Processed Date:2/2/2016

Bridge Inventory Data Listing

Parameters: Bridge Serial Num
Structure ID:051-0150-0

SUFF. RATING: 37.10

Chatham

Location & Geography
*
Structure
ID:

051-0150-0

200 Brdge Information:

07

*104 Highway System:

*26 Functional Classification: 16- Urban - Minor Arterial

*6A Feature Int:
*6B Critical Bridge:

SPRINGFIELD CANAL

*7A Route No Carried:

CR00680

*7B Facility Carried:

LOUISVILLE ROAD

9

Location:

.25 MI S OF TALMADGE BR.

2

Dot District:

4841500000 - D5 District Five Jesup

207 Year Photo:

2012

*91 Inspection Frequency:
92A Fract Crit Insp Freq:

24

Date: 10/02/2014

0

Date:

02/01/1901

92B Underwater Insp Freq:

00

Date:

02/01/1901

92C Other Spc. Insp Freq:

00

Date: 02/01/1901

* 4 Place Code:

69000

*5 Inventory Route(O/U):

1

Type:

5 - City Street

Designation:

1- Mainline

Number:

04032

Direction:

0. Not applicable

*16 Latitude:

32.0000- 4.6302

HMMS Prefix:

*17 Longtitude:

81.0000- 6.2316

HMMS Suffix:

MP: 0.00
98 Border Bridge:
99 ID Number:

% Shared:00
000000000000000

*100 STRAHNET:

0- The Feature is not a STRAHNET route.

12 Base Highway Network:

1

13A LRS Inventory Route:

512068000

13B Sub Inventory Route:

0.00

*101 Parallel Structure:

N. No parallel structure exists

*102 Direction of Traffic:

2- Two Way

*264 Road Inventory Mile Post:

002.63

*208 Inspection Area:

Area 05

Engineer's Initials:
* Location ID No:

Signs & Attachments

0- Inventory Route is not on the NHS

*204 Federal Route Type:

M - Urban.

105 Federal Lands Highway:
*110 Truck Route:

0. Not applicable
0

206 School Bus Route:

1

217 Benchmark Elevation:

0000.00

218 Datum:

0- Not Applicable

242 Deck Drains:

02- Open or sealed concrete joint (silicone
sealant).
0- None.

243 Parapet Location:

0- None present.

Height:

0.00

Width:

0.00

238 Curb Height:
Curb Material:

0
1- Concrete.

2

239 Handrail

1- Concrete.

*20 Toll:

3- On a Free Road or Non-Highway

*240 Median Barrier Rail:

0- None.

*21 Maintanance:

04-City or Municipal Highway Agency.

241 Bridge Median Height:

0

*22 Owner:

04-City or Municipal Highway Agency.

*

*31 Design Load:

2- H 15

230 Guardrail Loc. Dir. Rear:

37 Historical Significance:

2- Eligible for the National Register of Historic Places

Fwrd:

0- None.

205 Congressional District:

012

Oppo. Dir. Rear:

0- None.

27 Year Constructed:

1930

Oppo. Fwrd:

0- None.

106 Year Reconsrtucted:

0

244 Aproach Slab

0- None.

33 Bridge Median
:
34 Skew:

0-None

224 Retaining Wall:

0- None.

233Posted Speed Limit:

30

35 Structure Flared:

No

236 Warning Sign:

0.00

38 Navigation Control:

0- Navigation is not controlled by an Agency

234 Delineator:

0.00

213 Special Steel Design:

0- Not applicable or other

235 Hazard Boards:

0

267 Type of Paint:

5- Waterborne System (Type VI or VII)

237 Utilities Gas:

00- Not Applicable

*42 Type of Service On:

5-Highway-Pedestrian

Type of Service Under:

0

0

203 Type Bridge:

M - Gravity- Wall
(massive
concrete)
/ Masonary.
O. Concrete
Steel-Co
- N.pour
- O. Concrete

259 Pile Encasement

3

*43 Structure Type Main:

3-Steel

2-Stringer/Multi-Beam or Girder
1
0- Other

0- Other
0

46 No Spans Appr:

Bridge Median Width:

Water:

5-Waterway

214 Movable Bridge:

44 Structure Type Appr:

bcn
051-04032M-003.00E

04032

*19 Bypass Length:

45 No.Spans Main:

Initials: KAS

225 Expansion Joint Type:
No:

226 Bridge Curve Horz

0

111 Pier Protection

N - Navigation Control item coded 0, or Feature not a waterway

Vert: 0.00

0
0- None.

00- Not Applicable

Electric:

22- Bottom Right.

Telephone:

21- Bottom Left.

Sewer:

22- Bottom Right.

247 Lighting Street:

6- Other.

0

Navigation:

0

Aerial:

0- Not applicable or other

*248 County Continuity No.:

00

107 Deck Structure Type:
108 Wearing Structure Type:
Membrane Type:
Deck Protection:

File Location: CF Conversions/BIMS
"The Information contained in this File/Report is the property of GDOT and may not be released to any other party without the written consent of the Data Custodian. Please dispose of this information by shredding or other confidential method."

