Você está na página 1de 347

Philippine Nutrition

Facts and Figures 2011

FOOD AND NUTRITION RESEARCH INSTITUTE


Department of Science and Technology
Bicutan, Taguig City, Metro Manila
December 2012

ISSN 1655-2911
This report summarizes the results of the 2011 Updating of Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and
Other Population Groups undertaken by the Food and Nutrition Research Institute Department of
Science and Technology (FNRI-DOST).
Additional information on the survey may be obtained from the FNRI-DOST, DOST Complex, Gen. Santos
Avenue, Bicutan, Taguig City, Metro Manila, Philippines 1631
Tel Numbers: (632) 8372071 local 2282/2296
Telefax
(632) 8372934; 8391843
E-mail
Website

mvc@fnri.dost.gov.ph; mar_v_c@yahoo.com
www.fnri.dost.gov.ph

Recommended Citation:
Food and Nutrition Research Institute Department of Science and Technology (FNRI-DOST). 2012.
Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2011. DOST Complex, FNRI Bldg., Bicutan, Taguig City, Metro
Manila, Philippines.

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Table of Contents

Foreword

Acknowledgments

vi

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

vii

Definition of Terms

ix

List of Figures

xiii

List of Tables

xxiii

List of Statistical Annexes

xxvi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

Background

Objectives

10

Survey Components/Modules

11

CHAPTER II METHODOLOGY

13

Sampling Design

15

Survey Coverage

16

Survey Methods

16

Survey Questionnaires/Forms

22

Ethical Review

23

Preparatory Survey Activities

23

Training and Recruitment

23

Pilot Survey

23

Survey Equipment

24

Pre-Survey Conferences

24

Actual Field Survey Operations and Coordination

24

Location of Households/Informed Consent Form

25

Field Editing and Encoding

25

Data Entry System

25

Organization of Survey Teams

26

Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

26

Dissemination of Results

27

Facts and Figures, 2011

ii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

CHAPTER III RESULTS

29

PART A CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS

31

1. Household Size

31

2. Occupation of Household Head

32

3. Education of Household Head

32

4. Type and Ownership of Dwelling Unit

33

5. Main Material Used for Dwelling Unit

34

6. Ownership of Household Appliances

35

7. Main Source of Drinking Water

36

8. Type of Toilet Facility

36

9. Type of Garbage Disposal

37

PART B NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF ALL POPULATION GROUPS

38

1. Birthweight of Young Children, 0-3.9 years old

38

2. Nutritional Status of All Population Groups


2.1 Pre-school and School Children, 0-10.0 years old (0-120
months)
2.2 Pre-adolescents & Adolescents,10.08-19.0 years old (121228 months)
2.3 Adults, 19.08 years old and over (229 months and over)

40
40
60
65

2.4 Pregnant Women

74

2.5 Lactating Mothers

76

PART C INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING PRACTICES

78

1. Current Breastfeeding Practices

79

1.1 Initiation of Breastfeeding

80

1.2 Place of Delivery and Breastfeeding Practices

81

1.3 Type of Delivery and Breastfeeding Practices

82

1.4 Continued Breastfeeding

84

2. Prelacteal Feeding

86

3. Complementary Feeding Practices

89

PART D PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN TO NUTRITION AND


RELATED PROGRAMS
1. Government Programs

92
92

1.1 Expanded Program on Immunization

93

1.2 Newborn Screening

98

1.3 Growth Monitoring

98

Facts and Figures, 2011

ii

iii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.4. Operation Timbang

100

1.5 Vitamin A Supplementation

101

1.6 Deworming

103

1.7 Supplementary Feeding

104

1.8 Orally-Fit Child

106

1.9 Daycare Program

107

1.10 Healthy Habits of Children, 6-12 years old

109

PART E MATERNAL NUTRITION


1. Nutritional Status of Mothers with Children 0-5 years old by
Socio-Demographic Characteristics
2. Utilization of Pre-Natal and Post Natal Care
3. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Mothers on Nutrition,
Health and Hygiene

117

PART F FOOD INSECURITY STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS

126

117
121
123

1. Food-Insecure Households

127

2. Food-Insecure Adults and Children


3. Comparison of Food Insecure Households and Children:
2008 and 2011
4. Coping Mechanisms

132

PART G PARTICIPATION OF HOUSEHOLDS TO NUTRITION AND


RELATED PROGRAM
1. Government Programs

140
142
143
143

1.1

Botika ng Barangay

144

1.2

Free Medical Services

146

1.3

Free Dental Services

147

1.4

Philhealth

149

1.5

Senior Citizen Program

150

1.6

Nutrition Education

152

1.7

Vegetable Gardening

154

2. Iodized Salt

155

CHAPTER IV CONCLUSIONS and CHALLENGES

163

REFERENCES

167

Facts and Figures, 2011

iii

iv

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

STATISTICAL ANNEXES

171

A. Characteristics of Households

172

B. Nutritional Status of All Population Groups

183

C. Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices

227

D. Participation of Children to Nutrition and Related Programs

237

E. Maternal Nutrition

265

F. Food Insecurity Status of Households

278

G. Participation of Households to Nutrition and Related Programs

284

LIST OF RESEARCH TEAM

Facts and Figures, 2011

309

iv

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

FOREWORD
The Institutes fervent commitment to its mission to fight malnutrition in its various
forms with accurate and timely data/information and innovative technologies is once
again proven with the publication of this document: The Philippine Nutrition Facts
and Figures, 2011 barely a year after the end of the data collection of the 2011
survey entitled Updating of Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and Other
Population Groups. The Survey started in June 2011 and ended December 2011.
This milestone underscores the dedication, commitment, hardwork and courage of
the Survey Team of the Nutritional Assessment and Monitoring Division (NAMD) of
the Institute who is given the difficult task to undertake nutrition surveys at a national
scale every 2 to 3 years.
With great sense of fulfillment, it is always the pleasure of FNRI to serve its various
stakeholders, advocates and institutions (government and non-government) that
share the Institutes vision of OPTIMUM NUTRITION for all Filipinos.
We fervently hope that the data and information presented in The Philippine
Nutrition Facts and Figures, 2011 will translate to more intensive as well as
proactive efforts of governments, both national and local and its partners
(convergence), particularly the private sector, to make our nutrition
programs/services work effectively at the grassroots. In consequence, more children
will be saved from the bondage of inter-generational cycle of undernutrition and its
negative effects on their physical, intellectual and economical productivity in later life.

MARIO V. CAPANZANA, Ph. D.


Director

Facts and Figures, 2011

vi

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Grateful acknowledgement and appreciation are due to the following:

The United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF) for the financial support in the project
Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and Anemia Prevention and
Control in Regions 5, 6 & 9 which become an integral part of this report;
The National Statistics Office (NSO) for the technical assistance in providing the
listing of sample housing units and sample households;
Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG), Local Government Units
(LGUs), the Governors, Mayors and Barangay Captains and their
constituents for providing direct assistance in the field survey operations;
The National Nutrition Council of the Department of Health (NNC-DOH) through its
Regional Nutrition Program Coordinators (RNPCs) and Provincial/City and
Municipal Nutrition Action Officers (PNAOs/CNAOs and MNAOs) for sharing
their untiring guidance and incessant support during field data collection;
Department of Science and Technology Regional Directors (RDs) and Provincial
Science and Technology Directors (PSTDs) for their support especially during
the conduct of field data collection, training and pre-survey coordination in the
regions/provinces;
Dr. Isidoro R. David and Dr. Arturo Y. Pacificador, as statistical consultants, for the
technical guidance in sampling design;
The FNRI Finance and Administrative Division for their invaluable assistance in the
financial aspect of the survey;
All the 38,894 households and 198,022 individuals for their indispensable
participation and utmost cooperation in the survey; and
All the FNRI technical and non-technical staff, local researchers, local survey aides
and numerous others who have provided their inputs involvement, and
contribution to the fruition of the 2011 Updating Survey

Facts and Figures, 2011

vii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ARMM

Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao

ASIN

An Act Promoting Salt Iodization

BCG

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

BMI

Body Mass Index

CALABARZON

Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, Quezon

CAR

Cordillera Administrative Region

CED

Chronic Energy Deficiency

CGS

Child Growth Standard

CI

Confidence Interval

CV

Coefficient of Variables

DDS

Dietary Diversity Score

DPT

Diptheria Pertussis Tetanus

EA

Enumeration Area

EAR

Estimated Average Requirement

EO

Executive Order

EPI

Expanded Program on Immunization

FAO

Food and Agricultural Organization

FCT

Food Consumption Table

FNRI

Food and Nutrition Research Institute

GP

Government Program

GMP

Growth Monitoring Program

IYCF

Infant and Young Child Feeding

MDG

Millennium Development Goal

MIMAROPA

Mindoro, Marinduque, Romblon,


Palawan

MS

Master Sample

NCR

National Capital Region

NSO

National Statistics Office

NNS

National Nutrition Survey

OFC

Orally Fit Child

OPV

Oral Polio Vaccine

OPT

Operation Timbang

Facts and Figures, 2011

viii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

PSU

Primary Sampling Unit

RA

Republic Act

RTK

Rapid Test Kit

SD

Standard Deviation

SE

Standard Error

SF

Supplementary Feeding

SOCCSKSARGEN

South

Cotabato,

Cotabato,

Sultan

Kudarat, Sarangani, General Santos City


UNICEF

United Nations Childrens Fund

WC

Waist Circumference

WHR

Waist-Hip Ratio

WHO

World Health Organization

Facts and Figures, 2011

ix

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

DEFINITION OF TERMS
Low Birthweight

a newborn weighing less than 2,500 grams or 2.5 kg. ( RA


7600)

Body Mass Index


(BMI)

an indicator of nutritional status of adults twenty years of


age and above expressed as body weight in kilograms
divided by the square of the height in meters. It provides a
measure of body mass, ranging from thinness to obesity.
The normal range is from 18.5 24.9 Kg/m2.

Breastfeeding

a method of feeding an infant directly from the breast (RA


7600).

Breastmilk

the human milk from a mother. ( RA 7600)

Chronic Energy
Deficiency (CED)

a condition of the body characterized by low body weight


relative to height and low energy stores due to deprivation
of food over a long period of time. CED is determined by
body mass index (BMI) <18.5 as the cut- off and is
associated with lower physical work capacity.

Colostrum

first milk secreted from the breast after childbirth, usually


yellowish in color, rich in protein and antibodies for the
child.

Complementary
Foods

any food, whether manufactured or locally prepared,


suitable as a complement to breast milk to satisfy the
nutritional requirements of the infant. Such food is
commonly called weaning food or breast milk
supplement (EO 51).

Exclusive
Breastfeeding

Method where infant receives nothing else but breast milk


(including expressed breast milk or breast milk from a wet
nurse) with the exception of oral rehydration solution
(ORS), drops, syrup (vitamins, minerals and medicines)
(WHO-UNICEF, 2008).

Expanded Program on
Immunization (EPI)

a DOH program to reduce infant mortality and morbidity


through decreasing the prevalence of TB, diphtheria,
pertussis, tetanus, polio and measles through
immunization.

Immunization

giving of vaccinations such as DPT, OPV and measles to


infants or children. Not all immunizations are given thru
vaccines, OPV is oral.

Feeding Practices

collective term for all feeding practices included in the


study. This includes: a) exclusive brestfeeding, b)
breastfeeding plus complementary food, c) other milk (as
breastmilk substitute), d) other milk and other food, and e)
other foods.

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Formula Milk

artificial milks for babies made out of a variety of products,


including sugar, animal milks, soybeans and vegetable oil.
They are usually in powder form, to mix with water.(EO 51)

Height-for
Age/Length-for-Age

an indicator that is used to determine past or chronic


nutritional status where the childs actual height/length is
compared with the standard or reference height/length for
his age. If the childs height/length falls below this
standard or reference height/length, the child is stunted.
Height-for-length is the indicator used for children, 2 years
old and above, while (recumbent) length-for-age is the
indicator used for children below 2 years old (0-23
months).

Height/Length

refers to the measurement of both total stature and trunk


length, which has four components namely: legs, pelvis,
spine and skull. Standing height is measured for subjects
who are 2 years old and above using a microtoise
attached to a smooth flat surface while recumbent length
is measured for children less than 2 years old (0-23
months old) using an infantometer.

Infantometer

a wooden length board used to take recumbent length


(crown of the head to heel length) of infants and preschool-age children below 2 years old (0-23 months).

Iodized Salt

ordinary salt to which iodine has been added according to


the guidelines set by the Bureau of Food and Drugs
(BFAD).

Microtoise

a measuring instrument for standing height (stature) of


individuals, 2 years and above. It consists of an L-shaped
device (the head bar) to which is attached a spring-loaded
coiled tape measure. In use, the head-bar is placed
securely on the floor and the tape is fully drawn out. The
free end of the tape is secured with a nail to a suitable
vertical surface directly above the headbar or securely
taped against the wall. The head bar is then raised above
the height of the subject.

Nutrient
Supplementation

a government intervention program where micro-nutrients


such as Vitamin A, iron and iodine are usually given to
children, pregnant and lactating women on the National
Micronutrient Day spearheaded by DOH. Children age 1 to
5 years are given high dose of vitamin A capsules. (DOH
AO 3 As. 2000)

Nutrition Education

a government intervention program aimed to influence


behaviour among mothers/caregivers towards adoption of
more positive nutrition related practices, eating nutritious
and safe foods. This includes participation/attendance in
nutrition classes, food demonstrations and discussions.

Facts and Figures, 2011

xi

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Nutritional Status

the condition of the body resulting from the intake,


absorption, and utilization of food. Clinical examinations,
biochemical analyses, anthropometric measurements, and
dietary studies are used singly or in combination to
determine this condition.

Operation Timbang

a government intervention program where children under 6


years old are weighed in barangay by trained nutrition
worker once a year (usually between January to March)

Orally Fit Child


Program

is DOH and LGUs are implemented program for under 6


years old aimed to develop of positive behaviour such as
tooth brushing and dental care that would relieve pain and
discomfort due to dental caries. Services under this
program include filling of cavities, extraction of unsavable
tooth and treatment of post-operative infections (Oral
Health Program DOH, 2007-0007).

Other foods

practice where a child is solely taking other foods without


other milk. (EO 51)

Other milk

refers to other milk given to replace breast milk. This


includes commercial formula.(EO 51)

Other milk and other


foods

a method where a child is fed with other milk and other


foods.(EO 51)

Overweight

refers to above normal weight body weight relative to


height, with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 29.9.

Predominant
Breastfeeding

a feeding practice for infants where breastmilk (including


milk expressed or from a wet nurse) is the predominant
source of nourishment and certain liquids (water, waterbased fluids, fruit juice), ORS, vitamins and medicines are
allowed to be consumed (WHO-UNICEF, 2008).

Stunting

reflects a shortness-for-age, an indicator of chronic


malnutrition and calculated by compairing the height-forage of a child with a reference population of well nourished
and healthy children.

Undernutrition

an abnormal state resulting from the consumption of an


inadequate quantity of food over an extended period of
time. It is manifested by underweight, stunting, or growth
retardation, and in severe cases, clinical signs of
marasmus or kwashiorkor.

Underweight

refers to people with a body mass index (BMI) of under


18.5 or a weight of 15 to 20% below that normal for their
age and height group. It is measured using weight-for-age
as an index. It indicates current malnutrition.

Wasting or Thinness

a condition where the childs weight is lower than that of a


normal child of the same height. It is measured using
weight-for-height as an index.
It indicates acute

Facts and Figures, 2011

xii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

malnutrition.
Weight

refers to the total or exact amount of heaviness of an


individual, mainly made up of muscles, fat, bone and
internal organs with the addition in
pathological
circumstances of edema, ascites, massive organ
enlargement and even the helminth burden in severe
ascariasis. Measured using a calibrated beam balance or
Detecto weighing scale, recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg.

Weight-for-Age

the simplest and most common indicator for the


assessment of growth. It compares the weight of an
individual to a standard or reference weight-for-age. This
indicator is useful for rapid screening because it combines
acute and chronic malnutrition.

Weight-for-height

an indicator for the assessment of growth. It compares the


weight of an individual to the weight of a reference
population of the same height (or length). Weight-forheight is an expression of leanness.

Facts and Figures, 2011

xiii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.

Title

Page No.

Multi-stage stratified sampling design

15

Organizational structure of the 2011Updating Nutrition


Survey

26

B.1

Percentage distribution of children 0-3.9 years old (0-47


months), by sex and level of birthweight: Philippines, 2011

39

B.2

Percentage distribution of children 0-3.9 years old (0-47


months), by level of birthweight and by region: Philippines,
2011

39

B.3

Nutritional status of children, 0-10 years old (0-120 months),


based on WHO-CGS weight-for-age, height-for-age, weightfor-height and BMI-for-age: Philippines, 2011

42

B.4

Prevalence of a.) underweight; b.) stunting; c.) wasting; and


d.) overweight/obese among children, 0-10 years old (0-120
months), by single age: Philippines, 2011

43

B.5

Prevalence of underweight among children, a.) 0-5 years old


(0-60 months) and b.) 5.08-10.0 years old (61-120 months),
by age group based on WHO-CGS weight-for-age
classification: Philippines, 2003 2011.

44

B.6

Prevalence of stunting among children, a.) 0-5 years old


children (0-60 months) and b.) 5.08-10.0 years old (61-120
months) by age group based on WHO-CGS height-for-age
classification: Philippines, 2003 2011

45

B.7

Prevalence of wasting among children, a.) 0-5 years old


children (0-60 months) and b.) 5.08-10.0 years old (61-120
months), by age group based on WHO-CGS weight-forheight classification: Philippines, 2003 2011

46

B.8

Prevalence of overweight among children, a.) 0-5 years old


(0-60 months) and b.) 5.08-10.0 years old (61-120 months),
by age group based on WHO-CGS weight-for-height
classification: Philippines, 2003-2011

47

B.9

Trends of malnutrition among children, 0-5 years old (0-60


months), based on WHO-CGS classification: Philippines,
1989-2011

48

B.10

Trends in the prevalence of underweight-for-age among


children, under-five years old (0 to <60 months), for
monitoring of MDG Goal 1: 1990-2011

49

Facts and Figures, 2011

xiv

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

B.11

Trends of malnutrition among children, 5.08-10 years old


(61-120 months), based on WHO-CGS classification:
Philippines, 2003-2011

49

B.12

Magnitude of underweight children, 0-5 years old (0-60


months), by province: Philippines, 2011

54

B.13

Magnitude of underweight children, 5.08-10 years old (61120 months), by province: Philippines, 2011

55

B.14

Magnitude of stunted children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months),


by province: Philippines, 2011

56

B.15

Magnitude of stunted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120


months), by province: Philippines, 2011

57

B.16

Magnitude of wasted children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months),


by province: Philippines, 2011

58

B.17

Magnitude of wasted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120


months), by province: Philippines, 2011

59

B.18

Nutritional status of children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228


months), based on height-for-age and BMI-for-age
classification using WHO-Growth Reference: Philippines,
2011

60

B.19

Prevalence of a.) stunting; b.) wasting; and c.)


overweight/obese among children, 10.08-19 years old
(121-228 months), by single age: Philippines, 2011

61

B.20

Trends of malnutrition among children, 10.08-19 years old


(121-228 months): Philippines, 2003-2011

62

B.21

Magnitude of stunted children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228


months), by province: Philippines, 2011

63

B.22

Magnitude of wasted children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228


months old), by province: Philippines, 2011

64

B.23

Nutritional status of adults, 20 years old and over (240


months), by sex, based on WHO-CGS BMI classification:
Philippines, 2011

65

B.24

Prevalence of a.) CED; b.) overweight; and c.) obese


among adults, 19.08 years old and over (229 months), by
age group: Philippines, 2011

66

B.25

Trends in the prevalence of CED and overweight among


adults, 20 years old and over (240 months) based on BMI:
Philippines, 1993-2011

67

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xv

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

B.26

Prevalence of CED and Obese adults, 20 years old and


over (>240 months and over) by region: Philippines, 2011

68

B.27

Trends in high waist circumference prevalence among


adults, 20 years old and over ( 240 months): Philippines,
1998-2011

70

B.28

Prevalence of high waist circumference among adults, 20


years old and over (>240 months and over) by sex and by
region: Philippines, 2011

71

B.29

Trends in high waist to hip ratio (WHR) prevalence among


adults, 20 years old and over ( 240 months): Philippines,
1998-2011

73

B.30

Prevalence of high waist to hip ratio among adults, 20


years old and over (>240 months and over) by sex and by
region: Philippines, 2011

74

B.31

Percentage distribution of pregnant women by age group


and weight-for-height classification: Philippines, 2011

75

B.32

Trends in the prevalence of nutritionally at risk pregnant


women based on weight-for-height: Philippines, 1998-2011

75

B.33

Prevalence of nutritionally at-risk pregnant women by


region and weight-for-height classification: Philippines,
2011

76

B.34

Percentage distribution of lactating mothers by age group


and by nutritional status classification using BMI-for-age
and BMI for adults: Philippines, 2011

76

B.35

Trends in the prevalence of underweight and overweight


lactating mothers based on BMI: Philippines, 1998-2011

77

B.36

Prevalence of underweight and overweight lactating


mothers by region and by nutritional status classification
using BMI-for-age and BMI for adults: Philippines, 2011

77

C.1

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by age


group: Philippines, 2011

79

C.2

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by current


feeding practice: Philippines, 2011

79

C.3

Percentage of children, 0-5 months old currently


exclusively breastfed at the time of the survey by single
age: Philippines, 2011

80

C.4

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by time of


breastfeeding initiation: Philippines, 2011

80

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xvi

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

C.5

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by place of


delivery: Philippines, 2011

81

C.6

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding within one hour after delivery and by place of
delivery: Philippines, 2011

81

C.7

Percentage distribution of children 0-5 months by current


feeding practices and by place of delivery: Philippines,
2011

82

C.8

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by type of


delivery: Philippines, 2011

82

C.9

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding within one hour after delivery and by type of
delivery: Philippines, 2011

83

C.10

Percentage distribution of children, 0-5 months by current


feeding practices and by type of delivery: Philippines, 2011

83

C.11

Comparison between current feeding practice of infants 0-5


months old and initiation and timing to breastfeed:
Philippines, 2011

84

C.12

Percentage of children with continued breastfeeding among


the 6-11 months, one year old and the 2 years: Philippines,
2011

85

C.13

Trends of exclusively breastfeeding among infants 0-5


months: Philippines, 2003, 2008, 2011*

85

C.14

Comparison of mean duration (in months) of breastfeeding


and exclusive breastfeeding: Philippines, 2003, 2008 &
2011*

86

C.15

Comparison on the current feeding (CF) practice of children


given prelacteal feed and given other milk as prelacteal
feed by age: Philippines, 2011

88

C.16

Percentage of children 6-8 months by introduction of solid,


semi-solid or soft foods: Philippines, 2011

89

C.17

First introductory foods given to children 0-23 months:


Philippines, 2011

89

C.18

Percentage of children meeting the Minimum Dietary


Diversity Score: Philippines, 2011

91

D.1

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in various


Government Programs: Philippines, 2011

92

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xvii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

D.2

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in various


Government Programs: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

93

D.3

Percent of children, 0-48 months, participating in Expanded


Program on Immunization (EPI): Philippines, 2011

94

D.4

Percent of children, 0-48 months, participating in Expanded


Program on Immunization (EPI): Philippines, 2008 and
2011

94

D.5

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Bacillus,


Calmette, Guirin (BCG) immunization by region:
Philippines, 2011

95

D.6

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in


Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus (DPT) immunization by
region: Philippines, 2011

95

D.7

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Oral Polio


Vaccine (OPV) immunization by region: Philippines, 2011

96

D.8

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Hepatitis


B vaccination by region: Philippines, 2011

97

D.9

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Measles


vaccination by region: Philippines, 2011

97

D.10

Percent of children, 0-23 months old, participating in


Newborn Screening by region: Philippines, 2011

98

D.11

Percent of children, 0-2 years old, participating in Growth


Monitoring by region: Philippines,2011

99

D.12

Percent of children, 0-2 years old, participating in Growth


Monitoring by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

99

D.13

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in Operation


Timbang by region: Philippines, 2011

100

D.14

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in Operation


Timbang by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

101

D.15

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in Vitamin A


Supplementation by region: Philippines, 2011

102

D.16

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in Vitamin A


Supplementation by region with 95 % confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

102

D.17

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in


Deworming Program by region: Philippines, 2011

103

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xviii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

D.18

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in


Deworming Program by region with 95% confidence
interval: Philippines, 2011

104

D.19

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in


Supplementary Feeding Program by region: Philippines,
2011

105

D.20

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in


Supplementary Feeding Program by region with 95%
confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

105

D.21

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Orally-Fit


Child Program by region: Philippines, 2011

106

D.22

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Orally-Fit


Child Program by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

107

D.23

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Day Care


Center by region: Philippines, 2011

108

D.24

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Day Care


Center by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

108

D.25

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands before meals by region: Philippines, 2011

109

D.26

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands before meals by region with 95% confidence
interval: Philippines, 2011

110

D.27

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after meals by region: Philippines, 2011

111

D.28

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after meals by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

111

D.29

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after toilet use by region: Philippines, 2011

112

D.30

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after toilet use by region with 95% confidence
interval: Philippines, 2011

113

D.31

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always brush their


teeth by region: Philippines, 2011

114

D.32

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always brush their


teeth by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

114

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xix

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

D.33

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, with dental caries by


region: Philippines, 2011

115

D.34

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, with dental caries by


region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

116

E.1

Nutritional status of mothers with children 0-5 years old:


Philippines, 2011

118

E.2

Percentage of underweight mothers with children 0-5 years


old, by a.) age; b.) highest educational attainment; and c.)
work status: Philippines, 2011

118

E.3

Percentage of overweight/obese mothers with children 0-5


years old by a.) age; b.) highest educational attainment;
and c.) work status: Philippines, 2011

119

E.4

Percentage of underweight and overweight/ obese mothers


with children 0-5 years old, by region: Philippines, 2011

120

E.5

Percentage of mothers who delivered low birth weight


infants in the past 2 years by nutritional status: Philippines,
2011

120

E.6

Percentage of mothers who received pre-natal care and


various health services during pre-natal visits when
pregnant with the youngest child: Philippines, 2011

121

E.7

Percentage of mothers who took supplements during


pregnancy with the youngest child, by region: Philippines,
2011

122

E.8

Type of supplements taken by mothers during pregnancy


with the youngest child: Philippines, 2011

122

E.9

Awareness of mothers on common nutrition disorders:


Philippines, 2011

123

E.10

Awareness of mothers on a.) duration of exclusive


breastfeeding; and b.) initiation of complementary feeding:
Philippines, 2011

123

E.11

Knowledge of mothers on causes of diarrhea among


children: Philippines, 2011

124

E.12

Health seeking behaviors of mothers when child gets


diarrhea: Philippines, 2011

124

E.13

Practice of hand-washing with soap among mothers with


children 0-5 years old: Philippines, 2011

125

F.1

Percentage of food insecure households and the 95%


confidence interval by region: Philippines, 2011

130

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xx

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

F.2

Percentage of food insecure households by province:


Philippines, 2011

131

F.3

Percentage of food insecure households and the 95%


confidence interval by province: Philippines, 2011

132

F.4

Percentage of food insecure adults and the 95%


confidence interval by region: Philippines, 2011

135

F.5

Percentage of food
Philippines, 2011

province:

136

F.6

Percentage of food insecure adults and the 95%


confidence interval by province: Philippines, 2011

137

F.7

Percentage of food insecure children and the 95%


confidence interval by region: Philippines, 2011

138

F.8

Percentage of food
Philippines, 2011

by province:

139

F.9

Percentage of food insecure children and the 95%


confidence interval by province: Philippines, 2011

140

F.10

Percentage of households who were food insecure and by


food insecurity item: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

141

F.11

Percentage of households who were food insecure and by


food insecurity experience: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

141

F.12

Percentage of food insecure households by coping


mechanisms: Philippines, 2011

142

G.1

Percent of households participating in various government


health services and nutrition-related programs: Philippines,
2011

143

G.2

Percent of households participating in Botika ng Barangay


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

144

G.3

Percent of households participating in Botika ng Barangay


Program by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

145

G.4

Comparison of households participating in Botika ng


Barangay Program by region: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

145

G.5

Percent of households participating in Free Medical


Services by region: Philippines, 2011

146

G.6

Percent of households participating in Free Medical


Services by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

147

Facts and Figures, 2011

insecure

insecure

Page No.

adults

children

by

xxi

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

G.7

Percent of households participating in Free Dental Services


by region: Philippines, 2011

148

G.8

Percent of households participating in Free Dental Services


by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

148

G.9

Percent of households participating in Philhealth by region:


Philippines, 2011

149

G.10

Percent of households participating in Philhealth by region


with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

150

G.11

Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

151

G.12

Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen


Program by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

151

G.13

Percent of households participating in Nutrition Education


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

152

G.14

Percent of households participating in Nutrition Education


Program by region with 95% confidence interval :
Philippines, 2011

153

G.15

Comparison of households participating in Nutrition


Education Program by region: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

153

G.16

Percent of households participating in Vegetable


Gardening Program by region: Philippines, 2011

154

G.17

Percent of households participating in Vegetable


Gardening Program by region with 95% confidence
interval: Philippines, 2011

155

G.18

Percent of households who are aware of iodized salt by


region: Philippines, 2011

156

G.19

Percent of households who are aware of iodized salt by


region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

156

G.20

Percent users of iodized salt among the households by


region: Philippines, 2011

157

G.21

Percent users of iodized salt among the households by


region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

158

G.22

Trends in the awareness and usage of iodized salt among


households: Philippines, 1998-2011

158

G.23

Percent of household salts positive to potassium iodate


using the salt testing solution by region: Philippines, 2011

159

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xxii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure No.

Title

G.24

Percent of household salts positive to potassium iodate


using the salt testing solution by region with 95%
confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

160

G.25

Trends of household salts positive to potassium iodate


using the salt testing solution: Philippines, 2003-2011

160

G.26

Percentage distribution of household salts by level of iodine


content by region: Philippines, 2011

161

Facts and Figures, 2011

Page No.

xxiii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

LIST OF TABLES
Table No.

Title

Page No.

Distribution of enumeration areas, sample households and


individuals by region: Philippines, 2011

16

Age groupings of the WHO-Child Growth Standards for


infants and young children, (0-60 months) and WHO
Growth Reference 2007 for school-aged children and
adolescents (61-228 months) by index

18

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of


children, 0-10 years old (0-120 months), based on WHOCGS

18

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of


children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months), based on BMI-forage (WHO-CGS)

19

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of


children, 5.08-19.0 years old (61-228 months) based on
the 2007 WHO Growth Reference BMI-for-age

19

Cut-off points used in determining magnitude and severity


of underweight and stunted children under-five years old
(0 to <60 months), as public health problem (WHO, 1995)

19

Cut-off points used in determining magnitude and severity


of wasted children under-five years old (0 to <60 months),
as public health problem (WHO, 1995)

19

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of adults


and lactating mothers 19.0 years old and over (228
months) based on Body Mass Index (NCHS/WHO, 1978)

19

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of


pregnant women based on weight-for-height (Magbitang,
1988)

20

10

Cut-off points of waist circumference and waist-hip ratio by


sex

20

A.1

Percentage distribution of households by households size:


Philippines, 2011

31

A.2

Percentage distribution of households by


occupation of household head: Philippines, 2011

present

32

A.3

Percentage distribution of households by highest


educational attainment of household head: Philippines,
2011

33

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxiv

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table No.

Title

Page No.

A.4

Percentage distribution of households by type and


ownership of dwelling unit and lot: Philippines, 2011

33

A.5

Percentage distribution of households by main material


used for dwelling unit: Philippines, 2011

34

A.6

Percentage distribution of households by type of owned


appliances owned: Philippines, 2011

35

A.7

Percentage distribution of households by main source of


drinking water: Philippines, 2011

36

A.8

Percentage distribution of households by type of toilet


facility: Philippines,2011

36

A.9

Percentage distribution of households by type of garbage


disposal: Philippines, 2011

37

B.1

Mean birthweight of children, 0-3.9 years old by sex and


level of birthweight: Philippines, 2011

38

B.2

Mean (SE) height and weight of children 0-10 years-old (0120 months), by single age and by sex: Philippines, 2011

40

B.3

Mean weight and height of children 0-10 years-old (0-120


months): Philippines, 2005-2011

41

B.4

Prevalence of underweight children, 0-5 years old (0-60


months), by region: Philippines, 2008-2011

51

B.5

Prevalence of underweight children, 5.08-10 years old (61120 months), by region: Philippines, 2008-2011

51

B.6

Prevalence of stunted children, 0-5 years old (0-60


months), by region: Philippines, 2008-2011

52

B.7

Prevalence of stunted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120


months), by region: Philippines, 2008-2011

52

B.8

Prevalence of wasted children, 0-5 years old (0-60


months), by region: Philippines, 2008-2011

53

B.9

Prevalence of wasted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120


months), by region: Philippines, 2008-2011

53

B.10

Mean waist circumferences (WC) and percent distribution


of WC among adults 20 years and over by sex and by age
group: Philippines, 2011

69

B.11

Mean waist to hip ratio (WHR) and percent distribution of


WHR among adults 20 years and over by sex and age
group: Philippines, 2011

72

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxv

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table No.

Title

Page No.

C.1

Prelacteal feed given to children 0-23 months: Philippines,


2011

87

C.2

Reasons why prelacteal feed was given to children 0-23


months: Philippines, 2011

87

C.3

Reason why the first introductory food was given among


children 0-23 months: Philippines, 2011

90

F.1

The Radimer-Cornell food insecurity items and response


categories

127

F.2

Percentage of food insecure household based on the


Radimer-Cornell food insecurity items and frequency of
experience during the past 3 months before the survey:
Philippines, 2011

128

F.3

Percent of households who experienced food insecurity by


region: Philippines, 2011

129

F.4

Percentage of food insecure mothers/ caregivers and


children, and frequency of experience during the past 3
months before the survey: Philippines, 2011

133

F.5

Percent of food insecure adults and children by region:


Philippines, 2011

134

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxvi

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

LIST OF STATISTICAL ANNEXES


Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

A.1

Percentage distribution of households by household size


and by region: Philippines, 2011

172

A.2

Percentage distribution of households by occupation of


household head and by region: Philippines, 2011

173

A.3

Percentage distribution of households by education of


household head and by region: Philippines, 2011

175

A.4

Percentage distribution of households by type of owned


appliances and by region: Philippines, 2011

176

A.5

Percentage distribution of households by main sources


of drinking water and by region: Philippines, 2011

178

A.6

Percentage distribution of households by type of toilet


facility and by region: Philippines, 2011

180

A.7

Percentage distribution of households by type of


garbage disposal and by region: Philippines, 2011

181

A.8

Percentage distribution of households by garbage


segregation and by region: Philippines, 2011

182

B.1

Percentage distribution, mean, and median weight-forage z-scores of children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by
sex, age group: Philippines, 2011

183

B.2

Estimates of the proportion of underweight among


children, 0-5.0 year-old (0-60 months), using WHO-CGS
weight-for-age, standard error, confidence interval, and
coefficient of variation by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

184

B.3

Percentage distribution, mean, and median weight-forage z-scores of children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120
months) by sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011

187

B.4

Estimates of the proportion of underweight, among


children, 5.08-10.0 years old (61-120 months), using
WHO-Growth Reference weight-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011

188

B.5

Percentage distribution, mean, and median height-forage z-scores of children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by
sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011

191

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxvii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

B.6

Estimates of the proportion of stunted among children, 05.0 year-old (0-60 months), using WHO-CGS height-forage, standard error, confidence interval, and coefficient
of variation by region and province: Philippines, 2011

192

B.7

Percentage distribution, mean and median height-forage z-scores of children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120
months) by sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011

195

B.8

Estimates of proportion of underheight among children,


5.08-10.0 years old (61-120 months), using WHOGrowth Reference height-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011

196

B.9

Percentage distribution, mean, and median weight-forheight z-scores of children 0-5 years old (0-60 months)
by sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011

199

B.10

Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


0-5.0 years old (0-60 months), using WHO-CGS weightfor-height, standard error, confidence interval, and
coefficient of variation by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

200

B.11

Percentage distribution, mean, and median BMI-age-for


z-scores of children 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011

203

B.12

Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


0-5 years old (0-60 months) using WHO-Growth BMI-forage, standard error, confidence interval, and coefficient
of variation by region and province: Philippines, 2011

204

B.13

Percentage distribution, mean and median BMI-for-age


z-scores of children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months)
by sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011

207

B.14

Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


5.08-10.0 years old (61-120 months), using WHOGrowth Reference BMI-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011

208

B.15

Percentage distribution, mean height-for-age z-scores of


children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011

211

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxviii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

B.16

Estimates of the proportion of stunted among children,


10.08-19.0 years old (121-228 months), using WHOGrowth Reference height-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011

212

B.17

Percentage distribution, mean BMI-for-age z-scores of


children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011

215

B.18

Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


10.08-19.0 years old (121-228 months), using WHOGrowth Reference BMI-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011

216

B.19

Percentage distribution, mean BMI and 95% CI of adults,


19.08 years old and over (229 months) by sex, and age
group; and by WHO BMI classification: Philippines, 2011

219

B.20

Estimates of the proportion of chronically energy


deficient (CED) adults 20 years old, using Body Mass
Index, standard error, confidence interval, and coefficient
of variation by region and province: Philippines, 2011

220

B.21

Percentage distribution of pregnant women by age group


and weight-for-height classification: Philippines, 2011

223

B.22

Estimates of the proportion of nutritionally at-risk among


pregnant women using weight-for-height, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region:
Philippines, 2011

224

B.23

Percent distribution of lactating mothers by age group


and region, and by nutritional status classification using
BMI-for-age and BMI for Adults Philippines, 2011

225

B.24

Estimates of the proportion of underweight among


lactating mothers, using Body Mass Index, standard
error, confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by
region: Philippines, 2011

226

C.1

Current feeding practice of children 0-23 months by age


group: Philippines, 2011

227

C.2

Percentage of exclusively breastfed children 0-5 months


by age group: Philippines, 2011

227

C.3

Percentage of exclusively breastfed children 0-5 months


by region: Philippines, 2011

228

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxix

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

C.4

Percentage of predominantly breastfed children 0-5


months by age group: Philippines, 2011

228

C.5

Percentage of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding immediately after delivery by region:
Philippines, 2011

229

C.6

Percentage of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding less than the day after delivery by region:
Philippines, 2011

230

C.7

Percentage of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding more than one day after delivery by
region: Philippines, 2011

230

C.8

Percentage of children 0-23 months given prelacteal


feeds by region: Philippines, 2011

231

C.9

Percentage of children with continued breastfeeding for


1 year by region: Philippines, 2011

231

C.10

Percentage of children with continued breastfeeding for


2 years by region: Philippines, 2011

232

C.11

Percentage of ever breastfed children 0-23 months by


region: Philippines, 2011

233

C.12

Percentage of age-appropriately breastfed children 0-23


months by region: Philippines, 2011

233

C.13

Percentage of bottle-fed children 0-23 months by age


group: Philippines, 2011

234

C.14

Percentage of bottle-fed children 0-23 months and by


region: Philippines, 2011

234

C.15

Reasons for exclusive breastfeeding among children 023 months: Philippines, 2011

235

C.16

Reasons for continued breastfeeding among children 023 months: Philippines, 2011

236

C.17

Reasons for stopping breastfeeding: Philippines, 2011

236

D.1

Percent participation of children 1-5 years old in Vitamin


A Supplementation by region and province: Philippines,
2011

237

D.2

Percent participation of children 3-5 years old in


Supplementary Feeding Program by region and
province: Philippines, 2011

239

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxx

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

D.3

Percent participation of children 1-5 years old in


Deworming Program by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

241

D.4

Percent participation of children 0-5 years old in


Operation Timbang Plus Program by region and
province: Philippines, 2011

244

D.5

Percent participation of children 0-2 years old in Growth


Monitoring Program (GM) by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

246

D.6

Percent participation of children 3-5 years old Orally-Fit


Child Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011

248

D.7

Percent participation of children 3-5 years old in Day


Care Center Program by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

250

D.8

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash


their hands before meals by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

253

D.9

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash


their hands after meals by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

255

D.10

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash


their hands after toilet use by region and province:
Philippines, 2011

257

D.11

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always brush


their teeth by region and province: Philippines, 2011

259

D.12

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, with dental caries by


region and province: Philippines, 2011

262

E.1

Nutritional status of mothers with children 0-5 years old,


by socio- demographic characteristics: Philippines, 2011

265

E.2

Percentage of underweight mothers with children 0-5


years old, by socio-demographic characteristics and by
region: Philippines, 2011 (n=1,095)

266

E.3

Percentage of overweight/obese mothers with 0-5 years


old children, by socio-demographic characteristics and
region: Philippines, 2011 (n=3,701)

267

E.4

Percentage of mothers who took supplements during


pregnancy with the youngest child by region: Philippines,
2011

268

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxxi

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

E.5

Percentage of mothers by type of supplements taken


during pregnancy with the youngest child by region:
Philippines, 2011

268

E.6

Awareness on nutritional disorders among mothers by


region: Philippines, 2011

270

E.7

Knowledge
on
proper
duration
of
exclusive
breastfeeding among mothers by region: Philippines,
2011

273

E.8

Knowledge on the timing of introducing complementary


food among mothers by region: Philippines, 2011

274

E.9

Mothers hand washing practices among mothers by


region: Philippines, 2011

274

F.1

Percent of food insecure households by region and by


province: Philippines, 2011

278

F.2

Percent of food insecure mothers by region and by


province: Philippines, 2011

280

F.3

Percent of food insecure children by region and by


province: Philippines, 2011

282

G.1

Percent of households participating in Botika ng


Barangay Program by region and province: Philippines,
2011

284

G.2

Percent of households participating in Free Medical


Services by region and province: Philippines, 2011

286

G.3

Percent of households participating in Free Dental


Services by region and province: Philippines, 2011

288

G.4

Percent of households participating in Free Philhealth


Care by region and province: Philippines, 2011

290

G.5

Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen


Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011

293

G.6

Percent of households participating in Nutrition


Education Program by region and province: Philippines,
2011

295

G.7

Percent of households participating in Vegetable


Gardening Program by region and province: Philippines,
2011

297

G.8

Result of iodized salt survey: Philippines, 2011

300

G.9

Percent awareness on iodized salt among the


households by region and province: Philippines, 2011

302

Facts and Figures, 2011

xxxii

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table No.

Title

Page No.

G.10

Percent users of iodized salt among the households by


region and province: Philippines, 2011

304

G.11

Percent of households salt positive to potassium iodate


using the salt testing solution by region and province:
Philippines 2011

306

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As the nations premier research and development institute in food and nutrition and
true to its mission to provide accurate and timely data, the Food and Nutrition
Research Institute, Department of Science and Technology (FNRI-DOST) have
undertaken the fifth of a series of Updating Surveys entitled 2011 Updating of the
Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and Other Population Groups from June
to December 2011. The Updating Survey along with the National Nutrition Surveys
are designated statistical activities that generate critical data on food, nutrition and
health status of the population for decision making of both the government and
private sector (EO 352). This mandate was given in due recognition to the wealth of
relevant information generated from the nationwide nutrition surveys which FNRI
regularly undertakes in adherence to its first mandate (EO 128) to undertake
research that defines the citizenrys nutritional status with reference particularly to
malnutrition problem, its causes and effects, and identify alternative solutions.
Since 1978 and five years thereafter, the Institute conducts the NNS, and the
Updating Survey as follow-up survey in between the NNS. The NNS and the
Updating Survey continue to evolve by integrating other relevant nutrition and health
variables to meet the growing needs of its stakeholders and in response to the new
and emerging health/nutrition problems.
Results of these nutrition surveys particularly the prevalence of underweight among
the under fives and the proportion of population below minimum level of dietary
energy requirements are used to track the countrys progress towards its
achievement of the first target of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals
(MDG) which is extreme poverty and hunger. Furthermore, results indirectly provide
vital information on other targets of the MDGs such as child mortality and
improvement of maternal health. Likewise, data continue to provide important
statistics in non-communicable diseases and risk factors, and micronutrient
malnutrition (MDGs plus). These data are vital inputs in designing
strategies/approaches in curtailing the health and economic consequences of
nutrition/lifestyle-related diseases as well as curbing micronutrient deficiencies in the
country.
Responsive to the growing need for other relevant nutrition data and in recognition of
the important role of maternal nutrition on childrens nutritional status, specifically,
the first 1,000 days, the 2011 Updating Survey included a module on Maternal
Nutrition along with the original modules on Anthropometry, Infant and Young Child
Feeding Practices, Government Program Participation of Households and Children,
Food Insecurity and Socio-Economics. The 2003 Master Sample of the National
Statistics Office (NSO) which is a multi-stage stratified sampling design was used in
the household selection. A total of 3,136 enumeration or survey areas, 38,894
households and 198,022 individuals from the 17 regions and 79 provinces in the
country including NCR were covered.

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

The primary objective of the 2011 Updating of Nutritional Status is to provide a


continuing flow of updated information on the nutritional status of Filipino children and
other population groups, as well as other nutrition related information. Specifically, it
aimed to: 1) determine the nutritional status of children 0-10 years old and other
population groups using standard techniques; 2) determine changes in feeding
practices of infants and young children, 0-23 months old; 3) determine maternal
nutrition among mothers with children 0-5 years old, as well as pregnant women and
lactating mothers; 4) determine participation of households and children in nutrition
and nutrition-related government programs; 5) determine food insecurity among
households, adults and children; and 5) determine household awareness and usage
of iodized salt.
The 2011 Survey consisted of six components/modules namely: 1) Anthropometric;
2) Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices; 3) Maternal Nutrition; 4) Government
Program Participation; 5) Food Insecurity; and 6) Socio-Economic. For each module,
descriptive statistics were generated and these modules when analyzed collectively
provides a holistic picture of the nutrition situation in the country as well as its
determinants. This report presents the descriptive results of all survey components.
The problem of undernutrition among Filipino children 0-10 years old and other
population groups including the pregnant women and lactating mothers remained
unchanged for nearly 2 decades. Among children 0-5 years, more children were
stunted than underweight, although the prevalence of both forms of undernutrition
was still prevalent at high level. Wasting was serious. Stunting denotes chronic
undernutrition while wasting is a manifestation of acute undernutrition. For children 610 years old, stunting remained at high level, but the magnitude of underweight was
very high (prevelance > 30.0%). Overweight on the other hand, for both groups of
children was low, but is slowly and continuously increasing over the years.
Disaggregating by age, both prevalence of underweight and stunting were increasing
with age with the increase glaringly notable after the 5 th month of life and continued
until the 3rd year. For underweight, the increases across age groups were almost
equal, however, the prevalence of stunting increase more than 2 times on the first
year of life from the 6-11 months. Among the 1-3 years old, the prevalence of
stunting was at very high level (prevalence > 30.0%). The effect of stunting is
irreversible where poor intellectual development and work/economic productivity is
one of the serious repercussions.
Among adolescents, stunting was a problem of 1/3 of the population and remained
unchanged since 2003. Of the adult population (20 years old and above),
overnutrition more than under nutrition was the problem. Chronic energy deficiency
(CED) is indicative of undernutrition among adults and result shows that the
prevalence of CED adults is lower by more than half compared with the prevalence of
overweight and obese adults. Furthermore, prevalence of overweight and obese
adults is continuously increasing since 1993 while prevalence of undernutrition is
inversely declining. Results likewise revealed that CED is common among adults

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

below 20 years old and 70 years old and above. Conversely, overweight and obesity
were increasing with age and highest among the 30 to 69 years old.
Obesity based on waist circumference and waist-hip ratio was more pronounced
among females than males and highest among female 40 years and above. More
than half of female adults 30 years old and above had high waist-to-hip ratio
indicating that women in these age groups have wider hipline than waistline
suggestive of android obesity type. Obesity is a serious public health problem as it
increases risk of individuals to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) which is
emerging and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the country.
For pregnant women, 25% were at risk of delivering low birth weight babies and other
pregnancy complications because they are not gaining the desired weight relative to
gestational age. This state of undernutrition was highest among pregnant women
who were still in their teen years (below 20 years old). Among lactating mothers,
overweight was more of a problem than underweight among mothers 20 years old
and above.
For the component module on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices the
WHO and UNICEF global indicators were used. A total of 6,653 children under two
years of age were covered where almost half (48.7%) of children were 12-23 months
old, 27.4% were 6-11 months and 24% were 0-5 months. Results showed positive
gains in breastfeeding practices based on increased proportion of children 0-5
months old currently being exclusively breastfeed (46.7%) and longer duration of
exclusive breastfeeding (3.7 months) and ever breastfeeding (7.7 months) compared
with the previous survey.
Moreover, there is an indication that the type and place of delivery, as well as the
timing of initiation to breastfeeding are factors affecting exclusive breastfeeding.
Results revealed that there was higher proportion of children currently exclusive
breastfeeding among children delivered normally, those delivered in governmentowned health facilities and those initiated to breastfeeding following the prescribed 1
hour after delivery than those delivered by caesarian section, those delivered in nongovernment health facilities and those not immediately initiated to breastfeeding after
delivery.
The reasons cited by mothers for stopping breastfeeding were inadequate milk flow
(32.4%) and have to work (20.3%), while the reason for giving prelacteal feed was no
milk flow (62.2%) for the first few days after delivery. On the choice of what is the first
food given to children, mothers identified popularity of the baby food/product (32.3%)
and convenience (15.2%) as reasons for choosing the first introductory food.
In terms of complementary foods, the dietary diversity score was used to determine
diversity and quality of diet. Results showed that foods given to almost all children 611 months was not diverse, and only 26.1% of the 12-17 months and 33.4% of the
18-23 months were meeting the recommended minimum dietary diversity score of 4
food groups and minimum acceptable diet.

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

For nutritional status of mothers with children 0-5 years old, underweight mothers
were noted in the 20-29 years age bracket (12.0%), those without formal schooling
(13.5%) and not working (10.0%) at the time of the Survey. Furthermore, increasing
number of children consequently increases the proportion of underweight mothers.
Moreover, mothers who are underweight or chronically energy deficient (CED) are
more likely to deliver low birth-weight babies than mothers who are not CED.
In terms of nutrition knowledge, mothers are familiar or aware of nutrition and health
related disorders like anemia, iodine deficiency disorders or goiter, hypertension and
Diabetes Mellitus among others. However, lower proportions lack the appropriate
knowledge on appropriate feeding of infants and children in order to achieve optimum
nutrition of children early in life. Results revealed that only 31.1% and 26.5% of
mothers were knowledgeable on the first 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding and
introduction of complementary foods on the 6 th month respectively.
On access/coverage of health services/nutrition programs implemented by
government, high coverage of pre-school children 0-48 months in Expanded Program
of Immunization was noted. Likewise, participation in deworming program was low as
only 66.3% of the target children 1-5 years old were dewormed. This is contrary to
the mass deworming guidelines of the program. The Essential Health Care Program
of DepEd such as hand washing is remarkably practiced by school age children 6-12
years old except for regular tooth brushing.
Free Medical Services and having discount cards under the Senior Citizen Program
among households with 60 years old members were availed by more than 60% of
sample households. Household awareness of iodized salts remained unchanged,
usage however sharply increased. About 80% of household salts were tested to be
iodized as these salts changed in color, from white to pink/violet, when tested with
the MBI Rapid Test kit. Of these salts, 54.5% had an iodine content of more than 15
parts per million (ppm).
To re-assess food insecurity in the country, the 10 Radimer-Cornell food insecurity
items/statements was used. Four of the items/statements were used to assess
household food insecurity and a set of three was used to assess individual food
insecurity based on the experience of the household respondent and children.
Of the 21,484 households with children 0-10 years old covered in the survey, 69.3%,
36.0% and 22.9% were food insecure households, adults and children, respectively.
The most common experience of food insecure adults and children was skipped
eating or missed meals.
Across regions, ARMM significantly had the highest percentage of food insecure
households, adults and children. Among provinces, the top 5 with highest percentage
of food insecure households were Lanao del Sur, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi and Maguindanao.
The same provinces had likewise highest percentage of food insecure adults and
children.

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Recognizing the importance of the first 1000 days of life as a window of opportunity
to arrest undernutrition and improve childrens present and future nutrition/health
status and economic productivity respectively, it is imperative to focus policy/program
in improving maternal health and nutrition to break the vicious inter-generation cycle
of undernutrition. The services under Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition
(MCHN) like pre-and post-natal care and supplementation should be intensified at
the local level.
The poor knowledge of mothers on appropriate infant feeding particularly exclusive
breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life and introduction of appropriate
complementary foods on the 6th months is potential area for intervention to intensify
during nutrition education in mothers class, mass media and through school
curriculum to prepare and capacitate future mothers and fathers with the right
knowledge on breastfeeding and role and support to breastfeeding, respectively.

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Background
The Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Department of Science and Technology
(FNRI-DOST) is the premier R and D agency in food and nutrition in the country.
Through EO 128, the Institute is mandated to conduct researches that define the
nutritional status of the citizenry, its causes and effects, and based on the results,
identify alternative solutions to it. Along with this mandate, one of the major thrusts of
FNRI is the regular conduct of the National Nutrition Survey (NNS) every five years
and the Updating Survey in-between the NNS. The first NNS was undertaken in
1978.
With the wealth of relevant information generated from the surveys, in July 1996, the
nutrition surveys was designated as one of the statistical activities in the country that
will generate critical data for decision making of both government and private sector
at the national and sub-national levels.
The 2011 Updating of Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and other Population
Groups is the fifth in a series of updating surveys that was started twenty years ago,
the first being done in 1989-90. The Survey was undertaken for six (6) months, from
June to December 2011, by courageous and dedicated men and women of the
Institute. Like its predecessor, all regions and provinces in the country were covered
with the exception of Batanes because during the time of data collection, the weather
condition in the northern part of the country was unpredictable.
In response to the growing need for other relevant nutrition data, the 2011 Updating
Survey included a module on Maternal Nutrition along with the original modules on
Anthropometry, Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices, Government Program
Participation of Households and Children, Household Food Insecurity and SocioEconomics. The 2003 Master Sample of the National Statistics Office (NSO) which is
a stratified multi-stage sampling in design was used.
The data and information gathered from the survey is used as a basis for monitoring
progress of various nutrition intervention as well as development programs such as
Poverty Alleviation Programs, Food Security, infant feeding and the reformulation of
the Medium Term Philippine Plan of Action for Nutrition (MTPPAN) to name the most
important ones. The results on the nutritional status of children under five years old
is used to monitor the countrys progress to its commitment to the United Nations
Millennium Development Goals target of reducing extreme poverty and hunger in
2015.
To improve the timely delivery of survey results at the national down to the provincial
level, the 2011 Updating Survey developed and used a web-based Data Entry
System, where data encoding was done after field data collection and editing of
accomplished survey questionnaires. The encoded data were immediately
transmitted electronically from the field to the central office where it was validated
against the questionnaires and check for consistency.

Facts and Figures, 2011

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

This breakthrough in data collection system facilitated the early release of survey
results to various stakeholders at the national and sub-national levels. In April, 2012,
three (3) months after the culmination of the Survey, the first Nutrition Summit
showcasing the nutritional status of children 0-10 years old, infant and young child
feeding practices and participation of children to nutrition and related programs in the
country was presented. Then, the series of Regional Disseminations followed in all
regions of the country including the National Capital Region. In these fora, all the
major variables disaggregated at the regional and provincial level were presented to
the regional/provincial nutrition/health and development planners and managers.
After the presentation, the participants in a workshop, developed and/or revised their
regional development plans based on the results presented.
Another milestone of the 2011 Updating Survey is the publication of the 2011
Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures within a year after the Survey where the full
details of the Survey as well as all results are documented. One of the strengths of
the 2011 Nutrition Facts and Figures is the generation of the provincial disaggregated
data of major nutrition variables. An offspring of this 2011 Facts and Figures is the
Philippine Regional Nutrition Facts and Figures where a holistic snapshot of the
region and its provinces in terms of nutrition, food and health situation are presented
using the combined results of the 2011 Updating Survey and the 7 th National
Nutrition Survey, 2008. The objective of this endeavour is to make survey results
relevant to local level planning.
The Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2011, presents the descriptive analysis of
all major variable collected in the Survey cutting across all components/modules.

Objectives of the Survey


The 2011 Updating Survey of Filipino Children and Other Population Groups aimed
to provide a continuing flow of updated information on the nutritional status of Filipino
children and other population groups, as well as other nutrition related information.
Specifically it aimed:
1. To determine the nutritional status of 0-10.0 years old children, 10.08-19.0
years old children,19.08 years old adults and over, pregnant women and
lactating mothers using standard techniques;
2. To determine changes in feeding practices of infants and young children, 0-23
months old;
3. To determine maternal nutrition among mothers with children 0-5 years old,
as well as pregnant women and lactating mothers;
4. To determine household and children participation in nutrition and nutritionrelated government programs;
5. To determine the magnitude of food insecurity among households, adults and
children; and
6. To determine household awareness and usage of iodized salt.

Facts and Figures, 2011

10

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Survey Components/Modules
The 2011 Updating Survey consisted of different components/modules, namely:
A. Anthropometric Component/Module contains the weight and height
measurements of all members of the households as well as the
measurements of waist and hip circumferences of adults members (20 years
old and above) to determine prevalence of underweight, stunting, wasting and
overweight among children 0-10 years old and prevalence of chronic energy
deficiency (CED), overweight and obesity among adults, respectively. The
prevalence of nutritionally at-risk pregnant women is also determined.
B. Infant and Young Child Feeding Component/Module contains
information on the current infant and young child feeding practices of Filipino
mothers for their children 0-23 months old. This module also contains
checklists of foods consumed by the subjects during the past day and the
type of food consumed and diet diversity.
C. Maternal Nutrition Component/Module - contains information regarding the
socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics of Filipino mothers with
0-5 years old children and health seeking behavior of mothers during
pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum.
D. Government Program Participation Component/Module includes
information on participation/access to government health and related
programs of sample households, children, pregnant women and lactating
mothers.
E. Food Insecurity Component/Module includes gathers data on food
insecurity at household and individual levels and coping mechanisms and
strategies adopted by households in times of limited food and money to buy
food.
F.

Socio-Economic Component/Module collects socio-economic and


demographic characteristics of households and members.

Facts and Figures, 2011

11

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

CHAPTER II

METHODOLOGY

Facts and Figures, 2011

13

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Sampling Design
The 2011 Updating Survey adopted the 2003 Master Sample (MS) of the National
Statistics Office (NSO), wherein four (4) replicates of the 2004 Labor Force Survey
was utilized. The master sample is a stratified multi-stage sampling design, covering
all regions and provinces of the country. The first stage of sampling is the selection of
Primary Sampling Units (PSUs), where a PSU is defined as a barangay (village) or
contiguous barangays with at least 500 households. This is then followed by the
selection of Enumeration Areas (EA) from the PSUs. An EA is a contiguous area in a
barangay or a barangay with 150-200 households. The ultimate sampling unit is the
household (Barcenas, 2004).
The 2011 Updating Survey used the list of sampled households from the four
replicates of the 2004 Labor Force Survey. A replicate is defined as a sub-sample
that possesses the properties of the full master sample, such that each replicate can
generate national level estimates with adequate precision. The survey covered all of
the four replicates and 100% of the sampled households, allowing the generation of
provincial estimates of major nutrition variables. Figure 1 shows the process of
selection of the master sample.
While the household is the final-stage sampling unit, all members of each sample
household were included in the Survey for parameters that needs to be analyzed at
the individual level. Post-stratification by age and sex was done to provide estimates
of malnutrition prevalence for various population groups.

SAMPLING DESIGN
REGION

1st Stage

2nd Stage

All Regions
All Provinces

PRIMARY
SAMPLING UNIT

One barangay or a
contiguous barangay
with at least 500
households

ENUMERATION
AREAS

One barangay or a
contiguous area in a
barangay with 150-200
households

3rd Stage

Sample households
& all members of
each sample HH

Figure 1.

Multi-stage stratified sampling design

Facts and Figures, 2011

15

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Survey Coverage
The 2011 Updating of Nutritional Status and Other Population Groups covered all 17
regions of the country and its 79 provinces including the National Capital Region
(NCR). Table 1 shows the survey coverage in terms of enumeration areas,
households and individuals.

Table 1.

