Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
AND
G. A. PEARSON2
Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140 South Africa
2
CCMAR (Centre of Marine Sciences), Campus Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Citation: Zardi, G. I., K. R. Nicastro, E. A. Serrao, R. Jacinto, C. A. Monteiro, and G. A. Pearson. 2015. Closer to the rear
edge: ecology and genetic diversity down the core-edge gradient of a marine macroalga. Ecosphere 6(2):23. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1890/ES14-00460.1
v www.esajournals.org
ZARDI ET AL.
INTRODUCTION
Characterization of species geographic ranges
and their borders is fundamental in ecology,
evolution and conservation biology. The study of
geographic ranges is experiencing renewed interest prompted by current habitat and global
climate changes and their profound influence on
distributional patterns of a wide variety of taxa
(e.g., Chen et al. 2011, Nicastro et al. 2013,
Freeman and Class Freeman 2014). Research has
mainly targeted high latitude limits of species
distributions also favoured by the relatively
easier access to sampling sites and funding
availability. On the other hand, populations
residing at the low-latitude margin of species
distribution ranges or trailing edges have only
recently started to receive deserved attention
(e.g., Hampe and Petit 2005, Araujo et al. 2011,
Lepais et al. 2013, Ferreira et al. 2014).
The general assumption is that population
abundance, reproductive output and recruitment
decline towards rear edges where conditions are
expected to be less favorable (Castro et al. 2004,
Hampe 2005, Viejo et al. 2010). This straightforward view is based on the idea that within the
realized niche of a species, rapid and/or steady
changes in abiotic and biotic conditions affect
individual performance, and thus population
size. These ecological and demographic premises
have been used to predict how genetic diversity
varies among populations across the geographical range of species. Much of the research
focused in contrasting central vs. low latitude
peripheral populations is prompted by the
interest in understanding whether marginal
populations have reduced genetic diversity
translating into reduced fitness and lower adaptive capacity relative to larger central populations
(Pearson et al. 2009, Hampe and Jump 2011,
Lepais et al. 2013).
The benign center view of species distribution
is supported by abundant empirical evidence
across a wide range of taxa and habitats (Jump
and Woodward 2003, Guo et al. 2005, Angert
2006, Fenberg and Rivadeneira 2011, Langlois et
al. 2012). However recent reviews and metaanalyses of experimental studies have raised
concerns regarding the generality of this hypothesis showing support by 39% of the reviewed
studies (Sagarin and Gaines 2002, Sagarin et al.
v www.esajournals.org
ZARDI ET AL.
METHODS
Model species and study area
Fucus guiryi is a canopy-forming, intertidal
rocky shore, hermaphrodite macroalga, recently
described by Zardi et al. (2011). Fucus spp. are
dominant bioengineers along northern hemisphere shores and can influence coastal species
richness by modifying habitats, increasing spatial
complexity and facilitating the presence of other
species (Seed and OConnor 1981). Reproductive
tissue (receptacles) develops at the apices and
contains conceptacles with male (antheridia) and
v www.esajournals.org
ZARDI ET AL.
ZARDI ET AL.
from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Earth Sciences
(GES) Data and Information Services Center
(DISC). Four annual environmental predictors
were selected based on the biological significance
to Fucus spp. along this stretch of coast (e.g.,
Nicastro et al. 2013, Zardi et al. 2013, Assis et al.
2014) and averaged across the years: SST of the
hottest and coldest month and air temperature of
the hottest and coldest month.
Data analyses
To test the null hypothesis of no relationship
between each variable and RI, a series of
univariate linear regressions using RI as a
predictor were run for each locations annual
mean of the demographic, life-history and
morphological variables. Additionally, temporal
variations of individual reproductive effort and
of recruitment rates were calculated as the
coefficient of variation between sampling dates.
To test the prediction that HE and A dropped
towards the edge, univariate linear regressions
were implemented between each of these genetic
diversity measures and RI.
To test the prediction of the presence of an
environmental gradient from center to edge, RI
was correlated with each environmental variable
using a series of Spearman rank correlations.
To test the null hypothesis of no relationship
between environmental variables and all biotic
variables, a series of univariate linear regressions
using as a predictor were run for each locations
annual mean of all demographic, life-history and
morphological variables and also for each locations genetic diversity measures.
For each univariate linear regression, homogeneity (visual examination of the plot) and
normality (Shapiro-Wilks test) of the residuals
was verified prior to testing and variables were
log-transformed if needed. When the above
assumptions were not met even after transformation, a Spearman rank correlation was calculated instead.
