Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Control
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL AND
PREVENTION
Jerry Spiegel and Lucien Y. Maystre
Over the course of the twentieth century, growing recognition of the environmental
and public health impacts associated with anthropogenic activities (discussed in the
chapter Environmental Health Hazards) has prompted the development and
application of methods and technologies to reduce the effects of pollution. In this
context, governments have adopted regulatory and other policy measures (discussed
in the chapter Environmental Policy) to minimize negative effects and ensure that
environmental quality standards are achieved.
The objective of this chapter is to provide an orientation to the methods that are
applied to control and prevent environmental pollution. The basic principles followed
for eliminating negative impacts on the quality of water, air or land will be introduced;
the shifting emphasis from control to prevention will be considered; and the
limitations of building solutions for individual environmental media will be examined.
It is not enough, for example, to protect air by removing trace metals from a flue gas
only to transfer these contaminants to land through improper solid waste management
practices. Integrated multimedia solutions are required.
The Pollution Control Approach
The environmental consequences of rapid industrialization have resulted in countless
incidents of land, air and water resources sites being contaminated with toxic
materials and other pollutants, threatening humans and ecosystems with serious health
risks. More extensive and intensive use of materials and energy has created
cumulative pressures on the quality of local, regional and global ecosystems.
Before there was a concerted effort to restrict the impact of pollution, environmental
management extended little beyond laissez-faire tolerance, tempered by disposal of
wastes to avoid disruptive local nuisance conceived of in a short-term perspective.
The need for remediation was recognized, by exception, in instances where damage
was determined to be unacceptable. As the pace of industrial activity intensified and
Lauridsen provide a summary of the issues that are addressed in pursuing recycling as
a preferred waste management strategy, and consider the potential worker exposure
implications of this.
Shifting Emphasis to Pollution Prevention
End-of-pipe abatement risks transferring pollution from one medium to another,
where it may either cause equally serious environmental problems, or even end up as
an indirect source of pollution to the same medium. While not as expensive as
remediation, end-of-pipe abatement can contribute significantly to the costs of
production processes without contributing any value. It also typically is associated
with regulatory regimes which add other sets of costs associated with enforcing
compliance.
While the pollution control approach has achieved considerable success in producing
short-term improvements for local pollution problems, it has been less effective in
addressing cumulative problems that are increasingly recognized on regional (e.g.,
acid rain) or global (e.g., ozone depletion) levels.
The aim of a health-oriented environmental pollution control programme is to
promote a better quality of life by reducing pollution to the lowest level possible.
Environmental pollution control programmes and policies, whose implications and
priorities vary from country to country, cover all aspects of pollution (air, water, land
and so on) and involve coordination among areas such as industrial development, city
planning, water resources development and transportation policies.
Thomas Tseng, Victor Shantora and Ian Smith provide a case study example of the
multimedia impact that pollution has had on a vulnerable ecosystem subjected to
many stresses - the North American Great Lakes. The limited effectiveness of the
pollution control model in dealing with persistent toxins that dissipate through the
environment is particularly examined. By focusing on the approach being pursued in
one country and the implications that this has for international action, the implications
for actions that address prevention as well as control are illustrated.
As environmental pollution control technologies have become more sophisticated and
more expensive, there has been a growing interest in ways to incorporate prevention
in the design of industrial processes - with the objective of eliminating harmful
environmental effects while promoting the competitiveness of industries. Among the
benefits of pollution prevention approaches, clean technologies and toxic use
reduction is the potential for eliminating worker exposure to health risks.
Suspended particulate matter (SPM, PM-10) includes diesel exhaust, coal fly-ash,
mineral dusts (e.g., coal, asbestos, limestone, cement), metal dusts and fumes (e.g.,
zinc, copper, iron, lead) and acid mists (e.g., sulphuric acid), fluorides, paint pigments,
pesticide mists, carbon black and oil smoke. Suspended particulate pollutants, besides
their effects of provoking respiratory diseases, cancers, corrosion, destruction of plant
life and so on, can also constitute a nuisance (e.g., accumulation of dirt), interfere with
sunlight (e.g., formation of smog and haze due to light scattering) and act as catalytic
surfaces for reaction of adsorbed chemicals.
Gaseous pollutants include sulphur compounds (e.g., sulphur dioxide (SO 2) and
sulphur trioxide (SO3)), carbon monoxide, nitrogen compounds (e.g., nitric oxide
(NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ammonia), organic compounds (e.g., hydrocarbons
(HC), volatile organic compounds (VOC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH),
aldehydes), halogen compounds and halogen derivatives (e.g., HF and HCl), hydrogen
sulphide, carbon disulphide and mercaptans (odours).
Secondary pollutants may be formed by thermal, chemical or photochemical
reactions. For example, by thermal action sulphur dioxide can oxidize to sulphur
trioxide which, dissolved in water, gives rise to the formation of sulphuric acid mist
(catalysed by manganese and iron oxides). Photochemical reactions between nitrogen
oxides and reactive hydrocarbons can produce ozone (O 3), formaldehyde and
peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN); reactions between HCl and formaldehyde can form bischloromethyl ether.
While some odours are known to be caused by specific chemical agents such as
hydrogen sulphide (H2S), carbon disulphide (CS2) and mercaptans (R-SH or R1-S-R2)
others are difficult to define chemically.
Examples of the main pollutants associated with some industrial air pollution sources
are presented in table 55.1 (Economopoulos 1993).
Table 55.1 Common atmospheric pollutants and their sources
Category
Source
Emitted pollutants
Agriculture
Open burning
Mining and
quarrying
Manufacturing
Manufacture of
chemicals
Coal mining
SO2
SPM, Pb
Stone quarrying
SPM
SPM, VOC
Wood products
SPM, VOC
Phthalic anhydride
Chlor-alkali
Cl2
Hydrochloric acid
HCl
Hydrofluoric acid
HF, SiF4
Sulphuric acid
SO2, SO3
Nitric acid
NOx
Phosphoric acid
SPM, F2
SPM, Pb
Ammonia
Sodium carbonate
SPM, NH3
Calcium carbide
SPM
Adipic acid
Alkyl lead
Pb
CO, VOC
SPM, NH3
Ammonium nitrate
Ammonium sulphate
VOC
Petroleum refineries
SPM, VOC
Soap
SPM
Trinitrotoluene
Miscellaneous products of
petroleum and coal
Power generation
Non-ferrous industries
SPM, SO2, F, Pb
Pb
Transport
Community services
Municipal incinerators
traffic during unfavourable weather conditions. The best air quality management
stresses that the air pollutant emissions should be kept to a minimum; this is basically
defined through emission standards for single sources of air pollution and could be
achieved for industrial sources, for example, through closed systems and highefficiency collectors. An emission standard is a limit on the amount or concentration
of a pollutant emitted from a source. This type of legislation requires a decision, for
each industry, on the best means of controlling its emissions (i.e., fixing emission
standards).
The basic aim of air pollution management is to derive a clean air implementation
plan (or air pollution abatement plan) (Schwela and Kth-Jahr 1994) which consists of
the following elements:
emissions inventory
causal analysis
control measures
projections for the future on population, traffic, industries and fuel consumption
sulphur dioxide
nitrogen oxides
carbon monoxide
ozone
lower diesel particulate emission has the additional beneficial effect of increasing the
potential for catalytic control of diesel particulate and organic HC emissions.
Another important management tool for reducing vehicle evaporative and refuelling
emissions is the control of gasoline volatility. Control of fuel volatility can greatly
lower vehicle evaporative HC emissions. Use of oxygenated additives in gasoline
lowers HC and CO exhaust as long as fuel volatility is not increased.
Reduction of VMT is an additional means of controlling vehicle emissions by control
strategies such as
While such approaches promote fuel conservation, they are not yet accepted by the
general population, and governments have not seriously tried to implement them.
All these technological and political solutions to the motor vehicle problem except
substitution of electrical cars are increasingly offset by growth in the vehicle
population. The vehicle problem can be solved only if the growth problem is
addressed in an appropriate way.
Cost of Public Health and Environmental Effects; Cost-Benefit Analysis
The estimation of the costs of public health and environmental effects is the most
difficult part of a clean air implementation plan, as it is very difficult to estimate the
value of lifetime reduction of disabling illnesses, hospital admission rates and hours of
work lost. However, this estimation and a comparison with the cost of control
measures is absolutely necessary in order to balance the costs of control measures
versus the costs of no such measure undertaken, in terms of public health and
environmental effects.
Transportation and Land-Use Planning
The pollution problem is intimately connected to land-use and transportation,
including issues such as community planning, road design, traffic control and mass
transportation; to concerns of demography, topography and economy; and to social
concerns (Venzia 1977). In general, the rapidly growing urban aggregations have
severe pollution problems due to poor land-use and transportation practices.
Transportation planning for air pollution control includes transportation controls,
transportation policies, mass transit and highway congestion costs. Transportation
controls have an important impact on the general public in terms of equity,
repressiveness and social and economic disruption - in particular, direct transportation
controls such as motor vehicle constraints, gasoline limitations and motor vehicle
emission reductions. Emission reductions due to direct controls can be reliably
estimated and verified. Indirect transportation controls such as reduction of vehicle
miles travelled by improvement of mass transit systems, traffic flow improvement
regulations, regulations on parking lots, road and gasoline taxes, car-use permissions
and incentives for voluntary approaches are mostly based on past trial-and-error
experience, and include many uncertainties when trying to develop a viable
transportation plan.
National action plans incurring indirect transportation controls can affect
transportation and land-use planning with regard to highways, parking lots and
shopping centres. Long-term planning for the transportation system and the area
influenced by it will prevent significant deterioration of air quality and provide for
compliance with air quality standards. Mass transit is consistently considered as a
potential solution for urban air pollution problems. Selection of a mass transit system
to serve an area and different modal splits between highway use and bus or rail service
will ultimately alter land-use patterns. There is an optimum split that will minimize air
pollution; however, this may not be acceptable when non-environmental factors are
considered.
The automobile has been called the greatest generator of economic externalities ever
known. Some of these, such as jobs and mobility, are positive, but the negative ones,
such as air pollution, accidents resulting in death and injury, property damage, noise,
loss of time, and aggravation, lead to the conclusion that transportation is not a
decreasing cost industry in urbanized areas. Highway congestion costs are another
externality; lost time and congestion costs, however, are difficult to determine. A true
evaluation of competing transportation modes, such as mass transportation, cannot be
obtained if travel costs for work trips do not include congestion costs.
Land-use planning for air pollution control includes zoning codes and performance
standards, land-use controls, housing and land development, and land-use planning
policies. Land-use zoning was the initial attempt to accomplish protection of the
people, their property and their economic opportunity. However, the ubiquitous nature
of air pollutants required more than physical separation of industries and residential
areas to protect the individual. For this reason, performance standards based initially
International agencies such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) have instituted
monitoring and research projects in order to clarify the issues involved in air pollution and to
promote measures to prevent further deterioration of public health and environmental and
climatic conditions.
The Global Environmental Monitoring System GEMS/Air (WHO/ UNEP 1993) is organized and
sponsored by WHO and UNEP and has developed a comprehensive programme for providing the
instruments of rational air pollution management (see figure 55.1. The kernel of this programme
is a global database of urban air pollutant concentrations of sulphur dioxides, suspended
particulate matter, lead, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and ozone. As important as this
database, however, is the provision of management tools such as guides for rapid emission
inventories, programmes for dispersion modelling, population exposure estimates, control
measures, and cost-benefit analysis. In this respect, GEMS/Air provides methodology review
handbooks (WHO/UNEP 1994, 1995), conducts global assessments of air quality, facilitates
review and validation of assessments, acts as a data/information broker, produces technical
documents in support of all aspects of air quality management, facilitates the establishment of
monitoring, conducts and widely distributes annual reviews, and establishes or identifies regional
collaboration centres and/or experts to coordinate and support activities according to the needs of
the regions. (WHO/UNEP 1992, 1993, 1995)
The Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) programme (Miller and Soudine 1994) provides data and
other information on the chemical composition and related physical characteristics of the
atmosphere, and their trends, with the objective of understanding the relationship between
changing atmospheric composition and changes of global and regional climate, the long-range
atmospheric transport and deposition of potentially harmful substances over terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems, and the natural cycling of chemical elements in the global
atmosphere/ocean/biosphere system, and anthropogenic impacts thereon. The GAW programme
consists of four activity areas: the Global Ozone Observing System (GO3OS), global monitoring
of background atmospheric composition, including the Background Air Pollution Monitoring
Network (BAPMoN); dispersion, transport, chemical transformation and deposition of
atmospheric pollutants over land and sea on different time and space scales; exchange of
pollutants between the atmosphere and other environmental compartments; and integrated
monitoring. One of the most important aspects of the GAW is the establishment of Quality
Assurance Science Activity Centres to oversee the quality of the data produced under GAW.
In this case, the equation mentioned above can be solved analytically. The resulting
formula describes a plume with Gaussian concentration distribution, the so called
Gaussian plume model (VDI 1992). The distribution parameters depend on
meteorological conditions and downwind distance as well as on stack height. They
have to be determined empirically (Venkatram and Wyngaard 1988). Situations where
emissions and/or meteorological parameters vary by a considerable amount in time
and/or space may be described by the Gaussian puff model (VDI 1994). Under this
approach, distinct puffs are emitted in fixed time steps, each following its own path
according to the current meteorological conditions. On its way, each puff grows
according to turbulent mixing. Parameters describing this growth, again, have to be
determined from empirical data (Venkatram and Wyngaard 1988). It has to be
stressed, however, that to achieve this objective, input parameters must be available
with the necessary resolution in time and/or space.
Concerning accidental releases or single case studies, a Lagrangian or particle model
(VDI Guideline 3945, Part 3) is recommended. The concept thereby is to calculate the
paths of many particles, each of which represents a fixed amount of the pollutant in
question. The individual paths are composed of transport by the mean wind and of
stochastic disturbances. Due to the stochastic part, the paths do not fully agree, but
depict the mixture by turbulence. In principle, Lagrangian models are capable of
considering complex meteorological conditions - in particular, wind and turbulence;
fields calculated by flow models described below can be used for Lagrangian
dispersion modelling.
Dispersion Modelling in Complex Terrain
If pollutant concentrations have to be determined in structured terrain, it may be
necessary to include topographic effects on pollutant dispersion in modelling. Such
effects are, for example, transport following the topographic structure, or thermal
wind systems like sea breezes or mountain winds, which change wind direction in the
course of the day.
If such effects take place on a scale much larger than the model area, the influence
may be considered by using meteorological data which reflect the local
characteristics. If no such data are available, the three-dimensional structure
impressed on the flow by topography can be obtained by using a corresponding flow
model. Based on these data, dispersion modelling itself may be carried out assuming
horizontal homogeneity as described above in the case of the Gaussian plume model.
However, in situations where wind conditions change significantly inside the model
area, dispersion modelling itself has to consider the three-dimensional flow affected
by the topographic structure. As mentioned above, this may be done by using a
Gaussian puff or a Lagrangian model. Another way is to perform the more complex
Eulerian modelling.