Distribution of enumeration areas, sample


individuals by region: Philippines, 2011
Region

Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Enumeration
Areas

Sample
Households

3,136
148
131
110
234
122
299
127
156
190
185
140
140
150
163
153
560
128

38,894
2,239
1,961
1,517
2,994
1,584
3,702
1,694
2,293
2,657
2,634
2,212
1,595
1,903
1,861
1,976
4,350
1,722

households,

and

Number of
Individuals
198,022
11,024
9,329
9,698
15,386
8,351
18,549
8,461
12,398
13,417
13,177
11,597
8,345
9,960
9,175
10,168
20,076
8,911

Survey Methods
The 2011 Updating of Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and Other Population
Groups Survey employed various methods in collecting data/information that
included anthropometric measurements of weight, height, and waist and hip
circumference using prescribed techniques of household members. Other information
were collected through face-to-face interview by trained Researchers in households
homes using structured questionnaires. Secondary data like birthweights and
immunization on childrens birth certificates, ECCD cards, baby books and other
records were utilized to validate respondents answers on these information.
Actual salt testing was also done during the Survey to determine whether salts used
by households are iodized or not using the MBI Rapid Test kit provided by DOH.

Facts and Figures, 2011

16

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

A.

Anthropometric Measurements

Weight and height/recumbent length of all members of the sample households were
measured by trained anthropometric Researchers using standard techniques (Jelliffe,
1966). Standing height of subjects two (2) years and above was taken using the
microtoise and recumbent length for those less than two years old was measured
using an infantometer, a wooden length board. Height/length was recorded to the
nearest 0.1 cm.
The platform beam balance weighing scale (Detecto brand) with 160-kilogram
capacity was used to take the weights of all household members. Children below 2
years old and are not able to stand independently were weighed together with their
mothers/caregivers. Then the weight of the mother without the child was taken and
subtracted to the combined weight of mother and child. Weight was recorded to the
nearest 0.1 kilogram.
Two (2) measurements were taken from each subject. In the analysis, the average of
the readings was considered.
Age was determined from birth records or similar documents. If not, age was
obtained through verbal information or recollection from reliable sources (mother or
primary caregiver/birth attendants or hilots). If only the birth year was reported, the
day and month of the survey period was used as the birth month and day.
Assessment of nutritional status. The World Health Organizations Child Growth
Standard (WHO-CGS) was used to assess nutritional status of children, based on the
weight and height measurements of children 0-5.0 years old (0-60 months) while the
WHO Growth Reference 2007 was used for children 5.08-19.0 years old (61-228
months). The softwares used for data analysis were the WHO Anthro 3.3.2 for

Facts and Figures, 2011

17

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

children 0-60 months and the WHO Anthro Plus 1.0.3 for children 61-228 months.
Table 2 shows the anthropometric indices used to assess nutritional status of
children and age groupings under the WHO-CGS and WHO Growth Reference 2007.
The cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of children 0 to 19.0 years old
(0-228 months) based on WHO-CGS are shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5.
To determine the magnitude and severity of underweight, stunting and wasting as a
public health problem in each population group, the cut-off points for children underfive years old (WHO, 1995) in Table 6 and 7 were used.
Body mass index (NCHS/WHO, 1978) was used for adults and lactating mothers. For
pregnant women, the Philippine reference (Magbitang, et al. 1988) was used as
criteria. Cut-off points used in the said population groups are shown in Tables 8 and
9.
Table 2. Age groupings of the WHO-Child Growth Standards for infants and young
children (0-60 months) and WHO Growth Reference 2007 for school-aged
children and adolescents (61-228 months) by index
WHO Child Growth
WHO Growth Reference
Indicators
Standards
2007
Weight-for-age
0-60 months (0-5.0y)
61-120 months
(5 y & 1mo-10.0y)
Length/Height-for-age
0-60 months (0-5.0y)
61-228 months
(5y & 1mo-19.0y)
Weight-for-length/height 0-60 months (0-5.0y)
None
BMI-for age

Table 3.

0-60 months (0-5.0y)

61-228 months
(5y & 1mo-19.0y)

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of children, 0-10 years


old (0-120 months), based on WHO-CGS
Indicator/Nutritional Status

Cut-off Points

Weight-for-age
Underweight
Normal
Overweight/Above Normal

<-2SD
-2SD to +2SD
>2SD

Length/Height-for-age*
Underheight/Stunting
Normal
Above average/tall

<-2SD
-2SD to +2SD
>2SD

Weight-for-length/height**
Thin/Wasting
Normal
Overweight
NEC

<-2SD
-2SD to +2SD
>2SD
***

*Use only for children 10 years & 1 month to 19.0 y (121-228 months)
**Use only for children 0-5 years (0-60 months)
***NEC Not Elsewhere Classified those whose heights are beyond the limits of the
weight-for-height tables

Facts and Figures, 2011

18

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table 4.

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of children 0-5 years


old (0-60 months) based on BMI-for-age (WHO-CGS)
Nutritional Status

Cut-off Points

Severe wasting/thinness
Wasting/Thinness
Normal
Overweight
Obesity

Table 5.

<-3SD
<-2SD to -3SD
-2SD to +2SD
>+2SD to +3SD
>+3SD

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of children, 5.08-19.0 years


old (61-228 months) based on the 2007 WHO Growth Reference BMI-for-age
Nutritional Status
Severe wasting/thinness
Wasting/thinness
Normal
Overweight
Obesity

Cut-off Points
<-3SD
<-2SD to -3SD
-2SD to +1SD
>+1SD (equivalent to BMI 25 kg/m2 at 19 yrs)
>+2SD (equivalent to BMI 30 kg/m2 at 19 yrs)

Table 6.

Cut-off points used in determining magnitude and severity of underweight


and stunted children under-five years old (0 to <60 months), as public health
problem (WHO, 1995)
Magnitude and
Prevalence Group
Prevalence Group for
Severity
for Underweight
Stunting
Low
<10%
<20%
Medium
10-19%
20-29%
High
20-29%
30-39%
Very
>30%
>40%
High

Table 7.

Cut-off points used in determining magnitude and severity of wasted


children under-five years old (0 to <60 months), as public health problem
(WHO, 1995)
Prevalence Group for
Magnitude and Severity
Wasting
Acceptable
<5%
Poor
5-9%
Serious
10-14%
Critical
15%

Table 8.

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of adults and


lactating mothers 19.0 years old and over (228 months) based on Body
Mass Index (NCHS/WHO, 1978)
Classification
Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED)
Normal
Overweight
Obesity

Facts and Figures, 2011

Cut-off Points
<18.5
18.5 to 24.99
25.0 to 29.99
<30.0

19

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table 9.

Cut-off points used in classifying nutritional status of pregnant


women based on weight-for-height (Magbitang, 1988)
Classification

Cut-off Points

Nutritionally at-risk

< P95

Not Nutritionally at-risk

P95

Waist and hip circumferences of household members 20 years old and above were
measured using fibreglass tape measure. Classification and cut-off points for waist
circumference (WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) are shown in Table10.

Table 10.

B.

Classification and cut-off points of waist circumference and


waist-hip ratio by sex
Waist
Sex
Classification
Waist-Hip Ratio
Circumference
Male
Low
<90
<0.9
Normal
90-101
0.9 to 0.99
High
102
1.0
Female
Low
<80
<0.8
Normal
80-87
0.8 to 0.84
High
88
0.85

Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices

Face-to-face interview was conducted using a structured questionnaire to gather


information on infant and young child feeding practices of mother/caregiver of all
infants and children below 2 years old (0-23 months). Information on childs food
intake and breast-milk duration, in a single 24-our food recall was also obtained.

Facts and Figures, 2011

20

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

C. Maternal Nutrition
Face to face interview was done to all the mothers with 0-5 year old children to
determine their nutritional and health status and identify health seeking
behaviours.

D. Government Program Participation of Households and Children


Face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire was conducted with an
adult member of the household as respondent. Questions asked were
households participation on nutrition-related programs such as Food Production,
Nutrition Education, and Iodized Salt; government assistance programs such as
Botika ng Bayan/Barangay, Senior Citizen Discount Card and Philhealth Care;
other programs/social services like free medical and dental services.

E. Food Insecurity
Face-to-face interview was done to assess food insecurity status of the
households, adults and children aged 0-19 years old using the Radimer-Cornell
food insecurity items. Food insecurity experiences were considered during the
past three (3) months from the date of the interview.

F. Socio-Economic
Face-to-face interview was conducted to collect information on households
socio-economic and demographic characteristics of household members.

G. Government Program Participation


Childrens participation to government programs include Growth Monitoring,
Operation Timbang, Supplementary Feeding, Orally Fit Child, Expanded Program
of Immunization, Newborn Screening, Deworming, and Vitamin A
Supplementation, the respondents were usually the mothers or caregivers.
Participation of pregnant women and lactating mothers to government programs
like tetanus toxoid immunization, nutrition counselling, breastfeeding promotion,
and micronutrient supplementation were also collected through face to face
interview.

H. Salt Testing
The MBI Rapid Test Kit (RTK) was used to check the presence of potassium
iodate in the salts used by households. Presence of iodine (in iodate form) is
indicated by a change of the salt samples color to violet or dark violet. No
change in color indicates that the sample is not iodized or iodine is in iodide form.

Facts and Figures, 2011

21

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Face to face interview

Salt testing

Survey Questionnaires/Forms
The 2011 Survey questionnaires consisted of 3 set, each set is composed of several
survey forms. The survey questionnaires/forms were pre-tested several times before
their finalization.
Set 1 - Household Information
Form 1.1 - Household Membership and Demographic Information
Form 1.2 - Household and Other Demographic Information
Form 1.3 - Government Program Participation and Home Food Production
Form 1.4 - Household Food Insecurity
Form 1.5 - Household Awareness and Usage of Iodized Salt
Set 2 - Individual
Form 2.1 - Anthropometric Measurement of All Household Members
Form 2.2 - Birthweight and Related Information of Children, 0-47 Months
Form 2.3 - Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices of Children, 0-23
Months
Form 2.4 - The 24- Hour Food Recall of Children 0-23 Months Old
Form 2.5 - Motor Development Assessment of Children, 4-23 Months Old
Form 2.6 - Government Program Participation of Children, 0-12 Years Old
Set 3 - Mothers and Pregnant Women
Form 3.1 - Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition (for all mothers with
children, 0-60 months)
Form 3.2 - Pregnant Women: Knowledge and Selected Practices

Facts and Figures, 2011

22

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Ethical Review
The protocol for the conduct of the 2011 Updating Survey was submitted to the FNRI
Institutional Ethics Review Committee (FNRI-IERC) for clearance. However, the
FNRI-IERC opined that the 2011 Updating Survey does not require ethical clearance
since its conduct is in line with the Institutes legal mandate to define nutritional status
of the Philippine population that will serve as basis for program planning and
intervention as embodied in E.O. 128.
Ethical principles such as protection of life, health, privacy and dignity of human
subjects along with the scientific integrity and outmost confidentiality of information
collected from the households/subjects were largely considered in the
implementation of the survey.

Preparatory Survey Activities


Prior to the actual field data collection, training and recruitment of field survey
personnel, conduct of pilot survey, organization of survey team and conduct of presurvey conferences with local officials of the survey areas were done. Other
preparatory activities included the preparation, finalization and reproduction of survey
questionnaires/forms, Manual of Operations, Manual of Instructions (MOI) as well as
the training modules and trainees hand-out. The team movement and survey
schedule for both the pre-survey conferences with local officials and actual field
survey were laid out and finalized.
Administrative requirements such as travel documents (Special Orders) and travel
itineraries, financial requirements and contracts of services were prepared and
submitted for approval.
The calibration of survey tools and equipments and other paraphernalia was also
done before actual field survey operations.
Training and Recruitment. Trainings of field personnel were conducted in FNRI for
eight (8) days by experienced personnel of the Nutritional Assessment and
Monitoring Division (NAMD). The trainings conducted in 5 batches, consisted of
lectures, actual demonstrations, quizzes, role playing, practical exercises and
reliability tests. It culminated with a field practicum to ensure that adequate skills and
knowledge gained during the training were appropriately applied and practiced during
actual field survey operations.

Pilot Survey. Prior to actual field data collection, a pilot survey was done in two
barangays in Cardona, Rizal. The pilot test was done to simulate the various
processes of actual data collection and to test the feasibility of the survey schedule
and team movement as well as the assigned load of Researchers in terms of number

Facts and Figures, 2011

23

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

of household coverage in a day/survey area. The pilot survey was done by newly
hired Researchers and was supervised and observed by NAMD field survey staff.
After the pilot survey, processing was done to discuss what needs to be improved
after which standardization of procedures/survey protocol were laid out and
formulated.

Survey Equipment. Before the survey commenced, all survey equipment, tools/
instruments used in field survey operations such as the platform beam balance
scales, the microtoise, infantometer, the fibreglass tape measure were calibrated at
the National Metrology Laboratory of the Industrial Technology Development Institute
(ITDI) of DOST. Regular checking and calibration of survey instruments and
equipment were done by the Researchers during the field data collection. Spare or
extra units of the survey equipment/tools were also brought by the survey teams, in
case of unavoidable damage and problems on site were encountered.

Pre-Survey Conferences
Pre-survey conferences or visits
primarily to coordinate with local
officials of the survey areas were done
before actual data collection. In these
visits, ocular inspection of the survey
areas was done to gather information
on the accessibility, mode of
transportation, peace and order
situation
and
other
pertinent
information. The local officials were
briefed with the survey objectives,
procedures
and
schedule,
and
arrangements were made with regards
to the hiring of local survey aides,
housing/accommodation of the survey team and transportation facilities. This
information is vital to the orderly and smooth, effective and efficient implementation
of the survey.

Actual Field Survey Operations and Coordination


The actual field data collection was undertaken from June to December 2011. A subteam, composed of a team leader and four members, usually stays in the survey
areas for 3-5 days for collecting all information in all survey modules/components
including the location of the households, anthropometric measurements and
interview.

Facts and Figures, 2011

24

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Location of Households/Informed Consent Form


On the first day of data collection in the survey area, the location of sample
households was undertaken by the Researchers and the local survey aides. In these
locations, household head/members were briefed by the surveys objectives,
procedures/methods used and the expected cooperation of the households. Then the
consent of the households respondents to voluntarily participate in the Survey was
elicited and formalized when informed consent form was signed by the household
respondents.

Field Editing and Encoding


After data collection, editing of
accomplished survey questionnaires was
undertaken by Researchers and the
Team
Leaders
to
check
for
completeness and consistency of
entries. After data editing, data was
encoded in laptops using the data entry
system developed by the Institute for the
Survey.

Data Entry System


Data were encoded using the Data
Entry
System
(DES)
in
notebooks/laptops. The DES is a webbased data entry system specifically
designed for the 2011 Updating Survey.
Validation checks were included in the
system to check incorrect codes/entries
encoded, double and inconsistent
entries
and
outliers.
After
the
completion of data encoding, data were
immediately transmitted electronically
from the survey areas to the central
office in Bicutan, Taguig City using broadbands.
The data received in the office was then printed and the printed outputs were
validated or checked against the accomplished survey questionnaires.

Facts and Figures, 2011

25

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Organization of Survey Teams


The field survey personnel were organized into five major survey teams. Each team
is headed by a Team Coordinator who is assisted by two Assistant Team
Coordinators. A team was composed of seven Sub-teams. Each Sub-team was
composed of a Team Leader and four Field Researchers. Figure 2 shows the
organizational structure of the 2011 Updating Survey.

Project Director
Project Leader /
Overall Head of Survey
Assistant
Project Leader

Team
Coordinator

Team
Coordinator

Team
Coordinator

Team
Coordinator

Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Assistant
Team
Coordinator

Team
Leaders
(4)

Team
Leaders
(4)

Team
Leaders
(4)

Team
Leaders
(4)

Team
Leaders
(4)

Team
Leaders
(3)

Team
Leaders
(4)

Team
Leaders
(3)

Team
Leaders
(3)

Team
Leaders
(3)

Figure 2. Organizational Structure of the 2011 Updating Survey

Data Processing and Statistical Analysis


In the central office, the printed output of
encoded data (called the proof list) was
checked
against
the
edited
survey
questionnaires. Two rounds of manual
validations were done, then machine
validation which is done by applying
descriptive statistics to each variable to check
errors and outliers. Errors or outliers found
were validated with the actual entries/answers
in the survey questionnaires. Errors in
responses/answers were excluded.

Facts and Figures, 2011

26

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Once data were cleaned, the different survey modules were merged to create one
master datafile. Another round of consistency checks was undertaken to ensure
consistent entries of variables.
Sampling weights were then applied in order to make the estimate generated reflects
more closely the actual distributions in the whole population.
SPSS version 15 and STATA version 7 were used for the statistical analysis.
Descriptive statistics like mean, medians, and percentage, range, and confidence
intervals were generated to describe the distribution of each variable. For the
coefficient of variation, the STATA software was utilized to take into account the
design effect in the Survey.

Dissemination of Results
In April 2012, three (3) months after the culmination of the data collection, the initial
results of the 2011 Survey was first
presented in a Nutrition Summit in
Dusit Thani, Makati City. In
attendance were representatives
from the national line agencies, nongovernment organizations as well
as international and development
partners.
In July 2012, the full results of the
Survey were presented during the
38th FNRI Seminar Series, an
annual activity of the Institute in
celebration of the Nutrition Month.

Then in September, FNRI in


partnership with DOST Regional
Offices and the National Nutrition
Council of the Department of
Health organized the post-survey
conferences/seminars
in
the
regions to disseminate the survey
results, showcasing the regional
and provincial results of the major
nutrition variables. These fora
served as venues to provide
updates of the nutritional status of
Filipino children and other population groups well as other nutrition related
information like infant feeding, maternal nutrition and households/children

Facts and Figures, 2011

27

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

participation or access to government


programs on nutrition and related programs.
Seventeen regional dissemination fora were
organized in all regions of the country
including the National Capital Region
(NCR).
Participants of these dissemination fora
included regional/provincial planners from all
sectors: policy, health, nutrition, agriculture,
labor and development planners/workers,
researchers, academe, media, nutrition
advocates other stakeholders.

Facts and Figures, 2011

28

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

CHAPTER III

RESULTS

Facts and Figures, 2011

29

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part A Characteristics of Households


This section describes the demographic profile and characteristics of households. A
household, refers to a person living alone or group of persons who may be related or
not and usually sleep in the same dwelling unit with common arrangement for food
preparation and consumption. The socio-economic variables are vital inputs in the
analysis of its relationships with the nutrition and health data. The information
generated is very useful in targeting and locating specific population groups who are
nutritionally-at-risk and vulnerable to socio-economic fluctuations and environmental
degradation. Data collected from the individual members of the household are the
following: household size, formal education completed, present occupation and place
of work. For the characteristics of the household, the following variables are also
collected: presence of electricity and functioning household appliances, sources of
drinking water, toilet facility, garbage disposal and practice on garbage segregation.

1. Household Size
Household size refers to actual number of regular members residing in the
household. Table A.1, shows that, at the time of the survey, the average household
size of all the households covered was 5. About 35.1% of the sample households
have 4-5 members. Around 5% of the households have more than 9 members.

Table A.1.

Percentage distribution of households by household size:


Philippines, 2011
Household Size

Number

Percent

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 & above

1858
3695
4956
6635
6813
5366
3779
2339
1449
2004

4.8
9.6
13.0
17.4
17.7
13.7
9.5
5.8
3.5
4.9

Mean Household Size

Facts and Figures, 2011

5.05

31

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

2. Occupation of Household Head


Table A.2 shows that 23.5% of the household heads were involved in agricultural
works such as farming, fishing, livestock/poultry raising and logging; followed by
unskilled workers, labourers, vendors and domestic helpers (19.6%) and skilled
workers/plant machine operator (17.4%). About 8% were government officials,
executives, managers and entrepreneurs, while about 9% declared not even
engaged in any gainful activity or have no occupation at all.

Table A.2. Percentage distribution of households by


occupation of household head: Philippines, 2011
Present Occupation
Farmers, Forestry Workers,
Fishermen, Livestock/Poultry
Laborers and Unskilled Workers,
Vendors, Domestic Helpers
Skilled Workers, Plant and Machine
Operators
No Occupation
Officials of Gov., Corp. Exec.,
Housekeeper
Service Workers, Shop/Market
Sales Workers
Pensioners
Professionals, Technicians, Clerks
Other Occupation Not Stated,
Special Occupations, Military
Incapacitated
Students

present

Percent
23.5
19.6
17.4
9.3
8.1
5.5
5.3
4.9
4.3
1.5
0.5
0.1

3. Education of Household Head


Assessing the highest educational attainment of the household heads about 40.7%
reached elementary level, while a little more than 30% reached high school and
about 21.8% reached college. Moreover, about 3% have no schooling at all (Table
A.3).

Facts and Figures, 2011

32

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table A.3.

Percentage distribution of households by highest


educational attainment of household head: Philippines, 2011
Highest Educational Attainment

Percent

No Schooling
Elementary
High School
College
Above College
Special Education
Arabic Schooling

2.7
40.7
34.1
21.8
0.4
0.2
0.2

4. Type and Ownership of Dwelling Unit and Lot


Most number of household head live in a single house (87.9) while less than 2 % was
living in makeshift, boat houses and others. Majority of the household owned their
house (77.6%) while 14.2% were living in their houses for free. Only 1.0% was
squatters. In terms of ownership of the lot, 47.0% was owned and 31.7% was free
(Table A.4).
Table A.4.

Percentage distribution of households by type and ownership of


dwelling unit and lot: Philippines, 2011
Characteristics
Type of Dwelling Unit
Single House
Apartment/Condominium
Duplex
Makeshift/Barong-barong
Commercial
Others
Ownership of Dwelling Unit
Own
Free
Rent
Squat
Others
Ownership of Lot
Own
Free
Rent
Squat
Others

Facts and Figures, 2011

Number

Percent

34,841
1,863
1,222
623
225
120

87.9
5.7
3.7
1.8
0.6
0.3

30,758
5,422
2,266
339
109

77.6
14.2
7.0
1.0
0.3

18,581
12,677
3,765
3,329
542

47.0
31.7
10.7
9.2
1.4

33

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

5. Main Material Used for Dwelling Unit of Household


Table A.5 shows the main material used for dwelling unit of households. Most of the
roofing materials of the dwelling units occupied by the households at the time of the
survey was iron sheets (82.5%) followed by natural materials (14.2%). Most wall
materials used were strong 47.9 while 37.2% use light materials such as wood,
bamboo and others. Plain cement (54.2%) was the most commonly used flooring
material followed by coco lumber/bamboo (13.2%).

Table A.5.

Percentage distribution of households by main material used for


dwelling unit: Philippines, 2011
Characteristics
Roofing Material
Iron Sheets
Natural Materials (nipa, coconut,
cogon)
Cement
Others
Tegula/Tisa
Salvaged (scrap materials)
Wall Material
Strong (cement, marble)
Light (wood, bamboo)
Combination of strong and light
Salvaged (scrap materials)
Others
Flooring Material
Plain Cement
Coco lumber/Bamboo
Wood planks
Ceramic tiles
Earth/Sand
Others
Marble
Vinyl or Asphalt strips
Parquet or Polished

Facts and Figures, 2011

Number

Percent

31,291
6,418

82.5
14.2

403
314
240
228

1.2
0.8
0.7
0.7

17,380
15,830
4,851
520
313

47.9
37.2
12.9
1.4
0.6

20,208
5,669
5,090
3,492
3,252
553
346
229
55

54.2
13.2
11.1
10.1
7.9
1.5
1.1
0.7
0.2

34

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

6. Ownership of Household Appliances


Appliances and other utilities owned by the households were television and
telephone/ cellphone found in 7 in every 10 households (Table A.6). About 6 in every
10 households have electric fan, while 4 in every 10 households have wall clock,
VCD/DVD player/component, radio and cassette recorder. Other appliances found in
3 in every 10 households include refrigerator, stove/range/microwave oven and
washing machine. Computer, camera/video camera, blender and other appliances
were likewise found in 1 in every 10 households.

Table A.6.

Percentage distribution of households by type of owned


appliances owned: Philippines, 2011
Appliances*
Television
Telephone/Cellphone
Electric fan
Wall clock
VCD/DVD Player/Mini Component/Karaoke
Radio/cassette recorder
Refrigerator/freezer
Stove/range/microwave oven
Washing machine/dryer
Computer/laptop/playstation
Camera/video camera
Other appliances
Food processor/blender
Sewing machine
Air conditioner
Piano/organ
Electric generator

Percent
70.8
67.2
61.5
45.2
41.7
41.2
34.3
27.3
26.4
14.2
12.1
11.9
11.7
8.0
7.9
3.5
1.0

*Multiple Responses

Facts and Figures, 2011

35

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

7. Main Source of Drinking Water


The main source of water used for drinking of the households came mostly from
water system or piped in their dwelling unit (28.5%) and from tube well or borehole
(22.8%). Similarly, 23.5% of the households relied on bottled/mineral water as their
source of drinking water (Table A.7).
Table A.7.

Percentage distribution of households by main source of


drinking water: Philippines, 2011
Present Occupation
Piped into dwelling
Bottled/mineral water
Tube well or borehole
Protected spring
Public tap/stand pipe
Piped to yard/plot
Protected dug well
Unprotected dug well
Unprotected spring
Semi-protected dug well
Tanker truck
Rainwater
Surface water (river, dam, etc.)
Cart with small tank
Others

Percent
28.5
23.5
22.8
8.3
3.3
2.7
2.5
2.0
1.7
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.1
1.6

8. Type of Toilet Facility


At the time of the survey, about 83% of the households have water sealed toilet while
about 8% have toilet but not water sealed. It was likewise noted that about 10% of
the households covered have no toilet at all (Table A.8).

Table A.8.

Percentage distribution of households by type of toilet facility:


Philippines, 2011
Type of Toilet Facility
No toilet facility (bush, field, river, etc.)
Water-sealed (pour/flush with septic tank)
Not water-sealed (pour/flush without septic tank, pit latrine)

Facts and Figures, 2011

Percent
9.6
82.7
7.7

36

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

9.

Type of Garbage Disposal

As to garbage disposal, 46.5% of the households disposed their garbage through


garbage collector system, while 37.2% preferred to burn their garbage. About 22%
have compost pit; 13.4% dumped their garbage anywhere. Garbage segregation was
practiced by more than half (58.6%) of the households (Table A.9).
Regional results of the demographic profile and characteristics of households are
shown in Appendix Table A.1 - A.8.

Table A.9.

Percentage distribution of households by type of


garbage disposal: Philippines, 2011
Garbage disposal system*

Percent

By collector system
Burning
Compost pit
Dumping
Others

46.5
37.2
21.7
13.4
3.5

Practicing garbage segregation

58.6

*Multiple Responses

Facts and Figures, 2011

37

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part B - Nutritional Status of All Population Groups


The Anthropometric Survey Component covered a total of 38,894 sample
households. All members of these households were included as subjects of whom:
17,309 were preschool-age children (0-5 years or 0-60 months), 20,389 were schoolage children (5.08-10.0 years or 61-120 months), 33,613 were preadolescents/adolescents (10.08-19.0 years or 121-228 months), and 70,964 were
adults (19.08 years and over or 229 months and over); 1,651 pregnant women and
3,328 lactating mothers.

1. Birthweight of Young Children, 0-3.9 years old


Birthweight is an important indication of the infants health status, survival, and
physical and mental growth in the future. Infants with low birthweight of less than
2,500 grams are considered to have low birthweight (WHO, 2002). The reduction of
the proportion of low birthweight (LBW) among infants contributes to the reduction of
child mortality, which is included in the Millennium Development Goals.
It is internationally recognized that birthweight is an indicator of well-being of
neonates and women of reproductive age. Such estimates provide specific
information on the health of pregnant women and fetal development. Moreover,
birthweight has been a leading determinant of survival chances of a newborn
(Boerma, et al. 1996).

Table B.1.

Mean birthweight of children, 0-3.9 years old by sex and level of


birthweight: Philippines, 2011
Mean Birthweight

Sex

Mean (g) (SE)

Low Birthweight

Normal Birhtweight

< 2500 (g)(SE)*

> 2500 (g) (SE)

Boys

3,004 (11.08)

1,986 (16.29)

3,187 (9.86)

Girls

2,917 (10.57)

1,969 (15.85)

3,105 (9.08)

Both

2,963 (8.38)

1,978 (12.22)

3,149 (7.34)

*Based on WHO cut-off which is <2500 g for low birth weights

Figure B.1 shows the percentage distribution of children 0-3.9 years old (0-47
months) by sex and level of birthweight. Among infants and young children with
reported birthweight, around 15.9% or 2 out of 10 were with low birthweight. On the
other hand, 84.1% of children had normal birthweight or those with birthweight of
2,500g or more. Based on sex, females (16.5%) are more at risk to low birthweight
compared to males (15.3%). This means that females are more at-risk to mortality if

Facts and Figures, 2011

38

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

not given proper intervention. On the other hand, more males (84.7%) have normal
birthweight than females (83.5%).

Figure B.1.

Percentage distribution of children 0-3 years old (0-47 months),


by sex and level of birthweight: Philippines, 2011

Comparing low birthweight among regions, Bicol (18.6%), Western Visayas (19.3%),
Central Visayas (18.1%), Eastern Visayas (16.9%), Zamboanga Peninsula (17.5%),
Davao Region (16.8%), SOCCSKSARGEN (18.2%), and ARMM (17.6%) had higher
prevalence than the national prevalence of 15.9% (Table B.2).

Figure B.2.

Percentage distribution of 0-3.9 year old children (0-47 months),


by level of birthweight and by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

39

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

2. Nutritional Status of All Population Groups


2.1 Pre-school and School Children, 0-10.0 years old (0-120 months)
Height and Weight Measurements of Children
Table B.2 shows the mean (SE) height (cm) and weight (kg) of children by age and
by sex. Overall, mean height and weight of children 0-10.0 years-old (0-120 months)
increase as the children gets older. The mean height and weight of male children 05.0 years-old (0-60 months) was higher than that of the female children. Mean height
of males was also higher than females at age 5.08-7.9 years old. Females start to be
taller than males at age 8.0-10.0 years old. This is due to early puberty wherein
females start to grow taller than males.

Table B.2.

Mean (SE) height and weight of children 0-10 years-old (0-120


months), by single age and by sex: Philippines, 2011
All

Age Group
0-60m (0-5.0y)
0-5m
6-11m
12-23m (1.0-1.99y)
24-35m (2.0-2.99y)
36-47m (3.0-3.99y)
48-60m (4.0-5.0y)
61-120m (5.08-10.0y)
61-71m (5.08-5.99y)
72-83m (6.0-6.99y)
84-95m (7.0-7.99y)
97-107m (8.0-8.99y)
108-120m (9.0-10.0y)

Height
(cm)

Male
Weight
(kg)

Height
(cm)

Weight
(kg)

Female
Height
Weight
(cm)
(kg)

84.5 (0.10)
58.8(0.14)
69.4 (0.10)
77.0 (0.09)
85.6 (0.10)
92.6 (0.10)
99.1 (0.09)

11.3 (0.03)
5.6 (0.04)
7.9 (0.03)
9.5 (0.03)
11.5 (0.04)
13.2 (0.04)
14.8 (0.04)

84.8 (0.14)
59.2 (0.20)
69.9 (0.13)
77.4 (0.13)
86.1 (0.14)
92.9 (0.14)
116.3 (0.09)

11.6 (0.04)
5.7 (0.06)
8.2 (0.04)
9.8 (0.04)
11.9 (0.05)
13.6 (0.05)
15.1 (0.05)

84.1 (0.15)
58.4 (0.21)
68.7 (0.16)
76.5 (0.13)
84.9 (0.14)
92.2 (0.14)
116.1 (0.10)

11.1 (0.04)
5.5 (0.06)
7.7 (0.05)
9.2 (0.05)
11.3 (0.05)
13.0 (0.05)
14.5 (0.06)

116.2 (0.07)
105.4 (0.11)
110.7 (0.10)
115.6 (0.11)
120.8 (0.11)
125.6 (0.11)

20.5 (0.04)
16.5 (0.05)
18.2 (0.05)
20.1 (0.06)
22.3 (0.07)
24.8 (0.09)

99.6 (0.13)
105.7 (0.15)
110.9 (0.15)
115.7 (0.15)
120.7 (0.15)
125.3 (0.15)

20.6 (0.05)
16.7 (0.07)
18.4 (0.07)
20.3 (0.09)
22.4 (0.10)
24.8 (0.12)

98.6 (0.13)
105.1 (0.16)
110.5 (0.14)
115.5 (0.16)
120.9 (0.15)
126.0 (0.16)

20.3 (0.05)
16.3 (0.07)
18.0 (0.08)
19.7 (0.09)
22.2 (0.10)
24.8 (0.12)

Facts and Figures, 2011

40

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Generally, the mean weight and height of children, 0-10.0 years old had no difference
among the three survey periods (Table B.3).
Table B.3.

Mean weight and height of children 0-10 years-old (0-120


months): Philippines, 2005-2011
Height (cm)

Age Group

Weight (kg)

2005

2008

2011

2005

2008

2011

0-60m (0-5.0y)
0-5m
6-11m
12-23m (1.0-1.99y)
24-35m (2.0-2.99y)
36-47m (3.0-3.99y)
48-60m (4.0-5.0y)

59.0
69.0
77.6
85.3
92.5
99.1

59.4
69.5
77.6
85.5
92.5
99.3

58.8
69.4
77.1
85.7
92.7
99.3

5.5
7.7
9.5
11.5
13.2
14.7

5.6
7.9
9.6
11.5
13.1
14.9

5.6
7.9
9.5
11.6
13.3
14.8

61-120m (5.08-10.0y)
61-71m (5.08-5.99y)
72-83m (6.0-6.99y)
84-95m (7.0-7.99y)
97-107m (8.0-8.99y)
108-120m (9.0-10.0y)

104.9
110.6
115.6
120.3
125.7

105.3
110.4
115.5
120.5
126.2

105.5
110.9
115.9
121.1
125.8

16.3
18.1
20.0
21.8
24.6

16.5
18.0
19.9
22.0
24.7

16.5
18.2
20.1
22.3
24.8

Nutritional Status of Children


National Prevalence
Based on the four anthropometric indices, Figure B.3 shows the nutritional status of
children. Using weight-for-age as index, 2 out of 10 children aged 0-5 years old (0-60
months) and 3 out of 10 children aged 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) were
underweight. This reflects low weight for age, an indicator of both past and present
nutritional status.
Based on height-for-age, 3 out of 10 children aged 0-5 years (0-60 months) were
stunted. Stunting was also evident among 5.08-10 year old (61-120 months) children.
This condition reflects the effects of chronic malnutrition, infections and poor
environmental conditions that hinder childs linear growth.
Using weight-for-height classification, 7 out of 100 children aged 0-5 years old (0-60
months) were wasted which indicates acute undernutrition brought by current food
insecurity and illness such as diarrhea. Considering BMI-for-age classification, 6 in
every 100 children 0-5 years old (0-60 months old) and 9 in every 100 children 5.0810 years old (61-120 months old) were wasted. Using the same classification, 5 out
of 100 children aged 0-5 years old (0-60 months) and 8 out of 100 children aged
5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) were overweight for their height.
Facts and Figures, 2011

41

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure B.3.

Nutritional status of children, 0-10 years old (0-120 months),


based on WHO-CGS weight-for-age, height-for-age, weight-forheight, and BMI-for-age cut-off points: Philippines, 2011

By single age, the prevalence of underweight among 0-10 year old children
increases with age. Children 1 year old and below have medium prevalence while
those 2-6 years old have high prevalence based on the WHO classification of
magnitude of underweight children. Very high magnitude was observed among the 710 years old.
The prevalence of stunting doubled at the age of 1 year and also increases with age
until 3 years old. A decreasing trend was observed from 4 to 8 years old then
increased at 9-10 years old. Children less than 1 year old have low magnitude of
stunting while the 1 to 10 years old have high magnitude based on WHO
classification.

Facts and Figures, 2011

42

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Contrary to underweight and stunting, the wasting prevalence in children at age 1


year decrease as the child grows older (Figure B.4). The prevalence starts to
increase at age 6 to 10 years old. Children less than 1-year old are considered to be
in a serious magnitude of wasting while those who are 1 to 8 years old are
considered poor. Serious magnitude was also observed among children 9-10 years
old. The prevalence of overweight and obesity start to decrease from 1 to 5 years
old. Highest prevalence of overweight and obesity was also observed among
children aged 9-10 years old (8.4%)

Figure B.4.

Prevalence of a.) underweight; b.) stunting; c.) wasting; and d.)


overweight/obese among children, 0-10 years old (0-120 months),
by single age: Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

43

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Trends in Malnutrition Prevalence among Children


For the past four survey periods, prevalence of underweight children slightly
increased at an average of 8.05%-points per year among 0-5 month-old children.
Underweight prevalence decreased by 0.9%-points between 2003 and 2011 among
the 6-11 months. At age 1, underweight prevalence recorded an annual average
increase of 0.35%-points for the past eight years. Between 2003 and 2011,
underweight among 2 to 5 years old children decreased (Figure B.5).
For the 5.08-10 years old children, underweight prevalence slightly decreased among
the 6 year-old and 9-10.0 year-old children with 0.5%-points and 0.3%-points
decrease, respectively between 2003 and 2011. Children aged 5.08-5.9 and 7 years
old both had a 2.6%-points increase in underweight prevalence since 2003. An
annual average decrease of 0.51%-points was noted among 8 year-old children for
the past eight years.

Figure B.5.

Prevalence of underweight among children, a.) 0-5 years old (0-60


months); and b.) 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) by age group
based on WHO-CGS weight-for-age classification: Philippines,
2003-2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

44

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Since 2003, stunting has generally increased among children less than 2 years old
(Figure B.6). Occurrence of stunting among infants 0 to 5 months might be reflective
of poor maternal nutrition. When the child reached the age of 6 to 11 months old,
further increased in the prevalence of underheight might be attributed to
inappropriate feeding practices such as inadequate and untimely introduction of
complementary foods. Prevalence of stunting further double when the child reached
1 year old, that can be ascribed to prolonged inadequacies of food intake in terms of
quality and quantity, and recurrence of illness or infections that eventually slowed
downed their skeletal growth resulting to linear growth retardation. Stunting continued
to increase until 3 years old. The impact of stunting is lasting and irreversible, and
without further intervention in the first two years of life, this may predispose them to
severe illnesses, developmental delays and possibly even death. For those who can
survive, they are at risk to NCDs later in life.
Between 2003 to 2011, there was an improvement in height relative to age among
children 2 to 5 years old as shown in the decrease of stunting prevalence. The 2-year
old registered the highest annual average reduction of 0.69%-points since 2003.
Conversely, prevalence of stunting decreased between 2003 and 2011 among
children 5.08-8 years old indicating an improvement in linear growth. Highest annual
average reduction of 0.95%-points was recorded among children 8 years old for the
past eight years. Stunting prevalence among children aged 9-10.0 years old slightly
increased by 0.3%-points between 2003 and 2011.

Figure B.6.

Prevalence of stunting among children, a.) 0-5 years old (0-60


months); and b.) 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) by age group
based on WHO-CGS height-for-age classification: Philippines,
2003 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

45

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

By age group, children 0-5 years old had generally increased prevalence of wasting
between 2003 and 2011. The children 6-11 month-old registered the highest
prevalence of wasting with an annual average of 0.26%-point increase for the past
eight years. (Figure B.7).
Wasting prevalence also increased among 5.08-8 year old children. Children aged 7
years old had the highest annual average increase at 0.31%-points since 2003. A
decrease of 1.7%-points was recorded among children 9-10.0 years old which is
considered to be the highest among this age group for the past eight years.

Figure B.7.

Prevalence of wasting among children, a.) 0-5 years old (0-60


months); and b.) 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months), by age group
based on WHO-CGS weight-for-height classification: Philippines,
2003 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

46

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Overnutrition is becoming one of the most serious concern of the country, because
overweight prevalence is increasing among age groups for the past eight years
(Figure B.8). Prevalence of overweight was highest among the 0-5 month-old
children with an annual average increase of 0.59%-points since 2003.
Increasing trend was also observed among 5.08-10 year old children. The highest
increase was recorded among 6 year-old children with an average increase of
0.45%-points per year since 2003.

Figure B.8.

Prevalence of overweight among children, a.) 0-5 years old (0-60


months); and b.) 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months), by age group
based on WHO-CGS weight-for-height classification: Philippines,
2003-2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

47

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Since 2008, it is noted that there is no significant decrease in underweight


prevalence. Stunting on the other hand has significantly increased by 1.3%-points
between 2008 and 2011. Though wasting prevalence increased, there was no
significant difference between 2008 and 2011.
The decrease in the prevalence of underweight and stunting since 1989 are very
slow. The underweight prevalence decreased by an annual average rate of only
0.33%-points. On the other hand, the prevalence of stunting was reduced by 11.1%points or a yearly average of 0.50%-points. Wasting prevalence increased by 1.1%points since 1989. Among the ten survey periods, there is a rising trend in the
prevalence of overweight children with an annual average increase of 0.15%-points.
This is alarming considering the risk of 0-5 year old children to non-communicable
diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and other lifestyle diseases.

Figure B.9. Trends of malnutrition among children, 0-5 years old (0-60
months), based on WHO-CGS classification: Philippines, 19892011

Facts and Figures, 2011

48

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

To achieve the MDG target of reducing the underweight prevalence of under-five


children by 2015 the prevalence should be reduced by 6.6%-points or an average
reduction of 1.65%-points per year (Figure B.10).

Figure B.10. Trends in the prevalence of underweight-for-age among children,


under-five years old (0 to <60 months), for monitoring of MDG
Goal 1: 1990-2011
For children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months), the reduction in underweight and
stunting prevalence are also very slow. Since 2003, annual average reduction
registered at 0.01%-points for underweight while 0.35%-points for stunting. Wasting
and overweight prevalence are gradually increasing in this age group with an annual
average increase of 0.14%-points and 0.21%-points, respectively.

Figure B.11. Trends of malnutrition among children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120
months), based on WHO-CGS classification: Philippines, 20032011
Facts and Figures, 2011

49

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Regional Prevalence
Based on WHO classification for determining magnitude and severity among
undernourished children under-five years old (0 to <60 months) (1995), a high
prevalence of underweight among 0-5 year old children were found in three regions
in Luzon (Cagayan Valley, MIMAROPA and Bicol) and all regions in Visayas and
Mindanao. Using the same classification among 5.08-10 year old children, very high
prevalence was noted in two regions in Luzon (MIMAROPA and Bicol) and all
regions in Visayas and Mindanao.
Prevalence of stunting among 0-5 year old children was very high in Visayas,
specifically Western and Eastern Visayas, and two regions in Mindanao namely,
SOCCSKSARGEN and ARMM. For children 5.08-10 years old, a very high
magnitude of stunting was recorded in MIMAROPA in Luzon, Western and Eastern
Visayas in Visayas and most of the regions in Mindanao namely, Zamboanga
Peninsula, Northern Mindanao, Davao, SOCCSKSARGEN and ARMM.
Magnitude of wasting among children 0-5 years old were considered serious in
Cagayan Valley and MIMAROPA in Luzon, and ARMM in Mindanao. Acceptable
magnitude was noted in CAR. On the other hand, for children 5.08-10 years old, all
regions in the country are considered having poor magnitude of wasting except for
Central Visayas which is considered to have acceptable magnitude.

Facts and Figures, 2011

50

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Comparing the prevalence rates between 2008 and 2011, there was no significant
difference among underweight children 0-5 years old. For children, 5.08-10 years old,
significant difference was found only in Central Visayas (Table B.4 and B.5).

Table B.4.

Prevalence of underweight children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months), by


region: Philippines, 2008-2011
Region

LUZON
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
VISAYAS
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
MINDANAO
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Table B.5.

Underweight Prevalence (%)


2008
2011

Difference

20.3
20.5
15.5
14.5
17.4
16.5
26.6
26.4

19.8
23.2
11.9
15.8
14.7
14.8
24.9
25.3

-0.5
2.7
-3.6
1.3
-2.7
-1.7
-1.7
-1.1

25.0
19.4
26.4

23.9
21.6
25.7

-1.1
2.2
-0.7

25.4
21.6
22.0
24.7
22.7
24.4

25.2
21.9
20.2
25.1
23.0
26.2

-0.2
0.3
-1.8
0.4
0.3
1.8

Prevalence of underweight children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months),


by region: Philippines, 2008-2011
Region

LUZON
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
VISAYAS
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
MINDANAO
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Underweight Prevalence (%)


2008
2011

Difference

31.5
25.7
19.9
24.9
25.5
30.0
40.9
41.7

29.8
26.9
17.9
25.2
25.8
27.1
40.4
39.6

-1.7
1.2
-2.0
0.3
0.3
-2.9
-0.5
-2.1

40.2
31.8
38.2

40.4
36.6
37.8

0.2
4.8*
-0.4

38.8
32.7
33.7
34.5
38.8
33.3

34.6
32.8
32.4
36.2
34.6
37.0

-4.2
0.1
-1.3
1.7
-4.2
3.7

*significant at = 5%

Facts and Figures, 2011

51

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Conversely, there was no significant difference in stunting prevalence among 0-5


year-old and 5.08-10 year-old children between 2008 and 2011. (Table B.6 and B.7).
Table B.6.

Prevalence of stunted children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months), by region:


Philippines, 2008-2011
Region

LUZON
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
VISAYAS
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
MINDANAO
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Table B.7.

Stunting Prevalence (%)


2008
2011

Difference

27.5
31.1
36.3
22.3
24.7
24.8
37.2
38.2

29.0
32.1
34.3
22.3
26.8
27.4
37.2
36.8

1.5
1.0
-2.0
0
2.1
2.6
0
-1.4

39.1
35.1
41.1

41.0
38.6
41.7

1.9
3.5
0.6

40.3
37.7
37.0
39.6
37.2
39.7

42.2
37.2
35.2
42.6
37.3
43.5

1.9
-0.5
-1.8
3.0
0.1
3.8

Prevalence of stunted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months), by


region: Philippines, 2008-2011
Region

LUZON
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
VISAYAS
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
MINDANAO
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Facts and Figures, 2011

Stunting Prevalence (%)


2008
2011

Difference

29.3
26.3
28.9
23.6
23.5
27.0
41.0
40.0

28.1
27.6
32.3
22.2
25.7
26.2
40.3
36.6

-1.2
1.3
3.4
-1.4
2.2
-0.8
-0.7
-3.4

39.6
38.0
47.1

40.2
38.2
42.2

0.6
0.2
-4.9

44.3
38.7
40.7
40.6
39.8
38.4

43.5
40.3
40.3
41.5
37.8
41.8

-0.8
1.6
-0.4
0.9
-2.0
3.4

52

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Ilocos Region, MIMAROPA and Western Visayas are the regions that are
significantly different in wasting among 0-5 year old children between 2008 and 2011.
Furthermore, Central Luzon and Central Visayas are significantly different among
wasted children 5.08-10 years old (Table B.8 and B.9) between the two survey
periods.
Table B.8.

Prevalence of wasted children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months), by region:


Philippines, 2008-2011
Region

LUZON
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
VISAYAS
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
MINDANAO
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Wasting Prevalence (%)


2008
2011

Difference

6.5
8.0
5.8
7.1
6.2
6.5
7.0
8.0

9.9
10.5
4.7
7.0
6.6
6.5
10.5
8.4

3.4*
2.5
-1.1
-0.1
0.4
0
3.5*
0.4

8.5
4.6
6.7

5.8
5.3
7.8

-2.7*
0.7
1.1

8.0
6.6
5.7
6.9
7.8
10.3

7.1
7.3
7.2
7.1
6.6
10.0

-0.9
0.7
1.5
0.2
-1.2
-0.3

*significant at = 5%

Table B.9.

Prevalence of wasted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months), by


region: Philippines, 2008-2011
Region

LUZON
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
VISAYAS
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
MINDANAO
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Facts and Figures, 2011

Wasting Prevalence (%)


2008
2011

Difference

10.1
7.3
4.5
7.7
8.1
9.8
11.0
10.3

10.3
9.0
3.0
11.0
8.2
8.6
11.1
11.6

0.2
1.7
-1.5
3.3*
0.1
-1.2
0.1
1.3

11.3
5.1
5.9

9.8
7.1
6.1

-1.5
2.0*
0.2

7.5
5.9
6.3
5.6
5.6
8.7

5.9
7.4
6.1
6.4
7.2
9.3

-1.6
1.5
-0.2
0.8
1.6
0.6
53

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Provincial Prevalence
Underweight
A very high prevalence (>30%) of underweight children 0-5 years old was noted in
the provinces of Siquijor, Basilan, Guimaras, Capiz, and Camarines Norte based on
the WHO cut-off points (1995) (Figure B.12 and Appendix Table B.2).

*
Philippines: 20.2%

Figure B.12. Magnitude of underweight children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months),
by province: Philippines, 2011
*Based on the WHO classification in determining magnitude and severity of underweight and stunned
children under-five years old (0 to < 60months).

Facts and Figures, 2011

54

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Adopting the same reference points for children 0-5 years old, all provinces in
Mindanao, except Zamboanga, Sibugay and Camiguin, all provinces in the Visayas,
and all provinces in MIMAROPA and Bicol regions, except for Catanduanes have
very high prevalence of underweight children 5.08-10 years old (Figure B.13 and
Appendix Table B.4).

Philippines: 32.0%

Figure B.13. Magnitude of underweight children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120


months), by province: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

55

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Stunting
For children 0-5 years old, the province of Kalinga, Aurora, Camarines Norte,
Catanduanes, Marinduque, Romblon, Masbate in Luzon; Aklan, Antique, Capiz,
Guimaras, Samar Provinces in the Visayas and most provinces in Mindanao was
observed to have very high prevalence of stunting (Figure B.14 and Appendix Table
B.6).

*
Philippines: 33.6%

Figure B.14. Magnitude of stunted children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months), by
province: Philippines, 2011
*Based on the WHO classification in determining magnitude and severity of underweight and stunned
children under-five years old (0 to < 60months).

Facts and Figures, 2011

56

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

The prevalence of stunting was very high among children 5.08-10 years old, in most
provinces of MIMAROPA and CAR in Luzon, Eastern and Western Visayas, and all
regions in Mindanao except for CARAGA (Figure B.15 and Appendix Table B.8).

Philippines: 33.6%

Figure B.15. Magnitude of stunted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months),
by province: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

57

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Wasting
Provinces with critical magnitude of wasting among 0-5 year old children were found
in Siquijor, Basilan, Sulu and Tawi-Tawi (Figure B.16 and Appendix B.10).

*
Philippines: 7.3%

Figure B.16. Magnitude of wasted children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months), by
province: Philippines, 2011
*Based on the WHO classification in determining magnitude and severity of wasted children under-five
years old (0 to < 60months).

Facts and Figures, 2011

58

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Critical prevalence of wasting was noted among children 5.08-10 years old in the
provinces of Aurora, Bataan, Marinduque, Antique and Tawi-Tawi (Figure B.17 and
Appendix B.14).

Philippines: 8.5%

Figure B.17. Magnitude of wasted children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months),
by province: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

59

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

2.2 Pre-Adolescents and Adolescents, 10.08-19.0 years (121-228 months)


National Prevalence
Among children, 10.08-19 years old, 35.7% were severely stunted to stunted based
on Height-for-Age classification. On the other hand, 12.7% prevalence of wasting
was noted using BMI-for-Age classification (Figure B.18 and Appendix B.15 and
B.17).

Figure B.18. Nutritional status of children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228


months), based on height-for-age and BMI-for-age classification
using WHO-Growth Reference: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

60

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

By age group, stunting was higher among the 16-19 years old. On the other hand,
higher prevalence of wasting and overweight/obese were noted among the preadolescent group (10-12 years) compared to the other age groups. (Figure B.19)

Figure B.19. Prevalence of a.) stunting; b.) wasting; and c.) overweight/obese
among children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228 months), by single
age: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

61

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Trends in Malnutrition
Adolescents

Prevalence

among

Pre-Adolescents

and

Comparing the prevalence of malnourished children in the four survey periods,


10.08-19 year old children showed an increasing trend in the prevalence of wasting
and overweight/obese with an annual average increase of 0.25%-points and 0.225%points, respectively. Stunting was noted to have an annual average decrease in
prevalence by 0.38%-points (Figure B.20) since 2003.

Figure B.20. Trends of malnutrition among children, 10.08-19 years old (121228 months): Philippines, 2003-2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

62

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Provincial Prevalence
The children, 10.08-19 years old have a very high prevalence of stunting in selected
areas in Luzon, most of the provinces in Mindanao, and all provinces in the Visayas
based on the WHO cut-off points (Figure B.21 and Appendix Table B.16).

Philippines: 35.7%

Figure B.21. Magnitude of stunted children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228


months) by province: Philippines, 2011
Note: In the absence of the cut-off points in determining the magnitude and severity of stunting for
children, 10.08-19 years old, the WHO cut-off points for children under-five years old (0 to < 60months)
was adopted for better interpretation of data.

Facts and Figures, 2011

63

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Critical prevalence of wasting was noted in Cagayan, Ilocos Sur, Zambales, Bataan,
Bulacan, Cavite, Quezon, and Occidental Mindoro in Luzon; and all provinces of the
Panay Island except for Iloilo (Figure B.22 and Appendix Table 18).

Philippines: 12.7%

Figure B.22. Magnitude of wasted children, 10.08-19.0 years old (121-228


months old), by province: Philippines, 2011
Note: In the absence of the cut-off points in determining the magnitude and severity of wasting for
children, 10.08-19 years old, the WHO cut-off points for children under-five years old (0 to < 60months)
was adopted for better interpretation of data.

Facts and Figures, 2011

64

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

2.3 Adults, 19.08 years old and over (229 months and over)
National Prevalence
Body Mass Index
The BMI classification reflects the nutritional status of adults, 20.0 years old and over
(240 months and over). Overall, 1 out of 10 adults are chronically energy deficient
(CED), 2 out of 10 are overweight, and while 6 out of 100 are obese (Figure B.23).

Figure B.23. Nutritional status of adults, 20.0 years old and over (240
months), by sex based on BMI classification: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

65

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

By age group, Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED) are common among 19 years old
and elderly (70 years old). On the other hand, overweight and obesity are common
among 40-49 years old adults (Figure B.24).

Figure B.24. Prevalence of a.) CED; b.) overweight; and c.) obese among
adults, 19.08 years old and over (229 months) by age group:
Philippines, 2011
* Only adults aged 20.0 years old and above are included

Facts and Figures, 2011

66

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Trends in Malnutrition Prevalence among Adults 20 year old and over


There is a decreasing trend in the prevalence of CED with a 0.22%-point decrease
per year since 1993. On the other hand, an increasing trend in the prevalence of
overweight and obesity was noted with an annual average increase of 0.66%-points
for the five survey periods. (Figure B.25)

Figure B.25. Trends in the prevalence of CED and overweight among adults,
20 years old and over (240 months) based on BMI: Philippines,
1993-2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

67

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Regional Prevalence
Six regions in Luzon (Ilocos Region, Bicol Region, MIMAROPA, CALABARZON,
Cagayan Valley, and Central Luzon) , one in the Visayas (Western Visayas) and
two in Mindanao (ARMM and Zamboanga Peninsula) have higher CED prevalence
than the national prevalence (10.0%), while three regions in Luzon (NCR,
CALABARZON and Central Luzon) and two regions in Mindanao (CARAGA and
Northern Mindanao) have obesity prevalence of more than the national prevalence
of 6.1% (Figure B.26).

Figure B.26. Prevalence of CED and obese adults, 20 years old and over (240
months and over) by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

68

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Waist Circumference
National Prevalence
Aside from BMI which indirectly measures obesity, anthropometric measurement of
the upper abdomen reflecting the abdominal type of obesity, is also a common risk
factor to non-communicable diseases. The mean waist circumference of male and
female adults increase as they age up to 50-59 years old and then start to decrease
at 60 years old and over. Categorizing high waist circumference by age groups,
those at age 50-59 years old have the highest waist circumference for both male and
female. It is noted that female adults have higher prevalence of high waist
circumference than male adults (Table B.10).

Table B.10.

Age
(years)
Male
20
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
>70
Female
20
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
>70

Mean waist circumferences (WC) and percent distribution of WC


among adults 20 years and over by sex and by age group:
Philippines, 2011
95% CI
WC (%)
n
Mean
LL
UL
Low
Normal
High
<90 cm 90-101 cm 102cm
34,161
79.8
79.6
79.9
82.7
14.1
3.2
7,467
76.0
75.7
76.2
92.2
6.5
1.4
6,778
80.6
80.3
80.9
82.3
14.3
3.4
7,787
82.5
82.3
82.8
75.6
19.9
4.5
6,450
82.7
82.4
83.0
74.3
20.8
4.8
3,669
81.4
81.0
81.8
76.7
18.9
4.4
2,010
79.9
79.3
80.4
81.2
15.4
3.4
<80 cm 80-87 cm 88 cm
36,920
78.6
78.5
78.8
57.5
22.6
19.9
5,812
73.7
73.4
73.9
78.0
13.9
8.2
7,134
78.8
78.5
79.0
58.3
23.7
18.0
8,843
80.8
80.6
81.1
47.8
27.2
25.0
7,546
81.8
81.6
82.1
43.3
27.6
29.1
4,579
80.9
80.6
81.3
46.7
24.9
28.4
3,006
79.7
79.2
80.3
52.3
20.7
27.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

69

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Trends in High Waist Circumference among adults 20 year old and over
Since 1998, prevalence of high waist circumference had an increasing trend. By sex,
prevalence of high waist circumference (WC) among males have increased by 0.5%points between 1998 and 2011. On the other hand, a 0.71%-point annual average
increase in high WC was noted among female adults. Females registered higher
prevalence of high WC than males indicating that they were more at-risk to
abdominal type of obesity and to non-communicable diseases (Figure B.27).

Figure B.27. Trends in high waist circumference prevalence among adults, 20


years old and over ( 240 months): Philippines, 1998-2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

70

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Regional Prevalence
Notably, for both male and female adults, 20 years old and over, prevalence of high
waist circumference in regions such as NCR, CALABARZON, and Central Luzon
were higher than the national prevalence of 3.2% and 19.9% respectively. In
addition, female adults, 20 years old and over in regions such as Davao Region,
Northern Mindanao, and Eastern Visayas have higher prevalence of high waist
circumference than the national prevalence (Figure B.28).

Figure B.28. Prevalence of high waist circumference among adults, 20 years


old and over (240 months and over) by sex and by region:
Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

71

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Waist and Hip Ratio


As seen in Table B.11, the mean waist and hip ratio of adults generally increase as
they age. Highest prevalence of high waist-hip ratio was recorded among 60-69 year
old male and 50-59 year-old female adults. Generally, females are more obese than
males as indicated by high wasit-hip ratio.
Table B.11.

Age
(years)
Male
20
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
>70
Female
20
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
>70

Mean waist to hip ratio (WHR) and percent distribution of WHR


among adults 20 years and over by sex and age group:
Philippines, 2011
95% CI
WHR (%)
n
Mean
LL
UL
Low
Normal
High
< 0.90
0.90-0.99
> 1.0
34,115
0.897
0.896
0.898
51.2
41.9
6.9
7,457
0.868
0.867
0.870
71.1
26.7
2.2
6,769
0.899
0.898
0.901
49.5
44.7
5.9
7,775
0.916
0.914
0.918
38.4
52.0
9.6
6,442
0.922
0.921
0.924
33.7
53.9
12.4
3,667
0.921
0.919
0.924
36.0
50.5
13.4
2,005
0.915
0.912
0.918
38.9
49.5
11.6
< 0.80
0.80-0.84 > 0.85
36,853
0.870
0.869
0.871
11.2
26.3
62.5
5,802
0.849
0.847
0.851
18.5
33.3
48.2
7,121
0.869
0.868
0.871
9.3
27.5
63.1
8,827
0.878
0.876
0.879
7.8
22.5
69.7
7,530
0.883
0.881
0.884
8.0
21.7
70.3
4,574
0.883
0.881
0.885
10.2
21.5
68.2
2,999
0.890
0.887
0.894
11.8
20.8
67.4

Facts and Figures, 2011

72

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Trends in High Waist-Hip Ratio among adults 20 year old and over
The trends in the four survey periods showed that high WHR increased sharply from
1998 to 2008 at an average of 2.6%-points among females and decreased
significantly by 3.0%-points between 2008 and 2011. On the other hand, for males,
high WHR increased sharply from 1998 to 2003, then declined by 1.0%-point
between 2003 and 2008, and decreased sharply by 4.2%-points from 2008 to 2011
(Figure B.29).

Figure B.29. Trends in high waist to hip ratio (WHR) prevalence among adults,
20 years old and over ( 240 months): Philippines, 1998-2011

Regional Prevalence
Comparing the regional prevalence of high waist to hip ratio with the national
prevalence, 3 regions namely, NCR, Central Luzon and CALABARZON have a
higher prevalence than the national prevalence both among males (6.9%) and
females (62.5%) adults, 20 years and over (Figure B.30).

