Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
l. Introduction
'70s a considerable research effort
Since the mid
has been directed toward the acoustical conditions
preferred by musicians when performing; particularly with regard to ensemble playing Il -4]. Results
in the cited works with direct application in stage,
hall, and studio design, give ranges of preferred
ACUSTICA
Vo1 58(1985)
131
are the resultsof Dunn and Farnsworth (1939) measured with a microphone at a distance of only
60 cm. These show, in the horizontal plane a steady
level reduction from front to back which is more
marked at higher frequencies. In the vertical plane
rather weaker secondary maxima occur which just
exceed the level in the forward direction. Niese
(1956) obtained similar results (deviations up to
2 dB) with running speech using a microphone
distance of 2 m. It appeared that with some test
persons the level in the forward direction was about
I dB below the maxima. Finally it is worth noting
that Trendelenburg (1929) showed that the .reduction to the back of the head is greater than is found
in the shadowing of a point source by a spherical
surface. He ascribed this to the projecting effect of
the mouth and showed also differences with altered
mouth shapes. It follows that one cannot assume
that speechdirectivity data are applicable without
further question to the sung radiation patterns.
132
ONS
ACUSTICA
Vo1 58(1985)
133
TableI.
valuesof the singer'sdirectivity.
Characteristical
Centre
frequency
of the octave
band [Hz]
Direction of the
maximum
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
+45 (front)
+40 (frOnt)
20 (side)
-40
cFront)
-20
(frOnt)
-20
(frOnt)
8000
-20
AZ*"
3 dB-down region
dB
horizontal
+ 45
- 45
- 80
+ 80
+ 9 0
-90
+ H 5
H 5
60
20
+359
- 35
80
and
70
- 50
+ 50
31.5
6.0
7.5
9.5
11
20.5
23.5
(frOnt)
vertical
(-40 ) +120
+110
(-40 )
(-40 ) + 75
(-40 ) +60
-32 - 8
-35 +35
-35
+25
0 3dB
0 10 dB
WS
\oerrino
125
?50
500
1000 2000
+
FreQuency
1000Hz 8000
3 . 2l.. C o m p a r i s o n o f m a l e v o i c e s
and female voices
Analysis of results for the female voices showed
substantive agreement in the radiation patterns with
those obtained for the Baritone differences being
smallest in the 8000Hz region. The only significant
deviation was in the 2000 Hz octave where for the
female voices the sharp maximum downwards to
the front (Fig. 2) almost disappears and the 3 dB
region is spread to approximately 30o upwards. An
additional secondary maximum occurs for female
voices at 60o upwards in both the 2kHz and 4kHz
134
A.H.M
ACUSTICA
158(1985)
15
ACUSTICA
Vo1 58(1985)
135
m
c
AA m
have.a reflective floor. Side, overhead and rear reflections corresponding to a variety of stage sizes
were simulated with a digital delayline, feeding
back directly to the singers via cardioid microphones at 0.5 m from each singer's mouth, and
loudspeakers at a distance of about 3 m, see Fig. 7.
Levels were calculated according to spherical divergencewith some correction for vocal directivity.
Reverberation was generated on the two incoherent feeds from an EMT Goldfoil reverberation
plate and radiated to the ensemble from three loudspeakers arranged to simulate the reverberance of
the auditorium, see Fig. 8 a for schematic synthetic
sound fields and Fig. 8 b for simulated stage sizes.
Table II gives the delay applied through the delayline plus the delay causedby the 3 m dimension between the singing group and the respective loudspeakers.
The music chosen consisted of unaccompanied
chorales and choruses from the J. S. Bach "St Matthew Passion" and "Elijah" by Mendelssohn. Excerpts approximately 30 s long were sung for each
trial and then the musicians were asked to rate the
conditions on 7-point scales for "ease of singing"
and "ease of ensemble", before the next presentation. Fourteen presentations wer made in random
order in each series.
AKG delay
line
X
A
B
C
D25ms
E
F
G50
Reverberation
no reflection
6.25ms
12.5 ms
18.75
ms
3 1 . 2m
5s
37.5 ms
75
Total dday
16.25 ms
22.5 ms
28.75 ms
35
ms
41.25 ins
47.5 ms
60
85
mate
Appro
surfa
distance
2.75m
3.82m
4.89m
5.95m
7.01m
8.07m
10.2 m
(13.6o
136
ACUSTICA
158(1985)
7. Results
7.1. Correlation between"ease of singing"
and "ease of ensemble"
For all groups there is a high correlation between
Fig.9. Photographof the vocal quartettein the anechoic
the judgements of ease of singin! and ease of enroom.
semble. Correlation coefficients lie between 0.82
and 0.90 for all trials. Fig. l0 showsthe dependence
The greatest number of experiments were perof the correlation coefficients on the four reverberaformed by the quartette, with the choir of 14 voices
tion times presented for the quartette. The correlaand the soloists each available on only one occasion.
tion was even higher for the choir (0.92). From this
To maximize dependenceon the "reflected" sound
we concludethat essentiallyonly one judgement was
singers faced away from each other on the hemibeing made.
anechoicspace.SeeFig. 9.