Page 1 of 2

Processed Date:2/2/2016

Parameters: Bridge Serial Num

Bridge Inventory Data Listing

Structure ID:051-0150-0
Programming Data
201 Project No:
202 Plans Available:

Measurements:

UNKNOWN

8520 Year:2011

*29 ADT

0- No Plans Available.

109 %Trucks:

1

* 28 Lanes On:

2

210 No. Tracks On:

00

* 48 Max. Span Length

31

* 49 Structure Length:

31

51 Br. Rwdy. Width

30.00

52 Deck Width:

36.00

* 47 Tot. Horiz. Cl:

30

$182

50 Curb / Sidewalk Width

0.00

76 Imp Length:

1351

32 Approach Rdwy. Width

97 Imp Year:

2013

*229 Shoulder Width:

114 Furure ADT:

12780

249 Prop Proj No:

0000000000000000000000000

250 Approval Status:

0000

251 PI Number:

0000000

252 Contract Date:

02/01/1901

260 Seismic No:

00000

75 Type Work:
94 Bridge Imp: Cost:

34- Widening
with deck
$121

95 Roadway Imp. Cost:

$12

96 Total Imp Cost:

1- Work to be done by contract

Year:2031

Rear Lt:
Fwd. Lt:

Hydralic Data
215Waterway Data:

Under:0
Under:00

/

30

0000.0

Year:1900

Flood Elev:

0000.0

Freq:000

Avg Streambed Elev: 0000.0

Rear:

Drainage Area:

00000

Area of Opening:

000000

Transition:

113 Scour Critical

U. No Load Rating; no scour critical data entered.

App. G. Rail:

216 Water Depth:

5.0

222 Slope Protection:

0

221Spur Dikes Rear

0

219 Fender System

0- None.

36Safety Features Br. Rail:

Br.Height:10.3

App. Rail End:
53 Minimum Cl. Over:

Fwd:0

0

H-Modified:

17

HS-Modified:

25 0

Type 3:

21 0

Type 3s2:

30 0

Timber:

28 0

Piggyback:

00 0

24

Rt:2

67 Structural Evaluation:

4

Rt:0

58 Deck Condition:

7 - Good Condition

59 Superstructure Condition:

4 - Poor Condition

* 227 Collision Damage:

1 Fwd: 1
3- Inspected feature exists but does not meet current or
construction date standards.
0- Does not meet standards
3- Inspected feature exists but does not meet current or
construction date standards.
0- Does not meet standards
99'99"
0.00'0.00"

*228 Minimum Vertical Cl

220 Dolphin:

2 - HS loading. Rating: 38

15

26.00 Type: 2- Asphalt.

Under: N- Feature not a highway or railroad.

2 - HS loading. Rating: 23

64 Operating Type:

262 H Operating Rating

30.00 Type: 2- Asphalt.
Intersaction Rear:

2-Allowable Stress (AS)

66 Inventory Type:

261 H Inventory Rating:

Pavement Width:

High Water Elev:

2-Allowable Stress (AS)

63 Operating Rating Method:

231Calculated Loads:

4.50

2.00 Type: 7 None.
0.00 Type:1 Concrete.

65 Inventory Rating Method:

60A Substructure Condition:

6 - Satisfactory Condition

60B Scour Condition:

8 - Very Good Condition

60C Underwater Condition

N - Not Applicable

71 Waterway Adequacy:

8-Equal to present desirable criteria.

61 Channel Protection Cond.:

8

68 Deck Geometry:

3

69 UnderClr. Horz/Vert:

N

72 Appr. Alignment:

8-No reduction of vehicle operating speed required.

62 Culvert:

N - Not Applicable

Posting Data

Act. Odm Dir::

99 ' 99"

000

Oppo. Dir:

99' 99"

70 Bridge Posting Required

5. Equal to or above legal loads

Type:

0- Not Applicable

Posted Odm. Dir:

00' 00"

41 Struct Open, Posted, CL:

A. Open, no restriction

No. Barrels:

0

Oppo. Dir:

00'00 "

* 103 Temporary Structure:

0

Width:

0.00

223 Culvert Cover:

Height:0

55 Lateral Undercl. Rt:

N- Feature not a highway or railroad.

0.00

232 Posted Loads

0

Apron:0

56 Lateral Undercl. Lt:

0.00

H-Modified:

00

*265 U/W Insp. Area

0

Diver:ZZZ

*10 Max Min Vert Cl:

99' 99" Dir:0

HS-Modified:

00

*Location ID No:

051-04032M-003.00E

39 Nav Vert Cl:

000 Horiz:0

Type 3:

00

116 Nav Vert Cl Closed:

000

Type 3s2:

00

245 Deck Thickness Main
Deck Thick Approach:

6.00
0.00

Timber:

00

246 Overlay Thickness:

5.00

Piggyback

00

212 Year Last Painted:

Sup:1999 Sub:0000

Length:

253 Notification Date:

02/01/1901

258 Fed Notify Date:

02/01/1901

File Location: CF Conversions/BIMS
"The Information contained in this File/Report is the property of GDOT and may not be released to any other party without the written consent of the Data Custodian. Please dispose of this information by shredding or other confidential method."

Page 2 of 2

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful