Ecological psychology

1.

"annotated references ecological psychology."

2.

Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for

studying the environment of human behavior, Stanford University Press.

3.

Bechtel, R. (2000). Assumptions, Methods, and Research Problems of

Ecological Psychology. Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior
Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and H. Minami, Springer US:
61-66.

4.

Evans, G. W., et al. (2010). "The ecological context of student

achievement: School building quality effects are exacerbated by high
levels of student mobility." Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(2):
239-244. Roger Barker's Behavior Setting Survey is generally recognized
as the first major effort to bring physical and social contexts into
psychological methodologies for studying human behavior. Since Barker's
day, advances in social theory, speech act philosophy, pragmatics and
other disciplines within the human sciences have converged with Barker's
concerns in various ways, making it possible to sharpen and enrich a
number of his formulations. The methodological school of critical
qualitative research in many ways occupies the vanguard of approaches
synthesizing advances in social theory for methodological application.
Critical qualitative research, however, has yet to take advantage of
Barker's work on behavior settings. Thus both Barker's work and the work
of critical ethnographers can be enriched through a synthesis of their
theoretical constructs and procedures. This pilot study explores the
advantages of synthesizing behavior setting survey and critical qualitative
methodology. A university department was studied through a truncated
version of the Behavior Setting Survey (BSS) and also with Carspecken's
five-stage model for critical social research. Results are significant on both
substantive and analytical levels. It was found that departmental behavior
patterns discovered through the BSS are only explicable when their
cultural conditions are reconstructed via critical qualitative data analysis.
This was true particularly with respect to the circuitry discovered by the
BSS but explained through cultural reconstructions.

5.

Heft, H. (2001). "Ecological psychology in context James Gibson, Roger

Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism." from
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=63039.

6.

Scott, M. M. (2005). "A Powerful Theory and a Paradox: Ecological

Psychologists After Barker." Environment and Behavior 37(3): 295-329.
Roger Barker, influenced by Lewin, developed a powerful theory in
psychology, behavior setting theory. Paradoxically, this theory is still not
widely known or understood in mainstream American psychology. Oral
histories of the core group whoworked with Barker were collected and
examined to determine influences on them and subsequent directions in

the field of ecological psychology in an attempt to understand this

paradox. Three clusters of factors emerged. Behavior setting theory has
been affirmed in a number of places, including other behavioral sciences,
but has not as yet moved into mainstream psychology, although there are
some indications that the theory is moving in that direction. These
directions as well as barriers are discussed.
7.

Wicker, A. W. (2002). Ecological psychology: Historical contexts, current

conception, prospective directions. Handbook of environmental
psychology. R. B. Bechtel and A. Churchman, Wiley: 114-126.

8.

Willems, E. (1977). Ecological Psychology

9.

Behavioral Ecology. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D. Stokols,

Springer US: 39-68.

10.

Willems, E. (1977). Ecological Psychology

11.

Behavioral Ecology. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D. Stokols,

Springer US: 39-68.

12.

Winkel, G., et al. (2009). "An ecological perspective on theory, methods,

and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges."
Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3): 318-328. Over the course of
environmental psychology's brief history, there has been an interest in
ecologically oriented approaches to theory and research. Based on this
work, this paper identifies a set of six principles of ecological analysis that
present theoretical, methodological, and analytic challenges to future
research in environmental psychology. These challenges include the
theoretical treatment of the multiple contexts within which human
experience and behavior occurs, the need for sampling both persons and
environments, the modeling of moderating and mediating processes, the
issue of self-selection into and out of different settings, the necessity of
considering temporal factors in environmental research, reliance on single
methods (e.g., verbal report) in data generation, cross-sectional and
longitudinal research designs, and the need for greater use of statistical
techniques developed for contextual (multi-level) research. These issues
are discussed and illustrated using recent developments in
environmentally oriented research. The paper concludes with a set of 11
recommendations for the future

Environmental psychology
13.

"<The paradox of environmental psychology..pdf>."

14.