To determine wind direction in accord with the topographically structured terrain,
mass consistent or diagnostic flow modelling may be used (Pielke 1984). Using this
approach, the flow is fitted to topography by varying the initial values as little as
possible and by keeping its mass consistent. As this is an approach which leads to
quick results, it may also be used to calculate wind statistics for a certain site if no
observations are available. To do this, geostrophic wind statistics (i.e., upper air data
from rawinsondes) are used.
If, however, thermal wind systems have to be considered in more detail, so called
prognostic models have to be used. Depending on the scale and the steepness of the
model area, a hydrostatic, or the even more complex non-hydrostatic, approach is
suitable (VDI 1981). Models of this type need much computer power, as well as much
experience in application. Determination of concentrations based on annual means, in
general, are not possible with these models. Instead, worst case studies can be
performed by considering only one wind direction and those wind speed and
stratification parameters which result in the highest surface concentration values. If
those worst case values do not exceed air quality standards, more detailed studies are
not necessary.
Figure 55.2, figure 55.3 and figure 55.4 demonstrate how the transport and
dispension of pollutants can be presented in relation to the influence of terrain and
wind climatologies derived from consideration of surface and geostrophic wind
frequencies.
Figure 55.2 Topographic structure of a model region
determined, it can be used to calculate the transport and turbulent mixing of the
pollutant emitted. This can be done by Lagrangian or Eulerian dispersion modelling.
More detailed studies - concerning accidental releases, for instance - can be performed
only by using non-hydrostatic flow and dispersion models instead of a diagnostic
approach. As this, in general, demands high computer power, a worst case approach as
described above is recommended in advance of a complete statistical modelling.
checking the results of pollution abatement measures and trends over time
screening measurements
Parameter
Area of measurement
Measurement height
Measurement frequency
Measurement time
Random choice
Measured object
Measurement procedure
High
VDI guidelines
Costs
The example in table 55.2 shows the case of a measurement network that is supposed
to monitor the air quality in a specific area as representatively as possible, to compare
with designated air quality limits. The idea behind this approach is that a random
choice of measurement sites is made in order to cover equally locations in an area
with varying air quality (e.g., living areas, streets, industrial zones, parks, city centres,
suburbs). This approach may be very costly in large areas due to the number of
measurement sites necessary.
Another conception for a measurement network therefore starts with measurement
sites that are representatively selected. If measurements of differing air quality are
conducted in the most important locations, and the length of time that the protected
objects remain in these microenvironments is known, then the exposure can be
determined. This approach can be extended to other microenvironments (e.g., interior
rooms, cars) in order to estimate the total exposure. Diffusion modelling or screening
measurements can help in choosing the right measurement sites.
A third approach is to measure at the points of presumed highest exposure (e.g., for
NO2 and benzene in street canyons). If assessment standards are met at this site, there
is sufficient probability that this will also be the case for all other sites. This approach,
by focusing on critical points, requires relatively few measurement sites, but these
must be chosen with particular care. This particular method risks overestimating real
exposure.
The parameters of measurement time period, assessment of the measurement data and
measurement frequency are essentially given in the definition of the assessment
standards (limits) and the desired level of certainty of the results. Threshold limits and
the peripheral conditions to be considered in measurement planning are related. By
using continuous measurement procedures, a resolution that is temporally almost
seamless can be achieved. But this is necessary only in monitoring peak values and/or
for smog warnings; for monitoring annual mean values, for example, discontinuous
measurements are adequate.
The following section is dedicated to describing the capabilities of measurement
procedures and quality control as a further parameter important to measurement
planning.
Quality Assurance
Measurements of ambient air pollutant concentrations can be costly to conduct, and
results can affect significant decisions with serious economic or ecological
implications. Therefore, quality assurance measures are an integral part of the
measurement process. Two areas should be distinguished here.
Procedure-oriented measures
Every complete measurement procedure consists of several steps: sampling, sample
preparation and clean-up; separation, detection (final analytical step); and data
collection and assessment. In some cases, especially with continuous measurement of
inorganic gases, some steps of the procedure can be left out (e.g., separation).
Comprehensive adherence to procedures should be strived for in conducting
measurements. Procedures that are standardized and thus comprehensively
documented should be followed, in the form of DIN/ISO standards, CEN standards or
VDI guidelines.
User-oriented measures
Using standardized and proven equipment and procedures for ambient air pollutant
concentration measurement cannot alone ensure acceptable quality if the user does not
employ adequate methods of quality control. The standards series DIN/EN/ISO 9000
(Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards), EN 45000 (which defines
the requirements for testing laboratories) and ISO Guide 25 (General Requirements
for the Competence of Calibration and Testing Laboratories) are important for useroriented measures to ensure quality.
Important aspects of user quality control measures include:
acceptance and practice of the content of the measures in the sense of good
laboratory practice (GLP)
correct maintenance of measurement equipment, qualified measures to eliminate
disruptions and ensure repairs
Measurement Procedures
Measurement procedures for inorganic gases
A wealth of measurement procedures exists for the broad range of inorganic gases. We
will differentiate between manual and automatic methods.
Manual procedures
In the case of manual measurement procedures for inorganic gases, the substance to
be measured is normally adsorbed during the sampling in a solution or solid material.
In most cases a photometric determination is made after an appropriate colour
reaction. Several manual measurement procedures have special significance as
reference procedures. Because of the relatively high personnel cost, these manual
procedures are conducted only rarely for field measurements today, when alternative
automatic procedures are available. The most important procedures are briefly
sketched in table 55.3 .
Table 55.3 Manual measurement procedures for inorganic gases
Material Procedure
Execution
Comments
SO2
EU-reference measurement
TCM procedure
DL = 0.3 g SO2;
s = 0.03 mg/m3 at 0.5 mg/m3
SO2
NO2
Saltzman procedure
O3
Potassium iodide
procedure
F-
Silver bead
procedure; variant 1
F-
Silver bead
procedure; variant 2
Cl-
Mercury rhodanide
procedure
Cl2
Methyl-orange
DL = 20 g/m3;
rel. s = 3.5% at 390 g/m3
procedure
NH3
DL = 3 g/m3 (impinger);
partial inclusion of compoun
and amines
NH3
Nessler procedure
H2S
Molybdenum-blue
procedure
DL = 0.4 g/m3
H2S
Methylene blue
procedure
DL = 0.3 g/m3
There are numerous different continuous measuring monitors on the market for
sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and ozone. For the most part they
are used particularly in measurement networks. The most important features of the
individual methods are collected in table 55.4 .
Table 55.4 Automated measurement procedures for inorganic gases
Material
Measuring principle
Comments
SO2
SO2
UV fluorescence; excitation of
SO2molecules with UV radiation
(190230 nm); measurement of
fluorescence radiation
NO/NO2
Chemiluminescence; reaction of NO
with O3 to NO2; detection of
chemiluminescence radiation with
photomultiplier
CO
O3
O3
Chemiluminescence; reaction of
O3with ethene to formaldehyde;
detection of chemiluminescence
radiation with photomultiplier
Among particulate air pollutants, dustfall and suspended particulate matter (SPM) are
differentiated. Dustfall consists of larger particles, which sink to the ground because
of their size and thickness. SPM includes the particle fraction that is dispersed in the
atmosphere in a quasi-stable and quasi-homogenous manner and therefore remains
suspended for a certain time.
Measurement of suspended particulate matter and metallic compounds in SPM
total suspended dust, because the measuring devices must be fitted with special,
expensively constructed sampling heads that require costly maintenance. Table 55.5
contains details on the most important SPM measurement procedures.
Table 55.5 Measurement procedures for suspended particulate matter (SPM)
Procedure
Measuring principle
Comments
LIB device
FH 62 I
Gravimetric calibration by
dusting of single filters; device
also operable with PM-10
preseparator
Gravimetric calibration by
703
TEOM 1400
Relationship between
frequency lowering and dust
mass must be established
through calibration
Recently, automatic filter changers have also been developed that hold a larger
number of filters and supply them to the sampler, one after another, at timed intervals.
The exposed filters are stored in a magazine. The detection limits for filter procedures
lie between 5 and 10 g/m3 of dust, as a rule.
Finally, the black smoke procedure for SPM measurements has to be mentioned.
Coming from Britain, it has been incorporated into EU guidelines for SO 2 and
suspended dust. In this procedure, the blackening of the coated filter is measured with
a reflex photometer after the sampling. The black smoke values that are thus
photometrically obtained are converted into gravimetric units (g/m 3) with the help of
a calibration curve. Since this calibration function depends to a high degree on the
composition of the dust, especially its soot content, the conversion into gravimetric
units is problematic.
Today, metal compounds are often routinely determined in suspended dust immission
samples. In general, the collection of the suspended dust on filters is followed by a
chemical dissolution of the separated dusts, since the most common final analytical
steps presuppose converting the metallic and metalloid compounds in an aqueous
solution. In practice, the most important methods by far are atom absorption
spectroscopy (AAS) and spectroscopy with plasma excitation (ICP-OES). Other
other parameters. The differences in the measurement values obtained with the
different procedures can reach 50 per cent.
Also important is the composition of the deposited dust, such as the content of lead,
cadmium and other metallic compounds. The analytical procedures used for this are
basically the same as those used for suspended dust.
Measuring special materials in dust form
Special materials in dust form include asbestos and soot. Collecting fibres as air
pollutants is important since asbestos has been classified as a confirmed carcinogenic
material. Fibres with a diameter of D 3mm and a length of L 5mm, where L:D 3,
are considered carcinogenic. Measurement procedures for fibrous materials consist of
counting, under the microscope, fibres that have been separated on filters. Only
electron microscopic procedures can be considered for outside air measurements. The
fibres are separated on gold-coated porous filters. Prior to assessment in an electron
scan microscope, the sample is freed of organic substances through plasma
incineration right on the filter. The fibres are counted on part of the filter surface,
randomly chosen and classified by geometry and type of fibre. With the help of energy
dispersive x-ray analysis (EDXA), asbestos fibres, calcium sulphate fibres and other
inorganic fibres can be differentiated on the basis of elemental composition. The
entire procedure is extremely expensive and requires the greatest care to achieve
reliable results.
Soot in the form of particles emitted by diesel motors has become relevant since diesel
soot was also classified as carcinogenic. Because of its changing and complex
composition and because of the fact that various constituents are also emitted from
other sources, there is no measurement procedure specific to diesel soot. Nevertheless,
in order to say something concrete about the concentrations in ambient air, soot is
conventionally defined as elemental carbon, as a part of total carbon. It is measured
after sampling and an extraction step and/or thermal desorption. Determination of the
carbon content ensues through burning in an oxygen stream and coulometric titration
or non-dispersive IR detection of the carbon dioxide formed in the process.
The so-called aethalometer and the photoelectric aerosol sensor are also used for
measuring soot, in principle.
Measuring Wet Depositions
Together with dry deposition, wet deposition in rain, snow, fog and dew constitute the
most important means by which harmful materials enter the ground, water or plant
surfaces from the air.
In order to clearly distinguish the wet deposition in rain and snow (fog and dew
present special problems) from the measurement of total deposition (bulk deposition,
see section Measurement of dustfall and metallic compounds above) and dry
deposition, rain catchers, whose collection opening is covered when there is no rain
(wet-only sampler), are used for sampling. With rain sensors, which mostly work on
the principle of conductivity changes, the cover is opened when it starts to rain and
closed again when the rain stops.
The samples are transferred through a funnel (open area approx. 500 cm 2 and more)
into a darkened and if possible insulated collection container (of glass or polyethylene
for inorganic components only).
In general, analysing the collected water for inorganic components can be done
without sample preparation. The water should be centrifuged or filtered if it is visibly
cloudy. The conductivity, pH value and important anions (NO 3 , SO42 , Cl) and
cations (Ca2+, K+, Mg2+, Na+, NH4+ and so on) are routinely measured. Unstable trace
compounds and intermediate states like H 2O2 or HSO3 are also measured for
research purposes.
For analysis, procedures are used that are generally available for aqueous solutions
such as conductometry for conductivity, electrodes for pH values, atom adsorption
spectroscopy for cations (see section Measuring special materials in dust form,
above) and, increasingly, ion exchange chromatography with conductivity detection
for anions.
Organic compounds are extracted from rain water with, for example,
dichloromethane, or blown out with argon and adsorbed with Tenax tubes (only highly
volatile materials). The materials are then subjected to a gas chromatographic analysis
(see Measurement procedures for organic air pollutants, below).
Dry deposition correlates directly with ambient air concentrations. The concentration
differences of airborne harmful materials in rain, however, are relatively small, so that
for measuring wet deposition, wide-mesh measuring networks are adequate. Examples
include the European EMEP measurement network, in which the entry of sulphate and
nitrate ions, certain cations and precipitation pH values are collected in approximately
90 stations. There are also extensive measurement networks in North America.
Optical Long-Distance Measurement Procedures
Whereas the procedures described up to now catch air pollution at one point, optical
long-distance measuring procedures measure in an integrated manner over light paths
of several kilometres or they determine the spatial distribution. They use the
Procedure
Application
Advantages,
disadvantages
+ Multicomponent
system
+ dl a few ppb
Expensive
+ Easy to handle
+ Successful
performance test
+ Multicomponent
system
High dl under
conditions of poor
visibility (e.g.fog)
+ High sensitivity
(to ppt)
+ Measures
unstable trace
compounds
High cost
Difficult to
handle
Monitors surface
sources, large surface
immission
measurements
+ Measurements
of spatial
distribution
+ Measures
inaccessible
places (e.g.,
smoke gas trails)
Expensive
Limited
component
spectrum (SO2,
O3, NO2)
Material group
Low-boiling
ng/m3-g/m3
hydrocarbons, highly
volatile halogenated
hydrocarbons
Capillary GC/FID
Capillary GC/FID/ECD/M
Capillary GC/FID/ECD/M
Capillary GC-GCMS
(PCDD/PCDF), capillary
GC-FID or MS (PAH),
HPLC fluorescence detec
(PAH)
Modification for
low-boiling
compounds (from
-120 C)
ng/m3-g/m3
GC/FID
GC = gas chromatography;
GCMS = GC/mass spectroscopy;
FID = flame ionization detector
HRGC/ECD = high resolution GC/ECD;
ECD = electron capture detector
HPLC = high performance liquid chromatography.
PID = photo-ionization detector.
Deposition measurements of organic compounds with low volatility (e.g.,
dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAH)) are gaining in importance from the perspective of environmental impact.
Since food is the main source of human intake, airborne material transferred onto food
plants is of great significance. There is, however, evidence that material transfer by
The first possibility combines emission measurement with modelling and, strictly
speaking, cannot be classified under the term air quality monitoring. In the third
method, the human nose is used as the detector with significantly reduced precision as
compared to physical-chemical methods.
Details of inspections, measurement plans and assessing the results are contained, for
example, in the environmental protection regulations of some German states.
Screening Measurement Procedures
Simplified measurement procedures are sometimes used for preparatory studies
(screening). Examples include passive samplers, test tubes and biological procedures.