The only exception was a combination of a long
reverberation time and unfavoured reflection delays.
In this situation, "ease of ensemble" seemed to be
5. General observations
little worsethan "easeof singing".
7.2.Early reflections(for the ensembles)
Although it was quickly appatent that the principal conclusion to be drawn from the experiments
concerned the importance of reverberation to
singers, approximately half the presntations to the
subjects comprised only early reflections without
reverberance. The results are very straight forward
and will be presented flrrst.
Fig. I I summarisesthese results. It is a cumulative plot of normalised preferenceagainst the relative energy of early reflections which as noted above
6. Experimental variables
012s3
Reverberoiionlime +
In addition to reflection delay and level, reverbera- and "ease of singing" for different reverberation times
tion time was varied in the presentations through 0, presented.
ACUSTICA
V o 1 5 8 ( 1 9 8 5 ) A.H.MARSHALL and J.MEYER:DIREC
137
EnsemblP
(-o)
-12
-6
-t0
-8
RelotivE
e n e r gl Y
e v l+
-1
-? dB 0
0.4
'
m _ '
Code:A A
GG
EE
36
CC
DE
E000 68
0B
AC
CA
AA
CodelX X
7 . 3 . 1E
. ffect of sound fields consisting
of early reflections and
reverberation for the ensembles
E[
In the sound fields presented without early reflections but with reverberation the reverberation time
seems to have no systematic effect on preference in
the range of the 3 reverberationtimes presented(1,
1.5 and 3s respectively) to the quartette and the
choir.
(-o)
-'12
-10
-8
-6
n e l o l i v E n e r gLye v e+l
-1
-? dB
-0,1
(-o I
-6
-0
-10
Level+
RelotiveEnerqy
-L
_0)
12
10
-4
d0
7 . 3 . 3O
. nset delay time
We investigated the possibility that the reduction
in preference for the reverberant flreld at 40 ms
Two series were conducted with the quartette
could have been an artifact. The reverberation
using I s reverberation time instead of the l'5 s signal started in the experimental set-up at a disadopted as standard with onset delay 85 ms. Mask- crete time - virtually like a reflection at 85 ms
ing of the early reflections by reverberation is delay. Accordingly wc ran a series in which the
reduced. Early energetic reflections integrate with
variable was the onset delay time for the reverberathe reverberation so that preference for the rever- tion. The set-up did not permit us to include the
berated sound is negligible. Only for delay greater
unreverberated field for comparison as would have
than about 40 ms is the reverberated field strongly given us directly comparable results with those
preferred again. See Fig. 14. This result gives a clue
already shown. However Fig. 15 shows that a
as to what is happening in Fig. 13. The pronounced signilicant dip in preference does occur with each of
dip occurs at the point where dependence solely on the onset delays at the 40 ms region with a reducthe reverberated signal takes place becausethe early tion at smaller onset delays than about 70 ms. That
reflections energy is as low that it is negligible. A means, that the 40 ms effect is very important for
further variation with the quartette used 3.0 s re- the design of single reflectors, if the other reflecting
verberation time. The reverberant signal at 3 s so areashave distancesof more than about l2 m.
obviously dominated the singing experience that
only tests with the reverberation were run. Apart
7.4. Soloists
from a slight improvement in preference for the
At the conclusion of the measuring programme
earliest and most energetic discrete reflections
paper we asked
preference for all test fields was uniform within the described in the first section of this
series @ncerntest
at
undertake
the singers each to
experimentalaccuracy.
described
to
those
comparable
"ease
of
singing"
From this series we conclude that the shorter the ing
gives
initial
the
16
Fig.
quartette
choir.
and
the
for
reverberation time, the more important the earliest
gives
the
l7
Fig.
while
responses
plot
of
their
about
after
reflections are for ensemble. However
in
the
energy
reflection
plotted
against
preferences
reverberation
statistical
35 ms of reflection delay the
7 . 3 . 2R
. everberation time variation
ACUSTICA
V
1 58(1985)
6 B
D E
E D
X X
8 6
C A
A C
l C o d e
139
10
6
8
Relotive Ene
gy tevel
Fig. 18. String quartette:Differencesin normalisedpreferencebetweensound fields with and without reverberationcomponent.
to "easeof ensemble",
o Response
to "tonequality".
o resporBe
7.5.Instrumentalists
140
ONS
(Received
February21th,1985.)
References
Progromm
I e
Proqromme
2
3 2 0 1 2 3
D i f i e r e n c e i n t he es u il nl ds iv
duol
e8.
ue56l,
]1
Progromme
2