Você está na página 1de 43

Strategic

Thinking for
Problem Solving
An Overview
Strategy Club
2/12/2015
Arnaud Chevallier
Wednesday, February 25, 15

What skills and knowledge are employers


looking for in new hires?

What are you doing to acquire those?

Wednesday, February 25, 15

Employers want more than just content


expertise
Content knowledge +
Ethic
Communication
Teamwork

Problem solving

Social responsibility
(Casner-Lotto & Barrington, 2006)

Employers prioritize critical


thinking, communication, and

Increasingly, employers indicate


a need for professionals who excel
in teamwork, communications,
problem identification and
solutions, and the ability to have
a broad view.
(Wendler et al., 2012)

complex problem-solving
skills over a job candidates

major field of study when hiring.


(AAU, 2013)

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

Work in a team structure


Make decisions and solve

problems

Plan, organize, and prioritize


work
Communicate
(NACE, 2014)
3 / 42

For our purposes, lets define a problem as the gap


between where you are and where you want to be

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

4 / 42

Taking this definition, we all spend our entire days


solving problems
Go to work

Solve work problems


Eat
Solve work problems
Go home
Solve personal
problems

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

5 / 42

Of all problem types, lets focus on complex, illdefined, non-immediate (CIDNI) ones
+ Non immediate (i.e. you
have > weeks to solve it)
What is the optimal
Diverse,
fuel quantity to put
dynamic, and/or
in the A380 going
Complex
interdependent
from Paris to NYC
variables
today?

Simple

Homogeneous,
static, and/or
independent
variables

Source: Pretz et al. 2003; Woods, 2000; Frensch & Funke, 1995

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

How should we
reverse global
warming?

How many standardsize ping pong balls


can fit in a
20x40x10cm box?
Goals, solution path,
obstacles are clear

No clear path to
solution

Well defined

Ill defined
6 / 42

To solve CIDNI problems, you need both depth and


breadth of knowledge; this talk is about the latter
Breadth of
knowledge across
disciplines makes
you a generalist

Breadth
D
e
p
t
h

Depth of knowledge
in a discipline makes
you a specialist
Ideal problem solver
(or problem solving
team) is T shaped

Strategic
Thinking

generalist

Traditional
programs +
research

specialist

Source: (Perkins & Salomon, 1989), (Gauch, 2003) [pp. 23] (Grasso & Burkins, 2010) [pp. 1
10]; (Kulkarni & Simon, 1988) [p. 140], (Sanbonmatsu, Posavac, Kardes, & Mantel, 1998),
(Sheppard, Macatangay, Colby, & Sullivan, 2009) [p. 175], (Katzenbach, 1993), (Savransky, 2002)
[p. 18], (M. U. Smith, 1991) [pp. 1015].

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

7 / 42

You can become a better problem solver through


a four-step approach
WHAT
1. Frame the
problem

WHY
2. Diagnose the
problem

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

HOW

DO

3. Find
solutions

4. Implement
solution

8 / 42

This starts with framing the problem you should


solve
WHAT
1. Frame the
problem

WHY
2. Diagnose the
problem

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

HOW

DO

3. Find
solutions

4. Implement
solution

9 / 42

Framing the problem requires identifying the key question


that encompasses all the other relevant questions

?
?
?

?
?

?
?
?

?
?

Key
question

?
?
?
?
?

See also (Davis, Keeling, Schreier, & Williams, 2007)

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

10 / 42

You must identify the right key question

Cartoon by Charles Addams


Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

11 / 42

To illustrate, lets look at a real case


A friend calls you, speaking frantically: My dog
Harry is gone! I came home a few minutes ago
and Harry wasnt there.
I left my house at noon, and when I came
back, around 4pm, he was missing. Our house
has a backyard with a doggy door in between.
Thats really strange: he hasnt escaped in monthsever since we fixed the
gate, he cant.
Also, I fired the housekeeper this morning for poor performance. She blamed
Harry, saying he sheds too much, and she was upset. Im sure shes kidnapped
him.
He has no collar; how are we going to find him? Also the yard crew came
today to mow the lawn.
Anyway, youre the master problem solver. Help!
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

12 / 42

First, you need to identify your overall objective


HOW can we get
Harry back?
WHY is Harry
missing?

