Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The exploratory studies referred to here suggest quite clearly that lying is
negatively related to verbal and graphic fluency measures as well as being
significantly more characteristic of the less-creative than it is of the more
creative persons.*
“The dominant factor of differences existing between the creative and the
non-creative individual seems to be the presence of a disposition that
organizes experience with an emphasis in the inexhaustible and unlimited
meaningfulness of reality. And while both of these individuals accept
experience as the basic point of departure in their mental organization, the
non-creative man tends to cultivate and preserve the conventional
classification of it, received as a collective heritage imposed upon him by
the social environment, while the artist mistrusts any such restriction.
In following this line of thought I am, for the moment, at lest, rejecting
Arateh’s state of moral creativeness characteristic of the integrative
person. It is in the state of creative attitude that one finds joy in needs
that benefit others regardless of hoped-for rewards. It is also in the state
of creative attitude that one functions naturally and spontaneously without
having a desire to record, to write, or to create in terms of physical
objects.” Professor Arasteh seems quite oblivious to the world of the
aesthetic as I comprehend it. In fact, the subject appears twice in the
index, once when describing the value structure of H. Rickert and where, in
a quotation from Maslow the tern “esthetic experiences” is used. It seems
as though Arasteh is unaware of the topic even as a subject of discourse for
he makes no reference to it, to my knowledge, beyond the two references
made by others. Maslow, on the other hand, in the quotation mentioned
above lists aesthetic experiences and creative experiences separately so it
might be profitable to ascertain how he distinguishes. If he does, between
them.
The following quotations are taken from Arasteh and begin, I believe, to
point to a prejudice…an admirable one, perhaps, favoring the non-material
‘Eastern’ world at the expense of the material ‘western’. Professor Araste
is too intelligent a man not to be equally sensitive as is Martin (5) to the
meaningfulness of sense.
Arasteh writes on “sense” and it is hoped that the following might promote
productive thought in those areas wherein he fails to be specifically
concerned.
“His life never seems to have been extinguished by the pragmatic (in the
narrowest sense of the word) , he has never been a “realist” to the
exclusion of everything else, his imagination has thrown a we of magic
thought over the world of the senses, to which he has given a new
meaning.”