Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Quasars
By G. Mark Voit
Il lu st r ation by Don Dixon
Jet
Jet
These Hubble Space Telescope images confirm what ground-based views have long hinted at:
quasars live in galaxies. Many are in obviously disturbed (top row) or interacting (middle row)
systems, though others seem to shine from textbook spirals and ellipticals (bottom row).
NASA
galaxies, often fail to find the bright, pointlike emission characteristic of quasars. Instead, such observations have sometimes found that the cores of
these galaxies hold nothing more exotic than the
remnants of exploding stars (S &T: April 1998, page
19). One notable exception is the galaxy Markarian
231, the dusty aftermath of a galaxy merger whose
center displays all the hallmarks expected of a
quasar buried deep within a blanket of obscuring
Nearly next door in cosmological terms, the two galaxies of the Antennae (NGC
4038 and 4039 in Corvus) are spawning numerous stars as they collide a
process that has revealed itself in infrared images like the one from the Infrared Space Observatory (lower right) and in visible-light frames from the Hubble Space Telescope (right). Only time will tell if a quasarlike glow is to follow
tens or hundreds of millions of years hence.
NASA
Can you spot the quasar? Markarian 231 (opposite page) and
Arp 220 (left) are both ultraluminous galaxies that give off
copious far-infrared radiation evidence, some say, for
quasarlike nuclei buried deep within mantles of dust. But
deeper scrutiny suggests that Arp 220s glow almost certainly
is fueled by prodigious star formation alone, while Markarian
231 harbors a bona fide quasar at its heart.
43
immense gravitational fields. The most convincing signature of a black hole would be a group of objects rapidly
orbiting something extremely massive but completely invisible. However, the zone within which a supermassive
black holes gravity dominates a galaxys central regions is
comparatively small, amounting to less than 1 arcsecond:
the apparent width of a single star in our own Milky Way
on a good night of ground-based observing.
The number of active galactic nuclei that have yielded
strong evidence for a central black hole can still be
counted on one hand, but progress in the last decade has
been swift. Our current best case for a supermassive
black hole rests on some remarkable observations of the
galaxy M106, also known as NGC 4258 (S &T: April
1995, page 10). Orbiting the active nucleus of this galaxy
are gas clouds whose water molecules, stimulated by Xrays from the nucleus, are sending out intense microwave signals quite similar to laser beams. Using a
continent-wide network of radio telescopes, astronomers in Japan and the United States have been able to
pinpoint the sources of these beams and to measure
their motions with mind-boggling precision. These
water-bearing gas clouds which as a group span less
than 0.0003 arcsecond in the sky orbit a dark object
weighing 36 million Suns in nearly perfect circles mere
light-months across. Either the object theyre circling is a
black hole, or its something so inconceivably strange
that it has so far defied the grasp of human imagination.
Seeking Dormant Monsters
Quasars are much less common today than they once
were, but their relics should still be with us. Once created, black holes are virtually impossible to destroy. If gigantic black holes truly powered a multitude of quasars
some 10 billion years ago, then these holes must linger
on, lurking hidden at the centers of normal-looking
galaxies throughout the universe.
Evidence that our own Milky Way contains a now-dormant black hole has grown much stronger during the past
few years. Time-lapse infrared pictures taken by Andreas Eckart and Reinhard Genzel (Max Planck Institute,
Germany) with the New Technology Telescope in Chile
and more recently by Andrea Ghez (UCLA) at Keck Observatory in Hawaii clearly show that stars at the center
of our galaxy are orbiting an invisible concentration of
matter. From the orbital speeds of these stars the scientists
deduce a mass between two and three million times our
Suns for the unseen object. Again, the central object must
be either a black hole or something even more exotic.