Facts and Figures, 2011

73

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure B.30. Prevalence of high waist to hip ratio among adults, 20 years old
and over (240 months and over) by sex and by region:
Philippines, 2011

2.4 Pregnant Women


National Prevalence
Using the weight for height table by Magbitang, et al (1988), the nutritional status of
pregnant women were determined. Overall, 1 in every 4 pregnant women is
nutritionally at-risk. Adolescent pregnant women are more nutritionally at-risk than
older pregnant women (Figure B.31).

Facts and Figures, 2011

74

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure B.31. Percentage distribution of pregnant women by age group and


weight-for-height classification: Philippines, 2011

Trends in the Prevalence of Nutritionally at-risk Pregnant Women


The prevalence of nutritionally at-risk pregnant women in 2011 did not differ with the
prevalence in 2008. Since 1998, prevalence rate decreased by 0.44%-point per year
(Figure B.32).

Figure B.32. Trends in the prevalence of nutritionally at risk pregnant women


based on weight-for-height: Philippines, 1998-2011

Regional Prevalence
By region, high prevalence of nutritionally at-risk pregnant women was noted in
MIMAROPA (43.6%), Western Visayas (33.2%), Cagayan Valley (32.6%) and Bicol
(30.7%) (Figure B.33).

Facts and Figures, 2011

75

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure B.33. Prevalence of nutritionally at-risk pregnant women, by region and


weight-for-height classification: Philippines, 2011

2.5 Lactating Mothers


National Prevalence
Across age groups, about 1 in every 10 lactating mothers is underweight, while about
2 in every 10 lactating mothers are overweight. The prevalence of overweight is 3
times more common among lactating mothers, 20 yrs and over (Figure B.34).

Figure B.34. Percentage distribution of lactating mothers by age group and by


nutritional status classification using BMI-for-age and BMI for
adults: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

76

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Trends in the Prevalence of Malnourished Lactating Mothers


Figure B.35 shows the trends in the prevalence of underweight and overweight
lactating mothers. The NCHS was used for the four survey periods while the WHOCGS was used for the 2011 survey. Thus, caution should be done when comparing
the prevalences. Generally, overweight is a problem among lactating mothers.

Figure B.35. Trends in the prevalence of underweight and overweight


lactating mothers based on BMI: Philippines, 1998-2011

Regional Prevalence
As seen in Figure B.36, underweight prevalence was highest in Bicol region (16.6%),
while the prevalence of overweight was highest in CAR (28.7%).
REGION

% UNDERWEIGHT

% OVERWEIGHT

Figure B.36. Prevalence of underweight and overweight lactating mothers by


region and by nutritional status classification using BMI-for-age
and BMI for adults: Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

77

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part C. Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices


Nutrition is a crucial, universally recognized component of the childs right to the
enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health. In fulfilling this, it is imperative
that children receive adequate nutrition and have access to safe and nutritious food.
Appropriate infant and young child feeding practices sets an exceptional role in
achieving a childs optimal nutrition and health. This should be well-established early
from birth as this equates with a strong and healthy future. Poor feeding practices
during this period could lead to malnutrition which subjects the child to its
consequences like severe illnesses, stunted growth, developmental delays and even
death.
In response to this, the WHO and UNICEF jointly developed the Global Strategy for
Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) to revitalize world attention to the impact that
feeding practices have on the nutritional status, growth and development, health and
survival of infants and young children.
As a global public health recommendation, infants should be exclusively breastfed for
the first six (6) months of life and breastfeeding should be continued for up to two (2)
years and beyond with the provision of timely, adequate, safe, and appropriate
complementary foods at six months.
In the assessment of the IYCF practices of Filipino children under two years of age,
the WHO and UNICEF indicators were used based on a Global Consensus meeting
on Indicators for IYCF to harmonize IYCF indicators with the global data. The core
Indicators are early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, continued
breastfeeding at one year, introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods, minimum
dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency, minimum acceptable diet, and
consumption of iron-rich or fortified foods. Optional indicators, on the other hand,
include children ever breastfed, continued breastfeeding at two years, ageappropriate breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding under six months, bottle
feeding of infants and milk feeding frequency for non-breastfed children.
The Survey covered a total of 6,653 children wherein almost half (48.6%) were
children aged 12-23 months, 27.4% were 6-11 months and the remaining 24% were
0-5 months old (Figure C.1).

Facts and Figures, 2011

78

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure C.1.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by age group:


Philippines, 2011

1. Current Breastfeeding Practices


Figure C.2 graphical presentation shows the proportion of children by feeding
practice and the childs age where each feeding starts, peaks, declines or stops.
About 63% of children under two months old were exclusively breastfed, 19% were
on breast and other milk while about 13% were on pure other milk. Breastfeeding
decreases with age except for mixed feeding that starts to peak at 8-9 months.
Giving of other foods started as early as two months and peaked at 6-7 months. At 89 months all children received foods other than breast milk. Furthermore, beginning
at eight months there were children who were no longer taking any milk.

*current feeding based on feeding the previous day

Figure C.2.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by current


feeding practice: Philippines, 2011

Among children 0-5 months of age, almost half (48.9%) were currently exclusively
breastfed at the time of the survey. By single age, exclusive breastfeeding decreased
from 69.1% at zero month to 23.8% at five months (Figure C.3).

Facts and Figures, 2011

79

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure C.3.

Percentage of children 0-5 months old currently exclusively


breastfed at the time of the survey by single age: Philippines,
2011

1.1 Initiation of Breastfeeding


The WHO and UNICEF recommend to put the newborn to the breast within one hour
after delivery to stimulate early suckling and establish early lactation. At the national
level, 5 in every 10 children were initiated to breastfeed within one hour after delivery
(Figure C.4).

Within
one hour
51.9%

Less
than one
day
32.3%
More
than one
day
15.8%

Figure C.4.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by time of


breastfeeding initiation: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

80

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.2 Place of Delivery and Breastfeeding Practices


By place of delivery, 42.9% of children were delivered at home, nearly 30% at public
hospitals, 18% at private hospitals/lying-in clinics and less than 10% at rural health
units/centers (Figure C.5). Higher proportion of children initiated to breastfed within
one hour was noted among children delivered at rural health units/centers and an
almost equal proportion by those delivered at public hospitals and at home. There
was lower proportion of children initiated to breast within one hour at private
hospitals/clinics (Figure C.6).

Figure C.5.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by place of


delivery: Philippines, 2011

Figure C.6.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding within one hour after delivery and by place of
delivery: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

81

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

By current feeding practice, higher percentage of infants 0-5 months old on


exclusively breastfeed were those delivered at home at 54.7%, followed by those
delivered at rural health centers (52.8%), and public hospitals (43.2%). Lower
proportion of children currently on exclusive breastfeeding and consequently higher
proportion currently on other milk feeding were those delivered at private hospitals
and clinics. This result is consistent with the result on breastfeeding initiation by place
of delivery (Figure C.7).

Figure C.7.

Percentage distribution of children 0-5 months by current feeding


practices and by place of delivery: Philippines, 2011

1.3 Type of Delivery and Breastfeeding Practices


By type of delivery, 90.6% of children were delivered normally delivery while the
remaining fraction (9.4%) were delivered through caesarian section, an indicator of
critical pregnancy (Figure C.8). Children born via normal delivery were most likely to
be initiated to breast within one hour than their counterpart delivered by caesarian
section (Figure C.9).

Figure C.8.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months by


delivery: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

type of

82

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure C.9.

Percentage distribution of children 0-23 months initiated to


breastfeeding within one hour after delivery and by type of
delivery: Philippines, 2011

Conversely there was significantly lower proportion of children currently on exclusive


breastfeeding and higher proportion currently on other milk feeding among infants
0-5 months who were delivered via caesarian section than via normal delivery.

Figure C.10. Percentage distribution of children 0-5 months by current


feeding practices and by type of delivery: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

83

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Comparing the current feeding practices of children initiated to breastfeed within the
prescribed one hour and beyond one hour, the proportion of children currently on
exclusive breastfeeding was higher (56%) when initiated to breastfeed within one
hour than beyond one hour.

Figure C.11. Comparison between current feeding practice of infants 0-5


months old and timing initiation to breastfeed: Philippines 2011

1.4 Continued Breastfeeding


The Global recommendation is to breastfeed children continuously from birth to 2
years or beyond. Since breastmilk remains an important component of the childs diet
at six months onwards. Continued breastfeeding at 1 year and 2 years are the
proportion of children 12-15 months old and 20-23 months old, respectively who are
still fed breast milk. Results show a decreasing trend of breastfeeding with age, from
62.7% among 6-11months, 51.7% at 1 year and 28.9% at 2 years (Figure C.12).

Facts and Figures, 2011

84

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure C.12. Percentage of children with continued breastfeeding among


the 6-11 months old, one year old and the 2 years old:
Philippines, 2011

Figure C.13 reveals that there is a 6.2% points increase in the proportion of
exclusively breastfed children from 2003 to 2008, and a notable increase of 10.8 %
points from 2008 to 2011. For comparison purposes, feeding practice is based on the
usual feeding at the time of the survey.

Figure C.13. Trend of exclusively breastfeeding among infants 0-5 months:


Philippines, 2003, 2008, 2011*

Facts and Figures, 2011

85

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Mean duration of breastfeeding and exclusively breastfeeding (in months) in 2011 at


7.7 months and 3.7 months, respectively, significantly increased as compared to that
recorded in 2003 and 2008.

Figure C.14. Comparison of mean duration (in months) of breastfeeding and


exclusive breastfeeding: Philippines, 2003, 2008, & 2011

2. Prelacteal Feeding
Mothers were asked if they gave any liquid other than breastmilk in the first three
days after delivery, termed as prelacteal feeds. Giving of prelacteal feeds were
discouraged as they are less nutritious, susceptible to contamination and hinders
regular milk flow.
Table C.1 shows that 26.8% of children were given prelacteal feed within three days
after delivery. The common prelacteal feeds given are other milk, plain water, water
with sugar/honey and vegetable or herbal extract. Majority (62.2%) of mothers gave
prelacteal feeds because of lack of milk flow (Table C.2).

Facts and Figures, 2011

86

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table C.1.

Percentage of children 0-23 months old given prelacteal


feed and by type of prelacteal feed: Philippines, 2011
Proportion given prelacteal feed:
Type of Prelacteal Feed

Other milk
Plain water
Water with sugar/honey
Vegetable/herbal extract
Honey
Tea
Fruit juice
Others

Table C.2.

26.8%
n

Percentage

803
414
170
122
14
3
1
43

51.6
26.3
11.2
7.5
0.7
0.2
0.0
2.4

Reasons why prelacteal feed was given to children 0-23


months old: Philippines, 2011
Reasons

Percentage

No milk flow

983

62.2

To cleanse babys gut for digestion

205

12.7

Prevent dehydration

189

12.6

32

2.3

Prevent jaundice

Comparing the current feeding practice of children and the practice of giving
prelacteal feed, results showed that among infants 0-5 months old, the proportion of
infants currently exclusively breastfeeding was significantly higher when not given
prelacteal feed. Higher proportion of children introduced to complementary foods
before the recommended 6 months were noted among children given prelacteal
feeds. In addition, higher proportion of children who were given other milk as
prelacteal feed were not exclusively breastfed or were currently feeding on other
milk.
Among the 6-8 and the 9-23 months old, higher proportion of children who were still
breastfed were those not given prelacteal feed. The result implies that prelacteal
feeding compromises early initiation of breastfeeding and the delay in initiation to
breastfeeding encourages giving of other milk or introducing complementary foods
(Figure C.15).

Facts and Figures, 2011

87

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

CF, Not given prelacteal food CF, Given prelacteal food

CF, Not given prelacteal food CF, Given prelacteal food

CF, Not given prelacteal food CF, Given prelacteal food

Figure C.15. Comparison on the current feeding (CF) practice of children


given prelacteal feed and given other milk as prelacteal feed by
age: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

88

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

3. Complementary Feeding Practices


At the national level, 83.7% of infants 6-8 months old were introduced to solid, semisolid or soft foods. Introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods increased with age
from 72.8% among infants 6 months old, to 92.6% among children aged 8 months.
The early introduction of liquids and semi-solid foods before six months is a cause of
concern because these foods replace breast milk, and acts as possible vehicle of
contamination which is a major cause of diarrhea and other infectious diseases
among infants. Commercially prepared baby foods was the most common first
introductory food given to children, followed by lugao, mashed vegetable and rice
(Figure C.16 & Figure C.17).

Figure C.16. Percentage of children 6-8 months old by introduction of solid,


semi-solid or soft foods: Philippines, 2011

Figure C.17. First introductory foods given to children 0-23 months old:
Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

89

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

As cited by mothers, their main reason for giving the first introductory food was
based on what is the norm or being the known food for babies (32.3%), being easy to
prepare (15.2%) and based on advised by relatives and friends (13.8%).
Table C.3.

Reason why the first introductory food was given to children 0-23
months: Philippines, 2011

Main Reasons
Known food for babies
Easy to prepare
As per advised by relatives/friends
Nutritious
Always available
Soft/Easy to digest
As per advised by health personnel
Affordable/Economical/No money
Culture/Feeding Practices
Self-Awareness/Personal Choice
Trial
Media
Safe to eat
Others

Percentage
32.3
15.2
13.8
10.4
10.3
5.2
5.1
2.0
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.1
2.7

The concept of a Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) is a useful proxy indicator of the
nutrient adequacy of diets of population groups based on the number of food groups
consumed by each child using a standard set of food groups. The food groups are
grains, roots and tubers; legumes and nuts; dairy product; meat, fish, poultry and
liver/organ meats; eggs; vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; and other fruits and
vegetables. A score of one is given for each food group consumed by the child where
a minimum DDS is one and maximum of seven DDS. The sum of which is then
compared with WHO cut-off where a DDS of four indicates meeting the minimum
DDS.
Based on Figure C.18, only 1 out of 5 children met the minimum DDS of 4. The
proportion of children who met the minimum DDS was higher among older infants 1223 months and the minimum DDS maybe difficult to meet by children 6-11 months
old as only 7% met the minimum DDS.
Regional results of infant and young child feeding practices are shown in Appendix
Tables C.3 - C.14.

Facts and Figures, 2011

90

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure C.18. Percentage of children meeting the Minimum Dietary Diversity


Score: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

91

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part D.

Participation of Children to Nutrition and


Related Programs

1. Government Programs
The Government Program Participation Survey Component aimed to assess
participation of households/individuals to a wide range of nutrition and health
programs of the government and to track changes in participation of
households/individuals to government programs monitored over time. For children 0
to 12 years old, government programs include Growth Monitoring, Operation
Timbang, Supplementary Feeding, Orally Fit Child, Expanded Program of
Immunization, Newborn Screening, Deworming and Vitamin A Supplementation.
Household participation to government programs is shown in Part G.
About 9 out of 10 children participated in Vitamin A supplementation, while about 8
out of 10 children participated in Operation Timbang, and 6 out of 10 children
participated in Deworming. More than half or 5 out of 10 children participated in
Growth Monitoring and Day Care Center. Lowest participation was noted in Orally Fit
Child (34.9%) and Supplementary feeding (29.4%) (Figure D.1). In general,
participation of children among Government Programs increased significantly from
2008 to 2011 (Figure D.2).

Figure D.1.

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in various


Government Programs by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

92

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.2.

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in various


Government Programs: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

1.1 Expanded Program on Immunization


Immunization is a basic health service and as such it is integrated in to the health
services being provided by Rural Health Centers. The Expanded Program on
Immunization (EPI) was established to ensure that infants and children have access
to routinely recommended infant/ childhood vaccines. These include basic
immunization for children under 5 years. The goal is to reduce the morbidity among
children against the most common vaccine- preventable diseases. Moreover, EPI
also target to sustain the polio-free status of the Philippines and eliminate measles
infection and neonatal tetanus.
The standard routine immunization schedule for infants is adopted to provide
maximum immunity against the vaccine preventable diseases before childs first
birthday. A child is said to be Fully Immunized Child when a child receives one dose
of BCG, 3 doses of DPT, 3 doses of Hepatitis B, and one dose of measles before a
childs 1st birthday. A high participation of children 0-48 months to Expanded Program
on Immunization was noted. Overall, 9 out of 10 targeted children received BCG
vaccine and at least 1 dose of OPV, DPT, and Hepatitis B. Eight out of 10 targeted
children received the measles vaccine (Figure D.3).

Facts and Figures, 2011

93

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.3.

Percent of children, 0-48 months, participating in Expanded


Program on Immunization (EPI): Philippines, 2011

Generally, there was an increased participation in the Expanded Immunization


Program among children between 2008 and 2011. The increased participation of
BCG, measles and hepatitis B immunization was highly significant (Figure D.4).

Figure D.4.

Percent of children, 0-48 months, participating in Expanded


Program on Immunization (EPI): Philippines, 2008 and 2011

Bacillus, Calmette, Guirin (BCG) vaccine is given intradermally soon after birth to
protect infants from the possibility of Tuberculosis meningitis and other Tuberculosis
infection in which infants are prone. Figure D.5 shows that at the national level, 9 out
of 10 children 0-48 months received BCG vaccine. In addition, nearly 100% of the
children in Western Visayas received the BCG vaccine while, ARMM has the lowest
percentage (72.1%) of availment.

Facts and Figures, 2011

94

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.5.

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Bacillus,


Calmette, Guirin (BCG) immunization by region: Philippines, 2011

Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus (DPT) is a combination of vaccines against three


infectious diseases in humans namely, dipththeria, pertussis (whooping cough) and
tetanus. Nine out of 10 children receives DPT immunization in the country as shown
in Figure D.6. Disaggregating by region, the highest percentage of participants
availing the DPT vaccine can be found in CARAGA (95.3%). Conversely, ARMM has
the lowest number of participants (68.8%).

Figure D.6.

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Diphtheria,


Pertussis, Tetanus (DPT) immunization by region: Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

95

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

The extent of protection against polio is increased the earlier the Oral Polio Vaccine
is given. OPV was received by 89.5% of children in the country. By region, CARAGA
(94.5%) had the largest proportion of recipients while ARMM (68.8%) had the
smallest proportion, as shown in Figure D.7.

Figure D.7.

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Oral Polio


Vaccine (OPV) immunization by region: Philippines, 2011

An early start of Hepatitis B immunization among infants reduces the chance of being
infected and becoming a carrier later in life. Ninety percent of children received
Hepatitis B vaccination in the country while Western Visayas (95.7%) had the highest
percentage of participation while ARMM (68.0%) had the lowest (Figure D.8)

Facts and Figures, 2011

96

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.8.

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Hepatitis B


vaccination by region: Philippines, 2011

Measles is a highly contagious disease and can be prevented by immunization at an


early age of nine months. Figure D.9 reveals the percentage participation of children
in measles vaccination. It was found out that 8 out 10 children were immunized. Nine
out of 10 children in Central Visayas and CARAGA received the measles vaccine
which accounts the highest percentage of participation while ARMM had the lowest
participation, 6 out of 10.

Figure D.9.

Percent of children, 0-4 years old, participating in Measles


vaccination by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

97

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.2

Newborn Screening

Newborn Screening is a public health program designed to screen infants shortly


after birth for a list of conditions that are treatable, but not clinically evident in the
newborn. Figure D.10 shows the percentage of participant 0-23 months old on
Newborn Screening program. It was revealed that 3 in every 10 infants in the country
were participants of the program. CAR had the largest proportion of participants, 5
out of 10 while ARMM had the smallest proportion of participants, 1 out of 10.

Figure D.10.

1.3

Percent of children, 0-23 months old, participating in Newborn


Screening by region: Philippines, 2011

Growth Monitoring

Growth Monitoring is the regular measurement of weights of children using individual


growth charts where measurements are plotted. This serves as an entry point for
appropriate measures to maintain a childs normal growth patterns or correct a childs
manifested growth faltering. In this survey, considered are the 0-2 years old children.
More than half of the population of children in the country were participants of growth
monitoring program as Figure D.11 shows. In addition, the highest percentage
participation can be found in CARAGA (65.0%). Furthermore, ARMM (35.3%) and
CALABARZON (39.8%) had significantly lower participation than the national
estimate (53.3%) (Figure D.12).

Facts and Figures, 2011

98

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.11.

Percent of children, 0-2 years old, participating in Growth


Monitoring by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure D.12.

Percent of children, 0-2 years old, participating in Growth


Monitoring by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

99

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.4

Operation Timbang (OPT)

Operation Timbang is an annual weighing of pre-school children aged 0-71 months


for the purpose of identifying and locating underweight children as well as
determining the nutrition situation in the community. On the average, about 8 out of
10 pre-school children participated in Operation Timbang program (Figure D. 13). It
was found out that ARMM and CALABARZON have significantly lower percentage
than the national estimate (79.3%) while Eastern Visayas, CARAGA, Central
Visayas, Northern Mindanao, CAR, Bicol, MIMAROPA and Western Visayas have
sgnificantly higher percentage (Figure D.14).
.

Figure D.13.

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in Operation


Timbang by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

100

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.14.

1.5

Percent of children, 0-5 years old, participating in Operation


Timbang by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

Vitamin A Supplementation

Vitamin A supplementation is one of the component of Garantisadong pambata


which provide vitamin A capsules to children 1-5 years old. Nine out of 10 children,
aged 1-5 years old were given at least 1 dose of vitamin A capsules during the GP
campaign (Figure D.15). The GP campaign is done twice a year usually in April and
October. Significantly lower percentage can be found in ARMM while NCR,
CARAGA, Eastern Visayas and Western Visayas have significantly higher
percentages than the national estimate (91.6%) (Figure D.16).

Facts and Figures, 2011

101

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.15.

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in Vitamin A


Supplementation by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure D.16.

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in Vitamin A


Supplementation by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

102

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.6

Deworming

Deworming is the provision of an antihelminthic tablet to children 1-5 years old during
the Garantisadong Pambata campaign to reduce the prevalence of soil-transmitted
helminth infections. On the average, 6 out of 10 children were dewormed, as shown
in Figure D.17. Among the regions, highest participation was noted in CAR, while
lowest in Central Luzon, CALABARZON and NCR. Central Luzon, CALABARZON,
NCR and ARMM had significantly lower percentage than that of the national estimate
(63.3%) while, Ilocos, Western Visayas, Zamboanga Peninsula, MIMAROPA,
Cagayan Valley, Central Visayas, Davao, Northern Mindanao, Eastern Visayas,
CARAGA and CAR have significantly higher percentage than the national estimate
(Figure D.18)

Figure D.17.

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in Deworming


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

103

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.18.

1.7

Percent of children, 1-5 years old, participating in Deworming


Program by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

Supplementary Feeding

The Healthy Start Feeding Project (HSFP) of the DSWD provides food supplement to
day care children 3-5 years old. The food supplementation is in the form of hot meals
served either as breakfast or afternoon snacks for 5 days a week. The projects
target duration is 120 feeding days. The food preparation is handled by childrens
parent based on a prepared menu using available indigenous food materials. About 3
out of 10 children in the country participated in the supplementary feeding program
as shown in Figure D.19. Across the region, highest participation was noted in
Zamboanga Peninsula whereas, CALABARZON had the lowest participation.
CALABARZON, ARMM, Central Luzon and Davao have significantly lower
percentage of participation than the national estimate of 32.5%. Conversely,
SOCCKSARGEN, Central Visayas, Western Visayas, MIMAROPA, Cagayan Valley,
CARAGA, Northern Mindanao and Zamboanga Peninsula have significantly higher
percentage of participation in Supplementary Feeding (Figure D. 20).

Facts and Figures, 2011

104

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.19.

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in


Supplementary Feeding Program by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure D.20.

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in


Supplementary Feeding program by region with 95%
confidence interval: Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

105

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.8

Orally-Fit Child

Orally fit child is committed to contribute to the improvement of the quality of life
through the attainment of the highest possible level of oral health. It is a nationwide
campaign to highlight the importance of proper behaviors to maintain optimum oral
health for under six children. The program promotes good tooth brushing techniques,
healthy diet, filling of cavities to relieve pain and discomfort due to dental caries,
extraction of unsavable tooth and treatment of post operative infections. This
program also recognizes that oral hygiene is a basic personal measure to prevent
and control tooth decay and gum disease. Figure D.21 shows that 4 out of 10
children in the country participated on Orally Fit Child Program. Among the regions,
Central Visayas has the highest participation while CALABARZON has the lowest.
Significantly lower percentage than the national estimate (37.6) were found in
CALABARZON and ARMM (Figure D.22).

Figure D.21.

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Orally-Fit


Child Program by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

106

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.22.

1.9

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Orally-Fit


Child Program by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

Day Care Program

The establishment of Day Care Centers in every barangays was embodied in House
Bill Number 1620 to provide for a universal pre-school education that promotes
effective social, intellectual and skills stimulation and value-formation for children 3-5
years old. Percent participation of children 3-5 years old in Day Care Center program
by region was shown in Figure D.23. At the national level, 5 out of 10 children 3-5
years old participated in the Day Care Programs. Significantly lower percentage of
participation than the national estimate were found in NCR and CALABARZON. On
the other hand, ARMM, CARAGA, CAR, Western Visayas, MIMAROPA, Eastern
Visayas, Zamboanga Peninsula and Northern Mindanao have significantly higher
percentage than the national estimate (50.8%) (Figure D.24).

Facts and Figures, 2011

107

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.23.

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Day Care


Center by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure D.24.

Percent of children, 3-5 years old, participating in Day Care


Center by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

108

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.10 Healthy Habits of Children, 6-12 years old


The Essential Health Care Program of DepEd aims to promote cleanliness by simple
health interventions like hand washing before and after meals and after toilet use and
regular brushing of teeth. At the national level, 8 out of 10 children practice washing
their hands before meals. Across regions, a high proportion of children who practice
washing their hands before meals were noted in Ilocos Region (91.5%) and Central
Luzon (90.7%), while the lowest proportion was observed in ARMM (42.7%) (Figure
D.25). Figure D.26 shows the percentage of children, 6-12 years old who practice
washing of hands before meals and it was highly practice in all regions except in
ARMM (42.7%). Regions that have statistically lower percentage than the national
estimate (82.0%) was seen in ARMM, Western Visayas and SOCCSKSARGEN.

Figure D.25.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old who always wash their


hands before meals by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

109

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.26.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands before meals by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

Similarly, 8 out of 10 children practice washing their hands after meals. Among the
regions, the highest proportion of children who practice this healthy habit was noted
in Central Luzon (89.3%), while lowest among children in ARMM (43.7%) (Figure
D.27). Regions that have statistically lower percentage than the national estimate
was observed in ARMM and CAR (Figure D.28).

Facts and Figures, 2011

110

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.27.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after meals by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure D.28.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after meals by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

111

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.29 shows the percent of children, 6-12 years old, who wash their hands
after using the toilet, by region. In general, 8 out of 10 children wash their hands after
using the toilet. Across the regions, the highest number of children who practice this
healthy habits was noted in Ilocos Region (92.4%) followed by Central Luzon
(91.9%). ARMM (44.8%) has the least number of children who washed their hands
after using the toilet. Regions that have statistically lower estimate than the national
estimate (82.8%) was recorded in ARMM and CAR (Figure D.30).

Figure D.29.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after toilet use by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

112

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.30.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their


hands after toilet use by region with 95% confidence interval:
Philippines, 2011

At the national level, about 7 out of 10 children claimed brushing their teeth after
every meal. Among the regions, this practice was evident in Central Luzon (83.3%),
while lowest among children in ARMM (46.6%). Except in ARMM, more than half of
the children in all regions practice this healthy habit (Figure D.31). Among the
regions, ARMM, Eastern Visayas, CAR, Zamboanga Peninsula and Central Visayas
had statistically lower percentage than the national estimate (Figure D.32).

Facts and Figures, 2011

113

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.31.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always brush their


teeth by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure D.32.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always brush their


teeth by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

114

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Dental caries, also known as tooth decay is a bacterial infection in origin that causes
demineralization and destruction of the hard tissues (enamel, dentin and cementum)
usually by the production of acid. About 7 out of 10 children have dental caries.
Highest proportion of children with dental caries can be observed in Eastern Visayas
(79.3%) followed by CARAGA (77.9%) and Northern Mindanao (76.3%). Lowest
proportion of children with dental caries was recorded in Bicol Region (69.4%)
(Figure D.33). Among the regions with highest percentage than national estimate
were Eastern Visayas and CARAGA (Figure D.34)
Provincial results for participation of children to nutrition and related programs are
shown in Appendix Tables D1 - D12.

Figure D.33.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, with dental caries by


region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

115

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure D.34.

Percent of children, 6-12 years old, with dental caries by


region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

116

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part E. Maternal Nutrition


The past and current nutritional status of a mother is an important indicator of her
ability to conceive, to carry the fetus to term, the likelihood that she and the fetus will
survive, the ability to emerge from childbirth and the capacity to breastfeed
successfully through adequate nutrition (Kusin, 1998).
Despite previous efforts to improve the health and nutrition of mothers and their
newborn, maternal and neonatal mortality per year is still at alarming level of 200 per
1000 livebirths and this is due to pregnancy-related complications. In this scenario,
the Philippines commitment to the Millennium Development Goal (MDGs) of
improving maternal health and reduction of child mortality may be put to risk by 2015.
The Department of Health (DOH) identified four risks of maternal and neonatal
mortality: (1) the risk of having mistimed, unplanned, unwanted, and unsupported
pregnancy; (2) risk of not securing adequate care by the mother during the course of
the pregnancy; (3) risk of delivering without being attended to by skilled birth
attendants such as skilled midwives, nurses and physicians; (4) risk of not securing
proper postpartum and postnatal care for the mother and the baby.
The first 1000 days of child life the nine months in the womb and the child 2nd
birthday offer a unique window of opportunity to provide right nutrition, thereby having
a profound impact on childs ability to grow, learn and break the vicious cycle of
malnutrition. The impact of inadequate nutrition during this golden period is lasting
and irreversible, with effects beyond physical health to affect the childs cognitive
development.
To help attain the MDGs target of universal access to reproductive health services as
well as reduction of maternal and newborn mortality, the survey on Maternal Nutrition
aimed to: assess the level of utilization on pre-natal and post-natal care among
mothers; and ascetain the level of knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of mothers
on nutrition, health and hygiene. These factors are equally important to help
strengthen care services intended for pregnant women, lactating mothers as well as
the child-bearing age women and to promote the adoption of healthy behaviors for
improving their health and their infants. Information of maternal nutrition were
collected from mothers with children 0-5 years old.

1. Nutritional Status of Mothers with Children 0-5 Years Old by SocioDemographic Characteristics
In assessing the nutritional status of mothers with 0-5 year old children, Body Mass
Index (NCHS/WHO, 1978) was used as a criteria wherein a mother with a BMI of
<18.5 was classified as Chronic Energy Deficient (CED) while 25 and above was
classified as overweight. Chronic energy deficiency is associated with reduce physical
capacity due to deprivation of food over a long period of time. Figure E.1 shows that
9.4% of mothers are underweight while 31.8% are overweight/obese.

Facts and Figures, 2011

117

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure E.1.

Nutritional status of mothers with children 0-5 years old:


Philippines, 2011

Characterizing the underweight mothers, Figure E.2 shows that mothers 20-29 years
old and were not working have statistically higher risk to CED compared with their
counterparts who were younger less than 20 years old and older 30 years and were
working mothers. In terms of their highest educational attainment, mothers with no
schooling had higher risk to CED but the result was not statistically significant.

Figure E.2.

Percentage of underweight mothers with children 0-5 years old, by


a.) age; b.) highest educational attainment; and c.) work status:
Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

118

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

On the other hand, overweight/obesity was statistically higher among teenage


mothers (< 20 years old) and those who were working mothers compared with their
counterparts who were older and not working. In terms of educational attainment,
there was no statistical difference noted among the different groups.

29.4

Figure E.3.

Percentage of overweight/obese mothers with children 0-5 years


old by a.) age; b.) highest educational attainment; and c.) work
status: Philippines, 2011

Figure E.4 shows the percentage of underweight and overweight/ obese mothers with
children 0-5 years old by region. Across regions, the highest proportion of
underweight mothers was noted in ARMM (13.0%); CALABARZON (11.8%) and Bicol
(11.5%) which are above the national average. Meanwhile, the highest proportion of
overweight/ obese mothers was noted in NCR (36.1%); Central Luzon (35.1%) and
CALABARZON (33.9%).

Facts and Figures, 2011

119

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

REGION

Figure E.4.

% UNDERWEIGHT

% OVERWEIGHT/OBESE

Percentage of underweight and overweight/ obese mothers with


children 0-5 years old by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure E.5 illustrates the percentage of mothers who delivered low birthweight infants
disaggregated by the nutritional status of the mother. Mothers who are chronically
energy deficient or with low BMI (<18.5) have statistically higher risk to deliver low
birth-weight infants. Consequently, low birthweight infants are link with higher risk to
infant mortality based on studies. Result showed that 2 in every 10 underweight
mothers who delivered low birth weight infants in the past 2 years was higher
compared with mothers who were normal and above normal.

Figure E.5.

Percentage of mothers who delivered low birth weight infants in


the past 2 years by nutritional status: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

120

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

2. Utilization of Pre-Natal and Post-Natal Care


About 9 in every 10 mothers had at least one pre-natal visit from a health center, clinic
or hospital during their pregnancy with the youngest child. On the other hand, only
about 4 in every 10 mothers had post-natal visit after delivery with the youngest child.
During pre-natal visits, blood pressure measurement was mostly done (92.5%)
followed by weighing and nutrition counseling at 89% and 87%, respectively. A little
over half (56%) of mothers had received physical examination during their pre-natal
visit. Only about 81% of the mothers received tetanus toxoid during their pre-natal
visit. Moreover, laboratory services such as urinalysis (54%) and blood test (49%) and
ultrasound were not often done during pre-natal check-up (Figure E.6).

Figure E.6.

Percentage of mothers who received pre-natal care and various


health services during pregnancy with the youngest child:
Philippines, 2011

Taking supplements among women during pregnancy is particularly important for the
mothers as well as developing fetus. Figure E.7 shows that about 9 in every 10
mothers took supplements when pregnant with the youngest child. Across regions,
highest proportion of mothers who took supplements during pregnancy with the
youngest child was noted in Central Visayas (94.9%); Nothern Mindanao (93.4%) and
NCR (91.8%) while ARMM (63.7%) had the lowest estimate.

Facts and Figures, 2011

121

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure E.7.

Percentage of mothers who took supplements during pregnancy


with the youngest child by region: Philippines, 2011

Pregnant women needs daily iron supplementation to provide enough iron for
placenta, fetus development and expansion of blood volume. Inadequate intake of
iron among pregnant mothers can lead to iron-deficiency anemia which can result to
low birth weight or pre-term delivery. Figure E.8 shows the type of supplements taken
by mothers during pregnancy with the youngest child, iron tablet was higly taken
among 82.2% mothers while multivitamins with iron, folic acid, and iron-folic acid was
taken by 14.3%, 4.7% and 2.5% mothers, respectively.

Figure E.8.

Type of supplements taken by mothers during pregnancy with the


youngest child: Philippines, 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

122

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

3. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Mothers on Nutrition, Health and


Hygiene
Awareness on the important nutrition/health disorders is shown in Figure E.9,
Hypertension, tuberculosis and iodine deficiency disorders were commonly known by
mothers with children 0-5 years old. Few mothers (31.1%) were aware of night
blindness, an impairment of vision due to vitamin A deficiency particularly during
pregnancy.

Figure E.9.

Awareness of mothers
Philippines, 2011

on

common

nutrition

disorders:

Almost two-third of the mothers did not know the proper duration of exclusive
breastfeeding which is from birth up to 6 months. About 31.0% and 34.0% of mothers
answered that proper duration of exclusive breastfeeding is less than 6 months and
beyond 6 months, respectively. On the other hand, knowledge on the proper
introduction of complementary foods which starts at 6 months was asked among the
mothers. More than than half (50.9%) of mothers knew that infant should be given
complementary foods starting at 6 months (Figure E.10).

Figure E.10. Awareness of mothers on a.) duration of exclusive breastfeeding;


and b.) initiation of complementary feeding: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

123

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Majority of mothers (80.7%) knew that lack of hygienic practices such as feeding
unsafe foods to a child, giving unsafe/contaminated drinking water or poor feeding
practices were the main causes of diarrhea among children 0-5 years old. There were
still 17% of mothers who believed that diarrhea is associated by their own personal
beliefs (Figure E.11).

Figure E.11. Knowledge of mothers on causes of diarrhea among children:


Philippines, 2011

Mothers health-seeking behaviour during childs diarrhea varies from buying over the
counter drugs for self-medication, bringing the child to a health facility, giving OralRehydration Solution (ORS), bringing the child to traditional healer and doing nothing.
Result shows that bringing the child to a health facility was the most common practice,
followed by giving commercial ORS and buying over the counter drugs for self
medication. Bringing the child to traditional healer or albularyo was least practiced by
mothers as seen in Figure E.12.

Figure E.12. Health seeking behaviors of mothers when child gets diarrhea:
Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

124

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Promotion of sanitary practices including personal hygiene and hand-washing can be


a promising area of intervention where it could significantly improve the nutritional
status of mothers as well as their children 0-5 years old. Table E.13 shows that
handwashing before eating is highly practiced, followed by hand-washing after eating
by 88.7% and 70.1, respectively. Least practiced by mothers were the handwashing
before feeding the child and after attending to a child who defecated at 35.6% and
30.1%, respectively.
Regional results of maternal nutrition are shown in Appendix Tables E.2 - E.9.

Figure E.13. Practice of hand-washing with soap among mothers with children
0-5 years old: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

125

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part F.

Food Insecurity Status of Households

Food insecurity is defined as the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally


adequate and safe foods or the limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable
foods in socially acceptable ways (Anderson, 1990). Involuntary hunger is the
immediate consequence of food insecurity and when recurrent over time results to
undernutrition. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimated 16% of
population in developing countries were affected by hunger (FAO, 2010). Based on
the 7th National Nutrition Survey 2008, acute and chronic hunger among Filipino
children 0-5 years old, in the form of underweight and stunting, respectively, were of
high magnitude (FNRI, 2010). Moreover, at least 70% of Filipino households were
not meeting 100% of energy requirement making these households at risk to various
nutritional and health problems. The consequences of food insecurity on the children
are many and wide ranging: it affects physical and mental development, which in turn
affect their economic productivity later in life.
One of the objectives of the 2011 Updating Survey on Nutritional Status of Filipino
Children and other Population Groups was to re-asses food insecurity in the country
using the Radimer-Cornell food insecurity items. The Radimer-Cornell tool consisted
of 10 simple and easy to ask statements/items: four items are used to assess
household food insecurity and a set of three is used to assess individual food
insecurity based on the experience of the household respondent and children. These
statements/items describe the conditions experienced by food insecure households
and individuals. If household respondent answered yes to at least one of the four
household food insecurity items, the household is considered food insecure, and a
yes answer to at least one of the individual food insecurity items, the respondent,
representing the adults is food insecure. The same is applied to assess if a child is
food insecure or not. The period of reckoning is the past three months prior to the
interview. The tool was administered through face to face interview by the researcher
with the respondent who is usually the mother or any adult member in sample
household. Households included in the analysis are those with children 0-10 years
old who voluntarily consented to answer all the food insecurity items/statements.
Table F.1 shows the Radimer-Cornell food insecurity items and the response
category.

Facts and Figures, 2011

126

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table F.1

The Radimer-Cornell food insecurity items and response


categories

RADIMER-CORNELL FOOD INSECURITY ITEMS

RESPONSE
CATEGORIES

Household Level
1. I worried that our food would run out before we got
money to buy more.

Not true/
Often/Sometimes

2. The food we bought did not last and we do not


have enough money to get more.

Not true/
Often/Sometimes

3. The children were not eating enough because we


did not have enough food and we could not afford
to buy more.
4. We could not feed the children nutritionally
adequate meals because we do not have enough
food and enough money to buy food.

Not true/
Often/Sometimes

Adult Level
5. Skipped eating or missed meal(s) because there
was no food or money to buy food.
6. Did not ever eat the whole day because there was
no food or money to buy food.
7. Ever hungry but did not eat the whole day because
there was no food or money to buy food.

Not true/
Often/Sometimes

Never/Once//More than
once
Never/Once//More than
once
Never/Once//More than
once

Child Level
8. Skipped eating or missed meal(s) because there
was no food or money to buy food.
9. Did not ever eat the whole day because there was
no food or money to buy food.
10. Ever hungry but did not eat the whole day
because there was no food or money to buy food.

Never/Once//More than
once
Never/Once//More than
once
Never/Once//More than
once

1. Food-Insecure Households
Table F.2 shows the percentage of households who are food insecure based on the
Radimer-Cornell food insecurity items. Of the 21,484 households covered in the
Survey, 69.3% are food insecure as these households affirmed to have experience
at least one of the household food insecurity items at least once during the past three
months prior to the interview. Among the items, the most common experience of
households is Worried that food would run out before household got money to buy
more (67.9%), followed by the uncertainty statement that That food just bought did
not last and do not have enough money to get more (54.7%). Among households
with children 0-10 years old, 41% reported that the children were not eating enough
because household do not have enough food and cannot afford to buy more and
42.3% could not feed the children nutritionally adequate meals because they do not
have enough food and money to buy more.

Facts and Figures, 2011

127

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Based on the frequency of food insecurity experience, household food insecurity is


considered a moderate problem since an almost equal proportions of households
who affirmed to the food insecurity items experienced the conditions sometimes
and often during the past three months before the interview.

Table F.2.

Percentage of food insecure household based on the RadimerCornell food insecurity items and frequency of experience
during the past 3 months before the survey: Philippines, 2011
FREQUENCY OF
RADIMER-CORNELL FOOD INSECURITY
OCCURENCE
(%)
PERCENT
ITEMS
Often
Sometimes

Worried that food would run out before


household got money to buy more
That food just bought did not last and do not
have enough money to get more
The children were not eating enough because
household do not have enough food and cannot
afford to buy more
Household could not feed the children
nutritionally adequate meals because household
do not have enough food and enough money to
buy more
% with experience of at least one of the items

Facts and Figures, 2011

67.9

49.3

50.7

54.7

50.0

50.0

41.0

46.2

53.8

42.3

45.7

54.3

69.3

128

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table F.3 shows the percentage of food insecure households, the standard error
(SE), 95% confidence interval (CI) and coefficient variable (CV) by region. The
percentage of food insecurity ranges from 54.6% in Ilocos to 91.5% in ARMM.
Regions with high percentages of food insecure households are found in ARMM,
SOCCSKSARGEN, Bicol, Central Visayas, Northern Mindanao and MIMAROPA.
While low percentages are observed in NCR, Central Luzon, CALABARZON, CAR.
Ilocos has the lowest percentage.

Table F.3.

Percent of households who experienced food insecurity


region: Philippines, 2011
(95% CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL)
REGIONS
n
%
SE
Lower
Upper
Limit
Limit
Philippines
21,484
69.3
0.4
21.2
22.8
Ilocos Region
1,144
54.6
2.0
50.7
58.6
Cagayan Valley
1,006
66.5
2.0
62.6
70.5
CAR
911
57.2
2.6
52.0
62.3
Central Luzon
1,646
63.7
1.5
60.7
66.8
NCR
2,314
63.8
1.4
61.1
66.5
CALABARZON
1,983
58.7
1.5
55.8
61.6
MIMAROPA
923
73.4
2.2
69.0
77.8
Bicol Region
1,338
78.2
1.7
74.8
81.6
Western Visayas
1,310
74.7
1.4
71.9
77.5
Central Visayas
1,331
77.7
1.4
74.9
80.4
Eastern Visayas
1,197
74.3
1.8
70.7
77.9
Zamboanga Peninsula
910
72.5
2.1
68.4
76.5
Northern Mindanao
1,097
77.6
2.0
73.7
81.4
Davao Region
999
72.0
2.1
67.8
76.2
SOCCSKSARGEN
1,171
80.0
2.1
76.0
84.0
CARAGA
993
70.1
2.2
65.8
74.5
ARMM
1,211
91.5
1.0
89.5
93.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

by

CV
(%)
1.8
3.7
3.0
4.6
2.4
2.1
2.5
3.1
2.2
1.9
1.8
2.5
2.8
2.6
3.0
2.6
3.1
1.1

129

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure F.1 shows that the percentage of food insecure households and the 95% CI
by region. Regions that are statistically higher than the national estimate of 69.3%
are ARMM, SOCCSKSARGEN, Bicol, Central Visayas, Northern Mindanao, Western
Visayas and Eastern Visayas. Among these regions, ARMM had the highest
percentage as its 95% CI does not overlap with the other aforementioned regions.
On the other hand, Ilocos, CAR, CALABARZON, Central Luzon and NCR have
statistically lower percentages than the national estimate.

Figure F.1.

Percentage of food insecure households and the 95% confidence


interval by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure F.2 shows the percentage of food insecure households by province. For
graphical presentation, the estimates in percentages are classified into 5 groups: 1)
80.1 and above; 2) 70.1-80; 3) 60.1-70; 4) 50.1-60.0; and 5) 50 and below (<=50).
Of the provinces, 14 out of the 80 provinces or about 18% of the provinces in the
country have at least 80% of households who are food insecure. It is noted that
except for Ifugao and Catanduanes in Luzon, provinces with high percentages of
food insecure households are mostly located in the Visayas groups of islands and
Mindanao.
Between provinces, more than 80% of households in Lanao del Sur, Sulu, TawiTawi, Maguindanao, Catanduanes, Occidental Mindoro, Ifugao, Negros Occidental,
Davao del Sur, Albay, Zamboanga del Norte, Misamis Oriental, Capiz, Bukidnon, and
Bohol are food insecure. While less than 50% of households are found in Apayao,
La Union, Laguna and Zamboanga Sibugay are food insecure.

Facts and Figures, 2011

130

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

National Estimate: 69.3%

Figure F.2.

Percentage of food
Philippines, 2011

insecure

households

by

province:

Figure F.3 shows the percentages of food insecure households and the 95% CI by
province. The percentages of food insecure households in Apayao (36.5%), La Union
(47.4%), Laguna (51.3%) and Zamboanga Sibugay (51.8%). Southern Leyte, Ilocos
Norte, Ilocos Sur, Zambales, Rizal, Pangasinan, Cavite, Surigao Norte, Marinduque,
Bataan and NCR are significantly lower than the national estimate. While that in
Ifugao (85.4%), North Cotabato (85.5%) Occidental Mindoro (85.8%), Catanduanes
(87.8%), Maguindanao (89.8%) Tawi-Tawi (93.5%), Sulu (94.3%) and Lanao del Sur
(96.6%) are significantly higher than the national estimates. However, the differences
between these provinces are not significant as their 95% CI are overlapping each
other.

Facts and Figures, 2011

131

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure F.3.

Percentage of food insecure households and the 95% confidence


interval by province: Philippines, 2011

2. Food-Insecure Adults and Children


Table F.4 shows the percentages of adults as represented by the household
respondents and children who are food insecure and the frequency of experience by
item. Results showed that 36.0% of mothers/caregivers respondent are food insecure
for the past three months prior to the interview. Of the three items skipped eating or
missing meals is the most common experienced with 34.3%, 10.3% did not eat for a
whole day and 19.5% felt hungry but did not eat because there was no food or
money to buy food.
Using on the same items to determine children who are food insecure, 22.9% of
children are found food insecure. The most common experience of food insecurity
experienced by children is skipping meals at 21.5% and 13.3% experienced hunger
but did not eat, whereas 7.3% of them did not eat the whole day all because there
was no food or money to buy.
Comparing food insecurity experience between adults and children, results reveal
that the percentage of adults is higher than the percentage of children who skipped
meals or missed meals, not eat the whole day and go hungry when households are
confronted with food insecurity.

Facts and Figures, 2011

132

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table F.4.

Percentage of food insecure adults and children, and frequency


of experience during the past 3 months before the survey:
Philippines, 2011
Adults
Children
Frequency (%)
Frequency (%)
INDIVIDUAL FOOD
More
More
INSECURITY ITEMS
Percent
Percent
Once
than
Once
than
Once
Once

Skipped eating or missing


meal(s)

34.3

50.1

49.9

21.5

49.9

50.1

Hungry but did not eat

19.5

51.6

48.6

13.3

49.1

50.9

10.3

57.0

43.0

7.3

54.9

45.1

Did not eat for the whole


day
Percent with experience of
at least one of the indices

36.0

22.9

Table F.5 shows high proportions of food insecure adults and children in ARMM at
78.9% and 64.3% respectively and SOCCSKSARGEN following at 50.2% and
35.8%, respectively. Other region with percentage of food insecure adults higher than
the national estimate are noted in Davao (41.9%), Northern Mindanao (41.3%),
Zamboanga (40.4%) and other regions like in Western Visayas, Central Visayas,
MIMAROPA, Bicol, Eastern Visayas.
Results also reveal that aside from ARMM and SOCCSKSARGEN, high proportions
of food insecure children are found in Bicol (27.8%), Northern Mindanao (27.0%) and
MIMAROPA at 26.3%. Inversely, the least percentages of food insecure children are
observed in CALABARZON, Central Luzon and CAR at 16.2%, 15.4% and 7.1%,
respectively.
Figure F.4 presents the percentage of food insecure adults and the 95% CI by
region. It is clearly reveal that the highest percentage of food insecure adults is
significantly highest in ARMM and lowest in CAR as their 95% Cls does not overlap
with the other regions. Other regions with percentage higher than the national
estimates include Northern Mindanao, Davao and SOCCSKSARGEN.

Facts and Figures, 2011

133

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Table F.5.

Percent of food insecure adults and children by region:


Philippines, 2011
Food Insecure Adults
Food Insecure Children

REGIONS

SE

(95% CI)
LL

UL

CV
(%)

SE

( 95% CI)
LL

UL

CV
(%)
1.6

Philippines

36.0

0.4

35.2

36.9

1.2

22.9

0.4

22.1

23.6

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

25.3
27.5
14.5
26.7
33.0
29.0
38.7
38.7
39.4
38.9
36.9
40.4
41.3
41.9
50.2
30.9
78.9

1.5
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.3
2.1
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.7
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.5
2.0
1.6

22.3
24.3
11.7
24.1
30.7
26.5
34.6
35.6
36.2
35.3
33.5
36.1
37.3
37.6
45.4
27.0
75.8

28.3
30.6
17.2
29.3
35.3
31.4
42.9
41.8
42.6
42.5
40.3
44.7
45.4
46.2
55.1
34.7
82.1

6.0
5.9
9.7
5.0
3.6
4.4
5.5
4.1
4.2
4.7
4.7
5.5
5.0
5.2
4.9
6.4
2.1

16.4
17.8
7.1
15.4
18.0
16.2
26.3
27.8
21.1
26.0
24.0
25.5
27.0
26.1
35.8
20.6
64.3

1.3
1.4
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
2.1
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.6
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.3
1.7
2.0

13.8
15.1
5.1
13.6
16.3
14.2
22.3
25.2
18.5
22.6
20.9
21.7
23.3
22.2
31.3
17.2
60.4

19.1 8.1
20.5 7.7
9.2 14.5
17.2 6.0
19.8 5.0
18.2 6.4
30.4 7.8
30.3 4.7
23.7 6.3
29.3 6.6
27.1 6.6
29.3 7.6
30.8 7.1
30.0 7.5
40.4 6.4
23.9 8.3
68.3 3.1

Facts and Figures, 2011

134

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure F.4.

Percentage of food insecure adults and the 95% confidence


interval by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure F.5 presents the percentage of food insecure adults by province. Following
the groupings of the estimates, high percentages of food insecure households (>
40%) are mainly found in the Visayas group of island and Mindanao. Figure F.6 on
the other hand shows the percentage of food insecure mothers and the 95% CI by
province. Result reveals that high percentages of food insecure children are
observed in provinces of ARMM like Tawi-Tawi (87.6%), Sulu (86.4%), Lanao del Sur
(79.6%) and Maguindanao (77.9%) which are statistically higher than the other
provinces because their 95% CI does not overlap with the rest of the provinces.
Conversely, percentages in Benguet (6.8%), Apayao (8.4%), Ilocos Norte (11.2%),
Mountain Province (14.3%), Ilocos Sur (15.2%), Aurora (15.9%) and Abra (16.1%)
are significantly lower than the national estimate.

Facts and Figures, 2011

135

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

National Estimate: 36.0%

Figure F.5.

Percentage of food insecure adults by province: Philippines,


2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

136

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure F.6.

Percentage of food insecure adults and the 95% confidence


interval by province: Philippines, 2011

Figure F.7 shows that the percentages of food insecure children and 95% CI by
region. And obviously ARMM and SOCCSKSARGEN have significantly higher
percentages of food insecure children, while CAR has significantly the lowest
percentage. Aside from ARMM, regions with higher than the national estimate
include SOCCSKSARGEN (35.8%), Bicol (27.8%), Northern Mindanao (27.0%) and
MIMAROPA.
Figure F.8 shows the percentage of food insecure children by province. Following the
same groupings, more than 40% of food insecure children are found in Sulu, TawiTawi, Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, Sultan Kudarat and South Cotabato, whereas,
below percentage below 10% is observed in CAR.

Facts and Figures, 2011

137

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure F.7.

Percentage of food insecure children and the 95% confidence


interval by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

138

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

National Estimate: 22.9%

Figure F.8.

Percentage of food insecure children by province: Philippines,


2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

139

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure F.9.

Percentage of food insecure children and the 95% confidence


interval by province: Philippines, 2011

3. Comparison of Food Insecure Households and Children: 2008 and


2011
Comparing the percentage of food insecure households and children, Figures 10 and
11 show the results of the comparative analysis between 2008 and 2011. Generally,
the percentage of households who are food insecure three months prior to the
interview as well as the percentage of households by food insecurity item statistically
decline in 2011 from 2008 (Figure 10). On the contrary, the percentages of children
who are food insecure slightly increase, from 20.2% in 2008 to 22.9% in 2011. By
food insecurity experience, with the exception of ever not eat the whole day, the
percentages of children with experience of skipped eating or missed meal(s) and the
ever hungry but did not eat slightly increased (Figure 11).

Facts and Figures, 2011

140

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

78.6

Food insecure households

69.3

Worried that food would run out


before household got money to get
more

74.7
67.9

The food we bought did not last and


we do not have enough money to get
more

64.5
54.7

The children were not eating enough


because we did not have enough food
and we could not afford to buy more

52.3
41.0

We could not feed the children a


nutritionally adequate meals because
we do not have enough food and

57.5
42.3
0

20

40

60

80

100

Figure F.10. Percentage of households who were food insecure and by


food insecurity item: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

Food insecure children

20.2
22.9

Skipped eating or missed


meal(s)

18.8
21.5
8.6

Ever not eat the whole day

7.3
12.2
13.3

Ever hungry but did not eat


0

10

20

30

40

50

Figure F.11. Percentage of children who were food insecure and by food insecurity
experience: Philippines, 2008 and 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

141

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

4. Coping Mechanisms
Figure F.12 shows the different coping mechanisms adopted by the households
when there is insufficient amount of food. Coping mechanisms are classified into food
and non-food mechanisms. For food coping mechanisms, the most common practice
is purchased food on credit (75.6%), borrow food from relatives (66.3%), reducing
portion sizes of their meals eaten (56.9%), restricting consumption of adults to
protect their child from hunger (54.7%). While, 45.6% agreed that they reduce their
intake/number of meals in a day and some would rely on less expensive foods and
22.2% used to eat exotic/wild foods to fill their empty stomachs.
For non-food coping mechanism, the most common practice is to loan money from
relatives and friends at 74.6%, and 56.8% respectively, and 22.8% of households let
their children to be absent in school.

Figure F.12. Percentage of food insecure households by coping mechanisms:


Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

142

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Part G.

Participation of Households to Nutrition and


Related Programs

1. Government Programs
The government program participation survey of household has covered a total of
38,896 sample households. Information was collected about nutrition-related
programs (Vegetable Gardening, Nutrition Education and Iodized Salt); government
assistance program (Botika ng Barangay, Senior Citizen Discount Cards and
Philhealth Care); other programs and services (Free Medical and Dental Services).
Generally, low participation of households to government programs was noted as
shown in Figure G.1. About 6 in every 10 households availed the free medical
services offered by the government, while 5 in every 10 households availed the
government assistance programs such as Philhealth Care and Senior Citizen
discount card. About 4 in every 10 households participated tn the free dental services
and 3 in every 10 household benefited from Botika ng Barangay Program and
Nutrition Education. Only 1 in every 10 household participated in Vegetable
Gardening.

Figure G.1.

Percent of households participating in various government


health services and nutrition-related programs: Philippines,
2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

143

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.1 Botika ng Barangay


Botika ng Barangay is a government program which refers to a drug outlet
managed by a legitimate organization/NGO supervised by a trained operator and
pharmacist established in the barangay. This program is in accordance with DOH
Administrative Order No. 144 s.2004. Figure G.2 shows the percentage of
households that availed the Botika ng Barangay Program. About 3 in every 10
households availed the Botika ng Barangay program. Across the regions, higher
participation were found in Mindanao which includes Northern Mindanao(44.0%),
followed by Davao Region (39.6%) and CARAGA (39.2%), while only 20.1% of
households in Central Visayas benefited from the program. Figure G.3 shows the
percentage of households that availed the Botika ng Barangay Program by region
with 95% confidence interval. Regions that have statistically lower percentage
participation than the national estimate (27.6%) were Central Visayas, Eastern
Visayas and NCR. Figure G.4 shows the comparison of households that availed the
Botika ng Barangay Program by region between 2008 and 2011. In general, the
percentage of households that availed the Botika ng Barangay Program decline from
33.9% in 2008 to 27.6% in 2011. In contrast, availment of Botika ng Barangay in
regions such as CAR, Central Visayas, Northern Mindanao, CARAGA, and ARMM
have increased.

Figure G.2.

Percent of households participating in Botika ng Barangay


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

144

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.3.

Percent of households participating in Botika ng Barangay


Program by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

Figure G.4.

Comparison of households participating in Botika ng


Barangay program by region: Philippines, 2008 and 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

145

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.2

Free Medical Services

Basic health services aim to improve the peoples quality of life through the
attainment of the highest possible care. Free Medical Services give direct health and
medical attention to the marginalized sector of the population in all of health centers
and government hospital nationwide. Figure G.5 shows the percentage of
households that availed of DOHs Free Medical Services. More than half (57.7%) of
the households in the entire Philippines availed the program. Among the regions,
households in CARAGA have the highest participation (70.8%) while households in
Ilocos Region have the lowest participation (47.0%). Percent of households
participating in Free Medical Services by region with 95% confidence interval is
shown in Figure G.6. Regions from Ilocos, Central Luzon, Cagayan VaIley, and
CALABARZON Region have significantly lower percent participation of households
than the national average (57.7%).

Figure G.5.

Percent of households participating in Free Medical Services


by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

146

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.6.

1.3

Percent of households participating in Free Medical Services


by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Free Dental Services

Free Dental Services aims to reduce the prevalence of dental caries to 85% and
periodontal disease by 60% by the end of 2016. The program seeks to achieve this
objective by providing preventive, curative, and promotive dental health care to
Filipinos through a lifecycle approach. Percent of households participating in Free
Dental Services by region is shown in Figure G.7. In general, about 2/5 or 40% of the
households in the entire country benefited from the Free Dental Services. Across the
regions, highest participation was noted among households in CARAGA (52.1%),
followed by NCR (49.4%) and Northern Mindanao (47.4%), lowest participation was
noted in ARMM (29.2%). Figure G.8 shows the percentage of households
participating in Free Dental Services by region with 95% confidence interval. Notably,
regions that have statistically lower percentage participation than the national
estimate (40.0%) were ARMM, Ilocos Region, Bicol Region, CALABARZON, Central
Luzon and Zamboanga Peninsula.

Facts and Figures, 2011

147

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.7.

Percent of households participating in Free Dental Services


by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure G.8.

Percent of households participating in Free Dental Services


by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

148

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.4 Philhealth
Philhealth was created to create a universal health coverage for all Filipinos. Its goal
is to ensure a sustainable national health insurance program for all. This is a joint
project of the Department of Health and the Philippines Health Insurance Corporation
(PHIC) in keeping with the government promise to give to each and every Filipino
access to quality healthcare. This means that every Filipino should have access to
high quality health care that is efficient, accessible, equitably distributed, adequately
funded, fairly financed, and direct conjunction with an informed and empowered
public. Figure G.9 shows the percentage of households participating in Philhealth by
region. Almost half (48.8%) of the households in the entire Philippines benefited from
the program. Among the regions, households in Northern Mindanao (77.0%) had the
highest participation in Philhealth while households in ARMM had the lowest
participation (35.1%). Percent of households participating in Philhealth by region with
95% confidence interval is shown in Figure G.10. Regions from ARMM,
CALABARZON, MIMAROPA, and Cagayan VaIley and NCR have significantly lower
percent participation of households than the national average (48.8%).

Figure G.9.

Percent of households participating in Philhealth by region:


Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

149

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.10.

