with being government institutions.
Such has Peres twisted the law that yes, all foundations in Israel
are now public institutions if the Peres Center is ever used as a legal
precedent.
Israeli law insists that public buildings be open to the public.
The Peres Center will be surrounded by guards and only the invited
allowed in. The Peres Center counters:
We are building a museum of peace, a meeting place and an auditorium.
We will be inviting the public to our functions no matter what their
political leanings.
163
 Of course, only the most gullible of the radical left will ever
want to visit the center, but the explanation skirts the issue. Public
buildings by law are open to the GENERAL public and the Peres
Center will not be. It will serve almost no one in Yaffo and will
interrupt all boardwalk traffic. The building is, simply, breaking the
law by its existence; but there is more.
Israeli environmental law now bans the construction of
buildings closer then 100 meters from the sea. The law is vital since
so little seafront property remains open in the country. The Peres
Center parking lot is situated much closer to the water than 100
yards. It was okayed without submitting the plans to the
Environment Ministry as is dictated by law.
No problem for the Peres Institute. They explain that a parking
lot isn’t a building and everything is right as rain. Only, those who
choose to stroll along the beach will be blocked by the lot’s fence
and have to take a detour around it.
There is nothing legal about the new Peres Center for Peace
building in Yaffo, just as there is nothing legal about its criminal
namesake.

RABIN CENTER EMPLOYEE OPENS HIS MOUTH

ABOUT THE ASSASSINATION
Now speaking about peace centers, look what is happening
across the street at the Yitzhak Rabin Center for Israel Studies. A
paid employee of the center is talking truth about the assassination
of that center’s namesake. And the story is culled from no less than
Ha’aretz, certainly the most extremist left of the country’s news
outlets. Read on:
Rabin Center sponsors work criticizing the Left,
questioning assassination
The new and improved Rabin
by Uriya Shavit
Ha’aretz Magazine 13 April 2001
In January 1995, 11 months before Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was
assassinated at the end of a peace rally in Tel Aviv, Rabbi Yaakov Meidan
from the Gush Etzion bloc of settlements in the West Bank sent a
sharply worded letter to Ha’aretz. Five years later, in one of those ironic
twists with which Israel’s short history is studded, the salary of Rabbi

164
Meidan is being paid by the center that was established to perpetuate the
slain prime minister, the Yitzhak Rabin Center for Israel Studies.
That fact might have aroused no more than sad irony were it not for the
fact that Meidan is the author of the center’s official keynote document,
together with Hebrew University professor of law Ruth Gavison. Entitled
“Foundation for a new social pact between religiously observant and
nonreligious in Israel,” the document was written within the framework
of the Shalom Hartman Institute and was adopted by the Rabin Center in
September 2000. And it didn’t come cheap: In the last four months of
2000, NIS 186,749 was invested in work on and promotion of the pact; in
2001 the center will invest a further NIS 600,000 in it. Rabbi Meidan and
Prof. Gavison enjoy a stipend which costs NIS 6,000 a month each. And
the center intends to convene a “national congress” to discuss the
document.
Meidan’s introduction to the document, at the top of which a photograph
of Yitzhak Rabin appears, is fascinating: “In the past few years a shift has
occurred which I believe calls into question the adherence of the secular
community to humanism,” he writes, and continues with a withering
attack on the road pursued by Yitzhak Rabin, as well as on the police and
the Supreme Court. “A series of matters—the undemocratic behavior of
the police in their activity against the demonstrators over the blood that
was shed, the doubts that have begun to surface about how much the
Supreme Court has contributed to the entrenchment of democracy, the
fact that there is hardly anyone from the secular public who is demanding
that Avishai Raviv, who flagrantly incited Yigal Amir to assassinate Prime
Minister Yitzhak Rabin of blessed memory, stand trial, and more recently
the fact that negotiations were conducted by a transition government
which does not enjoy public backing, and the fact that many intellectuals
from the top level of the Israeli elite are now saying explicitly that they
will not forgo the opportunity of making peace with the Arab nation only
because of democratic principles and are ready to trample deliberately
whatever interferes with them—all this raises questions, which are not
necessarily easy to answer, about the contention that secular culture is the
bastion of democracy.”
Revelations undisclosed
“What I write is the truth,” Rabbi Meidan said this week, “but I can’t tell
you that it seems to me directly logical that a passage like this should
appear in the Rabin Center.”
What is there that the public doesn’t know about the Rabin assassination
that is important for it to know?
“A great many things. A great many things. You are asking me for bombs
which I am not ready to give you at this moment in this press interview.”
Maybe you could explain the main points.
“There are three things you people don’t understand. First, the impossible
corner you pushed us into. The left pushed the people who had to run
165
 between bullets day and night in order to bury their dead. Second, you did
not understand the influences that affected Yigal Amir—not from our
direction but from totally different directions. Avishai Raviv, who was not
one of ours [Raviv was a Shin Bet security service agent working among
far-right activists], is one of them. Third you don’t begin to understand
the huge and vast gulf that separates angry words, however harsh, from
[pulling] the trigger and committing murder.”
What do you mean in the reference your document makes to
Avishai Raviv?
“Mister, was he the one who created a photograph of Yitzhak Rabin
dressed in an SS uniform? Was he the one who said to Yigal Amir—and
there are 35 witnesses to this—‘Let’s see if you’re a real man by killing
Rabin’? A person like that was not put on trial, and no one opens his
mouth to protest.
“The Rabin Center—and I am saying hard words against the center which
pays my salary—was upset at the fact that Margalit Har-Shefi [now
serving a prison term after being convicted of failing to try to prevent
Amir from assassinating Rabin] was interviewed on television. But the
Rabin Center has so far not said a word about the fact that Avishai Raviv
is walking about freely and until not long ago received a salary of NIS
10,000 a month. “If there was no protest at these things, then something
here was not real. There was an attempt here to stir up the public against
religious Zionism, in order to eradicate religious Zionism—something
very similar to what was done at the time in the wake of the assassination
of Arlozoroff [referring to accusations leveled at right-wing nationalists
for the murder of a Labor movement leader, Chaim Arlozoroff, in
Palestine in 1933].”
Are you saying that Avishai Raviv wanted Yigal Amir to
assassinate Rabin?
“Avishai Raviv knowingly incited Yigal Amir to do it and he was not
tried. How is it possible that you people do not protest this?”
Are you saying that the Shin Bet knew about this?
“What differences does it make? If you are asking me whether the Shin
Bet knew about it, that is a different question. I am not dealing with that.
A few books have already discussed that. I am now talking about the fact
that there was no ‘satisfaction’ for Yitzhak Rabin’s spilt blood. The blood
of Yitzhak Rabin cries out from the earth. It is crying out against a person
who is walking free ... The leaders of the country and the leaders of the
left are responsible for that spilt blood.”
Admittedly, Meidan is off course; in fact he’s taking the wrong
course altogether. Raviv did not provoke Amir to murder Rabin,
since Amir shot blank bullets and Rabin’s bodyguard Yoram Rubin
did the dirty deed. BUT, here is a Rabin Center employee
166
demanding the truth and threatening to “explode bombs” at his
chosen time. It’s a most refreshing change from the flagrant
criminality of the Peres Center, almost a breath of fresh air that
Yitzhak Rabin would enjoy inhaling.

THEY’RE DOING IT AGAIN

Three days before he died, Rehavam Zeevi attacked Shimon
Peres viciously in the government’s cabinet meeting. He told PM
Sharon that if Peres wasn’t sacked, he would resign from the
government and take seven Knesset members from Moledet and
Yisrael Beiteinu with him. Sharon refused to fire Peres, so Zeevi
wrote his last essay, for the Arutz Sheva website. It read in part:
“But what is understood in Washington is apparently not understood
here. Prime Minister Sharon, who himself fought for many years against
Arab terrorism, is not strong or consistent enough in this fight during his
tenure as Prime Minister. In order to keep Shimon Peres in the national
unity government, he gives in to Peres’ dictates and allows him to
continue talking with the top brass of the evil Palestinian Authority,
which is a terrorist headquarters in every sense. Peres conducts diplomatic
negotiations, while the Palestinians continue to shoot at our communities
and on Jews—and he is doing all this just in order to revive the Oslo
process, which brought catastrophe upon us and could, in the end, lead to
the collapse of the State of the Jews. Peres is doing this possibly because
he believes in it—or possibly because he wants to save his place and
reputation in history.”
Zeevi went on the warpath against Peres, not a wise strategy.
Others have tried and others have died.
In numerous previous articles, this author has shown the many
connections between Peres and the French connection to the Rabin
murder. The same connections are emerging with the Zeevi murder
and those claiming responsibility for it, the Front for the Liberation
of Palestine (PFLP). Recall that it was French President Mitterand
who had PFLP founder George Habash cared for in France during
his last days.
“THE George Habash affair is closed, or so François Mitterrand decreed
in a pugnacious television interview on February 4th. The presidential
aide and three top civil servants who failed to inform Mr Mitterrand
about the Palestinian leader’s admission into France for supposedly
urgent medical treatment had been ‘sanctioned’, he said, which means
sacked.

167
 “The ministers involved would not resign, the president went on, because
the affair was ‘not serious enough’. It involved an ‘error of judgment’
about a ‘retired terrorist’ grossly overblown by press and television. There
would be no change of prime minister, no government reshuffle, no early
general election and no parliamentary inquiry. The opposition would have
a chance to propose a motion of no confidence in the government at a
special session of parliament on February 7th. That was it.
“Edith Cresson’s government will not fall, not yet anyway. Socialists
(including a former prime minister and likely presidential candidate,
Michel Rocard) who joined the critics asking for ministerial heads must
now toe the line. The Communists, who dread an early general election
almost as much as the Socialists, have announced that their members of
parliament will not vote with the opposition to bring the government
down. As the conservatives have not the votes to do this on their own, a
censure motion is doomed to fail.
“Though contained, the damage has further weakened the government
and added to an impression of muddle or worse at the top.
Mr. Mitterrand claims he was not told about Mr. Habash’s visit until
almost 12 hours after the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation
of Palestine had arrived in Paris on January 29th. That may well be true.
Unfortunately for him, less than half of French voters, according to one
poll, believe it.”
It would have been no trouble for Peres and the French to order
the PFLP to knock off Zeevi. All we have to do is prove it. Given
enough time, that will prove doable. Just look at the emerging
cover-up:
Just like, in the aftermath of the Rabin assassination, Israel’s
Shabak has ordered its own investigation of the Zeevi murder. So
who is sitting on this commission of inquiry? According to Ma’ariv,
there is SH, who was responsible for Peres’ personal security on the
night of the Rabin murder, I believe that would be Yuval Schwartz,
and there is A, who is currently head of the Shabak’s Jewish
Department, the very gang led by Eli Barak, who ran the
provocateur Avishai Raviv previous to Rabin’s murder and had a
central role in the assassination itself.
The Rabin murderers are back, this time covering up Zeevi’s
assassination. And just look how they are doing it.
First, they are spreading the word that Zeevi was responsible for
his own demise by refusing Shabak protection. Unfortunately for
them, a 1997 Supreme Court decision ruled that even if a cabinet
minister rejects Shabak protection, he must get it anyway. But that’s

168
just the beginning because Zeevi was not the only sensitive figure
who stayed on the eighth, VIP, floor of the Hyatt Hotel. Joining
him were Shas MK Yair Peretz, not a likely candidate for
assassination, and Deputy Internal Security Affairs Minister Gideon
Ezra, a former Deputy Head of the Shabak, a very likely candidate
for kidnapping or assassination.
The Shabak can howl all they want that Zeevi’s eighth floor was
unguarded because he wanted it that way, but let them explain away
Ezra’s lack of protection. Good luck to them.
Now the Peres connection. From the Jerusalem Post:
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon promised slain tourism minister Rehavam
Zeevi that he would not permit any future meetings between Foreign
Minister Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat, Zeevi told his faction shortly
before his death. Zeevi showed the seven MKs a handwritten note from
Sharon with the promise...The promise came about after Zeevi wrote to
Sharon, via cabinet secretary Gideon Saar, asking him about reports that
Peres intended to meet with Arafat at a Socialist Party conference in
Greece.

HOW THINGS REALLY WORK ... AGAIN

We had hoped that Shimon Peres’ seemingly irrational
appointment of Carmi Gillon as ambassador to Denmark would
open up his role in the Rabin assassination. So far, that has not
happened, but it will. Instead, and from the most unexpected
source, Gillon’s role in the planning and execution of the Hebron
massacre of February 1994 is being raised. Read what Dr. Linda
Efroni writes in the highly influential but staid Israeli business daily,
Globes:
Besides being head of the Shabak, we must recall that Gillon was a central
figure in the massacre at the Cave of the Patriarchs. It was decided that
the Shabak fell asleep at the wheel in this case but, maybe not. In either
case, the investigating committee headed by then Supreme Court
President, Meir Shamgar, cleaned up Gillon’s responsibility...
Once out of service, Gillon was taken care of with a job as chairman of
the Peres Center for Peace at a salary equal to that of a bank CEO. There
is no more preventing discussion of the dangerous connection between
Peres and the government. As Foreign Minister today, Peres continues to
take care of Gillon. Why did he appoint this klutz with no diplomatic
background and a long history of failure to be the Danish ambassador?
And why does the government back this disastrous appointment, one
which endangers Israel’s reputation in Europe? It is more than obvious
169
 that Gillon has the information to grasp quite a few politicians by their
tender parts.
At last, the mainstream media has raised Gillon’s role in the
Hebron massacre and the likelihood that he is blackmailing Peres
and other politicians over the truth of the slaughter. The Israeli
public was informed that an extremist, Dr. Baruch Goldstein
entered the mosque in Hebron’s Cave of the Patriarchs alone and
massacred 51 Arab worshippers. But that is not the conclusion one
would reach after reading the records of the Shamgar
Commission’s inquiry into the event.
For one thing, no witness, Arab or Jew saw a lone shooter in the
mosque. But that’s just the start. The three soldiers guarding the
entrance to the Cave complex testified that Goldstein entered at
4:45 AM carrying an M-16. Shamgar concluded that Goldstein
arrived at 5:20, carrying a Glilon assault rifle.
Goldstein entered the mosque with two soldiers. They threw
grenades and shot into the crowd, then escaped the mosque,
locking the door behind them, thus trapping Goldstein inside
against the panicked mob. At this point, an Arab on the
commission, Judge Zuabi noted:
“Then there was a conspiracy. Goldstein couldn’t have locked the door
from the outside if he was inside. He would have needed help for that.”
There is much more. Readers are advised to order the full
commission protocols from the Ministry of Justice. The sum total
of eyewitness testimonies prove that Dr. Goldstein was a patsy who
did not murder anyone.
But a patsy for who? Carmi Gillon was head of the Jewish
Department of the Shabak, based in Hebron, at the time yet
somehow was not called on by Shamgar’s commission to testify.
That was easily arranged since Gillon’s brother Ilan was the court
registrar who decided on the witness list.
Thanks to Peres’ insane decision to appoint Gillon the Danish
ambassador, even and finally, Gillon’s suspected role as planner and
executioner of the Hebron massacre is emerging in the mainstream
Israeli press.

170
The Har Shefi Dirty Deal Revealed
We knew that Margalit Har Shefi’s incredibly damaging saga was
based on some kind of filthy agreement. By insisting that she did
not know that Amir would murder Rabin, Har Shefi set the truth
back years and landed herself in prison for a short stay. While
incarcerated, her Knesset member uncle Benny Elon said not a
word about the injustice his niece was suffering. Somehow, Har
Shefi’s supporters missed the significance of his silence.
Har Shefi’s attorney was Elon’s far-left brother Yosef. He
planned the legal strategy that assured Har Shefi’s deceit and
imprisonment. Meanwhile, brother Benny sits on the Committee to
Elect Judges. So guess what? Thanks to the newspaper Hatsofe, we
learned that Benny’s committee has decided to appoint Yosef Elon
a judge. Har Shefi’s role in wrecking the truthful search for Rabin
justice has been rewarded.
However, the search continues despite her attempts to sabotage
it. Recall the previous article from this author. An eyewitness inside
Ichilov Hospital saw Peres’ commanding role in the murder and
small details of his testimony are being confirmed. He claimed Prof.
Gabi Barabash and journalist Eitan Haber arrived at the hospital
together, having been at the same party. The witness was right on
the money. Now, another correspondent has provided the name of
the party’s host:
“Barabash and Haber together is correct (they came from Ido Disenchik’s
home where Rabin was supposed to show up too). Since they arrived
together, it was Barabash who showed the way to Haber inside Ichilov.
Haber’s testimony that ‘he wandered aimlessly’ through the corridors is
Alice in Wonderland.”
Even Har Shefi and her two uncles can’t stop the truth from
marching on.

AVI DICHTER: HEAD OF THE SHABAK

AND PART-TIME CRAP SALESMAN
Thirty days after the murder of Binyamin Kahane and his wife
Talya, the chief of Israel’s General Security Services (Shabak) spent
the Sabbath with the deceased couple’s family. His mission was to
unload an unwanted supply of rotting crap. But before describing

171
his weekend, let us examine some classic cases of successful crap
sales.
On November 1, 1990, Binyamin’s father Rabbi Meir Kahane’s
speech in New Work was interrupted by lethal gunfire. The
shooter, an Arab named Nosair was a trained assassin. He felled the
rabbi from a distance of sixty feet with small arms. He raced
outside where a postman, who just happened to be wearing a
bullet-proof vest, was supposed to kill him as he fled. But Nosair
shot first and saved himself.
Later it was discovered that Nosair somehow arrived in the US
without a passport. And somehow he joined an Islamic cell in New
Jersey run by a blind Egyptian cleric who would later order the
bombing of the World Trade Center.
This cell was infiltrated by an Arab who later moved to Israel for
his own protection. He met with Binyamin Kahane and signed an
affidavit for him declaring that he had reported the upcoming hit
on Rabbi Meir Kahane to his contacts in the FBI and Mossad. They
did nothing to stop the murder. And later, they intervened in the
courts to prevent Nosair from being convicted of Rabbi Kahane’s
murder.
The Israeli and world media reported that Rabbi Kahane was
murdered by a radical Arab. That was crap. Meir Kahane was a
political threat to, more than anyone else, the Likud Party and its
leader, then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. While the Left
despised him for his fiery opposition to their delusions, the Right
feared him for luring away, according to all the polls, at least 20%
of their voters. He was assassinated in a covert intelligence
operation and that is the truth.
In the Spring of 2000, the Israeli Ambassador to France, Eliyahu
Ben Elissar, got wind of the truth behind the Rabin assassination
and the collusion of France in the murder. French intelligence
operatives told him that Shimon Peres cut a deal with the French.
They authorized Rabin’s removal and in return his successor
Shimon Peres signed an agreement for a French-approved peace
deal. The UN would take over security of Jerusalem’s Old City,
they would grant the PLO a capital there and the Vatican would
become sovereign over the holy places within. Ben Elissar was

172
determined to warn his people and that the French authorities
would not allow.
Prime Minister Barak was called to Paris and met with Ben
Elissar and Jacques Chirac. Ben Elissar was warned in the frankest
language not to intervene to save his nation. He did not comply.
Barak returned to Israel knowing what the French would do to his
ambassador and tried his best to save him.
To make Ben Elissar’s recall to Jerusalem more logical, Barak
recalled a total of six Foreign Ministry workers and spread the word
that he was firing appointees of his renegade Foreign Minister
David Levy. Seeing that Ben Elissar was packing his bags, the
French hit team went into action.
They removed Ben Elissar’s Paris police guards and by whatever
means, had his Israeli Shabak bodyguards abandon him as well.
Alone, late Sabbath morning, Ben Elissar went to his embassy’s
small hotel to meet two men. He clearly thought this meeting was
vital enough to interrupt his normally quiet day of rest.
The three of them went to a room. Ben Elissar was overcome,
stripped naked and tied to the bed. A needle with an air bubble was
injected into him and when the empty pocket of blood reached his
heart he suffered a cardiac arrest.
The Israeli media was leaked a lurid tale of Ben Elissar spending
his last morning in the company of two male prostitutes and of
having a heart attack while engaged in a sadomasochistic orgy. And
the media dutifully spread the crap. It never occurred to them that a
man of Ben Elissar’s stature and intelligence would never have
shown up in the embassy’s hotel where everyone knew him, with
two homosexual call boys.
I received a call from America from a gentleman who worked in
the same department as Ben Elissar when he was the ambassador
to Washington. His wife worked with him personally. She was
informed that American intelligence had conclusively proved that
Ben Elissar’s death was a murder. In Israel, the crap story continues
to rule.
One morning in the fall of 2000, Binyamin Kahane, his wife and
three children returned from Jerusalem to their home in Kfar
Tapuah. No doubt his mood was fine because he was having a
resurgence. After his father’s death, he abandoned his political party
173
Kach because it was thoroughly infiltrated by the Shabak and
assembled an alternative movement called Kahane Chai.
The Arab uprising begun three months previously had
convinced tens of thousands of Israelis to openly proclaim that his
father’s philosophy was being proven prophetic. They spread
stickers everywhere reading, “Kahane was Right.”
This, however, wasn’t what really worried the authorities in
Israel. What got their ire were those hundreds of thousands of
Israelis who thought, “Okay, Kahane went too far and he was an
extremist. But, he was right about some things.” To prevent that
bud from blossoming, Israel Police had recently shut down
Binyamin Kahane’s yeshiva. But the stubborn bud threatened to
flower, so it had to be removed from the stalk.
Binyamin Kahane’s killers waited from just 60 meter’s range,
audaciously close. They pumped 62 bullets into his vehicle. Please
find another example of “random terrorism” where the shooters
were so determined to fell their quarry that they pumped 62 bullets
into his car. There aren’t any. This was a hit, and by skilled hit men.
Their bullets only landed in the front seat. Not one bullet even
scratched the children sitting in the rear. They were wounded by
shattered glass and the car accident that followed.
The Israeli media tried selling their usual crap, but this time
people—too many people—decided not to buy it. So the Shabak
sent its chief to unload the refuse in person. Read the following
press release from Kahane’s organization:
update...update...update...exclusive...update...exclusive
GSS ADMITS: “KAHANE MURDERERS STILL FREE”
AND DENIES SHIN BET INVOLVEMENT IN MURDER
GSS head Avi Dichter met with family members of the late Binyamin and
Talya Kahane today, and informed them that the murderers of the
couple—parents of six orphans under the age of 11—have been
apprehended.
Dichter confirmed that the terrorist murderers were members of Yasser
Arafat’s Presidential Guard. The cell, most of whose members are also
part of Arafat’s Force 17, murdered seven Jews over the past three
months:
Sarah Lisha and the soldiers Elad Veinshtein and Amit Zana—all in a
two-pronged attack between Ofrah and Shilo; Ariel Jerafi east of
Tapuach; Eliyahu Cohen on the Modi’in highway, and Binyamin and

174
 Talya Kahane outside Ofrah. This cell is apparently also responsible for
many of the recent shooting attacks in northern Jerusalem.
However, when Dichter and the other GSS heads were confronted by the
Kahane family and asked if indeed those apprehended were the ones who
pulled the trigger in the murder of Binyamin and Talya Kahane, Dichter
conceded that the actual murderers were not yet apprehended.
Dichter then offered the real reason for his visit. The GSS representatives
expressed their concern over the dissemination of conspiracy theories
connected to the murder of Binyamin and Talya Kahane.
Specific reference was made to the conspiracy theories that blamed the
government for former Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination and asked
the Kahane family to accept their denial of any government participation
in the plot to kill Binyamin and Talya Kahane. “We had nothing to do
with their murder”, insisted Dichter.
David HaIvri, the husband of Molly, who is Talya’s sister told the GSS:
“I personally did not suspect a conspiracy, however, many of the Kahane
supporters believe that the Israeli government may have played a role.
After all, you persecuted him and killed him so many times while he was
alive, people see it as more than a coincidence that Kahane was arrested
and his offices closed by the government only weeks before his murder.
Everybody knows how hard you tried to silence and bury him.”
On the day Binyamin and Talya Kahane were murdered, I told
my readers that the hit men were from Arafat’s own force. Look
who got it right. The day before Dichter’s visit, the Israeli media
proudly announced that the murderers of the Kahanes were
captured. This was crap and Dichter was forced to admit it.
So why did Dichter make his journey to the lair of the Kahanes?
Because all the crap is coming out, starting with government
involvement in the Rabin assassination, and the Shabak is
panicking. The vicious attack on the Kahanes was one murder too
far, and this time there will be no nipping the truth in the bud. Too
many people are finally seeing through the crap.

PROTECTING PERES
It was a small incident but a telling one. The Italian journalist
Franco Levi was visiting Israel on a tour this week and was banned
from visiting a Foreign Ministry briefing with the rest of his tour
members. See, Levi has been translating writing coming from Israel,
including this author’s, and has reached the conclusion that Peres
was the mastermind of the Rabin assassination. Someone didn’t

175
want him asking embarrassing questions about the Foreign
Minister.
Levi was furious:
“This is my nation and I have every right to ask whatever I want. The
tour organizer was more interested in protecting Peres than letting us hear
some true information.”
The phenomenon of protecting Peres is now widespread and
constant. In recent days, Peres’ protégé Ophir Pines-Paz sponsored
a Knesset law preventing the Rabin murder patsy Yigal Amir from
being pardoned in the future. Amir’s eighteen year old brother
Sivan was banned from serving in the army. After six years of
searches and daily cleaning, the police raided the Amir home in
Herzlia and, lo and behold, discovered a gun clip they claimed
belonged to Amir’s alleged partner in murder, brother Hagai. All
this to reinforce the prevailing image of the assassination the way
Peres wants it to prevail.
Peres is also recruiting his French handlers in clearing his name.
Uri Savir, Peres’ co-conspirator in the Oslo Accords and Collette
Avital, his mistress, have been inducted into the French Legion of
Honor.
The French connection has even reached Israel. The nation’s
largest circulation newspaper, Yediot Ahronot, published a six page
report in its weekend magazine on the growing number of
distinguished academics investigating the real events surrounding
Rabin’s murder. Israel’s government television station, Channel
One, wasted no time organizing a prime-time program to mock
Yediot’s reporter and the professors and professionals he
interviewed. The chosen debunker was Michael Bar Zohar, an
author who had written a glowing book about Jean Frydman, the
French media tycoon who paid for the security of Rabin’s final rally
and organized it to the last detail with Peres.
It is no secret that Yasser Arafat is blackmailing Peres and not
necessarily over Rabin. There are also the payoffs Peres receives
from the PLO’s phone company and now defunct casino and
untold seamy operations, like the Hebron massacre scam of
February 1994. But Arafat played his cards a bit too confidently
about the murder of the Tourism Minister Rehavam Zeevi, who
was knocked off five days after he gave Prime Minster Sharon an

176
ultimatum: fire Peres or I leave and take two parties with me. The
French-controlled PFLP (Front for the Liberation of Palestine)
were called into action and Zeevi was eliminated six hours before
he quit the government, taking nine dissenting Knesset members
with him. Needless to say, the leaders of the two dissenting parties,
Benny Elon and Yves Lieberman got the message and returned to
the government.
Just before Christmas, Arafat went on Israeli Television and said
the “Palestinians” were not behind the Zeevi murder, the Israelis
were. It did not take long before Israeli shells landed near his office,
followed by tanks to make sure he was trapped there. Even Arafat’s
cynical plea to visit Bethlehem for Christmas didn’t move Sharon
to lift the barriers. And the show goes on; while Sharon demands
that Arafat hand over Zeevi’s murderers, he claims his people
weren’t behind the murder. Arafat misjudged the wrath that follows
such a huge betrayal of Peres.
Another example: The Public Committee to Reinvestigate the
Rabin Assassination held a press conference in Tel Aviv, during
which evidence incriminating Peres was presented. The next day,
Yediot Ahronot editor Eitan Haber wrote a blistering editorial calling
the investigators “nuts. Everything that needs to be discovered has
been released.”
On the night of Rabin’s murder, Peres met Haber at Ichilov
Hospital, and according to one terrified doctor from Raanana,
ordered him to go into the operating theatre, then to Rabin’s office,
“and get rid of all the evidence.”
Peres is just as terrified now because he’s not fooling the Israeli
people. One poll revealed that 60% of Russian Israelis consider
Peres the greatest enemy of Israel, with Arafat trailing behind at
32%. As Amnon Lord noted in a brilliant piece published in Makor
Rishon:
The Israeli people have completely lost faith in Sharon and the kind of
government they are saddled with. The overwhelming majority voted out
the Left in the last elections and are asking why Sharon ignored them and
appointed Peres their Foreign Minister.
In the same article he quoted the economics writer Yaacov
Verker:

177
 Peres is capable of anything. Back in 1977, he approached the Americans
with a plan to get rid of Begin. That’s why Peres’ ally Yigal Yadin decided
to join Begin’s government, to protect him from Peres.
The American writer Dell Griffin, who was deported from his
longtime home in Israel, blamed Peres for the deportation because
he purchased land Peres had promised to the PLO.
The day before, Knesset member Michael Kleiner announced
his intention to submit a request to the parliament to investigate the
source of funding for Peres’ Peace Center, claiming Peres was being
funded by outsiders with an agenda inimical to Israel’s survival.
If the investigation is initiated, Israelis will discover just who is
protecting Peres from his murderous crimes. For those with an
understanding of who the Bilderberg Group and Council on
Foreign Relations consist of, take a look at some of the board
members of the Peres Center for Peace:
• Dr. Ahmad Mango—Advisor to Jordanian Crown
Prince Hassan
• Hani Masri—President of Capital Investment
Management Corporation
• Alex McCalla—Director of Rural Development for the
World Bank
• Aaron Miller—American government Middle East
advisor
• Miguel Moratinos—EU envoy to the Middle East
• Jens Neumann—Volkswagen board member
• Wayne Owens—President of the Middle East Peace
and Economic Corporation and former US Senator
• Dr. Ferdinand Piech—Chairman of the Management
Board of Volkswagen
• Lester Pollak—Managing Director of Lazard Freres
and Co.
• Bruce Rappaport—International crook, as well as
Chairman, Bank of New York
• Terje Roed-Larsen—Norwegian destroyer of Israeli
security and sovereignty
178
 • Dennis Ross—American special envoy to the Middle
East
• Baron Eric de Rothschild—Illuminati leader
• Susana Sam-Vargas—UNESCO Program Specialist
• Chaim Saban—Children’s show producer investigated
for illegal funding of Ehud Barak’s last election
campaign
• Andre Sassoon—Illuminati lawyer
And that’s just from M to S. Peres is being protected from his
hideous crimes by the tyrants of the New World Order. And that’s
why it’s so hard to pin the Rabin murder on him, no matter how
compelling the evidence.

PERES PROTECTION TAKES

A TURN FOR THE WEIRD
Since the very public accusations published in Yediot Ahronot,
that Shimon Peres organized the Rabin assassination and that
Rabin’s bodyguard Yoram Rubin did the shooting, a very
determined campaign has taken place to neutralize the charges. I
documented this campaign in my previous posting called
“Protecting Peres”.
Just three days since that posting, the campaign has turned
desperate and downright bizarre. Look at the article published in
Ma’ariv January 5, 2002:
According to a Book Published by the
Cabinet Minister Eli Yishai’s Brother in Law: Amir Is Not the Murderer
In a book published by Shas Party Chairman Eli Yishai’s brother, Yigal
Amir is portrayed as a patsy. In the book, The Whole Truth, written by
Rabbi Yosef Shashua, a séance is recalled with the late prime minister,
Yitzhak Rabin, during which he identifies his Shabak bodyguard Yoram
Rubin as his murderer. The book was exposed during last night’s Channel
Two Program, ‘Tonight With Gabi Gazit’.
Rabbi Shashua, who is married to Shas Chairman and Interior Minister
Eli Yishai’s sister, receives a monthly government stipend of 3000
shekels. The book’s forward was written by Shas spiritual leader Rabbi
Ovadia Yosef, who notes: “In the name of providing our people with
strength in their hearts, Rabbi Shashua’s book The Whole Truth proves that

179
 we are far from being told the truth and are being led astray from the holy
Torah.”
In one chapter of the book, a séance with Rabin is conducted at the
request of David Ben Gurion’s daughter Geula Ben Eliezer, who received
messages from Ben Gurion’s spirit to conduct it. In the séance Ben
Gurion says, “I prepared Rabin to be a victim...I warned him about the
conniver (Peres)...There’s no Oslo...Rubin murdered Rabin”.
Then Rabin asked the assembled to read his book (Pincas Sherut) Service
Record, because Shimon Peres betrayed him and was a partner in his
murder. During the séance Rabin said, “Rubin shot the bodyguard who
shouted, ‘They’re blanks’. He’s part of the bigger conspiracy. Yigal Amir
was a victim.”
Shas spokesman Yitzhak Sudri explained that, “The Minister is not
responsible for the activities of his family.”
Now what’s going on here? The séance was conducted five years
ago and the book has been out for almost half that time. Why is
this news now?
Here’s how it worked out that way. On Saturday Night, Channel
Two broadcast promos for the Gazit show promising a séance that
would expose Rabin’s bodyguard Yoram Rubin. Israel’s leading
parapsychologist Hanan Avraham was scheduled to conduct the
séance, but he was cancelled at the last moment. Instead, Gazit just
talked about the Shashua book.
Instant scandal. The next day the radio talk shows were abuzz
with callers reacting to the show. One caller on Radio Two
summed up the overall attitude: “The book’s author is an idiot and
if Peres doesn’t sue him, he’s a bigger idiot.” Then came Ma’ariv’s
report with the screaming headline that Amir isn’t the murderer.
I reported this séance in 1997, and I was the only one to so
bother. I add, I caught living heck from a lot of readers who
thought I was cheapening my both-feet-on-the-ground research by
reporting nonsense. I replied that I felt there was a legitimate
sociological angle to the event. Here’s what I reported:
“I was faxed this confirmation from the magazine Tzahov, popular in the
New Age crowd. Now admittedly, their research is hardly conclusive, but
Tzahov reports that Rabin was killed by his bodyguard Yoram Rubin. How
did they reach this left wing extremist conclusion? In typical New Age
fashion; their reporters attended a séance conducted by the country’s
leading parapsychologist, Hanan Avraham, in which Rabin was called
back from the land of the dead to attend. Tzahov’s editor Shimon Ashor
admits that he was one of those who ‘threw away his kippa after the

180
murder believing that the stupidity and racism of the religious caused
Rabin’s death.’ Thus he was ‘flabbergasted’ by Rabin’s comments from
the world beyond. Hanan Avraham’s method is to place a cup in the
middle of a board surrounded by Hebrew letters. When Rabin answered,
the cup moved from letter to letter. The reporters saw no physical means
for moving the cup and Ashor admits that ‘most thought the cup was
moved by the spiritual power of Hanan Avraham.’ Now that the validity
of the method was established in New Age terms, the séance was
recorded:
Rabin: Yitzhak here.
Hanan: Excuse us, we are all very excited to hear from you. Are you the
departed Prime Minister?
Rabin: No need to apologize. Yes, I am.
Hanan: Do you have a message for the people?
Rabin: I tried my best to slow things down and was made to pay for it.
My service was terminated. Remember what I said at Givat
Hatakhmoshet in ‘94? There is no abandoning Jerusalem.
Hanan: What do you mean by ‘my service was terminated’?
Rabin: Peres.
Hanan: What about him?
Rabin: He betrayed me...
(Hanan tries to get Rabin to elaborate but his message is confused. So he
tries a new conversation opener.)
Hanan: Does your friend Ben Gurion have a message for us?
Rabin: Yes.
Hanan: Did you give the warning at Givat Hatakhmoshet that it is
forbidden to abandon Jerusalem?
Rabin: Yes.
Hanan: Is Ben Gurion beside you?
Rabin: Yes.
Hanan: Please, our intentions are good.
Ben Gurion: I prepared Yitzhak for sacrifice. I warned him about
intrigue. There is no Oslo. Rubin shot Yitzhak.
Rabin: Dado (the scapegoat for the Yom Kippur War who died most
suspiciously) warned me and so did Skolnik. Both were betrayed also. I
miss my grandson Michael.
Hanan: How did you prepare Yitzhak?
Ben Gurion: We knew about the conspiracy. We tried to warn him to
prevent a crisis. There is no Oslo. It is a mistaken Holocaust process.
Rabin: Leah is suffering. She cries for shelter. She too is in a trap from the
highest echelons of the Shabak.

181
 Hanan: Who is Skolnick?
Skolnick: I am Skolnick. I am Levi Eshkol (former Prime Minister). I tried
to warn him about the shigitz (Yiddish for “a Gentile”).
Hanan: Mr. Rabin, do you have a message for your granddaughter Noa?
Rabin: Yes. She is frightened and confused. Rubin shot the bodyguard
who shouted, ‘They’re blanks’, (Yoav Kuriel perhaps). Persky (Peres’
original name) conspires with Satan. He’ll do anything to be prime
minister.
Hanan: What is your opinion of Yigal Amir (his alleged murderer)?
Rabin: A victim.
Hanan: Of whom?
Rabin: Of the Shabak and Avishai. (Avishai Raviv, the Shabak agent
provocateur).
Hanan: Your friend Ben Gurion said to stop the peace process. What is
the alternative?
Rabin: The peace process is a delusion, the Old Man (Ben Gurion)
reckons.
Hanan: Was Yigal Amir the one who shot you?
Rabin: No.
Hanan: Does Amir know?
Rabin: Yes.
Hanan: Who shot you, then?
Rabin: The bodyguard.
Hanan: Who gave him the order?
Rabin: D.
Hanan: Who told you?
Rabin. Dado.
Hanan: Did you know the scenario ahead of time?
Rabin. Yes.
Hanan: So why didn’t you prevent it?
Rabin: Because if I did there would be two choices: military trials and
suicides or a dictatorship followed by a civil war over peace. Tell
everyone. Goodbye.”
At this point the stunned gathering breaks into tears, all their
illusions shattered. Allow me to say that I am not an advocate of
this kind of research. However, tens of thousands of Israeli New
Agers are and the minutes of this séance are very real to them. They
are also citizens of Israel who now believe that Rabin was murdered
in much the same terms that my worldly research suggests, if not

182
proves. The authenticity of this feeling is confirmed by Ashor, who
writes that despite the charges leveled by Rabin from the other side,
“I am in favor of Peres continuing the peace process.”
This séance was conducted in 1996, barely a year after the
assassination. So here is what spooks me. The details are right. It
took me four years to discover that Rabin was murdered after he
told his foreign bosses that he wouldn’t carry on with ‘peace’
process as it was being conducted. It took me five years to get the
goods on Rubin and Peres. This séance beat us all to the truth by at
least three years.
Nonetheless, I decided to never, ever, ever discuss the séance
ever, ever, ever again. And that meant sloughing hundreds of
inquiries about it at lectures and over the computer. That’s just
what I need, to be associated with ouija boards and the occult, a
surefire recipe for destroying the credibility of my research.
And that’s why this story is now going public. Peres’ protectors
have found a formula for diminishing the credibility of the Rabin
researchers, and members of the Public Committee for the
Reinvestigation of the Rabin Assassination who have been most
publicly implicating Peres and Rubin in Rabin’s murder. Committee
chairman Yaacov Verker was overjoyed by the Gazit show and the
Ma’ariv article.
“Look at the crazy twists the story is taking now. They think they are
squelching the talk about Peres and Rubin but they’re actually spreading
it.”
“No,” I answered, “They’re ridiculing it.”
“Then why was Hanan Avraham pulled off the Gazit show? Someone
was worried about what he’d say about Rabin. I know Hanan, he’s very
serious. I’m going to follow this up.”
“Don’t do it. You’re falling into the trap.”
Needless to say, the determined Yaacov immediately had a long
conversation with Hanan Avraham. Here’s what he was going to
explain on the Gazit show:
“Two days before the Rabin assassination, Geula Ben Eliezer contacted
me. Her father David Ben Gurion had spoken to her in dreams for the
past few nights. He wanted an urgent meeting. I complied and Ben
Gurion warned her that Peres was plotting against Rabin and his life was
in danger. After the session, she quickly called Rabin and told him what
her father said. He shrugged her off and answered, ‘So, I’ll be the
victim.’”
183
 And that was just the prologue before he was to speak about the
post-assassination session.
Now you see why I want nothing to do with this latest twist in
the protection of Peres? This is a highly sophisticated psychological
operation to get Peres off the hook. Who is going to believe any of
this?
Peres is desperate and desperate times call for desperate
measures. Not only is Peres under attack from the Committee’s
campaign, but at least two of the actors in the Rabin murder drama
are close to spilling the beans. The doctor who forged Rabin’s
autopsy report, Yehuda Hiss is about to be prosecuted for stealing
body parts during his autopsies and he needs to buy safety, and
Rabin’s last driver, Menachem Damti, is going stark raving mad.
I certainly believe the séances took place. Early Labor Zionist
leaders were involved in all kinds of cultic adventures. Rabin was a
32nd degree Mason and Ben Gurion delved deeply into Buddhism.
That Ben Gurion’s daughter communicated to him through
dubious spiritual exercises is no real surprise.
But I’m staying away from the ambush and sticking to this-
worldly evidence.