With passive (diffusive) samplers, the material to be tested is collected with freely
flowing processes such as diffusion, permeation or adsorption in simple forms of
Beyond the telemetric measurement network, other measuring systems for monitoring
air quality are used to varying extents. Examples include (occasionally partially
automated) measurement networks to determine:
Continuous measuring
system
Partially automated
measuring system
Discontinuous measuring
system/Multi-component
measurements
Sulphur dioxide
Nitrogen monoxide
Nitrogen dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Suspended particulate matter
(SPM)
Ozone
Hydrocarbons
Wind direction
Wind speed
Air temperature
Air pressure
Relative humidity
Radiation balance
Precipitation
SPM composition:
Lead
Cadmium
Nickel
Copper
Iron
Arsenic
Beryllium
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[e]pyrene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
Benzo[ghi)perylene
Coronene
Ideally, the selection of the appropriate controls will be made in the context of the
problem to be solved.
What combination of controls must be selected to ensure that the short-term and
long-term exposure levels are not exceeded?
Table 55.9 describes the steps in this process.
Table 55.9 Steps in selecting pollution controls
Step 1:
Define emissions.
The first part is to determine what will be released from the stack. All
potentially harmful emissions must be listed. The second part is to
estimate how much of each material will be released. Without this
information, the manager cannot begin to design a control programme.
Step 2:
Define target groups.
Step 3:
Determine acceptable
exposure levels.*
Step 4:
Select controls.
again. This process continues until all exposures are at or below the
acceptable level. Dispersion modelling can be used to estimate
exposures for new plants or to test alternative solutions for existing
facilities.
* When setting exposure levels in Step 3, it must be remembered that these exposures
are total exposures, not just those from the plant. Once the acceptable level has been
established, background levels, and contributions from other plants must be subtracted
to determine the maximum amount that the plant can emit without exceeding the
acceptable exposure level. If this is not done, and three plants are allowed to emit at
the maximum, the target groups will be exposed to three times the acceptable level.
** Some materials such as carcinogens do not have a threshold below which no
harmful effects will occur. Therefore, as long as some of the material is allowed to
escape to the environment, there will be some risk to the target populations. In this
case a no effect level cannot be set (other than zero). Instead, an acceptable level of
risk must be established. Usually this is set in the range of 1 adverse outcome in
100,000 to 1,000,000 exposed persons.
Some jurisdictions have done some of the work by setting standards based on the
maximum concentration of a contaminant that a susceptible target can receive. With
this type of standard, the manager does not have to carry out Steps 2 and 3, since the
regulating agency has already done this. Under this system, the manager must
establish only the uncontrolled emission standards for each pollutant (Step 1), and
then determine what controls are necessary to meet the standard (Step 4).
By having air quality standards, regulators can measure individual exposures and thus
determine whether anyone is exposed to potentially harmful levels. It is assumed that
the standards set under these conditions are low enough to protect the most
susceptible target group. This is not always a safe assumption. As shown in table
55.10, there can be a wide variation in common air quality standards. Air quality
standards for sulphur dioxide range from 30 to 140 g/m3. For less commonly
regulated materials this variation can be even larger (1.2 to 1,718 g/m 3), as shown
in table 55.11 for benzene. This is not surprising given that economics can play as
large a role in standard setting as does toxicology. If a standard is not set low enough
to protect susceptible populations, no one is well served. Exposed populations have a
feeling of false confidence, and can unknowingly be put at risk. The emitter may at
first feel that they have benefited from a lenient standard, but if effects in the
community require the company to redesign their controls, or install new controls,
costs could be higher than doing it correctly the first time.
Table 55.10 Range of air quality standards for a commonly controlled air contaminant
(sulphur dioxide)
Australia
50
Canada
30
Finland
40
Germany
140
Hungary
70
Taiwan
133
Table 55.11 Range of air quality standards for a less commonly controlled air contaminant
(benzene)
City/State
Connecticut
53.4
Massachusetts
1.2
Michigan
2.4
North Carolina
2.1
Nevada
254
New York
1,718
Philadelphia
1,327
Virginia
300
Process
Pollutant
Control method
Estimated
efficiency
Soil remediation
Hydrocarbons
Thermal oxidizer
99
Particulates
Electrostatic
precipitator
99.68
Production of
fumed silica
Carbon monoxide
Good practice
50
Oven afterburner
90
Particulates
Baghouse
100
Petroleum refinery,
catalytic cracking
Respirable
particulates
Cyclone + Venturi
scrubber
93
Medical incinerator
Hydrogen chloride
97.5
Coal-fired boiler
Sulphur dioxide
90
Waste disposal by
dehydration and
incineration
Particulates
Cyclone + condenser +
Venturi scrubber + wet
scrubber
95
Asphalt plant
Hydrocarbons
Thermal oxidizer
99
BACT by itself does not ensure adequate control levels. Although this is the best
control system based on gas cleaning controls and good operating practices, BACT
may not be good enough if the source is a large plant, or if it is located next to a
sensitive target. Best available control technology should be tested to ensure that it is
indeed good enough. The resulting emission standards should be checked to determine
whether or not they may still be harmful even with the best gas cleaning controls. If
emission standards are still harmful, other basic controls, such as selecting safer
processes or materials, or relocating in a less sensitive area, may have to be
considered.
Another universal solution that bypasses some of the steps is source performance
standards. Many jurisdictions establish emission standards that cannot be exceeded.
Emission standards are based on emissions at the source. Usually this works well, but
like BACT they can be unreliable. The levels should be low enough to maintain the
maximum emissions low enough to protect susceptible target populations from typical
emissions. However, as with best available control technology, this may not be good
enough to protect everyone where there are large emission sources or nearby
susceptible populations. If this is the case, other procedures must be used to ensure the
safety of all target groups.
Both BACT and emission standards have a basic fault. They assume that if certain
criteria are met at the plant, the target groups will be automatically protected. This is
not necessarily so, but once such a system is passed into law, effects on the target
become secondary to compliance with the law.
BACT and source emission standards or design criteria should be used as minimum
criteria for controls. If BACT or emission criteria will protect the susceptible targets,
then they can be used as intended, otherwise other administrative controls must be
used.
Control Measures
Controls can be divided into two basic types of controls - technological and
administrative. Technological controls are defined here as the hardware put on an
emission source to reduce contaminants in the gas stream to a level that is acceptable
to the community and that will protect the most sensitive target. Administrative
controls are defined here as other control measures.
Technological controls
Gas cleaning systems are placed at the source, before the stack, to remove
contaminants from the gas stream before releasing it to the environment. Table 55.13
shows a brief summary of the different classes of gas cleaning system.
Table 55.13 Gas cleaning methods for removing harmful gases, vapours and particulates
from industrial process emissions
Control method
Examples
Description
Efficienc
Condensation
Contact condensers
Surface condensers
80+% w
ppm
Absorption
Wet scrubbers
(packed or plate
absorbers)
8295%
ppm 95
>100 pp
Adsorption
Carbon
Alumina
Silica gel
Molecular sieve
90+% w
ppm 95+
>1,000 p
Incineration
Flares
Incinerator
Catalytic incinerator
Not reco
concentr
when co
Cyclones
Gases/Vapours
Particulates
Inertialseparators
Wet scrubbers
Venturi
Wetted filter
Tray or sieve
scrubber
For 5 m
w.g.; 99
For 1 m
99.95 at
Electrostatic
precipitators
Plate-wire
Flat-plate
Tubular
Wet
9599.5
99.259
Filters
Baghouse
99.9% fo
99.5% fo
The gas cleaner is part of a complex system consisting of hoods, ductwork, fans,
cleaners and stacks. The design, performance and maintenance of each part affects the
performance of all other parts, and the system as a whole.
It should be noted that system efficiency varies widely for each type of cleaner,
depending on its design, energy input and the characteristics of the gas stream and the
contaminant. As a result, the sample efficiencies in table 55.13 are only
approximations. The variation in efficiencies is demonstrated with wet scrubbers
in table 55.13 . Wet scrubber collection efficiency goes from 98.5 per cent for 5 m
particles to 45 per cent for 1 m particles at the same pressure drop across the
scrubber (6.8 in. water gauge (w.g.)). For the same size particle, 1 m, efficiency goes
from 45 per cent efficiency at 6.8 w.g. to 99.95 at 50 w.g. As a result, gas cleaners
must be matched to the specific gas stream in question. The use of generic devices is
not recommended.
Waste disposal
When selecting and designing gas cleaning systems, careful consideration must be
given to the safe disposal of the collected material. As shown in table 55.14 , some
processes produce large amounts of contaminants. If most of the contaminants are
collected by the gas cleaning equipment there can be a hazardous waste disposal
problem.
Table 55.14 Sample uncontrolled emission rates for selected industrial processes
Industrial source
Emission rate
In some cases the wastes may contain valuable products that can be recycled, such as
heavy metals from a smelter, or solvent from a painting line. The wastes can be used
as a raw material for another industrial process - for example, sulphur dioxide
collected as sulphuric acid can be used in the manufacture of fertilizers.
Where the wastes cannot be recycled or reused, disposal may not be simple. Not only
can the volume be a problem, but they may be hazardous themselves. For example, if
the sulphuric acid captured from a boiler or smelter cannot be reused, it will have to
be further treated to neutralize it before disposal.
Dispersion
Similarly, if a plant is located in a valley, the plumes may move up and down the
valley, or be blocked by surrounding hills so that they do not spread out and disperse
as expected.
Administrative controls
In addition to the technological systems, there is another group of controls that must
be considered in the overall design of an air pollution control system. For the large
part, they come from the basic tools of industrial hygiene.
Substitution
Controls are required for all the identified problems that cannot be avoided by
substituting safer materials or methods. Emissions start at the individual worksite, not
the stack. A ventilation system that captures and controls emissions at the source will
help protect the community if it is properly designed. The hoods and ducts of the
ventilation system are part of the total air pollution control system.
A local ventilation system is preferred. It does not dilute the contaminants, and
provides a concentrated gas stream that is easier to clean before release to the
environment. Gas cleaning equipment is more efficient when cleaning air with higher
concentrations of contaminants. For example, a capture hood over the pouring spout
of a metal furnace will prevent contaminants from getting into the environment, and
deliver the fumes to the gas cleaning system. In table 55.13 it can be seen that
cleaning efficiencies for absorption and adsorption cleaners increase with the
concentration of the contaminant, and condensation cleaners are not recommended for
low levels (<2,000 ppm) of contaminants.
If pollutants are not caught at the source and are allowed to escape through windows
and ventilation openings, they become uncontrolled fugitive emissions. In some cases,
these uncontrolled fugitive emissions can have a significant impact on the immediate
neighbourhood.
Isolation
Isolation - locating the plant away from susceptible targets - can be a major control
method when engineering controls are inadequate by themselves. This may be the
only means of achieving an acceptable level of control when best available control
technology (BACT) must be relied on. If, after applying the best available controls, a
target group is still at risk, consideration must be given to finding an alternate site
where sensitive populations are not present.
Isolation, as presented above, is a means of separating an individual plant from
susceptible targets. Another isolation system is where local authorities use zoning to
separate classes of industries from susceptible targets. Once industries have been
separated from target populations, the population should not be allowed to relocate
next to the facility. Although this seems like common sense, it isnt employed as often
as it should be.
Work procedures
Work procedures must be developed to ensure that equipment is used properly and
safely, without risk to workers or the environment. Complex air pollution systems
must be properly maintained and operated if they are to do their job as intended. An
important factor in this is staff training. Staff must be trained in how to use and
maintain the equipment to reduce or eliminate the amount of hazardous materials
emitted to the workplace or the community. In some cases BACT relies on good
practice to ensure acceptable results.
Real time monitoring
A system based on real time monitoring is not popular, and is not commonly used. In
this case, continuous emission and meteorological monitoring can be combined with
dispersion modelling to predict downwind exposures. When the predicted exposures
approach the acceptable levels, the information is used to reduce production rates and
emissions. This is an inefficient method, but may be an acceptable interim control
method for an existing facility.
The converse of this to announce warnings to the public when conditions are such that
excessive concentrations of contaminants may exist, so that the public can take
appropriate action. For example, if a warning is sent out that atmospheric conditions
are such that sulphur dioxide levels downwind of a smelter are excessive, susceptible
populations such as asthmatics would know not to go outside. Again, this may be an
acceptable interim control until permanent controls are installed.
Real time atmospheric and meteorological monitoring is sometimes used to avoid or
reduce major air pollution events where multiple sources may exist. When it becomes
evident that excessive air pollution levels are likely, the personal use of cars may be
restricted and major emitting industries shut down.
Maintenance/housekeeping
In all cases the effectiveness of the controls depends on proper maintenance; the
equipment has to operate as intended. Not only must the air pollution controls be
maintained and used as intended, but the processes generating potential emissions
must be maintained and operated properly. An example of an industrial process is a
wood chip dryer with a failing temperature controller; if the dryer is operated at too
high a temperature, it will emit more materials, and perhaps a different type of
material, from the drying wood. An example of gas cleaner maintenance affecting
emissions would be a poorly maintained baghouse with broken bags, which would
allow particulates to pass through the filter.
Housekeeping also plays an important part in controlling total emissions. Dusts that
are not quickly cleaned up inside the plant can become re-entrained and present a
hazard to staff. If the dusts are carried outside of the plant, they are a community
hazard. Poor housekeeping in the plant yard could present a significant risk to the
community. Uncovered bulk materials, plant wastes or vehicle-raised dusts can result
in pollutants being carried on the winds into the community. Keeping the yard clean,
using proper containers or storage sites, is important in reducing total emissions. A
system must be not only designed properly, but used properly as well if the
community is to be protected.
A worst case example of poor maintenance and housekeeping would be the lead
recovery plant with a broken lead dust conveyor. The dust was allowed to escape from
the conveyor until the pile was so high the dust could slide down the pile and out a
broken window. Local winds then carried the dust around the neighbourhood.
Equipment for Emission Sampling
Source sampling can be carried out for several reasons:
To characterize the emissions. To design an air pollution control system, one must
know what is being emitted. Not only the volume of gas, but the amount, identity and,
in the case of particulates, size distribution of the material being emitted must be
known. The same information is necessary to catalogue total emissions in a
neighbourhood.
To test equipment efficiency. After an air pollution control system has been
purchased, it should be tested to ensure that it is doing the intended job.
As part of a control system. When emissions are continuously monitored, the data
can be used to fine tune the air pollution control system, or the plant operation itself.
To determine compliance. When regulatory standards include emission limits,
emission sampling can be used to determine compliance or non-compliance with the
standards.
The type of sampling system used will depend on the reason for taking the samples,
costs, availability of technology, and training of staff.
Visible emissions
Where there is a desire to reduce the soiling power of the air, improve visibility or
prevent the introduction of aerosols into the atmosphere, standards may be based on
visible emissions.
Visible emissions are composed of small particles or coloured gases. The more opaque
a plume is, the more material is being emitted. This characteristic is evident to the
sight, and trained observers can be used to assess emission levels. There are several
advantages to using this method of assessing emission standards:
Plant operators can quickly assess the effects of process changes at low cost.
Questionable emissions can be located and the actual emissions then determined
by source testing as described in the following sections.