1.5

Percent of households participating in Philhealth by region


with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Senior Citizen Program

A senior citizen or elderly refers to any resident citizen of the Philippines at least sixty
(60) years old. Under the Republic Act. No. 9994 or the Expanded Senior Citizen Act
of 2010, the senior citizen shall be entitled to the following: The grant of 20%
discount and exemption on the purchase of medicines, on the professional fees, on
medical and dental services, actual fare for land and transportation travel on public
utility vehicles, on utilization of services in hotels and similar lodging establishments,
restaurant and recreation centers, on admission charges by cinema houses;
exemption from payment of individual income taxes; and grant of five percent
discount to utilities expenses; free medical, dental services, diagnostic and laboratory
fees. Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen Program by region is
shown in Figure G.11. Generally, more than half (53.9%) of the households in the
entire Philippines availed from the Senior Citizen Program. Across the regions,
highest participation was noted among households in NCR (71.2%). About 6 out of
10 households in Western Visayas, Ilocos Region, Eastern Visayas, Central Visayas,
Davao Region, and Northern Mindanao participated in the program. Lowest
participation was noted in ARMM (17.1%). Figure G.12 shows the percentage of
households participating in Senior Citizen Program by region with 95% confidence
interval. In particular, regions that have statistically lower percentage participation
than the national estimate (53.9%) were ARMM, Cagayan Valley, Zamboanga
Peninsula and MIMAROPA, CAR and CALABARZON.
Facts and Figures, 2011

150

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.11.

Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen Program


by region: Philippines, 2011

Figure G.12.

Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen Program


by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

151

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.6 Nutrition Education


Nutrition education program aimed to influence behaviour towards adoption of more
positive nutrition related practices, eating nutritious and safe foods. Examples are
mothers class, food demonstrations, reading newsprints, listening over various radio
programs in nutrition, surfing through internet, public lectures and promotional
campaign on television. Figure G.13 shows the percentage of households
participating in Nutrition Education Program by region. Generally, more than onefourth (26.5%) of the households in the entire Philippines benefited from the program.
Among the regions, households in Northern Mindanao (39.3%) had the most number
of participation in Nutrition Education, followed by Davao Region (34.2%) and Central
Visayas (33.0%) while only 10.8% of households in ARMM participated the program
which and had the lowest participation. Percent of households participating in
Nutrition Education Program by region with 95% confidence interval is shown in
Figure G.14. Regions from ARMM, Cagayan Valley, Ilocos Region, and Eastern
Visayas have significantly lower percent participation of households than the national
average (26.5%). Figure G.15 shows the comparison of households that availed the
Nutrition Education Program by region between 2008 and 2011. In general, the
percentage of households that availed the Nutrition Education Program increased
from 13.1% in 2008 to 26.5% in 2011. Notably, among the regions, participation of
Nutrition Education Program only decline in Zambaonga Peninsula from 2008 to
2011.

Figure G.13.

Percent of households participating in Nutrition Education


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

152

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.14.

Figure G.15.

Percent of households participating in Nutrition Education


Program by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

Comparison of households participating in Nutrition


Education Program by region: Philippines, 2008 and 2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

153

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

1.7

Vegetable Gardening Program

The vegetable gardening program such as the Gulayang Masa sa Barangay,


Gulayan sa Eskuwela were strongly advocated and likewise implemented because of
the disturbing result on low consumption of vegetables in the Filipino diet. Percent of
households participating in Vegetable Gardening Program by region is shown in
Figure G.16. Despite the tremendous effort of the government to implement the
program, only 1/10 or 12.9% of the households in the entire Philippines participated
from the Vegetable Gardening Program. Across the regions, higher participation
were noted among households in CARAGA (25.3%), Cagayan Valley (23.9), Bicol
Region (23.0), Northern Mindanao (22.9%) and MIMAROPA (21.8%). Only a few
(2.0%) households participated in Vegetable Gardening in NCR. Figure G.17 shows
the percentage of households participating in Vegetable Gardening Program by
region with 95% confidence interval. In particular, regions that have statistically lower
percentage participation than the national estimate (12.9%) were NCR, ARMM,
Ilocos Region, Central Luzon and CALABARZON.

Figure G.16.

Percent of households participating in Vegetable Gardening


Program by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

154

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.17.

Percent of households participating in Vegetable Gardening


Program by region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines,
2011

2. Iodized Salt
Iodine Deficiency Disorder (IDD) is a common cause of preventable mental
retardation. It also affects the mothers reproductive function and impedes childrens
learning capacity. The prevalence of IDD among school children 6-12 years old in the
country have shown improvement from mild IDD prevalence in 1998 to optimum
iodine nutriture in 2008. This improvement can be attibuted to the salt iodization
program. The ASIN Law or RA. 8172 requires all food grade salt to be iodized. It
also mandates all salt producers and traders to make iodized salt available to
Filipinos. Iodized salt is defined as ordinary salt to which iodine in the form of
potassium iodate or potassium iodide was added.
Results of the iodized salt survey showed that at the time of the survey, nearly 4/5 or
78.7% of the households claimed they were aware of iodized salt (Figure G.18).
Across the regions, highest awareness on iodized salt was noted among households
in CALABARZON (90.2%) while the lowest was found in ARMM (29.3%). Figure
G.19 shows the percent awareness on iodized salt among the households by region
with 95% confidence interval. Regions from ARMM, Eastern Visayas, Zamboanga
Peninsula, and CARAGA have significantly lower percent awareness on iodized salt
of households than the national average (78.7%).

Facts and Figures, 2011

155

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.18.

Figure G.19.

Percent of households who are


region: Philippines, 2011

aware of iodized salt by

Percent of households who are aware of iodized salt by


region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

156

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Of the total households, 46.6% are claimed users of iodized salts (Figure G.20).
Among the regions, more than 60% of the households in CAR and in Cagayan Valley
claimed using iodized salt. In Northern Mindanao , more than half of the households
claimed using iodized salt while 1 out of 10 households in ARMM were claimed users
of iodized salt. Regions that have statistically lower percentage of iodized salt users
than the national estimate (46.6%) were ARMM, Western Visayas, Central Luzon,
and Eastern Visayas, Zamboanga Peninisula and Ilocos Region. (Figure G.21).

Figure G.20.

Percent users of iodized salt among the households by


region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

157

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.21.

Percent users of iodized salt among the households by


region with 95% confidence interval: Philippines, 2011

Comparing the result of the 2011 Survey than that of the 2008 data, awareness on
iodized salt remained unchanged. Usage of iodized salt however, increased from
41.9% in 2008 to 46.6% in 2011 and the increased was found to be highly significant
(Figure G.22).

Figure G.22.

Trends in the awareness and usage of iodized salt among


households: Philippines, 1998-2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

158

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

On-site testing of household salt was done during the field data collection using a salt
testing solution to determine if the salt is iodized or not. A change of color in salt
after the addition of the test kit solution indicates the presence of potassium iodate,
an indication that the salt was iodized. If there is no change in color, it indicates that
the salt is not iodized or the fortificant in salt is the potassium iodide. Locally,
potassium iodate is being used by the manufacturers because of its strong resistance
to hot climate such as the Philippines.
The result of the salt testing have shown that, majority of the household salts reacted
positively to the salt testing solution indicating the presence of potassium
iodate..Among the regions, CARAGA, SOCCSKSARGEN, Davao, CAR, Bicol, and
Eastern Visayas had the most number of households whose salt reacted positively to
salt testing solution. Central Luzon and Zamboanga Peninsula had the most number
of households salt with negative reaction to salt testing solution (Figure G.23).
Percent of household salts that reacted positively to potassium iodate by region with
95% confidence interval is shown in Figure G.24. In general, regions that have
statistically lower percentage of household salts positive to potassium iodate
compared with the national estimate (80.1%) were found in Zamboanga Peninsula,
Central Luzon, ARMM, and MIMAROPA.

Figure G.23.

Percent of household salts positive to potassium iodate using


the salt testing solution by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

159

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Figure G.24.

Percent of household salts positive to potassium iodate using


the salt testing solution by region with 95% confidence
interval: Philippines, 2011

Comparing the result of on-site testing of household salts positive to potassium


iodate between 2008 and 2011 survey periods showed a slight decrease of 1
percentage point from the 2008 data. The decrease was found to be statistically
significant (Figure G.25).

Figure G.25.

Trends of household salts positive to potassium iodate using


the salt testing solution: Philippines, 2003-2011
Facts and Figures, 2011

160

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

The salt testing solution (MBI test kit) used during the 2011 Survey determines the
test level of iodine (in ppm) of household salt by a change in color of salt when the
solution is added, and these are the following: from white to dark violet - 15 ppm
iodine level; white to slight violet -1 to <15 ppm iodine level and no change in color zero ppm.
Using the MBI test kit category, the results showed that for the entire Philippines,
54% of household salt had iodine content of 15 ppm while, 26% had 1 to <15 ppm
and about 20% with zero ppm iodine content. Among the regions, household salts in
CAR, Bicol Region, Davao Region, SOCCSKSARGEN, and CARAGA had more than
15 ppm iodine content. Central Luzon and zamboanga Peninsula had the most
number of household salts with zero iodine content (Figure G.26).
Provincial results of the participation of households to nutrition and related programs
are shown in Appendix Tables G.1 - G.11.

Figure G.26.

Percentage distribution of household salts by level of iodine


content by region: Philippines, 2011

Facts and Figures, 2011

161

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

CHAPTER IV

CONCLUSION
AND
CHALLENGES

Facts and Figures, 2011

163

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

The problem of undernutrition among Filipino children 0-10 years old and other
population groups including the pregnant women and lactating mothers remain
unchanged for nearly 2 decades (1993-2011). For children 0-10 years old, stunting
was more of a problem than underweight, although both forms of undernutrition were
still prevalent at high to very high levels while wasting was serious in magnitude.
Overweight on the other hand, for both groups of children was low, but was slowly
and continuously increasing over the years.
Analyzing the trend by age, both prevalence of underweight and stunting increase
with increasing age and continued to increase from birth until the 3rd year, indicating
that children in these age groups are inappropriately and inadequately fed. At
population level, underweight among children 0 to 1 year was medium in magnitude,
this increased to high levels among the 2 to 3 years old.
Stunting on the other hand was low among children less than 1 year old and
dramatically went up to high levels on the 1st and 2nd year and very high among the 3
years old. Stunting reflects chronic or long term undernutrition. Occurrence of
stunting among infants 0 to 5 months might be reflective of poor maternal nutrition.
When the child reached the age of 6 to 11 months old, further increased in the
prevalence of underheight might be attributed to inappropriate feeding practices such
as inadequate and untimely introduction of complementary foods. Prevalence of
stunting further double when the child reached 1 year old, that can be ascribed to
prolonged inadequacies of food intake in terms of quality and quantity, and
recurrence of illness or infections that eventually slowed downed their skeletal growth
resulting to linear growth retardation. The impact of stunting is lasting and
irreversible, and without further intervention in the first two years of life, this may
predispose them to severe illnesses, developmental delays and possibly even death.
Identify efforts to curb chronic malnutrition particularly in the 1st two years of life to
prevent risk to delayed mental development, poor school performance and reduced
intellectual capacity. Arrest overnutrition in children, adults and lactating mothers to
prevent both short term and long term health consequences to non-communicable
diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer by intensifying
promotion on physical and healthy lifestyle programs.
The slight improvement on infant feeding practices, specifically on practice of
exclusive breastfeeding, ever breastfeeding and complementary feeding, is still
below the global recommendation. IYCF practices can be improved further by
disseminating IYCF messages intensively and extensively at grass roots levels. This
will also address mothers inadequate knowledge and subsequently improve infant
feeding practices. Furthermore, the strict implementation and monitoring of RA 10028
in all government and private health institutions as mandated to implement roomingin to support breastfeeding in the workplace and EO 51 known as the Milk Code
should be reinforced. The less diverse and poor quality of food given to children calls
for the reformulation or development of affordable, culturally acceptable and easy to
prepare complementary foods/recipes (processed or home-prepared).
Educating mothers on the proper selection of complementary foods given to children
should also be looked into and intensify. Other avenues for interpersonal means of

Facts and Figures, 2011

165

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

delivering basic nutrition knowledge and that of IYCF should be explored in the Day
Care Centers where mothers are usually present, during pre-and post natal visits, GP
and during medical missions. Universities and colleges offering nutrition courses,
both public and private, should also take active role in disseminating IYCF and
nutrition knowledge in the homes of mothers during their field practicum or out-reach
programs.
There is also a need to strengthen mother support system for breastfeeding within
the family, the workplace and the community, and within the society. Intensify
capacity building in infant and young children feeding among program implementers
like mothers, caregivers, health workers, and the community in general.
Addressing the poor nutritional status of pregnant women is the most cost effective
and efficient approach to break the vicious inter-generational cycle of undernutrition.
The first 1000 days of child life the nine months in the womb and the childs 2nd
birthday offer a unique window of opportunity to provide right nutrition, thereby having
a profound impact on childs ability to grow and develop. The importance of the first
1000 days reinforces an integrative approach of the Maternal-Newborn-Child Health
and Nutrition (MNCHN) and the improved delivery of its services to improve access
and sustained participation of mothers.
Recognizing the crucial role of breastfeeding, the Department of the Interior and
Local Government (DILG) should enforce and make into local ordinance the
Memorandum Circular 2011-54 which enjoins all local chief executives and the
Regional Governor, and ARMM, the strict implementation and monitoring of the
national policy on breastfeeding and setting-up of workplace lactation program. This
includes RA 10028 known as the Expanded Promotion of Breastfeeding Act of 2009
and EO 51 known as the National Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes,
Breastmilk Supplements and other Related Products.
While pursuing preventive measures to curtail undernutrition among children,
wellness programs should also be integrated into the public health system to address
the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in the adult population. Creating
early awareness on proper food selection and healthy eating should start at homes
and intensified in schools. Educating teenagers on healthy choice and eating, and
lifestyle, including lectures on teenage pregnancy shall be conducted in order to
reduce the onset of overweight/obesity and the intergenerational cycle of
malnutrition. Nutrition assistance to vulnerable groups of women and supplementary
feeding should be one of the priorities under the maternal and child nutrition and
health programs.
Priority attention should be given to the most nutritionally vulnerable groups of
mothers which include those who are adolescent mothers with no education and
work.
Nutrition improvement in convergence with health preventive measures/programs
should be intensively promoted and campaigned at the local level to ensure active
participation of households and children to achieve the targets of EPI, vitamin A
supplementation and the ASIN law.

Facts and Figures, 2011

166

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

REFERENCES
Barcenas, ML. (2004). The Development of the 2003 Master Sample (MS) for the
Philippines Household Surveys. Paper presented during the 9 th National
Convention on Statistics (NCS), October 4-5, 2010 at EDSA Shangri-La
Hotel, Manila, Philippines.
Bickel G., Nord M., Price C., Hamilton W., and Cook J. 2000. Guide to Measuring
Household Food Security. Revised ed. Alexandria, VA.: US Department of
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. 76p.
Boerma, J.T., K.I. Weinstein, S.O. Rutstein, and A.E. Sommerfelt. 1996. Data on
birth weight in developing countries: can surveys help? Bulletin of the World
Health Organization. 74 (2): 209-216.
Botika ng Bayan. From WikiPilipinas: The Hip n Free Philippines Encyclopedia
Ca-ang, C.T.,and Basoy J.D.F.2008. Awareness on food fortification among mothers
with malnourished children in selected barangays at Magpet and Tulunan,
Cotabato, Philippines. USM R & D 16(2):35-44.
Calleja, D. 2009. Masbate Mayor says yes to Food Production. Business Mirror.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009. 22:07
Cerdea C.M., Lana R.D., Molano W.L., Chavez M.C., and Nones C.A. 2002.
Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures Supplement 1: 2002 Update of the
nutritional status of 0-10 year-old Filipino children. Bicutan, Taguig City,
Philippines: Food and Nutrition Research Institute-Department of Science and
Technology (FNRI-DOST). 15p.
Cook, JT, Frank, DA, Berkowitz, C, Black, MM, Casey, PH, Cutts, DB, Meyers, AF,
Zaldivar, N, Skalicky, A, Levenson
De Onis M. and Habicht J.P. 1997. Anthropometric reference data for international
use: Recommendations from a WHO Expert Committee. Food and Nutrition
Bulletin 18(2):179-189.
Department Circular No. 2008-0214. October 22, 2008. Subject: Observance of the
National Food Fortification Day on November 7, 2008 in consonance with the
Food Fortification Law (RA 8976) and Executive order 382.
Department of Health. Essential Drugs. Accessed from www.doh.gov.ph.
Food Agricultural Organization. (2009). Global hunger declining. www.fao.org
[FNRI-DOST] Food and Nutrition Research Institute-Department of Science and
Technology. 20010. Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2008: The 7 th
National Nutrition Survey: Philippines, 2008. Bicutan, Taguig City: FNRIDOST.

Facts and Figures, 2011

167

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

[FNRI-DOST] Food and Nutrition Research Institute-Department of Science and


Technology. 2007. Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2005: Nutritional
Status of Filipino Children and Selected Population Groups: 2005 Update.
Bicutan, Taguig City: FNRI-DOST.36p.
[FNRI-DOST] Food and Nutrition Research Institute-Department of Science and
Technology. 2006. Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2003: The 6 th
National Nutrition Survey: Philippines, 2003. Bicutan, Taguig City: FNRIDOST.114p.
Gibson R.S. 1990. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. New York: Oxford University
Press. P155-260.
Jeliffe D.B. 1966. The assessment of the nutritional status of the community.
Monograph Series No. 53. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
271p.
Juguan, JA, Ph.D, Cerdea, CM, Nueva Espaa, MB, Valleabella, LA, Dilidili, A.
(2012). Food insecurity based on the 7 th National Nutrition Survey,
Philippines, 2008: Part I Prevalence of household food insecurity. Phil J
Nutr. (in-press)
Kendall, A, Olson, CM, Frongillo, EA (1995). Validation of the Radimer-Cornell tool
on measures of hunger and food security. J. Nutr. 125: 2793-2801
Lee, JS, Frongillo, EA (2001). Nutritional and health consequences are associated
with food insecurity among U.S. elderly persons. J. Nutr. 131: 1503-1509. S,
Hereen, T, Nord, M. (2004). Food insecurity is associated with adverse health
outcomes among human infants and toddlers. J Nutr. 134: 1432-1438.
Magbitang J.A., Tangco J.B.M., dela Cruz E.O., Flores E.G., and Guanlao F.E..
1988. Weight for height as measure of nutritional status in Filipino pregnant
women. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2(2):96-104.
National Nutrition Council. One Nutrition, One Nation: Nurturing the Filipinos.
National Convention of the NAOs and D/CNPCs. July 23, 2010
[NNC] National Nutrition Council. 2005. The Philippine Plan of Action for Nutrition
(PPAN), 2005-2010. Manila: National Nutrition Council. 11p.
National Statistics Office and ICF Macro. 2009. National Demographic and Health
Survey, 2008. Calverton, Maryland: NSO and ICF Macro. pp. 105-120.
Olson, Frongillo (2001), Rose, Basiotis and Klein (1995) Food insufficiency, family
income and health in US pre-school children and school-aged children
Philippine Information Agency (PIA). 2006. Food-for-School program gains ground in
Region XII. Press release. March 22, 2006 Cotabato City: PIA Archive News
Readers.

Facts and Figures, 2011

168

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Radimer K.L., Olson C.M., and Campbell C.C. 1990. Development of Indicators to
Assess Hunger. J. Nutr. 120:1544-1548.
Sarlio-Lahteenkorva, SS and Lahelma, E. (2001). Food insecurity is associated with
past and present economic disadvantage. J Nutr. 131: 2880-2884
Villavieja G.M., Lana R.D., Cerdea C.M., Constantino A.S., Boquecosa J.P.,
Chavez M.C., Palafox E.F., Nones C.A., Concepcion D.S., Tarrayo ME.R.,
and Casio M.B.. 2001. 1998 Updating of nutritional status of Filipino children
at the provincial level. Philippine Journal of Nutrition 48(1-2):1-4.
Villavieja G.M., Molano W.L., Cerdea C.M., Lana R.D., Constantino A.S., Tarrayo
ME.R., Concepcion D.S., Juguan J.A., and Sario I.S.. 1997. Fourth National
Nutrition Survey, Philippines, 1993. Part B Anthropometric Survey. Philippine
Journal of Nutrition 44(1-2):34-48.
Vozoris, NT, Tasaruk, VS. (2003). Household food insufficiency is associated with
poorer health. J Nutr.133:120-126
[WHO] World Health Organization. 2009. WHO AnthroPlus for Personal Computers
Manual: Software for assessing growth of the worlds children and
adolescents. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Accessed on
September 2012 from (http:/www.who.int/growthref/tools/en/).
[WHO] World Health Organization. 2009. WHO Anthro for Personal Computers
Manual: Software for assessing growth of the worlds children. Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization. Accessed on September 2012 from
(http:/www.who.int/childgrowth/software/en/).
[WHO] World Health Organization. 2003. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child
Feeding, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.30p.
[WHO] World Health Organization. 2003. Implementing the Global Strategy for Infant
and Young Child Feeding. Meeting Report. 3-5 February 2003; Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization.47p.
World Health Organization. 2002. Meeting of advisory group on maternal nutrition
and low birth weight. Geneva: December 4-6, 2002.
[WHO] World Health Organization. 2010. Nutrition Landscape Information System
country profile indicators: interpretation guide. Department of Nutrition for
Health and Development. Geneva, Switzerland: Document Production
Services, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health
Organization. P.1-2.

Facts and Figures, 2011

169

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

STATISTICAL
ANNEXES

Facts and Figures, 2011

171

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

A. Characteristics of Households
Appendix Table A.1

Region

Percentage distribution of households by household size and by


region: Philippines, 2011
Household Size

Mean
Household
Size

10 &
above

Ilocos Region

5.0

10.2

12.2

17.7

18.2

13.8

10.9

4.7

3.8

3.4

4.9

Cagayan Valley

5.3

10.9

12.3

19.9

19.6

12.7

8.7

5.0

2.5

3.2

4.8

CAR

6.1

9.7

10.9

14.4

16.2

13.1

10.6

7.4

5.1

6.4

5.3

Central Luzon

3.8

8.6

12.2

16.7

19.7

15.2

9.9

5.6

3.1

5.2

5.1

NCR

5.4

10.8

15.2

20.9

18.6

12.5

7.2

4.3

2.2

2.8

4.6

CALABARZON

3.7

8.3

13.4

19.9

19.0

13.9

9.6

5.5

2.6

4.4

5.0

MIMAROPA

5.7

10.2

12.4

16.1

16.5

14.8

9.9

6.7

3.5

4.2

5.0

Bicol Region

4.8

9.1

11.8

13.7

15.8

13.5

11.5

7.4

5.8

6.4

5.4

Western Visayas

6.0

10.4

12.3

16.1

16.6

13.6

9.9

6.1

4.1

4.7

5.1

Central Visayas

6.4

11.2

13.2

15.5

16.4

12.7

8.8

6.3

3.2

6.1

5.0

Eastern Visayas

5.6

10.3

12.6

14.4

14.0

14.3

10.6

7.2

4.5

6.2

5.2

Zamboanga Peninsula

3.3

9.0

13.3

16.4

17.5

14.9

9.6

6.6

4.0

5.5

5.2

Northern Mindanao

4.7

8.4

12.8

16.6

16.8

14.3

10.3

6.1

4.1

5.8

5.2

Davao Region

5.7

9.9

15.0

16.1

17.8

13.4

9.0

5.4

2.9

5.2

4.9

SOCCSKSARGEN

3.8

8.6

11.7

18.3

18.9

14.4

10.3

5.2

4.2

4.7

5.2

CARAGA

4.1

9.3

12.3

16.3

17.9

13.9

10.2

7.1

4.5

4.4

5.2

ARMM

0.8

4.4

9.2

14.4

15.3

14.8

11.5

8.9

7.3

13.6

6.4

Note: Numbers may not add up to totals as these were rounded off.

Facts and Figures, 2011

172

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.2

Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
ARMM
CARAGA

Percentage distribution of households by occupation of household


head and by region: Philippines, 2011

No
Occupation

Officials
of Gov.,
Corp. Exec

Professionals,
Technician,
Clerks

Service
Workers,
Shop/Market
Sales Workers

Farmers,
Forestry
Workers,
Fisherman,
Livestock
/Poultry

Skilled
Workers,
Plant And
Machine
Operators

9.4
7.3
7.0
12.1
9.6
9.9
10.1
9.7
9.3
10.9
8.1
5.8
8.1
7.2
8.2
5.2
9.3

6.0
5.1
8.0
7.4
11.5
10.7
5.2
6.4
8.8
7.8
6.9
7.2
8.4
7.0
5.1
4.0
5.6

4.0
2.8
5.2
3.9
6.3
5.4
3.9
3.8
3.0
3.7
3.6
3.4
3.0
3.8
3.5
2.1
4.5

4.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
10.0
7.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
5.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
1.0
4.0

24.5
40.5
35.0
16.9
1.1
14.4
36.8
32.8
26.7
27.5
27.8
37.5
28.7
30.5
35.6
59.8
29.7

15.7
12.0
11.0
20.8
26.5
24.0
13.7
11.0
14.7
15.1
12.3
11.7
13.7
15.5
12.6
5.4
13.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

173

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table A.2

Region

Laborers and
Unskilled Workers,
Vendors, Domestic
Helpers

Housekeeper

Other Occupation
Not Stated, Special
Occupations,
Military

Students

Pensioners

Incapacitated

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

22.2
18.6
17.0
18.1
21.3
15.5
16.4
19.8
21.7
17.7
28.2
20.0
20.9
19.7
20.4
22.9
14.7

5.8
6.6
4.8
6.4
5.3
5.5
5.8
5.4
4.6
5.4
5.2
5.4
6.7
4.8
5.0
4.0
4.5

1.4
1.4
1.4
3.4
0.9
1.8
1.5
2.3
0.4
1.0
0.4
1.3
1.1
2.3
2.2
0.7
1.4

0.0
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1

5.5
2.5
5.1
4.7
7.0
5.7
2.1
3.8
6.9
5.4
3.8
2.9
4.5
5.2
1.9
5.2
0.9

0.8
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.9
1.0
0.5
0.1
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

174

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.3

Percentage distribution of households by education of household


head and by region: Philippines, 2011
Education
No
Schooling
(6 yrs old
and Over)

Elementary

High
School

College

Above
College

Special
Education

Arabic
Schooling

Ilocos Region

1.0

37.4

38.3

22.8

0.3

0.0

0.0

Cagayan Valley

2.3

49.4

28.6

19.4

0.1

0.0

0.0

CAR

5.5

40.6

28.1

24.7

0.5

0.0

0.0

Central Luzon

1.0

39.0

36.0

23.0

0.4

0.3

0.0

Region

NCR

0.3

18.1

48.1

32.7

0.4

0.1

0.0

CALABARZON

1.1

34.6

37.9

25.0

0.7

0.7

0.1

MIMAROPA

3.3

50.9

28.8

16.5

0.4

0.0

0.0

Bicol Region

1.1

53.3

29.1

15.9

0.4

0.0

0.0

Western Visayas

2.6

47.1

30.4

19.2

0.1

0.3

0.0

Central Visayas

2.7

51.2

26.6

18.9

0.4

0.0

0.0

Eastern Visayas

3.5

56.8

24.1

14.7

0.5

0.0

0.0

Zamboanga Peninsula

5.5

53.0

23.8

17.1

0.4

0.0

0.0

Northern Mindanao

1.8

44.7

34.1

19.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

Davao Region

3.8

46.6

30.7

18.5

0.5

0.0

0.1

SOCCSKSARGEN

7.0

41.9

32.1

17.8

0.2

0.0

0.8

CARAGA

2.0

48.8

32.0

16.6

0.6

0.0

0.0

ARMM

23.0

42.9

21.2

8.0

0.3

0.0

4.6

Note: Numbers may not add up to totals as these were rounded off.

Facts and Figures, 2011

175

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.4

Percentage distribution of households by type of owned appliances


and by region: Philippines, 2011
Appliances*

Region

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

TV

79.2
70.8
66.2
86.3
88.6
84.5
56.6
60.6
65.6
61.7
56.8
45.2
60.9
64.0
55.9
57.4
27.0

Telephone
/cellphone

Electric
fan

68.1
63.9
65.5
75.5
80.8
81.5
59.7
58.6
63.8
60.5
51.5
51.7
60.1
62.5
58.7
54.5
39.3

72.3
62.2
23.8
85.3
92.7
81.6
44.1
51.0
52.0
49.0
41.8
30.8
33.9
45.4
38.4
31.8
11.7

Wall
clock

45.0
42.4
41.3
54.2
62.5
58.4
38.7
42.6
40.5
40.9
30.8
27.2
30.7
37.0
27.4
29.0
20.0

Vcd/dvd
player
/mini
component/
karaoke

36.5
40.5
37.4
48.5
55.5
53.2
34.0
30.5
40.0
38.8
35.5
26.4
35.1
39.8
29.7
31.7
13.0

Radio/
cassette
recorder

Refrigerator
/freezer

48.6
43.4
46.0
42.8
47.1
47.6
31.3
39.0
44.1
43.3
26.3
33.0
35.7
42.3
34.8
28.2
15.5

38.3
26.6
35.0
39.4
46.9
47.7
21.5
19.3
27.7
28.1
23.4
24.1
32.2
37.6
28.4
28.8
6.3

Stove/
range
/microw
ave
oven

30.4
20.9
35.7
36.2
50.2
47.0
11.9
12.3
12.4
18.5
15.4
8.6
14.0
16.9
11.1
13.7
2.5

*multiple responses

Facts and Figures, 2011

176

Washing
machine/
dryer

24.8
24.5
27.7
44.8
46.0
42.2
17.1
10.9
13.2
11.5
11.4
11.7
15.9
18.6
13.1
13.7
3.8

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table A.4

Appliances

Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Computer/
laptop /play
station

12.4
9.4
16.3
19.3
25.4
22.8
6.7
6.7
8.7
10.6
7.0
7.2
9.4
10.3
7.7
8.0
1.4

Camera/
video camera

Other
appliances

11.4
9.7
12.9
16.1
19.8
20.3
6.6
5.3
8.5
9.3
5.6
6.2
7.6
9.0
6.8
5.4
2.3

9.4
13.4
9.7
12.6
19.5
13.0
9.8
11.6
9.8
9.9
10.1
7.9
7.7
11.8
9.7
7.8
2.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

Food
processsor
/blender

10.2
9.3
10.2
17.1
17.8
18.9
6.0
5.3
8.2
9.5
6.1
6.4
8.7
10.1
6.9
6.1
1.3

Sewing
machine

Air
conditioner

Piano
/Organ

Electric
generator

6.4
8.3
5.6
10.5
9.3
11.8
6.2
5.4
8.3
7.6
5.4
6.2
6.8
7.5
4.8
5.2
3.0

6.6
3.6
0.9
12.4
12.7
12.2
3.0
3.4
5.7
6.3
4.4
4.9
5.3
8.4
4.5
5.5
0.9

3.9
3.5
3.2
4.8
5.3
5.5
2.8
2.2
2.3
2.7
2.0
2.1
3.6
2.0
1.2
1.8
0.3

1.5
2.4
0.4
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.6
1.5
0.9
0.5
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.7
1.2

177

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.5

Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water


and by region: Philippines, 2011
Source of Drinking Water

Piped
into
dwelling

Tube well
or borehole

Protectted spring

Public tap
/stand pipe

Piped to yard
/plot

Protected
dug well

Semiprotected
dug well

Bottled
/mineral
water

12.0
9.6
17.5
29.9
43.8
35.8
17.1
28.2
16.2
30.3
23.5
28.3
41.1
33.6
20.3
25.1
6.9

50.8
55.1
17.2
35.4
1.2
14.1
37.6
26.9
32.4
11.3
20.8
17.0
14.3
20.8
38.5
23.2
26.1

4.6
3.5
26.7
1.9
0.0
3.5
11.5
10.2
4.8
12.9
23.9
16.0
17.9
13.3
14.3
21.1
11.8

1.0
2.5
1.1
2.0
1.2
3.0
4.3
4.0
8.9
0.9
5.5
3.7
4.4
6.4
4.2
3.8
4.1

2.5
2.8
5.0
1.0
2.4
3.1
4.0
4.6
2.6
0.5
4.3
4.3
1.8
2.9
2.6
3.6
2.9

2.4
4.7
1.2
1.6
0.0
1.6
4.5
6.0
3.9
3.7
5.7
2.7
1.6
1.1
1.3
1.9
6.6

2.8
1.9
0.9
0.2
0.0
1.0
1.4
4.7
3.9
1.0
2.5
2.1
0.4
1.3
1.5
0.7
7.6

21.5
16.4
24.1
24.9
49.3
33.5
8.0
6.8
18.8
32.1
9.1
10.6
12.1
7.7
7.5
12.5
1.0

Note: Numbers may not add up to totals as these were rounded off.

Facts and Figures, 2011

178

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table A.5


Source of Drinking Water
Region

Unprotected
dug well

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

0.5
1.9
1.6
0.3
0.0
0.7
4.3
3.3
3.6
2.5
1.5
6.0
2.2
1.8
3.3
0.7
13.3

Unprotected
spring

Tanker truck

Surface water
(river, dam, etc.)

Cart
with small
tank

Rainwater

Others

0.2
0.5
2.6
1.0
0.5
1.6
1.8
1.4
2.7
1.7
0.9
6.2
2.9
2.8
1.7
1.8
5.1

0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.8
1.7
1.6
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.0
3.6
0.4
0.0
0.3

0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.5
0.4
1.2
1.2
0.1
4.9

0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1

0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.1
0.0
1.7
0.0
1.2
6.1

1.6
0.6
1.4
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.7
2.2
0.7
1.9
1.4
2.0
0.8
1.6
3.1
4.2
3.2

Note: Numbers may not add up to totals as these were rounded off.

Facts and Figures, 2011

179

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.6

Percentage distribution of households by type of toilet


facility and by region: Philippines, 2011
no toilet facility
(bush, field, river,
etc.)

Toilet Facility
water-sealed
(pour/flush with
septic tank)

not water-sealed
(pour/flush without
septic tank, pit latrin)

Ilocos Region

3.4

89.1

7.5

Cagayan Valley

2.7

81.7

15.5

CAR

6.2

80.7

13.0

Central Luzon

5.5

89.0

5.5

NCR

2.3

94.9

2.8

Region

CALABARZON

5.3

91.8

3.0

MIMAROPA

15.0

73.8

11.2

Bicol Region

18.3

69.6

12.1

Western Visayas

12.3

79.2

8.5

Central Visayas

19.0

76.9

4.1

Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula

16.2

81.3

2.5
15.7

11.9

72.4

Northern Mindanao

9.9

83.1

7.0

Davao Region

5.5

82.0

12.5

12.2

70.0

17.8

7.1

87.9

5.1

44.1

29.2

26.7

SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Facts and Figures, 2011

180

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.7

Percentage distribution of households by type of garbage


disposal and by region: Philippines, 2011

Region

By Collector
System
21.1
20.8
33.8
53.9
96.2
63.9
19.0
23.3
22.4
46.2
31.7
24.1
34.5
44.9
27.4
39.8
6.8

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Garbage Disposal*
Burning

Compost pit

Dumping

Others

59.5
55.0
43.5
45.0
2.2
32.4
56.0
55.5
48.6
38.5
45.7
35.8
42.4
33.5
37.3
36.7
46.3

33.5
35.8
31.8
16.5
0.5
10.6
32.0
24.6
32.5
25.6
21.5
38.3
35.4
31.7
33.9
38.0
13.2

15.9
14.9
14.4
10.7
3.2
11.9
18.0
19.3
20.2
9.3
21.4
14.5
11.3
12.3
16.9
6.9
47.6

2.4
1.3
3.6
3.9
1.5
1.8
3.7
4.2
1.5
7.5
4.2
6.3
5.1
4.6
5.2
4.7
7.0

*Multiple Responses

Facts and Figures, 2011

181

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table A.8

Percentage distribution of households by garbage


segregation and by region: Philippines, 2011
Yes

No

59.2

40.8

60.0

40.0

61.9

38.1

NCR
CALABARZON

63.2
58.9
55.5

36.8
41.1
44.5

MIMAROPA
Bicol Region

55.8

44.2

54.3

45.7

52.8
72.1

47.2
27.9

51.0
52.5
62.6
75.0

49.0
47.5
37.4
25.0

53.7
72.2

46.3
27.8

20.8

79.2

Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon

Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Facts and Figures, 2011

182

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

B. Nutritional Status of All Population Groups


Appendix Table B.1 Percentage distribution, mean, and median weight-for-age
z-scores of children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011
Disaggregation/
Variable

Severely
Underweight
<-3SD

Weight-for-age (%)

Underweight

Normal

<-2SD to
-3SD

-2SD to
+2SD

Overweight
-for-age
>+2SD

Mean
zscores

Median
zscores

Sex/Age Group
All
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

4.4
5.1
4.4
4.5
5.3
3.6
3.7

15.8
7.3
10.8
15.0
16.5
18.1
19.5

77.7
84.7
82.6
78.2
75.8
76.3
75.4

2.1
2.8
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.0
1.3

-1.04
-0.51
-0.80
-1.00
-1.08
-1.16
-1.04

-1.12
-0.47
-0.82
-1.06
-1.15
-1.26
-1.12

Male
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

4.3

15.8

77.6

2.3

-1.03

-1.11

5.6
5.5
4.6
4.8
3.2
3.4

8.4
11.7
16.7
16.0
17.7
18.0

83.8
80.7
76.3
76.4
76.9
76.8

2.2
2.1
1.4
28.9
2.2
1.8

-0.59
-0.88
-1.02
-1.06
-1.11
-1.03

-0.56
-0.87
-1.08
-1.14
-1.22
-1.11

Female

4.4

15.9

77.8

1.8

-1.05

-1.14

0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

4.5
3.1
4.3
5.9
4.2
4.1

6.2
9.8
13.1
17.1
18.4
21.1

85.7
84.9
80.3
75.2
75.7
73.9

3.5
2.2
2.2
1.8
1.7
8.5

-0.42
-0.69
-0.96
-1.10
-1.22
-1.33

-0.40
-0.76
-1.05
-1.15
-1.29
-1.42

Facts and Figures, 2011

183

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.2 Estimates of the proportion of underweight among


children, 0-5.0 year-old (0-60 months), using WHO-CGS
weight-for-age, standard error, confidence interval, and
coefficient of variation by region and province:
Philippines, 2011
%
Underweight

Standard
Error

Philippines

20.2

0.36

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

19.8
15.3
14.9
18.3
22.1

Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

19.5

20.9

1.8

1.42
3.14
4.73
3.54
1.81

17.0
9.1
5.6
11.4
18.5

22.6
21.4
24.2
25.2
25.6

7.1
20.6
31.8
19.3
8.2

23.2
27.4
23.6
16.6
13.3

1.65
3.35
2.19
4.77
2.99

20.0
20.8
19.3
7.2
7.4

26.4
34.0
27.9
26.0
19.2

7.1
12.2
9.3
28.7
22.5

11.9
16.4
20.4
9.0
7.2
17.0
9.7

1.20
3.68
4.98
1.74
2.02
3.89
3.19

9.6
9.2
10.6
5.6
3.2
9.4
3.5

14.3
23.7
30.2
12.4
11.1
24.6
16.0

10.1
22.4
24.4
19.4
28.2
22.9
32.9

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

15.8
26.1
24.8
13.3
17.5
13.0
16.1
21.7

1.06
13.12
4.59
1.57
2.45
2.27
2.97
4.77

13.7
0.4
15.8
10.2
12.7
8.5
10.2
12.4

17.9
51.8
33.8
16.4
22.3
17.4
21.9
31.1

6.7
50.3
18.5
11.8
14.0
17.5
18.5
22.0

NCR

14.7
15.4
12.8
13.7
17.3

0.86
1.92
1.41
1.63
1.82

13.1
11.7
10.0
10.5
13.8

16.4
19.2
15.5
16.9
20.9

5.8
12.5
11.0
11.9
10.5

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

14.8
15.1
13.4
14.6
18.6
13.5

1.05
2.14
1.80
2.15
3.59
2.21

12.7
10.9
9.8
10.3
11.6
9.2

16.8
19.3
16.9
18.8
25.7
17.8

7.1
14.2
13.4
14.8
19.3
16.4

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

24.9
28.6
23.9
23.6
27.6
17.1

1.78
5.62
4.69
3.92
2.81
4.26

21.4
17.6
14.7
15.9
22.1
8.7

28.4
39.6
33.1
31.3
33.1
25.5

7.1
19.6
19.6
16.6
10.2
24.9

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

184

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.2


%
Underweight

Standard
Error

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

25.3
26.3
30.4
22.5
27.3
22.9
28.2

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.49
3.19
4.34
2.85
9.40
3.58
2.75

22.4
20.0
21.8
16.9
8.8
15.9
22.8

28.2
32.5
38.9
28.0
45.7
29.9
33.6

5.9
12.1
14.3
12.7
34.5
15.6
9.7

23.9
21.8
22.3
32.7
34.7
22.4
22.8

1.64
3.93
4.75
6.15
9.33
2.44
2.76

20.7
14.1
13.0
20.6
16.4
17.6
17.4

27.1
29.5
31.6
44.7
53.0
27.2
28.2

6.9
18.0
21.3
18.8
26.9
10.9
12.1

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

21.6
25.7
21.0
18.5
46.0

1.45
3.40
1.87
3.11
12.49

18.8
19.0
17.3
12.4
21.5

24.5
32.4
24.7
24.6
70.4

6.7
13.2
8.9
16.8
27.2

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

25.7
12.4
27.1
25.1
28.2
21.6
29.4

1.32
4.25
4.96
2.19
2.74
4.20
2.62

23.1
4.0
17.4
20.8
22.9
13.4
24.3

28.3
20.7
36.9
29.4
33.6
29.9
34.6

5.1
34.4
18.3
8.7
9.7
19.4
8.9

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

25.2
25.5
23.9
24.9

1.98
3.23
2.68
3.79

21.3
19.2
18.7
17.4

29.1
31.9
29.2
32.3

7.9
12.7
11.2
15.2

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

21.9
25.5
25.4
19.0
25.7
19.2

1.57
2.74
7.34
3.13
3.81
3.13

18.8
20.1
11.0
12.8
18.2
13.1

25.0
30.8
39.8
25.1
33.2
25.3

7.2
10.7
28.9
16.5
14.8
16.3

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

20.2
22.9
16.8
21.4
16.5

1.65
6.00
3.59
2.14
3.61

16.9
11.1
9.7
17.2
9.4

23.4
34.7
23.8
25.6
23.6

8.2
26.2
21.4
10.0
21.9

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

25.1
27.9
23.8
23.9
24.1

1.59
3.14
3.20
2.57
3.16

22.0
21.7
17.5
18.8
17.9

28.2
34.1
30.0
28.9
30.3

6.3
11.3
13.5
10.7
13.1

Facts and Figures, 2011

185

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.2


%
Underweight

Standard
Error

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

23.0
27.5
19.2
22.6
22.3

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

26.2
33.8
25.3
26.0
29.8
22.8

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.90
3.83
2.48
4.80
3.94

19.3
20.0
14.3
13.2
14.6

26.8
35.0
24.0
32.0
30.0

8.2
13.9
12.9
21.2
17.7

1.87
7.91
2.85
3.41
5.57
3.74

22.5
18.3
19.7
19.3
18.9
15.5

29.8
49.3
30.8
32.7
40.7
30.1

7.2
23.4
11.3
13.1
18.7
16.4

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

186

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.3 Percentage distribution, mean, and median weight-for-age


z-scores of children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) by
sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011
Weight-for-age (%)

Disaggregation/
Variable

Severely
Underweight
<-3SD

Underweight

Normal

Overweight

<-2SD to
-3SD

-2SD to
+2SD

>+2SD

24.5
22.8
23.2
25.7
23.4
26.9

66.0
70.5
68.5
64.1
66.2
61.8

1.9
1.7
2.0
2.1
1.9
19.9

Mean
zscores

Median
zscores

-1.40
-1.32
-1.36
-1.42
-1.41
-1.40

-1.53
-1.43
-1.48
-1.55
-1.55
-1.53

Sex/Age Group
All
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

7.6
5.0
6.3
8.1
8.5
9.4

Male
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

8.6

25.5

63.6

2.3

-1.44

-1.57

4.7
7.0
10.1
10.4
9.9

22.0
25.0
27.7
24.8
27.3

71.6
65.6
59.6
62.4
60.6

1.7
2.4
2.7
2.3
2.2

-1.30
-1.42
-1.49
-1.47
-1.47

-1.42
-1.54
-1.63
-1.63
-1.66

Female
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

6.5
5.2
5.6
5.8
6.4
8.9

23.4
23.6
21.3
23.5
22.0
26.5

68.6
69.4
71.5
69.2
70.2
63.0

1.6
1.8
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.3

-1.36
-1.34
-1.30
-1.35
-1.35
-1.46

-1.48
-1.44
-1.42
-1.47
-1.49
-1.58

Facts and Figures, 2011

187

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.4 Estimates of the proportion of underweight among


children, 5.08-10.0 years old (61120 months), using WHOGrowth Reference weight-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011
%
Underweight

Standard
Error

Philippines

32.0

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.40

31.3

32.8

1.2

29.8
29.6
21.1
34.5
30.2

1.73
3.46
4.51
5.24
2.24

26.4
22.8
12.2
24.2
25.8

33.2
36.4
29.9
44.8
34.6

5.8
11.7
21.4
15.2
7.4

Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

26.9
27.5
27.7
20.9
31.7

1.77
2.72
2.25
6.65
8.22

23.4
22.1
23.3
7.8
15.6

30.4
32.8
32.1
33.9
47.8

6.6
9.9
8.1
31.8
25.9

CAR

17.9
22.3
30.9
11.2
10.0
32.0
13.9

1.29
4.19
4.50
1.93
2.87
3.02
4.35

15.4
14.1
22.1
7.4
4.4
26.0
5.4

20.4
30.5
39.8
15.0
15.7
37.9
22.5

7.2
18.8
14.5
17.2
28.5
9.5
31.3

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

25.2
36.3
26.8
25.4
24.5
24.1
21.3
33.5

1.33
5.45
4.72
2.38
2.62
2.83
3.37
7.51

22.6
25.6
17.5
20.7
19.3
18.6
14.7
18.7

27.8
47.0
36.1
30.1
29.6
29.7
27.9
48.2

5.3
15.0
17.6
9.4
10.7
11.7
15.8
22.4

NCR

25.8
27.4
25.1
23.3
27.4

1.11
3.06
1.73
2.49
2.03

23.6
21.4
21.7
18.5
23.4

28.0
33.4
28.5
28.2
31.4

4.3
11.2
6.9
10.6
7.4

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

27.1
25.3
26.1
27.2
36.1
22.7

1.23
2.70
2.20
3.08
3.41
2.48

24.7
20.0
21.8
21.1
29.4
17.8

29.5
30.6
30.4
33.2
42.7
27.5

4.5
10.6
8.4
11.3
9.4
11.0

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

40.4
35.9
44.0
39.0
43.0
33.9

1.73
4.93
3.84
3.78
3.02
3.83

37.0
26.3
36.5
31.6
37.1
26.4

43.8
45.6
51.6
46.4
48.9
41.4

4.3
13.7
8.7
9.7
7.0
11.3

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

188

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.4


%
Underweight

Standard
Error

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

39.6
41.0
38.2
36.6
29.9
45.3
40.9

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.65
3.75
6.24
3.14
3.93
3.36
4.21

36.4
33.6
26.0
30.4
22.1
38.7
32.6

42.8
48.3
50.4
42.7
37.6
51.8
49.1

4.2
9.1
16.3
8.6
13.2
7.4
10.3

40.4
39.1
45.5
45.5
35.5
39.3
39.1

1.73
6.12
4.50
5.95
4.68
3.16
2.59

37.0
27.1
36.7
33.8
26.3
33.1
34.0

43.8
51.1
54.3
57.2
44.7
45.5
44.2

4.3
15.7
9.9
13.1
13.2
8.0
6.6

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

36.6
40.8
36.4
32.8
31.6

1.70
4.04
2.27
3.02
11.22

33.3
32.9
32.0
26.9
9.6

39.9
48.7
40.9
38.8
53.6

4.6
9.9
6.2
9.2
35.5

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

37.8
41.4
31.5
36.2
43.0
35.1
39.9

1.60
5.09
3.06
2.96
2.68
4.42
4.11

34.6
31.5
25.5
30.4
37.8
26.5
31.8

40.9
51.4
37.5
42.0
48.3
43.8
47.9

4.2
12.3
9.7
8.2
6.2
12.6
10.3

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

34.6
38.4
34.0
29.1

1.68
2.69
2.39
4.20

31.3
33.2
29.3
20.9

37.9
43.7
38.6
37.4

4.8
7.0
7.1
14.4

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

32.8
36.1
25.5
32.5
33.4
30.7

1.64
3.24
10.61
3.66
3.73
2.81

29.6
29.8
4.7
25.3
26.1
25.2

36.1
42.5
46.3
39.7
40.7
36.2

5.0
9.0
41.6
11.3
11.2
9.1

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

32.4
37.5
31.7
31.3
32.1

1.81
4.82
4.58
2.40
4.79

28.8
28.0
22.7
26.6
22.7

35.9
46.9
40.6
36.0
41.5

5.6
12.9
14.5
7.7
14.9

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

36.2
33.9
46.6
34.5
35.4

1.66
2.54
3.61
3.13
4.11

32.9
28.9
39.5
28.3
27.3

39.4
38.8
53.7
40.6
43.4

4.6
7.5
7.7
9.1
11.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

189

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.4


%
Underweight

Standard
Error

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

34.6
31.6
33.7
36.6
37.4

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

37.0
40.1
33.2
34.5
42.8
38.3

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.73
3.32
3.32
2.98
3.89

31.2
25.1
27.2
30.7
29.8

38.0
38.1
40.2
42.4
45.1

5.0
10.5
9.9
8.2
10.4

1.79
5.33
2.46
2.88
5.12
4.59

33.5
29.6
28.4
28.9
32.7
29.3

40.5
50.5
38.0
40.2
52.8
47.2

4.8
13.3
7.4
8.4
12.0
12.0

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

190

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.5 Percentage distribution, mean, and median height-for-age


z-scores of children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011
Height-for-age (%)

Disaggregation/
Variable

Severely
Stunted

Mean
z-scores

Median
zscores

Stunted

Normal

Tall

<-3SD

<-2SD to
-3SD

-2SD to
+2SD

>+2SD

All
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

10.4
4.8
4.6
11.0
13.7
12.1
10.4

23.2
9.3
11.6
22.6
25.6
29.4
27.0

64.9
82.3
80.5
65.0
59.7
57.7
62.0

1.4
3.6
3.3
1.4
1.0
0.8
0.6

-1.43
-0.55
-0.77
-1.47
-1.64
-1.69
-1.43

-1.49
-0.57
-0.83
-1.50
-1.69
-1.75
-1.49

Male
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

11.5

23.5

63.9

1.2

-1.47

-1.51

5.4
5.9
13.5
15.0
12.3
11.0

10.6
13.9
23.7
24.7
30.4
25.4

81.7
77.3
61.5
59.3
56.8
63.2

2.4
2.9
1.4
1.0
0.6
0.4

-0.65
-0.92
-1.57
-1.66
-1.73
-1.59

-0.63
-0.93
-1.59
-1.69
-1.79
-1.60

9.3

23.0

66.0

1.7

-1.37

-1.45

4.2
3.0
8.2
12.4
11.9
9.8

7.9
9.0
21.3
26.5
28.2
28.6

83.0
84.2
68.9
60.1
58.7
60.8

4.9
3.9
1.5
1.0
1.1
0.8

-0.44
-0.59
-1.37
-1.61
-1.65
-1.64

-0.46
-0.72
-1.40
-1.68
-1.71
-1.68

Sex/Age Group

Female
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

Facts and Figures, 2011

191

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.6 Estimates of the proportion of stunted among children, 05.0 year-old (0-60 months), using WHO-CGS height-forage, standard error, confidence interval, and coefficient of
variation by region and province: Philippines, 2011
% Stunted

Standard
Error

Philippines

33.6

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.42

32.8

34.5

1.3

29.0
30.3
17.4
27.7
31.4

1.84
5.96
4.23
4.12
2.43

25.4
18.6
9.1
19.6
26.7

32.6
42.0
25.7
35.7
36.2

6.3
19.7
24.4
14.9
7.7

Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

32.1
35.7
31.3
32.6
20.5

1.91
3.47
2.58
5.79
8.25

28.4
28.9
26.2
21.2
4.4

35.9
42.5
36.3
43.9
36.7

5.9
9.7
8.2
17.8
40.2

CAR

34.3
32.9
32.7
32.4
32.2
44.2
32.3

1.99
5.10
6.93
3.49
6.48
4.40
3.99

30.4
22.9
19.1
25.5
19.5
35.6
24.5

38.2
42.9
46.3
39.2
45.0
52.9
40.1

5.8
15.5
21.2
10.8
20.1
10.0
12.3

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

22.3
43.1
28.0
18.2
20.9
21.3
25.2
31.4

1.32
9.89
6.92
2.13
3.04
2.67
3.65
4.81

19.7
23.7
14.5
14.0
15.0
16.1
18.0
22.0

24.8
62.5
41.6
22.3
26.9
26.6
32.3
40.8

5.9
22.9
24.7
11.7
14.5
12.5
14.5
15.3

NCR

26.8
28.2
25.6
25.3
28.5

1.11
2.86
1.76
2.03
2.34

24.6
22.6
22.2
21.3
23.9

29.0
33.8
29.1
29.3
33.1

4.1
10.1
6.9
8.0
8.2

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

27.4
27.1
24.9
24.0
35.3
27.9

1.33
2.75
2.05
3.08
4.37
2.93

24.8
21.7
20.9
18.0
26.7
22.1

30.0
32.4
28.9
30.1
43.8
33.6

4.9
10.2
8.2
12.8
12.4
10.5

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

37.2
30.9
39.6
36.0
36.8
42.6

2.23
7.53
6.16
4.18
3.43
6.54

32.8
16.1
27.6
27.8
30.0
29.8

41.6
45.6
51.7
44.1
43.5
55.4

6.0
24.4
15.5
11.6
9.3
15.3

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

192

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.6


95 % Confidence Interval

% Stunted

Standard
Error

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

36.8
30.5
43.2
34.5
51.2
43.1
36.0

1.53
2.73
5.28
3.24
4.55
3.23
3.64

33.8
25.2
32.9
28.2
42.2
36.8
28.9

39.8
35.9
53.6
40.9
60.1
49.4
43.1

4.1
8.9
12.2
9.4
8.9
7.5
10.1

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

41.0
47.2
44.2
47.9
45.2
38.1
39.7

1.71
6.76
4.26
6.58
8.74
2.78
2.70

37.7
33.9
35.9
35.0
28.1
32.7
34.4

44.4
60.4
52.6
60.8
62.4
43.6
45.0

4.2
14.3
9.6
13.7
19.3
7.3
6.8

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

38.6
38.8
38.8
38.5
23.0

1.63
4.00
2.10
3.53
6.02

35.4
31.0
34.7
31.6
11.2

41.8
46.7
42.9
45.5
34.8

4.2
10.3
5.4
9.1
26.2

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

41.7
31.2
48.8
39.5
45.4
37.1
45.1

1.73
5.90
5.23
2.88
3.29
6.90
4.04

38.3
19.6
38.6
33.8
38.9
23.6
37.2

45.1
42.8
59.1
45.1
51.8
50.7
53.0

4.1
18.9
10.7
7.3
7.3
18.6
9.0

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

42.2
45.4
39.6
44.9

2.28
4.39
3.07
5.76

37.7
36.8
33.6
33.6

46.7
54.0
45.7
56.2

5.4
9.6
7.7
12.8

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

37.2
43.9
22.4
41.0
38.0
31.2

1.81
3.73
6.86
4.87
3.72
2.67

33.7
36.6
9.0
31.5
30.7
26.0

40.8
51.2
35.9
50.6
45.3
36.5

4.9
8.5
30.6
11.9
9.8
8.5

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

35.2
37.3
32.4
34.5
40.3

1.89
6.06
3.25
2.62
5.10

31.5
25.4
26.1
29.4
30.3

38.9
49.1
38.8
39.6
50.4

5.4
16.3
10.0
7.6
12.6

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

42.6
45.4
41.5
41.3
41.6

1.97
3.40
4.96
3.02
5.44

38.8
38.8
31.7
35.4
30.9

46.5
52.1
51.2
47.3
52.3

4.6
7.5
12.0
7.3
13.1

Region/ Province

Facts and Figures, 2011

LL

UL

CV %

193

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.6

95 % Confidence Interval

% Stunted

Standard
Error

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

37.3
34.2
37.8
41.3
37.0

2.27
4.39
4.29
5.32
4.32

32.9
25.6
29.4
30.9
28.6

41.8
42.8
46.2
51.7
45.5

6.1
12.9
11.4
12.9
11.7

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

43.5
42.4
52.6
44.6
42.9
28.2

1.84
8.35
2.98
3.69
2.84
3.88

39.9
26.1
46.8
37.4
37.3
20.6

47.1
58.8
58.5
51.9
48.4
35.8

4.2
19.7
5.7
8.3
6.6
13.8

Region/ Province

LL

UL

CV %

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Intervals (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

194

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.7 Percentage distribution, mean and median height-for-age


z-scores of children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) by
sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011
Height-for-age (%)

Disaggregation/
Variable

Severely
Stunted
<-3SD

Stunted

Normal

Tall

<-2SD to
-3SD

-2SD to
+2SD

>+2SD

Mean
zscores

Median
zscores

Sex/Age Group
All
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

8.1
9.1
7.9
8.4
7.1
8.4

25.5
24.4
24.8
25.0
24.8
28.1

65.5
65.3
66.2
65.7
67.4
63.0

0.9
1.2
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.6

-1.50
-1.51
-1.47
-1.50
-1.47
-1.57

-1.57
-1.55
-1.52
-1.58
-1.54
-1.65

Male
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

9.2

26.6

63.4

0.9

-1.56

-1.62

9.7
9.4
9.8
8.4
8.7

25.5
25.7
26.4
26.5
28.3

63.5
63.7
62.8
64.3
62.5

1.3
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.5

-1.54
-1.54
-1.56
-1.53
-1.61

-1.55
-1.61
-1.65
-1.61
-1.65

7.0

24.4

67.8

0.8

-1.45

-1.52

8.5
6.4
6.7
5.7
8.0

23.4
23.8
23.4
22.9
28.0

67.0
69.0
69.0
70.8
63.4

1.1
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.6

-1.48
-1.40
-1.43
-1.39
-1.54

-1.54
-1.47
-1.49
-1.46
-1.64

Female
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

Facts and Figures, 2011

195

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.8 Estimates of the proportion of underheight among


children, 5.08-10.0 years old (61120 months), using WHOGrowth Reference height-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011
% Stunted

Standard
Error

Philippines

33.6

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.43

32.8

34.5

1.3

28.1
35.6
17.8
32.1
27.4

1.83
6.28
4.87
4.68
2.25

24.5
23.3
8.2
22.9
22.9

31.7
47.9
27.3
41.3
31.8

6.5
17.7
27.4
14.6
8.2

Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

27.6
25.1
28.7
31.7
23.7

1.88
2.85
2.36
7.61
7.36

23.9
19.5
24.1
16.8
9.3

31.3
30.7
33.3
46.6
38.1

6.8
11.3
8.2
24.0
31.1

CAR

32.3
26.3
40.4
26.1
37.8
36.7
40.2

2.21
4.63
5.92
3.41
8.82
2.84
8.69

27.9
17.2
28.8
19.4
20.5
31.1
23.1

36.6
35.4
52.0
32.8
55.1
42.2
57.2

6.8
17.6
14.6
13.1
23.4
7.7
21.6

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

22.2
19.0
22.2
25.7
20.7
20.1
20.8
23.9

1.32
7.55
4.58
2.61
2.59
3.01
3.08
5.17

19.6
4.2
13.2
20.6
15.6
14.3
14.8
13.8

24.8
33.8
31.2
30.8
25.8
26.0
26.9
34.1

5.9
39.8
20.7
10.2
12.5
14.9
14.8
21.6

NCR

25.7
24.9
26.7
22.4
27.2

1.19
3.06
2.08
2.31
2.3

23.3
18.9
22.7
17.8
22.7

28.0
30.9
30.8
26.9
31.7

4.6
12.3
7.8
10.3
8.5

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

26.2
22.3
27.1
24.3
34.7
23.8

1.20
2.97
2.35
2.51
3.08
2.64

23.9
16.4
22.5
19.4
28.7
18.6

28.6
28.1
31.7
29.2
40.7
29.0

4.6
13.3
8.7
10.3
8.9
11.1

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

40.3
34.7
39.5
41.1
39.5
45.1

2.22
4.16
5.76
3.79
3.90
7.22

35.9
26.5
28.2
33.7
31.9
30.9

44.7
42.8
50.8
48.6
47.2
59.3

5.5
12.0
14.6
9.2
9.9
16.0

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

196

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.8


% Stunted

Standard
Error

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

36.6
34.1
37.9
33.8
37.0
45.8
34.4

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.71
3.55
6.54
3.19
5.89
3.87
4.18

33.3
27.1
25.0
27.6
25.5
38.2
26.2

40.0
41.0
50.7
40.1
48.5
53.4
42.6

4.7
10.4
17.3
9.4
15.9
8.5
12.1

40.2
39.5
45.0
45.5
28.5
36.6
40.8

1.94
7.17
6.15
7.20
3.03
3.45
2.75

36.4
25.4
32.9
31.4
22.6
29.9
35.4

44.0
53.5
57.0
59.6
34.5
43.4
46.2

4.8
18.2
13.7
15.8
10.6
9.4
6.7

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

38.2
43.6
37.2
36.4
31.6

1.75
4.21
2.09
4.62
11.22

34.9
35.7
33.1
27.4
9.6

41.7
52.2
41.3
45.5
53.6

4.6
9.6
5.6
12.7
35.5

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

42.2
41.5
41.3
40.6
46.7
34.0
45.3

1.92
8.37
5.40
3.39
3.23
6.54
4.32

38.5
25.1
30.7
34.0
40.4
21.2
36.8

46.0
57.9
51.8
47.3
53.0
46.8
53.7

4.5
20.2
13.1
8.3
6.9
19.2
9.5

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

43.5
51.3
39.6
43.3

2.06
4.10
2.85
3.31

39.4
43.3
34.0
36.8

47.5
59.4
45.2
49.8

4.7
8.0
7.2
7.6

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

40.3
43.4
45.4
46.8
42.4
32.4

1.69
3.77
8.71
3.62
4.08
2.33

37.0
36.0
28.3
39.7
34.4
27.8

43.6
50.8
62.4
53.9
50.4
37.0

4.2
8.7
19.2
7.7
9.6
7.2

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

40.3
45.9
43.8
36.3
44.0

2.17
5.10
4.56
3.12
6.31

36.0
35.9
34.8
30.2
31.6

44.5
55.9
52.7
42.5
56.4

5.4
11.1
10.4
8.6
14.3

XII. SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

41.5
38.8
55.6
39.7
38.3

1.99
2.74
4.97
3.73
5.00

37.6
33.5
45.9
32.4
28.5

45.4
44.2
65.4
47.0
48.1

4.8
7.0
8.9
9.4
13.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

197

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.8


% Stunted

Standard
Error

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

37.8
31.6
39.8
40.1
41.0

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

41.8
40.4
49.1
37.6
46.4
32.2

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.80
3.25
4.03
3.06
3.69

34.3
25.3
31.9
34.1
33.7

41.4
38.0
47.7
46.1
48.2

4.8
10.3
10.1
7.6
9.0

1.97
5.26
3.00
3.02
6.10
4.18

38.0
30.1
43.2
31.7
34.5
24.0

45.7
50.8
55.0
43.5
58.4
40.4

4.7
13.0
6.1
8.0
13.1
13.0

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Intervals (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

198

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.9 Percentage distribution, mean, and median weight-forheight z-scores of children, 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by
sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011
Disaggregation/
Variable

Severely
Wasted
<-3SD

Weight-for-Height (%)
Overweight
Wasted
Normal
-for-Height
<-2SD to -2SD to
>+2SD
-3SD
+2SD

NEC

Mean
zscores

Median
zscores

Sex/Age Group
All
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

2.4
6.5
4.0
3.1
1.8
1.2
1.0

4.9
4.6
7.9
6.0
4.8
3.3
4.5

88.1
80.1
84.0
86.1
88.9
91.1
91.3

4.3
8.1
4.1
4.7
4.1
4.2
2.9

0.3
0.7
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2

-0.31
-0.07
-0.44
-0.36
-0.29
-0.26
-0.39

-0.38
-0.07
-0.47
-0.43
-0.35
-0.36
-0.44

Male
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

2.4

5.1

87.6

4.6

0.2

-0.28

-0.35

7.2
4.6
3.0
1.8
1.1
0.9

5.4
8.6
6.2
4.7
3.4
4.1

78.6
82.9
85.9
88.8
89.9
91.5

8.4
3.8
4.7
4.4
5.3
3.4

0.4
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1

-0.09
-0.45
-0.33
-0.27
-0.19
-0.33

-0.09
-0.46
-0.36
-0.32
-0.33
-0.39

Female

2.3

4.8

88.7

3.9

0.3

-0.35

-0.42

0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

5.6
3.4
3.3
1.9
1.3
1.2

3.8
7.0
5.8
4.8
3.1
4.8

81.8
85.3
86.4
89.1
92.3
91.1

7.8
4.3
4.5
3.8
3.1
2.5

1.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.3

-0.05
-0.42
-0.39
-0.31
-0.32
-0.45

-0.04
-0.48
-0.49
-0.36
-0.40
-0.51

Facts and Figures, 2011

199

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.10 Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


0-5.0 years old (0-60 months), using WHO-CGS weightfor-height, standard error, confidence interval, and
coefficient of variation by region and province:
Philippines, 2011
% Wasted

Standard
Error

7.3

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.22

6.9

7.8

3.0

9.9
10.2
12.1
8.0
9.9

1.01
3.04
3.24
2.22
1.30

7.9
4.3
5.7
3.6
7.3

11.9
16.2
18.4
12.4
12.4

10.2
29.7
26.8
27.8
13.2

10.5
10.8
11.3
8.9
6.3

1.20
2.26
1.73
3.30
3.45

8.1
6.4
7.9
2.5
0

12.8
15.3
14.7
15.4
13.0

11.5
20.9
15.3
36.9
55.1

4.7
6.5
6.1
3.5
2.7
5.3
7.1

0.76
1.99
4.43
0.98
1.55
2.35
2.43

3.2
2.6
0
1.6
0
0.7
2.3

6.2
10.4
14.8
5.4
5.8
9.9
11.8

16.1
30.4
72.3
28.2
56.5
44.6
34.3

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

7.0
0
6.2
8.8
6.4
6.9
6.6
3.3

0.83
0
2.55
1.63
1.52
1.79
2.76
1.82

5.3
0
1.2
5.6
3.4
3.4
1.2
0

8.6
0
11.2
12.0
9.4
10.4
12.0
6.8

11.9
0
41.1
18.4
23.9
25.8
42.0
55.8

NCR

6.6
6.8
6.5
3.5
8.9

0.58
1.39
1.1
0.88
1.13

5.5
4.1
4.4
1.8
6.7

7.8
9.6
8.7
5.2
11.1

8.8
20.4
16.9
24.8
12.7

6.5
5.6
5.9
6.3
8.9
6.5

0.66
1.30
1.05
1.68
2.11
1.51

5.2
3.1
3.8
3.0
4.7
3.5

7.8
8.2
8.0
9.6
13.0
9.4

10.2
23.0
17.8
26.6
23.8
23.3

10.5
8.0
13.7
9.5
12.0
5.0

1.30
3.89
3.66
2.67
2.10
2.32

8.0
0.4
6.5
4.3
7.8
0.4

13.1
15.6
20.9
14.8
16.1
9.5

12.4
48.6
26.8
28.0
17.5
46.4

Philippines

CAR

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
1

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

200

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.10


Region/ Province
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

% Wasted

Standard
Error

95 % Confidence
Interval
LL

CV %

UL

8.4
10.7
8.3
6.8
9.8
5.9
10.4

0.92
2.19
2.85
1.38
5.41
1.85
2.58

6.6
6.4
2.8
4.0
0
2.3
5.4

10.2
15.0
13.9
9.5
20.4
9.6
15.5

10.9
20.4
34.1
20.4
55.2
31.1
24.7

5.8
8.5
4.9
5.6
10.7
6.1
5.2

0.78
3.81
2.65
2.48
4.93
1.32
1.21

4.3
1.0
0
0.8
1.0
3.5
2.8

7.3
16.0
10.1
10.5
20.4
8.7
7.5

13.4
44.8
53.8
44.0
46.1
21.8
23.4

5.3
7.4
5.2
2.5
23.0

0.69
1.93
0.88
1.08
10.51

3.9
3.6
3.5
0.4
2.3

6.7
11.2
7.0
4.6
43.6

13.1
26.2
16.7
43.0
45.8

7.8
3.3
5.0
7.7
7.6
8.9
10.6

0.91
1.93
1.95
1.28
2.56
3.69
2.59

6.0
0
1.2
5.2
2.6
1.7
5.5

9.6
7.1
8.8
10.2
12.6
16.2
15.7

11.6
59.0
39.0
16.5
33.7
41.4
24.4

7.1
5.6
7.2
4.8

1.06
1.74
1.40
2.37

5.0
2.2
4.5
0.1

9.1
9.1
10.0
9.4

14.9
30.8
19.4
49.4

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

7.3
6.3
11.4
6.4
7.4
8.0

0.78
1.29
4.57
1.44
2.05
1.53

5.7
3.8
2.4
3.6
3.4
5.0

8.8
8.8
20.3
9.3
11.4
11.0

10.8
20.6
40.2
22.4
27.7
19.1

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

7.2
2.8
6.2
9.0
5.6

0.95
1.51
1.67
1.41
2.78

5.4
0
3.0
6.2
0.2

9.1
5.8
9.5
11.7
11.1

13.1
53.5
26.8
15.7
49.3

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

7.1
9.2
6.4
6.1
6.6

0.87
1.80
2.49
1.15
2.14

5.4
5.7
1.6
3.8
2.4

8.9
12.7
11.3
8.3
10.8

12.2
19.6
38.6
18.9
32.3

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

Facts and Figures, 2011

201

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.10


Region/ Province

% Wasted

Standard
Error

95 % Confidence
Interval
LL

CV %

UL

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

8.6
9.1
5.9
12.4
7.6

1.17
2.33
1.78
3.00
2.07

6.3
4.5
2.4
6.5
3.5

10.9
13.6
9.4
18.2
11.6

13.5
25.6
30.1
24.3
27.3

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

10.0
15.4
6.4
6.7
16.0
16.0

1.06
3.96
1.41
1.21
3.93
3.18

7.9
7.6
3.7
4.3
8.3
9.7

12.1
23.1
9.2
9.0
23.7
22.2

10.6
25.8
21.9
18.1
24.6
19.9

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

202

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.11 Percentage distribution, mean, and median BMI-for-age


z-scores of children 0-5 years old (0-60 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011
BMI-for-Age (%)

Disaggregation/
Variable

Severely
Wasted
<-3SD

Wasted

Normal

Overweight

Obese

<-2SD to
-3SD

-2SD to
+2SD

>+2SD to
+3SD

>+3SD

Mean
zscores

Median
zscores

Sex/Age Group
All
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

2.4
5.8
4.3
3.1
1.9
1.1
1.0

4.1
6.4
8.2
4.3
3.3
2.4
3.2

88.8
81.6
83.5
86.6
89.5
91.6
92.6

2.5
3.5
2.0
3.6
2.3
2.5
1.7

2.3
2.8
2.0
2.4
3.0
2.5
1.4

-0.18
-0.23
-0.47
-0.12
-0.05
-0.06
-0.29

-0.24
-0.27
-0.50
-0.16
-0.13
-0.17
-0.34

Male
0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

2.4

3.8

88.5

2.7

2.6

-0.12

-0.17

6.8
4.8
3.1
1.9
1.0
0.9

6.8
9.1
3.8
3.1
1.9
2.2

80.7
82.1
86.8
89.5
90.8
93.1

2.9
1.7
4.0
2.3
3.1
2.0

2.7
2.3
2.3
3.2
3.2
1.7

-0.28
-0.47
-0.08
0.00
0.06
-0.18

-0.30
-0.48
-0.09
-0.08
-0.10
-0.23

Female

2.3

4.3

89.1

2.3

2.0

-0.25

-0.32

0-5 m
6-11 m
12-23 m (1.0-1.99 y)
24-35 m (2.0-2.99 y)
36-47 m (3.0-3.99 y)
48-60 m (4.0-5.0 y)

4.6
3.7
3.2
2.0
1.3
1.1

5.9
7.3
4.8
3.6
2.9
4.2

82.6
85.0
86.4
89.5
92.4
92.1

4.0
2.4
3.1
2.3
1.7
1.4

2.8
1.6
2.6
2.7
1.6
1.2

-0.18
-0.47
-0.17
-0.10
-0.19
-0.40

-0.22
-0.52
-0.24
-0.18
-0.26
-0.45

Facts and Figures, 2011

203

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.12 Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


0-5 years old (0-60 months), using WHO-Growth BMI-forage, standard error, confidence interval, and coefficient
of variation by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region/ Province

% Wasted

Standard
Error

6.4

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.20

6.0

6.8

3.2

8.0
7.2
10.2
8.1
7.7

0.92
2.49
2.86
2.44
1.17

6.2
2.3
4.6
3.3
5.4

9.8
12.0
15.8
12.8
10.0

11.5
34.8
28.0
30.3
15.1

9.9
10.0
11.0
7.7
6.3

1.14
2.39
1.54
2.62
3.45

7.7
5.3
8.0
2.6
0

12.1
14.7
14.0
12.8
13.0

11.6
23.9
14.0
34.0
55.1

5.2
7.4
6.1
4.2
2.7
5.4
7.1

0.83
2.26
4.43
1.13
1.55
2.69
2.43

3.5
2.9
0
2.0
0
0.1
2.3

6.8
11.8
14.8
6.5
5.8
10.6
11.8

16.2
30.7
72.3
26.7
56.5
50.3
34.3

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

6.5
0
5.1
7.7
5.5
7.6
6.6
2.2

0.78
0
2.32
1.55
1.48
1.82
2.09
1.53

5.0
0
0.6
4.6
2.6
4.0
2.5
0

8.0
0
9.7
10.7
8.4
11.1
10.7
5.2

12.0
0
45.2
20.2
27.1
24.1
31.8
69.8

NCR

6.3
5.9
6.0
3.2
9.1

0.56
1.39
1.03
0.81
1.11

5.2
3.1
4.0
1.6
6.9

7.4
8.6
8.0
4.8
11.3

9.0
23.7
17.2
25.1
12.3

6.1
5.3
5.3
5.6
8.9
6.2

0.66
1.26
1.10
1.40
2.25
1.55

4.8
2.8
3.1
2.8
4.5
3.1

7.4
7.8
7.4
8.3
13.3
9.2

10.9
23.7
20.9
25.2
25.3
25.1

7.8
4.7
7.6
5.8
11.1
3.5

1.02
2.41
2.89
1.60
1.83
2.10

5.8
0.0
1.9
2.6
7.5
0

9.8
9.5
13.3
8.9
14.7
7.6

13.1
50.9
38.0
27.8
16.6
59.7

Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
1

Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
1

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

204

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.12


95 % Confidence Interval

% Wasted

Standard
Error

6.6
8.5
6.2
5.4
4.8
4.0
9.3

0.78
1.86
2.26
1.29
2.09
1.19
2.55

5.0
4.8
1.8
2.9
0.7
1.7
4.3

8.1
12.1
10.7
7.9
8.9
6.4
14.3

11.8
21.9
36.2
23.9
43.9
29.5
27.4

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

5.0
10.1
3.8
4.0
10.5
5.4
4.2

0.76
3.41
2.78
2.09
7.89
1.28
1.11

3.5
3.4
0
0
0
2.9
2.0

6.5
16.7
9.2
8.1
26.0
7.9
6.4

15.1
33.9
73.3
51.7
75.0
23.4
26.5

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

4.2
5.9
4.2
1.9
14.4

0.61
1.49
0.80
0.95
14.19

3.0
3.0
2.6
0.1
0

5.4
8.8
5.7
3.8
42.2

14.8
25.3
19.2
48.9
98.9

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

6.5
3.3
2.9
7.1
5.5
5.9
8.7

0.89
1.93
1.63
1.29
2.40
3.13
2.64

4.7
0
0
4.6
0.8
0
3.6

8.2
7.1
6.1
9.6
10.2
12.0
13.9

13.8
59.0
55.3
18.2
43.6
53.1
30.2

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

6.7
4.7
7.2
4.8

1.01
1.68
1.35
2.37

4.7
1.4
4.6
0.1

8.7
8.0
9.9
9.4

15.1
35.8
18.7
49.4

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

5.9
5.8
11.4
5.0
6.0
6.1

0.75
1.42
4.57
1.43
1.83
1.39

4.5
3.0
2.4
2.2
2.4
3.4

7.4
8.6
20.3
7.8
9.6
8.8

12.5
24.4
40.2
28.8
30.6
22.9

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

6.6
2.8
4.8
8.5
4.7

0.90
1.51
1.77
1.31
2.42

4.8
0
1.3
5.9
0.0

8.3
5.8
8.3
11.1
9.5

0.99
0.86
0.94
0.95
1.22

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

5.5
6.7
6.4
4.3
5.4

0.82
1.79
2.64
1.03
1.67

3.8
0
1.3
5.9
0.0

7.1
10.2
11.6
6.3
8.7

15.1
26.5
41.0
24.0
30.9

Region/ Province
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

Facts and Figures, 2011

LL

UL

CV %

205

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.12


Region/ Province
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

% Wasted

Standard
Error

7.1
5.7
5.9
9.5
8.2
8.8
13.5
5.1
5.6
16.5
12.7

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

1.07
1.78
1.78
2.57
2.56

5.0
2.2
2.4
4.5
3.2

9.2
9.2
9.4
14.5
13.2

15.0
31.3
30.1
27.0
31.3

0.96
3.75
1.09
1.22
3.81
2.66

7.0
6.1
3.0
3.3
9.0
7.5

10.7
20.8
7.2
8.0
24.0
17.9

10.8
27.8
21.4
21.6
23.1
20.9

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

206

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.13 Percentage distribution, mean and median BMI-for-age zscores of children, 5.08-10 years old (61-120 months) by
sex, and age group: Philippines, 2011
BMI-for-Age (%)

Severely
Wasted

Wasted

Normal

<-3SD

<-2SD
to -3SD

Sex/Age Group
All
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

1.7
1.4
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.8

Male
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)
Female
5.08-5.99 y (61-71 m)
6.0-6.99 y (72-83 m)
7.0-7.99 y (84-95 m)
8.0-8.99 y (96-107 m)
9.0-10.0y(108-120m)

Disaggregation/
Variable

Obese

-2SD
to
+2SD

Overweight

>+2SD
to +3SD

>+3SD

6.8
4.2
6.1
6.6
7.7
9.0

84.0
86.7
85.4
84.3
83.5
80.8

4.3
4.7
4.1
4.1
4.4
4.5

1.9
1.5
1..8
2.1
2.0
2.2

6.9
4.1
6.0
7.2
7.6
9.0

82.9
85.7
84.9
82.8
82.6
79.5

1.4
1.4
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.4

6.7
4.3
6.1
5.9
7.8
8.9

85.1
87.6
85.8
86.0
84.5
82.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

Mean
zscores

Median
zscores

3.1
3.0
2.9
3.2
2.7
3.9

-0.63
-0.47
-0.58
-0.65
-0.69
-0.72

-0.70
-0.54
-0.65
-0.73
-0.75
-0.85

4.3
5.2
4.2
3.8
4.5
4.1

3.9
3.5
3.0
4.1
3.5
5.3

-0.61
-0.42
-0.57
-0.64
-0.67
-0.69

-0.69
-0.50
-0.63
-0.74
-0.74
-0.83

4.4
4.1
3.9
4.4
4.4
4.9

2.3
2.6
2.7
2.0
1.9
2.4

-0.65
-0.53
-0.60
-0.66
-0.71
-0.75

-0.72
-0.58
-0.65
-0.71
-0.77
-0.86

207

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.14 Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


5.08-10.0 years old (61120 months), using WHO-Growth
Reference BMI-for-age, standard error, confidence
interval, and coefficient of variation by region and
province: Philippines, 2011
% Wasted

Standard
Error

8.5

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

Region/ Province
Philippines

CAR

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR

District I
District II
District III
District IV

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
1

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.22

8.1

9.0

2.6

10.3
11.8
5.6
8.0
11.4

0.99
2.40
2.66
2.09
1.38

8.4
7.1
0.4
3.9
8.7

12.2
16.5
10.9
12.1
14.1

9.6
20.3
47.2
26.0
12.1

9.0
8.6
10.8
4.7
7.5

1.08
1.57
1.84
1.90
4.97

6.9
5.6
7.2
1.0
0

11.1
11.7
14.4
8.5
17.3

12.0
18.2
17.0
40.0
66.3

3.0
3.6
6.2
3.3
0
5.0
0

0.62
1.51
1.64
1.36
0
1.56
0

1.8
0.7
3.0
0.6
0
1.9
0

4.2
6.6
9.4
6.0
0
8.0
0

20.5
41.3
26.4
41.2
0
31.5
0

11.0
16.8
15.0
9.0
11.9
10.4
10.5
13.0

0.98
11.41
3.82
1.66
1.90
2.20
3.08
3.62

9.0
0
7.6
5.8
8.2
6.1
4.5
5.9

12.9
39.2
22.5
12.3
15.7
14.7
16.5
20.1

9.0
67.8
25.4
18.3
15.9
21.1
29.4
27.8

8.2
9.5
7.5
6.2
9.8

0.68
1.66
1.29
1.31
1.19

6.9
6.2
5.0
3.6
7.4

9.5
12.7
10.0
8.7
12.1

8.3
17.5
17.2
21.4
12.2

8.6
7.6
8.9
9.8
8.6
8.1

0.68
1.60
1.29
1.63
1.60
1.55

7.3
4.5
6.4
6.6
5.5
5.0

10.0
10.8
11.5
13.0
11.7
11.1

7.9
20.9
14.4
16.6
18.6
19.2

11.1
15.3
12.3
9.2
13.6
4.4

1.00
4.83
2.31
1.62
2.00
1.45

9.2
5.8
7.8
6.0
9.7
1.5

13.1
24.7
16.9
12.4
17.6
7.2

9.0
31.6
18.8
17.6
14.7
33.1

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

208

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.14


% Wasted

Standard
Error

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

11.6
14.2
11.3
12.7
7.9
5.7
14.0

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.81
1.89
2.69
1.52
3.42
1.49
2.07

10.0
10.5
6.0
9.7
1.2
2.8
9.9

13.2
17.9
16.6
15.7
14.6
8.6
18.0

7.0
13.3
23.8
12.0
43.3
26.1
14.8

9.8
9.9
16.2
7.9
7.0
11.7
7.9

0.98
2.60
4.72
1.79
5.10
2.12
1.43

7.9
4.8
6.9
4.4
0
7.5
5.1

11.7
15.0
25.5
11.4
17.0
15.8
10.7

10.0
26.2
29.2
22.5
73.3
18.1
18.0

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

7.1
10.6
7.1
3.3
5.3

0.79
2.09
1.03
1.09
5.33

5.5
6.4
5.1
1.2
0

8.6
14.7
9.1
5.5
15.7

11.1
19.8
14.5
33.0
101.3

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

6.1
1.4
6.8
6.6
7.8
2.3
5.9

0.73
1.29
1.75
1.11
2.13
1.54
1.99

4.7
0
3.4
4.4
3.6
0
2.0

7.5
3.9
10.2
8.8
11.9
5.3
9.8

11.9
95.4
25.8
16.9
27.4
68.3
33.6

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

5.9
4.1
7.1
5.1

0.79
1.17
1.28
1.69

4.3
1.8
4.6
1.8

7.4
6.4
9.6
8.4

13.4
28.5
18.1
33.3

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

7.4
5.3
6.3
5.5
9.7
9.7

0.91
1.44
4.05
1.60
2.67
1.87

5.6
2.5
0
2.4
4.4
6.0

9.2
8.2
14.2
8.7
14.9
13.3

12.3
27.1
64.4
28.9
27.6
19.3

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

6.1
6.3
5.4
6.8
4.2

0.91
3.12
1.49
1.30
2.06

4.3
0.1
2.5
4.3
0.2

7.9
12.4
8.4
9.4
8.3

14.8
49.8
27.5
19.1
48.7

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

6.4
7.8
3.7
5.3
8.6

0.78
1.60
1.28
1.21
1.97

4.9
4.7
1.2
2.9
4.7

7.9
11.0
6.2
7.7
12.5

12.2
20.4
34.3
22.8
22.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

209

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.14


Region/ Province
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

% Wasted

Standard
Error

7.2
8.3
4.5
7.8
8.2
9.3
10.9
2.4
8.2
14.5
15.0

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.91
1.62
1.85
1.79
1.95

5.4
5.1
0.9
4.3
4.3

8.9
11.5
8.1
11.3
12.0

12.7
19.5
41.2
22.9
24.0

0.98
3.28
0.86
1.32
3.18
2.68

7.4
4.5
0.7
5.6
8.3
9.7

11.2
17.4
4.1
10.8
20.7
20.2

10.5
29.9
36.5
16.1
21.9
17.9

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

210

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.15 Percentage distribution, mean height-for-age z-scores of


children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011
Height-for-age (%)

Severely
Stunted

Mean zscores

Stunted

Normal

Tall

<-3SD

<-2SD to 3SD

-2SD to
+2SD

>+2SD

Sex/Age Group
All
10.08-12.99 y (121-155 m)
13.0-15.99 y (156-191 m)
16.0-19.0 y (192-228 m)

9.0
10.4
9.1
7.0

26.7
26.6
24.1
30.2

64.1
62.8
66.6
62.7

0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0

-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.7

Male

10.2

27.6

62.0

0.2

-1.7

10.08-12.99 y (121-155 m)
13.0-15.99 y (156-191 m)
16.0-19.0 y (192-228 m)

10.0
12.3
8.1

28.5
23.7
31.1

61.2
63.9
60.8

0.3
0.1
0.0

-1.6
-1.6
-1.8

7.7

25.7

66.4

0.1

-1.6

10.8
5.8
5.8

24.4
24.6
29.1

64.6
69.5
65.0

0.1
0.1
0.1

-1.5
-1.6
-1.7

Disaggregation/ Variable

Female
10.08-12.99 y (121-155 m)
13.0-15.99 y (156-191 m)
16.0-19.0 y (192-228 m)

Facts and Figures, 2011

211

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.16 Estimates of the proportion of stunted among children,


10.08-19.0 years old (121-228 months), using WHOGrowth Reference height-for-age, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011
% Stunted

Standard
Error

Philippines

35.7

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.36

35.0

36.5

1.0

25.0
26.2
27.2
25.1
24.3

1.21
3.25
2.96
3.82
1.49

22.6
19.8
21.4
17.6
21.4

27.3
32.5
33.0
32.5
27.2

4.9
12.4
10.9
15.2
6.1

Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

27.8
25.7
26.7
35.7
30.6

1.35
1.81
1.88
5.88
4.28

25.2
22.2
23.0
24.2
22.2

30.4
29.3
30.4
47.2
38.9

4.9
7.0
7.0
16.5
14.0

CAR

35.6
35.7
34.4
27.3
47.0
47.7
37.4

2.27
3.18
6.24
2.21
10.73
4.32
10.10

31.1
29.5
22.2
23.0
25.9
39.2
17.6

40.0
41.9
46.7
31.7
68.0
56.2
57.2

6.4
8.9
18.1
8.1
22.8
9.1
27.0

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

23.2
46.5
16.6
27.5
20.9
19.6
22.0
30.3

1.11
10.30
3.15
2.46
1.95
2.08
2.87
4.58

21.1
26.3
10.5
22.6
17.1
15.5
16.4
21.3

25.4
66.7
22.8
32.3
24.7
23.7
27.6
39.3

4.8
22.1
18.9
8.9
9.3
10.6
13.1
15.1

NCR

28.1
31.1
28.3
25.5
28.2

1.08
28.6
1.89
2.23
1.91

26.0
25.5
24.6
21.2
24.4

30.2
36.7
32.0
30.0
31.9

3.8
9.2
6.7
8.7
6.8

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

28.4
29.3
25.7
26.4
35.0
26.8

1.08
2.54
2.39
2.28
2.48
2.33

26.3
24.3
21.0
21.9
30.2
22.3

30.5
34.3
30.4
30.8
39.9
31.4

3.8
8.7
9.3
8.6
7.1
8.7

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

38.6
28.2
41.0
38.2
39.6
40.2

1.63
4.60
4.16
2.96
2.98
4.11

35.4
19.2
32.8
32.4
33.8
32.1

41.8
37.3
49.2
44.1
45.4
48.2

4.2
16.3
10.1
7.8
7.5
10.2

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

212

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.16


95 % Confidence Interval
LL
UL

% Stunted

Standard
Error

39.3
37.9
38.0
37.4
44.0
45.8
36.8

1.40
3.02
4.83
2.68
6.47
3.41
2.70

36.5
31.9
28.5
32.2
31.3
39.1
31.5

42.0
43.8
47.5
42.7
56.6
52.5
42.1

3.6
8.0
12.7
7.2
14.7
7.4
7.3

43.0
41.7
42.1
47.5
34.3
40.6
44.2

1.40
4.53
6.34
3.57
8.26
2.00
2.51

40.3
32.8
29.6
40.5
18.1
36.7
39.3

45.7
50.6
54.5
54.5
50.5
44.5
49.1

3.2
10.9
15.1
7.5
24.1
4.9
5.7

41.3
44.7
40.3
43.1
19.1

1.36
3.17
1.66
3.55
10.17

38.7
38.5
37.0
36.1
0

44.0
50.9
43.5
50.0
39.0

3.3
7.1
4.1
8.2
53.3

45.3
43.7
47.1
43.6
45.5
41.8
50.0

1.47
5.55
4.93
2.01
4.88
5.76
2.95

42.5
32.9
37.4
39.7
36.0
30.5
44.2

48.2
54.6
56.8
47.5
55.1
53.1
55.8

3.2
12.7
10.5
4.6
10.7
13.8
5.9

45.2
47.4
44.0
43.7

1.83
3.32
2.53
3.82

41.6
40.8
39.0
36.2

48.8
53.9
48.9
51.2

4.0
7.0
5.8
8.7

45.6
53.4
37.4
47.9
39.4
41.5

1.75
3.45
3.43
4.46
3.74
2.94

42.2
46.6
30.7
39.2
32.1
35.8

49.1
60.2
44.2
56.7
46.7
47.3

3.8
6.5
9.2
9.3
9.5
7.1

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

41.8
41.4
45.9
39.1
48.4

1.75
5.74
3.40
2.37
4.61

38.4
30.1
39.2
34.5
39.3

45.3
52.7
52.5
43.8
57.4

4.2
13.9
7.4
6.1
9.5

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

45.5
43.4
58.1
42.8
44.4

1.69
2.76
4.59
2.88
3.89

42.2
38.0
49.1
37.2
36.8

48.8
48.8
67.1
48.4
52.1

3.7
6.4
7.9
6.7
8.8

Region/ Province
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV %

213

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.16

95 % Confidence Interval
LL
UL

% Stunted

Standard
Error

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

43.2
41.7
44.6
42.5
44.1

1.41
2.81
3.16
2.52
2.63

40.5
36.2
38.4
37.6
39.0

46.0
47.2
50.8
47.4
49.3

3.3
6.7
7.1
5.9
6.0

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

45.8
47.6
57.8
42.6
45.4
34.4

1.79
6.57
3.20
3.25
4.47
2.84

42.3
34.7
51.5
36.2
36.6
28.8

49.3
60.4
64.0
48.9
54.2
40.0

3.9
13.8
5.5
7.6
9.8
8.3

Region/ Province

CV %

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

214

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.17 Percentage distribution, mean BMI-for age z-scores of


children, 10.08-19 years old (121-228 months) by sex,
and age group: Philippines, 2011
BMI-for-age (%)

Disaggregation/ Variable

Severely
Wasted
<-3SD

Wasted

Normal

<-2SD
to -3SD

-2SD to
+1SD

Overweight
>+1SD
to +2SD

Obese
>+2SD

Mean zscores

Sex/ Age Group


All
10.08-12.99 y (121-155 m)
13.0-15.99 y (156-191 m)
16.0-19.0 y (192-228 m)

2.9
3.3
3.2
1.8

9.8
11.0
10.0
7.9

80.6
77.5
81.0
84.5

5.0
5.6
4.4
4.7

1.7
2.6
1.4
1.0

-0.80
-0.8
-0.8
-0.7

Male

3.5

11.3

78.4

4.7

2.1

-0.9

10.08-12.99 y (121-155 m)
13.0-15.99 y (156-191 m)
16.0-19.0 y (192-228 m)

3.7
4.2
2.5

11.3
12.3
10.0

75.9
77.7
82.6

5.7
4.1
4.1

3.4
1.7
0.8

-0.8
-0.9
-0.8

Female

2.1

8.2

83.1

5.3

1.3

-0.7

10.08-12.99 y (121-155 m)
13.0-15.99 y (156-191 m)
16.0-19.0 y (192-228 m)

2.9
2.1
1.1

10.6
7.6
5.4

79.3
84.5
86.8

5.6
4.8
5.4

1.6
1.0
1.3

-0.8
-0.6
-0.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

215

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.18 Estimates of the proportion of wasting among children,


10.08-19.0 years old (121-228 months), using WHOGrowth
Reference
BMI-for-age,
standard
error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by region
and province: Philippines, 2011
% Wasted

Standard
Error

Philippines

12.7

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

Region/ Province

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.22

12.2

13.1

1.8

13.8
14.4
15.5
17.0
12.5

1.0
2.3
3.5
2.4
1.2

11.9
9.8
8.6
12.2
10.1

15.7
18.9
22.4
21.8
15.0

7.1
16.3
22.7
14.4
9.9

Cagayan Valley1
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

12.4
15.1
12.8
5.0
10.0

1.1
2.0
1.6
1.9
2.6

10.4
11.2
9.7
1.3
4.9

14.5
19.0
16.0
8.7
15.1

8.5
13.0
12.4
38.1
25.8

CAR

5.0
8.4
12.1
4.2
0.6
4.2
5.5

0.7
2.6
1.7
0.8
0.6
1.1
2.7

3.7
3.3
8.9
2.5
0
2.0
0.2

6.3
13.4
15.4
5.8
1.8
6.4
10.8

13.0
30.7
13.8
20.3
106.5
27.1
48.8

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

14.9
4.1
15.3
15.2
14.2
14.9
12.8
21.1

0.8
1.9
4.0
1.6
1.6
1.6
2.4
4.2

13.3
0.5
7.4
12.0
11.0
11.8
8.2
12.8

16.6
7.8
23.2
18.5
17.3
18.1
17.4
29.3

5.7
45.4
26.4
10.8
11.4
10.8
18.5
19.9

NCR

14.2
17.0
12.6
14.0
15.1

0.8
2.4
1.3
1.5
1.7

12.6
12.3
10.1
11.0
11.8

15.8
21.6
15,0
16.9
18.3

5.7
14.0
10.0
10.7
11.0

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

14.4
13.7
15.8
14.8
14.0
13.5

0.7
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.8

13.1
10.5
13.1
12.1
11.2
10.0

15.8
17.0
18.5
17.6
16.7
17.0

4.7
12.1
8.6
9.3
10.1
13.2

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

14.4
14.9
16.8
13.8
14.6
12.0

1.0
2.4
2.1
1.9
2.1
2.4

12.4
10.2
12.7
10.0
10.5
7.3

16.4
19.7
20.9
17.6
18.6
16.6

7.1
16.3
12.4
14.0
14.3
19.9

Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province

District I
District II
District III
District IV

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

216

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.18


Region/ Province
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

% Wasted

Standard
Error

14.9
17.4
15.9
15.6
10.6
11.3
14.7

95 % Confidence Interval

CV %

LL

UL

0.8
1.6
1.8
1.5
3.3
2.1
2.2

13.3
14.3
12.3
12.5
4.1
7.1
10.4

16.5
20.5
19.6
18.6
17.1
15.4
19.1

5.5
9.1
11.6
9.9
31.2
18.7
15.0

14.4
22.0
20.3
15.0
16.5
13.6
12.4

0.9
5.7
3.5
2.2
2.8
1.5
1.3

12.6
10.9
13.4
10.6
11.1
10.7
9.8

16.2
33.0
27.3
19.3
22.0
16.6
15.0

6.4
25.7
17.4
14.8
16.8
11.1
10.9

9.9
10.9
10.1
8.8
2.3

0.7
1.5
1.0
1.4
2.4

8.4
7.9
8.1
6.0
0

11.3
13.9
12.1
11.6
7.0

7.5
14.1
10.1
16.2
106.9

10.8
11.3
7.3
11.6
12.2
11.6
10.0

0.8
4.9
1.4
1.0
2.1
3.0
2.2

9.3
1.7
4.6
9.6
8.1
5.6
5.6

12.3
20.9
10.1
13.6
16.2
17.5
14.4

7.1
43.2
19.4
8.9
16.9
26.2
22.3

10.0
9.5
11.6
5.3

0.9
1.6
1.3
1.5

8.2
6.4
9.0
2.5

11.7
12.5
14.2
8.2

9.1
16.4
11.4
27.2

10.0
8.1
17.5
9.4
13.0
10.0

0.8
1.5
8.6
1.9
2.5
1.2

8.4
5.1
0.7
5.6
8.2
7.6

11.7
11.1
34.4
13.1
17.9
12.3

8.4
19.0
49.0
20.4
18.9
12.0

8.9
4.7
9.8
9.9
8.0

0.9
1.2
2.1
1.3
2.1

7.1
2.3
5.8
7.3
3.8

10.6
7.1
13.8
12.5
12.1

9.9
26.2
21.0
13.5
26.6

10.2
9.3
7.0
11.5
11.8

0.8
1.5
1.8
1.5
2.2

8.5
6.4
3.5
8.6
7.5

11.9
12.2
10.5
14.4
16.2

8.3
15.7
25.6
12.8
18.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

217

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.18


Region/ Province

% Wasted

Standard
Error

95 % Confidence Interval
LL

UL

CV %

CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

10.2
11.3
8.1
12.7
9.0

0.8
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.7

8.5
7.9
5.2
9.4
5.6

11.8
14.7
11.0
16.1
12.3

8.2
15.4
18.0
13.5
19.3

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

12.9
10.0
4.1
12.3
22.2
17.4

1.2
2.5
1.3
2.0
3.8
2.2

10.6
5.1
1.6
8.3
14.8
13.0

15.2
14.9
6.6
16.3
29.6
21.8

9.1
25.1
30.9
16.5
17.0
13.0

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

218

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.19 Percentage distribution, mean BMI and 95% CI of adults,
19.08 years old and over (229 months), by sex, and age
group; and by WHO BMI classification: Philippines, 2011
Disaggregation/
Variable
Sex/Age Group
All*
19.08-19.99y
20.00-29.99y
30.00-39.99y
40.00-49.99y
50.00-59.99y
60.00-69.99y
70.00
Male*
19.08-19.99y
20.00-29.99y
30.00-39.99y
40.00-49.99y
50.00-59.99y
60.00-69.99y
70.00
Female*
19.08-19.99y
20.00-29.99y
30.00-39.99y
40.00-49.99y
50.00-59.99y
60.00-69.99y
70.00
Region*
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
Central Luzon
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
NCR
CAR
ARMM

BMI (%)

CED

Normal

<18.5

18.5<25.0

Overweight
25.0<30.0

70,964
1,967
13,337
13,917
16,613
13,967
8,224
4,908
34,115
1,126
7,488
6,782
7,778
6,426
3,663
1,978
36,849
841
5,848
7,135
8,835
7,540
4,561
2,930

10.0
23.0
13.7
6.9
6.2
9.3
14.4
23.4
9.2
20.5
11.6
6.4
5.8
9.2
15.8
23.3
10.7
26.5
16.5
7.4
6.5
9.3
13.3
23.5

61.6
68.7
69.3
61.5
57.0
56.1
57.7
56.4
66.1
71.8
71.8
64.5
62.8
62.5
62.1
62.5
57.3
64.7
66.1
58.7
52.1
50.8
54.3
52.3

22.3
6.4
13.5
24.4
28.9
27.0
22.6
16.5
20.1
6.1
13.7
23.2
25.6
23.3
19.2
11.9
24.4
6.9
13.3
25.5
31.8
30.0
25.2
19.5

6.1
1.8
3.4
7.1
7.9
7.7
5.3
3.7
4.5
1.6
2.9
5.9
5.8
5.1
2.9
2.3
7.6
2.0
4.1
8.3
9.6
9.9
7.2
4.7

4,230
3,703
5,595
7,256
2,923
4,321
4,894
4,856
4,167
2,730
3,608
3,378
3,370
7,538
2,682
2,620
3,093

12.3
10.5
10.1
10.7
11.5
11.8
12.5
9.5
8.0
10.1
8.4
8.1
9.6
8.4
4.9
12.9
7.6

61.5
66.4
58.0
59.1
66.6
65.6
65.6
62.4
63.9
65.0
64.0
62.4
64.7
55.5
64.7
68.4
64.9

21.0
18.9
25.3
23.5
18.5
18.2
17.8
21.9
22.2
20.3
21.2
23.4
19.9
27.2
25.4
15.0
21.1

5.1
4.1
6.6
6.7
3.4
4.3
4.1
6.1
5.9
4.6
6.5
6.1
5.8
9.0
5.0
3.8
6.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

Obese
30

Mean
BMI

95% CI
LL

UL

23.0
20.6
21.9
23.5
23.9
23.6
22.7
21.6
22.7
20.7
21.9
23.2
23.4
23.0
22.1
21.1
23.3
20.6
21.8
23.7
24.3
24.1
23.2
21.9

23.0
20.5
21.8
23.4
23.8
23.5
22.6
21.4
22.7
20.5
21.8
23.1
23.4
22.9
21.9
20.9
23.3
20.3
21.7
23.6
24.2
24.0
23.1
21.7

23.1
20.8
22.0
23.6
24.0
23.7
22.8
21.7
22.8
20.9
22.0
23.3
23.5
23.1
22.2
21.3
23.4
20.8
21.9
23.8
24.4
24.2
23.4
22.1

22.7
22.5
23.3
23.2
22.3
22.4
22.3
23.0
23.1
22.7
23.0
23.2
22.8
23.8
23.4
22.1
23.2

22.5
22.3
23.2
23.1
22.1
22.2
22.1
22.8
22.9
22.5
22.9
23.0
22.6
23.7
23.2
21.8
23.0

22.8
22.6
23.4
23.4
22.5
22.5
22.4
23.2
23.3
22.9
23.2
23.3
23.0
23.9
23.6
22.3
23.3

219

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.20 Estimates of the proportion of chronically energy


deficient (CED) adults 20 years old, using Body Mass
Index, standard error, confidence interval,
and
coefficient of variation by region and province:
Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence Interval

%CED

Standard
Error

Philippines

10.0

0.15

9.7

10.3

1.5

Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

12.3
13.7
10.0
12.2
12.6

0.63
1.98
1.79
1.30
0.83

11.1
9.8
6.5
9.7
11.0

13.6
17.5
13.6
14.8
14.2

5.1
14.5
17.8
10.7
6.6

Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

10.5
11.8
10.4
6.8
11.9

0.59
1.02
0.84
1.11
3.38

9.4
9.8
8.8
4.6
5.3

11.7
13.8
12.1
9.0
18.6

5.6
8.6
8.0
16.3
28.3

CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Provinces

4.9
6.8
11.1
2.9
3.6
9.3
2.6

0.43
0.96
2.17
0.56
1.27
1.29
1.50

4.0
4.9
6.9
1.8
1.1
6.8
0

5.7
8.7
15.4
4.0
6.1
11.9
5.5

8.8
14.2
19.5
19.3
35.4
13.8
57.7

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

10.1
7.8
8.4
10.8
9.9
9.0
12.0
9.9

0.46
3.12
1.63
0.92
1.01
0.87
1.40
1.58

9.2
1.7
5.2
9.0
7.9
7.3
9.2
6.8

11.0
13.9
11.6
12.6
11.9
10.7
14.7
13.0

4.6
40.1
19.3
8.5
10.3
9.7
11.7
15.9

NCR
District I
District II
District III
District IV

8.4
6.8
8.2
10.0
8.0

0.39
0.74
0.64
0.91
0.77

7.6
5.4
7.0
8.2
6.5

9.1
8.3
9.5
11.7
9.5

4.7
10.9
7.8
9.1
9.6

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal

10.7
11.4
10.2
10.3
12.7
9.7

0.47
1.31
0.74
0.94
1.26
1.09

9.8
8.9
8.8
8.4
10.2
7.5

11.6
14.0
11.7
12.1
15.2
11.8

4.4
11.4
7.2
9.2
9.9
11.2

MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

11.5
9.7
12.2
11.0
12.4
10.9

0.80
2.05
1.96
1.22
1.74
2.00

9.9
5.7
8.3
8.6
9.0
7.0

13.1
13.7
16.0
13.4
15.9
14.9

7.0
21.2
16.1
11.1
14.0
18.3

Region/Province

LL

UL

CV%

excluding the province of Batanes since not covered during data collection

Facts and Figures, 2011

220

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.20


%CED

Standard
Error

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

11.8
11.4
15.5
11.5
8.1
9.7
14.0

Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Ilo-Ilo
Negros Occidental

Region/Province

95% Confidence Interval

CV%

LL

UL

0.59
1.25
1.44
0.96
1.43
1.89
1.62

10.7
9.0
12.7
9.6
5.3
6.0
10.8

13.0
13.9
18.4
13.4
10.9
13.4
17.2

5.0
10.9
9.3
8.4
17.6
19.5
11.6

12.5
11.9
16.1
12.1
8.0
12.9
11.9

0.61
2.22
2.00
1.93
2.17
1.09
0.95

11.3
7.5
12.1
8.4
3.7
10.7
10.1

13.7
16.2
20.0
15.9
12.2
15.0
13.8

4.9
18.7
12.5
15.9
27.1
8.5
7.9

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

9.5
10.2
8.9
10.9
10.5

0.48
1.36
0.56
1.10
4.63

8.6
7.5
7.8
8.7
1.4

10.4
12.8
10.0
13.0
19.5

5.0
13.4
6.3
10.1
44.3

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

8.0
11.3
4.2
8.4
8.9
9.5
7.0

0.50
3.04
1.15
0.74
1.82
0.99
1.00

7.0
5.4
1.9
6.9
5.3
7.6
5.0

9.0
17.3
6.4
9.8
12.4
11.4
8.9

6.2
26.9
27.5
8.8
20.5
10.4
14.3

Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Del Norte
Zamboanga Del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

10.1
8.9
11.3
8.2

0.71
1.17
1.03
1.59

8.7
6.6
9.3
5.1

11.5
11.2
13.4
11.3

7.0
13.1
9.1
19.4

Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao Del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

8.4
8.9
10.6
7.4
6.6
9.2

0.56
1.14
2.09
1.29
1.00
1.03

7.3
6.7
6.5
4.9
4.6
7.1

9.5
11.1
14.7
9.9
8.6
11.2

6.7
12.8
19.7
17.4
15.1
11.2

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao Del Norte
Davao Del Sur
Davao Oriental

8.1
8.2
6.2
8.3
10.5

0.64
2.52
1.14
0.80
1.65

6.9
3.2
4.0
6.7
7.2

9.4
13.1
8.5
9.9
13.7

7.8
30.8
18.3
9.6
15.7

SOCCKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat

9.6
10.1
10.9
8.6
10.0

0.54
0.88
1.96
0.76
1.53

8.5
8.4
7.1
7.1
7.0

10.6
11.8
14.8
10.1
13.0

5.7
8.7
17.9
8.9
15.4

Facts and Figures, 2011

221

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table B.20


Region/Province
CARAGA
Agusan Del Norte
Agusan Del Sur
Surigao Del Norte
Surigao Del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao Del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

95% Confidence Interval

%CED

Standard
Error

7.6
7.4
6.5
7.2
9.3

0.54
0.99
1.06
1.15
1.00

6.6
5.5
4.4
4.9
7.3

8.7
9.3
8.6
9.4
11.3

7.0
13.4
16.3
16.1
10.8

12.9
14.8
9.5
11.5
14.6
16.9

1.18
2.50
1.16
2.47
2.54
3.66

10.6
9.9
7.3
6.7
9.6
9.8

15.2
19.7
11.8
16.4
19.6
24.1

9.2
16.9
12.2
21.4
17.5
21.6

LL

UL

CV%

Note: Prevalences between provinces are significantly different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not
overlap from each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the province.
District I Manila
District II Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Pasig, San Juan
District III Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas, Valenzuela
District IV Makati, Pateros, Taguig, Las Pias, Muntinlupa, Paraaque, Pasay City

Facts and Figures, 2011

222

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.21 Percentage distribution of pregnant women by age group


and weight-for-height classification: Philippines 2011
Nutritionally at-risk
(< P95)

Not Nutritionally
at-risk
(> P95)

Age Group
All
< 20 years old
> 20 years old

25.0
35.7
23.3

75.0
64.3
76.7

Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

28.8
32.6
15.8
21.4
18.7
28.8
43.6
30.7
33.2
15.8
18.8
21.9
27.2
20.3
29.4
18.0
26.9

71.2
67.4
84.2
78.6
81.3
71.2
56.4
69.3
66.8
84.2
81.2
78.1
72.8
79.7
70.6
82.0
73.1

Disaggregation/ Variable

Facts and Figures, 2011

223

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.22 Estimates of the proportion of nutritionally at-risk among


pregnant women using weight-for-height, standard error,
confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by
region: Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence
Interval
LL
UL

CV%

0.60

22.8

27.1

4.93

4.96
5.37
4.21
3.40
3.22
3.68
6.56
4.60
4.86
3.92
3.44
5.21
4.56
4.39
6.01
4.30
4.03

19.1
22.0
7.5
14.7
12.4
21.6
30.7
21.7
23.7
8.1
12.0
11.7
18.2
11.7
17.6
9.5
19.0

38.6
43.1
24.1
28.1
25.1
36.0
56.4
39.7
42.8
23.5
25.5
32.2
36.1
28.9
41.2
26.4
34.8

17.2
16.5
26.7
15.9
17.2
12.9
15.1
15.0
14.6
24.6
18.3
23.8
16.8
21.6
20.5
23.9
15.0

%
Nutritionally
at-risk

Standard
Error

Philippines

28.0

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

28.8
32.6
15.8
21.4
18.7
28.8
43.6
30.7
33.2
15.8
18.8
21.9
27.2
20.3
29.4
18.0
26.9

Region

Note: Prevalences between regions are significally different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) do not overlap
with each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the region

Facts and Figures, 2011

224

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.23 Percent distribution of lactating mothers by age group


and region, and by nutritional status classification using
BMI-for-age and BMI for Adults Philippines, 2011
Nutritional Status

Disaggregation/ Variable
Age Group
< 20
> 20
Overall
Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Underweight

Normal
Percent

Overweight

293
3,035
3,328

11.8
11.9
11.9

81.4
69.3
70.4

6.7
18.8
17.7

179
158
169
194
281
239
165
226
232
239
217
177
174
129
171
144
234

12.9
11.9
4.5
14.9
11.9
15.4
13.5
16.6
11.3
11.2
6.6
11.4
10.8
6.2
7.6
8.9
14.4

67.1
73.6
66.8
64.8
67.5
67.8
75.0
72.0
77.5
71.1
78.9
67.3
67.0
74.2
71.4
67.2
70.6

20.0
14.4
28.7
20.3
20.6
16.8
11.5
11.4
11.2
17.7
14.5
21.3
22.2
19.7
21.0
23.8
14.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

225

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table B.24 Estimates of the proportion of underweight among


lactating mothers, using Body Mass Index, standard
error, confidence interval, and coefficient of variation by
region: Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence
Interval
LL
UL

%
Underweight

Standard
Error

Philippines

11.9

0.60

10.8

13.1

4.93

Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

12.9
11.9
4.5
14.9
11.9
15.4
13.5
16.6
11.3
11.2
6.6
11.4
10.8
6.2
7.6
8.9
14.4

2.46
2.49
1.80
2.37
1.92
2.18
2.42
2.68
2.15
2.08
1.59
2.86
2.51
2.05
1.84
2.46
2.48

8.1
7.0
1.0
10.3
8.1
11.1
8.8
11.3
7.1
7.1
3.5
5.8
5.8
2.1
4.0
4.1
9.6

17.7
16.8
8.0
19.6
15.7
19.6
18.2
21.8
15.5
15.2
9.7
17.0
15.7
10.2
11.2
13.8
19.3

19.0
20.9
40.0
15.8
16.1
14.2
17.9
16.2
19.0
18.7
24.1
25.1
23.3
33.2
24.3
27.5
17.2

Region

CV%

Note: Prevalences between regions are significally different if the Confidence Interval (CIs) does not overlap
with each other.
CVs that are <20 are acceptable estimates for the region

Facts and Figures, 2011

226

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

C. Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices


Appendix Table C.1 Current feeding practice of children 0-23 months by age group:
Philippines, 2011
Age (in months)
ALL
0-5
6-8
9-23
Feeding Practice
No
%
No
%
No
%
No
%
Exclusive BF
Predominant BF (BF with
clear liquid only)
Breastfeeding with
Complementary
Formula/Other milk with
foods
Regular food without any
milk

Appendix Table C.2


Age Group
All
<2
2-3
4-5
Age in Months
0
1
2
3
4

806

48.9

48

5.1

25

0.6

879

12.7

109

7.2

16

1.8

0.2

134

2.1

382

24.1

520

58.0 1928

44.7

2830

41.5

284

19.8

265

34.9 1901

47.6

2450

39.3

0.0

7.0

321

4.4

0.2

319

Percentage of exclusively breastfed children 0-5 months by age


group: Philippines, 2011
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
48.9
62.5
53.3
31.0

1.3
2.3
2.2
2.1

46.3
58.0
48.9
26.9

51.5
67.1
57.6
35.0

2.7
3.7
4.2
6.7

69.1
55.6
51.9
55.0
39.8

3.0
3.3
2.9
3.4
3.2

63.2
49.1
46.2
48.4
33.4

75.1
62.2
57.7
61.7
46.1

4.4
6.0
5.7
6.2
8.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

227

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.3


Region
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Percentage of exclusively breastfed children 0-5 months, by


region: Philippines, 2011
[95% Conf. Interval]
%
Std. Err.
CV
48.9
52.2
44.7
59.5
27.8
44.5
33.1
58.3
57.9
49.9
48.5
72.7
60.9
64.1
60.0
60.3
54.5
44.6

1.3
5.3
6.7
6.3
4.4
4.1
3.8
6.1
5.2
5.4
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.7
5.2
5.8
6.4
5.6

46.3
41.9
31.5
47.1
19.2
36.4
25.7
46.2
47.7
39.3
39.1
62.9
50.6
52.9
49.7
48.9
41.8
33.6

51.5
62.5
57.9
71.9
36.5
52.5
40.5
70.4
68.1
60.5
57.9
82.5
71.2
75.3
70.3
71.7
67.1
55.7

2.7
10.1
15.0
10.6
15.9
9.2
11.4
10.6
9.0
10.8
9.9
6.9
8.6
8.9
8.7
9.6
12.6

Appendix Table C.4 Percentage of predominantly breastfed children 0-5 months by


age group: Philippines, 2011
Std.
Age Group
%
Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
All
7.2
0.7
5.8
8.7
10.3
<2
4.8
1.1
2.6
7.0
23.3
2-3
7.9
1.2
5.5
10.2
15.4
4-5
8.9
1.3
6.4
11.5
14.7
Philippines
7.2
0.7
5.8
8.7
10.3
Region
Ilocos Region
8.9
3.4
2.2
15.6
38.5
Cagayan Valley
3.2
2.2
0
7.6
69.7
CAR
4.5
2.6
0
9.7
59.0
Central Luzon
7.0
2.6
1.9
12.1
37.4
NCR
4.9
2.0
0.9
8.9
41.8
CALABARZON
12.4
2.9
6.6
18.1
23.8
MIMAROPA
2.9
2.1
0
7.0
70.4
Bicol Region
3.3
1.9
0
7.1
58.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

228

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table C.4


Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
NorthernMindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Appendix Table C.5


Region
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Std. Err.

8.5
13.9
4.3
4.4
5.5
4.6
8.5
8.3
7.0

2.8
3.6
2.1
2.2
2.8
2.2
3.8
3.7
2.5

[95% Conf. Interval]


3.0
6.8
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
1.0
1.1
2.1

14.0
21.0
8.3
8.6
11.0
8.9
16.0
15.5
11.9

CV
32.9
26.1
49.1
49.6
49.8
46.9
45.2
44.0
35.8

Percentage of children 0-23 months initiated to breastfeeding


immediately after delivery by region: Philippines, 2011
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
51.9
41.3
27.0
49.9
34.4
61.8
38.2
45.0
51.2
62.6
64.5
69.2
50.4
59.8
61.7
56.6
61.5
49.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

0.8
3.0
3.0
3.8
2.6
2.3
2.5
3.4
2.9
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.5
3.2

50.4
35.4
21.2
42.4
29.3
57.2
33.4
38.4
45.6
57.3
59.0
63.5
43.4
52.9
55.1
50.1
54.6
42.7

53.4
47.2
32.9
57.4
39.4
66.4
43.1
51.6
56.8
68.0
70.0
74.8
57.4
66.8
68.2
63.1
68.4
55.4

1.5
7.2
11.0
7.7
7.5
3.8
6.5
7.5
5.6
4.3
4.4
4.2
7.1
5.9
5.4
5.8
5.7
6.6

229

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.6 Percentage of children 0-23 months initiated to breastfeeding less
than the day after delivery by region: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Estimate
32.3
41.5
48.7
37.3
33.9
26.3
44.3
40.9
34.8
25.8
24.4
23.3
34.6
29.0
25.3
27.5
29.1
28.6

Std. Err.
0.7
2.7
3.9
3.3
2.3
2.1
2.5
3.3
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.2
3.1
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.5

[95% Conf. Interval]


30.9
33.7
36.1
46.9
41.2
56.3
30.8
43.8
29.3
38.5
22.2
30.4
39.5
49.2
34.4
47.5
29.4
40.2
20.9
30.6
19.2
29.5
18.0
28.6
28.4
40.8
22.9
35.0
19.8
30.9
21.7
33.3
23.3
34.8
23.7
33.5

CV
2.2
6.6
7.9
8.9
6.8
7.9
5.6
8.2
7.9
9.6
10.9
11.6
9.1
10.6
11.2
10.7
10.0
8.7

Appendix Table C.7 Percentage of children 0-23 months initiated to breastfeeding


more than one day after delivery by region: Philippines, 2011
Region
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
Philippines
15.8
0.5
14.8
16.9
3.3
Ilocos Region
17.2
2.3
12.7
21.7
13.4
Cagayan Valley
24.2
2.9
18.5
29.9
12.1
CAR
12.8
2.1
8.6
17.0
16.7
Central Luzon
31.7
2.3
27.1
36.3
7.4
NCR
11.9
1.4
9.2
14.6
11.7
CALABARZON
17.5
1.8
13.9
21.0
10.3
MIMAROPA
14.1
2.2
9.7
18.5
15.9
Bicol Region
14.0
1.7
10.6
17.4
12.4
Western Visayas
11.6
1.6
8.4
14.8
13.9
Central Visayas
11.2
1.8
7.7
14.6
15.7
Eastern Visayas
7.6
1.3
5.0
10.1
17.2
Zamboanga Peninsula
15.0
2.9
9.3
20.7
19.4
Northern Mindanao
11.2
1.7
7.8
14.6
15.4
Davao Region
13.0
2.0
9.0
17.0
15.7
SOCCSKSARGEN
15.9
2.2
11.6
20.3
14.0
CARAGA
9.4
1.9
5.6
13.2
20.5
ARMM
22.3
2.4
17.6
27.1
10.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

230

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.8

Percentage of children 0-23 months given prelacteal


region: Philippines, 2011
Region
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
Philippines
26.8
0.7
25.5
28.1
Ilocos Region
35.0
3.0
29.2
40.8
Cagayan Valley
37.0
3.0
31.1
42.8
CAR
15.1
2.2
10.7
19.4
Central Luzon
53.8
2.6
48.7
59.0
NCR
18.6
1.7
15.3
21.9
CALABARZON
34.6
2.4
29.9
39.3
MIMAROPA
23.8
2.8
18.3
29.3
Bicol Region
27.6
2.5
22.7
32.4
Western Visayas
20.8
2.2
16.4
25.2
Central Visayas
18.8
2.2
14.6
23.0
Eastern Visayas
10.1
1.7
6.8
13.4
Zamboanga Peninsula
20.7
2.9
15.1
26.4
Northern Mindanao
18.0
2.6
12.9
23.1
Davao Region
19.9
2.4
15.3
24.5
SOCCSKSARGEN
20.0
2.6
15.0
25.0
CARAGA
12.7
2.4
7.9
17.4
ARMM
40.4
3.1
34.2
46.5

Appendix Table C.9


Age in Months
Philippines
Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula

feeds by
CV
2.5
8.5
8.0
14.7
4.9
9.1
7.0
11.8
8.9
10.7
11.5
16.7
13.9
14.4
11.9
12.8
19.0
7.8

Percentage of children with continued breastfeeding for 1 year


by region: Philippines, 2011
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf.
Interval]
CV
51.7

1.6

48.6

54.8

3.0

52.2
59.4
72.2
34.3
44.4
48.5
75.0
56.7
56.3
53.5
57.7
62.4

8.5
7.8
8.0
5.2
4.5
5.5
7.0
6.4
6.3
5.5
5.5
6.4

35.5
44.1
56.5
24.2
35.5
37.7
61.3
44.2
44.0
42.7
46.8
49.8

68.9
74.8
87.8
44.5
53.3
59.3
88.8
69.3
68.7
64.3
68.6
75.0

16.3
13.2
11.0
15.0
10.2
11.4
9.3
11.3
11.2
10.3
9.6
10.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

231

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table C.9


Age in Months
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Std. Err.