Altman, I. (1976). "Environmental Psychology and Social Psychology."

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2(2): 96-113.This paper
examines the newly developing field of Environmental Psychology and its
relationship to Social Psychology. Some major research topics concerned

with environment and behavior are summarized, along with an analysis of

dominant research values of this emerging field. The paper also considers
some possible ways in which Environmental Psychology can enhance
social psychological research and theorizing, and ways in which the study
of environment and behavior can make salient (and perhaps call into
question) certain assumptions implicit in present day Social Psychology.
15.

Bechtel, R., et al. (1997). Environmental Psychology and Biosphere 2.

Handbook of Japan-United States Environment-Behavior Research. S.
Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer US: 235-244.

16.

Bechtel, R. B. and A. Churchman (2003). Handbook of environmental

psychology, Wiley.

17.

Bell, P. A., et al. (2001). Environmental Psychology, New

Jersey.Environmental psychology . . . deals with the reciprocal relationships
between humans and the built and natural environment.With this 4th
edition of our book, we have retained many of the features of the earlier
editions. We have maintained scientific rigor while emphasizing clarity of
key points and challenges of the future. While updating all the material, we
have also included more historical perspectives on issues such as the way
humans have viewed nature across the centuries and the ways we have
designed cities and college campuses. We have also included a much more
international flavor to reflect the current status of the field.We conceived
this and earlier editions of "Environmental Psychology" as a primary text
for environment and behavior courses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c)
2012 APA, all rights reserved)
1. The Why, What, and How of Environmental Psychology.
2. Nature and Human Nature.
3. Environmental Perception and Cognition.
4. Theories of Environment-Behavior Relationships.
5. Noise.
6. Weather, Climate, and Behavior.
7. Disasters, Toxic Hazards, and Pollution.
8. Personal Space and Territoriality.
9. High Density and Crowding Intimacy.
10. The City.
11. Planning and Design For Human Behavior.
12. Design in Residential and Institutional Environments.
13. Work, Learning, and Leisure Environments.
14. Changing Behavior to Save the Environment.

18.

Canter, D. (2000). Seven Assumptions for an Investigative Environmental

Psychology. Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research. S.
Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and H. Minami, Springer US: 191-206.

19.

Canter, D. V. and K. H. Craik (1981). "Environmental psychology." Journal of

Environmental Psychology 1(1): 1-11.The origins and development of
environmental psychology are summarized and a general definition of the
field is offered. Its current vigorous state is held to be a product both of the

way its practitioners have met the challenges of application and of the
benefits accruing from the cumulative impact of several scientific research
traditions. Whilst the core of the field is appropriately placed within the
discipline of psychology, its strength derives also from continuing
transactions with other disciplines. One major conclusion from considering
the early and recent development of the field is that any premature or
narrow definition of it could reduce its future vitality.
20.

Craik, K. (1997). Prospects for Environmental Psychology in the Third

Millennium. Handbook of Japan-United States Environment-Behavior
Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer
US: 377-383.

21.

Edgerton, E. R. O. R. L. S. C. (2007). Environmental psychology : putting

research into practice. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars
Publishing.

22.

GIFFORD, R. (2002). Making a Difference: Some Ways Environmental

Psychology Has Improved the Worlds. Handbook of environmental
psychology. R. B. Bechtel and A. Churchman, Wiley: 323-334.

23.

Gifford, R., et al. "Environmental Psychology."

24.

