Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
( annexure A4 )
The appellant ,a sovereign citizen of India sought information under RTI dated
9.07.2015 ( A1) consisting of 7 points pertaining to,inter alia,vigilance report of
Jaipur . The CPIO sought pretext effectively denying all of the desired
information . The appellant, vide appeal dt.24/08/2015 requested disclosure of
information to FAA .
However, the said Renjeet Gangadharn who
enjoyed air travel*** to CIC on 20th May 2013 instead of attending prescribed
mode of video conference from Mumbai resorted to the fallacies including back
dated order(printed date 30 November 2015 dispatch date 8/1/16) to justify the
denial of information.
***Rs.22710 on account of Air Fare+Halting+Conveyance.
Prayer or Relief sought: 1. The information be disclosed as it pertains to to acts of public
servants on behalf of a PSU insurance company
2. That obstruction to information be viewed seriously and responsible official be penalized under
Section 20 (10) of the Act.
Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per Sec 19(8)* of the RTI
Act related to the detriment suffered since long denial of information.
Grounds for the Prayer or Relief:
1.The RTI officials continue to deny information on one pretext or the other.
2. There is no attempt to ensure objective disclosure of information either by CPIO or FAA
3. the desired information is essential for fundamental rights of applicant.
Whether 2 sets of appeal attached:Yes
Whether self -attested all documents:Yes
Page numbering (bottom to top):
A1: Application under RTI act with annexures.dt.9th July.2015
A2: Reply of CPIO
dt.31/07/2015 A3. First Appeal dt.24/08/2015. A4. Order of FAA dispatch 8/01/2016
A5 -6. E mail copy of a set sent to CPIO, and FAA.
.
I verify that the facts mentioned above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief,the matters under appeal have not previously been filed,or pending with any court or tribunal
or with any other authority.
Yours Sincerely,
(ShriGopal Soni),Appellant, Ajmer (Rajasthan).
Dt. 31 January 2016
P.S.
The appellant requests video conference hearing .
A 5-6
Email: to <rti.ho@newindia.co.in>
Surendra Bhatoa,,Regional MANAGER & CPIO,
New India Assurance Co Ltd,( NIACL), Nehru Place Tonk Road,Jaipur-302015
Madam/Sir, Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005
With reference to My application under the R.T.I.Act 9.07.2015 reply by you 31.07.2015 the applicant
herewith files second appeal* in the said matter against the decision of FAA under Appeal
No.136/2015 .Kindly be informed as above.
Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004.
(appellant) Enclosed: Set of II appeal to CIC *
Dt. 31-01-2016
Email: to renjit.gangadharan@newindia.co.in
Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager (FAA),
New India Assurance Co Ltd, ( NIACL),87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001
Madam/Sir, Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005
That II appeal to the Central Information Commission is being filed herewith in the matter of deliberate
denial of information to a sovereign citizen of Indias RTI application dated 9.07.2015. Please note HO
appeal no. 136/2015
(appellant)
Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004.
Enclosed: Set of II appeal to CIC *
Dt. 31-01-2016
the public of its due is an abuse of law, the Delhi High Court has imposed a cost
on NIACL for resorting to such practice. Justice V B Gupta said the government
undertaking should have a sympathetic view towards the general public. "
The government undertaking must have human approach and should not
indulge in the jugglery of legal provisions as to deprive the unfortunate
victims of their legal due," Justice Gupta said while imposing a cost of Rs 5,000
on New India Assurance Co. Ltd (NIACL)
5 May, 2008, 2206 hrs IST, PTI
THE ECONOMIC TIMES
GM-Transparency Officer,NIACL,
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd,(NIACL)
87,M.G. Road, Fort,MUMBAI-400001
24th August.2015
HO/VIG/2009//CF 19.01.2009
No. 5387/123
addressed CVC
that applicant was
already transferred
Regional Manager
CPIO reply
reference nil dated
31 July 2015*
Appeal
Information is not
specific or
identifiable
-- as above--
-- as above--
-- as above--
-- as above
P.T.O.
alteration
-- as above--
-- as above--
-- as above--
-- as above--
-- as above--
Book of Dos
of statues/laws in terms
of which NIACL
officials empower
themselves as
authority.
6. (Para1) information of
any other VO report, in
respect of applicant.
7. Information of last wage
Yours Sincerely,
(ShriGopal Soni)
C231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004.
Tel. 0145-2644106.
revribhav@gmail.com
*** enclosed in annexure(s) *.
e-mail: G Srinivasan,Chairman,NIACL-GIPSA.
segar.sampath@newindia.co.in The NIACL CPIO attempts to deny
information to a sovereign citizen of India despite no dispute that
information exists***.
Please interfere ,applicants Right to Livelihood remains affected.
Dy General Manager,
New India Assurance Co. Ltd, (NIACL)
Nehru Place, Tonk Road
Jaipur-302015
9 July 2015
OM No. Conf/1463
/08/9639 dated
29.04.2008
Year 2008-09
Identity of applicant
complainant was
revealed
Gopa Ray,the then HO/VIG/2009//CF
CVO
No. 5387/123
NIACL is directed
ensure that no
harassment is caused
to complainant* in
any manner
CVO directed
investigation of
VO,NIACL,Jaipur
19.01.2009
addressed CVC that
applicant was
already transferred
3 times repeats the
applicant was
Hindi Translator
Cell. 9414982395