Identify
Identify HOW
WHY Harry
to get him
is missing
back

In scope
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

HOW do we
prevent this from
happening again?

Time

3
DO: Get
him back

Identify HOW
to prevent this
from happening
again

DO: prevent
this from
happening
again

Out of scope
13 / 42

Also, you need to think about the logistics of your


project

Time

People
Equipment

Money

Other
resources

Facilities
Processes
Etc.
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

14 / 42

Capture that information in a WHAT card (as in,


what you want to do in your project)
Project name: Find Harry the dog
Specific goals:
(what you are
going to do)

1. Understand why Harry is missing (why)


2. Identify best way to get him back (how)
3. Get him back (do)

Out of scope:
Prevent him from going missing again
(what you are
in the future (both the how and the
not going to do) implementation)

Sponsor(s):

John and his wife

Other key
stakeholders:

Time table:

Actions

N/A

1. Frame the problem (define the what)


2. Diagnose the problem (find the why)
Define the diagnostic key question and identify possible causes
Collect the diagnostic evidence, analyze, & draw conclusions
3. Identify solutions (find the how)
Define the solution key question and identify possible solutions
Collect evidence, analyze, and decide which solution(s) to implement
4. Implement (do)
Resources:

Money: Spend up to $150 for the why, $150 for the how, $300 for the do
People: Up to 3 people dedicated full time

Possible
problems:

Speaking with housekeeper can backfire

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

Mitigation
actions:

Needed Cumulative
time
time
2h
2h
4h
6h

6h
12h

6h
6h
48h

18h
24h
72h

Refrain from speaking with the


housekeeper until absolutely necessary

15 / 42

Now that youve identified what problem to solve,


you need to understand why you have it
WHAT
1. Frame the
problem

WHY
2. Diagnose the
problem

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

HOW

DO

3. Find
solutions

4. Implement
solution

16 / 42

Our diagnostic is driven by a question with a why root that


enables you to uncover the root causes of the problem
WHAT
1. Frame the
problem

WHY
2. Diagnose the
problem

HOW

DO

3. Find
solutions

4. Implement
solution

Why is Harry missing?


Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

17 / 42

To get to the diagnosis question, you need an


introductory flow: a situation and complication
Situation:

My friend has a dog


Harryand lives in a
house. Sometimes, he
leaves Harry alone at
the house

Complication: Today, when my friend


came home after 4
hours, Harry was
missing

Parts of the
universe

Problems

Diagnostic
Why is Harry missing?
key question:

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

18 / 42

Capture this information in a diagnostic definition


cardi.e., a WHY card
Situation: My friend has a dogHarryand lives in a house. Sometimes, he leaves
Harry alone at the house

Complication: Today, when my friend came home after being absent for 4 hours, Harry was
missing
Diagnostic key Why is Harry, the dog, missing [from my friends house where he was left
question: unattended for 4 hours]?
Decision My friend and his wife
makers:
Other N/A
stakeholders:
Goals and Spend up to $150 on the diagnosis, design diagnostic analysis within 6
logistics: hours, conduct diagnostic analysis within 12 hours
Voluntarily left- Call the housekeeper to accuse her of kidnapping Harry without conducting
out answers: a preliminary analysis first
Consider irrational explanations such as alien abduction
Consider that friend is mistaken or lying when saying that Harry is not at
the House
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

19 / 42

Next, build a WHY issue map: a graphical breakdown of


your problem space; issue maps have four basic rules

Issue
maps...