[95% Conf.

Interval]

CV

55.0
40.1
58.8
44.0
63.9

6.2
6.0
7.3
7.4
6.1

42.9
28.4
44.5
29.5
52.0

67.0
51.8
73.2
58.5
75.9

11.2
14.9
12.4
16.8
9.5

Appendix Table C.10 Percentage of children with continued breastfeeding for 2 years
by region: Philippines, 2011
Region
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
Philippines
28.9
1.5
26.0
31.8
5.1
Ilocos Region
29.9
5.7
18.7
41.2
19.1
Cagayan Valley
40.3
7.8
25.0
55.6
19.3
CAR
39.8
7.9
24.3
55.3
19.8
Central Luzon
27.0
5.1
16.9
37.1
19.1
NCR
24.8
4.5
16.0
33.7
18.1
CALABARZON
21.1
4.1
13.1
29.2
19.4
MIMAROPA
30.7
9.7
11.7
49.6
31.5
Bicol Region
26.4
4.5
17.5
35.3
17.2
Western Visayas
30.3
6.0
18.5
42.0
19.8
Central Visayas
29.4
5.7
18.1
40.7
19.5
Eastern Visayas
34.6
6.4
22.0
47.1
18.5
Zamboanga Peninsula
22.0
6.9
8.5
35.6
31.4
Northern Mindanao
36.9
6.0
25.1
48.6
16.2
Davao Region
20.7
6.8
7.3
34.0
32.9
SOCCSKSARGEN
43.7
6.7
30.4
56.9
15.4
CARAGA
30.4
7.2
16.3
44.5
23.7
ARMM
30.0
7.5
15.3
44.7
24.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

232

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.11 Percentage of ever breastfed children 0-23 months by region:
Philippines, 2011
Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Std. Err.

92.2
93.5
94.8
86.3
92.1
91.4
94.6
92.8
94.9
96.7
95.1
94.2
93.7
94.4
94.8
94.8
94.9

1.5
1.7
1.4
1.7
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.2
1.1
0.8
1.0
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.4

[95% Conf. Interval]


89.3
90.1
92.1
83.0
89.9
89.2
91.6
90.5
92.6
95.1
93.1
91.4
90.9
91.7
92.4
92.2
92.2

95.1
96.9
97.5
89.6
94.3
93.6
97.6
95.2
97.1
98.4
97.2
96.9
96.5
97.1
97.3
97.5
97.5

CV
1.6
1.8
1.4
1.9
1.2
1.2
1.6
1.3
1.2
0.9
1.1
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.4

Appendix Table C.12 Percentage of age-appropriately breastfed children 0-23 months


by region: Philippines, 2011
Region
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

48.4
57.5
63.8
37.7
41.3
35.8
60.1
55.6
54.9
54.0
56.8
55.6
52.1
48.4
56.3
52.1
58.8

2.6
2.9
3.1
2.3
2.1
1.9
3.5
2.5
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.8
2.9
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.7

43.4
51.8
57.8
33.2
37.1
31.9
53.2
50.8
49.3
48.9
52.1
50.2
46.4
42.4
50.7
46.3
53.5

53.4
63.2
69.9
42.1
45.4
39.6
67.0
60.4
60.4
59.0
61.5
61.1
57.8
54.4
61.9
57.8
64.1

5.3
5.0
4.8
6.0
5.1
5.4
5.9
4.4
5.1
4.8
4.2
5.0
5.6
6.3
5.1
5.7
4.6

Age-appropriately breastfed- proportion of children 0-5 months who are exclusively


breastfed and children 6-23 months who are breastfed and given solid, semisolid or soft foods
Facts and Figures, 2011

233

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.13 Percentage of bottle-fed children 0-23 months by age group:
Philippines, 2011
Age Group
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
All
<2
2-3
4-5
6-7
8-9
10-11
12-15
16-19
20-23

44.7
26.2
31.3
36.1
41.3
44.2
49.6
51.8
51.6
50.0

0.7
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.1
2.1
1.6
1.6
1.7

43.4
22.0
27.1
31.7
36.9
40.1
45.5
48.7
48.5
46.7

46.1
30.4
35.5
40.5
45.7
48.3
53.8
54.9
54.7
53.2

1.5
8.1
6.8
6.2
5.5
4.7
4.2
3.0
3.1
3.3

Appendix Table C.14 Percentage of bottle-fed children 0-23 months and by region:
Philippines, 2011
Region
%
Std. Err.
[95% Conf. Interval]
CV
Philippines
44.7
0.7
43.4
46.1
1.5
Ilocos Region
47.7
2.9
42.1
53.4
6.1
Cagayan Valley
43.5
3.4
36.8
50.2
7.8
CAR
31.6
3.0
25.7
37.4
Central Luzon
56.7
2.6
51.7
61.7
4.5
NCR
53.0
2.1
48.9
57.0
3.9
CALABARZON
58.7
2.2
54.4
62.9
3.7
MIMAROPA
37.4
3.1
31.3
43.4
8.3
Bicol Region
41.7
2.6
36.6
46.8
6.2
Western Visayas
43.9
2.7
38.6
49.2
6.2
Central Visayas
33.8
2.1
29.6
38.0
6.3
Eastern Visayas
38.1
2.6
33.0
43.1
6.7
Zamboanga Peninsula
34.3
2.6
29.3
39.4
7.5
Northern Mindanao
36.3
2.6
31.3
41.4
7.1
Davao Region
39.6
3.1
33.5
45.7
7.8
SOCCSKSARGEN
37.2
2.9
31.5
43.0
7.8
CARAGA
36.0
3.3
29.6
42.4
9.1
ARMM
28.3
2.7
23.0
33.7
9.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

234

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.15 Reasons for exclusive breastfeeding among children


months: Philippines, 2011
Reasons for Breastfeeding
%
SE
[95% Conf. Interval]
Economical/no money to buy infant
52.9
0.8
51.4
54.5
formula
13.2
0.6
12.1
14.3
Stronger maternal-child bonding
22.0
0.7
20.6
23.4
Safe convenient and readily available
56.0
0.8
54.4
57.5
Nutritious/complete food for the baby
24.6
0.7
23.1
26.0
Increase immune response
11.6
0.5
10.6
12.6
As advised by physician
6.3
0.4
5.5
7.1
As advised by friends and relatives
1.0
0.2
0.7
1.4
As seen in TV
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
As heard over the radio
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.6
As read in print media/billboard
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
Based on experience/family tradition
1.3
0.2
1.0
1.6
Good/Best for babies
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
Child not yet eating
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.5
Mothers preference
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
Do not know / No idea of the benefits
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.7
Childs preference of breastmilk
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
Hospital/clinic policy
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
Form of family planning
There is available time to breastfeed/not
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
working
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
Help build childs character and behavior
*Multiple response

Facts and Figures, 2011

0-23
CV
1.5
4.3
3.2
1.4
3.0
4.3
6.6
17.5
28.3
31.0
34.1
12.0
27.2
22.7
35.3
17.4
32.2
26.6
46.5
51.6

235

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table C.16 Reasons for continued breastfeeding among children


months: Philippines, 2011
Reasons for Continuing
%
SE
[95% Conf. Interval]
Breastfeeding
Economical/no money to buy infant
56.5
1.1
54.4
58.6
formula
14.4
0.8
12.8
15.9
Stronger maternal-child bonding
21.5
1.0
19.6
23.4
Safe convenient and readily available
48.9
1.1
46.6
51.1
Nutritious/complete food for the baby
21.4
0.9
19.6
23.2
Increase immune response
7.7
0.6
6.6
8.8
As advised by physician
4.2
0.4
3.3
5.0
As advised by friends and relatives
0.9
0.2
0.5
1.3
As seen in TV
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
As heard over the radio
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.5
As read in print media/billboard
1.4
0.3
0.9
1.9
Others
0.7
0.2
0.3
1.0
Form of family planning
1.5
0.3
1.0
2.0
There is enough milk flow
1.6
0.3
1.1
2.1
Baby is always healthy
4.4
0.5
3.5
5.3
Child prefers breastmilk
1.5
0.3
1.0
2.0
Mothers preference
1.2
0.2
0.7
1.6
Child eats small amount of food
*Multiple response

Appendix Table C.17 Reasons for stopping breastfeeding: Philippines, 2011


Reasons for Stopping Breastfeeding
Est. Prop.
Std. Err.
6.2
0.5
Mother ill/weak/underwent surgery
3.9
0.4
Cracked nipple/breast infection
7.9
0.6
Another pregnancy
32.4
1.0
Inadequate milk flow
20.3
0.9
Working outside home/too busy
2.4
0.3
Child abandoned/separated from mother
14.0
0.8
Child refused
1.4
0.3
Child ill/weak
2.6
0.4
Child not gaining weight
2.6
0.4
Child old enough for weaning
1.4
0.3
As advised by health personnel
0.8
0.2
As advised by relatives/friends
0.6
0.2
Others
0.7
0.2
Mother is taking contraceptives/pills
1.9
0.3
"Nipple-biting"
0.5
0.1
Inverted nipples
0.6
0.2
Personal choice
*Multiple response

Facts and Figures, 2011

0-23
CV
1.9
5.5
4.5
2.3
4.3
7.4
10.5
24.2
70.6
45.3
18.0
26.0
17.0
16.4
10.3
17.3
19.1

CV
8.9
11.2
7.5
3.2
4.5
13.8
5.7
19.4
14.2
14.1
19.6
25.1
29.3
26.5
16.0
30.9
27.4

236

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

D. Participation of Children to Nutrition and Related Programs


Appendix Table D.1 Percent participation of children 1-5 years old in Vitamin A
Supplementation by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San
Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La
Pias/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

Percent

SE

91.6

0.3

93.0
34.0
55.5
47.1
43.4
92.0
32.9
40.9
41.5
37.2
93.9
45.5
26.4
39.8
15.4
19.8
22.3
89.9
32.3
64.5
56.0
44.8
58.2
59.5
51.0
94.3
48.6

1.1

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
91.1
92.2

CV (%)
0.3

7.3
10.6
4.9
5.7
4.9
4.1
1.1
13.5
5.7
3.1
3.8
3.8
4.7
5.6
0.6
3.5

90.9
24.7
44.4
36.1
37.6
89.4
24.9
34.8
26.4
29.5
91.5
31.3
5.6
30.2
4.3
10.2
14.3
87.7
5.9
53.5
50.0
37.3
50.7
50.3
39.9
93.1
41.7

95.1
43.3
66.6
58.0
49.2
94.7
40.9
47.0
56.7
44.9
96.3
59.8
47.2
49.4
26.6
29.4
30.2
92.2
58.7
75.6
62.0
52.3
65.6
68.8
62.0
95.5
55.5

1.2
14.0
10.2
11.9
6.8
1.5
12.4
7.6
18.7
10.6
1.3
16.0
40.2
12.3
36.9
24.7
18.2
1.3
41.6
8.8
5.5
8.6
6.5
7.9
11.1
0.6
7.2

56.7

2.5

51.8

61.5

4.4

55.9

2.8

50.5

61.4

5.0

52.9

2.6

47.8

57.9

4.9

91.4
44.7
45.2
53.0
28.0
47.7
86.4
36.6
20.4
36.7
36.9
42.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

1.3

1.2

0.9

1.8

4.8
5.7
5.6
3.0
4.1
3.1
7.7
3.9

3.6
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.9
5.7
5.6
3.5
3.5
9.0

89.6

82.9

37.5
39.4
47.3
22.2
40.0
25.4
9.5
29.8
30.0
25.3

93.2
51.8
50.9
58.8
33.8
55.4
89.9
47.8
31.3
43.5
43.8
60.6

1.0

2.1

8.1
6.5
5.5
10.6
8.2
15.6
27.3
9.5
9.6
20.9

237

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.1


Region
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Western Samar
Southern Samar
Biliran
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
89.3
93.3
22.5
36.1
18.7
38.4
29.1
43.0
8.4
33.7
19.5
34.4
23.3
36.4

91.3
29.3
28.5
36.1
21.0
26.9
29.8

1.0
3.5
5.0
3.5
6.5
3.8
3.3

96.1
49.0
29.9
36.3
36.3
42.9
45.4
94.0
43.1
43.8
30.7
38.9
95.7
31.9
31.2
38.8
37.6
36.1
44.3

0.7
4.9
6.8
6.0
6.0
3.1
3.3
1.0
4.8
2.2
3.6
22.0
0.7
7.0
3.0
5.2
4.7
7.5
3.4

94.8

90.7
23.3
29.2
36.0
92.8
32.7
39.0
24.8
36.2
47.5
91.6
31.4
41.1
32.7
19.8
90.5
21.2
32.9
21.2
11.9
95.5
46.3
30.4
48.1
36.4

1.2
3.3
2.8
3.6
2.2
4.0
12.7
5.2
5.3
3.4
1.3
4.8
5.5
3.1
4.2
1.6
3.0
3.3
5.6
3.2
0.9
4.3
4.7
6.2
4.3

88.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

92.1

94.3

88.4

89.0

87.4

93.8

39.4
16.5
24.5
24.5
36.9
38.9
33.8
39.4
23.6
0
18.2
25.4
28.7
28.3
21.3
37.5
16.9
23.8
28.9
24.8
14.2
14.6
25.7
40.8
22.0
30.3
26.6
11.6
15.2
26.6
10.3
5.7
37.9
21.1
35.9
28.0

97.4

95.9

97.1

93.0

97.2

94.2

93.7

97.3

58.7
43.2
48.1
48.1
48.9
51.9
52.5
48.2
37.8
82.1
45.5
37.1
49.0
46.8
50.9
51.0
29.8
34.7
43.0
40.5
63.8
35.0
46.6
54.3
40.8
51.8
38.8
27.9
27.2
39.3
32.1
18.2
54.7
39.7
60.3
44.9

CV (%)
1.1
11.8
17.6
9.8
30.7
14.1
11.2
0.7
10.1
22.8
16.6
16.6
7.1
7.3
1.0
11.1
5.1
11.8
56.6
0.8
21.8
9.6
13.4
12.6
20.9
7.7
1.3
14.0
9.5
10.0
2.4
12.2
32.5
20.9
14.8
7.3
1.4
15.3
13.3
9.5
21.1
1.8
14.4
9.9
26.2
26.7
0.9
9.2
15.6
12.9
11.8

238

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D. 1


Region
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
72.6
75.4
85.4
73.5
59.0
65.4

SE
2.4
8.4
3.7
3.8
6.2
7.1

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
67.9
77.2
58.9
92.0
78.1
92.6
66.0
81.0
46.8
71.1
51.5
79.2

CV (%)
3.3
11.2
4.3
5.2
10.5
10.8

Appendix Table D.2. Percent participation of children 3-5 years old in Supplementary Feeding
Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Region
Percent
SE
CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
32.5
0.7
31.2
33.8
2.0
Luzon
Ilocos Region
26.1
3.2
19.8
32.4
12.3
Ilocos Norte
17.5
9.0
0
35.1
51.5
Ilocos Sur
30.5
7.7
15.3
45.6
25.3
La Union
44.1
12.9
18.7
69.5
29.4
Pangasinan
23.8
4.1
15.7
31.9
17.4
Cagayan Valley
42.8
3.1
36.8
53.7
9.5
Cagayan
44.2
5.5
33.4
54.9
12.4
Isabela
45.3
4.3
36.8
53.7
9.5
Nueva Vizcaya
34.1
8.8
16.8
51.4
25.9
Quirino
32.6
9.1
14.8
50.5
27.9
CAR
32.0
3.6
25.0
39.0
11.1
Abra
56.5
8.7
39.4
73.6
15.5
Apayao
56.5
8.7
39.4
73.6
15.5
Benguet
16.2
4.7
7.0
25.4
29.1
Ifugao
45.0
9.1
27.2
62.8
20.2
Kalinga
25.3
10.8
4.2
46.4
42.6
Mt. Province
42.7
15.2
12.8
72.6
35.7
Central Luzon
23.1
2.4
18.3
27.9
10.6
Aurora
32.8
11.8
9.7
55.9
35.9
Bataan
23.5
8.2
7.5
39.6
34.8
Bulacan
20.2
4.4
11.6
28.8
21.7
Nueva Ecija
30.8
6.7
17.6
44.0
21.8
Pampanga
13.9
4.6
4.9
22.9
33.1
Tarlac
31.7
7.6
16.7
46.7
24.1
Zambales
26.2
6.3
14.0
38.5
23.8
NCR
24.8
1.7
24.7
52.5
18.3
Manila
22.6
3.6
15.5
29.8
16.1
Mandaluyong/Marikina
Pasig/Quezon City/
26.4
2.8
20.8
31.9
10.7
San juan City
Caloocan/Malabon/
23.3
3.6
16.1
30.4
15.6
Navotas/ Valenzuela
Las Pias/Makati/
Pasay/ Pateros/
25.4
3.6
18.2
32.5
14.3
Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig

Facts and Figures, 2011

239

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.2


Region
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Western Samar
Southern Samar
Biliran
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
17.1
25.3
7.2
28.8
3.2
15.1
19.4
39.7
18.7
39.5
15.5
34.8
34.2
47.6
54.3
76.1
19.0
45.7
33.4
55.7
24.2
52.3
7.6
62.5
26.4
38.3
16.2
36.5
30.3
75.9
13.5
32.0
0.8
27.2
45.6
73.7
16.1
57.5

9.8
30.6
33.1
17.5
18.2
19.5
8.4
8.5
21.0
12.7
18.7
39.9
9.4
19.7
21.9
20.7
48.1
12.0
28.7

CV (%)

21.2
18.0
9.2
29.5
29.1
25.2
40.9
65.2
32.3
44.6
38.3
35.0
32.4
26.3
53.1
22.7
14.0
59.7
36.8

2.1
5.5
3.0
5.2
5.3
4.9
3.4
5.6
6.8
5.7
7.2
14.0
3.0
5.2
11.6
4.7
6.7
7.2
10.6

39.6
66.8
68.4
48.0
29.4
36.6
32.1
38.2
51.9
35.1
31.8
70.0
33.9
10.1
37.5
38.7
29.6
39.4
39.3

2.7

9.1
6.1
10.1
16.5
5.2
3.9
2.4
5.9
3.0
5.3
20.5
2.6
5.7
3.7
8.7
5.3
11.8
10.3

34.3
49.0
56.4
28.1
-3.1
26.4
24.4
33.6
40.3
29.2
21.4
29.9
28.7
-1.0
30.3
21.6
19.3
16.3
19.1

45.0
84.7
80.5
67.8
61.8
46.8
39.8
42.8
63.4
40.9
42.3
110.1
39.0
21.3
44.7
55.8
39.9
62.6
59.5

6.9
13.6
9.0
21.1
56.3
14.2
12.3
6.2
11.4
8.5
16.7
29.2
7.7
56.0
9.8
22.5
17.7
29.9
26.2

55.0
67.4
50.1
49.7
46.1
37.3
46.0
41.1
77.3
41.2

2.8
4.4
4.3
7.3
2.9
4.7
17.8
7.6
4.8
4.9

49.5
58.8
41.7
35.4
40.5
28.0
11.1
26.1
67.9
31.6

60.5
76.1
58.4
64.0
51.7
46.5
81.0
56.1
86.7
50.7

5.1
6.5
8.5
14.7
6.2
12.7
38.7
18.6
6.2
11.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

240

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.2


Region
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
23.8
44.1
33.2
14.5
26.7
37.7
31.2
36.9
41.0
55.5
42.9
47.1
41.7
42.7
38.6
22.4
43.9
15.0
29.5
9.7
22.0

SE
2.5

2.7

3.1

7.1
5.1
3.1
8.3
4.4
4.3
6.5
9.1
5.4
6.2
6.3
7.1

2.6
11.0
7.9
4.5
3.2
5.4

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
18.9
28.7
30.1
58.0
23.2
43.1
8.4
20.7
10.5
43.0
32.4
43.0
22.6
39.8
28.5
45.3
28.3
53.8
37.7
73.4
36.8
48.9
36.5
57.7
29.5
53.9
30.4
54.9
24.7
52.5
17.2
27.6
22.4
65.5
-0.6
30.5
20.7
38.4
3.5
15.8
11.4
32.6

CV (%)
10.4
16.2
15.3
21.6
31.0
7.2
14.0
11.6
15.8
16.4
7.2
11.5
15.0
14.7
18.3
11.8
25.0
52.9
15.3
32.7
24.5

Appendix Table D.3. Percent participation of children 1-5 years old in Deworming Program by
region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Region
Percent
SE
CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
63.3
0.5
62.3
64.3
0.8
Luzon
Ilocos Region
69.4
1.9
65.7
73.1
2.7
Ilocos Norte
90.7
3.9
83.2
98.3
4.3
Ilocos Sur
80.4
4.9
70.8
90.0
6.1
La Union
68.2
5.3
57.9
78.6
7.8
Pangasinan
62.9
2.4
58.1
67.7
3.9
Cagayan Valley
74.3
2.1
70.1
78.4
2.8
Cagayan
85.0
2.8
79.4
90.5
3.3
Isabela
69.4
3.4
62.8
76.1
4.9
Nueva Vizcaya
62.5
6.9
49.0
76.0
11.0
Quirino
76.9
7.5
62.3
91.5
9.7
CAR
84.0
1.7
80.7
87.4
2.0
Abra
82.6
8.3
66.3
99.0
10.1
Apayao
85.9
3.8
78.4
93.4
4.4
Benguet
80.0
3.0
74.2
85.9
3.7
Ifugao
94.4
3.3
87.9
100.9
3.5
Kalinga
83.7
5.3
73.2
94.1
6.4
Mt. Province
84.1
2.8
78.5
89.7
3.4

Facts and Figures, 2011

241

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.3


Region
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
46.9
53.6
3.4
74.9
103.2
8.1
44.5
73.8
12.6
34.9
48.7
8.4
44.7
59.6
7.3
48.7
60.0
5.3
40.1
61.4
10.7
36.3
55.9
10.8
47.3
53.1
3.0
39.9
55.3
8.3

50.2
89.1
59.1
41.8
52.2
54.3
50.8
46.1
50.2
47.6

1.7
7.2
7.5
3.5
3.8
2.9
5.4
5.0
1.5
3.9

48.5

2.5

43.6

53.4

5.1

44.5

3.3

38.1

50.9

7.3

57.4

2.6

52.3

62.5

4.5

50.2
52.7
43.3
43.2
65.8
51.4
73.7
77.9
67.0
72.3
74.0
83.2
59.7
48.8
71.9
54.2
74.8
69.1
66.5

1.7
3.4
3.6
4.3
3.5
3.7
2.1
3.2
5.0
3.8
4.0
5.5
2.0
3.7
5.3
3.6
7.6
5.3
5.9

46.8
46.1
36.2
34.8
58.8
44.0
69.5
71.6
57.3
64.9
66.2
72.4
55.7
41.5
61.5
47.1
60.0
58.6
55.0

53.5
59.3
50.3
51.6
72.7
58.7
77.8
84.3
76.7
79.7
81.8
94.0
63.7
56.2
82.2
61.3
89.6
79.5
78.0

3.4
6.4
8.3
9.9
5.4
7.3
2.9
4.1
7.4
5.2
5.4
6.6
3.4
7.7
7.3
6.7
10.1
7.7
8.8

69.5
68.5
89.3
73.7
74.6
69.9
64.4
75.6
86.0
70.4
82.6
85.7

1.6
6.6
4.4
3.8
10.8
3.4
2.2
1.6
2.8
2.2
2.8
7.1

66.5
55.6
80.6
66.3
53.5
63.3
60.2
72.5
80.5
66.0
77.1
71.9

72.6
81.5
97.9
81.1
95.8
76.5
68.6
78.7
91.5
74.8
88.1
99.6

2.2
9.7
4.9
5.1
14.5
4.8
3.4
2.1
3.3
3.2
3.4
8.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

242

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.3


Region
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent

SE

80.3
82.8
83.7
76.2
81.8
86.7
83.8

1.4

70.5
70.6
73.3
68.8
76.0
82.7
66.1
68.0
84.6
72.9
75.6
73.6
73.5
79.8
82.9
66.5
65.2
65.2
67.1
73.7
81.3
65.0
86.7
89.6
88.2
53.8
53.8
68.2
45.7
51.2
49.3

2.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

2.1

7.5
3.9
2.5
2.9
4.1
2.6
3.5
2.7
5.6

2.6
16.8
6.9
3.4
2.9
1.9
5.1
2.7
3.4
4.0
1.9
2.4
3.5
5.3
5.7
1.7
4.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.3
11.3
4.2
3.9
5.4
5.4

95% confidence
interval
CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
77.6
83.1
1.8
68.0
97.6
9.1
76.2
91.3
4.6
71.3
81.2
3.3
76.2
87.4
3.5
78.8
94.7
4.7
78.8
88.9
3.1
66.2
63.7
68.0
57.9
71.8
77.5
33.1
54.6
77.9
67.2
71.8
63.5
68.2
73.1
75.1
62.7
60.6
58.4
56.7
62.5
78.0
56.7
82.3
84.8
83.3
49.3
31.6
59.9
38.1
40.6
38.6

74.8
77.6
78.6
79.8
80.2
87.8
99.1
81.5
91.4
78.6
79.4
83.7
78.9
86.4
90.8
70.3
69.8
71.9
77.4
84.9
84.6
73.2
91.2
94.4
93.0
58.4
75.9
76.5
53.3
61.7
59.9

3.1
5.0
3.7
8.1
2.8
3.2
25.5
10.1
4.1
4.0
2.5
7.0
3.7
4.3
4.8
2.9
3.6
5.3
7.9
7.8
2.1
6.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
4.3
21.0
6.2
8.5
10.5
11.0

243

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table D.4. Percent participation of children 0-5 years old in Operation
Timbang Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
CV (%)
Region
Percent
SE
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
79.3
0.4
78.5
80.1
0.5
Luzon
Ilocos Region
81.6
2.0
77.8
85.5
2.4
Ilocos Norte
82.8
4.5
74.1
91.6
5.4
Ilocos Sur
88.7
3.7
81.6
95.9
4.1
La Union
82.7
4.2
74.4
90.9
5.1
Pangasinan
79.7
2.9
74.1
85.3
3.6
Cagayan Valley
83.1
1.6
79.9
86.3
1.9
Cagayan
83.7
2.8
78.2
89.2
3.3
Isabela
84.4
2.3
80.0
88.9
2.7
Nueva Vizcaya
74.6
4.8
65.1
84.1
6.5
Quirino
88.3
6.1
76.4
100.1
6.9
CAR
84.9
1.9
81.2
88.6
2.2
Abra
73.2
11.6
50.5
95.9
15.8
Apayao
83.2
5.6
72.1
94.3
6.8
Benguet
82.7
2.9
77.0
88.5
3.5
Ifugao
89.4
3.7
82.1
96.7
4.2
Kalinga
89.2
4.4
80.7
97.8
4.9
Mt. Province
90.1
3.1
84.0
96.2
3.5
Central Luzon
81.2
1.3
78.7
83.6
1.5
Aurora
79.8
6.5
67.1
92.5
8.1
Bataan
87.6
3.1
81.5
93.7
3.6
Bulacan
77.6
2.4
72.9
82.3
3.1
Nueva Ecija
78.0
2.9
72.3
83.7
3.7
Pampanga
81.0
2.8
75.5
86.5
3.4
Tarlac
86.4
3.6
79.3
93.6
4.2
Zambales
88.2
2.9
82.5
93.8
3.2
NCR
79.7
1.2
77.4
82.0
1.5
Manila
80.7
2.3
76.1
85.3
2.9
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
74.4
2.3
69.9
79.0
3.1
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
81.1
2.1
77.0
85.2
2.6
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
84.1
2.0
80.1
88.1
2.4
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
60.6
1.6
57.4
63.9
2.7
Batangas
66.0
3.6
59.0
73.0
5.4
Cavite
49.7
3.7
42.5
56.9
7.4
Laguna
64.4
3.7
57.3
71.6
5.7
Quezon
63.2
3.7
56.1
70.4
5.8
Rizal
64.5
3.0
58.6
70.3
4.6
MIMAROPA
84.0
1.9
80.3
87.7
2.2
Marinduque
90.9
5.4
80.3
101.5
6.0
Occidental Mindoro
80.0
2.6
74.9
85.1
3.2
Oriental Mindoro
93.1
1.8
89.6
96.6
1.9
Palawan
75.0
4.3
66.5
83.5
5.8
Romblon
94.9
2.5
89.9
99.9
2.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

244

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.4


Region
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
81.9
86.9
76.4
86.8
69.9
92.8
82.4
90.1
67.0
94.4
86.2
95.9
73.9
88.3

CV (%)

84.4
81.6
81.3
86.2
80.7
91.0
81.1

1.3

83.2
85.9
87.1
87.8
83.5
83.0
80.9
89.2
92.4
87.5
92.0
88.9
92.5
98.7
91.6
92.3
95.4
91.3
89.6

1.4
4.7
4.6
3.3
3.5
2.8
2.2
1.2
2.6
1.7
2.0
6.6
1.1
1.3
3.9
1.5
2.5
4.9
2.9

80.4
76.6
78.1
81.4
76.7
77.5
76.6
86.8
87.3
84.1
88.1
75.9
90.4
96.1
83.9
89.3
90.4
81.6
83.9

85.9
95.2
96.1
94.3
90.3
88.6
85.1
91.6
97.4
90.9
95.9
101.9
94.6
101.3
99.3
95.2
100.4
101.0
95.4

1.7
5.5
5.3
3.8
4.2
3.4
2.7
1.4
2.8
2.0
2.1
7.4
1.2

79.1
86.5
76.9
84.1
87.1
90.2
71.9
75.0
93.5
90.9
82.0
76.1
85.5
72.1
84.1
82.3
73.5
82.6
89.9
94.1
89.6
92.5
86.8
91.9
87.1

2.2
3.1
2.6
3.5

74.8
80.4
71.7
77.2
83.7
86.1
45.6
64.8
88.2
87.1
78.8
67.0
81.5
62.8
78.7
78.6
66.0
77.1
82.6
88.8
86.5
88.6
80.7
86.3
78.3

83.3
92.6
82.1
91.1
90.5
94.3
98.1
85.2
98.9
94.7
85.1
85.3
89.4
81.4
89.5
86.0
81.0
88.0
97.2
99.4
92.7
96.3
92.9
97.5
95.9

2.7
3.6
3.4
4.2
2.0
2.3
18.6
6.9
2.9
2.1
2.0
6.1
2.3
6.6
3.3
2.3
5.2
3.4
4.1
2.9
1.8
2.1
3.6
3.1
5.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

1.7

2.6
5.8
2.0
7.0
2.5
3.7

2.1
13.4
5.2
2.7
1.9
1.6
4.7
2.0
4.7
2.8
1.9
3.8
2.8
3.7
2.7
1.6
1.9
3.1
2.9
4.5

1.5
3.2
7.2
2.3
8.7
2.7
4.5

4.3
1.7
2.7
5.4
3.3

245

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.4


Region
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
53.3
51.9
71.5
58.3
26.4
40.2

SE
2.6
12.4
4.6
5.1
4.9
4.5

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
48.3
58.3
27.6
76.2
62.4
80.6
48.4
68.3
16.7
36.1
31.5
49.0

Appendix Table D.5. Percent participation of children 0-2 years old in Growth
Program (GM) by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Region
Percent
SE
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
53.3
0.7
51.9
54.6
Luzon
Ilocos Region
51.1
2.8
45.5
56.7
Ilocos Norte
64.7
10.6
43.8
85.5
Ilocos Sur
69.0
5.2
58.8
79.2
La Union
66.6
7.6
51.6
81.6
Pangasinan
40.8
3.6
33.8
47.8
Cagayan Valley
55.5
3.2
49.2
61.8
Cagayan
60.3
6.2
48.1
72.4
Isabela
59.8
4.2
51.5
68.0
Nueva Vizcaya
33.5
8.6
16.7
50.3
Quirino
55.2
9.3
37.0
73.5
CAR
60.9
2.9
55.3
66.5
Abra
76.0
14.0
48.5
103.4
Apayao
76.1
7.8
60.8
91.3
Benguet
60.5
5.2
50.4
70.6
Ifugao
32.5
5.1
22.5
42.5
Kalinga
34.6
8.1
18.7
50.5
Mt. Province
82.7
2.6
77.5
87.9
Central Luzon
53.0
2.4
48.2
57.8
Aurora
45.7
21.6
3.4
88.0
Bataan
84.2
6.0
72.4
95.9
Bulacan
46.0
5.1
36.0
56.0
Nueva Ecija
38.4
4.2
30.2
46.7
Pampanga
59.0
4.6
49.9
68.0
Tarlac
58.8
7.6
43.9
73.7
Zambales
61.0
6.6
48.0
74.0
NCR
51.5
2.0
47.6
55.5
Manila
63.2
4.2
55.0
71.4
Mandaluyong/
Marikina/
51.2
3.3
44.6
57.7
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
47.8
4.5
38.8
56.7
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
48.0
4.1
40.0
56.0
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV (%)
4.8
23.9
6.5
8.7
18.7
11.1
Monitoring
CV (%)
1.3
5.6
16.4
7.5
11.5
8.7
5.8
10.3
7.0
25.5
16.9
4.7
18.4
10.2
8.5
15.7
23.4
3.2
4.6
47.2
7.1
11.1
11.0
7.9
12.9
10.9
3.9
6.6
6.5
9.5
8.5

246

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.5


Region
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

Percent

SE

39.8
40.1
24.0
48.3
46.9
46.7
55.7
80.9
50.3
55.8
45.0
84.7
62.0
51.9
65.2
63.9
49.1
66.9
70.7

2.1

51.7
39.1
51.6
43.6
34.4
56.0
53.6
64.5
85.2
61.1
56.4
16.7
63.2
90.8
63.9
67.5
53.7
49.7
54.6

2.8

51.1
53.4
50.0
65.6
58.6
73.3

3.3

44.2
67.3
58.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

3.5

2.5

2.8

2.6

3.7

4.7
3.8
4.8
4.9
4.3
6.9
9.5
7.9
5.3
6.1
6.2
7.2
3.9
8.8
6.2
6.2
12.4
10.5
9.6
8.4
5.2
3.8
4.1
3.7
6.6
15.0
3.6
8.0
3.9
7.7
14.5
5.6
5.1
4.8
9.0
3.7
0.0
7.2
7.9
7.5

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
35.7
43.9
5.3
30.9
49.4
11.8
16.6
31.5
15.7
38.9
57.8
10.0
37.3
56.5
10.4
38.3
55.1
9.2
48.9
62.6
6.3
67.3
94.5
8.5
31.5
69.0
19.0
40.3
71.2
14.1
34.6
55.5
11.8
72.8
96.6
7.2
57.0
67.0
4.1
39.8
64.0
11.9
51.0
79.4
11.1
56.2
71.5
6.1
31.9
66.3
17.9
54.9
79.0
9.2
58.4
82.9
8.8
46.3

59.0

58.1

44.6

51.4

14.8
31.1
24.8
17.9
45.8
46.2
77.1
53.8
43.5
-12.8
83.7
48.1
59.9
38.6
21.3
43.6
43.4
40.5
48.0
66.1
30.1
51.9
44.0

57.1

70.0

68.3

57.6

65.8

63.5
72.2
62.4
51.0
66.1
61.0
93.3
68.4
69.3
46.2
97.8
79.6
75.1
68.8
78.0
65.6

5.3
31.7
20.3
22.0
24.5
9.2
7.1
4.3
4.9
6.1
11.7
90.3
4.1
4.0
12.6
5.7
14.3
29.1
10.3

80.6

6.5
9.5
9.7
13.7
6.3
5.1

58.4
82.7
73.6

16.4
11.7
12.8

63.3
59.5
83.2

247

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.5


Region

Percent

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Appendix Table D.6.


Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province

57.6
49.6
52.9
65.0
39.0
59.7
52.1
60.6
64.8
67.2
65.0
56.9
70.2
69.5
65.6
35.3
37.7
26.1
46.4
20.5
32.2

SE
2.8

6.2
7.2
3.8
6.0
2.8
5.2
3.7
6.4
9.3
4.1
9.8
5.4
7.7
7.2
2.5
8.9
4.7
5.0
3.9
5.1

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
52.1
63.0
37.5
61.7
38.8
66.9
57.5
72.6
27.3
50.7
54.3
65.2
42.0
62.3
53.3
68.0
52.2
77.4
48.9
85.5
57.1
73.0
37.7
76.1
59.6
80.7
54.5
84.5
51.5
79.8
30.4
40.1
20.2
55.1
16.9
35.4
36.7
56.2
12.8
28.2
22.2
42.2

CV (%)
4.9
12.5
13.5
5.9
15.3
4.7
9.9
6.2
9.9
13.9
6.2
17.2
7.7
11.0
11.0
7.0
23.7
18.0
10.7
19.1
15.9

Percent participation of children 3-5 years old in Orally-Fit Child


Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Percent
SE
CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
37.6
0.7
36.2
38.9
1.8
32.9
29.9
45.1
37.0
30.4
38.7
41.5
43.1
28.9
6.5
33.9
33.6
29.7
30.2
41.2
18.1
59.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

3.8
9.8
9.5
12.0
4.9
3.4
6.8
4.6
7.8
7.1
4.0
9.5
9.3
6.3
11.1
12.0
8.7

25.5
10.7
26.4
13.5
20.8
32.0
28.1
34.2
13.6
0
26.0
14.9
11.5
17.8
19.4
0
42.1

40.4
49.1
63.8
60.4
40.0
45.4
54.9
52.1
44.2
20.5
41.8
52.3
47.9
42.6
63.1
41.7
76.2

11.5
32.8
21.1
32.4
16.1
8.8
16.5
10.6
27.0
109.8
11.8
28.4
31.2
20.9
27.0
66.2
14.7

248

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.6


Region
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/
Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
30.4
41.5
7.9
36.2
101.1
24.1
33.1
69.9
18.2
16.9
39.6
20.5
22.3
54.5
21.4
15.5
33.9
18.9
39.6
66.8
13.1
9.9
36.9
29.5
31.9
38.9
5.0
32.9
49.7
10.4

Percent

SE

36.0
68.7
51.5
28.2
38.4
24.7
53.2
23.4
35.4
41.3

2.8
16.6
9.4
5.8
8.2
4.7
7.0
6.9
1.8
4.3

34.1

2.8

28.7

39.5

8.1

31.1

3.8

23.6

38.6

12.3

36.6

3.5

29.7

43.6

9.6

26.3
22.4
12.5
44.5
30.4
23.9
42.6
56.4
38.9
49.4
27.6
55.0
39.9
32.2
61.3
34.5
14.3
48.2
57.7

2.3
5.5
3.4
5.7
5.3
5.2
3.9
9.8
8.1
6.2
7.4
12.8
3.3
6.4
8.5
6.1
8.7
5.8
10.2

21.9
11.7
5.8
33.4
20.0
13.8
35.1
37.2
22.9
37.2
13.1
29.9
33.5
19.6
44.7
22.5
0
36.8
37.8

30.7
33.2
19.3
55.6
40.8
34.1
50.2
75.6
54.9
61.7
42.1
80.0
46.4
44.7
78.0
46.5
31.4
59.5
77.6

8.6
24.4
27.4
12.7
17.4
21.7
9.0
17.4
20.9
12.6
26.8
23.3
8.2
19.9
13.8
17.7
61.2
12.0
17.6

40.8
59.7
84.5
61.9
16.2
33.9
31.9
45.1
54.2
42.9
42.4
55.6

2.6
13.6
3.6
6.3
14.5
4.5
3.9
2.6
6.4
3.3
6.6
4.9

35.8
33.0
77.5
49.5
0
25.0
24.2
39.9
41.7
36.5
29.5
45.9

45.9
86.3
91.5
74.4
44.7
42.8
39.6
50.3
66.7
49.3
55.3
65.2

6.3
22.8
4.2
10.2
89.8
13.4
12.4
5.8
11.8
7.6
15.5
8.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

249

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.6


Region
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Appendix Table D.7


Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan

34.0
50.2
19.0
32.2
33.8
37.5
46.0

2.3
11.4
4.2
3.6
6.5
5.6
5.2

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
29.5
38.6
6.8
27.8
72.6
22.8
10.7
27.3
22.2
25.2
39.2
11.1
21.1
46.5
19.1
26.6
48.5
14.8
35.9
56.1
11.2

42.3
54.1
36.5
43.8
44.0
48.1
30.7
27.7
68.2
40.8
41.6
43.3
43.0
45.5
18.6
42.6
35.3
46.3
44.3
46.8
41.1
41.1
40.2
40.8
42.4
28.4
33.0
27.0
30.3
12.6
39.8

2.7
4.2
4.0
7.4
3.1
5.6
17.5
5.7
6.1
5.7
2.8
6.9
8.8
3.4
5.9
2.7
4.2
4.5
7.1
6.5
3.4
6.8
6.9
6.2
7.1
2.1
9.0
3.6
4.2
3.6
5.8

37.0
45.9
28.6
29.2
37.9
37.1
0
16.5
56.2
29.6
36.0
29.9
25.7
38.8
7.1
37.3
27.0
37.5
30.4
34.1
34.4
27.9
26.6
28.6
28.5
24.3
15.4
19.9
22.1
5.5
28.3

Percent

SE

47.7
62.2
44.4
58.4
50.1
59.1
65.0
39.0
80.2
52.1
47.1
56.8
60.3
52.2
30.2
47.8
43.6
55.0
58.2
59.5
47.7
54.4
53.8
53.0
56.4
32.5
50.6
34.0
38.6
19.7
51.2

6.5
7.7
11.0
17.0
7.0
11.7
57.0
20.7
9.0
14.0
6.8
15.8
20.5
7.5
31.6
6.3
12.0
9.6
16.0
13.9
8.3
16.4
17.2
15.2
16.8
7.4
27.2
13.3
13.9
28.6
14.7

Percent participation of children 3-5 years old in Day Care


Center Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Percent
SE
CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
50.8
0.6
49.5
52.0
1.2
50.7
36.5
77.6
54.8
48.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

3.8
6.8
7.6
12.6
5.3

43.2
23.2
62.7
30.1
38.0

58.2
49.9
92.6
79.6
58.6

7.5
18.7
9.8
23.0
10.9

250

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.7


Region

Percent

Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao

50.4
46.6
53.5
51.1
46.3
63.3
71.9

Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila

72.1

SE
3.6

3.8

6.7
5.2
9.3
9.3
7.0

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
43.3
57.5
33.5
59.7
43.3
63.7
32.8
69.3
28.1
64.4
56.0
70.7
58.3
85.6

CV (%)
7.2
14.4
9.7
18.2
20.0
5.9
9.7

46.0

98.2

18.4

52.4
65.4
72.0
73.8
48.1
69.1
65.8
36.6
47.5
37.1
62.5
62.9
35.3

13.3
5.5
9.5
9.4
12.5
2.5
23.9
7.2
4.8
6.0
5.1
4.6
9.6
1.5

41.6
46.7
53.6
49.2
43.1
22.3
51.7
27.2
35.6
27.1
53.4
44.0
32.3

63.3
84.1
90.4
98.3
53.1
116.0
79.9
46.0
59.3
47.1
71.5
81.8
38.3

10.6
14.6
13.0
17.0
5.3
34.5
10.9
13.0
12.7
13.7
7.4
15.3
4.4

43.7

3.8

36.3

51.1

8.6

2.7

32.8

43.6

7.2

3.0

23.0

34.8

10.3

2.9

26.4

37.8

9.1

38.6
30.3
26.9
43.9
45.3
24.7
54.0
65.4
41.6
54.1
39.5
47.9
51.7
44.2
27.8
44.3
-7.9
67.0
43.3

46.8
52.3
40.2
61.9
69.4
42.7
65.8
92.3
65.6
70.5
66.9
100.2
63.3
64.9
100.4
64.3
91.3
85.5
65.5

4.8
13.6
10.1
8.7
10.7
13.6
5.0
8.7
11.4
6.7
13.2
18.0
5.1
9.7
28.8
9.4
60.7
6.2
10.4

Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
38.2
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
28.9
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
32.1
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
42.7
Batangas
41.3
Cavite
33.6
Laguna
52.9
Quezon
57.4
Rizal
33.7
MIMAROPA
59.9
Marinduque
78.9
Occidental Mindoro
53.6
Oriental Mindoro
62.3
Palawan
53.2
Romblon
74.0
Bicol Region
57.5
Albay
54.6
Camarines Norte
64.1
Camarines Sur
54.3
Catanduanes
41.7
Masbate
76.2
Sorsogon
54.4

Facts and Figures, 2011

2.1

3.0

5.6
3.4
4.6
6.2
4.6

6.9
6.1
4.2
7.0
13.3
3.0
5.3
18.5
5.1
25.3
4.7
5.7

251

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.7


Region
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent

SE

63.0
74.5
90.7
66.1
54.5
60.8
58.2
57.7
70.5
52.9
59.0
88.9
59.6
80.8
52.7
58.3
61.0
72.6
55.2

2.4

59.2
68.5
52.5
61.4
59.1
52.4
75.4
59.6
74.7
55.3
48.8
46.1
57.8
48.2
42.2
50.8
52.2
51.3
44.9
53.7
66.2
60.3
65.3
74.9
66.2

2.3

52.2
47.1
43.9
28.4
53.2

8.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

2.4

9.5
3.7
8.3
7.7
4.8
3.5

4.9
3.1
5.9
11.6
2.3
10.9
7.3
3.3
6.3
7.3
5.6

2.5

2.6

2.6

2.5

3.0
3.4
6.2
5.6
9.2
5.3
5.0
4.2
7.1
6.0
3.5
7.1
5.0
3.5
8.3
5.8
4.3
5.4
4.7
4.7
4.4
4.1
4.0
8.8

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
58.4

53.1

55.1

54.7

54.3

43.7

45.7

61.4

35.4

55.8
83.5
49.9
39.3
51.5
51.3
60.8
46.8
47.5
66.2
59.3
38.4
51.8
48.7
58.2
44.2
62.6
45.7
49.3
41.4
57.4
49.1
64.8
46.9
32.2
46.0
41.3
28.3
42.4
44.4
28.5
42.3
51.7
54.7
65.8
57.0
38.4
35.8
20.5
36.0

67.6

80.1
59.1
70.5
111.6
64.1
102.3
67.1
64.8
73.3
87.0
66.2

3.7
12.7
4.1
12.5
14.2
7.8
6.0
4.1
7.0
5.9
9.9
13.0
3.9
13.6
13.9
5.7
10.3
10.1
10.1

63.8

3.9

62.4

64.0

54.0

56.0

71.1

69.0

93.1
98.0
82.3
69.7
70.1
65.0

74.4
59.2
73.5

68.8
75.8
84.0
75.5

4.4
6.6
10.1
4.2
10.7
12.2
9.0
6.7
7.7
5.4
15.3
10.4
7.3
16.9
5.2
9.6
6.9
18.6
10.9
3.8
7.2
8.2
6.2
7.1

55.7
52.0
36.2
70.4

16.4
9.4
9.4
14.1
16.5

63.3
93.3
70.1
84.5
63.6
60.0
69.6
55.1
56.2
62.0
58.2
61.2
65.1

252

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table D.8. Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their hands
before meals by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
CV (%)
Region
Percent
SE
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
82.0
0.4
81.1
82.9
0.5
Luzon
Ilocos
91.5
1.1
89.4
93.6
1.2
Ilocos Norte
86.7
4.1
78.7
94.6
4.7
Ilocos Sur
94.3
3.1
88.2
100.3
3.3
La Union
90.9
2.6
85.7
96.1
2.9
Pangasinan
92.1
1.3
89.5
94.7
1.4
Cagayan Valley
86.6
2.1
82.5
90.8
2.4
Cagayan
87.8
3.2
81.5
94.1
3.6
Isabela
84.9
3.2
78.6
91.3
3.8
Nueva Vizcaya
93.7
5.9
82.1
105.3
6.3
Quirino
77.0
11.7
54.1
100.0
15.2
CAR
80.6
2.3
76.1
85.2
2.9
Abra
92.4
4.9
82.9
101.9
5.2
Apayao
88.5
3.7
81.2
95.7
4.2
Benguet
79.0
3.8
71.6
86.4
4.8
Ifugao
77.9
8.0
62.2
93.5
10.2
Kalinga
69.7
7.3
55.4
83.9
10.4
Mt. Province
86.6
3.7
79.4
93.8
4.3
Central Luzon
90.7
1.0
88.7
92.7
1.1
Aurora
95.0
3.2
88.7
101.3
3.4
Bataan
88.7
4.0
80.8
96.5
4.5
Bulacan
92.2
1.5
89.2
95.2
1.6
Nueva Ecija
84.4
2.9
78.8
90.1
3.4
Pampanga
94.9
1.7
91.6
98.2
1.8
Tarlac
92.7
2.9
87.1
98.4
3.1
Zambales
84.8
4.8
75.3
94.2
5.7
NCR
82.1
1.3
79.6
84.7
1.6
Manila
86.8
2.7
81.5
92.0
3.1
Mandaluyong/
Marikina/
84.9
2.0
81.1
88.8
2.3
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
74.3
3.2
68.1
80.5
4.3
Navotas/Valenzuela
Las
Pias/Makati/Pasay/
82.3
2.7
76.9
87.6
3.3
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
83.0
1.6
80.0
86.1
1.9
Batangas
79.3
4.8
69.8
88.8
6.1
Cavite
75.9
3.6
68.9
83.0
4.7
Laguna
92.9
1.7
89.6
96.3
1.8
Quezon
77.7
3.5
70.9
84.4
4.4
Rizal
91.6
1.8
88.1
95.2
2.0
MIMAROPA
89.3
1.5
86.4
92.2
1.7
Marinduque
87.5
5.4
76.8
98.1
6.2
Occidental Mindoro
84.4
4.7
75.2
93.5
5.5
Oriental Mindoro
90.1
3.3
83.7
96.6
3.6
Palawan
89.1
2.0
85.2
93.1
2.2
Romblon
95.3
2.4
90.5
100.0
2.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

253

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.8


Region
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

Percent

SE

86.3
79.4
98.8
85.3
74.4
88.9
92.6

1.5
4.0
0.7
2.6
10.2
3.3
2.1

75.0
79.6
84.3
75.4
43.2
71.1
77.3
85.8
84.9
86.4
84.3
89.7
79.5
89.9
79.8
80.1
77.6
68.1
81.5

2.1

84.6
82.8
84.0
93.4
86.2
80.9
90.6
82.1
84.4
93.0
81.2
90.2
86.4
80.7
65.8
78.3
71.1
80.0
84.1
82.2
87.6
90.6
89.2
81.9
87.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
83.3
89.3
1.8
71.6
87.2
5.0
97.4
100.2
0.7
80.2
90.4
3.1
54.3
94.4
13.8
82.4
95.3
3.7
88.5
96.7
2.3

1.4
3.3
1.7
3.3
11.5
2.2
2.8
7.3
2.7
8.6
7.1
4.6

70.9
65.3
77.5
65.7
25.9
61.8
71.2
83.1
78.5
83.1
77.9
67.0
75.2
84.5
65.5
74.9
60.8
54.2
72.5

79.1
93.9
91.1
85.1
60.5
80.4
83.3
88.5
91.3
89.8
90.7
112.3
83.8
95.3
94.2
85.4
94.5
81.9
90.5

2.8
9.1
4.1
6.6
20.4
6.7
4.0
1.6
3.8
2.0
3.9
12.9
2.8
3.1
9.2
3.3
11.1
10.4
5.6

1.6
2.8
2.3
2.2
1.8
4.3
6.4
4.9
4.7
1.7
1.8
2.5
3.7
2.6
5.7
2.2
3.9
4.1
3.4
4.6
1.3
2.5
2.5
3.1
2.6

81.4
77.4
79.4
89.1
82.5
72.5
78.0
72.5
75.2
89.7
77.7
85.3
79.2
75.5
54.5
74.1
63.5
71.9
77.4
73.2
85.0
85.8
84.3
76.0
82.3

87.8
88.2
88.5
97.7
89.8
89.2
103.1
91.7
93.5
96.2
84.8
95.1
93.6
85.9
77.0
82.5
78.7
88.1
90.8
91.2
90.2
95.5
94.2
87.9
92.3

1.9
3.3
2.8
2.3
2.1
5.3
7.1
5.9
5.5
1.8
2.2
2.8
4.2
3.3
8.7
2.8
5.5
5.1
4.0
5.6
1.5
2.7
2.8
3.7
2.9

7.3
3.5
4.9
8.8
4.8
3.1

254

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.8


Region
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
42.7
76.0
24.7
58.1
36.5
36.2

SE
2.5
7.2
3.6
5.1
4.3
6.1

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
37.8
47.6
5.8
61.8
90.2
9.5
17.7
31.8
14.5
48.1
68.1
8.8
28.0
45.0
11.9
24.3
48.2
16.8

Appendix Table D.9. Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash
after meals by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Region
Percent
SE
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
80.4
0.5
79.5
81.3
Luzon
Ilocos Region
88.7
1.2
86.2
91.1
Ilocos Norte
74.6
5.2
64.4
84.8
Ilocos Sur
95.3
2.7
90.0
100.5
La Union
88.6
3.4
81.9
95.3
Pangasinan
90.3
1.4
87.6
93.1
Cagayan Valley
82.5
2.1
78.4
86.7
Cagayan
82.1
3.1
76.0
88.3
Isabela
82.4
3.4
75.7
89.1
Nueva Vizcaya
89.3
4.7
80.2
98.5
Quirino
70.8
11.4
48.6
93.1
CAR
73.3
2.6
68.2
78.3
Abra
89.9
5.1
79.9
99.9
Apayao
76.6
7.8
61.3
91.9
Benguet
76.2
3.9
68.6
83.7
Ifugao
67.8
8.1
51.9
83.7
Kalinga
61.0
7.5
46.3
75.7
Mt. Province
66.8
8.7
49.8
83.7
Central Luzon
89.3
1.1
87.1
91.4
Aurora
97.3
2.9
91.6
102.9
Bataan
92.3
3.6
85.1
99.4
Bulacan
90.5
1.8
87.0
94.0
Nueva Ecija
78.8
3.4
72.1
85.5
Pampanga
92.9
1.9
89.3
96.6
Tarlac
95.8
1.9
92.1
99.5
Zambales
86.1
4.1
78.0
94.2
NCR
81.8
1.2
79.4
84.2
Manila
86.4
2.7
81.0
91.8
Mandaluyong/Marikina
Pasig/Quezon City/
82.6
1.9
78.8
86.4
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
77.3
2.8
71.8
82.7
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
81.8
2.6
76.8
86.8
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig

Facts and Figures, 2011

their hands
CV (%)
0.6
1.4
7.0
2.8
3.9
1.5
2.5
3.8
4.1
5.2
16.0
3.5
5.7
10.2
5.1
12.0
12.3
13.0
1.2
3.0
3.9
2.0
4.3
2.0
2.0
4.8
1.5
3.2
2.3
3.6
3.1

255

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.9


Region

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
79.7
86.0
68.2
88.2
68.7
83.2
89.7
96.4
71.0
85.6
87.4
94.7
79.8
87.0
87.6
98.3
59.0
77.1
78.2
93.7
75.9
88.4
87.8
100.9
80.6
87.8
68.0
85.1
93.3
100.8
79.0
90.0
58.5
90.7
70.8
94.2
89.4
97.5
72.3
80.1
65.3
93.9
74.9
89.9
65.3
82.6
42.9
78.4
62.3
81.0

CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

82.8
78.2
75.9
93.1
78.3
91.0
83.4
92.9
68.0
86.0
82.2
94.4
84.2
76.6
97.1
84.5
74.6
82.5
93.5
76.2
79.6
82.4
73.9
60.7
71.6

1.6
5.1
3.7
1.7
3.7
1.9
1.8
2.7
4.6
3.9
3.2
3.3
1.8
4.4
1.9
2.8
8.2
6.0
2.1
2.0
7.3
3.8
4.4
9.0
4.8

79.5

2.8

73.9

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

84.3
82.3
85.1
84.0
75.9
78.3
92.7
78.6
80.0
74.4
60.0
81.3

1.3
2.8
1.7
3.0
12.7
2.3
2.9
7.3
2.9
9.4
5.4
4.7

78.0
79.0
73.8
91.1
82.7
79.7
90.4
74.6
86.2
88.1

1.7
3.0
2.3
2.2
2.2
4.0
8.9
6.2
4.8
2.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV (%)
2.0
6.5
4.9
1.8
4.8
2.0
2.2
2.9
6.8
4.6
3.9
3.5
2.2
5.7
2.0
3.3
11.0
7.2
2.2
2.6
9.1
4.6
6.0
14.9
6.7
3.6

81.7
76.9
81.7
78.2
50.9
73.8
87.0
64.3
74.3
56.0
49.4
72.0

85.0
86.9
87.7
88.5
89.8
100.8
82.8
98.3
92.9
85.7
92.9
70.6
90.5

1.6
3.4
2.0
3.5
16.8
2.9
3.1
9.3
3.6
12.6
9.0
5.8

74.7
73.1
69.2
86.8
78.4
71.9
72.9
62.5
76.9
83.3

81.3
84.9
78.4
95.4
86.9
87.5
108.0
86.8
95.6
93.0

2.2
3.8
3.2
2.4
2.6
5.0
9.9
8.3
5.5
2.8

256

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.9


Region
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
80.3
91.8
83.5
78.9
68.2
76.0
69.5
77.5
82.3
78.6
86.0
89.1
85.5
82.2
86.5
43.7
75.2
22.9
53.7
40.0
50.5

SE
1.9
2.4
4.0
2.7
6.5
2.4
4.3
4.5
3.1
6.2
1.5
2.5
3.3
2.9
2.7
2.5
7.0
3.4
5.2
3.9
5.8

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
76.5
84.1
87.1
96.4
75.6
91.4
73.6
84.3
55.3
81.0
71.3
80.7
61.2
77.9
68.7
86.2
76.2
88.5
66.5
90.6
83.2
88.9
84.1
94.1
79.0
92.0
76.4
88.0
81.2
91.8
38.9
48.5
61.4
88.9
16.1
29.6
43.5
64.0
32.4
47.6
39.2
61.8

CV (%)
2.4
2.6
4.8
3.5
9.6
3.2
6.1
5.8
3.8
7.8
1.7
2.9
3.9
3.6
3.1
5.6
9.4
15.0
9.7
9.7
11.4

Appendix Table D.10. Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always wash their
hands after toilet use by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Region
Percent
SE
CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
82.8
0.4
82.0
83.7
0.5
Luzon
Ilocos Region
92.4
1.1
90.3
94.4
1.1
Ilocos Norte
89.5
3.7
82.2
96.8
4.2
Ilocos Sur
95.4
1.8
91.9
98.9
1.9
La Union
88.5
3.2
82.2
94.8
3.6
Pangasinan
93.4
1.3
90.9
95.9
1.4
Cagayan Valley
85.8
1.9
82.0
89.6
2.3
Cagayan
82.9
3.7
75.6
90.1
4.5
Isabela
87.6
2.7
82.3
92.9
3.1
Nueva Vizcaya
92.8
3.7
85.5
100.2
4.0
Quirino
74.0
9.6
55.1
92.9
13.0
CAR
76.6
2.2
72.2
81.0
2.9
Abra
86.8
3.9
79.1
94.4
4.5
Apayao
87.5
4.7
78.4
96.6
5.3
Benguet
83.5
3.4
76.8
90.2
4.1
Ifugao
93.6
2.3
89.2
98.1
2.4
Kalinga
73.8
8.2
57.8
89.9
11.1
Mt. Province
20.1
5.7
8.9
31.2
28.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

257

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.10


Region
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
90.1
93.6
91.6
102.9
93.1
101.0
89.9
95.3
77.3
89.0
90.6
97.3
94.3
99.6
87.0
97.2
84.6
88.5
86.1
93.7

CV (%)

