Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2
The approach of Elizabeth Eva Leach ............................................................................ 3
Motets, love, sex, birds and a cardinal ......................................................................... 10
The sexual and devotional nightingale ......................................................................... 13
Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 16
Bibliography ................................................................................................................. 17
Introduction
The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of medieval
musicology. My interests lie with the work of Elizabeth Eva Leach and therefore I will be
focusing on two of her publications, one about birds in medieval song1 and the other about
Leachs feminization of the semitone.2 In my opinion it is not very satisfactory to only look
at the current state of medieval musicology by looking at other scholars, but also at their
relation to my own work. In my view my research is also part of current musicology. I also
believe that every assignment should fuel my own interests and research. For these reasons I
will incorporate my own research as part of this assignment.
I like Leachs approach of embedding her work in medieval thinking and interpreting
it with concepts like gender or birds. After she establishes a theory she starts to analyse music
with it. However, she also uses musical examples to redefine and improve these theories. I
like to think that this is the hermeneutic circle at work. This paper explores this approach and
asks the question if Leachs work is useful for my own research.
First I will introduce Elizabeth Eva Leach and her book Sung Birds and article
Gendering the semitone, Sexing the Leading tone. According to me these publications are
two good examples of her work. Following, I will briefly introduce my own research and
some new hypotheses I have. Finally, I will focus on the concept of the nightingale developed
by Leach in Sung Birds and try to apply this to the triplum of Mo-M312 (The motet Au tans
nouvel que naissent flour/Chele ma tollu ma joie/Jai fait tout nouveletement from the eight
fascicle of the Montpellier Codex3).
Elizabeth Eva Leach, Sung Birds : Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages (Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 2007).
2
Elizabeth Eva Leach, "Gendering the Semitone, Sexing the Leading Tone: Fourteenth-Century Music Theory
and the Directed Progression," Music Theory Spectrum 28, no. 1 (2006), 1-21.
3
Mo f. 359, VIII, 312.
Elizabeth Eva Leach, Sung Birds: Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle
Ages. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007).
Elizabeth Eva Leach, Gendering the Semitone, Sexing the Leading Tone: FourteenthCentury Music Theory and the Directed Progression, Music Theory Spectrum 28
(2006): 1-21.
Leach describes on her website that Sung Birds deals with the ontology and ethics of musical
sound through the lens of the earliest composed pieces that imitate birdsong.5 The chapter on
sirens in Sung Birds led to the article Gendering the semitone, which won the Outstanding
Publication Award of the Society for Music Theory 2007 and started a heavy debate with
Sarah Fuller, which I will discuss later.
In her latest book on Machaut Leach tries to combine several aspects of Machaut. The
dismembered Machaut, who is sometimes a secretary, sometimes a poet, and sometimes a
musician, is put back together by Leach to make a total Machaut. Although, we could ask
4
5
Elizabeth Eva Leach, "About Me," http://eeleach.wordpress.com/about-me/ (accessed october, 24, 2011).
Ibid.
ourselves if a separation between the poet and musician is even legitimized. In addition to the
two publications discussed here I would recommend this book as a fine example of current
work in the field of medieval musicology. However my interest lies not in Machaut, therefore
I will not discuss it.
What strikes me is that Leachs work is a combination of music and medieval
thinking, writing and theory. She interprets the work medieval thinkers and theorists to show
how medieval thinking was formed and the impact it had on music. I my view her approach is
one of trying to construct a framework in which we can try to understand music as people
from medieval times would have understood it. However after an encounter with LeechWilkinson6, I should ask myself if this approach is in any way a better approach than any
other. Actually, I can only say that her approach is very useful for me and that is the only
argument I need.
Daniel Leech-Wilkinson, The Modern Invention of Medieval Music: Scholarship, Ideology, Performance (New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Leach, Sung Birds : Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages
Ibid.
Leach uses Boethius using his De institutione musica who divides music into three
species: musica mundane, musica humana and musica instrumentalis. Only the latter is
something we would define as music, but when Boethius gives his extended discussion about
musica instrumentalis he writes about harmonics. Or, to quote Leach, this study of
harmonics is a study of musica instrumentalis9.
The Boethius example is, for me, a good argument for thinking about music through a
medieval conception of music, because Leach clearly shows that ratio, mathematics and
number are certainly a bigger part of music in the Middle Ages than they are now. Leach also
states that it is self-evident (or axiomatic) that theoretical writings that consider music are
part of a spectrum of information about the cultural status of music of this period.10 I think in
this quote she explains and justifies her way of working.
Chapter one continues with examples of how grammar and music are linked and how
vox (voice) has been theorized and divided. In essence Leach gives an overview of how music
was perceived as a rational thing in the Middle Ages and illustrates this with examples of
theoretical writings. To me this chapter is the most useful part of the book for medieval
musicologists. Leach explains and justifies her approach and gives a clear example of how the
conception of music in the Middle Ages influences her work. However, in the second chapter
Leach is comparing birdsong and human singing and her exposition about the nightingale is
very useful to my own research and I will explain this later.