1
2

... progress from the key


question to the conclusions

... have mutually exclusive and


collectively exhaustive (MECE)
branches

... are insightful

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

diagnostic maps answer a


why key question

... consistently
answer one
type of
question

solution maps answer a


how key question

20 / 42

To build a map, break your diagnosis question into


parts

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

21 / 42

Further map out the problem space by exploring


all possibilities

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

22 / 42

Force yourself to think about all possible


scenarios. That will require some effort

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

23 / 42

Now that youve structured your diagnosis,


formulate your set of diagnostic hypotheses

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

24 / 42

Next, prioritize your analysis, which may include


discarding hypotheses that seem too unlikely
Test first because it has
implications on next steps

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

Discard (for now)


because too unlikely

25 / 42

Then, look for evidencei.e., information that


youll use to test your hypotheses
Inspect the location:
Quiet residential neighborhood
Talk with friend:
Friend was away from noon to 4pm
Harry can go between house and yard
Harry hasnt escaped in months, since friend fixed the gate
Harry has no collar
The backyard gate was closed when friend came back
There are no holes in or under the fence
The backyard gate doesnt lock
Harry cant jump over the fence or gate
Friend fired housekeeper that morning because of poor
performance
Housekeeper was upset and blamed Harry for shedding
Harry escapes whenever possible, follows scents, and ends
up lost
Whenever the lawn crew is there, Harry barks loudly
enough for the crew to hear
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

Talk with neighbor:


Saw a police car in front
of the house at 2:20pm
Saw Harry out on the
street by himself at
~2:20pm

Talk with lawn crew


supervisor:
Crew came today
between 1 & 2pm
Crew knows Harry but
didnt see him today

26 / 42

You may re-organize your evidence to help you gain some


understanding, perhaps in a timeline or a map of the events
Street
Street
Sidewalk
Where neighbor saw
Harry by himself

Front yard
House door

Where the yard crew


park their truck
Drive way

House

Yard gate
Solid fence
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

Doggy door

Back yard
27 / 42

Use evidence, presuppositions and logic to test


your hypotheses

See (Austhink, 2006), (Gauch, 2003) [pp. 124131], (Twardy, 2010)

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

28 / 42

Then decide if the evidence contrary to each


hypothesis is sufficient to discard it

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

29 / 42

This will lead


you to identify
a subset of
root cause(s) to
focus on

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

30 / 42

Now that you know why you have your problem,


you can search, evaluate, and select solutions
WHAT
1. Frame the
problem

WHY
2. Diagnose the
problem

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

HOW

DO

3. Find
solutions

4. Implement
solution

31 / 42

Start by building a solution definition card


i.e., a HOW card
Situation:

My friend has a dogHarrywho went missing a few hours ago


Complication: While we initially suspected foul play, we now believe that no-one is

preventing us from recovering Harry

Solution key
question: How can we get Harry (the dog) back, knowing that no-one is

preventing us from recovering him?

Decision
makers: My friend and his wife
Other My friends neighbors and other people that we enlist to partake in the
stakeholders: search
Goals and Identify all solutions within 4 hours; Pick and implement subset within 12 hours;
logistics: Bring Harry back within 24 hours
Voluntarily leftout answers: Ask neighbors to invest significant time in locating Harry
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

32 / 42

To identify possible solutions, develop a


HOW map

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

33 / 42

Keep drilling
until your map
is sufficiently
explicit

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

34 / 42

Next, formulate
hypotheses...

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

35 / 42

identify attributes to evaluate the alternatives


and decide which to pursue
Individual
Quickness
likelihood of Timeliness
of success
success
Weight
H1: Searching the
neighborhood
H3: Informing
people likely to
know about
missing animals
H4: Posting
virtual
announcements
H5: Checking
announcements
H6: Enabling
Harry to come
back on his own

Weighted
Cost
Ranking
score

30%

40%

20%

5%

5%

50

100

100

100

90

84.5

100

100

80

100

100

96

15

20

20

16.5

50

100

7.5

30

90

100

100

100

75

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

Lack of
setup
time

36 / 42

All thats left is to implement your solution

WHAT
1. Frame the
problem

WHY
2. Diagnose the
problem

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

HOW

DO

3. Find
solutions

4. Implement
solution

37 / 42

Implementing a solution requires, at the very least,


to sell it...