Giuliani, M. V. and M. Scopelliti (2009). "Empirical research in

environmental psychology: Past, present, and future." Journal of
Environmental Psychology 29(3): 375-386.Have research interests in
environmental psychology changed over the years? If so, in which
direction? What can we learn from the past to direct future research? To
answer these questions, empirical studies published in Environment &amp;
Behavior (E&amp;B) and in Journal of Environmental Psychology (JEP), from
their foundation to 2005, were reviewed. The articles were classified in
relation to the following criteria: mode of humanenvironment
transaction, research topic, type of setting and function of places, sociodemographic characteristics and environmental role of people, mode of
presentation of the setting, sampling procedure, and source of data.
Results showed both variations through the years and differences between
the journals. The main research topics can be identified as the study of the
residential environment, environmental cognition, observation of actual
behaviour in the environment, and concern for the ecological value of the
global environment. Trends in research interests showed a stable interest
in the analysis of the built environment, a more place-specific approach in
the beginning, strongly anchored in observational studies, and a central
concern for sustainability and conservation of the environment in recent
years. With respect to journals, the central role attributed to psychology by
JEP, and the stronger participation by designers and planners in E&amp;B,
are reflected in the emphases given to the different modes of
humanenvironment transaction. Trends in research interests help
address the strengths and weaknesses of the discipline, thus suggesting
future directions of inquiry.

25.

Gump, P. V. (1975). Environmental psychology and the behavior setting.

EDRA 6: Responding to Social Change.

26.

Gnther, H. (2009). "The environmental psychology of research." Journal of

Environmental Psychology 29(3): 358-365.The paper addresses three
issues: (1) the possibility of a unified description of environmentbehaviour
(EB) relationships and the place of environmental psychology therein. The
points of departure are sets of, respectively, behaviours and environments.
In an analogy to canonical correlation, groups of variables that describe
behaviour/subjective experiences and groups of variables that describe
environments are joined through setting variates that constitute instances
of environment behaviour studies. (2) The research act is conceptualised
as a setting variate, which allows for turning the circumstances that
constitute the research act, that is behaviour (researcher in social context)
and environment (research objects in research space) into objects of
scrutiny in their own right. (3) Implications for the emicetic paradox and
the future of environmental psychology are considered in light of the
growing globalisation of environmental challenges and ways of addressing
them. Kaplan, S. and R. Kaplan (2009). "Creating a larger role for
environmental psychology: The Reasonable Person Model as an integrative
framework." Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3): 329-339.We argue
that the environment, broadly construed, has a profound effect on human
cognition, action, and well-being. If this is true, then the field of
environmental psychology has a far larger potential to aid humanity than
is generally realized. We suggest that the field would be more likely to
achieve this potential if it viewed environments from the perspective of
human informational needs, and focused on environmental/informational
patterns that have the potential to make it easier for people to help
themselves. Further, achieving such benefits could be greatly enhanced by
taking advantage of the many opportunities available for collaborating
with researchers in other areas of psychology. The reasonable person
model is offered as a perspective that could facilitate moving in these
various new directions while taking advantage of the considerable existent
knowledge about humanenvironment interactions that is currently
underappreciated.

27.

Kopec, D. (2012). Environmental psychology for design. New York, Fairchild

Books.

28.

Kopec, D. (2012). An Introduction to Environmental Psychology.

Environmental psychology for design

29.

New York, Fairchild Books.

30.

Moser, G. (2003). Environmental Psychology for the new millennium:

towards an integration of cultural and temporal dynamics, The
Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems. Oxford: Eolls Publishers.

31.

Nilsson, A. (2010). On the Future Development of Theories in

Environmental Psychology: The Role of the Environmental Psychologist as

a Researcher and as a Practitioner

32.

Environmental psychology new developments. J. G. L. Valentn. New York,

Nova Science Publishers: Chapter 11, 227.

33.

Pati, D. and P. Barach (2010). Application of Environmental Psychology

Theories and Frameworks to Evidence-Based Healthcare Design 1.
Environmental psychology new developments. J. G. L. Valentn. New York,
Nova Science Publishers: Chapter 1, 1:36.

34.

Pol, E. (2006). "Blueprints for a history of environmental psychology (I):

From first birth to American transition." Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento
Humano 7(2): 95-113.

35.

Pol, E. (2007). "Blueprints for a History of Environmental Psychology (II):

From Architectural Psychology to the challenge of sustainability." Medio
Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano 8(1): 1-28.

36.

Proshansky, H. and T. OHanlon (1977). Environmental Psychology: Origins

and Development. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D. Stokols,
Springer US: 101-129.