184
 CHAPTER SIX
TRIPS BEFORE AND AFTER
SEPTEMBER 11

LAST THOUGHTS BEFORE I TRAVEL

• Har Shefi—The Rabin murder is enjoying a revival
thanks to Margalit Har Shefi’s impending incarceration
and the postponement of Avishai Raviv’s trial until
June 2, when it will be postponed again. A campaign
has been organized to pressure President Katzav into
pardoning her. A word of advice: If the organizers
insist on arguing that Har Shefi couldn’t read Amir’s
mind and thus didn’t take his threats against Rabin
seriously, their campaign is doomed. Har Shefi is
innocent because Amir didn’t murder Rabin... period.
Will the campaign organizers find the courage or will to
base Har Shefi’s freedom on the truth, for a big
change?
• Colin Powell—Here it comes. People are confused and
surprised by the supposedly sympathetic new Secretary-
of-State Colin Powell’s call for even-handedness in the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Same old policy, press
Israel into retreat. Now how many times must I repeat
the same message? Powell is a member of the Council
on Foreign Relations. He owes his power to them and
he takes his orders from them. There is no
individualistic Secretary-of-State, there is only the CFR.
Powell, like all his predecessors at the post, are front
men and nothing more.
• Eitan Haber—Remember him? He is the journalist
cum Rabin’s office manager who, on the assassination
night, absconded with Rabin’s belongings at the
hospital and then emptied Rabin’s file cabinets of their

185
 incriminating contents. Remember Ehud Barak? Before
he left his Interior Ministry office after the 1996
Netanyahu victory, he gutted the file cabinets of all
“sensitive” records. Well, as a final gesture to Haber,
Barak opened the government’s “sensitive” Rabin files
to Haber exclusively because he is writing a book about
the murder. He will, of course, write himself out of the
plot.
• The Villain—If anyone wonders how I acquire high-
level intelligence, look at the following letter from a
long-loyal correspondent, as a fine example of how you
help get the truth out:
Listen to this, I met Jack Kemp last week. I was at this function and he
was there. I spoke to him for 5 minutes. He’s a good supporter of Israel.
So listen to what he told me. The person who was most anti-Israel and
works for the Council on Foreign Relations is Richard N. Haass. This
idiot is a self-hating Jew. Do you know anything about Richard N. Haass.
He told me, he was the person directing US Policy in the Middle East
even today. He also told me, when he was in the Bush Administration, 89
to 93, this guy Richard Haass was the Anti-Israel guy and was directing
the policy.
Jack Kemp is a high level source. He has identified Israel’s top
enemy in the CFR.
• Another Villain—Now look at the following new item:
New York Times News Service
February 22, 2001
ROME -- Pope John Paul II on Wednesday installed 44 new cardinals in
a ceremony combining pageantry with the purpose of molding the
institution that will someday pick his successor. It was the largest single
investiture of cardinals.
After the cardinals recited an oath of fidelity to the pope and his
successors, the pontiff received them one by one at his golden throne,
handing them as they knelt before him the red biretta, a silken, square-
ridged hat that symbolizes their rank as princes of the church.
Pope John Paul has appointed 166 cardinals, more than any other pope.
Only 10 of the 135 cardinals who are eligible to vote for the next pope
were not appointed by him.
Among the new elite were three American prelates: Cardinal Edward
Egan, 68, of New York; Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, 70, of
Washington; and Cardinal Avery Dulles, 82, a Jesuit theologian at
Fordham University and son of U.S. statesman John Foster Dulles.
186
 Why should this be of interest to anyone interested in Israel’s
salvation? For those who read about the Dulles’ plots against Israel
in the Loftus/Arons book, The Secret War Against the Jews, the
answer is clear. For those who haven’t, permit me to quote from
Christopher Simpson’s book, The Splendid Blond Beast:
Allen Dulles exploited his post in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
to quash war crimes prosecutions of senior Nazi officials and German
business leaders who cooperated with him in a series of clandestine
schemes to secure US advantage in Central Europe...Meanwhile, John
Foster Dulles helped forge consensus on Wall Street and in the
Republican Party in favor of an ‘internationalist’ US foreign policy based
on rebuilding the German economic elite into a renewed bulwark against
revolution in Europe.
Based on my reading of Phelps’ Vatican Assassins and Saussy’s
Rulers of Evil, I have accepted that it has been the Jesuit’s ‘Black
Pope,’ the real ruler of the Vatican, who is behind the Secret War
Against the Jews. Unknown to most Jews, the papal appointment of
the Jesuit Avery Dulles to American Cardinal is a poignant lesson in
modern Jewish history.
• Shimon Peres—Peres fought like a cornered rat to drag
his party into Sharon’s government. He is well aware if
he is out of power for even a day, he will not be able to
control the Rabin murder truth from remaining
concealed, nor his central role in the assassination. He
knows it and Sharon knows it. What a thing to return
to.

WHO CREATED ISLAMIC EXTREMISM?

Well they did it again. For the third time is less than a century,
the Illuminati manipulated a world war. They succeeded in creating
an issue of good and evil that cannot be ignored. Yes, the Muslim
extremists present a danger to the planet and have to be
extinguished, just like the Nazis. So who created the Nazis and who
created Islamic extremism?
For hundreds of years the Arabs were quiescent and obedient
servants of the Ottoman Empire. Then in 1917, the British expelled
the Ottomans and took over Palestine. They and their secretive
Round Table approved a declaration permitting Jews to re-establish
Israel, thus offering them a shelter from Europe’s pogroms, which
187
were fueled by the Illuminati for just this purpose. Then they set
Arab on Jew, creating such animosity that Islam gleefully allied
itself with Nazism.
After that, the Illuminati ignited the Holocaust and when it was
ended, the Vatican’s Jesuit rulers, with Allied approval, shipped the
worst of the genocidal criminals worldwide through its
appropriately named “ratline.” Europe’s Jews were then shipped to
Israel and a war was ignited which the Jews were supposed to lose,
thus completing stage two of the Holocaust. But Israel overcame
the odds and survived. Since then, the planet’s hidden rulers have
done their utmost to turn Islam into an improved version of
Nazism, starting with the creation of an artificial, terrorism-based
“Palestinian” nationhood. It took barely a generation after to create
Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban out of the same mold.
So who created the Taliban? President Jimmy Carter of the
Council on Foreign Relations took the first step by ordering a
covert war against Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Who originally
funded the Taliban? CIA chief George Bush of the CFR affiliate,
Skull and Bones Society. Who supplied the Taliban with all the
sophisticated encrypted telecommunications equipment, which
made its attacks on the twin towers and Pentagon possible?
President Clinton of the CFR, who approved sales of the high-tech
wonders to Syria, where it was inevitable that radical Islam would
inherit it. Who handed the Taliban $48 million, to eradicate
poppies, knowing full well it wouldn’t be used for that purpose?
Why our current American President, like his father, a Skull and
Bones graduate. Who is Bin Laden’s brother’s business partner?
Why Percy Rockefeller of the CFR-founding Rockefeller family.
Who owned the land the World Trade Centers stood on? Why
those pesky Rockefellers again. They even wanted to call them the
Rockefeller Towers.
And who created Islam in America? The same gang who
imported Islam to Europe. No American black should identify with
Islam. This religion captured territory in Africa in medieval times
and looted its conquests for slaves. Without Arab slave traders, it is
unlikely the European industry would have taken hold. Even today,
Muslims enslave huge numbers of Christian blacks in the Sudan
and Mauritania.

188
 American blacks picked up this religion in the late 1950s and it
was spread in the prison system. Who is enforcing those laws,
especially the drug laws, which assure millions of blacks of some
prison time where many will have to adopt Islam or face the
consequences?
The hidden rulers have created an angry community of Moslems
in America and if they object too vigorously to this new war, there
will be a race war in America. The same goes for the Moslems of
Europe, imported by the millions for just this moment in history.
We’ve all been set up for a period of bloody, murderous chaos.
Then lucky us, we get a new planetary order with guess who in
charge? And if enough people choose not to investigate how this
war was really started and who was behind it, we’ll all deserve this
new world order as a punishment for human stupidity.

PRACTICING FOR THE

WTC/PENTAGON BLASTS IN ISRAEL
Operations as complicated and risky as the WTC/Pentagon
attacks could not possibly have gone ahead without practice
exercises. There are good reasons to suspect that Israel was chosen
as the venue for at least two dry runs and that its government,
under pressure, covered up both incidents. Consider two such
exercises that preceded the Israeli events:
A couple of years ago, an Egypt Air flight from New York
crashed into the Atlantic when the co-pilot decided to commit
suicide and take all passengers and crew down with him. Though
the Egyptian government denied that any Muslim would ever
commit suicide in this or any other fashion, the FAA insisted the
black box recording proved that this was the case.
The WTC/Pentagon bombers’ Egyptian connection has been
established. How the co-pilot was inducted into the terror syndicate
and brainwashed to die in a plane crash on command has yet to be
discovered. Whatever the mind control techniques that were used
on him, they were the products of Western technology.
After the Egypt Air crash, the plotters knew that pilots could be
brainwashed into turning their planes into potent bombs. But could
the crew be overcome with just small knives?

189
 That was tested when a Russian passenger plane was hijacked to
India. The hijackers were Chechnyan nationalists who overcame
three stewardesses and stunned the passengers into inaction with
the same type of knives used to the same effect in America. Lest
there be any doubt that this was also a dry run, see who agrees that
Chechnya was a training ground for the suspected terrorists of the
WTC/Pentagon:
MOSCOW (AP) A senior aide to President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday
that some of the perpetrators of terror attacks on the United States had
trained in the breakaway republic of Chechnya.
‘‘At least four of the suicide perpetrators of the terror attacks on the
United States passed through Chechnya,’’ said Sergei Yastrzhembsky, an
aide to Putin and Russia’s chief spokesman on Chechnya.
‘‘The people who sent suicide attackers against New York and
Washington conducted dress rehearsals for terror attacks in Chechnya,’’
Yastrzhembsky told a news conference, according to the Interfax news
agency.
A few months later, it was Israel’s turn. A Jerusalem wedding
hall, the Versailles, collapsed vertically killing 26 and wounding over
300. The venue had been under repair at the time and most of the
workers at the site were Arab. One such laborer was interviewed by
Israel television on the night of the disaster and blatantly lied about
the type of work that was taking place in the building.
One could easily dismiss the possibility that the Versailles was
victimized by terror except for one fact: after examining the ruins
for just a few days, the government refused to investigate any
further. Despite the fact that this was Israel’s worst building
disaster ever and despite the pleas of the survivors and the families
of the dead, the government could not be moved. Instead, it
opened a general commission of inquiry into national building
codes and practices. Within days of the building’s collapse, the
remains of the Versailles were hauled away in a blatant act of
evidence destruction.
Simply put, why wouldn’t the government investigate the
tragedy? Why was the blame put on a flooring system that never
collapsed before? Why have no indictments come down since the
atrocity? What is the government hiding and who ordered the
cover-up?

190
 The Versailles could have taught many lessons: how to drop a
building straight down, how many casualties could be expected in
such an operation, how to increase the percentage of dead, how
quickly people could be evacuated, and how rescue teams would
react. The Israeli government’s refusal to investigate the incident
only fuels such, for now, speculation. However, if I were an
American, I would be even more fearful of the significance of the
next act of infamy.
Just as Israelis were recovering from the shock of the Versailles,
a third of their drinking water was poisoned. Over two million
people in the Tel Aviv and central region of the country had water
running through their pipes, heavily tainted with, they were told,
ammonia. It took 150 million cubic meters of water, or three times
the amount Israel supplies annually to Jordan, to flush out the
poison.
The public was told that agricultural waste seeped into a valve at
a pumping station in the Jezreel Valley, and then flowed 80 km.
undetected. As absurd as the explanation was, no one bothered to
explain a far more frightening event.
On the day the poisoned water entered the system, a security
guard at a Water Authority station near Lod was murdered. The
murder was written off as just another terrorism incident. Now why
would terrorists climb over a chain link fence, risk barbed wire and
entrapment in the middle of the country far from the safety of the
Palestinian Authority, to murder an armed guard? Maybe they were
thieves, risking life and limb to steal some water? Or maybe we
should ask what the guard saw or what he stumbled into.
This dry run was a valuable lesson. The perpetrators learned
how to poison the most people possible, how many of them would
be affected, how quickly the water authorities would detect the
poison, how the public would be informed and how fast the system
could be flushed clean.
It might be a good idea for Americans to stock up on clean
water.

191
 PEOPLE ARE GETTING SMARTER
After eight lectures in New York, New Jersey and Toronto, I
conclude that people are getting smarter. They demanded to know
less about Rabin and more about New World Order this tour
around.
Toronto comments:
* “Israeli biological and nuclear scientists are being knocked off one by
one and this covert war is going unnoticed. A plane carrying scientists to
Russia’s biological warfare center at Novosibirsk was blown up over the
Black Sea and no one questions that the Ukrainian missile that supposedly
did the job was a hundred miles out of range. Then a Swissair Corsair
crashes killing the head of Ichilov Hospital’s Hematology department, as
well as directors of the Hebrew University School of Medicine and the
Tel Aviv Public Health Department and not a word of suspicion is raised.
After that, one of the country’s most prominent nuclear scientists, Baruch
Zinger is assassinated and still, no one is putting the pieces together. Your
front line against nuclear and biological attacks is being picked off in a
covert murder campaign and your government is taking no security
precautions to stop the intellectual slaughter. Or if it is, your public is
totally unaware of the daily danger to its most educated citizens.”
* “Three suicide and car bombers make it to downtown Jerusalem and
your media isn’t questioning the security establishment? Think about this
‘breakdown’. Each bombing requires about thirty people for surveillance,
engineering, hideouts and more. Over a hundred backup people were
required to make the operation work and the GSS (Shabak) had no
intelligence beforehand? I don’t buy it. It’s a fair bet that you have traitors
in the GSS withholding information from the army. You can count on the
fact that there are Israeli plants who believe in this New World Order and
are abetting the bloodshed.”
* “I’ve done a little research into Shimon Peres’ childhood and there’s
one item which has been overlooked that may explain everything. It turns
out his father went to Palestine and left his wife back in Poland. He
reportedly shacked up with an Arab woman and fathered children with
her. That may not be the first time he had children with a gentile woman.
In Poland during the 20s, Jewish children were sent to their own schools.
Peres received his elementary school education at a Jesuit school.”
* (From the same source. He phones Israel and is faxed an article from
Ma’ariv about the ownership of the PLO’s public phone company Paltel.
It is 40% owned by the Bin Laden family of Saudi Arabia and 40% by
Arafat himself. BUT 2.46% of shares are owned by Shimon Peres). “Have
a look at this Peres/Bin Laden business connection,” he says.
New York:

192
I make a pilgrimage to Ground Zero. I’ve seen pictures of wartime Berlin
and Hiroshima, but the devastation is more complete here. I view the
wreckage from the fifth floor office of an acquaintance’s office, then stare
transfixed at the destruction of the remaining evidence from street level
for an hour. When I return to my hotel, my face is beet red and blistered.
There was something highly caustic, perhaps toxic, in the air.
* “They’re hiding the real death figures. They’ve got it down to only 3200
now. Now I’ll tell you why that can’t be. Only one company released its
fatality figures, Cantor Fitzgerald. They lost 700 employees working on
four floors. Even accounting for their being on top floors, you take 220
stories and do the math, you get a figure of 42,000. And that’s just
employees, not visitors.”
* “I knew the story of the plane hijackings was baloney when the Times
published the, supposedly, only black box transcripts which survived.
Four planes, and only one black box survived. Did you read the cockpit
recording? It was straight out of Dragnet; ‘Don’t do anything stupid,’ says
the terrorist.
“But if you think that was contrived, look at the stupid story they told us
about Flight 93. This was the plan that went wrong. To get the other
three planes to crash into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, you had
to override their autopilots. They were set from Logan and Newark to
Los Angeles, and had to be switched off and the plane flown manually, or
reset to the coordinates of their targets. And all the while this was
happening, not one pilot activated the Mayday signal.
“However, something went wrong with Flight 93, and the plane kept
flying west. There was a snafu and the autopilot wasn’t overridden. So it
was shot down 80 miles from Pittsburgh. It absolutely had to have been
because parts of the tail were found eight miles from the nose. A plane
can’t crash land and thrust its tail eight miles backwards. Only a midair
explosion can do that.
“So look at the scenario of heroism they paint to cover up the missile
attack on the plane. They’ve got three terrorists with little box cutters
gathering together a half dozen of the toughest passengers. One is a
wrestler, the other a rugby player, the rest six feet tall and 190 pounds
minimum. You’ve got the front line of the Green Bay Packers all together
and no one rushes the little terrorists with their pint sized blades.
“Next, the terrorists decide to let the passengers call home on their cell
phones. Sure, that makes sense. You’re supposedly on the way to
Washington, ninety minutes flying time away, to bomb the Capitol
building, and you alert the entire defense establishment that you’re
coming. That’s the way to make your mission a success alright.
“And in the final act of the drama, Rambo is heard on one phone telling
the troops, ‘Let’s roll, boys.’ And to make sure the public buys this
ridiculous story, they roll out the pregnant wife and stick her on the same
flight a few days later.

193
 “Nothing about the scenario rings true because it didn’t happen. If you
want to get to the truth about what happened on the three planes which
did hit their targets, start examining the one that missed.”
Good advice from one of the many people who have wised up,
we hope, in time.

FORTY DAYS AT SEA

I left on March 2, returned, April 11; forty days of lecturing in
America. I finally met the loyal legions who created this peculiar
career of mine and discovered they have almost nothing in
common. In New York, my sponsors were religious Jews, including
one memorable evening at the Lubatvitch world headquarters in
Brooklyn. In Springfield, Missouri, the prophetic David Lewis
Ministries were my hosts, while in Denver, the American Freedom
Network organized a memorable evening. There, I was told, they
take a historical view of Jesus, regarding him as a divine freedom
fighter against the New World Order of the times, the Romans. My
plane landed in Salt Lake City at 7:50 and Joel Skousen rushed me
to a nearby university campus for an 8:00 PM lecture. The lecture
hall was packed with Mormons who knew more about my work
than any audience yet. In Dallas, the maverick archaeologist Vendyl
Jones presented me to his convention of Bnei Noah, gentiles who
accept the Old Testament but reject the New. In El Paso, my
presenter was Eliezer Ben Yosef, a Reform Jew with a Saturday
morning radio show. And my last stop in Hawaii was organized by
Peter Goodgame, unaffiliated with any movement.
If there is a thread of commonality amongst my sponsors and
audiences, I couldn’t find it. Put them all in a room and the party
would break up early. This diversity was a kind of revelation. Those
people who find in my work the best explanation for what is
happening to Israel today are united only in their love of the Jewish
people, their battle against the New World Order and their
profound hospitality towards a speaker who came a long way to
meet them.
Before I left, I vowed not to keep up with news from Israel
unless it was too disturbing to ignore. My idea was to both take a
vacation from the hothouse and return with a refreshed viewpoint.
The strategy mostly worked and I have nothing to add to anyone’s

194
knowledge of the Middle East. In fact, my most striking memory
has nothing to do with politics of any kind and shortly I’d like to
take the liberty of expanding on new information I was given on a
very different subject for me, seasickness.
However, religion and politics did rear their heads on the trip
and I suppose it would be in best character to point to a few
highlights:
• I arrived in New York to awful news. The worst
snowstorm in fifty years was set to hit the city on the
night of my first lecture and bury the landscape in two
feet of snow on the evenings of the next two. My New
York tour was to be wiped out, including a Television
interview I had been looking forward to; The Americans
for a Safe Israel program on Manhattan Cable TV.
But then Ray Antoky and G-d decided to help me out.
Ray provided my accommodations on condition that I
wear tefillin on my trip. For those unacquainted with
this tradition, tefillin are hand-written quotations from
the Hebrew Bible placed in small leather boxes
attached to the head and arm by thin leather straps. He
and a dozen buddies chipped in $350 to purchase a
handcrafted set of tefillin and just hours before the
blizzard was set to hit, I put them on. I hadn’t worn
tefillin since my bar mitzvah, but they felt comfortable.
I recited the prayer for wearing the tefillin with the
rabbi who made them but added one phrase: “And
please stop the storm.”
The storm missed New York City by ten miles. I
managed to get to Manhattan for the TV interview.
None of the lectures was cancelled, in fact hundreds
arrived at the Lubavitch world headquarters for the
speech.
Do I think it was because of the tefillin? Yes.
• I was privileged to have been interviewed on numerous
radio shows in the past forty days including five hours
on the legendary Alex Jones program and an hour on
Hawaii’s most popular morning show, hosted by Rick
Hamada.
195
 But the most troublesome program came out of Omaha. The
host, Marty, told me that he would like to support Israel
wholeheartedly but its laws against evangelizing prevented it. I
replied:
“How would you like it if a bunch of Jews came into your neighborhood
trying to change the faith of your children. Or how would you like it if
Scientologists handed out pamphlets in your church?”
He admitted he would not like it at all.
“Well, we Jews don’t proselytize your young people because we respect
your faith too much for that. Naturally we expect the same respect shown
to us.”
He said he had never considered that side of the issue but it
made sense. Then he opened the phone lines to callers. One of the
first brought up the silly matter of the Khazarians. A few decades
back Arthur Koestler wrote a book about the Khazar empire whose
leadership, late in the Middle Ages, did covert to Judaism. Then he
took the crazy leap of hypothesizing that all Ashkenazi Jews are
descendants of Khazars who migrated to Eastern Europe at the fall
of their empire. This caller insisted that 95% of Jews are actually
not descended from Abraham but rather of a medieval Turkish
tribe called the Khazars.
“Do you think,” I asked, “that if 95% of Jews were from Khazaria we
would have forgotten that? Jews have long, exact memories and we know
where we were. If it was in Khazaria we wouldn’t have forgotten it. And
if we were Khazars, Yiddish would be a Turkish-based language, which it
is not. I don’t think there are any Khazarian words in Yiddish. The
Khazarian royal court did covert to Judaism, mostly for political reasons,
but the Khazar people didn’t or we would have remembered it.”
Marty stated that my reasoning had to be right and invited me
back on his show two weeks later. If I ever earn some sort of
legacy, it might have something to do with having straightened out
a few anti-Semitic notions held by people who have no reason to
dislike Jews if they thought about a few things a bit differently.
• The Texas leg of my tour was the longest and most
confusing. While some crowds were ample, over 150 in
both Dallas and San Antonio, others were the smallest
by far of the tour. And the smallest of the smallest was
to a group of 15 Israelis in the Dallas home of Rabbi
Moyal. Despite the paucity of people, I gave my best as
always but wondered why I flew 8000 miles to address
196
 an audience of two dozen souls. The answer came a
few days later when Wayne Linksman accompanied me
to a gala Dallas Jewish social event, the Kosher Chili
Cook-off. One person after another told me they heard
I gave a very controversial but thought-provoking
lecture at Rabbi Moyal’s home. A couple of Israelis
gave me the cold shoulder at first but within an hour
came back to ask if what I was doing really was healthy
for Israel. I told them that it was beyond healthy, it was
vital to the nation’s survival.
“Both of you know how corrupt our government is.” I noted. “How long
do you think we can survive this level of corruption? The very people
who murdered Rabin are still ruling us, so when do you start saying this
has gone too far?”
One Israeli, Iranian-born asked, “Why are you stirring things up and why
should we talk when no one of influence is willing to say anything?”
Rabbi Malka provided the answer. He had attended my
lecture and had been deeply affected. He came up to
me and said, “I brought something for you. It’s from
Friday’s Yediot Ahronot. I have a subscription.”
He flipped through the weekend magazine section until
he found an interview with the leading spokeswoman
of Israeli Russians, Ida Nudel. The headline read: “Ida
Nudel Believes Rabin Was Murdered in a Conspiracy:
That Amir Was Just the Patsy”.
I showed it to the two Israelis. The Persian smiled.
“See,” I said, “I’m not alone. Now it’s your turn.”
There were only 15 people at Rabbi Moyal’s home to hear my
lecture, but now I knew that was more than enough.

The Secrets of Seasickness

Yitzhak Rabin made a dream come true. He provided me with
an expense-paid working holiday to Hawaii. My host Peter
Goodgame covered the costs for no other reason than to get the
truth of Rabin’s murder to the Hawaiian people. Unlike my
previous sponsors, Peter had no church, synagogue or political
organization behind him. He’s a working man saving for a home
for his handsome family, but he set back his plans because he
believed in me. I was humbled.
197
 And for a first-timer he did just fine. He got me a spot on
Honolulu’s most popular morning talk show. The host Rick
Hamada conducted a superb interview and a fine crowd arrived for
my lecture later that evening. Once over, I was free to pursue a
dream, to catch a marlin off Hawaii.
Accompanying me was Ron, a longtime American soldier. And
lest you believe there are no black helicopters harassing American
citizens, Ron flew his share of missions on these choppers, until his
Christian conscience opened up. “The goal of the black helicopters
is urban warfare.”
He told me. “I was in a special ops unit which trained with
foreign troops and I can tell you that armies are being used today to
control or eliminate troublesome individuals and groups.”
On this tour, I had about ten other former military men with not
dissimilar stories. I guess my work is of great interest to former
soldiers. Ron reserved two seats on a six seat party boat and it was
just a matter of time before he would be clicking shots of me
beside my lifetime dream marlin.
I had never been in a squall on a small boat. I had never spent
eight hours in nine foot swells, going up and down, side to side, up
and down until I became sick. Not just sick, I’ve been sick before. I
was so sick that when a fish, after seven fruitless hours, finally took
my lure briefly, I prepared myself to let Ron reel it in. The dead and
dying do not reel.
After disgusting myself and all aboard, the nightmare was over.
Only one of us caught anything, two had come down with serious
seasickness, while another spent the day lying in the cabin to
prevent his from worsening. I had paid $150 to spend the day on a
never-ending roller coaster. Once on land I recovered my health,
but I was humiliated by the whole experience.
But Peter came to my rescue. “You have nothing to be ashamed
of,” he said. “I want to introduce you to my neighbor Gordie. He
knows all about what happened to you.”
Gordie’s home is decorated in blown glass fishing floats. These
are thick green glass balls up to two feet in diameter used to float
huge fishing nets. He picked them up floating free during his many
voyages.

198
 “Feel the smoothness of the glass, “ he said. “This is the best glasswork
made in the world today. They are perfectly designed not to shatter at sea.
Now look here, the blower left his signature in the glass. When I started
collecting them, it was for their beauty. Now there are collectors
everywhere and I hear they’re sold in galleries in Paris.”
Gordie is a middle-aged, tanned sea salt. He skippers fishing
boats in major tournaments and has worked from Washington
State, to Alaska to Hawaii. I told him about my day.
“So you had a bad day? You didn’t feel anything! I once had it for 30 days
straight with nowhere to go. I knew what death was, you didn’t even get a
hint of it.”
I disagreed because what I felt was as close to death as could be,
but he was right about the duration of Hell. An Israeli lady named
Naveh, living in Hawaii, later told me about her nine day bout on a
trip to Palmyra, an island a thousand miles to the south. As bad as I
had it, it gets worse over time.
“There is no sickness known to mankind as powerful as seasickness,”
added Gordie. “I’m told the last stages of AIDS is as close as it gets. It
makes men crazy. I took a guy out, real tough, loved his guns. Just a few
hours after it hit him he said to me, ‘Gordie, I’ve got a Beretta in my
jacket. There are two shots in the clip. You have to get it and finish me
off.’ I told him no and he grabbed my shirt and yelled, ‘You gotta do it
Gordie. I can’t live another second like this. Just do it and throw me over.
No one will know.’
“And he wasn’t the worst. I’ll tell you how crazy it makes you. I used to
work on this island in Puget Sound. The only way to get to it was by a
small ferry and I saw the same people on it all the time. Well one day we
got caught in a winter storm and I didn’t think we’d make it. That ferry
boat got tossed as bad as any small yacht in a squall. And this guy got the
sickness so bad he almost fell in the water a few times. The last time
though, I saw him crawling to the side on purpose. I knew he was going
to jump and grabbed him. ‘Just let me go,’ he said, ‘It’s the best thing.’
Well, I didn’t and we made it to the island. He hasn’t been back to the
mainland since and I’ll bet it’s been twenty years. Nothing will get him on
a boat ever again and there’s no other way out.”
Gordie has made a study of seasickness.
“It’s 90% psychological. The Dramamine and ear patches only work
because people think they do. But when you get into really rough water,
seven out of ten people get hit and the figure is the same for those who
take the precautions. I once proved it was psychological. I took this
arrogant (expletive) fishing and he kept bragging how the sea never got to
him. So I worked on him all day, you know, ‘Are you okay, you look a
little queasy,’ I’d cook up greasy food and offer it to him, talk about

199
moving, flying, falling, asked him to read small print, and it worked. Had
him begging me to turn back but I said not until we caught a big one.
“Another couple bragged they could take any sea but I wasn’t a mile off
the sandbar before they begged me to leave them on the bar. So there
they are sprawled on the sandbar in the middle of nowhere refusing to get
on the boat. The husband yells that he paid for the day and I could use it
to catch fish. I caught $3000 worth that day. By evening they were
prepared to sail to shore, maybe ten minutes away.
“But that was nothing compared to this lady who wanted me to sail her to
Kono, four days away. I told her I made arrangements in Kono and once
we were past our island there was no turning back. No problem, she said,
she’d been on boats before. It took less than half an hour before the
sickness got her. Half a day later we’re at the edge of the island and after
that it’s open sea. ‘I have to get off,’ she announced, and I told her no
way. She sees a boat anchored maybe half a mile a way. She shouts, ‘I’m
not staying here,’ jumps in the water and swims to the other boat. I
radioed him and she was safe in the end but that’s how crazy the sickness
makes you. I don’t know of another that saps you of all rationality and
makes you do suicidal things.
“And if you think it’s only the passengers who suffer, it’s just as hard on
the crew. How’d you like to be on a boat where the skipper gets seasick
and can’t operate the craft? I’ve seen that lots of times but the worst was
when the sickness killed the skipper. Seasickness will kill you two ways.
After the belly is empty, it attacks what’s left. In the most severe cases,
the body will dehydrate the organs and refuse to accept liquids. Or, the
severity will cause a cardiac arrest.
“That’s what happened to this skipper. Straight out of Gilligan’s Island.
The skipper is dead at the wheel and the first mate doesn’t know how to
control the boat. He radios for help and I get there and see the boat
doing short circles in the water. And no one aboard figured out anything
was wrong. The girls all covered up in their beach blankets when I
approached. How you can’t suspect something is amiss when your boat
has been doing sharp circles for two hours is explainable by the fact that
despite federal regulations, lots of people take intoxicants on boats. And
that’s a real bad idea. I’ve seen passengers throw everything overboard
when they get the sickness. First they vow never to touch the vile
inebriant ever again as long as they live, then over go bottles of booze,
cocaine, pot. The only one I try to stop from going overboard is the pot.
“The cancer and AIDS patients who want it legalized because it stops
nausea are right. It’s the only stuff I ever saw that is a cure for
seasickness. All the other advice like lie down, concentrate on one point,
or even steer the boat to keep busy is worthless. But that stuff works.
“And the skippers hate it when the passengers come down with the
motion sickness. For one thing, the plumbing in the head gets clogged
and it takes forever to clear it. One skipper tells passengers not to use the

200
 head for seasickness because just a few weeks back a passenger got so sick
he fell unconscious in the head and died of drowning. Right in the head,
he tells people. No way it happened but that’s how desperate he is to keep
his plumbing flowing. And the passengers always believe him and when it
hits them, they go to the edge of the boat.
“Which is awful because everyone sees him and then begins the domino
effect. Now boats aren’t seasick friendly. The edge is too thick to go on
the knees and use. And if you stand, it’s overboard for you lots of times. I
had this great product idea. It’s like a big airsickness bag only with a
harness attached to your head. You just find a corner somewhere and
don’t bother anyone else. I’d like it to be bio-degradable so you can throw
it in the ocean before you land. I’d call it, ‘In Case of Seasickness Take
One’.
“If you think you had a bad day, I say you’re wrong. You learned a lesson.
Man is a land animal; he was never supposed to go to sea. His body rebels
with all it has. But if there is ever to be greatness, truth or discovery, we
have to fight it until we finally get our sea legs.”
I have succumbed to Gordie’s wisdom. I will take the next
opportunity to go to sea and catch my dream marlin. I wouldn’t be
me if I surrendered to mere unnatural risk.
The final leg of the tour. Twenty four hours of flying from
Honolulu to Tel Aviv. I change planes in New York to El Al. Yediot
Ahronot is given to the passengers and I read my first Hebrew
newspaper cover to cover in forty days. I find out that after a
meeting with Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, who for forty days in
America I had been proving was the prime suspect in Rabin’s
murder, Prime Minister Sharon has agreed not to build new
settlements in Judea and Samaria. A fellow passenger observes,
“No one understands it. He’s no different than Barak.”
I took the taxi from Ben Gurion Airport home. The driver asks
why I was away so long and I answer that I gave lectures in
America on Rabin’s murder.
“Oh that,” he replies. “I knew Avishai Raviv personally. I even bailed him
out of jail once. We all know what happened. Raviv gave Yigal Amir a
gun with blanks in it. He shot the blanks and Rabin’s bodyguard
murdered him after that. Why do you need to give a lecture about that?
Everyone knows already.”
After a hazardous journey, I was clearly reaching land.

201
 CHAPTER SEVEN
THE WAR IS ON

AND NOW, END PLAY

While the sane world has watched with pride as Israel fought for
its shared sane values, the good times are coming to an end. Now
the forces of the New World Order are going to show their cards.
The cracks in Israel’s armor are appearing faster than anyone
can plaster them. After a classic advance which reoccupied the
West Bank in a week, Jenin was proving hard to crack. A few dozen
diehards refused to surrender and booby-trapped a last stand in a
crowded block of buildings in an area not much bigger than a
football field. The army called for an Air Force bombing of the
block because it was too dangerous to be tackled on foot. The
government turned down the request because it wouldn’t look
good on TV and 13 soldiers paid with their lives for better
publicity. And the “Palestinians” get their own Alamo myth.
Military analysts are aghast at the Jenin snafu and a few are
beginning to ask questions; Like, why has Hamas not been targeted
for retaliation operations even when they accept responsibility for a
terrorist act? And why wasn’t the Gaza Strip cleaned out of
terrorists along with the West Bank? The answer is likely the threat
that Hamas will use non-conventional terror if their backs are to
the wall.
And while the refusal to use a jet or two to clear up Jenin was
based purely on publicity considerations, the brave victims of this
betrayal will have died in vain; for the media vultures are circling,
waiting for the pullback to sweep down on the urban battlefields
and record the horror of war. Pity Israel when they get to picking
her flesh. Brace yourself for bodies and blood, and lots of sob
stories told by “innocent” survivors of Israel’s brutality.
The Children of Israel are about to become the lepers of the
world. And it has all been planned from the beginning. UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan announced just this before he added
203
that he would be meeting Colin Powell in Spain. The CFR, UN and
Jesuit Vatican will meet in Madrid to add the final touches to the
end game for Israel.
They have been playing NWO good cop/bad cop with Israel.
Bush and the US, of course, were the good cops, the UN and EU,
the bad, but now Israel is going to discover they were all the same,
all along: same aim, same anti-Semitic agenda, same new order, they
just played different roles for awhile.
And once the horror of the streets of the West Bank tarnishes
the Jews throughout this perverted planet, there will be no one to
stop the NWO forces from arriving in the region to “bring peace.”
They will dictate the terms to both sides and appear as wise as
Solomon as they cut Israel with their scalpel, depriving the country
of its land, water, capital, resources and sovereignty.
The best we can do is expose the NWO machinations and hope
enough people will wake up in time. I wouldn’t bet the farm on it.
Still, I received a timely and useful surprise. It seems that someone
took the trouble to reread the newsletter I co-edited between 1992-
1996, Inside Israel. That someone excerpted numerous items from
the newsletter and sent them streaming down the net. I received
three copies in a day.
After the Netanyahu victory in 1996, I wrote that the new
government must arrest, then try those who brought us the Oslo
Accord, and quoted some of the crimes listed below. Since then,
the call to try the Oslo criminals has spread the length and breadth
of Israel. Inside Israel did provide the evidence of betrayal and it
provided a glimpse of how the NWO operates. Look at the dates
beside the articles and note how much has become our pathetic
reality since then. And how much this obvious truth was ignored by
the Jews we tried so hard to awaken.

A CHRONOLOGY OF “THE PEACE PROCESS”

This article, in its entirety, was submitted by a faithful
subscriber. I pass it on to my readers for your perusal.

204
How We Can Gain Justice for the Victims of Oslo (JVO)
Just so we don’t forget how it happened and who was behind
the creation of the Oslo Accords, in early l993 a very unique news
source appeared reporting on Israel’s political, diplomatic and
national security affairs. Had more people taken notice of its news
reports Israel might not be suffering today from Arab terrorism
I was fortunate enough to have been one of Inside Israel’s
subscribers from l993-l997. Thus, I understand how they did it and
why they did it. I also know who in Israel allowed the foreigners to
install the PA in power. I understand that the destruction of our
country didn’t begin in September 2000. It started in l991 when
Beilin and Peres began their plotting to have the Israeli public buy
into their deadly secret deals which were supposed to bring peace.
These two “Jews” brought nothing but misery and bloodshed to
both sides. Yet both still maintain their highly respected positions
in Israeli political affairs—with Peres still serving in the position he
started off with in l993. Who knows what secret deals Beilin is
plotting as you read these words. Shame on the Israeli public for
allowing these two traitors/criminals to continue to represent the
interests of the people of Israel. First they corrupted our national
leaders, then they divided us and swiped our soul, and now they are
out to physically destroy us.
Beilin and Peres’ plans and efforts were treacherous, deceitful,
and illegal. They can be brought to justice. When will they be
brought to justice? When will there be Justice for the Victims of
Oslo (JVO)?
The information contained in this “Chronology of the Oslo
Accords” was based on the press reports which appeared in the
Israeli printed media from l992-l996. The original archives of Inside
Israel can be found at Israel’s National Library and Archives in
Jerusalem. The author of this essay is asking all who receive it to
translate it, post it on the Internet, send it to many other Jews and
to print out copies and post them on bulletin boards in synagogues,
community centers, schools and yeshivot. We all need to know how
this catastrophe began so we will know who is responsible for it.