Extractive sampling
A much more rigorous sampling method calls for a sample of the gas stream to be
removed from the stack and analysed. Although this sounds simple, it does not
translate into a simple sampling method.
The sample should be collected isokinetically, especially when particulates are being
collected. Isokinetic sampling is defined as sampling by drawing the sample into the
sampling probe at the same velocity that the material is moving in the stack or duct.
This is done by measuring the velocity of the gas stream with a pitot tube and then
adjusting the sampling rate so that the sample enters the probe at the same velocity.
This is essential when sampling for particulates, since larger, heavier particles will not
follow a change in direction or velocity. As a result the concentration of larger
particles in the sample will not be representative of the gas stream and the sample will
be inaccurate.
A sample train for sulphur dioxide is shown in figure 55.5 . It is not simple, and a
trained operator is required to ensure that a sample is collected properly. If something
other than sulphur dioxide is to be sampled, the impingers and ice bath can be
removed and the appropriate collection device inserted.
Figure 55.5 A diagram of an isokinetic sampling train for sulphur dioxide
The potential accuracy of the method makes it suitable for performance testing of
new control equipment.
Since samples can be collected and analysed under controlled laboratory
conditions for many components, it is useful for characterizing the gas stream.
A simplified and automated sampling system can be connected to a continuous gas
(electrochemical, ultraviolet-photometric or flame ionization sensors) or particulate
(nephelometer) analyzer to continuously monitor emissions. This can provide
documentation of the emissions, and instantaneous operating status of the air pollution
control system.
In situ sampling
Emissions can also be sampled in the stack. Figure 55.6 is a representation of a simple
transmissometer used to measure materials in the gas stream. In this example, a beam
of light is projected across the stack to a photcell. The particulates or coloured gas will
absorb or block some of the light. The more material, the less light will get to the
photocell. (See figure 55.6.)
Figure 55.6 A simple transmissometer to measure particulates in a stack
By using different light sources and detectors such as ultraviolet light (UV), gases
transparent to visible light can be detected. These devices can be tuned to specific
gases, and thus can measure gas concentration in the waste stream.
An in situ monitoring system has an advantage over an extractive system in that it can
measure the concentration across the entire stack or duct, whereas the extractive
method measures concentrations only at the point from which the sample was
extracted. This can result in significant error if the sample gas stream is not well
mixed. However, the extractive method offers more methods of analysis, and thus
perhaps can be used in more applications.
Since the in situ system provides a continuous readout, it can be used to document
emissions, or to fine tune the operating system.
As a reference for water quality, distilled waters (H 2O) represent the highest state of
purity. Waters in the hydrologic cycle may be viewed as natural, but are not pure.
They become polluted from both natural and human activities. Natural degradation
effects may result from a myriad of sources - from fauna, flora, volcano eruptions,
lightning strikes causing fires and so on, which on a long-term basis are considered to
be prevailing background levels for scientific purposes.
Human-made pollution disrupts the natural balance by superimposing waste materials
discharged from various sources. Pollutants may be introduced into the waters of the
hydrologic cycle at any point. For example: atmospheric precipitation (rainfall) may
become contaminated by air pollutants; surface waters may become polluted in the
runoff process from watersheds; sewage may be discharged into streams and rivers;
Precipitation is viewed as the initiating form in the above hydrologic budget. The term
runoff is synonymous with stream flow. Storage refers to reservoirs or detention
systems which collect waters; for example, a human-made dam (barrage) on a river
creates a reservoir for purposes of water storage. Groundwater collects as a storage
system and may flow from one location to another; it may be influent or effluent in
relation to surface streams. Evaporation is a water surface phenomenon, and
transpiration is associated with transmission from biota.
Although watersheds may vary greatly in size, certain drainage systems for water
pollution designation are classified as urban or non-urban (agricultural, rural,
When deleterious waste materials from the above sources are discharged into streams
or other bodies of water, they become pollutants which have been classified and
described in a previous section. Pollutants or contaminants which enter a body of
water can be further divided into:
degradable (non-conservative) pollutants: impurities which eventually decompose
into harmless substances or which may be removed by treatment methods; that is,
certain organic materials and chemicals, domestic sewage, heat, plant nutrients, most
bacteria and viruses, certain sediments
non-degradable (conservative) pollutants: impurities which persist in the water
environment and do not reduce in concentration unless diluted or removed through
treatment; that is, certain organic and inorganic chemicals, salts, colloidal suspensions
hazardous waterborne pollutants: complex forms of deleterious wastes including
toxic trace metals, certain inorganic and organic compounds
radionuclide pollutants: materials which have been subjected to a radioactive
source.
Water pollution control regulations
agencies (EPAs) and ministries of health are usually charged with this responsibility.
In the discussion of regulations below, the format and certain portions follow the
example of the water quality standards currently applicable for the US State of Ohio.
Water quality use designations
The ultimate goal in the control of water pollution would be zero discharge of
pollutants to water bodies; however, complete achievement of this objective is usually
not cost effective. The preferred approach is to set limitations on waste disposal
discharges for the reasonable protection of human health and the environment.
Although these standards may vary widely in different jurisdictions, use designations
for specific bodies of water are commonly the basis, as briefly addressed below.
Water supplies include:
public water supply: waters which with conventional treatment will be suitable for
human consumption
agricultural supply: waters suitable for irrigation and livestock watering without
treatment
industrial/commercial supply: waters suitable for industrial and commercial uses
with or without treatment.
Recreational activities include:
bathing waters: waters which during certain seasons are suitable for swimming as
approved for water quality along with protective conditions and facilities
primary contact: waters which during certain seasons are suitable for full body
contact recreation such as swimming, canoeing and underwater diving with minimal
threat to public health as a result of water quality
secondary contact: waters which during certain seasons are suitable for partial
body contact recreation such as, but not limited to, wading, with minimal threat to
public health as a result of water quality.
Public water resources are categorized as water bodies which lie within park systems,
wetland, wildlife areas, wild, scenic and recreational rivers and publicly owned lakes,
and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance.
Aquatic life habitats
Typical designations will vary according to climates, but relate to conditions in water
bodies for supporting and maintaining certain aquatic organisms, especially various
species of fish. For example, use designations in a temperate climate as subdivided in
regulations for the State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are listed
below without detailed descriptions:
warmwater
limited warmwater
exceptional warmwater
modified warmwater
seasonal salmonid
coldwater
Natural waters and wastewaters are characterized in terms of their physical, chemical
and biological composition. The principal physical properties and the chemical and
biological constituents of wastewater and their sources are a lengthy list, reported in a
textbook by Metcalf and Eddy (1991). Analytical methods for these determinations
are given in a widely used manual entitled Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Waste Water by the American Public Health Association (1995).
Each designated water body should be controlled according to regulations which may
be comprised of both basic and more detailed numerical criteria as briefly discussed
below.
Basic freedom from pollution. To the extent practical and possible, all bodies of water
should attain the basic criteria of the Five Freedoms from Pollution:
1. free from suspended solids or other substances that enter the waters as a result of
human activity and that will settle to form putrid or otherwise objectionable sludge
deposits, or that will adversely affect aquatic life
2. free from floating debris, oil, scum and other floating materials entering the
waters as a result of human activity in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or cause
degradation
3. free from materials entering the waters as a result of human activity, producing
colour, odour or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance
4. free from substances entering the waters as a result of human activity, in
concentrations that are toxic or harmful to human, animal or aquatic life and/or are
rapidly lethal in the mixing zone
5. free from nutrients entering the waters as a result of human activity, in
concentrations that create nuisance growths of aquatic weeds and algae.
Water quality criteria are numerical limitations and guidelines for the control of
chemical, biological and toxic constituents in bodies of water.
With over 70,000-plus chemical compounds in use today it is impractical to specify
the control of each. However, criteria for chemicals can be established on the basis of
limitations as they first of all relate to three major classes of consumption and
exposure:
Class 1: Chemical criteria for protection of human health are of first major concern
and should be set according to recommendations from governmental health agencies,
the WHO and recognized health research organizations.
Class 2: Chemical criteria for control of agricultural water supply should be based on
recognized scientific studies and recommendations which will protect against adverse
effects on crops and livestock as a result of crop irrigation and livestock watering.
Class 3: Chemical criteria for protection of aquatic life should be based on recognized
scientific studies regarding the sensitivity of these species to specific chemicals and
also as related to human consumption of fish and sea foods.
Wastewater effluent criteria relate to limitations on pollutant constituents present in
wastewater effluents and are a further method of control. They may be set as related to
the water use designations of bodies of water and as they relate to the above classes
for chemical criteria.
Biological criteria are based on water body habitat conditions which are needed to
support aquatic life.
Organic content of wastewaters and natural waters
The gross content of organic matter is most important in characterizing the pollutional
strength of both wastewater and natural waters. Three laboratory tests are commonly
used for this purpose:
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD): five-day BOD (BOD5) is the most widely used
parameter; this test measures the dissolved oxygen used by micro-organisms in the
biochemical oxidation of organic matter over this period.
Chemical oxygen demand (COD): this test is to measure the organic matter in
municipal and industrial wastes that contain compounds that are toxic to biological
life; it is a measure of the oxygen equivalent of the organic matter that can be
oxidized.
Total organic carbon (TOC): this test is especially applicable to small concentrations
of organic matter in water; it is a measure of the organic matter that is oxidized to
carbon dioxide.
Antidegradation policy regulations
Antidegradation policy regulations are a further approach for preventing the spread of
water pollution beyond certain prevailing conditions. As an example, the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Standards antidegradation policy
consists of three tiers of protection:
Tier 1: Existing uses must be maintained and protected. No further water quality
degradation is allowed that would interfere with existing designated uses.
Tier 2: Next, water quality better than that needed to protect uses must be maintained
unless it is shown that a lower water quality is necessary for important economic or
social development, as determined by the EPA Director.
Tier 3: Finally, the quality of water resource waters must be maintained and protected.
Their existing ambient water quality is not to be degraded by any substances
determined to be toxic or to interfere with any designated use. Increased pollutant
loads are allowed to be discharged into water bodies if they do not result in lowering
existing water quality.
Water pollution discharge mixing zones and waste load allocation modelling
Mixing zones are areas in a body of water which allow for treated or untreated
wastewater discharges to attain stabilized conditions, as illustrated in figure 55.10 for
a flowing stream. The discharge is initially in a transitory state which becomes
progressively diluted from the source concentration to the receiving water conditions.
It is not to be considered as a treatment entity and may be delineated with specific
restrictions.
Figure 55.10 Mixing zones
extend downstream for a distance more than five times the stream width.
Waste load allocation studies have become important because of the high cost of
nutrient control of wastewater discharges to avoid instream eutrophication (defined
below). These studies generally employ the use of computer models for simulation of
water quality conditions in a stream, particularly with regard to nutrients such as
forms of nitrogen and phosphorous, which affect the dissolved oxygen dynamics.
Traditional water quality models of this type are represented by the US EPA model
QUAL2E, which has been described by Brown and Barnwell (1987). A more recent
model proposed by Taylor (1995) is the Omni Diurnal Model (ODM), which includes
a simulation of the impact of rooted vegetation on instream nutrient and dissolved
oxygen dynamics.
Variance provisions
All water pollution control regulations are limited in perfection and therefore should
include provisions which allow for judgemental variance based on certain conditions
which may prevent immediate or complete compliance.
Risk assessment and management as related to water pollution
The above water pollution control regulations are typical of worldwide governmental
approaches for achieving compliance with water quality standards and wastewater
effluent discharge limits. Generally these regulations have been set on the basis of
health factors and scientific research; where some uncertainty exists as to possible
effects, safety factors often are applied. Implementation of certain of these regulations
may be unreasonable and exceedingly costly for the public at large as well as for
private enterprise. Therefore there is a growing concern for more efficient allocation
of resources in achieving goals for water quality improvement. As previously pointed
out in the discussion of hydrologic waters, pristine purity does not exist even in
naturally occurring waters.
A growing technological approach encourages assessment and management of
ecological risks in the setting of water pollution regulations. The concept is based on
an analysis of the ecological benefits and costs in meeting standards or limits.
Parkhurst (1995) has proposed the application of aquatic ecological risk assessment as
an aid in setting water pollution control limits, particularly as applicable for the
protection of aquatic life. Such risk assessment methods may be applied to estimate
the ecological effects of chemical concentrations for a broad range of surface water
pollution conditions including:
The proposed method consists of three tiers; as shown in figure 55.11 which
illustrates the approach.
Figure 55.11 Methods for conducting risk assessment for successive tiers of analysis. Tier
1: Screening level; Tier 2: Quantification of potentially significant risks ; Tier 3: Sitespecific risk quantification
Lakes and reservoirs provide for the volumetric storage of watershed inflow and may
have long flushing time periods as compared with the rapid inflow and outflow for a
reach in a flowing stream. Therefore they are of special concern with regard to the
retention of certain constituents, especially nutrients including forms of nitrogen and
phosphorous which promote eutrophication. Eutrophication is a natural ageing process
in which the water content becomes organically enriched, leading to the domination of
undesirable aquatic growth, such as algae, water hyacinth and so on. The eutrophic
process tends to decrease aquatic life and has detrimental dissolved oxygen effects.
Both natural and cultural sources of nutrients may promote the process, as illustrated
by Preul (1974) in figure 55.12 , showing a schematic listing of nutrient sources and
sinks for Lake Sunapee, in the US State of New Hampshire.
Figure 55.12 Schematic listing of nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) sources and sinks for
Lake Sunapee, New Hampshire (US)
Lakes and reservoirs, of course, can be sampled and analysed to determine their
trophic status. Analytical studies usually start with a basic nutrient balance such as the
following:
(lake influent nutrients) = (lake effluent nutrients) + (nutrient retention in lake)
This basic balance can be further expanded to include the various sources shown
in figure 55.12 .
Flushing time is an indication of the relative retention aspects of a lake system.
Shallow lakes, such as Lake Erie, have relatively short flushing times and are
associated with advanced eutrophication because shallow lakes often are more
conducive to aquatic plant growth. Deep lakes such as Lake Tahoe and Lake Superior
have very long flushing periods, which are usually associated with lakes with minimal
eutrophication because up to the present time, they have not been overloaded and also
because their extreme depths are not conducive to extensive aquatic plant growth
except in the epilimnion (upper zone). Lakes in this category are generally classified
as oligotrophic, on the basis that they are relatively low in nutrients and support
minimal aquatic growth such as algae.
It is of interest to compare the flushing times of some major US lakes as reported by
Pecor (1973) using the following calculation basis:
lake flushing time (LFT) = (lake storage volume)/(lake outflow)
Some examples are: Lake Wabesa (Michigan), LFT=0.30 years; Houghton Lake
(Michigan), 1.4 years; Lake Erie, 2.6 years; Lake Superior, 191 years; Lake Tahoe,
700 years.