37.

Proshansky, H. and T. OHanlon (1977). Environmental Psychology: Origins

and Development. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D. Stokols,
Springer US: 101-129.

38.

Proshansky, H. M., et al. (1970). Environmental psychology: Man and his

physical setting, Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York.

39.

Proshansky, H. M., et al. (1976). "Environmental psychology people and

their physical settings." from
http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/2020614.html.

40.

Rivlin, L. (2000). Reflections on the Assumptions and Foundations of Work

in Environmental Psychology. Theoretical Perspectives in EnvironmentBehavior Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and H. Minami,
Springer US: 51-59.

41.

Rivlin, L. G. and C. S. Weinstein (1984). "Educational issues, school

settings, and environmental psychology." Journal of Environmental
Psychology 4(4): 347-364.This paper reviews selected research on
classroom and school environments, using a framework that views schools
from three perspectivesas places for learning, as places for socialization
and as places for psychological development. Studies are included that
deal with the impact of noise and classroom design on learning; the
relationship between seating position, achievement and status; spatial
cognition; the classroom environment and sex role stereotyping; privacy;
and density. The need for classrooms to enhance children's feelings of
competence, security and self-esteem is also stressed. The goal of the

paper is to point out ways in which environmental psychologists can

contribute to the improvement of the educational system and to the
quality of life in schools.
42.

Saegert, S. and G. H. Winkel (1990). "Environmental Psychology." Annual

Review of Psychology 41(1): 441-477.

43.

Seamon, D. (1982). "The phenomenological contribution to environmental

psychology." Journal of Environmental Psychology 2(2): 119-140.This essay
considers the value of phenomenology for environmental psychology, first,
by examining differences between a conventional scientific approach and
phenomenology; second, by presenting substantive phenomenological
research meaningful for environmental psychology. Three substantive
themes are discussed: (1) a phenomenology of human experience; (2) a
phenomenology of physical environment; (3) a phenomenology of the
personworld relationship. The essay concludes that conventional
research in environmental psychology has sometimes uncritically accepted
theories and concepts which are out of touch with the actual fabric of
environmental behavior and experience. A phenomenological perspective
looks at the personenvironment relationship afresh and thus helps to
revitalize the ontological, epistemological and methodological foundations
of environmental psychology.

44.

Spivack, A. J., et al. (2010). Contemporary Physical Workspaces: A Review

of Current Research, Trends, and Implications for Future Environmental
Psychology Inquiry Environmental psychology new developments. J. G. L.
Valentn. New York, Nova Science Publishers: Chapter 2 , 37.

45.

Steg, L., et al. (2012). Environmental psychology: An introduction, Wiley.

com.

46.

Stokols, D. (1978). "Environmental Psychology." Annual Review of

Psychology 29(1): 253-295.

47.

Stokols, D. (1995). "The paradox of environmental psychology." American

Psychologist 50(10): 821-837. Scientific and applied contributions of
environmental psychology are examined in relation to 6 trends that have
occurred in this field over the past 3 decades: (a) development of novel
constructs and methods for analyzing the links between environment and
behavior; (b) increased emphases on cross-paradigm research, (c)
transactional models of environment and behavior, (d) groupenvironment
relationships, (e) expanded application of environmentbehavior research
to community problem solving, and (f) broadening international scope of
the field. A paradoxical feature of environmental psychology is that its
identity as a distinct area of study has become increasingly interested in
"core" contextual and environmental concerns. This diffusion of scientific
identity is discussed in relation to environmental psychology's
multidisciplinary and international scope and the incorporation of
environmental-contextual perspectives into other disciplines. Directions for
research and theory development are considered in light of several

societal concerns, including global environmental change, the spread of

violence at regional and international levels, impacts of new information
technologies on work and family life, rising costs of health care delivery,
and processes of societal aging. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA,
all rights reserved)
48.

Stokols, D. (1997). Directions of Environmental Psychology in the TwentyFirst Century. Handbook of Japan-United States Environment-Behavior
Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer
US: 333-353.