A Chronology of Oslo as Recorded in the Archives of Inside Israel

YEAR 1, 1993

205
 HOW OSLO REALLY BEGAN
• Palestinian Affairs:
The Labor party’s official chronology of events leading up to
Israel’s recognition of the PLO has the seeds planted after the party
assumed power. This is a lie. According to the official scenario,
Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin started the “Gaza-Jericho
First” ball rolling at an academic conference. It was revealed in
March 1995 in an interview with Yediot Ahronot that Dr. Henry
Kissinger took credit for the idea that led to the Oslo Accord. Dr.
K. claimed that he suggested pulling out of Gaza and Jericho first
to then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin back in l976.
The most recent version of the idea, the one that led to the
“Oslo Accords”, was brought to life by Beilin who subsequently
pursued it for a year at a Norwegian university through the offices
of Terje Roed Larsen, a social scientist who had been doing
research on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Another version of the
official version of how Oslo began is that it was the result of a
chance meeting in a hotel in Oslo between representatives of the
PLO and Yair Hirshfeld and Ron Pundak—two unknown Israeli
academics who happened to be staying at the hotel. Due to that
chance meeting, the “Oslo Agreements” were said to have evolved
as Pundak and Hirshfeld (who held no standing whatsoever in the
Israeli government) hammered out an agreement with these PLO
officials and then presented it to the Labor party for ratification.
Neither story is the truth.
The origins of Oslo are in January 1990, when the then-Science
Minister, later to become President, Ezer Weizmann met with PLO
officials in London. He told Labor party head Shimon Peres, who
was then a member of the National Unity Government, about the
meetings. Peres knew then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir
would not go along with it, so Peres engineered a coalition. When
the “Baker plan” came up in February l990, it demanded that
Jerusalem was put up for negotiations, which Shamir couldn’t
accept. On January 17, l992, US Secretary of State James Baker tells
Hosni Mubarak that the American government would begin a
campaign to force Israel into freezing settlements, and that the
Bush administration would oppose Israel’s request to receive $10

206
billion in US loan guarantees. New elections were held in June l992
which swept the Labor to power under Yitzhak Rabin.
What is absent from this story is “Beilin and Peres’ stinky deal”.
It went like this:
Starting in June 1991, Peres had sent Yossi Beilin to Egypt four
times to make an agreement with the PLO. At the King Hotel in
Cairo, Beilin offered Said Kamal and Mahmud Abbas, two Arafat
aides, a deal; in return for the PLO shifting Arab-Israeli votes to
Labor in the upcoming national elections, the Labor party would
cancel the law which forbids meetings with the PLO, freeze Jewish
settlements, and give recognition to something close to a state. The
meetings were reported in the Israeli daily Hadashot by Arab affairs
analyst, Yehoshua Mieri, and by two Egyptian newspapers, Al-
Gomhouriya and Al-Wafd.
After Rabin’s primary victory, Arafat invited the leaders of the
three radical Arab-Israeli political parties to Cairo and called for the
delegates and the politicians to close ranks behind one united pro-
PLO party that would vote en mass for Labor. This made the
difference on June 23rd, 1992, in effect putting Rabin into power.
On November 25, just five months after the Labor party was
placed back into power based on their support from the Israeli
Arabs, Justice Minister David Libai introduced into the cabinet a
bill to rescind the law banning Israelis from meeting with
representatives of the PLO.
It is believed that those secret talks were arranged by members
of the Council on Foreign Relations. In an interview with journalist
Yitzhak Ben Horin of Ma’ariv in January l996, Council on Foreign
Relations point man on Israeli affairs, Canadian billionaire Edgar
Bronfman, boasts using his influence to secure Rabin’s election in
l992, adding, “Usually I believe Americans should not interfere with
the Israeli election infrastructure but, in this case I broke my rule
because I believed in the peace process.” Officially, Israel was not
publicly involved in a “peace process” until late August l993.
February 1993: According to the Lebanese publication El-Kifach
Al Arabi, secret talks are underway between PLO officials and the
Israeli government in Paris and London. The French magazine Le
Canard Enchaine revealed that French experts will be in charge of
establishing a Palestinian police force to secure an autonomy
207
arrangement in the West Bank and Gaza. The agreement was
reached in November l992 in a series of meetings in London under
the auspices of the American government. One of the reasons the
talks continued in secret is because Israel wanted to have already
concluded an agreement with the PLO before the negotiations are
made public. In a May l995 report in an Israeli newspaper, Oslo
negotiator Ron Pundak revealed that the US State Department
“was in on the secret process from day one.”
A secret clause to the Oslo Accords, authored by then Deputy
Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin, was entitled “The Palestine Interim
Self-Government Agreement”. It explains how the ultimate aims of
the peace process are to 1) roll back Israel’s territory to the l949
borders; 2) to create a Palestinian “entity”, which, after an interim
period will be granted statehood; and 3) to permit the right of
return for any Palestinian to the new nation.
The document which dealt with Jerusalem, called “The
Illegitimacy of Israeli Sovereignty Over Jerusalem,” outlines the
Israeli government’s program for the future of Jerusalem. It called
for the division of the Old City into cantons whose border posts
will be under UN control. The Plan also wanted to work towards
the removal of all Jews from beyond the Green line, to be done in
stages. The first stage would be the disarming of the settlers. Once
the settlers become less able to defend themselves, army presence
on the roads leading to their homes will be greatly diminished
leading to heavy terrorist casualties and a feeling of fear and
helplessness. As part of this program, a “dehumanizing” effort
would take place to paint the residents of the territories as
“fanatics”, since they were against the peace process. Once such an
image had been planted, the settlers would no longer be identified
by most Israelis as one of them and it would be easier to break their
morale to resist.
Three days before the Washington signing of the Oslo Accords
on September 10, 1993, Prime Minister Rabin ratified a decision
made earlier allowing 187 members of the Hamas leadership
deported to Lebanon to return home to the West Bank and Gaza
three months early. Though Rabin had stated publicly that week
that Hamas could scuttle the agreement with the PLO, he
nevertheless strengthened the organization by placing its strategic

208
leadership in the battlefront. In Kiryat Shemona hundreds of
demonstrators pelted the busloads of deportees with rocks. With
absolutely no protest from any wing of the political establishment
in effect, Rabin’s decision put in place the series of events that led
to the wave of deadly terror that Israel’s civilian population is
experiencing ten years later.
• Security Affairs:
February 1993: Arafat flew to Khartoum from Amman where he
attends two meetings with Osama Ben Laden and Hassan Atourbi,
leader of the Sudanese Islamic Fundamentalist Movement. The
plan to bomb the World Trade Center in l993 was hatched there
with Arafat’s approval.
June 1993: Egypt agreed to establish courses for hundreds of
Palestinians from the territories to teach them how to administrate
law enforcement activities. More than 50 Palestinians will be sent to
Egypt to learn how to become police captains. The Egyptians
warned that if the Palestinians don’t act soon, they won’t have any
trained personnel to run a country.
August 1993: For the first time Arabs gathered at the Al-Aqsa
mosque in Jerusalem heard the assistant mufti, Sheikh Mahmud
Aljemal, call for the killing of all Israeli Jews. The police had taped
these comments but refused to hand them over to the office of the
state legal advisor Yosef Harish, when National Religious Party MK
Hanan Porat demanded that Harish charge Aljemal for incitement
to murder. Nonetheless, in the previous six months, 25 mosques
were closed down by Israeli authorities after routine searches
uncovered recordings of incitement by Islamic Fundamentalist
leaders.
November l993: Colonel Ron Naveh of Acharei forms an
organization just after the Oslo accords were signed on September
13 composed of Israel Defense Forces officers who refuse to do
reserve duty in protest over the agreement. Naveh predicted, “The
agreement is a disaster for the security of Israel and our only reply
is not to serve under the government which arranged it.” Nine
months later in May 1994, dozens of IDF officers signed a protest
advertisement that appeared in Israeli newspapers. The public
notice read, “The surrender to terror is the only achievement of the
negotiations with the PLO, which threaten our survival. Shaking
209
hands with terrorists means terror has won. Arafat represents his
own interests and will never fight for the security of Israel.”
December l993: Israel Defense Ministry urges the Israeli team
negotiating with the PLO to demand a detailed report of every
weapon held by PLO personnel in the territories, now and every
year after. It also demanded a joint committee of the PLO and the
Mossad to fight terrorism, and the names and locations of terrorists
responsible for 14 of the most serious PLO attacks.
• Secret Diplomacy:
September 10th: Three days before the signing of the Oslo
Accords in Washington, the Italian newspaper La Stampa reported
that Foreign Minister Shimon Peres concluded a secret deal with
the Vatican to hand over sovereignty of Jerusalem’s Old City to the
Vatican. The plan was originally discussed in November 1992 (the
same time the first meetings in London took place to discuss an
agreement between Israel and the PLO, which were probably
arranged by Council on Foreign Relations executive, Edgar
Bronfman) when then-Foreign Minister Shimon Peres met with
Vatican officials in Rome. Under the plan, Jerusalem will stay the
capital of Israel but the Old City will be administered by the
Vatican. Arafat agreed not to oppose the plan. The plan also calls
for Jerusalem to become the second Vatican of the world with all
three major religions represented but under the authority of the
Vatican.
October 1993: Peres sends a letter to the Norwegian Foreign
Minister committing Israel to respect PLO governing institutions in
Jerusalem. Peres later denied that such a letter existed, much to the
chagrin of Cabinet whip Moshe Shachal, who transmitted Peres’
message to the Knesset and was furious when the government later
admitted that such a letter was actually sent. In response to the
revelation of the letter, Peres told the Knesset, “If you are
insinuating that we would ever divide Jerusalem, then that’s an ugly
slander.”
November l993: In a report in the weekly newspaper Kol Ha’ir, it
was revealed that:
...for the past six months, the Israeli government has been taking advice
on the future of Jerusalem from a planning commission headed by a close
aide of Teddy Kollek, Raanan Weitz, formerly the settlement director of

210
 the Jewish Agency. At a secret meeting on September 9, 1993, just before
Prime Minister Rabin signed the recognition agreement with the PLO in
Israel, the forum met secretly and approved in principle a plan for
Jerusalem concocted by Weitz, which he calls, “Metropolitan Jerusalem”.
December 1993: In a Knesset debate on the security situation in
the territories, Foreign Minister Shimon Peres announced, “When a
Palestinian state in Gaza is established, it will take care of security.”
Members of the opposition were shocked, believing that Peres had
finally admitted publicly the ultimate goal of his agreements with
the PLO. After the Knesset session turned into an uproar, Peres
backtracked, claiming he had meant to say, ‘Palestinian police
force,’ not ‘Palestinian state.’ Many opposition MKs were
convinced that Peres had already promised the PLO a state and this
was Peres’ confession, whether intended or not.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR 2, 1994
• Palestinian Affairs:
January l994: Achmad Awad, leader of the Black Panther militia
of the PLO, asks the court to subpoena Yasser Arafat as a witness
for his defense. Awad was being tried for the murders of sixteen
people and for being an accessory in the deaths of ten others.
Awad’s defense was that the murders were the result of direct
orders from Arafat. His attorney presented faxes to the court from
Arafat to Awad ordering executions of alleged Palestinian
collaborators.
February 1994: PLO members throughout the territories met
secretly to discuss the mental state of their leader. They reached the
conclusion that years of intrigue and assassination attempts have
taken their toll. In Lebanon, PLO chief there, Monir Makdakh,
refuses to acknowledge Arafat’s right to lead the PLO and call the
shots. Makdakh told reporters that he will not lay down his arms.
He predicted a schism will create two PLOs, one committed to war
on Israel’s northern frontier and another within the autonomous
regions purportedly dedicated to snuffing out Palestinian violence
against Israelis with its police force. Makdakh has little faith in the
Palestinian police force’s resolve to stop any future bloodshed,
adding, “Lots of my supporters have been placed in this police
force. They will act as I see fit not as Arafat tells them to.”

211
 March l994: Moshe Sasson, autonomy advisor for the Ministry
of Police, confirmed to the Israeli press that an Israeli cabinet
minister had been meeting with Hamas leaders on behalf of the
Israeli government. It was believed to be Yossi Sarid. According to
Sasson, “Some Hamas people want to be in line when we start
handing out the fruits of autonomy. We are cultivating them.”
The first meeting took place before the declaration of principles
between Israel and the PLO was signed in September l993. At its
conclusion, cash was given to the Hamas representatives in order to
buy them into supporting autonomy and moderation. Israeli
officials behind the policy see it as working. They point to the
Hamas decision not to attack the PLO violently as a sign that the
organization is coming around to the latter’s way of thinking. They
believe the wave of attacks against Jews since September is a
temporary phenomenon that will end once full autonomy is
instituted.
April 1994: According to an arms dealer in Gaza, since the
September 13 signing of the Declaration of Principles, the residents
of Gaza have been arming themselves. He says smuggling guns
from Israel became infinitely easier as 75% of all Gazans homes
now conceal a weapon. This has caused the price of a pistol to rise
from $1,300 in l992 to $3,600 in l994.
May l994: Faisal El-Husseini, the PLO’s head in Jerusalem, says
he believes that the new police force created by the Palestinian
Authority might need some help to maintain order. If that is the
case, an armed militia, whose members are all Fatah supporters, are
ready for action if Israeli authorization for the fledging Palestinian
police is delayed for any reason.
June l994: Talks between the PLO and Hamas over the
administration of Gaza were completed. Hamas agreed not to
oppose the PLO takeover of Gaza in return for sharing power. In
return, Hamas activists received a significant number of jobs
including posts in the Palestinian police force. Hamas also was
allowed to have members of its assassination squad, Az Adin El
Kasam, to be included in the Palestinian constabulary.
September l994: Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat
sends a telegram to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein assuring him
that the fight for Palestine had just begun and would not end until
212
there was a victory in Jerusalem. There was no protest from the
Prime Minister or any member of the Israeli government to his
remarks.
October l994: Graduates of training courses who are supposed
to serve as policemen in Gaza and Jericho are operating out of the
Orient House. The policemen boasted to the Palestinian press that,
“We are really not policemen, rather feyadeen, and Jericho is our new
base for capturing the rest of Palestine.” Shared patrols by the IDF
and the Palestinian police have become a fiasco. Commenting on
why his jeep drove so far behind that of the Palestinian police, one
Israeli soldier said, “We don’t know when they are going to start
shooting at us. It’s a just a matter of time until they do.”
October 1994: Israel’s internal security force, the Shabak, has
had to increase its anti-Hamas operations in light of the recent
fracture in the organization. Hamas in the northern West Bank is
allied with the Lebanese Hizbullah and are the most radical of the
factions. Hamas in Jerusalem and Bethlehem is tied to the Moslem
Brotherhood of Jordan and is considered the most moderate
faction. In Gaza and Hebron, Hamas leaders get their funding and
orders from the Moslem Brotherhood in Egypt.
November 1994: Two Palestinian terrorists who kill two Israelis
on a shooting spree in downtown Jerusalem, are found to have
suspicious pasts. The first was a Palestinian Authority policeman
holding weaponry supplied by Israel. The second arrived in Gaza
via Egypt on July 14. Found in his pocket were a list of operational
commands including an order to “contact the Egyptian
ambassador.”
• Secret Diplomacy:
April l994: Deputy Mayor of Jerusalem Shmuel Meir tells the
Jerusalem press that he had received information that properties
promised to the Vatican in Jerusalem would be granted
extraterritorial status. (In early 1996 Meir was killed in a very
suspicious car crash whereby the driver who drove a UN truck into
Meir’s car was not even charged.)
The plan for the dividing of Jerusalem would have the complete
support of the planning organization, “The Jerusalem Forum.” It is
believed that the plan was drafted according to the wishes of the
Vatican. Three weeks before the Cairo Agreement was signed,
213
Peres and Arafat meet secretly in Bucharest, Rumania, with the
Iranian Foreign Minister. Arafat was given pledges by Peres that the
sovereignty of Jerusalem will be shared by the PLO and Israel.
Peres also agreed to increase the size of the Palestinian police force
to include 500 Sudanese trained by Islamic fundamentalists, and
acquiesced completely on the right of return for all Palestinians to
currently disputed areas, including Jerusalem.
November 13, l994: The Israeli newspapers Ha’aretz, Ma’ariv and
The Jerusalem Post report that David Rockefeller, the chairman of the
Council on Foreign Relations, landed at Jerusalem’s Atarot Airport
for a 12 hour secret visit with former mayor Teddy Kollek. Shortly
after Rockefeller left Israel, Kollek flew to Cairo for the first time
ever, met with Egyptian Foreign Minister Omar Mussa and
presented him with his plan for Jerusalem’s future. According to
this plan, the city would be divided into quarters, each with its own
separate governing body.
November l994: Israel signs a peace treaty with Jordan which,
according to reports in Ha’aretz, Ma’ariv, and Yediot Achronot,
included secret clauses concerning water and Jerusalem. The
agreement had been negotiated in London eight months before
between Rabin, King Hussein, and Lord Victor Mishcon, an
attorney who represents much of British royalty as well as the
Jordanian monarch. As part of the agreement, Jordan would receive
control over the Islamic Holy sites within a Vatican-controlled Old
City of Jerusalem.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR 3, 1995
• Palestinian Affairs:
March l995: The Israeli government agrees that Palestinians
would now be able to travel freely within Israel. Under the terms of
the agreement, Palestinian Authority officials traveling between
Gaza and Jericho will pass through Hebron and Jerusalem with
their bodyguards fully armed beside them. Although Prime Minister
Rabin initially told the country that the PLO would be allowed
9,000 policemen to protect Arafat and wipe out anti-Israeli
terrorism, within two years 25,000 “policemen” were roaming the
streets of the Gaza Strip. Many were fully trained terrorists
imported from North Africa, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen. They had
214
no interest in arresting other terrorists and allowed them to train
under their noses.
May l995: Over a thousand PLO policemen roam the streets of
Jericho and many residents of this once peaceful city of 12,000
want them out. They are accused of killing, raping and looting at
will and with impunity and citizens are frightened to leave their
homes.
June l995: Speaking before members of the Weizmann Institute,
then Deputy IDF Chief-of-Staff Matan Vilanai announced, “The
Palestinians hate us like death and they don’t consider someone
who murders Israelis a criminal.” (Vilani would later serve as a
minister in Ehud Barak’s government.)
July l995: Jibril Rajoub’s personal bodyguards stand trial in Israel
for kidnapping two Jerusalem Arabs at gunpoint to bring them to a
PLO investigation.
September l995: Israel suffers from enormous acts of sabotage
from the PLO and the government covered each one up. Fires
raged in July as Peres and Arafat were rushing to meet the deadline
for the agreement on the second stage of the autonomy talks.
Environment Minister Yossi Sarid and Police Minister Moshe
Shachal conducted furious negotiations with the PLO on the
morning of July 2, beseeching Arafat not to allow any Palestinian
group to take responsibility for the fires and in return he would get
his agreement the next day. Labor feared that if the PLO or any
Palestinians were blamed for the fire in the Jerusalem Forest it
would cause their fall from power and the end of the peace process
October 1995: Nadav Haetzni of Ma’ariv writes:
Arabs throughout the West Bank and East Jerusalem dread the day the
PLO takes over their cities and towns. One former PLO supporter said,
“The PLO have no sense of justice, no courts, no legal system. They will
shake us down and ruin our businesses.”
November 1995: Two days before Rabin’s death, two car bombs
exploded. Yediot Ahronot and Israeli TV reported that the car bombs
were assembled in front of the PLO’s border policemen and were
allowed to pass through their checkpoints. This was said to be the
latest example of collusion between the PLO and the “radical”
camp.

215
 November l995: Before Israel releases Palestinians held in
prisons to the PA, they must sign a document promising to support
the peace process and never engage in terrorism again. Jamal
Sakawi, who was sentenced to 24 years for attempted murder and
released as part of the Oslo 2 agreement summed up the document
this way, “It was just a piece of paper. I signed it to get out of there.
In practice it means nothing. There is no peace, only terror.”
• Secret Diplomacy:
June l995: The Jordanian newspaper Taot A-Shaab reported that
Hamas leader Dr. Musa Abu Marzuk, flew to Washington for
secret negotiations with the US. In the report, Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak confirmed the secret channel adding that the
Americans are also conducting secret negotiations with the Moslem
Brotherhood, believing that the Americans want to cover their bets
in case either Arafat or Mubarak are overthrown.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR 4, 1996
• Palestinian Affairs:
May 1996: The Saudi newspaper Al Hayat reported that Arafat
had cut a deal with Hamas in March. The terms were that if the
organization stopped terrorist activities until after the Israeli
elections, he would release hundreds of Hamas prisoners from his
jails. Once the elections were over, the leader of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt, Mustapha Mashor, said that Arafat told him
he would be releasing hundreds of Islamic Jihad and Hamas
prisoners to open a new terror front against Israel.
August 1996: Israel TV commentator Ehud Yaari notes that
corruption and violence have become so intolerable that Arab
leaders in Hebron have appealed to the IDF not to withdraw from
the city. Khalad Abu-Tuoma, an Arab reporter for the weekly
Jerusalem newspaper Yerushalayim, writes that “PLO policemen are
torturing Palestinians with dual Israeli citizenship. Kol Ha’ir
reported on Zakhi Nakhas, deputy mayor of Albira, who had been
held and tortured for three weeks by the PLO’s intelligence force
for the crime of being appointed by the Israeli-established
municipal council.

216
 December l996: Eitan Rabin of Ha’aretz reports that cooperation
between Israeli and PLO intelligence forces have broken down in
the wake of the discovery by the Israelis of a secret and most
sensitive operation. Called Operation Thorn Field, it was devised
by officers of the Palestinian policy force as a plan to entice Israeli
soldiers into a shooting war. Rabin writes, “Israel will be forced to
reenter Palestinian cities, and when she does, Jordanian and
Egyptian forces will enter the fray.”
• Security Affairs:
May l996: The Director of the CIA, John Deutsch, appoints
former CIA director, George Tenet, to be his liaison between Israel
and the PLO. Then Prime Minister Shimon Peres assented to the
PLO sending 40 “policemen” for an advanced CIA marksmanship
course in Virginia. The CIA-trained hit squad’s mission was to
eliminate Jewish leaders of Judea, Samaria and Gaza and spreading
mass demoralization as a prelude to removing the residents of these
areas from their homes. PLO Security Chief Jibril Rajoub was in
charge of the operation. The official reason for the creation of the
Palestinian sniper squad was to eliminate Hamas and Islamic Jihad
terrorists. John Deutsch and George Tenet are both members of
the Council on Foreign Relations.
• Secret Diplomacy:
February l996: A delegation from the Vatican met with PLO
Religious Affairs Minister Hassan Tahbob in Jerusalem. Head of
the Vatican delegates, Father Serge Sebastian, Secretary General of
the Vatican, announced that the Holy See recognizes PLO
sovereignty over East Jerusalem. During that same month after
Shimon Peres had replaced Yitzhak Rabin as Israel’s prime
minister, Internal Security Minister Moshe Shachal refused to allow
a Palestinian Authority meeting at the Vatican’s Notre Dame
Hospice in Jerusalem. According to Shachal, the Palestinians were
planning to “use the Vatican to circumvent the Oslo Accords”.
March l996: The Israeli daily business newspaper Globes reports
in a four part series of articles that Israel has legal title to 20,000
acres of Syrian land much of it in the Golan. The land was legally
purchased by Baron Rothschild in the 1890s and less then legally
confiscated by the Syrian government in 1942. The Baron
transferred the deeds to the Jewish National Fund in l957.
217
 RAVIV’S TRIAL
I attended the trial of Avishai Raviv, and here is what happened.
The large crowd of journalists is barely seated before the judges
agree to drop the charges against Raviv for heading an illegal
organization, Eyal. Judge Cohen quickly agrees to drop several key
witnesses from the prosecution roster. Most significant, Eitan
Oren, the Channel One director no longer has to testify to his role
in staging Eyal’s phony swearing in ceremony or training camp.
Raviv’s new attorney, Eitan Peleg, who journalist Adir Zik tells
me once worked for the Shabak’s legal affairs department, argues
that his client is on trial, “only because some people, like the
prosecutor, want talk about the Rabin murder conspiracy quashed.”
It is a subtle threat. The judges and prosecution team get the
message: get this trial over painlessly or some truths may slip out.
Judge Cohen understands and postpones the next trial date to
July 21. Make that the tenth postponement, surely a judicial record.
Unlike Raviv’s previous lawyer, Eyal Shomroni Cohen, the Raviv
team of Hacohen and Peleg have no interest in pursuing anything
resembling truth.
Peleg holds a mini-press conference outside the chambers. I
start to ask, “Raviv’s previous lawyer Eyal Shomroni-Cohen...”
Peleg does not like the sound of this. “Who are you?” he asks. I
respond with my name. “I’m not answering any question from
you,” he declares.
“Like, what if Amir didn’t murder Rabin?” I counter.
“I’m not answering you.”
“Then I’ll report that. I can dig deeper than you’re going to.”
He knows that I know the shoddy legal game he’s playing. He
tries to make a joke. He puts his palms on his belly and says, “Yes
but I can expand farther than you.”
I put my hand on my unfortunately full pot and reply, “You’ll
have competition in that too.”
He looks at my hand, smiles and answers, “That’s for sure.”
An American reporter intervenes: “Mr. Peleg, what are you
hiding? Do you think you can choose who to answer at an
American press conference?”
218
 Peleg replies, “This is Israel and I can do whatever I want.”
Indeed, including covering up Raviv’s crimes for the ruling
establishment who brought us Oslo, the Rabin murder and a war
Israel won hands down but is about to lose anyway.

IT’S TIME TO STOP DEFENDING ISRAEL

A publisher and writer I respect sent me an “exclusive”
intelligence report smuggled out of Ramallah by an Arab lady
trapped there. This distorted piece of propaganda kept me reading
for a few paragraphs until I got to the part where “settlers” were
rampaging through Ramallah with the IDF.
That did it for me. I wrote a letter to the publisher, a Jewish
woman who seems to have forgotten that minor fact, and asked her
to stop sending me lies by e-mail. There are no “settlers” rampaging
through the town. She wrote back, “Prove to me it’s wrong.”
I calmly replied, “No, you prove to me. Find the names or
photos of ‘settlers’ rampaging through Ramallah. I don’t have to
prove anything to you.”
It’s time we stopped defending Israel. We don’t need to, and
anyone who enters into a debate on Israel’s nastiness against the
benevolent and peace-loving Arabs honors the ignoramus by
entering the fray on his terms and ends up making Israel look guilty
by falling into the trap.
What’s the point? Look at CNN. The splendiforous Wolf Blitzer
asked viewers to vote on the following poll: Will there be peace in
the Middle East under Sharon’s watch? Of course, the implication
is that Sharon is responsible for war and no one else. Now who
would vote in a rigged poll like that?
The following answer is the only appropriate one for any Jew
with dignity: “I’m sorry, I know you don’t like us and are abetting
our murderers, so I don’t feel like talking to you.”
No, let’s stop defending Israel to the misguided stooges
attacking us and use our energy more efficiently by defending Israel
for ourselves. The first line of defense is truth and we’ll never be
free unless we rid ourselves of the forces who brought us this war
and are planning our extinction.

219
 The following information comes from solid sources but not all
has been proven by corroboration. Let’s gather intelligence
together.

How Nazis Infiltrate

I was given a remarkable document which links Shimon Peres to
French “former” Nazis, the most prominent being François
Mitterand. I will present the case in the “Book Reviews” section of
this book.
Meanwhile, in 1994 the newsletter Inside Israel proved that Peace
Now was receiving significant monies from a pro-Nazi fund
located in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Ein Kerem. A well-
placed informant explained,
“You know all the far left speakers who appear at the Van Leer Institute
in Jerusalem. The Van Leers were known Dutch Nazi collaborators.
Martin Buber refused to speak at the institute because of that. What’s
their building doing in Jerusalem attached to the State President’s office?”

The Rebbetzin Peres

Whatever happened to Shimon Peres’ wife Sonia? We never see
her anymore. And we used to from time to time for show even
when hubby was cohabitating with and promoting the political
career of Collette Avital. Well, it seems that Sonia has taken
revenge in a good way.
From a rabbi with a devoted following.
“Sonia Peres has become very religious. She is especially fond of my
writings and tapes and is not only studying them but holding study
sessions in her home.”

Shamgar Saves The Day

From an attorney who is at the head of a political movement.
He is a very good source. We cover many topics. i.e.:
“There was a lot of talk about a murder around the Demanjuk trial. Dov
Eitan was appointed to defend Demanjuk and discovered the government
got the wrong man. He died before the trial started and not many people
think it was a natural parting.”
In my book The Last Days of Israel and Natan Gefen’s book Fatal
Sting we both offer serious evidence that the 1996 elections were
rigged. Peres actually won by 2% but had been pre-blackmailed
220
over his organization of the Rabin murder to take a dive. 148,000
votes for Peres were destroyed before they were counted.
The attorney concurs, “You got that right. What happened was
Shamgar warned Peres he would blow the truth sky high unless
Netanyahu won the elections.”

RESTAURANTS AND
OTHER ASSASSINATION TOPICS

Two Facts From Dependable Sources Absolutely Confirmed

Remember Benny Lahav, the Shabak’s Forces Commander at
the rally where shortly after, Rabin got killed? In 1996, he
threatened to write a book exposing all he knows about the murder.
Looks like he found a better vocation. After retiring with a fancy
pension, he bought a pizzeria in Kochav Yair. Buy a slice and ask
the owner what was going to be in his book.
Yoram Rubin, Rabin’s bodyguard and murderer, has a father-in-
law who owns Cafe Max in downtown Jerusalem. Rubin, himself, is
security chief at the Israeli Embassy in Cairo. Max relates that all
the families of the embassy staff, including Rubin’s, were sent back
to Israel. Yoram had better watch out there isn’t a terror attack that
removes a guard who knows too much.
Also, highly confirmed: Yoram Rubin was confined to Ichilov
Hospital for 6 days after the Rabin murder, though his medical
reports show he had nothing worse than a slight burn on his arm.
Why the long sojourn?
Dr. David Khen, a vascular surgeon and colonel in the reserves,
has gathered eye-witness testimony that Rubin threatened to
commit suicide on the night of the assassination and was kept
under a suicide watch for almost a week.

Kimche Kimche Kimche

Remember that name. The Jerusalem Post gives him first column
editorial space to promote Oslo almost every week.
From an excellent investigative reporter:
“David Kimche is at Oxford in ‘76, the next thing you know he’s a high-
ranking Mossad officer in Israel. No one understood where he came
from, he didn’t even speak Hebrew. He still doesn’t, very well. He is a
221
 British plant but more than that, he’s the executive director of the Israeli
Council on Foreign Relations.”

I Won’t Vouch for These Two...Yet

Why were three of Rabin’s bodyguards murdered? A source I
met just once after a lecture explained:
“Kuriel or another bodyguard was supposed to shoot Amir with a 22
caliber pistol. Amir wasn’t supposed to survive but his killer chickened
out of shooting him. The Shabak that night went crazy looking for the 22
caliber gun.”
A middle level clerk in the Foreign Ministry:
“We received a request to cut diplomatic ties with Norway over their pro-
PLO actions in light of the fact that they arranged the Oslo Accords. The
request actually read that it won’t take long before Oslo is equated with
Auschwitz and maintaining diplomatic ties was no different than keeping
ties open with Nazi Germany. Our Minister, Peres, was not shown the
request.”

And Now...Good Tips From My Most Astute Correspondents

I correspond with several Arabs and I think we’re reaching some
understanding. Well, their adjectives to describe Israel are softening
somewhat. One letter did strike out:
“The only good thing I can think about Israel is they didn’t murder you
for investigating the Rabin murder. They won’t let us do that. Do you
think anyone thought Nasser died naturally from a heart attack? He was
52 and in perfect health. Sadat’s assassination may have been suspicious
but at least there were trials and executions. Whoever murdered Nasser
got away with the perfect assassination.”

Zinni, At Last
I recently found peacemaker Anthony Zinni on the CFR list,
discovered some key Jesuit figures in his early career and concluded
that he was not in Israel to make peace. A brilliant researcher from
Toronto dug much deeper. Absorb yourself in the following
portrait of Bush’s man of peace.
“That bus bomb in Haifa STINKS of CIA involvement, man. I’d be
willing to bet the support infrastructure was the same people the DEA is
involved with in Syria smuggling heroin to Europe and NYC. Zinni is a
key figure in the drug trade... that’s why they call him the Godfather.
Sharon’s war is messing with Zinni and Bush’s drug profits, and they
couldn’t stand Sharon making Bush look bad on TV, so BOOM.

222
“When are people going to understand that America is the world’s
greatest criminal enterprise? Arafat is a school boy compared to the
Bushes.
“Zinni joined the USMC in 1961. He makes General in SIX YEARS,
serves two stints in Vietnam. Thus begins the fast track to the
intel/defense circles that Bush, Armitage, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc. are
building up.
“1970, he’s shipped to Okinawa, and over the next 5 years spends a
considerable amount of time in the Caribbean... this sets him up as the
perfect liaison for the USMC end of the eventual Central
America/Middle East/Austin-Miami-Mena pipeline used by Air Caribe in
the 1980’s.
“1974, he’s assigned as head of the Officer Assignment branch of the
Manpower Department... a key post in the Shadow Government that’s
preparing to Emerge in 1980. The Bush cabal needs to be able to have
their people in the right places in order to make things work..
“1981-1986, the Iran/Contra years, Zinni is first stationed near Langley
(CIA headquarters) at Quantico. Then he’s moved to USMC Head of
Special Ops and Terrorism Counteraction Section... in other words he’s
controlling the portion of the USMC that’s now fighting Reagan’s phony
war on terror. He’s in a position to have his people training at Fort
Benning, where they can liase with their South American counterparts
and train death squads for Reagan.
“1989, he’s back at Quantico.
“1993, he’s in charge in Somalia, where he deliberately screws things up
for Clinton as Bush’s last parting shot at Clinton. The Somali exercise was
in fact set up by Bush in 1992, and Clinton inherited a program whose
failure was ensured, because Bush set it up that way, and Bush’s men on
the ground made sure Clinton would get slimed.
“Zinni has been in and around every major drug operation set up by the
Bush/Casey/Colby team since Vietnam. He’s been peripheral to
personnel placement and oversight for years, always in strategically
sensitive places where there have been known DEA/CIA drug pipelines
in operation.
“You’re never going to get hard proof, but Zinni is a Bush boy. While not
directly involved in any hands on drug smuggling, he’s peripheral to ALL
of it and has been for a very long time. He’s a facilitator, not a player in
the true sense. His job has more or less been to make sure that the right
people are in the right place at the right time.
“This is fairly common knowledge in insider circles, but I don’t suggest
trying to make the accusations publicly... there just isn’t enough paper to
prove anything, and Robert Mueller made sure to stop the BNL and
BCCI investigations before they could lead back to the Pentagon or
White House. He also stopped the Lockerbie investigation cold, so
Zinni’s (and many others including Bush Sr) ties to the Syrians never saw
223
 the light of day, although there IS a Library of Congress document you
can get entitled ‘Syria, President Bush, and Drugs’ that was published
October 28, 1992. It makes for some interesting reading.
“The contents of the report are more or less confirmed in a book by
Lester Coleman entitled On the Trail of the Octopus that tells of his time in
the DIA. He was loaned out by the DIA to spy on the CIA and DEA on
behalf of the DOD, and while in Cyprus and the Middle East discovered
that a DEA operation had been compromised. He believes (and
plausibly... read the book) that the Pan Am 103 bomb was placed on the
plane not by Libyans as claimed by Bob Mueller’s investigation, but by
Syrians who used their DEA heroin pipeline to smuggle a bomb onto the
plane. Considering that at least one of the alleged bombers was acquitted
and the second is still in the appellant process, it’s more likely than not
that Coleman is right.
“We’re talking about the most sophisticated Organized Crime Syndicate
in the history of man, run by Bush Jr.’s father. You’re not going to find
any evidence to pin on anyone in the inner two circles, and that includes
Zinni. They’re all buffered by mules like Oliver North and Barry Seale.
And now they have Robert Mueller as head of the FBI and Ashcroft as
attorney general, which basically ensures no war crimes tribunals in the
near future. Both men are as racist and corrupt as it gets.”

Why the PLO “Embassy” Got the Boot

What do you know? The Rockefellers of CFR fame were the
PLO’s landlords.
“Barry: In the attached information from Gale databases, please note the
associations between Cushman & Wakefield, of today’s Arafat eviction,
and it’s parent company the Rockefeller Group, Inc. It seems that the
Rockefeller family is realizing that their sponsorship of terrorists has bit
them in the ass. They know all too well the alliance between Osama and
Arafat. Can you imagine the loss of income to Rockefeller Group, Inc. in
New York alone from the 9-11 attack? Are the CFR occultists losing the
Rockefeller family? Persecuting little Israel has a price! (Gen. 12:3) Is the
Enron bust out an attempt to recover their losses in New York?”
I sent one observation of my own to this fine observer. My
information shows that the NY financial district was in a real estate
crisis before the towers were felled. It was far more profitable to
sell the property and let the new owner enjoy his six week old $3
billion insurance against damage caused by terror attacks.

Of Course! Israel’s Got the PLO’s Entire Collection of Records

This lady has to be right, though I can’t find anyone to say so.
Once Israel confiscated the PLO “government” records, it had the
224
goods on every NWO crook and anti-Semite in the form of
documented proof of their murderous and illegal transactions
against Israel. Imagine how handy that could turn out to be! No
wonder Europe and the Bush administration wants an Israeli
withdrawal far from the buildings they are snooping through.
“Dear Barry,
“I have been wondering if the recent turn around by the Bush
Administration has something to do with the documents the IDF is
turning up in their searches. Maybe the Bush administration thought the
incriminating evidence that the IDF is finding about Arafat funding terror
operations would be better hid. Maybe they are afraid of even more
incriminating info becoming public or falling into Israeli hands to be used
as a bargaining chip against them.
“What if the IDF uncovered documents concerning the CIA’s
recruitment (payment?) of terrorist leaders such as Rajoub, and the
murder of Israelis living in the west bank, many of those killed being US
citizens. This would place the USA in the position of supporting terrorist
organizations. It would place Bush in violation of his own ‘Bush
Doctrine’.
“Some people think the recent about face in US policy is a ploy, that the
US secretly still wants Israel to continue its offensive, sort of a good
cop/bad cop routine to appease the Arabs. I don’t think so. If they were
doing that they could have done it better and sooner.
“They did this to everyone’s surprise, shortly after evacuating Rajoub
from his hideout. Where is he now by the way? And shortly after the IDF
started making some smoking gun documents public. I think they are
scared and I think they are serious and they might even be being
blackmailed by the PLO itself using the same documents. I think they got
themselves into a mess that they don’t know how to get out of and the
welfare of the State of Israel is not their priority. They are worried about
saving their own skins. What do you think about this, and is anyone in
Israel looking into it?”

ENEMIES WITHIN, ENEMIES WITHOUT

Here an enemy, there an enemy. For Israel everywhere is an
enemy. Almost all Israelis acknowledge that now, but here is the
common view. The Arabs are enemy number one, the EU and UN
are supporting the Arabs because they are anti-Semites and the US
of A is just the peachiest place anywhere.
Of course, Israelis and most of the world will believe anything,
even that a plane defied trillion to one odds and accidentally
smashed directly into the tallest building in Milan in clear sunlight
225
and destroyed the administrative offices of the Government of
Lombardy. Since this is nigh impossible, the story is the pilot
committed suicide, which is why he radioed the tower that he had
lost control of his plane... the same way the September 11 planes
lost control when their autopilots were overridden by remote
control and new, deadly coordinates replaced the original
destinations. Let us wonder who is celebrating that the records of
the Lombardy government are no longer with us.
The way Israelis have it down, out of relief and gratitude that
their country finally punched out the murderers of the PLO, Ariel
Sharon and his Defense Minister are just the cleanest, bravest guys
we ever had leading us. Except that’s not the reality.
Sharon’s office manager Uri Shani suddenly resigned and
speculation spread that he was involved in illegal fundraising for
Sharon during the last election. My sources tell me to go farther
back, to 1991-2 when Sharon was Housing Minister. At the time
Israel was overwhelmed by a huge wave of immigration from the
former Soviet Union and Ethiopia. Sharon tackled the problem by
using American government-guaranteed bank loans to pillage and
loot the Housing Ministry. Billions of dollars are still not properly
accounted for. One of the means Sharon used in his grand larceny,
was overpaying for many thousands of caravans used to house the
new immigrants, as one of my correspondents writes:
“Re: $10 billion in US loan guarantees
“The $10 billion probably went into Israeli officials pockets. Recall that it
was for resettling Soviet Jews, and they bought caravans in the US.
“Those caravans were built in Georgia. I traced them to the factory in
Eaton, Georgia where they were built. A plant supervisor I enlisted to
help said he recalled the caravans were the shoddiest construction ever
leaving that plant. Unfortunately, the contract records were off limits to
him, whereas he had never been denied access to any other contracts.
I’ll dig up an article I wrote about this years ago. The smallest trailer
available for purchase in Atlanta is twice as large as the ones Israel
ordered, and the retail cost is one-third as much as Israel paid wholesale
for those caravans, while the quality of the Atlanta trailers is better.
Someone pocketed $10 billion.
“So, Israel borrowed $10 billion with US loan guarantees for 30 years to
buy caravans with a life -- probably they are all junked by now -- less than
10 years. Well built American trailers last 20 years or more.”

226
 Now this crime should make Sharon very vulnerable to
blackmail from the Labor Party, right? Nonsense, because
following Sharon as Housing Minister was Binyamin Ben Eliezer.
He raped, robbed, looted and pillaged the Housing Ministry budget
to buy votes among Arab and Druze municipal politicians.
What we’ve got running the show is a balance of theft. Now
throw Shimon Peres into the equation. The arch master criminal is
currently chastising Sharon for daring to insult the sensitive
Norwegian UN envoy Terje Larsen. Peres has this “Peace Center”
which has received huge donations from Europe. The EU loves to
bribe Israeli politicians, Yossi Beilin and Roman Bronfman are just
two Knesset members on their payroll. We now look at the board
of directors of the Peres Center for “Peace” and, voila, there’s the
name Terje Larsen on it. No conflict of interest here.
Remember, Peres runs the Foreign Ministry and decides what
kind of events Israel will present abroad. Which is why a recent
pro-Israel rally in Washington was peppered with speeches
sympathetic to “Palestinian” nationalism delivered by the likes of
Peres’ Vatican emissary “Rabbi” Michael Melchior.
And no one dares challenge the other because everyone has the
dirt on everyone else. Which is why Peres’ blatant role in the
organization of the Rabin assassination will never be pursued by
this or any other government.
Let us now, go abroad to visit our foes in their lairs. Note that
we do not visit Arab lands. As far as this author is concerned, the
Arabs are the barbaric tools of the New World Order. They control
nothing, their peoples have no say in their governments’ policies. If
the NWO turns on the hot tap, they will do a war dance. And they
have turned the tap onto super-boil right now. Here’s how they do
it, starting with the US.
I have been noting that ALL those responsible for peace in
Israel are members of an evil cabal called the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR): George Mitchell, George Tenet, Anthony Zinni
and William Burns. I have traced their ties to the Jesuits, all that is
but William Burns. Let’s see if my readers can help. And you do,
you do!
Recently I published a letter claiming that chief peacemaker
Anthony Zinni was tied up in the covert world of mass hard drug
227
smuggling and money laundering. It didn’t take long before the
confirmation came in:
“Dear Barry,
“As a Jew I must express my gratitude for your piece re: not defending
Israel. Excellent.
“Some facts you may not know: Both Tenet and Zinni are Knights of
Malta.
“As for Zinni and Drugs, I doubt you know this because I never had
occasion to reveal this before.
“During my second CIA tour of duty in Vietnam, I worked for a time at
Vung Tau instructing in the Phoenix program. After some months I was
brought back to Than So Nhut air base to work on a program known as
the “Long Silver Train” which was the operation exporting heroin in the
body cavities of unknown soldiers and shipping them back to CONUS.
“David Yallop has written a book about it called The Unholy Alliance about
Al Francovich and me. Yallop has admitted to several journalists that the
person called Oscar Benjamin is me. As for Zinni, he was involved in the
program in a big way with a lot of clout. I saw him there (a restricted area)
often and he made several trips to Okinawa each month and to Australia
(to Nugan Hand).”
And now, can anyone add to this tip on George Mitchell’s Jesuit
ties or fill in the William Burns picture? If so, we’ll have a pretty
clear idea of who is behind the violence against Israel.
“Don’t know about Mitchell but good friends tell me he’s very
close to Cardinal Bernard Law, for whatever that’s worth.”
Finally, some proof of my contention that Daniel Pipes of the
CFR is up to no good. The trick is to appear really anti-Arab, then
advocate a “Palestinian” state. The NWO psychologists must have
taken their good time to work this ploy out: let’s get the Jews used
to the idea by spreading fake right wing and religious writers to gain
their trust, and then whammo, reveal that they support the CFR’s
plans for Israel.
From Ric Shulman:
April 17, 2002, Arabs & Israel 7979:
Pipes Reveals True Colors
CNBC interviewed Daniel Pipes and Newsweek columnist Fareed Zakaria.
Daniel Pipes revealed that he supports eventual Arab statehood in Judea,
Samaria, and Gaza. That makes him a short-term friend of Israel and a
long-term enemy. He’s a friend to the extent of wanting to destroy
terrorism in the Mideast. He’s an enemy in wanting to let the Arabs, who

228
 already have the bulk of the Land of Israel and the rest of the Mideast
outside of Iran, to get another chunk, which chunk happens to contain
the strategic borders that would make Israel defensible. Even without
terrorism, the Arab states have made war on Israel. His plan is no good
unless the whole Mideast and Islam reformed. And if it did, why would
the Arabs in Yesha need a separate state? What about the Arabs of Israel?
It is likely that the government would accept Pipes’ blessing for eventual
PA statehood without his admonition that it should be free of irredentism
against Israel. Barry Chamish warned us that Daniel Pipes is working
against Israel. Here is evidence of it.
And now we arrive in Europe, where a coalition of the Vatican,
EU and UN is out for blood. Thanks to a devoted researcher from
Toronto, we return to a theme I can be accused of harping on.
Another cabal of iniquity is out to get Israel and it is led by the
Jesuit-trained King of Spain, Juan Carlos. As we know, Juan Carlos
believes he is a descendent of Jesus himself and the title he is
proudest of is, Protector of the Holy Sites of Jerusalem. He wants
the Jews out of town and the Vatican back in. He and his bosses
are using war to make their fondest wishes come true.
Why, oh why, don’t Israelis get it? They think Juan Carlos is a
retired royal and the real ruler of Spain is its democratically elected
government. Even as Peres is once again in Madrid the very day
these words are being written, they just don’t see why. They cannot
grasp that Peres is a Vatican spy, a monster in our midst.
Look who is running to Spain and watch how the UN and
Vatican are pitching in:
***
(http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2002/04/11/016.html)
Thursday, April 11, 2002. Page 5
EU, UN, Russia Back Powell’s Peace Mission
By Barry Schweid
...Powell was meeting later Wednesday in Madrid with King Juan Carlos
in Madrid with King Juan Carlos of Spain and then having dinner with
Ivanov, to discuss the Middle East as well as U.S.-Russian affairs,
including a planned arms-control summit in Moscow.
(http://www.arabia.com/afp/news/mideast/article/english/0,10846,152
817,00.html)
Jordan’s King Abdullah to Meet with Spanish king
March 03, 2002, 06:01 PM

229
AMMAN (AFP)—Jordan’s King Abdullah II will travel to Madrid later
this month for talks with Spanish King Juan Carlos and senior
government officials, diplomatic sources said.
The sources did not elaborate on the subject of the talks, but both Jordan
and Spain, which currently holds the rotating European Union
presidency, have both been lobbying for solutions to the raging Israeli-
Palestinian conflict
(http://www.petra.gov.jo/2002/72/en7213.htm)
(http://www.zenit.org/english/)
Date: 2002-04-16
Address to U.N. Human Rights Commission
Urges Respect for Religious Sites in Holy Land
GENEVA, APRIL 16, 2002 (Zenit.org).- The Vatican’s permanent
observer the United Nations here, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin,
delivered an address last Friday to a session of the U.N. Human Rights
Commission. Here is the text of the address, published today.
(Last paragraph:)
“Any long-term solution to the crisis in the Middle East must indeed
address the question of respect for and unrestricted access to the religious
sites, sacred to each religious tradition. This is also a dimension of
religious freedom. It is a precondition for fostering a climate of dialogue
between religions in the Middle East, in the service of peace”. (JC:cl. IV)
http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?f=/stories/20020416/6
52511.html
UN Backs Palestinian Violence
Arab, European nations pass resolution supporting use of ‘armed
struggle’
EU members Austria, Belgium, France, Portugal, Spain and Sweden
approved the resolution, and Italy abstained.
Belgium and Spain have been pushing for tough EU measures against the
Jewish state, with Belgium calling for sanctions based on a human rights
clause in the EU-Israeli Free Association agreement, which grants Israel
preferential trading terms.
(AFP)—EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana called for an immediate
halt to Israel’s military offensive but back-tracked on a plan to slap an
arms embargo against the Jewish state.
In remarks prepared for delivery to the European Parliament and
distributed to journalists beforehand, Solana said he favoured suspending
the shipment of weapons to Israel that might be used against Palestinian
civilians. But he inexplicably dropped all references to such sanctions
when he rose to speak at the start of a two-hour debate in the EU
legislature.