91.9
97.3
97.1
92.6
83.1
94.0
97.0
92.1
86.6
89.9

0.9
2.9
2.0
1.4
3.0
1.7
1.4
2.6
1.0
1.9

87.2

1.5

84.2

90.2

1.8

82.7

2.7

77.4

88.0

3.3

86.9

1.9

83.3

90.6

2.1

86.1
84.3
78.9
95.8
84.1
89.9
82.9
92.2
69.4
89.0
80.5
88.7
84.9
76.0
97.1
87.1
77.0
81.5
94.0
81.0
84.9
91.4
78.0
70.7
78.3
82.1
85.3
84.9
85.7
84.1
89.7

1.5
4.0
4.0
1.2
3.0
2.3
2.2
3.3
6.8
3.5
3.6
6.7
1.8
4.5
2.0
2.2
10.3
5.3
2.2
1.7
6.1
2.5
4.7
7.7
3.7
2.5
1.4
3.3
1.8
3.2
11.5

89.1
92.3
86.7
98.1
90.1
94.4
87.2
98.7
82.7
95.9
87.6
101.9
88.3
84.7
100.9
91.4
97.2
91.9
98.3
84.4
97.0
96.3
87.3
85.7
85.6
87.1
88.1
91.3
89.2
90.5
112.3

1.8
4.8
5.0
1.2
3.6
2.6
2.6
3.6
9.7
4.0
4.5
7.6
2.1
5.9
2.0
2.5
13.4
6.5
2.4
2.1
7.2
2.7
6.1
10.8
4.8
3.1
1.7
3.9
2.1
3.9
12.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

83.1
76.4
71.1
93.5
78.2
85.3
78.7
85.7
56.2
82.1
73.3
75.5
81.4
67.2
93.2
82.9
56.7
71.2
89.6
77.7
72.8
86.6
68.7
55.6
71.0
77.1
82.5
78.4
82.2
77.8
67.0

1.0
3.0
2.1
1.5
3.6
1.8
1.4
2.8
1.2
2.2

258

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.10


Region
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
XII. SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

78.6
90.9
72.7
79.7
76.6
71.3
81.2

2.3
4.3
6.9
3.3
8.3
6.8
5.3

95% confidence interval


CV (%)
Lower limit Upper limit
74.0
83.2
3.0
82.4
99.4
4.8
59.2
86.2
9.5
73.3
86.1
4.1
60.3
93.0
10.9
58.0
84.7
9.5
70.7
91.7
6.6

78.0
81.8
71.8
89.7
80.5
77.8
95.5
62.7
89.2
89.4
83.7
94.4
88.2
82.0
71.7
80.3
74.2
82.1
86.0
81.5
88.0
93.3
90.7
83.9
82.3
44.8
82.2
32.3
53.4
38.9
42.5

2.2
3.1
3.6
3.2
2.7
3.6
4.9
8.8
4.1
2.8
2.0
1.3
4.1
3.1
5.7
2.2
3.9
4.1
2.4
6.0
1.3
1.9
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.4
4.5
3.5
5.2
4.6
5.6

73.8
75.7
64.7
83.5
75.1
70.8
85.9
45.4
81.1
83.9
79.8
91.9
80.2
75.9
60.6
76.0
66.6
74.0
81.2
69.8
85.4
89.7
84.7
78.2
77.1
39.9
73.5
25.3
43.2
29.8
31.5

Percent

SE

82.3
88.0
78.8
95.9
85.8
84.9
105.0
80.0
97.2
94.9
87.6
96.9
96.2
88.2
82.9
84.6
81.9
90.3
90.7
93.2
90.6
97.0
96.8
89.6
87.6
49.6
91.0
39.2
63.6
48.1
53.4

Appendix Table D.11. Percent of children, 6-12 years old, who always brush
by region and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
Percent of
Region
SE
Children
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
68.5
0.5
67.4
69.5
Luzon
Ilocos Region
72.0
1.9
68.2
75.8
Ilocos Norte
73.0
4.6
63.9
82.0
Ilocos Sur
70.0
7.1
56.2
83.9
La Union
76.8
4.9
67.1
86.5
Pangasinan
70.9
2.4
66.2
75.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

2.8
3.8
5.0
3.5
3.4
4.6
5.1
14.1
4.6
3.2
2.4
1.4
4.6
3.8
7.9
2.7
5.3
5.0
2.8
7.3
1.5
2.0
3.4
3.5
3.2
5.5
5.4
11.0
9.7
11.9
13.1

their teeth
CV (%)
0.8
2.7
6.3
10.1
6.4
3.4

259

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.11


Region
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/
Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
72.2
80.7
64.9
81.2
74.8
84.6
65.1
95.4
50.0
76.9
55.0
65.6
45.2
81.9
78.7
105.5
59.1
75.3
20.8
49.3
28.3
55.9
63.4
79.7
80.5
86.0
40.1
91.1
74.5
94.3
76.9
85.4
70.3
83.5
80.2
93.7
80.0
92.0
91.6
98.5
66.9
72.4
58.8
72.7

CV (%)

76.4
73.1
79.7
80.2
63.4
60.3
63.6
92.1
67.2
35.1
42.1
71.6
83.3
65.6
84.4
81.1
76.9
87.0
86.0
95.1
69.7
65.8

2.2
4.1
2.5
7.7
6.8
2.7
9.4
6.8
4.1
7.3
7.1
4.2
1.4
13.0
5.0
2.2
3.4
3.4
3.0
1.8
1.4
3.6

70.9

2.5

66.1

75.8

3.5

67.2

2.9

61.6

72.9

4.3

72.0

2.7

66.8

77.3

3.7

71.4
66.3
63.3
81.7
72.2
76.7
73.8
83.4
63.3
68.8
73.3
91.4
77.3
73.5
94.8
74.9
69.2
69.6
90.1

1.9
5.3
4.8
2.4
3.2
3.5
2.0
3.7
5.5
4.2
3.2
3.0
1.9
4.0
1.4
3.3
11.3
5.6
3.4

67.7
55.9
53.9
76.9
65.9
69.8
69.9
76.1
52.5
60.5
66.9
85.5
73.6
65.7
91.9
68.5
47.0
58.5
83.4

75.2
76.7
72.7
86.5
78.6
83.6
77.6
90.8
74.0
77.1
79.6
97.3
81.1
81.2
97.6
81.3
91.4
80.7
96.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

2.8

5.7
3.1
9.6
10.8
4.5
14.7
7.4
6.2
20.7
16.8
5.8
1.7
19.8
6.0
2.7
4.4
3.9
3.5
1.9
2.0
5.4

2.7

2.7

2.4

8.0
7.6
3.0
4.5
4.6
4.5
8.7
6.2
4.4
3.3

5.4
1.5
4.4
16.4
8.1
3.8

260

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.11


Region
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
64.9
65.9
93.2
59.3
43.4
62.7
64.3
62.7
58.4
63.4
64.4
72.4
56.9
66.1
50.1
56.9
58.5
39.4
64.4
62.7
53.2
71.3
57.6
66.1
67.4
75.7
63.3
53.0
71.0
66.7
82.0
68.0
63.7
59.4
66.9
59.6
70.2
73.0
66.5
63.6
71.7
53.0
65.5
64.0
46.6
76.0
24.2
49.4
59.9
50.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
2.1
4.7
2.9
6.2
5.2
4.1
3.4
1.8
4.9
2.3
3.9
14.5
2.5
7.4
6.9
3.7
8.2
5.4
6.4
2.0
4.0
2.5
6.1
2.2
4.2
7.1
5.4
7.3
3.1
2.5
4.1
7.7
3.3
6.5
2.4
4.1
4.0
3.5
8.0
2.3
4.0
4.9
4.5
5.0
2.5
5.5
3.1
4.3
9.6
3.6

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
60.8
56.8
87.6
47.1
33.3
54.7
57.5
59.1
48.8
58.9
56.7
44.0
52.0
51.6
36.5
49.7
42.5
28.9
51.9
58.8
45.4
66.4
45.7
61.8
59.1
61.7
52.9
38.7
65.0
61.7
73.9
53.0
57.1
46.6
62.2
51.6
62.3
66.1
50.8
59.1
63.8
43.4
56.6
54.2
41.7
65.1
18.1
41.1
41.1
43.7

68.9
75.1
98.9
71.5
53.5
70.7
71.0
66.3
68.0
67.8
72.0
100.8
61.8
80.7
63.7
64.1
74.6
50.0
76.9
66.7
61.1
76.1
69.5
70.5
75.7
89.6
73.8
67.3
76.9
71.6
90.1
83.0
70.2
72.2
71.5
67.5
78.1
79.9
82.1
68.2
79.6
62.5
74.4
73.7
51.6
86.8
30.3
57.8
78.7
58.0

CV (%)
3.2
7.1
3.1
10.5
11.9
6.5
5.3
2.9
8.4
3.6
6.0
20.0
4.4
11.2
13.8
6.4
14.0
13.6
9.9
3.2
7.5
3.5
10.5
3.4
6.3
9.4
8.4
13.8
4.3
3.8
5.0
11.3
5.2
11.0
3.6
6.8
5.7
4.8
12.0
3.6
5.6
9.2
6.9
7.8
5.5
7.3
12.8
8.6
16.0
7.2

261

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table D.12. Percent of children, 6-12 years old, with dental caries by region
and province: Philippines, 2011
95% confidence interval
CV
Region
Percent
SE
(%)
Lower limit Upper limit
Philippines
73.7
0.3
73.0
74.4
0.5
Luzon
Ilocos Region
75.1
1.5
72.3
78.0
1.9
Ilocos Norte
68.3
4.2
60.0
76.6
6.2
Ilocos Sur
76.2
4.3
67.8
84.6
5.6
La Union
75.9
3.1
69.8
81.9
4.1
Pangasinan
76.2
1.9
72.4
79.9
2.5
Cagayan Valley
73.1
1.4
70.4
75.8
1.9
Cagayan
74.2
2.2
69.9
78.5
2.9
Isabela
75.3
1.9
71.5
79.0
2.5
Nueva Vizcaya
67.8
5.0
58.0
77.5
7.3
Quirino
61.2
6.8
47.9
74.5
11.1
CAR
70.0
1.9
66.4
73.7
2.6
Abra
85.3
3.3
78.9
91.8
3.8
Apayao
77.4
5.4
66.8
87.9
7.0
Benguet
72.8
2.6
67.8
77.9
3.5
Ifugao
61.0
6.3
48.6
73.4
10.4
Kalinga
55.2
5.2
44.9
65.5
9.5
Mt. Province
71.2
5.6
60.3
82.2
7.8
Central Luzon
72.8
1.3
70.3
75.3
1.7
Aurora
80.7
3.1
74.7
86.7
3.8
Bataan
76.5
3.2
70.1
82.8
4.2
Bulacan
72.0
2.6
67.0
77.1
3.6
Nueva Ecija
74.8
2.7
69.4
80.1
3.7
Pampanga
70.1
2.6
65.0
75.2
3.7
Tarlac
73.5
3.8
66.1
81.0
5.2
Zambales
74.2
4.6
65.1
83.2
6.2
NCR
75.2
1.0
73.2
77.1
1.3
Manila
77.1
2.2
72.8
81.5
2.9
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
74.4
1.7
71.1
77.6
2.2
San Juan
Caloocan/Malabon/
74.5
2.2
70.1
78.8
3.0
Navotas/ Valenzuela
La Pias/
Makati/Pasay/
75.6
2.0
71.6
79.5
2.7
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paraaque/ Taguig
CALABARZON
71.4
1.2
69.0
73.8
1.7
Batangas
71.1
2.5
66.1
76.1
3.6
Cavite
70.4
2.8
65.0
75.9
3.9
Laguna
69.0
2.3
64.4
73.6
3.4
Quezon
79.2
2.2
74.8
83.5
2.8
Rizal
68.4
3.3
61.9
74.8
4.8
MIMAROPA
70.9
1.7
67.6
74.2
2.4
Marinduque
70.4
4.6
61.5
79.3
6.5
Occidental Mindoro
72.5
4.5
63.8
81.3
6.1
Oriental Mindoro
71.1
3.4
64.4
77.8
4.8
Palawan
76.1
2.8
70.7
81.5
3.6
Romblon
56.1
4.3
47.7
64.5
7.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

262

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.12


Region
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga Norte
Zamboanga Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

69.4
72.6
75.4
73.2
74.5
61.7
61.8
73.3
72.6
74.9
71.5
89.3
70.8
74.5
73.6
76.3
73.4
71.0
79.3
79.3
87.1
78.3
80.6
81.9
77.3
74.1

1.2
2.4
3.7
2.1
7.9
2.5
3.4
1.4
5.7
3.2
5.4
7.7
2.4
1.8
1.3
2.6
1.8
2.5
8.2
1.2
3.7
3.6
1.8
2.4
4.2
3.3

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
67.0
71.8
67.9
77.3
68.1
82.7
69.1
77.3
59.1
89.9
56.9
66.6
55.0
68.5
70.7
76.0
61.3
83.8
68.6
81.2
60.9
82.1
74.1
104.4
66.2
75.5
71.0
78.1
71.0
76.1
71.1
81.4
69.9
76.9
66.1
75.8
63.3
95.3
77.0
81.6
80.0
94.3
71.2
85.4
77.0
84.2
77.1
86.7
69.0
85.6
67.8
80.5

71.5
64.6
76.5
69.0
76.3
79.7
76.3
76.1
85.2
70.9
75.1
80.0
73.8
75.8
68.8
74.8
76.3
75.5
71.9
73.4
77.9
75.3
79.2
79.2
78.6

1.8
3.6
2.4
4.8
1.4
2.8
5.2
3.4
2.4
2.5
1.5
3.1
3.5
2.1
4.5
1.4
2.0
3.0
2.8
3.1
1.5
2.9
2.9
2.5
3.3

68.0
57.6
71.8
59.6
73.5
74.2
66.2
69.5
80.6
65.9
72.2
73.8
67.0
71.8
60.0
72.0
72.4
69.7
66.5
67.3
75.0
69.6
73.4
74.2
72.1

Percent

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE

75.1
71.6
81.3
78.4
79.1
85.2
86.4
82.8
89.8
75.8
78.0
86.2
80.6
79.9
77.6
77.7
80.2
81.4
77.4
79.5
80.8
80.9
84.9
84.2
85.2

CV
(%)
1.8
3.3
4.9
2.9
10.5
4.0
5.6
1.8
7.9
4.3
7.6
8.7
3.3
2.4
1.8
3.4
2.4
3.5
10.3
1.5
4.2
4.6
2.3
3.0
5.5
4.4
2.5
5.5
3.2
6.9
1.9
3.5
6.8
4.5
2.8
3.6
2.0
3.9
4.7
2.7
6.5
1.9
2.6
4.0
3.8
4.3
1.9
3.8
3.7
3.2
4.3

263

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table D.12


Region
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
74.4
70.6
80.0
70.7
75.6
73.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.5
7.0
2.2
2.8
4.4
3.0

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
71.4
77.3
56.8
84.4
75.6
84.4
65.2
76.1
67.0
84.2
67.7
79.3

CV
(%)
2.0
10.0
2.8
3.9
5.8
4.0

264

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

E. Maternal Nutrition
Appendix Table E.1

Characteristics
Age group (year)
<20 years old
<19.0
>19.08-19.9
>20 years old
20-29
30-39
at least 40
Highest Educational
Attainment
No schooling
Elementary
High school
College
Work Status
Not working
Working
TOTAL

Nutritional status of mothers* with children 0-5 years old, by


socio-demographic characteristics: Philippines, 2011
Nutritional Status
Chronic Energy
Overweight/
Normal
Deficient
Obese
n
%
n
%
n
%
30
6.1
262
47.4
242
46.6
7
2.4
166
52.9
135
44.7
23
10.9
96
40.0
107
49.1
1,065
9.6
6,774
59.3
3,459
31.2
562
12.0
3,081
64.0
1,121
24.0
362
7.7
2,754
57.2
1,651
35.1
141
8.0
939
52.2
687
39.8

35
257
558
245

13.6
9.6
10.2
7.6

165
1,661
3,299
1,910

61.4
61.5
58.3
57.4

66
756
1,734
1,145

25.1
28.8
31.5
34.9

891
204
1,095

10.0
7.5
9.4

5,546
1,490
7,036

60.6
53.1
58.7

2,610
1,091
3,701

29.4
39.4
31.8

* Nutritional Status based on BMI

Facts and Figures, 2011

265

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table E.2

Characteristics
Age group (year)
<20
20-29
30-39
>40

Percentage of underweight mothers with children 0-5 years old


by socio-demographic characteristics and by region:
Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence Interval

SE

9.4
6.1
12.0
7.7
8.0

0.3
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.7

8.9
3.9
11.0
6.9
6.7

9.9
8.2
13.0
8.5
9.3

3.0
18.0
4.1
5.3
8.3

Lower limit

Upper limit

% CV

Highest Educational
Attainment
No schooling
Elementary
High school
College

9.4

0.3

8.9

9.9

3.0

13.5
9.6
10.2
7.6

2.7
0.6
0.4
0.5

8.3
8.5
9.4
6.6

18.8
10.8
11.0
8.5

19.7
6.1
4.2
6.4

Work status
Not working
Working

9.4
10.0
7.5

0.3
0.3
0.5

8.9
9.4
6.5

9.9
10.6
8.6

3.0
3.2
7.2

By region
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

9.4
10.2
9.0
4.9
9.6
9.0
11.8
10.9
11.5
9.4
7.9
6.9
9.7
7.8
6.6
7.4
8.2
13.0

0.3
1.1
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.8
1.0
1.4
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.4
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.5

8.9
8.1
6.5
2.9
7.7
7.5
9.9
8.3
9.4
7.3
6.0
5.0
6.9
5.7
4.5
5.2
5.8
9.9

9.9
12.3
11.6
7.0
11.4
10.6
13.7
13.6
13.8
11.5
9.7
8.8
12.4
9.9
8.7
9.7
10.5
16.0

3.0
10.6
14.5
21.5
9.7
8.7
8.2
12.4
9.7
11.5
11.9
14.1
14.3
14.0
15.9
15.4
14.9
11.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

266

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table E.3

Characteristics

Percentage of overweight/obese mothers with 0-5 years old


children by socio-demographic characteristics and by region:
Philippines, 2011
%

SE

Age group (year)


<20
20-29
30-39
>40

46.6
24.1
35.1
39.8

Highest Educational
Attainment
No schooling
Elementary
High school
College

95% Confidence Interval


% CV

Lower limit

Upper limit

2.3
0.7
0.7
1.2

42.1
22.8
33.7
37.4

51.1
25.3
36.6
42.2

4.9
2.7
2.1
3.1

25.1
28.8
31.5
35.0

2.6
0.9
0.7
0.9

20.0
27.0
30.2
33.2

30.1
30.7
32.8
36.8

10.3
3.2
2.1
2.6

Work status
Not working
Working

29.4
39.4

0.5
1.0

28.4
37.4

30.4
41.3

1.7
2.5

By region
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

31.8
30.3
29.5
33.8
35.1
36.1
33.9
29.3
25.5
27.4
32.5
27.9
31.4
31.3
31.4
31.8
33.1
26.2

0.5
1.9
2.1
2.1
1.7
1.4
1.4
2.0
1.7
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.9
1.7
2.1
1.8
2.1
1.9

30.9
26.6
25.4
29.8
31.8
33.3
31.2
25.3
22.1
23.7
28.9
24.5
27.8
28.0
27.3
28.3
29.0
22.5

32.7
34.0
33.5
37.9
38.4
38.9
36.6
33.3
28.8
31.1
36.0
31.4
35.1
34.7
35.5
35.3
37.2
29.9

1.4
6.2
7.0
6.1
4.8
4.0
4.0
6.9
6.7
6.9
5.5
6.2
6.0
5.4
6.7
5.6
6.3
7.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

267

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table E.4

Percentage of mothers who took supplements* during


pregnancy with the youngest child by region: Philippines, 2011

Region

95% Confidence Interval

SE

86.2

0.4

85.4

87.0

0.4

Ilocos Region
85.4
Cagayan Valley
77.7
CAR
89.6
Central Luzon
82.7
NCR
91.8
CALABARZON
82.5
MIMAROPA
78.5
Bicol Region
79.1
Western Visayas
90.4
Central Visayas
94.9
Eastern Visayas
89.3
Zamboanga Peninsula
88.3
Northern Mindanao
93.4
Davao Region
89.5
SOCCSKSARGEN
87.0
CARAGA
91.6
ARMM
63.7
* Any vitamin/mineral supplements

1.8
2.1
1.8
1.4
0.9
1.4
2.1
1.7
1.1
0.8
1.3
1.7
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.5
2.7

82.0
73.5
86.0
79.8
90.0
79.8
74.3
75.9
88.2
93.3
86.8
85.0
91.2
86.4
83.8
88.5
58.4

88.8
81.8
93.1
85.5
93.7
85.2
82.7
82.4
92.6
96.6
91.8
91.6
95.7
92.7
90.2
94.6
69.1

2.1
2.7
2.0
1.7
1.0
1.7
2.7
2.1
1.3
0.9
1.4
1.9
1.2
1.8
1.9
1.7
4.3

Philippines

Appendix Table E.5

Upper limit

% CV

Percentage of mothers by type of supplements taken during


pregnancy with the youngest child by region: Philippines, 2011

Characteristics/ Region
A. Iron
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao

Lower limit

SE

82.2
78.8
88.2
86.1
83.3
80.9
77.1
79.6
88.3
78.4
83.5
84.5
87.4
83.7

0.5
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.5
2.3
1.5
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
81.3
74.8
84.5
82.6
80.1
78.2
74.2
75.1
85.4
74.6
80.3
81.3
84.1
79.9

Upper limit
83.1
82.8
91.8
89.7
86.5
83.5
80.0
84.1
91.3
82.3
86.8
87.7
90.8
87.5

% CV
0.6
2.6
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.9
2.9
1.7
2.5
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.3

268

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table E.5


95% Confidence Interval

% CV

Region

SE

Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA

83.0
84.9
83.8

2.0
2.1
2.2

79.1
80.8
79.5

86.9
89.0
88.0

2.4
2.5
2.6

4.7
6.9
6.0
5.2
9.3
3.2
7.0
3.4
5.2
3.6
2.7
2.6
0.8
6.2
5.0
1.5
1.7
1.9

0.2
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.1
0.6
0.9
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
1.1
1.0
0.5
0.6
0.8

4.2
4.3
3.4
3.1
7.2
2.1
5.2
0.9
3.3
2.1
1.5
1.4
0.0
4.0
3.0
0.5
0.5
0.4

5.1
9.5
8.5
7.3
11.5
4.4
8.8
5.9
7.1
5.2
3.9
3.8
1.6
8.4
6.9
2.4
3.0
3.4

5.1
19.2
21.9
20.7
11.8
18.2
13.1
38.0
18.5
21.7
21.9
23.6
50.5
18.5
19.7
33.6
36.8
39.9

2.5
1.0
2.0
1.2
1.4
2.5
3.5
5.1
0.3
3.6
1.6
3.7
3.4
1.1
2.4
3.9
2.8
5.5

0.2
0.4
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.5
0.2
0.7
0.6
1.0
1.1
0.5
0.8
1.2
1.0
1.3

2.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
1.5
2.1
2.2
0
2.2
0.3
1.7
1.2
0.2
0.7
1.6
0.9
2.8

2.9
1.9
3.9
2.2
0.2
3.6
5.0
8.0
0.7
5.0
0.3
5.6
5.5
2.1
4.1
6.2
4.8
8.1

7.7
44.8
48.5
43.1
34.9
20.9
21.1
28.8
70.6
19.9
39.8
27.3
32.7
42.9
35.2
30.3
35.3
24.6

B. Folic acid
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Lower limit

Upper limit

C. Ferrous sulphate +folic acid


Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Facts and Figures, 2011

269

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table E.5


%

SE

14.3
18.9
16.0
9.1
20.4
13.7
20.2
13.7
12.7
19.5
14.4
6.5
7.4
13.4
8.3
6.8
12.0
3.0

0.4
2.0
2.2
1.5
1.8
1.1
1.4
2.0
1.3
1.7
1.4
1.0
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.0
1.7
0.7

Region
D. Multivitamins with iron
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM
Appendix Table E.6

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit

13.5
14.9
11.6
6.1
16.9
11.6
17.5
9.8
10.1
16.2
11.6
4.6
4.4
10.1
5.3
4.8
8.6
1.5

15.1
22.9
20.3
12.1
24.0
15.8
22.9
17.6
15.3
22.8
17.2
8.4
10.3
16.7
11.4
8.7
15.3
4.5

% CV

2.9
10.8
13.9
16.8
8.8
7.8
6.8
14.6
10.5
8.6
10.0
14.6
20.5
12.7
18.8
14.5
14.3
24.9

Awareness on nutritional disorders among mothers by region:


Philippines, 2011

Nutritional Disorders/
Region

95% Confidence Interval

SE

A. Anemia
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN

81.9
82.9
87.8
82.5
84.1
90.5
85.9
75.6
79.4
83.7
84.3
80.1
73.1
78.7
82.8
75.7

0.4
1.8
1.6
1.9
1.4
0.9
1.1
2.4
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.8
2.6
2.1
2.0
2.2

81.0
79.4
84.6
78.9
81.4
88.8
83.8
70.9
75.8
80.7
81.4
76.4
67.9
74.6
79.0
71.4

82.7
86.3
91.0
86.2
86.8
92.2
88.0
80.4
82.9
86.8
87.1
83.7
78.2
82.9
86.7
80.0

0.5
2.1
1.9
2.3
1.6
0.9
1.3
3.2
2.3
1.8
1.7
2.3
3.6
2.7
2.4
2.9

CARAGA

82.2

2.1

78.1

86.2

2.5

ARMM

45.6

2.7

40.3

50.9

5.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

Lower limit

Upper limit

% CV

270

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table E.6


Nutritional Disorders/
%
Region
B. Night Blindness (Matangmanok)
Philippines
31.1
Ilocos Region
32.5
Cagayan Valley
32.4
CAR
40.1
Central Luzon
32.9
NCR
35.3
CALABARZON
31.7
MIMAROPA
27.5
Bicol Region
33.6
Western Visayas
31.4
Central Visayas
28.7
Eastern Visayas
31.0
Zamboanga Peninsula
22.3
Northern Mindanao
30.7
Davao Region
32.6
SOCCSKSARGEN
31.2
CARAGA
30.9
ARMM
11.7
C. Iodine Deficiency/ Goiter (Bosyo)
Philippines
87.8
Ilocos Region
85.8
Cagayan Valley
91.6
CAR
91.2
Central Luzon
89.4
NCR
96.5
CALABARZON
90.3
MIMAROPA
83.5
Bicol Region
84.1
Western Visayas
92.6
Central Visayas
92.7
Eastern Visayas
88.4
Zamboanga Peninsula
83.9
Northern Mindanao
85.2
Davao Region
88.2
SOCCSKSARGEN
82.4
CARAGA
88.5
ARMM
44.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE

0.5
2.4
2.3
2.5
1.9
1.6
1.5
2.3
2.2
2.2
1.8
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.5
2.5
2.9
1.4

0.4
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.1
0.5
1.0
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.0
1.4
2.5
1.8
1.9
2.1
1.7
2.4

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit

30.0
27.8
27.9
35.2
29.2
32.1
28.7
23.0
29.3
27.2
25.2
26.8
17.9
26.5
27.7
26.2
25.3
8.9

87.1
82.4
89.0
88.7
87.3
95.5
88.4
79.5
81.0
90.6
90.8
85.6
78.9
81.8
84.4
78.3
85.1
39.9

32.1
37.1
36.9
45.0
36.6
38.4
34.7
32.0
37.8
35.7
32.2
35.2
26.8
34.9
37.5
36.1
36.5
14.5

88.5
89.3
94.2
93.7
91.5
97.5
92.2
87.4
87.3
94.7
94.6
91.2
88.8
88.7
91.9
86.5
91.8
49.3

% CV

1.7
7.3
7.1
6.2
5.8
4.5
4.9
8.4
6.5
6.9
6.3
6.9
10.2
6.9
7.6
8.1
9.3
12.2

0.4
2.1
1.5
1.4
1.2
0.5
1.1
2.4
1.9
1.1
1.1
1.6
3.0
2.1
2.2
2.5
1.9
5.4

271

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table E.6


Nutritional Disorders/
Region

D. Hypertension (Altapresyon)
Philippines
88.7
Ilocos Region
87.5
Cagayan Valley
88.8
CAR
88.1
Central Luzon
90.6
NCR
95.7
CALABARZON
92.6
MIMAROPA
80.7
Bicol Region
82.8
Western Visayas
92.4
Central Visayas
92.1
Eastern Visayas
89.1
Zamboanga Peninsula
84.3
Northern Mindanao
85.2
Davao Region
90.8
SOCCSKSARGEN
83.2
CARAGA
89.4
ARMM
60.3

SE

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit

Upper limit

% CV

0.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
0.6
0.8
2.4
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.5
2.2
2.0
1.7
2.2
1.8
2.3

88.0
84.4
85.8
85.0
88.7
94.5
91.1
76.1
79.7
90.3
89.6
86.1
80.0
81.3
87.5
79.0
85.9
55.7

89.4
90.5
91.9
91.1
92.5
96.9
94.1
85.3
86.0
94.5
94.5
92.2
88.5
89.2
94.2
87.4
92.8
64.8

0.4
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.1
0.6
0.8
2.9
1.9
1.2
1.4
1.7
2.5
2.4
1.9
2.6
2.0
3.9

0.4
1.7
1.7
2.2
1.1
0.7
1.0
2.3
1.7
1.2
1.3
1.8
2.1
1.9
2.0
2.2
1.8
2.5

83.6
80.5
83.7
79.7
86.9
90.9
85.2
75.5
75.4
84.7
85.0
78.6
75.0
78.1
80.2
74.3
79.2
46.4

85.1
87.3
90.4
88.3
91.1
93.8
89.2
84.6
82.2
89.6
90.1
85.5
83.3
85.5
88.0
82.8
86.3
56.3

0.5
2.1
2.0
2.6
1.2
0.8
1.2
2.9
2.2
1.4
1.5
2.2
2.7
2.3
2.3
2.7
2.2
4.9

E. Diabetes Mellitus (Diyabetes)


Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

84.3
83.9
87.1
84.0
89.0
92.3
87.2
80.0
78.8
87.1
87.5
82.1
79.1
81.8
84.1
78.5
82.8
51.4

Facts and Figures, 2011

272

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table E.6


Nutritional Disorders/
%
Region
F.Tuberculosis
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

Appendix Table E.7


Region
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

88.6
87.5
91.1
89.6
89.7
97.0
90.9
84.9
82.9
91.8
90.5
89.1
83.5
85.6
89.3
83.5
88.7
61.2

SE
0.4
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.1
0.5
1.0
2.0
1.8
1.1
1.3
1.6
2.2
1.9
1.6
2.0
1.6
2.3

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
87.9
84.1
88.4
87.0
87.6
96.1
89.0
81.0
79.5
89.6
88.0
86.0
79.2
81.9
86.2
79.6
85.5
56.7

89.3
90.8
93.8
92.1
91.7
98.0
92.9
88.8
86.4
94.0
93.1
92.2
87.8
89.3
92.3
87.4
92.0
65.6

% CV
0.4
1.9
1.5
1.5
1.2
0.5
1.1
2.3
2.1
1.2
1.4
1.8
2.6
2.2
1.8
2.4
1.9
3.7

Knowledge on proper duration of exclusive breastfeeding


among mothers by region: Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence Interval
%
SE
% CV
Lower limit
Upper limit
35.1
38.1
15.9
36.2
22.2
46.8
30.5
21.5
34.3
42.7
28.5
50.7
26.7
26.9
45.3
51.5
33.8
31.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

0.6
2.4
1.8
2.8
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.5
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.6
2.8
2.2
2.8
2.4

34.0
33.4
12.3
30.7
18.9
43.5
27.6
17.7
30.0
37.7
24.2
46.1
22.4
21.8
39.8
47.2
28.3
27.2

36.2
42.7
19.5
41.8
25.5
50.0
33.5
25.3
38.6
47.7
32.9
55.3
31.0
32.0
50.7
55.8
39.3
36.4

1.6
6.3
11.5
7.8
7.6
3.5
5.0
9.0
6.4
6.0
7.8
4.6
8.1
9.7
6.1
4.2
8.4
7.4

273

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table E.8


Region

Knowledge on the timing of introducing complementary food


among mothers by region: Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence Interval
%
SE
(weighted)
% CV
Lower limit
Upper limit

Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM
Appendix Table E.9
Region

50.9
42.2
55.0
51.9
53.0
53.4
53.3
52.4
46.6
58.8
49.5
38.4
54.9
56.3
50.9
49.8
45.8
38.8

0.5
2.4
2.7
2.7
1.8
1.5
1.6
2.5
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.4

49.8
37.5
49.7
46.6
49.5
50.4
50.0
47.4
42.6
55.2
45.5
34.1
50.2
52.0
46.3
44.6
40.5
34.2

51.9
46.9
60.2
57.2
56.4
56.4
56.5
57.3
50.5
62.3
53.5
42.6
59.5
60.5
55.6
55.0
510
43.5

1.0
5.7
4.9
5.2
3.3
2.9
3.1
4.8
4.3
3.1
4.1
5.6
4.3
3.9
4.7
5.3
5.9
6.1

Mothers hand washing practices among mothers by region:


Philippines, 2011
95% Confidence Interval
%
SE
% CV
Lower limit
Upper limit

A. Before Food Preparation


Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

46.1
64.7
57.0
46.2
54.3
45.7
52.5
48.1
49.7
36.1
44.2
36.2
41.6
40.0
35.0
51.5
34.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

0.6
2.5
2.9
2.5
2.3
1.6
1.8
3.2
2.2
2.5
2.5
2.6
3.0
2.4
2.2
3.1
2.2

44.9
59.8
51.4
41.3
49.8
42.6
49.0
41.8
45.3
31.2
39.4
31.1
35.7
35.4
30.7
45.3
30.2

47.3
69.6
62.6
51.1
58.8
48.8
56.0
54.4
54.1
40.9
49.0
41.2
47.6
44.7
39.3
57.6
38.8

1.3
3.9
5.0
5.4
4.3
3.5
3.4
6.7
4.5
6.9
5.5
7.2
7.3
5.9
6.3
6.1
6.3

274

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table E.9


Region

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit

SE

B. Before Eating
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

88.7
94.0
92.5
85.5
88.7
87.9
91.2
88.4
86.6
91.7
91.1
93.3
89.3
90.6
90.5
83.0
92.1
62.5

0.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
0.9
0.9
1.4
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.8
1.2
2.1

88.0
91.4
89.9
82.9
86.2
86.0
89.4
85.7
83.7
89.3
88.6
91.3
86.4
88.1
87.7
79.5
89.8
58.5

89.3
96.6
95.1
88.1
91.1
89.7
93.0
91.1
89.5
94.1
93.5
95.3
92.1
93.2
93.3
86.5
94.5
66.5

0.4
1.4
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.1
1.0
1.5
1.7
1.3
1.4
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.6
2.1
1.3
3.3

C. After Eating
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

70.1
78.7
71.4
63.3
72.5
70.6
77.8
63.6
66.1
72.2
68.7
72.4
59.5
68.4
69.4
64.3
74.6
50.6

0.5
2.4
2.7
2.8
1.8
1.5
1.7
2.7
2.3
1.9
2.2
2.1
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.6
2.1

69.0
73.9
66.1
57.8
69.0
67.7
74.4
58.2
61.7
68.4
64.4
68.3
54.3
63.4
64.3
59.3
69.5
46.4

71.1
83.4
76.7
68.9
76.1
73.4
81.2
68.9
70.5
76.0
73.0
76.5
64.7
73.4
74.5
69.2
79.8
54.7

0.8
3.1
3.8
4.5
2.5
2.1
2.2
4.3
3.4
2.7
3.2
2.9
4.5
3.7
3.7
3.9
3.5
4.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

% CV

275

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table E.9

95% Confidence Interval

% CV

Region

SE

D. Before Feeding Child


Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

35.6
39.6
45.9
28.7
43.0
36.2
43.1
30.2
31.8
35.8
31.8
30.7
33.3
35.5
30.0
21.6
36.9
23.8

0.6
2.6
2.9
2.3
2.3
1.6
1.7
3.1
2.2
2.5
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.9
2.3
1.9
3.2
2.1

34.4
34.4
40.3
24.2
38.4
33.1
39.7
24.2
27.4
30.8
27.4
26.0
28.2
29.8
25.6
17.8
30.6
19.7

36.7
44.8
51.6
33.2
47.5
39.4
46.5
36.2
36.2
40.8
36.2
35.3
38.5
41.3
34.5
25.4
43.2
27.9

1.7
6.7
6.3
8.0
5.4
4.4
4.0
10.1
7.0
7.1
7.0
7.7
7.9
8.2
7.5
8.9
8.7
8.8

E. After Child Defecation


Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

30.1
33.3
38.0
23.3
40.6
27.3
40.2
22.4
24.2
27.2
26.5
22.9
21.3
32.2
25.2
17.0
30.3
33.2

0.6
2.2
3.2
2.1
2.5
1.5
1.9
2.8
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.3
3.2
2.0
2.1
3.2
2.0

28.9
29.0
31.7
19.3
35.6
24.3
36.4
17.0
19.9
22.4
22.1
18.5
16.8
25.9
21.3
12.9
24.1
29.2

31.3
37.6
44.2
27.4
45.5
30.4
44.0
27.8
28.4
32.0
30.9
27.4
25.8
38.4
29.1
21.1
36.5
37.1

2.0
6.6
8.4
8.9
6.3
5.6
4.8
12.3
9.0
9.0
8.5
9.8
10.7
10.0
7.9
12.4
10.5
6.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

Lower limit

Upper limit

276

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table E.9


Region
F. After Using Toilet
Philippines
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
CAR
Central Luzon
NCR
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
CARAGA
ARMM

SE

45.3
50.6
47.2
38.7
53.5
43.6
54.2
37.0
38.9
48.9
45.4
44.0
27.2
43.6
43.7
33.1
51.1
37.9

0.6
2.8
2.9
2.6
2.5
1.6
1.9
2.8
2.2
2.5
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.8
2.3
2.4
2.7
2.1

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% Confidence Interval


% CV
Lower limit
Upper limit

44.1
45.1
41.5
33.5
48.6
40.3
50.5
31.5
34.5
43.9
40.9
39.1
22.3
38.0
39.1
28.3
45.7
33.8

46.5
56.0
52.8
43.9
58.4
46.8
57.9
42.5
43.3
53.9
49.9
49.0
32.2
49.2
48.3
37.9
56.4
41.9

1.4
5.5
6.1
6.8
4.7
3.8
3.5
7.6
5.8
5.2
5.0
5.7
9.2
6.5
5.4
7.4
5.3
5.4

277

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

F. Food Insecurity Status of Households


Appendix Table F.1

Province
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Romblon
Palawan
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Iloilo
Guimaras
Negros Occidental

Percent of food insecure households by region and by province:


Philippines, 2011
n

Percent

1,144
143
151
183
667
1,006
341
481
121
63
911
149
356
107
131
100
68
1,646
107
452
342
400
202
113
30
2,314
1,983
387
528
360
332
376
923
80
162
265
116
300
1,338
305
114
411
74
218
216
1,310
87
89
166
529
406
33

54.6
54.1
54.4
47.4
56.7
66.5
65.7
65.9
65.5
77.1
57.2
61.0
36.5
71.8
85.4
75.5
58.7
63.7
58.4
60.9
68.1
62.4
68.3
67.2
54.1
63.8
16.2
65.0
58.4
51.3
64.8
55.2
73.4
58.9
85.8
65.7
66.3
79.4
78.2
83.2
63.2
79.2
87.8
74.5
77.8
74.7
79.2
68.6
80.7
73.6
73.6
84.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
2.0

2.0

2.6

5.7
5.5
5.4
2.6
3.0
3.0
7.0
7.0

4.6
4.9
10.1
2.9
4.9
5.4
1.5
5.7
2.6
3.2
3.8
4.4
5.5
7.7
1.4
1.0
3.1
3.0
3.1
3.7
3.7
2.2
4.7
3.8
4.6
7.6
3.9
1.7
3.0
7.5
2.9
3.0
5.8
3.7
1.4
4.7
5.7
4.0
2.2
2.7
7.6

95 % CI
LL
UL
50.7
58.6
42.9
65.3
43.5
65.2
36.8
58.1
51.7
61.8
62.6
70.5
59.8
71.7
60.1
71.8
51.7
79.3
63.3
90.9
52.0
62.3
52.1
70.0
26.9
46.1
51.9
91.7
79.6
91.2
65.9
85.0
48.0
69.3
60.7
66.8
47.2
69.6
55.7
66.0
61.9
74.3
55.0
69.9
59.7
77.0
56.3
78.0
39.0
69.3
61.1
66.5
14.2
18.2
59.0
71.1
52.5
64.4
45.3
57.4
57.6
72.0
48.0
62.5
69.0
77.8
49.7
68.0
78.3
93.3
56.7
74.6
51.5
81.2
71.7
87.1
74.8
81.6
77.2
89.1
48.6
77.9
73.6
84.9
82.0
93.7
63.3
85.8
70.6
84.9
71.9
77.5
69.9
88.4
57.4
79.8
72.9
88.6
69.3
78.0
68.4
78.9
69.6
99.5

CV
3.7
10.6
10.2
11.5
4.5
3.0
4.6
4.5
10.8
9.1
4.6
7.5
13.4
14.1
3.5
6.5
9.2
2.4
9.8
4.3
4.6
6.1
6.4
8.2
14.2
2.1
6.4
4.7
5.2
6.0
5.7
6.7
3.1
7.9
4.4
7.0
11.4
4.9
2.2
3.7
11.8
3.6
3.4
7.7
4.7
1.9
6.0
8.3
5.0
3.0
3.6
9.0

278

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued... Appendix Table F.1


Province
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
ZamboangaSibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent

1,331
251
806
254
20
1,197
128
490
179
241
88
910
301
476
133
1,097
296
34
234
168
365
999
206
519
134
140
1,171
349
471
201
150
993
290
239
228
236
1,211
100
295
424
216
176

77.7
80.4
78.0
74.2
75.0
74.3
77.3
77.1
74.9
72.8
54.0
72.5
82.1
72.0
51.8
77.6
80.4
79.9
77.3
65.5
80.5
72.0
72.7
68.3
83.3
75.8
80.0
85.5
76.5
78.1
80.7
70.1
77.3
72.6
58.6
69.7
91.5
76.2
96.6
89.8
94.3
93.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.4

1.8

2.1

2.0

2.1

2.1

2.2

1.0

3.3
1.7
3.7
7.4
4.5
2.7
5.5
4.6
6.0
3.1
2.6
8.6
3.3
7.7
4.9
8.3
2.3
5.1
3.1
3.8
5.2
2.5
3.4
5.3
7.3
4.0
4.2
4.1
4.9
5.5
1.0
2.0
1.8
3.3

95 % CI
LL
74.9
73.9
74.7
66.9
60.6
70.7
68.4
71.9
64.1
63.7
42.3
68.4
76.0
67.0
34.9
73.7
74.0
64.8
67.6
49.1
75.9
67.8
62.8
62.2
75.9
65.7
76.0
80.6
69.9
67.6
66.4
65.8
69.5
64.5
50.5
60.0
89.5
65.4
94.7
85.9
90.8
87.1

UL
80.4
87.0
81.3
81.5
89.4
77.9
86.1
82.4
85.7
81.9
65.8
76.5
88.2
77.0
68.6
81.4
86.8
94.9
86.9
81.8
85.1
76.2
82.7
74.4
90.8
85.9
84.0
90.4
83.1
88.5
95.1
74.5
85.2
80.8
66.7
79.3
93.6
87.0
98.6
93.8
97.9
99.9

CV
1.8

2.5

4.1
2.2
5.0
9.8

5.8
3.5
7.3
6.4
11.1
2.8
3.8
3.6
16.6
2.6
4.1
9.6
6.4
12.7
2.9
3.0
7.0
4.5
4.6
6.8
2.6
2.9
4.4
6.8
9.1
3.1
5.2
5.7
7.0
7.1
1.1
7.2
1.0
2.2
1.9
3.5

279

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table F.2

Province
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Romblon
Palawan
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Iloilo
Guimaras
Negros Occidental

Percentage of food insecure mothers by region and by province:


Philippines, 2011
n

Percent

1,144
143
151
183
667
1,006
341
481
121
63
911
149
356
107
131
100
68
1,646
107
452
342
400
202
113
30
2,314
1,983
387
528
360
332
376
923
80
162
265
116
300
1,338
305
114
411
74
218
216
1,310
87
89
166
529
406
33

25.3
11.2
15.2
24.0
30.7
27.5
30.2
26.6
23.5
27.7
14.5
16.1
8.4
6.8
26.7
27.9
14.3
26.7
15.9
26.8
26.0
27.2
32.2
28.5
24.8
33.0
29.0
31.0
29.6
22.7
32.5
29.2
38.7
31.5
48.1
26.9
31.0
48.0
38.7
45.2
28.4
39.7
27.7
34.1
41.8
39.4
36.5
56.9
42.1
40.8
31.7
54.1

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.5

1.6

1.4

1.3

2.5
3.8
4.2
2.0
2.7
2.3
4.2
9.5
3.1
1.8
2.2
4.4
6.7
5.3

4.7
2.7
3.0
2.5
3.4
4.6
14.8
1.2
1.3
3.3
2.7
2.4
3.0
2.7
2.1
4.9
4.6
2.9
6.0
4.5
1.6
3.0
3.9
3.2
5.4
4.0
3.8
1.6
7.1
7.5
5.9
2.3
2.9
6.0

95 % CI
LL
UL
22.3
28.3
6.3
16.0
7.7
22.8
15.7
32.3
26.7
34.7
24.3
30.6
25.0
35.4
22.1
31.1
15.3
31.7
9.1
46.2
11.7
17.2
10.1
22.1
4.8
12.1
2.4
11.1
18.0
35.3
14.8
41.1
3.9
24.7
24.1
29.3
6.7
25.0
21.5
32.0
20.0
31.9
22.3
32.1
25.4
38.4
19.5
37.4
0
53.7
30.7
35.3
26.5
31.4
24.6
37.5
24.3
34.9
18.0
27.5
26.6
38.5
23.9
34.5
34.6
42.9
21.8
41.1
39.1
57.2
21.1
32.6
19.2
42.7
39.2
56.8
35.6
41.8
39.3
51.1
20.7
36.0
33.3
46.0
17.0
38.4
26.2
42.0
34.3
49.3
36.2
42.6
22.6
50.5
42.1
71.7
30.6
53.7
36.3
45.3
26.0
37.5
42.4
65.8

CV
6.0
22.1
25.1
17.6
6.6
5.9
8.8
8.6
17.8
34.2
9.7
18.9
21.9
32.9
16.5
24.1
37.1
5.0
29.4
10.1
11.6
9.2
10.7
16.0
59.7
3.6
4.4
10.6
9.1
10.7
9.3
9.2
5.5
15.7
9.6
10.9
19.4
9.3
4.1
6.7
13.7
8.1
19.6
11.9
9.2
4.2
19.5
13.2
14.0
5.6
9.2
11.0

280

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table F.2


Province

Percent

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
ZamboangaSibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

1,331
251
806
254
20
1,197
128
490
179
241
88
71
910
301
476
133
1,097
296
34
234
168
365
999
206
519
134
140
1,171
349
471
201
150
993
290
239
228
236
1,211
100
295
424
216
176

38.9
33.4
41.8
34.5
35.0
36.9
46.1
35.1
40.8
34.7
34.1
32.4
40.4
42.5
41.2
32.3
41.3
44.8
29.7
48.1
31.0
40.1
41.9
43.9
40.8
45.5
40.4
50.2
49.0
44.8
61.0
57.5
30.9
33.9
36.8
20.2
31.3
78.9
51.9
79.6
77.9
86.4
87.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.8

1.7

2.2

2.1

2.2

2.5

2.0

1.6

4.7
2.4
3.3
6.8
5.9
2.5
4.8
4.3
5.4
6.1
3.5
3.2
5.5
3.4
7.6
6.3
5.4
2.9
4.6
3.1
5.9
5.5
4.1
3.9
6.9
6.4
3.0
4.5
3.9
4.1
8.8
2.9
2.5
3.2
5.3

95 % CI
LL
UL
35.3
42.5
24.1
42.7
37.1
46.5
28.0
40.9
21.7
48.3
33.5
40.3
34.5
57.8
30.1
40.1
31.4
50.2
26.3
43.2
23.6
44.7
20.4
44.5
36.1
44.7
35.6
49.5
34.8
47.5
21.6
43.1
37.3
45.4
38.1
51.5
14.9
44.5
35.7
60.4
20.5
41.5
34.5
45.8
37.6
46.2
34.9
53.0
34.7
46.8
34.0
57.1
29.7
51.1
45.4
55.1
40.9
57.1
37.2
52.4
47.5
74.4
45.0
70.0
27.0
34.7
28.0
39.7
27.9
45.6
12.6
27.9
23.4
39.2
75.8
82.1
34.7
69.1
73.9
85.4
72.9
82.9
80.1
92.8
77.3
97.9

CV
4.7
14.1
5.7
9.5
19.4
4.7
12.9
7.2
11.8
12.4
15.8
18.9
5.5
8.3
7.8
17.0
5.0
7.6
25.5
13.1
17.3
7.2
5.2
10.5
7.6
12.9
13.5
4.9
8.4
8.7
11.2
11.1
6.4
8.8
12.2
19.3
12.9
2.1
16.9
3.7
3.3
3.7
6.0

281

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table F.3

Province
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental

Percentage of food insecure children by region and by province:


Philippines, 2011
n

Percent

1,138
143
151
183
661
1,005
340
481
121
63
911
149
356
107
131
100
68
1,646
107
452
342
400
202
113
30
2,314
1,983
387
528
360
332
376
923
80
162
265
300
116
1,338
305
114
411
74
218
216
1,309
87
89
166
405
529
33

16.4
4.9
6.7
15.2
21.3
17.8
19.7
16.4
17.7
18.3
7.1
4.0
4.8
2.9
13.8
14.6
10.1
15.4
6.4
15.3
12.9
14.7
22.3
22.4
21.4
18.0
16.2
17.6
15.6
12.4
20.8
15.5
26.3
17.5
33.3
17.4
33.8
21.6
27.8
36.0
27.4
27.5
16.6
21.8
26.5
21.1
21.7
29.5
23.4
16.3
21.8
32.9

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.3

1.4

1.0

0.9

1.9
2.4
3.2
2.0
2.4
1.9
3.4
7.6
1.5
1.3
1.5
2.4
6.5
4.1

2.4
2.0
1.8
1.7
2.1
4.8
13.1
0.9
1.0
2.9
2.1
2.1
2.5
2.1
2.1
4.7
4.2
2.5
4.7
4.9
1.3
2.7
3.4
2.6
3.7
3.2
3.1
1.3
4.3
4.8
5.3
2.2
1.9
9.0

95 % CI
LL
UL
13.8
19.1
1.2
8.5
2.0
11.4
8.9
21.5
17.5
25.2
15.1
20.5
14.9
24.4
12.8
20.1
11.1
24.3
3.3
33.2
5.1
9.2
1.0
7.0
2.2
7.3
0.0
5.9
9.1
18.4
1.9
27.3
2.1
18.0
13.6
17.2
1.7
11.1
11.4
19.1
9.3
16.4
11.3
18.1
18.1
26.5
12.9
31.9
0
47.1
16.3
19.8
14.2
18.2
12.0
23.2
11.5
19.6
8.3
16.5
15.9
25.7
11.4
19.6
22.3
30.4
8.3
26.6
25.1
41.5
12.4
22.4
24.7
43.0
12.0
31.2
25.2
30.3
30.7
41.2
20.7
34.1
22.4
32.6
9.3
24.0
15.6
28.1
20.3
32.6
18.5
23.7
13.1
30.2
20.1
38.9
12.9
33.9
11.9
20.7
18.0
25.6
15.2
50.7

CV
8.1
38.5
35.6
21.1
9.2
7.7
12.3
11.4
19.0
41.8
14.5
38.3
27.2
51.5
17.3
44.2
40.3
6.0
37.6
12.9
14.1
11.9
9.6
21.6
61.2
5.0
6.4
16.2
13.2
16.8
12.0
13.5
7.8
26.7
12.6
14.6
13.8
22.7
4.7
7.4
12.5
9.5
22.5
14.6
11.9
6.3
20.0
16.3
22.8
13.7
8.9
27.5

282

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table F.3


Province

Percent

Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
ZamboangaSibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
Sarangani
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

1,331
251
806
254
20
1,197
128
490
179
241
88
71
910
301
476
133
1,097
296
34
234
168
365
999
206
519
134
140
1,170
349
470
201
150
993
290
239
228
236
1,211
100
295
424
216
176

26.0
25.8
26.3
25.1
25.0
24.0
33.1
22.4
26.8
23.1
21.7
16.9
25.5
23.3
28.3
19.6
27.0
33.2
17.7
31.5
17.3
24.6
26.1
26.5
26.3
27.7
23.7
35.8
34.0
30.0
43.6
49.6
20.6
23.5
25.0
14.0
18.6
64.3
34.9
58.0
66.3
76.4
72.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.7

1.6

1.9

1.9

2.0

2.3

1.7

4.8
2.2
3.3
2.0
5.9
2.0
5.4
4.1
4.9
5.1
2.9
3.1
3.4
3.5
7.1
6.1
3.9
2.5
5.0
2.6
5.2
4.8
3.2
3.3
7.8
6.5
3.2
3.9
3.4
3.0

2.0
10.1
3.7
3.0
5.5
5.5

95 % CI
LL
UL
22.6
29.3
16.4
35.1
22.0
30.5
18.6
31.7
21.0
29.0
20.9
27.1
21.4
44.8
18.6
26.3
16.3
37.4
15.1
31.0
12.2
31.2
6.9
26.9
21.7
29.3
17.7
28.8
22.3
34.4
13.0
26.2
23.3
30.8
26.3
40.2
3.9
31.6
19.5
43.4
9.6
24.9
19.6
29.5
22.2
30.0
16.7
36.3
21.1
31.4
17.5
37.9
14.3
33.1
31.3
40.4
27.7
40.3
23.4
36.5
28.2
58.9
36.8
62.3
17.2
23.9
17.3
29.7
17.4
32.7
7.5
20.6
12.7
24.5
60.4
68.3
15.2
54.7
50.7
65.3
60.5
72.2
65.6
87.2
61.9
83.7

CV
6.6
18.5
8.3
13.3
8.2
6.6
18.0
8.7
20.0
17.6
22.4
30.1
7.6
12.3
10.9
17.1
7.1
10.7
39.7
19.4
22.6
10.3
7.5
18.9
10.0
18.8
20.2
6.4
9.4
11.2
18
13.1
8.3
13.4
15.6
23.9
16.1
3.1
28.8
6.4
4.5
7.2
7.6

283

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

G. Participation of Households to Nutrition and Related Programs


Appendix Table G.1 Percent of households participating in Botika ng Barangay
Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San
Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela
LasPinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

Percent of
Household

SE

95% Confidence Interval

Lower limit

Upper limit

CV (%)

27.6

0.6

26.5

28.7

2.0

26.8
36.8
56.7
21.5
19.4
22.7
19.2
25.0
19.6
33.3
36.8
46.3
30.7
29.3
39.4
33.7
62.4
30.9
23.1
41.7
32.1
21.6
25.7
34.9
56.0
21.7
8.9
22.5

2.2
7.0
5.9
6.0
2.8
2.5
3.6
4.0
5.2
16.1
3.3
10.2
10.8
5.0
10.5
8.9
7.8
1.9
18.9
8.0
3.5
3.2
3.8
6.1
7.9
1.1
2.0
1.9

22.5
23.1
45.1
9.7
13.9
17.8
12.1
17.1
9.5
1.7
30.3
26.3
9.5
19.5
18.7
16.3
47.0
27.2
0
25.9
25.3
15.4
18.4
22.9
40.5
19.5
5.0
18.8

31.2
50.5
68.3
33.3
24.8
27.7
26.4
32.8
29.7
64.9
43.3
66.3
51.9
39.1
60.0
51.1
77.7
34.5
60.2
57.4
39.0
27.8
33.1
46.8
71.5
23.9
12.9
26.3

8.3
19.0
10.5
28.0
14.4
11.1
18.9
16.0
26.3
48.3
9.0
22.0
35.2
17.1
26.7
26.4
12.5
6.0
82.1
19.3
10.8
14.6
14.6
17.5
14.1
5.1
22.5
8.5

28.3

2.5

23.5

33.1

8.7

21.9

2.1

17.7

26.1

9.8

26.7
16.9
28.6
39.0
18.8
26.8
35.0
36.1
36.7
37.9
25.8
49.0

1.6
3.2
3.3
3.6
3.1
4.0
2.5
8.0
5.5
5.5
3.0
8.9

29.8
23.2
35.0
46.1
24.9
34.6
39.9
51.8
47.6
48.7
31.7
66.5

5.9
19.3
11.5
9.2
16.5
15.0
7.1
22.2
15.1
14.5
11.7
18.2

Facts and Figures, 2011

23.6

30.1

10.5
22.1
32.0
12.7
18.9
20.4
25.9
27.1
19.9
31.5

284

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table G.1


Percent of
Region
Household
Bicol Region
24.7
Albay
18.1
Camarines Norte
33.9
Camarines Sur
28.0
Catanduanes
4.3
Masbate
23.1
Sorsogon
30.3
Visayas
Western Visayas
29.8
Aklan
32.9
Antique
44.5
Capiz
32.0
Guimaras
19.5
Iloilo
32.0
Negros Occidental
25.0
Central Visayas
20.1
Bohol
31.5
Cebu
15.6
Negros Oriental
26.0
Siquijor*
0
Eastern Visayas
20.3
Biliran
29.3
Eastern Samar
3.8
Leyte
17.4
Northern Samar
14.8
Southern Leyte
23.7
Western Samar
38.8
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
30.8
Zamboanga del Norte
36.5
Zamboanga del Sur
27.1
Zamboanga Sibugay
29.9
Northern Mindanao
44.0
Bukidnon
49.1
Camiguin
1.5
Lanao del Norte
30.4
Misamis Occidental
50.0
Misamis Oriental
48.7
Davao Region
39.6
Compostela Valley
37.1
Davao del Norte
44.7
Davao del Sur
36.7
Davao Oriental
49.9
SOCCSKSARGEN
26.1
North Cotabato
18.6
South Cotabato
34.9
Sultan Kudarat
18.5
Sarangani
25.3
CARAGA
39.2
Agusan del Norte
26.1
Agusan del Sur
50.2
Surigao del Norte
42.4
Surigao del Sur
40.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
2.3
3.7
8.8
4.0
2.6
6.1
6.9

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
20.2
29.1
10.9
25.3
16.7
51.2
20.3
35.8
0
9.3
11.1
35.1
16.7
43.9

2.6
10.5
13.0
8.7
14.2
4.6
3.7
2.3
6.7
2.6
5.8
0
2.7
7.7
3.9
3.5
7.4
12.0
9.2

24.7

3.0
5.6
3.9
8.4
3.0
5.9
1.6
6.0
7.6
5.6
2.7
7.8
5.5
3.7
7.4
2.6
4.4
4.5
6.8
5.7
3.2
5.4
6.2
6.9
7.0

25.0

15.7

15.1

38.1

34.4

20.9

33.0

12.4
19.1
14.9
0
22.9
17.8
18.4
10.5
14.6
0
14.2
0
10.5
0.4
0.1
20.8
25.5
19.4
13.5
37.5
0
18.6
35.2
37.8
21.9
33.8
29.4
35.3
10.0
26.0
5.1
14.1
15.5
38.1
28.9
27.0

34.9

24.6

25.6

36.6

49.9

44.9

31.2

45.4

53.4
70.0
49.1
47.3
41.0
32.2
44.7
20.7
37.5
0
44.4
11.5
24.3
29.3
47.4
56.9
47.6
34.8
46.3
60.7
4.6
42.1
64.8
59.7
52.3
55.6
43.9
64.5
27.3
43.7
31.9
36.5
36.7
62.4
55.9
54.4

CV(%)
9.1
20.3
25.9
14.1
60
26.5
22.9
8.8

31.8
29.1
27.2
72.7
14.4
14.6
11.3
21.3
16.7
22.4
0
13.2
26.3
101.7
20.2
49.8
50.7
23.7
9.7

6.9

6.7

15.4
14.5
28.0
12.0
106
19.7
15.1
11.5

20.9
12.4
10.0
14.9
10.1
23.6
13.0
36.9
22.6
8.1
20.7
12.3
16.2
17.2

285

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.1


Region
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
22.6
37.2
9.5
25.6
44.7
6.0