Finally, to test the null hypothesis of no
differences between sampling intervals, a series
of one-way ANOVAs using sampling intervals (n
6) as fixed factor. When the assumption of
homogeneity of variance was not met, data were
either log- or square root-transformed. In the
event of a significant main effect of sampling
Genetic diversity
At each location, vegetative apices from 48
individuals were sampled every meter at a fixed
vertical height within the species patches. Tissue
was stored in silica drying crystals for genetic
analyses. DNA was isolated from 510 mg of
dried tissue with a CTAB method (Hoarau et al.
2007) but modified using a silica filter plate
(Milipore MultiScreen HTS, FB Cat number
MSFBN6B10) instead of silica fines. Six microsatellite loci were amplified as in Zardi et al. (2013)
for the following loci: L20, L58, L38, L94, L78 and
F26II. Fragment length was analyzed on an
automated DNA sequencer ABI PRISM 3130
(Applied Biosystems) using both GeneScan 350
ROX (L20, L38, L58, L78, L94) and GeneScan 500
LIZ (F26II) standards. PEAK SCANNER v. 1.0
software (Applied Biosystems) was used to
estimate allele length.
For each location separately, expected heterozygosities (HE ) were estimated using GENETIX
version 4.05 (Belkhir et al. 1996-2004) while
was assessed using StandArich
allelic richness (A)
(http://www.ccmar.ualg.pt/maree/software.php?
softsarich) and adjusted by estimating the allelic
richness (Rs) using the rarefaction process to
account for differences in sample size.
Environmental variables
To estimate environmental parameters at each
location, monthly averaged Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and air temperature datasets between
January 2010 and September 2014 were retrieved
v www.esajournals.org
ZARDI ET AL.
RESULTS
Determination of the geographical center
of a continuous range
In Iberia, Fucus guiryi is currently continuously
distributed from La Franca (Spain; 43823 0 3800 N,
4834 0 24 00 W) to near Albufeira (Portugal;
378053 0 2100 N, 8811 0 3300 W). Within this region, it
displays two boundaries, a northeastern edge in
the warm areas of the Bay of Biscay and the other
in Southern Portugal, with a distributional center
in NW Iberia (North Portugal-Galicia). South of
southern Portugal, cold upwelled waters sustain
restricted F. guiryi populations within isolated
areas (western Alboran Sea and Morocco). Along
the N Spain coastline, the distribution is not
limited by the absence of rocky substratum.
Rocky shores typify this stretch of coast (over
500 km) where the species has suitable (substratum) habitat but along which it was not found.
Moreover, further north of the warm waters of
the Bay of Biscay, species presence has been
reported (but as F. spiralis var. platycarpus)
(Batters 1902) at both sides of the English
Channel and as far north as the Scottish Orkney
islands. However, these areas are not part of the
Iberian continuous coastal distribution and are
separated by hundreds to thousands of km
where the species is not present and thus were
not part of the continuous environmental gradient used as model in the present study.
Genetic diversity
A total of 35 different alleles were found in the
six sampled populations. Population allelic rich
ness standardized to the smallest sample size (A)
and gene diversity HE ranged from 3.86 to 1.54
and from 0.506 to 0.056, respectively. Because
contrasting A and HE values were recorded for
populations at RI close to zero (A 3.86 and HE
0.506 for VC; A 1.78 and HE 0.124 for AM), no
significant p-values for either correlation with RI
were recorded (Fig. 5).
Environmental variables
Hottest months were always in August or
September while the coldest from December to
February (Fig. 6). Sea surface temperature (SST)
of the coldest month was the most relevant
environmental variables affecting F. guiryi (Tables 1A, 2A, 3A in Appendix). In contrast, SST of
the hottest month was significantly correlated to
bushiness, population density and density of the
reproductive population only. None of the
environmental variables were significantly related to genetic diversity.
All environmental variables were significantly
positively correlated with RI, thus increasing
towards the edge of the continuous species
distribution. Environmental conditions that are
patchily distributed conspicuously violate one
of the abundant center hypothesis assumptions
(Brown 1984). Our study area extends along well
defined temperature gradients (e.g., Lima et al.
