Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I.
II.
Jurisdiction
A. Definition
Hasegawa, et al. vs. Kitamura, G.R. No. 149177, November 23, 2007
B. Types of Judicial Jurisdiction and Bases for its Exercise
De Joya vs. Judge Placido C. Marquez, G.R. No. 162416, January 31, 2006
1. Jurisdiction over the Subject Matter Judiciary Act of 1948; Batas Pambansa Blg.
129 as amended by Rep. Act 7691
Perkins vs. Roxas, G.R. No. 47517, June 27, 1941
Reyes vs. Diaz, G.R. No. L-48754, November 26, 1941
2. Jurisdiction over the Person (Plaintiff & Defendant) Rule 14, Secs. 6 & 7, 1997
Rules of Court
Pantaleon vs. Asuncion, G.R. No. L-13141, May 22, 1959
Gemperle vs. Schenker, G.R. No. L-18164, January 23, 1967
Sequito vs. Letrondo, G.R. No. L-11588, July 20, 1959
1
III.
i.
g. Administration of Estates Rule 78, Sec. 4 & Rule 79, Sec. 5, Rules of Court
Tayag vs. Benguet Consolidated Inc., G.R. No. L-23145, November 29, 1968
4. Contracts
a. Capacity to Enter Into Contracts Art. 15, NCC
b. Extrinsic Validity of Contracts Art. 17, NCC
c. Intrinsic Validity of Contracts
i.
Adhesion Contracts
Pan Am World Airways vs. Rapadas, G.R. No. 60673, May 19, 1992
Philippine Airlines vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 119641 May 17, 1996
Special Contracts
o
ii.
iii.
Pakistan International Airlines vs. Ople, G.R. No. 61594, September 28,
1990
Ralli Bro. vs. Companie Naviera Sota y Aznar [1920] 2K.B. 287 [C.A.]- 85
5. Torts and Crimes Art. 20 & 2176, NCC; Article 2, RPC; Article 27, UNCLOS
a. Lex Loci Delicti
Loucks vs. Standards Oil Co., 224 N.Y. 99, N.E. 198 (1913)
b. Modern Theories on Foreign Tort Liability
Saudi Arabian Airlines vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 122191, October 8,
1998
Babcock vs. Jackson, supra.
c. Foreign Tort Claims
Asahi Metal Industry Co. vs. Superior Court of California, 480 US 102 (1987)
d. Distinguishing between Torts and Crimes
6. Corporations and other Juridical Entities Article 51, NCC; Sec. 14, Corporation
Code
a. Corporations
i.
Teaching Methods/Strategies:
A question-and-answer format will be primarily employed to determine whether the
student read and understood the provisions of the law, the commentaries and the decisions
of the Court. Lectures, group discussions and visual aids may be used when applicable.
There shall be a midterm and final examination to test the knowledge and understanding of
the students.
Grading Criteria:
Mid-term Exam:
Recitations:
30%
30%
9
Final Exam:
40%
000
10