230
 ***
That last article is the happiest news we’ve received in years.
Israel now has nearly the entire government records of the
“Palestinian Authority” and she’s already using the really good
evidence to defend herself.
To keep the Americans in line, Israel leaked a few barely benign
documents connecting George Tenet with PLO Security Chief
Jibril Rajoub’s reign of terror against Israel. Incredibly, American
commentators like William Safire “observed” that Tenet is a nice
guy who was taken in by Rajoub.
Tenet got off cheap so far. But clearly Spain’s Solana didn’t.
Whatever evidence was amassed against him kept him at bay.
Whatever illegal deals and transactions the Vatican, EU and UN
had with the PLO and its associated terrorists are in Jewish hands
now, so finally, we have one over our enemies.

NORWAY, THE EU, THE US:

SAME PLOT, DIFFERENT CROOKS
Now come on already. If your Foreign Minister, it doesn’t
matter which country, bribed a prominent Norwegian to win a
Nobel Prize, the scandal would ruin him and he’d be out of office
in a day. Right? So how does Shimon Peres do it?
Yoav Yitzhak, in the wide circulation newspaper Ma’ariv,
revealed that Peres gave Terje Larsen, the UN Middle East
representative, $100,000 to secure him a Nobel Prize. He also
revealed that the Peres Peace Center largely exists to give Oslo and
Rabin criminals like Carmi Gillon, Uri Savir and Ron Pundak lots
of money to keep their mouths shut.
A week later, David Bedein, writing in Makor Rishon, applied the
coup de grace. He interviewed a member of the Nobel Prize
Committee, Kaare Kristiansen, who not just confirmed the bribe
but described Larsen’s pressure on the committee in full detail.
So why isn’t this the international scandal of the decade? Why is
the media letting Peres, Larsen, the Nobel Committee and Norway
off the hook? And for that matter, how come Yossi Beilin, who
appointed Larsen his personal Oslo negotiator, isn’t being pressed
hard to explain why he brought that crook into our home?
231
 Well, I’m not letting the matter drop. I went looking to find out
why Norway, through Beilin and Peres, appointed its finest
criminals to wreck Israel and I hit gold.
From The Middle East Intelligence Digest, Vol. 7, No. 5, May, 1996:
“The Norway Connection”
Twenty five years ago he committed himself to wiping Israel from the
face of the Middle East. On May 13, Norwegian Foreign Minister Bjorn
Tere Godal arrived to see the deployment of Norwegian ‘peacekeeping’
troops in Hebron—to oversee the beginning of the end of Jewish rule
over the first Jewish city.
On May 4, the Norwegian newspaper Dagen exposed a 25 year old
commitment by leading figures in Norway’s ruling Labor Party to support
and facilitate the demise of a sovereign Jewish Israel, and to establish in
its place a secular, liberal Palestinian state.
The report showed that Norwegian Labor Party leaders agree with
Arafat’s ultimate aim: the removal of the Jewish state in the Middle East.
Twenty five years ago, the man who is today’s Minister of Foreign Affairs
committed the Labor Party Youth wing to removing Israel from the
Middle East, thus paving the way for the Oslo Accords. By giving
Norway the ‘honor’ of hosting the secret talks with the PLO, Israel in its
thirst for peace, played into the hands of those committed to its
dissolution.
Dagen centered its report on revelations in a book by Haaken Lie, a
former secretary-general of Norway’s Labor Party and a strong friend of
Israel.
Lie revealed that in the 1971 Labor Youth Organization (AUF)
convention, chairman Bjorn Tere Godal approved the following
resolution: “The AUF will support the forces which struggle for the
national and social liberation of the Palestinian people. The qualification
for lasting peace must be that Israel ceases to exist as a Jewish state, and
that a progressive Palestinian state is established where all ethnic groups
can live side by side in complete equality.”
Godal is today Norway’s minister of foreign affairs and a strong advocate
of a Palestinian state. When confronted with his words, he told Dagen, “It
is irrelevant what I meant at that point because the situation has
changed.”
Dagen traced the first resolution by the AUP and how it was pursued in
the ensuing years by various Labor Party politicians such as Thorvald
Stoltenberg, Knut Frydenlund and (then) Prime Minister Gro Harlem
Brundtland.
Stoltenberg was foreign minister when the secret Israel-PLO talks began
in January 1993. He was also the brother-in-law of the late Johan Joergen
Holst, foreign minister when the Oslo Agreement was signed. Ten years

232
 before, he and then foreign minister Frydenlund visited Arafat in Tunisia,
returning to persuade their Labor colleagues that, “there is no reason to
doubt Arafat’s willingness to sit at the negotiating table.”
Frydenlund had wanted Arafat to visit Oslo but Swedish Prime Minister
Olaf Palme changed the plan. So the chairmen of the Scandinavian Labor
Parties met Arafat in Stockholm in 1983, after which Brundtland told the
press, “Arafat is a knowledgeable and interesting person. I have not met
with an extremist.”
Dagen recalled that the conclusion reached by Palme and by Denmark’s
Prime Minister Anker Jorgensen was equally clear: “Israel was the
problem preventing peace in the Middle East.”
Thus, writes Dagen, twelve years after meeting Arafat, Norway watched as
Prime Minister Burndtlend “leads Arafat by the hand on the red carpet
when he comes to receive the Nobel Prize for Peace.”
Leif Wellerap, a Norwegian journalist, believes the Dagen report answers
all those who have wondered why Norway involved itself so heavily in the
past years in making Arafat and the PLO so politically palatable.
“For those aware of the traditionally good and friendly relationship
between Israel and Norway, and specifically between Israel and the
Norwegian Labor Party,” says Wellerap, “it has been hard to understand
what lay behind the efforts to clean up the Middle East’s chief terrorist
and turn him into a main player in what is known around the world as the
Oslo process.”
“Lie makes it easier to understand what has led the Norwegian
government to act as a locomotive in the process that is about to place
Israel in its greatest danger since its birth. My hope is that this report will
open eyes to the misery Israel is heading towards if it stays on the track,
regrettably named after my country’s capital.”
***
It is immensely gratifying to receive confirmation that my
readers actually pay attention to my writing. Many made the
connection that the first person to visit Arafat after being released
from his Ramallah bondage, unfortunately alive, was Pope John
Paul II’s personal envoy, the FRENCH Cardinal Roger Etchegaray.
As one reader noted, “We know he gave Arafat his marching
orders, but now let’s ask why the first visit abroad by Leah Rabin
after her husband’s murder was to this same pope.”
And it is even more gratifying when readers trust me enough to
send me eye-witness testimony. Let us look at the EU from inside:
Shalom Barry,
While I was navigating as assistant to various cabinets, I had to learn:

233
a) the structure and functioning of the EU institutions: the Commission,
Parliament, Council. How working documents develop into laws and who
interferes and negotiates on what level. I often followed a negotiation
process from one cabinet to the other where I had to put myself into the
opposite shoes where another member state would “cook” their position.
I worked on the diplomatic level but also on technical issues like legal
issues. After a year the forest of procedures started to become
transparent.
Also I learned how different facets of work seem to be worlds apart – like
agriculture, enlargement, culture, budget—and overlap behind the screens
into strategies. The intranet of the Commission is a huge construction, a
never-ending “city” of information.
b) the structures of the cabinets of the member states with their contacts
in permanent representations in Brussels, governmental contacts in the
countries as well as specific advisors and media (who must be channeled
by priority at work).
c) constantly blend into work processes that I don’t have a clue about,
playing “Sherlock Holmes” all the time. I must say after repeated despair
of not finding the right names or documents, I now mostly instinctively
link things together. When I come into an office or a computer it takes
me a minimum of time to find the requested name, phone number, letter
or link, it just goes like an instinct. We replacements often work under
enormous pressure to perform with minimum knowledge and for the big
shots we cannot afford to make mistakes or let anyone wait. Among 24
colleagues I had the ambition to fit anywhere at anytime, and they even
keep me in the Italian cabinet of the President though I don’t speak
Italian (I just understand roughly). But I always get my job done
excellently, I mostly always know who’s important and who not to disturb
superiors when people call or documents come in when they are on
mission. I always try to put myself in the shoes of my superior and be his
“second skin”. In this way I know exactly what is important for him/her
even when they don’t explain. Last year I had about 30 different cabinet
superiors of different nationalities, ranks and psychological crazes, I try to
be professional like the army and concentrate on the essential. I never
needed personal favors, I work by performance and personal charm, but
no strings attached. I have an excellent contact with people but keep
myself independent from cabinet gossips and manipulations.
And I’m not alone. Actually a Christian French secretary from the
Commission and me wanted to promote Christian activities from within
the EU in order to seize an opportunity to let Christian values/activities
have more impact.
You must know, we both don’t attach much value to our nationality and
both think we have Jewish roots.—Besides a tired Catholic group there
was not much to do. It seemed that no Christians prosper at the
Institutions! We tried several things but all got stuck. Last fall we went to

234
a “Prayer breakfast” at the Parliament with some 250 others and some
Christian VIPs.
It was quite impressive but still, the level was rather “kindergarten”. We
said, if these people are really Christians, why is there so little influence
going on?
A longtime friend from France, a lawyer from the noblesse who serves in
an inner healing ministry got involved, following a recent call towards
“politicians”. We started a series of seminars and gathered a group of only
ten Christians who identified their position at the Institutions as a specific
privilege and call from God to do something “FROM WITHIN”. We
met to get ourselves together, to “clean up” our spiritual/personal
situations, to get equipped and to see what God wants.
Member of the group is Paul Van Buitenen, an infamous name in
Brussels. As a whistleblower he brought the last Commission down in
1999 and the whole College could go home. It was a huge scandal. At that
time Paul suffered bad treatment and the story is still not finished. He
worked as a small “nobody” at the anti-fraud office at that time where he
discovered irregularities.
Then a Christian who is in my prayer group, came into contact with him
and Paul started to believe in God. From then on he collected monstrous
files of abuse in the Institutions and even lots of people who knew things
had them land anonymously on his desk when he went out to go to toilet.
After lots of resistance the whole thing exploded and the Commission
went home. The soup is still cooking because he made a resume (of
document which mainly stayed in a safe at a bank in the end) of 220
allegations and the time is NOW that the present Commission is
supposed to clean up the rotten structures. They admitted 15 eventual
irregularities so far. Paul has also written a book on this thing.
While weekly praying with Maria (who accompanied Paul and his family)
and Colette (the French secretary) we realized they were trying to get Paul
into a deadlock. By “coincidence” I got assignments just on vital posts in
cabinets that treated the matter and I saw how the machine was building a
wall. But we said what God starts he can also finish and Paul’s success
had not been for nothing.
So I spent months and months reading everything in the cabinets that
passed my desk and mailbox to understand the system better. Then I got
information from you and some sites on secret societies and read this
stuff as much as I could. At the same time, I studied all the political
matters I treated. In the end I did nothing else than prayer, work, reading
and discussing mainly with Colette what I discovered—until late at nights.
(You see we don’t have time to talk about fashion...). I know when I sleep
that my brain is processing because it keeps reconditioning daily and
drastically.
Working with the President I get the world press twice a day, together
with press releases and reporting from within the Institutions I have to

235
“pre-read” for specific issues. There I could learn how the media works
daily. My orientation point was Israel. If anything is right in politics for
me it is the existence of Israel and its welfare. So whatever they say
against that I know it’s from the enemy and there I could see where we
stand. Over weeks and weeks I learned how politics develop about Israel
from close by. It actually started last fall when in October Arafat visited
Prodi. I went down to the press conference and stood 3 meters from
both of them. I wanted to look Arafat into his eyes. I had had the PA on
the phone previously and I was disgusted how we even speak with these
people. When I stood face to face with this disgusting man I was seized
by an enormous anger. My heart was beating and I was sweating and I felt
I wanted to scream. I could not believe how our politicians stand with
this monster. Prodi, intimidated, arms around his body, no self-assurance,
not at ease. This Arafat like he was at home, and expecting everyone to
bow. I could literally see blood stains on him. His mouth was so dirty.
And he was just a cockroach.
I went out in fury, trembling. It took me the whole afternoon to calm
down. But then God said to me, “this is what Europe chooses and this is
what they will get. It is a judgment.”
After that I worked for the Budget Commissioner, directly, for a longer
time. We had to close the yearly budget and the Euro was coming. Then
Harry Kney Tal came to see the commissioner as someone of the
parliament protested that the EU finances PA terror. I received both
personally (and I always pray). Both stayed unusually long. It stirred lots
of wind, then Christopher Patten, commissioner for External relations,
took complete side for the PA. I saw the documents explaining all the
fundings. Final line was Israel had no chance.
So in January I sat with Armando Varricchio, the diplomatic counselor of
the President for some two months. Even when short interruptions came
in from other posts, I often returned to Varricchio just when important
stuff on Israel was going on. There the ciphers and classified mail
between the foreign ministries was passing through my hands. The Karine
ship was caught on Jan 12. What a wind in the diplomatic forest! But you
know all these exchanges looked like a baby game, for very stupid people.
So what were they hiding behind all this talking? I started to discern more
about the diplomatic contacts and who phoned at what moment. When
Israel was bleeding in attacks, Arab ambassadors would praise EU work
and we got prospects for better trade. Last fall they started to renew the
pacts with the Arab states on trade, after 14 years! Suddenly everything
goes so smoothly. I also understood that the very important things and
people went with the least wordings: When finally Council and Parliament
agreed that the damage on PA structure is equal to damage on EU
structure, it was a small phrase in EU official reporting. That day I cried
and explained to Colette that now the EU is OFFICIALLY at war with
Israel, while the public is brain-dead. Because of this I also felt I should
share things with someone, but I realized that nobody can be trusted,

236
Sharon is not the Sharon we thought, and who are the others (like at the
embassy)? I had the impression they were all sitting in one boat. Another
thing are the phone calls; When Moratinos called (official EU rep for
Middle East) or from Solana. You know, secretaries like me “read”
people by intuition, just by two seconds hearing a voice on the phone. I
can tell you those people sounded all like dirty mafia Arabs and
everywhere was conspiracy.
I was sitting next to the room where cabinet members “cooked” the
decisions how to put Israel under pressure, with deadlock on the trade
agreements and The Hague in the future. The irony sometimes was that
they wrote resolutions themselves in a meeting for confidentiality and
finally gave them to me to ‘quickly copy them’. This happened regularly. I
always copied them one extra set which I threw into the waste bin or so
and recovered it later to read it. A month ago I stopped this extra
sniffling. It had been tiring because I often took risks and it was not right.
Then I also had learned how to read the bigger lines and I could interpret
without seeing their documents. I sometimes went to the president’s
secretariate where the door was open and my boss talked with the
president. He didn’t see me looking but I could see a lot in his face. HE
was giving Prodi orders that OTHERS had given him. He was exerting
power on his “boss”. I could strongly feel “mind control” and fear.
I see all the mail from these “Christians” who claim beside having a
church or a statue damaged that they are persecuted by Israeli terror. I
read the mail from the PA in Tunisia and how Egypt gets exemption on
steel tariffs because of “special” relations.
Once I did extensive “filing” at the advisors closets. He’s leaving in some
months and throws the files into the closet without order. Personal
protocols, handwritten minutes—and copies that are not public
documents. But signed by Putin! or meetings with heads of state I never
heard of. All mixed with the other briefings. I copied what I could and
still have a lot to read at home. What I found was enough to confirm all
these conspiracy and NWO theories I had studied in the meantime.
Freemason stuff, long term strategies, the Vatican. You know we have
special guards in the building for the president, but before Easter all
people were gone or lazy.
Now that I was stricken how much all these things you and others write
are real in front of my eyes, I think there must be an assignment for me in
all that. Colette and me think we should talk to those Christians who
really want to wake up and make seminars. Persecution will come anyway.
I feel very strongly what they are doing to the Jews now is coming to the
real Christians soon.
I’ve got to stop, sorry for my unstructured style. I love Israel and I love
people who defend it. I love the truth.
***

237
 (http://www.jpost.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=JPost/A
/JPArticle/Full&cid=1020146447165)
Bush Refuses to Put Syria on His Terror Nation List
This ties in with the Bush family interests... read the
congressional report, “President Bush, Syria and Drugs”.
Also Lester Coleman’s “On the Trail of the Octopus”. Coleman
talks about observing the actions of the Bush/CIA/ DEA pipeline
when he was a DIA agent stationed in the Middle East, on loan to
the DEA. He knew the guys who infiltrated the Bush family’s
heroin pipeline and planted the bomb on Pan Am 103 (Lockerbie).
He ran away to Sweden for asylum after writing the book. Shortly
after, the Carlyle Group (a defense and medical conglomerate kind
of like IG Farben that Bush works with) via its subsidiary United
Defense bought Bofor’s... a Swedish Defense Contractor that
accounts for 40% of Sweden’s GDP. Needless to say, shortly after
that Coleman was handed over to the Americans and jailed. For
telling the truth, Coleman’s going to die in jail the same as Bush’s
South American drug partners Noriega and Montesinos.
The heroin pipeline is the main reason why Zinni is pushing for
“Observers” and not “Peacekeepers” on the ground. Peacekeepers
will be unsophisticated “grunts” (translate as honest citizens) who
won’t have the “nuance” (translate as corruptibility) to help the
Bush family poison little colored kids in the name of Ethnic
superiority. Observers, on the other hand, will all be hand picked
CIA people who will play ball and spy on Israel, Syria and Lebanon
for the Bush cabal.
***
I’m always flattered when people remember my ancient work.
For instance, last November I wrote that a plane full of Israelis
shot down over the Black Sea was the deliberate murder of five
leading microbiologists. Now three readers have sent me reports
from the US, Canada and Britain on the murder of a good dozen
microbiologists in America during the past year.
It seems like years, actually it was years, when I reported that
Pres. Clinton was offered gazillions of Arab dollars if he could get
Israel to sign its suicide before he left office. A reader sent a
NewsMax piece proving that such bribery is the norm.

238
 Remember Jimmy Carter? The first President who let the
CFR/Tri-Lateral Commission take over his whole cabinet. The
supremely moral born again Christian who oversaw the election
that brought Arafat his presidency and declared it fair, but forgot to
mention Arafat threatening his main rival out of the race, thus
leaving a 72 year old lady with no chance of victory, who also
forgot that ballot stuffing and vote burning is illegal. Well, he was
on the Arab payroll all along.
From NewsMax:
The Carter Center: Follow the Money
The financing behind Georgia’s Carter Center and the Jimmy Carter
Library that raises serious doubts that the former president is, in actuality,
a wholly neutral intermediary in the troubled region. NewsMax has
reviewed annual reports that indicate millions of charitable dollars have
flowed into the center from His Majesty Sultan Qaboss bin Said Al Said
of Oman, Jordan, from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and from the
Government of the United Arab Emirates.
Furthermore, hundreds of thousands of dollars have been donated to the
center by the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development. H.R.H.
Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdallah of Morocco has also contributed
tens of thousands of dollars.
There are no corresponding contributions apparent from Israeli sources,
however.
As the center’s literature describes,
“The Carter Center and the Jimmy Carter Library were built in large
measure thanks to the early leadership and financial support of the Carter
Center founders.”
Three of those generous founders:
Agha Hasan Abedi
On July 5 1991, banking regulators targeted Abedi’s Bank of Credit and
Commerce International (BCCI), triggering a worldwide financial tidal
wave. To date, accountants and lawyers have managed to recoup
(discounting fees) $7 billion out of the $12 billion money pit that fueled
the BCCI fraud.
Agha Hasan Abedi, a banker and self-styled mystic on first-name terms
with Carter, created BCCI in 1972. Abedi had charmed seed money out
of Arab sheikhs, organizing camel races and hunting trips. The Bank of
America bought into BCCI as a way of buying access to the Middle East,
holding a 30 percent stake at one point before dumping its holdings in the
late 1970s.
His Majesty King Fahd of Saudi Arabia

239
 Last month Saudi Arabia transferred $15.4 million in advance aid to the
Palestinian Authority. The transfer was made to a controversial Arab
League fund, a product of the recent Arab summit in Beirut. According
to Arab spokesmen, the money was hurriedly contributed due to the dire
plight of the Palestinian people as a result of “vicious Israeli aggression”.
King Fahd, Crown Prince Abdullah and Defense Minister Prince Sultan
jointly donated $4.8 million to launch the fund pot, while Interior
Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz sent an estimated $800,000 to the
families of “155 Palestinian martyrs” killed in the current Israeli offensive.
Hasib J. Sabbagh
Sabbagh is the chairman of Consolidated Contractors Co. of Oman,
Jordan. He is also the Senior Fellow for the Middle East of the Council
on Foreign Relations. Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations
is a membership organization contributing ideas to U.S. foreign policy.
The Council publishes Foreign Affairs, a leading journal on global issues.

UP TO THEIR OLD TRICKS AGAIN

Remember the long gone past when it was agreed internationally
that anything resembling a “Palestinian” state would be inherently
unstable and would spread violence and war throughout the region?
Back then, this was a planet-wide consensus and for that reason
even Jordan and Egypt refused to create such a state out of Gaza
and the West Bank when they controlled them.
Of course, the consensus back then was on the spot correct, but
the last decade has seen such intensive worldwide brainwashing
that most of planet Earth is now convinced that a “Palestinian”
state is somehow a natural and just foregone conclusion, whether
an actual Palestinian people exists or not.
On May 12, the Likud Party gathered to return to sanity and
declare that as the party 2/3 of Israelis voted for in the last election,
it would never acquiesce to such madness. The leaders of the Israeli
Left panicked and organized a rally the night before the Likud
gathering in favor of such a state. It wasn’t easy for them; they
rented a fleet of buses and emptied out whole Arab towns and
Jewish leftwing youth movements and still only managed to put
together about 60,000 protesters. That’s all they have left. They
know that in the next elections Labor and its allies are going to be
all but wiped out.
And they’re scared, really, really scared. So they’re doing
desperate, really, really desperate things.
240
 Knesset Member Benny Elon told the daily, Ma’ariv, that there
was a mole in the government giving away security secrets to the
PLO and the foreign media. The government had prepared a
military operation to take Arafat’s compound and arrest all within,
except apparently, Arafat. The newspaper Makor Rishon found the
report leaking the plan, thus short-circuiting it, and guess what, it
was written and prepared by Shlomo Gur’s lust partner, Yossi
Beilin. And he’s still at work. A plan to avenge a suicide bomb in
Rishon Letzion, and its 16 dead Israelis, with an attack on Gaza to
arrest the bombing planners was also short-circuited by military
leaks to the foreign media.
And with published proof that he is behind the leaks, no one
thinks that Beilin should be investigated for high-level treason???
There is no room for hatred of the followers of the Israeli left.
They have been brainwashed to accept national suicide as pure fun.
They are mostly fine people who deserve to be understood. But
their highest ranking leaders are murderous, conniving criminals
whose felonies are being exposed too quickly for them to keep
plugging holes much longer. Look at what’s come out:
• Shimon Peres paid Norwegian UN rep Terje Larsen
$100,000 to pressure the Nobel committee in Oslo to
award him a prize.
• Yossi Beilin has been paid off by the EU since 1990 to
destabilize, supposedly, his own country.
• Peres exchanged Israeli citizenship with criminals such
as Marc Rich for lots of cash.
• And the Rabin murder truth will just not go away. The
trial of Shabak provocateur Avishai Raviv was
postponed for the tenth time, until July 21.
Which brings us back to that rally two days ago in Tel Aviv. It
sure was reminiscent of the one six years ago which snuffed out
Yitzhak Rabin! Back then, the commander of the Shabak’s Jewish
Department was Khezi Kalo. He was the superior officer of the
same Raviv the court system just can’t find the time to try after
three years of, yes, trying.
Kalo ran Raviv’s phony radical Jewish group Eyal whose
purpose was to blame religious, right wing or any Jews who didn’t
241
support the Oslo process with crimes of murderous violence. Since
these Jews were not murderously violent, Raviv created the
outrageous acts for them under the tutelage of Kalo. All this led
eventually to the Rabin assassination.
We have a surprise for you. Kalo is back in the driver’s seat
again, and repeating his crimes just like in the good old days. This
time, he has created a new Jewish underground.
Recall how desperate and terrified Kalo is. He knows his day of
justice is not far off, and in his twisted mind, he thinks tricks will
put it off forever. Remember how he tricked Dahlia Pelosoff Rabin
into supporting the indictment of Shlomi Halevy, when she really
didn’t? Recall just a few months ago when the stillborn Israeli TV
Channel 10 gave him airtime to once again blame a conspiracy of
rabbis for Rabin’s murder. Well here is his latest plan:
For the past year, the Israeli media has been spreading reports of
a Jewish radical underground somewhere in Judea or Samaria.
Among other incidents, they were blamed for a drive by killing of
three Arabs near Hebron last spring, and the planting of a bomb in
a schoolyard at Tsur Bakhur near Jerusalem, a few months ago. On
April 29, the Shabak announced that they had arrested the four
members of this underground which committed these two crimes.
Let us remind ourselves of these incidents.
The day before the drive by killings, a bomb was found in Kach
leader Noam Federman’s wife’s car. She was never charged with
carrying explosives, so we can safely surmise that the Shabak
planted them in her car with the idea of implanting the idea that
those Jewish settlers are up to their violent activities again. The next
day the three Arabs were shot in their van, and one was a political
rival of Arafat’s. Coincidence, coincidence.
As for Tsur Bakhur, this is the very last place any real Jewish
underground would hit, but the PLO sure hates it because its
village council has decided it doesn’t want to join the Palestinian
Authority but would rather stay in Israel.
Nonetheless, a leaflet by the Israel Revenge Fighters was sent to
some media outlets, nicely printed in Hebrew. Surely, an
underground that wants to stick around for a while would go to a
print shop and advertise itself!

242
 On April 28, a van was found full of explosives in Jerusalem,
leading to the arrest of four Jews from the Bethlehem area. It
wasn’t long after the arrest that another leaflet was sent to the
media, this time by the Fighters of the Kingdom of Israel, accepting
responsibility for the drive by murders and the Tsur Bakhur
bombing.
How convenient, how fortunate for the Shabak. Here was the
proof they had been seeking to prove that radical settlers were up
to their old ways, the kind of ways that murdered Yitzhak Rabin.
And how satisfied Khezi Kalo must feel knowing that the public
has the message that radical Jews, the kind who really murdered
Rabin, actually exist. This is even better than the Shlomi Halevy
trick.
Within a day, the Shabak convinced the Supreme Court to
cancel the right of habeas corpus for the four arrestees. For the past
two weeks, the victims have not been allowed to see anyone,
including a lawyer. If the Shabak had any evidence whatsoever
against them, they should have been charged and the legal process
begun.
But they had nothing, so they and the police have spent a
fortnight trying their best to force confessions out of the four. One
can only imagine the terrifying techniques used to extract the
confessions but the victims, apparently, did not buckle because
today the police announced that there was no evidence linking
them to the Hebron drive-by shooting or the Tsur Bakhur
bombing. One of the four was finally allowed to see an attorney.
But that won’t be the end of the story because three of the
victims are still all alone against their interrogators and in the end
they’ll say anything to stop the near tortuous harassment.
And that is how desperate the leaders of the Left are. Kalo was
given to go-ahead to print the leaflets and plant the bombs in the
van. Or a Raviv-like provocateur set up a sting and the group fell
for it. Like that’s going to put off Kalo’s day of justice.

243
 FROM TWO NORWEGIAN READERS:

More on Larsen and the Norwegians

In 1992, the Tromsoe, Norway-based freelancer Arne Eriksen
published the book Rosa Japper I Fiskefarse (which loosely translates
to “Pink Yuppies in Fish Farce”), explaining how Fagbevegelsens
Forskningsinstitutt (FAFO) had got involved in a fishery project in
Nordvoegen, Finnmark (Norway) in the mid-80s.
Terje Roed-Larsen was the managing director of FAFO, and
from 1984 he was either directly or by way of FAFO involved in
establishing and running the company Fideco which was to get
involved in fishery operations in Finnmark.
Also involved in Fideco was the Bergen-based company Bird
Technology which had collaborative links to Shell (which was
interested in getting involved in land-based activities in Norway in
order to obtain a license to cultivate oil in the North Sea).
The scandal was that Roed-Larsen earned circa NKR 600,000
from realizing his Fideco share options in a deal with Bird (basically
“money for nothing”, while others who held shares in the company
lost their invested capital.)
Although he had a legal right to realize his share options, the
questionable thing is the date when the share options were
realized—highly relevant in terms of the tax Roed-Larsen was due
to pay from it. It became known that Roed-Larsen had backdated
the agreement.
(Shell had also been pushing for Bird to purchase the shares
from Roed-Larsen.)
This didn’t create much debate in 1992, neither in 1994 when
Eriksen published a new book, this time about FAFO.
But on October 25, 1996, Roed-Larsen was named minister of
planning in the government of then-prime minister Thorbjoern
Jagland. One week later, one newspaper (Fiskaren) published an
article about Roed-Larsen’s Fideco dealings, quoting the 1992 book
by Eriksen. Opposition politicians and the media demanded details
about Roed-Larsen and Shell’s involvement, and how it all related
to cultivation of oil.

244
 Throughout the next month, the media frenzy was so intense
that it ultimately led to the involvement of Oslo’s tax office. Roed-
Larsen met with the head of Oslo’s tax office on November 21,
inquiring “whether there is any new information which has
consequences for my tax payments in 1986 and 1987.”
He left six days later, after 35 days in the office. Eventually, he
was fined NKR 50,000 (a huge discount because the matter was
“ancient history”). A nice deal considering how much money he
made in the first place.
***
There is no change in the attitude towards Israel of the youth
division of the Norwegian Labor Party—AUF.
Only last night on Norwegian state TV—NRK 1—the leader of
AUF vehemently criticized the vice president of the Norwegian
Parliament, Mr. Inge Lonning, (Conservative) for wanting to
spoil(!) the good work of Mr. Terje Roed-Larsen and his wife,
Mona Juul. Surely everybody could see that their work for the peace
process clearly outweighed any mistake in not having declared the
money they had received... The one in charge of the program,
communist inspired Mr. Knut Olsen had no objections to that kind
of reasoning.
If you would make a word search on the whole document and
find the name Stoltenberg, then you have the same senior
Norwegian Labor Party member Thorvald Stoltenberg, Special
Representative of the UN Secretary General for Humanitarian
Affairs in Iraq; President Norwegian Red Cross, Oslo; former Co-
Chairman (UN) of the Steering Committee of the International
Conference on Former Yugoslavia; former Foreign Minister of
Norway; former UN High Commissioner for Refugees—as
mentioned in the list of members of the Trilateral Commission—
http://trilateral.org:9999/memb.htm
You may also like to know that his son, Jens Stoltenberg, MP
for labor, and until recently the PM of Norway, can at times be
seen and heard defending the rights of the Palestinian Arabs at the
stand the Palestine Committee has on Saturdays in front of the
Norwegian Parliament. They have vowed to keep their stand until
Israel gives in to the demands of Arafat and PLO.

245
 So now you know what socialistic solidarity with the Israeli
Labor Party and Shimon Peres is all about.
***
How do you feel about the fact that your man Moshe Arens sits
together with leading world Jew-haters PLO Hanan Ashrawi and
Norwegian Mega-bitch Gro Harlem Brundtland on the
International Advisory Board of the New York based Council on
Foreign Relations?
Source: Council on Foreign Relations 2000 Annual Report, p. 116,
“International Advisory Board”

Europe and the Vatican

Here is an interesting quote from a former UN official of which
I believe it is worth taking note:
“The only hope for the western world lies in an alliance between the
Roman Catholic church which is the most commonly, influential,
controlling, unifying element in Europe and the Eastern Orthodox
church. Rome must unite with Eastern Orthodoxy, because the Eastern
Orthodox church controls western middle east, [the east end of the
Mediterranean] and if they don’t solidify that control, Islam will march
across Europe. Islam is political. The only hope of the western world lies
then in a united Europe under the control of the Pope. And then all
Protestant Christians around the globe must come into submission to the
Pope so we will have a unified Christian world.”
- Charles Habib Malik, U.S. diplomat and foreign-service officer, former
president of the U.N. General Assembly and Security Council, guest
lecturer at Harvard
***
That’s a surprise, Peres heading to Rome and the Vatican!
(http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=16168
6&contrassID=1&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassID=0)
Peres Headed to Rome to Convince Italian PM to Accept Militants
ROME—Hours after a five-week standoff at Bethlehem’s Church of the
Nativity ended, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres arrived in Rome
Friday for talks with Premier Silvio Berlusconi and top Vatican (news -
web sites) officials.
Peres landed at Rome’s Leonardo da Vinci airport shortly after 10 a.m.
(0800 GMT).
His visit includes a meeting with Vatican Secretary of State Angelo
Sodano and Vatican Foreign Minister Archbishop Jean-Louis Tauran.

246
 ***
Rome, May 10 (Reuters)
Israel said on Friday it favored Italy as the venue for a regional
conference on the middle east that might pave the way for the
resumption of the peace process.
“I would like to see the regional conference take place in Italy. Let the
Rome government choose the place,” prime minister Ariel Sharon told
the weekly magazine Panorama.

FRENCH FIRE FRICASSEES FACTS

The headline everywhere: “Israeli Embassy Fire in Paris Caused
by Electrical Short”. Yeah, sure it was. Why the media even knew
about the faulty wiring while the inferno was blazing, before any
fire inspector could have possibly examined the building.
This line is from Israel Television One News. “The embassy was
locked before the fire broke out.” We now conjure pictures in our
mind of the ambassador leaving work at 5 and locking the building
behind him. This was the most sensitive Israeli embassy in Western
Europe and it was manned by security staff 24 hours a day. How
come one of them didn’t spot the electrical fire, report it and put it
out before it spread to the entire edifice?
And that’s no tiny edifice. What was inside to feed the fire so
quickly? diplomatic rags soaked in linseed oil? And need we ask,
assuming all the security personnel were asleep, why didn’t the
smoke detectors sound the alarm?
The newspaper Ma’ariv noted that ALL of the embassy’s cables,
notes, records, and documents were destroyed in the fire. All
computer hard drives became mush, all paper, ash.
How very convenient. Now history will never know the tawdry
crimes of the French government against Israel, nor will Shimon
Peres’ central role in these crimes, including the Rabin
assassination, be proven in time for his ever more likely upcoming
trials.
From here on until forever, the French government’s collusions
with Peres on the Golan Geights, the murder of Paris Ambassador
Eliahu Ben Elissar, the backing of PFLP terror attacks, the secret
talks with the Vatican, including the negotiations between Peres’
rabbis Rosen and Melchior with French Cardinal Lustiger to divvy
247
up Jerusalem, all this and more will never be provable in a court of
law or scholarship.
This was in inside job. No arsonist snuck past embassy security
and rigged this fire. And no one could be more pleased by the
inferno than Shimon Peres.

Beilin and the CFR

Yossi Beilin is not a Knesset nor cabinet member. He has no
official role to play in Israeli politics, right? Let us quote from The
Jerusalem Post. In mid-May:
“Yossi Beilin, the former justice minister was told by US officials in
Washington that CIA director George Tenet will be traveling to the
region very soon. His visit will be followed by a trip by Assistant Secretary
of State for Near Eastern Affairs, William Burns and then another trip by
Secretary of State Colin Powell. Beilin met with Burns yesterday and with
Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and State Department Policy
Planning Director, Richard Haass on Tuesday.”
Now let’s play a little game. How many of the names in the
previous short item belong to the Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR)? For those unacquainted with this little 3800 member think
tank in New York, they have more than once published their war
plans against Israel, but the Jewish people still don’t catch on that
the CFR is their number one enemy in the US.
Now for the game, According to the CFR’s own 2001
membership list:
Tenet (CFR), Burns (CFR), Powell (CFR), Armitage (CFR),
Haass (CFR). That’s right, the lot of them. Now ask, what is non-
government member and Shlomo Gur’s love machine, Beilin doing
in Washington with these criminals? Watch out for Beilin, people;
he’s on the move again, and out to get us all on behalf of his pals at
the CFR.
Lest anyone believe my CFR exposés are going unnoticed, look
at this nice notice found on page 8 of the May 20, 2002 edition of
the large circulation magazine The New American!
“In Israel Betrayed, published in 2000, Israeli investigative reporter Barry
Chamish warned: ‘All the evidence more than just indicates that the
current Middle East Peace Process was hatched by the CFR and is
promoted with all the necessary weapons at its disposal. The peace
process is a surefire formula for war...and soon. The year 2000 will most
likely see Israel and its neighbors caught up in bloody turmoil.’ Mr
248
 Chamish’s observations concerning the CFR’s elites’ schemes in the
Middle East have repeatedly proven accurate. He has provided well
documented evidence of the CFR’s simultaneous control of Israeli
politicians such as Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Shamir,
Binyamin Netanyahu, and Ariel Sharon, as well as Yasser Arafat.”
Pretty nice of them to say so. But that isn’t the end of the fine
New American analysis:
“The April 15th Israel Solidarity Rally was top-heavy with liberal-left CFR
members such as Representatives Richard Gephardt and Jane Harman,
Senator Charles Schumer, AFL-CIO President Hugh Price, Senator
Hillary Rodham Clinton (wife of CFR member Bill Clinton) also
attended, as did Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz (CFR), a
major featured speaker. A few days later the CFR hand was again very
apparent in the pro-PLO rally.”

BEHIND THE “PEACE” PROCESS

The Council on Foreign Relations, EU and UN are all closing
ranks on the Jesuit Vatican’s “peace” plan for Israel. Here are
glimpses of the evolution of an upcoming “peace” conference
which will likely be held in Spain or Italy in July.
We begin with Shlomo Gur’s little teddy bear, Yossi Beilin. We
recall that he was in Washington meeting with such shining lights
of the CFR as Richard Armitage and Richard Haass. Where did
these meetings lead but straight to England, as reported in The
Guardian:
The secret talks, chaired by Jonathan Freedland, were held at Weston
House, a country house near Stafford where Northern Ireland
negotiations were conducted last year.
Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, said that the Northern Ireland
delegates were “great evangelists for their peace process and were keen to
offer practical advice and heartfelt encouragement. The two situations are,
of course, different in many ways. But this group found so much in
common and genuinely felt they learned much from each other over the
three days.”
As well as Avraham Burg, speaker of the Knesset, the Israeli side included
General Amnon Lipkin-Shahak, the former chief of staff of the Israeli
army; Yossi Beilin, the former justice minister and one of the architects of
the 1993 Oslo peace accords; and Naomi Chazan, the deputy speaker of
the Knesset.
The Palestinian side included Professor Nabeel Kassis, a Palestinian
minister without portfolio; Yezid Sayigh, a former negotiator; and Salim
Tamari, another former negotiator. Mr. Burg and Mr. Beilin are members
249
 of the Israeli Labour party, which is in Mr. Sharon’s coalition
government.
The Northern Ireland quartet was made up of: Martin McGuinness, now
Northern Ireland education minister; David Ervine, who temporarily
walked out of Weston Park talks last year; Mark Durkan, leader of the
nationalist Social Democratic Labour Party; and Sir Reg Empey, one of
the leaders of the Ulster Unionist party.
Absent from the talks was anyone from the Likud party, which is led by
the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon.
New initiatives to emerge from yesterday’s talks include:
• creation of a shadow Israeli-Palestinian government as an
alternative to Mr. Sharon’s government
• drafting of a peace plan that will flesh out the proposals at Taba,
including setting out for the first time an exact figure of how many
of the 3.5 million Palestinians will be given the right to return
• a draft document setting out two or three points about how to
secure peace to be signed by key Israeli and Palestinian figures.
So Yossi returns to Israel from his CFR-RIAA tour and, pockets
bulging with fresh cash to add to his EU allowance, he starts a new
party he calls “Dawn.” His duty is to assure lots of dissent in the
country while the cabal out to disintegrate Israel goes to work.
***
With thanks to my readers, especially a lady near Toronto, we
see that the latest edition of the Peace Chronicles begins in March
when...
The London-based Al-Hayat daily said in its Thursday’s issue
quoting sources at the UN that the UN secretary general Kofi
Annan received an American green light from the US
administration to strongly interfere in the peace process.
The sources told the paper that Annan intends to invite 60
members of high ranking Israeli, Arab, American and European
figures to a conference to be held in the Spanish city of Ashbelya
by the beginning of May to achieve two objectives. The first to
place the UN at the core of the peace process and ensure an
international unanimous stand on the framework that can be
negotiated upon to end the conflict.
The sources said that among the participants in the conference
are prominent figures like the Syrian deputy foreign minister Walid
al-Muaallim, the representative of the foreign policy at the
250
European Union Javier Solana, the Egyptian foreign minister
Ahmad Maher, the Saudi foreign minister Saud al-Faisal, former
Israeli foreign minister Shlomo Ben Ami, the Palestinian
negotiators Saeb Ereikat; Ahmad Qrei’, Mahmoud Abbas, and the
chairman of the political planning department at the US state
department Richard Haass, the US under secretary of state for near
East affairs William Burns and the British and French ambassador
to the UN.
The sources expected that Annan will debate his vision for the
Arab-Israeli settlement and the conference will be divided into
work groups to concentrate on areas of differences like Jerusalem,
the refugees, the borders and the settlements.
The sources reported that the US ambassador at the UN
informed the UN special envoy Terry Roed-Larsen that
Washington is planning to give the UN security council a greater
role to search for a settlement.
***
This looked like an exciting prospect and the EU wanted
aboard.
***
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020521/ap_
wo_en_ge/greece_eu_middle_east_1
EU Presidency Urges Israeli Concessions Over ‘Very Fragile’ Mideast
Tuesday May 21,2002 -- The European Union’s presidency warned on
Tuesday that the situation in the Middle East was still “very, very fragile,”
and urged Israel to accept a Saudi Arabian peace plan.
***
But the UN’s Spanish conference didn’t get off the ground and
this made the Vatican very angry, so its pope was put to work.
***
(http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020517/ap_
wo_en_ge/vatican_middle_east_1)
Pope Again Presses for Protection for Holy Places
and for Negotiations to Resume in Middle East
John Paul reiterated his joy over the end of the five-week-long siege of
the basilica by Israeli troops after militants and other Palestinians sought
refuge inside the church complex.

