Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Research Article
Meta Heuristic Method for the Design Optimization of a Wind Turbine Blade
M. Anjali*, C. Tara Sasanka, Ch. Deva Raj and K. Ravindra
Department of mechanical Engineering, R.V.R & J.C College of Engineering, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
Accepted 12 March 2014, Available online 01 April 2014, Special Issue-3, (April 2014)
Abstract
The cost of wind turbine is the important criteria to make the wind energy competitive. The manufacturing cost of wind
turbine blade is about 15-20% of wind turbine production cost. The expenses of innovations in the design of turbine
blades represent the small amount of overall cost of wind turbine production. Small changes in the structural model or
the use of suitable composite materials or better techniques of manufacturing will lead to greater profits. When designing
a wind turbine, the goal is to attain the highest possible power output under specified atmospheric conditions. From the
technical point of view, these depend on the shape of the blade. The change in the shape of the blade changes dynamic
and mechanical properties of wind turbine. This paper presents the design, selection and optimization of a turbine blade
among four different materials. The blade is modeled by using Pro/E and analyzed by standard FEA software ANSYS for
different materials. In order to continuing the efforts for innovation, optimization is performed by using a meta heuristic
method Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and the results are satisfactory.
Keywords: Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Energy Cost, Meta heuristic methods, Wind Turbine, Blade Design, Blade
Energy Momentum (BEM).
1. Introduction
1
175
M.Anjali et al
International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Special Issue-3, (April 2014)
Material
Kevlar 149
Technora
Glass E
Glass S
Elastic modulus
(Gpa)
179
70
76
88
Density
(kg/m3)
1470
1390
2540
2540
Glass S
1.6728
6.4494
12.723
15.679
20.042
29.031
39.25
45.656
47.036
60.773
Frequency[Hz]
Glass E
Technora
1.5546
2.0168
5.9936
7.7756
11.824
15.339
14.571
18.903
18.626
24.164
26.979
35
36.476
47.321
42.429
55.644
43.712
56.708
56.478
73.27
Kevlar 149
3.1361
12.091
23.853
29.394
37.574
54.425
73.583
85.593
88.181
113.93
4.1 Methodology
The analysis of aerodynamic loads in this case is based on
the blade element momentum method. The input data are
the free stream velocities, geometry of aerodynamic
profiles used in blade with Cl and Cd as the aerodynamic
lift and drag coefficients unique for each of them. In
literature they are represented as Cl and Cd which
means they depend on the angle of attack alpha.
Blade element momentum method is an iterative
method, at the beginning the value of axial retardation
coefficient also is assumed to be zero, the results of
simulation calculated are compared with the initial value.
If their values differ the calculation is repeated with the
received axial retardation coefficient as initial value. If
they agree calculation is finished. Below equations 1, 2, 3,
4and 5 are used in BEM method (Sunith Fernando et.al,
2001 and Grant Ingram ,2011).
176
M.Anjali et al
International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Special Issue-3, (April 2014)
Vrel
w r 1a
'
(1)
cos
(3)
(4)
(5)
Blade
Station
Radius
Cl
CD
FNN
FTN
0.15
1.4
0.039
27.54
29.43
0.2
1.4
0.039
40.44
32.27
0.25
1.38
0.039
54.66
34.6
0.3
1.38
0.029
70.72
37.96
0.35
1.37
0.024
87.6
40.51
0.4
1.31
0.022
101.45
40.73
0.45
1.28
0.019
116.6
41.5
0.5
1.22
0.016
127.81
40.92
0.55
1.2
0.013
141.54
41.1
10
0.6
1.12
0.0093
146.06
38.77
11
0.65
1.04
0.01
147.48
35.44
12
0.7
0.95
0.009
144.24
31.64
13
0.75
0.87
0.008
139.19
27.9
14
0.8
0.78
0.007
129.45
23.75
15
0.85
0.68
0.0065
115.18
19.22
Deflection
Material
Kevlar 149
268.411
5.69
Technora
268.46
14.56
Glass E
267.69
13.38
Glass S
267.69
11.55
177
M.Anjali et al
Minimize Z
International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Special Issue-3, (April 2014)
Crotor
AEP
(6)
(7)
M i Ci ,opt
(8)
M tot Ci ,or
exp Vi 1
(9)
Where Cmin is the lower limit and Cmax is the upper limit of
chord, and min is the lower limit and max is the upper
limit of twist angle and of the blade respectively.
As a usual procedure for optimization problems, we
have one objective function and multiple constraints. To
achieve the optimization, the ACO code in C-Program is
written for the objective function of the wind turbine.
7. Ant Colony Optimization
ACO algorithms are approximate algorithms used to
obtain good enough solutions to hard Combinatorial
Optimization problems in a reasonable amount of time.
Ant Colony Algorithms are typically used to solve
minimum cost problems. We may usually have N nodes
and A undirected arcs. The two points in which we want to
establish a minimum cost path are called the source and
destination nodes. In the Ant Algorithms, the source and
destination nodes are deemed the nest and food source. A
detailed explanation on ACO can be found in any of
literature (D. Sameer Kumar et.al, 2007&2011)
n 1
(10)
Where () is the power at the wind speed of .
The expression for power is given by
P 0.5m Vo 0.5AoVo3
(11)
The ants evaluate the cost of the paths they have traversed,
thus modulated the deposited pheromones. The shorter
paths will receive a greater deposit of pheromones. An
evaporation rule will be tied with the pheromones, which
will reduce the chance for poor quality solutions. In
General, the ACO approach attempts to solve the
optimization problems by repeating the following two
steps.
Candidate solutions are constructed using a pheromone
model that is a parameterized probability distribution over
the solution space.
178
M.Anjali et al
International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Special Issue-3, (April 2014)
Iteration no
1
5
30
80
140
500
Chord length
0.1679
0.1
0.1409
0.11358
0.12716
0.12716
Blade angle
0.254
0. 219
0.297
0.245
0.271
0.271
179