Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
"'~"'i}jij; ~"''''''~.
<
"
•
~"""':---''''' ~
~M?;
11 '-
ourMidla,nd.com.
4 :8JIII*
from the Mldlilnd Dally New5
""
09115/2007
. UPTO
Call for Info~ SFC 1. Wilson 'i- 20.000
989-835-8321 BONUS!
Or "isIt: 1-800-GO-GUARD.com
http://www.ounnidland.com/site/printerFriendly.cfm?brd=2289&dept_id=472542&newsid... 9/21/2007
Mlive.com's Printer-Friendly Page Page 1 of 1
m-
.com
Everything Mlch,lgen
IT LOOKS LIKE MIDLAND city officials are in the dioxin driver's seat. For now, anyway.
Last week the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told the city to hand over all dioxin sampling data
Midland took within its city limits in 2006 and 2007. The EPA says the data will help it figure out just how
bad any dioxin contamination is in each particular parcel.
The city is holding off on releasing the information. Why? Because the EPA is playing let's break a deal.
Last fall, Dow Chemical Co., the state Department of Environmental Quality and the EPA started a detailed
soil study mostly to the north and east of Dow's plant to determine contamination levels of Dow-related
substances -- dioxin in particular. They took 145 samples.
Combustion or other industrial processes create dioxins, some of which have links to cancer. Dow has
admitted its Midland complex polluted the Tittabawassee River floodplain with dioxins many years ago.
"It appears that the data is obscured by an unusual double blind system that the EPA has been unable to
obtain voluntarily from the city of Midland," said EPA Region 5 Superfund Division Director Richard Karl.
'The city holds the key to the data, and we're requiring them to provide it."
It's odd that Karl used the words "it appears." Before the testing in the Midland area ever started, Dow, the
DEQ, the EPA and the city agreed to put the individual dioxin samples into larger and larger groups,
thereby masking each specific property's identity.
They did this certainly to protect the property values of the parcels, but mostly just to get the residents to
participate in the study. Some would say that's a contract. The EPA could've objected then, but it didn't.
Also part of the plan was to make public any results that exceeded the EPA's danger level where health or
environmental risks may exist that call for cleanup. None did.
Midland's reluctance to release the sample data before it strikes any deal to make it public is
understandable, not only from the standpoint of maintaining credibility with its citizens, but also their trust.
And, it's a lead-pipe cinch someone will sue the city for breach of contract over private property rights if any
of the contract stipulations aren't adhered to.
Thursday, Midland officials and their lawyers will go to Chicago to talk with EPA honchos, presumably to
work out some sort of compromise. If the EPA can provide a significant, compelling reason for Midland to
unblind the data right away, then by all means the city should do so. Health issues should trump money
issues.
But if EPA officials are merely playing power politics, then Midland is well within its rights to take the matter
to court.
http://www.mlive.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/news-l/1189633790253460.xml&coll=9 912112007
Mlive.com's Printer-Friendly Page Page 1 of 1
mlive
.com
Everything Michigan
MIDLAND, Mich. (AP) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the city of Midland have a deal
over dioxin testing.
The federal agency had asked city for all dioxin sampling data taken within the community from the start of
last year to give a more complete picture of Dow Chemical's dioxin contamination in the area.
The EPA now says it will require specific information about sampling protocol and distribution of data. But
the Midland Daily News reports it won't require the identification of specific property locations or property
owners.
http://www.mlive.com/printer/printer.ssf?lbaselbusiness-13/1189883652226400.xml&stor... 9/21/2007