Although the relationship between the process of eutrophication and nutrient content
is complex, phosphorous is typically recognized as the limiting nutrient. Based on
fully mixed conditions, Sawyer (1947) reported that algal blooms tend to occur if
nitrogen values exceed 0.3 mg/l and phosphorous exceeds 0.01 mg/l. In stratified
lakes and reservoirs, low dissolved oxygen levels in the hypoliminion are early signs
of eutrophication. Vollenweider (1968, 1969) has developed critical loading levels of
total phosphorous and total nitrogen for a number of lakes based on nutrient loadings,
mean depths and trophic states. For a comparison of work on this subject, Dillon
(1974) has published a critical review of Vollenweiders nutrient budget model and
other related models. More recent computer models are also available for simulating
nitrogen/phosphorous cycles with temperature variations.
Water pollution in estuaries
An estuary is an intermediate passageway of water between the mouth of a river and a
sea coast. This passageway is comprised of a river mouth channel reach with river
inflow (fresh water) from upstream and outflow discharge on the downstream side
into a constantly changing tailwater level of sea water (salt water). Estuaries are
continuously affected by tidal fluctuations and are among the most complex bodies of
water encountered in water pollution control. The dominant features of an estuary are
variable salinity, a salt wedge or interface between salt and fresh water, and often
large areas of shallow, turbid water overlying mud flats and salt marshes. Nutrients are
largely supplied to an estuary from the inflowing river and combine with the sea water
habitat to provide prolific production of biota and sea life. Especially desired are
seafoods harvested from estuaries.
From a water pollution standpoint, estuaries are individually complex and generally
require special investigations employing extensive field studies and computer
modelling. For a further basic understanding, the reader is referred to Reish 1979, on
marine and estuarine pollution; and to Reid and Wood 1976, on the ecology of inland
waters and estuaries.
Water pollution in marine environments
Oceans may be viewed as the ultimate receiving water or sink, since wastes carried by
rivers finally discharge into this marine environment. Although oceans are vast bodies
of salt water with seemingly unlimited assimilation capacity, pollution tends to blight
coastlines and further affects marine life.
Sources of marine pollutants include many of those encountered in land-based
wastewater environments plus more as related to marine operations. A limited list is
given below:
domestic sewage and sludge, industrial wastes, solid wastes, shipboard wastes
fishery wastes, sediments and nutrients from rivers and land runoff
oil spills, offshore oil exploration and production wastes, dredge operations
Each of the above requires special handling and methods of control. The discharge of
domestic sewage and sewage sludges through ocean outfalls is perhaps the major
source of marine pollution.
For current technology on this subject, the reader is referred to the book on marine
pollution and its control by Bishop (1983).
Techniques for reducing pollution in wastewater discharges
Physical Operations
Chemical Processes
Biological Processes
Flow measurement
Precipitation
Aerobic action
Screening/grit removal
Neutralization
Anaerobic action
Mixing
Adsorption
Aerobic-anaerobic
combinations
Flocculation
Disinfection
Sedimentation
Chemical oxidation
Flotation
Chemical reduction
Filtration
Incineration
Drying
Ion exchange
Distillation
Electrodialysis
Centrifuging
Freezing
Reverse osmosis
Primary treatment
treatment. After some pre-treatment handling such as screening, grit removal and
comminution, the main process of primary sedimentation is the settling of the raw
wastewater in large settling tanks for periods up to several hours. This process
removes from 50 to 75% of the total suspended solids, which are drawn off as an
underflow sludge collected for separate treatment. The overflow effluent from the
process then is directed for secondary treatment. In certain cases, chemicals may be
employed to improve the degree of primary treatment.
Secondary treatment
The portion of the organic content of the wastewater which is finely suspended or
dissolved and not removed in the primary process, is treated by secondary treatment.
The generally accepted forms of secondary treatment in common use include trickling
filters, biological contactors such as rotating discs, activated sludge, waste
stabilization ponds, aerated pond systems and land application methods, including
wetland systems. All of these systems will be recognized as employing biological
processes of some form or another. The most common of these processes are briefly
discussed below.
Biological contactor systems. Trickling filters are one of the earliest forms of this
method for secondary treatment and are still widely used with some improved
methods of application. In this treatment, the effluent from the primary tanks is
applied uniformly onto a bed of media, such as rock or synthetic plastic media.
Uniform distribution is accomplished typically by trickling the liquid from perforated
piping rotated over the bed intermittently or continuously according to the desired
process. Depending on the rate of organic and hydraulic loadings, trickling filters can
remove up to 95% of the organic content, usually analysed as biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD). There are numerous other more recent biological contactor systems in
use which can provide treatment removals in the same range; some of these methods
offer special advantages, particularly applicable in certain limiting conditions such as
space, climate and so on. It is to be noted that a following secondary settling tank is
considered to be a necessary part of completing the process. In secondary settling,
some so-called humus sludge is drawn off as an underflow, and the overflow is
discharged as a secondary effluent.
Activated sludge. In the most common form of this biological process, primary treated
effluent flows into an activated sludge unit tank containing a previously existing
biological suspension called activated sludge. This mixture is referred to as mixed
liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and is provided a contact period typically ranging
from several hours up to 24 hours or more, depending on the desired results. During
this period the mixture is highly aerated and agitated to promote aerobic biological
activity. As the process finalizes, a portion of the mixture (MLSS) is drawn off and
A third level of treatment may be provided where a higher degree of pollutant removal
is required. This form of treatment may typically include sand filtration, stabilization
ponds, land disposal methods, wetlands and other systems which further stabilize the
secondary effluent.
Disinfection of effluents
Industrial (non-domestic) wastes are numerous and vary greatly in composition; they
may be highly acidic or alkaline, and often require a detailed laboratory analysis.
Specialized treatment may be necessary to render them innocuous before discharge.
Toxicity is of great concern in the disposal of industrial wastewaters.
Representative industrial wastes include: pulp and paper, slaughterhouse, brewery,
tannery, food processing, cannery, chemical, petroleum, textile, sugar, laundry, meat
and poultry, hog feeding, rendering and many others. The initial step in treatment
design development is an industrial waste survey, which provides data on variations in
flow and waste characteristics. Undesirable waste characteristics as listed by
Eckenfelder (1989) can be summarized as follows:
suspended solids
trace organics
volatile materials.
The US EPA has further defined a list of toxic organic and inorganic chemicals with
specific limitations in granting discharge permits. The list includes more than 100
compounds and is too long to reprint here, but may be requested from the EPA.
Treatment methods
The handling of industrial wastes is more specialized than the treatment of domestic
wastes; however, where amenable to biological reduction, they are usually treated
using methods similar to those previously described (secondary/tertiary biological
treatment approaches) for municipal systems.
Waste stabilization ponds are a common method of organic wastewater treatment
where sufficient land area is available. Flow-through ponds are generally classified
according to their bacterial activity as aerobic, facultative or anaerobic. Aerated ponds
are supplied with oxygen by diffused or mechanical aeration systems.
Figure 55.14 and figure 55.15 show sketches of waste stabilization ponds.
Figure 55.14 Two-cell stabilization pond: cross sectional diagram
When industrial waste in-plant operations and processes are analysed at their source,
they often can be controlled so as to prevent significant polluting discharges.
Recirculation techniques are important approaches in pollution prevention
programmes. A case study example is a recycling plan for a leather tannery
wastewater effluent published by Preul (1981), which included chrome recovery/reuse
along with the complete recirculation of all tannery wastewaters with no effluent to
any stream except in emergencies. The flow diagram for this system is shown
in figure 55.16 .
Figure 55.16 Flow diagram for tannery wastewater effluent recycling system
For more recent innovations in this technology, the reader is referred to a publication
on pollution prevention and waste minimization by the Water Environment Federation
(1995).
Advanced methods of wastewater treatment
The case study of the Dan Region Sewage Reclamation Project discussed elsewhere in
this chapter provides an excellent example of innovative methods for wastewater
treatment and reclamation.
Thermal pollution
Heat decreases oxygen saturation content of water and decreases rate of natural
reoxygenation.
The net effect of heat is generally detrimental during warm months of year.
Winter effect may be beneficial in colder climates, where ice conditions are
broken up and surface aeration is provided for fish and aquatic life.
Influence on aquatic life
Many species have temperature tolerance limits and need protection, particularly in
heat affected reaches of a stream or body of water. For example, cold water streams
usually have the highest type of sport fish such as trout and salmon, whereas warm
waters generally support coarse fish populations, with certain species such as pike and
bass fish in intermediate temperature waters.
Thermal analysis in receiving waters
Figure 55.17 illustrates the various forms of natural heat exchange at the boundaries
of a receiving water. When heat is discharged to a receiving water such as a river, it is
important to analyse the river capacity for thermal additions. The temperature profile
of a river can be calculated by solving a heat balance similar to that used in
calculating dissolved oxygen sag curves. The principal factors of the heat balance are
illustrated in figure 55.18 for a river reach between points A and B. Each factor
requires an individual calculation dependent on certain heat variables. As with a
dissolved oxygen balance, the temperature balance is simply a summation of
temperature assets and liabilities for a given section. Other more sophisticated
analytical approaches are available in the literature on this subject. The results from
the heat balance calculations can be used in establishing heat discharge limitations and
possibly certain use constraints for a body of water.
Figure 55.17 Heat exchange at the boundaries of a receiving water cross section
cooling towers
Where physical conditions are favourable within certain environmental limits, hydroelectric power should be considered as an alternative to fossil-fuel or nuclear power
generation. In hydro-electric power generation, there is no disposal of heat and there
is no discharge of waste waters causing water pollution.
Groundwater Pollution Control
Importance of groundwater
Since the worlds water supplies are widely extracted from aquifers, it is most
important that these sources of supply be protected. It is estimated that more than 95%
of the earths available fresh water supply is underground; in the United States
approximately 50% of the drinking water comes from wells, according to the 1984 US
Geological Survey. Because underground water pollution and movement are of subtle
and unseen nature, less attention sometimes is given to the analysis and control of this
form of water degradation than to surface water pollution, which is far more obvious.
Sources of underground pollution
Figure 55.19 shows the hydrologic cycle with superimposed sources of groundwater
contamination. A complete listing of the potential sources of underground pollution is
extensive; however, for illustration the most obvious sources include:
mining operations
irrigation systems
artificial recharge
spills
disposal wells
agricultural operations
toxic constituents (typical, not complete list) - nitrate, arsenic, chromium, lead,
cyanide, copper, phenols, dissolved mercury
Of the above, nitrates are of special concern in both ground waters and surface waters.
In groundwater supplies, nitrates can cause the disease methaemoglobinaemia (infant
cyanosis). They further cause detrimental eutrophication effects in surface waters and
occur in a wide range of water resources, as reported by Preul (1991). Preul (1964,
1967, 1972) and Preul and Schroepfer (1968) have also reported on the underground
movement of nitrogen and other pollutants.
Pollution travel in underground domain
Groundwater movement is exceedingly slow and subtle as compared with the travel of
surface waters in the hydrologic cycle. For a simple understanding of the travel of
ordinary groundwater under ideal steady flow conditions, Darcys Law is the basic
approach for the evaluation of groundwater movement at low Reynolds numbers (R):
V = K(dh/dl)
where:
V = velocity of groundwater in aquifer, m/day
K = coefficient of permeability of aquifer
(dh/dl) = hydraulic gradient which represents the driving force for movement.
In pollutant travel underground, ordinary groundwater (H 2O) is generally the carrying
fluid and can be calculated to move at a rate according to the parameters in Darcys
Law. However, the rate of travel or velocity of a pollutant, such as an organic or
inorganic chemical, may be different due to advection and hydrodynamic dispersion
processes. Certain ions move slower or faster than the general rate of groundwater
flow as a result of reactions within the aquifer media, so that they can be categorized
as reacting or non-reacting. Reactions are generally of the following forms:
physical reactions between the pollutant and the aquifer and/or the transporting
liquid
chemical reactions between the pollutant and the aquifer and/or the transporting
liquid
Groundwater pollution control efforts are largely directed at protection of aquifers and
the prevention of pollution.
Pollution prevention requires land-use controls in the form of zoning and certain
regulations. Laws may apply to the prevention of specific functions as particularly
applicable to point sources or actions which potentially may cause pollution. Control
by land-use zoning is a groundwater protection tool which is most effective at the
municipal or county level of government. Aquifer and wellhead protection
programmes as discussed below are leading examples of pollution prevention.
An aquifer protection programme requires establishing the boundaries of the aquifer
and its recharge areas. Aquifers may be of an unconfined or confined type, and
therefore need to be analysed by a hydrologist to make this determination. Most major
aquifers are generally well known in developed countries, but other areas may require
field investigations and hydrogeologic analysis. The key element of the programme in
the protection of the aquifer from water quality degradation is control of land use over
the aquifer and its recharge areas.
Wellhead protection is a more definitive and limited approach which applies to the
recharge area contributing to a particular well. The US federal government by
amendments passed in 1986 to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (1984) now
requires that specific wellhead protection areas be established for public supply wells.
The wellhead protection area (WHPA) is defined in the SDWA as the surface and
subsurface area surrounding a water well or well field, supplying a public water
supply system, through which contaminants are reasonably likely to move toward and
reach such water well or well field. The main objective in the WHPA programme, as
outlined by the US EPA (1987), is the delineation of well protection areas based on
selected criteria, well operation and hydrogeologic considerations.
Throughout the design, installation and routine operation of the system, careful
consideration has been given to water sanitation and occupational hygiene concerns.
All necessary precautions have been taken to ensure that the reclaimed wastewater
will be practically as safe as regular drinking water, in the event that people
accidentally drink or swallow it. Similarly, appropriate attention has been given to the
issue of reducing to the minimum any potential exposure to accidents or other
biological, chemical or physical hazards that may affect either the workers at the
wastewater treatment plant proper or other workers engaged in the disposal and
agricultural use of the reclaimed water.
At Stage One of the project, the wastewater was biologically treated by a system of
facultative oxidation ponds with recirculation and additional chemical treatment by a
lime-magnesium process, followed by detention of the high-pH effluent in polishing
ponds. The partially treated effluent was recharged to the regional groundwater
aquifer by means of the Soreq spreading basins.
At Stage Two, the wastewater conveyed to the treatment plant undergoes mechanicalbiological treatment by means of an activated-sludge process with nitrificationdenitrification. The secondary effluent is recharged to the groundwater by means of
the spreading basins Yavneh 1 and Yavneh 2.
The complete system consists of a number of different elements complementing each
other:
a wastewater treatment plant system, comprised of an activated-sludge plant (the
biomechanical plant), which treats most of the wastes, and of a system of oxidation
and polishing ponds used mostly for treatment of excess sewage flows
a groundwater recharge system for the treated effluent, which consists of
spreading basins, at two different sites (Yavneh and Soreq), that are intermittently
flooded; the absorbed effluent passes through the soils unsaturated zone and through
a portion of the aquifer, and creates a special zone that is dedicated to complementary
effluent treatment and seasonal storage, which is called SAT (soil-aquifer-treatment)
networks of observation wells (53 wells all together) which surround the recharge
basins and allow the monitoring of the efficiency of the treatment process
networks of recovery wells (a total of 74 active wells in 1993) which surround the
recharge sites
a special and separate reclaimed water conveyance main for unrestricted irrigation
of agricultural areas in the Negev; this main is called The Third Negev Line, and it
complements the water supply system to the Negev, which includes another two major
fresh water supply main lines
a setup for chlorination of the effluent, which consists, at present, of three
chlorination sites (two more to be added in the future)
six operational reservoirs along the conveyance system, which regulate the
amounts of water pumped and consumed along the system
an effluent distribution system, composed of 13 major pressure zones, along the
effluent main, that supply the treated water to the consumers
a comprehensive monitoring system which supervises and controls the complete
operation of the project.