49.

Stokols, D. (1997). Directions of Environmental Psychology in the TwentyFirst Century. Handbook of Japan-United States Environment-Behavior
Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer
US: 333-353.

50.

Stokols, D. (1997). Directions of Environmental Psychology in the TwentyFirst Century. Handbook of Japan-United States Environment-Behavior
Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer
US: 333-353.

51.

Stokols, D. (2000). Theory Development in Environmental Psychology.

Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research. S. Wapner, J.
Demick, T. Yamamoto and H. Minami, Springer US: 269-276.

52.

Stokols, D. and I. Altman (1987). Conceptual strategies of environmental

psychology. Handbook of environmental psychology. D. Stokols and I.
Altman. New York, Wiley.

53.

Stokols, D. and A. Irwin (1987). Handbook of environmental psychology.

New York, Wiley. Uzzell, D. and N. Rthzel (2009). "Transforming
environmental psychology." Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3):
340-350.Although it is recognised that the individual and the external
world are linked in complex and mutual ways and can only be treated
together as one phenomenon there is little evidence that transactionalist
approaches, despite potentially providing a truly distinctive approach for
environmental psychology, have been fully understood or operationalised.
We take as our starting point the theoretical proposition that individuals
are the sum of their social relations, i.e., they are the cause and
consequence of their relations to others and the environment. Therefore
environmental psychology should give priority to examining the reciprocity
between people and environment and the ways in which they mutually
reproduce the material conditions for their existence. Drawing on the
example of sustainable development, we argue that any attempt to
develop a sustainable society has to understand how the relationships
between individuals and their social contexts can be changed. Thus the
emphasis in a transformative environmental psychology should shift to the
relations of production and consumption and the social and political
relations within which values, attitudes and behaviours are formed, and
unsustainable ways of living and working as well as the environment are

produced and reproduced.

54.

Valentn, J. G. L. (2010). "Environmental psychology new developments."

from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=339885.

55.

Vischer, J. C. (2008). "Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace:

How People are Affected by Environments for Work." Architectural Science
Review 51(2): 97-108. Abstract Inquiry into how people experience
environmental conditions at work is a growing area of study. Until the
1980s, there was insufficient research on ?workspaces??and on office
environments in particular?to warrant review. Since that time, the range
and number of studies of workspace have burgeoned. This paper will
identify and review the main themes and findings of this area of research
with the objective of defining basic parameters and prevailing theories of
the environmental psychology of workspace. These will generate questions
and directions for future research. Inquiry into how people experience
environmental conditions at work is a growing area of study. Until the
1980s, there was insufficient research on ?workspaces??and on office
environments in particular?to warrant review. Since that time, the range
and number of studies of workspace have burgeoned. This paper will
identify and review the main themes and findings of this area of research
with the objective of defining basic parameters and prevailing theories of
the environmental psychology of workspace. These will generate questions
and directions for future research.

56.

Winkel, G., et al. (2009). "An ecological perspective on theory, methods,

and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges."
Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3): 318-328. Over the course of
environmental psychology's brief history, there has been an interest in
ecologically oriented approaches to theory and research. Based on this
work, this paper identifies a set of six principles of ecological analysis that
present theoretical, methodological, and analytic challenges to future
research in environmental psychology. These challenges include the
theoretical treatment of the multiple contexts within which human
experience and behavior occurs, the need for sampling both persons and
environments, the modeling of moderating and mediating processes, the
issue of self-selection into and out of different settings, the necessity of
considering temporal factors in environmental research, reliance on single
methods (e.g., verbal report) in data generation, cross-sectional and
longitudinal research designs, and the need for greater use of statistical
techniques developed for contextual (multi-level) research. These issues
are discussed and illustrated using recent developments in
environmentally oriented research. The paper concludes with a set of 11
recommendations for the future.

57.

Wolf, K. L. (2007). "The environmental psychology of shopping." Research

Review 14(3): 39.

Environment behavior

58.

