Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Institute of Construction and Architecture of the Slovak Academy of Science, Dbravska cesta 9, 84503 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Slovak Academy of Science, Dbravska cesta 9, 84536 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 November 2009
Received in revised form 12 November 2010
Accepted 14 November 2010
Available online 18 December 2010
Keywords:
Metakaolin
Geopolymer
Compressive strength
Pore structure parameters
Thermal analysis
EDX results
a b s t r a c t
The paper presents the results of the study on the effects of the combination of the low liquid/solid (l/s)
ratio and pressure compaction of the fresh pastes on the properties of the hardened metakaolin geopolymer paste. It is well known that the combination gives the possibility to prepare cement composites
resulting in the excellent engineering properties. The results obtained shown the high dense nano- or
near-nano-pore structure with high degree of its homogeneity and high strength of metakaolin geopolymer hardened paste prepared under the use of very low l/s ratio and pressure compaction.
Two factors were found responsible for the high positive effects:
(i) Mechanical effect of the densifying of the starting mixture and the decrease of the initial porosity
due to action of the applied pressure compaction.
(ii) The well known very positive effect of the l/s ratio decrease on the rate and level of the development of the properties of cement composites.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
It is known that alkali activated aluminosilicates are able to
produce alumino-silicate polymers geopolymers. The hardening
mechanism involves the chemical reaction of geopolymeric
precursors, such as alumino-silicate oxides, with alkali polysilicates
yielding polymeric SiOAl bonds. The production of geopolymeric
precursors is carried out by calcinations of aluminosilicates natural
clay materials. Their source can be also some industrial aluminosilicate waste materials. The result of the hardening mechanism is a
three dimensional zeolitic framework unlike traditional hydraulic
binders in which hardening is the result of the hydration of calcium
aluminates and silicates [17]. This circumstance is a cause of
signicant differences in the quality and variety of the engineering
properties of the composites based on geopolymer and current
cements.
As it is very well known the strength and the level of the other
engineering properties of the cement based materials are signicantly dependent on the w/c ratio used. Also the fact that their
strengths, durability and the quality of other engineering properties are increased when the w/c values are decreased [810]. A
signicant factor limiting the effective use of these positive effects
is the decreasing of the quality of the properties of the composites
due to the decrease of the workability of the fresh composite
mixtures prepared with very low w/c ratios.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +421 2 59309257.
E-mail address: usarziv@savba.sk (V. Zivica).
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.004
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The metakaolin used was the product of kaolin heat-treatment at 650 C for 4 h.
The data on the chemical composition and specic weight of the original kaolin and
metakaolin are given in Table 1. With the aim to compare the reactivity of both
materials also their solution heat was estimated using the method of the kinetics
of its development [18,19].
The comparison of the chemical composition shown an increase in the SiO2,
Al2O3 and Fe2O3 contents of the metakaolin as a direct consequence of the decrease
of the ignition loss due to the heat-treatment of kaolin. Further interesting effects
could be observed: a signicant (ca. 20 times) increased solution heat and, on the
contrary, a decreased specic weight of the metakaolin. The increased solution heat
indicated the increased reactivity of metakaolin opposite to the kaolin. The found
specic weight decrease indicated the decreased compactness of metakaolin. This
Kaolin
Metakaolin
Humidity
Ignition loss
SiO2
A12O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Specic weight (kg m
Solution heat (J g 1)
0.94
12.20
48.06
36.76
1.42
0.33
0.24
2631
278.2
0.35
1.95
53.68
42.00
1.70
0.21
0.10
2582
5563
2207
effect was conrmed by the porosimetry results showing 31.8% increase of pore
volume and 20.2% increase of total porosity. Further, the found 40.7% decrease of
macro-pore content and 689.8% increase of specic surface area indicating the
metakaolin as a material signicantly ner than the starting kaolin (Table 2).
All the mentioned effects were undoubtedly the consequence of the process of
the heat-treatment producing the amorphous or near-amorphous SiO2Al2O3
Fe2O3 product. Its presence in the metakaolin is conrmed from the DTA-curves
by a very broad endotherm between ca. 200 and 950 C, instead of the sharp endotherm peak at 511 C visible on the DTA-curve of the kaolin (Fig. 1).