Description of the Reclamation System
The general scheme of the reclamation system is presented in figure 55.20 and the
flow diagram in figure 55.21 . The system consists of the following segments:
wastewater treatment plant, water recharge fields, recovery wells, conveyance and
distribution system, chlorination setup and a comprehensive monitoring system.
Figure 55.21 Flow diagram of Dan Region Project
The wastewater treatment plant of the Dan Region Metropolitan Area receives the
domestic wastes of the eight cities in the region, and also handles part of their
industrial wastes. The plant is located within the Rishon-Lezion sand dunes and is
based mostly on secondary treatment of the wastes by the activated-sludge method.
Some of the wastes, mostly during peak-flow discharges, are treated in another, older
system of oxidation ponds occupying an area of 300 acres. The two systems together
can handle, at present, about 110 106 m3 per year.
The recharge fields
The treatment plant effluents are pumped into three different sites located within the
regional sand dunes, where they are spread on the sand and percolate downward into
the underground aquifer for temporary storage and for additional time-dependent
treatment. Two of the spreading basins are used for recharge of the mechanicalbiological treatment-plant effluent. These are Yavneh 1 (60 acres, located 7 km to the
south of the plant) and Yavneh 2 (45 acres, 10 km south of the plant); the third basin is
used for recharge of a mixture of the oxidation ponds effluent and a certain fraction
from the biomechanical treatment plant that is required in order to improve the quality
of the effluent to the necessary level. This is the Soreq site, which has an area of about
60 acres and is located to the east of the ponds.
The recovery wells
Around the recharge sites there are networks of observation wells through which the
recharged water is re-pumped. Not all of the 74 wells in operation in 1993 were active
during the whole project. In 1993 a total of about 95 million cubic metres of water
were recovered from the systems wells and pumped into the Third Negev Line.
The conveyance and distribution systems
The water pumped from the various recovery wells is collected into the conveyance
and distribution system of the Third Line. The conveyance system is composed of
three sections, having a combined length of 87 km and a diameter ranging from 48 to
70 inches. Along the conveyance system six different operational reservoirs,
floating on the main line, were constructed, in order to regulate the water flow of
the system. The operational volume of these reservoirs ranges from 10,000 m 3 to
100,000 m3.
The water flowing in the Third Line system was supplied to the customers in 1993
through a system of 13 major pressure zones. Numerous water consumers, mostly
farms, are connected to these pressure zones.
The purpose of the chlorination that is carried out in the Third Line is breakage of the
human connection, which means elimination of any possibility for existence of
micro-organisms of human origin in Third Line water. Throughout the course of
monitoring it was found that there is a considerable increase of fecal micro-organisms
during the stay of the reclaimed water in the water reservoirs. Therefore it was
decided to add more chlorination points along the line, and by 1993 three separate
chlorination points were routinely operating. Two more chlorination points are to be
added to the system in the near future. The residual chlorine ranges between 0.4 and
1.0 mg/l of free chlorine. This method, whereby low concentrations of free chlorine
are maintained at various points along the system rather than a single massive dose at
the beginning of the line, secures the breakage of the human connection, and at the
same time enables fish to live in the reservoirs. In addition, this chlorination method
will disinfect the water in the downstream sections of the conveyance and distribution
system, in the event that pollutants entered the system at a point downstream from the
initial chlorination point.
The monitoring system
Operation of the reclamation system of the Third Negev Line is dependent upon
routine functioning of a monitoring setup which is supervised and controlled by a
professional and independent scientific entity. This body is the Research and
Development Institute of the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, in Haifa, Israel.
The establishment of an independent monitoring system has been a mandatory
requirement of the Israeli Ministry of Health, the local legal authority according to the
Israeli Public Health Ordinance. The need for establishing this monitoring setup stems
from the facts that:
1.
2. It comprises some non-routine elements that have not as yet been experimented
with.
3.
The major role of the monitoring system is therefore to secure the chemical and
sanitary quality of the water supplied by the system and to issue warnings regarding
any change in the water quality. In addition, the monitoring setup is conducting a
follow-up of the complete Dan Region reclamation project, also investigating certain
aspects, such as the routine operation of the plant and the chemico-biological quality
of its water. This is necessary in order to determine the adaptability of the Third Line
water for unlimited irrigation, not only from the sanitary aspect but also from the
agricultural viewpoint.
The preliminary monitoring layout was designed and prepared by the Mekoroth Water
Co., the major Israeli water supplier and the operator of the Dan Region project. A
specially appointed steering committee has been reviewing the monitoring programme
on a periodic basis, and has been modifying it according to the accumulated
experience gained through the routine operation. The monitoring programme dealt
with the various sampling points along the Third Line system, the various investigated
parameters and the sampling frequency. The preliminary programme referred to
various segments of the system, namely the recovery wells, conveyance line,
reservoirs, a limited number of consumer connections, as well as the presence of
potable water wells in the vicinity of the plant. The list of parameters included within
the monitoring schedule of the Third Line is given in table 55.16 .
Table 55.16 List of investigated parameters
Ag
Silver
g/l
Al
Aluminium
g/l
ALG
Algae
No./100 ml
ALKM
Alkalinity as CaCO3
mg/l
As
Arsenic
g/l
Boron
mg/l
Ba
Barium
g/l
BOD
mg/l
Br
Bromide
mg/l
Ca
Calcium
mg/l
Cd
Cadmium
g/l
Cl
Chloride
mg/l
CLDE
Chlorine demand
mg/l
CLRL
Chlorophile
g/l
CN
Cyanides
g/l
Co
Cobalt
g/l
COLR
COD
mg/l
Cr
Chromium
g/l
Cu
Copper
g/l
DO
Dissolved oxygen as O2
mg/l
DOC
mg/l
DS10
mg/l
DS55
mg/l
EC
Electrical conductivity
mhos/cm
ENTR
Enterococcus
No./100 ml
F-
Fluoride
mg/l
FCOL
Faecal coliforms
No./100 ml
Fe
Iron
g/l
HARD
Hardness as CaCO3
mg/l
HCO3-
Bicarbonate as HCO3-
mg/l
Hg
Mercury
g/l
Potassium
mg/l
Li
Lithium
g/l
MBAS
Detergents
g/l
Mg
Magnesium
mg/l
Mn
Manganese
g/l
Mo
Molybdenum
g/l
Na
Sodium
mg/l
NH4+
Ammonia as NH4+
mg/l
Ni
Nickel
g/l
NKJT
mg/l
NO2
Nitrite as NO2-
mg/l
NO3
Nitrate as NO3-
mg/l
ODOR
OG
g/l
Pb
Lead
mg/l
PHEN
Phenols
mg/l
PHFD
pH measured at field
PO4
Phosphate as PO4-2
mg/l
PTOT
Total phosphorus as P
mg/l
RSCL
mg/l
SAR
Se
Selenium
g/l
Si
Silica as H2SiO3
mg/l
Sn
Tin
g/l
SO4
Sulphate
mg/l
Sr
Strontium
g/l
SS10
mg/l
SS55
mg/l
STRP
Streptococcus
No./100 ml
Temperature
TCOL
Total coliforms
No./100 ml
TOTB
Total bacteria
No./100 ml
TS10
mg/l
TS55
mg/l
TURB
Turbidity
NTU
UV
Zn
Zinc
g/l
The sampling programme of the recovery wells is based upon a bi-monthly or trimonthly measurement of a few indicator-parameters (table 55.17). When the
chlorides concentration at the sampled well exceeds by more than 15% the initial
chlorides level of the well, it is interpreted as a significant increase of the share of
the recovered effluent within the underground aquifer water, and the well is
transferred into the next category of sampling. Here, 23 characteristic-parameters
are determined, once every three months. In some of the wells, once a year, a
complete water investigation, including 54 various parameters, is carried out.
Group A
Group B
Group C
Indicator parameters
Characteristic Parameters
Complete-Test Parameters
1. Chlorides
Group A and:
2. Electrical
conductivity
6. Temperature
7. pH
8. Turbidity
9. Dissolved solids
27. Coliform
3. Detergents
4. UV absorption
5. Dissolved oxygen
29. Faecal streptococcus
11. Alkalinity
30. Zinc
12. Hardness
31. Aluminium
13. Calcium
32. Arsenic
14. Magnesium
33. Iron
15. Sodium
34. Barium
16. Potassium
35. Silver
17. Nitrates
36. Mercury
18. Nitrites
37. Chromium
19. Ammonia
38. Lithium
20. Kjeldahl total nitrogen
39. Molybdenum
21. Total phosphorus
22. Sulphate
40. Manganese
23. Boron
41. Copper
42. Nickel
43. Selenium
44. Strontium
45. Lead
46. Fluoride
47. Cyanides
48. Cadmium
49. Cobalt
50. Phenols
51. Mineral oil
52. TOC
53. Odour
54. Colour
The conveyance system, the length of which is 87 km, is monitored at seven central
points along the wastewater line. At these points 16 different parameters are sampled
once per month. These are: PHFD, DO, T, EC, SS10, SS55, UV, TURB, NO3+, PTOT,
ALKM, DOC, TOTB, TCOL, FCOL and ENTR. Parameters which are not expected
to change along the system are measured at two sampling points only - at the
beginning and at the end of the conveyance line. These are: Cl, K, Na, Ca, Mg,
HARD, B, DS, SO42, NH4+, NO2 and MBAS. At those two sampling points, once a
year, various heavy metals are sampled (Zn, Sr, Sn, Se, Pb, Ni, Mo, Mn, Li, Hg, Fe,
Cu, Cr, Co, Cd, Ba, As, Al, Ag).
Reservoirs monitoring
The monitoring setup of the Third Line reservoirs is based mostly on examination of a
limited number of parameters which serve as indicators of biological development in
the reservoirs, and for pinpointing the entry of external pollutants. Five reservoirs are
sampled, once per month, for: PHFD, T, DO, Total SS, Volatile SS, DOC, CLRL,
RSCL, TCOL, FCOL, STRP and ALG. At these five reservoirs Si is also sampled,
once per two months. All these parameters are also sampled at another reservoir,
Zohar B, at a frequency of six times per year.
Summary
The Dan Region Reclamation Project supplies high-quality reclaimed water for
unrestricted irrigation of the Israeli Negev.
Stage One of this project is in partial operation since 1970 and in full operation since
1977. From 1970 to 1993, a total raw sewage amount of 373 million cubic metres
(MCM) was conveyed to the facultative oxidation ponds, and a total water amount of
243 MCM was pumped from the aquifer in the period 19741993 and supplied to the
South of the country. Part of the water was lost, mostly due to evaporation and
seepage from the ponds. In 1993 these losses amounted to about 6.9% of the raw
sewage conveyed to the Stage One plant (Kanarek 1994).
The mechanical-biological treatment plant, Stage Two of the project, has been in
operation since 1987. During the 1987-1993 period of operation a total raw sewage
amount of 478 MCM was conveyed to the mechanical-biological treatment plant. In
1993 about 103 MCM of water (95 MCM reclaimed water plus 8 MCM potable
water) were conveyed through the system, and used for unlimited irrigation of the
Negev.
The recovery-wells water represents the underground aquifer water quality. The
aquifer water quality is changing all the time as a result of the percolation of effluent
into it. The aquifer water quality approaches that of the effluent for those parameters
that are not influenced by the Soil-Aquifer Treatment (SAT) processes, while
parameters that are affected by the passage through the soil layers (e.g., turbidity,
suspended solids, ammonia, dissolved organic carbon and so on) show considerably
lower values. Noteworthy is the chloride content of the aquifer water, which increased
within a recent four-year period by 15 to 26%, as evidenced by the changing water
quality in the recovery wells. This change indicates the continuous replacement of
aquifer water by effluent having a considerably higher chloride content.
The quality of the water in the six reservoirs of the Third Line system is influenced by
biological and chemical changes that occur within the open reservoirs. The oxygen
content is increased, as a result of photosynthesis of algae and due to dissolution of
atmospheric oxygen. Concentrations of various types of bacteria are also increased as
a result of random pollution by various water fauna residing near the reservoirs.
The quality of the water supplied to the customers along the system is dependent upon
the quality of water from the recovery wells and the reservoirs. Mandatory
chlorination of the systems water constitutes an additional safeguard against
erroneous use of the water as potable water. Comparison of the Third Line water data
with the requirements of the Israeli Ministry of Health regarding quality of wastewater
to be used for unlimited agricultural use shows that most of the time the water quality
fully satisfies the requirements.
In conclusion it might be said that the Third Line wastewater recovery and utilization
system has been a successful environmental and national Israeli project. It has solved
the problem of sanitary disposal of the Dan Region sewage and at the same time it has
increased the national water balance by a factor of about 5%. In an arid country such
as Israel, where water supply, especially for agricultural use, is quite limited, this is a
real contribution.
The costs of the recharge operation and maintenance of the reclaimed water, in 1993,
was about 3 US cents per m3 (0.093 NIS/m3).
The system has been operating since the late 1960s under strict surveillance of the
Israeli Ministry of Health and of Mekoroths occupational safety and hygiene
department. There have been no reports of any occupational disease resulting from the
operation of this intricate and comprehensive system.
indirectly (from the recycling sector), bearing in mind that all consumption waste
flows back to this recycling sector either for recycling and/or for disposal.
Figure 55.22 A global model of the principles of waste management
From this perspective, recycling must be defined broadly: from the recycling of whole
objects (returnables), to the recycling of objects for some of their spare parts (e.g.,
cars, computers), to the production of new materials (e.g., paper and cardboard, tin
cans) or the production of similar objects (recycling, downcycling and so on). Over
the long term, this model can be visualized as a steady-state system wherein goods
end up as waste after a few days or often a few years.
Deductions from the Model
Some major deductions can be made from this model, provided the various flows are
clearly defined. For purposes of this model:
Po=the annual input of materials drawn from the environment (bio-, hydro- or
lithospheres). In a steady state, this input is equal to the annual final disposal of waste.
R=the annual flow of waste converted to goods through recycling. (In a steady
state: C=R+ P)
If C/Po=C*; then C* is the ratio of goods to the materials drawn out of nature.
In the past, industry has developed along the line of an increase of the efficiency of
production, p. Currently, in the late 1990s, the price of waste disposal through
dispersion into the atmosphere, into bodies of water or into soils (uncontrolled
tipping), or the burial of waste in confined deposit sites has increased very rapidly, as
a result of increasingly stringent environmental protection standards. Under these
conditions, it has become economically attractive to increase the effectiveness of
recycling (in other words, to increase r). This trend will persist through the coming
decades.