251
 “I appeal yet again for the international community to take, without delay,
the necessary measures to see that the specific statute (protecting) holy
places is respected and assuring their true protection,” the pope said.
He did not elaborate, but the Vatican has long called for an international
statute to govern sites holy to Jews, Christians and Muslims.
***
(http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020403/ap_
wo_en_ge/vatican_mideast_1)
Vatican Steps Up Diplomatic Efforts,
Condemns Terrorism and ‘Humiliation’ of Palestinians
Wed Apr 3, 7:36 AM ET
The Vatican effort began showing fruit and this spurred Israeli
Foreign Minister Shimon Peres into action. He sent his toy rabbis,
Rosen and Melchior to Paris for negotiations with the French
Cardinal Lustiger.
***
Now the stage was set: Israel’s Vatican agents, the UN and EU
were aboard, all that was missing was the CFR. Bush Jr. now rides
onto the scene:
***
VATICAN, (CWNews.com) -- Pope John Paul II will meet with US
President George W. Bush at the Vatican on Tuesday, May 28.
President Bush is currently in Europe, where his schedule includes stops
in Berlin, Moscow, and Paris. He will arrive in Rome on May 27 for a
NATO conference, then visit the Pope the following day.
This will be the second encounter for the Pope and the American leader.
The first occurred last July 23, when Bush and his wife visited the Pontiff
at his summer residence on Castel Gandalfo.
The Pope’s discussion with the US President are expected to include the
Middle East peace process and the terror attacks on the United States.
(Last October, shortly after those attacks, the Pope met with former
President George Bush, the current president’s father.) A White House
official recently assured reporters that the President did not intend to
bring up the topic of the scandal caused by clerical misconduct in the US.
From UPI:
.....At the same time, Washington has become more conscious of the fact
that the Roman Catholic Church can exert considerable political clout
when it sees fit to do so, and there have been situations when the U.S.
government and the Vatican have worked together -- usually secretly.

252
 The papal audience has been a fixed point on every U.S. president’s
itinerary since Eisenhower.
But the visit also usually includes a private discussion between the pope
and the president, with very few officials present.
Vatican sources reached by telephone Monday expected the pope to urge
the president to use Washington’s influence to hasten the resumption of
the Middle East peace process.
***
After Bush’s meeting with the Pontiff, he held a little press
conference, during which he announced that he would be sending
William Burns and George Tenet to Israel for some relaxing
disruption.
Of Tenet, readers of these send-outs will know that he, with the
connivance of Shimon Peres, personally trained the PLO in the
finer arts of murdering Jews. But who should confirm this but,
none other than the Jerusalem Post?
The National Union-Yisrael Beitenu faction called upon Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon to raise the case of Muhammed Fouzi Muhaneh in his
meeting today with CIA Director George Tenet.
Muhaneh, a member of a Tanzim Terrorist cell, was one of 13 terrorists
recently released from the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem to
Europe.
According to his Foreign Ministry bio, Mahaneh “participated in a course
on security in the United States,” which the faction, quoting security
sources, said is a euphemism for CIA training.
“Please verify with Tenet that anyone trained and given information by
the CIA will not use it for terrorism against the State of Israel,” the
faction wrote.
***
So the circle of secret diplomacy leading to a gang-up against
Israel is complete. The Vatican is leading the CFR, UN, EU charge
and the traitors within the gates of Israel, led by Beilin and Peres,
will weaken the walls. This time, the siege won’t last for long.
***
A correspondent writes:
“Just to tell you, your international view is right and one member of the
government can’t live with the betrayal anymore. Watch out for Ephraim
Sneh. He’s drinking and medicating himself. People are worried he’ll snap
and start talking. He even did an interview on Arabic TV plastered and a
lot of people were sweating.”

253
 ***
I completed a wonderful 2 hour interview on Lee Klein’s KFI-
Los Angeles radio show. One caller had a story to tell. He met
Chaim Saban, the TV producer, in New York and kidded him
about how much money he makes. Saban turned dour and said he
has almost nothing; everything he makes is to protect Israel from
“the Council. If they get their way, we haven’t got ten years left.”

TESTIMONIES AND OTHER HELP

For 12 days this summer, I was selling my books at the Hebrew
Book Fair held at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. And you know
what that means, right? I met the broad public by the thousands
and whenever that happens, people pass on testimonies. At past
fairs, the information has mostly centered on the Rabin murder.
This year saw a surprising change. More people wanted to talk
about Baruch Goldstein, and an unexpected number bought my
book Israel Betrayed for its Goldstein chapter.
On Thursday night, the second to last fair day, a gentleman
passed by my booth, looked very briefly at the books and said,
“You got Goldstein right. I know from personal experience,” then
he walked away. I called to him, “What do you mean? Can we
talk?” But he kept on walking. He returned ten minutes later and
asked me to step away from the booth. We sat alone on the steps
of the Museum.
“You’ve met Bernard Schechter I take it?”
I had, a few years ago at another book fair. He was fairly upfront
with me. Schechter was the American-born head of the Israel
Police ballistics laboratory at the time of the Rabin murder. His
honest testimony, written and verbal, has helped prove conclusively
that the bullets which struck down Yitzhak Rabin did not come
from Yigal Amir’s gun.
“I was the technician who worked with Bernie on Goldstein’s
rifle. Did you ever talk to him about that?”
In fact, I didn’t know. The Shamgar Commission of Inquiry into
the Hebron Massacre had called other police ballistics experts to
testify, but I don’t recall Schechter giving testimony.

254
 “Well, he won’t volunteer telling what he knows. I remember
calling his department in ‘96 and asking for him. They said he
retired. I couldn’t believe that, he loved his work. I’ll bet Goldstein
had a lot to do with that?”
“What do you mean?”
“I was in the lab, I saw. The bullets we were given didn’t match
Goldstein’s rifle. None of them.”
“So he didn’t do the killing?”
“Either that or we examined someone else’s rifle.”
I won’t reveal the man’s name. When the atmosphere is right,
I’m sure he’ll give his testimony openly after a persuasive phone call
or two. And if you think this eye-witness testimony is something,
wait till the end of this section.
The booth next to mine was womanned by a sweet lady in her
30s selling her book of children’s poems. She was not acquainted
with the view of my books, and she couldn’t believe it but she was
stuck listening to my explanations to hundreds of buyers over
almost two weeks. She will never be the same again.
I noticed on the last night of the fair that she was reading Israel
Betrayed intently. The fair had just closed at midnight on Saturday
and the following took place in this order.
At 12:01, a cute teenaged girl came up to the table and said, “I’m
Shlomo Edelstein’s daughter. Do you really think my father is a
CIA agent?”
I was taken aback. I had never associated him with the CIA but
certainly had grave suspicions about his conduct on the morning of
the Hebron Massacre. I had read the protocols of Shamgar’s
Hebron investigation, collected media reports and received serious
information from an unrecognized journalist named Avraham
Yosef. After that I wrote a two-part article called “Was Baruch
Goldstein Completely Innocent?”, which became a chapter of Israel
Betrayed.
This article has had an endearing effect, and it is becoming
looming truth in some circles. This was aided greatly in the past
year when journalist Adir Zik, who had covered the Shamgar
Commission, verified my findings and added a few of his own in

255
the newspaper Hatzofe and over the radio via his Arutz Sheva
program.
Here is what I wrote about the father of the smiling girl across
from my display table:
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) originally announced that Goldstein had
arrived in uniform at the mosque in his civilian Subaru. The Shamgar
Commission heard very different evidence. Dr. Goldstein’s wife Miriam
was surprised to discover a note informing her that Baruch was called to
reserve duty. She phoned the IDF duty commander for Kiryat Arba,
Shlomo Edelstein to ask if he knew where her husband was. He said he
didn’t. And yet, evidence presented at the Shamgar Commission proved
that Goldstein arrived in Edelstein’s IDF jeep.
From The Jerusalem Post, April 4, 1995:
Goldstein’s wife, meanwhile was trying to reach her husband. Shortly
after 5 AM she called Shlomo Edelstein, who was on reserve duty at the
telecommunications center. Edelstein, swinging nervously on his swivel
chair, told the commission he had spoken to Goldstein and told Ungar to
pick him up. A short while later, Miriam Goldstein called, asking if he
could help track down her husband.
“I told her he was at the clinic and tried calling him on the
communications network. I asked her if everything was fine and she said
it was.” But he admitted that later he had told her Goldstein might be at
the Cave praying. Miriam said her husband “did not go there to pray.”
Members of the commission had a surprise for Edelstein. According to
records of the calls to the center, obtained from the phone company,
Miriam Goldstein had called him twice. “If she did, I don’t remember,”
an uncomfortable Edelstein said.”
After which, I wrote:
Suspect number two, Shlomo Edelstein. In another Post Article, it is
reported that Goldstein once belonged to a prayer quorum in the
Machpela Cave but quit it over a year before. Since then, as Miriam
Goldstein supposedly said to Edelstein, her husband “DID NOT GO
THERE TO PRAY.” So why did Edelstein tell her he was going there?
And why did other soldiers testify that Goldstein was a regular worshiper
at the Machpela Cave? The commission trapped Edelstein in his own lies
with phone company records. What was he covering up and why?
I said to the teenaged religious girl, “Why do you think your
father told Miriam Goldstein that her husband was praying at the
Cave of the Patriarchs where the massacre took place, when his
wife said he had stopped praying there?”
“He told me he was trying to console her. He really didn’t
know.”
256
 “Why did your father forget her second call to him?”
“He was busy, so he forgot.”
“He’s manning the phones at 4 AM and you think he was too
busy to remember the call? Do you know that Goldstein met a
high-ranking intelligence officer named Shlomo Mofaz, brother of
our Chief-of-Staff on the day before the massacre?”
“I know Shlomo, what about it?”
“I don’t know, but maybe your father does. Ask him.”
“May I have a copy of Israel Betrayed to show him?”
I hesitated and then handed one over. Far better that her father
considers his own testimonies in print. Maybe they’ll stimulate him
to talk about what he’s holding inside.
Back to the booth next door at 12:16. The poetess says, “ I
attended the Shamgar Hebron hearings.” It seemed totally out of
character. “Why?” I asked. “My brother-in-law is Rotem Revivi,”
she replied.
Here’s what I wrote about him:
From The Jerusalem Post, March 28, 1995:
Yosef, Drori and a third soldier, Erez Elimelech also all testified that they
had seen Goldstein enter with an M-16. This contradicted the testimony
of Lt. Rotem Revivi, the only soldier inside the cave when the massacre
took place. Revivi said Goldstein had entered with a Glilon—the type of
rifle from which the massacre bullets were actually shot.
In response to questions from commission members, Yosef and Drori
both said that one person had entered with a Glilon that morning—a
settler they didn’t recognize who arrived shortly after Goldstein. The
arrival of a settler they didn’t recognize was unusual, the two said, since
they knew all the regulars at the early prayer service.
Revivi also said Goldstein entered the cave at about 5:20: the other three
put the time around 4:45...Commission member Judge Ahmed Zuabi
commented if Revivi’s assertion that Goldstein could not have used the
main entrance without seeing him is true, it raises the possibility that
Goldstein had assistance. One of the other entrances into the Yitzhak
Hall is from Avraham Hall...Since this door was bolted from the Jewish
side after the massacre, Zuabi noted, if Goldstein used this entrance,
someone must have bolted it behind him.
I responded:
“If I had to start naming suspects in the conspiracy or cover-up,
I would start with Lieut. Rotem Revivi, who backed the
257
government’s case that Goldstein carried a Galil rifle and arrived at
5:20, against those of three other soldiers who testified that
Goldstein BROUGHT AN M-16 INTO THE CAVE OF THE
MACHPELA 45 MINUTES BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT
SAID HE ARRIVED. I will stress the most important fact of all,
the IDF and Shamgar concluded that the massacre was caused by a
Galil rifle not an M-16, yet three soldiers on duty testified that
Goldstein carried an M-16. Judge Zuaabi has finally awoken and
publicly expressed his belief that a conspiracy was possible. Revivi
testified that Goldstein did not pass by his post and enter the
prayer hall through the main entrance. That leaves two other doors
but only one on the Jewish side of the Cave where Goldstein was
free to roam. Since it was found bolted from the Jewish side after
the massacre, if Goldstein entered through it, someone else locked
him into the prayer hall afterward.”
I said to my new poetess friend, “Next time you’re at dinner,
please ask your brother-in-law why of four soldiers on duty, he was
the only one who saw Goldstein enter the hall at the time and with
the rifle that Shamgar wanted.”
“I’ve asked him things like that. He told me he testified
truthfully. That’s what he saw.”
“Then ask yourself how that could be. How could three soldiers
all get one time and rifle and your brother-in-law another? Unless
there was a second Goldstein, somebody has to be lying.”
She saw the logic, I could tell. She said, “So maybe everyone was
fooled.” A very real possibility that explains away the contradictory
testimonies of Edelstein and Revivi. Such an explanation might
explain the peculiar actions of Kach leader Noam Federman.
He has been at the forefront of besmirching me, mainly over my
Goldstein research. Knowing nothing of the facts, seemingly
anyway, he has loudly proclaimed the truth of Shamgar’s version of
the massacre and has declared Goldstein a hero for his mass
murder. That has led me to conclude that his attitude is just too
handy for the ruling class.
Six weeks ago, the Shabak busted a new Jewish underground,
based in Bat Ayin, which planned to blow up an Arab girl’s school
in East Jerusalem. Or so they told us. I don’t believe it because,
against all norms of democracy and morality, the core members of
258
this group have not been allowed to see outsiders, including an
attorney, for over six weeks. In near legal terminology, that is called
extracting a confession by force.
Federman was briefly arrested on suspicion of aiding and
abetting this underground. The day before the fair closed, he
published a stinging recollection of his interrogation by the Shabak
in the newspaper Makor Rishon. He called it “It’s the Same Old
Shabak.”
On the surface, the Shabak must have recoiled from his bitter
words against them. Yet look at what he writes:
Here are a few quotes from their interrogations:
On Rabbi Dov Lior: “A little racist.”
On Rabbi Avi Runski: “Our collaborator in Samaria.”
On Rabbi Yehuda Gilad: “Simply an idiot, not worth working with.”
On Ivri Dan of Itamar: “Too naive but still works well with us.”
On Rabbi Shlomo Aviner they cursed in a way I can’t repeat.
Now doesn’t that serve the purposes of our corrupt
establishment? By mixing the reactions, it appears that Runski and
Dan are Shabak stool pigeons. It is a perfect formula for spreading
division among the settlers. Could Federman be so dumb that he
couldn’t see it? Does he really believe Goldstein was the butcher
the government wants him to be?
Now consider the poet’s brother-in-law or the pretty young
religious girl’s father. Could they all have been tricked into
cooperation with murderous covert operations without their
suspicions being raised? It seems incredible, but...
And now, really exciting testimony.
After a lecture at the home of attorney Dov Even Or, one of the
audience members, who I was a bit furious at for contradicting my
evidence in mid-lecture that Amir had no gunpowder on his hands,
met me on the lawn outside to explain a few things. He, it turns
out, was a high ranking investigator for the Israel Police Crime
Laboratory.
He apologized for interrupting my lecture, but I hadn’t got the
facts all right. The police didn’t look for gunpowder, rather trace
elements left by the explosion of gunpowder like antimony and
barium, which corroborate other ballistic evidence. That Amir had
259
none of these on his hands does mean he couldn’t have shot a live
bullet, but my explanation wasn’t quite exact.
Then he exploded his bombshell. “I was the ballistics
investigator in the Yoav Kuriel suicide.”
Kuriel, was Rabin’s bodyguard who the police and media
declared committed suicide over his failure to save Rabin’s life. I
spoke with the man who prepared Kuriel’s body for burial and he
said there were seven bullet holes in his chest. A stubborn suicide.
“I was called to a Ramat Gan apartment to investigate Kuriel’s ‘suicide’. I
wasn’t allowed to see the body but I know who did and you’re welcome
to see if they’ll talk. I asked to be given the suicide gun for lab testing and
the superior officer told me the gun was missing. I asked him, ‘How does
a gun used by a suicide victim disappear?’ He wouldn’t answer but we
both knew it couldn’t in a real suicide. You can’t publish my name, just
what I said. Some day when it’s safe, it will all come out.”
***
We end section one and enter the realms of reader research.
Several people sent important information, and as usual, a lady near
Toronto did some ace-scholarship on covert diplomacy. We begin
with her.
In reply to my previous send-out, she pointed out that President
Bush first flew to Moscow and met with Russian Orthodox bishops
to discuss the Middle East, before flying to the Vatican to meet his
papal majesty to discuss the same topic. This would explain a
subsequent statement by Shimon Peres:
JERUSALEM, June 4
NEWS ANALYSIS
Seemingly Best Friends, Israel, U.S. May Be On Collision Course
....To preempt a diplomatic rift with the United States and the rest of the
international community, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres is urging
Sharon to coordinate peace moves with the United States, Europe, Russia
and the United Nations.
In Peres’ view, the conference and the preceding run-up should be used
to shape the contours of a settlement with the quartet that would
guarantee Israel’s vital interests.
***
And on to the Vatican and Yossi Beilin. Two readers wrote that
I missed a participant in the secret meetings in England where
Beilin and Avraham Burg plotted to create a government-in-exile
260
within Israel to oppose the Sharon-led Knesset. The Guardian also
reported that Beilin’s assistant was also present at the plotting. The
result of the meeting: Beilin returned to Israel and started a new
party Shachar (Dawn), an acronym for Peace, Education and
Welfare. From such high-blown concepts to Welfare? It looks like
he had trouble fitting in the last policy, so went with whatever was
handy. But Dawn was no mistake, as one correspondent pointed
out.
“So what’s that new party called ‘Dawn’ or Shachar? ‘When the moon is in
the 7th House and Mars and Jupiter.... it is the dawning of the age of
what?’”
So Beilin has got a new-age party started with EU and CFR
bucks. Two readers felt that harping on Gur as Beilin’s favorite
squeeze was demeaning and I should stop. I replied that Gur and
that pipsqueak Beilin buddy of his have been secretly conniving
Israel’s end on behalf of the Jesuit-run Vatican and blackmail may
have been how it all got started. Just look what these vampires have
been doing:
Pontiff Meets Israeli Minister
VATICAN, Sep. 29, 00 (CWNews.com) -- Pope John Paul II received
Israel’s justice minister, Yossi Beilin, in a private audience on Friday,
September 29.
The Israeli minister was making a courtesy call at the Vatican, while in
Rome on other business. Beilin became acquainted with Vatican
diplomats during the negotiations that led up to the establishment of
diplomatic relations between the Holy See and Israel in 1994. He now has
responsibility for religious affairs, including the government’s relations
with Christians.
In March 1994, the Israeli newsmagazine Shishi published an
interview with Mark Halter, a French intellectual and close friend of
Shimon Peres. He said he delivered a letter from Peres to the Pope
the previous May, within which Peres offered the Vatican
hegemony over the Old City of Jerusalem. The article detailed
Peres’ offer which essentially turned Jerusalem into an international
city overseen by the Holy See.
The same month Rabin....as seen in the following article:
(http://www.jrep.com/Pope/a.html)
April 21, 1994
Rabin met Pope John Paul II in mid-March in Rome, and asked him to
use his moral authority to help get Middle East peace talks back on track
261
 after the massacre. A warm communiqué published by the Holy See
indicated that the pope was ready to do whatever he could. A papal
emissary was dispatched to PLO headquarters in Tunis. And in private,
the pope told Rabin that he hoped comprehensive peace would be
achieved in the Middle East by the year 2000, as Christianity approached
the end of its second millennium.
For the Vatican, the key to the negotiation has been safeguarding the
Church’s traditional rights in the Holy Land regarding holy places,
Christian pilgrimages, Catholic education, charitable institutions, health
care and, most of all, Church property. The Vatican wants to be sure that
it is not left out as peace transforms the Holy Land. But translating rights
granted the Church by custom into binding legal obligations isn’t easy.
For the Vatican, the negotiations were between two equal entities not just
two independent states, but also the leading representatives of Christianity
and Judaism, with equal religious rights in the Holy Land. Israel, by
contrast, insisted that it alone is the secular power in the Holy Land, and
that any agreements would have to be “subordinate” to Israeli law. There
may never have been an agreement if Beilin and aide Shlomo Gur had not
found a secret channel to the Vatican.
In December 1992, six months after the start of the public negotiations
by the “permanent bilateral commission,” a friend of Gur’s put the two
Israelis in touch with Father David Jaeger.
The cherubic, 39-year-old Jaeger, now judge president of the Catholic
Court in Austin, Texas, is a former Israeli, who, after a strictly Orthodox
Jewish upbringing, converted to Catholicism. With his knowledge of
Hebrew, Israel and Judaism, he quickly became the Church’s main go-
between with the Israelis.
Sharon Says Offensive Will Continue
April 9, 2002
“This is an act of indescribable barbarity. It is a violation of every law of
humanity and civilization,” said Father David Jaeger, spokesman for
custodians of Catholic sites in the Holy Land, who is currently in Rome.
***
Once again we return with vigor to the issue of Jesuit-trained
King Juan Carlos of Spain. I’ve been saying he is at the top of the
Middle East “peace process” food chain and Israelis continue to
believe he is a retired king with no power. Read on:
Jordan Times
Thursday, March 14, 2002

262
 King Abdullah, Spanish Monarch
Review Situation in Occupied Territories
MADRID (Agencies) — His Majesty King Abdullah on Wednesday left
Spain for London after holding talks with King Juan Carlos on the
situation in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The two leaders discussed “the role Europe can play to end the cycle of
violence [in the occupied territories] and put the peace process back on
track,” the Jordan News Agency, Petra, reported. Spain currently holds
the rotating EU presidency.
At the meeting, which included a luncheon attended by Queen Sofia,
King Abdullah stressed the importance of intensifying European efforts
aimed at reaching a ceasefire, relaunching the peace talks and alleviating
the sufferings of the Palestinian people.
The talks come one day after the King urged a more active US role in
efforts to end violence in the occupied territories during a meeting in
Amman with US Vice President Dick Cheney.
They also follow a call on Tuesday by Foreign Minister Marwan Muasher
on the EU to redouble efforts to end the vicious cycle of violence.
Petra said King Abdullah and the Spanish monarch discussed bilateral
relations and means of bolstering them.
Upon his arrival in Madrid earlier Wednesday on the start of his brief
visit, King Abdullah was received at the airport by King Carlos who
accompanied him to Zarzuela Palace, the king’s official residence just
outside the capital.
King Abdullah left for London straight after the three-hour talks...The
King will then go on to Mexico to join around 40 world leaders, including
US President George W. Bush, for the International Conference on
Financing for Development, which comes as a follow-up to the New
York Millennium Summit of September 2000.
The King and Bush are expected to meet on the sidelines of the UN-
sponsored conference in Monterrey, which lasts from March 18 to 22.
Abdullah goes to KJC in Spain; Powell goes to KJC Spain;
Powell goes to Abdullah in Jordan; Abdullah calls for EU
involvement in ME; Now all in one day, today: Powell makes
Palestinian proposal; Sharon is open to statehood proposal; Peres
endorses PA proposal; Bush won’t make state proposal!
(http://detnews.com/2002/nation/0204/10/nation-461803.htm)
April 10, 2002
European Union, UN Back Powell
Powell was meeting later today in Madrid with King Juan Carlos of Spain
and then having dinner with Ivanov, to discuss the Middle East as well as
U.S.-Russian affairs including a planned arms-control summit in Moscow.

263
 Powell is to fly to Jordan for discussions with the Jordanian king on
Thursday and then on Israel later in the day.
(http://www.syrialive.net/Media/news/041302Assad%20speaks%20to%
20Spanish%20King,%20Shara%20receives%20Spanish%20FM%20for%
20%20foreign%20affairs.htm)
Assad Speaks to Spanish King,
Shara Receives Spanish FM for Foreign Affairs
14-April-2002
Syria’s president Bashar al-Assad discussed Saturday over the phone the
latest developments in the Middle East with Spanish King Juan Carlos.
The Syrian Arab News Agency quoted the Syrian President as discussing
the European role towards the deteriorating condition in the Middle East
in wake of the escalating Israeli military activities.
Meanwhile, Syrian foreign minister Farouk al-Shara met earlier the same
day with the visiting Spanish secretary of state for foreign affairs Miguel
Nadal, KUNA reported.
***
Now isn’t that more than enough proof that the address to
decide Israel’s fate is Juan Carlos, retired monarch, Madrid, Spain?
Another reader finds mainstream proof that the Jesuits organized
the first Holocaust and are working on the second in Israel.
***
Finally, I’m taking all readers’ reports more attentively. Two days
before the last send-out, an Israeli reader wrote that his friend
somewhere in the IDF reported to him that Hizbullah had
smuggled in a huge cache of explosives which was distributed
among sympathizing Arabs in the Galilee. They would be setting
off a mega-bomb any day.
I chose not to report the warning, and a few days later Hizbullah
satisfied George Tenet’s need for the energy of burning Jews by
incinerating 18, mostly soldiers, at Megiddo Junction with the aid of
Israeli Arabs. I doubt that it would have made a difference, but I
should have published the warning.
The final report comes from a longtime source whose
information always or close to it, turned out to be right:
“I have just heard from a source in Israel traveling abroad (he has proved
extremely accurate on countless occasions before—a one time GSS guy)
that there had been recently (matter of months) an internal putsch
attempt within the Mossad that eventually went out of hand and
developed in its last instance to a handgun fire INSIDE the ‘academy.’
264
 “I’m told it all started with the quitting of the former IDF North
Command chief (who recently came on TV with a political program)
leaving the whole show in the hands of Halevy. Rogue pockets of
resistance that formed during some years now inside the Mossad came
together in a radical attempt to change the organization from within. The
power struggle was a mind game for a long time between camps, but
when the office of Halevy (who was abroad at the time) was sieged, some
hot-headed rookies—including Halevy’s own bodyguards, he’s got about
6-8 of them—tried to force the issue and fired.
“The ‘academy’ was cordoned off by some army units called in for several
hours, between c.23:00 and 04:00 hours. There were three bodies brought
out of there.
“Halevy apparently returned promptly from abroad and went straight to
Sharon to ask if to resign or continue. And what did Sharon do? He sent
him to Peres to work it out .... Sharon despises the Mossad as an
intelligence unit, only has time for the ‘Kidon’ teams.... He was among
those who put together with Mike Harari the special team that tracked
down the 1972 Munich assassins... Nevertheless, seems like the next chief
will be a Sharon appointee.
“Some ex-Mossad members, now MKs, moved in quickly to hush the
event, as they always close ranks, and banned editors from even alluding
to it in their papers.”
No wonder the Mossad seemed so quiet in recent months....

I FOUND MY SHABAK INFORMER

I was supposed to be speaking at a school in Zichron Yaacov on
November 28. My subject was to be “The Corruption of Israeli
Democracy by Outsiders”. My organizer called this morning to
inform me that the school had just called. It seems the Ministry of
Education ordered them to cancel my lecture. How the Ministry
even knew it was scheduled in one little school of theirs among
thousands is proof that someone in government is following my
activities.
Now I’m really going to get even because I’m going to name my
Shabak informer. I’m just one of her responsibilities. She shows up
at literally every right wing or “subversive” meeting everywhere in
the country.
She pretends to be an airhead who is interested in Israel’s
interests, if you explain things to her ever so slowly. There was a
period when she’d call me monthly to get the latest news and I
couldn’t get her off the phone. So I amused myself by expanding
265
grandly on the truth, with her taking notes and taping me on the
other end of the line.
But I didn’t suspect she was an agent, even when my book Israel
Betrayed was just published and I told her I had some very serious
evidence within that exonerates Baruch Goldstein from massacre
responsibility. She seemed to panic and said she had to have the
book right away. I asked why, since she didn’t read English. She
thought about it and said she had to give it to an American friend.
Within a few hours, she had dug up a new American friend and
they were at my door buying the book.
For a period, she was staking out Dr. Uri Milstein’s lectures and
the two times I showed up, she was there. She asked to be driven
home both times and she pumped me for information all the way
to her neighborhood.
Some time ago, I bought a new old car from a friend in America.
He kept it in Israel and used a friend to deliver the car and the
papers to me. I was warned that the engine is rebuilt but the doors
have flaws in the locks. Last Thursday, I was on my way to
Jerusalem to sell books outside the Moledet Party 13th birthday
celebration at the Jerusalem Theatre. I packed my wares but the
door wouldn’t close and I forgot the trick that makes the lock
work.
So the lady who arranged the sale met me to show me the lock
trick. The agent saw us together and got excited. “She is your
girlfriend, right?” she announced in joy. I equally joyfully
acknowledged this, watched her reaction and then pointing to the
car said, “Come on. I bought that car from her.” The lady had a
headache and asked the informer if she had a painkiller. She said
she didn’t but she’d go arrange one for her. Ten minutes later she
was back and beckoned the lady away to get the painkiller she had
found.
The informer said, “I don’t really have the pill but I know who
you are. You’re...”
And then gave the last name of the American I had bought the
car from. And it only took her ten minutes to get the license
number of the car, call it in, and get the name of the owner. That’s
the only way it could have happened. She didn’t pull the right name
out of a hat.
266
 At last, the name of the informer: It is IRIS COHEN!
Israeli political activists: Say nothing to her. It won’t be hard to
resist her dubious charms. If you don’t, every word you say will be
recorded at Shabak headquarters.

Letters to the Editor, Actually to Me

Could anyone anywhere have such visionary readers? They view
the world so clearly! Take the first comment as a typical case in
point:
Look at the movements of the EU Solana (Foreign Minister), Spain was
the latest holder of the presidency of the EU and finally the movements
of Lord Michael Abraham Levy (Blair’s private foreign minister), his
movements and meetings with Arafat and associates and his tie up with
Beilin—Daniel Levy is Beilin’s chief assistant and son of Lord Levy!!!
There has been a lot of muck about Lord Levy in the Sunday Times
(London) recently. It appears his contacts with certain persons through
“philanthropic Jewish connections” has led him to many contacts and
funds. It could be worth checking it out. In this week’s London Jewish
Chronicle there is an opinion piece by Professor Aldman who states the
Lord Levy was on the list of invitees to Beilin, Burg and Chazan’s recent
meeting in N. Ireland and the UK with the PLO!
Dawn Party Leader Yossi Beilin’s secret diplomacy with the
Jesuit-controlled Vatican through his “assistant” Shlomo Gur and
the Illuminati “rabbi” David Rosen are revealed by a faithful
correspondent.
Now guess who is responsible for many of these Scriptural changes with
beginnings in Rome......none other than the Jesuit priest, Cardinal Carlo
Maria Martini himself.
(http://www.jrep.com/Pope/a.html)
The diplomatic agreement between Israel and the Vatican as states set the
stage for a public demonstration of Jewish-Christian reconciliation,
organized by Rosen. In February, the rabbi convened an international
Jewish-Christian conference in Jerusalem, bringing together over 400
Jewish and Christian religious leaders from more than 80 countries.
Among them were Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of the Vatican, Italy’s
Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini (who many predict will be the next pope),
and George Carey, the Archbishop of Canterbury.
AND guess where he is heading to “retire” ~~~~~~~~Jerusalem!
(http://user.online.be/~sj.eur.news/ns/arch01.htm#0909)

267
 Jesuit Cardinal Martini of Milan to Retire in February
“I do not keep secret my desire, expressed to the Pope, to retire to
Jerusalem to dedicate myself to prayer and the study of codes and
manuscripts,” the Jesuit cardinal revealed.
I would say Israel, “LOOK OUT”! The “new dawn” that is coming may
be different than you think.
A Russian-born professor responds to my new information
proving Baruch Goldstein did not shoot up a Hebron mosque in
February 1994. She followed the Shamgar Commission of Inquiry
into the Hebron Massacre and, back in 1994, knew something very
fishy was taking place.
Barry, following your new information about Baruch Goldstein:
1. I remember very well the testimony of Rotem Revivi at the Shamgar
Commission which I listened to on the radio. It was so clear and
interesting, that I repeated his words several times to my friends. So I
have no doubt that he said the following things-- He, Rotem Revivi was
at all the times near the entrance to Itzhak hall. And he did not see that
Goldstein (B.G.) entered the hall. He insisted that Goldstein did not enter
Itzhak hall!
It was even more interesting that on the same day or a day before we
could hear a representative of WAKF (Arab Religious Council), who
insisted that B.G. entered the hall with weapon and used force when that
Arabs tried to stop him. He merely pushed them away. (The Shamgar
Commission later accused this Arab of giving false evidence). Revivi
insisted that he did not see such a scene of struggle between B.G. and
that man from the WAKF. If the WAKF witness in fact was telling the
truth, he was saying that Revivi could not have been in the hall.
2. Revivi’s testimony, if accurate, means Goldstein arrived earlier, was
guided to another room, and another man in an officer’s uniform came at
5:20 and did the shooting. He escaped and Goldstein replaced him.
(Complicated but not impossible).
3. In the same testimony Revivi, the officer on duty, said that he was the
first who entered the hall after shooting. And he did not see the body of
B.G. Only when he entered the hall the second time after some time did
he see a body (“buba in modin”—he said) in the corner not far from the
door to Josefia = misgad ha nashim. As you remember Josefia (= misgad ha
nashim) was closed from outside the Izhak hall, i.e. inside of Josefia.
With so many informants, who needs to do original research?
How did I miss this telling ad? So let us ask why the American
Embassy is asking for Israeli contractors to build a base near
Jerusalem?

268
 Hello,
Please let me draw your attention to an ad, which appeared in English, in
Ma’rriv, last Friday.
The ad is on behalf of U.S. Embassy (in Germany). They ask for
contractors for construction of an American military base in Israel, near
Jerusalem. The ad appears in “Asaqim” (Business) supplement, on page
14. What do you make of it? Is it a Trojan horse?
A reader with an intelligence past and a few chilling stories to
recall it by, wants to know who got the contracts to build the new
security fence to protect the country from suicide bombers. “This
new Maginot Line will cost a quarter of a billion bucks and if you
dig a bit, you’ll find contractors tied to Sharon and Ben Eliezer
building it. Another devoted reader and keen observer, Joel
Skousen, has this to say about the fence:
If the government were going to build a fence for security reasons, it
would not choose the Green Line as a basis, which leaves no buffer zone
or distance between conflicting groups. The Green Line also runs right
through Jerusalem and puts numerous Israeli settlements outside the
security fence, which will have to be protected as enclaves. It is obvious
to many Israelis that the construction of this fence will create a de facto
boundary upon which future peace negotiations will be based. Indeed,
savvy Israelis fear its construction is setting up the nation for a new US
peace process intended to confine Israel to the borders its own
government is now so conveniently demarcating.
I think one of the reasons Sharon came to Washington recently was to
coordinate this new plan for giving in to a Palestinian state with Israeli
defense policy. The new Green Line security fence is almost certainly a
planned part of this approach to get a foot in the phony “peace” door.
Without public discussion, the Sharon government decided to put up an
expensive $21,000 /mile “security fence” and just happened to pick the
Green Line as the location. In the near future, they will have a convenient
fait accompli in this de facto border that the Israeli people will have already
gotten used to as a “natural boundary” for the new state.
I was somewhat deluged with the following item. The
implication is that Israeli security personnel are supplying the
enemy with at least some their weapons.
Jerusalem Post UPDATE, June 17, 2002
Police Probe Complaint That Confiscated Settler’s Gun
Ended Up in Jenin Terrorists’ Hands
Police said Monday there were investigating a complaint from the Hebron
Jewish Community that a gun confiscated from a reservist officer was
found recently in the possession of Palestinians in Jenin.

269
 About a year ago, the police took the weapon away from Capt. (res.)
Avner Gilboa during a protest in Kiryat Arba against the slaying of two
community members, Hebron area news agencies said.
Recently the IDF found the gun among the weapons of Palestinian terror
suspects in Jenin.
I have an Arab Sheikh on my list. Like me, he is convinced the
anti-Arabist CFR member Daniel Pipes is nothing but an
intelligence stooge, working hand in hand with the Council on
Foreign Relations to further their global ambitions. The following
two letters show amazement that Pipes has come so blatantly out
of the closet.
Now I’ll say it with certainty: Daniel Pipes is fooling the Jews.
Daniel Pipes has no allegiance to or love of Israel. He does what
the CFR orders him to do, and nothing more or less.
After reading the following with unfettered astonishment, write
Pipes and demand to know who is funding his policy institute and
his magazine no one reads yet professes to be an influential voice
of the Jewish conservative community. Who is behind Pipes? Who
are his donors?
If he doesn’t agree to name his financers, then quit reading him.
He’s dangerous. If he does, I’ll be happy to check them off my
CFR member list. Either way, he’s a fraud.
Dear Barry,
Sheikh Abdul Hadi received an advance copy of the September, 2002
(Fall) issue of The Middle East Quarterly (Pipes’ rag).
To his astonishment, it includes an entire verbatim C.F.R. document on
“solving” the Middle East problem with commentary by MEQ editors.
AHP points out that they present it like a text of the Torah with rabbinic
commentaries on Scripture!
God bless scanners: here is the document. My impression is that Pipes &
Co. are telling the CFR: “Your task force could do a good job... but that’s
not enough! You have ‘experts’ but need something more: the
superexperts (ourselves)!”. It seems a inter-CFR war for the control of
propaganda (sorry, “public diplomacy”). This could should also explain
why newspapers are running to glorify Lewis, Ajami, Pipes, the highest
scholars in the history of humanity!
It is really comic that the MEQ experts in manipulations and plagiarism
refer to themselves as “serious professional journalists and scholars, who
seek the facts and don’t simply twist them to it their political prejudices.”

270
 COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
IMPROVING U.S. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
Editors’ preface:
In the aftermath of September 11, the United States government, the
media, and the American public were taken aback by Muslim and Arab
expressions of support for Osama bin Ladin and by the intensity of anti-
American incitement in the Middle East and South Asia. “Why do they
hate us?” many asked. Perhaps the United States had failed to put its
message persuasively before the Muslim world.
In U.S. government parlance, the information effort to explain America’s
case is culled “public diplomacy.” After September 11, many voices called
for a massive augmentation of American “public diplomacy,” which
critics argued had been neglected and under-funded. The State
Department sought to demonstrate the importance of the issue when it
named Charlotte Beers, a renowned advertising executive, as
undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs. She was
sworn in on October 2.
Enter the Council on Foreign Relations, the New York-based clearing-
house for international affairs and U.S. foreign policy and publisher of
Foreign Affairs. The Council moved immediately after 9/1l to establish an
“Independent Task Force on America’s Response to Terrorism,” which
began deliberations on American “public diplomacy.” The task force
included what the council described as “a bipartisan group of individuals
with experience at the highest levels of national security policy.” On
November 6, 2001, the task force issued a report entitled “Improving the
U.S. Public Diplomacy Campaign in the War against Terrorism.”
Below are excerpts from the task force’s report, followed by comments
by several of the Middle East Quarterly’s editors and editorial board
members (in italics). As the comments suggest, the issues surrounding
“public diplomacy” remain contentious. The “consensus” of the task
force represents only one point on the spectrum of informed ideas about
how the United States should explain itself and its actions to the world.
What would this send-out be without more on the EU and the
Jesuit-trained King Juan Carlos of Spain, the man really pulling the
strings in the Middle East?
(http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=17896
6&contrassID=1&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassID=0)
EU Leaders Call for Early Mideast Peace Conference
Saturday, June 22, 2002 -- European Union leaders, ending a 2-day
summit, called Saturday for the early convening of an international peace
conference on the Middle East, warning the region had reached a
“dramatic turning point.” In a statement issued after a particularly deadly
week in Israel and the Palestinian territories, the European leaders
declared they stand “ready to contribute fully to peace-building”, and to
271
 the reconstruction of the Palestinian economy. It also said an
international peace conference—jointly hosted by the EU, the U.S., the
U.N., and Russia—was needed to discuss security, political and economic
issues. It must also “re-affirm the parameters of a political solution and
establish a realistic and well-defined timescale.” “We need a quick
initiative,” Javier Solana, the EU’s foreign and security policy chief told
reporters after the summit.
EU, Russia, US, UN.......
And the common denominator is......?
Putin (Russia) met last September 4 and 5, 2001 privately one
day apart with Ariel Sharon and King Juan Carlos of Spain (EU)
respectively, as seen from previous Pravda articles. Powell (US) met
with King Juan Carlos of Spain (EU) April 10, 2002
Now on May 3, 2002 Annan (UN) and King Juan Carlos
(EU).....
(http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/020503/2002050303.html)
...one of the options was an invitation by Annan and the Spanish King
Juan Carlos of 60 Palestinians, Israeli, Syria and international figures to
convene a conference in Spain to be split to five working groups in
charge of discussing the files of Jerusalem, the borders, settlements, the
security and refugees by the beginning of this month (May) but the Israeli
invasion of the Palestinian territories postponed this option.
Emphasis here is on “postponed”! Could we be looking at a call
for a restart of the above?