According to the results the used metakaolin was the material with SiO2/Al2O3
molar ratio 2.22 showing signicantly increased neness and solution heat both
contributing to the increase of its reactivity as a partner in the process of the geopolymer formation [7,20,21].
Kaolin
Metakaolin
771
26.8
1102
77.8
4.9
1016 (+31.8%)
15.5 ( 40.7%)
772 ( 29.9%)
93.5 (+20.2%)
38.7 (+689.8%)
For the study the hardened alkali activated metakaolin pastes prepared with
activator solution/metakaolin ratio (l/s) 0.08 and compacted by the pressure
300 MPa were used. The prepared test specimens were 20 mm-edge cubes. The reference test specimens were prepared with l/s 0.70 using the compaction by hand.
The alkali activator sodium hydroxide was added to the mixture in the form of solution in the adequate quantity of water. The portion of the activator corresponded to
7 wt.% of the weight of the metakaolin.
The preparation of the fresh mixtures represented the addition of the given
activator solution amount to the metakaolin and intensive mixing for 3 min using
electrical mixer. The pressure compaction followed after this procedure. The
2208
Table 3
Bulk weight and compressive strength of metakaolin geopolymer pastes and pore structure parameters after 24 h of the hardening.
Pressure
compaction
Reference
Bulk weight
(kg m 3)
Compressive strength
(MPa)
Total porosity
(%)
1862
146.6
15.7
0.03
54.5
814
Pore median
(nm)
Portion of pores
59
5.5
96
814
5.8
93
Fig. 2. Histogram and pore size distribution curve of metakaolin geopolymer pressured composite.
r < 100 nm
(%)
r > 100 nm
(%)
2209
Fig. 3. Histogram and pore size distribution curve metakaolin geopolymer reference composite.
2210
Fig. 5. Composition of the pressure compacted metakaolin composite after 24 h of the hardening analysed by EDX.
Fig. 7. Composition of the reference metakaolin geopolymer composite after 24 h of the hardening analysis by EDX.
Pressure compacted
paste
Reference
paste
Metakaolin
SiO2
A12O3
Na2O
SiO2/A12O3 molar
ratio
Na2O/A12O3 molar
ratio
37.32
33.41
8.38
1.90
49.71
39.44
6.60
2.14
53.68
42.00
2.17
0.41
0.26
2211
Fig. 8. Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermal (DTA) analysis curves of the pressure compacted metakaolin geopolymer composite after 24 h of the hardening.
2212
Fig. 9. Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermal (DTA) analysis curves of the reference metakaolin geopolymer composite after 24 h of the hardening.
The found positive effect of the combination of the low l/s ratio
and high-pressure compaction also at the another alkali activated
alumino-silicate materials can be expected.
The Si:Al ratio in the starting alumino-silicate materials, neness, the portion and type of alkali activators used, curing regime,
and other parameters are undoubtedly important for the development of the properties of the geopolymer composites with the potential in the quality differences of the systems based on the
various aluminosilicates. Therefore, these factors are worthy of
the more detailed study because the pressured geopolymer composites seem to be very interesting materials.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank to Slovak Grant Agency VEGA
for its support towards this work (Grant No. 2/0055/08).
References
[1] Davidovits J. Geopolymer cements to minimize carbon-dioxide greenhousewarming. Ceram Trans 1993;37:16582.
[2] Davidovits J. Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal
1991;37:163356.
[3] Wang Shao-Dong, Xin-Cheng Pu, Scrivener KL, Pratt PL. Alkali-activated slag
cement, concrete: a review of properties and problems. Adv Cem Res
1995;7(27):93102.
[4] Della Roy M. Alkali-activated cement, opportunities and challenges. Cem Concr
Res 1999;29(2):24954.
[5] Duxson P, Fernndez-Jimnez A, Provis JJ, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer
JSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J. Mater Sci. 2007;42:
291733.
[6] Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S. Alkali-activated binders: a review.
Part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanism and hydration
products. Constr Build Mater 2008;22(7):130514.
[7] Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S. Alkali-activated binders: a review.
Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture. Constr Build Mater
2008;22(7):131522.
[8] Schulze J. Inuence of watercement ratio and cement content of the
properties of polymer modied mortars. Cem Concr Res 1999;29:90915.
2213