One important condition has to be met in order to improve the effectiveness of
recycling: the waste to be recycled (in other words the raw materials of the second
generation) must be as pure as possible (i.e., free of unwanted elements which
would preclude the recycling). This will be achieved only through the implementation
of a generalized policy of non-mixing of domestic, commercial and industrial waste
at the source. This is often incorrectly termed sorting at the source. To sort is to
separate; but the idea is precisely not to have to separate by storing the various
categories of waste in separate containers or places until they are collected. The
paradigm of modern waste management is non-mixing of waste at the source so as to
enable an increase in the efficiency of recycling and thus to achieve a better ratio of
goods per material drawn out of the environment.
Waste Management Practices
Waste may be grouped into three major categories, depending on its production:
1. from the primary sector of production (mining, forestry, agriculture, animal
breeding, fishery)
2. from the production and transformation industry (foods, equipment, products of
all types)
3. from the consumption sector (households, enterprises, transportation, trade,
construction, services, etc.).
Waste can be also classified by legislative decree:
municipal waste and mixed waste from enterprises which may be aggregated as
municipal waste, since both consist of the same categories of waste and are of small
size (vegetables, paper, metals, glass, plastics and so on), although in differing
proportions.
Collected by trucks, these wastes can be transported (directly or by road-to-road, roadto-rail or road-to-waterway transfer stations and long-distance transportation means)
to a landfill, or to a treatment plant for material recovery (mechanical sorting,
composting, biomethanization), or for energy recovery (grid or kiln incinerator,
pyrolysis).
Treatment plants produce proportionally small quantities of residues which may be
more hazardous for the environment than the original waste. For example, incinerators
produce fly ashes with very high heavy metal and complex chemical content. These
residues are often classified by legislation as hazardous waste and require appropriate
management. Treatment plants differ from landfills because they are open systems
with inputs and outputs, whereas landfills are essentially sinks (if one neglects the
small quantity of leachate which deserves further treatment and the production of
biogas, which may be an exploited source of energy on very large landfills).
Industrial and domestic equipment:
The present trend, which also has commercial contributions, is for the producers of
the waste sectors (e.g., cars, computers, machines) to be responsible for the recycling.
Residues are then either hazardous waste or are similar to ordinary waste from
enterprises.
Construction and demolition waste:
The increasing prices of landfills is an incentive for a better sorting of such waste.
Separation of the hazardous and burnable waste from the large quantity of inert
materials allows the latter to be disposed of at a far lower rate than mixed waste.
Special waste:
One should bear in mind that health and safety hazards will arise where the waste is
produced in the first place - in the factory or with the consumer. Hence, waste storage
at the waste generator - and especially when waste is separated at source - may cause
harmful impact on the nearby surroundings. This article will focus on a framework for
understanding solid waste management practices and situating the occupational health
and safety risks associated with the waste collection, transportation, processing and
disposal industries.
Why Solid Waste Management?
Solid waste management becomes necessary and relevant when the structure of the
society changes from agricultural with low-density and widespread population to
urban, high-density population. Furthermore, industrialization has introduced a large
number of products which nature cannot, or can only very slowly, decompose or
digest. Hence, certain industrial products contain substances which, due to low
degradability or even toxic characteristics, may build up in nature to levels
representing a threat to humanitys future use of the natural resources - that is,
drinking water, agricultural soil, air and so on.
The objective of solid waste management is to prevent pollution of the natural
environment.
A solid waste management system should be based on technical studies and overall
planning procedures including:
feasibility studies.
The studies must include protection of the natural environment and occupational
health and safety aspects, taking the possibilities of sustainable development into
consideration. As it seldom is possible to solve all problems at one time, it is
important at the planning stage to note that it is helpful to set up a list of priorities.
The first step in solving environmental and occupational hazards is to recognize the
existence of the hazards.
Principles of Waste Management
Waste management involves a complex and wide range of occupational health and
safety relations. Waste management represents a reverse production process; the
product is removal of surplus materials. The original aim was simply to collect the
materials, reuse the valuable part of the materials and dispose of what remained at the
nearest sites not used for agriculture purposes, buildings and so on. This is still the
case in many countries.
Sources of waste can be described by the different functions in a modern society
(see table 55.18).
Table 55.18 Sources of waste
Activity
Waste description
Industry
Product residues
Default products
Wholesale
Default products
Retail
Transport packaging
Default products
Organics (from food processing)
Food waste
Consumer
Transport packaging
Retail packaging (paper, glass, metal, plastics, etc.)
Kitchen waste (organics)
Hazardous waste (chemicals, oil)
Bulky waste (used furniture) etc.
Garden waste
Infrastructure activities
Park waste
Street cleaning waste
Clinkers, ashes and flue gas from energy production
Sewage sludge
Hospital waste
Waste processing
Each type of waste is characterized by its origin or what type of product it was before
it became waste. Hence, basically its health and safety hazards should be laid down
upon the restriction of handling the product by the waste producer. In any case,
storage of the waste may create new and stronger elements of hazards (chemical
and/or biological activity in the storage period).
Solid waste management can be distinguished by the following stages:
separation at source into specific waste fraction depending on material
characteristics
waste processing:
- manual or mechanical sorting out into different material fractions for recycling
- processing of presorted waste fractions to secondary raw materials
- processing for new (raw) materials
- incineration for volume reduction and/or energy recovery
waste disposal:
Recycling
Recycling or salvaging is the word covering both reuse (use for the same purpose) and
reclamation/recovery of materials or energy.
The reasons for implementing recycling may change depending on national and local
conditions, and the key ideas in the arguments for recycling may be:
detoxification of hazardous waste when high environmental standards are set by
the authorities
energy recovery in areas where conversion of waste to energy can replace fossil
fuel (coal, natural gas, crude oil and so on) for energy production.
As previously mentioned, recycling can occur at any stage in the waste system, but
recycling can be designed to prevent waste from being born. That is the case when
products are designed for recycling and a system for repurchasing after end-use, for
instance by putting a deposit on beverage containers (glass bottles and so on).
Hence, recycling may go further than mere implementation of reclamation or recovery
of materials from the waste stream.
Recycling of materials implies, in most situations, separation or sorting of the waste
materials into fractions with a minimum degree of fineness as a prerequisite to the use
of the waste as a substitute for virgin or primary raw materials.
The sorting may be performed by waste producers (source separation), or after
collection, meaning separation at a central sorting plant.
Source Separation
Source separation will, by todays technology, result in fractions of waste which are
designed for processing. A certain degree of source separation is inevitable, as some
mixtures of waste fractions can be separated into usable material fractions again only
by great (economic) effort. The design of source separation must always take the final
type of recycling into consideration.
The goal of the source sorting system should be to avoid a mixing or pollution of the
different waste fractions, which could be an obstacle to easy recycling.
The collection of source-sorted waste fractions will often result in more distinct
occupational health and safety hazards than does collection in bulk. This is due to
concentration of specific waste fractions - for instance, toxic substances. Sorting out
The Response
Since the 1950s, both countries have put in place domestic and bilateral programmes
to address gross pollution problems and also to respond to more subtle water quality
concerns. As a result of these actions, Great Lakes waters are visibly cleaner than they
were at mid-century, loadings of heavy metals and organic chemicals have decreased
and contaminant levels in fish and aquatic birds have gone down significantly. The
successes of CanadaUnited States actions to restore and protect the Great Lakes
It was generally agreed that achieving virtual elimination in the environment through
the application of zero-discharge philosophy to sources and the ecosystem approach to
Great Lakes water quality management needed to be further strengthened and
promoted.
To reaffirm their commitment to the virtual elimination goal for persistent toxic
substances, Canada and the United States amended the 1978 Agreement through a
protocol in November 1987 (United States and Canada 1987). The protocol
designated areas of concern where beneficial uses have been impaired around the
Great Lakes, and required the development and implementation of remedial action
plans (RAPs) for both point and non-point sources in the designated areas. The
protocol also stipulated lakewide management plans (LAMPs) to be used as the main
framework for resolving whole-lake impairment of beneficial uses and for
coordinating control of persistent toxic substances impacting each of the Great Lakes.
Furthermore, the protocol included new annexes for establishing programmes and
measures for airborne sources, contaminated sediments and dump sites, spills and
control of exotic species.
1990s
Following the signing of the 1987 protocol, the goal of virtual elimination was
strongly promoted by environmental interest groups on both sides of the Great Lakes
as concerns about the threat of persistent toxics increased. The International Joint
Commission (IJC), the binational advisory body created under the 1909 Boundary
Waters Treaty, also strongly advocated the virtual elimination approach. An IJC
binational task force recommended a strategy for Virtual Elimination in 1993
(see figure 55.27). By the mid-1990s, the IJC and the parties are attempting to define a
process for implementing this strategy, including considerations for socioeconomic
impacts.
Figure 55.27 Decision-making process for virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances
from the Great Lakes
In 1989, Environment Canada consolidated and streamlined its legal mandates into a
single statute. CEPA provides the federal government with comprehensive powers
(e.g., information gathering, regulations making, enforcement) over the entire life
cycle of chemicals. Under CEPA, the New Substances Notification Regulations
establish screening procedures for new chemicals so that persistent toxics that cannot
be adequately controlled will be prohibited from being imported, manufactured or
used in Canada. The first phase of the Priority Substances List (PSL I) assessment
programme was completed in 1994; 25 of the 44 substances assessed were found to be
toxic under the definition of CEPA, and the development of management strategies for
these toxic chemicals was initiated under a Strategic Options Process (SOP); an
additional 56 priority substances will be nominated and assessed in phase II of the
PSL programme by the year 2000. The National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI)
was implemented in 1994 to mandate industrial and other facilities that meet the
reporting criteria to annually report their releases to air, water and land, and their
transfers in waste, of 178 specified substances. The inventory, modelled on the Toxic
Release Inventory (TRI) in the United States, provides an important database for
prioritizing pollution prevention and abatement programmes.
Canada-Ontario Agreement (COA)
In 1994, Canada and Ontario set out a strategic framework for coordinated action to
restore, protect and conserve the Great Lakes ecosystem with a key focus on reducing
the use, generation or release of 13 Tier I persistent toxic substances by the year 2000
(Canada and Ontario 1994). COA also targets an additional list of 26 priority toxics
(Tier II) for significant reductions. Specifically for Tier I substances, COA will: (1)
confirm zero discharge of five banned pesticides (Aldrin, DDT, Chlordane, Mirex,
Toxaphene); (2) seek to decommission 90% of high-level PCBs, destroy 50% now in
storage and accelerate destruction of low-level PCBs in storage; and (3) seek 90%
reduction in the release of the remaining seven Tier I substances (benzo(a)pyrene,
hexachlorobenzene, alkyl-lead, octachlorostyrene, PCDD (dioxins) PCDF (furans)
and mercury).
The COA approach is to seek quantitative reductions wherever feasible, and sources
are challenged to apply pollution prevention and other means to meet the COA targets.
Fourteen projects have already been launched by federal Ontario staff to achieve
reduction/elimination of Tiers I and II substances.
A set of scientifically based criteria (Environment Canada 1995b) (see table 55.19)
will be used to categorize substances of concern into the two tracks. If a substance
identified for either track is not adequately controlled under existing programmes,
additional measures will be identified under the multi-stakeholder Strategic Options
Process. The policy is consistent with the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and
will direct and frame a number of domestic programmes by defining their ultimate
environmental objective, but the means and pace of achieving the ultimate objective
will vary by chemical and source. Further, Canadas position on persistent toxics will
also be framed by this policy in international discussions.
Table 55.19 Criteria for the selection of substances for Track 1 toxic substances
management policy
Persistence
Medium
Half-life
Air
Water
Sediment
Soil
2 days
182 days
365
days
182 days
Bioaccumulation
Toxicity
Predominantly
Anthropogenic
BAF5,000
or
BCP 5,000
or
log Kow 5.0
CEPA-toxic Concentration in
environment largely
or
resulting from human
CEPA-toxic activity
equivalent
A strong pollution prevention programme has been put in place for the Great Lakes
basin. Since March 1991, Environment Canada and the Ontario Ministry of the
Environment and Energy have been working together with industries and other
stakeholders to develop and implement pollution prevention projects, in contrast to
waste treatment or reducing pollution after its generation. In 1995/96, more than 50
In addition to the above domestic initiatives, Canada and the United States are
currently developing a binational strategy to coordinate agency action and to establish
shared goals for persistent toxics in the Great Lakes basin. Goals and objectives
similar to the Canada-Ontario Agreement for the Tiers I and II substances and a
similar US list will be adopted. Joint projects will be developed and implemented to
facilitate information exchange and agency action on priority chemicals such as PCBs
and mercury. By taking an aggressive approach to virtual elimination as outlined
above, Canada will be able to assume a leadership role in promoting international
action on persistent toxics. Canada hosted a United Nations conference in June 1995
in Vancouver to focus global dialogue on persistent organic pollutants (POP) and to
explore pollution prevention approaches to reducing their emissions around the world.
Canada also co-chairs the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
(UNECE) workgroup to develop a protocol for persistent organic pollutants under the
Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution.
An ExampleDioxins and Furans
For more than a decade, polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins and furans have been
recognized as a group of persistent toxics of concern to the Canadian environment and
the Great Lakes. Table 55.20 summarizes federal actions and the reductions in
releases achieved to date, illustrating the mix of programmes and initiatives which has
Sources of Emissions
Reductions
Reporting
Period
Canadian Government
Initiatives
82%
1989-94
2,4,5-T-pesticide
100%
1985
2,4-D-pesticide
100%
1987-90
- wood preservation
6.7%
1987-90
- wood protectant
100%
1987-90
PCBs
23%
1984-93
80%
1989-93
Pentachlorophenol
Incineration
guidelines
1990-95
than another, or remediation may be the most urgent - for example, in the event of a
major spill or the hazardous dissemination of pollutants from a contaminated site.
Pollution prevention
Pollution control measures cannot eliminate pollution; all they can do is to mitigate its
effects on the environment. Control measures are instituted at the end of the (waste)
pipe. The usefulness of control measures will depend on the pollutant and the
industrial circumstance. The main methods of pollution control, in no particular order,
are:
filtration, whereby airborne or waterborne pollutants are removed from the waste
stream by physical methods such as meshes, filters and other permeable barriers (such
as coke)
precipitation, whereby the pollutant is chemically precipitated and then captured
in its transformed state or captured by physical methods such as an electrostatic
charge
destruction - for example, incineration, or neutralization, whereby pollutants are
transformed chemically or biologically into substances which are less harmful
dilution, whereby the pollutant is diluted or flushed in order to lessen its effects on
any one organism or on an ecosystem; or concentration to lessen the effect of disposal
Pollution remediation
Remediation is needed to the extent that pollution prevention and control fail. It is
also very expensive, with the costs not always accruing to the polluter. The modes of
remediation are:
The clean-up of contaminated sites
Most treatment of hazardous (or toxic) waste now takes place in purpose-built
facilities by hazardous-waste workers. From an environmental point of view, the test
of effectiveness of a hazardous-waste facility is that it produces no outputs which are
not inert or virtually inert, such as silica, insoluble inorganic compounds, insoluble
and non-corrosive slags, gaseous nitrogen or carbon dioxide - though carbon dioxide
is a greenhouse gas which causes climate change and is, thus, a further
environmental detriment.