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. 2. Morphological and demographic variables. Univariate regressions or Spearman rank correlations using
range index as a predictor. Mean values of response variables used are: (A) individual length; (B) individual
bushiness; (C) individual biomass; (D) population density. All p-values are significant.
override larger scale latitudinal gradients (Helmuth et al. 2002). Relevant environmental variables considered here are significantly correlated
to Range Index. In our study, the linear relationship between F. guiryi demography/life history
and range index reflects, and is potentially
sustained by, a broad cold- to warm-temperate
environmental cline. Interestingly, winter SSTs are
the most significant variables that influence
morphological, demographic and reproductionrelated variables, while summer SSTs are the least
relevant environmental variables affecting the
species. Latitudinal gradients in air and sea
temperatures, which are intensified by upwelling
events that dominate north-western Iberia during
summer periods (Arstegui et al. 2006), have been
reported as the cause of species distributional
DISCUSSION
Demographic, life-history and morphological
variables
The expected pattern of strong decline of
demographic and life history traits towards the
margin of species distribution relies on the
presence of a strong environmental cline. Often,
however, empirical results will not display this
trend because the effects of local abiotic factors
v www.esajournals.org
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. 3. Reproduction-related variables. Univariate regressions or Spearman rank correlations using range index
as a predictor. Response variables used are: (A) minimum length of a reproductive individual; (B) maximum
individual reproductive effort; (C) (mean) density of the reproductive population; (D) (mean) recruitment rates.
patterns. In particular, the western Iberian coastline studied here represents latitudinal clines in
abundance and distributional edge limits for
many coastal species (Boaventura et al. 2002,
Lima et al. 2006, Pereira et al. 2006, Assis et al.
2013).
Mirroring the sharp latitudinal environmental
gradient, we observed a substantial latitudinal
cline in population density, individual morphology and size (length, bushiness and biomass).
Stunted specimens with a compact, bushy
appearance (short and wide) developed towards
marginal locations. In general, body size greatly
affects thermoregulation through its effects on
energy and water requirements allowing higher
resistance and resilience to environmental condiv www.esajournals.org
ZARDI ET AL.
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. 6. Regressions between environmental and biotic variables. (A) Summary of the regressions using
environmental variables as predictors. Significant p-values are depicted with an asterisk (*). Latitude-time
Hovmoller diagram with (B) monthly averaged SSTs (C) monthly averaged near surface air temperatures. For
complete statistical results see Tables 1A, 2A, 3A in the Appendix.
10
ZARDI ET AL.
Genetic diversity
Our population-genetic data did not display
the expected core-edge prediction: contrasting
levels of A were recorded at RI close to zero and
no significant regression with geographic distance or environmental variables was noted for
either A or HE. Inter-specific hybridization with
neighboring taxa is the most likely explanation
for the pattern reported here, as explained below.
Several species of Fucus co-inhabit the intertidal and shallow subtidal zone along northern
European shorelines (Luning 1990) and hybridization is known to occur between species that
partially overlap in the intertidal zonation (e.g.,
Billard et al. 2005). In particular, in VC, several
Fucus spp. (F. spiralis, F. guiryi, F. vesiculosus, F.
serratus) coexist and show extensive hybridization (Zardi et al. 2011). However, at the second
most northern site (AM, less than 10 km from
VC), gaps of several meters separate the F. guiry
11
ZARDI ET AL.
Conclusions
Coupling population dynamics with genetic
diversity is a significant step forward towards a
comprehensive understating of effects of peripherality at rear edges and ultimately, the potential
for shifts in species southern margins as a
response to climatic changes.
As we have shown, empirical testing should
consider the complexity of biotic and abiotic
factors, including their spatio-temporal variability, that define a species range. In particular, we
stress the importance of long-term sampling
(rather than once-offs) along the geographic
range of the organisms of interest (rather than
center vs. southern edge), especially in regions of
strong environmental clines, to account for
temporal shifts and seasonal and non-climatic,
site specific fluctuations of demographic, morphological and life history traits.
Finally, population-genetic core-edge predictions should deal more exhaustively with the
intrinsic complexity of the genetic pattern by
evaluating also past influences such as levels of
inter-specific hybridization, which may be critical
in sustaining species genetic diversity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financed by FCT (Foundation for
Science and Technology, Portugal) through projects
PTDC/MAR/110251/2009, EXCL/AAG-GLO/0661/2012
and supported by an award from the South Africa
Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department
of Science and Technology. K. R. Nicastro was funded
by FCT postdoctoral grant SFRH/BPD/45544/2008.
Enviormental data used were acquired as part of the
activities of NASAs Science Mission Directorate, and
are archived and distributed by the Goddard Earth
Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center
(DISC). G. I. Zardi and K. R. Nicastro contributed
equally to this work.