"<13 Observing Environmental Behavior by Zeisel.pdf>."

59.

"<Perspectives on Environment and Behavior.pdf>."

60.

Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal

space, territory, crowding, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company Monterey, CA.

61.

Altman, I. (1977). Research on Environment and Behavior: A Personal

Statement of Strategy. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D.
Stokols, Springer US: 303-323.

62.

Altman, I. (1977). Research on Environment and Behavior: A Personal

Statement of Strategy. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D.
Stokols, Springer US: 303-323.

63.

Altman, I. (1997). Environment and Behavior Studies. Handbook of JapanUnited States Environment-Behavior Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T.
Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer US: 423-434.

64.

Altman, I. and K. E. Christensen (1990). Environment and behavior studies:

Emergence of intellectual traditions, Plenum Press.

65.

Altman, I. and W. J. F. (1977). Human Behavior and Environment Advances

in Theory and Research. Boston, MA, Springer US.

66.

Altman, I. and J. F. Wohlwill (2012). Human behavior and environment:

Advances in theory and research, Springer Science & Business Media.

67.

Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for

studying the environment of human behavior, Stanford University Press.

68.

Bonaiuto, M. and M. Bonnes (2000). Social-Psychological Approaches in

Environment-Behavior Studies. Theoretical Perspectives in EnvironmentBehavior Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto and H. Minami,
Springer US: 67-78.

69.

Catton, W., Jr. (1983). Social and Behavioral Aspects of the Carrying
Capacity of Natural Environments. Behavior and the Natural Environment.
I. Altman and J. Wohlwill, Springer US. 6: 269-306.

70.

Clitheroe Jr, H. C., et al. (1998). "CONCEPTUALIZING THE CONTEXT OF

ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR." Journal of Environmental Psychology
18(1): 103-112. Rapid technological change, global environmental
concerns, and other dramatic ecological and societal changes are
rendering previous conceptualizations of environments, and the
relationships between environment and behavior, inadequate. Following a
brief review of earlier conceptualizations of environments, distinctions
between the terms context, environment, behavior setting and situation

are drawn. A contextual model that focuses on the behaviors of individuals

or groups in response to a prompt, and the personal, social or physical
factors that might affect them, is developed. Two types of contextual
change are explored: gradual, evolutionary contextualshifts, and sudden or
dramatic contextualtransformations. Application of a more fully contextual
approach to the field of creativity is considered, and an example of
organizational creativity focusing on developing and implementing
customer service recommendations is used to illustrate the model. A
concluding section considers the research implications of a more fully
contextual approach to conceptualizing environments.@ 1998 Academic
Press
71.

Cohen, U. and G. T. Moore (1977). The organization and communication of

environment-behavior research information in architectural programming.
Behavior-environment research methods: proceedings of the Wisconsin
Conference. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for
Environmental Studies.

72.

Cone, J. and S. Hayes (1977). Applied Behavior Analysis and the Solution of
Environmental Problems. Human Behavior and Environment, vol2. I.
Altman and J. Wohlwill, Springer US: 129-179.

73.

Demick, J., et al. (2000). Cross-Cultural Environment-Behavior Research

from a Holistic, Developmental, Systems-Oriented Perspective. Theoretical
Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick, T.
Yamamoto and H. Minami, Springer US: 207-215.

74.
75.

Dijkstra, J., et al. (2000). Towards a multi-agent system for visualizing

simulated behavior within the built environment. Proceedings of Design
and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning
Conference: DDSS, Citeseer.

76.

EI-Mahrouky, A. A. S. (2012). Urban Responsive Public Spaces

Environmental Behavior Study Helwan university. faculty of Engineering.
department of Architecture . Thesis (master).

77.

Evans, G. and S. Lepore (1997). Moderating and Mediating Processes in

Environment-Behavior Research. Toward the Integration of Theory,
Methods, Research, and Utilization. G. Moore and R. Marans, Springer US.
4: 255-285.

78.