REVENGE AGAINST PERES

THE REASON FOR THE LAX SHOOTING
A long list of violent and powerful people are going after
Foreign Minister Shimon Peres. The July 4 shooting at Los Angeles
Airport was a failed attempt to exact vengeance by murdering his
granddaughter.
By bungling the Rabin assassination, Peres has become an easy
target for political blackmail in Israel. A longtime agent of the
Vatican and EU, Peres has been forced to jump ship and support
the CFR/RIIA American/British Middle East agenda.
The Europeans are furious at Peres for his perceived treachery
and incompetence. The French government demanded that all
records of its chicanery with him; like the Rabin assassination,
secret diplomacy over the Golan Heights, the murder of Paris
272
ambassador Eliahu Ben Elissar, the covert channels to the PFLP
and other terror groups, the untold millions of francs funneled to
Peres through Switzerland and the EU, be destroyed. and so an
“electrical short” caused a fire to race through the five stories of the
Israeli embassy, devouring all written and computer records in its
path.
But that wasn’t enough. A powerful message was sent to Peres
in Los Angeles that he had better get back on board the European
ship.
The first person to declare the shooting at the El Al counter at
Los Angeles International Airport a terror act was Shimon Peres.
That Peres immediately “knew” that the shooting was a terror act,
though that fact hasn’t been established positively even days after
the incident, may be telling. But the first descriptions of the shooter
may be even more so. He was not seen as an Arab by witnesses, but
as a blonde Caucasian. The dead Egyptian’s father said the same
thing to the TV cameras. He asked why witnesses saw a blonde
man with a ponytail do the shooting, not his son.
Something is rotten in the state of California and there may be
clues in the following AP report of the crime:
FBI: Gunman Went to LAX to Kill
Friday July 5, 7:48 PM ET
By ANDREW BRIDGES, Associated Press Writer
LOS ANGELES (AP)—The FBI ( news - web sites) said Friday that the
heavily armed Egyptian immigrant who fatally shot two people at the
ticket counter of Israel’s national airline had gone to the Los Angeles
airport to kill.
“Why he did that is what we are still trying to determine,” FBI special
agent Richard Garcia said.
Hesham Mohamed Hadayet was the fourth person in line at the El Al
counter when he opened fire, authorities said. He fired 10 or 11 bullets
before he was fatally shot himself by an airline security guard, as hundreds
of people dove for cover.
Three other people were wounded, including a guard who was stabbed by
Hadayet as he fought with the wounded gunman. A fourth bystander
suffered heart trouble after the attack.
The shooting could have been a random act of violence or a hate crime,
Garcia said. He said authorities also had not ruled out a number of
potential motives, including terrorism, though Hadayet, 41, was not on
any FBI or federal aviation “watch” lists.
273
Israeli officials said they would consider the attack an act of terror unless
it was proven otherwise. A source close to Israeli Foreign Minister
Shimon Peres said Peres’ granddaughter was in the terminal at the time of
the attack.
Hadayet was armed with a .45-caliber semiautomatic Glock pistol, a 9 mm
handgun and a 6-inch knife, authorities said. The FBI said it wasn’t clear
whether he acted alone or why he had drivers’ licenses with two last
names — Hadayet and Ali.
The California licenses also had two birth dates — July 4, 1961 and April
7, 1961. Authorities believe the discrepancy was caused when he filled out
his application and wrote 4-7-61 instead of 7-4-61.
Relatives said Hadayet was a Cairo-born accountant who ran a limousine
company out of his Irvine apartment. Hassan Mostafa Mahfouz, who is
married to Hadayet’s aunt, said Hadayet had studied commerce at Ain
Shams University in Cairo, and had worked as an accountant in a bank
before he left for the United States in 1992.
“He is a very, very tender person and close to his family,” Mahfouz said
in Cairo. He confirmed that Thursday was his nephew’s birthday.
Hadayet, his wife and two sons, ages 8 and 11, lived in a small apartment
building in a middle-class section of Orange County. His family had left
for Egypt about a week ago.
Neighbors said Hadayet was quiet, but became angry when an upstairs
neighbor hung large American and Marine Corps flags from a balcony
above his front door after the September 11 attacks.
“He complained about it to the apartment manager. He thought it was
being thrown in his face,” neighbor Steve Thompson said.
There was no record of such a complaint, said Rich Elbaum, a spokesman
for The Irvine Co., which owns and manages the complex where Hadayet
lived.
The flags were there the day of the shooting. A bumper sticker on
Hadayet’s front door that read “Read the Koran” was removed by
authorities.
The FBI searched the apartment Thursday night, impounding a Toyota
Camry and carrying away a computer, books, binders and other material.
They refused to say what else the search turned up.
Hadayet’s state limousine permit, issued in August 1997, was revoked last
November when he failed to maintain insurance papers on file with the
state, the Public Utilities Commission (news - web sites) said. Irvine
Police Lt. Dave Freedland said Hadayet had three contacts with the
department since 1996 — all of them “unremarkable.”
Kobi Metzler, 44, who lives near Hadayet, said his 16-year-old daughter
recently asked Hadayet about using his limo service to go to her prom.
“She came home and said ‘Dad, this guy is so cool,’“ Metzler said, adding
that Hadayet offered his daughter a low price.
274
 I have been at this same El Al counter at LAX six times in the
past two years. I doubt I could have snuck in a butter knife let
alone a .45-caliber semiautomatic Glock pistol, a 9 mm handgun
and a 6-inch knife, plus lots of ammo. Is it not odd that the shooter
did, especially if he looked Egyptian? El Al security personnel are
Shabak-trained to kill within two seconds of anyone opening fire.
So how did Hadayet get off eleven rounds before being subdued?
Having two driver’s licenses with two different birthdates caused by
inverting the month and day is understandable. Having two driver’s
licenses with two different names is not. And how terribly
convenient that his family left America a week before the shooting.
Don’t you love the touch with the Marine flag flown above his
door and the “Read the Koran” sticker? At last, we have a motive.
Except Hadayet did not complain to the apartment manager like
the neighbors said. It sure sounds like the unwitting neighbors were
set up by rumor.
Now here is where things get sticky. First, Hadayet lived in a
Jewish neighborhood. Kobi Metzler is an Israeli. Neither he nor his
daughter had any compunctions about Hadayet driving the teenager
to her prom. Fine, he wasn’t openly a Jew or Israeli hater. But the
Metzlers should have had plenty of compunctions if they knew he
was driving without a license.
The November before, his license was revoked because he
didn’t keep up with insurance payments. Now why didn’t he pay his
insurance and get the license back? How could he keep offering his
limousine services illegally for 8 months without anyone noticing?
And we return full circle. If the California Public Utilities
Commission took the trouble to investigate his insurance records,
why didn’t they ask what he was doing with two driving licenses
under two separate names? If he registered his limo under only one
of them, what exactly was the other license used for?
Why did the witnesses see a blonde man with a pony tail do the
shooting? Could Hadayet have replaced the real hit man, whose
target was very specific? Unless Dr. David Parkus is more than
what is reported, it seems that Hadayet was, in fact, the lone
assassin. Consider the following news report:
By David M. Bresnahan July 5, 2002
NewsWithViews.com
275
 LOS ANGELES -- Israel calls the shooting at Los Angeles International
Airport a terrorist event but U.S. investigators say they are unsure.
Egyptian limousine driver Mohamed Hadayet, 41, began shooting people
in front of the El Al airline ticket counter yesterday. A security guard shot
and killed Hadayet. A drivers license found by police listed his birthday as
July 4, 1961, as well as a second birth date.
Los Angeles Police and the F.B.I. are searching for evidence to determine
whether the act was terrorist connected, or just an act of violence. Israeli
officials say the granddaughter of Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres
was in the airport at the time. They believe the gunman was attempting to
locate her when he was frustrated by an El Al ticket agent.
F.B.I. spokesman Matt McLaughlin told reporters that terrorism is not
being ruled out, “but there’s nothing to indicate terrorism at this point.”
Hadayet, who had a California gun permit, was carrying a Glock 45-
caliber semiautomatic handgun along with an unidentified 9 mm
handgun, as well as a 6-inch knife. In addition he had extra magazines
with more ammunition for both guns -- indicating the attack was thought
out and planned in advance.
Dr. David Parkus, a trauma surgeon from Texas was nearby when the
shooting began, according to an Associated Press report.
He said he saw one security guard wrestling with Hadayet, then a second
guard shot him. Parkus said one guard had injuries to his head and was
cut by a knife on the right arm. The second guard was cut on the lower
back and the left thigh, and also had a gunshot wound to the right thigh.
Parkus said he held the gunman as he died, then performed CPR on two
victims, according to AP.
The motives for the attempted murder of Peres’ granddaughter
are numerous, but my first instinct tells me it may have had
something to do with Peres’ appointments the same week of
Nissim Zvilli as French ambassador and Avi Primor as EU
ambassador. I have also been informed that Rabin murder suspect
Jean Frydman began a campaign to rule over most French Jewish
organizations during the same period. Could it be that Peres was
returning to the European fold and ticked off the CFR gang? Can
anyone help put the pieces together?

DR. PARKUS TALKS, AVISHAI RAVIV DOESN’T,

IF ONLY PERES WOULDN’T
An essential eye-witness to the July 4 Los Angeles Airport
shooting contacted me and we had an eye-opening talk. Dr. David
Parkus, the courageous physician who first helped hold down the

276
assumed killer Heshem Hadayet and then tended the wounded and
dying, described what he saw at LAX.
DP: I was waiting in the Singapore Air line across from El Al when I
heard three or four shots. I turned around and saw a stocky man about
eight feet away from the El Al counter shoot at the counter. People hit
the floor and he was about the only one standing. A well-built El Al
employee rushed the shooter and fought with him over the gun. A couple
of seconds later, another El Al security man rushed the shooter and shot
him in the flank. He was wrestled to the ground and I ran to the scene
and helped hold the shooter to the floor. I saw a knife fall from his body
while he was still resisting, then I felt him go limp.
BC: Witnesses saw a blonde man with a pony tail shoot as well. The
police insisted he was 52 years old. One witness phoned an Israeli radio
program minutes after the incident, while another worked at the
Mexicana Air counter next to El Al. Did you see him?
DP: Not at all. But the first El Al security man had long blonde, wavy
hair. He fought for the gun. From the point of view of Mexicana Air and
elsewhere it could have looked like he was the shooter.
BC: Was he about 52 years old?
DP: No, he was in his twenties.
BC: Could he have been mistaken for a 52 year old?
DP: No, he looked his age.
BC: People heard between 12 and 15 shots and were certain, at least
some, came from this 52 year old blonde. Others saw a man of this
description taken away in a squad car and LAPD initially announced that
a suspected accomplice was under arrest. What do you make of this?
DP: First of all, people got mixed up. There were no more than eight
shots by the shooter and the second El Al security officer who rushed
him, combined. One or two of these shots came during the struggle for
the gun with the blonde security man. Even the reporters mixed up facts.
In most reports they got it right. I saw the shooter wearing a gray sports
jacket and pinkish shirt. One reporter had me saying he was wearing a
blue blazer or shirt. What I said was the blonde El Al guard who fought
the shooter wore a blue shirt. That’s who people must have seen
shooting.
BC: Can you be certain that there wasn’t an older look-alike who played
some sort of role in the incident?
DP: No, I only had a limited viewpoint, from the floor of the airport.
However, I must admit there were strange things. Where were the LAPD
policemen? Why was I holding the shooter without any police help? They
didn’t come to the scene. Not only that, when I returned to LAX from
my trip, I sat in the bar on the second floor, above the El Al counter. A
waitress told me there was always an airport security man stationed there
watching over the El Al counter. Where was he that day? And there’s
277
 more; the FBI tried to confiscate the photos my brother took of the
shooter. It’s a good thing he handed the film over to the Los Angeles Times
or there would be no record of the incident.
***Now that makes no sense. I don’t believe for a second that
the airport surveillance cameras didn’t record the whole thing. Why
isn’t the film being released?***
BC: I am now ready to accept the likelihood that the blonde El Al
security man wearing the blue shirt was the second shooter people
mistook for the real shooter. But you saw a man waiting patiently in line
and only shooting when he was eight feet from the counter. Does that
sound like a terrorist to you? If he had wanted to kill as many people as
possible, wouldn’t he have stood parallel to the line and blasted everyone
he could?
DP: I thought about that. There is a phenomenon in America called,
“suicide by cops.” There are people who provoked policemen into killing
them. If that isn’t the answer, then it looks more like the shooter was
after someone than trying to commit mass murder. But I can’t know the
motive, I can only know what I saw.

THE RAVIV TRIAL CIRCUS

Attorney Doron Sheftel said it best in Makor Rishon:
The Shabak are saying that Avishai Raviv didn’t tell them about Yigal
Amir’s proclamations that Yitzhak Rabin had to die. It is an insult to our
intelligence but the judges are going to buy it. Raviv was beyond doubt of
any but the blindest of our people, a Shabak provocateur whose role was
to incriminate all opposed to the Oslo Accords. And there is no hope of
this circus of a trial coming anywhere near to revealing that truth.
How right he is! Two of Raviv’s handlers “Kfir” (Khezi Kalo)
and “Adin” (Eli Barak) boldly perjured themselves. Read the
following report from the Itim News Agency:
Shin Bet: Raviv Didn’t Realize How Dangerous Yigal Amir Was
By Itim
Avishai Raviv’s handler believed that Raviv was unaware of Yigal Amir’s
intention to kill former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, according to
testimony given Monday by Kfir, Raviv’s handler, at opening of Raviv’s
trial Monday.
Publication of the handler’s testimony was permitted after portions were
censored by the Shin Bet.
Also Monday, the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court issued a subpoena
instructing the Prisons Service to bring Amir’s brother, Hagai, to court
Thursday to testify in the case despite his objection.

278
 Raviv’s handler told the court that the Shin Bet had found discrepancies
between the information passed on by Raviv regarding Yigal Amir
following a meeting the two had in August before the murder, and the
information passed on by Raviv just hours after the assassination. The
handler said, nevertheless, that based on his acquaintanceship with Raviv,
had the latter known of Amir’s intentions, he would have informed the
Shin Bet.
Raviv began working as a Shin Bet agent in 1987 at the age of 20, and
Kfir was his handler from 1992 until after Rabin’s murder. Parallel to his
activities for the Shin Bet, Raviv was also active in the Kach movement
and headed the Eyal movement; he moved to Kiryat Arba in 1994 and
remained in contact with his handlers on a daily basis.
In his testimony, Kfir said that Raviv served as an agent against a group
with which he identified. Asked how that was possible, Kfir said: “The
explanation is that it doesn’t go together. I don’t think that he lived with
some sort of internal conflict without the ability to settle it. The lack of a
solution allowed him to work along both lines, to be active among the
target and to tell us about the activities he sometimes initiated.”
Kfir said that Raviv had first mentioned Amir’s name to the Shin Bet in
March 1995. From the information he had passed on, Amir had been
behind student activities on the Bar-Ilan University campus that were
aimed at strengthening the settlement enterprise in the territories on the
backdrop of the Oslo process.
“Avishai spoke about Yigal’s intentions to organize a group of serious
students who were interested in doing things. We didn’t really understand
what activities he was talking about, and we didn’t understand who the
students were and what ‘serious’ meant...Despite the debriefings, we were
unable to get to anything more concrete.”
Kfir was summoned to speak to Raviv shortly after the shooting. “One of
the first things I did was to call the defendant [Raviv] so that he could be
on stand by because it became clear to us pretty quickly that the shooter
was Yigal Amir.”
But Raviv’s testimony regarding Amir after the murder was unlike his
reports that he had submitted a few months earlier. “He described him as
an extreme individual of a different degree... He also described how
[Amir] had justified the actions of [Baruch] Goldstein.”
Following his report, Raviv agreed to be remanded in custody for 48
hours, during which he was placed in a cell, as an undercover Shin Bet
agent, with other individuals suspected of involvement in the murder.
Kfir told the court that he had never heard Amir speak of murdering the
prime minister.
So Kalo and Barak never heard Raviv mention Amir’s intention
to murder Rabin??? We previously caught them in their lies but
only the newspaper Hatsofe exposed the perjury for what it was.
279
 Some time ago, I received a huge stack of once secret
documents. Included was Raviv’s testimony to the police on the
night of the assassination. He told the police that he had heard
Amir declare his intentions to murder Rabin “on numerous
occasions”. I gave the testimony to Dr. David Khen who passed it
on to Hagai Huberman of Hatsofe. After reporting on Kalo’s bald-
faced lying testimony, Raviv’s police interrogation was printed with
the rather obvious comment that Kalo had lied to the judges of the
current Raviv trial. But will Kalo be charged with perjury? Come on
people, this is Israel!!
Now, on to the surprise of the trial. Since polls now reveal that
more than half of Israelis believe or suspect Yigal Amir did not
murder Rabin, that would explain why he was not called as a key
witness in this trial. Instead, his brother Hagai was called to the
stand. One perceptive reader had high hopes for Hagai, but they
were dashed in a most unexpected way.
Tomorrow’s likely to be one of the “circus days” in Avishai Aviv’s trial.
Hagai Amir, brother of Yigal Amir, is about to testify in court. The
tactical beauty of his summons to court is that it was made by the
prosecution. Hence, the content of his testimony is known before Hagai
even steps into court. He will testify that Raviv did know about the
attempt to murder Rabin before the event. What deal had been cut with
Hagai Amir is really unknown, but given that the two Amir brothers
(especially Yigal) consistently refused to testify against, or implicate, Raviv
in any wrong doings, the latest move is quite a surprise. There are few
more judicially convincing moves that are taking the symptom itself and
applying it to the ailment and that’s precisely what the prosecution is
hoping to do.
Eitan Peleg, Raviv’s attorney, already called this move “a deplorable,
pitiful decision’ (Ma’ariv 22.7.02). If the older Amir will be in any clear
state of mind to answer questions, the opportunity is there for Peleg to
probe deeper into the affair and expose the whole sham.
Something’s telling me the opportunity will be lost. As is well known, the
court has the power to summon anyone to testify in a case like this and
the main witness should have been Yigal Amir himself. So far he wasn’t
summoned and that tells us what kind of court this is. It’s a Kangaroo
court, hence a circus.
Expect any of the three judges involved, the presiding Amnon Cohen,
flanked by Arie Romanov and Orit Efal-Gabai to hold in “rapid due
course” a chair in the High Court. My money is on Cohen...
My correspondent must have been as surprised as everyone
when Hagai Amir refused to testify, stating,
280
 “I do not want to testify. The fact that they brought me as a witness
makes me think they want to conduct a fake trial. They are not calling the
right witnesses.”
Three cheers and more for Hagai Amir. He must have been
primed to testify the way the state wanted and refused to for the
exact right reason: the court is not calling the right witnesses.
One minute after Rabin was shot by Yigal Amir’s blank bullets,
over forty minutes before the rest of the country knew about Amir
through the media, Raviv called 38 reporters via his beeper service
with the message, “We missed this time. Next time we’ll kill
Rabin.” A minute later Amir Gilat of Ma’ariv called Raviv to ask
what he meant and Raviv gave him Yigal Amir’s details—where he
lived, studied, served in the army. How did Raviv, 40 minutes
before the rest of the country, know Amir shot at Rabin? How did
he know Amir missed? He knew because he handed him the gun
with blanks. And these witnesses, all reporters, if they had been
called to testify at Raviv’s trial, would have indelibly connected the
Shabak to the Rabin assassination.
But, they weren’t called and the rest is mere fiasco.

ALAS, PERES THE TRAITOR

About half of Israel know or suspect that Foreign Minister
Shimon Peres organized the Rabin assassination with the help of
Shabak chief Carmi Gillon. But many won’t believe that he sold
Jerusalem to the Vatican. This, I and my partner reported in March
1996 in our newsletter Inside Israel. Well people, now he’s trying in
earnest to complete the transaction. Read on:

The Italian Connection

On Friday, June 8, Gorbachev’s agenda took a big step forward
with the formal public unveiling of the Charter. The ceremony was
held in Urbino, Italy—a town approximately 135 miles north of
Rome. This “great international event” was sponsored by Italy’s
President, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi. The Earth Charter website
(www.earthcharter.org) in its pre-event coverage stated:
..... Numerous international and Italian celebrities will be in Urbino for
the ceremony; amongst them, Rita Levi-Montalcini winner of the Nobel
Prize for Medicine and Honorary President of the Italian Green Cross,
Steven Rockefeller of the international foundation of the same name,
281
 Father Massimiliano Mizzi, General administrator of “Dialogo dell’Opera
Frati Minori Conventuali” of Assisi, the Metropolitan Pitirim of the
Moscow Patriarchate and various members of the advisory committee of
Green Cross International amongst whom figure celebrities like Shimon
Peres, Evgeni Velikov, Arba Diallo, Thor Heyerdhal, Ted Turner and
Robert Redford.

Glocal Forum Opens in Rome

As The Guardian reported on May 11,
The September 11 terrorist attacks destroyed any illusion that rich
countries can ignore desperation and poverty elsewhere, the World Bank
president said Saturday at the opening of a conference on the weaknesses
of globalization. The first Glocal Forum, whose participants include
Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and mayors and business leaders
from around the world, is a response to concerns that globalization isn’t
always meeting local.....

Secret Talks in Europe?

Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, meeting with Danish officials in
Copenhagen, was presented with the latest European Middle East
peace plan. Denmark now holds the rotating presidency of the
European Union, but its plan is very similar to, and not meant to
compete with, that which U.S. President George Bush spoke about
last month in his public address.
Highly-placed security sources have intimated that intensive
negotiations are already taking place in Europe. Israel’s General
Security Service head Ami Ayalon and others are meeting with
leading Arabs from Judea and Samaria, according to the report, and
on the agenda are the internationalization of Jerusalem and a return
to the 1967 borders. Speaking at the new Chief-of-Staff ceremony,
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said, “It is likely that a window of
hope has opened, and we have no intention of missing it.”
***
(http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?sid=9&aid=6968)
Israel Accepts EU Peace Plan
“I have huge expectations with regards to the Danish European Union
presidency and we welcome a larger role for Europe in an effort to re-
establish peace,” said Mr. Peres after his meeting with Danish Foreign
Minister Per Stig Moller.
***
282
Barry,
I wonder if you ever heard of the “Rome Understanding”. I read about it
today for the first time in the Italian press (La Repubblica). You find it
(probably today only, so save it) at:
(http://www.repubblica.it/online/esteri/terrisei/terrisei/terrisei.html)
The news is reported by CNN, but only in its Italian website, at:
(http://www.cnnitalia.it/2002/MONDO/mediooriente/07/08/intesa/
index.html)
I couldn’t find it anywhere else.
I do not know if you read Italian. In few words, it says that Savit and Abu
Ala had 4 meetings (1 day the shortest, 4 days the longest) last Autumn in
Rome under the facilitating services of Rome’s Mayor who apparently
confirmed. Peres joined them for the last meeting.
They apparently agreed that the creation of a Palestinian State should
come at the beginning of the negotiations and not before. This “Rome
Understanding” is similar but not identical to the one leaked half a year
ago and considered “irresponsible” by Sharon. CNN quotes La Repubblica
saying that the plan includes 3 steps, which are to be performed in 2
years: mutual recognition of the 2 States, 1 year negotiation of pending
issues, 1 year execution. But I could find only the first step in La
Repubblica...
***
(http://www.cuttingedge.org/news_updates/newsupdatemain.html)
July. 8, 2002
Proposal Seeks to Internationalize Jerusalem’s Old City
Israeli, US, and German delegates spent yesterday fighting a surprise
proposal to internationalize Jerusalem’s Old City presented by an Italian
politician at the five-day meeting in Berlin of the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe, composed of parliamentarians from
55 countries.
“It came as a surprise to us,” said MK Colette Avital (Labor). “We have
been working the whole evening to persuade him to take it back but we
haven’t succeeded.”
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the US-based Simon
Wiesenthal Center, who is also in Berlin, said he fears the initiative will
pass when brought before the OSCE for a vote today because it appeared
to have a lot of support yesterday.
“The head of the Italian delegation told us his main concern is that in the
future when there are peace discussions, the Palestinian entity will be
given control of the Christian Holy sites. He thinks that is not good
enough for Christians,” Cooper said.

283
 He added that the Italian politician preferred for religious reasons to have
the Old City internationally administered.
***
Israeli, US and German delegations at the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe in Berlin have to fight a surprise proposal to
internationalize Jerusalem’s Old City by the Italian delegation to the
meeting. The head of the Italian delegation told Rabbi Abraham Cooper,
associate dean of the US-based Simon Weisenthal Center, that the main
concern of the Italian government was that “in the future when there are
peace discussions, the Palestinian entity will be given control of the
Christian Holy sites.”
Why the secular government of Italy should be worried about this was
not explained in the news item. (The Jerusalem Post, July 8, 2002)
***
In 1947, the British were on their way out of India and Israel.
They pulled the same stunt on both countries to assure never
ending conflict and ensure their perpetual control of their former
colonies. Artificial Muslim national entities were created in Kashmir
and Judea and Samaria with borders guaranteed to be enflamed
forever. And in case there was a danger of peace quieting the
regions, they placed their stooges from the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral
Commission and Bilderberg Group in charge of keeping the war
simmering to boiling.
Here is a bio of America’s new Ambassador to India, previously
an “expert” on the Middle East:
(http://usembassy.state.gov/mumbai/wwwhwill.html)
NEW DELHI -- Ambassador Blackwill took up his duties in India on
July 27, 2001.
The Ambassador was the Belfer Lecturer in International Security at
Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and taught
foreign and defense policy and qualitative public policy analysis. During
his 14 years at Harvard, he was Associate Dean of the Kennedy School,
faculty chairman of the School’s Executive Program for U.S. and Russian
General Officers; of the School’s Chinese Security Studies Program; and
of the Kennedy School’s Middle East Initiative.
Special Assistant to President George Bush for European and Soviet
Affairs in 1989-90, he was awarded the Commander’s Cross of the Order
of Merit by the Federal Republic of Germany for his contribution to
German Unification.

284
 He is the author of many books and articles including co-editor of
Conventional Arms Control and East-West Security (Duke University Press,
1989), and A Primer for the Nuclear Age (University Press of American,
1990). He also co-edited New Nuclear Nations (Council on Foreign
Relations Press, 1993) with Albert Carnesale, Damage Limitation or Crisis?
Russia and the Outside World (Brassey’s Inc., 1994) with Sergei Karaganov,
and Allies Divided: Transatlantic Policies for the Greater Middle East (MIT Press,
1997) with Michael Sturmer of German’s Research Institute for
International Affairs. Other books include Engaging Russia (The Trilateral
Commission, 1995) with Rodric Braithwaite and Akihiko Tananka, and
Arms Control and the US-Russian Relationship (Council on Foreign Relations
Press, 1996). In 1999, the Council on Foreign Relations published his
monograph, The Future of Transatlantic Relations. His latest book, America’s
Asian Alliances, co-edited with Paul Dibb, was published in July 2000 by
MIT Press, July 19,2002.
And lest anyone still doubt that the CFR and their allied “think”
tanks are out for Israel’s blood, keep reading:
Ha’aretz
July 19,2002
Either Chutzpah or a Joke
By Ze’ev Schiff
Israel may not be calling its presence and activities in the territories an
occupation, but in reality that’s what it is. Ariel Sharon does not want to
get out of the Palestinian cities, while Benjamin Ben-Eliezer is afraid of a
renewed wave of terror. Both Sharon and Ben-Eliezer have in effect
rejected, each in his own way, President Mubarak’s requests, brought by
the head of the Egyptian intelligence services, to withdraw from the
Palestinian cities. There is no negotiation taking place between Israel and
the Palestinians, but behind the scenes there is some activity in that
direction.
Yossi Beilin, in cooperation with the Palestinians, is back to dealing with
the refugee issue. The State Department is financing a study on the
conditions for establishing a Palestinian state based on the outline
presented by President Bush. An odd situation has arisen, because the
study has ended up in the hands of a pro-Palestinian group at the Council
for Foreign Policy in New York.
I have been lecturing throughout Israel this summer, every day,
sometimes twice a day. The crowds from the Dead Sea, to the
Negev, to the shores of the Kinneret average about 150 and for
that I can thank, in no small part, Rabbi Eliahu Shapira. He was
one of the first rabbis to invite me to speak at his Yeshiva in
Peduel, and he re-invited me four months ago. He was a brave
truth seeker.
285
 This week he was murdered by terrorists on the way to his
school. When the IDF identify his murderers, a one ton bomb
from an F-16 will be far too small to eliminate them.
But identifying them will be tricky. Lately, the victims of terror
in Emmanuel, a border post near Efrat and Adora saw light
complexioned “Europeans” in IDF uniforms doing the deed. It
seems, Israel has a foreign hit squad in its midst.

BRITISH FREEMASONRY COVETS ISRAEL

Without British Freemasonry there would be no modern state of
Israel. In the 1860s, the British-Israelite movement was initiated
from within Freemasonry. Its goal was to establish a Jewish-
Masonic state in the Turkish province of Palestine. Of course, that
would mean dealing with the Turks at some point down the line,
but first the country would have to be repopulated with Jews. And
the idea wasn’t to bring in more of the same religious Jews who
already were the majority in Jerusalem and elsewhere, but the kind
of Jews who would eventually accept the Masonic view of history.
Initially, British Jewish Masonic families like the Rothschilds and
Montefiores provided the capital to build the infrastructure for the
anticipated wave of immigration. However, luring the Jews to Israel
was proving difficult. They, simply, liked European life too much
to abandon it. So Europe was to be turned into a nightmare for the
Jews.
This led to the rise of pogroms and Zionism. The leader of
Zionism, Theodore Herzl certainly had some British support but he
apparently was not thinking in terms of a Masonic state. He died
mysteriously in 1905 at the tender age of 43, and the movement fell
into British hands under the immoral leadership of one Chaim
Weizmann.
Then things began moving quickly. British Masons like Arthur
Balfour and Herbert Samuel led the campaign for official British
recognition of a Jewish homeland during World War One. At the
same time, a million British troops, badly needed in the trenches of
Europe, were sent marching to Palestine to oust the Ottomans.
When the war ended, the campaign for a Jewish state went into
full speed at Versailles. In 1919, the Royal Institute of International

286
Affairs was founded in London and two years later, the Council on
Foreign Relations began its nefarious activities in New York. Their
agendas called for a world governmental takeover and a global
religion based in Jerusalem.
So far, so good for the Jews one might think. In fact, the British
finagling led straight to the Holocaust, which Mason Winston
Churchill refused to prevent or disrupt, right to the next attempt at
a Holocaust called the Oslo Peace Accords, which began with a
meeting in London in November 1992 between arch-criminals
Beilin, Hirshfeld and Pundak and members of the outlawed PLO.
Since then, secret meeting after secret meeting have taken place
between Israel’s “peacemakers” and British Freemasons. The
results are there for everyone to see.
The British have turned on Israel, but for reasons very few
could even contemplate considering seriously. However, the
reasons are deadly serious. What follows is information privy to
only the very highest degrees of British Freemasonry and British
Royalty. Upon threat of agonizing death, these secrets are to be
withheld from the meaningless masses of humanity. Much of the
material comes from Tony Bushby’s The Bible Fraud, which breaks
the cryptic messages of British Freemasonry.
Perhaps only several thousand people in all Britain and Israel are
aware that British Freemasonry and Royalty are totally convinced
that Jesus was King of Britain and was stoned to death in London,
at Ludgate, the location of St. Paul’s Cathedral. This conviction is
based on a history many are going to find insulting. Nonetheless, it
is vital to understand the thinking that has led to the 20th century
slaughter of the Jews and the current attempt to annihilate Israel.
Initiates into the deepest secrets of British Freemasonry are
taught that Jesus was born with an identical twin, Judas Thomas.
Their mother Mariamne was the granddaughter of King Herod. She
was raped by a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julias Abdes
Panthera. In his time, Jesus was known as Yeshua Ben Panthera.
The twins had very different personalities. Judas Thomas was
violent and irresponsible. He led a revolt of Galileans against the
Romans. The Galileans were, in fact, from Gaul, a captured Celtic
Roman province with a highly hostile population. Judas Thomas
took his revolt to Rome and in his 33rd year was ordered crucified
287
by Pontius Pilate. However, invoking royal Herodian privileges and
a large bribe, his uncle Joseph of Arimathea persuaded Pontius to
replace Judas Thomas on the cross with another victim. Judas
Thomas was sold into slavery and died much later in India.
Jesus, meanwhile took his priestly vows seriously. He was cousin
to John the Baptist, the chief Rabbi of the Essenes and second in
line to take over the position. With the executions of John and
Judas Thomas, Jesus became the chief rabbi of the Essenes.
During much of his youth, Jesus lived in Britain with his uncle
Joseph of Armithea, who ran a lucrative tin trading business
between Cornwall and Phoenicia. While in Cornwall, Jesus learned
the secrets of the Druids, a Celtic religion which was closely allied
with the Essenes. Both shared a belief in fraternal love and a strict
set of fatal punishments for those who betrayed the mysteries of
their faiths. And both demanded a rigorous three stage initiation
process for those wishing to be privy to those mysteries.
Jesus was in Rome at the time of his brother’s crucifixion. He
and his family and followers escaped the city in the wake of the
crackdown on Zealots following Judas Thomas’s revolt. Most went
to Marseilles and from there spread throughout Gaul and Britain.
Jesus and his wife fled to Britain.
Yes, wife. According to British Freemasonry, he had four of
them. His first, a Nabatean named Cypros produced five children,
the most famous being Caradoc, a future king who would fight
Rome with savage success.
But it was the second, Mary Magdelene who was even more
significant. Her father was an early British Celtic king and she a
Celtic princess. Their children and all their descendants produced
the British royal lineage. With this marriage, Jesus became a Celtic
royal and he was given a suitable new royal name, Jesus
Cunobeline.
Shortly after his arrival in Britain, Jesus Cunobeline and his
family were given royal jurisdiction over a huge tract of land in
southern Wales. It is for this reason that the Prince of Wales is
considered a direct ancestor of the first king of modern Wales,
Jesus Cunobeline, with privileges that extend to all of Judaism and
Israel.

288
 Just before Emperor Claudius attacked Britain, Jesus abdicated
his crown to his son Caradoc, who defeated the Romans at every
turn. But through trickery, he and his father, Jesus Cunobeline were
captured and shipped in shackles to Rome. Caradoc appealed to the
Roman Senate for clemency, and was granted it on condition that
Britain never fought Rome on its soil again. He accepted the
proviso, and he and his entourage were given a palace of their own.
Jesus lived there for seven years.
Then he sailed to Egypt to learn the secrets of the Egyptian
mystery schools. He was an honored student and soaked in the
secret handshakes, cryptic messages and graduated revelations. The
Christianity of Jesus became Freemasonry.
Jesus wanted to share his new complete Essene/Druidic/
Egyptian religion, and that proved his undoing. He was stoned to
death in London, aged 63, for betraying his vows and revealing the
secrets of the mystery schools.
However, back in Rome, presbyters had combined the lives of
Jesus and Judas Thomas to create a rapidly growing religion. The
British-born Roman emperor Constantine of York, a direct
descendant of Jesus, and his mother Helena saw a great advantage
in spreading a publicly accepted story of Jesus to create unity in the
empire, while keeping the true story alive amongst the most trusted
of British royalty and their closest allies.
Constantine gathered a British army and smashed his way to
Rome. Shortly after, in 330, he convened a conference of
presbyters in Nicaea to unify Christianity. Final gospels were voted
on and a New Testament created. But to assure that his empire’s
newly official religion never forgot the Israelite roots of Jesus and
the British royal line, Constantine tacked the Jewish scriptures onto
the New Testament.
As far as British Freemasonry is concerned, they are both the
true Jews and true Christians. This, they reason, is the right that
comes with knowing the secret truth of Jesus.
And when they re-created Israel in their distorted image, the
Freemasons had no room in the country for those Jews they
considered deluded. Through Chaim Weizmann, they eliminated
religious Jews and patriotic Jews from the Zionist movement. They
were condemned to die in Europe.
289
 Those who did arrive in Israel were thoroughly inculcated in
socialist, secular, occult values. Israel was to be transformed into a
Masonic Jewish state ruled by their rightful leaders, the Freemasons
of Britain.
But something unexpected happened during the 1930s. The
religious Jews, both of Israel and Eastern Europe, rejected this
peculiar Zionism as a foreign growth on G-d’s intended Judaism.
And non-religious, but patriotic Jews led by the likes of Jabotinsky,
Begin and Shamir fought to expel the British from their land. And
they fought so well that the British ordered their Jewish Masons
like Teddy Kollek (33rd degree) and Yitzhak Rabin (32nd degree)
to betray their fellow Jews and turn them over to the British or to
murder them outright.
The British Freemasons and their Jewish quislings managed to
do the bidding of the British, to the point of joining them in an
attack of Egypt in 1956. There was still hope that a British
Freemasonic Israel could yet be created by the Ben Gurions,
Weizmanns and Dayans they had placed in power. But in 1977, all
illusions were smashed by the election of Menachem Begin as
prime minister. Since then, Britain has declared a covert war against
an Israel that turned to G-d and Jewish patriotism instead of rule by
Masonry. The Oslo process begun in London in November 1992,
was their ultimate revenge.

Beware Mitzna
The Council on Foreign Relations assigned their member, Dan
Kurtzer, the US Ambassador to Israel, to identify the best Labor
candidate to thoroughly control and get Israel back on the Oslo
track. The winner is Haifa mayor Amram Mitzna. Watch his
upcoming meteoric rise, backed by CFR dollars.

290
 CHAPTER 8
HOW BAD ARE THE
PEACEMAKERS?
Start of a typical week. Shakhaf Pilovitch phones me. He is a
broadcaster on the Voice of the Red Sea radio station. A month
ago he came over to my place and photocopied hundreds of pages
of Rabin murder documentation. One by one, he released the most
damning documents over the Israeli internet. Lately, the popular
platform Rotter featured his discoveries on their forums and they
were getting between 8,000 and 18,000 hits a day.
During the past week, there was a surge of slanderous letters
against him on the forums. Last Friday, Yaacov Verker, chairman
of the Committee to Reinvestigate the Rabin Assassination,
published a powerful article in Makor Rishon. Within a day of
publication, he was being slandered on the Rotter forums.
On Monday evening, Shakhaf called.
“I was looking through the police records and found a huge lie. One
policeman reports that he found Yigal Amir’s gun license in his wallet
immediately after the shooting. Then, two hours later, another cop found
the gun license on the sidewalk. Somebody has to be lying.”
“No,” I replied. “The police were honest about the Rabin murder. They
didn’t lie. There really were two licenses. And this would explain a major
mystery. The police ballistics lab chief, Bernard Shechter was given two
guns to examine that night and no one knew why. If Amir had licenses
for two guns, it would explain a lot.”
Shakhaf published the documents on Rotter with my
explanation. He phoned me the next morning.
“You won’t believe what happened! I put the police records on Rotter
and they disappeared within ten minutes. And that’s not all, another story
disappeared almost as quickly on the Hatsofe site.”
The story that disappeared concerned the PLO’s chief financier
and paymaster who escaped the region for the safety of London.
The story was front page news for one day, even in the Jerusalem
Post. The Hatsofe article reported that he was smuggled out of the
country by Deputy Foreign Minister, “Rabbi” Michael Melchior.
291
Someone removed that story from Hatsofe’s site. Of Melchior, let
the following report explain where Peres’ “rabbi” is coming from:
David Bedein, of Israel Resource News Agency, reported
yesterday, on Arutz-7’s RUTH MATAR English-language show,
that Michael Melchior’s father and Ron Pundak’s father are both
trying to raise money for the Israeli COMMUNIST Party affiliate
group called Tayush! Their contact in Israel: Peres Center for
Peace.
Ruth and he both reported that Michael Melchior’s comments in
the US are being investigated by news agencies. (Possible referral to
the Israeli Attorney-General for SEDITION??)
Michael Melchior’s father Bent is the former chief rabbi of
Denmark. Ron Pundak was one of the two original Israeli
negotiators of the Oslo Accord. The senior Melchior and Pundak
are communists who raise more money for “Palestinian” causes
than any other Jews in northern Europe.
Now why would Shimon Peres’ deputy Foreign Minister
smuggle a crooked PLO financier to England or better put, what
did he get out of it?
The morning is not over. An e-mail arrives:
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=19816
7&contrassID=2&subContrassID=4&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
Dear Barry,
There are a lot of questions here.
1. Why was she killed if all the Arabs knew her?
2. Did she know something to make them want to eliminate her?
3. The terrorist has 20 minutes to do a lot of killing, yet he only
attacked this family, why?
I’m sure there are more questions.
I checked the page and it was white. The article had disappeared.
My informant wrote back asking why the page was erased. Within
two hours he wrote: “It’s dangerous to write you. Out of nowhere
my e-mails are being held back and sent in bunches.” I replied,
“No, it was dangerous for you to have entered the Ha’aretz page.
What was on it?”
Because of Meir’s gallant publication of the Rabin evidence over
the Hebrew internet, the Israeli security police initiated a new

292
department whose duty is to erase Hebrew language reports which
endanger the ruling cabal of criminals. But that’s not all they do.
Wednesday morning 2:30 AM. Shakhaf called.
“Meir,” I said, “This is way too late for chit chat.”
“You won’t believe what happened,” he answered. “They slashed all four
tires on my car and smashed the windshields. Inside was a dead black cat
with a note around its neck warning me that if I keep it up, I’m next.”
That’s what you get if you expose the Rabin murder: satanism.
The day before, I received a phone call from Yisrael Cohen of
Tel Aviv.
“You don’t know me,” he began. “But I read your book The Last Days of
Israel and I’ve got a few things I have to get off my chest. I worked in the
Hadassah Hospital lab for years and I witnessed crimes.”
I met Yisrael at his Tel Aviv flat. Yaacov Verker joined me.
There were two topics on the menu. The first was Rudolph
Kastner. Those who have read Perfidy by Ben Hecht know that
Kastner was the Jewish Agency employee sent to Hungary to
“save” Jews. Working hand in hand with Adolph Eichmann,
Kastner saved 3,000 friends and family and aided the Nazis in the
extermination of the other 400,000.
By 1953, the scandal was out and Prime Minister Ben Gurion
gave the order to rub Kastner out. The Shabak urged a group of
nationalists called Sulam to do the deed. Those familiar with the
Rabin murder will recognize Sulam as the Eyal of their time. And
just like the Rabin murder, the Kastner hit was botched and he was
taken to Hadassah Hospital in Tel Aviv, now known as Ichilov
Hospital, the same place Rabin was finished off.
Yisrael Cohen recalls:
“My lab was on the same floor as Kastner’s room. He was given a private
room and the government arranged for a guard outside the door 24 hours
a day. Except he didn’t last that long. He was shot in the abdomen and
Professor Marcus successfully operated on the wound. Kastner was going
to make a full recovery.
“You should have seen the joy by the government. They were going to
name streets after this ‘hero.’ They didn’t stop sending flowers. Golda
Meir sent the biggest bouquet of all. It was a waste of money. He died in
the middle of the night of a perforated stomach. The government accused
Professor Marcus of botching the operation and he ended up the
scapegoat.