All the above mentioned parts of the book do not relate to musical examples.
However, in her third chapter Birds Sung Leach interprets several medieval songs with
birdsong as a feature. Senlechess En ce gracieux is a virelai that is used as an example. A
narrator imitates a nightingale and a cuckoo in this song. The fact that the imitation of the
9
Ibid.
Ibid., 14
10
11
Ibid., 125-7
Sarah Fuller, "Concerning Gendered Discourse in Medieval Music Theory: Was the Semitone 'Gendered
Feminine?'," Music Theory Spectrum 33, no. 1 (2011), 65-89.
13
Ibid., 68
12
it untrue either. Leach reacts by stating that she is interpreting the, indeed commonplace,
notion of the semitone as imperfect as feminine.14 A rather small, but crucial difference.
The second argument against the feminization of the semitone by Fuller is asserting
that several theorists have described the use of semitone as positive, sweet and beautiful and
therefore the negative connotation of feminine is out of the question.15 According to me this is
a really bad argument, because Leach never claims that feminine is a negative category. A
directed progression, with its semitones, is interpreted as feminine, desiring or sensual by
Leach, but to me these categories are not negative. Fullers claim that when Marchetto of
Padua speaks of elegance and beauty when a lightly inflected imperfect consonance
approaches a subsequent consonance by the smallest possible distance16 a directed
progression poses a challenge to Leachs interpretation, holds no grounds for me. Leach
asserts that Fullers citations on this point serve to strengthen the reading of the semitone as
feminine, since the positive characteristics are all those that are part and parcel of feminine
gendering in the Middle Ages. Women are beautiful, colored, about surface, necessary,
imperfect.17 It seems Fullers attack is towards an anachronistic use of gender by Leach
(gender is part of our current mind set), but in her attack she is using her own mind set
feminine is negative in an anachronistic manner.
Another point made by Fuller in her latest letter is: Progressions from imperfect to
perfect consonance are commonplace in both sacred and secular music of that [the fourteenth]
century and occur in a variety of textual contexts in which an erotic signification would be
14
Elizabeth Eva Leach, "Reading and Theorizing Medieval Music Theory: Interpretation and its Contexts,"
Music Theory Spectrum 33, no. 1 (2011), 90.
15
Fuller, Concerning Gendered Discourse in Medieval Music Theory: Was the Semitone "Gendered Feminine?",
76-7
16
Ibid., 77
17
Leach, Reading and Theorizing Medieval Music Theory: Interpretation and its Contexts, 93
18
Sarah Fuller, "To the Editor: A Brief Response to Elizabeth Eva Leach's 'Reading and Theorizing Medieval
Music Theory: Interpretation and its Contexts'," Music Theory Spectrum 33, no. 2 (2011), 231.
19
Here I deviated from the translation that I found in Tischler, The Montpellier Codex 4, 106-7. The translation I
found is I leave off singing and whistling henceforth, cry. Upon examining the French I came up with the
translation I leave off singing and henceforth, whistling (in silence) cry.
20
Singing is interpreted as ejaculation, as it does in the Dutch expression: to leave church before singing,
which is a metaphor for Coitus interruptus.
10
HYPOTHESES
A question always in the back of my mind was: how did the
author(s)/composer(s)/poet(s) of the Fauvel motet know about the tenor of Mo-M312?21
Maybe they did not know it at all through this source or maybe they had access to the
manuscript? In a footnote I found a lead towards the owner or sponsor of the Montpellier
Codex:
21
The possibility of it being a refrain is not considered here, but that could also be a viable option.
11
22
Mary E. Wolinski, "The Compilation of the Montpellier Codex," EMH Early Music History 11 (1992), 276.
Robert Branner, Manuscript Painting in Paris during the Reign of Saint Louis : A Study of Styles (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1977), 132.
24
Salvador Miranda, "The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church," http://www2.fiu.edu/~mirandas/bios1281.htm
(accessed november 3, 2011).
23
12
Montpellier Codex could be made for a religious audience opens up this devotional space for
interpretation, according to me. Even if it was not made for a cardinal another interpretation
can yield new results and insights. I will pursue this by looking at the triplum of the MoM312 and using the nightingale concept by Leach, which can be both explained in a secular
sense and a devotional sense.
25
Leach, Sung Birds : Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages, 91
Ibid., 91
27
Ibid., 93
28
Ibid., 91
29
With author I always means author/composer/poet.
26
13
dimension that Leach provides with her interpretation of the nightingale gives me new
insights in the nightingales used in this triplum.