Here is what we need to


do, and here is why...
We believe our best chance to recover Harry is to focus on
putting announcements in the street and alerting his vet and
pet associations that he is missing, here is why:
Support point #1
Support point #2
Support point #3
...

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

38 / 42

... and sometimes to actually manage the


implementation yourself

... so, please do X and Ill do Y

Task
Design and print
announcements

Owner
Me

Due Date
5pm

Post announcements

All

8pm

Alert vet

John

4:30pm

Look up pet associations

Jane

6pm

Alert pet associations

John

8pm

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

39 / 42

Also integral to implementation is evaluating your


solution and course-correcting as you progress
As sailors, follow
a general strategy

but adapt it to
integrate new
developments
Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved
Wednesday, February 25, 15

40 / 42

And when youre done, celebrate!

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

41 / 42

In summary, proactively improve your strategic


thinking
Employers want you to be a good specialist
and a generalist
So develop your strategic thinking skills
Take ENGI/LEAD 545
Read powerful-problem-solving.com
Read timvangelder.com
Email meacd@rice.edu

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

Breadth
D
e
p
t
h

42 / 42

References
American Association of Universities (2013). It
take more than a major: Employer priorities for
college learning and student success. [p. 4]
Austhink (2006, December 7, 2006). "Argument
Mapping Tutorials." Retrieved January 14, 2014,
from http://austhink.com/reason/tutorials/.
Casner-Lotto, J. and L. Barrington (2006). Are
They Really Ready to Work? Employers'
Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and
Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century
US Workforce, ERIC. [p. 8]
Davis, I., et al. (2007). "The McKinsey approach
to problem solving." McKinsey Staff Paper(66):
27.
Frensch, P. A. and J. Funke, Eds. (1995).
Complex problem solving: The European
perspective. New York, Psychology Press.
Perkins, D. N. and G. Salomon (1989). "Are
cognitive skills context-bound?" Educational
researcher 18(1): 16-25.
Gauch, H. G. (2003). Scientific method in
practice, Cambridge University Press. [pp 23],
[pp. 124131]
Grasso, D. and M. B. Burkins (2010). Beyond
technology: The holistic advantage. Holistic
Engineering Education. D. Grasso and M. B.
Burkins, Springer: 1-10.!
Katzenbach, J. R. (1993). The wisdom of teams:
Creating the high-performance organization,
Harvard Business Press.

Copyright Arnaud Chevallier 2015. All rights reserved


Wednesday, February 25, 15

Kulkarni, D. and H. A. Simon (1988). "The


processes of scientific discovery: The strategy of
experimentation." Cognitive science 12(2):
139-175.
National Association of Colleges and Employers
(2014). The job outlook for the class of 2014. [p.
4]

Wendler, C., et al. (2012). "Pathways through


Graduate School and into Careers." Educational
Testing Service. [p. 33]
Woods, D. R. (2000). "An EvidenceBased
Strategy for Problem Solving." Journal of
Engineering Education 89(4): 443-459.

Pretz, J. E., et al. (2003). Recognizing, defining,


and representing problems. The Psychology of
Problem Solving. J. E. Davidson and R. J.
Sternberg. New York, Cambridge University
Press: 3-30.
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., et al. (1998). "Selective
hypothesis testing." Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review 5(2): 197-220.
Sheppard, S., et al. (2009). Educating engineers:
Designing for the future of the field, Jossey-Bass
San Francisco, CA.
Savransky, S. D. (2002). Engineering of creativity:
Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive
problem solving, CRC Press
Smith, M. U. (1991). A view from biology. Toward
a unified theory of problem solving: Views from
the content domains. M. U. Smith. New York,
Routledge: 1-21.
Twardy, C. (2010). "Argument maps improve
critical thinking." Teaching Philosophy 27(2):
95-116.

43 / 42

Você também pode gostar