293
 “I talked with Professor Marcus’ operating team, even Kastner’s personal
nurse. Here’s what happened. Someone applied strong pressure on
Kastner’s abdomen and tore open the stitches from his operation. No
one came into the floor that night and Kastner didn’t cry out. The only
possible explanation was the guard put a pillow over Kastner’s mouth to
shut him up and ripped the stitches with his knee. The guard was never
heard of again.”
Shades of Yoram Rubin and Yitzhak Rabin.
Then Yisrael Cohen told the story of how he was almost
corrupted. The mayor of Tel Aviv during the 1970s was Mordechai
Namir. His wife Ora Namir was later a Minister in Peres’
government and then sent to China as Israel’s ambassador. One
night Mayor Namir caught his wife in the sack with Moshe Dayan.
He reacted by swallowing a bottle of barbiturates in front of both
of them. An ambulance was called and Namir’s stomach pumped at
Ichilov. Yisrael Cohen examined the contents of the stomach and
wrote a lab report.
“I was squeezed to falsify the report. First the hospital director cornered
me, then someone I didn’t know. I was literally ordered to change the
name of the attempted suicide. They didn’t want another Labor Party
scandal or Ora Namir’s promiscuity to get out. They didn’t want to lose
control of Tel Aviv city hall. I resisted all the pressure and the truth did
get out. Mayor Namir’s career was over.”
Ora Namir, Ron Pundak, Michael Melchior, all Peres’ protégés.
All “peacemakers.” All filthy to the core. And the filth will continue
with the Labor Party’s upcoming new leader.
The very first story published in my defunct newsletter Inside
Israel in November 1993 was the ugly truth about two Poles named
Andre Genshyurovski and Bogslev Bagshik. In one of the biggest
robberies in history, these crooks stole $600 million from the Polish
banking system. They arrived in Israel on visas arranged by the
Prime Minister’s Liaison Office, known as Nativ, and were given
shelter. Between 1992-1995, Shimon Peres and then-Energy
Minister and later Police Minister Moshe Shachal were smuggling
major crooks and their stolen money into Israel on Nativ visas,
including the former president of the Ukraine and Yugoslavia’s
leading banker. In the months before his murder, Rabin tried
earnestly to shut down Nativ and initially I considered this the
prime motive for his murder. Yigal Amir was sent to Riga, Latvia as
an employee of Nativ in the spring and summer of 1992.
294
 The Poles, both gentiles, became Jews when then-Interior
Minister Arye Deri granted them citizenship based on the Law of
Return. Now a way had to be found to launder all the money.
Shachal had a plan. He’d sell them Israel’s largest petrochemical
concern, Paz Oil, whose majority shares were owned by his Energy
Ministry. Seven years earlier, minority shares were purchased by a
contractor named Gad Zeevi. He proved more than willing to sell
these shares to the Polish megacrooks.
Today, Shachal is still in the oil business. Just last year, an
Argentinean company he chaired wooed the Taliban to allow them
to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan. Another company
vying for the pipeline was Unocol, with tentacles all through the
Bush Administration. The Taliban turned both down, then came
September 11 and we know the rest.
A few months ago, the Jerusalem Post Tel Aviv magazine City
Lights published a strange report. It seems that Daniel Kurtzer,
Israel’s Council on Foreign Relations executive American
ambassador had recommended Haifa mayor Amram Mitzna as the
new Labor Party leader. It was reported that arch-traitor Yossi
Beilin would support his candidacy. I knew then that he was in and
I was aghast.
You see, in June 1982, my army unit entered Lebanon on the
first day of the invasion. My superior officers included Dan
Shomron, Ehud Barak and Amram Mitzna. I fought in the central
axis, the only front of three which failed to meet its battle plan on
time. Our goal was to split the Beirut-Damascus highway and trap
the Syrian Army behind our lines. We didn’t reach this goal until
two months later, when this trio of buffoons was replaced.
Worse, we suffered horrendous losses for no apparent reason.
The biggest fiasco of the whole war occurred when Colonel Ehud
Barak ordered a religious armored division into a Syrian ambush in
a valley called Sultan Yakub. Twenty three soldiers were killed in
the ambush and another five captured and later murdered. Barak’s
leading role in the fiasco was covered up until this day and the five
captured soldiers were deliberately neglected as part of this cover-
up.
And while my axis was being slaughtered, Col. Amram Mitzna
informed Defense Minister Ariel Sharon that he refused to lead his
295
troops into battle. Faced with an immediate threat of being fired, he
reneged on his declaration. But the central axis continued to miss
its assigned targets for the rest of his tenure.
Five years later, the intifada broke out and who did Defense
Minister Rabin assign to squelch it but the worst officers of the
Lebanon War? Ehud Barak, Dan Shomron and Amram Mitzna!
They not only failed to put it down, it seemed they were
deliberately fanning it.
Recently journalist Uri Dan wrote a piece exposing Mitzna’s role
in the Lebanon War and he made a frightening implication: perhaps
Mitzna was also involved in the Sultan Yakub slaughter and just
maybe, the Israeli religious troops were sent to their slaughter
deliberately to wreck Sharon’s, so far, successful war aims.
And who would have ordered them to give such a treasonous
command? Frightened by the success of the Begin/Sharon
Lebanese policy, terrified by the likelihood that it would lead to a
peace treaty with a stable Christian government, Shimon Peres and
Yossi Sarid began an expensive anti-war campaign in the US,
working hand in hand with the CFR’s Sandy Berger. They turned
American opinion against Begin and Sharon, destroyed Christian
Lebanon, strengthened the Syrian enemy and assured the death of
500 more Israeli soldiers in Lebanon.
It took the CFR another decade before they financed the
bumbling Barak into the Prime Minister’s Office but it was worth
the trouble. Practically his first act in power was to unilaterally pull
out of Southern Lebanon, leaving Israel’s Christian allies to run for
their lives or face torture.
Barak’s withdrawal left Haifa exposed to missile and artillery
attacks. But Mayor Mitzna didn’t care. He was having much too
much fun taking payoffs from Gad Zeevi in return for handing the
contractor the finest pieces of city-owned real estate to build malls
and luxury apartment blocks. Yes, Zeevi, who sold his Paz Oil
shares to the crooked Poles was now living it up on the generosity
of Amram Mitzna.
And Mitzna did not forget his old battle comrade Ehud Barak.
Barak’s campaign team is now under police investigation for
financing their campaign with donations from bunko charities. Jews
in Israel and all over the world contributed to charitable funds to
296
boost employment in slums and the like, but in fact, the money
went straight to Barak’s election team. Mitzna sponsored a phony
Haifa charitable fund to pay off his old pal and the State
Comptroller is sitting on his unclosed file.
There is more. I have received reports about Mitzna’s personal
behavior which I will not repeat. Let someone else expose it.
Those Labor/left leaders who brought us peace are totally
without morals or scruples. But their followers are nothing like
them. I grew up in a Shomer Hatzair socialist home. My parents
were unceasingly honest and ethical. I’d like to think I inherited lots
of decent morality from them. But they either turned a blind eye to
the kind of sewerage leading the socialist Zionists or just didn’t
know. The Leftists are mostly good people. Their leaders are
monsters.

297
 APPENDIX
BOOK REVIEWS

JUST AS SCARED, JUST AS DOOMED

Last November, I was invited by Atara Beck to speak at Israel’s
the Judaica Centre in Toronto. After she organized a most
successful lecture, she gave me a book written by her father M.J.
Nurenberger. This wasn’t the first time I was given a book to read
and rarely is the task rewarding. After dawdling two months, I
finally set about to give the late Mr. Nurenberger a chance.
I hope he forgives me for ever doubting him.
M. J. Nurenberger was a wartime columnist for Jewish
newspapers worldwide. He later founded the Canadian Jewish News,
the country’s most influential Jewish media source. The book I read
by him, The Scared and the Doomed—The Jewish Establishment vs. The
Six Million, is one of the most important works about modern
Jewish history and for me, completes the trilogy of truth about the
Jewish leaders’ role in the Holocaust, which includes Perfidy by Ben
Hecht and The Transfer Agreement by Edward Black.
I have previously reviewed Perfidy and The Transfer Agreement and
found both contained nearly divine lessons about Israel’s situation
today. The Scared and the Doomed confirms the demoralizing truths
found in those books because Nurenberger was an eye-witness to
the events the other authors covered.
But his book adds so many details. The following is a long
critique. Mr. Nurenberger’s quotes will speak for themselves but I’ll
add commentary. I won’t dwell on events covered by Hecht and
Black but will recommend that all three books be read one after
another. The effect is a horrid indictment of world, especially,
Jewish leaders, but none more so than the founding fathers of
Labor Zionism. Once the rotten stench of the truth wears off,
readers will have learned the lessons needed to save Israel and the
Jewish nation from still, another slaughter.

299
While There Was Time
Before the war broke out, a group of Zionists led by Vladimir
Jabotinsky foresaw the upcoming Holocaust of the Jews. His
followers were known as the Revisionists and later founded the
Irgun. They proposed practical solutions to fight Hitler but one
stands out: a Jewish army on the European continent trained by
what would be known as the Allies. Jabotinsky could have recruited
over a hundred thousand men and had he done so, the Jews could
have protected themselves. But the Jewish establishment would not
allow him to save Europe’s Jews.
“The war against Jabotinsky, followed by wars against the Irgun, made a
united Jewish resistance impossible and indirectly prepared the ground for
the great tragedy of World War II. The mentality of relying upon
professional organizations and an elite leadership still threatens the entire
Jewish way of life and, indeed, our very survival.” pp 23
“During the last few months of Jabotinsky’s life, he was under constant
attack by the Jewish establishment as an ‘irresponsible’ leader and a
pessimist. The campaign against him in New York was truly miserable.
The entire Jewish press, in the service of the establishment, did not let up
in its ridicule.” pp 37
“The project (a Jewish army) frightened the American Zionist
establishment which wanted no part of the flamboyant Jabotinsky. A few
days before a well-publicized Zionist rally, four Zionist leaders—Louis
Lipsky, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Eliezer Kaplan (then treasurer of the Jewish
Agency in Jerusalem), and Solomon Goldman—called on Lord Lothian in
Washington and announced that, ‘responsible Zionist quarters
disassociated themselves from Jabotinsky’s adventurous scheme.’” pp 48
“This episode certainly is relevant to what happened later and is an
illustration of how the Jewish establishment fought any serious effort to
organize world Jewry against Hitler. Their actions were dictated by the
fear that Jabotinsky would become a real challenge to Chaim Weizmann
and go on to become leader of the Jewish people. This has remained the
preoccupation of the establishment.” pp 50
“Thus the Labor Zionists who had forged an alliance with the timid,
frightened pro-British wing of the General Zionists, gained final control
of the entire World Zionist Movement and its fundraising apparatus.
There was no opposition except from breakaway factions, a situation that
prevails to this day in the Jewish state.” pp 52
Nurenberger confirms that there were two strands of Zionism,
the moral or Revisionist brand and the utterly demonic Labor
Zionism. To stress the obvious, very few Labor Zionist advocates
were in on the secret machinations of their leaders. Most were good

300
people, deeply manipulated by their leaders. Keep reading to see
just how foul these machinations were. Still we must ask, why
couldn’t the followers of Jewish socialism of the 1930s and 40s see
through their leaders, any more than the well-meaning followers of
the Israeli far left can see through theirs today.

The Slovakian Saints

Nurenberger proves, beyond doubt, that the Nazis viewed Jews
as a commodity to be sold to any bidder. Both Black and Hecht
made the same discovery. The criminals committing mass murder
desisted when paid off to do so. The Scared and the Doomed provides
several examples of bribes saving lives but none so heartbreaking
and frustrating as that of two Jews from Slovakia, Rabbi Michael
Dov Weissmandl and his assistant Gizi Fleishmann. They first sent
cables to an associate, Isaac Sternbuch, the Swiss representative of
the Vaad Hatzalah (Salvation Committee), who passed them on to
American Jewish leaders. By this route, the leaders had the earliest
proof that the Holocaust was under way. A route had been blazed
between Slovakia and Switzerland to save the nation’s Jews and all
that was needed was enough money to bribe one or two German
officers.
“Cable from Sternbuch to Jacob Rosenheim: ‘According to the last
authentic and repeated information, the German authorities recently
evacuated completely the population of the Warsaw ghetto. One hundred
thousand Jews were murdered in the most bestial manner. The mass
murders still continue. From the corpses, Germans make soap and
fertilizer.’ ...The matter was not given publicity because Rosenheim
promised to keep it strictly secret in exchange for the assurance that the
United States government would take some action immediately.” pp 62-63
“There was no use talking to any of those Jews abroad because they were
criminals: they refused to save people from killers. Instead of secretly
negotiating for the release of hostages, they made public statements and
sought publicity as ‘leaders of their people.’...After the war, when
Weissmandl’s memoirs of that period appeared, he understood that most
of the Orthodox rabbis in America and the Irgun delegation there were
not only foiled in their efforts to arouse the Americans to ‘buy Jews’—
this was Ben Hecht’s overt slogan—but were maligned by those in the
Jewish establishment who feared ‘competition’ in the field of fundraising
within the Jewish community.” pp 65
“By 1943 many Nazis had already realized that they would have to save
their skins, so Dieter von Wissliczeny, Eichmann’s second-in-command,
suggested several deals to the secret committee in Bratislava of which
301
Weissmandl was a member. In fact, negotiations had started as early as
1941, when the Eichmann organization still believed that Jews overseas
and Allied governments were interested in ‘buying’ Jewish
lives...Weissmandl established contact with the representatives of the
American Joint Distribution Committee in Switzerland...Weissmandl was
not taken seriously. In one of his acrimonious letters to American Jewish
leaders, he wrote; ‘You are dealing with Nazis. You are afraid to risk
money to save lives. You are insane.’” pp 66-67
“The rabbi described in detail the types of officials with whom he was
dealing. When Wissliczeny, the German bureaucrat in charge of
exterminating the Jews, received his first payment, he kept his word and
stopped the deportations. Weissmandl informed his friends abroad that
there was no danger that any funds would land in the German war
treasury. Those who were bribed put their money into their own pockets;
they were saving up for defeat.” pp 69
“The map that Weissmandl sent abroad by special courier, a detailed map
of Auschwitz with a request that the crematoria be put out of order,
wound up in the wastebasket of some bureaucrat in a New York Jewish
office.” pp 68
“Gizi Fleischmann had always been a dedicated Zionist...and remained in
constant touch with the headquarters of the World Zionist Movement in
Jerusalem. Gizi informed her superiors that the deportations could be
stopped quickly if certain conditions were met...These Nazis declared that
they would find ways to relieve the situation of the Jews of Poland
through an agency they would set up in Berlin...They pledged themselves
to completely halt the second deportation.” pp 70
“Gizi Fleischmann was an idealist who could not understand why all her
appeals to Jerusalem were ignored. During 1943, the time of greatest
opportunity for rescue, the establishment leaders in America were busy
fighting every move by the Emergency Committee. It was the leaders of
the establishment there who decided what they would or would not do
about the ransom money and about saving Jews from Nazis. It was they
who believed themselves to be the divinely appointed representatives of
all Jews, including those in Hitler’s camps.” pp 70
“The New York Vaad Hatzalah decided to pay the ransom on time, no
matter how difficult it might be to raise the funds, because such an appeal
could not be made public. They wired their committee in Switzerland that
Weissmandl should go ahead, that the money would be deposited. The
cable never reached Switzerland; it was stopped by a censor. The censor
was Moe Levitt, executive director of the American Joint Distribution
Committee. The American government had appointed the JDC as the
clearing house for all such messages...Is it possible to deny that by this
action, the Joint contributed to the liquidation of innumerable thousands
of hostages?” pp 72

302
 “Those in control of the funds of the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem and the
JDC in New York would not ‘gamble’ ransom money. They gambled with
the lives of fellow Jews...Gizi went to incredible lengths to impress upon
the leaders of the Jewish Agency that they must take seriously the
possibility of rescue, but to no avail. Documents prove that these leaders
tried to withhold information concerning the extermination from the
Jewish community in Palestine and from the press.” pp 73-74
“It is evident that had the Nazis known the Jews of Europe were a
commodity, worth something to the Allies, that many would have had
second thoughts when it came to collaborating fully in the so-called Final
Solution. But how could the Nazis have known this, when the European
Jews were seemingly worthless to their overseas brethren?” pp.171
Gizi Fleischmann was later cremated alive at Auschwitz while
Weissmandl saved himself by jumping off the train to the same
death camp.

The American Jewish Leaders

When reading the following quotes, ask yourself how the current
crop of American Jewish leaders would react to the Holocaust. We
know the answer by their reaction in 1993 to the Israeli
government’s sellout to the world’s leading terrorist, Yasser Arafat.
Though most Israelis opposed the agreement with all their hearts,
rightly fearing that Israel would turn into Beirut of the ‘80s, the
American Jewish leadership rallied around the flag of suicide. All
except the Likud-appointed AIPAC whose leadership was ousted
through a salacious campaign of innuendo without any cries of
objection from their fellow “Jewish leaders.”
“Were they stupid? Were some of them, in a sense, war criminals? Should
there be a Jewish War Crimes Tribunal, and should the survivors of these
organizations be asked to appear before such a court? What kind of
people run what we call in the community, ‘Jewish life?’” pp 107
“The Jews of Europe had one hope: that the United States and her allies
would proclaim that the Jews locked within Hitler’s fortress were
prisoners of war, that the Red Cross had a duty to report to the Allied
governments on their fate and that the extermination camps would be
bombarded. Each time such demands were stated, the Jewish
establishment not only refused to support them, but denounced the Irgun
delegation as irresponsible adventurers. It became very easy for Roosevelt
not to consider the Irgun demands, for he could always dispense with
them by stating that they came from unauthorized Jewish sources. Thus,
the Jews of Europe lost their war for survival because those who claimed
to speak for them did not even mention their plight.” pp 166-167

303
“Dr. Wise became so angry on account of these advertisements, on
account of all this ‘irresponsibility’ on the part of the so-called
unauthorized Jewish groups, that he attacked the Emergency Committee.
Of course, each attack by Wise strengthened the position of Secretary
Hull and Breckenridge Long, who could well afford to continue being
tolerant towards Germany’s war of extermination against the Jews. It took
two years and three to four million corpses before an American agency to
rescue Jews became operational, all because of sabotage by the Jewish
establishment, which feared competition and was intent on maintaining
its position no matter what the cost...One of the stalling maneuvers was
the House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing organized by
Congressman Bloom with a design to diminish the impression made by
the Emergency Committee. The hearings effectively postponed action for
another year ..The Emergency Committee warned American Jews against
these tactics but was relatively helpless as the Zionist organizations had at
their disposal tremendous subsidies from the United Jewish Appeal.” pp
170, 172
“The activities of Agudat Israel led to open conflict with the World
Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Congress who picketed the
offices of Agudat Israel because they ‘helped the Nazis by sending food
to the Jews in Poland.’” pp 174
“In a cold and frightful voice, Dr. Nahum Goldmann of the World
Jewish Congress said, ‘I think we have to take into consideration the
extermination of the majority of European Jews, except those who are in
the USSR or Britain.’ Nahun Goldmann admitted, years after the war,
that he ‘made a mistake’ during World War II—just a tiny error.” pp 177
“As more and more declassified documents continue to indicate, the
Irgun delegates were accused of misappropriating funds, and were
troubled by the attentions of the Internal Revenue Service.” pp 179
“During 1943 the Zionist organization and the American Jewish Congress
continually undermined the position of the Irgun representatives. For
example, every time a prominent American lent his name to the
Committee, he would receive a letter from Stephen Wise urging him to
resign. Dr. Wise, in a memorandum to Harold Ickes, Roosevelt’s
Secretary of the Interior, had this to say: ‘I do not like to speak ill to you
concerning a group of Jews, but I am under the inexorable necessity of
saying to you that the time will come, and come soon, when you will find
it necessary to withdraw from this irresponsible group.’ These legislators
were bombarded with letters from Jewish organizations to the effect that
they were being used for fundraising and personal enrichment. Some were
practically forced to make statements from the Senate floor in order to
defend themselves against influential Jews.” pp 180
“The Zionist statement ‘informed’ Americans that this group, in
Palestine, opposed ‘the official Zionist policy of disciplined restraint’
against Arab rioters...Thousands of copies of this statement were
distributed to people throughout the United States to warn them against
304
the Emergency Committee, instead of supporting its effort to establish a
powerful agency to save the Jews of Europe.” pp 182
“One should remember that ever since late summer in 1942, all American
Jewish leaders, as well as the leaders of the Jewish community in
Palestine, had known the terrible truth about the Nazi extermination
program. They knew that every day, while they were debating Zionism
and non-Zionism, thousands and tens of thousands of Jews were being
condemned to the furnaces of Auschwitz and Maidenek. Yet Zionist
business, Jewish community dinners and testimonials for important
philanthropists continued as usual. No neurosis engulfed the Jewish
community. All Jewish offices continued to function as in yesteryear. But
in Europe the German machine functioned with unabated efficiency.” pp
189
“It is not an accident of history that from 1933 to 1945, no important
Jewish organization ever demanded that the United States open its doors
to the Jews threatened by Hitler.” pp 191
“The Jewish establishment, afraid of losing its influence upon the
community, instead of supporting rescue, mobilized all its power not to
save the Jews of Europe but to save the prestige of its leaders. This effort
was financed from public funds collected among Jews to help the
refugees. Jewish professionals used to salaries larger than those paid to
members of the United States Congress, would not have survived if Irgun
policy had become their financial policy.” pp 193
“Wise devised a very diplomatic solution. He knew that he could not
publicly oppose a resolution establishing a government agency to save the
European Jews, but could kill it by lending it a political character...There
was a war against the entire Jewish people and the Jewish leadership was
playing the futile game of Who’s Who in American Jewry.” pp 194
“It is not widely appreciated that during World War II there was one
segment within American Jewry that used every possible means to save
Jews: the Orthodox Jewish groups...Someone within the Jewish
community, someone among its ‘recognized’ leaders, must have made it
easy for the President to insult the most respected spiritual leaders of
American Jewry...Judge Samuel I. Rosenman, FDR’s speechwriter was
asked to intervene so the President would not have to receive a rabbinical
delegation... Roosevelt must have learned that as long as he listened to the
establishment Jews, he could continue to fool the Jews of America by
publicly telling them one thing and doing otherwise behind the
scenes...Wise’s response to the slaughter of his brethren was to occupy
himself with attacking the Irgun delegation, which had charged Roosevelt
with personal responsibility for the lives of European Jewry.” pp 198-199,
202, 203
“The fact that a few thousand were saved was entirely due to the efforts
of a small number of activists in Switzerland, led by Recha Sternbuch,
who represented American Orthodox Jews. For three years, from 1941 to

305
 1944, the Joint in America refused to support this ‘illegal’
activity...Sternbuch had made an effort to directly contact the Joint in
America to counteract their Swiss representative Sally Meyer’s obstruction
but to no avail. The first transport of Jews from Germany was
discontinued because of Mayer’s sabotage.” pp 225
“A professional Jew by the name of Henry Montor, then executive Vice-
President of the United Jewish Appeal of America, circulated thousands
of copies of a letter asking Jews not to support illegal emigration to
Palestine. The circular was mailed on the stationery of the United Jewish
appeal on behalf of the American Joint Distribution Committee. Montor
later became head of the State of Israel Bonds organization in America.
Of course, he will never be tried by a Jewish tribunal because he belongs
to the ‘right’ Zionist party.” pp 54
“The president of Hadassah followed the same line: ‘The time has come
for heart-searching discussions and thoughtful exploration of plans for
American Jewry’s participation in the post-war reconstruction of Jewish
life.’ She then praised B’nai B’rith for organizing a successful conference.
The Jews in Auschwitz and Maidenek apparently did not know what
wonderful opportunities were awaiting them after cremation.” pp 112- 113
“It is almost amusing to read the speeches of the leaders who stressed
unity as the most important issue: a unity that would block dissident
action on behalf of European Jewry.” pp 111
“Has the establishment that carries such a burden of guilt given up,
relegated itself to the shadow of history? Has it made room for others less
guilty to continue in the effort to redeem what is redeemable, to revive
what could be made to live and flourish again? Or has this new class of
professionals Jewish leaders entrenched itself with such power that the
facts of history will remain hidden until the end of time?” pp 74
To the final question, the answer is yes and no; the American
Jewish organizations have been running a cover-up for sixty years.
But they won’t get away with it much longer, partly because their
policies are disintegrating the American Jewish community which
feeds it. Those Jews who survive the materialism, inter-marriage
and decadence will expose the corruption of the “leaders” in time.
That is guaranteed.
But in the meantime, these organizations are repeating their
Holocaust activities precisely the same way they did so sixty years
ago. They honor the likes of Henry Kissinger, who tried to destroy
Israel in the Yom Kippur War, and has the bloodstains of 3500
Jewish soldiers on his hands. They pay William Jefferson Clinton,
who has about 150 scalps of his victims on his rack, $100,000 to
receive plaques and diplomas because he was “a true friend to

306
Israel.” And they believe it to the point of advocating his wife,
whose financial ties to Arab terror groups go back over twenty
years, for a Senatorial post in a largely Jewish district.
After honoring the most wicked of their American enemies, they
lionize Israeli collaborators with the enemy with names like Beilin,
Dayan and Sarid. Even worse, they ask the murderer of Yitzhak
Rabin, Shimon Peres to come to their temples and pass on his
bloody wisdom. In return for his honored presence, they use their
control of the media to make certain that the real story of the Rabin
assassination is never known to their constituency.
If that isn’t demoralizing enough, they invite PLO leaders, even
Arafat, to their dinners as peacemakers. Why not, they can afford
it? The Jewish leaders are not chosen for their innate understanding
of diplomacy or war, rather the richest appoint themselves to the
highest posts. Thus, the greediest and most unscrupulous run the
show. These are just the type of people who will sell their souls and
those of their people for a position of power and lots of acclaim.
But they can never receive enough acclaim, so they plan dinners
and give each other even more trophies.
And they are still taking orders from the “peace” camp of the
Jewish Agency, the same folks who wouldn’t fight the Arabs in the
1930s and are just as opposed to doing so today. These folks with
their American Jewish leaders in tow are directly responsible for the
chaos that exists in Israel today and for the thousands of Jewish
deaths and mutilations in the name of their nine year old peace
process.
Nothing has changed. The same kind of demented egomaniacs
who ran the biggest American Jewish organizations of six decades
ago are still in power. And under them Israeli Jewry has as good a
chance of survival as European Jewry once did.
Note that just like in 1944, the UJA’s central theme today is
Jewish Unity. It’s a noble thought but an empty one: who is going
to unify behind deadly idiocy this time around?

FDR and the State Department

One must recall that by the 1930s, the State Department had
been totally shanghaied by a small but rotten Manhattan think tank
called the Council on Foreign Relations. This notorious sham was
307
founded with Rockefeller and Morgan money in 1922 and its stated
goal is a vast reduction of population followed by a one world
government with them in charge. They despise Jews at the top, so
recruit lots for the middle who will do their bidding. Almost every
major Jewish organization in America today is run by CFR
members with names like Bronfman, Lauder, Hoenlin, Seigman
and Zuckerman.
FDR’s Secretary of State Cordell Hull was a longtime high-
ranking CFR officer and it’s a fair bet that his anti-Semite deputy
Breckenridge Long was too. In 1942, FDR met with the Saudi royal
family and cut a multi-billion dollar deal. The Saudis would appoint
the Bechtel Corporation, of which Hull was VP, to build an oil
pipeline to the Mediterranean. But not if FDR was too nice to the
Jews. Watch as an incredibly cynical FDR feigns friendship with the
Jewish leaders, while condemning their families to genocide.
Recall that the CFR still runs the State Department and the
President and is conducting the exact same ploys on the current
crop of Jewish leader suckers.
“On February 10, 1939, the Department of State informed President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt of a secret memo sent to American
representatives of the Intergovernmental Refugee Committee. The wire
contained instructions from then Secretary of State Cordell Hull
concerning a ‘program of emigration’ of Jews from Nazi-controlled
territory...The Nazis wanted to get rid of Jews ‘in a civilized manner’ but
the State Department threw a monkey wrench into the program from its
very beginning. This was the manner in which the State Department
treated any suggestion for evacuation of Jews from Hitler-held territory.”
pp 13-14
“Breckenridge Long and his immediate superior, Secretary-of-State
Cordell Hull made sure that members of the American delegation
remembered that nothing should be done to ‘interfere with the war
effort,’ a euphemism which signified opposition to the rescue of Jews. p 169
“Nahum Goldmann sent a memo to the State Department proving that
the Jewish establishment had been fighting the Irgun representatives since
their activities began. Goldmann wrote the following letter to Mr. Wallace
Murray of the Department of State: ‘All Zionist organizations in the
country repudiate the Committee for a Jewish Army.’ The sins of the
Committee must have been very grave for ‘all Zionist groups’ to issue a
statement denouncing them.” pp 187-88
“Bloom was a truly pathetic figure. He was a State Department boy as far
as the Jewish issue was concerned. And so, while the State Department
continued to frustrate any earnest effort to rescue the masses of
308
 European Jews, its bureaucrats found in Bloom a Satan’s gift—an ideal
instrument to thwart a declaration that the rescue of European Jewry was
an important aim of the Allied Powers.” p 190
“How ‘successful’ the Zionist leaders were with their political campaign
on behalf of Palestine became clear after the war. Britain did not move
one inch, nor did Roosevelt. We know that while the President had
authorized Stephen Wise to make statements on his behalf in support of
the establishment of a Jewish Commonwealth in Palestine, the President
and the State Department continually assured the Arabs in secret
memoranda and secret conversations that they should not pay any
attention to these political statements. The Arabs were told that these
proclamations were meaningless vote-getting gimmicks and did not
represent American policy. p 235
“The State Department’s indifference to the fate of European Jewry
suggests that Washington indirectly consented to the Final Solution.” p 190
To illustrate how thoroughly American Jews have been misled
by their leaders, 90% will tell you that FDR was a great president
who was good for the Jews. Incredible, but true. Take your own
poll if you can’t believe such blindness actually exists in any people,
anywhere.

Chaim Weizmann and the British

The Labor Zionist myth is that the Balfour Declaration,
promising British support for a Jewish state, was presented to
Chaim Weizmann as a gift for his World War One chemical
process which created acetone for explosives from peeling paint.
Nothing of this myth is true, though the British did put up a phony
factory to produce the magic acetone, but not so much as a
firecracker was ever manufactured there.
Chaim Weizmann was the emissary of the British crown, and its
associated secret societies. He did their bidding and was welcome in
all corridors of power. As you shall see, even the Rothschilds had
to seek his permission before financing any project.
American Jewish leaders convinced their congregations that
Weizmann gained his power from being chairman of the Jewish
Agency and president of its umbrella group, the World Zionist
Organization (WZO), even though he lived in London and not
Jerusalem. These leaders did not make a move without his say-so
and he said that European Jews must die.

309
 “At the meeting in Zurich, the gathering applauded Weizmann despite his
proclamation that only two million—the young, the idealistic, would
survive the oncoming flood. The others, he said, because of historical
developments, would disappear, ‘like dust.’” p 35
“Perhaps a British hand was in the murder of Arlozoroff. Perhaps. But
one thing is certain: Dividing Jews in Palestine into two opposing camps
suited the British perfectly.” p 47
“It was no accident that Weizmann fought any attempt to support the
‘illegal’ immigration when the doors of Palestine were closed, and that he
resented anyone who contradicted his views. For example, at the
beginning of World War II, in London, where he lived, when asked by
one of the Rothschilds to help the Irgun bring a boat of Aliyah Bet to
Palestine, Weizmann said, ‘he would not sit down with a satan.’ This was
already at the time that there was no other avenue of escape.” p 90
“This development came later. During the years when the Six Million
were in the balance, the official Zionist Movement in the Free World was
influenced by Weizmann’s cautious policy of not wanting to antagonize
the British. As early as 1933, the Jewish Agency, in the wake of the
Transfer Deal with Germany, continued to import German products into
the Middle East. At the same time it continued to harass the Irgun-
sponsored Aliyah Bet.” p 91
“As a young man Felix Frankfurter was a representative of the World
Zionist Organization and Dr. Chaim Weizmann. He also successfully
negotiated an agreement between the British and King Faisal of Saudi
Arabia.” p 159
“As a conference to end all Jewish conferences, the most important
political ‘resolution’ was the greeting sent to Dr. Chaim Weizmann in London.
It affirmed support for this elegant and diplomatic representative of the
Jews, and voiced opposition to the extremists and adventurers who would
force open the doors of Palestine. No doubt the British government was
pleased to have the support of the conference.” p 115
Now let’s get it straight for once! Chaim Weizmann knew the
results of the Holocaust ahead of time and deliberately allowed the
slaughter to take place. He knew what he was doing and turned
Jewish leaders in America and Jerusalem into mass murderers in the
second degree. It’s not just that he followed British dictates and
agreed with their policy of blocking refugee immigration into
Palestine. He was sending official proclamations to Jewish leaders
worldwide, not to try and save their co-religionists in Europe no
matter where they were headed. And they listened to him because
he was the head of the Jewish Agency, the capital of Labor
Zionism.

310
The Jewish Agency
Nearing the end of the war, Eichmann cut a deal with a rabbi
named Yoel Brand. He would save all the remaining Jews of
Hungary, in exchange for 700 trucks. Brand traveled to Allepo,
Syria to meet Jewish Agency deputy head Moshe Sharett to raise
funds for the trucks. There, he was quickly arrested by the British.
This doomed the Jews of Hungary. The order for the arrest must
have come from Sharett and his superior, Chaim Weizmann.
And do keep in mind that the Jewish Agency is still being used
to weaken the Jewish nation. It has been reliably reported that a
recent head, Avraham Burg, long corrupted and groomed by
Israel’s deepest enemies, initiated a policy change which allowed a
flood of gentiles to pour into Israel from the former Soviet Union.
A dilution of the Jewish character of the state, as assimilation in the
Diaspora, in time, will serve the same purpose as the Holocaust—
the destruction of Jewry.
“The Transfer Deal of 1933, signed between the Jewish Agency and the
German Nazi authorities, allowed wealthy German Jews who emigrated
to Palestine, to export German goods representing a small percentage of
their property. Thus, the Jewish Agency indirectly became a sales
organization promoting Nazi goods in the Middle East. It was the first act
of Jewish surrender to Hitler.” p 23
“Moshe Sharett, longtime foreign minister of Israel, was never cleared of
the accusation that Brand was turned over to the British by the Zionist
establishment. Brand’s mission could have saved one hundred thousand
Hungarian Jews, or more.” p 102
“Only towards the end of November 1942 did officials of the Jewish
Agency finally permit the Palestinian press to release the news concerning
the extermination of Jews in Europe, at which time Agudat Israel
demanded the creation of an Emergency Committee.” p 174
“Suggestions for a solidarity strike in Palestine or public march in
Jerusalem were rejected by the Jewish Agency politicians on grounds that
they would imperil the ‘good relations’ between Palestinian Jews and the
British administration.” p 174
“Each committee had to be under the supervision of the Labor Zionists.
No instructions of this ‘Rescue Committee’ were to be carried out if they
were found to be in opposition to the policies of the representatives of
the leftist groups. According to a doctoral thesis written by Arye
Morgenstern, the representatives of the leftist groups opposed every
move towards independent, secret deals aimed at saving lives.” p 175
“Jewish Agency executive Yitzhak Greenbaum stated at a committee
meeting, ‘I do not believe we can save Polish Jewry or even help them.’
311
 Greenbaum saw no reason to continue the public campaigns on behalf of
Polish Jews. He even stated that people should not continue to support
the negotiations of Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl in Slovakia. Later,
Greenbaum also stated that he did not approve of Joel Brand’s rescue
mission. Greenbaum would become Israel’s first Minister of the Interior.
Today we understand from Greenbaum’s statements why the Zionist
leaders in America, acting under orders from Palestinian Jewish leaders,
did not engage in any earnest rescue work. We can also understand why
Brand was turned over to the British. Greenbaum was even more explicit.
He said there were two areas of Jewish combat: Palestine and rescue in
the Diaspora. One cannot postpone the first because of the second.
‘Zionism must be above any other consideration.’ The Jewish Agency was
active only in bringing individual Jews to Palestine...Greenbaum
sabotaged the initiatives of Rabbi Weissmandl and Gizi Fleischmann in
Bratislava and opposed Joel Brand as well. Greenbaum, a leader of the
Jewish Agency, adopted the same tone as Cordell Hull, the American
Secretary of State who declared the rescue of European Jewry would only
come about, ‘after the victory of the Allies.’” pp 176-177
“‘This calamity,’ Greenbaum concluded in a memorandum, ‘will prove
the Zionist point of view that only Palestine can save Jews and that only a
number of them will be saved. However, the Rescue Committee must
continue to operate in order to prove to the world and to the Jewish
people that the Jewish Agency is the only one that acts on behalf of
saving lives.’ However, the Jewish Agency memorandum also contains
notes of ‘optimism.’ It is an optimism that makes one cry in despair. We
are told that the Holocaust will raise the prestige of Zionism as the only
solution to the world Jewish problem. Palestine will be recognized as the
only country to which Jews can turn in order to save themselves.” p 179
“It is understandable why those responsible for this policy have seen to it
that the story of our generation is not communicated factually to children
in Israeli public schools. If they ever become acquainted with these facts
and begin to ask questions, G-d knows what would happen to some of
the street signs in Israeli cities named in honor of certain ‘prominent’
Jewish leaders.” p 68
While the Jewish Agency was deliberately thwarting efforts to
rescue Jews from the Nazis, it was conducting a tidy little business
with the Nazi regime in Germany. We knew that; it’s the subject of
Black’s book, The Transfer Agreement. And while the Nazis in charge
of extermination were offering every opportunity to bribe hundreds
of thousands of Jews to safety, the Jewish Agency was scorning
their offers. We also knew that; it’s the subject of Ben Hecht’s
book, Perfidy.
What we didn’t know until now is why. If Greenbaum was
actually reflecting Labor Zionist policy, this movement wanted a
312
Holocaust to gain a nation in their image. Only the individual Jews
they chose were welcome within it. It’s too gruesome a thought to
consider, but then, how do we explain that the far left of Israel
today rejoice at terrorism against their own people because they
believe it justifies their political point of view? The evidence is there
and we can only accept that there is a self-destructive phenomenon
within radical liberal and left-wing Jewish politics that is being
exploited by the enemies of Judaism.
Nurenberger’s conclusion, not totally covered by the evidence
presented in this critique, is that while Germany was the tool of the
massacres, they were fueled by Britain in collusion with the State
Department and the Vatican. This is the recognized top order of
the Illuminati, those with the power to create a New World Order
by destroying the Old. Labor Zionism was used as another tool in
the destruction of Judaism and it drew the American Jewish
leadership into its schemes.
American and Israeli Jewish leadership is as corrupted today as
during the Holocaust. Today’s Jewish leaders will lead us into the
next Holocaust, and most won’t be aware that they are being duped
by their most vicious enemies.
The set has moved to Israel but the players are about the same.
Mostly, it’s the Orthodox and the Right who are prepared to fight
this round of suicide. But those guiding us to doom are using their
media power to present the left and Labor Zionists as ‘the
peacemakers,’ the rational, civilized and cultured face of Jewry. And
they have the sympathy of America’s Jewish leadership and their
brainwashed, ignorant but fast declining, minions.
Unlike Hitler, Arafat didn’t do his job well enough, so a
replacement will be found; one that is smooth-talking enough to be
acceptable to the leaders of world Jewry. And watch, under the
guidance of Labor Zionism, how the American Jewish elite will run
to his side. History will repeat itself unless some very obvious steps
are taken and quickly.
First, Nurenberger is right, the street names have to change.
Nothing can be named after Chaim Weizmann; no technology
institutes, no prizes, not so much as a garbage collection alley. The
same goes for Stephen Wise, Nahum Goldmann, Moshe Sharett
and all the aiders and abetters of the Holocaust. Modern Jewish
313
history will have to be re-written from the bottom up. No people
can survive long living with such a perversion of the truth.
Jews, we have to be honest... about everything. Unless the
organizations representing Jews own up to their crimes, be they of
commission or omission, no one of honor can join them. If we
have to start again, then let’s get rolling. It is now 1890. There is no
Labor Zionism. We are mostly religious, and truthful and good.
The way G-d meant us to be. We have the proudest history of any
nation on the planet. Our leaders cannot be corrupted. There are
no Jewish organizations colluding with our mass murderers. We
defend Israel with honor because it is our rightful national home.
We make no more pacts with devils. We can’t be fooled anymore;
especially by those we choose to lead our nation.