A further test is that the facility be energy efficient - that is, energy is not wasted - and
as energy non-intensive as possible (i.e., the ratio of energy use to the volume of
waste treated be as low as possible). A general rule of thumb (it is fortunately not a
universal law) is that the more effective the pollution (or waste) abatement strategy,
The same considerations will apply to chemical spills and leaks as to the clean-up of
contaminated sites, with the further hazards caused by the urgency of the clean-up.
Workers cleaning up spills and leaks are almost always emergency workers.
Depending on the scale and the nature of the pollutant, leaks and spills can become
major industrial accidents.
The Modes of Pollution Prevention
Definition and philosophy
Of these, the third is usually ruled out as not qualifying as pollution prevention: the
more remote the recycling site, the less of a guarantee that the recycled product is
actually reused. There are also hazards in the transporting of waste to be recycled, and
the financial uncertainty that the waste will have a continuous market value. Similar,
though less acute, considerations apply to out-of-process but on-site recycling: there is
always a possibility that the waste will not actually be recycled or, if recycled, not
actually reused.
In the initial pollution prevention strategies of the 1980s, on-site but out-of-process
recycling was ruled out as not being a genuine pollution prevention measure. There
was a fear that an effective pollution prevention programme would be compromised
or diluted by too great an emphasis on recycling. In the mid-1990s, some policymakers are prepared to entertain on-site, out-of-process recycling as a legitimate
pollution prevention method. One reason is that there are genuine grey areas
between prevention and control. Another reason is that some on-site recycling really
does do what it is supposed to do, even though it may not technically qualify as
pollution prevention. A third reason is business pressure: employers see no reason
why techniques should be ruled out it they serve the purposes of a pollution
prevention programme.
Pollution prevention planning
responsibilities and action in the event of the plan not being fulfilled or realized.
The status of such plans varies widely. Some are voluntary, though they can be spelled
out in law as a (voluntary) code of practice. Others are mandatory in that they are
required (1) to be kept on-site for inspection or (2) submitted to a regulatory authority
on completion or (3) submitted to a regulatory authority for some form of scrutiny or
approval. There are also variations, such as requiring a plan in the event that a
voluntary plan is, in some way, inadequate or ineffective.
The degree to which mandatory plans are prescriptive also varies - for example, in
regard to penalties and sanctions. Few authorities have the power to require specific
changes in the content of pollution prevention plans; almost all have the power to
require changes in the plan in the event that the formal requirements have not been
met - for example, if some plan headings have not been addressed. There are virtually
no examples of penalties or sanctions in the event that the substantive requirements of
a plan have not been met. In other words, legal requirements for pollution prevention
planning are far from traditional.
Issues surrounding the production of pollution prevention plans concern the degree of
confidentiality of the plans: in some cases, only a summary becomes public, while in
other cases, plans are released only when the producer fails in some way to comply
with the law. In almost no cases do the requirements for pollution prevention planning
override existing provisions regarding the trade secrecy or the business confidentiality
of inputs, processes or the ingredients of products. In a few cases, community
environmental groups have access to the planning process, but there are virtually no
cases of this being required by law, nor are the legal rights of workers to participate in
the production of plans widespread.
Legislation
traditional strategy, which is the total isolation or the total enclosure of a chemical
process. While total enclosure is highly useful and highly desirable, it does not count
as a pollution prevention method since it controls, rather that reduces intrinsically, an
existing hazard.
The pollutants which pose hazards to workers, communities and the physical
environment alike, have usually been addressed primarily because of their impact on
human communities (environmental health). Though the greatest exposures are often
received by workers within a workplace (workplace pollution), this has not, so far,
been the prime focus of pollution prevention measures. The Massachusetts legislation,
for instance, aims to reduce the risks to the health of workers, consumers and the
environment without shifting the risks between workers, consumers and parts of the
environment (New Jersey is similar). But there was no attempt to focus on workplace
pollution as a major detriment, nor was there a requirement to accord a primacy to the
chief human exposures to hazards - often the workers. Nor is there any requirement to
train workers in the discipline of pollution prevention.
There are several reasons for this. The first is that pollution prevention is a new
discipline in the context of a general, traditional failure to see environmental
protection as a function of processes utilized and adopted within workplaces. A
second reason is that worker-management co-determination in the area of
environmental protection is not well advanced. Workers in many countries have legal
rights, for instance, to joint workplace health and safety committees; to refuse unsafe
or unhealthy work; to health and safety information; and to training in health and
safety issues and procedures. But there are few legal rights in the parallel and often
overlapping area of environmental protection, such as the right to joint unionmanagement environment committees; the right of employees to blow the whistle
(go public) on an employers anti-environmental practices; the right to refuse to
pollute or to degrade the outside environment; the right to environmental information;
and the right to participate in workplace environmental audits (see below).
The impacts of pollution prevention planning on employment are hard to gauge. The
explicit aim of pollution prevention initiatives is often to increase industrial efficiency
and environmental protection at the same time and by the same set of measures. When
this happens, the usual effect is to decrease overall employment within any given
workplace (because of technological innovation) but to increase the skills required
and then to increase job security (because there is planning for a longer-term future).
To the extent that the use of raw materials and adjuncts is reduced, there will be
decreased chemical manufacturing employment, though this is likely to be offset by
the implied transition of feedstock to speciality chemicals and by the development of
alternatives and substitutes.
communities and the environment of wastes. Nor is it clear that pollution taxes reduce
pollution in proportion to the amounts levied; taxes may well internalize costs, but
they otherwise only add to the cost of doing business.
The advantage of environmental auditing is that the audit can make economic sense
without having to cost externalities. For instance, the value of waste can be
calculated in terms of resource input loss and energy non-utilization (inefficiency) in other words, of the difference in value between resources and energy on one side
and the value of the product on the other. Unfortunately, the financial side of pollution
prevention planning and its part in workplace environmental audits is not well
advanced.
Hazard assessment
Some pollution prevention schemes work without any hazard evaluation - that is,
without criteria to decide whether a plant or facility is more or less environmentally
benign as a result of pollution prevention measures. Such schemes may rely on a list
of chemicals which are objects of concern or which define the scope of the pollution
prevention programme. But the list does not grade chemicals as to their relative
hazardousness, nor is there a guarantee that a chemical substitute not on the list is, in
fact, less hazardous than a listed chemical. Common sense, not scientific analysis,
tells us how to go about implementing a pollution prevention programme.
Other schemes rest on criteria for assessing hazardousness, that is, on hazard
assessment systems. They work, essentially, by laying down a number of
environmental parameters, such as persistence and bioaccumulation in the
environment, and a number of human health parameters which serve as measures of
toxicity - for example, acute toxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive
toxicity and so on.
There is then a weighted scoring system and a decision procedure for scoring those
parameters on which there is inadequate information on the chemicals to be scored.
Relevant chemicals are then scored and ranked, then (often) assembled in groups in
descending order of hazardousness.
Though such schemes are sometimes devised with a specific purpose in mind - for
example, for assessing priorities for control measures or for elimination (banning) their essential use is as an abstract scheme which can be used for a large variety of
environmental protection measures, including pollution prevention. For instance, the
top group of scored chemicals could be the prime candidates for a mandatory
pollution prevention programme, or they could be candidates for phasing-out or
substitution. In other words, such schemes do not tell us how much we should reduce
environmental health hazards; they tell us only that any measures we take should be
informed by the hazard assessment scheme.
For instance, if we have to make decisions about substituting a less hazardous
chemical for a more dangerous one, we can use the scheme to tell us whether, prima
facie, the substitution decision is a good one: we run both chemicals through the
scheme to determine whether there is a wide or merely a narrow gap between them
regarding their hazardousness.
There are two sorts of considerations which rarely fall within the scope of hazard
assessment schemes. The first is exposure data, or the potential for human exposure to
the chemical. The latter is difficult to calculate, and, arguably, it distorts the intrinsic
hazard of the chemicals concerned. For instance, a chemical could be accorded an
artificially low priority on the grounds that its exposure potential is low; though it
may, in fact, be highly toxic and relatively easy to deal with.
The second sort of consideration is the socioeconomic impact of eliminating or
reducing the use of the chemical concerned. While we can start to make substitution
decisions on the basis of the hazard analysis, we would have to make a further and
distinct socioeconomic analysis and consider, for example, the social utility of the
product associated with the chemical use (which may, e.g., be a useful drug), and we
would also have to consider the impact on workers and their communities. The reason
for keeping such analysis separate is that it is impossible to score the results of a
socioeconomic analysis in the same way that the intrinsic hazards of chemicals are
scored. There are two entirely distinct sets of values with different rationales.
However, hazard assessment schemes are crucial in assessing the success of pollution
prevention programmes. (They are also relatively new, both in their impact and their
utility.) For instance, it is possible to apply them without reference to risk
assessments, risk analysis and (with reservations) without reference to cost-benefit
analysis. An earlier approach to pollution was to first do a risk assessment and only
then decide what sort of action, and how much, was necessary to reduce the risk to an
acceptable level. The results were rarely dramatic. Hazard assessment, on the other
hand, can be utilized very quickly and in such a way that it does not delay or
compromise the effectiveness of a pollution prevention programme. Pollution
prevention is, above all, a pragmatic programme capable of constantly and speedily
addressing pollution issues as they arise and before they arise. It is arguable that
traditional control measures have reached their limit and only the implementation of
comprehensive pollution prevention programmes will be capable of addressing the
next phase of environmental protection in a practical and effective way.
REFERENCES
American Public Health Association (APHA). 1995. Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater. Alexandria, Va: Water Environment
Federation.
ARET Secretariat. 1995. Environmental Leaders 1, Voluntary Commitments to Action
On Toxics Through ARET. Hull, Quebec: Environment Canadas Public Enquiry
Office.
Bishop, PL. 1983. Marine Pollution and Its Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, LC and TO Barnwell. 1987. Enhanced Stream Water Quality Models
QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and User Manual. Athens, Ga: US
EPA, Environmental Research Lab.
Brown, RH. 1993. Pure Appl Chem 65(8):1859-1874.
Calabrese, EJ and EM Kenyon. 1991. Air Toxics and Risk Assessment. Chelsea,
Mich:Lewis.
Canada and Ontario. 1994. The Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great
Lakes Ecosystem. Hull, Quebec: Environment Canadas Public Enquiry Office.
Dillon, PJ. 1974. A critical review of Vollenweiders nutrient budget model and other
related models. Water Resour Bull 10(5):969-989.
Eckenfelder, WW. 1989. Industrial Water Pollution Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Economopoulos, AP. 1993. Assessment of Sources of Air Water and Land Pollution. A
Guide to Rapid Source Inventory Techniques and Their Use in Formulating
Environmental Control Strategies. Part One: Rapid Inventory Techniques in
Environmental Pollution. Part Two: Approaches for Consideration in Formulating
Environmental Control Strategies. (Unpublished document WHO/YEP/93.1.) Geneva:
WHO.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1987. Guidelines for Delineation of
Wellhead Protection Areas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: EPA.
Environment Canada. 1995a. Pollution Prevention - A Federal Strategy for Action.
Ottawa: Environment Canada.
. 1972. Underground pollution analysis and control. Water Research. J Int Assoc
Water Quality (October):1141-1154.
. 1974. Subsurface waste disposal effects in the Lake Sunapee watershed. Study and
report for Lake Sunapee Protective Association, State of New Hampshire,
unpublished.
. 1981. Recycling Plan for Leather Tannery Wastewater Effluent. International
Water Resources Association.
. 1991. Nitrates in Water Resources in the USA. : Water Resources Association.
Preul, HC and GJ Schroepfer. 1968. Travel of nitrogen compounds in soils. J Water
Pollut Contr Fed (April).
Reid, G and R Wood. 1976. Ecology of Inland Waters and Estuaries. New York: Van
Nostrand.
Reish, D. 1979. Marine and estuarine pollution. J Water Pollut Contr Fed 51(6):14771517.
Sawyer, CN. 1947. Fertilization of lakes by agricultural and urban drainage. J New
Engl Waterworks Assoc 51:109-127.
Schwela, DH and I Kth-Jahr. 1994. Leitfaden fr die Aufstellung von
Luftreinhalteplnen [Guidelines for the implementation of clean air implementation
plans]. Landesumweltamt des Landes Nordrhein Westfalen.
State of Ohio. 1995. Water quality standards. In Chap. 3745-1 in Administrative Code.
Columbus, Ohio: Ohio EPA.
Taylor, ST. 1995. Simulating the impact of rooted vegetation on instream nutrient and
dissolved oxygen dynamics using the OMNI diurnal model. In Proceedings of the
WEF Annual Conference. Alexandria, Va: Water Environment Federation.
United States and Canada. 1987. Revised Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of
1978 As Amended By Protocol Signed November 18, 1987. Hull, Quebec:
Environmental Canadas Public Enquiry Office.
Venkatram, A and J Wyngaard. 1988. Lectures On Air Pollution Modeling. Boston,
Mass: American Meteorological Society.
Venzia, RA. 1977. Land use and transportation planning. In Air Pollution, edited by
AC Stern. New York: Academic Press.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) 1981. Guideline 3783, Part 6: Regional dispersion
of pollutants over complex train. Simulation of the wind field. Dusseldorf: VDI.
. 1985. Guideline 3781, Part 3: Determination of plume rise. Dusseldorf: VDI.
. 1992. Guideline 3782, Part 1: Gaussian dispersion model for air quality
management. Dusseldorf: VDI.
. 1994. Guideline 3945, Part 1 (draft): Gaussian puff model. Dusseldorf: VDI.
. n.d. Guideline 3945, Part 3 (in preparation): Particle models. Dusseldorf: VDI.
Viessman, W, GL Lewis, and JW Knapp. 1989. Introduction to Hydrology. New York:
Harper & Row.
Vollenweider, RA. 1968. Scientific Fundamentals of the Eutrophication of Lakes and
Flowing Waters, With Particular Reference to Nitrogen and Phosphorous Factors in
Eutrophication. Paris: OECD.
. 1969. Mglichkeiten and Grenzen elementarer Modelle der Stoffbilanz von Seen.
Arch Hydrobiol 66:1-36.
Walsh, MP. 1992. Review of motor vehicle emission control measures and their
effectiveness. In Motor Vehicle Air Pollution, Public Health Impact and Control
Measures, edited by D Mage and O Zali. Republic and Canton of Geneva: WHOEcotoxicology Service, Department of Public Health.
Water Environment Federation. 1995. Pollution Prevention and Waste Minimization
Digest. Alexandria, Va: Water Environment Federation.
World Health Organization (WHO). 1980. Glossary On Air Pollution. European
Series, No. 9. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications.
. 1987. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. European Series, No. 23. Copenhagen:
WHO Regional Publications.
World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Environmental Programme
(UNEP). 1994. GEMS/AIR Methodology Reviews Handbook Series. Vol. 1-4.
Quality Insurance in Urban Air Quality Monitoring, Geneva: WHO.