Exactly why the black hole at our galaxys core doesnt
glow like a quasar remains a mystery. Perhaps it has run
out of interstellar gas to consume, but some theorists
argue that most of the radiation generated in its vicinity
gets swept into the hole along with the infalling gas. As-
Deep within the core of M106 (left) lies a warped disk of molecular gas clouds
(artists impression above). Their motions, traced with radio telescopes, betray
the presence of an invisible, compact object 36 million times more massive than
our Sun. That object is almost certainly a black hole that powers the galaxys
mildly active nucleus and it may have powered a quasar in the distant past.
Kunihiko Okanos visible-light CCD image was taken with a 12-inch reflector.
44
1996
1997
1998
ANDREA GHEZ
1995
AURA
500
lightyears
45
108
107
106
108
M87
Astronomers have found that black holes seem to know something about the galaxies they
live in, since the most massive galaxies tend to harbor the most massive holes. Could this be a
clue to the origin and fate of quasars? Courtesy Douglas Richstone.
mers interest in potential links between galaxy formation and the quasar phenomenon.
Quite possibly, the formation of a massive central
black hole was a necessary consequence of galaxy birth.
According to currently favored cosmological theories,
galaxies originally formed from collapsing clouds of primordial hydrogen gas. These clouds, subject to the crushing force of their own gravity, shrank, fragmented, and,
during the first few billion years after the Big Bang,
formed the stars we see today in elliptical galaxies and in
the bulges of spirals. However, star formation is never
100 percent efficient. Some gas is always left over, and in
a collapsing protogalactic cloud this gas might have settled to the center without forming stars. If this central
concentration of gas was massive enough and hot
enough, it would not have been able to fragment into
star-forming clouds as it continued to collapse. Without
any clear alternative, some theorists believe that the inexorable pull of gravity destines such a dense cloud of leftovers to become a supermassive black hole.
These speculations about black-hole formation in
collapsing primordial clouds remain unverified. But our
deepest surveys of the cosmos are revealing a curious
correspondence between the formation of stars in the uniQuasars and Galaxy Evolution
STIS observations of supermassive black holes possi- verse and the production of quasars. Images like the Hubbly the one-time sites of now-quiet quasars were ble Deep Field show us galaxies at many different distances
postponed in order to make the best use of HSTs near- and hence at many different epochs in the past. By measinfrared camera, NICMOS, whose coolant evaporated uring the starlight emanating from galaxies at a variety of
prematurely in January. But the ground-based mass distances, we are beginning to reconstruct the universes
measurements described above, while preliminary, al- star-formation history. Star production has clearly been
ready show an intriguing trend: the size of a galaxys declining for the last 5 billion years or so, but its less clear
black hole is related to the size of the galaxy itself. More when the production rate peaked. Early results from these
precisely, a black hole in a spiral galaxy has a mass pro- surveys indicate that most of the stars in the universe
portional to that of the galaxys bulge, its oldest popula- formed between 3 and 7 billion years after the Big Bang,
tion of stars. Similarly, a black hole in an elliptical an era that partly overlaps the golden age of quasars.
Perhaps this coincidence of the era of quasars with the
galaxy, which consists entirely of old stars, has a mass
proportional to that of the galaxy as a whole. John Kor- primary era of star formation is just a red herring. But
more and more astronomers are
mendy (University of Hawaii),
Redshift
betting that it is not. Because obDouglas Richstone (University of
0.1
0.3
0.6
1.2
3.6
servations of such distant happenMichigan), and their colleagues
ings are so difficult, we may not
have found that a supermassive
know the truth for some time to
black hole weighs roughly 200
come. Nevertheless, astronomers
times less, on average, than the
are hopeful that the interplay becombined mass of the old stars in
tween the study of quasars and ulthe galaxy around it. This emergtradeep imaging surveys will solve
ing relationship, unlikely to be
some of the mysteries surrounding
accidental, has renewed astronothis remarkable epoch, when the
universe as we know it was most
The latest evidence suggests that
actively under construction.
quasars peaked in abundance some
109
Black Holes in
Galaxy Cores
1010
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8