Você está na página 1de 1

JM E P E G ÓAS M I nternational

DO I : 10 . 10 0 7/ s116 6 5-0 10 -96 21-5 10 59-9495/ $ 19. 0 0

Determination of Some Parameters for Fatigue Life


in Welded Joints Using Fracture Mechanics Method
A.M. Al-Mukhtar, H. Biermann, P. Hübner, and S. Henkel

(Submitted July 1, 2009; in revised form February 1, 2010)

In this work, the parameters stress intensity factor (SIF), initial and final crack lengths (ai and af), crack
growth parameters (C and m), and fatigue strength (FAT) are investigated. The determination of initial
crack length seems to be the most serious factor in fatigue life and strength calculations for welded joints. A
fracture mechanics approach was used in these calculations based on SIF which was calculated with the
finite element method (FEM). The weld toe crack was determined to be equal to 0.1 mm, whereas the weld
root crackÕs length was varied depending on the degree of the weld penetration. These initial crack length
values are applicable for all types of joints which have the same crack phenomenon. As based on the above
calculated parameters, the new limits of FAT for new geometries which are not listed yet in recommen-
dations can be calculated according to the current approach.

the prob lem that arises to determine the fatigue life is to choose
Keywords FAT-class, fatigue life, fracture mechanics, FRANC2D,
initial and final crack lengths, propagation life, welded the appropriate parameters of C, m, ai and final crack length
joints (af) .
There is often a considerab le amount of scatter in fatigue
data ev en when carefully machined standard specimens out of
the same lot of material are used. Therefore, a reduction factor
is often applied to the S- N curv es to prov ide a conserv ativ e
1 . I ntroduction v alue of FAT for the design of components. The FAT class is
determined at two million cy cles for 95% surv iv al prob ab ility
I n engineering structures ev en small fl aws, cold laps, non- (Ref 2) . I n this work, this v alue of FAT for some notch cases is
melted line, etc. , can eliminate the fatigue crack initiation calculated. I n addition, ai, C and m hav e b een determined b y
period. Then, only propagation life play s a significant role in b ackward calculations. Recommended v alues of FAT for a new
fatigue life of welded joints. The dimensions of these detected geometry can b e giv en b y using the current approach.
defects hav e a major role in fatigue life. The prob lem is
aggrav ated b ecause of the undetermined lengths of initial 1 .1 F rac ture Mec hanic s Metho d
cracks and the complex ity of welded joints.
The inev itab le parameter, which must b e studied and B etween the two conv entional approaches that are called,
calculated in fracture mechanics methods, is the stress intensity S- N and fracture mechanics approach for prediction fatigue life,
factor range (DK) . The stress intensity factor prov ides more fracture mechanics is an indispensab le method when a crack is
information for failure. detected. The fracture mechanics b ased method can b e used to
I n this work, S I Fs hav e b een calculated using a Fracture determine FAT of unknown notch cases of welded joints.
Analy ses Code two-dimensional program, FRANC2D (Ref 1) . S ince for welds in structural metals crack initiation often
The calculated results hav e b een v erified with the av ailab le occupies only a small portion of the life, it can then b e assumed
solutions from I nternational I nstitute of W elding (I I W ) (Ref 2) , negligib le. The assumption of ex istence of an initial crack
B ritish S tandards I nstitution (B S I ) (Ref 3) and from the (Ref 2) makes the fracture mechanics method suitab le for
literature. assessment of fatigue life and inspection interv als. M ore details
Traditionally , the fatigue design of welded joints for and discussion of v arious fracture controlled concepts such as
structural applications has used the S-N curv e ty pe of approach safe-life, fail-safe and damage tolerance hav e b een giv en in Ref
b ased on ex perimental results for different weld geometries 8. I n addition, an introduction to the most important damage
(Ref 4) , included for ex ample in E urocode 3, B S 540 0 , B S tolerance issues of safety relev ant railway components such as
76 0 8 (Ref 5-7) and I I W (Ref 2) where the initial crack length ax les, wheels and rails is prov ided also (Ref 8) .
(ai) is non-measurab le y et and no guidance is found. Therefore, H owev er, b ecause it is not possib le to suppose where the
first crack will b e started and to determine the ai and af depth,
the fracture mechanics approach assumes the ex istence of an
initial crack (ai) and predicts the fatigue life b y calculation of
A.M. Al-Mukhtar, H . B iermann, and S. H enkel, I nstitute of M ater-
ials E ngineering, Technische U niv ersita¨t B ergakademie Freib erg,
the growth of the crack to its final siz e (af) . The accu-
G ustav -Z euner-S traß e 5, 0 9599 Freib erg, G ermany ; and P . H übner, rate parameters hav e not y et b een scientifically estab lished.
College of M echanical E ngineering, Fachhochschule M ittweida, 0 96 48 Therefore, P outiainen et al. (Ref 9) mentioned that the initial
M ittweida, G ermany . Contact e-mail: almukhtar@ hotmail. de. cracks used in fatigue analy ses are often in the range of

J ournal of M aterials E ngineering and P erformance

Você também pode gostar