LITERATURE CITED
Abeli, T., R. Gentili, A. Mondoni, S. Orsenigo, and G.
Rossi. 2014. Effects of marginality on plant popu-
12
ZARDI ET AL.
lation performance. Journal of Biogeography
41:239249.
Abeli, T., G. Rossi, R. Gentili, A. Mondoni, and P.
Cristofanelli. 2012. Response of alpine plant flower
production to temperature and snow cover fluctuation at the species range boundary. Plant Ecology
213:113.
berg, P., and H. Pavia. 1997. Temporal and multiple
A
scale spatial variation in juvenile and adult
abundance of the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum.
Marine Ecology Progress Series 158:111119.
Angert, A. L. 2006. Demography of central and
marginal populations of monkeyflowers (Mimulus
cardinalis and M. lewisii ). Ecology 87:20142025.
Angert, A. L. 2009. The niche, limits to species
distributions, and spatiotemporal variation in
demography across the elevation ranges of two
monkeyflowers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:1969319698.
berg.
Araujo, R., E. A. Serrao, I. Sousa-Pinto, and P. A
2011. Phenotypic differentiation at southern limit
borders: the case study of two fucoid macroalgal
species with different life-hystory traits. Journal of
Phycology 47.
Arstegui, J., X. A., E. D. Barton, F. G. Figueiras, S., C.
Roy, and A. M. P. Santos. 2006. Chapter 23.
Oceanography and fisheries of the Canary Current/Iberian region of the eastern North Atlantic.
Pages 877931 in The global coastal ocean. Interdisciplinary Regional Studies and Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
USA.
Arnaud-Haond, S., S. Teixeira, I. Massa, C. Billot, P.
Saenger, G. Coupland, C. M. Duarte, and E. A.
Serrao. 2006. Genetic structure at range edge: low
diversity and high inbreeding in Southeast Asian
mangrove (Avicennia marina) populations. Molecular Ecology 15:35153525.
Assis, J., N. Castilho Coelho, F. Alberto, M. Valero, P.
Raimondi, D. Reed, and E. Alvares Serrao. 2013.
High and distinct range-edge genetic diversity
despite local bottlenecks. PLoS ONE 8:e68646.
Assis, J., E. A. Serrao, B. Claro, C. Perrin, and G. A.
Pearson. 2014. Climate-driven range shifts explain
the distribution of extant gene pools and predict
future loss of unique lineages in a marine brown
alga. Molecular Ecology 23:27972810.
Batters, E. A. L. 1902. A catalogue of the British marine
algae. Journal of Botany 40:1107.
Beatty, G. E., and J. Provan. 2011. High clonal diversity
in threatened peripheral populations of the yellow
birds nest (Hypopitys monotropa; syn. Monotropa
hypopitys). Annals of Botany 107:663670.
Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi, N. Raufaste, and F.
Bonhomme. 19962004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel
sous Windows TM pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interac-
v www.esajournals.org
13
ZARDI ET AL.
limits and geographic patterns of abundance of the
rocky intertidal owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. Journal
of Biogeography 38:22862298.
Ferreira, J. G., F. Arenas, B. Martnez, S. J. Hawkins,
and S. R. Jenkins. 2014. Physiological response of
fucoid algae to environmental stress: comparing
range centre and southern populations. New
Phytologist 202:11571172.
Freeman, B. G., and A. M. Class Freeman. 2014. Rapid
upslope shifts in New Guinean birds illustrate
strong distributional responses of tropical montane
species to global warming. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 111:44904494.
Garca, D., R. Zamora, J. M. Gomez, P. Jordano, and
J. A. Hodar. 2000. Geographical variation in seed
production, predation and abortion in Juniperus
communis throughout its range in Europe. Journal
of Ecology 88:435446.
Gardner, J. L., A. Peters, M. R. Kearney, L. Joseph, and
R. Heinsohn. 2011. Declining body size: a third
universal response to warming? Trends in Ecology
& Evolution 26:285291.
Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of
geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Gaston, K. J. 2009. Geographic range limits: achieving
synthesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B
276:13951406.
Granado-Yela, C., L. Balaguer, C. Garca-Verdugo, K.
Carrillo, and M. Mendez. 2013. Thriving at the
limit: Differential reproductive performance in
range-edge populations of a Mediterranean sclerophyll (Olea europaea). Acta Oecologica 52:2937.