Georgiou, D., et al. (1996). "AN EXPANSION OF ROGER BARKER''S

BEHAVIOR SETTING SURVEY FOR AN ETHNO-ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO
PERSONENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS." Journal of Environmental
Psychology 16(4): 319-333. Roger Barker's Behavior Setting Survey is
generally recognized as the first major effort to bring physical and social
contexts into psychological methodologies for studying human behavior.

Since Barker's day, advances in social theory, speech act philosophy,

pragmatics and other disciplines within the human sciences have
converged with Barker's concerns in various ways, making it possible to
sharpen and enrich a number of his formulations. The methodological
school of critical qualitative research in many ways occupies the vanguard
of approaches synthesizing advances in social theory for methodological
application. Critical qualitative research, however, has yet to take
advantage of Barker's work on behavior settings. Thus both Barker's work
and the work of critical ethnographers can be enriched through a synthesis
of their theoretical constructs and procedures. This pilot study explores the
advantages of synthesizing behavior setting survey and critical qualitative
methodology. A university department was studied through a truncated
version of the Behavior Setting Survey (BSS) and also with Carspecken's
five-stage model for critical social research. Results are significant on both
substantive and analytical levels. It was found that departmental behavior
patterns discovered through the BSS are only explicable when their
cultural conditions are reconstructed via critical qualitative data analysis.
This was true particularly with respect to the circuitry discovered by the
BSS but explained through cultural reconstructions.
79.

GIFFORD, R., et al. (1997). Meta-Analysis for Environment-Behavior and

Design Research, Illuminated with a Study of Lighting Level Effects on
Office Task Performance. Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods,
Research, and Utilization, Environmental Design Research Association.
volume 4.

80.

Golledge, R. (1977). Multidimensional Analysis in the Study of

Environmental Behavior and Environmental Design. Human Behavior and
Environment, vol2. I. Altman and J. Wohlwill, Springer US: 1-42.

81.

Gump, P. V. (1975). Environmental psychology and the behavior setting.

EDRA 6: Responding to Social Change.

82.

Harvey, J. H. (1981). Cognition, social behavior, and the environment.

Hillsdale, N.J., L. Erlbaum.

83.

Horayangkura, V. (2012). "Incorporating Environment-Behavior Knowledge

into the Design Process: An Elusive Challenge for Architects in the 21st
Century." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50: 30-41.

84.

Hutchison, E. D. (2010). Dimensions of human behavior: Person and

environment, Sage.

85.

Kernohan, D. (1991). Einsteins Theory of Environment-Behavior

Research. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design. E. Zube and G.
Moore, Springer US. 3: 319-326.

86.

Kounin, J. S. and L. W. Sherman (1979). "School Environments as Behavior

Settings." Theory into Practice 18(3): 145-151.

87.

Krasner, L. (2013). Environmental design and human behavior: A

psychology of the individual in society, Elsevier.

88.

Krasner, L. (2013). Environmental design and human behavior: A

psychology of the individual in society, Elsevier.

89.

Lang, J. (1991). Design Theory from an Environment and Behavior

Perspective. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design. E. Zube and
G. Moore, Springer US. 3: 53-101.

90.

Lang, J. (1991). Design Theory from an Environment and Behavior

Perspective. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design. E. Zube and
G. Moore, Springer US. 3: 53-101.

91.

Minami, H. and T. Yamamoto (2000). Cultural Assumptions Underlying

Concept-Formation and Theory Building in Environment-Behavior Research.
Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research. S. Wapner, J.
Demick, T. Yamamoto and H. Minami, Springer US: 237-246.

92.

Moore, G. (1997). Toward Environment-Behavior Theories of the Middle

Range. Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and
Utilization. G. Moore and R. Marans, Springer US. 4: 1-40.

93.

Moore, G. T. (1979). "Architecture and human behavior: The place of

environment-behavior studies in architecture." Wisconsin Architect: 18-21.

94.

Moore, G. T. (1979). Environment-behavior studies. Introduction to

Architecture, McGraw-Hill.

95.