In the devotional interpretation the nightingale is often seen as female. It is a positive
bird that wants to die for the desire of God, but the negative devotional nightingale is often
seen as seductive, leading a religious man from the straight path. This nightingale is also often
interpreted as female.
THE DEVOTIONAL NIGHTINGALE IN THE MONTPELLIER CODEX
In addition to my earlier reading of triplum I will try to read it in another context. I
will try to interpret the text with the devotional nightingale in mind. First of all, it is clear that
there are two birds presented in the triplum one female and one male. This fact opens up more
than one possible interpretation.
Leach suggests that the devotional nightingale is mostly female, so I will start with the
female bird. A negative variant is easily spotted in the triplum: the female bird is the seductive
one and the male bird, possibly a cleric I, is seduced. However, it is the female bird that
corrects the male bird and that seems rather strange, because in medieval thinking it should be
the more rational male that should be able to withstand temptation. Trying to interpret the
female bird with the positive context is more difficult and I have not yet found a satisfactory
reading.
Changing my our focus to the male bird I think both a positive and a negative reading
are possible. In the negative sense the male bird is the seduction and the female bird is able to
withstand this temptation. Again this is a rather strange situation, except if the gender roles
are turned around in this example. In the positive sense the male bird is actually a clerical I
that wants to make love, but with true intentions. Love being the love for god. So the bird
14
wants to love god, but for the right reasons. As the male bird says: All lovers (of god) who
value their honour sing nobly. I interpret singing nobly as being a good Christian.
I think that, with this Christian connection in mind, I could say that there is a possible
Christian message carried by this text, namely be a good Christian and not only when it suits
you. However, there seems to be something going on with the gender roles in this triplum.
This ambiguity needs to be further researched to be fully understood. If there is something to
be understood.
To make better interpretations and grasp the message behind this triplum I first have to
be more at home with the Old-French language. For instance, the difference between leave off
and let off could be very crucial to my interpretations. Let of singing, could be seen as coitus
and leave off singing could mean, leave the faith, which opens up a totally new and different
interpretation. Also some more research into the use of nightingales as symbols in poetry
could give more insights.
15
Conclusion
For me Leach sums up her approach towards medieval music when she writes I take
it as axiomatic that theoretical writings that consider music are part of a spectrum of
information about the cultural status of music during this period.30 The medieval writings
about music give information about the cultural status of music in the Middle Ages and
therefore a context for interpreting medieval music. I like Leachs way of working, but it is
not a given that everyone can work in this way. To read medieval theoretical treatises and
understand medieval philosophers I have to invest a lot of time in Latin and get to know a big
amount of manuscripts. With that in mind I am content with using Leachs work for my own
research.
The question is if Leachs research is useful to my own research? Her approach seems
to give good results and the theories and concept she works out are very useable, for me at
least. The things Leach picks up on seem to come back in all types of music of the Middle
Ages. The feminized semitone seems to work when applied to musica ficta and the
interpretation of molle hexachords as soft or feminine and durum hexachords as hard or
masculine also seems to work when applied to music, especially in the Roman de Fauvel. As
we have seen Leachs theory about the nightingale makes for some interesting interpretations
that are not immediately apparent from the triplum itself. In sum I think I can use Leachs
work, but only when critically engaging with it. In my own research the different perspectives
used and produced by Leach give me new insights and open up new paths to pursue as to
better understand a very small part of medieval music.
30
Leach, Sung Birds : Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages, 14
16
Bibliography
Branner, Robert. Manuscript Painting in Paris during the Reign of Saint Louis : A Study of
Styles. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.
Fuller, Sarah. "To the Editor: A Brief Response to Elizabeth Eva Leach's 'Reading and
Theorizing Medieval Music Theory: Interpretation and its Contexts'." Music Theory
Spectrum 33, no. 2 (2011): 230-231.
. "Concerning Gendered Discourse in Medieval Music Theory: Was the Semitone
'Gendered Feminine?'." Music Theory Spectrum 33, no. 1 (2011): 65-89.
Leach, Elizabeth Eva. "About Me", accessed October, 24, 2011,
http://eeleach.wordpress.com/about-me/.
. "Gendering the Semitone, Sexing the Leading Tone: Fourteenth-Century Music
Theory and the Directed Progression." Music Theory Spectrum 28, no. 1 (2006): 1-21.
. "Reading and Theorizing Medieval Music Theory: Interpretation and its Contexts."
Music Theory Spectrum 33, no. 1 (2011): 90-98.
. Sung Birds : Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 2007.
Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel. The Modern Invention of Medieval Music : Scholarship, Ideology,
Performance. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Miranda, Salvador. "The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church." , accessed november 3, 2011,
http://www2.fiu.edu/~mirandas/bios1281.htm.
Wolinski, Mary E. "The Compilation of the Montpellier Codex." EMH Early Music History
11, (1992).
17