Guo, Q., M. Taper, M. Schoenberger, and J. Brandle.
2005. Spatial-temporal population dynamics across
species range: from centre to margin. Oikos 108:47
57.
Hampe, A. 2005. Fecundity limits in Frangula alnus
(Rhamnaceae) relict populations at the species
southern range margin. Oecologia 143:377386.
Hampe, A., and A. S. Jump. 2011. Climate relicts: past,
present, future. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:313333.
Hampe, A., and R. J. Petit. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters.
Ecology Letters 8:461467.
Hassall, M., R. J. Walters, M. Telfer, and M. R. J.
Hassall. 2006. Why does a grasshopper have fewer,
larger offspring at its range limits? Journal of
Evolutionary Biology 19:267276.
Helmuth, B., C. D. G. Harley, P. M. Halpin, M.
ODonnell, G. E. Hofmann, and C. A. Blanchette.
2002. Climate change and latitudinal patterns of
intertidal thermal stress. Science 298:10151017.
Hoarau, G., J. A. Coyer, W. T. Stam, and J. L. Olsen.
2007. A fast and inexpensive DNA extraction/
purification protocol for brown macroalgae. Mo-
v www.esajournals.org
14
ZARDI ET AL.
New York, New York, USA.
Marko, P. B., J. M. Hoffman, S. A. Emme, T. M.
McGovern, C. C. Keever, and L. Nicole Cox. 2010.
The ExpansionContraction model of Pleistocene
biogeography: rocky shores suffer a sea change?
Molecular Ecology 19:146169.
Marquet, N., K. R. Nicastro, M. Gektidis, C. D.
McQuaid, G. A. Pearson, E. A. Serrao, and G. I.
Zardi. 2013. Comparison of phototrophic shelldegrading endoliths in invasive and native populations of the intertidal mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Biological Invasions 15:12531272.
Martnez, B., F. Arenas, M. Rubal, S. Burgues, R.
Esteban, I. Garca-Plazaola, F. L. Figueroa, R.
Pereira, L. Saldana, I. Sousa-Pinto, A. Trilla, and
R. M. Viejo. 2012. Physical factors driving intertidal
macroalgae distribution: physiological stress of a
dominant fucoid at its southern limit. Oecologia
170:341353.
Meiri, S. 2011. Bergmanns Rule: whats in a name?
Global Ecology and Biogeography 20:203207.
Menzel, A., et al. 2006. European phenological
response to climate change matches the warming
pattern. Global Change Biology 12:19691976.
Mieszkowska, N., M. T. Burrows, F. G. Pannacciulli,
and S. J. Hawkins. 2014a. Multidecadal signals
within co-occurring intertidal barnacles Semibalanus balanoides and Chthamalus spp. linked to the
Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. Journal of Marine Systems 133:7076.
Mieszkowska, N., H. Sugden, L. B. Firth, and S. J.
Hawkins. 2014b. The role of sustained observations
in tracking impacts of environmental change on
marine biodiversity and ecosystems. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society A. Mathematical,
Physical and Engineering Sciences 372:20130339.
Murray, S., R. F. Ambrose, and M. N. Dethier. 2006.
Monitoring rocky shores. University of California
Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
Neiva, J., G. A. Pearson, M. Valero, and E. A. Serrao.
2012. Drifting fronds and drifting alleles: range
dynamics, local dispersal and habitat isolation
shape the population structure of the estuarine
seaweed Fucus ceranoides. Journal of Biogeography
39:11671178.
Nicastro, K. R., G. I. Zardi, and C. D. McQuaid. 2010.
Differential reproductive investment, attachment
strength and mortality of invasive and indigenous
mussels across heterogeneous environments. Biological Invasions 12:21652177.
Nicastro, K. R., G. I. Zardi, S. Teixeira, J. Neiva, E. A.
Serrao, and G. A. Pearson. 2013. Shift happens:
trailing edge contraction associated with recent
warming trends threatens a distinct genetic lineage
in the marine macroalga Fucus vesiculosus. BMC
Biology 11:6.
Norton, T. A. 1991. Conflicting constraints on the form
v www.esajournals.org
15
ZARDI ET AL.
morphology of intertidal seaweeds: adaptive significance of aggregate vs. solitary forms. Marine
Ecology Progress Series 18:295402.
Tomanek, L. 2010. Variation in the heat shock response
and its implication for predicting the effect of
global climate change on species biogeographical
distribution ranges and metabolic costs. Journal of
Experimental Biology 213:971979.
Torres-Dowdall, J., C. A. Handelsman, D. N. Reznick,
and C. K. Ghalambor. 2012. Local adaptation and
the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 66:3432
3443.
Townsend, C. R., M. Begon, and J. L. Harper. 2008.
Essentials in ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
Viejo, R. M., B. Martnez, J. Arrontes, C. Astudillo, and
L. Hernandez. 2010. Reproductive patterns in
central and marginal populations of a large brown
seaweed: drastic changes at the southern range
limit. Ecography 34:7584.
Vitasse, Y., A. Lenz, and C. Korner. 2014. The
interaction between freezing tolerance and phenology in temperate deciduous trees. Frontiers in Plant
Science 5:541.
Walters, R., and M. Hassall. 2006. The temperature-size
rule in ectotherms: May a general explanation exist
after all? American Naturalist 167:510523.
Wethey, D. S., S. A. Woodin, T. J. Hilbish, S. J. Jones,
F. P. Lima, and P. M. Brannock. 2011. Response of
intertidal populations to climate: Effects of extreme
events versus long term change. Journal of Exper-
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
APPENDIX
Table A1. Regressions between environmental and morphological/demographic variables. Univariate regressions
(R2) or Spearman rank (Rho) correlations using environmental variables as predictors.
SST
Hottest month
Variable
Rho
Individual length
Individual bushiness
Individual biomass
Population density
0.755
0.914
0.724
0.894
Air temperature
Coldest month
Rho
0.08
,0.05
0.104
,0.01
0.959
0.923
0.965
0.671
Hottest month
P
Rho
,0.01
.0.01
,0.01
,0.05
0.912
0.912
0.971
Coldest month
Rho
0.928
0.928
0.81
,0.05
,0.05
,0.001
,0.05
R2
0.96
0.655
,0.01
,0.01
,0.01
0.051
Log-transformed.
v www.esajournals.org
16
ZARDI ET AL.
Table A2. Regressions between environmental and reproduction-related variables. Univariate regressions (R2) or
Spearman rank (Rho) correlations using environmental variables as predictors.
SST
Hottest month
Variable
Minimum length of a
reproductive individual
Maximum individual
reproductive effort
Density of the reproductive
population
Recruitment rates
Rho
Air temperature
Coldest month
Rho
0.754
0.083 0.958
0.712
0.112
0.875 ,0.01
0.656
Hottest month
P
Rho
Rho
,0.01 0.964
0.14
0.638
0.096
R2
,0.05 0.853
P
0.173
0.914 ,0.01
0.445 0.142
0.156 0.886
Coldest month
0.165
0.827 ,0.05
,0.05
Table A3. Regressions between environmental and genetic diversity. Univariate regressions (R2) or Spearman
rank (Rho) correlations using environmental variables as predictors.
SST
Hottest month
Variable
Rho
0.532
0.528
v www.esajournals.org
Air temperature
Coldest month
Rho
0.277
0.282
0.651
0.675
17
P
0.162
0.141
Hottest month
Rho
0.493
Coldest month
Rho
0.32
0.242
0.321
0.145
0.221
R2
P
0.784
0.674
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A1. Individual length. Bimonthly measurements of mean individual length, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC; (B)
AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post
hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
18
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A2. Individual bushiness. Bimonthly measurements of mean individual bushiness, n 4 quadrats, at: (A)
VC; (B) AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and
post hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
19
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A3. Individual biomass. Bimonthly measurements of mean individual biomass, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC;
(B) AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post
hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
20
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A4. Population density. Bimonthly measurements of population density, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC; (B)
AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post
hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
21
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A5. Minimum length of a reproductive individual. Bimonthly measurements of minimum length of a
reproductive individual, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC; (B) AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to
locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
22
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A6. Maximum individual reproductive effort. Bimonthly measurements of maximum individual
reproductive effort, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC; (B) AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to
locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
23
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A7. Density of the reproductive population. Bimonthly measurements of the density of the reproductive
population, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC; (B) AM; (C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to locations in
Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post hoc results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
24
ZARDI ET AL.
Fig. A8. Recruitment rates. Bimonthly measurements of recruitment rates, n 4 quadrats, at: (A) VC; (B) AM;
(C) ER; (D) FL; (E) AR; (F) CS. Codes correspond to locations in Fig. 1 while ANOVAs p-values and post hoc
results for each location are depicted.
v www.esajournals.org
25