Moore, G. T. (1981). New directions for environment-behavior research in

architecture, Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

96.

Moore, G. T. and R. W. Marans (1997). "Advances in Environment, Behavior,

and Design Volume 4: Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods,
Research, and Utilization." New York and London: Plenum.

97.

ORiordan, T. (1976). Attitudes, Behavior, and Environmental Policy Issues.

Human Behavior and Environment. I. Altman and J. Wohlwill, Springer US:
1-36.

98.

Patterson, A. (1977). Methodological Developments in EnvironmentBehavioral Research. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D.
Stokols, Springer US: 325-344.

99.

Rapoport, A. (1997). Theory in Environment Behavior Studies. Handbook of

Japan-United States Environment-Behavior Research. S. Wapner, J. Demick,
T. Yamamoto and T. Takahashi, Springer US: 399-421.

100. Rogers, A. (2013). Human behavior in the social environment, Routledge.

101. Sahachaisaeree, N. (2012). "Environmental Simulation and Behavioral
Response as Means of Enquiry in Multidisciplinary Design Research
Procedure." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 36: 35-50. The
paper attempts to discuss the research methodology and research tools
pertaining to physical design at all level. It starts with the definition of
scientific research and its underlying obligationon why and how
empirical approach proves and derives facts to accommodate good
design.. The paper also connects the field of environment and behavior
with research approaches in design, assuming that design of physical
environment meant to respond to users daily living behavior, and vice
versa. Simulation is thus a crucial tools for cognitive enquiry. A number of
research experiences are cited to support such viewpoints.
102. Schriver, J. M. (2004). Human behavior and the social environment, Allyn
and Bacon.
103. Seidel, A. (1981). "Teaching Environment and Behavior: Have We Reached
the Design Studios?" JAE 34(3): 8-13.
104. Sommer, R. (1977). Applications of Behavioral Research to Environmental
Design
105. Action Research. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D. Stokols,
Springer US: 195-203.
106. Sommer, R. (1997). Utilization Issues in Environment-Behavior Research.
Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilization. G.
Moore and R. Marans, Springer US. 4: 347-368.
107. Stokols, D. (1977). Origins and Directions of Environment-Behavioral
Research. Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. D. Stokols, Springer
US: 5-36.
108. Stokols, D. (1977). Origins and directions of environment-behavioral
research. Perspectives on environment and behavior, Springer: 5-36.
109. Stokols, D. (1977). Origins and directions of environment-behavioral
research. Perspectives on environment and behavior, Springer: 5-36.
110. Stokols, D. (1977). Origins and directions of environment-behavioral
research. Perspectives on environment and behavior, Springer: 5-36.
111. Stokols, D. (2013). Perspectives on environment and behavior: theory,
research, and applications, Springer Science & Business Media.
112. Stokols, D. (2013). Perspectives on environment and behavior: theory,

research, and applications, Springer Science & Business Media.

113. Stokols, D. (2013). Perspectives on environment and behavior: theory,
research, and applications, Springer Science & Business Media.
114. Wapner, S. (1997). Handbook of Japan-United States environment-behavior
research, Springer Science & Business Media.
115. Wapner, S. (1997). Handbook of Japan-United States environment-behavior
research, Springer Science & Business Media.
116. Wapner, S. (2000). Theoretical perspectives in environment-behavior
research: Underlying assumptions, research problems, and methodologies,
Springer Science & Business Media.
117. Young, V. E. (2003). Can we encourage learning by shaping environment?
Patterns of seating behavior in undergraduates. Learning to Make a
Difference: Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference of the
Association of College & Research Libraries, April 1013, 2003, Charlotte,
NC.
118. Zube, E. H. and G. T. Moore (1989). "Advance in Environment, Behavior,
and Design Volume 2." from http://link.springer.com/openurl?
genre=book&isbn=978-1-4612-8047-7.
119. Zube, E. H. and G. T. Moore (1991). Advances in environment, behavior,
and design, Vol. 3, Environmental Design Research Association.