314
 DISCORD, DECEIT AND DISINFORMATION
It seems like the wrong time to expose how the Council on
Foreign Relations uses discord and deceit to push through its
murderous Israeli agenda. After all, this week it’s Europe’s turn to
get Israel. The EU’s foreign ministers, led by the German cutthroat
Joschka Fischer will meet in Brussels and reward the PLO for its
unrelenting slaughter with a state.
I had prepared an article called “The Astonishing Secrets of
Europe’s Plot Against Israel” as a prelude to the meeting. Included
within was Fischer’s order to PM Sharon not to retaliate after the
Dolphinarium blast, which murdered twenty young people down
the block from his Tel Aviv hotel last summer. But we’ll get to
Fischer and Europe in the next installment, once my readers absorb
the reality of the upcoming European plans for Israel.
Instead, circumstances call for an exposé of the CFR’s use of
disinformation, because I’m a victim of it and I’m getting quite
tired of it all.
In my case, the 3800 member Manhattan think tank is using its
pawns to denigrate me in the American right wing Jewish
community, as illustrated by an attack which was just published in
the magazine outlet of Americans for a Safe Israel. The attack is
pathetic and utilizes the same stupid arguments the attackers have
used for the past two years. Conspiracy theories against Jews and
Israel are all wrong, therefore there could not have been a
conspiracy to murder Yitzhak Rabin. I have written about weird
subjects therefore I have no credibility. And my exposé of Rabin’s
murder has no evidence to back it up. False claims all of them and,
as always, not many readers will be fooled.
Here is how such a campaign of discordant falsehood is
organized. You start with one CFR member—Richard Pipes—who
is not just any old CIA employee, but past head of the CIA’s Soviet
research department. The apple falls right by the tree as his son,
CFR member Daniel Pipes receives slightly indirect CFR funding to
run a “think” tank in Philadelphia, serving CFR interests. In the
recent past, D. Pipes has been called upon to neutralize
“conspiracy” theories and he wrote inferior articles resulting in an
inferior book on the subject. Today, his role is to spread hatred
315
against Islam, while his CFR superiors publicly profess no objection
to the religion as they blow Afghanistan to smithereens and draw
up battle plans to capture the Middle East.
Pipes has attacked my work in his institute’s barely-read journal
but the real work has been passed to a buddy of his, an unknown
economics teacher based in Haifa. Numerous readers have sent me
background on this creep, and he’s just as tied up with the ruling
establishment as his mentor. He was trained, groomed and financed
by the American Federal Reserve, and apparently sent to Israel in
the 80s to instill that peculiar globalist economic theory that insists
local economies must be “reformed” through “liberalization,” or in
short, local industries must be wrecked in order to make way for
American corporations.
But as a former colleague of his explained, “He got nowhere.
People in his field saw him as a screwball whose ideas were off the
wall. He was dismissed as irrelevant ten years ago.” Trying to be
known for something, he is a willing partner in the smear campaign
against me. Yes, he is an infiltrator sowing discord among right
wing American Jews. And he’s not the only one. Others have made
the same claim against one Murray Kahl, whose role seems to be
the venting of Jewish anger towards harmless issues. So let us
counterattack against infiltration with a simply amazing piece of
evidence given to me last week by the director of the Root and
Branch Society, Aryeh Gallin.
Up until now, the best proof of the CFR’s nefarious Israeli
agenda was their Middle East Task Force Report of July 1997, which,
in barely couched terms, called for Israel’s withdrawal to its 1948
borders and the division of Jerusalem. That task force was headed
by one Henry Seigman, who receives $200,000 a year from the EU
to spread anti-Israel disinformation in the world media. That fact
was intended for my “Astonishing EU Secrets” article, but let’s let
one cat out of the bag early.
Now, we have in hand an even more detailed proof of CFR
chicanery against Israel in the form of a whole study called A
Changing Israel by Peter Grose—A Council on Foreign Relations
Book. This book was published by Vintage Books in 1984. It is a
CFR policy book, and thereafter became the official diplomacy of
such CFR members as James Baker, George Shultz, Warren
316
Christopher, Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright. Like all CFR
publications, it tries hard to appear to be balanced but upon, even
the most cursory reading, comes up a transparent piece of
deception. The author’s method is to relay his views and those of
his CFR bosses, through the quotes of others, almost always
anonymously.
Look at the claims of the preface:
“The author of this book, director of the Council’s Middle East program,
visited Israel twice during the study to confirm facts and impressions... A
generous grant from the Ford Foundation underwrote the costs of
bringing Israeli discussion leaders to this country...The groups were
deliberately diverse...”
Diverse? A list of some fifty discussion leaders follows. I saw
one name that I recognized as a right wing leader, Eliahu Ben
Elissar, who was assassinated in Paris a few years ago. All the rest
were of the likes of Meron Benvenesti, recipient of Ford
Foundation money during this period to head a West Bank anti-
settlement watchdog group; Arthur Hertzberg, a rabbi and partner
of CFR member Edgar Bronfman, best known in certain circles for
their work with the UN to spread a one world religion; Samuel
Lewis, the former American ambassador to Israel and recent signer
of a petition less than indirectly supporting Arafat’s regime of
terror; Itamar Rabinovich, the Israeli diplomat who negotiated away
the Golan Heights to Syria; and a man who needs no introduction
in war-torn former Yugoslavia or anywhere, Cyrus Vance.
Of the Vance connection, let’s look at the author’s short
biography:
“Peter Grose is managing editor of Foreign Affairs and a Senior Fellow
of the Council on Foreign Relations. A longtime correspondent for the
New York Times; he was bureau chief in Moscow, Israel and at the United
Nations and later served on the Policy Planning Staff of the State
Department under Cyrus Vance.”
Now let us look at this study and get a rare glimpse at the CFR’s
Israeli agenda.

The CFR’s Attitude Towards Israelis

If you are a member of any political group from Labor to its left,
you are described as “thoughtful” or at the worst, “dovish.” Take a
gander at the adjectives if you are not:
317
 “Those espousing the more militant ideologies of the Likud...allowed
adventurist leaders to pursue a ruinous, inflationary economic policy...” p 4
“They told me their dismay over the hard-line policies of the Likud
government...and the danger for the future survival of Israel.” pp 6-7
“...the fanatic rabbi Meir Kahane, considered an abomination by
moderate Israelis.” p 9
“As Begin’s rhetoric unfolded, his dogmatic assertions about Jewish rights
and Arab perfidy sounded clear and satisfying (to Sephardi Jews).” p 28
But the good news is that, “Sephardi soldiers returned from the 1982
invasion of Lebanon expressing the same disgust as their Ashkenazi
partners.” p 40
“Gaining strength along with this generalized rediscovery of Jewish roots
was its extremist expression...” p 44
“Secular Israelis are troubled by the appeal of the narrow, traditionally
religious Jewish radicals, particularly to the young.” p 127
There you have it. Israelis to the right of Labor are all extremists
and endanger Israel’s future. Of course, Grose could not have
known that the people who would eventually endanger Israel’s
future are the “moderates” of Labor-left who brought us the
dubious gifts of the CFR’s Oslo “peace” process eight years later.
After all, Grose, was merely a tool, preparing the ground for later
public acceptance of Oslo. Or maybe, he actually knew what he was
doing, which means he is personally responsible for thousands of
Jewish and Arab casualties.

Sharon and the CFR

Sharon’s CFR ties have previously been examined in depth.
They began in 1974 with a meeting between him and Henry
Kissinger. His role was to infiltrate and destroy the Herut
movement and he succeeded nearly completely. However,
according to this study, Sharon rebelled against the CFR in 1982
with his Lebanon policies. I would take the following passages with
a grain of salt and consider the likelihood that Sharon was actually
pursuing the war the way his masters desired. Nonetheless, examine
the CFR’s attitude to the current prime minister in light of his
impotence to protect his people.
“Dissent reached a critical level over the military campaign in Lebanon, a
war undertaken at Israel’s initiative, under dubious political controls and
for aims far broader than merely to counter any immediate threats to the
life of the population.” p 90.

318
 So while Grose conveniently forgets that a constant barrage of
Katyushas threatening lives, along with a series of terror attacks
from Lebanon, taking lives, was the prime reason for the Lebanese
invasion, it offers him the opportunity to go for Sharon’s jugular.
“The political leadership, supposedly operating under a system of
collective responsibility, was manipulated during the weeks of combat by
one member, Defense Minister Ariel Sharon. Begin and his colleagues
were kept substantially in the dark about crucial military decisions until it
was too late to alter them.” p 92.
On this point we agree, the difference is my claim that one of
Sharon’s goals was to destroy Begin and his Herut movement
through his conduct of the war; a pre-agreed CFR policy. This is
the belief, minus the CFR, of Begin’s son, Binyamin. Still, Grose’s
wrath knows no bounds when it comes to Sharon’s doctrine of
defense.
“Sharon’s bold strategic doctrine rested on four premises:
• The concept of strategic defense aimed at altering the political
status quo on Israel’s borders, was to replace the longstanding
posture which had been intended to maintain the status quo.
• Military operations were to be initiated whenever targets of
opportunity presented themselves; national survival required the
dulling of enemy capabilities.
• Tsahal’s central mission was to keep hostile forces off balance by
initiating anti-terrorist operations, rather than maintaining a
defensive stance to counter basic threats to the Jewish state.
• The government was to maintain the capability to make strategic
decisions quickly, based on the judgments of the responsible
military and security officers, without necessarily seeking national
consensus...
“For all the traumas of Lebanon, the Sharon doctrine is not universally
discredited, particularly among the hard-line extremists who registered
such a strong showing in the 1984 election. Sharon is not spent as a
political force...Israelis pride themselves on greater sensitivity to casualties
than Arabs, but the offensive operations called for under Sharon would
inevitably produce higher casualties.” pp 99-100
“Military cooperation would grow less defensible in Washington, of
course, were Israel to continue the adventurist, military policies of the
Sharon doctrine.” pp 116
Imagine the nerve of this Sharon! He actually favored taking out
Israel’s enemies before they murder Israelis. Well, the CFR had to
put a stop to this. And they did. Sharon has a thousand more
319
reasons to invade the PLO Authority than he ever did to enter
Lebanon, but he is incapable of acting. His CFR masters clearly
wouldn’t like it if he did, and one can only imagine what is making
him obey them. Meanwhile, the CFR restraint option is producing
the desired effect; Israeli casualties are far higher than would have
been if the so-called intifada had been forcefully nipped in the bud
the minute the Israeli public gave Sharon the mandate to do so.
The Grose book states without hesitation or shame that the CFR
would never allow Sharon again to change the status quo through
pre-emptive strikes. From now on, Sharon could only react and
retaliate, and moderately at that, thus turning Israelis into the sitting
ducks of the CFR.

The Grand Deceit

Of all the self-serving chutzpah seen in various CFR
publications, none is more outstanding than Grose’s total denial
that international forces are coordinating the Middle East violence.
Forget that after Word War I, the CFR and their British buddies
created the new Middle East. Forget that Labor Zionism was their
creation, as was the never before heard of Palestinian Arab nation.
Why recall that their oil companies run Saudi Arabia and the Gulf
States and placed the Hussein clan in power in Jordan and Iraq?
Absolutely incredibly, Grose denies that the current conflict is
being manipulated by the very forces he works for and this lie may
have been a primary motive for his book. However, this claim is so
shabby and shallow that he contradicts it more often than he
supports it. Watch the argument break down before your eyes.
“For generations the people on both sides have deceived themselves into
supposing that the conflict was external to themselves, the clash of
foreign forces...A quite different prospect could emerge if the two sides
recognized how mutually destructive that portrayal has been through the
twentieth century. Forces external to Palestine have clearly manipulated
the rivalry of the two claimants to the land, but can it honestly be said
that the rivalry originates with outsiders? Israelis and Palestinians might
well consider the hypothesis that they only have themselves to reckon
with.” p 79
“Looking upon the Arab-Israeli reality in this new light, as an internal
conflict, the concerned outsider can be excused for feeling like a latter-day
Dr. Zhivago, watching a revolution that passed him by. Ideologues on all
sides continue to bewail the malignant influence of external forces on

320
 Arab-Israeli relations...Problems could always be blamed on external
forces intent on stirring up trouble.” pp 87, 88
Now watch Grose cut his own ridiculous thesis into pieces
before your unbelieving eyes.
“The policy of the British Mandate administration starting in the 1920s,
underscored the two communities’ habits of separate development. The
Mandate was committed to ‘putting into effect the Balfour Declaration
and to establishing a Jewish Agency’ which would represent ‘all the Jews’
the world over. Externalization was thus enshrined in international law.
“The only outlet for national expression was within the new diaspora of
Palestinian refugees, with its strange mixture of internationally supported
charities and its obsessive military structure.” p 80
No sir! Those British and those international charities aren’t
initiating trouble in the Middle East. Nobody outside the region
would want to do that. After all, what’s there to gain by constant
conflict except control of the region and all its resources?

The CFR’s Israeli Agenda Exposed,

and It’s About Time It Was Understood
The importance of the Grose book is that it exposes the CFR’s
plans from the 1980s. Look how they all came to fruition in the
1990s and then realize that they and the State Department they
control are directly and deliberately responsible for the slow
bleeding death of Israel at the start of the new century.
“The state of the Israeli economy is no longer a purely internal matter left
to Israeli politicians. It is increasingly the American Treasury that
underwrites the economic priorities defined in Jerusalem. This is a
situation calling for serious, quiet professional dialogue among friends,
and with Shimon Peres’ visit to Washington, the dialogue has begun.” p 70
“It is the attitudes in Washington that do the most to assure the security
and well-being of the people and land of Israel.” p 111
“Israelis have not found the costs of territorial expansion too high a price
to pay. This could change if the Arabs within Israeli jurisdiction become
restive or if the financial burden of developing Jewish life in Judea and
Samaria starts to divert too much of the national treasure away from
social needs.” p 88
“Israel must have the legal and territorial basis, it is argued, for military
action to assure the continued demilitarization of the West Bank and
Gaza. No Arab armor, artillery or missile batteries are to be deployed in
any surrendered territories. There is obviously little room in this concept
for an independent sovereign Palestinian state.” p 97

321
 “A way has to be found to differentiate convincingly between a stance of
firm support for Israel and a readiness to support whatever the Israeli
government of the day advocates...A proposal to move the United States
Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is an example of an irresponsible
and foolish litmus test. Its sole impact (would be) to spread mischief and
ill-feeling.” pp 118-119
“The settlement budget, though small, is vulnerable in any drive to cut
overall government spending and will be wound down in the coming
years.” p 119
“The extended borders reached in 1967 may well hold firm for a long
time to come, in the absence of effective pressures from any source to
change them...Even the broader Palestinian question, for all its emotional
and humanitarian force, is important to US foreign policy only because its
potential for spreading a populist instability throughout a strategic quarter
of the world.” pp 123-124
“Another war would certainly change the equation; a significant increase
in the level of violence along Israel’s extended frontiers would increase
the costs of prolonged occupation. Opportunities for diplomatic
maneuver could arise...The United States, a would-be mediator, must be
ready to move fast in response to changing circumstances, even if it is not
called upon to initiate a diplomatic process. pp 124-125
And there is the CFR plan in a nutshell. To force Israel’s
removal from its defensive positions, a fully armed PLO state must
start a war. Once the violence reaches a critical point, the US and
its CFR Secretary of State will negotiate an end to the conflict
which will include the removal of all Jews from the Golan Heights,
Jordan Valley, Judea, Samaria and Gaza.
Give the CFR some credit, they are good to their word. And if
Israelis don’t wake up mighty fast to their plans, they are going to
find out just what their word means. A good starting point would
be for Israelis to totally boycott all members of the CFR, starting
with such American Jewish leaders as Bronfman, Lauder, Hoenlin,
Zuckerman, and Seigman.
We are all suffering from their infiltration and it’s time to say,
“enough”!

322
 RABBI ANTELMAN IS BACK
“Rabbi Antelman expresses the view that when the CFR-affiliated Jewish
Power Elite saw they would not be able to stop Zionism and the creation
of the state of Israel, they decided they would ‘join it,’ gain control of it,
and destroy it from within.” Richard Gilman—editor Conspiracy Digest
We all owe a huge debt to Rabbi Marvin Antelman, the first Jew
to try to decipher the real conspiracy to destroy Jews and Judaism,
which, as we all know, is in full swing today.
Way back in 1974, before any of us had heard of the Illuminati
or the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Rabbi Antelman
published his book To Eliminate the Opiate and exposed their covert
war against religion, focusing on their battle plan to extinguish
Judaism, but with great implications for Christianity as well.
This book is now found on literally all the lists of classic
conspiracy literature. It has drawn praise for its deep scholarship
even from researchers who clearly have no great love for Jews. Its
crowning achievement was to prove that Jews are the chief victims
of the New World Order, not its chief promulgators. However, that
is not to say that Judaism lacks powerful traitors.
After 28 years, Rabbi Antelman has published the second
volume of To Eliminate the Opiate. And those traitors are named—
oh, how they are named!
In his new volume, Rabbi Antelman traces the treachery from
within. He begins with Judaism’s false messiah of the seventeenth
century, Shabbetai Tzvi. He had convinced, perhaps, half of world
Jewry that he was the true messiah and a vast Sabbatian movement
promoted his messianic ambitions. However, the Ottoman Turks
had a different view of him, and on threat of execution, successfully
persuaded him to recant.
As far as most Jews are concerned, that was the end of the
Sabbatian phenomenon. But Rabbi Antelman proves that his most
ardent followers in Turkey have kept his movement alive through
the centuries, with great help the next century from one Jacob
Frank, who reintroduced Sabbatianism to Europe, and by this
route, to America and Israel. Rabbi Antelman refers to today’s
believers as “satanic Sabbatian Frankists.”

324
 Satanistic, because Rabbi Antelman charges that Shabbetai Tzvi
promoted an anti-Judaism, an image in reverse of G-d’s intended
religion. So, while, true Judaism’s aim is the survival of His people,
Sabbatianism’s goal is the elimination of Judaism. This explanation
does much to increase our understanding of a characteristic unique
to one people, Jewish self-hatred, or the desire to destroy your own
flesh and blood.
But according to Rabbi Antelman, Tzvi’s followers took his
perverse thinking much farther than he ever dared.
“Sabbatian cults are well documented in the Encyclopedia Judaica and in the
writings of distinguished Israeli academics including the late Professor Y.
Tishbi, Yehuda Liebes and Yaacov Katz. In a nutshell, these groups
practiced incest, adultery and homosexuality. They conspired with the
Illuminati with goals of destroying all religions and fusing all nations into
one.” p 256
“Gershon Scholem has traced the incestuous practices of the Sabbatians
to that of Earth Mother worship.” p 123
“With New Age charitable trusts such as the Youngwood Institute, one
finds disgust of the Jewish and Christian groups that have to be
exterminated. Accordingly, in the next ‘burnt offering’ being planned,
religious Jews and so-called fundamental Christians are at the top of the
list.” p 208
According to Rabbi Antelman’s chronology, in the 1770s Jacob
Frank made a pact with one Adam Weishaupt, a Jesuit, to enlist his
Sabbatians to join Weishaupt’s Illuminati. During the French
Revolution, documents were discovered which exposed the
Illuminati’s plan to destroy the foundations of European
civilization; family, religion, royalty and morality, through
revolutions. Weishaupt’s organization was formally banned
throughout Europe, so a decision was made to infiltrate the
relatively benign Freemasonry and instill Illuminism from within.
The plan worked and as Rabbi Antelman observes:
“While the Illuminati have attempted to subvert Freemasonry, it should
be noted that Freemasonry per se is suspect despite the fine people who
join its ranks. Lower degree Masons have been duped into thinking that
the Masonry building symbols were connected with Solomon’s Temple.
Many Jewish Freemasons erroneously think that there is some sort of
Jewish element or tradition in Freemasonry because of this. If they knew
the truth their hair would stand on end. In effect, Freemasonry supports
the Islamic concepts of conquest of Judaism and its destruction as taught
in the Koran, and today the Dome of the Rock is a perpetual symbol of
the destruction of the Temple.” p 121
325
 “For this reason, the Illuminati preferred to subvert Masonic groups,
which they so hated, because much of Masonic ritual is transmitted from
generation to generation, providing a vehicle to transmit an antinomian
torah of evil over the ages.” p 89
Rabbi Antelman’s research provides ample evidence that large-
scale Sabbatianism was introduced to Judaism through the Reform
and Conservative movements and through organizations such as
the American Jewish Congress—headed by a rather blatant traitor,
CFR executive Henry Seigman, the World Jewish Congress—
founded by the CFR’s Bronfman family, and the Bnai Brith, which
was initially a branch of Freemasonry, and may, unknown to most
members, still be. It is the traitors from within which anger Rabbi
Antelman, more even than their gentile superiors:
“While we are focusing on apostate Jewish Illuminati, it must be reiterated
that the Bundist-Illuminati were predominantly of Christian birth, both
among the membership and the leadership. However, they found it most
suited to their ends, as the Communists or the CFR elitists of today do, to
utilize the intellectual talents of these Jewish-born apostates. They were
especially placed in conspicuous positions so as to insure a victory of
sorts if they would not succeed—thus polarizing among the masses those
who would be stupid enough to blame the Jews for Illuminism,
Revolution, Bundism, Socialism or Communism.” p 26
“Until the first comprehensive English Translation of the Talmud by
Soncino Press (1935-1952) appeared, a non-comprehensive translation by
M. L. Rodkinson was the only one in existence. Most scholars utilizing his
works were unaware that he was a sinister personality whose primary
efforts to render portions of the Talmud into English were for the
purpose of disinformation and for providing grist for the anti-Semitic
attacks on Jewry via careful distortion of selected words and
mistranslation of Talmudic passages.” p 131
“Consider Stephen Wise, head of the Reform movement in the United
States during World War II. As the slaughter was going on in Europe,
Wise was more interested in his own gratification. Wise was both a
Communist and a Sabbatian. That he was a Communist is attested to by
Maurice Malkin, a member of the Communist Party who returned to
Judaism, in his book Return To My Father’s House. Wise was a Sabbatian, as
was shown in Helen Rawlinson’s book Stranger at the Party. In her
chronicle of a sexual encounter with the so-called Rabbi Wise, she
describes how Wise had sex with her in his office on his conference table,
and quoted the verse from Psalms which Sabbatians did when engaged in
sexual intercourse.” p 217
“Among the Nazi concentration camps of Europe was the ‘country club’
Theresienstadt. There the so-called ‘Chief Rabbi of European Jewry,’ Leo
Baeck was imprisoned. What he was really doing in Theresienstadt was
326
 presiding as chief Sabbatian of the New Age style destruction of
European Jewry, which Professor Gershom Scholem and other scholars
have shown was a Sabbatian project.” p 222
“Those ideological leftists in Israel cannot face a strong Israel because it
means they are helping God. Thus they become partners in their own
self-destruction to ‘eliminate the opiate.’ When in history has a country
consented not only to surrender its territory to enemies but also to arm
them as well, resulting in the deaths of its own civilians and soldiers, as
the Rabin government did?” p 168

The CFR and the New World Order

“This letter, in my opinion, is probably the most important document
linking the Illuminati Sabbatians, Narodnicks, post World War I
Internationalists such as the CFR, the Nazis and the World Government
UN Establishment.” p 43
“Of all Gnostic societies and cults, those that posed the greatest threats to
Christianity and Judaism, and have most influenced the course of events
of contemporary history are the Sabbatians and Illuminati-CFR
conspirators.” p 82
“The United Nations has Gnostic millennialist overtones, and has shown
time and time again that it is one of the greatest enemies of the Jewish
people and the State of Israel. Most of the diplomats of the UN today are
actually united by Gnostic concepts.” p 91
“The World Peace Foundation is merely a Bostonian manifestation of the
hand of the CFR, which in turn embodies the commitments of its
founder Colonel House to Gnostic Illuminism and Socialism, out of
which grew the United Nations.” p 116
“Prominent among the Round Table group is the London affiliate of the
Morgan banking interests in New York, known as Morgan, Grenfell &
Co. It was shortly after the Yom Kippur War that Morgan, Grenfell &
Co. had arranged for a $3 billion financial transaction to resupply Syria
and Egypt with armaments.” p 113
“We should also not forget that Professor Anthony Sutton documents
well in his book Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, how the socialist radicals,
members of Colonel House’s Council on Foreign Relations—whose
acronym CFR stands for Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller—consistently
backed Hitler. A CFR founder, John D. Rockefeller sent his best public
relations man, Ivy Lee, to help enhance Hitler’s image.” p 216
“The CFR elite is, thus, not worried about the future, since they control it
on a global scale.” p 241
“The CFR have financed both Hamas and PLO terror, through their own
funds and UN money obtained from US taxpayers.” p 248
“The CFR is orchestrating nothing less than the complete destruction of
the Jewish people; depicting religious Jews negatively in the news media,
327
promoting abortion, homosexuality and moral violations of the Noahidic
Laws, all the way to the salami policy of destroying Israel bit by bit...The
Harry S. Truman Peace Institute of Hebrew University is where PLO
terrorists regularly meet with CFR activists to do the dirty work of
dismantling the State of Israel.” p 244

328
 SHIMON PERES AND HIS EUROPEAN NAZI PALS
Shimon Peres’ reputation in Israel has hit rock bottom, and we
can thank three journalists for that: David Bedein, Yoav Yitzhak
and Carolyn Glick. Bedein revealed that in 1999, Peres handed the
Middle East UN head Terje Larsen and his wife Mona, the
Norwegian ambassador to Israel, a $100,000 “prize” pilfered from
the treasury of the Peres Center for Peace. Yitzhak revealed that the
money was a payoff for Larsen’s intervention to get Peres a Nobel
Prize in 1994. And Glick put all the pieces together, showing how
“peace” is just extortion in the hands of Peres and his Oslo deputy
Yossi Beilin.
So who is this Larsen that Peres bribed to arrange his Nobel
laureate? Read this report from a few years ago:
“Recent revelations, however, have shown that almost all of Norway’s top
politicians, including just-resigned Prime Minister Gro Harlem
Brundtland, and three foreign ministers, Thorvald Stoltenberg, (minister
when the secret Israeli-PLO meetings began), Johann Joergen Holst,
(who died of a heart attack after overseeing the signing of Oslo I), and
Bjorn Tore Godal (the current minister), are long-term supporters of the
belief that a Palestinian state should replace all of Jewish Israel.
“As reported last May, Tore Godal was chairman of the Labour Party’s
Youth Organization (AUF) when, 25 years ago, it committed itself to
‘support the forces which struggle for the national and social liberation of
the Palestinian people’. ‘The qualification for lasting peace,’ the AUF
insisted, ‘must be that Israel ceases to exist as a Jewish state, and that a
progressive Palestinian state is established where all ethnic groups can live
side by side in complete equality’.
“Now we can reveal that, six years later, top Oslo Accords architect and
Norway’s recently appointed minister of planning, Terje Roed Larsen,
was on the editorial committee of the Norwegian publication Palestine
News (Issue No.1) when it stated: ‘Fight the Zionistic State of Israel, US
imperialism, and the enemies of the Palestinian people in the Arab world.
‘No’ to a two-state solution—support the battle for the liberation of all of
Palestine.’
“Israelis will most recently remember Larsen as the man who, with a
spring in his step, entered the building straddling the ‘border’ between
Gaza and ‘Israel proper’ on September 4 to witness the latest fruits of his
handiwork—the first meeting and handshake between Yasser Arafat and
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.
“Right now, Larsen is battling for his young political life after a
Norwegian tabloid on November 10 fingered him for financial

329
 mismanagement of state-sponsorship to the tune of millions of
Norwegian Kroner, accusing him of breaching Norway’s strict institution
governing laws.
“According to the Dagbladet reports, the Institute for Applied Social
Science (FAFO), which Larsen headed, never accounted for a
government subsidy it received in 1989-1991. FAFO was at the center of
secret talks leading to the Oslo agreements, with both director Larsen and
researcher Marianne Heiberg (Holst’s wife) actively involved.”
Look at the company Peres keeps. Here’s how he operates his
mafia. He seeks criminals like Marc Rich to pump his peace center
full of money and they receive diplomatic dividends from Israel in
return.
The money is then circulated to Peres’ gang of thugs and killers
in his personal Shabak hit squad. That’s how he buys loyalty in
Israel. And the price is only Israel itself.
That is because the most vicious European enemies of Israel,
nazis included, are Peres’ pals. We switch from Norway to France
and an inadvertently revealing book.

Peres and the French

“That shitty little country, Israel.”
Daniel Bernard, French Ambassador to England (and former
French ambassador to the UN), December 2001.
“Arsonists have attacked synagogues in Lyons, Marseilles and Strasbourg.
School buses, a soccer team and individuals walking down the street have
also been assaulted. Gunmen fired on a kosher butcher shop in Toulouse.
“What have the French authorities been doing to prevent this? Precious
little.
“Indeed, French officials have tended either to turn a blind eye to this
ugliness, or to characterize it as an inevitable by-product of the fighting in
Israel.
“French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine illustrated just how anti-
Zionism easily slips into anti-Semitism: He actually characterized the
attacks on synagogues and Jewish schools as ‘expressions of sympathy’
with the Palestinians.
“And Prime Minister Lionel Jospin responded to one synagogue arson by
saying that the French police could hardly be expected to protect Jews
wherever they went. Obscene.
“Although the French government may be starting to take a firmer stand,
it seems to have made a cynical calculation in the worst tradition of
French politics (and that’s saying something!).” NY Post, April 22, 2002
330
 Last January Yediot Ahronot published a six page “exposé” of the
academics and doctors who believe Yigal Amir didn’t murder
Yitzhak Rabin. Within days, Israel television called on an author
named Michael Bar-Zohar to attack and mock these respected and
established people. Why him, asked one of my correspondents, and
he passed on a book to me by Bar-Zohar called Bitter Scent. And
what do we discover but Bar-Zohar’s book is a long praise for
Peres’ peace and murder partner, Jean Frydman.
We recall that Frydman pumped $6 million to promote Peres’
Oslo deal, and before November 4, 1995, persuaded a suspicious
Yitzhak Rabin to speak at a mass rally he paid for in Tel Aviv.
Frydman and Peres also paid for and organized security at the rally,
and the most famous result was the murder of Rabin.
But it’s not as if Frydman was the only French connection to
Rabin’s murder. Take the case of Shabak head Carmi Gillon.
Against Rabin’s wishes, Peres had Gillon appointed to head the
Shabak and promised him a fine career ahead if he played ball with
his contingencies for the intelligence service. Gillon prepared the
plans on the ground for the Rabin murder and on the assassination
night was in Paris coordinating the next steps with his counterparts
in French Intelligence. And if French Intelligence was in on the
murder, you can be sure that so was French President François
Mitterand.
He would have no trouble murdering another Jew, since Bar-
Zohar’s book reveals that he was a nazi.
Let us begin at the end of Bitter Scent. The book is about
Frydman’s legal battle against the perfume giant L’Oreal and its
nazi board of directors, but wouldn’t you know it, it concludes with
the Rabin assassination. Let us look at Bar-Zohar’s version of
Frydman’s role in the assassination and then compare it with
Frydman’s own version which appeared in the Paris Match,
December 16, 1995.
Bar Zohar - “One night in October 1995, Jean Frydman watched a
television news broadcast in his Savyon home. The main item was a
Jewish right wing rally in Jerusalem, protesting Yitzhak Rabin’s peace
initiative. The campaign focused on some young activists who carried
signs saying: ‘Rabin traitor,’ and ‘Rabin murderer.’ Some of them
displayed posters representing Rabin in SS uniform.”

331
 Even Bar-Zohar must have heard by now that it was the Shabak
provocateur Avishai Raviv who distributed the Rabin in SS uniform
posters. Which means the posters were Carmi Gillon and ultimately
Shimon Peres’ idea. And even Bar-Zohar could have done a little
checking to report accurately that the rally in Jerusalem took place
in September, not October. But it all doesn’t matter because
Frydman traces his hatred of the Right a decade earlier, to the
signing of the Taba Accord.
Frydman - “After the Taba Accord, I realized that Israeli public opinion
was in the hands of the Far Right. Then at a rally of the Right Wing
Likud, some displayed a photomontage with Rabin in an SS uniform.
Others shouted, ‘Death to the traitor Rabin.’ When told of the incidents,
Rabin was furious. He was well past fear but felt an injustice had been
done him. On Saturday, October 6, I was at Shimon Peres’ home. I told
him, ‘We cannot leave the streets in the hands of the Likud and Far Right.
We must put up a fight.’”
Bar Zohar - “He called several of his friends and persuaded them to
organize a huge rally in support of peace. He then met with Yitzhak
Rabin and Shimon Peres and described his idea. The prime minister and
foreign minister reluctantly agreed...Jean Frydman and the former mayor
of Tel Aviv, who organized the rally, had no doubt it would be a success.
Frydman - On Monday Shimon and I were in Rabin’s office. He asked
me one question; ‘Will you take responsibility for this great event?’ I told
him, ‘Yes, if we do it your way.’ Rabin and Peres gave me the green light.
‘Let’s go!’ they said.
“With Lahat, we organized a dozen generals for our Israeli Woodstock
festival of peace.
“I suggested November the 4th as the date of the event, but Rabin
hesitated. He had an official dinner. Finally, he reorganized his agenda
and accepted. I wish I had not arranged things for the day of his death.”
So far, so good, though the versions don’t exactly match.
Frydman admits that Rabin was suspicious of the event and initially
sought an excuse not to attend. Bar-Zohar skips over that detail but
it is minor compared to the big story—Peres and Frydman
personally oversaw the security for the rally.
Frydman - “We distributed posters reading, ‘Say Yes To Peace, Say No
To Violence.’ We constructed a huge stage and a grand podium. We
worked with security personnel, assigning 750 police officers, 250 border
guards, sixty elite sharpshooters and three helicopters to patrol the skies.
This was in addition to the Shabak forces that permanently protected
Rabin and Peres. We placed special detection equipment at each entrance
of the perimeter.”

332
 And still Rabin got killed. Now look at Bar-Zohar change
history, oh that’s too nice, watch him lie.
Bar-Zohar - “Rabin hugged Frydman. ‘Thank You, Jean,’ the prime
minister said, ‘for giving me the two happiest hours of my life.’ Less than
a minute later he was shot in the back by a right-wing assassin.
“In deep sorrow, Frydman followed the prime minister’s car to Ichilov
Hospital, where he was told Rabin had died.
“Frydman didn’t know how he would face Leah Rabin, the prime
minister’s widow. After all, the rally at which her husband died had been
his idea. But when Leah Rabin saw him, she embraced him and said,
‘Jean, thanks to you, Yitzhak died a happy man.”
Rabin’s limousine drove away from the hospital, and got lost for
22 minutes. If Frydman was following him, he was either a
commander of the murder squad or he just loved to joyride.
And yet, Bar-Zohar does us all a favor, by accident you can be
sure. Because he exposes Shimon Peres’ closest foreign ally, French
President François Mitterand, as a nazi. Needless to say, Bar Zohar
doesn’t remind his readers that Mitterand sent his own personal hit
squads, from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, to
murder Israelis. Or that its founder, George Habash literally died in
Mitterand’s arms. That connection comes much too close to Peres
and his Oslo disaster. While Bar-Zohar writes like a paid
ghostwriter for Frydman, he still manages to enlighten us about
who runs France and who runs Peres.
“Frydman had introduced him to Shimon Peres, Ariel Sharon and other
Israeli leaders.” p 2
“‘My partners in that endeavor,’ Frydman said, ‘are General Hod, the
former chief of the Israeli Air Force and General Amit, former chief of
the Mossad.’” p 7
“He had earlier met David Ben Gurion, Moshe Dayan and Shimon Peres
during their visits to Paris. He had even helped Peres, the young director
general of Israel’s Defense Ministry, to establish his first contacts with
several French political leaders in the mid-fifties. These contacts helped
forge the French-Israel alliance during the Suez War in 1956.” p 41
“Besides becoming a partner in several Israeli companies, he became a
supporter of the Israeli Labor Party led by his close friend Shimon Peres.”
p 43
“Jacques Correze (L’Oreal American Office Director) was briefly
associated with a Jew, Baron Henri de Rothschild...Before the war he
joined a lodge of Freemasons, a secret order with a history dating back to

333
the Middle Ages and a belief in a ‘supreme being’ that could be the God
of all religions.” p 47
“Frydman chose as his attorney a former cabinet minister, Michel Jobert,
who wasn’t popular in Jewish circles for his harsh criticism of Israel.” p 68
“(Former Vichy police chief) Rene Bosquet was indicted following
charges by Serge Klarsfeld. He created a national scandal by revealing that
Bousquet was a close friend and political supporter of President
Mitterand, who knew all about his past. Judge Getti painstakingly
prepared the evidence for the court, but Bousquet’s trial never took place.
On June 8, 1993 a mentally ill gunman ambushed the former Vichy police
chief and shot him dead.” p 80
“In October, 1956, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion secretly flew
to Paris with chief-of-staff Moshe Dayan and Defense Ministry Director
General, Shimon Peres. He held talks with France’s leaders and the
British Foreign Minister, and signed a secret agreement that amounted to
a military alliance.” p 83
“During the campaign of 1981, Mitterand solemnly promised the
president of the Jewish community, Alain de Rothschild, that France
would comply no longer with the Arab Boycott of Israel. Various
members of his cabinet objected, including the foreign minister Claude
Cheysson, the finance minister, Jacques Delors and the trade minister
Michel Jobert.” p 84
“President Mitterand didn’t keep his word. He mentioned the boycott in a
speech in Lisbon but that was the end of his initiative.” p 184
“Correze reacted angrily, ‘This investigation of yours, it’s bullshit,’ he
muttered. ‘Do you know who I am? I am a relative of François
Mitterand.’” p 87
“Frydman had known Mitterand since 1945, and had met him before and
after his election. He had been his guest for lunch at the Elysee. He
trusted him as a man of his word, and as a friend of Israel.” p 178
“The Frydman brothers are naive in a way. They belong to a generation
that believes a left-wing president is on the side of Israel, a right wing one
against them. They sincerely believed Mitterand was a friend of the Jewish
people. I didn’t.’’ p 179
“Then on April 27, 1993, the forty seven year old Bismuth suddenly died.
The untimely passing of this brilliant scholar put an abrupt end to the
Elysee’s involvement in the boycott investigation. The fact is, Bismuth’s
death was very convenient for many people. It cut short a delicate
investigation that could rock France’s political establishment.” p 185
“Andre Bennecourt, Oreal’s owner, had written for a Vichy propaganda
magazine and had been directly financed by Goebbel’s people in Berlin.”
p 202

334
 “David Frydman was sickened. Andre Bennecourt, the man widely
known as Mitterand’s close companion during the Resistance, had written
this?” p 197
“In 1994, the Frydman brothers got an advance copy of a book by a
prominent French historian, Pierre Pean, called A French Youth. It related
the hitherto unknown story of Mitterand’s right wing connections during
his youth and his activities as an official of the Petain government in
Vichy. A photograph, long concealed, appeared on the cover: Mitterand
and Petain standing together, the young man looking admiringly at the old
marshal. The French people were appalled to learn that their Socialist
President had been a collaborator with the Nazis. The French also
discovered that Mitterand kept his ties of close friendship with many
former collaborators, including war criminals.” p 206
“During his student years, Mitterand was attracted to right wing political
movements. Some rare photographs of the handsome youth during a
student protest against foreigners, one tainted with anti-Semitic
sentiments, date from the time the three friends were inseparable.” p 209
“Mitterand was employed at the Vichy government department in charge
of prisoners of war.” p 209
(And we know who those prisoners mostly were)
“The former ‘colonel’ of the fascist Legion was a member of Mitterand’s
extended family. The niece of Correze was Mitterand’s brother Robert’s
first wife.” p 211
“Bettencourt told Pean that he, ‘maintained the liaison with the Americans
and the British, especially with Allen Dulles of the OSS.” p 214
(Dulles became director of the CIA. Dulles’ uncle is the Jesuit
Cardinal for Washington, DC)
“According to his biographer Peter Grose, Allen Dulles crossed the
border and headed for Lyon.” p 217
(Peter Grose wrote A Changing Israel, the Council on Foreign
Relations’ war program against Israel.)
“Mitterand willing accepted (the Nazi) Schueller’s assistance, and the
ensuing victory started him on the long road leading to the presidential
palace.” p 223
Bennecourt’s defense for writing tracts calling for the
extermination of French Jews:
“In the course of my ministerial functions, I have been received by Mrs.
Golda Meir and Foreign Minister Abba Eben. I served as the
representative of France at the funeral of Ben Gurion.” p 240
As we noted before, the company Shimon Peres keeps!! French
nazis. And the Jews of France just don’t get it. Le Pen is a blessing
for them. Those who have read my book The Last Days of Israel
335
know that, at the least, Jacques Chirac knows who really murdered
Yitzhak Rabin. But the Jews will vote for Chirac and the nazis who
have infected the French government, and reject a man whose main
objection is Arab immigrants—those same immigrants who have
been burning synagogues the length and breadth of France,
encouraged by the deliberate neglect of the ruling order.
Those with a long memory will recall that I wrote Jorge Haider
would be a huge improvement over his Kreiskyite socialist
opponent. And there you have it. Austria is about the only
European state where anti-Israel protests haven’t broken out since
Israel’s admirable partial smashing of the PLO began a month ago.
Because Haider was anti-EU, anti-Euro and anti-Arab
immigration, the New World Order branded him an anti-Semite. Le
Pen is anti-Euro, anti-EU and anti-Arab immigration, so the same
tactics have been used against him. But all the detractors could find
was a 1982 sentence in which Le Pen called the Holocaust “a
historical detail,” a blunder but one Le Pen has explained
convincingly.
No, the Jews of France won’t catch on and they’ll join elitist
marches against a man who has the audacity to challenge the nazi
establishment ruling France. All we can say to them is, “Go Le Pen,
Go.!”
***
Of course, my readers know that the Vatican has long infiltrated
the French political system and the Jesuit branch calls the shots.
And that is the primary cause for the war against Israel. But you
need Israeli traitors at the highest levels to keep the blood flowing.
Yossi Beilin comes close to matching Peres for treason. Not
only did he hatch the Oslo process, but three months earlier, he
initiated the Vatican process as well. The official story is while in
luscious embrace with his homosexual lover, Shlomo Gur, he asked
if Shlomo knew someone who could get him in with the Holy See.
While Shlomo was tending to his whip burns, it hit him. A friend of
his knew an Israeli convert to Catholicism in Texas named Father
David Jager. Yossi was so happy to hear this, his mascara ran.
Thus, through Jager did Yossi get to play with the pope.

336
 Then we have Rabbi David Melchior, Peres’ Vatican emissary.
Turns out that daddy Melchior was chief rabbi of Denmark and the
leading fundraiser there for the PLO cause.
In our last send-out, we learned that George Mitchell of Jesuit
Georgetown University, who authored the famous report which
brought so much peace to Israel, is in close contact with one Father
Bernard Law. An appeal for further information brought results.
We now discover the George Mitchell-Jesuit connection to the
Bush administration via John Ashcroft.
“I knew Bernie Law at Harvard in ‘52, ‘ambitious’ good organizer was my
impression. He’s from Louisiana. From Bishop Law of the southern
sector of Missouri he moved to Cardinal in Boston before I moved to
S.W. Missouri. (dot connection: Ashcroft?).” - From journalist and former
US military officer stationed in the Middle East during the ‘50s, Joe Nix:
“Tell Barry that Bernard Law is a Knight of Malta along with Alexandre
de Marenches, former chief of French Intelligence under Giscard
d’Estaing, himself a Knight of Malta. That is the same French Intelligence
that sought to give Saddam Hussein a nuclear reactor for the building of a
nuclear device.” - Jon Eric Phelps, author of Vatican Assassins.

337