SE
3.3
11.7
5.2
5.8
10.6
1.8

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
16.1
29.2
14.3
60.0
0
19.8
14.2
37.1
23.8
65.5
2.4
9.5

CV (%)
14.8
31.4
55.1
22.7
23.8
30.1

Appendix Table G.2 Percent of households participating in Free Medical


Services by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San
Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela/
Las Pinas/ Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig

Percent

SE

57.7

0.4

47.0
57.1
43.1
50.0
44.7
49.7
53.2
48.0
44.4
52.6
56.4
55.0
60.9
54.7
53.4
49.2
74.7
47.7
48.8
50.8
46.6
40.9
49.0
54.5
53.7
62.5
60.8
60.1

2.4
7.6
7.8
5.1
3.0
2.0
3.2
3.0
5.0
10.2
2.2
7.3
4.4
3.6
5.1
5.4
3.9
1.5
12.8
6.9
2.7
2.8
3.4
3.8
5.8
1.1
3.1
1.7

58.2

2.1

69.6

1.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
56.9
58.5
42.3

45.8

52.1

44.8

60.4

0.7

66.9
63.4

5.1
13.4
18.2
10.2
6.8
4.0
6.0
6.3
11.3
19.4
3.9
13.3
7.2
6.6
9.6
10.9
5.2
3.1
26.2
13.6
5.9
6.8
6.9
6.9
10.8
1.7
5.1
2.8

54.0

62.4

3.7

66.0

73.2

2.7

42.1
27.7
40.0
38.8
47.0
42.1
34.6
32.6
40.6
52.4
47.6
43.3
38.7
67.0
23.7
37.3
41.2
35.5
42.4
47.1
42.3
54.7
56.8

51.7

CV (%)

53.6

60.6

50.6

64.6

72.0
58.5
60.0
50.7
59.4
54.0
54.3
72.7
69.4
69.5
61.8
63.5
59.8
82.3
73.9
64.4
52.0
46.4
55.6
61.9
65

286

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.2


Region
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
48.8
53.8
49.1
62.4
44.2
52.8
52.0
61.4
31.1
45.7
49
60.4
52.2
58.6
36.6
59.7
52.5
67.0
53.9
64.4
41.5
53.4
58.3
74.7
57.3
63.8
56.0
69.0
53.1
76.4
49.0
60.9
44.3
72.4
50.5
67.6
60.3
76.1

Percent

SE

51.3
55.7
48.2
56.7
38.4
54.7
55.4
48.2
59.7
59.1
47.5
66.5
60.6
62.5
64.8
55.0
58.3
59.1
68.2

1.3
3.4
2.2
2.4
3.7
2.9
1.6
5.9
3.7
2.7
3.0
4.2
1.7
3.3
5.9
3.0
7.2
4.4
4.0

57.8
56.4
57.6
65.5
75.0
53.3
58.3
65.4
66.4
65.2
67.6
38.5
58.5
73.0
45.1
64.1
69.0
18.3
60.1

1.8
5.1
4.4
3.6
5.2
3.7
2.9
1.5
3.2
1.9
4.1
15.7
2.1
5.2
8.7
2.6
5.5
8.0
6.2

54.3

53.1
59.0
53.6
35.0
66.4
70.1
48.3
53.7
67.1
71.9
68.2
69.6
71.9
67.6
63.6

2.0
3.0
3.0
5.3
1.6
3.0
7.8
4.0
3.6
2.9
1.6
3.5
3.8
2.2
4.1

49.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

62.4

54.3

63.2

65.2

46.4
48.8
58.6
64.8
46.1
52.7
60.2
61.5
59.5
7.7
62.8
27.9
59.0
58.3
2.6
47.9
53.1
47.8
24.7
64.3
32.9
45.9
60.0
66.3
62.8
64.4
63.3
55.5

61.2

68.4

62.6

56.9

69.6

71.3

66.4
66.3
72.5
85.3
60.6
63.9
72.7
68.9
75.8
69.3
83.3
62.2
69.1
79.7
34.0
72.2
64.9
59.4
45.3
75.9
63.6
61.6
74.2
77.6
76.4
79.3
71.8
71.7

CV (%)
2.5

6.1
4.5
4.2
9.7
5.3

3.0
12.3
6.2
4.5
6.4
6.3
2.8
5.3
9.2
5.5
12.3
7.4
5.9
3.0

2.3

9.0
7.7
5.4
7.0
6.9
4.9

4.8
2.9
6.1
40.9
3.6
7.2
19.4
4.0
7.9
43.8
10.3
3.7
5.1
5.5
15.0
2.5
4.2
16.2
7.4
5.4
4.0
2.3
5.0
5.3
3.2
6.5

287

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.2


Region

Percent

SE

SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

68.6
62.7
67.6
73.9
79.2
70.8
68.0
71.3
73.0
71.4
52.1
54.2
45.2
69.8
57.3
16.9

1.6
2.9
2.6
3.1
3.6
1.7
2.2
2.9
4.2
4.5
2.0
7.3
5.0
2.2
3.7
3.4

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
65.5
71.6
56.9
68.5
62.5
72.8
67.9
80.0
72.3
86.2
67.3
74.2
63.6
72.4
65.6
77.0
64.8
81.2
62.5
80.3
48.2
55.9
39.9
68.6
35.3
55.1
65.4
74.2
49.9
64.6
10.3
23.5

CV (%)
2.3

2.5

4.7
3.9
4.2
4.5
3.3
4.1
5.7
6.3

3.8
13.5
11.2
3.2
6.5
19.9

Appendix Table G.3 Percent of households participating in Free Dental


Services by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales

Percent

SE

40.0

0.4

30.4
43.9
20.4
36.3
27.9
39.0
42.3
37.9
33.6
39.9
40.4
26.3
47.7
44.9
29.5
38.6
48.8
34.8
47.0
41.7
31.6
34.1
30.1
47.2
35.2

1.9
6.9
4.4
4.7
2.3
1.7
3.3
2.5
3.6
7.9
2.1
4.6
7.1
3.6
5.8
4.8
5.1
1.2
13.5
0.5
2.3
2.4
2.5
4.5
4.1

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
39.2
40.8

1.0

26.6

6.3

35.6

36.3

32.4

30.3
11.7
27.0
23.3
35.9
33.1
26.5
24.5
17.2
33.7
37.8
18.2
29.2
38.8
20.5
31.5
27.1
29.4
25.2
38.5
27.1

34.1

42.5

44.5

37.3

57.4
29.0
45.5
32.5
48.7
42.8
40.7
55.3
35.3
61.6
51.9
40.8
41.5
58.7
73.4
51.8
36.1
38.9
34.9
56.0
43.3

CV (%)

4.5

5.2

3.6

15.8
21.7
13.0
8.4
7.7
6.6
10.8
19.7
17.6
15
8.0
19.6
8.9
10.4
28.7
1.6
7.3
7.1
8.2
9.5
11.7

288

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.3


Region
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela/
Las Pinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
47.2
51.6
37.4
49.8
45.8
52.4

Percent

SE

49.4
43.6
49.1

1.1
3.2
1.7

44.6

2.5

39.7

49.5

5.6

56.2

2.1

52.1

60.3

3.8

33.4
35.9
32.4
34.9
24.3
38.0
39.0
37.6
44.3
46.6
33.4
30.5
31.0
32.2
17.4
27.9
33.1
34.1
39.4

1.2
3.0
2.2
2.4
3.5
2.7
1.7
5.6
3.2
3.0
3.3
5.0
1.5
3.1
5.3
2.7
4.1
3.2
3.7

31.1
30.1
28.2
30.3
17.4
32.8
35.6
26.7
38.1
40.7
26.9
20.8
28.1
26.1
7.0
22.6
25.1
27.8
32.1

35.8
41.7
36.7
39.5
31.1
43.3
42.3
48.5
50.5
52.5
39.8
40.3
33.8
38.4
27.8
33.3
41.1
40.5
46.6

3.6

41.6
30.7
51.6
48.8
59.3
35.3
43.5
44.8
42.2
45.0
48.6
26.9
40.8
36.8
40.9
42.0
56.1
17.2
39.7

1.7
3.8
5.5
4.9
3.3
3.2
2.7
1.9
4.5
2.3
5.0
10.1
2.0
2.8
7.9
2.8
5.5
7.3
5.4

38.3
23.2
40.7
39.3
52.8
29.1
38.1
41.1
33.3
40.4
38.7
7.1
36.8
31.3
25.5
36.4
45.3
2.8
29.2

44.8
38.2
62.5
58.3
65.8
41.5
48.8
48.6
51.1
49.5
58.4
46.7
44.8
42.4
56.4
47.5
66.9
31.5
50.2

4.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV (%)
2.3
7.2
3.4

4.4

4.7

4.3

5.0

8.2
6.6
6.7
14.4
7.0
14.8
7.1
6.4
9.9
16.3
9.7
30.5
9.8
12.3
9.5
9.4
12.5
10.7
10
5.6
8.9
6.3
10.8
5.2
10.4
37.5
7.7
19.3
6.7
9.8
42.6
13.5

289

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.3


Region
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent

SE

35.5
45.3
31.6
25.3
47.4
51.8
39.0
29.3
53.5
52.1
46.7
58.3
50.5
45.5
31.9
42.3
34.3
44.6
41.7
55.1
52.1
44.4
52.6
55.9
56.9
29.2
41.1
22.3
43.1
26.7
6.1

1.7
3.1
2.3
4.9
1.7
3.8
5.1
2.8
3.7
3.1
1.9
3.9
4.9
2.6
3.9
1.6
2.9
2.5
4.0
3.7
2.0
3.7
3.9
4.7
4.2
2.1
7.6
4.1
3.9
4.6
2.0

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
32.2

44.1

43.1

39.2

48.1

25.0

39.2
27.2
15.8
44.5
28.9
23.7
46.3
46.0
50.8
40.9
40.5
24.2
28.6
39.7
33.8
47.8
37.2
45.0
46.6
48.8
26.3
14.1
35.4
17.6
2.1

38.7
51.4
36.1
34.8
50.8
59.2
49.1
34.9
60.7
58.3
50.4
65.9
60.1
50.5
39.6
45.4
40.0
49.5
49.6
62.3
56.1
51.5
60.3
65.2
65.1
33.4
55.9
30.4
50.7
35.7
10.1

CV (%)
4.7
6.8
7.2
19.2
3.6
7.2
13.2
9.7
6.8
6.0
4.0
6.6
9.7
5.6
12.3
3.7
8.4
5.6
5.6
6.7
3.9
8.3
7.4
8.5
7.3
7.3
18.4
18.6
9.1
17.3
33.6

Appendix Table G.4 Percent of households participating in Free Philhealth


Care by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino

48.8

0.4

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
48.0
49.6

46.1
49.3
45.8
56.5
42.6
41.5
38.8
42.3
31.5
74.5

1.7
5.8
5.1
3.9
2.2
1.7
3.1
2.5
3.3
6.2

42.7
38.0
35.9
48.9
38.3
38.2
32.6
37.4
25.0
62.4

Percent

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE

49.5
60.6
55.7
64.1
46.9
44.8
44.9
47.2
38.1
86.7

CV (%)
0.8
3.8
11.7
11
6.9
5.1
4.1
8.1
5.9
10.5
8.3

290

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix Table G.4


Region
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San
Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela/
Las Pinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
50.8
59.2
47.2
67.6
21.9
42.4
48.3
61.9
41.9
64.0
40.6
68.0
58.8
80.0
46.8
52.5
51.8
86.0
45.0
65.6
40.6
51.9
32.0
45.2
49.6
61.3
52.6
66.9
38.1
61.4
43.5
47.7
39.4
50.1
43.1
49.6

Percent

SE

55.0
57.4
32.1
55.1
52.9
54.3
69.4
49.6
68.9
55.3
46.3
38.6
55.4
59.7
49.7
45.6
44.8
46.3

2.2
5.2
5.2
3.5
5.6
7.0
5.4
1.5
8.7
5.2
2.9
3.4
3.0
3.6
6.0
1.1
2.7
1.6

39.4

2.3

35.0

43.9

5.7

49.9

2.2

45.5

54.2

4.4

36.4
47.4
26.1
41.0
36.7
33.2
41.2
39.3
27.1
64.4
30.2
37.8
51.2
71.2
56.5
38.5
62.0
40.3
50.2

1.3
3.3
2.4
2.8
3.1
2.8
1.6
3.8
3.0
2.9
3.5
4.2
1.5
2.4
4.4
3.1
6.0
4.0
3.8

33.8
41.1
21.3
35.5
30.5
27.6
38
31.9
21.3
58.7
23.4
29.6
48.2
66.6
47.8
32.4
50.3
32.5
42.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

38.9

44.4

54.2

53.8
30.8
46.5
42.8
38.8
46.7
32.9
70.0
37.0
46.0
75.8
65.2
44.5
73.7
48.1
57.7

CV (%)
3.9
9.1
16.3
6.3
10.7
12.9
7.8
3.0
12.6
9.5
6.2
8.7
5.4
6.1
12.0
2.3
6.1
3.5

3.6

4.0

6.9
9.3
6.8
8.6
8.6

9.6
11.0
4.5
11.6
11.0
3.0
3.3
7.8
8.0
9.6
9.8
7.6

291

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix G.4
Region
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
51.1
68.6
66.7
58.1
66.5
44.8
47.5
51.6
62.3
47.9
55.7
30.8
56.7
45.2
57.1
54.8
71.5
53.9
56.7
47.2
50.3
47.1
45.7
77
74.9
67.0
74.6
79.6
79.6
49.9
43.0
47.4
54.8
37.1
58.5
56.5
64.1
51.4
54.0
64.9
69.5
59.9
61.8
67.1
35.1
22.5
41.2
37.0
40.5
21.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.4
6.4
4.8
4.0
6.6
2.2
2.4
1.4
3.8
1.8
2.7
8.7
1.8
6.3
4.5
2.6
3.3
6.5
5.2
1.6
2.9
2.3
2.1
1.2
2.4
6.6
2.0
3.2
2.2
1.9
4.1
5.6
2.3
4.8
1.7
3.6
2.0
5.1
4.9
1.6
3.0
2.9
3.8
3.2
2.0
5.7
3.9
3.5
5.2
4.3

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit

CV (%)

48.4
56.0
57.3
50.3
53.5
40.6
42.8
48.9
54.9
44.4
50.4
13.6
53.3
32.8
48.3
49.6
65.1
41.0
46.4
44.1
44.6
42.5
41.7
74.6
70.1
54.1
70.7
73.4
75.2
46.2
34.9
36.4
50.2
27.6
55.1
49.4
60.2
41.4
44.4
61.7
63.7
54.3
54.3
60.8
31.1
11.4
33.5
30.2
30.4
13.0

2.7
9.4
7.1
6.8
10.0
4.8
5.0
2.7
6.1
3.7
4.9
28.4
3.1
14.0
7.8
4.8
4.6
12.2
9.2
3.3
5.8
5.0
4.5
1.6
3.3
9.8
2.7
4.0
2.8
3.8
9.6
11.9
4.3
13.1
3.0
6.4
3.1
9.9
9.1
2.5
4.3
4.8
6.1
4.8
5.8
25.2
9.5
9.3
12.8
20.1

53.9
81.2
76.0
65.8
79.4
49.1
52.2
54.3
69.7
51.4
61.0
47.9
60.1
57.6
65.8
59.9
77.9
66.7
67.0
50.2
56.0
51.7
49.8
79.4
79.7
79.9
78.5
85.9
84.0
53.6
51.2
58.5
59.4
46.6
61.9
63.6
68.0
61.3
63.6
68.0
75.3
65.5
69.2
73.4
39.1
33.7
48.8
43.7
50.6
30.0

292

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table G.5 Percent of households participating in Senior Citizen


Program by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San
Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela/
Las Pinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

53.9

0.5

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
52.8
54.9

62.3
71.9
61.5
77.1
57.5
37.6
30.7
48.5
38.5
30.1
46.0
49.1
45.1
54.8
32.7
41.4
33.0
48.7
79.8
55.4
64.3
33.0
42.4
55.2
64.1
71.2
68.2
76.5

2.2
4.2
4.5
4.8
3.1
2.0
3.0
2.7
5.9
6.3
2.3
5.6
5.4
4.1
4.8
8.5
3.9
1.7
9.3
8.3
3.7
2.8
3.4
4.7
6.8
1.6
4.1
2.5

57.9
63.5
52.7
67.7
51.3
33.8
24.8
43.2
26.9
17.8
41.6
38.2
34.5
46.7
23.3
24.8
25.4
45.4
61.5
39.1
57.1
27.5
35.8
46.0
50.9
68.0
60.2
71.6

66.6
80.2
70.4
86.6
63.6
41.5
36.7
53.7
50.1
42.4
50.4
60.0
55.7
62.9
42.2
58.0
40.7
52.1
98.1
71.6
71.6
38.5
49.0
64.5
77.4
74.5
76.2
81.4

3.6
5.9
7.4
6.2
5.5
5.2
9.9
5.6
15.4
20.9
4.9
11.3
12.0
7.6
14.8
20.4
11.8
3.5
11.7
15
5.7
8.5
8.0
8.5
10.6
2.3
6.0
3.3

67.6

3.6

60.7

74.6

5.3

68.8

3.4

62.1

75.4

4.9

46.9
65.5
60.5
71.5
34.1
25.6
43.2
36.6
51.5
37.9
43.7
60.6

1.5
3.7
3.1
3.4
3.2
2.3
2.2
6.3
6.2
3.2
5.0
6.1

44.0
58.3
54.4
64.8
37.7
21.1
38.8
24.2
39.4
31.6
33.8
48.6

49.8
72.7
66.6
78.1
40.4
30.0
47.6
48.9
63.6
44.3
53.6
72.6

3.2
5.6
5.1
4.7
9.5
8.9
5.2
17.3
12.0
8.5
11.5
10.1

Percent

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE

CV (%)
1.0

293

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.5


Percent

SE

Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao

53.2
74.6
49.3
60.6
85.3
31.7
40.6

2.1
4.1
4.4
3.5
5.3
5.5
4.1

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
49.2
57.3
66.5
82.7
40.7
57.9
53.8
67.4
74.9
95.8
20.9
42.4
32.5
48.7

63.2
79.8
74.7
73.1
63.7
62.7
56.5
61.4
64.7
62.5
53.0
73.7
61.7
66.6
60.1
59.9
66.6
52.3
68.5

1.6
3.9
4.8
5.5
8.6
2.6
2.6
1.9
3.8
2.7
3.8
11.3
2.1
7.8
8.8
2.8
4.9
6.7
5.6

60.1
72.1
65.3
62.4
46.7
57.6
51.4
57.6
57.3
57.1
45.6
51.5
57.6
51.4
42.7
54.5
57.1
39.1
57.6

66.3
87.4
84.1
83.9
80.6
67.8
61.6
65.2
72.1
67.9
60.4
95.9
65.8
81.8
77.4
65.4
76.2
65.5
79.5

2.5
4.9
6.4
7.5
13.6
4.1
4.6
3.1
5.8
4.4
7.1
15.4
3.4
11.6
14.7
4.7
7.3
12.9
8.1

Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

40.7
46.4
34.9
55.4
55.5
56.6
31.5
55.8
61.9
57.0
58.5
59.4
54.4
62.1
49.7
48.7
48.3
51.9
49.1
38.6
51.9
48.2
50.7
61.4
48.6

2.5
3.5
3.6
7.2
2.4
5.4
4.9
5.1
6.2
4.3
2.5
6.0
5.8
3.4
6.2
2.6
4.6
4.0
7.4
5.1
2.8
5.2
7.0
3.8
6.0

35.8
39.5
27.9
41.3
50.9
46.1
21.8
45.7
49.8
48.6
53.6
47.6
42.9
55.5
37.7
43.6
39.2
43.9
34.5
28.5
46.3
38.1
37
53.9
36.7

45.7
53.3
42.0
69.5
60.1
67.2
41.1
65.8
74.0
65.5
63.3
71.3
65.9
68.7
61.8
53.7
57.4
59.8
63.6
48.7
57.4
58.3
64.3
68.9
60.5

6.2
7.6
10.3
13.0
4.2
9.5
15.6
9.2
10.0
7.5
4.3
10.2
10.8
5.4
12.4
5.3
9.6
7.8
15.1
13.3
5.5
10.7
13.7
6.2
12.4

Region

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV (%)
3.9
5.5
8.9
5.7
6.3
17.3
10.1

294

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.5


Region
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent

SE

17.1
18.8
41.7
23.9
6.1
7.9

2.2
7.6
5.1
4.5
2.9
3.7

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
12.9
21.3
3.9
33.6
31.8
51.7
15.1
32.6
0.4
11.8
0.5
15.2

CV (%)
12.6
40.3
12.1
18.7
47.4
47.6

Appendix Table G.6 Percent of households participating in Nutrition


Education Program by region and province:
Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/San
Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela/
Las Pinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig

Percent

SE

26.5

0.3

17.2
11.4
21.9
17.4
17.5
16.7
15.7
15.2
17.7
33.2
28.0
26.4
17.6
27.9
34.7
19.4
41.0
26.6
3.8
28.1
31.8
16.5
31.1
22.6
30.9
24.5
21.8
24.3

1.3
2.7
4.7
3.2
1.6
1.2
2.2
1.8
2.6
4.6
1.7
5.1
3.1
2.7
6.1
3.7
5.1
1.2
2.1
4.0
2.4
2.3
3.0
2.9
5.0
0.9
2.6
1.4

26.4
24.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
25.8
27.2
14.7

CV (%)
1.3

6.1
12.8
11.0
14.3
14.4
11.4
11.6
12.7
24.2
24.6
16.3
11.5
22.6
22.7
12.0
30.9
24.2
-0.3
20.2
27.1
12.0
25.3
16.9
21.2
22.7
16.7
21.5

19.7
16.6
31.1
23.7
20.6
19.1
19.9
18.7
22.7
42.2
31.5
36.5
23.8
33.2
46.6
26.7
51.1
29.0
7.8
35.9
36.6
21.0
36.9
28.2
40.7
26.4
26.9
27.1

7.4
23.6
21.2
18.7
9.2
7.3
13.8
11.9
14.5
13.8
6.2
19.5
17.7
9.7
17.6
19.3
12.6
4.6
54.8
14.2
7.6
14.0
9.5
12.7
16.1
3.8
11.9
5.9

1.9

22.6

30.2

7.3

1.9

21.0

28.6

7.8

295

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.6


CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras

25.6
24.1
21.9
28.4
20.5
32.8
28.6
35.5
29.3
14.9
32.1
43.9
25.3
20.9
32.9
23.3
7.7
33.8
29.1

1.1
2.7
2.1
2.7
2.4
2.6
1.4
3.1
4.0
2.4
2.6
3.2
1.5
3.0
3.8
2.8
4.1
5.1
3.7

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
23.4
27.8
18.9
29.4
17.8
26.0
23.1
33.7
15.7
25.2
27.7
37.9
25.9
31.3
29.4
41.6
21.6
37.1
10.2
19.6
27.0
37.3
37.7
50.2
22.3
28.3
15.0
26.8
25.5
40.4
17.8
28.7
-0.3
15.7
23.8
43.8
21.8
36.3

32.7
33.9
33.1
33.2
43.4

1.1
2.8
4.4
3.4
6.5

30.6
28.3
24.5
26.6
30.6

34.9
39.4
41.8
39.9
56.3

3.3
8.4
13.3
10.2
15.1

Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte

28.8
34.7
33.0
33.9
32.3
34.0
40.4
19.6
39.1
10.4
23.0
14.1
9.7

2.1
1.7
1.5
3.1
2.0
3.2
10.2
1.2
4.3
2.8
1.6
4.1
3.8

24.7
31.4
30.1
27.8
28.4
27.7
20.4
17.3
30.6
4.9
19.8
6.1
2.3

32.9
37.9
35.9
40.0
36.1
40.4
60.3
22.0
47.5
15.9
26.2
22.2
17.1

7.3
4.8
4.5
9.2
6.1
9.5
25.2
6.0
11.0
27.0
7.1
29.1
39

18.7

3.5

11.8

25.6

18.8

24.3
29.6
20.8
25.4
39.3
45.0
48.3
21.4
26.1
50.0

1.6
2.7
2.2
4.3
1.9
4.4
4.0
2.0
4.0
3.6

21.2
24.4
16.4
16.9
35.5
36.4
40.5
17.4
18.2
42.9

27.3
34.9
25.2
33.8
43.0
53.5
56.0
25.4
33.9
57.1

6.5
9.1
10.7
17.0
4.9
9.7
8.2
9.5
15.3
7.2

Region

Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental

Percent

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE

CV (%)
4.4
11.1
9.5
9.5
11.8
7.9
4.8
8.8
13.5
16.1
8.2
7.3
6.1
14.4
11.5
11.9
53.1
15.1
12.8

296

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.6


Region

Percent

Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

SE

34.2
44.6
40.4
30.1
32.2
27.4
16.2
31.8
29.6
37.8
32.7
43.5
35.8
31.0
19.4
10.8
18.3
9.5
16.8
4.3
4.8

1.7
3.7
4.7
2.3
3.6
1.5
2.3
2.5
4.6
3.9
1.7
3.7
3.0
3.7
2.8
1.3
4.0
1.5
3.1
2.5
1.7

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
30.9
37.6
37.4
51.8
31.2
49.7
25.6
34.7
25.2
39.3
24.4
30.4
11.6
20.8
26.9
36.7
20.5
38.7
30.2
45.5
29.4
36.1
36.3
50.8
29.8
41.8
23.8
38.1
13.8
25.0
8.3
13.3
10.5
26.2
6.5
12.5
10.8
22.8
-0.7
9.3
1.4
8.2

CV (%)
5.0
8.2
11.6
7.7
11.2
5.6
14.5
7.9
15.7
10.3
5.2
8.5
8.5
11.8
14.7
12.0
21.8
16
18.2
58.8
36.2

Appendix Table G.7 Percent of households participating in Vegetable


Gardening Program by region and province: Philippines,
2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
Pangasinan
La Union
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province

Percent

SE

12.9

0.3

7.6

1.0
2.3
3.8
1.1
3.2
1.5
3.1
1.8
4.6
5.3
1.9
7.9
9.8
1.9
4.1
6.3
5.9

7.7
11.2
6.1
9.8
23.9
33.3
19.4
16.3
19.3
18.8
24.9
33.1
8.1
37.8
17.5
29.8

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
12.3
13.4
5.6

3.3
3.7
4.0
3.6

20.9
27.2
15.8
7.2
8.9
15.2
9.5
13.9
4.3
29.7
5.2
18.2

9.5

12.2
18.6
8.3
16.1
26.9
39.5
22.9
25.3
29.6
22.5
40.3
52.4
11.9
46.0
29.8
41.4

CV (%)
2.2
13.1
29.2
33.9
17.7
32.5
6.5
9.4
9.3
28.4
27.5
10.0
31.6
29.7
23.8
10.9
35.8
19.8

297

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.7


Region

Percent

SE

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit Upper limit
8.2
11.6
3.3
27.2
5.8
18.9
8.2
14.9
5.8
13.4
4.2
10.5
3.7
15.2
4.2
13.6
1.5
2.5
0.2
1.6
1.2
2.7

CV (%)

Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan/
Caloocan/ Malabon/
Navotas/ Valenzuela/
Las Pinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras

9.9
15.2
12.4
11.5
9.6
7.4
9.4
8.9
2.0
0.9
1.9

0.9
6.1
3.3
1.7
1.9
1.6
2.9
2.4
0.3
0.3
0.4

0.7

0.3

0.1

1.3

41.9

3.7

0.7

2.3

5.1

18.9

10.4
15.2
3.0
12.8
15.0
8.7
21.8
31.1
18.8
24.1
17.1
25.7
23.0
12.1
29.1
21.4
15.6
38.2

0.8
2.5
0.7
1.8
2.6
1.5
1.6
3.8
3.6
3.4
2.7
3.9
1.6
2.0
5.3
3.4
7.8
4.4

8.8

10.3
1.6
9.2
9.9
5.7
18.7
23.7
11.7
17.4
11.9
17.9
20.0
8.2
18.7
14.8
0.2
29.6

12.0
20.0
4.4
16.4
20.1
11.7
24.9
38.4
25.9
30.9
22.4
33.4
26.1
15.9
39.6
28.0
31.0
46.8

7.9
16.3
24.0
14.4
17.3
17.5
7.3
12.1
19.3
14.3
15.7
15.4
6.8
16.4
18.3
15.8
50.2
11.5

14.3
10.9
29.9
17.8
20.1

1.2
4.3
5.8
4.4
4.3

11.8

16.7
19.3
41.2
26.4
28.6

8.7
39.6
19.4
24.7
21.6

Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor

11.3
13.1
11.7
32.3
5.1
12.0
30.8

2.2
1.9
1.0
4.2
0.7
2.2
12.8

24.0
3.7
7.7
5.7

15.6
16.3
13.7
40.6
6.5
16.3
55.8

19.1
14.2
8.5
13.1
14.3
18.3
41.6

Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte

16.9
24.9
7.4
12.7
17.0
38.6

1.5
4.1
3.6
1.7
4.9
7.7

16.9
0.3
9.2
7.3
23.5

19.9
32.9
14.5
16.1
26.7
53.7

8.9
16.4
49.1
13.8
29.0
20.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

2.4
18.5
9.1
11.6

9.8

14

7.1
9.5

8.8
40.0
27.0
14.6
20.0
21.7
31.2
26.8
12.7
39.4
19.9

298

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.7


Region
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent
16.6
25.6
9.6
26.5
22.9
26.5
15.6
18.9
36.0
17.1
18.3
22.9
25.6
12.7
29.1
15.3
9.9
16.6
13.9
25.9
25.3
21.1
27.9
38.1
16.3
4.4
5.6
0.3
7.3
3.5
3.7

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE
1.4
3.3
1.3
5.2
1.8
3.6
2.0
3.2
6.0
2.7
1.5
3.4
4.3
1.7
5.5
1.4
1.9
2.3
3.3
4.8
1.7
3.0
3.4
4.2
3.2
0.9
2.6
0.3
2.1
2.2
1.2

95% Confidence Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit

CV (%)

13.8
19.2
6.9
16.3
19.4
19.4
11.6
12.6
24.3
11.8
15.4
16.2
17.3
9.3
18.4
12.7
6.2
12.1
7.5
16.6
22
15.2
21.3
29.8
10.0
2.6
0.5
-0.3
3.2
-0.9
1.4

8.7
12.8
14.0
19.6
7.8
13.6
13.1
17.1
16.6
15.9
8.0
15
16.6
13.6
18.8
8.9
19.3
13.8
23.5
18.3
6.7
14.3
12.1
11.1
19.7
21.2
46.1
102.5
28.8
63.4
32.2

19.4
32.0
12.2
36.7
26.4
33.6
19.6
25.3
47.7
22.4
21.2
29.7
34
16.1
39.9
18
13.6
21.1
20.4
35.3
28.7
27.1
34.5
46.4
22.5
6.2
10.6
0.8
11.5
7.9
6.0

299

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table G.8

Result of iodized salt survey: Philippines, 2011

Information Data
Aware of iodized salt (n=38,894)
Not aware
Reported users of iodized salt
All survey households (38,894)
All households aware of iodized salt (29,827)

Percent
78.7
21.3

46.6
59.3

Sources of information on iodized salt (29,857)


Television
Radio
Print Media (Newspaper/magazine,comics)
IEC Materials (flyers/pamphlets, billboards/posters)
Govt Health Personnel (doctors, nurses, midwifes,
BNS/BHW)
Relatives/Friends/Neighbors
Others

17.2
13.4

Meaning of Iodized Salt(29,857)


Prevent goiter
Good for the brain
Good for the body
Good for pregnant women
Clean/refined
Added with iodine
Others

38.6
15.0
27.0
1.4
16.7
14.9
17.9

Reasons for stopping iodized salt (8,809)


Not available in stores, market, centers
Expensive than ordinary salt
Different taste/form from ordinary salt
Run out of stock
Forgot to buy
Others

27.9
23.2
13.0
19.6
8.5
15.8

Reasons for not ever using iodized salt (2,965)


Not available in stores, market, centers
Expensive than ordinary salt
Different taste/form from ordinary salt
Not interested
Others

20.1
24.3
13.3
16.5
19.8

Frequency use of iodized salt (18,064)


Daily
Weekly
Monthly

91.5
7.4
1.1

Facts and Figures, 2011

37.5
6.5
2.9
1.2
46.4

300

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Continued Appendix G.8


Information Data
Perception on cost of Iodized salt (18,064)
Cheap
Just right
Expensive than ordinary salt

Percent of
household
18.4
69.4
12.2

Market sources (18,064)


Sari-sari stores
Market/talipapa
Grocery/supermarket
Ambulant vendors
Health centers/Hospitals
Given free
Others

31.6
33.7
38.3
1.4
4.1
1.4
1.5

Type of packaging (18,064)


No package, bought in Takal
In package with label
In package without label

33.8
44.9
21.4

Storage container (N=18,064)


Transparent with cover
Colored bottle with cover
Clay pot
Others

80.5
13.8
1.0
4.7

Frequency of buying
Today/yesterday
Last week
Last month
Others

24.9
48.8
17.0
9.4

Facts and Figures, 2011

301

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Appendix Table G.9 Percent awareness on iodized salt among the households
by region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Viscaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela
LasPinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon

78.7

0.3

95% Confidential Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
78.1
79.3

74.2
64.9
74.9
71.4
76.9
81.1
82.1
80.9
74.2
91.9
83.9
76.2
70.7
92.5
85.9
60.5
92.2
87.2
95.7
94.3
87.4
82.7
90.1
86.6
81.8
88.0
88.7
89.4

1.3
3.2
3.5
3.7
1.6
1.3
2.3
1.6
5.1
3.1
1.4
5.5
6.0
1.3
3.7
5.5
2.3
0.8
4.0
1.8
1.4
22.6
1.4
1.9
2.9
0.7
1.8
1.0

71.7
58.5
68.1
64.2
73.7
78.5
77.7
77.6
64.2
85.9
81.2
65.5
58.8
90.0
78.7
49.7
87.7
85.7
87.9
90.7
84.7
78.2
87.5
82.8
76.2
86.6
85.1
87.5

76.7
71.2
81.7
78.5
80.1
83.7
86.6
84.1
84.2
97.9
86.7
86.9
82.5
94.9
93.2
71.2
96.6
88.7
103.5
97.9
90.2
87.1
92.8
90.3
87.4
89.5
92.2
91.4

1.7
5.0
4.6
5.1
2.1
1.6
2.8
2.0
6.9
3.3
1.7
7.2
8.5
1.4
4.3
9.1
2.4
0.9
4.1
1.9
1.6
2.7
1.5
2.2
3.5
0.8
2.0
1.1

90.1

1.2

87.8

92.2

1.3

84.4

1.7

81.0

87.9

2.1

90.2
87.9
90.7
93.4
86.1
91.5
78.6
81.7
83.6
76.5
76.7
79.7

0.6
1.8
1.4
0.9
1.4
1.5
1.5
3.0
4.4
2.8
2.7
2.9

89.0
84.4
88.0
91.6
83.3
88.7
75.7
75.9
74.9
70.9
71.3
74.1

91.4
91.3
93.4
95.2
88.8
94.4
81.5
87.6
92.3
82.1
82.0
85.3

0.7
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.6
1.6
1.9
3.7
5.3
3.7
3.5
3.6

Percent

Facts and Figures, 2011

SE

%CV
0.4

302

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.9


Region
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Mindanao
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur

Percent

SE

95% Confidential Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
75.3
80.2
72.3
84.0
81.1
92.5
75.3
83.1
60.9
81.3
69.6
80.1
66.7
81.3

77.7
78.1
86.8
79.2
71.1
74.8
74.0

1.2
3.0
2.9
2.0
5.2
2.7
3.7

74.4
77.1
60.5
79.9
60.8
76.9
73.7
74.5
74.5
76.4
69.0
67.3
57.7
68.3
40.5
61.5
55.1
57.9
57.3

1.2
4.7
6.2
3.5
5.2
2.1
1.7
1.2
3.2
1.5
2.9
3.3
1.4
6.3
2.6
2.0
5.8
3.1
3.3

72.0

68.5
63.7
69.9
78.2
79.4
85.9
70.4
55.2
86.1
85.6
76.1
84.0
87.6
72.2
66.4
74.7
72.0
84.7
65.8
60.6
72.5
81.6
75.7
69.6
61.7

1.8
2.8
2.5
3.8
1.3
2.0
2.9
3.8
3.3
2.2
1.7
2.7
3.0
2.6
3.3
1.7
3.4
2.0
6.3
3.4
1.5
2.6
2.6
3.6
3.2

65.0

Facts and Figures, 2011

72.2

55.0

%CV
1.6
3.8
3.4
2.5
7.3
3.6
5.0

55.9
35.4
57.6
43.8
51.8
50.7

76.7
86.4
72.7
86.8
71.1
81.0
77.1
76.9
80.9
79.2
74.6
73.8
60.4
80.7
45.6
65.3
66.4
63.9
63.9

1.6
6.1
10.3
4.4
8.6
2.7
2.4
1.6
4.3
1.9
4.2
4.9
2.4
9.2
6.4
3.2
10.5
5.3
5.8

58.2
65.0
70.7
76.8
82.0
64.6
47.8
79.6
81.2
72.8
78.8
81.7
67.1
60.0
71.3
65.4
80.8
53.4
53.9
69.4
76.5
70.7
62.5
55.4

72.0
69.2
74.8
85.7
82.0
89.9
76.1
62.7
92.7
89.9
79.3
89.3
93.4
77.3
72.9
78.1
78.6
88.5
78.2
67.3
75.5
86.7
80.8
76.8
68.0

2.6
4.4
3.6
4.9
1.7
2.4
4.2
6.9
3.9
2.6
2.2
3.2
3.4
3.6
4.9
2.3
4.7
2.3
9.6
5.6
2.1
3.2
3.4
5.2
5.2

67.8
48.2
73.0
50.6
72.7
70.2
68.2
73.5
63.4
60.8

303

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.9


Region

Percent

ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

29.3
39.3
30.9
34.8
15.6
25.3

SE
2.4
10.8
5.6
36.2
4.3
5.7

95% Confidential Interval


Lower limit
Upper limit
24.6
33.9
18.1
60.5
19.9
41.9
27.7
41.9
7.2
24.1
14.2
36.5

%CV
8.1
27.5
18.1
10.4
27.5
22.4

Appendix Table G.10 Percent users of iodized salt among the households by
region and province: Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Apayao
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Central Luzon
Aurora
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
NCR
Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
Sn Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela
LasPinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig

Percent

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
45.8
47.4

CV (%)

46.6

0.4

40.1
34.4
42.1
38.4
41.4
60.3
58.6
61.0
61.3
61.9
61.5
38.2
51.0
71.9
62.3
48.2
69.2
36.1
38.7
38.3
38.2
33.0
41.3
26.9
32.2
53.7
55.1
51.6

1.9
5.3
5.2
4.7
2.4
1.6
3.1
2.2
4.0
5.4
1.9
7.0
6.8
2.2
6.3
5.2
6.7
1.3
8.6
5.5
2.4
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.9
1.0
2.6
1.6

36.4
23.9
31.8
29.1
36.7
57.1
52.5
56.7
53.5
51.3
57.7
24.5
37.6
67.6
49.9
38.0
56.0
33.5
21.8
27.5
33.5
26.9
35.2
21.1
24.6
51.7
50.1
48.4

43.7
44.8
52.3
47.7
46.1
63.4
64.6
65.3
69.2
72.4
65.3
52.0
64.3
76.3
74.8
58.3
82.3
38.7
55.6
49.0
42.9
39.2
47.4
32.7
39.7
55.6
60.1
54.7

4.7
15.4
12.4
12.2
5.8
2.7
5.3
3.6
6.5
8.7
3.1
18.3
13.3
3.1
10.1
10.8
9.7
3.6
22.2
14.4
6.3
9.4
7.5
11.2
12.1
1.9
4.7
3.1

52.2

2.1

48.0

56.5

4.0

56.6

2.0

52.7

60.6

3.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

0.9

304

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G10


Region
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA
Marinduque
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Guimaras
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Biliran
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Southern Leyte
Western Samar
Zamboanga Peninsula
Zamboanga del Norte
Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay
Mindanao
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Compostela Valley
Davao del Norte
Davao del Sur
Davao Oriental

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
52.5
58.0
36.3
49.8
47.9
59.8
60.6
70.6
38.2
52.2
59.7
71.1
43.5
50.6
56.8
71.0
51.4
69.4
36.9
49.6
25.6
39.0
52.1
74.3
38.1
46.2
26.6
43.3
54.3
74.6
32.5
46.9
11.7
42.9
32.5
55.3
36.4
58.4

Percent

SE

55.2
43.1
53.9
65.6
45.2
65.4
47.0
63.9
60.4
43.2
32.3
63.2
42.2
34.9
64.4
39.7
27.3
43.9
47.4

1.4
3.5
3.0
2.5
3.6
2.9
1.8
3.6
4.6
3.2
3.4
5.7
2.1
4.3
5.2
3.7
7.9
5.8
5.6

33.3
35.6
32.6
32.6
26.4
27.9
37.8
49.5
55.6
49.1
45.7
42.3
38.2
35.3
25.2
38.9
42.9
47.2
38.4
38.8
19.9
50.0
46.0

1.7
9.2
4.6
5.1
6.1
2.8
2.8
1.4
3.0
1.9
3.0
10.5
1.5
4.2
3.4
2.3
5.7
3.9
3.6
2.1
2.8
3.2
5.2

30.0
17.6
23.6
22.6
14.5
22.4
32.4
46.7
49.7
45.4
39.8
21.8
35.2
27.1
18.6
34.4
31.8
39.6
31.3
34.7
14.4
43.8
35.9

36.7
53.7
41.5
42.5
38.4
33.4
43.2
52.3
61.5
52.9
51.5
62.9
41.1
43.5
31.7
43.4
54.0
54.7
45.5
42.9
25.4
56.3
56.2

5.1
25.8
14.1
15.6
23.1
10.0
7.4
2.8
5.4
3.9
6.6
24.8
3.9
11.9
13.5
5.9
13.3
8.3
9.4
5.4
14.1
6.4
11.3

57.4
71.9
53.0
35.7
59.0
58.1
53.3
64.7
66.5
48.6
41.0

1.7
2.7
3.8
3.6
5.2
3.0
1.8
3.5
3.3
2.7
4.3

54.1
66.6
45.5
28.8
48.7
52.3
49.8
57.9
60.0
43.3
32.6

60.7
77.1
60.5
42.7
69.3
63.9
56.9
71.5
73.0
54.0
49.3

3.0
3.8
7.2
10.1
8.8
5.2
3.4
5.4
5.0
5.6
10.5

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV (%)
2.5
8.1
5.6
3.8
8.0
4.4
3.8
5.6
7.6
7.4
10.5
9.0
5.0
12.3
8.1
9.3
28.9
13.2
11.8

305

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table 10
Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-Tawi

Percent

SE

48.6
49.7
56.2
34.1
39.4
52.7
50.7
49.8
57.2
53.7
13.8
20.8
14.8
18.9
3.8
9.0

1.8
3.1
3.0
4.9
4.0
1.7
3.1
2.9
3.9
3.3
1.5
8.3
3.5
2.7
1.4
2.7

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
45.1
52.2
43.6
55.9
50.2
62.1
24.5
43.7
31.5
47.3
49.5
56.0
44.7
56.8
44.1
55.6
49.5
64.8
47.1
60.2
10.9
16.7
4.6
37.0
7.9
21.7
13.5
24.2
1.1
6.6
3.8
14.2

CV (%)
3.7
6.3
5.3
14.4
10.2
3.2
6.1
5.8
6.8
6.1
10.9
39.9
23.6
14.3
36.8
30.0

Appendix Table G.11 Percent of households salt positive to potassium iodate


using the salt testing solution by region and province:
Philippines, 2011
Region
Philippines
Luzon
Ilocos Region
Ilocos Norte
Ilocos Sur
La Union
Pangasinan
Cagayan Valley
Cagayan
Isabela
Nueva Vizcaya
Quirino
CAR
Abra
Benguet
Ifugao
Kalinga
Mountain Province
Apayao
Central Luzon
Bataan
Bulacan
Nueva Ecija
Pampanga
Tarlac
Zambales
Aurora

Percent

SE

80.1

0.4

92.2
75.3
94.4
97.1
94.1
87.6
85.7
88.6
92.7
79.6
95.3
99.2
95.9
94.8
96.7
83.5
97.4
44.3
42.5
39.4
39.9
41.5
58.7
64.2
48.4

1.4
8.0
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.6
2.7
2.5
2.8
8.4
0.8
0.8
0.8
2.2
1.6
7.1
1.5
1.7
6.8
2.8
4.4
3.3
5.4
7.4
11.6

Facts and Figures, 2011

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
79.3
80.8
89.5
59.6
91.4
95.4
91.5
84.4
80.5
83.8
87.1
63.1
93.6
97.5
94.3
90.5
93.7
69.5
94.4
41.0
29.1
0.3
31.2
35.1
48.2
49.8
0.3

94.9
91.0
97.4
98.8
96.8
90.7
90.9
93.4
98.2
96.1
96.9
100.8
97.6
99.0
99.8
97.4
100.4
47.7
55.8
44.8
48.6
47.9
69.2
78.6
71.2

CV (%)
0.5
1.5
10.6
1.6
0.9
1.4
1.8
3.1
2.8
3.0
10.6
0.9
0.8
0.9
2.3
1.6
8.5
1.6
3.9
16.1
7.0
11.2
7.9
9.1
11.5
24.0

306

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G. 11
Region

Percent

NCR

Manila
Mandaluyong/Marikina/
Pasig/Quezon City/
San Juan/
Caloocan/Malabon/
Navotas/Valenzuela
LasPinas/Makati/Pasay/
Pateros/Muntinlupa/
Paranaque/Taguig
CALABARZON
Batangas
Cavite
Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
MIMAROPA

SE

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
76.7
80.9
81.6
91.3
68.9
76.6

CV (%)

78.8
86.4
72.7

1.1
2.5
1.9

1.4
2.8
2.7

85.2

2.0

81.4

89.0

2.3

77.6

2.0

73.6

81.6

2.6

77.1
63.9
77.8
82.7
81.3
79.5
66.1

1.5
3.7
3.7
2.4
4.5
2.4
1.9

74.2
56.6
70.6
78.1
72.4
74.8
62.4

80.1
71.2
85.0
87.4
90.2
84.2
69.9

2.0
5.8
4.7
2.9
5.6
3.0
2.9

Marinduque

93.8

3.6

86.6

100.9

3.9

Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Palawan
Romblon
Bicol Region
Albay
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Catanduanes
Masbate
Sorsogon
Visayas
Western Visayas
Aklan
Antique
Capiz
Iloilo
Negros Occidental
Guimaras
Central Visayas
Bohol
Cebu
Negros Oriental
Siquijor
Eastern Visayas
Eastern Samar
Leyte
Northern Samar
Western Samar
Southern Leyte
Biliran
Zamboanga Peninsula

56.7
86.7
32.7
91.4
89.4
88.3
95.7
92.4
77.5
78.0
96.2

6.1
3.3
3.8
2.4
1.2
2.6
2.6
1.6
7.6
4.0
2.4

44.8
80.3
25.4
86.7
87.1
83.2
90.7
89.3
62.6
70.1
91.6

68.6
93.1
40.1
96.1
91.7
93.4
100.7
95.6
92.4
85.9
100.8

10.7
3.8
11.5
2.6
1.3
3.0
2.7
1.7
9.8
5.2
2.4

87.6
97.7
92.9
97.9
86.4
85.1
56.3
94.6
95.2
95.2
92.4
94.2
97.8
100.0
98.1
95.1
97.1
98.2
98.5
43.6

1.3
1.0
2.4
8.5
3.0
2.0
4.0
0.8
1.4
1.1
1.8
1.7
0.6
0
0.6
2.5
2.6
0.9
1.0
2.4

85.0
95.7
88.2
96.2
80.5
81.2
48.5
93.1
92.4
93.0
88.9
91.0
96.6
96.9
90.1
91.9
96.3
96.6
39.0

90.1
99.6
97.7
99.6
92.4
88.9
64.1
96.2
98.0
97.3
95.8
97.5
99.0
99.4
100.0
102.2
100.4
100.4
48.2

27.3

1.5
1.0
2.6
0.9
3.5
2.3
7.1
0.8
1.5
1.1
1.9
1.8
0.6
0
0.6
2.7
2.7
1.0
1.0
5.4

16.4

65.2
64.4

6.2
11.0

Zamboanga del Norte


Zamboanga del Sur
Zamboanga Sibugay

Facts and Figures, 2011

20.7

3.4

14.1

58.2
52.9

3.6
5.8

51.1
41.5

307

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

ContinuedAppendix Table G.11


Region
Mindanao
Northern Mindanao
Bukidnon
Camiguin
Lanao del Norte
Misamis Occidental
Misamis Oriental
Davao Region
Davao del Norte

Davao del Sur

Davao Oriental
Compostela Valley
SOCCSKSARGEN
North Cotabato
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Sarangani
CARAGA
Agusan del Norte
Agusan del Sur
Surigao del Norte
Surigao del Sur
ARMM
Basilan
Lanao del Sur
Maguindanao
Sulu
Tawi-tawi

Percent
85.6
94.0
93.6
81.3
74.0
86.3
95.7
94.4

SE
1.5
1.4
2.6
4.5
5.2
2.8
0.7
2.1

95% confidence interval


Lower limit Upper limit
82.6
91.2
88.4
72.6
63.9
80.9
94.2
90.1

88.5
96.7
98.7
90.1
84.2
91.7
97.1
98.6

1.8
1.5
2.8
5.5
7.0
3.2
0.8
2.3

0.9
1.7
0.6
1.2
0.8
0.9
1.8
0.6
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.6
2.6
25.2
0.6
1.1
35.4
40.4

95.9

1.0

94.0

97.9

97.7
94.6
96.7
95.5
97.9
97.2
95.4
96.8
93.9
97.4
97.6
98.9
65.9
21.3
98.4
95.6
5.3
15.2

9.0
1.6
0.5
1.1
0.8
2.3
1.7
0.5
1.4
0.1
1.0
0.6
1.7
5.3
0.6
1.1
1.9
6.2

96.0
91.4
95.7
93.3
96.3
95.6
92.1
95.8
91.0
95.5
95.7
97.7
62.4
10.8
97.2
93.5
1.6
3.2

99.5
97.7
97.8
97.8
99.5
98.9
98.7
97.9
96.7
99.3
99.6
100.0
69.3
31.9
99.6
97.7
9.0
27.3

Facts and Figures, 2011

CV (%)

1.0

308

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

2011 Updating of Nutritional Status and Other Population Groups


Research Team
Project Director
Project Leaders

Mario V. Capanzana, Ph.D


Corazon M. Cerdea (until May 2011)
Jocelyn A. Juguan, Ph.D (June 2011 to date)

Study Leaders
Socio-Economic
Anthropometry
Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices
Government Program Participation of Children
Maternal Nutrition
Food Insecurity
Government Program Participation of Households

Cynthia A. Nones
Ma. Lilibeth P. Dasco
Mildred O. Guirindola
Ma. Adrienne S. Constantino
Eva A. Goyena
Jocelyn A. Juguan, Ph.D
Milagros C. Chavez

Team Coordinators
Team i
Team ii
Team iii
Team iv
Team v

Ma. Adrienne S. Constantino


Ma. Lilibeth P. Dasco
Milagros C. Chavez
Charmaine A. Duante
Mildred O. Guirindola

Assistant Team Coordinators


Team i
Team ii
Team iii
Team iv
Team v

Crisanta M. Delos Reyes


Ma. Belina N. Nueva Espaa
Juamina Belen T. Quiogue
Magelende B. Casio
Zenaida S. Isada
Ma. Erlinda R. Tarrayo

Josie L. Platon
Carolina R. Pine
Clarissa J. Cruz
Ana Maria B. Francisco
Marlon O. Balitaon

Financial Manager (Special Disbursing Officer)


Dulce S. Concepcion

Statisticians/Programmers
Jeffrey Y. De Leon
Eldridge B. Ferrer

Mae Ann SA. Javier


Myra Rebelyn Lopez

Glen Melvin P. Gironella

Ma. Lynell M. Valdeabella

Support Staff
Remedios S. America
Nelisa P. Cortez
Ma. Sheryl C. Velasco

Facts and Figures, 2011

309

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Team Leaders
Maritess E. Ambayec
Agape Paula D. Apolinar
Rovea Ernazelle G. Austria
Abbey Gail V. Bacay
Marife L. Baluyot
Sharon M. Begino
Michelle A. Bertillo
Geneveve G. Campo
Quennie SA. Campo
Leonalyn A. Coloma
Donie S. Corpuz
Joseph A. Desnacido
Daysie E. Espina
Jacqueline B. Estalilla
Jasmin F. Francisco
Matchelle I. Gannaban
Rommel F. Juan
Daisy Gail P. Mangabat

Elvie C. Monceda
Maricel C. Muga
Jay S. Paniterce
Odessa L. Panliboton
Sheinna A. Parajes
Maricar C. Parcon
Taharudin B. Rachman
Johna P. Remerata
Allan R. Reyes
Amparo D. Rivero
Alpha Amor O. Saguban
Armin S. Salcedo
Cecilia S. Salen
Caryl Denn D. Sayson
Rex S. Timpug
Juvy A. Vidal
Phoebe Gay R. Villanueva
Rona C. Vito

Local Anthropometric Researchers


Marianne S. Abanilla
Sheila Mae D. Ablando
Alden G. Acedera
Karen Ann D. Acoba
Mayjulyn Fe P. Agduma
Agnes M. Aguilar
Rose Ann C. Algura
Jan Fran Kristian P. Alindato
Melisa B. Allosada
Kathrina N. Almenie
Linalen K. Amilbahar
Bienvenido E. Ander
Katherine Q. Ang
Guillermo B. Anonas Jr.
Arcelyn G. Arahan
Romina Joy Anne A. Aralar
Maricris C. Aro
Nadzjima T. Asakil
Shaweda M. Asarud
Ethel Whitney Chloe D. Ayala
Frances Daphne D. Ayala
Mary N. Azib
Jowell D. Balagtas
Michelle B. Balberona
Cyrene Joy S. Balonzo
Catherine V. Bantayaon
Michael A. Barandino
Maria Concepcion C. Barase
Suratul Ragda J. Basa
Jan Michael G. Belen
Lani C. Belleza

Facts and Figures, 2011

Criselda E. Gaytano
Sherwin F. Gente
Milan A. Gonzales
Ray Pathrick T. Gordula
Gian Jay D. Grijalvo
Alvin S. Gulla
Edelisa V. Hilario
Ma. Kristina M. Hortilano
Neriah Joy T. Isada
Analiza Marie F. Jacob
Roseniwati K. Jahuran
Ryan E. Jasareno
Ressielyn B. Javier
Shyne E. Javier
Dayana R. Kaing
Merl-Shariff M. Kalain
Kyrene S. Laihee
Melody H. Lamangen
Ailleen L. Laurentino
Alvin P. Limbauan
Jimmy A. Lina
Michelle P. Llabres
Janine Paola B. Magbanua
Edzar F. Maharail
Jea Girl R. Malacad
Mc Jason Howard C. Mallillin
Junnalyn L. Mamites
Janice Manalastas
Jenifer V. Mangaron
Blessy Grace P. Marasigan
Rebecca T. Masil
310

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Local Anthropometric Researchers


Hermely Bernardino
Jay-Jay A. Bertillo
Sayatul A. Berto
Joel S. Bisen
Linoernbar D. Blanco
Klark Adrian S. Borje
Leslie T. Borromeo
Jasmine Joy M. Bulan
Laarni F. Bueno
George C. Bura-Ay Jr.
Rose Ann B. Cachuela
Robert Paul H. Caf
Sheila P. Cahanap
Katrina Mae R. Camba
Marvin C. Campos
Peter L. Caparida Jr.
Herald M. Carpio
Lealyn A. Catiyan
Maria Jovylyn R. Cenidoza
Harold King R. Combalicer
Dianne Y. Constantino
Lady Rose D. Corpus
Rhea C. Crisostomo
Aera DJ. Cualing
Ed Priann R. Dalisay
Christina Damlani
Zhab-Ar R. Daniel
Sherhaina Dansalan
Cristina N. Dasco
Gerald C. De Guzman
Rachelle G. Dela Cruz
John Michael A. De Leon
Armando S. De Luna
Maureen A. Dickson
Norenz Paul D. Dizon
Rica Paula M. Domingo
Clarine K. Dumpit
Mario M. Ergina Jr.
Reina B. Esmeralda
Riza B. Esmeralda
Darwin T. Espia
Christine B. Espiritu
Michelle DJ. Espiritu
Merlinda A. Estrella
Danilo F. Fernando
John Cesar E. Florendo
Kiarah Louise P. Florendo
Gerwin N. Flores
April R. Francisco
Aviegel C. Francisco
Jhon S. Francisco
Andrea M. Galang
Gemmalyn R. Galeon
Irene Q. Garces

Facts and Figures, 2011

Divine Mae A. Mayomis


Carina M. Miranda
Rona S. Molina
Mary Rose S. Mondala
Chrisremsel A. Montenegro
Polly M. Morales Jr.
Elsa R. Nieves
Kenneth V. Nuez
Riza M. Orbita
Milfred P. Paca-anas
Nancy E. Paclos
Lai-yan O. Padang
Lita Jane N. Pandosen
Mark Paul V. Panganiban
Edna R. Panoy
Lanie P. Par
Mae Pearl C. Patricio
Nina Ricci F. Pelobello
Ellaine O. Policarpio
Maria Lourdes D. Presto
Shiela Luz M. Punzalan
Lyka N. Putong
Carol Ann P. Que
Menche Q. Quezon
Abigail V. Quilatan
Mary Anne G. Ramirez
Anna Teresita S. Reginaldo
Ricky E. Reovoca
Carol Fe C. Repil
Elaine M. Romero
Ma. Adela D. Rubio
Angelique V. Salac
Annabel C. Salcedo
Erwin Y. Salen
Maricar B. Sangalang
Angelica M. Sarmiento
Maureen B. Siasol
Diana Z. Sicat
Cherradee O. Simondac
Jihada H. Sirajan
Karen T. Tarrobago
Aeron Jay P. Tasic Jr.
Kristine S. Titar
Jo-Mart E. Tabillo
Karen T. Tarrobago
Mary Frances R. Tongson
Jeanette M. Torrecampo
Michelle Pearl Darling R. Trinidad
Stewart P. Utuanis
Johannes G. Velasco
Ma. Cristina L. Velez
Christine Q. Verano
Matthew M. Wang
Gemuel C. Zalsos
311

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

Data Encoders
Alejandro C. Alejandro
John Rey V. Breboneria
Geneveve G. Campo
Quennie Sa. Campo
Mark Lester M. Cadayong

Ahdrian Camilo C. Gernale


Arlene V. Julian
Mary Grace Olorvida
Cathlyn Joy M. Peque
Archie C. Umlas

Science Aides
Arden P. Andres
Raylin M. Sarad
Junel C. Trinidad
Jumar P. Tuazon

Facts and Figures, 2011

312

PHILIPPINE NUTRITION FACTS AND FIGURES 2011

FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT PERSONNEL

Administrative Office
Dr. Ferdinand B. Oamar
Ma. Helen Fortuna R. Pilariza

- Chief FAD
- Administrative Aide

Personnel and Records Section


Remia V. Estrella
Myrna A. Sobrevega
Honey Grace B. Barrientos
Laila R. Porlucas
Herminigilda L. Agustin

- Administrative Officer V
- Administrative Officer IV
- Administrative Officer III
- Science Research Analyst
- Administrative Assistant II

Budget Section
Naomi O. Solis
Joselita Salamera
Romana Llamas

- Budget Officer V
- Budget Officer IV
- Budget Officer II

Accounting Section
Robert Paulo T. Lumbatan
Jester C. Virina
Florentina A. Coronado
Ma. Fe A. Cariso
Angelina A. Tabia
Sofia B. Banta
Ma. Cris C. Lagbas

- Accountant III
- Accountant II
- Administrative Officer II
- Administrative Officer II
- Administrative Assistant II
- Administrative Aide IV
- Administrative Aide IV

Property Section
Aquilina V. de la Cruz
Yolanda G. Perlas
Hilarion Sanchez
Lucila Huelar

-Supervising Administrative Officer


- Administrative Officer V
- Administrative Aide VI
- Administrative Aide VI

Collection and Disbursing Section


Evelina R. Fradejas
Emma G. Valdez
Letecia H. Cuaterno

- Administrative Officer V
- Administrative Officer I
- Administrative Aide IV

Internal Audit Section


Aquilina V. de la Cruz
Maria Fe R. Mandapat

-Supervising Administrative Officer


-Science Research Assistant

Facts and Figures, 2011

313

Você também pode gostar